Nature Genetics: doi: /ng.2995

Similar documents
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

iplex genotyping IDH1 and IDH2 assays utilized the following primer sets (forward and reverse primers along with extension primers).

DNA methylation signatures for 2016 WHO classification subtypes of diffuse gliomas

Examining large groups of cancer patients to identify ways of predicting which therapies cancers might respond to.

Supplemental Information. Molecular, Pathological, Radiological, and Immune. Profiling of Non-brainstem Pediatric High-Grade

Genomic analysis of childhood High grade glial (HGG) brain tumors

Nature Medicine: doi: /nm.3967

Nature Genetics: doi: /ng Supplementary Figure 1. Details of sequencing analysis.

Supplementary Appendix

Nature Genetics: doi: /ng Supplementary Figure 1. SEER data for male and female cancer incidence from

Pharmacologic inhibition of histone demethylation as a therapy for pediatric brainstem glioma

Classification of Diffuse Gliomas: Progress, Pearls and Pitfalls. Rob Macaulay Neuropathologist, MCC October 21, 2017

CDH1 truncating alterations were detected in all six plasmacytoid-variant bladder tumors analyzed by whole-exome sequencing.

Case Presentation: USCAP Jason T. Huse, MD, PhD Assistant Member Department of Pathology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Clinical significance of genetic analysis in glioblastoma treatment

Corporate Medical Policy

PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER CENTRE CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES

gliomas. Fetal brain expected who each low-

A clinical perspective on neuropathology and molecular genetics in brain tumors

Supplementary Figure 1: High-throughput profiling of survival after exposure to - radiation. (a) Cells were plated in at least 7 wells in a 384-well

Supplementary Information

CNS Tumors: The Med Onc Perspective. Ronald J. Scheff, MD Associate Clinical Professor Weill Medical College of Cornell U.

Nature Methods: doi: /nmeth.3115

Enterprise Interest None

S1 Appendix: Figs A G and Table A. b Normal Generalized Fraction 0.075

Expert-guided Visual Exploration (EVE) for patient stratification. Hamid Bolouri, Lue-Ping Zhao, Eric C. Holland

Supplementary Appendix

MSI positive MSI negative

Clinical Trials for Adult Brain Tumors - the Imaging Perspective

Whole Genome and Transcriptome Analysis of Anaplastic Meningioma. Patrick Tarpey Cancer Genome Project Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

Supplementary Figure 1. Schematic diagram of o2n-seq. Double-stranded DNA was sheared, end-repaired, and underwent A-tailing by standard protocols.

성균관대학교삼성창원병원신경외과학교실신경종양학 김영준. KNS-MT-03 (April 15, 2015)

Genomic Methods in Cancer Epigenetic Dysregulation

MolDX: Chromosome 1p/19q deletion analysis

Supplementary Figure 1. Estimation of tumour content

A mathematical model for short-term vs. long-term survival in patients with. glioma

PROPOSED/DRAFT Local Coverage Determination (LCD): MolDX: Chromosome 1p/19q deletion analysis (DL36483)

Supplementary Figure 1. IDH1 and IDH2 mutation site sequences on WHO grade III

Detection of IDH1 mutation in human gliomas: comparison of immunohistochemistry and sequencing

Research Article Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-1 Mutations as Prognostic Biomarker in Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients in West Bohemia

Gliomas in the 2016 WHO Classification of CNS Tumors

7SK ChIRP-seq is specifically RNA dependent and conserved between mice and humans.

Supplementary Materials for

Nature Genetics: doi: /ng Supplementary Figure 1. Depths and coverages in whole-exome and targeted deep sequencing data.

Concomitant (without adjuvant) temozolomide and radiation to treat glioblastoma: A retrospective study

Supporting Information

Supplementary Appendix

Frequency(%) KRAS G12 KRAS G13 KRAS A146 KRAS Q61 KRAS K117N PIK3CA H1047 PIK3CA E545 PIK3CA E542K PIK3CA Q546. EGFR exon19 NFS-indel EGFR L858R

Precision medicine for gliomas

Single-strand DNA library preparation improves sequencing of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cancer DNA

Supplementary Figures

underlying metastasis and recurrence in HNSCC, we analyzed two groups of patients. The

Supplementary Figure 1

Supplementary Figure 1: Expression of NFAT proteins in Nfat2-deleted B cells (a+b) Protein expression of NFAT2 (a) and NFAT1 (b) in isolated splenic

WHO 2016 CNS Tumor Classification Update. DISCLOSURES (Arie Perry, MD) PATTERN RECOGNITION. Arie Perry, M.D. Director, Neuropathology

