2016 Student Success Key Performance Indicators

Transcription

1 Cuyamaca College 2016 Student Success Key Performance Indicators

2 1 P age TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction: 2016 Key Performance Indicators... 3 Student Success Scorecard... 3 Evaluation of Disproportionate Impact... 4 College Profile All Students First-Time Students Student Access & College Readiness Student Demographics and Service Area Assessment Rates and College Readiness English Assessments Preparation Rates (Student Success Scorecard) Student Success Milestones First Year Enrollment Patterns Developmental Sequence Completion Patterns Developmental English Sequence, College Level Completion Developmental English Sequence, Transfer Level Completion Developmental Math Sequence, College Level Completion Developmental Math Sequence, Transfer Level Completion Remedial Progress Rates (Student Success Scorecard) Remedial English Progress Rates Remedial Math Progress Rates ESL Progress Rates Course Completion Course Success Rates: All Courses Course Success Rates: Transfer Level Courses Course Success Rates: Developmental Courses Course Success Rates: Career Technical Education (CTE) Courses Course Success Rates: Distance Education (DE) Courses Retention Rates Course Retention Rates: All Courses Course Retention Rates: Transfer Level Courses Course Retention Rates: Developmental Courses

3 2 P age Course Retention Rates: Career Technical Education (CTE) Courses Course Retention Rates: Distance Education (DE) Courses Persistence Rates ( to Spring) Persistence Rates ( to Spring): All Students Persistence Rates ( to Spring): First-Time Students Persistence Rates ( to ) Persistence Rates ( to ): All Students Persistence Rates ( to ): First-Time Students Persistence Rates (Student Success Scorecard) Units Attempted Units Attempted: All Students Units Attempted: First-Time Students Units Completed Units Completed: All Students Units Completed: First-Time Students Units Completion Rate in First Year Units Completion Rate (Student Success Scorecard) GPA GPA: All Students GPA: First-Time Students Student Success Outcomes Completion Rates (Student Success Scorecard) CTE Completion Rates (Student Success Scorecard) Degrees and Certificates Transfers Transfer Rate (Student Success Scorecard) Number of Transfers: CCCCO Methodology Number of Transfers: GCCCD Methodology Appendix Data Definitions Student Characteristics: GCCCD Research Database Student Characteristics: Student Success Scorecard

4 3 P age INTRODUCTION: 2016 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Developed by the GCCCD Student Success Committee in, the Student Success Framework provided guidance and structure to the student achievement metrics detailed in the Key Performance Indicators Report. As shown in Figure 1, the Framework is based on a student pathways model for student achievement. Measurement and data definitions were developed collaboratively in the Institutional Research and Planning Committee throughout -. This report is to provide the college community with useful information as it relates to students achievement and success as well as to incorporate accountability measures from the Student Success Scorecard. The data collected here is generated both by the California Community College Chancellor s Office (via MIS reporting) and the GCCCD Research Database. Lastly, this is an ongoing process and the future structure of this report will respond to the college s need for data that is aligned with major initiatives associated with Strategic Planning, Enrollment Management, Program Reviews, and other major projects on the campus. Figure 1: GCCCD Student Success Framework GCCCD Student Success Framework ACCESS DEVELOPMENTAL COLLEGE-LEVEL COMPLETION Financial Assistance Pre-assessment Prep Assessment/Orientation/Advisement Long Term Education Plan Registration Before Term Begins Degree Completion Certificate Completion Transfer Outcome Job Placement (Focus on CTE) Licensure/Certification Pass Rates Start English/Math Sequence in First Year Persist in Developmental Sequence Complete Developmental Sequence within 2 Years Update Long Term Education Plan at End of First Year Enroll in Gatekeeper Courses Start English/Math within First Year Pass College Level English/Math Within One Year Continuously Enroll in First Three Primary Terms Complete 30 units of Degree Applicable Work Completion of GE Package within 6 Years Achieve Transfer Preparedness within 6 Years Student Success Scorecard This report makes extensive use of the Student Success Scorecard. The Student Success Task Force (SSTF) recommended the implementation of a new accountability framework, whose purpose is to provide stakeholders with clear and concise information on key student progress and success metrics in order to improve performance. The recommendation specified that a scorecard be built on the existing reporting system, the Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC).

5 4 P age In 2004, Assembly Bill 1417 triggered the creation of a performance measurement system for the California Community Colleges (CCC). That legislation and ensuing budget action authorized the California Community Colleges Chancellor s Office (CCCCO) to design and implement a performance measurement system containing performance indicators for the system and its colleges. This comprehensive system is known as the Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges, or ARCC. To satisfy the request of the SSTF, the ARCC Advisory Workgroup, which guided the development of the initial accountability system in 2005, was reconvened. The workgroup was represented by individuals from various community college organizations and stakeholder groups, as well as researchers with technical expertise in performance measures. This technical workgroup reviewed the existing framework and designed the new Student Success Scorecard. The data has now been disaggregated by gender, age, ethnicity, disability status, economically disadvantaged status, and veteran status in order for the colleges to monitor achievement gaps. In addition, outcome metrics are further broken down by whether or not first-time students enrolled at the colleges prepared for college level academics. The Student Success Scorecard can be found at the following link: The following report includes synopsis of the overall trends in the scorecard data. EVALUATION OF DISPROPORTIONATE IMPACT Using cohorts and outcomes from the California Community Colleges Chancellor s Office (CCCCO) Student Success Scorecard and DataMart, this document presents two methodologies to measure disproportional impact for disaggregated subgroups within the California Community Colleges (CCC) student population: the test and the proportionality test. Disproportionate impact occurs when the percentage of persons from a particular racial, ethnic, gender, age or disability group who are directed to a particular service or placement based on an assessment instrument, method, or procedure is significantly different from the representation of that group in the population of persons being assessed, and that discrepancy is not justified by empirical evidence demonstrating that the assessment instrument, method or procedure is a valid and reliable predictor of performance in the relevant educational setting. [Title 5 Section 55502(d)] The second-to-last column of all tables disaggregated by cohort student characteristics contains an evaluation of possible disproportionate impact for each subgroup of students using the Rule outlined in the 1978 Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures and was used in Title VII enforcement by the U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission, Department of Labor, and the Department of Justice. The Rule states that: A selection rate for any race, sex, or ethnic group which is less than four-fifths (4/5) (or eighty percent) of the rate for the group with the highest rate will generally be regarded by the Federal enforcement agencies as evidence of adverse impact, while a greater than four-fifths rate will generally not be regarded by Federal enforcement agencies as evidence of adverse impact. [Section 60-3, Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedure (1978); 43 FR 38295(August 25, 1978)] Subgroups that do not comprise at least two percent of the cohort are denoted by with an asterisk (*). The bold percentage located at the bottom of the disproportionate impact column provides the outcome percentage of the reference group multiplied by 80 percent (the reference group is provided in parentheses). The last column of all tables contains the results obtained from the proportionality methodology. The proportionality methodology compares the percentage of a disaggregated subgroup in an initial cohort to its own percentage in the resultant outcome group. The formula for proportionality is the percentage in the outcome group divided by the percentage in the original cohort (outcome percentage/cohort percentage). For example, 7.9 percent of the first-time, degree/transfer-seeking cohort is comprised of African American or black students; whereas 6.0 percent of the students who achieved a successful outcome (i.e., degree, certificate, transfer, or transfer-prepared) were African American or black students. Dividing 6.0% by 7.9% we find a proportionality index of The higher the proportionality, the higher the rate at which a subgroup has attained a desired educational outcome; the lower the proportionality index, the lower the attainment rate. The proportionality methodology does not specify at which point a proportionality index should be considered as a disproportionate impact. The designation of which disaggregated subgroups should be considered as disproportionately impacted will rely on the judgment of the analysis team at the college.

