arxiv: v2 [cs.ro] 31 Jul 2018

Transcription

1 Design and Development of Effective Transmission Mecanisms on a Tendon Driven Hand Ortosis for Stroke Patients arxiv: v2 [cs.ro] 31 Jul 218 Sangwoo Park1, Lynne Weber2, Lauri Bisop2, Joel Stein2,3 and Matei Ciocarlie1,3 Abstract Tendon-driven and ortoses ave advantages over exoskeletons wit respect to wearability and safety because of teir low-profile design and ability to fit a range of patients witout requiring custom joint alignment. However, no existing study on a wearable tendon-driven and ortosis for stroke patients presents evidence tat suc devices can overcome spasticity given repeated use and fatigue, or discusses transmission efficiency. In tis study, we propose two designs tat provide effective force transmission by increasing moment arms around finger joints. We evaluate te designs wit geometric models and experiment using a 3D-printed artificial finger to find force and joint angle caracteristics of te suggested structures. We also perform clinical tests wit stroke patients to demonstrate te feasibility of te designs. Te testing supports te ypotesis tat te proposed designs efficiently elicit extension of te digits in patients wit spasticity as compared to existing baselines. I. I NTRODUCTION One of te most common impairment patterns in stroke patients is loss of fine motor control togeter wit spasticity tat limits functional use of te and [1]. In recent years, many wearable robots ave been developed for patients wit incomplete motor recovery, a condition wic affects more tan alf of stroke patients following conventional reabilitation [2]. In designing tese wearable robots, te focus as often been on providing te patients a large number of exercise repetitions. In order to deliver sufficient assistance so tat patients are able to extend teir and against te force of spasticity, te actuation also as to be strong enoug wile keeping te device compact. Linkage-based exoskeletons generally provide efficient force transmission; owever, alignment of an axis of rotation wit eac finger and its respective robotic joint remains callenging [3]. Misalignment can result in discomfort and even injury [4]. In contrast, a tendon-driven system does not require alignment of te joints. Tese systems are also better suited for underactuation, allowing a design wit a small number of motors to reduce te overall device size. However, because of inefficient transmission compared wit exoskeletons, larger and more powerful motors may be needed to overcome spasticity. *Tis work was supported in part by te Columbia-Coulter Translational Researc Partnersip and te National Science Foundation under grant IIS12696 (part of te National Robotics Initiative). 1 Department of Mecanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 27, USA. Fig. 1. Prototypes of te and ortosis transmission mecanisms (top: Design A, bottom: Design B) proposed in tis study. In tis study, we focus on te design of mecanical structures on a and ortosis to enance force transmission efficiency in a tendon-driven device. To acieve tis, te device must assist and opening wit greater torques around eac joint making te most of te given motor force witout compromising wearability. Overall, te main contributions of tis paper are te following: {sp3287, matei.ciocarlie}@columbia.edu 2 Department of Reabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY 27, USA. {lw2739, lb2413, js116}@cumc.columbia.edu 3 Co-Principal Investigators We propose two mecanical structure designs: one for iger spasticity at te proximal interpalangeal (PIP) joint tan te metacarpopalangeal(mcp) joint, and one for equally severe tone on eac joint. Using matematical models of te two designs, we measure te moment arms around te PIP and MCP joints. Assuming tat te PIP and MCP joints move simultaneously, we vary design parameters to see ow tey affect te moment arms. Also, we compare between te two and a baseline design to demonstrate teir validity. We evaluate te computational results troug exper-

2 iments, quantitatively assessing te joint angles and force on te actuated tendon wit a 3D-printed artificial finger, designed to mimic te finger of a patient after stroke. We present quantitative results troug clinical tests wit stroke patients to demonstrate te teoretical computations and outcome of experiments wit te artificial finger. To te best of our knowledge, tis study is te first to present and evaluate transmission mecanisms by wic exotendons can overcome and spasticity for functional tasks wit low motor forces and no rigid joints. Efficient transmission is important as it allows a reduction in te tendon force required to acieve functional finger extension. Lower tendon forces allow te use of smaller motors; tey also reduce te unwanted penomenon of distal migration, were, due to te applied forces, te motor component of te devices slides on te forearm towards te and. Bot of tese caracteristics can lead to more