Report. Nonuniform Distribution and Spectral Tuning of Photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cells of the Mouse Retina

Transcription

1 Current Biology 23, , September 9, 2013 ª2013 The Authors. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license. Nonuniform Distribution and Spectral Tuning of Photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cells of the Mouse Retina Report Steven Hughes, 1 Thomas S. Watson, 1 Russell G. Foster, 1, * Stuart N. Peirson, 1, * and Mark W. Hankins 1 1 Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Headley Way, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK Summary Melanopsin-expressing photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (prgcs) represent a third class of retinal photoreceptor [1 3]. These cells are intrinsically photosensitive, but also receive inputs from rod and cone photoreceptors [4 7], acting as the primary sensory conduit mediating non-image-forming responses to light [8 11]. Multiple subtypes of prgc have been described in the mouse retina with characteristic morphologies and functional properties, and which perform distinct physiological roles [12 15]. Here, we examine the levels of melanopsin expression and distribution of prgc subtypes across the mouse retina, identifying a previously unreported anatomical and functional specialization of the melanopsin system. Our results show a dorsal-ventral gradient in the expression of melanopsin and the distribution of prgcs, which, combined with dorsal-ventral gradients in ultraviolet-sensitive and medium-wavelength-sensitive cone opsin expression, produce dramatic variations in the ratio of cone opsins and prgcs across the retina. Using c-fos expression as a marker of light activation in vivo [16 18], we show that the responses of prgcs are spectrally tuned by gradients in cone opsin expression depending on their location in the retina. These data illustrate the importance of classical photoreceptors in providing spectral tuning of prgc light responses and have important implications for the complexity of non-image-forming responses to light. Results and Discussion The Melanopsin System Is Spatially Specialized in the Mouse Retina Immunostaining with a highly sensitive melanopsin antibody revealed a nonuniform pattern of staining across the wildtype mouse retina (Figure 1 and Figure S1 available online). The total number of melanopsin-immunoreactive cells identified was typically 1,600 1,800 cells per retina, consistent with previous estimates of total photosensitive retinal ganglion cell (prgc) numbers detected with melanopsin antibodies [19]. These include brightly stained M1-type cells with processes located in the OFF layer of the inner plexiform layer (IPL) and also weakly stained M2-type cells with process located in ON layer of the IPL. However, the density of *Correspondence: russell.foster@eye.ox.ac.uk (R.G.F.), stuart.peirson@ eye.ox.ac.uk (S.N.P.) This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. melanopsin-positive cells and the extent of dendritic processes are both significantly higher in the dorsal retina compared to the ventral retina (Figure 1). In the dorsal retina, both M1 and M2 cells are clearly visible, with extensive and highly overlapping dendritic networks observed in both the OFF and ON layers of the IPL. By contrast, the ventral retina is more sparsely populated and dominated by intensely stained M1-type cells (Figure S1). There was little noticeable variation in the pattern of staining observed between the temporal and nasal regions. The orientation of retinae was confirmed by double labeling for ultraviolet-sensitive (UVS) cone opsin (see below). A similar pattern of melanopsin staining was observed for all retina examined (>50), including retina from multiple strains of wild-type mice (C57/Bl6 and C3H/He), degenerate rd/rd cl retina lacking outer retina photoreceptors, Opn4 2/2 mice lacking melanopsin, and also retinae collected throughout postnatal development (Figure S1). Collectively, these observations suggest that this patterning of prgc distribution is a fundamental property of the mouse retina. Distribution of prgc Subtypes The distribution of specific prgc subtypes was determined by cell density and