Risk assessments for Campylobacter in broiler meat: what we learned and what we need. Maarten Nauta
|
|
- Edgar McKinney
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Risk assessments for Campylobacter in broiler meat: what we learned and what we need Maarten Nauta
2 Campylobacter in the broiler meat chain Campylobacter enter the food chain Carcasses get contaminated by leaking faeces Last point for official control Consumer food handling gives cross-contamination
3 Controlling Campylobacter in chicken meat What is the best point in the chain to control it? a) farm b) processing c) retail d) consumer
4 Risk assessment: a scientific food chain approach What is happening to the pathogen? What can be done to eliminate or reduce it? What is the most efficient way of doing that? where in the food chain? what intervention?
5 This lecture Example of a Campylobacter risk assessment The Netherlands 2005 Assessment of the effect of control measures: Farm (flock prevalence) Slaughter and processing (concentrations) Consumer stage Microbial criteria Outlook
6 A food chain risk model for Campylobacter in chicken meat (2005) Campylobacter on chicken breast fillets produced in the Netherlands, from animals reared in the Netherlands - current risk - potentials for interventions Exposure via cross contamination to a salad prepared after cutting the meat. all Campylobacters are killed of with cooking the meat (?)
7 Farm Farm to fork Processing scalding defeathering evisceration washing chilling Cutting breast cap double filet filet Storage Consumer preparation Ingestion / Dose response
8 Farm A Farm to Fork Microbial Risk model Processing Cutting Storage scalding defeathering evisceration washing chilling breast cap double filet filet Model transmission of microbial hazard through the food chain (prevalence and numbers) Assess consumer exposure and combine with dose response models to assess risk Consumer preparation Ingestion / Dose response Compare alternative scenarios due to interventions and estimate risk reductions achieved
9 source: Nauta et al, Risk Analysis, 2007
10 Exposure and illness, baseline scenario Cross-contamination from fillet to salad; the Netherlands, % of salads is contaminated; yearly cases of GE 60.0% 50.0% exposures cases frequency 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% >100 cfu ingested
11 Interventions reduce prevalence and/ or concentrations somewhere in the food chain Farm Monospecies farms Improved hygiene No thinning Phage therapy Logistic slaughter Channeling Processing Reduction of faecal leakage Decontamination of scalding tank Treatment of carcasses: decontamination, crust freezing, irradiation Freezing of products Channeling to meat processing Consumer Freezing at home Improved kitchen hygiene Information campaign
12 Risk reduction by interventions thinning farm hygiene phage therapy red. faecal leakage decont. scald tank decont. carcass dip decont. dip and spray crust freezing irradiation product freezing prepared meat kitchen hygiene home freezing -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
13 More Campylobacter risk assessments
14 Generic results Reducing the concentration is more effective than reducing the prevalence. The true prevalence of contaminated carcasses after slaughter is proportional to the risk Logistic slaughter has little effect For consumers, cross-contamination has more impact than undercooking The variability in concentrations determine the risk, not so much the mean concentrations
15 What does risk assessment learn us about options for control Interventions at the farm Interventions at the slaughterhouse Improving consumers hygiene Microbiological criteria
16 Options for control Interventions at the farm Interventions at the slaughterhouse Improving consumers hygiene Microbiological criteria
17 Interventions at the farm CamCon project ( ) Risk factor study at the farm How are farm management practices related to Campylobacter flock prevalence? Compare different EU countries, ES, NL, NO, PL, UK Risk assessment Effectivity of intervention on public health risk Cost effectiveness study
18 Effects of interventions at the farm Risk factors identified Large studies and NO 20 farms studies for 2 years in all countries
19 Risk factors for Camp. colonization in broilers Results All countries Variable Effect on prevalence Country Campylobacter positive flocks descending order: PL, ES, UK, NL, and NO Temperature Increasing temperature increasing number of positive flocks Age of house Newest house lower prevalence Biosecurity (anteroom/barrier) Biosecurity (designated tools) Ante-room/barrier Designated tools lower prevalence lower prevalence Downtime Low downtime (< 10 days) lower prevalence Drinkers (Bells, nipples with cups, nipples without cups) Nipples without cups lower prevalence Sommer et al. CamCon Annual Meeting 2015
20 Effects of interventions at the farm Identified risk factors translated to interventions Flock prevalence reduction assessed Additionally considered Ban on thinning (EFSA) Reduce slaughter age to 35 days (EFSA) Apply fly screens (Denmark) Sommer, et al 2016 Microbial Risk Analysis
21 Intervention already OK if intervention involved in intervention (% of all farms) Campylobacter prev. after control ES NL NO PL UK ES NL NO PL UK anteroom barrier in new houses both physical barrier and anteroom in all houses < 15 yrs build anteroom and barrier (assume not both = none) in all houses < 15 yrs down time downtime <10 days reduce downtime to < 10 days + rodent control in 30 % of these farms + disinfection (improved cleaning) between all crops at the end of downtime in 3 % of these farms new houses < 15 years of age build new house if > 15 years + anteroom and barrier+ nipples without cups+ designated tools drinkers nipples without cups apply nipples without cups in all farms designated tools per house in new houses each new house ( <15 yrs) has its own tools (basic equipment) have designated tools in each house < 15 yrs no thinning lower slaughter age fly screens (in new houses) improved cleaning no thinning applied stop thinning days or less slaughter at 35 days applied for all houses apply fly nets in houses < 15 years Disinfection between all crops start disinfection Not significant, not done combined with downtime rodent control Farmer applies rodent control > 6 times per year start application of rodent control Not significant, not done combined with downtime
