Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ as Revealed by Large-Core Needle Breast Biopsy: Results of Surgical Excision
|
|
- Elvin Haynes
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Marla L. Rosenfield Darling 1 Darrell N. Smith 1 Susan C. Lester 2 Carolyn Kaelin 3 Donna-Lee G. Selland 1 Christine M. Denison 1 Pamela J. DiPiro 1 David I. Rose 1 Esther Rhei 3 Jack E. Meyer 1 Received January 28, 2000; accepted after revision May 2, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women s Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA Address correspondence to M. L. Rosenfield Darling. 2 Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women s Hospital, Boston, MA Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women s Hospital, Boston, MA AJR 2000;175: X/00/ American Roentgen Ray Society Atypical Hyperplasia and In Situ as Revealed by Large-Core Needle Breast Biopsy: Results of Surgical Excision OBJECTIVE. This investigation compares the frequency of histologic underestimation of breast carcinoma that occurs when a large-core needle biopsy reveals atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ with the automated 14-gauge needle, the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device, and the 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Evaluation of 428 large-core needle biopsies yielding atypical ductal hyperplasia (139 lesions) or ductal carcinoma in situ (289 lesions) was performed. The results of subsequent surgical excision were retrospectively compared with the needle biopsy results. RESULTS. For lesions initially diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ, underestimation of invasive ductal carcinoma was significantly less frequent using the 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device when compared with the automated 14-gauge needle (10% versus 21%, p < 0.05) but was not significantly less frequent when compared with the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted device (10% versus 17%, p > 0.1). For lesions diagnosed initially as atypical ductal hyperplasia, underestimation of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma was significantly less frequent using the 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device compared with the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted device (19% versus 39%, p = 0.025) and with the automated 14-gauge needle (19% versus 44%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION. The frequency of histologic underestimation of breast carcinoma in lesions initially diagnosed as atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ using large-core needle biopsy is substantially lower with the 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted device than with the automated 14-gauge needle and with the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted device. L arge-core needle biopsy of the breast has become a widely used alternative to open surgical biopsy for the initial diagnosis of suspicious abnormalities visible on mammography or sonography. Early experiences with a 14- gauge automated biopsy needle showed that large-core needle biopsy had a diagnostic accuracy comparable with that of surgical excision after wire localization [1 4]. Technical advances have allowed further improvement in accuracy with the introduction of the directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device, allowing retrieval of larger quantities of tissue with a single insertion of a 14- or 11-gauge needle using stereotactic guidance [5 7]. Despite improvements in technique, histologic underestimation of disease frequently occurs when lesions initially diagnosed using large-core needle biopsy as either atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ are excised surgically. Previous reports have cited underestimation rates ranging from 11% to 75% for atypical ductal hyperplasia (subsequently diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive ductal carcinoma after surgical excision) and from 15% to 35% for ductal carcinoma in situ (subsequently diagnosed as invasive ductal carcinoma) using an automated 14-gauge needle [4, 8 23]. The few groups of researchers evaluating the directional vacuum-assisted device with a 14- gauge needle have shown improvement in underestimation rates ranging from 0% to 38% for atypical ductal hyperplasia and from 0% to 19% for ductal carcinoma in situ [14, 16, 17, 23]. Recent experiences with the 11- gauge directional vacuum-assisted device have been reported that suggest further slight improvement, citing underestimation rates of AJR:175, November
2 Darling et al. from 10% to 27% for atypical ductal hyperplasia and from 4% to 15% for ductal carcinoma in situ [20, 22 26]. This investigation was undertaken to evaluate the results of surgical excision of a large series of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions diagnosed using large-core needle biopsy. The frequencies of histologic underestimation of lesions diagnosed using the automated 14-gauge needle, the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted device, and the 11-gauge directional vacuumassisted device were compared. Subjects and Methods From August 1, 1991, to December 31, 1999, 3873 imaging-guided large-core needle biopsies of the breast were performed at our hospital. Included in this experience were 2364 masses and 1509 clusters of calcifications. A retrospective review of the results of these large-core needle biopsies and subsequent wire localization and surgical excision was performed. There were 292 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (252 clusters of calcifications and 40 masses) and 148 cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia (122 clusters of calcifications and 26 masses) for a total of 440 lesions in 413 patients. Patients ranged in age from 24 to 89 years, with a mean age of 54 years and a median age of 52 years. Lesion size ranged from 2 to 80 mm (mean, 12.6 mm) for ductal carcinoma in situ lesions and from 2 to 41 mm (mean, 9.7 mm) for atypical ductal hyperplasia lesions. Surgical excision with preoperative wire localization of each of these 440 lesions was recommended and was performed in 428 (97.3%). The final histologic diagnosis was compared with the large-core needle biopsy diagnosis. Among the 12 patients who did not undergo surgery were two with ductal carcinoma in situ and three with atypical ductal hyperplasia who refused surgery and elected for mammographic follow-up at 6-month intervals. The remaining seven were patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia (n = 6) and ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 1) who delayed surgical excision. Of the 428 biopsies yielding ductal carcinoma in situ or atypical ductal hyperplasia for which surgical follow-up was obtained, 403 were performed using stereotactic guidance on a dedicated stereotactic core biopsy unit (Mammotest [August 1991 through August 1994], Fischer Imaging, Denver, CO; and DSM [September 1994 through December 1999], Lorad, Danbury, CT), which was equipped with digital imaging beginning in Sixty-seven biopsies (40 calcifications and 27 masses) were performed with a 14-gauge automated biopsy device using the multiple-pass technique [4]; four to 11 core samples (mean, 7 samples) were obtained from each cluster of calcifications and three to eight core samples (mean, 5 samples) were obtained from each mass. From May 1996 through December 1999, all stereotactic biopsies were performed with a directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device (Mammotome; Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH) using a standardized technique that has been previously described [7]. These included 75 lesions (69 clusters of calcifications and 6 masses) biopsied with a 14-gauge needle (4 15 core samples; mean, 8 samples) and 261 lesions (255 clusters of calcifications and 6 masses) biopsied with an 11-gauge needle (5 22 core samples; mean, 9 samples). For calcification sampling, if a specimen radiograph did not show any particles of calcification, additional samples were removed [27]. Samples of targeted calcifications were obtained in all cases. For stereotactic biopsies using the 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device, if complete mammographic removal of the lesion occurred, a 2 2 mm radiopaque localizing clip (MicroMark; Ethicon Endo-Surgery) was inserted into the biopsy site to provide an accurate target for wire localization before excisional biopsy should it be necessary [23, 28, 29]. The remaining 25 lesions yielding ductal carcinoma in situ or atypical ductal hyperplasia on large-core needle biopsy were masses that were biopsied with an automated 14-gauge biopsy needle using sonographic guidance with a 7.5-MHz linear array transducer (AI Performa Plus; Acoustic Imaging, Denver, CO). From four to eight core samples (mean, 5 samples) were obtained from each mass. No calcification clusters were sampled using sonographic guidance. Comparison was made between the histologic diagnosis based on large-core needle biopsy specimens and that based on