No prior entry for threat-related faces: Evidence from temporal order judgments
|
|
- Whitney Felicia Chambers
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 No prior entry for threat-related faces 1 1 Running head: NO PRIOR ENTRY FOR THREAT-RELATED FACES No prior entry for threat-related faces: Evidence from temporal order judgments 5 6 Antonio Schettino 1,2, Tom Loeys 3, & Gilles Pourtois Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium 2 Institute of Psychology I, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany 3 Department of Data Analysis, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Corresponding author: Antonio Schettino Institute of Psychology I University of Leipzig Seeburgstraße Leipzig Germany Phone: +49 (0) antonio.schettino@uni-leipzig.de
2 No prior entry for threat-related faces Abstract Previous research showed that threat-related faces, due to their intrinsic motivational relevance, capture attention more readily than neutral faces. Here we used a standard temporal order judgment (TOJ) task to assess whether negative (either angry or fearful) emotional faces, when competing with neutral faces for attention selection, may lead to a prior entry effect and hence be perceived as appearing first, especially when uncertainty is high regarding the order of the two onsets. We did not find evidence for this conjecture across five different experiments, despite the fact that participants were invariably influenced by asynchronies in the respective onsets of the two competing faces in the pair, and could reliably identify the emotion in the faces. Importantly, by systematically varying task demands across experiments, we could rule out confounds related to suboptimal stimulus presentation or inappropriate task demands. These findings challenge the notion of an early automatic capture of attention by (negative) emotion. Future studies are needed to investigate whether the lack of systematic bias of attention by emotion is imputed to the primacy of a non-emotional cue to resolve the TOJ task, which in turn prevents negative emotion to exert an early bottom-up influence on the guidance of spatial and temporal attention Keywords: temporal order judgment; visual prior entry; threat-related faces; emotion; attention
3 No prior entry for threat-related faces No prior entry for threat-related faces: Evidence from temporal order judgments Introduction Results obtained from a variety of experimental paradigms suggest that, under specific circumstances, negative emotional stimuli may receive prioritized access to awareness by biasing perceptual and attentional processes [1,2,3,4,5]. In variants of the Stroop task, for instance, naming the color of a word is slower when the stimulus carries a negative emotional meaning, even though this semantic feature is task-irrelevant [6,7,8]. Similarly, in visual search tasks participants are usually faster at detecting negative emotional targets embedded in an array of neutral distracters [3,9,10]. Furthermore, the well-known deficit in perceiving the second of two targets presented rapidly one after another among a stream of distracter items (attentional blink; see Refs ) is reduced if the second target carries a negative emotional meaning [13,14,15], or prolonged if the first target is (highly) arousing [16,17,18,19]. Finally, studies using spatial cueing tasks have shown that emotion-laden stimuli facilitate the processing of (non-emotional) targets subsequently presented at the same location, consistent with the assumption of a rapid orienting of attention towards these (task-irrelevant) stimuli, as opposed to neutral ones [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Taken together, these findings suggest that motivationally relevant stimuli (including negative facial expressions) can exert a strong modulatory influence on attentional control processes. However, still little is known about how these stimuli are initially prioritized by dedicated attentional control systems, mainly because the initial attentional orienting was not directly measured in these earlier studies. Visual search, spatial cueing, or attentional blink tasks, in fact, require participants to quickly engage, disengage, and reallocate attention towards different competing stimuli. Therefore, these paradigms are not suited to titrate changes in the initial
4 No prior entry for threat-related faces allocation of attention towards emotional vs. neutral stimuli [28]. By contrast, temporal order judgment (TOJ) tasks provide a more direct, sensitive, and accurate measure of attentional capture [29,30,31,32]. In a typical TOJ task, attention is oriented either to the left or the right side of fixation, and participants have to judge which of two competing stimuli, displayed on the left and right at various stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs), was presented first. Because attention accelerates sensory processing [33,34], the stimulus appearing on the attended location is processed faster and, as a consequence, its onset is perceived as occurring first (visual prior entry; see Refs. 35,36,37). To date, two studies already used TOJ tasks to assess whether emotional faces could lead to a prior entry effect when competing with neutral faces. In their study, Fecica & Stolz [38] presented schematic neutral, happy, or angry faces -- separated by SOAs of 0, 17, 34, or 100 ms - - on the left and right side of fixation, and asked participants to judge the location of the stimulus that appeared first. Results showed that, in conditions of high uncertainty (i.e., at short as opposed to long SOAs), happy and angry faces were consistently perceived as appearing first compared to neutral faces. Moreover, a stronger prior entry effect was observed for happy relative to angry faces. This latter result is at variance with the well-known negativity bias for threatening stimuli [9,23,39,40] and might ultimately be explained, at least in part, by the use of a small number of stimuli (i.e., three schematic faces consistently repeated across trials) which may have introduced systematic attentional biases based on the fast processing of specific lowlevel perceptual features [41, 42; but see 43]. West, Anderson, & Pratt [44] conducted several experiments using the TOJ task to investigate whether motivationally significant stimuli could be prioritized over neutral ones. First, they reported a prior entry effect for schematic upright (neutral) faces when competing with inverted
5 No prior entry for threat-related faces schematic faces, providing evidence for a bias in the early allocation of attention towards these biologically relevant stimuli. Moreover, they found that this initial attentional deployment was influenced by the emotional content of the faces (i.e., schematic angry faces were prioritized over neutral faces), and was further enhanced by the use of realistic photographs of angry faces. However, in this study alike, a limited number of face stimuli was used (i.e., four angry and four neutral identities). Therefore, based on these earlier studies, it remains unclear whether the negative emotional facial expression per se, or rather uncontrolled perceptual factors, led to a differential early allocation of attention towards these emotion-laden stimuli. In the present study we used a large set of realistic photographs of faces (extensively validated in the literature) and assessed whether negative emotional facial expressions could lead to a prior entry effect when competing with neutral faces. Importantly, to overcome any low-level perceptual confound, on each and every trial we presented participants with a pair of faces (with a variable SOA between their respective onsets) that were always visually dissimilar, both in terms of identity and facial expression (i.e., either neutral or emotional). The rationale of this manipulation is that, across trials, visual dissimilarity between the two competing faces is always present and variable -- and thus uninformative -- and, accordingly, it cannot implicitly be used by participants as a distinctive visual cue to decide which of the two faces appeared first [27,45,46]. In these conditions, presumably, only the differential emotional content of the face would influence perceptual judgments. Furthermore, to verify that the emotional facial expressions were recognized as such, at the end of the experiment we asked participants to rate the emotion intensity of each and every face stimulus used during the main TOJ task. The main goal of our study was to evaluate whether negative (threat-related) emotional faces were processed faster
6 No prior entry for threat-related faces than neutral faces (see Ref. 4), thereby showing prior entry consistent with the assumption of early attentional capture. Experiment 1 Ethics statement All the experiments were approved by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Psychological and Educational Sciences, Ghent University. All participants were required to give written informed consent prior to their participation. Participants Thirty-seven undergraduate psychology students of Ghent University participated in the study in exchange of course credits. All volunteers were native Dutch speaking, right-handed, had normal or corrected-to-normal vision, with no history of neurological or psychiatric disorders. The data of five participants were excluded from subsequent analyses due to abnormal psychometric functions in at least one experimental condition [37,47,48], indicating that their performance was not influenced by the main SOA manipulation (see below). Thus, the final sample consisted of 32 participants (27 women, mean age 19 years, range 18-22). Stimuli We used pairs of grayscale photographs of ten different individuals (four women) selected from the standardized Ekman database [49]. In order to remove most of the external facial features (e.g., hair and ears) and to standardize the spatial layout occupied by each face, each stimulus was enclosed in an oval frame encompassing 8.86 x 7.63 of visual angle (Figure 1; for a similar procedure, see also Ref. 27). Means and standard deviations of pixel luminance were extracted using ImageJ (v1.44; and apparent contrast, defined as the standard deviation divided by the mean, was calculated for each and every face stimulus.