22 Intervention already OK if intervention involved in intervention (% of all farms) Campylobacter prev. after control ES NL NO PL UK ES NL NO PL UK anteroom barrier in new houses both physical barrier and anteroom in all houses < 15 yrs build anteroom and barrier (assume not both = none) in all houses < 15 yrs down time new houses downtime <10 days < 15 years of age reduce downtime to < 10 days + rodent control in 30 % of these farms + disinfection (improved cleaning) between all crops at the end of downtime in 3 % of these farms build new house if > 15 years + anteroom and barrier+ nipples without cups+ dedicated tools drinkers nipples without cups apply nipples without cups in all farms designated tools per house in new houses no thinning Intervention can be applied, CamCon questionaire each new house ( <15 yrs) has its own tools (basic equipment) Different per intervention and country have dedicated tools in each house < 15 yrs no thinning applied stop thinning lower slaughter age fly screens (in new houses) improved cleaning 35 days or less slaughter at 35 days applied for all houses apply fly nets in houses < 15 years Disinfection between all crops start disinfection Not significant, not done combined with downtime rodent control Farmer applies rodent control > 6 times per year start application of rodent control Not significant, not done combined with downtime
23 Intervention already OK if intervention involved in intervention (% of all farms) Campylobacter prev. after control ES NL NO PL UK ES NL NO PL UK anteroom barrier in new houses both physical barrier and anteroom in all houses < 15 yrs build anteroom and barrier (assume not both = none) in all houses < 15 yrs down time downtime <10 days reduce downtime to < 10 days + rodent control in 30 % of these farms + disinfection (improved cleaning) between all crops at the end of downtime in 3 % of these farms Current prevalence, EFSA baseline 2008 new houses < 15 years of age build new house if > 15 years + anteroom and barrier+ nipples without cups+ dedicated tools drinkers nipples without cups apply nipples without cups in all farms designated tools per house in new houses each new house ( <15 yrs) has its own tools (basic equipment) have designated tools in each house < 15 yrs no thinning lower slaughter age fly screens (in new houses) improved cleaning no thinning applied stop thinning days or less slaughter at 35 days applied for all houses apply fly nets in houses < 15 years Disinfection between all crops start disinfection Not significant, not done combined with downtime rodent control Farmer applies rodent control > 6 times per year start application of rodent control Not significant, not done combined with downtime
24 Intervention already OK if intervention involved in intervention (% of all farms) Campylobacter prev. after control ES NL NO PL UK ES NL NO PL UK anteroom barrier in new houses both physical barrier and anteroom in all houses < 15 yrs build anteroom and barrier (assume not both = none) in all houses < 15 yrs down time downtime <10 days reduce downtime to < 10 days + rodent control in 30 % of these farms + disinfection (improved cleaning) between all crops at the end of downtime in 3 % of these farms new houses < 15 years of age build new house if > 15 years + anteroom and barrier+ nipples without cups+ dedicated tools drinkers nipples without cups apply nipples without cups in all farms designated tools per house in new houses no thinning lower slaughter age fly screens (in new houses) improved cleaning rodent control each new house ( <15 yrs) has its own tools (basic equipment) have designated tools in each house < 15 yrs no thinning applied stop thinning days or less slaughter at 35 days applied for all houses apply fly nets in houses < 15 years Disinfection between all crops Farmer applies rodent control > 6 times per year The best intervention differs per country Reduction in flock prevalence is always limited start disinfection Not significant, not done combined with downtime start application of rodent control Not significant, not done combined with downtime CamCon Annual Meeting 2012
25 Main conclusions Camcon: interventions at the farm Differences between countries matter No single intervention solves the problem It s all about strict biosecurity
26 Cost of interventions on farm Average costs per intervention ( /100 chickens housed/year/farm without measure) Intervention Poland Spain Netherlands UK Denmark Norway Anteroom with hygiene barrier Dedicated tools Fly screens Maximal downtime 10 days Drink nipples without cup Slaughter at 35 days Stop thinning New houses only estimated for Denmark (effectiveness only provided for Denmark) 2 not estimated for Norway (average delivery at 33 days; legal maximum number of broilers per year) Big difference in intervention costs between countries High: Norway, Denmark Low: Poland source: Van Wagenberg & Van Horne2016 Microbial Risk Analysis
27 Cost-effectiveness interventions DALY / case = source: Van Wagenberg et al 2016 Microbial Risk Analysis ES PL ES UK ES ES PL ES PL UK NL PL NL UK NL NO PL UK UK NL NL ES NO Expensive ES PL PL UK UK NL NL NO NO NO 55.00
28 CHEAP Cost-effectiveness interventions ES PL ES UK ES ES PL ES PL UK NL PL NL UK NL NO PL UK UK NL NL ES NO PL ES UK PL NL NL UK NO NO NO 55.00
29 Cost-effectiveness interventions ES PL ES PL ES ES ES ES PL PL PL ES UK PL UK UK UK UK UK NL NL NL PL NL NL NL UK NL NO Low NO risk reduction NO NO NO 55.00
30 Cost-effectiveness interventions High risk reduction ES PL ES UK ES ES PL ES PL UK NL PL NL UK NL NO PL UK UK NL NL ES NO PL ES UK PL NL NL UK NO NO NO 55.00
31 Cost-effectiveness interventions Cheap ES ES PL and PL ES ES PL effective ES UK PL UK UK UK NL PL NL NL UK NL NO NL ES NO PL ES UK PL NL NL UK NO NO NO 55.00
32 Conclusions Big differences in costs and cost-effectiveness of interventions between countries Interventions with low costs/daly Anteroom with hygiene barrier Designated tools Interventions with high costs/daly Stop thinning New houses Slaughter at 35 days Drink nipples without cup
33 Options for control Interventions at the farm Interventions at the slaughterhouse Improving consumers hygiene Microbiological criteria
34 Interventions at the slaughterhouse Defeathering and evisceration are critical stages Complex chaotic process of crosscontamination, removal and survival Decontamination is not allowed But effects can be studied anyway
35 Relative risk reduction Effect of concentration reduction on human health risk in published risk assessments Product freezing % Dec. before chil. (TSP) Dec. before chilling (L) 90.00% EO water Dipping Crust freezing Initial load 2 cfu 80.00% 70.00% Crust freezing 60.00% 50.00% Havelaar et al. (2007), Nauta et al. (2005) Lake et al. (2007) Rosenquist et al. (2003) Brynestad et al. (2008) Lactic ac % 30.00% Gellynck et al. (2008) Linqvist and Lindblad (2008) WHO-FAO (2009) Tank dec. (TSP) Log reduction (cfu) Tank dec. (L) Initial load 6 cfu 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% source: EFSA opinion on Campylobacter control 2011 Red lines indicate EFSA model predictions