surgically excised specimens for each lesion. A lesion was considered to be an underestimation if the surgical results yielded a discordant, higher grade lesion that is, an underestimation was a lesion diagnosed using large-core needle biopsy results as atypical ductal hyperplasia but found at surgical excision to be ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive ductal carcinoma. Similarly, an underestimation was a lesion diagnosed initially as ductal carcinoma in situ but found at surgery to be invasive ductal carcinoma. If no residual atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ was found in an accurately localized surgical specimen (needle biopsy tract identified), the lesion was considered to have been completely excised at the time of the large-core needle biopsy. The lesions for which the large-core needle biopsy diagnosis was the same as the surgical diagnosis were considered to be concordant. Statistical analysis was performed using either the chi-square test or Fisher s exact test when appropriate. Statistical significance was assigned a p value of less than Results Of the 289 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed using large-core needle biopsy, 40 were found at surgical excision to be invasive ductal carcinoma yielding an underestimation rate of 14% for the three devices combined. When evaluated separately, 14 (21%) of 67 underestimations of invasive ductal carcinoma were with the automated 14-gauge needle, eight (17%) of 47 underestimations of invasive ductal carcinoma were with the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device, and 18 (10%) of 175 underestimations of invasive ductal carcinoma were with the 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device (Table 1). When these results are compared, the number of underestimations with the 11- gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device is significantly lower than that with the automated 14-gauge needle (p < 0.05). Differences between the 11- and 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy devices (p > 0.1) and between the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted device and the automated 14-gauge needle (p > 0.5) did not reach statistical significance. Of the 139 lesions diagnosed as atypical ductal hyperplasia using large-core needle biopsy, 38 (27%) were found at surgical excision to be either ductal carcinoma in situ (27 lesions) or invasive ductal carcinoma (11 lesions) for the three devices combined. With the automated 14-gauge needle, 11 (44%) of 25 lesions (8 ductal carcinoma in situ and 3 invasive ductal carcinoma) were underestimated. With the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device, 11 (39%) of 28 lesions (8 ductal carcinoma in situ and 3 invasive ductal carcinoma) were underestimated. With the 11-gauge directional vacuumassisted biopsy device, 16 (19%) of 86 lesions (11 ductal carcinoma in situ and 5 invasive ductal carcinoma) were underestimated (Table 2). When these results are compared, the number of underestimations with the 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device is significantly lower than that with the automated 14-gauge needle (p = 0.01) and that with the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device (p = 0.025). Differences between the 14- gauge directional vacuum-assisted device and the automated 14-gauge needle did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.5). The initial lesion was completely excised at the time of core biopsy with no residual ductal carcinoma in situ or atypical ductal hyperplasia in the surgical specimen in 12 (13%) of 92 lesions with the automated 14-gauge needle, 10 (13%) of 75 lesions with the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device, and 56 (30%) of 185 lesions with the 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device. The slight increase in the rate of complete excision with the 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted 1342 AJR:175, November 2000
3 Large-Core Needle Biopsy of Breast TABLE 1 Lesions Results of Surgical Excision of In Situ No In Situ a Two procedures were performed using sonographic guidance. b Eight procedures were performed using sonographic guidance. c Five procedures were performed using sonographic guidance. No. of Cases of In Situ Invasive Underestimation of Invasive (%) Calcifications (n = 34) Masses (n = 29) 2 a 23 b 8 c 28 Total (n = 67) Calcifications (n = 43) Masses (n = 4) Total (n = 47) Calcifications (n = 173) Masses (n = 2) Total (n = 175) TABLE 2 Lesions Results of Surgical Excision of Atypical Hyperplasia No Atypical Hyperplasia No. of Cases of Atypical Hyperplasia In Situ Invasive Underestimation of In Situ and Invasive (%) Calcifications (n = 6) Masses (n = 19) 10 a 3 b 4 a 2 b 31 Total (n = 25) Calcifications (n = 26) Masses (n = 2) Total (n = 28) Calcifications (n = 82) Masses (n = 4) Total (n = 86) a Three procedures were performed using sonographic guidance. b Two procedures were performed using sonographic guidance. biopsy device compared with the 14-gauge needles was not statistically significant (p > 0.1). For all needle types combined, atypical ductal hyperplasia lesions were significantly more frequently completely excised than were ductal carcinoma in situ lesions (42% versus 6%, p < 0.001). For each needle type evaluated separately, complete excision of atypical ductal hyperplasia lesions was significantly more frequent than of ductal carcinoma in situ lesions with the 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted device (p < 0.001) and with the automated 14-gauge needle (p < 0.001). Differences in complete excision were not statistically significant when the two types of lesion were compared for the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device (p = 0.08). Discussion Atypical ductal hyperplasia is a histologically borderline lesion that has some but not all the features of ductal carcinoma in situ. These features may include a uniform population of cells, smooth geometric spaces between cells or micropapillary formations with even cellular placement, hyperchromatic nuclei, or any combination of these three features. Atypical ductal hyperplasia also lacks the extent of involvement required to meet the strict criteria for ductal carcinoma in situ. Involvement of a single duct or an aggregate diameter of involvement of less that 2 mm constitutes a diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia, and a more extensive lesion with the same histologic features is labeled ductal carcinoma in situ [30 32]. Given the importance placed on the extent of disease in differentiating between these two similar entities, the underestimation of ductal carcinoma in situ encountered when atypical ductal hyperplasia is retrieved on a large-core needle biopsy is likely explained by sampling error. A similar argument can be made for the phenomenon of underestimation of invasive carcinoma when areas of invasion are missed by large-core needle biopsy sampling and only areas containing ductal carcinoma in situ or atypical ductal hyperplasia are retrieved. The development of the directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device and the introduction of the 11-gauge needle has allowed improved accuracy in sampling clusters of calcifications and masses [7, 16, 17, 20, 22 24, 26]. Although the number of lesions in each of the prior series was relatively small, the collective data provided by these investigators indicate a decrease in the rate of histologic underestimation when comparing the 14-gauge automated needle with either the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device or the 11-gauge directional vacuumassisted biopsy device. The 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device removes a larger quantity of tissue per sample (96 mg) than the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device (40 mg) and the automated 14-gauge needle (17 mg) [5, 6]. Calcification retrieval and complete mammographic lesion removal are more likely with the directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device instrument [7, 17, 25]. These improvements in tissue acquisition afforded by the newer device have diminished, but not eliminated, the problem of underestimation. Regarding underestimations of invasive ductal carcinoma that yielded only ductal AJR:175, November