7 No prior entry for threat-related faces Independent samples t-tests revealed that neutral and fearful faces did not differ with regard to apparent contrast [t(18) = -0.65, p =.523]. Procedure The experiment was conducted in a small, dimly lit room on a PC connected to a 19" CRT monitor (refresh rate: 100 Hz) running E-Prime 2.0 ( Viewing distance was held constant at 60 cm throughout the experimental session, with head motions restrained by a chinrest. After filling out the informed consent, participants were presented with four blocks (90 trials each) of the experimental task, preceded by verbal instructions and a practice block containing 10 trials with happy and neutral faces. Trials were structured as follows (Figure 1). A central black cross (0.96 x 0.96 ) was displayed for 1000 ms on a white background. Participants were instructed to maintain fixation on this cross. Afterwards, the first face (8.86 x 7.63 ) appeared in one of two placeholders located on the left or right side of fixation. After a variable time interval (SOAs: 100, 30, or 10 ms), the second face appeared on the opposite side. Both stimuli were equidistant from fixation (distance between the center of the cross and the center of the face: ). Both faces remained on the screen for 100 ms before being replaced in synchrony by a uniform mask until response. The task was to indicate, as fast and accurately as possible, the location (either left or right) of the stimulus that was perceived as appearing first (i.e., two-alternative forced-choice task), using numbers 2 or 8 of the numeric pad of a standard AZERTY keyboard. In order to avoid any stimulus-response compatibility effects [35,37], we opted for the use of response buttons whose (vertical) alignment was orthogonal to the stimuli appearing on the screen along the horizontal axis. Response buttons were counterbalanced across participants. Importantly, each face pair always consisted of two different identities, resulting in a total number of 90 face pairs per
8 No prior entry for threat-related faces condition. In 50% of the trials, one face conveyed a fearful expression, while the other one displayed a neutral expression. Each emotion expression appeared equally often to the left or right of the central fixation cross. As control conditions, either two neutral faces (25% of the trials) or two fearful faces (25% of the trials) were presented on screen. Thus, three stimulus pair conditions were presented in random order: fearful face-neutral face (FearNeut), fearful facefearful face (FearFear), neutral face-neutral face (NeutNeut). To verify that the emotional content of the faces selected in our study was perceived in line with the normative ratings, at the end of the experiment we asked participants to rate the amount of fear conveyed by each neutral and fearful face. A standard 9-point Likert scale was used for this purpose, with anchor 1 corresponding to not afraid and anchor 9 to extremely afraid. Questionnaires At the end of the experiment (also valid for Experiments 2-5), participants were asked to fill out two questionnaires, in order to assess whether specific affective or personality traits might be related to task performance. Levels of trait anxiety were measured using the Dutch version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, trait characteristics [50]. Participants also completed the Need For Affect Scale [51], which provides an estimate of participants general motivation to either approach or avoid emotion-inducing situations. The results confirmed normal scores of trait anxiety and Need for Affect (Table 1). In particular, no significant differences were found between the STAI-T scores of our participants and the average normative STAI-T scores obtained in the Dutch student population (M = 36.90, SD = 8.40) [52]. More importantly, no significant correlation was found between these scores and the behavioral results obtained across the five experiments described below. Therefore, the potential modulatory role of these
9 No prior entry for threat-related faces personality factors on the prioritized allocation of attention towards negative emotional stimuli will not be discussed further. Data analysis Accuracy was expressed as the proportion of right first responses. Positive SOAs refer to cases when the first stimulus was presented on the right hemifield, whereas negative SOAs indicate that the first stimulus was presented on the left side (see Figure 2A). The effect of prior entry was assessed by calculating each participant s point of subjective simultaneity (PSS). This parameter indicates the time interval needed by each participant to perceive the two stimuli as arriving simultaneously or, in other words, an estimate of the SOA at which participants would be likely to make each response equally often [36,37,47,53,54]. To compute the PSS, transformed z-scores of the proportion of right first responses were first obtained by applying the inverse of the standard normal distribution function to the raw proportion scores (probit analysis; see Ref. 55). This transformation enabled us to perform a linear regression on the transformed data to derive the PSS, calculated from the slope and intercept of the best-fitted line of the z-scores (PSS = -slope/intercept). To account for the correlation of measurements within the same subject, we used a mixed probit regression model, where each participant had his/her own intercept and slope with estimated random effects from a bivariate zero-mean normal distribution. If a PSS value was falling outside the SOA range (i.e., > +100 or < -100 ms), the data of this participant were excluded from further analyses (for a similar procedure, see Refs. 37, 48). Based on previous research [44], we hypothesized a prior entry effect (i.e., PSS significantly different from zero, as assessed by two-tailed, one-sample t-tests) for fearful compared to neutral faces in the FearNeut condition, whereas no difference ought to be observed in the two control conditions (i.e., FearFear and NeutNeut).
10 No prior entry for threat-related faces Interestingly, several studies point either to a possible advantage of the right hemisphere in attention selection mechanisms [56,57,58], or a disadvantage of the left hemisphere in these processes [59,60]. Moreover, earlier work suggested that the right hemisphere could preferentially be engaged in the processing of emotion-laden stimuli [61,62,63,64]. Accordingly, in all the experiments reported here, we also assessed whether any enhanced prior entry effect could be observed when the first (emotional or neutral) face in the pair was presented in the left vs. right hemifield relative to fixation. However, we did not find any effect of the side of presentation during the TOJ task. These results are also consistent with the study by Fecica & Stolz [38]. We also computed and analyzed the so-called just noticeable difference (JND; see Table 3). JND corresponds to the slope of the best-fitted line of the z-scores (0.675/slope). This metric reflects the smallest temporal interval between two stimuli needed for an observer to correctly judge which stimulus had been presented first on 75% of the trials, since ±0.675 represents the 75% and 25% point on the cumulative normal distribution [36,47,54,65]. However, from a theoretical standpoint, the effects of spatial attention on JND in a TOJ task are still unclear [54,66]. In addition, our analyses performed on the JND obtained for each of the five experiments did not reveal any valuable (compared to the PSS) information regarding differential prior entry effects for emotional relative to neutral faces. Reaction times (RTs) were analyzed by means of repeated measures ANOVAs. However, it should be noted that previous studies (see, for instance, Ref. 53) have been equivocal with regards to the reliability of this dependent variable in assessing genuine prior entry effects, particularly because TOJ tasks are usually performed under unspeeded time constraints [67,68]. Therefore, RT data were analyzed with the sole purpose to provide additional evidence that our
11 No prior entry for threat-related faces main experimental manipulation (i.e., SOA) was successful: at short SOAs (i.e., ±30 and ±10 ms), where uncertainty was high, participants would be slower than at long SOAs (i.e., ±100 ms). The results unambiguously confirmed this prediction. However, this analysis did not reveal any significant result that would be compatible with a prior entry effect for threat-related faces. Hence, we will not report the outcome of this analysis, either for Experiment 1 or the subsequent Experiments (2-5). The alpha level for all statistical analyses was set at p < Results Trials whose RTs were slower than three standard deviations from the mean (calculated for each condition and SOA separately across participants) were removed from the analysis (M = 1.12%, SD = 0.73). Figure 2A shows the proportion of right first responses for each condition (FearNeut, FearFear, NeutNeut). A clear inverted S-shaped psychometric function was obtained for each condition, providing evidence that the main experimental manipulation (i.e., SOA) was successful. Thus, participants perceived the onsets of the two stimuli in accordance with their respective occurrences. More specifically, participants TOJs were more uncertain (i.e., the proportion of right first responses was close to chance) at short (i.e., ±30 and ±10 ms) compared to long (i.e., ±100 ms) SOAs. The PSS values for each condition are reported in Table 2. For none of the three conditions did the one-sample t-test reach significance [FearNeut: t(31) = 1.15, p =.260; FearFear: t(31) = 1.37, p =.180; NeutNeut: t(31) = 1.82, p =.079], indicating no reliable prior entry effect for fearful compared to neutral faces (Figure 2B). Importantly, results of the post-experiment ratings unequivocally confirmed that fearful faces were perceived as more fearful compared to neutral faces [t(31) = 28.10, p <.001] (Figure 2C).
