(close relationships) (interpersonal intimacy) 1) ( ) ( ) 2) ( 3) ( ) (unit) (Figure 1) Figure 1

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "(close relationships) (interpersonal intimacy) 1) ( ) ( ) 2) ( 3) ( ) (unit) (Figure 1) Figure 1"

Jeffrey Hall
5 years ago
Views:

1 1) ( ) 1. (close relationships) (interpersonal intimacy) 1) ( ) ( ) 2) ( ) 3) ( ) 4) ( ) (unit) (Figure 1) ( ) Figure 1

2 (generalized other) (Mead,1934) (looking-glass self) Cooley Mead (Symbolic interactio nism) 2. Critelli, Myers, & Loos(1986) 5 Sternberg(1986) (intimacy) (passion) (commitment/decision)3 ( ) 3 3 Sternberg(1997)3 45 TLS Triangular Love Scale (BF GF ) BF GF BF GF BF GF Sternberg (,2003a) (2003b)

3 Berscheid, Snyder, & Omoto(1989) (1) (2) (3) (4) (Relationship Closeness Inventory RCI) (1992) RCI RCI ( ) (1993)RCI RCI (Kerckhoff & Davis,1962) ( )

4 3. (, 1990,, 1990, 2003) ( ) ( ) Shaw & Sadler(1965) Noller(1980) ( ) 1990) ) 4. Lewis(1973) ( ) ( ) Beier & Sternberg(1977) Alberts(1988) Noller(1980,1984)

5 Gottman, Notarius, Markman, Bank, Yoppi, & ERubin(1976) Noller(1984) Ickes & Barnes(1978) Noller & Gallois(1986) ( ) 5. Harvey & Omarzu(1997) (Minding) 1) 2) 3) 1) 2) 3) Harvey & Omarzu(1997) ( ) Simpson, Ickes, & Orina(2001) 4

6 Markman et al., 1988 (2003a) ( ) (2003a) 6. Clark & Mills(1979) (exchange) (communal) (1985,1988,1989) 7. 3

7 (Figure 2) Figure 2 (3 ) (2003a) ( ) (2003b) 2 (1970) (S ) (N ) ( ) 3 3 ( ) ( ) % (Figure 3) Figure 3 ( ) ( 33.3% ) S 4 N ( )2

8 S 5N 3( ) S 9 S ( 6 S 50.1N74.1 S 21.7N 12.6) S 49.1% 93.9% S S Lindahl & Markman(1990) 1) 2) 3) 4) Condon & ( 2001) (, 2002) Sander(1974 Alberts, J. K An analysis of couples' conversational complaints. Communication Monographs,, (Interpersonal synchrony entrainment) Beier, E. G. & Strenberg, D. P Marital communication: Subtle cues between newlyweds. Journal of Communication., Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M The (1996) relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, Clark, M. S. & Mills, J Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,,

9 Condon, W. S. & Sander, L. W Neonate noy in love with you. Journal of Marriage and Family movement is synchronized with adult Counseling., speech:interactional participation and language acquisition. Science,, Critelli, J. W., Myers, E. J., & Loos, V. E The components of love:romantic attraction and sex role orientation. Journal of Personality,, Lewis, R. A A longitudinal test of a developmental frame-work for premarital dyadic formation. Journal of Marriage and the Family,, K. M., & H. J., E.A ,, Blechman, E. A. ed Emotions and the family. University of ColoradoPp , Markman, H. J., Floyd, F., Stanley, S., & Storaasli, R The prevention of marital distress: A 2001 longitudinal investigation. Journal of Consulting and,, Clinical Psychology,, (1),, , a 1993,, 1-,G.H., Mead,G.H Mind,self,and 2003b society. University of Chiago Press.,, Gottman, J., Notarius, C., Markman, H., Bank, S., Yoppi, B., & Rubin, M. E Behavior exchange theory and marital decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, Harvey, J. H. & Omarzu, J Minding the close relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Review,, Noller, P Misunderstandings in marrital communication: A study of couples' nonverbal communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, Noller, P Nonverbal communication and marital interaction. Pergamon Press. Noller, P. & Gallois, C Sending emotional messages in marriage: Nonverbal behaviour, sex and 1970 communication clarity. British Journal of Social,, Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, Ickes, W. & Barnes, R. D Boys and girls together-and alienated: On enacting stereotyped sex roles in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, Equity,, Equity Psychology,, Shaw, M. E. & Sadler, O. W Interaction patterns in heterosexual dyads varying in degree of intimacy. Journal of Social Psychology,, Simpson, J. A., Ickes, W., & Orina, M Empathic accuracy and preemptive relationship stability maintenance. ( Narvey, J. H., Wenzel, A., Eds Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement. Pp ) Sternberg, R. J A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review,, , Sternberg, R. J Construct validation of a 1989 Equity. triangular love scale. European Journal of Social 30, Psychology,, a 1990., Pp ,, b3 (2)? Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W New directions in equity research. In Berkowitz, L. & Walster, E. Eds. Advances in Experimental Socail?. Psychology, Pp , Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Traupman, J a Equity and premarital sex. Journal of Personality.,, and Social Psychology,, b 1996.,, (. Kerckhoff, A. C. & Davis, K.E Value consensus Pp , ) and need complementarity in mate selection. American Sociological Review,, RCI,, Lasswell, T. E. & Lasswell, M. E I love you but I'm

10 Interpersonal communication reflected intimacy Ikuo DAIBO (Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University) Many researchers concern the dynamics of how people manage their close relationships over time. Interpersonal intimacy contains some aspects of psychological features depend on the extent to which both people are concerned for the partner s wellness. Interpersonal communication enhances partnership and commitment with the members. Intimacy of the relationship is not single construct, but connotes cognitive, motivational, and communicative aspects of the relationships. Also, it is considered that the interpersonal intimacy is derived from personal tendency or relational unit. We need to pay attention to the difference among the size of members in the interaction, because interpersonal intimacy should be affected by the different interaction process reflected dyadic or triadic dynamics that produces different numbers of interpersonal interaction. It is important and useful that the nature of interpersonal relationships is considered as the points of the view of balance, equity. As caring and minded response reinforce one another, a close relationship is maintained and enhanced. Key words: interpersonal communication, interpersonal relationships, intimacy, love, dyadic-triadic relations

Walster & Walster(1978)

1 449 2 460 1 7 (28 ) 2 1 2 2 ( ) 3 1960 1970 Rubin(1970) Walster & Walster(1978) Lee(1977) Sternberg (1986) Aron & Aron(1986) Sternberg (1995) Fehr(1988) Hendrick & Hendrick(2000) LETS-2( (p.203), ( 1990)