4 Darling et al. carcinoma in situ on large-core needle biopsy, our findings of a 21% underestimation rate for the automated 14-gauge needle, 17% for the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device, and 10% for the 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device are consistent with the work of other investigators and depict this trend toward increased accuracy. Previously reported underestimations range from 15% to 67% for ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed using the 14-gauge automated needle [4, 8, 10, 12, 17, 18, 20, 21]. This wide variability is likely caused by the small number of cases in some of these studies (range, 3 55 cases; mean, 26.5 cases). Burbank [17] found an underestimation rate of 0% of 32 ductal carcinoma in situ lesions biopsied with the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device, although lesion size, biopsy technique, and patient age were comparable with our series; this difference may be caused by the larger average number of specimens per lesion (and therefore the lower chance of sampling error) obtained in his study (mean, 26 specimens) compared with our study (mean, 8 specimens). For the 11-gauge directional vacuumassisted biopsy device, the previous series have shown underestimation rates of from 4% to 15% [20, 23, 24], similar to our findings. One additional series of 12 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ lesions reported by Liberman et al. [25] yielded zero underestimations. In this study, the mean number of specimens was greater than that in our series (15 versus 9 specimens), and this difference combined with the small number of cases may explain the lower underestimation rate compared with our data (Table 3). Evaluation of our data for the automated 14-gauge needle reveals that the overall underestimation rate of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma for lesions yielding only atypical ductal hyperplasia on large-core needle biopsy is 44%. Results of underestimation rates from prior studies [4, 8, 9, 11 19, 21 23] have ranged from 11% to 75%, with sample sizes of from two to 54 cases (mean, 22.4 cases), which is comparable with our series. The largest series was reported by Jackman et al. [16] in which 54 lesions yielding atypical ductal hyperplasia on large-core needle biopsy were surgically excised; 18 ductal carcinoma in situ lesions and eight invasive ductal carcinoma lesions were found for an overall underestimation rate of 48%. The lowest reported rate of underestimation for the automated 14-gauge TABLE 3 Comparison of Investigations of Large-Core Needle Biopsies Yielding In Situ Resulting in Underestimation of Invasive Researchers No. of Cases with Surgical Follow-Up needle is 11% by Lin et al. [19]. In this series, 18 lesions were diagnosed as atypical ductal hyperplasia on large-core needle biopsy; one lesion proved to be ductal carcinoma in situ after immediate excision, and one proved to be ductal carcinoma in situ after excision when the calcifications recurred at an unspecified follow-up interval. These investigators did not specify the mean number of core specimens obtained but state that it was rarely more than six (Table 4). Evaluation of the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device in our experience shows an underestimation rate of 39% for core biopsies yielding atypical ductal hyperplasia. This finding compares favorably with that of a series [23] that reported a 38% underestimation rate for this device, with 24 atypical ductal hyperplasia lesions yielding seven ductal carcinoma in situ and two invasive ductal carcinoma lesions at excision. Both of these rates are higher than the two rates reported in the other large series for this device: Burbank [17] had a 0% underestimation rate for eight lesions, and Jackman et al. [16] showed an overall underestimation of 18% for 74 atypical ductal hyperplasia lesions yielding 10 ductal carcinoma in situ No. of Cases of Invasive Revealed at Surgery Underestimation of Invasive (%) This study Won et al. [20] Jackman et al. [21] Liberman et al. [18] Burbank [17] Meyer et al. [4] Liberman et al. [10] Jackman et al. [8] This study Burbank [17] This study Won et al. [20] Meyer et al. [23] Liberman et al. [24] Liberman et al. [25] and three invasive ductal carcinoma lesions at surgery. In these latter two reports, the mean number of tissue specimens was greater than that in our series, 27 and 15.8 core specimens, respectively, compared with a mean of eight core specimens. Other factors such as lesion size, biopsy technique, and patient age are comparable; therefore, the lower average number of specimens obtained may again account for the higher rate of underestimation that we report in this group (Table 4). For the 86 biopsies performed with the 11- gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device yielding atypical ductal hyperplasia, the underestimation rate for ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma was 19%. Brem et al. [26] and Philpotts et al. [22] have recently reported similar results in their series with underestimation rates of 25% (4 of 16 lesions) and 26.7% (4 of 15 lesions), respectively. In an evaluation of calcium retrieval, Liberman et al. [24] reported a slightly lower underestimation rate, with one (10%) of 10 atypical ductal hyperplasia lesions revealing ductal carcinoma in situ at excision. Compared with the findings of Liberman et al., our mean number of core 1344 AJR:175, November 2000
5 Large-Core Needle Biopsy of Breast TABLE 4 Researchers Comparison of Investigations of Large-Core Needle Biopsies Yielding Atypical Hyperplasia Resulting in Underestimation of In Situ and Invasive with Surgical Follow-Up specimens was lower, with nine specimens versus 14 specimens. Because other factors were comparable, a smaller number of specimens combined with a larger number of cases may also account for the difference in this group (Table 4). We have shown that in our series of largecore biopsies, use of the 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device results in the lowest rate of underestimation of disease for lesions initially diagnosed as atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ when compared with other widely used needle types. On the basis of our experience, our current practice is to sample all suspicious No. of Cases of at Surgery of Invasive at Surgery Underestimation of In Situ and Invasive (%) This study Meyer et al. [23] Philpotts et al. [22] 30 6 a 20 Jackman et al. [21] Lin et al. [19] Stolier [14] Jackman et al. [16] Moore et al. [15] Gadzala et al. [13] Liberman et al. [18] Burbank [17] 18 8 a 44 Tocino et al. [12] Dershaw et al. [11] Meyer et al. [4] Liberman et al. [9] Jackman et al. [8] This study Meyer et al. [23] Stolier [14] Jackman et al. [16] Burbank [17] 8 0 a 0 This study Brem et al. [26] Meyer et al. [23] Philpotts et al. [22] 15 4 a 26.7 Liberman et al. [24] calcifications judged to be amenable to stereotactic biopsy using the 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device. If atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ is diagnosed on the basis of the large-core needle biopsy, surgical excision is recommended. Although our average number of core specimens obtained with the 11- gauge needle was less than that of those few studies showing lower underestimation rates, the sample sizes of the other studies were small. Evaluation of a larger number of cases would be needed to determine the optimal number of core specimens required to significantly lower the underestimation rate while at the same time to minimize the risk of complications such as bleeding or infection. At this point, our practice is to obtain an average of nine core specimens and to confirm radiographically that the targeted calcifications are in the specimens. The 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted device and the automated 14-gauge needle are not currently used for stereotactic biopsy of calcifications at our institution. If a suspicious mass is visible sonographically, large-core needle biopsy is performed at our institution with an automated 14-gauge needle; direct sonographic visualization of the needle within the mass at the time of the biopsy is used to confirm targeting accuracy. For masses that are also visible mammographically, an 11-gauge stereotactic biopsy is performed only if the operator deems the mass too small or indistinct to target accurately under sonographic guidance. Although the data presented in this study show that the 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted device has a lower underestimation rate than the automated 14-gauge needle for all lesions combined, the number of masses was small and therefore no statistically meaningful information can be obtained regarding masses alone. Our current practice regarding biopsy of masses has not changed on the basis of the results of this study. When no residual atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ was identified histologically after a large-core needle biopsy in an adequately localized surgical specimen, the lesion was considered to have been completely excised at the time of core biopsy. Complete excision occurred in 13% of our cases when the automated 14-gauge needle was used, in 13% of cases when the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device was used, and in 20% of cases when the 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device was used. The larger volume of tissue per specimen obtained by the 11-gauge needle likely accounts for the higher incidence of complete lesion removal in this group, although the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.1) [6]. For all needles combined, atypical ductal hyperplasia lesions (42%) were statistically more likely to have been completely removed than were ductal carcinoma in situ lesions (6%) (p < 0.001). The smaller size of atypical ductal hyperplasia lesions in this series (range, 2 41 mm; mean, 9.7 mm) compared with that of the ductal carcinoma in situ lesions (range, 2 80 mm; mean, 12.6 mm) may account for this difference. AJR:175, November