6 5 P age ality Index Interpretation 1.0 s of subgroups are equal. Less Than 1.0 More Than 1.0 Subgroup is less prevalent in the outcome group. Subgroup is more prevalent in the outcome group. The tables below summarize the indicators of possible disproportionate impact by the different population groups of students across all measures investigated in this report. The summary categories are defined as: Classification Description Yes Disproportionate impact indicated by BOTH the test and the proportionality test (< 0.90) Yes 1 Disproportionate impact indicated by the test but NOT the proportionality test (>= 0.90) Yes 2 No N/A Disproportionate impact indicated by the proportionality test (< 0.90) but NOT the test Disproportionate impact NOT indicated Sample size less than 30 students

7 6 P age Table 1: Summary of Disproportionate Impact by Race/Ethnicity African American American Indian Asian Filipino Hispanic Pacific Islander White Multi- Racial Student Access ENGL-109/110 Placement Yes N/A Yes Yes No N/A No No ENGL-120 Placement Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A No No MATH-103/110 Placement Yes N/A No No No N/A No No MATH-120 or above Placement Yes N/A No No Yes 1 N/A Yes 1 Yes 1 Preparation Rate (SSS) Yes No No Yes Yes No No No Student Success Milestones: Developmental 1st Year Enrollment Yes Yes No Yes No No No No Developmental English Seq. (College) Yes N/A No No No N/A No No Developmental English Seq. (Transfer) Yes N/A No No No N/A No No Remedial English Progress (SSS) Yes Yes No No No No No No Developmental Math Seq. (College) Yes N/A No N/A No N/A No No Developmental Math Seq. (Transfer) Yes N/A No N/A No N/A No No Remedial Math Progress (SSS) Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No ESL Progress (SSS) N/A N/A No N/A Yes N/A No No Course Completion: Developmental Yes N/A No No No N/A No No Student Success Milestones: College Level Course Completion: Overall Yes No No No No No No No Course Completion: Transfer Yes No No No No No No No Course Completion: CTE Yes No No No No No No No Course Completion: DE Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No Persistence ( to Spring) Yes 2 Yes 2 No No No No No No 1st Time Persistence ( to Spring) Yes 2 Yes 2 No No No No No No Persistence ( to ) Yes Yes 2 No No No No No No 1st Time Persistence ( to ) Yes Yes No No No No No No Persistence (SSS) No No No No No No No No 24+ Units Completion Yes Yes No No No No No No 30+ Units Completion (SSS) Yes 2 No No No No No No No Student Success Outcomes Completion Rate (SSS) Yes 2 No No Yes 2 Yes 2 Yes 2 No No CTE Completion Rate (SSS) No No No No No No No No Transfer Rate (SSS) No No No No Yes 2 Yes No No

8 7 P age Table 2: Summary of Disproportionate Impact by Gender Female Male Student Access ENGL-109/110 Placement No No ENGL-120 Placement No No MATH-103/110 Placement No No MATH-120 or above Placement No No Preparation Rate (SSS) No No Student Success Milestones: Developmental 1st Year Enrollment No No Developmental English Seq. (College) No No Developmental English Seq. (Transfer) No Yes Remedial English Progress (SSS) No No Developmental Math Seq. (College) No Yes Developmental Math Seq. (Transfer) No Yes Remedial Math Progress (SSS) No No ESL Progress (SSS) No Yes Course Completion: Developmental No No Student Success Milestones: College Level Course Completion: Overall No No Course Completion: Transfer No No Course Completion: CTE No No Course Completion: DE No No Persistence ( to Spring) No No 1st Time Persistence ( to Spring) No No Persistence ( to ) No No 1st Time Persistence ( to ) No No Persistence (SSS) No No 24+ Units Completion No No 30+ Units Completion (SSS) No No Student Success Outcomes Completion Rate (SSS) No No CTE Completion Rate (SSS) No No Transfer Rate (SSS) No No

9 8 P age Table 3: Summary of Disproportionate Impact by Age <20 years years years 40+ years Student Access ENGL-109/110 Placement No No No No ENGL-120 Placement Yes Yes No Yes MATH-103/110 Placement No Yes Yes Yes MATH-120 or above Placement No Yes Yes Yes Preparation Rate (SSS) No Yes Yes Yes Student Success Milestones: Developmental 1st Year Enrollment No Yes Yes Yes Developmental English Seq. (College) No Yes Yes Yes Developmental English Seq. (Transfer) No Yes Yes Yes Remedial English Progress (SSS) No Yes Yes Yes Developmental Math Seq. (College) Yes 1 Yes No No Developmental Math Seq. (Transfer) No No No Yes Remedial Math Progress (SSS) Yes Yes 1 No No ESL Progress (SSS) No Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes Course Completion: Developmental No Yes No No Student Success Milestones: College Level Course Completion: Overall No No No No Course Completion: Transfer No No No No Course Completion: CTE No No No No Course Completion: DE No No No No Persistence ( to Spring) No No No No 1st Time Persistence ( to Spring) No Yes Yes Yes Persistence ( to ) No Yes 1 Yes No 1st Time Persistence ( to ) No Yes Yes Yes Persistence (SSS) No No No No 24+ Units Completion No Yes Yes Yes 30+ Units Completion (SSS) No No No No Student Success Outcomes Completion Rate (SSS) No Yes Yes Yes CTE Completion Rate (SSS) No No Yes 1 Yes Transfer Rate (SSS) No Yes Yes Yes

10 9 P age Table 4: Summary of Disproportionate Impact by Disability Status, Economically Disadvantaged, Veteran Status, Foster Youth, and 1 st Generation Disability Economically Veteran Foster 1st Status Disadvantaged Status Youth Generation Student Access ENGL-109/110 Placement Yes No No N/A Yes ENGL-120 Placement Yes Yes No N/A Yes MATH-103/110 Placement Yes No Yes N/A No MATH-120 or above Placement Yes Yes 1 Yes N/A Yes Preparation Rate (SSS) Yes Yes Yes N/A N/A Student Success Milestones: Developmental 1st Year Enrollment No No Yes 2 No No Developmental English Seq. (College) Yes Yes No N/A No Developmental English Seq. (Transfer) Yes No No N/A No Remedial English Progress (SSS) Yes No No N/A N/A Developmental Math Seq. (College) Yes No No N/A No Developmental Math Seq. (Transfer) Yes No No N/A No Remedial Math Progress (SSS) No No No N/A N/A ESL Progress (SSS) No No N/A N/A N/A Course Completion: Developmental No No No Yes No Student Success Milestones: College Level Course Completion: Overall No No No Yes No Course Completion: Transfer No No No Yes No Course Completion: CTE No No No Yes No Course Completion: DE No No No Yes No Persistence ( to Spring) No No No No No 1st Time Persistence ( to Spring) No No No No No Persistence ( to ) No No No Yes 2 No 1st Time Persistence ( to ) No No No Yes No Persistence (SSS) No No No N/A N/A 24+ Units Completion Yes No No Yes No 30+ Units Completion (SSS) No No No N/A N/A Student Success Outcomes Completion Rate (SSS) Yes 2 No No N/A N/A CTE Completion Rate (SSS) No No No N/A N/A Transfer Rate (SSS) Yes Yes No N/A N/A