36 Intervention by reduction of the Campylobacter concentration Caecal concentration in live birds Vaccination Phage therapy Other methods Faecal contamination at early processing stages (scalding, defeathering, evisceration) Various methods Farm At the end of processing Decontamination Other methods Processing scalding defeathering evisceration washing chilling Cutting breast cap double filet filet
37 Intervention by reduction of the Campylobacter concentration in caeca 1) Caecal concentration in live birds Vaccination Phage therapy Other methods Numerous studies are done No convincing evidence from field trials Risk assessments: Large variability in results One log reduction in caecal concentration gives less than one log reduction in concentration on the meat No rule of thumb 2 log reduction may give > 60% risk reduction (Nauta et al, Microbial Risk Analysis 2016)
38 Intervention by reduction of the Campylobacter concentration at early stages 2) Faecal contamination at early processing stages (scalding, defeathering, evisceration) Various methods Risk assessments: Cross-contamination and survival are complex non-linear processes Carcass contamination by faeces at later stages may obstruct the effect of interventions at earlier stages These interventions may be effective, but quantification is difficult
39 Intervention by reduction of the Campylobacter concentration at late stages 3) At the end of processing Decontamination Other methods Risk assessments: In principle the risk reducing effect would be large: 1 log reduction may give > 80% risk reduction Challenges Decontamination is not allowed Could be used to hide bad practices Consumers don t like it Quality of product may be affected
40 Options for control Interventions at the farm Interventions at the slaughterhouse Improving consumers hygiene Microbiological criteria
41 Interventions at the consumer phase Consumers are out of control The fact that people get ill means that something goes wrong during cooking and hygiene What happens at the consumer stage? How does exposure depend on the contamination of the meat? Can we effectively educate consumers?
42 Interventions at the consumer phase Consumers are out of control The fact that people get ill means that something goes wrong during cooking and hygiene What happens at the consumer stage? How does exposure depend on the contamination of the meat? Can we effectively educate consumers?
43 The challenges Every food chain risk assessment should consider the consumer phase Consumers store, cook and handle their foods in many ways We have few data We cannot control consumers We need it to assess the effect of interventions on the risk
44 Chapman et al. Microbial Risk Analysis 2-3, 2016
45 Comparison of Consumer Phase Models for Campylobacter Q ill 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% Lindqvist FAO/WHO Christensen Mylius Nauta Van Asselt Brynestad Calistri 5% 0% log C ret (cfu/g) source: Nauta and Christensen, Risk Analysis, 2011
46 Some conclusions Different performance, but Predicted relative risk reductions consequential to control measures are not that different But they may be if you affect the tail of the distribution of concentrations (!) The Nauta model performs nicely intermediate Nauta et al, Risk Analysis 2008 based on observational data from consumers fair choice as a representative model?
47 Interventions at the consumer phase Consumers are out of control The fact that people get ill means that something goes wrong during cooking and hygiene What happens at the consumer stage? How does exposure depend on the contamination of the meat? Can we effectively educate consumers? Short answer: NO Source Nauta et al, Risk Analysis, 2008
48 Options for control Interventions at the farm Interventions at the slaughterhouse Improving consumers hygiene Microbiological criteria
49 Microbiological criteria (MC) A criterion defining the acceptability of a product, a batch of foodstuffs or a process, based on the absence, presence or number of microorganisms, and/or on the quantity of their toxins/metabolites, per unit(s) of mass, volume, area or batch. Legal instrument Action against (heavily) contaminated batches (or their producers) Identifies highest risk products May result in risk reduction 2011: Evaluation of potential impact of MCs (EFSA) 2018: Process hygiene criterion in place in the EU
50 An instrument to control food safety MC defines a sampling plan for a microbial hazard, for a food product at a point in the food chain with a treshold value for a test result defining acceptability e.g. n=5 samples of which c=1 may contain > m=1000 cfu/g Defines action to be taken when criterion is not met What is the impact of an MC? How many batches are not complying? What is the impact of removal of these batches from the market on the public health risk?
51 Risk based MCs: Evaluate Microbiological criteria in the food chain by risk assessment Farm scalding MC Processing defeathering evisceration washing chilling MC Cutting breast cap double filet filet MC Microbiological criteria Storage Consumer preparation Risk Assessment Ingestion / Dose response Human health risk
52 Establish risk-based MCs Define a potential MC n, c, m, sample point, sample type, action Define sampling frequency and action taken Estimate current prevalence and distribution of concentrations e.g. on the basis of the EU baseline study 2008 Estimate % of non-complying batches Estimate relative risk reduction that may be achieved Nauta, Sanaa and Havelaar, 2012 Int. J. Food Micr.
53 Risk managers can decide upon the best Microbiological criterion
54 Risk-based Microbiological criteria Risk assessment can be used to inform the impact of setting specific criteria Uncertainty in the assessment Assumptions are needed Other factors play a role as well Costs International politics There is a tool to help you do this tools.food.dtu.dk/trimicri/ See Seliwiorstow et al, 2016 Microbial Risk Analysis
55 Conclusions and perspectives
56 What risk assessment has achieved Unique possibility for analyses over the farm to fork continuum A structured integrated approach the assess the potential effects of interventions on public health risk Increased awareness of the complexity of the problem Insight in potentially effective interventions Establishment risk based microbiological criteria is possible
57 Options for control Interventions at the farm No simple efficient solution, strict biosecurity is key Interventions at the slaughterhouse Concentration reduction may be effective, but hard to achieve Improving consumers hygiene Difficult, education hardly works Microbiological criteria May be a helpful instrument
58 New developments Update of the dose-response relation (Teunis et al 2018, Epidemics) Modifies risk estimates EU process hygiene criterion Impact? New data? Genome sequencing and big data Source attribution Dynamics of different strains (infection, transfer, survival) Identification of virulent strains?