12 No prior entry for threat-related faces Discussion In Experiment 1, participants were presented with pairs of fearful and neutral faces, and were instructed to report whether the first stimulus appeared on the left or right visual hemifield. We hypothesized that fearful faces, because of their enhanced intrinsic motivational salience, could rapidly capture exogenous attention and, accordingly, bias TOJs (as reflected by PSS values being significantly different from zero in the FearNeut condition). However, we did not observe such pattern of results. Importantly, these non-significant findings could not easily be accounted for by mere task difficulty, abnormal temporal perception, or attentional allocation spread throughout the visual field, since most of the participants could correctly identify the first onset in the pair (as evidenced by the presence of a clear inverted S-shaped psychometric function observed for each experimental condition; see Figure 2A). Moreover, post-experiment ratings confirmed that fearful faces were clearly recognized as such compared to neutral faces (Figure 2C), ruling out the possibility that the fearful faces selected in this experiment displayed weak or undifferentiated negative emotional expressions. Although fearful faces were previously shown to influence early attention selection processes (see Ref. 4, for a recent review), the lack of a reliable prior entry effect for fearful faces might be explained by the fact that the threat displayed in these faces is indirect in essence, thereby affecting the motivational significance to a lower extent than angry faces, which convey a more direct threat [69,70]. Moreover, earlier studies using TOJ tasks already reported prior entry effects for (schematic and realistic) angry faces [38,44]. Therefore, in Experiment 2, we concurrently used angry and fearful faces in order to assess whether any prior entry effect for negative emotional facial expressions might be specific to angry faces or not. Furthermore, we substantially reduced the size of the face stimuli compared to Experiment 1, as well as their
13 No prior entry for threat-related faces eccentricity relative to fixation. We reasoned that the use of large face stimuli (i.e., subtending 8.86 x 7.63 of visual angle) shown in the far periphery (i.e., from fixation) may have favored the use of low-level features to perform the TOJ task in Experiment 1. By comparison, West and colleagues [44] presented schematic or human faces in squared boxes subtending 3.80 x 3.60 of visual angle at a lower horizontal eccentricity (3.15 from fixation). Accordingly, in Experiment 2, our stimulus parameters were more closely matched to those used previously by West, et al. [44]. Experiment 2 Participants Forty healthy psychology students participated in the study in exchange of course credits. None of them had participated in Experiment 1. All volunteers gave informed written consent prior to their participation. The data of two participants were excluded from further analyses due to an abnormal inverted S-shaped psychometric function in at least one experimental condition (similarly to Experiment 1). Thus, the final sample consisted of 38 participants (32 women, mean age 18 years, range 17-22). Stimuli Fearful and neutral faces were identical to the ones used in Experiment 1. However, they were now enclosed in a smaller oval frame, spanning 4.77 x 3.06 of visual angle. In addition, 10 faces displaying an angry expression were selected from the same standardized Ekman series [49]. Apparent contrast was also calculated for angry faces, and independent samples t-tests revealed no significant difference between neutral and angry faces [t(18) = -0.99, p =.334], as well as between fearful and angry faces [t(18) = -0.16, p =.877]. Procedure
14 No prior entry for threat-related faces The procedure and design of the task were similar to Experiment 1. However, here the facial stimuli were presented closer to fixation (distance between the center of the fixation cross and the center of the face: 6.68 ) compared to Experiment 1. The stimulus pair conditions were angry face-neutral face (AngerNeut) and fearful face-neutral face (FearNeut). No additional condition (i.e., AngerAnger, FearFear, or NeutNeut) was included, in order to avoid an excessively high number of trials and long testing session likely causing drops or lapses in attention. Note that the use of the AngerNeut and FearNeut conditions alone is sufficient to establish whether any reliable prior entry (for either angry or fearful faces) was present or not [44]. Ratings of perceived anger and fear conveyed by each face stimulus were collected at the end of the main TOJ task by means of 9-point Likert scales, ranging from 1 ( not afraid/angry ) to 9 ( extremely afraid/angry ). Additionally, participants were asked to provide ratings of perceived brightness for each emotional and neutral face (from 1, very dark, to 9, very bright ), to further corroborate the lack of clear difference in this low-level visual property across the three emotion categories (i.e., neutral, angry, and fearful). Results Following standard practice, trials whose RTs were slower than three standard deviations from the mean were discarded (M = 0.98%, SD = 0.66). Behavioral results showed that the distribution of the proportion of right first responses was consistent with the results obtained in Experiment 1: responses were close to chance level at short compared to long SOAs. Table 2 shows the PSS values for each condition. None of the one-sample t-tests were significantly different from zero [AngerNeut: t(37) = 0.99, p =.327; FearNeut: t(37) = 0.74, p =.466]. Thus, no prior entry for negative emotional facial expressions (either fear or anger) was evidenced.
15 No prior entry for threat-related faces Post-experiment ratings confirmed that fearful faces were perceived as more fearful compared to neutral [t(37) = 34.02, p <.001] and angry faces [t(37) = 29.60, p <.001]. Similarly, angry faces were rated higher along the anger intensity dimension compared to neutral [t(37) = 33.15, p <.001] and fearful faces [t(37) = 25.97, p <.001]. Thus, participants correctly perceived the respective emotion content displayed by the selected face stimuli. Results further revealed higher perceived brightness for emotional relative to neutral faces [anger vs. neutral: t(37) = 4.73, p <.001; fear vs. neutral: t(37) = 2.97, p <.001], an effect that could be explained by an emotionenhanced perceptual vividness [71]. Note that, despite these subjective differences in brightness, no prior entry effect for either angry or fearful faces was found. Discussion Results of Experiment 2 failed to show any significant prior entry effect for either fearful faces (replicating the results of Experiment 1) or angry faces when compared to neutral faces, despite a clear effect of SOA on TOJs (i.e., inverted S-shaped psychometric function). Unlike previous studies mainly using schematic angry faces [38,44], here we did not find evidence for the preferential (exogenous) orienting towards photographs of realistic fearful or angry faces when they compete with neutral faces for attention selection. Because our experimental setup was similar to West and colleagues [44], these results are unlikely to be explained by suboptimal stimulus parameters or task demands. Moreover, since participants of Experiment 2 unambiguously identified the emotion conveyed by fearful and angry faces during a postexperiment rating phase, these results cannot be accounted for by the use of face stimuli providing weak or undifferentiated emotional expressions relative to neutral faces. An intriguing possibility to account for these non-significant findings (Experiments 1-2) may be related to the specific task set adopted by the participants throughout the experimental
16 No prior entry for threat-related faces session. Given that participants had to focus on spatial and temporal properties to carry out the two-alternative forced-choice task (i.e., is it the left or right stimulus appearing first?), the emotion content of the faces could somehow be filtered out in these two experiments. Moreover, previous research showed that early and automatic affective stimulus processing could substantially be reduced when concurrent non-affective (spatial) stimulus dimensions became task-relevant [72,73,74,75], consistent with the idea that the (exogenous) capture of attention by emotion is not magic, but subject to (state) fluctuations depending on the availability of attentional resources, as well as the specific task set [4]. In light of this evidence, we surmised that participants of Experiments 1-2 may have adopted an efficient strategy and primarily allocated attentional resources to the processing of the spatial and temporal properties of the two face stimuli, while actively ignoring their emotional content because poorly informative to resolve the task. We have to acknowledge, however, that this account already posits that negative emotional facial expressions do not automatically capture attention, because this effect (at least in the case of a TOJ task) may actually depend upon the specific task demands [76]. Accordingly, no prior entry for angry or fearful faces was evidenced in these two first experiments, probably because participants could easily ignore the emotional content of the two competing faces and focus on a specific non-affective stimulus feature whose processing was sufficient to perform the task. To address this issue, in Experiment 3 we modified the task instructions and asked participants to judge whether the emotional or the neutral face appeared first (emotion TOJ), making the differential emotional content of the two faces in the pair directly task-relevant. Hence, in Experiment 3 a two-alternative forced-choice task was still required, but it concerned the content rather than the spatial position of the face stimuli. Experiment 3
17 No prior entry for threat-related faces Participants Thirty-seven psychology students, who did not participate in Experiments 1 or 2, took part in Experiment 3. Using the same exclusion criteria as above (see Experiments 1 and 2), the data of 16 participants had to be removed from the subsequent statistical analyses. The data of 21 participants (19 women, mean age 18 years, range 18-21) were thus included in the final sample. Stimuli and procedure The stimuli were identical to Experiment 2. However, unlike Experiments 1-2, participants were asked to perform a two-alternative forced-choice task based on the emotional content of the face stimuli in the pair. More precisely, they were instructed to judge whether the stimulus that appeared first had either a neutral or an emotional expression, thereby making the emotional content of the face stimuli directly task-relevant. Another notable difference between Experiment 3 and Experiments 1-2 was the use of a block design. In order to facilitate participants discrimination between emotional and neutral faces, AngerNeut and FearNeut trials were no longer presented in random order throughout the experimental session, but in two separate blocks (counterbalanced across participants). Finally, ratings for the perceived anger, fear, and brightness of the individual face stimuli were collected post-experiment, similarly to Experiments 1-2. Results A total of 0.55% (SD = 0.40) of trials were discarded because their RTs were slower than three standard deviations from the mean. As expected, the proportion of emotion first responses was close to chance level at short compared to long SOAs, as evidenced by a clear inverted S-shaped psychometric function.
