*2) Interprets relevance of context

Transcription

1 Descriptors Students will be able to demonstrate their analytical reasoning abilities to interpret, evaluate, and synthesize information across disciplines. Criteria (2) Standard (1) Does Not Meet NA 1) Identifies main argument(s) Is able to correctly identify all main points and unstated implications. Manipulates argument(s) and prioritizes or evaluates relative weight of components in argument(s). Is able to identify main argument(s) appropriately and selects the most relevant points in relation to the provided question(s). Inadequately or partially identifies main argument(s). Provides some description of main argument(s) but with errors or ambiguities or fails to identify, or misidentifies, main argument(s). Fails to identify main components in argument(s). *2) Interprets relevance of context Is able to Interpret all relevant contexts and the interplay or tensions among them. Is able to accurately relate material to relevant contexts. Some recognition of the interplay or tension among contexts. Inadequately relates material to relevant contexts. Attempts to identify context but with errors or ambiguities or fails to identify or comment upon relevant contexts. Misidentifies contexts. Only considers topic in isolation. 3) Evaluates assumptions 4) Analyzes and assesses evidence 5) Synthesizes conclusions. 6) Solves problems Is able to accurately identify underlying assumptions and evaluates their impact and is able to Identify additional minor or secondary assumptions and evaluates their relevance. Is able to consider all relevant data present and provides alternative and additional sources of relevant data and evidence. Identifies and analyzes counter arguments in detail. Is able to draw well-articulated, logical conclusions. Conclusions synthesize all the relevant material and discuss it in details and able to Consider alternate conclusions fully and discusses their relevant merits. Is able to analyze the implications of solutions to complex and controversial problems where no one solution is best; develops the best solution to a problem using professional reasoning and expertise, where no precedent or model is available. Is able to accurately identify underlying assumptions and evaluates their impact Is able to consider all the relevant data presented and evaluates their reliability and relevance. Presents limited alternative sources of evidence and counterarguments. Is able to draw well-articulated, logical conclusions. Conclusions synthesize all the relevant material and discuss it in detail. Is able to explain the best solution to a moderately complex problem using information from one or two professional sources; identifies the best solution to a problem by applying a complex or integrated example or model. *CONTEXT: cultural, social, political, historical, economic, ethical, scientific, technological, etc. Identifies main assumptions but does not evaluate them or fails to identify or comment upon assumptions. Incorrectly identifies assumptions. Identifies some important evidence but remains mainly descriptive. Partially or Insufficiently developed analysis of reliability, credibility and/or relevance or fails to examine evidence or data. Misunderstands the relationship among key points in argument. Ignores important points. Deploys faulty logic. Draws weak conclusions that do not fully synthesize relevant material or fails to draw explicit conclusions. No additional content. Fails to move beyond basic summary. Only able to identify a solution to a simple problem from a given list of alternatives; only identifies a solution to a problem using a specific example or model to copy from.

2 Students will be able to demonstrate their analytical reasoning abilities to interpret, evaluate, and synthesize information across disciplines. Rate the student for each outcome, as,, Below, or Not applicable. You may write a Descending number (3, 2, 1, 0), in the rated box for each outcome. For outcomes that don t apply to a specific project, please select. (2) (1) Does Not Meet Comments Interprets relevance of context* Solves problems *CONTEXT: cultural, social, political, historical, economic, ethical, scientific, technological, etc.

3 SETS A1, A2, and A3 Students will be able to demonstrate their analytical reasoning abilities to interpret, evaluate, and synthesize information across disciplines. Rate the student for each outcome, as,, Does Not Meet, or Not applicable. You may write a Descending number (2, 1, 0), in the rated box for each outcome. For outcomes that don t apply to a specific project, please select. (2) (1) Does Not Meet percentage of students who met or exceeded the A1+A2+A3 A1+A2+A3 A1+A2+A3 Interprets relevance of context 0+2+3=5 56% 3+1+0= =0 100% 1+1+3=5 56% 2+2+0= =0 100% 1+0+3= =5 56% 0+0+0=0 100% Solves problems 1+3+3=7 78% 2+0+0=2 22% 0+0+0=0 100% Percentage above shows an average per category of the points which all s gave per item. Total number of assignments per this set 3 Number of s for the set: 3 Each assignment in this set was scored three times.