11 10 P age COLLEGE PROFILE All Students Based on the GCCCD Research Database, the following tables display the unduplicated student headcount of those who received a grade notation. Annual headcounts include leading summers (e.g., summer 2010 enrollments are included in the annual headcount). Table 5: Unduplicated Student Headcount Trend % Change Summer 2,431 1,229 1,437 2,794 2,395 2, % 10,239 8,754 8,665 8,996 8,765 9, % Spring 10,290 9,908 9,236 9,304 9,079 9, % Total (Unduplicated) 15,464 13,466 13,176 13,896 13,380 13, % Table 6: Unduplicated Student Headcount by Gender, - Female 53.4% 53.0% 52.5% 52.9% 53.9% 53.1% (n = 4,672) (n = 4,590) (n = 4,727) (n = 4,633) (n = 4,933) (n = 23,555) Male 45.7% 46.2% 46.9% 46.5% 45.2% 46.1% (n = 4,002) (n = 4,005) (n = 4,215) (n = 4,078) (n = 4,130) (n = 20,430) Unknown 0.9% 0.8% 0.6% 0.6% 0.9% 0.8% (n = 80) (n = 70) (n = 54) (n = 54) (n = 82) (n = 340) Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325)

12 11 P age Table 7: Unduplicated Student Headcount by Race/Ethnicity, - African-American/Black 6.0% 6.1% 6.2% 5.9% 5.5% 5.9% (n = 523) (n = 526) (n = 559) (n = 513) (n = 502) (n = 2,623) American Indian 0.4% 0.4% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% (n = 33) (n = 33) (n = 44) (n = 38) (n = 39) (n = 187) Asian 3.7% 3.7% 3.4% 3.2% 3.2% 3.4% (n = 322) (n = 317) (n = 306) (n = 284) (n = 292) (n = 1,521) Filipino 2.4% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% (n = 211) (n = 216) (n = 222) (n = 221) (n = 230) (n = 1,100) Hispanic/Latino 26.9% 29.3% 31.3% 32.9% 32.0% 30.5% (n = 2,359) (n = 2,540) (n = 2,814) (n = 2,881) (n = 2,928) (n = 13,522) Pacific Islander 0.7% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.3% 0.5% (n = 61) (n = 47) (n = 49) (n = 41) (n = 32) (n = 230) White 48.0% 46.8% 45.5% 45.4% 46.6% 46.4% (n = 4,200) (n = 4,051) (n = 4,089) (n = 3,981) (n = 4,264) (n = 20,585) Two or more 7.6% 7.7% 7.8% 7.7% 8.1% 7.8% (n = 666) (n = 665) (n = 705) (n = 673) (n = 741) (n = 3,450) Unknown 4.3% 3.1% 2.3% 1.5% 1.3% 2.5% (n = 379) (n = 270) (n = 208) (n = 133) (n = 117) (n = 1,107) Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325)

13 12 P age Table 8: Unduplicated Student Headcount by Age, - < 20 years 26.9% 25.6% 25.7% 25.3% 26.1% 25.9% (n = 2,353) (n = 2,216) (n = 2,308) (n = 2,219) (n = 2,386) (n = 11,482) years 31.4% 33.5% 34.6% 34.2% 33.4% 33.4% (n = 2,746) (n = 2,905) (n = 3,114) (n = 2,994) (n = 3,053) (n = 14,812) years 24.9% 25.3% 24.9% 26.2% 26.4% 25.6% (n = 2,184) (n = 2,194) (n = 2,237) (n = 2,298) (n = 2,418) (n = 11,331) 40+ years 16.8% 15.6% 14.9% 14.3% 14.1% 15.1% (n = 1,471) (n = 1,350) (n = 1,337) (n = 1,254) (n = 1,288) (n = 6,700) Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) Table 9: Unduplicated Student Headcount by Disability Status, - Yes 8.3% 9.5% 9.1% 8.9% 8.2% 8.8% (n = 729) (n = 820) (n = 818) (n = 779) (n = 748) (n = 3,894) No 91.7% 90.5% 90.9% 91.1% 91.8% 91.2% (n = 8,025) (n = 7,845) (n = 8,178) (n = 7,986) (n = 8,397) (n = 40,431) Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325)

14 13 P age Table 10: Unduplicated Student Headcount by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 61.0% 63.2% 65.0% 66.1% 66.0% 64.3% (n = 5,341) (n = 5,476) (n = 5,843) (n = 5,792) (n = 6,032) (n = 28,484) No 39.0% 36.8% 35.0% 33.9% 34.0% 35.7% (n = 3,413) (n = 3,189) (n = 3,153) (n = 2,973) (n = 3,113) (n = 15,841) Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) Table 11: Unduplicated Student Headcount by Veteran Status, - Yes 5.7% 6.3% 5.7% 5.2% 4.7% 5.5% (n = 499) (n = 546) (n = 509) (n = 459) (n = 434) (n = 2,447) No 94.3% 93.7% 94.3% 94.8% 95.3% 94.5% (n = 8,255) (n = 8,119) (n = 8,487) (n = 8,306) (n = 8,711) (n = 41,878) Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) Table 12: Unduplicated Student Headcount by Foster Youth, - Yes 0.4% 0.4% 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% (n = 31) (n = 34) (n = 31) (n = 30) (n = 33) (n = 159) No 99.6% 99.6% 99.7% 99.7% 99.6% 99.6% (n = 8,723) (n = 8,631) (n = 8,965) (n = 8,735) (n = 9,112) (n = 44,166) Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325)

15 14 P age Table 13: Unduplicated Headcount by Recent High School Graduate, - Yes 11.7% 10.7% 11.8% 10.4% 10.7% 11.0% (n = 1,026) (n = 924) (n = 1,060) (n = 908) (n = 976) (n = 4,894) No 88.3% 89.3% 88.2% 89.6% 89.3% 89.0% (n = 7,728) (n = 7,741) (n = 7,936) (n = 7,857) (n = 8,169) (n = 39,431) Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) Table 14: Unduplicated Headcount by First Generation, - Yes 18.6% 22.2% 26.8% 30.6% 33.3% 26.4% (n = 1,630) (n = 1,924) (n = 2,409) (n = 2,684) (n = 3,041) (n = 11,688) No 28.7% 35.8% 42.2% 46.0% 48.0% 40.2% (n = 2,516) (n = 3,102) (n = 3,794) (n = 4,030) (n = 4,391) (n = 17,833) Unknown/Not reported 52.6% 42.0% 31.0% 23.4% 18.7% 33.4% (n = 4,608) (n = 3,639) (n = 2,793) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,713) (n = 14,804) Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325)

16 15 P age First-Time Students Figure 2 displays the five-year unduplicated headcount trend of first-time students who received a grade notation. Figure 2: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount, -