18 No prior entry for threat-related faces However, PSS values for each condition (see Table 2) revealed no significant prior entry effect [AngerNeut: t(20) = 0.18, p =.858; FearNeut: t(20) = -1.27, p =.218]. Post-experiment ratings confirmed that fearful faces were perceived as more fearful compared to neutral faces [t(20) = 15.84, p <.001] and angry faces [t(20) = 16.36, p <.001]. In addition, angry faces were perceived as carrying more anger intensity than neutral [t(20) = 17.00, p <.001] and fearful faces [t(20) = 16.72, p <.001]. Finally, participants rated emotional and neutral stimuli as equally bright (ps >.05). Discussion Despite the use of an emotion TOJ task (as opposed to a TOJ task based on the location of the face appearing first; see Experiments 1-2), we did not find evidence for a differential prior entry effect for either fearful or angry faces relative to neutral faces. Noteworthy, these non-significant results were obtained despite a clear emotion differentiation of the three emotion categories (as confirmed by post-experiment ratings), as well as the presence of clear inverted S-shaped psychometric functions in 21 participants (unambiguously revealing a clear sensitivity to the main SOA manipulation). The lack of prior entry effect for angry faces is puzzling to some extent, since participants were asked to process the emotional content of the faces in the pair in order to perform the task. Previous research showed that in these conditions (i.e., when emotion is directly task-relevant), rapid and automatic effects of (negative) emotion on feature-specific attention allocation could be observed in healthy adult participants [72,75,77]. Furthermore, these findings are also at odds with earlier results showing a reliable prior entry effect for angry faces [44], because similar stimulus parameters were used in these two studies. Using a stringent and standard exclusion criterion [37,47,48], we found out that the data of sixteen participants had to be removed from the analysis because they did not show a normal
19 No prior entry for threat-related faces change in TOJ (at least in one experimental condition) as a function of the SOA. This exclusion rate was substantially larger than what we found in Experiments 1-2 (where participants were instructed to focus exclusively on spatial and temporal properties of the two face stimuli in the pair), suggesting that the discrimination of the emotional content of the faces was more demanding than processing the temporal and spatial features of the first face appearing on screen. Noteworthy, none of the two previous studies looking at prior entry for angry faces used a similar exclusion criterion [38,44], suggesting that the results reported in these earlier studies might include the data of poor-performers who may encounter difficulties to process the (finegrained) changes in the respective onsets of the two faces. In Experiment 4, we aimed at addressing this question and, accordingly, we devised a new modification of the TOJ task enabling to briefly train temporal perceptual abilities with low-level geometrical stimuli, before the putative effect of the emotional content of the face was systematically explored. We hypothesized that this initial task familiarization with geometrical figures might later reduce the drop rate for the emotion TOJ. Hence, at the beginning of Experiment 4, we included two training blocks during which participants had to perform the TOJ task based on the orientation of line gratings (being either horizontal or vertical). Then, participants performed the emotion TOJ, as described in Experiment 3. Experiment 4 Participants Forty psychology students, who did not participate in any of the previous experiments, took part in Experiment 4 for course credits. Using the same exclusion criteria as above (see Experiments 1-3), the data of 23 participants had to be excluded from the subsequent statistical
20 No prior entry for threat-related faces analyses. Hence, the final sample consisted of 17 participants (13 women, mean age 20 years, range 18-30). Stimuli and procedure Face stimuli and procedure were identical to Experiment 3. In addition, before the emotion TOJ task, participants carried out a non-emotion TOJ task aimed at familiarizing them to detect asynchronies in the different onset times. Two blocks were included (each containing 90 trials), in which gratings consisting of either horizontal or vertical black lines on a white background (matched in size with the face stimuli; see Figure 1) were presented equally often on the left and right hemifield, separated by the SOAs described above (i.e., 100, 30, or 10 ms). Participants had to judge whether the horizontal or vertical line gratings appeared first. Ratings of the individual faces regarding the intensity of anger, fear, and brightness were collected at the end of the experiment. Results Trials whose RTs were slower than three standard deviations from the mean were discarded (M = 0.73%, SD = 0.51). Figure 3A shows the proportion of horizontal first responses for the non-emotion TOJ task during the two familiarization blocks, as well as the proportion of emotion first responses for the subsequent emotion TOJ task. Performance for the non-emotion TOJ task was remarkably accurate, as evidenced by a clear inverted S-shaped psychometric function (HorizVert condition in Figure 3A). By contrast, accuracy was substantially reduced for the emotion TOJ task, as shown by flatter inverted S-shaped psychometric functions for the AngerNeut and FearNeut conditions. Please note that the results reported here are for good performers only (i.e., participants whose PSS fell within the -100/+100 ms interval for all conditions). Table 2 shows
21 No prior entry for threat-related faces the PSS values for each condition separately. No significant prior entry effect was found in the HorizVert condition [t(16) = 0.58, p =.568], serving as control condition or low-level baseline. However, PSS values were also not significant in the AngerNeut [t(16) = -0.51, p =.616] and FearNeut [t(16) = -1.24, p =.232] conditions (Figure 3B). Post-experiment ratings confirmed that the face stimuli were perceived in line with the a priori emotion categories: fearful faces were perceived as more fearful compared to neutral [t(16) = 23.66, p <.001] and angry faces [t(16) = , p <.001]. Likewise, angry faces were perceived as more angry relative to neutral [t(16) = 16.99, p <.001] and fearful faces [t(16) = 14.54, p <.001], with no significant difference in perceived brightness across these three conditions (ps >.05) (Figure 3C). Discussion Results of Experiment 4 did not show any prior entry effect for either fearful or angry faces, when these threat-related face stimuli compete with neutral faces for early attention selection. As was already the case for Experiments 1-3, this result could not be imputed to a lack of perceived emotion differences between the three stimulus categories, since post-experiment ratings showed clear and predictable differences. We reasoned that the use of familiarization blocks with horizontal and vertical line gratings (i.e., non-emotional features) might have eased performance during the subsequent emotion TOJ task. However, this turned out to be a wrong prediction. Despite the introduction of these two familiarization blocks, in fact, the drop rate was still substantial (23 out of 40 participants, 58%). Hence, 23 participants had PSS values (at least in one condition) exceeding the maximum SOA range (± 100 ms). Unexpectedly, this drop rate was even higher compared to the one found in Experiment 3 (43%), where no familiarization with the vertical and horizontal gratings was introduced. However, if we only used the data of the TOJ
22 No prior entry for threat-related faces task performed on the line gratings, this drop rate would be remarkably lower (10%), suggesting that participants encountered specific difficulties only when asked to decide whether the emotional face in the pair was shown first or not, but not when asked to decide whether horizontal or vertical line gratings appeared first. This conclusion was also reinforced by the direct comparison of the two tasks for the 17 participants included in the analyses (see Figure 3A). We reasoned that task difficulty during the emotion TOJ might perhaps decrease if we would give more precise instructions to participants. Specifically, while in Experiments 3-4 instructions emphasized the discrimination between emotional and neutral faces, the use of distinct response labels (angry vs. neutral or fearful vs. neutral) could presumably improve performance. A refined task set biasing feature-specific attention allocation towards specific emotional features [72,74,77,78], in fact, could facilitate TOJs based on these emotional features. Accordingly, in Experiment 5, we used the same stimuli and setup as in Experiment 4, but asked participants to indicate whether the first stimulus was an angry/fearful (depending on the block) or a neutral face. Experiment 5 Participants Thirty-six psychology students, who participated in none of the previous experiments, took part in Experiment 5 in exchange of course credits. Using the same exclusion criterion as above, the data of twenty volunteers were removed from the subsequent statistical analyses, leaving a final sample of 16 participants (9 women, mean age 22 years, range 18-30). Stimuli and procedure