4 SETS B1, B2, and B3 Students will be able to demonstrate their analytical reasoning abilities to interpret, evaluate, and synthesize information across disciplines. Rate the student for each outcome, as,, Does Not Meet, or Not applicable. You may write a Descending number (2, 1, 0), in the rated box for each outcome. For outcomes that don t apply to a specific project, please select. (2) (1) B1+B2+B3 given by three B1+B2+B3 Does Not Meet B1+B2+B3 B1 percentage of students who met or exceeded the =19 40% 9+5+9= =6 12% 88% Interprets relevance of context =20 42% 8+4+9= =7 14% 88% 0+8+8=16 33% 2+8+8=18 38% =14 29% 71% =20 42% 7+6+7=20 42% 8+0+0=8 16% 84% 0+2+6=8 17% =24 50% =16 33% 67% Solves problems 0+0+6=6 6% =11 23% =15 31% 16 29% Percentage above shows an average per category of the points which all s gave per item. Total number of assignments per this set 16 Number of s for the set: 3 Each assignment in this set was scored three times.

5 SETS C1, C2, and C3 Students will be able to demonstrate their analytical reasoning abilities to interpret, evaluate, and synthesize information across disciplines. Rate the student for each outcome, as,, Does Not Meet, or Not applicable. You may write a Descending number (2, 1, 0), in the rated box for each outcome. For outcomes that don t apply to a specific project, please select. (2) (1) Does Not Meet percentage of students who met or exceeded the C1+C2+C3 C1+C2+C3 C1+C2+C3 C =23 45% = =5 10% 89% Interprets relevance of context =19 37% =21 41% =10 20% 78% =18 35% 8+6+3=17 33% =16 31% =15 29% =22 43% =12 24% 72% =17 33% =21 41% =11 22% 74% Solves problems 5+0+1=6 12% = % =29 57% 1 40% Percentage above shows an average per category of the points which all s gave per item. Total number of assignments per this set 17 Number of s for the set: 3 Each assignment in this set was scored three times.

6 SETS D1, D2, and D3 Students will be able to demonstrate their analytical reasoning abilities to interpret, evaluate, and synthesize information across disciplines. Rate the student for each outcome, as,, Does Not Meet, or Not applicable. You may write a Descending number (2, 1, 0), in the rated box for each outcome. For outcomes that don t apply to a specific project, please select. (2) (1) Does Not Meet percentage of students who met or exceeded the D1+D2+D3 D1+D2+D3 D1+D2+D3 Interprets relevance of context =28 49% =23 40% 6+0+0=6 11% 89% =29 51% = =3.5% 95% =27 43% =28 49% 2+0+0=2.4% 92% Solves problems =28 49% =26 46% 3+0+0=3.5% 95% Percentage above shows an average per category of the points which all s gave per item. Total number of assignments per this set 19 Number of s for the set: 3 Each assignment in this set was scored three times.

7 Students will be able to demonstrate their analytical reasoning abilities to interpret, evaluate, and synthesize information across disciplines. Percentage of students who met or exceeded the Percentage of students who did not meet Interprets relevance of context* Solves problems Sets of Assignments Submitted 4 Total Number of Assignments 55 89% 11% 88% 12% 70% 30% 88% 12% 85% 15% 68% 32% *CONTEXT: cultural, social, political, historical, economic, ethical, scientific, technological, etc.

8 100% Percentage of students who met or exceeded the 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% Interprets relevance of context* Solves problems 10% 0% Identifies main argument(s) Interprets relevance of context* Evaluates assumptions Analyzes and assesses evidence Synthesizes conclusions Solves problems