17 16 P age The following tables display the unduplicated headcounts of first-time students who received a grade notation Table 15: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount by Gender, - Female 46.8% 48.3% 47.0% 48.6% 51.5% 48.4% (n = 787) (n = 782) (n = 889) (n = 856) (n = 952) (n = 4,266) Male 52.2% 51.0% 52.1% 50.5% 46.9% 50.5% (n = 878) (n = 825) (n = 987) (n = 889) (n = 867) (n = 4,446) Unknown 1.0% 0.7% 0.9% 1.0% 1.7% 1.1% (n = 17) (n = 11) (n = 17) (n = 17) (n = 31) (n = 93) Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805)

18 17 P age Table 16: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount by Race/Ethnicity, - African-American/Black 6.9% 8.3% 7.4% 7.4% 5.6% 7.1% (n = 116) (n = 135) (n = 140) (n = 130) (n = 103) (n = 624) American Indian 0.3% 0.4% 0.3% 0.4% 0.6% 0.4% (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 12) (n = 35) Asian 2.9% 2.8% 2.6% 2.2% 2.9% 2.7% (n = 114) (n = 45) (n = 50) (n = 39) (n = 53) (n = 235) Filipino 2.5% 3.1% 2.5% 2.6% 2.1% 2.5% (n = 42) (n = 50) (n = 48) (n = 45) (n = 39) (n = 224) Hispanic/Latino 35.4% 39.4% 38.9% 37.4% 34.9% 37.2% (n = 596) (n = 638) (n = 737) (n = 659) (n = 646) (n = 3,276) Pacific Islander 0.4% 0.4% 0.5% 0.4% 0.3% 0.4% (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 36) White 43.2% 38.9% 40.1% 42.8% 45.6% 42.2% (n = 727) (n = 629) (n = 760) (n = 755) (n = 843) (n = 3,714) Two or more 6.8% 5.5% 6.7% 6.2% 7.5% 6.5% (n = 114) (n = 89) (n = 126) (n = 109) (n = 138) (n = 576) Unknown 1.6% 1.2% 1.0% 0.6% 0.5% 1.0% (n = 27) (n = 19) (n = 18) (n = 11) (n = 10) (n = 85) Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805)

19 18 P age Table 17: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount by Age, - < 20 years 58.3% 60.9% 61.3% 58.1% 56.9% 59.1% (n = 981) (n = 986) (n = 1,160) (n = 1,023) (n = 1,052) (n = 5,202) years 15.9% 16.7% 15.4% 17.0% 16.9% 16.4% (n = 268) (n = 270) (n = 291) (n = 300) (n = 312) (n = 1,441) years 15.6% 15.5% 15.7% 17.8% 18.3% 16.6% (n = 262) (n = 251) (n = 298) (n = 314) (n = 338) (n = 1,463) 40+ years 10.2% 6.9% 7.6% 7.1% 8.0% 7.9% (n = 171) (n = 111) (n = 144) (n = 125) (n = 148) (n = 699) Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) Table 18: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount by Disability Status, - Yes 7.4% 8.2% 6.2% 5.8% 5.0% 6.5% (n = 124) (n = 133) (n = 118) (n = 103) (n = 93) (n = 571) No 92.6% 91.8% 93.8% 94.2% 95.0% 93.5% (n = 1,558) (n = 1,485) (n = 1,775) (n = 1,659) (n = 1,757) (n = 8,234) Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805)

20 19 P age Table 19: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 62.5% 61.1% 63.5% 64.9% 67.6% 64.0% (n = 1,052) (n = 988) (n = 1,203) (n = 1,143) (n = 1,251) (n = 5,637) No 37.5% 38.9% 36.5% 35.1% 32.4% 36.0% (n = 630) (n = 630) (n = 690) (n = 619) (n = 599) (n = 3,168) Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) Table 20: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount by Veteran Status, - Yes 4.6% 5.5% 5.1% 4.0% 4.1% 4.6% (n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 96) (n = 71) (n = 75) (n = 409) No 95.4% 94.5% 94.9% 96.0% 95.9% 95.4% (n = 1,604) (n = 1,529) (n = 1,797) (n = 1,691) (n = 1,775) (n = 8,396) Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) Table 21: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount by Foster Youth, - Yes 0.3% 0.4% 0.3% 0.3% 0.5% 0.4% (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 32) No 99.7% 99.6% 99.7% 99.7% 99.5% 99.6% (n = 1,677) (n = 1,611) (n = 1,888) (n = 1,757) (n = 1,840) (n = 8,773) Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805)

21 20 P age Table 22: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount by Recent High School Graduate, - Yes 49.9% 51.9% 51.3% 47.8% 47.9% 49.7% (n = 840) (n = 839) (n = 971) (n = 843) (n = 887) (n = 4,380) No 50.1% 48.1% 48.7% 52.2% 52.1% 50.3% (n = 842) (n = 779) (n = 922) (n = 919) (n = 963) (n = 4,425) Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) Table 23: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount by First Generation, - Yes 33.1% 33.6% 35.6% 34.9% 38.3% 35.2% (n = 556) (n = 544) (n = 673) (n = 615) (n = 709) (n = 3,097) No 45.6% 56.5% 54.7% 58.1% 53.2% 53.7% (n = 767) (n = 914) (n = 1,036) (n = 1,024) (n = 985) (n = 4,726) Unknown/Not reported 21.3% 9.9% 9.7% 7.0% 8.4% 11.2% (n = 359) (n = 160) (n = 184) (n = 123) (n = 156) (n = 982) Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805)