6 Darling et al. Complete histologic removal at diagnostic stereotactic biopsy has been described previously. For atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions, Burbank [17] found higher rates of complete histologic removal using the 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device (18%) than using the automated 14-gauge needle (4%). Another study reported that in five (18%) of 28 lesions diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ using the 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy device, no residual ductal carcinoma in situ was found at surgical excision [23]. Liberman et al. [25] examined 12 lesions diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ using 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted needle biopsy in which the mammographic lesion was completely removed at the time of the biopsy that is, no residual abnormality was visible. Histologically, only 25% of these lesions had no residual ductal carcinoma in situ at the site at surgical excision. Of three invasive cancers in this series that were also mammographically completely removed at the time of biopsy, all had residual invasive carcinoma at surgery. Importantly, Liberman et al. caution that on the basis of their data, complete mammographic removal of a lesion at the time of percutaneous large-core needle biopsy does not ensure complete histologic removal and cannot be used as a measure of the adequacy of lesion removal. Although our study and the work of others have shown that complete histologic removal of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions can occur using the currently available large-core needle biopsy techniques, further investigation is warranted before attempting to use the percutaneous vacuum-assisted technique as a therapeutic tool. In our current practice, no attempt is made to completely mammographically remove a lesion at the time of large-core needle biopsy. In summary, the data presented here confirm that histologic underestimation of disease may occur with imaging-guided large-core needle biopsy when the core specimens yield atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ. The introduction of the directional vacuum-assisted biopsy instrument and the use of the 11-gauge needle have substantially diminished the likelihood of underestimation. It is imperative that breast lesions diagnosed as yielding either atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ using large-core needle biopsy results still undergo surgical excision to exclude the presence of a higher grade lesion that may have been missed because of sampling error. Acknowledgment We thank Lisa Loftus-Smith for her help in preparation of this manuscript. References 1. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, Burke BJ, Hopper KD, Yakes WF. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies. Radiology 1991; 180: Elvecrog EL, Lechner MC, Nelson MT. Nonpalpable breast lesions: correlation of stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy and surgical biopsy results. Radiology 1993;188: Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994;193: Meyer JE, Christian RL, Lester SC, et al. Evaluation of nonpalpable solid breast masses with stereotaxic large-needle core biopsy using a dedicated unit. AJR 1996;167: Burbank F, Parker SH, Fogarty TJ. Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with the Mammotome. Am Surg 1996;62: Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of 14- and 11-gauge Mammotome probe performance and complication rates. Am Surg 1997;63: Meyer JE, Smith DN, DiPiro PJ, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy of clustered microcalcifications with a directional, vacuum-assisted device. Radiology 1997; 204: Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Shepard MJ, Finkelstein SI, Marzoni FA. Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Radiology 1994;193: Liberman L, Cohen MA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Hann LE, Rosen PP. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic core biopsy of breast lesions: an indication for surgical biopsy. AJR 1995; 164: Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, et al. Stereotaxic core biopsy of breast carcinoma: accuracy at predicting invasion. Radiology 1995;194: Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Liberman L, Abramson AF. Nondiagnostic stereotaxic core breast biopsy: results of rebiopsy. Radiology 1996;198: Tocino I, Garcia BM, Carter D. Surgical biopsy findings in patients with atypical hyperplasia diagnosed by stereotaxic core needle biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 1996;3: Gadzala DE, Cederbom GJ, Bolton JS, et al. Appropriate management of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by stereotactic core needle breast biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 1997;4: Stolier AJ. Stereotactic breast biopsy: a surgical series. J Am Coll Surg 1997;185: Moore MM, Hargett CW, Hanks JB, et al. Association of breast cancer with the finding of atypical ductal hyperplasia at core breast biopsy. Ann Surg 1997;225: Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic breast biopsy: improved reliability with a 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 1997; 204: Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional, vacuumassisted biopsy. Radiology 1997;202: Liberman L, LaTrenta LR, Van Zee KJ, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Dershaw DD. Stereotactic core biopsy of calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy. Radiology 1997;203: Lin PH, Clyde C, Bates DM, Garcia JM, Matsumoto GH, Girvin GW. Accuracy of stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy in atypical ductal hyperplasia. Am J Surg 1998;175: Won B, Reynolds HE, Lazaridis CL, Jackson VP. Stereotactic biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device: persistent underestimation of disease. AJR 1999; 173: Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FA, Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ. Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 1999;210: Philpotts LE, Shaheen NA, Carter D, Lange RC, Lee CH. Comparison of rebiopsy rates after stereotactic core needle biopsy of the breast with 11-gauge vacuum suction probe versus 14-gauge needle and automatic gun. AJR 1999;172: Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. JAMA 1999;281: Liberman L, Smolkin JH, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Rosen PP. Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 1998;208: Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Borgen PI. Percutaneous removal of malignant mammographic lesions at stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 1998;206: Brem RF, Behrndt VS, Sanow L, Gatewood OMB. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: histologic underestimation of carcinoma in tissue harvested from impalpable breast lesions using 11-gauge stereotactically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. AJR 1999;172: Meyer JE, Lester SC, Frenna TH, White FV. Occult breast calcifications sampled with large-core biopsy: confirmation with radiography of the specimen. Radiology 1993;188: Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Thornton CM, Rosen PP. Clip placement after stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 1997;205: Burbank F, Forcier N. Tissue marking clip for stereotactic breast biopsy: initial placement accuracy, long-term stability, and usefulness as a guide for wire localization. Radiology 1997;205: Page DL, Rogers LW. Combined histologic and cytologic criteria for the diagnosis of mammary atypical ductal hyperplasia. Hum Pathol 1992; 23: Page DL, Jensen RA. Evaluation and management of high risk and premalignant lesions of the breast. World J Surg 1994;18: Tavassoli FA. Intraductal hyperplasia, ordinary and atypical. In: Tavassoli FA, ed. Pathology of the breast. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange, 1992: AJR:175, November 2000
Stereotactic 11-Gauge Vacuum- Assisted Breast Biopsy: A Validation Study
Georg Pfarl 1 Thomas H. Helbich 1 Christopher C. Riedl 1 Teresa Wagner 2 Michael Gnant 3 Margaretha Rudas 4 Laura Liberman 5 Received March 11, 2002; accepted after revision May 17, 2002. 1 Department
More informationLearning Curve for Stereotactic Breast Biopsy: How Many Cases Are Enough?
Laura Liberman 1 Catherine L. Benton D. David Dershaw Andrea F. Abramson Linda R. LaTrenta Elizabeth A. Morris Received July 17, 2000; accepted after revision September 7, 2000. Supported by grant C015709
More informationAtypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at ultrasound guided biopsy of breast mass
Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at ultrasound guided biopsy of breast mass Poster No.: C-1483 Congress: ECR 2014 Type: Authors: Keywords: DOI: Scientific Exhibit J. Cho, J. Chung, E. S. Cha, J. E.