nearest-neighbor analysis (Figures 2 and S2). Both approaches show a significant increase in density of M1 cells and M2 cells in the dorsal retina compared to the ventral retina. There are, however, subtle differences in the distribution of these cell types. The highest density of M1 cells is observed in the upper dorsal retina, whereas the highest density of M2 cells is observed in the middorsal retina. No significant differences in density of either M1 or M2 cells were observed between the temporal and nasal regions (for detailed nearest-neighbor analysis, see Figure S2). The dorsal-ventral distribution of M1-type prgcs was further confirmed by analysis of retina from Opn4 2/2 (tau-lacz +/+ ) mice (Figure S2) that selectively report M1-type prgcs [20]. Due to the rarity of bistratified M3 cells [19], no attempt was made to characterize the distribution of these cells. In addition to M1 M3-type cells, there also exist at least two other subtypes of prgc, M4- and M5-type cells, in which the levels of melanopsin expression are too low to be reliably detected with melanopsin antibodies [19], but can be detected using Opn4.Cre-based reporter mice [21]. Here, we have used the same Opn4.Cre mouse with an EYFP reporter to determine the distribution of M1 M5-type prgcs. For a full description of this model and a discussion of potential limitations, see Figure S2. In contrast to the distribution of M1 and M2 cells, EYFP-expressing cells were found to be uniformly distributed across the retina (n = 3 retina, t test, p = 0.22) (Figures 2 and S2). Double labeling with melanopsin and EYFP antibodies again confirmed the dorsal-ventral distribution of melanopsin-immunoreactive M1 and M2 cells (n = 3 retina, t test, p = ). Interestingly, levels of melanopsin and EYFP coexpression varied in dorsal-ventral manner, with significantly lower densities of melanopsin-negative EYFP-positive M4 M5 cells detected in the dorsal retina (n = 3 retina, t test, p = 0.002) (Figure 2). Collectively, our data indicate that melanopsin-expressing cells as a whole are uniformly distributed

2 Melanopsin Distribution 1697 Figure 1. Nonuniform Patterning of Melanopsin Expression across the Mouse Retina (A) Whole retina image showing the nonuniform pattern of melanopsin staining and distribution of melanopsin-positive prgcs across the wildtype C57/BL6 retina. Staining in the dorsal retina shows higher cell densities and increased coverage of the retina surface with dendritic processes when compared to the ventral retina. A total of 1,641 melanopsin-positive cells were identified. (B and C) Images collected from the dorsal and ventral retina as indicated in the main image. (D) Analysis of prgc cell density confirms an w1.6-fold increase in the density of cells in the dorsal retina compared to the ventral retina (t test, p = 0.004). (E) Threshold analysis of image pixel intensity confirms an w1.8-fold increase in the area of the retina covered by melanopsin cell bodies and dendrite processes in the dorsal and ventral retina (t test, p = ). For (D) and (E), analysis is based on n = 5 nonoverlapping images (0.49 mm 2 each) collected from the dorsal and ventral retina. Data are shown as mean 6 SEM. See also Figure S1. across the mouse retina, but the distribution of specific subtypes of prgcs varies. Both M1- and M2-type cells show higher densities in the dorsal retina, whereas melanopsinnegative EYFP-positive M4 M5 cells are more numerous in the ventral retina. Cone Opsin Gradients and Spectral Tuning of prgc Light Responses In addition to the dorsal-ventral gradients in melanopsin expression and distribution of prgc subtypes that we have described, there also exist significant dorsal-ventral gradients in the expression of cone opsins within M cones (95% of all cones) of the mouse retina [22 25]. Levels of medium-wavelength-sensitive (MWS) opsin are highest in the dorsal retina, whereas levels of ultraviolet-sensitive (UVS) opsin are highest in the ventral retina. The rarer S cones (5% of cones) express only UVS opsin and show no such gradients in expression (Figure S3). When combined, these gradients result in dramatic variations in the ratio of cone opsins and prgc subtypes present across the retina (Figure 3). Recent studies have confirmed that the changeable ratio of UVS and MWS opsin leads to a spectral tuning of light responses recorded from bipolar cells and ganglion cells of the mouse retina [26, 27]. Using the expression of c-fos as a marker of cellular light activation in vivo [16 18], we confirm the spectral tuning of retinal ganglion cells by cone opsin gradients and demonstrate that the responses of prgcs are spectrally tuned depending on their location in the retina (Figures 4 and S4). Spectral Tuning of M1-Type prgcs In wild-type mice, white light pulses resulted in a near saturating activation of M1-type cells in both the dorsal and ventral retina (dorsal, 96.7% 6 1.4% and ventral, 92.8% 6 3.7%, n = 3 retina, t test, p = 0.31) (Figure 4). Robust responses to white light were also observed for M1 cells in the rd/rd cl retina lacking rod and cone photoreceptors (dorsal, 81.5% 6 1.0% and ventral, 86.8% 6 1.7%, n = 3 retina, t test, p = 0.54), indicating that melanopsin-based photoresponses are sufficient to drive near maximal responses in M1 cells under these conditions. Analysis of light-induced c-fos expression in the retina of Opn4 2/2 mice [17], where prgcs lack endogenous photoresponses, confirmed a significant gradient in the excitatory inputs to M1 prgcs with a higher number of cells responding in the dorsal retina (dorsal, 78.2% 6 3.0% and ventral, 48.5% 6 4.1%, n = 3 retina, t test, p = 0.004). Overall, the pattern of c-fos expression detected in M1 prgcs from Opn4 2/2 mice receiving white light pulses is consistent with a significant excitatory input from M cones and the gradient of MWS cone opsin expression. We could also expect a significant contribution to M1 responses to white light from rodbased input [11, 28 31], yet it is likely this is reduced under these intensities of light [32]. In contrast to white light, a significant gradient of responses was observed for M1-type prgcs in wild-type retina following UV light stimuli, with increased numbers of responsive cells detected in the ventral retina compared to the dorsal retina (dorsal, 56.0% 6 5.4% and ventral, 71.9% 6 6.8%, n = 3 retina, t test, p = 0.03) (Figure 4). The direction of this gradient is again consistent with an excitatory input from M cones and the gradient of UVS opsin. However, despite the more striking gradient in expression of UVS opsin compared to MWS opsin, the gradient of UV light responses observed for M1 cells in Opn4 2/2 mice were less obvious than those observed in responses to white light (dorsal, 47.4% 6 4.3% and ventral, 54.6% 6 4.6%, n = 4 retina, t test, p = 0.29). Interestingly, the percentage of M1-type cells responding to UV light was significantly higher in the rd/rd cl retina compared to wild-type retina (WT versus rd/rd cl t test, dorsal p = 0.03, ventral p = 0.21). Thus, it would seem that M1-type prgcs show significantly greater responses to UV light in the absence of outer retina photoreceptors. White light activates M cones, rods, and

3 Current Biology Vol 23 No Figure 2. Differential Distribution of prgc Subtypes across the Mouse Retina (A, C, and D) Graphs showing the location and distribution of M1- and M2-type prgcs across the mouse retina. A total of 1,747 melanopsin cells were detected, 920 M1 cells and 827 M2 cells. Both M1- and M2-type prgcs show a similar, although not identical, dorsal-ventral pattern of distribution, with the density of both cell types higher in the dorsal retina compared to the ventral retina. (B) Manual counting of cell density confirms a dorsal-ventral gradient in distribution of M1-type prgcs (dorsal and ventral cells/mm 2, t test, p = 0.011) and M2-type prgcs (dorsal and ventral cells/mm 2 (t test, p = ). Analysis of cell density based on counts from n = 6 nonoverlapping images (0.49 mm 2 ) from the dorsal and ventral retina. Data are shown as mean 6 SEM (for detailed nearest-neighbor analysis of M1 and M2 distribution see Figure S2). Due to rarity of M3 cells [19], no attempt was made to characterize the distribution of these cells, and they are likely included as M1 cells. (E) Graph showing the uniform distribution of EYFP-positive cells across the retina of Opn4.Cre +/2 EYFP +/+ mice. A total of 4,705 EYFP cells were detected in the retina shown (range 4,415 4,705 cells per retina, n = 2), with