59 What we need Campylobacter research Consider the use of new data before you collect them Take advantage of risk assessments done Learn from mistakes of risk assessments Interventions Biosecurity is key Focus on concentration reduction Be innovative
60 Acknowledgements Many collegues from CARMA project (2005) Consumer project ZonMw (2008) MedVetNet WP24 (2009) EFSA working group Campylobacter (2010) CamCon (2015) You
Scientific Opinion on Campylobacter
Scientific Opinion on Campylobacter in broiler meat production: control options and performance objectives and/or targets at different stages of the food chain EFSA-Q-2009-233 FAVV Symposium 25 November
More informationMeasures to control Campylobacter in broilers and broiler meat
Measures to control Campylobacter in broilers and broiler meat Report of Expert Consultation www.vet.dtu.dk/ Default.aspx?ID=8561 2 DTU Food, Technical University of Denmark Talk outline Recommendations
More informationCampylobacter. Status quo on European level. Uppsala, EURL-Campylobacter Workshop Klaus Kostenzer, END European Commission, DG SANCO, G4
Campylobacter Status quo on European level Uppsala, EURL-Campylobacter Workshop 02.10.2012 Klaus Kostenzer, END European Commission, DG SANCO, G4 Overview EU structures in food safety Baselinestudy EFSA
More informationDr. Pedro Medel IMASDE AGROALIMENTARIA SL Athens, 12/05/2016
S17 Strategies to Control Foodborne Pathogens: Focus on Campylobacter in Broilers. An Update about the Different State-of-the-Art Methods to Control Campylobacter in Broilers: The European Project CAMPYBRO
More informationGUIDELINES FOR THE CONTROL OF CAMPYLOBACTER AND SALMONELLA IN CHICKEN MEAT CAC/GL
CAC/GL 78-20 Page of 26 GUIDELINES FOR THE CONTROL OF CAMPYLOBACTER AND SALMONELLA IN CHICKEN MEAT CAC/GL 78-20 Table of contents. Introduction 2. Objectives 3. Scope and use of the guidelines 3. Scope
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS
24.8.2017 L 218/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2017/1495 of 23 August 2017 amending Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 as regards Campylobacter in broiler carcases (Text with
More informationCampylobacter: is there light at the end of the tunnel?
Campylobacter: is there light at the end of the tunnel? Prof. Jaap A. Wagenaar, DVM, PhD Dept. Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
More informationImplementation of indicators for biological hazards by meat inspection of poultry
Implementation of indicators for biological hazards by meat inspection of poultry Ellerbroek, L. Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Diedersdorfer Weg 1, D-12277 Berlin, Germany. *Corresponding
More informationPredictive Modeling for Risk Assessment of Microbial Hazards
A D V A N C E S I N P A T H O G E N R E D U C T I O N Predictive Modeling for Risk Assessment of Microbial Hazards THOMAS P. OSCAR * Risk assessment models of meat animal production and processing systems
More informationAnnual Meeting 2015 Copenhagen 13 April
Annual Meeting 2015 Copenhagen 13 April Agenda Monday 13 April 14.00-16.00 WP Committee Meetings (WP3 and WP6: 5 minutes each, the rest: approx. 25 minutes each) 16.00-17.00 Break (not for Executive Board)
More informationReducing the risk of Campylobacteriosis from poultry: Feed interventions - blocking the colonisation of birds.
Reducing the risk of Campylobacteriosis from poultry: Feed interventions - blocking the colonisation of birds. Gilles Salvat 1, Pedro Medel², Muriel Guyard-Nicodème 1, Marianne Chemaly 1 1 Agence Nationale
More information4. Examples of possible interventions for hazard reduction
4. Examples of possible interventions for hazard reduction One of the objectives of the meeting was to prepare an independent assessment and review of available scientific information on control measures.
More informationUse of Microbial Risk Assessment in Decision-Making
Use of Microbial Risk Assessment in Decision-Making Slide show on: /firstmicrobial.htm Note the 2 l s! David Vose Consultancy 24400 Les Lèches Dordogne France David Vose's secretary Email David Vose Introduction
More informationSCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) 2, 3. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy
EFSA Journal 2011; 9(4):2105 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on Campylobacter in broiler meat production: control options and performance objectives and/or targets at different stages of the food
More informationWhat is Campylobacter?
The Society of Hygiene and Technology What is Campylobacter? Campylobacter species cause more reported cases of food-borne diarrhoea in the UK and Europe than any other bacteria, including Salmonella.