More informationSonographically Guided Core Biopsy of the Breast: Comparison of 14-Gauge Automated Gun and 11-Gauge Directional Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy Methods
Sonographically Guided Core Biopsy of the Breast: Comparison of 14-Gauge Automated Gun and 11-Gauge Directional Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy Methods Nariya Cho, MD 1 Woo Kyung Moon, MD 1 Joo Hee Cha, MD 1 Sun
More informationUnderestimation of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia at Sonographically Guided Core Biopsy of the Breast
Women s Imaging Original Research Jang et al. Sonographic Breast Biopsy Women s Imaging Original Research WOMEN S IMAGING Underestimation of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia at Sonographically Guided Core Biopsy
More informationDiagnostic benefits of ultrasound-guided. CNB) versus mammograph-guided biopsy for suspicious microcalcifications. without definite breast mass
Volume 118 No. 19 2018, 531-543 ISSN: 1311-8080 (printed version); ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version) url: http://www.ijpam.eu ijpam.eu Diagnostic benefits of ultrasound-guided biopsy versus mammography-guided
More informationDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
The British Journal of Radiology, 85 (2012), e349 e356 Comparison of the underestimation rate in cases with ductal carcinoma in situ at ultrasound-guided core biopsy: 14-gauge automated core-needle biopsy
More informationBreast calcifications are important mammographic features in the
Diagn Interv Radiol 2012; 18:354 359 Turkish Society of Radiology 2012 BREAST IMAGING ORIGINAL ARTICLE Causes of failure in removing calcium in microcalcification-only lesions using 11-gauge stereotactic
More informationNote: This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues or clients, cont
Note: This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues or clients, contact us at www.rsna.org/rsnarights. Risk of Upgrade
More informationPercutaneous Biopsy of the Breast
Percutaneous Biopsy of the Breast Expires Tuesday, March 31, 2020 Radiology Brooke A. Caldwell, M.D. Objectives 1. Describe the pros and cons of surgical biopsy and the reasoning behind the development
More informationImaging-Guided Core Needle Biopsy of Papillary Lesions of the Breast
Eric L. Rosen 1 Rex C. Bentley 2 Jay A. Baker 1 Mary Scott Soo 1 Received January 30, 2002; accepted after revision April 12, 2002. 1 Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Division, Duke University Medical
More informationStereotactic Core-Needle Biopsy of Non-Mass Calcifications: Outcome and Accuracy at Long-Term Follow-Up
Stereotactic Core-Needle Biopsy of Non-Mass Calcifications: Outcome and Accuracy at Long-Term Follow-Up Boo-Kyung Han, MD 1 Yeon Hyeon Choe, MD 1 Young-Hyeh Ko, MD 2 Seok-Jin Nam, MD 3 Jung-Han Kim, MD
More informationSonographically-Guided 14-Gauge Core Needle Biopsy for Papillary Lesions of the Breast
Sonographically-Guided 14-Gauge Core Needle Biopsy for Papillary Lesions of the Breast Eun Sook Ko, MD Nariya Cho, MD Joo Hee Cha, MD Jeong Seon Park, MD Sun Mi Kim, MD Woo Kyung Moon, MD Index terms:
More informationSonographic Detection and Sonographically Guided Biopsy of Breast Microcalcifications
Sonographic Detection and Sonographically Guided Biopsy of Breast Microcalcifications Mary Scott Soo 1 Jay A. Baker Eric L. Rosen OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of sonography
More informationProne table stereotactic breast biopsy
JYH Hui LK Chan RLM Chan AWL Lau J Lo JCS Chan HS Lam MEDICAL PRACTICE Prone table stereotactic breast biopsy!"#$%&'()*+, The prone table machine is a mammographic X-ray system specially designed for use
More informationThe Ratio of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Foci to Core Numbers in Needle Biopsy: A Practical Index Predicting Breast Cancer in Subsequent Excision
The Korean Journal of Pathology 2012; 46: 15-21 ORIGINAL ARTICLE The Ratio of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Foci to Core Numbers in Needle Biopsy: A Practical Index Predicting Breast Cancer in Subsequent
More informationMulticenter Evaluation of the Breast Lesion Excision System, a Percutaneous, Vacuum-Assisted, Intact-Specimen Breast Biopsy Device
945 Multicenter Evaluation of the Breast Lesion Excision System, a Percutaneous, Vacuum-Assisted, Intact-Specimen Breast Biopsy Device Angela Sie, MD 1 David C. Bryan, MD 2 Victor Gaines, MD 3 Larry K.
More informationImage-guided core needle biopsy has become a standard
Pathologic Review of Atypical Hyperplasia Identified by Image-Guided Breast Needle Core Biopsy Correlation With Excision Specimen I-Tien Yeh, MD; Diana Dimitrov, MD; Pamela Otto, MD; Alexander R. Miller,
More informationStereotactic Biopsy of the Breast Using an Upright Unit, a Vacuum-Suction Needle, and a Lateral Arm-Support System
Dianne Georgian-Smith 1,2 Carl D Orsi 3 Ellen Morris 4 Crandon F. Clark, Jr. 5 Ellen Liberty 3 Constance D. Lehman 1 Received January 8, 2001; accepted after revision October 8, 2001. Presented at the
More informationPAPER. Upstaging of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia After Vacuum-Assisted 11-Gauge Stereotactic Core Needle Biopsy
PAPER Upstaging of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia After Vacuum-Assisted 11-Gauge Stereotactic Core Needle Biopsy David J. Winchester, MD; Joel R. Bernstein, MD; Jan M. Jeske, MD; Mary H. Nicholson, MD; Elizabeth
More informationMichael J. Wagoner, MD, 1 Christine Laronga, MD, 2 and Geza Acs, MD, PhD 1-3. Abstract
Anatomic Pathology / ADH in Breast Core Needle Biopsy Specimens Extent and Histologic Pattern of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Present on Core Needle Biopsy Specimens of the Breast Can Predict Ductal Carcinoma
More informationBreast ultrasound appearances after Mammotome vacuumassisted
Breast ultrasound appearances after Mammotome vacuumassisted biopsy. Poster No.: C-1924 Congress: ECR 2011 Type: Educational Exhibit Authors: R. Patel 1, G. R. Kaplan 2 ; 1 London/UK, 2 Herts/UK Keywords:
More informationPercutaneous Biopsy and Sentinel Lymphadenectomy: Minimally Invasive. he diagnosis and treatment of nonpalpable. Breast Cancer
Laura Liberman 1 Hiram S. Cody III 2 Received January 30, 2001; accepted after revision April 3, 2001. Supported by a grant from the New York State Department of Health (C015709). 1 Department of Radiology,
More informationWomen s Imaging Original Research
Women s Imaging Original Research Villa et al. Biopsy of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Women s Imaging Original Research WOMEN S IMAGING Alessandro Villa 1 Alberto Tagliafico 2 Fabio Chiesa 1 Maurizio Chiaramondia
More informationMammographic features and correlation with biopsy findings using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVABB)
Original article Annals of Oncology 14: 450 454, 2003 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdh088 Mammographic features and correlation with biopsy findings using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVABB)
More informationOriginal Article Breast Imaging
Original Article Breast Imaging http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.6.697 pissn 1229-6929 eissn 2005-8330 Korean J Radiol 2014;15(6):697-703 Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Removal versus
More informationJournal of Breast Cancer
Journal of Breast Cancer ORIGINAL ARTICLE J Breast Cancer 2014 September; 17(3): 265-269 Absence of Residual Microcalcifications in Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Diagnosed via Stereotactic Vacuum-Assisted
More informationStereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy under lateral decubitus position
ORIGINAL ARTICLE pissn 2288-6575 eissn 2288-6796 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.90.1.16 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy under lateral decubitus
More informationThree-dimensional ultrasound-validated large-core needle biopsy: is it a reliable method for the histological assessment of breast lesions?