22 21 P age Table 24: Unduplicated First-Time Student Headcount by High School Attendance, - Valhalla 8.0% 9.1% 9.6% 10.2% 9.2% 9.2% (n = 134) (n = 148) (n = 182) (n = 179) (n = 170) (n = 813) Steele Canyon 8.1% 8.3% 7.1% 7.9% 7.6% 7.8% (n = 137) (n = 135) (n = 134) (n = 139) (n = 140) (n = 685) Monte Vista 6.8% 7.9% 8.8% 6.9% 6.2% 7.3% (n = 115) (n = 128) (n = 167) (n = 122) (n = 114) (n = 646) Granite Hills 7.0% 5.7% 5.7% 5.3% 6.6% 6.0% (n = 117) (n = 92) (n = 107) (n = 93) (n = 122) (n = 531) Mount Miguel 5.6% 4.0% 4.3% 4.0% 3.3% 4.2% (n = 95) (n = 65) (n = 82) (n = 70) (n = 61) (n = 373) El Cajon Valley 4.3% 4.3% 4.7% 3.4% 3.9% 4.1% (n = 73) (n = 69) (n = 89) (n = 60) (n = 72) (n = 363) Grossmont 2.2% 3.3% 2.3% 2.8% 3.7% 2.9% (n = 37) (n = 53) (n = 44) (n = 49) (n = 68) (n = 251) El Capitan 1.6% 1.8% 3.0% 2.0% 1.9% 2.1% (n = 27) (n = 29) (n = 57) (n = 36) (n = 35) (n = 184) Helix 1.6% 2.0% 3.0% 2.3% 1.4% 2.1% (n = 27) (n = 33) (n = 56) (n = 41) (n = 26) (n = 183) West Hills 1.4% 1.9% 1.5% 1.3% 1.5% 1.5% (n = 24) (n = 30) (n = 29) (n = 23) (n = 27) (n = 133) Morse 1.0% 1.4% 1.1% 1.6% 0.8% 1.2% (n = 17) (n = 22) (n = 21) (n = 29) (n = 15) (n = 104) Santana 0.8% 0.9% 1.3% 1.1% 0.9% 1.0% (n = 13) (n = 14) (n = 24) (n = 20) (n = 17) (n = 88) Henry 1.2% 1.1% 1.2% 0.9% 0.5% 1.0% (n = 20) (n = 18) (n = 23) (n = 15) (n = 10) (n = 86) Bonita Vista Senior 0.8% 1.1% 0.9% 1.0% 0.7% 0.9% (n = 14) (n = 18) (n = 17) (n = 18) (n = 13) (n = 80) Eastlake 1.1% 1.1% 0.6% 0.8% 0.8% 0.9% (n = 19) (n = 18) (n = 11) (n = 14) (n = 14) (n = 76) Sweetwater 0.6% 1.1% 0.7% 1.2% 0.5% 0.8% (n = 10) (n = 18) (n = 13) (n = 21) (n = 10) (n = 72) Hilltop Senior 0.6% 1.1% 0.7% 0.7% 0.3% 0.7% (n = 10) (n = 18) (n = 14) (n = 12) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 60) Charter School of San Diego 0.4% 0.8% 1.0% 0.6% 0.5% 0.7% (n = 1 to 9) (n = 13) (n = 18) (n = 10) (n = 10) (n = 58) Otay Ranch Senior 0.4% 0.6% 0.4% 0.9% 0.6% 0.6% (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 15) (n = 12) (n = 50) Other high school/not reported 46.3% 42.5% 42.2% 45.2% 49.1% 45.1% (n = 779) (n = 688) (n = 798) (n = 796) (n = 908) (n = 3,969) Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805)

23 22 P age STUDENT ACCESS & COLLEGE READINESS Student Demographics and Service Area The college service area is defined by the zip codes in which 90% of the enrolled students reside in each given academic year (summer, fall, spring). The service area population estimates were extracted from SANDAG on 6/17/2016, and college demographics are from the GCCCD research database. Table 25: Cuyamaca College Service Area Population and Student Comparison by Race/Ethnicity Service Area Service Area Service Area Service Area Service Area Service Area CC Students CC Students CC Students CC Students CC Students CC Students Population Population Population Population Population Population African-American 7.0% 6.9% 6.0% 6.5% 6.7% 6.2% 6.4% 5.9% 6.1% 6.4% 6.5% 6.4% Asian 3.9% 11.7% 3.9% 11.5% 3.9% 11.5% 3.6% 11.7% 3.3% 10.3% 3.7% 11.4% Hispanic 25.2% 38.0% 27.3% 38.7% 28.5% 39.2% 30.7% 39.1% 31.8% 42.7% 28.6% 39.5% White 47.0% 39.2% 47.2% 39.1% 46.3% 38.9% 45.3% 39.0% 45.5% 36.5% 46.3% 38.6% Two or more 7.8% 3.2% 8.2% 3.1% 8.1% 3.2% 8.3% 3.2% 8.2% 3.0% 8.1% 3.1% Unknown/Other 9.1% 1.1% 7.4% 1.1% 6.6% 1.1% 5.6% 1.1% 5.2% 1.1% 6.8% 1.1% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

24 23 P age Table 26: Cuyamaca College Service Area Population and Student Comparison by Gender Service Area Service Area Service Area Service Area Service Area Service Area CC Students CC Students CC Students CC Students CC Students CC Students Population Population Population Population Population Population Female 54.9% 50.4% 53.5% 50.3% 53.2% 50.4% 53.8% 50.4% 53.8% 50.7% 53.9% 50.4% Male 44.4% 49.6% 45.7% 49.7% 46.1% 49.6% 45.5% 49.6% 45.5% 49.3% 45.4% 49.6% Unknown 0.8% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Table 27: Cuyamaca College Service Area Population and Student Comparison by Age Service Area Service Area Service Area Service Area Service Area Service Area CC Students CC Students CC Students CC Students CC Students CC Students Population Population Population Population Population Population years 6.6% 12.9% 2.8% 12.7% 3.0% 12.5% 3.2% 12.5% 3.5% 12.7% 3.9% 12.7% years 52.4% 13.1% 55.4% 13.1% 55.6% 13.0% 56.0% 13.0% 56.3% 13.1% 55.1% 13.0% years 12.5% 9.4% 13.1% 9.4% 13.2% 9.5% 13.3% 9.4% 13.5% 8.6% 13.1% 9.3% years 12.6% 16.3% 12.8% 16.1% 12.9% 16.4% 13.1% 16.4% 12.8% 15.9% 12.8% 16.2% years 15.2% 35.9% 15.1% 35.9% 14.5% 35.7% 13.5% 35.5% 12.9% 36.1% 14.3% 35.8% 65+ years 0.7% 12.4% 0.8% 12.6% 0.7% 12.9% 0.9% 13.2% 0.9% 13.6% 0.8% 12.9% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

25 24 P age Assessment Rates and College Readiness English, ESL, and math assessment rates of first-time fall cohort students were examined. It should be noted that in spring, the district changed assessment instruments to ACCUPLACER, thus the fall cohort primarily assessed using ACCUPLACER whereas earlier cohorts assessed using the prior assessment instruments. Also, many first-time students are exempt from the assessment process via various methods (e.g., AP scores, SAT/ACT scores, EAP, prior coursework, assessments taken at other California community colleges), but the tables include only students who took an assessment at GCCCD. Table 28: Assessment Rates of First-Time GCCCD Students by Discipline, - English Placement 53.9% 55.4% 59.3% 55.1% 49.8% 54.7% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) ESL Placement 9.9% 7.0% 6.5% 9.0% 12.9% 9.1% (n = 167) (n = 114) (n = 123) (n = 159) (n = 239) (n = 802) English or ESL Placement 63.6% 61.7% 65.5% 63.3% 61.6% 63.2% (n = 1,069) (n = 999) (n = 1,240) (n = 1,116) (n = 1,139) (n = 5,563) Math Placement 61.5% 60.6% 64.3% 62.0% 56.6% 61.0% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) 1st Time Cohort (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) English Assessments Table 29: English Placement Levels, - ENGL % 13.7% 10.0% 11.9% 13.7% 12.1% (n = 105) (n = 123) (n = 112) (n = 115) (n = 126) (n = 581) ENGL % 58.0% 57.8% 26.6% 31.3% 46.4% (n = 522) (n = 520) (n = 649) (n = 258) (n = 288) (n = 2,237) ENGL-109/ % 17.8% 22.3% 35.5% 35.0% 26.6% (n = 204) (n = 160) (n = 250) (n = 344) (n = 322) (n = 1,280) ENGL % 10.5% 10.0% 26.1% 20.1% 14.9% (n = 76) (n = 94) (n = 112) (n = 253) (n = 185) (n = 720) 1st Time Cohort (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)