More informationStudy of physiological water content of poultry reared in the EU
Study of physiological water content of poultry reared in the EU quality safety service research analysis measurement innovation science expertise quality safety service researc Executive Summary The aim
More informationCampylobacter: the actual status and control options
Campylobacter: the actual status and control options Prof. Jaap A. Wagenaar, DVM, PhD Dept. Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
More informationInterventions to control Campylobacter in the broiler production
Interventions to control Campylobacter in the broiler production Report of an International Expert Consultation Copenhagen, Denmark, 26 27 November 2007 Interventions to control Campylobacter in the broiler
More informationFood Safety Risk Management
1 Food Safety Risk Management Ruth L. Petran, Ph. D. Corporate Scientist, Food Safety 02 October 2012 2 Discussion Overview Food safety trends and data Need risk management focus Risk based preventive
More informationMRA basic awareness course
MRA basic awareness course Topic 3 - Lecture 3 Microbiological Risk Assessment: Example - The FAO/WHO Listeria monocytogenes risk assessment Purpose of lecture Introduce the reasons for the FAO/WHO Listeria
More informationMinutes of the. Microbiological Risk Assessment
PARMA, 20/21 MARCH 2012 Minutes of the 6 th Meeting of the EFSA Network on Microbiological Risk Assessment Brussels, 20/21 March 2012 Agenda 1. Welcome and apologies 2. Declarations of interest 3. Adoption
More informationFAO/WHO GLOBAL FORUM OF FOOD SAFETY REGULATORS
E Agenda Item 4.2. a) GF/CRD UK-1 ORIGINAL LANGUAGE FAO/WHO GLOBAL FORUM OF FOOD SAFETY REGULATORS Marrakesh, Morocco, 28 30 January 2002 Conference Room Document submitted by the United Kingdom ESCHERICHIA
More informationA Guide to the National Control Programme for Salmonella in broiler flocks
www.gov.uk/defra A Guide to the National Control Programme for Salmonella in broiler flocks 2014 Crown copyright [insert year of publication] You may re-use this information (not including logos) free
More informationReport of the SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON VETERINARY MEASURES RELATING TO PUBLIC HEALTH (SCVPH) BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS OF
Report of the SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON VETERINARY MEASURES RELATING TO PUBLIC HEALTH (SCVPH) on BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS OF ANTIMICROBIAL TREATMENTS FOR POULTRY CARCASSES Definitions 30 October 1998 Within
More informationRisk assessment as the scientific basis for policy decisions: possibilities and limitations
Risk assessment as the scientific basis for policy decisions: possibilities and limitations O. Cerf 2011-Nov-25 AFSCA-FAVV 1 In plain language Be a health problem (nature and severity) associated with
More informationHow to prevent transmission to/from domestic pigs
Workshop on African swine fever management in wild boar surveillance and prevention of transmission to/from domestic pigs How to prevent transmission to/from domestic pigs Marius Masiulis FAO international
More informationEpidemiology, diagnosis and control of Toxoplasma gondii in animals and food stuff
Epidemiology, diagnosis and control of Toxoplasma gondii in animals and food stuff Aize Kijlstra Rome 2009 Toxoplasmosis is a neglected disease entity Disease burden is similar to salmonellosis and campylobacteriosis
More informationMicrobiological quality of broiler carcasses during slaughter processing
ACTA VET. BRNO 2012, 81: 037 042; doi:10.2754/avb201281010037 Microbiological quality of broiler carcasses during slaughter processing Irena Svobodová 1, Gabriela Bořilová 1, Radka Hulánková 1, Iva Steinhauserová
More informationVaccination of Poultry against Campylobacter in the EU. What are the Benefits?
Vaccination of Poultry against Campylobacter in the EU What are the Benefits? Hans Grinsted Jensen Jørgen Dejgaard Jensen Department of Food and Resource Economics University of Copenhagen Abstract. The
More informationWORLD OSTRICH ASSOCIATION UNDERSTANDING AND CONTROLING AVIAN INFLUENZA RISKS IN OSTRICH
UNDERSTANDING AND CONTROLING AVIAN INFLUENZA RISKS IN OSTRICH Introduction There are many good web sites containing information on Avian Influenza and offering guidelines on measures to be taken to protect
More informationCOMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX
Ref. Ares(2016)6396619-14/11/2016 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX SANTE/10539/2016 CIS Rev. 3 (POOL/G4/2016/10539/10539R4-EN CIS.doc) [ ](2016) XXX draft COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX amending
More informationIntestinal Integrity HDD Dr.Ashraf Farah
Intestinal Integrity HDD 2014 Dr.Ashraf Farah 2 November 2014 Are all Microorganisms harmful?? The number of nonpathogenic species far exceeds the number of pathogenic species. Many of the known bacteria
More informationImplementation of the Salmonella control programme in broiler flocks in Slovenia March, Beograd Maja Bajt
Implementation of the Salmonella control programme in broiler flocks in Slovenia 15-16 March, Beograd Maja Bajt Legislation Regulation (EC) No 2160/2003 minimum sampling requirements - Annex II, Part B
More informationmeat hygiene B2B3D4278D15FC68390E03DC2D238E33 Meat Hygiene 1 / 6
Meat Hygiene 1 / 6 2 / 6 3 / 6 Meat Hygiene Food hygiene are the conditions and measures necessary to ensure the safety of food from production to consumption. Food can become contaminated at any point
More informationPreventive strategies during slaughter of poultry, to improve food safety
Preventive strategies during slaughter of poultry, to improve food safety W.J.C. HEEMSKERK R&D Department, Meyn Food Processing Technology B.V., Noordeinde 68, 1511 AE Oostzaan, Netherlands wheemskerk@meyn.net
More informationTHE INFLUENCE OF FEED WITHDRAWAL AND TRANSPORTATION ON WEIGHT LOSS, MORTALITY RATE AND CARCASS QUALITY IN BROILER CHICKENS AT SLAUGHTER
THE INFLUENCE OF FEED WITHDRAWAL AND TRANSPORTATION ON WEIGHT LOSS, MORTALITY RATE AND CARCASS QUALITY IN BROILER CHICKENS AT SLAUGHTER D. ORLIC, M. KAPETANOV, DUBRAVKA POTKONJAK, DRAGICA STOJANOVIĆ Scientific