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 393 397 Published online 24 February 2004 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/uog.1001 Three-dimensional ultrasound-validated large-core
More informationDuctal carcinoma in situ, underestimation, ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy
Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed after an ultrasoundguided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: Can underestimation be predicted preoperatively? Poster No.: C-0442 Congress: ECR 2010 Type: Scientific
More informationPoster No.: C-0466 Congress: ECR 2010 Scientific Exhibit
Up-right stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy (UP-VAB) of non palpable breast lesions: Results and correlations with radiological suspicion (BI-RADS classification) Poster No.: C-0466 Congress: ECR 2010
More informationExtent of Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer After Diagnosis by Stereotactic Core Versus Wire Localization Biopsy
Annals of Surgical Oncology, 6(4):330 335 Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 1999 The Society of Surgical Oncology, Inc. Extent of Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer After Diagnosis by Stereotactic Core
More informationCNB vs Surgical Excision
Update on Core Needle Biopsy of Non-palpable Breast Lesions Nour Sneige, M.D. UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Tx Image-Guided CNB of Breast Lesions An alternative to surgical biospy CNB vs Surgical
More informationSix-Month Short-Interval Imaging Follow-Up for Benign Concordant Core Needle Biopsy of the Breast: Outcomes in 1444 Cases With Long-Term Follow-Up
Women s Imaging Original Research Monticciolo et al. Short-Interval Imaging Follow-Up for Benign Breast Biopsies Women s Imaging Original Research Debra L. Monticciolo 1 Rodney L. Hajdik 1 Mason G. Hicks
More informationPercutaneous Large Core Breast Biopsy
256 Percutaneous Large Core Breast Biopsy Steve H. Parker, M.D. Background. Surgical excision biopsy is considered by many to be the gold standard for the diagnosis of breast lesions. Fine needle aspiration
More informationUnderestimation of cancer in case of diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) by vacuum assisted core needle biopsy
reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy 1 7 (2 0 1 2) 129 133 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/rpor Original research article Underestimation
More informationPercutaneous Core Needle Biopsy of Radial Scars of the Breast: When Is Excision Necessary?
R. James Brenner 1, 2 Roger J. Jackman 3 Steve H. Parker 4 W. Phil Evans III 5 Liane Philpotts 6 Beth M. Deutch 7 Mary C. Lechner 8 Daniel Lehrer 9 Paul Sylvan 10 Rebecca Hunt 11 Steven J. Adler 12 Nancy
More informationConsensus Guideline on Image-Guided Percutaneous Biopsy of Palpable and Nonpalpable Breast Lesions
Consensus Guideline on Image-Guided Percutaneous Biopsy of Palpable and Nonpalpable Breast Lesions Purpose: To outline the use of minimally invasive biopsy techniques (MIBT) for palpable and nonpalpable
More informationOriginal Report. Mucocele-Like Tumors of the Breast: Mammographic and Sonographic Appearances. Katrina Glazebrook 1 Carol Reynolds 2
Katrina Glazebrook 1 Carol Reynolds 2 Received January 2, 2002; accepted after revision August 28, 2002. 1 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. S.W., Rochester, MN 55905. Address correspondence
More informationAtypical papillary lesions after core needle biopsy and subsequent breast carcinoma
Asian Biomedicine Vol. 5 No. 2 April 2011; 243-248 DOI: 10.5372/1905-7415.0502.031 Original article Atypical papillary lesions after core needle biopsy and subsequent breast carcinoma Tuenchit Khamapirad
More informationAtypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Papillomas: A Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Breast Biopsy and Stereotactic Guided Breast Biopsy
Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Papillomas: A Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Breast Biopsy and Stereotactic Guided Breast Biopsy Breast Cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women in the United
More informationFine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core needle biopsy
146 CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY A Comparison of Aspiration Cytology and Core Needle Biopsy in the Evaluation of Breast Lesions Pieter J. Westenend, M.D., Ph.D. 1 Ali R. Sever, M.D. 2 Hannie J. C. Beekman-de Volder
More informationDiagnostic accuracy for different strategies of image-guided breast intervention in cases of nonpalpable breast lesions
British Journal of Cancer (2004) 90, 595 600 All rights reserved 0007 0920/04 $25.00 www.bjcancer.com Diagnostic accuracy for different strategies of image-guided breast intervention in cases of nonpalpable
More informationExcisional biopsy or long term follow-up results in breast high-risk lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy
Excisional biopsy or long term follow-up results in breast high-risk lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy Poster No.: C-2515 Congress: ECR 2015 Type: Authors: Scientific Exhibit Ö. S. Okcu 1, A. Oktay
More informationBI-RADS Categorization As a Predictor of Malignancy 1
Susan G. Orel, MD Nicole Kay, BA Carol Reynolds, MD Daniel C. Sullivan, MD BI-RADS Categorization As a Predictor of Malignancy 1 Index terms: Breast, biopsy, 00.1261 Breast neoplasms, localization, 00.125,
More informationStereotactic large core needle biopsy for all nonpalpable breast lesions?
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 73: 177 182, 2002. 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Report Stereotactic large core needle biopsy for all nonpalpable breast lesions? L.E.
More informationORIGINAL ARTICLE. 128 Ultrasonography 33(2), April 2014 e-ultrasonography.org. Sung Hee Park 1, 2, Min Jung Kim 2, Soo Jin Kim 1, 2, Eun-Kyung Kim 2
Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed using an ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: can underestimation be predicted preoperatively? Sung Hee Park 1, 2, Min Jung Kim 2, Soo Jin
More informationCURRENT METHODS IN IMAGE GUIDED BREAST BIOPSY
CURRENT METHODS IN IMAGE GUIDED BREAST BIOPSY Stuart Silver April 24, 2004 OBJECTIVES Review development of current techniques Discuss stereotactic breast biopsy Discuss US guided breast biopsy 1 OBJECTIVES
More informationSTEREOTACTIC BREAST BIOPSY: CORRELATION WITH HISTOLOGY
3-rd Baltic Congress of Radiology, October 8-9, 2010 Riga Rūta Briedienė, Rūta Grigienė, Raimundas Meškauskas Institute of Oncology Vilnius University, National Centre of Pathology STEREOTACTIC BREAST
More informationBI-RADS CATEGORIZATION AND BREAST BIOPSY categorization in the selection of appropriate breast biopsy technique is also discussed. Patients and method
Original Article Positive Predictive Value of BI-RADS Categorization in an Asian Population Yah-Yuen Tan, Siew-Bock Wee, Mona P.C. Tan and Bee-Kiang Chong, 1 Departments of General Surgery and 1Diagnostic
More informationStereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy (SVAB) of Nonpalpable Breast Microcalcifications: Advantage of clip placement (Prospective study)
Department of Radiology, University of Ulm Director: Prof. Dr. med. HJ Brambs Stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy (SVAB) of Nonpalpable Breast Microcalcifications: Advantage of clip placement (Prospective
More informationWomen s Imaging Original Research
Women s Imaging Original Research Linda et al. Biopsy of Radial Scars Without Atypia Women s Imaging Original Research WOMEN S IMAGING Anna Linda 1 Chiara Zuiani 1 Alessandro Furlan 1 Viviana Londero 1
More informationIndex words: Breast US Breast neoplasm Breast cancer
Index words: Breast US Breast neoplasm Breast cancer 125 47.. 53. (),, taller than wide. 50.. 126 Table 1. + 34 24-106 145,, + 139 167-1 2 + 65 37-75 132 47. duct extension. 127 taller than wide + 62 95-78
More informationDoes Ultrasound-Guided Directional Vacuum-Assisted Removal Help Eliminate Abnormal Nipple Discharge in Patients with Benign Intraductal Single Mass?