wearable devices. II. RELATED WORK Kamper et al. [] posit tat over-excitement of te flexor muscles and decreased activation of te extensor muscles during finger extension may be a result of an overactive stretc response, resulting in involuntary grasp. Finger extension is an essential component of functional grasping tasks and a number of wearable and robots ave been developed to facilitate tis movement for enanced performance of activities of daily living. One of te most successful off-teself products, Saebo Flex, utilizes passive underactuation to provide spring-assisted and opening. A study reported tere were meaningful clinical improvements for te majority of participants for te Action Researc Arm Test (ARAT) and Upper Limb Motricity Index after a 12 week reabilitation program [6]. HandSOME [7] and SPO [8] are also passive and devices developed for impairment compensation following stroke. Wile suc passive devices acieve a compact and ligtweigt design, tey inerently interfere wit finger flexion due to te constantly applied spring force. Te mecanical interference wit finger flexion present wit mecanical finger extension aids can be avoided using active and ortoses. Jo et al. presented a single degree of freedom (DOF) exoskeleton using linkage structures tat follow fingertip trajectories found from experiments wit a motion capture system [9]. Pu et al. developed five digits actuated device, Exo-finger, based on and kinematics using a linkage driven system []. ExoKab utilizes mecanical transmission components, suc as worm gears and sliders wit two micro motors for four fingers and one motor for te tumb to assist independent and movement [11]. Tese exoskeletons are vulnerable to fit issues for ands of various sizes due to a well-known difficulty in joint axes alignment. To fill tis need, Cempini et al. developed a and exoskeleton wit an autonomous joint axes aligning mecanism by letting passive DOFs absorb any misplacement of te joint center [12]. Wearable and ortoses composed of soft structures are low profile, and reduce te likeliood of injury, compared to exoskeletons. Soft pneumatic actuator based devices take advantage of natural compliance and flexibility for better interaction wit te uman and, but remain tetered to external air pressure sources. A low-cost soft ortotic glove produced by Zao et al. [13] contains integrated optical strain sensors. Te optical bend sensors provide real time feedback on ow eac finger moves, wic can be of great benefit. A customized inconsistent bending profile wit variable stiffness can also be implemented to enance te usability of tis type of device [14]. Tendon-driven devices ave advantages over te two aforementioned mecanisms in terms of wearability since actuators can be remotely positioned and structures located on te and only require a few small ancor points, wic make te system more suitable for underactuation. Compact and ligtweigt, BiomHED, for example, exploits artificial exotendons to mimic uman finger movement [1]. Biggar and Yao built a tendon driven robotic glove wit suction cups on an inner glove as a cable guide using vacuum pressure [16]. Exo-Glove utilizes exotendon drive system on te surface of a glove adopting a differential mecanism to actuate a multiple fingers wit a single motor [17]. In an effort to reduce control inaccuracy caused by compliance in fabric-based gloves, Exo-Glove Poly was developed [18]. Tis device allows better fit troug various adaptable features rater tan relying on te compliance of soft material. Te tendon driven devices described above deploy eiter multiple motors closely located to te transmission [1], [16] or a distally mounted single strong motor connected to te end effector via a Bowden cable [17], [18]. However, installation of many motors for te assistance of one movement pattern is redundant, and Bowden cables introduce unnecessary friction. Altoug tere as been a study on transmission mecanisms tat provide a natural joint extension sequence using a tendon-driven ortoses [19], no prior study as systematically examined effective transmission metods for tendon driven devices. Our approac seeks to acieve efficient transmission on a tendon-driven system wile maintaining a compact and ligtweigt design for optimal wearability. III. DESIGN CRITERIA In tis section, we outline te goals tat drive our exotendon device development, in a manner independent of specific design coices. In te next section, we present and compare several designs intended to acieve tese goals. A. Acieve Functional Finger Extension Impaired finger extension is a common afftereffect in stroke patients. Since finger extension plays an essential role in functional grasp, tis impairment adversely affects te quality of life. However, many individuals can still form a grasp in coordinated movement pattern. Given te volitional finger flexion capability, we require tat our assistive device elp te user acieve functional finger extension.