23 No prior entry for threat-related faces Stimuli were identical to Experiment 4. Similarly, two familiarization blocks with horizontal and vertical line gratings were used at the beginning of the experiment, to allow participants to familiarize with the TOJ task and the different SOAs. Unlike Experiment 4, however, for the subsequent emotion TOJ task participants were specifically asked to decide whether the face that appeared first in the pair was neutral, angry, or fearful (two blocks each, counterbalanced across participants). Ten practice trials with either angry-neutral or fearful-neutral stimulus pairs preceded the two experimental blocks. Ratings for the individual faces regarding the amount of anger, fear, or brightness were collected at the end of the experiment. Results Trials whose RTs were slower than three standard deviations from the mean were discarded (M = 0.66%, SD = 0.50). Overall, participants performed better in the familiarization task compared to the emotion TOJ task, as evidenced by flatter inverted S-Shaped psychometric functions for the AngerNeut and FearNeut conditions relative to the HorizVert condition. None of the PSS values (reported in Table 2) was significantly different from zero [HorizVert; t(15) = -0.65, p =.524; AngerNeut: t(15) = p =.184; FearNeut; t(15) = -0.68, p =.508]. Post-experiment ratings confirmed that emotional faces were perceived as such by participants. Fearful faces were perceived as more fearful compared to neutral [t(15) = 19.08, p <.001] and angry faces [t(15) = , p <.001]. Similarly, angry faces were perceived as more angry than neutral [t(15) = 15.21, p <.001] and fearful faces [t(15) = 9.77, p <.001]. Higher perceived brightness for emotional relative to neutral faces was also reported [anger vs. neutral: t(15) = 5.54, p <.001; fear vs. neutral: t(15) = 3.56, p =.003], consistent with an emotion-
24 No prior entry for threat-related faces enhanced perceptual vividness [71]. However, these subjective differences in brightness did not lead to prior entry effect for either angry or fearful faces relative to neutral faces. Discussion Using more specific task instructions than in Experiment 4 (i.e., by explicitly mentioning either anger or fear as target emotion), we still failed to observe a reliable prior entry effect for threat-related faces. Moreover, as was already the case for Experiment 4, the data of a high number of participants had to be discarded (drop rate of 56%) due to PSS values in the AngerNeut and FearNeut conditions that were falling outside the ±100 ms SOA range. Therefore, the use of specific emotion labels during the emotion TOJ (Experiment 5) did not lead to any gain in accuracy compared to more general task instructions primarily emphasizing the discrimination of emotional vs. neutral faces (Experiments 3-4). Again, these results could not be explained by difficulties to identify or recognize the different emotional facial expressions (see results of the post-experiment ratings), or the use of suboptimal SOAs and/or stimulus parameters (see results for the two familiarization blocks with the line gratings). Additional analyses Power analysis The estimated average effect size of West et al. [44] s experiments was remarkably high (Cohen s d = 0.75), with an estimated power of 71%. An a priori power analysis using G*Power 3 [79] indicated that a total sample of 16 participants would be needed to detect the same effect with 80% power using two-tailed, one-sample t-tests with α = The number of participants in all our experiments was therefore adequate to detect a potential visual prior entry effect for threat-related vs. neutral faces of similar size. More specifically, we had a 98% power to detect an effect with α = 0.05 and d = 0.75 in Experiment 1, 99% in Experiment 2, 90% in Experiment
25 No prior entry for threat-related faces , 83% in Experiment 4, and 80% in Experiment 5. Thus, our five experiments appeared sensitive enough to detect an effect size equal to West et al. [44] s. Importantly, our experiments were able to detect, with 80% power and α = 0.05, an effect size of 0.51 in Experiment 1, 0.47 in Experiment 2, 0.64 in Experiment 3, 0.72 in Experiment 4, and 0.75 in Experiment 5. Assessing basic problems with the elected experimental design Presumably, the lack of prior entry for threat-related faces could be imputed to uncontrolled experimental factors in our design that would somehow prevent this attention effect to occur. A way to rule out this possibility is to show that, using the exact same task demands and stimulus parameters, we could nevertheless reveal a significant prior entry effect when attention is reflexively oriented towards one of the two sides using a standard exogenous cue. To address this issue, we ran an additional control experiment. Twenty-five participants (18 women, mean age 27 years, range 24-32) were presented with five blocks (72 trials each) of the line orientation TOJ task used in Experiments 4 and 5. However, in two-thirds of the trials, the thickness of either the left or right placeholder was increased (from 4 to 14 pixels) for 45 ms, prior to the actual onsets of the two gratings (vertical and horizontal) within the two placeholders. The time interval between this exogenous cue and the first stimulus in the pair was constant and set to 60 ms (for a similar procedure, see Ref. 53). Participants were explicitly instructed to ignore this cue throughout the whole experimental session because non-informative (see also Ref. 80), and only judged whether the horizontal or vertical lines appeared first. After converting the cued location into a cued orientation [53], the proportion of horizontal first responses was calculated. When no cue was presented (one third of the trials), a reliable psychometric curve was observed in a vast majority of participants (N = 22). The average PSS was ms (SD = 8.41) and was not statistically significant from zero [t(21) = -0.81, p =.426],
26 No prior entry for threat-related faces replicating the findings of Experiments 4 and 5. By contrast, when the unilateral exogenous cue was used (two thirds of the trials), the stimulus (either horizontal or vertical lines) presented in the same (valid) location was systematically perceived as appearing first, replicating earlier findings [53]. Of note, for 14 participants, the attention capture effect of this cue was so strong that prior entry effects were observed for the cued stimulus regardless of the duration of the SOA. As a result, reliable PSS values could not be computed for these participants. However and most importantly, for the remaining 8 participants where PSS values could be computed for all experimental conditions (i.e., cue and no cue), the average PSS value was ms (SD = 24.17) when the horizontal lines were cued, and ms (SD = 30.46) when the vertical lines were cued. These values were significantly different from zero [t(7) = -9.27, p <.001 and t(7) = 4.75, p =.002, respectively]. These results suggest that attention was reliably biased towards the location of the exogenous cue, such that the vertical or horizontal lines appearing later at the same (valid) location were systematically perceived as appearing first. Accordingly, the lack of systematic bottom-up effect of threat-related vs. neutral faces on the guidance of attention reported in Experiments 1-5 cannot simply be ascribed to uncontrolled methodological problems with the experimental design. Good vs. poor performers When the emotional content became task-relevant (Experiments 3-5), as opposed to the mere appearance of the two faces in the pair (Experiments 1-2), many participants showed PSS values outside the SOA range (±100 ms). These poor-performers, therefore, had to be excluded from subsequent statistical analyses (see Table 4). This suggests that poor performers could not accurately carry out the emotion TOJ task even though, in Experiments 4-5, the majority of them could correctly discriminate which line gratings appeared first, ruling out the possibility of a
Are In-group Social Stimuli more Rewarding than Out-group?
University of Iowa Honors Theses University of Iowa Honors Program Spring 2017 Are In-group Social Stimuli more Rewarding than Out-group? Ann Walsh University of Iowa Follow this and additional works at:
More informationTemplates for Rejection: Configuring Attention to Ignore Task-Irrelevant Features
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2012, Vol. 38, No. 3, 580 584 2012 American Psychological Association 0096-1523/12/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0027885 OBSERVATION Templates
More informationThe effects of subthreshold synchrony on the perception of simultaneity. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Leopoldstr 13 D München/Munich, Germany
The effects of subthreshold synchrony on the perception of simultaneity 1,2 Mark A. Elliott, 2 Zhuanghua Shi & 2,3 Fatma Sürer 1 Department of Psychology National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland.
More informationLearning to classify integral-dimension stimuli
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1996, 3 (2), 222 226 Learning to classify integral-dimension stimuli ROBERT M. NOSOFSKY Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana and THOMAS J. PALMERI Vanderbilt University,
More information(Visual) Attention. October 3, PSY Visual Attention 1
(Visual) Attention Perception and awareness of a visual object seems to involve attending to the object. Do we have to attend to an object to perceive it? Some tasks seem to proceed with little or no attention
More informationThe path of visual attention
Acta Psychologica 121 (2006) 199 209 www.elsevier.com/locate/actpsy The path of visual attention James M. Brown a, *, Bruno G. Breitmeyer b, Katherine A. Leighty a, Hope I. Denney a a Department of Psychology,
More informationInterpreting Instructional Cues in Task Switching Procedures: The Role of Mediator Retrieval
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, Vol. 32, No. 3, 347 363 Copyright 2006 by the American Psychological Association 0278-7393/06/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.347
More informationWhich way is which? Examining symbolic control of attention with compound arrow cues
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications, Department of Psychology Psychology, Department of 2016 Which way is which? Examining symbolic control
More informationInvariant Effects of Working Memory Load in the Face of Competition
Invariant Effects of Working Memory Load in the Face of Competition Ewald Neumann (ewald.neumann@canterbury.ac.nz) Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury Christchurch, New Zealand Stephen J.