Does Ultrasound-Guided Directional Vacuum-Assisted Removal Help Eliminate Abnormal Nipple Discharge in Patients with Benign Intraductal Single Mass? Jung Min Chang, MD 1 Nariya Cho, MD 1 Woo Kyung Moon,
More informationEffective Health Care Program
Comparative Effectiveness Review Number 19 Effective Health Care Program Comparative Effectiveness of Core-Needle and Open Surgical Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions Executive Summary Background
More informationMacrobiopsy under X-Ray Guidance
Macrobiopsy under X-Ray Guidance C. Balleyguier, B. Boyer Radiology Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France Breast Intervention Imaging Major domain in breast imaging European guidelines recommend a pre surgical
More informationClinical Studies MATERIALS AND METHODS. Image-guided large-core needle biopsies of breast lesions
British Journal of Cancer (005) 9, 31 35 All rights reserved 0007 090/05 $30.00 www.bjcancer.com Ultrasound-guided large-core needle biopsies of breast lesions: analysis of 96 cases to determine the number
More informationPseudoaneurysm of the Breast During Vacuum-Assisted Removal
Case Report Pseudoaneurysm of the Breast During Vacuum-Assisted Removal Yu-Mee Sohn, MD, Min Jung Kim, MD, Eun-Kyung Kim, MD, Sang Hoon Chung, MD, Jin Young Kwak, MD, Hee Jung Moon, MD, Soo Jin Kim, MD
More informationRadiologic Findings of Mucocele-like Tumors of the breast: Can we differentiate pure benign from associated with high risk lesions?
Radiologic Findings of Mucocele-like Tumors of the breast: Can we differentiate pure benign from associated with high risk lesions? Poster No.: C-0332 Congress: ECR 2014 Type: Educational Exhibit Authors:
More informationJournal of Breast Cancer
Journal of Breast Cancer ORIGINAL ARTICLE J Breast Cancer 2012 December; 15(4): 407-411 Validation of a Scoring System for Predicting Malignancy in Patients Diagnosed with Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Using
More informationUltrasound-guided core-needle biopsy of breast lesions
Insights Imaging (2011) 2:493 500 DOI 10.1007/s13244-011-0090-7 REVIEW Ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy of breast lesions Luis Apesteguía Luis Javier Pina Received: 1 September 2010 /Revised: 24 December
More informationIs stereotactic large-core needle biopsy beneficial prior to surgical treatment in BI-RADS 5 lesions?
Report Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 86: 165 170, 2004. Ó 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Is stereotactic large-core needle biopsy beneficial prior to surgical treatment
More informationBenign Breast Disease and Breast Cancer Risk
Benign Breast Disease and Breast Cancer Risk Jean F. Simpson, M.D. Vanderbilt University Nashville, Tennessee December 1, 2011 Nashville Nashville Lebanon 1 Cedars of Lebanon State Park The American University
More informationThe Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) was
710 Evaluation of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 Mammograms and the Use of Stereotactic Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy in a Nonacademic Community Practice Angela Mendez, M.D. Fernando
More informationCurrent Status of Supplementary Screening With Breast Ultrasound
Current Status of Supplementary Screening With Breast Ultrasound Stephen A. Feig, M.D., FACR Fong and Jean Tsai Professor of Women s Imaging Department of Radiologic Sciences University of California,
More informationVacuum-assisted breast biopsy using computer-aided 3.0 T- MRI guidance: diagnostic performance in 173 lesions
Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy using computer-aided 3.0 T- MRI guidance: diagnostic performance in 173 lesions Poster No.: C-2870 Congress: ECR 2017 Type: Scientific Exhibit Authors: A. Pozzetto, L. Camera,
More informationFeasibility of MRI-guided large-core-needle biopsy of suspiscious breast lesions at 3T
Eur Radiol (2009) 19: 1639 1644 DOI 10.1007/s00330-009-1310-0 BREAST Nicky H. G. M. Peters Carla Meeuwis Chris J. G. Bakker Willem P. Th. M. Mali Arancha M. Fernandez-Gallardo Richard van Hillegersberg
More informationBreast Lesion Excision System-Intact (BLES): A Stereotactic Method of Biopsy of Suspicius Non-Palpable Mammographic Lesions.
Breast Lesion Excision System-Intact (BLES): A Stereotactic Method of Biopsy of Suspicius Non-Palpable Mammographic Lesions. Poster No.: C-1595 Congress: ECR 2014 Type: Authors: Scientific Exhibit I. Georgiou
More informationDiagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography-guided core needle biopsy for breast lesions
Singapore Med J 01; 5(1) 40 Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography-guided core needle biopsy for breast lesions Wiratkapun Cl, MD, Treesit T1, MD, Wibulpolprasert E1, MD, Lertsithichai P, MD, MSc INTRODUCTION
More informationPURPOSE IMAGE-GUIDANCE MODALITIES IMAGE-GUIDED BREAST BIOPSY. US-Techniques. Ultrasound. US guided NLOBB. TH. Helbich
IMAGE-GUIDED BREAST BIOPSY PURPOSE TH. Helbich Department of Radiology Division of Molecular & Gender Imaging Medical University of Vienna Imaging techniques Interventional procedures Quality management
More informationManagement of Patients Diagnosed With Lobular Carcinoma in Situ at Needle Core Biopsy at a Community-Based Outpatient Facility
Women s Imaging Original Research Destounis et al. Management of LCIS Diagnosed at Core Needle Biopsy Women s Imaging Original Research FOCUS ON: Stamatia V. Destounis 1 Philip F. Murphy Posy J. Seifert
More informationTitle: Accuracy assessment methods of tissue marker clip placement after 11-gauge
1 Title: Accuracy assessment methods of tissue marker clip placement after 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of measurements using direct and conventional methods Hidetoshi
More informationComparison of Sonographically Guided Core Needle Biopsy and Excision in Breast Papillomas
ORIGINAL RESEARCH Comparison of Sonographically Guided Core Needle Biopsy and Excision in Breast Papillomas Clinical and Sonographic Features Predictive of Malignancy Yu-Mee Sohn, MD, PhD, So Hyun Park,
More informationClinical Experience with MRI-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy
Lehman et al. MRI-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy Constance D. Lehman 1,2 Elizabeth R. DePeri 3 Sue Peacock 1,2 Michelle D. McDonough 3 Wendy B. DeMartini 1,2 Jennifer Shook 1,2 Lehman CD, DePeri
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EXCELLENCE
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EXCELLENCE INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES PROGRAMME Interventional procedures overview of image-guided vacuum assisted excision biopsy of benign breast lesions Introduction This
More informationTable 1. Classification of US Features Based on BI-RADS for US in Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions US Features Benign n(%) Malignant n(%) Odds