More informationEnhancing animal health security and food safety in organic livestock production
Enhancing animal health security and food safety in organic livestock production Proceedings of the 3 rd SAFO Workshop 16-18 September 2004, Falenty, Poland Edited by M. Hovi, J. Zastawny and S. Padel
More information+ Agenda Items 2, 3 and 4 CRD 14 JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME
+ Agenda Items 2, 3 and 4 CRD 14 JOINT FAO/WHO FOOD STANDARDS PROGRAMME CODEX COMMITTEE ON FOOD HYGIENE Thirty-Nine Session New Delhi, India, October 30 November 4, 2007 EC comments on the Matters referred
More informationESCHERICHIA COLI. Pet Health Council Escherichia coli Updated November
ESCHERICHIA COLI Introduction Escherichia coli 0157:H7 (E. coli 0157) is a cause of food borne illness. Infection may result in sickness and diarrhoea, which can often be severe and with blood. Complications
More informationTHE PENNSYLVANIA/VIRGINIA EXPERIENCE IN ERADICATION OF AVIAN INFLUENZA (H5N 2) Gerald J. Fichtner
THE PENNSYLVANIA/VIRGINIA EXPERIENCE IN ERADICATION OF AVIAN INFLUENZA (H5N 2) Gerald J. Fichtner Avian influenza was identified in 448 flocks with over 17 million birds destroyed in Pennsylvania and Virginia
More informationAPPENDIX. 1. On use of chlorine, from FAO/WHO Consultation. References cited
APPENDIX The draft report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert meeting on the benefits and risks of the use of chlorine-containing disinfectants in food production and food processing. (Ann Arbor, USA, 27 30 May
More informationIntegrating Risk Assessment in Meat Hygiene
Integrating Risk Assessment in Meat Hygiene Seminar on Modernisation of Sanitary Inspection in Slaughterhouses Lyon, 7-11 July 2008 Marta Hugas, Erini Tsigaridi, Tobin Robinson, Ernesto Liébana, Fulvio
More information(Text with EEA relevance)
L 138/92 COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2017/893 of 24 May 2017 amending Annexes I and IV to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Annexes X, XIV and XV to Commission
More informationFood Processing: Salmonella
Loss Control Department Technical Information Paper Series Food Processing: Salmonella Copyright 1999 The Hartford Loss Control Department TIPS Series S 190.009 Printed in U.S.A. This document is provided
More informationMicrobiological Quantitative Risk Assessment and Food Safety: An Update
Veterinary Research Communications, 29(Suppl. 2) (2005) 101 106 DOI: 10.1007/s11259-005-0020-6 C Springer 2005 Microbiological Quantitative Risk Assessment and Food Safety: An Update V. Giaccone 1, and
More informationOn Farm Hygiene & Bio-security. Dr. Stephen Graham
On Farm Hygiene & Bio-security Dr. Stephen Graham Introduction What is Bio-security? A pro-active approach to reduce the risk of disease entering a farm, site or being spread further afield Disease challenges
More informationRisk-Benefit Assessment of Foods. Maarten Nauta Research Group for Risk-Benefit
Risk-Benefit Assessment of Foods Maarten Nauta Research Group for Risk-Benefit What should I eat? IS ALL FOOD IS DANGEROUS? 2 3 Risk-Benefit Assessment Usually our research focus is on only risks or benefits
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 14 February 2017 (OR. en)
Council of the European Union Brussels, 14 February 2017 (OR. en) 6300/17 AGRILEG 43 VETER 17 COVER NOTE From: European Commission date of receipt: 13 February 2017 To: General Secretariat of the Council
More informationEffects of the primary process on further processing
Effects of the primary process on further processing R.W. KRANEN* and M.E.T. van ESBROECK Stork PMT B.V. Poultry Processing Systems, Handelstraat 3, NL- 5831 AV, Boxmeer, The Netherlands *roland.kranen@stork.com
More informationWorld Health Day April. Food safety
World Health Day 2015 7 April Food safety 1 FAO/WHO World Declaration on Nutrition (1992) access to nutritionally adequate and safe food is a right of each individual. 2 Food safety is a hidden, and often
More informationBiosecurity and risk factors for production diseases in broilers
Biosecurity and risk factors for production diseases in broilers Tommy Van Limbergen Unit Porcine Health Management Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Ghent University Belgium Tommy Van Limbergen - Ghent University
More informationFOOD IRRADIATION within the EU
FOOD IRRADIATION within the EU The EU Legislation and results of monitoring in the EU Dr S.COULON DG Health and Food Safety - Unit G4 (Food/Alert system and training) IAEA - Vienna 10-14 October 2014 Food
More informationLimitations of Risk Assessment Based on Non Fit-For Purpose/Invalidated Laboratory Methods
Limitations of Risk Assessment Based on Non Fit-For Purpose/Invalidated Laboratory Methods Robert L. Buchanan Center for Food Safety and Security Systems College of Agriculture and Natural Resources University
More informationRISK ASSESSMENT OF CAMPYLOBACTER SPP. IN BROILER CHICKENS
M I C R O B I O L O G I C A L R I S K A S S E S S M E N T S E R I E S 11 RISK ASSESSMENT OF CAMPYLOBACTER SPP. IN BROILER CHICKENS INTERPRETATIVE SUMMARY WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
More informationMr Maarten van der Heijden
Mr Maarten van der Heijden Manager Health and Preservation, Nutreco Strategies of salmonella controls via drinking water & feed Sponsored by: Nutreco Strategies for Salmonella control via drinking water
More informationChecklist of issues to be considered by food business operators when implementing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005
Checklist of issues to be considered by food business operators when implementing Commission Regulation 1. General requirements 2. Sampling foodstuffs and testing against the relevant criteria 2.1 Validation
More informationTHE HYGIENE PACKAGE A NEW APPROACH TO FOOD SAFETY
24 THE HYGIENE PACKAGE A NEW APPROACH TO FOOD SAFETY Dwinger, R. H., Golden, T. E., Hatakka, M. and Daelman, W. European Commission, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General (DG SANCO), Unit
More information[Version 8.1, 01/2017] ANNEX I. SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS
[Version 8.1, 01/2017] ANNEX I. SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 1 1. NAME OF THE VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCT Nobilis SE live lyophilisate for use in drinking water for chickens 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE
More informationRisk management, Risk assessment and Predictive microbiology in the meat industry. Paul Vanderlinde and Patricia Desmarchelier
Risk management, Risk assessment and Predictive microbiology in the meat industry Paul Vanderlinde and Patricia Desmarchelier Risk Management Codex definition The process of weighing policy alternatives
More informationABSTRACT Research concerning the qualitative characterization of turkey meat by traceability analysis
ABSTRACT PhD thesis entitled Research concerning the qualitative characterization of turkey meat by traceability analysis is structured in two distinct parts: data from literature and the one represented
More informationRISKS ASSESSMENT IN ROMANIAN FOOD SAFETY SYSTEMS: OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINS. Abstract
N. Sava, et all. Journal of Agroalimentary Processes and Technologies, Volume XIII, No.1 (2007), 69-76 Review Food Control RISKS ASSESSMENT IN ROMANIAN FOOD SAFETY SYSTEMS: OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINS
More informationCODEX and the European Union s food safety policy
CODEX and the European Union s food safety policy Mike van Schothorst ABRAPA 1 Purpose of lecture introduce the Risk Analysis framework show its importance for international trade make the link with Codex
More informationZero Salmonella in 2014? How organic acids can help you achieve your goal. Gut integrity for performance. Mycotoxins and poultry feed
Issue 04 January 2014 Poultry A magazine of Zero Salmonella in 2014? Photo: Sebastian Kaulitzki How organic acids can help you achieve your goal Gut integrity for performance Learn all about the important
More information2013 Iowa FFA Food Science CDE Food Safety and Sanitation Section
2013 Iowa FFA Food Science CDE Food Safety and Sanitation Section In this segment of the contest, you will be given pictures/graphics to view in reference to common problems that exist within the food
More informationSUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS
SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS Page 1 of 16 1. NAME OF THE VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCT AviProSALMONELLA VAC E Lyophilisate for suspension for chickens 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Active
More informationAvian Influenza. Regional Workshops: Veterinary Discussion. Will Garton
Avian Influenza Regional Workshops: Veterinary Discussion Will Garton What is Avian Influenza? Influenza virus types A B C BIRDS, MAMMALS (including humans, pigs, horses, mink, sea mammals etc) HUMANS
More informationGumboro Disease: where are we with IBDV epidemiology. J.J. (Sjaak) de Wit, DVM, PhD, dipl ECPVS GD Deventer, The Netherlands
Gumboro Disease: where are we with IBDV epidemiology J.J. (Sjaak) de Wit, DVM, PhD, dipl ECPVS GD Deventer, The Netherlands Gumboro-virus (IBDV) Avibirna-virus: 2 segments of dsrna Non enveloped virus
More informationNUFFIELD UK. International strategies to reduce the incidence of Campylobacter in broiler flocks. A Nuffield Farming Scholarships Trust Report
A Nuffield Farming Scholarships Trust Report Award sponsored by The Nuffield Poultry Meat Award Syndicate: Aviagen, Cobb and Hubbard International strategies to reduce the incidence of Campylobacter in
More informationEU measures for surveillance and control of ASF in feral pigs
EU measures for surveillance and control of ASF in feral pigs 30 June 2014, Paris Francesco Berlingieri Unit G2 Animal Health Directorate-General for European Commission, Brussels This presentation does
More informationHPAI H5(N8) in Member States in poultry, captive and wild birds
HPAI H5(N8) in Member States in poultry, captive and wild birds (01/10/2016-01/03/2017) DG Health and Food Safety 13,578,000 5,610,000 234,000 Broad migration flows of ducks across Europe 1,000,000 71,000
More informationSCIENTIFIC REPORT OF EFSA
EFSA Journal 2010; 8(8):1522 SCIENTIFIC REPORT OF EFSA Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of Campylobacter in broiler batches and of Campylobacter and Salmonella on broiler carcasses, in
More informationMoving beyond AI Case study from The Netherlands
Moving beyond AI Case study from The Netherlands IEC/OVONED Ben Dellaert Buenos Aires, 26th October 2016 Disease control AI in NL Regulations European Guideline: 2005/94 stamping out (no vaccination) National:
More informationRisk analysis of foodborne antimicrobial resistance (AMR) Suphachai Nuanualsuwan DVM, MPVM, PhD1
Risk analysis of foodborne antimicrobial resistance (AMR) Suphachai Nuanualsuwan 1 Introduction Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is major global public health concern & food safety issue Risk Analysis :-
More informationSalmonella enteritidis (SE) Surveillance Program: Applications and Lessons Learned
Salmonella enteritidis (SE) Surveillance Program: Applications and Lessons Learned Eric Gingerich, DVM Diamond V NIAA Annual Mtg. March 27, 2012 Denver CO SE Applications and Lessons Learned History of
More informationQuantitative risk assessment of food borne pathogens a modeling approach
4 Quantitative risk assessment of food borne pathogens a modeling approach E.G. Evers, M.J. Nauta, A.H. Havelaar and A.M. Henken Introduction There is always a certain probability that the consumption
More informationAssessment of biosecurity initiatives on broiler farms in Khartoum, Sudan
International Scholars Journals African Journal of Poultry Farming ISSN 2375-0863 Vol. 4 (6), pp. 159-165, June, 2016. Available online at www.internationalscholarsjournals.org International Scholars Journals
More informationFigure CA2a. Notification rates of reported confirmed cases of human campylobacteriosis in the EU, Year
3.2 Campylobacter Figure CA2a. Notification rates of reported confirmed cases of human campylobacteriosis in the EU, 2004-2007 1 60.0 50.0 Confirmed Cases per 100,000 Population 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0
More informationAre happy chickens safer chickens?