3 Tube Extension Spring Tendon l l Guide Ancor point Traditional Design Finger p Piece Baseline Design Proposed Design A Proposed Design B Fig. 2. Traditional Design : Tubes or rings are installed on te surface of a and as cable guides, and te fixed point is often located at te finger tip. Baseline Design : Raised patways are attaced on eac palanx, and te fixed point is at te ead of middle palanx. Proposed Design A : A 3D printed part on back of te and works as an ancor point and anoter part is attaced on te distal and middle palanx. Proposed Design B : Two raised patways are used, one between te palm to te proximal palanx and one between te proximal and middle palanges. Yellow lines indicate were eac patway segment attaces wit te glove. Te distal ends of te patways ang freely, to avoid indering finger flexion. B. Efficient Transmission Given te first requirement above, it follows tat exotendons sould apply significant extension torques around te MCP and IP joints to overcome spasticity. Use of a strong motor to acieve large extension torques is undesirable as it requires sizable motors and causes distal migration. Increasing tendon moment arms around te joints is an attractive alternative wic avoids suc unwanted effects. We tus look for effective transmission mecanisms tat increase torque for a fixed tendon force. C. Effective Torque Distribution Top layer Fig. 3. Example of a raised patway attaced on a finger in extension (left) and flexion (rigt). Note tat insufficient expansion of te top layer of te patway inders finger flexion. In experiments wit stroke survivors Cruz and Kamper [2] conducted, proportions of constant extension torques applied to keep te joints in te neutral position were approximately.3:.66:.46 for te distal interpalangeal (DIP), PIP, and MCP joint respectively. Tis means tat te PIP joint typically exibits iger tone tan te oter joints. Terefore, it is important to distribute proper amount of torques translated from a motor force to eac joint for some patients. D. Wearability For a device to be used in te ome environment, it as to be kept compact and ligtweigt wile delivering meaningful assistance. Designing suc and devices is especially callenging, as available space on a and is limited. To conform wit tis constraint, te designs presented ere elicit movement using a single motor. In previous work, we ave sown tat a single motor can elicit te desired movement patterns [21], [22], but did not consider te effects of increased spasticity during functional tasks due to repetition and fatigue. IV. D ESIGN AND D EVELOPMENT A. Designs In tis section we introduce a number of possible device designs, wic we will later compare and contrast from te Fig. 4. Simple illustration of Design B on a finger in extension (left) and in flexion (rigt). Yellow lines sow te attacment areas between te glove and te raised patway. Since te patway does not elongate in flexion, finger movement is not indered. perspective of our requirements. All te designs discussed ere are illustrated in Fig. 2. 1) Baseline Design: Te starting point is te simplest design were te tendon is simply routed on te dorsal side of te finger (Traditional Design in Fig. 2). Wit no moment arm increase, owever, tis is an ineffective way to acieve te torque levels needed to overcome spasticity and is included ere only as a reference starting point. Furtermore, ancoring te tendon at te fingertip is likely to cause yperextension of a DIP joint unless te range of

4 motion is perfectly fitted wit te user. For all oter designs, we attac te tendon to te distal end of te middle palanx. Te most direct way to increase te moment arm is to install a raised patway for te entire tendon route. However, suc a patway must elongate to support finger flexion, creating elastic effects tat inder motion. Tis penomenon increases wit te eigt of te patway, as te top layer must elongate even furter. Tis beavior is illustrated in Fig. 3. Our Baseline Design tus consists of raised patways separated section-by-section to avoid te interruption of finger flexion. Altoug moment arms around te joints are increased wit tis design, te cable takes a sortcut between te patways leading to a sorter moment arm wen te finger is not fully extended (illustrated in Fig. 2). In tis study, we use tis structure as a baseline to make comparisons among envisioned designs. 