expression of EYFP largely restricted to cells located in the GCL and INL, consistent with the detection of M1 M5-type prgcs (Figure S2). (F) Analysis of cell density shows that EYFP cells (M1 M5-type prgcs) show a uniform density in the dorsal and ventral retina ( and cells/mm 2 respectively, n = 3 retina, t test, p = 0.22), melanopsin-positive cells (M1- and M2-type prgcs) show a significant dorsal-ventral gradient with higher densities of cells detected in the dorsal retina (t test, p = ). EYFP-positive melanopsin-negative cells (M4 and M5 cells) show an opposing dorsal-ventral gradient with significantly higher density of cells observed in the ventral retina (t test, p = 0.002). Analysis shown in (F) is based on manual counting from n = 5 regions (0.25 mm 2 ) from the dorsal and ventral retina of n = 3 mice. Data are shown as mean 6 SEM. (For a detailed nearest-neighbor analysis of EYFP cell distribution, see Figure S2.) (G and H) Double labeling with EYFP (green) and melanopsin (red) antibodies shows a significant difference in levels of colocalization observed in the dorsal and ventral retina. See also Figure S2. melanopsin, whereas UV light is most efficiently absorbed by UVS opsin (expressed in M cones and S cones) (Figure S4). It is therefore possible that S cones provide additional inhibitory signals to M1 cells under UV illumination. This conclusion is supported by recent data showing that both M cones and S cones provide excitatory inputs to prgcs, and that S cones also mediate a marked OFF inhibition of M1 prgc-driven responses [30]. Spectral Tuning of M2-Type prgcs In the wild-type retina, M2-type prgcs show significant gradients in c-fos expression following both white light and UV light exposure. Following white light stimuli, greater numbers of responsive M2 cells are detected in the dorsal retina, (dorsal, 84.4% 6 1.7% and ventral, 56.9% 6 6.5%, n = 3 retina, t test, p = ), whereas following UV light stimuli higher numbers of responsive M2 cells are detected in the ventral retina (dorsal, 50.8% 6 8.4% and ventral, 75.0% 6 9.3%, n = 3 retina, t test, p = 0.038) (Figure 4). The pattern of these responses is consistent with a significant excitatory input from M cones and the opposing gradients of MWS and UVS cone opsin expression. No such gradients were observed for M2 cells in the rd/rd cl retina lacking rod and cone photoreceptors (Figure 4). For both white light and UV light stimuli, the number of responsive M2 cells was higher in the wild-type retina compared to the rd/rd cl retina, indicating an additive effect of melanopsin and outer retina-driven signals. Gradients of light-induced c-fos expression were also observed for EYFP cells in retina from Opn4.Cre.EYFP mice following UV light (n = 3 retina, t test, p = ) and to a lesser extent white light pulses (n = 3 retina, t test, p = 0.14) (Figure S4). Collectively our data indicate that gradients in cone opsin expression influence the responses of M4 M5-type cells, consistent with recent studies of M4-type cells [13]. Differential Spectral Tuning of prgc Subtypes and Non- Image-Forming Responses to Light Overall, we show that the gradients of cone opsin expression within M cones of the mouse retina lead to the spectral tuning of prgc light responses depending on their location in the retina. However, given the high levels of endogenous photosensitivity observed for M1-type cells, it seems probable that under physiological conditions the gradients in cone opsin expression may do more to spectrally tune the responses of M2-type cells, and M4 M5 cells, than M1-type cells. These

4 Melanopsin Distribution 1699 Figure 3. Changing Ratios of Cone Opsins and Melanopsin-Expressing prgcs across the Mouse Retina (A) Double labeling with MWS (red) and UVS cone opsin (green) antibodies highlights the opposing dorsal-ventral gradients of MWS and UVS cone opsin expression present within M cones (w95% of all cones) of the mouse retina. M cones in the dorsal retina express high levels of MWS opsin and lack UVS opsin, M cones in the medial retina express high levels of both MWS and UVS opsin, whereas M cones in the dorsal retina express low levels of MWS and high levels of UVS opsin. S cones (w5% of all cones) are evenly distributed across the retina and