Are happy chickens safer chickens? Tom Humphrey t.j.humphrey@liverpool.ac.uk Professorial Fellow in Food Safety Science Director NCZR University of Liverpool Campylobacter as zoonotic pathogens in UK Estimated
More informationSalmonella Control Programs in the USA
Salmonella Control Programs in the USA Hector Cervantes, DVM, MSc, DACPV, Hon. MAM Senior Manager Poultry Veterinary Services Adjunct Prof. of Avian Medicine College of Veterinary Medicine University of
More informationINTESTINAL MICROBIOTA EXAMPLES OF INDIVIDUAL ANALYSES
EXAMPLES OF INDIVIDUAL ANALYSES INTESTINAL MICROBIOTA Microbiota in the animal or human intestine has evolved together with the host. Consequently, the gastrointestinal tract could be considered a metacommunity,
More informationA European Union-wide slaughterhouse baseline survey on the prevalence of Salmonella in slaughter pigs
A European Union-wide slaughterhouse baseline survey on the prevalence of Salmonella in slaughter pigs Pierre-Alexandre Belœil Zoonoses Data Collection Unit Workshop on Salmonella control in pigs Brussels
More informationDRINKING WATER. Dose: 100 ppm Dose: 200 ppm (history of problems during reception)
BREEDERS & GRAND PARENTS CITREX is a 100% organic antimicrobial with bactericidal, virucidal and fungicidal properties which leaves no residues on eggs and meat. It can be mixed with chlorine, antibiotics,
More informationRegulation (EC) No 2073/2005. foodstuffs CA
Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 on Microbiological criteria for foodstuffs CA 26.02.2008 Ari Hörman Microbiological criteria Main objectives To ensurea high level of human health protection Reduction of human
More information2012 Iowa FFA Food Science CDE Food Safety and Sanitation Section
2012 Iowa FFA Food Science CDE Food Safety and Sanitation Section In this segment of the contest, you will be given pictures/graphics to view in reference to common problems that exist within the food
More informationDOING THINGS DIFFERENTLY, A FINNISH EXAMPLE
DOING THINGS DIFFERENTLY, A FINNISH EXAMPLE By Hanna Hamina Twitter @haminahanna SUOMEN SIIPIKARJALIITTO RY FINLANDS FJÄDERFÄFÖRBUND FINNISH POULTRY ASSOCIATION Hanna Hamina Executive Director of the Finnish
More informationRISK-BASED SURVEILLANCE FOR FOOD-BORNE PARASITES Advantages, requirements and limitations
RISK-BASED SURVEILLANCE FOR FOOD-BORNE PARASITES Advantages, requirements and limitations Lis Alban DVM, PhD., DipECVPH Chief Scientist, Danish Agriculture & Food Council Adjunct Professor, University
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the document
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX [ ](2011) XXX draft COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Commission Regulation laying down detailed rules on a Salmonella food safety
More informationEmerging food-borne zoonoses
Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 2004, 23 (2), 513-533 Emerging food-borne zoonoses Introduction J. Schlundt (1), H. Toyofuku (2), J. Jansen (2) & S.A. Herbst (3) (1) Director, Food Safety Department,
More informationAnimal health requirements for heat-processed poultry meat and meat products. to be exported from Russian Federation to Japan.
Animal health requirements for heat-processed poultry meat Animal health requirements for heat-processed poultry meat and meat products to be exported from Russian Federation to 1. This document defines
More informationThe Costs of Human Salmonellosis Attributable to Pork: A Stochastic Farm-to-Fork Analysis
The Costs of Human Salmonellosis Attributable to Pork: A Stochastic Farm-to-Fork Analysis May 15, 2003 Paul E. McNamara 1 Xuanli Liu 2 Gay Y. Miller 3 Paper prepared for presentation at the American Agricultural
More informationBROILER. YIELD PLUS x ROSS 708. Performance Objectives An Aviagen Brand An Aviagen Brand
BROILER YIELD PLUS x ROSS 708 Performance Objectives An Aviagen Brand An Aviagen Brand Introduction This booklet contains the performance objectives for the Yield Plus TM x Ross 708 Broiler and is to be
More information16 th JPC REM ESA M ohammedia 18-19th April Surveillance of low pathogenic Avian Influenza virus
16 th JPC REM ESA M ohammedia 18-19th April 2018 Surveillance of low pathogenic Avian Influenza virus DR.SSA BENEDETTA CAPPELLETTI, DVM VETERINARY OFFICER FOR EXPORT AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS DIRECTORATE
More informationEvaluation of Biosecurity Status in Commercial Broiler Farms in Sri Lanka
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 7, Issue 4, April 217 114 ISSN 225-3153 Evaluation of Biosecurity Status in Commercial Broiler Farms in Sri Lanka W.M.J.B. Wijesinghe
More informationBroiler Performance Objectives
An Aviagen Brand Broiler Performance Objectives 1 Overview 2 Section g As-Hatched Performance 3 Section g Male Performance 4 Section g Female Performance 5 Section g Carcass Component Yield 6 Section lb
More informationAVIAN FLU BACKGROUND ABOUT THE CAUSE. 2. Is this a form of SARS? No. SARS is caused by a Coronavirus, not an influenza virus.
AVIAN FLU BACKGROUND 1. What is Avian Influenza? Is there only one type of avian flu? Avian influenza, or "bird flu", is a contagious disease of animals caused by Type A flu viruses that normally infect
More informationMonitoring of foodborne outbreaks caused by toxin-producing bacteria in the European Union Giusi Amore
Monitoring of foodborne outbreaks caused by toxin-producing bacteria in the European Union Giusi Amore BIOCONTAM unit - European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) OUTLINE BACKGROUND DATA COLLECTION ON FOOD-BORNE
More informationMicrobial Risk Assessment in the Main Steps of Poultry Slaughter. Keywords: pathogen microflora, microbiological risk, poultry meat, slaughter
Bulletin UASVM, Veterinary Medicine, 70(2)/2013 Print ISSN 1843-5270; Electronic ISSN 1843-5378 Microbial Risk Assessment in the Main Steps of Poultry Slaughter DAN Sorin Daniel 1, PLATON Sorin 1, MIHAIU
More informationSelf-declaration of Belgium regarding the recovery of the HPAI free status in poultry
Self-declaration of Belgium regarding the recovery of the HPAI free status in poultry Declaration sent to the OIE on October 11, 2017 by Dr. Jean-François Heymans, Chief of Veterinary Services of the Belgian
More informationTechnical meeting 4-6 December 2013 Beijing
Technical meeting 4-6 December 2013 Beijing Review on cost and financial implications of HPAI vaccination in countries applying HPAI vaccination Jan Hinrichs, Animal Health Economist, FAO Bangkok jan.hinrichs@fao.org
More informationModelling of inactivation through heating for quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA)
EU-FORA SERIES 1 APPROVED: 6 July 2018 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.e16089 Modelling of inactivation through heating for quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA) Abstract National Institute for
More information