PI3-Kinase Signaling. Rational Incorporation of Novel Agents into Multimodality Therapy. PI3-kinase. PI3-kinase 5/2/2010

Journal: Nature Methods

Computer Science, Biology, and Biomedical Informatics (CoSBBI) Outline. Molecular Biology of Cancer AND. Goals/Expectations. David Boone 7/1/2015

No evidence of clonally selected somatic genomic alterations in cancer associated

Reviewer #1 (Remarks to the Author)

The 16th KJC Bioinformatics Symposium Integrative analysis identifies potential DNA methylation biomarkers for pan-cancer diagnosis and prognosis

Supplementary Material

Description of Supplementary Files. File Name: Supplementary Information Description: Supplementary Figures and Supplementary Tables

CNS pathology Third year medical students. Dr Heyam Awad 2018 Lecture 12: CNS tumours 2/3

Supplementary Online Content

Cilengitide (Impetreve) for glioblastoma multiforme. February 2012

Radioterapia no Tratamento dos Gliomas de Baixo Grau

Problem Set 8 Key 1 of 8

CNS SESSION 3/8/ th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case based Approach

Precision medicine: How to exploit the growing knowledge on the evolving genomes of cells to improve cancer prevention and therapy.

AP VP DLP H&E. p-akt DLP

Lynch Syndrome Screening for Endometrial Cancer: Basic Concepts 1/16/2017

Supplementary information. Supplementary figure 1. Flow chart of study design

Chapter 4 Cellular Oncogenes ~ 4.6 -

Assessment performed on Friday, September 18, 2015, at Vancouver General Hospital

Contemporary Management of Glioblastoma

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 27 June 2007 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta121

Supplementary. properties of. network types. randomly sampled. subsets (75%

Supplementary Note. Nature Genetics: doi: /ng.2928

Meta-analysis of IDH-mutant cancers identifies EBF1 as a novel interaction partner for

Cancer Treatment by Alternating Electric Fields (TTFields); Physical Basis & Clinical Trial Results. Madrid, March 2015

Supplementary Table S1. List of PTPRK-RSPO3 gene fusions in TCGA's colon cancer cohort. Chr. # of Gene 2. Chr. # of Gene 1

Bin Liu, Lei Yang, Binfang Huang, Mei Cheng, Hui Wang, Yinyan Li, Dongsheng Huang, Jian Zheng,

SALSA MLPA probemix P315-B1 EGFR

21/03/2017. Disclosure. Practice Changing Articles in Neuro Oncology for 2016/17. Gliomas. Objectives. Gliomas. No conflicts to declare

Supplementary Figures

Disclaimers. Molecular pathology of brain tumors. Some aspects only. Some details are inevitably personal opinions

Integrating molecular markers into the World Health Organization classification of CNS tumors: a survey of the neuro-oncology community

Supplemental Figure 1. Genes showing ectopic H3K9 dimethylation in this study are DNA hypermethylated in Lister et al. study.

Development of Carcinoma Pathways

The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network* abstract

BRAF Testing In The Elderly: Same As in Younger Patients?

Supplementary Information Titles Journal: Nature Medicine

Nature Genetics: doi: /ng Supplementary Figure 1. Assessment of sample purity and quality.

Morphological features and genetic alterations

Nature Genetics: doi: /ng Supplementary Figure 1. HOX fusions enhance self-renewal capacity.

Supplemental Data: Detailed Characteristics of Patients with MKRN3. Patient 1 was born after an uneventful pregnancy. She presented in our

Results and Discussion of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase. Activation

2017 Diagnostic Slide Session Case 3

IDH1 R132H/ATRX Immunohistochemical validation

Transcription:

Supplementary Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier survival curves of patients with brainstem tumors. (a) Comparison of patients with PPM1D mutation versus wild-type PPM1D. (b) Comparison of patients with PPM1D mutation versus TP53 mutation. (c) Comparison of patients with PPM1D/H3F3A mutations versus TP53/H3F3A mutations.

Supplementary Figure 2 Consensus clustering by methylation β value and Lorenz curve. Our three groups could be mapped almost perfectly to IDH1 and H3F3A mutation status. We also noted that samples with hemizygous IDH1 mutation could be differentiated from samples with heterozygous IDH1 mutation.

Supplementary Figure 3 Principal-component analysis for our 45 samples. Tumor samples with H3F3A mutation (HIST), IDH1 mutation (IDH) and neither mutation (WT) could be differentiated by DNA methylation levels.

