Paper 2: Essay Rubric (HL)

Transcription

1

2

3 Criterion A: Knowledge and understanding How much knowledge and understanding has student shown of part 3 works studied in relation to answered? Criterion B: Response to How well has student understood specific demands of? To what extent has student responded to se demands? How well have works been compared and contrasted in relation to demands of? Criterion C: Appreciation of conventions of genre To what extent does student identify and appreciate use of conventions in relation to and works used? Criterion D: Organization and development How well organized, coherent and developed is presentation of ideas? Criterion E: Language How clear, varied and accurate is language? How appropriate is choice of register, style and terminology? ( Register refers, in this context, to student s use of elements such as vocabulary, tone, structure and terminology appropriate to ) Paper 2: Essay Rubric (HL) There is some There is mostly There is adequate There is good knowledge but adequate knowledge and knowledge and virtually no knowledge and understanding of understanding of understanding of some superficial part 3 works in part 3 works in part 3 works in understanding of relation to relation to relation to part 3 works in relation to answered. answered. answered. The word shows little awareness of main implications of, and ideas are mainly irrelevant and/or insignificant. There is little meaningful comparison of relation to Some identified but re is limited development relevant to and/or works used. Ideas have little organization; re may be a superficial structure, but /or development are lacking. Language is rarely clear and appropriate; re are many errors in construction, and little sense of. answered. responds to some of main implications of with some relevant ideas. There is a superficial attempt to compare relation to sometimes correctly some relevance to and works used. Ideas have some organization, with a recognizable structure, but development are often lacking. Language is sometimes clear chosen; construction are fairly accurate, although errors and inconsistencies are apparent; are to some extent appropriate to responds to most of main implications of with consistently relevant ideas. There is adequate comparison of relation to satisfactorily relevance to and works used. adequately organized, with a suitable structure and attention paid to Language is clear chosen, with an adequate degree of accuracy in construction despite some lapses; register and style are mostly appropriate to responds to main implications and some subtleties of, with relevant and carefully explored ideas. The comparison makes some evaluation of works used in relation to clearly identified and effectively relevance to and works used. effectively organized, with a very good structure, Language is clear chosen, with a good degree of accuracy in construction; are consistently appropriate to There is perceptive knowledge and understanding of part 3 works in relation to answered. responds to all implications, as well as subtleties of, with convincing and thoughtful ideas. The comparison includes an effective evaluation of works in relation to perceptively persuasively clear relevance to and works used. persuasively organized, with excellent structure, Language is very clear, effective, carefully chosen and precise, with a high degree of accuracy in construction; are effective and appropriate to

4

5