Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a February 12, 2018

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a February 12, 2018"

Brandon Alexander
5 years ago
Views:

1 Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a February 12, 2018

2 State s announcement February 7 Preliminary review Stage 1 facilities Water supply Costs Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a Slide 2 February 12, 2018

3 Proposed staged approach Stage 1 (6,000 cfs) one tunnel, one intermediate forebay, two intakes, and one pumping station Stage 2 (9,000 cfs) second tunnel, third intake, and second pumping station CA WaterFix to be funded by south-of-delta State Water Project contractors and potential participating CVP contractors CA WaterFix Provides benefits to aquatic species in the Delta Reduces reverse flows caused by the existing south Delta pumps Diverts water further upstream away from sensitive habitats Improves conditions for native fish species Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a Slide 3 February 12, 2018

4 CEQA and Permitting for Staged Implementation Supplemental EIR Supplemental ESA and CESA Permitting No new water quality or aquatic issues anticipated No changes to impact determinations or mitigation requirements anticipated Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a Slide 4 February 12, 2018

Full Project Staged Approach Intake 2 Intake

Pumps East Pumping Plant Water Planning and

5 Full Project Staged Approach Intake 2 Intake 5 Intake 3 Sacramento Intermediate Forebay West Tunnel East Tunnel Stockton Stage 1 Stage 2 West West Pumping Plant SWP Pumps CVP Pumps East Pumping Plant Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a Slide 5 February 12,

6 SWP-CVP Capability (MAF) Average Delivery Capability With & Without 9,000 cfs Facility MAF to to { 0 Existing Conditions Future without CA WaterFix Future with CA WaterFix 1 California WaterFix EIR/EIS No Action Alternative, existing conditions with 2025 climate change impacts Delivery Capability Report Existing Conveyance High Outflow scenario Delivery Capability Report Existing Conveyance Low Outflow scenario 4 California WaterFix EIR/EIS Alternative 4A-H4, initial operating criteria lower range 5 California WaterFix EIR/EIS Alternative 4A-H3, initial operating criteria upper range Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a Slide 6 February 12, 2018

7 Summary of Changes with Stage ,000 cfs 1 6,000 cfs facility protects approximately 0.9 MAF Stage 1 based on current information, SWP contractors will be the primary funder and will receive commensurate water supply benefit SWP deliveries are roughly unchanged between 9,000 cfs and 6,000 cfs (approximately 2.8 maf) (1) Preliminary modeling analysis based on 6,000 cfs north of Delta H3+ modeling criteria Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a Slide 7 February 12, 2018

8 Capital (2017 dollars) ITEM Stage 1 6,000 cfs ($ Billions) Full Project 9,000 cfs ($ Billions) Capital Conveyance Facility Construction Contingency for construction (~36%) Program Mgt., Construction Mgt., Engineering Land acquisition (includes 20% contingency) Subtotal $10.7 B $16.3 B Mitigation Capital Total (Capital & Mitigation) $11.1 B $16.7 B Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a Slide 8 February 12, 2018

9 Operations & Maintenance (2017 Dollars) ITEM Stage 1 6,000 cfs ($ M/yr.) Full Project 9,000 cfs ($ M/yr.) Total $49.6 M/yr. $64.4 M/yr. Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a Slide 9 February 12, 2018

10 2017 Dollars (1) Stage 1 assumes that up to 1,000 cfs of capacity is available for CVP use. The cost range shown is from 0 to 1,000 cfs of CVP use. (2) Based on Metropolitan's 2017/18 Revenue Requirement of $1,574 M (3) Approximate based on Metropolitan's 2017/18 sales budget of 1.70 million acre-feet Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a Slide 10 February 12, 2018

11 2017 Dollars Marginal Cost South Delta Pumps $588 /AF $613 /AF Delivered/Treated $815 /AF $840 /AF Household Cost 1 $ $2.40 / month $1.90 / month (1) Household impact based on 6.2 million occupied residential households in MWD Service area, 70% residential / 30% industrial split. Stage 1 assumes that up to 1,000 cfs of capacity is available for CVP use. The cost range shown is from 0 to 1,000 cfs of CVP use. Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a Slide 11 February 12, 2018

Approval of the Sale of Tenleytown Chiller Site

Planning, Program Development and Real Estate Committee Item V-E July 11, 2013 Approval of the Sale of Tenleytown Chiller Site Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary