PATHOLOGY AND CLINICAL SCIENCE 2 and 3 (BIOS222) SEMESTER/TRIMESTER: ONLINE/ON CAMPUS 2017 CASE STUDY ASSINGMENT_MARKING RUBRICS WIEGHTING 30%

Transcription

1 UNIT OF STUDY: SEMESTER/TRIMESTER: ONLINE/ON CAMPUS 2017 DEPARTMENT: ASSESSMENT TYPE: MARKS: WIEGHTING 30% PATHOLOGY AND CLINICAL SCIENCE 2 and 3 (BIOS222) BIOSCIENCE CASE STUDY ASSINGMENT_MARKING RUBRICS 100 marks DUE DATE: 11:55 PM SUNDAY OF SESSION 24 PARTS: STUDENT NAME AND ID LECTURER THIS ASSIGNMENT CONTAINS TWO CASE STUDIES CASE STUDY 1: out of 50 MARKS CASE STUDY 2: out of 50 MARKS Page 1

2 Marking rubrics for case study 1: Facets of clinical management pentagon Marking Rubrics Level 0 Student attempts task but do not achieve minimal Level 1 Student requires a high degree of structure/ guidance Level 2 Student requires some structure and guidance Level 3 Student works independently and satisfactorily fulfil the A. Students observe and ask on inquiry and so determine a need for knowledge/under standing Ability to observe the key points in a given case. Ability to ask appropriate questions process (3 key point in a given case relevant to differential. Unable to ask any question process that directs to the. Identifies few key points along with other points that are not relevant for the differential process. (0.5 mark) Asks all general questions that are not directing to the correct but related to the diseased body system. (0.5 mark -1.5 Identifies up to 3 key points relevant to the correct without any irrelevant points. (0.5 mark -1.5 Asks few questions that are directing to the correct with some questions related only to the diseased body system (1-2 Identifies 4 or more key points relevant to the correct without any irrelevant points. Asks all questions directing to the (3 B. Students find and generate needed using appropriate methodology Ability to find to generate with appropriate rationale (6 identify differences in the symptomatology of the differential to generate one (10 Unable to provide appropriate rationale for all the differences in the symptomatology or just provided a list of symptoms of the 3 differential of the correctly identified differential Identifies at least one correct (1 mark) for one (1 mark) compares few differences in the symptomatology of one correctly identified differential from other incorrect and/or the given case (0.5-6 Identifies at least two correct for up to two (1-2 compares key differences in correctly identified 2 (1-8 Identifies three correct (3 Provides exceptional rationale for up to three correct (1-3 Identifies key differences in correctly identified 3 (2-10 Page 2

3 explain the mechanism of disease pathology (6 Unable to explain the correct mechanism of Explains the disease pathology for the chosen at a superficial level (1-2 in detail. (3-4 at a highly detailed level. (5-6 C. Students analyse and Interpret Ability to analyse and interpret the of diseases pathology in relation to the clinical presentations in the given case (5 Unable to analyse and interpret the impact of disease pathology of the to the development of clinical presentations and investigation results of the given case. Briefly analyse and co-relate the disease pathology of the to up to 2 clinical results of the given case. (1-2 the disease pathology of the to up to 4 clinical results of the given case. (3-4 the disease pathology of the to all clinical results of the given case. (5 D. Students investigate and reflect on collected or generated Ability to investigate the through further diagnostic tests and imaging techniques Unable to select any selected correct investigation test relevant to chosen differential Selects all correct but nonconfirmatory investigation tests for the (0.5-1 mark) Selects at least 1 confirmatory and 1 non confirmatory (1-1.5 Selects all confirmatory Ability to reflect on the through the test results to confirm the (4 Unable to reflect on the test results from the correct test to confirm the chosen Reflects only on nonconfirmatory test results of the test results (0.5-1 mark) Reflects on one confirmatory test results and one non confirmatory test results (2-2.5 mark) Reflects on two confirmatory test results (4 E. Students apply and synthesize the knowledge gained pharmacological (3 appropriate pharmacological and Only lists pharmacological treatment measures for the and not related to the patient s presentation (0.5-1 pharmacological treatment for the pharmacological treatments (1.5 3 Page 3