express only UVS cone opsin (shown in circles). For a full characterization of cone opsin expression in the mouse retina, see Figure S3. (B) Double labeling for melanopsin (red) and UVS cone opsin (green) highlights the changing ratio of these photopigments in the dorsal and ventral retina and is most evident in the mid dorsal retina at the transition from high to low UVS expression. Overall, the dorsal retina contains higher densities of M1- and M2type prgcs, high MWS opsin expression, and low UVS opsin expression, whereas the ventral retina contains lower densities of M1- and M2-type prgcs and lower MWS opsin expression but significantly increased expression of UVS opsin. See also Figure S3. conclusions are consistent with the current understanding of the different prgc subtypes. The photoresponses of M1 cells are driven primarily by melanopsin phototransduction, whereas M2 cells, and also M4 M5 cells, exhibit lower levels of endogenous photosensitivity and rely upon greater excitatory inputs from the outer retina [6, 7, 11, 15, 21, 33, 34]. Specific subclasses of prgcs innervate specific areas of the brain [12, 21, 35 37] and participate in different non-image-forming response to light [12, 13]. Based on our data, it seems highly likely that different classes of prgc, and therefore different non-image-forming responses, are spectrally tuned to different wavelengths of light. Given their higher density in the dorsal retina it is likely that the majority of M2 cells show a green light bias, driven by the high levels of MWS cone opsin expression (lmax 508 nm). By contrast, EYFP-positive melanopsin-negative M4 M5 cells are more numerous in the ventral retina and likely receive predominantly UVS-driven inputs (lmax 360 nm). Responses from M1-type prgcs are likely to be closer to the peak sensitivity of melanopsin (lmax 479 nm) [38]. Conclusions In summary, our results show a previously unreported anatomical and functional specialization of the murine melanopsin system. This study provides the first evidence for a differential distribution of prgc subtypes and illustrates the importance of classical photoreceptor input in providing spectral tuning of prgc light responses. These data have clear implications for the complexity of sensory irradiance detection and the study of different non-image-forming responses to light. Supplemental Information Supplemental Information includes Supplemental Results and Discussion, Supplemental Experimental Procedures, and four figures and can be found with this article online at Acknowledgments This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Programme Grant awarded to R.G.F., S.N.P., and M.W.H. and by BBSRC grants awarded to M.W.H. and R.G.F. and to S.N.P. and R.G.F. Opn4 tau-lacz mice were a generous gift from K.-W. Yau, Johns Hopkins University. Opn4.Cre mice were a generous gift from S. Hattar, Johns Hopkins University. MWS cone opsin antibody (RJ492) was a kind gift from J. Nathans, Johns Hopkins University. Received: January 28, 2013 Revised: May 18, 2013 Accepted: July 2, 2013 Published: August 15, 2013

5 Current Biology Vol 23 No Figure 4. The Responses of M1- and M2-Type prgcs Are Spectrally Tuned by Gradients in Cone Opsin Expression Present within M Cones of the Mouse Retina (A and B) Images showing the levels of c-fos expression (red) detected within prgcs (green) located in the dorsal and ventral regions of wild-type C57/Bl6 mice, degenerate rd/rd cl mice lacking rod and cone photoreceptors, and Opn4 2/2 mice lacking melanopsin expression, following white light (A) and UV light pulses (B). (C and D) Graphs showing the percentage of M1- and M2-type prgcs showing detectable levels of c-fos expression following white light pulses (C) and UV light pulses (D). The responses of M1- and M2-type prgcs are spectrally tuned by gradients in MWS and UVS cone opsin expression present within M cones of the mouse retina. Spectral tuning of M1-type prgcs is evident from Opn4 2/2 mice receiving white light pulses (t test, p = 0.004) and wild-type mice receiving UV light pulses (t test, p = 0.03). The responses of M2-type prgcs are spectrally tuned in the wild-type retina following white light (t test, p= ) and UV light pulses (t test, p = 0.038). In all cases, the direction