2) Design A: Te main goal of Design A is to acieve a greater moment arm around te PIP joint, wic typically exibits te strongest spasticity among te tree joints of te finger. In tis design, we implement two 3D-printed parts as cable guides (Fig. 2). A fingertip piece is mainly used to increase a moment arm around te PIP joint. Tis component also mecanically prevents yperextension of te DIP joint wile assisting finger extension. Fabric straps are secured around te finger using velcro to maintain te position of te device on te and as depicted in Fig. 1. A funnel saped tube is installed on te dorsal side of te and to increase te moment arm around te MCP joint. However, for a small anded person, tis palmar component may collide wit te finger-tip component in full finger extension. Terefore, te funnel tube is designed to allow te fingertip component to be inserted into te dorsal component to enable full range of motion. Two parameters, x 1, te normal lengt between te center of te PIP joint and tendon location and x 2, te lengt between a support of te fingertip piece and te end of te fingertip piece, determine te moment arm around te PIP joint depending on te joint angle θ. To learn ow te two parameters contribute to te geometric caracteristics, we ave recorded te moment arm around te PIP joint. For simplicity, we assume tat te PIP and MCP joints are simultaneously moving wit te joint angle θ, and te range of motion for bot joints is from 9 (fully flexed) to (fully extended). Also, we limit te range of x 1 and x 2 to avoid designs tat are eiter too bulky or ineffective. Te results indicate tat x 1 is more responsible for torque generation wen te finger is extended, wereas x 2 is more influential for flexed positions, as sown in Fig.. Wit cosen parameters, te PIP and MCP joints are recorded across finger motions wit results plotted in Fig. 6-(a), and it sows tat te moment arm around te PIP joint is longer tan around te MCP joint. 3) Design B: Design B aims to maintain moment arms around te PIP and MCP joint at preset lengt and avoid interference wit grasps during and motions. Te Moment Arm (mm) 2 1 x1 = 13mm x1 = 14mm x1 = 1mm x1 = 16mm x1 = 17mm (a) Moment Arm (mm) 2 1 x2 = 11mm x2 = 13mm x2 = 1mm x2 = 17mm x2 = 19mm Fig.. (a) Moment arm around te PIP joint vs. joint angle for different x 1 were x 2 is fixed at 19mm. (b) Moment arm around te PIP joint vs. joint angle for different x 2 were x 1 is fixed at 17mm. design consists of a glove, extension springs, and two raised patways on eac finger (Fig. 2). Te patways are placed on top of te middle and proximal palanges, and back of te and covering te PIP and MCP joint. Tis prevents te tendon from taking a sortcut tat reduces te moment arms around te two joints. In order to avoid indering finger flexion, raised patways are rigidly secured proximally to te PIP and MCP joint wile te oter ends distally located to te joint are free to slide witout direct attacment(fig. 4). A clot cover is sewn on top of te patway to prevent it from drifting laterally during use. B. Design Comparison Fig. 6-(b) sows a moment arm around te PIP joint versus joint angle θ for Baseline design, Design A, and Design B. Te lengt between te center of eac joint and te tendon is set to 17mm at fully extended position for all tree designs. Te result indicates tat Design A and Design B generate a larger moment arm around te PIP joint tan Baseline design trougout and motions. Te moment arm wit Design A in an extended finger position is notably larger tan te oters, wic is beneficial considering tat a proportional increase in extension torque is required as te finger is in a more extended position [21]. Design B also creates a larger moment arm tan Baseline design. From te outcomes, one can assume tat te force level required to extend te finger by Baseline design would be te greatest. For Design A, te extension would require relatively lower force level on te PIP joint tan te MCP joint as te moment arm around te PIP joint is larger. Finally, in Design B, te PIP and MCP joints would need similar level of force to execute full extension because te geometry of te design for bot joints is relatively similar. C. Exotendon Device Te designs described above are used in a combination wit te exotendon device previously developed in our lab. Mecanical components of te device are composed of a forearm piece wit actuation and a structure based on te two designs (Fig. 1). Tis structure engages te impaired and wit a motor on te forearm piece troug a tendon network. An S-ook connects te tendon network from te end effector wit te motor to facilitate te donning process. (b)

5 Moment Arm (mm) 2 1 PIP MCP (a) Moment Arm (mm) 2 1 Baseline Design A Design B Fig. 6. (a) Moment arm around te PIP and MCP joint vs. joint angle for Design A. (b) Moment arm around te PIP joint vs. joint angle for Baseline design, Design A, and Design B. (b) Fig. 7. Experimental set-up wit an artificial finger. Te forearm piece works as bot an ancor point to stabilize a base of te motor and a splint tat constrains te wrist movement to efficiently transmit te motor force to te end effector. A DC motor (Pololu corporation, 47:1 Medium-Power 2D Metal Gearmotor) wit a N peak force is mounted on te forearm piece. Te motor is driven by Proportional-Integral-Derivative(PID) position controller, and te range of motion is determined at te clinical