4 non-pharmacological (3 appropriate nonpharmacological and Only lists nonpharmacological treatment measures for the chosen and not related to the patient s presentation (0.5-1 treatment for the treatments ( F. Students organise communicate and manage Ability to organize, manage and collected and knowledge gained. (6 Unable to follow the prescribed presentation, writing and referencing instructions to collected and knowledge gained. Adequate presentation and partially follows the with inconsistencies in academic writing style (0.5 Use mainly lay terminologies to demonstrate understanding (0.5 Generally appropriate presentation and mostly follows the instructions for presentation with appropriate academic writing style. (1 Use some discipline specific terminologies to demonstrate understanding (1 Professional presentation and consistently follows the with excellent academic writing style Always use discipline specific terminologies to demonstrate understanding case study but with major style (0.5 case study but with minor style (1 case study with fully correct in-text citation and reference list using the correct referencing style Page 4

5 Marking rubrics for case study 2: Facets of clinical management pentagon Marking Rubrics Level 0 Student attempts task but do not achieve minimal Level 1 Student requires a high degree of structure/ guidance Level 2 Student requires some structure and guidance Level 3 Student works independently and satisfactorily fulfil the A. Students observe and ask on inquiry and so determine a need for knowledge/under standing Ability to observe the key points in a given case. Ability to ask appropriate questions process (3 key point in a given case relevant to differential. Unable to ask any question process that directs to the. Identifies few key points along with other points that are not relevant for the differential process. (0.5 mark) Asks all general questions that are not directing to the correct but related to the diseased body system. (0.5 mark -1.5 Identifies up to 3 key points relevant to the correct without any irrelevant points. (0.5 mark -1.5 Asks few questions that are directing to the correct with some questions related only to the diseased body system (1-2 Identifies 4 or more key points relevant to the correct without any irrelevant points. Asks all questions directing to the (3 B. Students find and generate needed using appropriate methodology Ability to find to generate with appropriate rationale (6 identify differences in the symptomatology of the differential to generate one (10 Unable to provide appropriate rationale for all the differences in the symptomatology or just provided a list of symptoms of the 3 differential of the correctly identified differential Identifies at least one correct (1 mark) for one (1 mark) compares few differences in the symptomatology of one correctly identified differential from other incorrect and/or the given case (0.5-6 Identifies at least two correct for up to two (1-2 compares key differences in correctly identified 2 (1-8 Identifies three correct (3 Provides exceptional rationale for up to three correct (1-3 Identifies key differences in correctly identified 3 (2-10 Page 5

6 explain the mechanism of disease pathology (6 Unable to explain the correct mechanism of Explains the disease pathology for the chosen at a superficial level (1-2 in detail. (3-4 at a highly detailed level. (5-6 C. Students analyse and Interpret Ability to analyse and interpret the of diseases pathology in relation to the clinical presentations in the given case (5 Unable to analyse and interpret the impact of disease pathology of the to the development of clinical presentations and investigation results of the given case. Briefly analyse and co-relate the disease pathology of the to up to 2 clinical results of the given case. (1-2 the disease pathology of the to up to 4 clinical results of the given case. (3-4 the disease pathology of the to all clinical results of the given case. (5 D. Students investigate and reflect on collected or generated Ability to investigate the through further diagnostic tests and imaging techniques Unable to select any selected correct investigation test relevant to chosen differential Selects all correct but nonconfirmatory investigation tests for the (0.5-1 mark) Selects at least 1 confirmatory and 1 non confirmatory (1-1.5 Selects all confirmatory Ability to reflect on the through the test results to confirm the (4 Unable to reflect on the test results from the correct test to confirm the chosen Reflects only on nonconfirmatory test results of the test results (0.5-1 mark) Reflects on one confirmatory test results and one non confirmatory test results (2-2.5 mark) Reflects on two confirmatory test results (4 E. Students apply and synthesize the knowledge gained pharmacological (3 appropriate pharmacological and Only lists pharmacological treatment measures for the and not related to the patient s presentation (0.5-1 pharmacological treatment for the pharmacological treatments (1.5 3 Page 6

7 non-pharmacological (3 appropriate nonpharmacological and Only lists nonpharmacological treatment measures for the chosen and not related to the patient s presentation (0.5-1 treatment for the treatments ( F. Students organise communicate and manage Ability to organize, manage and collected and knowledge gained. (6 Unable to follow the prescribed presentation, writing and referencing instructions to collected and knowledge gained. Adequate presentation and partially follows the with inconsistencies in academic writing style (0.5 Use mainly lay terminologies to demonstrate understanding (0.5 Generally appropriate presentation and mostly follows the instructions for presentation with appropriate academic writing style. (1 Use some discipline specific terminologies to demonstrate understanding (1 Professional presentation and consistently follows the with excellent academic writing style Always use discipline specific terminologies to demonstrate understanding case study but with major style (0.5 case study but with minor style (1 case study with fully correct in-text citation and reference list using the correct referencing style Page 7