of enhanced responses is consistent with significant excitatory input from M cones and the opposing gradients of MWS and UVS cone opsin expression. No significant gradients in c-fos expression were observed in the rd/rd cl retina for either M1-type prgcs or M2-type prgcs following either white light or UV light pulses. Interestingly, for UV light pulses, the percentage of responsive M1 cells and the intensity of c-fos staining were lower in the wild-type retina compared to rd/rd cl retina (t test, dorsal p = 0.03, ventral p = 0.21). Analysis is based on manual counting from n = 8 10 nonoverlapping regions (0.25 mm 2 ) in the dorsal and ventral regions of each retina; values shown are the mean of n = 3 4 retina per group. Identification of M2 cells is not permitted using Opn4 2/2 mice [20](Figure S2). Orientation of retina from Opn4 2/2 and wild-type mice was performed by colabeling with UVS cone opsin (shown for Opn4 2/2 only). Orientation of rd/rd cl retina was performed based on the patterning of melanopsin expression. Data are shown as mean 6 SEM. See also Figure S4 for analysis of light-induced c-fos expression in EYFP cells from the retina of Opn4.Cre +/2 EYFP +/+ mice. References 1. Hankins, M.W., Peirson, S.N., and Foster, R.G. (2008). Melanopsin: an exciting photopigment. Trends Neurosci. 31, Do, M.T., and Yau, K.W. (2010). Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells. Physiol. Rev. 90, Hughes, S., Hankins, M.W., Foster, R.G., and Peirson, S.N. (2012). Melanopsin phototransduction: slowly emerging from the dark. Prog. Brain Res. 199, Belenky, M.A., Smeraski, C.A., Provencio, I., Sollars, P.J., and Pickard, G.E. (2003). Melanopsin retinal ganglion cells receive bipolar and amacrine cell synapses. J. Comp. Neurol. 460,

6 Melanopsin Distribution Viney, T.J., Balint, K., Hillier, D., Siegert, S., Boldogkoi, Z., Enquist, L.W., Meister, M., Cepko, C.L., and Roska, B. (2007). Local retinal circuits of melanopsin-containing ganglion cells identified by transsynaptic viral tracing. Curr. Biol. 17, Wong, K.Y., Dunn, F.A., Graham, D.M., and Berson, D.M. (2007). Synaptic influences on rat ganglion-cell photoreceptors. J. Physiol. 582, Schmidt, T.M., and Kofuji, P. (2010). Differential cone pathway influence on intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell subtypes. J. Neurosci. 30, Altimus, C.M., Güler, A.D., Villa, K.L., McNeill, D.S., Legates, T.A., and Hattar, S. (2008). Rods-cones and melanopsin detect light and dark to modulate sleep independent of image formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, Güler, A.D., Ecker, J.L., Lall, G.S., Haq, S., Altimus, C.M., Liao, H.W., Barnard, A.R., Cahill, H., Badea, T.C., Zhao, H., et al. (2008). Melanopsin cells are the principal conduits for rod-cone input to nonimage-forming vision. Nature 453, Hatori, M., Le, H., Vollmers, C., Keding, S.R., Tanaka, N., Buch, T., Waisman, A., Schmedt, C., Jegla, T., and Panda, S. (2008). Inducible ablation of melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells reveals their central role in non-image forming visual responses. PLoS ONE 3, e Lucas, R.J., Lall, G.S., Allen, A.E., and Brown, T.M. (2012). How rod, cone, and melanopsin photoreceptors come together to enlighten the mammalian circadian clock. Prog. Brain Res. 199, Chen, S.K., Badea, T.C., and Hattar, S. (2011). Photoentrainment and pupillary light reflex are mediated by distinct populations of iprgcs. Nature 476, Estevez, M.E., Fogerson, P.M., Ilardi, M.C., Borghuis, B.G., Chan, E., Weng, S., Auferkorte, O.N., Demb, J.B., and Berson, D.M. (2012). Form and function of the M4 cell, an intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell type contributing to geniculocortical vision. J. Neurosci. 32, Schmidt, T.M., Chen, S.K., and Hattar, S. (2011). Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells: many subtypes, diverse functions. Trends Neurosci. 34, Schmidt, T.M., Do, M.T., Dacey, D., Lucas, R., Hattar, S., and Matynia, A. (2011). Melanopsin-positive intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells: from form to function. J. Neurosci. 31, Semo, S., Daniela, L., Peirson, S., Butler, J., and Foster, R.G. (2003). Light induced c-fos induction in melanopsin retinal ganglion cells of young and aged rodless/coneless (rd/rd cl) mice. Eur. J. Neurosci. 