test after fitting te device. A simple pus button is implemented to trigger finger extension. Wile pusing te button, te motor stalls wen te applied motor force reaces its maximum level or te fingers arrive at te fully extended position. Releasing te button allows te fingers to flex and te and to grasp. Te DC motor applies an extension force to all four fingers except for te tumb, wic moves in unique ways compared wit te oter fingers. For grasping tasks, splinting te tumb in a functional, opposed position is sufficient if te four fingers are adequately extended by te device [23]. Te specific tumb splinting and device controlling approaces, oter tan te aforementioned button control, are excluded from tis study as tey are out of scope. We are planning to report tese metods in te near future. V. EXPERIMENTS AND RESULTS In order to evaluate te teoretical results sown in te previous section, we ave conducted experiments using a 3Dprinted artificial finger to find a relation between joint angles and applied force. In addition, we performed clinical tests wit stroke patients to provide validity of te results from simulations and experiments wit an artificial finger. In te experiments, subjects wore a device wit eac of Baseline design, Design A, and Design B at a time, and te joint angles of an index finger were measured wile te device was assisting finger extension. We provide a comparison of te range of finger extension elicited by te tree designs. A. Testing wit Artificial Finger Te artificial finger consists of 3D printed parts, torsion springs, and encoders(fig. 7). Torsion springs are installed on all tree joints to mimic and spasticity. A proportion of te spring constants is 3.:76.9:4.9 for te DIP, PIP, and, MCP joint respectively, wic is similar to.3:.66:.46 TABLE I SUBJECT CLINICAL INFORMATION MAS Extensor Score MAS Flexor Score Subject Elbow Wrist Finger Elbow Wrist Finger A B C D 1 from Cruz and Kamper s work [2]. Hall effect rotary encoders(as6) are placed on te side of te PIP and MCP joint. Te DIP joint, wic is coupled wit te PIP joint is excluded from te measurements for te sake of simplicity. Since four fingers oter tan te tumb ave similar structures and exibit identical movements experiments wit one fingered device sould suffice. Te main objective of tis experiment is to measure force caracteristics trougout an entire and motion assisted by te device wit Baseline design, Design A, and Design B. To measure a tension on te actuated tendon, a load cell(futek, FSH97) is installed in series wit a motor and te tendon network. Te force is recorded at Hz wile te motor applies extension torques to te fully flexed artificial finger ( 9 ) till te finger is fully extended ( ). For reliability, te measurements ave been taken times for eac design. Te average values of force vs. joint angles are sown in Fig. 8. Te result sows iger force is required for Baseline design tan te oters to acieve finger extension. Also, note tat differences in force requirement are more prominent in flexed positions as simulation results from te previous section suggest. For Design A, te PIP joint requires less force tan te MCP joint across and motions as evidenced from Fig. 6-(a). B. Testing wit Stroke Patients Four participants, one female and tree male, wit rigt side emiparesis and limited mobility following a stroke event at least 6 monts prior were recruited from a voluntary researc registry of individuals wo ave survived stroke. Testing was approved by te Columbia University Institutional Review Board and took place in a clinical setting under te supervision of licensed pysical and/or occupational terapists. Upper limb spasticity measurements were between

6 Fig. 8. Force vs. PIP (solid) and MCP (dased) joint angles from artificial finger experiments. Black, blue, and red colors indicate force needed to reac certain joint angles wit Baseline design, Design A, and Design B respectively. Particular ranges of our interest span from 9 to 2 as tis region encapsulates te necessary functional movements. and 2 on te Modified Aswort Scale(MAS) for all participants (Table I). Eac testing session was performed over te course of one visit. Spasticity scores at te elbow, wrist, and digits were assessed using te MAS before and after testing. Subjects were ten fitted wit te exotendon ortotic device and guided troug te following procedure wit eac version of te device. Te subject opens te and using te ortosis. Extension of te PIP and MCP joints of te index finger are measured using a goniometer. Te index finger was selected for measurement as it was most accessible wit te device in place; it was also qualitatively observed to be representative of te four fingers. Te subject attempts to grasp and release 1 times to induce fatigue. Te device is triggered to assist and opening using a button at te point of maximal effort. On te 1t repetition, te