Supplementary Figure 4 Box plot of DNA methylation levels for sample averages. The group with IDH1 mutation shows a hypermethylated pattern, whereas the group with H3F3A mutation shows a hypomethylated pattern.

Supplementary Figure 5 Density plot of probes for DNA methylation levels (β values) in different groups. The group with IDH1 mutation (red) shows a hypermethylated pattern, and the group with H3F3A (K27) mutation (orange) shows a hypomethylated pattern.

Supplementary Figure 6 Electropherograms of HCT116 parental, repaired 1 and repaired 2 lines. Electropherograms demonstrate repair of the heterozygous frameshift mutation to a wild-type PPM1D sequence in these lines.

Supplementary Figure 7 Colony formation assay for the HCT116 parental, repaired 1 and repaired 2 lines. Colony formation was assessed in the absence of ionizing radiation and under 2 Gy or 4 Gy of ionizing radiation. Representative stained plates with colony formation are shown.

Supplementary Table 1 Summary table of the 50 cases included in this genomic study Patient Gender Age Histopathology Grade Location Sequencing ID 234 female 30 Astrocytoma III medulla and C2 WES, TSS 235 male 31 Oligodendroglioma III right medulla WES, TSS 237 female 44 Oligoastrocytoma II pons and medulla WES, TSS 238 male 25 GBM IV thalamus, pons, medulla and WES, TSS cerebellum 239 female 42 Oligoastrocytoma III right pons and medulla WES, TSS 240 female 10 Oligoastrocytoma III right pons WES, TSS 241 female 23 Astrocytoma III left midbrain and left thalamus WES, TSS 242 female 49 Oligoastrocytoma III left pons WES, TSS 243 male 30 Oligoastrocytoma III midbrain WES, TSS 244 male 38 Oligoastrocytoma II pons and medulla WES, TSS 245 male 45 Oligoastrocytoma II midbrain,pons,medulla and cerebellum WES, TSS 246 male 16 Astrocytoma II pons WES, TSS 247 male 25 GBM IV pons and medulla WES, TSS 313 male 20 GBM IV brainstem WES, TSS 248 male 48 Oligodendroglioma III left thalamus WES, TSS 249 female 24 Oligoastrocytoma III left thalamus WES, TSS 250 male 11 Astrocytoma III right thalamus WES, TSS 251 male 42 Astrocytoma III right thalamus WES, TSS 252 female 53 Oligoastrocytoma II left thalamus + midbrain WES, TSS 254 male 12 Oligodendroglioma III right thalamus WES, TSS 255 female 5 Oligoastrocytoma II left thalamus + midbrain WES, TSS 257 male 27 Astrocytoma II bilareral thalamus, mainly in right WES, TSS 258 male 41 GBM IV right thalamus WES, TSS 259 male 24 GBM IV right thalamus, third and left ventricle WES, TSS 260 male 15 Astrocytoma II left thalamus WES, TSS 261 female 22 GBM IV left thalamus WES, TSS BST-2 female 10 Astrocytoma II left pons TSS 19 male 22 Oligoastrocytoma II right pons and right medulla TSS 8 male 47 GBM IV pons TSS 4 male 6 Astrocytoma II medulla and C7 TSS 6 female 21 Astrocytoma II pons TSS 13 male 46 Oligoastrocytoma II left pons TSS 16 female 38 Astrocytoma II right pons and right medulla TSS 2 male 41 Oligoastrocytoma II pons and medulla TSS BST-14 female 38 Oligoastrocytoma II pons TSS BST-15 female 32 Astrocytoma II pons TSS BST-17 male 31 Oligoastrocytoma II midbrain and the third ventricle TSS BST-20 female 10 Astrocytoma II pons TSS 3 male 12 Astrocytoma II medulla TSS 9 male 6 Astrocytoma II pons TSS 11 female 11 Oligoastrocytoma II medulla TSS 12 male 29 Astrocytoma III brainstem TSS 14 female 40 Astrocytoma II pons and medulla TSS

18 male 27 Astrocytoma II pons and medulla TSS 24 female 8 Astrocytoma III pons and medulla TSS 1 male 14 Oligoastrocytoma II right thalamus TSS 10 male 47 GBM IV right thalamus TSS 15 female 5 Astrocytoma III right thalamus TSS 21 male 23 GBM IV left thalamus TSS 23 female 44 GBM IV right thalamus TSS #WES: Whole Exome Sequencing, TSS: Targeted Sanger Sequencing