18, Pickard, G.E., Baver, S.B., Ogilvie, M.D., and Sollars, P.J. (2009). Lightinduced fos expression in intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in melanopsin knockout (opn4) mice. PLoS ONE 4, e Hannibal, J., Vrang, N., Card, J.P., and Fahrenkrug, J. (2001). Lightdependent induction of cfos during subjective day and night in PACAP-containing ganglion cells of the retinohypothalamic tract. J. Biol. Rhythms 16, Berson, D.M., Castrucci, A.M., and Provencio, I. (2010). Morphology and mosaics of melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cell types in mice. J. Comp. Neurol. 518, Hattar, S., Kumar, M., Park, A., Tong, P., Tung, J., Yau, K.W., and Berson, D.M. (2006). Central projections of melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells in the mouse. J. Comp. Neurol. 497, Ecker, J.L., Dumitrescu, O.N., Wong, K.Y., Alam, N.M., Chen, S.K., LeGates, T., Renna, J.M., Prusky, G.T., Berson, D.M., and Hattar, S. (2010). Melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion-cell photoreceptors: cellular diversity and role in pattern vision. Neuron 67, Rohlich, P., van Veen, T., and Szel, A. (1994). Two different visual pigments in one retinal cone cell. Neuron 13, Applebury, M.L., Antoch, M.P., Baxter, L.C., Chun, L.L., Falk, J.D., Farhangfar, F., Kage, K., Krzystolik, M.G., Lyass, L.A., and Robbins, J.T. (2000). The murine cone photoreceptor: a single cone type expresses both S and M opsins with retinal spatial patterning. Neuron 27, Haverkamp, S., Wässle, H., Duebel, J., Kuner, T., Augustine, G.J., Feng, G., and Euler, T. (2005). The primordial, blue-cone color system of the mouse retina. J. Neurosci. 25, Nikonov, S.S., Kholodenko, R., Lem, J., and Pugh, E.N., Jr. (2006). Physiological features of the S- and M-cone photoreceptors of wildtype mice from single-cell recordings. J. Gen. Physiol. 127, Wang, Y.V., Weick, M., and Demb, J.B. (2011). Spectral and temporal sensitivity of cone-mediated responses in mouse retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurosci. 31, Breuninger, T., Puller, C., Haverkamp, S., and Euler, T. (2011). Chromatic bipolar cell pathways in the mouse retina. J. Neurosci. 31, Altimus, C.M., Güler, A.D., Alam, N.M., Arman, A.C., Prusky, G.T., Sampath, A.P., and Hattar, S. (2010). Rod photoreceptors drive circadian photoentrainment across a wide range of light intensities. Nat. Neurosci. 13, Lall, G.S., Revell, V.L., Momiji, H., Al Enezi, J., Altimus, C.M., Güler, A.D., Aguilar, C., Cameron, M.A., Allender, S., Hankins, M.W., and Lucas, R.J. (2010). Distinct contributions of rod, cone, and melanopsin photoreceptors to encoding irradiance. Neuron 66, Allen, A.E., Brown, T.M., and Lucas, R.J. (2011). A distinct contribution of short-wavelength-sensitive cones to light-evoked activity in the mouse pretectal olivary nucleus. J. Neurosci. 31, Wong, K.Y. (2012). A retinal ganglion cell that can signal irradiance continuously for 10 hours. J. Neurosci. 32, Wyszecki, G., and Stiles, W. (1982). Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae, Second Edition (New York: Wiley-Interscience). 33. Schmidt, T.M., and Kofuji, P. (2009). Functional and morphological differences among intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurosci. 29, Hu, C., Hill, D.D., and Wong, K.Y. (2013). Intrinsic physiological properties of the five types of mouse ganglion-cell photoreceptors. J. Neurophysiol. 109, Hattar, S., Liao, H.W., Takao, M., Berson, D.M., and Yau, K.W. (2002). Melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells: architecture, projections, and intrinsic photosensitivity. Science 295, Baver, S.B., Pickard, G.E., Sollars, P.J., and Pickard, G.E. (2008). Two types of melanopsin retinal ganglion cell differentially innervate the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus and the olivary pretectal nucleus. Eur. J. Neurosci. 27, McNeill, D.S., Sheely, C.J., Ecker, J.L., Badea, T.C., Morhardt, D., Guido, W., and Hattar, S. (2011). Development of melanopsin-based irradiance detecting circuitry. Neural Dev. 6, Lucas, R.J., Douglas, R.H., and Foster, R.G. (2001). Characterization of an ocular photopigment capable of driving pupillary constriction in mice. Nat. Neurosci. 4,