joint angles of te index finger are measured again. In general, fatigue increases tone in and movement, and tis measurement is taken to see if one can still acieve functional and extension in tis condition. Te subject takes a rest for five minutes to reduce te impact of fatigue. Ten, te last measurements of te joint angles of te index finger are recorded wile te device is assisting. To avoid effects of fatigue carrying over to te next trial, te subject rests for ten minutes between trials wit different devices (including time spent on doffing and donning te devices). Fig. 9 sows te average of measured PIP joint angles wit all participants. Since te MCP joint was fully extended for every patient, only te PIP joint angle was measured. Fig. 9. Joint angles of te index finger measured wit stroke patients wile te device wit Baseline design(black dotted line), design A(red solid line), and design B(blue dased line) is assisting finger extension. TABLE II JOINT ANGLES OF THE INDEX FINGER MEASURED WITH STROKE PATIENTS(MEAN± STANDARD ERROR) Version Before Activity Wit Fatigue Following Rest Design A -.(±.7) -33.(±6.4) -8.8(±.9) Design B -18.8(±11.9) -37.(±2.) -27.(±16.) Baseline Design -28.8(±12.6) -61.3(±18.1) -2.(±16.) Te result demonstrates a comparative advantage of Design A and Design B over Baseline design. In particular, as patients became fatigued, te Baseline design generally failed to elicit functional extension, wereas Design A and Design B were less vulnerable to increased tone after activities. Tis result also suggests tat assessing te feasibility of a and device troug range of motion measurements witout te integration of functional tasks may not be representative of real life use. For a and device to allow repetitive exercises, post-fatigue evaluation sould also confirm te effectiveness of te device. VI. CONCLUSIONS In tis study, we ave proposed distal structures of a tendon driven and assistive ortosis for efficient force transmission. In order to evaluate te designs, we ran simulations wit matematical models and conducted experiments using a 3D-printed artificial finger. We also performed clinical tests wit stroke patients to study real-life applicability. In te geometric model analysis, te two designs we propose enabled torque generations wit large moment arms around joints of a finger, compared to traditional devices. Te advantages of te large moment arm were demonstrated by te experiments wit an artificial finger. Te result suggests tat te force required by proposed structures to extend a

7 finger was lower tan Baseline design. Clinical trials wit four stroke patients were we measured joint angles wit te device assisting finger extension also supported te feasibility of te effective mecanism. In te experiments, all four participants attained a functional finger range of motion even wen fatigued wit te assistance of Design A and Design B. Efficient transmission mecanisms in a wearable tendon driven device offer several advantages. Since te required level of force is lower, te size of te device can be reduced, and te likeliood of injury decreased. Small and ligt actuators can be placed closer to te affected and, furter increasing wearability. In addition, a low tendon force leads to reduced distal migration, wic is a limitation of active devices. A limitation of te assessment wit patients wit stroke is potential inaccuracy from te use of a manual tool suc as a goniometer. Future work will also involve more rigorous evaluations in functional performance, since increased range of motion may not guarantee improved performance of grasp/release tasks or activities of daily living. Anoter potential limitation is te ability to adjust te fit of eac design to te dimensions of te palm and digits of te patient. Trougout our experiments, we learned tat tis fit plays an important role in performance. Accordingly, future prototypes will include additional adjustable components; tis is especially important for Design A because it includes rigid parts wic make fitting more difficult. Once te fit is stabilized, we also plan to conduct experiments wit stroke patients to demonstrate functional improvements wit te device in integration wit more intuitive control metods, suc as forearm electromyograpy. We believe tat te combination of efficient mecanical designs wit intuitive control metods can lead to wearable devices used for numerous activities, providing functional assistance and improving quality of life. REFERENCES [1] J. Cauraug, K. Ligt, S. Kim, M. Tigpen, and A. Berman, Cronic motor dysfunction after stroke, Stroke, vol. 31, no. 6, pp , 2. [2] J. D. Scaecter, Motor reabilitation and brain plasticity after emiparetic stroke, Progress in neurobiology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp , 24. [3] A. H. Stienen, E. E. Hekman, F. C. Van Der Helm, and H. Van Der Kooij, Self-aligning