Supplementary Table 2 Summary table of Whole Exome Sequencing Statistics Case Number of somatic sequence alterations identified Number of somatic copy number alterations identified Sequenced Bases Mapped to Genome(G) Sequenced Bases Mapped to Target Regions(G) Fraction of Sequenced Bases Mapped to Target Regions Bases in target regions with at least 10 reads(m) Fraction of bases in target regions with at least 10 reads Average Number of Total High Quality Sequences at Each Base Average Number of Distinct High Quality Sequences at Each Base 234 Tumor 30 75 9.9 5.2 52.58% 50.19 92.41% 89.14 79.6 Normal 9.23 5.22 56.55% 50.72 93.40% 94.37 82.61 235 Tumor 24 55 9.84 5.27 53.49% 50.39 92.79% 90.69 79.57 Normal 8.3 4.62 55.63% 50.09 92.23% 83.62 75.13 237 Tumor 27 0 8.03 4.37 54.49% 50.17 92.38% 73.95 66.03 Normal 9.51 4.98 52.32% 50.6 93.17% 89.13 78.16 238 Tumor 29 150 10.9 6.3 57.91% 47.28 87.06% 109.01 68.39 Normal 9.12 5.02 55.02% 50.57 93.12% 89.87 77.26 239 Tumor 31 0 9.5 5.55 58.40% 50.68 93.32% 95.49 84.07 Normal 7.16 4.25 59.25% 50.15 92.35% 76.61 66.21 240 Tumor 19 0 9.62 5.56 57.73% 50.85 93.63% 95.39 85.8 Normal 9.01 5.24 58.19% 50.75 93.45% 94.69 82.06 241 Tumor 15 0 9.97 5.48 54.92% 50.46 92.92% 94.03 80.58 Normal 7.33 4.16 56.73% 49.97 92.01% 74.93 68.76 242 Tumor 69 0 8.83 4.78 54.14% 50.64 93.25% 81.1 71.37 Normal 11.13 6.71 60.30% 51.1 94.10% 120.99 97.04 243 Tumor 26 1 8.59 4.78 55.66% 50.66 93.29% 82.09 74.07 Normal 8.03 4.58 57.07% 50.23 92.50% 83.08 74.16 244 Tumor 20 0 9.29 4.86 52.27% 50.79 93.53% 83.65 77.13 Normal 9.15 5.23 57.11% 50.76 93.47% 94.62 83.49 245 Tumor 25 0 9.83 5.57 56.63% 50.73 93.41% 95.86 82.24 Normal 8.48 4.86 57.27% 50.29 92.61% 87.99 75.57 246 Tumor 27 11 9.19 5.09 55.36% 49.99 92.05% 87.61 76.83 Normal 8.09 4.59 56.68% 50.76 93.48% 82.48 72.13 247 Tumor 21 0 9.35 5.05 53.98% 49.86 91.82% 73.86 64.99 Normal 7.99 4.42 55.34% 49.64 91.41% 73.32 63.55 248 Tumor 34 14 10.11 5.44 53.79% 50.08 92.23% 79.32 69.82 Normal 8.92 4.8 53.79% 50.18 92.39% 79.38 69.04 249 Tumor 30 126 7.95 4.38 55.11% 49.99 92.05% 65.24 60.46 Normal 11.34 7.02 61.93% 50.98 93.88% 120.49 100.49 250 Tumor 19 40 6.59 3.64 55.15% 48.66 89.60% 55.07 51.19 Normal 8.03 4.59 57.21% 50.04 92.14% 77.19 67.9 251 Tumor 23 35 8.87 4.98 56.16% 49.45 91.07% 77.77 61.76 Normal 8.42 4.68 55.58% 49.53 91.21% 80.65 70.75 252 Tumor 42 98 8.77 5.03 57.37% 49.37 90.91% 78.38 66.08 Normal 8.61 4.72 54.83% 49.29 90.76% 81.56 61.34 254 Tumor 15 39 7.29 4.2 57.53% 49.84 91.78% 62.28 56.32 Normal 9.37 5.18 55.24% 49.47 91.09% 88.1 63 255 Tumor 4 0 7.79 4.11 52.68% 49.42 91.00% 59.48 54.12 Normal 9.61 5.37 55.87% 50.21 92.47% 89.93 80.29