215 Table 1. Classification of US Features Based on BI-RADS for US in Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions US Features Benign n(%) Malignant n(%) Odds ratio 719 (100) 305(100) Shape Oval 445 (61.9) 019
More informationGuidance on the management of B3 lesions
Guidance on the management of B3 lesions Lesion diagnosed on 14g or vacuumassisted biopsy (VAB) Risk of upgrade Recommended investigation Suggested approach for follow-up if no malignancy on VAE awaiting
More informationA E K Ibrahim, A C Bateman, J M Theaker, J L Low, B Addis, P Tidbury, C Rubin, M Briley, G T Royle
J Clin Pathol 2001;54:121 125 121 Departments of Histopathology and Cytopathology,, Tremona Road,, SO16 6YO, UK A E K Ibrahim A C Bateman J M Theaker B Addis P Tidbury Medical Statistics and Computing,
More informationPatient Outcomes in Canceled MRI-Guided Breast Biopsies
Women s Imaging Original Research Outcomes After Canceled MRI-Guided Breast Biopsies Women s Imaging Original Research Bethany L. Niell 1 Janie M. Lee 1, 2 Christopher Johansen 3 Elkan F. Halpern 4 Elizabeth
More informationIncidence and Management of Complex Fibroadenomas
Incidence and Management of Complex Fibroadenomas Women s Imaging Original Research 214.fm 11/29/07 WOMEN S IMAGING Miri Sklair-Levy 1 Tamar Sella 1 Tanir Alweiss 2 Ilia Craciun 1 Eugene Libson 1 Bella
More informationHigh-Risk Lesions at MRI-Guided Breast Biopsy: Frequency and Rate of Underestimation
Women s Imaging Original Research Lourenco et al. MRI-Guided Biopsy of High-Risk Breast Lesions Women s Imaging Original Research Ana P. Lourenco Hanan Khalil Matthew Sanford,2 Linda Donegan Lourenco AP,
More informationEmad A Rakha, Bernard Chi-Shern Ho, Veena K Naik, Soumadri Sen, Lisa Hamilton, Zsolt Hodi, Ian Ellis, Andrew Hs Lee
Outcome of breast lesions diagnosed as lesion of uncertain malignant potential (B3) or suspicious of malignancy (B4) on needle core biopsy including detailed review of epithelial atypia Emad A Rakha, Bernard
More informationAtypical proliferative lesions diagnosed on core biopsy - 6 year review
Atypical proliferative lesions diagnosed on core biopsy - 6 year review Dr Angela Harris, Dr Julie Weigner & Dr Ricardo Vilain NSW Health Pathology Pathology North, Hunter Anatomical Pathology & Cytology
More informationUltrasonography-guided 14-gauge core biopsy of the breast: results of 7 years of experience
Ultrasonography-guided 14-gauge core biopsy of the breast: results of 7 years of experience Inha Jung, Min Jung Kim, Hee Jung Moon, Jung Hyun Yoon, Eun-Kyung Kim Department of Radiology and Research Institute
More informationProliferative Breast Disease: implications of core biopsy diagnosis. Proliferative Breast Disease
Proliferative Breast Disease: implications of core biopsy diagnosis Jean F. Simpson, M.D. Breast Pathology Consultants, Inc. Nashville, TN Proliferative Breast Disease Must be interpreted in clinical and
More informationACR Appropriateness Criteria on Nonpalpable Mammographic Findings (Excluding Calcifications)
ACR Appropriateness Criteria on Nonpalpable Mammographic Findings (Excluding Calcifications) Mary S. Newell, MD a, Robyn L. Birdwell, MD b, Carl J. D Orsi, MD c, Lawrence W. Bassett, MD d, Mary C. Mahoney,
More informationIntracystic papillary carcinoma of the breast
Intracystic papillary carcinoma of the breast Poster No.: C-1932 Congress: ECR 2011 Type: Educational Exhibit Authors: V. Dimarelos, F. TZIKOS, N. Kotziamani, G. Rodokalakis, 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 T. MALKOTSI
More informationUtility of Adequate Core Biopsy Samples from Ultrasound Biopsies Needed for Today s Breast Pathology
Utility of Adequate Core Biopsy Samples from Ultrasound Biopsies Needed for Today s Breast Pathology Ugur Ozerdem, M.D. 1 Abstract Background: There is a paradigm shift in breast biopsy philosophy. In
More informationTips and Tricks to performing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Breast Interventional Procedures Habib Rahbar, MD, FSBI October 23, 2018, 7:00pm ET
Tips and Tricks to performing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Breast Interventional Procedures Habib Rahbar, MD, FSBI October 23, 2018, 7:00pm ET SAM Questions/Answers/Rationales/References 1. Below
More informationNeedle core biopsy characteristics identify patients at risk of compromised margins in breast conservation surgery
& 2008 USCAP, Inc All rights reserved 0893-3952/08 $30.00 www.modernpathology.org Needle core biopsy characteristics identify patients at risk of compromised margins in breast conservation surgery Mary
More informationCLINICAL GUIDELINES FOR BREAST CANCER SCREENING ASSESSMENT. Editors. Robin Wilson and Joyce Liston. Co-authors
CLINICAL GUIDELINES FOR BREAST CANCER SCREENING ASSESSMENT Editors Robin Wilson and Joyce Liston Co-authors Julie Cooke, Karen Duncan, Rosalind Given-Wilson, Elizabeth Kutt, Michael Michell, Julietta Patnick,
More informationEARLY DETECTION: MAMMOGRAPHY AND SONOGRAPHY
EARLY DETECTION: MAMMOGRAPHY AND SONOGRAPHY Elizabeth A. Rafferty, M.D. Avon Comprehensive Breast Center Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School Breast Cancer Screening Early detection of
More informationNational Diagnostic Imaging Symposium 2013 SAM - Breast MRI 1
National Diagnostic Imaging Symposium 2013 December 8-12, 2013 Disney s Yacht Club Resort Lake Buena Vista, Florida Self Assessment Module Questions, Answers and References Day SAM Title - Each SAM title
More informationBreast Health and Imaging Glossary
Contact: Lorna Vaughan HerSpace Breast Imaging & Biopsy Associates 300 State Route 35 South W. Long Branch, NJ 07764 732-571-9100, ext. 104 lorna@breast-imaging.com Breast Health and Imaging Glossary Women
More informationSurgical Pathology Issues of Practical Importance
Surgical Pathology Issues of Practical Importance Anne Moore, MD Medical Oncology Syed Hoda, MD Surgical Pathology The pathologist is central to the team approach needed to manage the patient with breast
More informationSpiculated breast masses on MRI: Which category should we choose, 4 or 5?
Spiculated breast masses on MRI: Which category should we choose, 4 or 5? Poster No.: C-1394 Congress: ECR 2015 Type: Scientific Exhibit Authors: N. Onishi, S. Kanao, M. Kataoka, M. Kawai, M. Iima, A.
More informationQuality ID #263: Preoperative Diagnosis of Breast Cancer National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care
Quality ID #263: Preoperative Diagnosis of Breast Cancer National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care 2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY MEASURE TYPE: Process DESCRIPTION:
More informationRadiologic and pathologic correlation of non-mass like breast lesions on US and MRI: Benign, high risk, versus malignant
Radiologic and pathologic correlation of non-mass like breast lesions on US and MRI: Benign, high risk, versus malignant Poster No.: C-1161 Congress: ECR 2013 Type: Educational Exhibit Authors: J. Kwak,
More information