More informationRapid fear detection relies on high spatial frequencies
Supplemental Material for Rapid fear detection relies on high spatial frequencies Timo Stein, Kiley Seymour, Martin N. Hebart, and Philipp Sterzer Additional experimental details Participants Volunteers
More informationFunctional Fixedness: The Functional Significance of Delayed Disengagement Based on Attention Set
In press, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance Functional Fixedness: The Functional Significance of Delayed Disengagement Based on Attention Set Timothy J. Wright 1, Walter
More informationThe number line effect reflects top-down control
Journal Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006,?? 13 (?), (5),862-868???-??? The number line effect reflects top-down control JELENA RISTIC University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
More informationThe time required for perceptual (nonmotoric) processing in IOR
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14 (2), 327-331 The time required for perceptual (nonmotoric) processing in IOR THOMAS M. SPALEK AND VINCENT DI LOLLO Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia,
More informationTEMPORAL ORDER JUDGEMENTS A SENSITIVE MEASURE FOR MEASURING PERCEPTUAL LATENCY?
TEMPORAL ORDER JUDGEMENTS A SENSITIVE MEASURE FOR MEASURING PERCEPTUAL LATENCY? Katharina Weiß and Ingrid Scharlau Department of Cultural Sciences, Paderborn University, 33098 Paderborn, Germany katharina.weiss@uni-paderborn.de,
More informationThe Simon Effect as a Function of Temporal Overlap between Relevant and Irrelevant
University of North Florida UNF Digital Commons All Volumes (2001-2008) The Osprey Journal of Ideas and Inquiry 2008 The Simon Effect as a Function of Temporal Overlap between Relevant and Irrelevant Leslie
More informationInteraction Between Social Categories in the Composite Face Paradigm. Wenfeng Chen and Naixin Ren. Chinese Academy of Sciences. Andrew W.
Interaction Between Social Categories in the Composite Face Paradigm Wenfeng Chen and Naixin Ren Chinese Academy of Sciences Andrew W. Young University of York Chang Hong Liu Bournemouth University Author
More informationSupplementary experiment: neutral faces. This supplementary experiment had originally served as a pilot test of whether participants
Supplementary experiment: neutral faces This supplementary experiment had originally served as a pilot test of whether participants would automatically shift their attention towards to objects the seen
More informationHOW DOES PERCEPTUAL LOAD DIFFER FROM SENSORY CONSTRAINS? TOWARD A UNIFIED THEORY OF GENERAL TASK DIFFICULTY
HOW DOES PERCEPTUAL LOAD DIFFER FROM SESORY COSTRAIS? TOWARD A UIFIED THEORY OF GEERAL TASK DIFFICULTY Hanna Benoni and Yehoshua Tsal Department of Psychology, Tel-Aviv University hannaben@post.tau.ac.il
More informationThe Color of Similarity
The Color of Similarity Brooke O. Breaux (bfo1493@louisiana.edu) Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504 USA Michele I. Feist (feist@louisiana.edu) Institute
More informationAttentional Capture Under High Perceptual Load
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review In press Attentional Capture Under High Perceptual Load JOSHUA D. COSMAN AND SHAUN P. VECERA University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa Attentional capture by abrupt onsets can be
More informationThe Attentional Blink is Modulated by First Target Contrast: Implications of an Attention Capture Hypothesis
The Attentional Blink is Modulated by First Target Contrast: Implications of an Attention Capture Hypothesis Simon Nielsen * (sini@imm.dtu.dk) Tobias S. Andersen (ta@imm.dtu.dk) Cognitive Systems Section,
More informationEffect of Pre-Presentation of a Frontal Face on the Shift of Visual Attention Induced by Averted Gaze
Psychology, 2014, 5, 451-460 Published Online April 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/psych http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.55055 Effect of Pre-Presentation of a Frontal Face on the Shift
More informationAttention for Emotional Faces Under Restricted Awareness Revisited: Do Emotional Faces Automatically Attract Attention?
Emotion Copyright 2007 by the American Psychological Association 2007, Vol. 7, No. 2, 285 295 1528-3542/07/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.285 Attention for Emotional Faces Under Restricted Awareness
More informationAutomatic detection, consistent mapping, and training * Originally appeared in
Automatic detection - 1 Automatic detection, consistent mapping, and training * Originally appeared in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1986, 24 (6), 431-434 SIU L. CHOW The University of Wollongong,
More informationThe obligatory nature of holistic processing of faces in social judgments
Perception, 2010, volume 39, pages 514 ^ 532 doi:10.1068/p6501 The obligatory nature of holistic processing of faces in social judgments Alexander Todorov, Valerie Loehr, Nikolaas N Oosterhof Department
More informationCongruency Effects with Dynamic Auditory Stimuli: Design Implications
Congruency Effects with Dynamic Auditory Stimuli: Design Implications Bruce N. Walker and Addie Ehrenstein Psychology Department Rice University 6100 Main Street Houston, TX 77005-1892 USA +1 (713) 527-8101
More informationThe role of cognitive effort in subjective reward devaluation and risky decision-making
The role of cognitive effort in subjective reward devaluation and risky decision-making Matthew A J Apps 1,2, Laura Grima 2, Sanjay Manohar 2, Masud Husain 1,2 1 Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience,
More informationIrrelevant features at fixation modulate saccadic latency and direction in visual search
VISUAL COGNITION, 0000, 00 (0), 111 Irrelevant features at fixation modulate saccadic latency and direction in visual search Walter R. Boot Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee,
More informationAutomaticity of Number Perception
Automaticity of Number Perception Jessica M. Choplin (jessica.choplin@vanderbilt.edu) Gordon D. Logan (gordon.logan@vanderbilt.edu) Vanderbilt University Psychology Department 111 21 st Avenue South Nashville,
More informationThe disengagement of attentive resources from task-irrelevant cues to sexual and emotional. infidelity
The disengagement of attentive resources from task-irrelevant cues to sexual and emotional infidelity Date: September 20, 2007 Word count: 4,664 Running head: Disengagement of attentive resources Disengagement
More informationRecognizing partially visible objects
Vision Research 45 (2005) 1807 1814 www.elsevier.com/locate/visres Recognizing partially visible objects Philip Servos a, *, Elizabeth S. Olds a, Peggy J. Planetta a, G. Keith Humphrey b a Department of
More informationAre Retrievals from Long-Term Memory Interruptible?
Are Retrievals from Long-Term Memory Interruptible? Michael D. Byrne byrne@acm.org Department of Psychology Rice University Houston, TX 77251 Abstract Many simple performance parameters about human memory
More informationWhat Matters in the Cued Task-Switching Paradigm: Tasks or Cues? Ulrich Mayr. University of Oregon
What Matters in the Cued Task-Switching Paradigm: Tasks or Cues? Ulrich Mayr University of Oregon Running head: Cue-specific versus task-specific switch costs Ulrich Mayr Department of Psychology University
More informationSpatially Diffuse Inhibition Affects Multiple Locations: A Reply to Tipper, Weaver, and Watson (1996)
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, Vol. 22, No. 5, 1294-1298 Copyright 1996 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 0096-1523/%/$3.00 Spatially Diffuse Inhibition
More informationHuman Learning of Contextual Priors for Object Search: Where does the time go?
Human Learning of Contextual Priors for Object Search: Where does the time go? Barbara Hidalgo-Sotelo, Aude Oliva, Antonio Torralba Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences and CSAIL, MIT MIT, Cambridge,
More informationFramework for Comparative Research on Relational Information Displays
Framework for Comparative Research on Relational Information Displays Sung Park and Richard Catrambone 2 School of Psychology & Graphics, Visualization, and Usability Center (GVU) Georgia Institute of
More informationDoes scene context always facilitate retrieval of visual object representations?