257 Tumor 37 14 8.53 5.07 59.46% 50.32 92.66% 78.64 68.18 Normal 7.04 3.98 56.53% 49.24 90.67% 68.53 62.41 258 Tumor 53 102 9.95 6.52 65.58% 51.04 93.98% 102.45 83.65 Normal 8.37 4.82 57.67% 49.68 91.48% 83.37 74.53 259 Tumor 17 0 13.16 7.11 54.03% 51.38 94.62% 108.68 97.98 Normal 10.47 5.71 54.52% 50.65 93.26% 97.63 84.28 260 Tumor 23 5 14.34 8.64 60.27% 51.54 94.90% 131.42 72.96 Normal 11.71 6.85 58.54% 51.31 94.48% 117.5 100.23 261 Tumor 25 7 9.56 5.79 60.61% 50.49 92.98% 88.32 71.42 Normal 11.13 6.78 60.87% 51.17 94.22% 115.79 99.11 313 Tumor 23 NA 20.15 12.12 60.14% 52 96% 193 127 Normal 17.98 10.92 60.71% 52.03 96% 191 116

Supplementary Table 5 Summary table of Sanger sequencing of validation for randomly selected mutations from whole exome sequencing Number of Mutations Selected for Validation 106 Number of Successful PCR Amplification 91 Successful Rate of PCR 86% Number of Confirmed Mutations 81 Sensitivity of Whole Exome Sequencing 89%

Supplementary Table 6 Summary and Statistical Analysis of patients age, groups by different gene mutations median p-value IDH1 MUT (n=8) 42.5 0.00555 (t-test) IDH1 WT (n=42) 24 H3F3A MUT (n=27) 24 0.1731 (t-test) H3F3A WT (n=23) 32 TP53 MUT (n=32) 26 0.6321 (t-test) TP53 WT (n=18) 24 PPM1D MUT/ H3F3A MUT in brainstem (n= 6) 25.5 0.4787 (Wilcoxon rank sum test) TP53 MUT/H3F3A MUT in brainstem (n=9) 25

Supplementary Table 7 Survival and treatment information for brainstem glioma patients Case ID Histopathology Grade Overall Survival (Month) Survival Status (1=death, 0=living) Treatment BST-2 Astrocytoma II 11.25 1 Surgery + Chemotherapy 234 Astrocytoma III 2 1 Surgery 19 Oligoastrocytoma II 0.5 1 Surgery 235 Oligodendroglioma III 1 1 Surgery 8 GBM IV 4 1 Surgery 4 Astrocytoma II 27.3 0 Surgery 237 Oligoastrocytoma II 28.3 0 Surgery 238 GBM IV 13 1 Surgery 6 Astrocytoma II 29.05 0 Surgery 13 Oligoastrocytoma II 26.3 0 Surgery 16 Astrocytoma II 32.05 0 Surgery + Radiotherapy 239 Oligoastrocytoma III 0.75 1 Surgery 240 Oligoastrocytoma III 5 1 Surgery + Radiotherapy 2 Oligoastrocytoma II 13.75 0 Surgery + Radiotherapy 241 Astrocytoma III 31.8 0 Surgery + Concurrent chemoradiotherapy + adjuvant chemotherapy 242 Oligoastrocytoma III 32.3 0 Surgery + Concurrent chemoradiotherapy 243 Oligoastrocytoma III 29 1 Surgery + Concurrent chemoradiotherapy + adjuvant chemotherapy 244 Oligoastrocytoma II 33.05 0 Surgery + Radiotherapy BST-14 Oligoastrocytoma II 33.8 0 Surgery + Radiotherapy BST-15 Astrocytoma II 14 1 Surgery 245 Oligoastrocytoma II 35.3 0 Surgery + Concurrent chemoradiotherapy + adjuvant chemotherapy BST-17 Oligoastrocytoma II 18 1 Surgery + Concurrent chemoradiotherapy + adjuvant chemotherapy 246 Astrocytoma II 17 1 Surgery 247 GBM IV 2 0 Surgery BST-20 Astrocytoma II 27.3 0 Surgery 3 Astrocytoma II 5 1 Surgery 9 Astrocytoma II 18.3 0 Surgery 11 Oligoastrocytoma II 17 0 Surgery + Radiotherapy 12 Astrocytoma III 0.25 0 Surgery 14 Astrocytoma II 3 0 Surgery 18 Astrocytoma II 20.3 1 Surgery + Concurrent chemoradiotherapy 24 Astrocytoma III 10.75 1 Surgery 313 GBM IV 18 0 Surgery + Radiotherapy

Supplementary Table 9 Primers used for generating the truncating mutations (PPM1D472 and PPM1D540) Forward PPM1D472 5'-GGAATGGCGGGGCTGTACTCGCTG-3' PPM1D540 5'-GGAATGGCGGGGCTGTACTCGCTG-3' Reverse 5'-GGGTTATGGATCTTTTGAGGGTATGACTAC-3' 5'-GGGCTATTCTAATGTCCTTTTAAAGTTTGTTGG-3'