exoskeleton axes troug decoupling of joint rotations and translations, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 2, no. 3, pp , 29. [4] A. Sciele and F. C. van der Helm, Kinematic design to improve ergonomics in uman macine interaction, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Reabilitation Engineering, vol. 14, no. 4, pp , 26. [] D. G. Kamper, H. C. Fiscer, E. G. Cruz, and W. Z. Rymer, Weakness is te primary contributor to finger impairment in cronic stroke, Arcives of pysical medicine and reabilitation, vol. 87, no. 9, pp , 26. [6] R. A. Stuck, L. M. Marsall, and R. Sivakumar, Feasibility of saeboflex upper-limb training in acute stroke reabilitation: A clinical case series, Occupational terapy international, vol. 21, no. 3, pp , 214. [7] J. Cen, D. Nicols, E. B. Brokaw, and P. S. Lum, Home-based terapy after stroke using te and spring operated movement enancer (andsome), IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Reabilitation Engineering, 217. [8] S. Ates, C. J. Haarman, and A. H. Stienen, Script passive ortosis: design of interactive and and wrist exoskeleton for reabilitation at ome after stroke, Autonomous Robots, vol. 41, no. 3, pp , 217. [9] I. Jo, J. Lee, Y. Park, and J. Bae, Design of a wearable and exoskeleton for exercising flexion/extension of te fingers, in Reabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 217 International Conference on. IEEE, 217, pp [] S.-W. Pu, J.-Y. Cang, Y.-C. Pei, C.-C. Kuo, and M.-J. Wang, Antropometry-based structural design of a and exoskeleton for reabilitation, in Mecatronics and Macine Vision in Practice (M2VIP), rd International Conference on. IEEE, 216, pp [11] O. Sandoval-Gonzalez, J. Jacinto-Villegas, I. Herrera-Aguilar, O. Portillo-Rodiguez, P. Tripiccio, M. Hernandez-Ramos, A. Flores- Cuautle, and C. Avizzano, Design and development of a and exoskeleton robot for active and passive reabilitation, International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 66, 216. [12] M. Cempini, M. Cortese, and N. Vitiello, A powered finger tumb wearable and exoskeleton wit self-aligning joint axes, IEEE/ASME Transactions on mecatronics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp , 21. [13] H. Zao, J. Jalving, R. Huang, R. Knepper, A. Ruina, and R. Seperd, A elping and: Soft ortosis wit integrated optical strain sensors and emg control, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 64, 216. [14] H. K. Yap, J. H. Lim, F. Nasralla, J. C. Go, and R. C. Yeow, A soft exoskeleton for and assistive and reabilitation application using pneumatic actuators wit variable stiffness, in Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 21 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 21, pp [1] S. Lee, K. A. Landers, and H.-S. Park, Development of a biomimetic and exotendon device (biomed) for restoration of functional and movement post-stroke, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Reabilitation Engineering, vol. 22, no. 4, pp , 214. [16] S. Biggar and W. Yao, Design and evaluation of a soft and wearable robotic glove for and reabilitation, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Reabilitation Engineering, vol. 24, no., pp. 71 8, 216. [17] H. In, B. B. Kang, M. Sin, and K.-J. Co, Exo-glove: A wearable robot for te and wit a soft tendon routing system, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 97, 21. [18] B. B. Kang, H. Lee, H. In, U. Jeong, J. Cung, and K.-J. Co, Development of a polymer-based tendon-driven wearable robotic and, in Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 216 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 216, pp [19] D. H. Kim, S.-H. Heo, and H.-S. Park, Biomimetic finger extension mecanism for soft wearable and reabilitation devices, in Reabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 217 International Conference on. IEEE, 217, pp [2] E. Cruz and D. Kamper, Use of a novel robotic interface to study finger motor control, Annals of biomedical engineering, vol. 38, no. 2, pp , 2. [21] S. Park, L. Bisop, T. Post, Y. Xiao, J. Stein, and M. Ciocarlie, On te feasibility of wearable exotendon networks for wole-and movement patterns in stroke patients, in Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 216 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 216, pp [22] C. Meeker, S. Park, L. Bisop, J. Stein, and M. Ciocarlie, Emg pattern classification to control a and ortosis for functional grasp assistance after stroke, in Reabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 217 International Conference on. IEEE, 217, pp [23] J. Arata, K. Omoto, R. Gassert, O. Lambercy, H. Fujimoto, and I. Wada, A new and exoskeleton device for reabilitation using a tree-layered sliding spring mecanism, in Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 213 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 213, pp