Psychon Bull Rev (2011) 18:309 315 DOI 10.3758/s13423-010-0045-x Does scene context always facilitate retrieval of visual object representations? Ryoichi Nakashima & Kazuhiko Yokosawa Published online:
More informationDiscrimination and Generalization in Pattern Categorization: A Case for Elemental Associative Learning
Discrimination and Generalization in Pattern Categorization: A Case for Elemental Associative Learning E. J. Livesey (el253@cam.ac.uk) P. J. C. Broadhurst (pjcb3@cam.ac.uk) I. P. L. McLaren (iplm2@cam.ac.uk)
More informationalternate-form reliability The degree to which two or more versions of the same test correlate with one another. In clinical studies in which a given function is going to be tested more than once over
More informationTop-down guidance in visual search for facial expressions
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14 (1), 159-165 Top-down guidance in visual search for facial expressions SOWON HAHN AND SCOTT D. GRONLUND University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma Using a visual search
More informationTransfer of Dimensional Associability in Human Contingency Learning
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition 2015 American Psychological Association 2016, Vol. 42, No. 1, 15 31 2329-8456/16/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xan0000082 Transfer of
More informationSupplementary Materials
Supplementary Materials Supplementary Figure S1: Data of all 106 subjects in Experiment 1, with each rectangle corresponding to one subject. Data from each of the two identical sub-sessions are shown separately.
More informationSequential Effects in Spatial Exogenous Cueing: Theoretical and Methodological Issues
Sequential Effects in Spatial Exogenous Cueing: Theoretical and Methodological Issues Alessandro Couyoumdjian (alessandro.couyoumdjian@uniroma1.it) Faculty of Psychology 1, University La Sapienza via dei
More informationHAPPINESS SUPERIORITY EFFECT FOR SCHEMATIC FACES 1. Different Faces in the Crowd: A Happiness Superiority Effect for Schematic Faces in
HAPPINESS SUPERIORITY EFFECT FOR SCHEMATIC FACES 1 Different Faces in the Crowd: A Happiness Superiority Effect for Schematic Faces in Heterogeneous Backgrounds Belinda M. Craig, Stefanie I. Becker, &
More informationThe Influence of the Attention Set on Exogenous Orienting
The Influence of the Attention Set on Exogenous Orienting Ahnate Lim (ahnate@hawaii.edu) Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii at Manoa 2530 Dole Street, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA Scott Sinnett (ssinnett@hawaii.edu)
More informationIntroduction to Computational Neuroscience
Introduction to Computational Neuroscience Lecture 11: Attention & Decision making Lesson Title 1 Introduction 2 Structure and Function of the NS 3 Windows to the Brain 4 Data analysis 5 Data analysis
More informationObject-based attention with endogenous cuing and positional certainty
Perception & Psychophysics 2008, 70 (8), 1435-1443 doi: 10.3758/PP.70.8.1435 Object-based attention with endogenous cuing and positional certainty ZHE CHEN University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
More informationThe Effect of Training Context on Fixations Made During Visual Discriminations
The Effect of Training Context on Fixations Made During Visual Discriminations Randy J. Brou (Rbrou@Inst.Msstate.Edu) 1 Teena M. Garrison (Teenag@Cavs.Msstate.Edu) 2 Stephanie M. Doane (Sdoane@Doane.Inst.Msstate.Edu)
More informationWhat matters in the cued task-switching paradigm: Tasks or cues?
Journal Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006,?? 13 (?), (5),???-??? 794-799 What matters in the cued task-switching paradigm: Tasks or cues? ULRICH MAYR University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon Schneider and
More informationJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance Attention to Hierarchical Level Influences Attentional Selection of Spatial Scale Anastasia V. Flevaris, Shlomo Bentin, and Lynn C.
More informationUniversity of Alberta. The SNARC effect as a tool to Examine Crosstalk during Numerical Processing in a PRP paradigm. Shawn Tan
University of Alberta The SNARC effect as a tool to Examine Crosstalk during Numerical Processing in a PRP paradigm by Shawn Tan A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial
More informationPupil Dilation as an Indicator of Cognitive Workload in Human-Computer Interaction
Pupil Dilation as an Indicator of Cognitive Workload in Human-Computer Interaction Marc Pomplun and Sindhura Sunkara Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts at Boston 100 Morrissey
More informationGrouped Locations and Object-Based Attention: Comment on Egly, Driver, and Rafal (1994)
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1994, Vol. 123, No. 3, 316-320 Copyright 1994 by the American Psychological Association. Inc. 0096-3445/94/S3.00 COMMENT Grouped Locations and Object-Based Attention:
More informationBehavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 284 (2015) 167 178 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Behavioural Brain Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bbr Research report How coordinate and categorical
More informationOrientation Specific Effects of Automatic Access to Categorical Information in Biological Motion Perception
Orientation Specific Effects of Automatic Access to Categorical Information in Biological Motion Perception Paul E. Hemeren (paul.hemeren@his.se) University of Skövde, School of Humanities and Informatics
More informationSHORT REPORT Facial features influence the categorization of female sexual orientation
Perception, 2013, volume 42, pages 1090 1094 doi:10.1068/p7575 SHORT REPORT Facial features influence the categorization of female sexual orientation Konstantin O Tskhay, Melissa M Feriozzo, Nicholas O
More informationRapid Resumption of Interrupted Visual Search New Insights on the Interaction Between Vision and Memory
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Report Rapid Resumption of Interrupted Visual Search New Insights on the Interaction Between Vision and Memory Alejandro Lleras, 1 Ronald A. Rensink, 2 and James T. Enns
More informationThe mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized
W. Gevers et al. / Cognition 87 (2003) B87 B95 B87 Cognition 87 (2003) B87 B95 www.elsevier.com/locate/cognit Brief article The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized Wim Gevers*,
More informationThe Meaning of the Mask Matters
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Report The Meaning of the Mask Matters Evidence of Conceptual Interference in the Attentional Blink Paul E. Dux and Veronika Coltheart Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science,
More informationThe eyes fixate the optimal viewing position of task-irrelevant words
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16 (1), 57-61 doi:10.3758/pbr.16.1.57 The eyes fixate the optimal viewing position of task-irrelevant words DANIEL SMILEK, GRAYDEN J. F. SOLMAN, PETER MURAWSKI, AND
More informationScale Invariance and Primacy and Recency Effects in an Absolute Identification Task
Neath, I., & Brown, G. D. A. (2005). Scale Invariance and Primacy and Recency Effects in an Absolute Identification Task. Memory Lab Technical Report 2005-01, Purdue University. Scale Invariance and Primacy
More informationWhich Way Is Which? Examining Global/Local Processing With Symbolic Cues
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications, Department of Psychology Psychology, Department of 2014 Which Way Is Which? Examining Global/Local
More informationStroop interference is affected in inhibition of return
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001, 8 (2), 315-323 Stroop interference is affected in inhibition of return ANA B. VIVAS City Liberal Studies: Affiliated Institution of the University of Sheffield, Thessaloniki,
More informationImage generation in a letter-classification task
Perception & Psychophysics 1976, Vol. 20 (3),215-219 Image generation in a letter-classification task THOMAS R. HERZOG Grand Valley State Colleges, Allandale, Michigan 49401 Subjects classified briefly
More informationIAT 355 Perception 1. Or What You See is Maybe Not What You Were Supposed to Get
IAT 355 Perception 1 Or What You See is Maybe Not What You Were Supposed to Get Why we need to understand perception The ability of viewers to interpret visual (graphical) encodings of information and
More informationRunning head: PERCEPTUAL GROUPING AND SPATIAL SELECTION 1. The attentional window configures to object boundaries. University of Iowa
Running head: PERCEPTUAL GROUPING AND SPATIAL SELECTION 1 The attentional window configures to object boundaries University of Iowa Running head: PERCEPTUAL GROUPING AND SPATIAL SELECTION 2 ABSTRACT When
More informationObject Substitution Masking: When does Mask Preview work?