26 25 P age ENGL-090 Placements Table 30: ENGL-090 Placements by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 26.7% 17.8% 8.2% 21.8% 10.2% 17.1% (n = 60) (n = 73) (n = 61) (n = 55) (n = 49) (n = 298) American Indian 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 7.1% (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 14) Asian 22.2% 33.3% 20.0% 46.7% 28.6% 29.3% (n = 18) (n = 18) (n = 20) (n = 15) (n = 28) (n = 99) Filipino 16.7% 13.0% 0.0% 12.0% 14.3% 10.7% (n = 18) (n = 23) (n = 23) (n = 25) (n = 14) (n = 103) Hispanic/Latino 12.0% 13.4% 13.3% 11.9% 11.1% 12.4% (n = 375) (n = 387) (n = 481) (n = 403) (n = 380) (n = 2,026) Pacific Islander 0.0% 20.0% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 18) White 7.6% 12.5% 7.1% 9.5% 16.1% 10.4% (n = 344) (n = 329) (n = 450) (n = 399) (n = 380) (n = 1,902) Two or more 8.8% 11.8% 8.1% 7.7% 9.5% 9.0% (n = 68) (n = 51) (n = 74) (n = 65) (n = 63) (n = 321) Total 11.6% 13.7% 10.0% 11.9% 13.7% 12.1% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) Table 31: ENGL-090 Placements by Gender, - Female 12.9% 12.6% 10.5% 12.1% 14.0% 12.3% (n = 420) (n = 454) (n = 545) (n = 478) (n = 443) (n = 2,340) Male 10.1% 14.5% 9.5% 11.8% 13.5% 11.7% (n = 477) (n = 435) (n = 569) (n = 485) (n = 465) (n = 2,431) Total 11.6% 13.7% 10.0% 11.9% 13.7% 12.1% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)

27 26 P age Table 32: ENGL-090 Placements by Age, - < 20 years 10.1% 13.1% 9.7% 11.3% 12.8% 11.3% (n = 775) (n = 753) (n = 937) (n = 787) (n = 743) (n = 3,995) years 17.9% 21.2% 11.8% 12.3% 11.2% 14.4% (n = 67) (n = 66) (n = 85) (n = 81) (n = 98) (n = 397) years 15.2% 14.8% 6.9% 15.7% 25.8% 15.4% (n = 46) (n = 61) (n = 72) (n = 83) (n = 62) (n = 324) 40+ years 42.1% 5.9% 20.7% 15.8% 22.2% 21.6% (n = 19) (n = 17) (n = 29) (n = 19) (n = 18) (n = 102) Total 11.6% 13.7% 10.0% 11.9% 13.7% 12.1% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) Table 33: ENGL-090 Placements by Disability Status, - Yes 39.7% 26.4% 29.1% 32.4% 27.3% 30.7% (n = 63) (n = 87) (n = 79) (n = 71) (n = 55) (n = 355) No 9.5% 12.3% 8.5% 10.2% 12.8% 10.6% (n = 844) (n = 810) (n = 1,044) (n = 899) (n = 866) (n = 4,463) Total 11.6% 13.7% 10.0% 11.9% 13.7% 12.1% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)

28 27 P age Table 34: ENGL-090 Placements by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 14.3% 16.1% 12.6% 13.7% 17.1% 14.7% (n = 574) (n = 584) (n = 755) (n = 677) (n = 662) (n = 3,252) No 6.9% 9.3% 4.6% 7.5% 5.0% 6.6% (n = 333) (n = 313) (n = 368) (n = 293) (n = 259) (n = 1,566) Total 11.6% 13.7% 10.0% 11.9% 13.7% 12.1% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) Table 35: ENGL-090 Placements by Veteran Status, - Yes 11.4% 7.3% 2.4% 3.4% 3.6% 5.7% (n = 35) (n = 41) (n = 41) (n = 29) (n = 28) (n = 174) No 11.6% 14.0% 10.3% 12.1% 14.0% 12.3% (n = 872) (n = 856) (n = 1,082) (n = 941) (n = 893) (n = 4,644) Total 11.6% 13.7% 10.0% 11.9% 13.7% 12.1% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) Table 36: ENGL-090 Placements by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 0.0% 20.0% 25.0% 0.0% 33.3% 19.2% (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 26) No 11.6% 13.7% 9.9% 11.9% 13.5% 12.0% (n = 904) (n = 892) (n = 1,119) (n = 965) (n = 912) (n = 4,792) Total 11.6% 13.7% 10.0% 11.9% 13.7% 12.1% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)

29 28 P age Table 37: ENGL-090 Placements by 1st Generation, - Yes 17.2% 17.6% 15.2% 16.7% 18.0% 16.9% (n = 309) (n = 306) (n = 401) (n = 342) (n = 362) (n = 1,720) No 7.4% 10.1% 5.3% 7.9% 9.8% 8.0% (n = 446) (n = 514) (n = 619) (n = 569) (n = 502) (n = 2,650) Total 11.6% 13.7% 10.0% 11.9% 13.7% 12.1% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)

30 29 P age ENGL-098 Placements Table 38: ENGL-098 Placements by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 56.7% 68.5% 75.4% 30.9% 36.7% 55.4% (n = 60) (n = 73) (n = 61) (n = 55) (n = 49) (n = 298) American Indian 100.0% 100.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 57.1% (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 14) Asian 61.1% 61.1% 50.0% 6.7% 21.4% 39.4% (n = 18) (n = 18) (n = 20) (n = 15) (n = 28) (n = 99) Filipino 61.1% 78.3% 69.6% 32.0% 50.0% 58.3% (n = 18) (n = 23) (n = 23) (n = 25) (n = 14) (n = 103) Hispanic/Latino 60.8% 63.3% 64.9% 31.3% 37.9% 52.1% (n = 375) (n = 387) (n = 481) (n = 403) (n = 380) (n = 2,026) Pacific Islander 50.0% 40.0% 33.3% 0.0% 100.0% 38.9% (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 18) White 53.8% 47.7% 49.1% 21.6% 23.7% 38.9% (n = 344) (n = 329) (n = 450) (n = 399) (n = 380) (n = 1,902) Two or more 61.8% 54.9% 51.4% 29.2% 33.3% 46.1% (n = 68) (n = 51) (n = 74) (n = 65) (n = 63) (n = 321) Total 57.6% 58.0% 57.8% 26.6% 31.3% 46.4% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) Table 39: ENGL-098 Placements by Gender, - Female 59.5% 60.6% 57.6% 26.2% 33.6% 47.6% (n = 420) (n = 454) (n = 545) (n = 478) (n = 443) (n = 2,340) Male 56.6% 55.6% 58.0% 26.8% 28.8% 45.5% (n = 477) (n = 435) (n = 569) (n = 485) (n = 465) (n = 2,431) Total 57.6% 58.0% 57.8% 26.6% 31.3% 46.4% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)

31 30 P age Table 40: ENGL-098 Placements by Age, - < 20 years 58.5% 59.8% 60.1% 27.2% 32.4% 48.1% (n = 775) (n = 753) (n = 937) (n = 787) (n = 743) (n = 3,995) years 64.2% 48.5% 48.2% 30.9% 30.6% 43.1% (n = 67) (n = 66) (n = 85) (n = 81) (n = 98) (n = 397) years 45.7% 50.8% 43.1% 19.3% 22.6% 34.9% (n = 46) (n = 61) (n = 72) (n = 83) (n = 62) (n = 324) 40+ years 26.3% 41.2% 48.3% 15.8% 16.7% 31.4% (n = 19) (n = 17) (n = 29) (n = 19) (n = 18) (n = 102) Total 57.6% 58.0% 57.8% 26.6% 31.3% 46.4% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) Table 41: ENGL-098 Placements by Disability Status, - Yes 41.3% 58.6% 51.9% 23.9% 25.5% 42.0% (n = 63) (n = 87) (n = 79) (n = 71) (n = 55) (n = 355) No 58.8% 57.9% 58.2% 26.8% 31.6% 46.8% (n = 844) (n = 810) (n = 1,044) (n = 899) (n = 866) (n = 4,463) Total 57.6% 58.0% 57.8% 26.6% 31.3% 46.4% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)

32 31 P age Table 42: ENGL-098 Placements by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 58.5% 59.8% 60.9% 28.8% 32.9% 47.9% (n = 574) (n = 584) (n = 755) (n = 677) (n = 662) (n = 3,252) No 55.9% 54.6% 51.4% 21.5% 27.0% 43.4% (n = 333) (n = 313) (n = 368) (n = 293) (n = 259) (n = 1,566) Total 57.6% 58.0% 57.8% 26.6% 31.3% 46.4% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) Table 43: ENGL-098 Placements by Veteran Status, - Yes 45.7% 46.3% 48.8% 10.3% 28.6% 37.9% (n = 35) (n = 41) (n = 41) (n = 29) (n = 28) (n = 174) No 58.0% 58.5% 58.1% 27.1% 31.4% 46.7% (n = 872) (n = 856) (n = 1,082) (n = 941) (n = 893) (n = 4,644) Total 57.6% 58.0% 57.8% 26.6% 31.3% 46.4% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) Table 44: ENGL-098 Placements by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 66.7% 80.0% 50.0% 40.0% 22.2% 46.2% (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 26) No 57.5% 57.8% 57.8% 26.5% 31.4% 46.4% (n = 904) (n = 892) (n = 1,119) (n = 965) (n = 912) (n = 4,792) Total 57.6% 58.0% 57.8% 26.6% 31.3% 46.4% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)

33 32 P age Table 45: ENGL-098 Placements by 1st Generation, - Yes 60.2% 67.6% 61.1% 30.1% 38.1% 51.1% (n = 309) (n = 306) (n = 401) (n = 342) (n = 362) (n = 1,720) No 55.8% 53.5% 55.1% 24.4% 25.3% 42.7% (n = 446) (n = 514) (n = 619) (n = 569) (n = 502) (n = 2,650) Total 57.6% 58.0% 57.8% 26.6% 31.3% 46.4% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818)

34 33 P age ENGL-109/110 Placements Table 46: ENGL-109/110 Placements by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 16.7% 11.0% 13.1% 34.5% 44.9% 22.5% YES 0.85 (n = 60) (n = 73) (n = 61) (n = 55) (n = 49) (n = 298) American Indian 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 33.3% 0.0% 14.3% YES* 0.54 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 14) Asian 16.7% 5.6% 25.0% 20.0% 17.9% 17.2% YES 0.65 (n = 18) (n = 18) (n = 20) (n = 15) (n = 28) (n = 99) Filipino 11.1% 8.7% 26.1% 28.0% 35.7% 21.4% YES 0.80 (n = 18) (n = 23) (n = 23) (n = 25) (n = 14) (n = 103) Hispanic/Latino 20.3% 16.5% 16.8% 36.2% 35.5% 24.8% NO 0.93 (n = 375) (n = 387) (n = 481) (n = 403) (n = 380) (n = 2,026) Pacific Islander 25.0% 40.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 38.9% NO* 1.46 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 18) White 26.7% 22.2% 29.1% 36.8% 35.0% 30.3% NO 1.14 (n = 344) (n = 329) (n = 450) (n = 399) (n = 380) (n = 1,902) Two or more 23.5% 19.6% 18.9% 29.2% 33.3% 24.9% NO 0.94 (n = 68) (n = 51) (n = 74) (n = 65) (n = 63) (n = 321) Total 22.5% 17.8% 22.3% 35.5% 35.0% 26.6% 24.2% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (White) Table 47: ENGL-109/110 Placements by Gender, - Female 20.2% 17.0% 20.7% 37.7% 32.7% 25.6% NO 0.97 (n = 420) (n = 454) (n = 545) (n = 478) (n = 443) (n = 2,340) Male 24.3% 18.9% 23.6% 33.6% 37.2% 27.5% NO 1.03 (n = 477) (n = 435) (n = 569) (n = 485) (n = 465) (n = 2,431) Total 22.5% 17.8% 22.3% 35.5% 35.0% 26.6% 22.0% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Male)

35 34 P age Table 48: ENGL-109/110 Placements by Age, - < 20 years 22.8% 18.1% 21.2% 36.6% 35.9% 26.7% NO 1.01 (n = 775) (n = 753) (n = 937) (n = 787) (n = 743) (n = 3,995) years 14.9% 16.7% 24.7% 28.4% 35.7% 25.2% NO 0.95 (n = 67) (n = 66) (n = 85) (n = 81) (n = 98) (n = 397) years 26.1% 13.1% 30.6% 32.5% 22.6% 25.6% NO 0.96 (n = 46) (n = 61) (n = 72) (n = 83) (n = 62) (n = 324) 40+ years 26.3% 29.4% 27.6% 31.6% 33.3% 29.4% NO 1.11 (n = 19) (n = 17) (n = 29) (n = 19) (n = 18) (n = 102) Total 22.5% 17.8% 22.3% 35.5% 35.0% 26.6% 23.5% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (40+ years) Table 49: ENGL-109/110 Placements by Disability Status, - Yes 12.7% 9.2% 13.9% 28.2% 34.5% 18.6% YES 0.70 (n = 63) (n = 87) (n = 79) (n = 71) (n = 55) (n = 355) No 23.2% 18.8% 22.9% 36.0% 35.0% 27.2% NO 1.02 (n = 844) (n = 810) (n = 1,044) (n = 899) (n = 866) (n = 4,463) Total 22.5% 17.8% 22.3% 35.5% 35.0% 26.6% 21.8% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Not DSPS) Table 50: ENGL-109/110 Placements by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 20.0% 16.6% 19.3% 34.9% 32.9% 25.0% NO 0.94 (n = 574) (n = 584) (n = 755) (n = 677) (n = 662) (n = 3,252) No 26.7% 20.1% 28.3% 36.9% 40.2% 29.9% NO 1.12 (n = 333) (n = 313) (n = 368) (n = 293) (n = 259) (n = 1,566) Total 22.5% 17.8% 22.3% 35.5% 35.0% 26.6% 23.9% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Not Econ)