Object Substitution Masking: When does Mask Preview work? Stephen W. H. Lim (psylwhs@nus.edu.sg) Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Block AS6, 11 Law Link, Singapore 117570 Chua
More informationEffects of Task Relevance and Stimulus-Driven Salience in Feature-Search Mode
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, Vol. 30, No. 6, 1019 1031 Copyright 2004 by the American Psychological Association 0096-1523/04/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.6.1019
More informationHow to trigger elaborate processing? A comment on Kunde, Kiesel, and Hoffmann (2003)
Cognition 97 (2005) 89 97 www.elsevier.com/locate/cognit How to trigger elaborate processing? A comment on Kunde, Kiesel, and Hoffmann (2003) Filip Van Opstal a, Bert Reynvoet b, Tom Verguts a, * a Department
More informationSelective bias in temporal bisection task by number exposition
Selective bias in temporal bisection task by number exposition Carmelo M. Vicario¹ ¹ Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università Roma la Sapienza, via dei Marsi 78, Roma, Italy Key words: number- time- spatial
More informationRunning head: GENDER DIFFERENCES IN EMOTION JUDGMENT
Running head: GENDER DIFFERENCES IN EMOTION JUDGMENT Gender Differences for Speed and Accuracy in the Judgment of the Six Basic Emotions Samantha Lumbert Rochester Institute of Technology 256 Abstract
More informationA297B Unilateral field advantage Hayes, Swallow, & Jiang. The unilateral field advantage in repetition detection: Effects of perceptual grouping and
The unilateral field advantage in repetition detection: Effects of perceptual grouping and task demands Matthew T. Hayes Khena M. Swallow Yuhong V. Jiang University of Minnesota Running title: Unilateral
More informationthe remaining half of the arrays, a single target image of a different type from the remaining
8 the remaining half of the arrays, a single target image of a different type from the remaining items was included. Participants were asked to decide whether a different item was included in the array,
More informationHemispheric performance in object-based attention
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11 (1), 84-91 Hemispheric performance in object-based attention MONICA A. VALSANGKAR-SMYTH University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada CHRISTA-LYNN DONOVAN University
More informationPAUL S. MATTSON AND LISA R. FOURNIER
Memory & Cognition 2008, 36 (7), 1236-1247 doi: 10.3758/MC/36.7.1236 An action sequence held in memory can interfere with response selection of a target stimulus, but does not interfere with response activation
More informationCultural Differences in Cognitive Processing Style: Evidence from Eye Movements During Scene Processing
Cultural Differences in Cognitive Processing Style: Evidence from Eye Movements During Scene Processing Zihui Lu (zihui.lu@utoronto.ca) Meredyth Daneman (daneman@psych.utoronto.ca) Eyal M. Reingold (reingold@psych.utoronto.ca)
More informationARTICLE IN PRESS. Vision Research xxx (2008) xxx xxx. Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Vision Research
Vision Research xxx (2008) xxx xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Vision Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/visres Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction
More informationThe edge complex: Implicit memory for figure assignment in shape perception
Perception & Psychophysics 2005, 67 (4), 727-740 The edge complex: Implicit memory for figure assignment in shape perception MARY A. PETERSON University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona and JAMES T. ENNS University
More informationInterference with spatial working memory: An eye movement is more than a shift of attention
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11 (3), 488-494 Interference with spatial working memory: An eye movement is more than a shift of attention BONNIE M. LAWRENCE Washington University School of Medicine,
More informationBlindness to response-compatible stimuli in the psychological refractory period paradigm
VISUAL COGNITION, 2002, 9 (4/5), 421 457 Blindness to response-compatible stimuli in the psychological refractory period paradigm Peter Wühr and Jochen Müsseler Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research,
More informationOffsets and prioritizing the selection of new elements in search displays: More evidence for attentional capture in the preview effect
VISUAL COGNITION, 2007, 15 (2), 133148 Offsets and prioritizing the selection of new elements in search displays: More evidence for attentional capture in the preview effect Jay Pratt University of Toronto,
More informationPrecueing Spatial S-R Correspondence: Is There Regulation of Expected Response Conflict?
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, Vol. 34, No. 4, 872 883 Copyright 2008 by the American Psychological Association 0096-1523/08/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.872
More information2/19/2011. Joseph Bardeen, M.A. Northern Illinois University February 18, 2011
Lifetime prevalence estimates for PTSD are about 8%; however, the majority of Americans experience a traumatic event in their lifetimes (Kessler et al, 1995: NCS) Joseph Bardeen, M.A. Northern Illinois
More informationDecline of the McCollough effect by orientation-specific post-adaptation exposure to achromatic gratings
*Manuscript Click here to view linked References Decline of the McCollough effect by orientation-specific post-adaptation exposure to achromatic gratings J. Bulthé, H. Op de Beeck Laboratory of Biological
More informationSymbolic control of visual attention: Semantic constraints on the spatial distribution of attention
A130RA BC MJA/cla Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2009, 71(2), 363-374 doi:10.3758/app.71.2.363 Symbolic control of visual attention: Semantic constraints on the spatial distribution of attention
More informationFundamentals of Psychophysics
Fundamentals of Psychophysics John Greenwood Department of Experimental Psychology!! NEUR3045! Contact: john.greenwood@ucl.ac.uk 1 Visual neuroscience physiology stimulus How do we see the world? neuroimaging
More informationEffects of Sequential Context on Judgments and Decisions in the Prisoner s Dilemma Game
Effects of Sequential Context on Judgments and Decisions in the Prisoner s Dilemma Game Ivaylo Vlaev (ivaylo.vlaev@psy.ox.ac.uk) Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1
More informationEFFECTS OF NOISY DISTRACTORS AND STIMULUS REDUNDANCY ON VISUAL SEARCH. Laurence D. Smith University of Maine
EFFECTS OF NOISY DISTRACTORS AND STIMULUS REDUNDANCY ON VISUAL SEARCH Laurence D. Smith University of Maine ldsmith@maine.maine.edu Ronald M. Pickett Marjan Trutschl Institute for Visualization and Perception
More informationThe Role of Color and Attention in Fast Natural Scene Recognition
Color and Fast Scene Recognition 1 The Role of Color and Attention in Fast Natural Scene Recognition Angela Chapman Department of Cognitive and Neural Systems Boston University 677 Beacon St. Boston, MA
More informationPsych 333, Winter 2008, Instructor Boynton, Exam 2
Name: ID # ID: A Psych 333, Winter 2008, Instructor Boynton, Exam 2 Multiple Choice (38 questions, 1 point each) Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.
More informationTechnical Specifications
Technical Specifications In order to provide summary information across a set of exercises, all tests must employ some form of scoring models. The most familiar of these scoring models is the one typically
More informationErica J. Yoon Introduction
Replication of The fluency of social hierarchy: the ease with which hierarchical relationships are seen, remembered, learned, and liked Zitek & Tiedens (2012, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
More informationChanging expectations about speed alters perceived motion direction
Current Biology, in press Supplemental Information: Changing expectations about speed alters perceived motion direction Grigorios Sotiropoulos, Aaron R. Seitz, and Peggy Seriès Supplemental Data Detailed
More informationFinal Exam PS 217, Fall 2010
Final Exam PS 27, Fall 200. Farzin, et al. (200) wrote an article that appeared in Psychological Science titled: Spatial resolution of conscious visual perception in infants. The abstract read: Humans
More informationA model of parallel time estimation
A model of parallel time estimation Hedderik van Rijn 1 and Niels Taatgen 1,2 1 Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS Groningen 2 Department of Psychology,
More informationGrace Iarocci Ph.D., R. Psych., Associate Professor of Psychology Simon Fraser University
Grace Iarocci Ph.D., R. Psych., Associate Professor of Psychology Simon Fraser University Theoretical perspective on ASD Where does attention and perception fit within the diagnostic triad of impairments?
More informationThe impact of item clustering on visual search: It all depends on the nature of the visual search
Journal of Vision (2010) 10(14):24, 1 9 http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/14/24 1 The impact of item clustering on visual search: It all depends on the nature of the visual search Yaoda Xu Department
More informationThank you Dr. XXXX; I am going to be talking briefly about my EMA study of attention training in cigarette smokers.
Thank you Dr. XXXX; I am going to be talking briefly about my EMA study of attention training in cigarette smokers. 1 This work is a result of the combined efforts of myself and my research advisor, Dr.
More informationFeature Integration Theory Revisited: Dissociating Feature Detection and Attentional Guidance in Visual Search
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, Vol. 35, No. 1, 119 132 2009 American Psychological Association 0096-1523/09/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.35.1.119 Feature Integration
More informationPrime display offset modulates negative priming only for easy-selection tasks
Memory & Cognition 2007, 35 (3), 504-513 Prime display offset modulates negative priming only for easy-selection tasks Christian Frings Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany and Peter Wühr Friedrich
More information