36 35 P age Table 51: ENGL-109/110 Placements by Veteran Status, - Yes 28.6% 24.4% 43.9% 34.5% 28.6% 32.2% NO 1.21 (n = 35) (n = 41) (n = 41) (n = 29) (n = 28) (n = 174) No 22.2% 17.5% 21.4% 35.5% 35.2% 26.4% NO 0.99 (n = 872) (n = 856) (n = 1,082) (n = 941) (n = 893) (n = 4,644) Total 22.5% 17.8% 22.3% 35.5% 35.0% 26.6% 21.1% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Not Vet) Table 52: ENGL-109/110 Placements by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 33.3% 0.0% 25.0% 20.0% 22.2% 19.2% YES* 0.72 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 26) No 22.5% 17.9% 22.3% 35.5% 35.1% 26.6% NO 1.00 (n = 904) (n = 892) (n = 1,119) (n = 965) (n = 912) (n = 4,792) Total 22.5% 17.8% 22.3% 35.5% 35.0% 26.6% 21.3% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Not FY) Table 53: ENGL-109/110 Placements by 1st Generation, - Yes 17.2% 10.5% 18.0% 36.0% 30.4% 22.7% YES 0.85 (n = 309) (n = 306) (n = 401) (n = 342) (n = 362) (n = 1,720) No 25.3% 21.4% 25.8% 35.1% 38.8% 29.4% NO 1.11 (n = 446) (n = 514) (n = 619) (n = 569) (n = 502) (n = 2,650) Total 22.5% 17.8% 22.3% 35.5% 35.0% 26.6% 23.5% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Not FG)

37 36 P age ENGL-120 Placements Table 54: ENGL-120 Placements by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 0.0% 2.7% 3.3% 12.7% 8.2% 5.0% YES 0.34 (n = 60) (n = 73) (n = 61) (n = 55) (n = 49) (n = 298) American Indian 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 33.3% 100.0% 21.4% NO* 1.43 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 14) Asian 0.0% 0.0% 5.0% 26.7% 32.1% 14.1% YES 0.95 (n = 18) (n = 18) (n = 20) (n = 15) (n = 28) (n = 99) Filipino 11.1% 0.0% 4.3% 28.0% 0.0% 9.7% YES 0.65 (n = 18) (n = 23) (n = 23) (n = 25) (n = 14) (n = 103) Hispanic/Latino 6.9% 6.7% 5.0% 20.6% 15.5% 10.8% YES 0.72 (n = 375) (n = 387) (n = 481) (n = 403) (n = 380) (n = 2,026) Pacific Islander 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 11.1% YES* 0.74 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 18) White 11.9% 17.6% 14.7% 32.1% 25.3% 20.5% NO 1.37 (n = 344) (n = 329) (n = 450) (n = 399) (n = 380) (n = 1,902) Two or more 5.9% 13.7% 21.6% 33.8% 23.8% 19.9% NO 1.33 (n = 68) (n = 51) (n = 74) (n = 65) (n = 63) (n = 321) Total 8.4% 10.5% 10.0% 26.1% 20.1% 14.9% 16.4% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (White) Table 55: ENGL-120 Placements by Gender, - Female 7.4% 9.9% 11.2% 24.1% 19.6% 14.5% NO 0.97 (n = 420) (n = 454) (n = 545) (n = 478) (n = 443) (n = 2,340) Male 9.0% 11.0% 9.0% 27.8% 20.4% 15.3% NO 1.02 (n = 477) (n = 435) (n = 569) (n = 485) (n = 465) (n = 2,431) Total 8.4% 10.5% 10.0% 26.1% 20.1% 14.9% 12.2% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Male)

38 37 P age Table 56: ENGL-120 Placements by Age, - < 20 years 8.6% 9.0% 9.0% 24.9% 18.8% 13.9% YES 0.93 (n = 775) (n = 753) (n = 937) (n = 787) (n = 743) (n = 3,995) years 3.0% 13.6% 15.3% 28.4% 22.4% 17.4% YES 1.16 (n = 67) (n = 66) (n = 85) (n = 81) (n = 98) (n = 397) years 13.0% 21.3% 19.4% 32.5% 29.0% 24.1% NO 1.61 (n = 46) (n = 61) (n = 72) (n = 83) (n = 62) (n = 324) 40+ years 5.3% 23.5% 3.4% 36.8% 27.8% 17.6% YES 1.18 (n = 19) (n = 17) (n = 29) (n = 19) (n = 18) (n = 102) Total 8.4% 10.5% 10.0% 26.1% 20.1% 14.9% 19.3% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (25-39 years) Table 57: ENGL-120 Placements by Disability Status, - Yes 6.3% 5.7% 5.1% 15.5% 12.7% 8.7% YES 0.58 (n = 63) (n = 87) (n = 79) (n = 71) (n = 55) (n = 355) No 8.5% 11.0% 10.3% 26.9% 20.6% 15.4% NO 1.03 (n = 844) (n = 810) (n = 1,044) (n = 899) (n = 866) (n = 4,463) Total 8.4% 10.5% 10.0% 26.1% 20.1% 14.9% 12.4% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Not DSPS) Table 58: ENGL-120 Placements by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 7.1% 7.5% 7.2% 22.6% 17.1% 12.5% YES 0.83 (n = 574) (n = 584) (n = 755) (n = 677) (n = 662) (n = 3,252) No 10.5% 16.0% 15.8% 34.1% 27.8% 20.1% NO 1.35 (n = 333) (n = 313) (n = 368) (n = 293) (n = 259) (n = 1,566) Total 8.4% 10.5% 10.0% 26.1% 20.1% 14.9% 16.1% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Not Econ)

39 38 P age Table 59: ENGL-120 Placements by Veteran Status, - Yes 14.3% 22.0% 4.9% 51.7% 39.3% 24.1% NO 1.62 (n = 35) (n = 41) (n = 41) (n = 29) (n = 28) (n = 174) No 8.1% 9.9% 10.2% 25.3% 19.5% 14.6% NO 0.98 (n = 872) (n = 856) (n = 1,082) (n = 941) (n = 893) (n = 4,644) Total 8.4% 10.5% 10.0% 26.1% 20.1% 14.9% 11.7% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Not Vet) Table 60: ENGL-120 Placements by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 22.2% 15.4% NO* 1.03 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 26) No 8.4% 10.5% 10.0% 26.0% 20.1% 14.9% NO 1.00 (n = 904) (n = 892) (n = 1,119) (n = 965) (n = 912) (n = 4,792) Total 8.4% 10.5% 10.0% 26.1% 20.1% 14.9% 12.0% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Not FY) Table 61: ENGL-120 Placements by 1st Generation, - Yes 5.5% 4.2% 5.7% 17.3% 13.5% 9.4% YES 0.63 (n = 309) (n = 306) (n = 401) (n = 342) (n = 362) (n = 1,720) No 11.4% 15.0% 13.7% 32.5% 26.1% 20.0% NO 1.34 (n = 446) (n = 514) (n = 619) (n = 569) (n = 502) (n = 2,650) Total 8.4% 10.5% 10.0% 26.1% 20.1% 14.9% 16.0% (n = 907) (n = 897) (n = 1,123) (n = 970) (n = 921) (n = 4,818) (Not FG)

40 39 P age Math Assessments Table 62: Math Placement Levels of First-Time GCCCD Students, - MATH % 19.9% 18.2% 29.7% 25.4% 22.4% (n = 194) (n = 195) (n = 222) (n = 325) (n = 266) (n = 1,202) MATH % 36.2% 33.2% 19.4% 26.3% 29.4% (n = 336) (n = 355) (n = 404) (n = 212) (n = 275) (n = 1,582) MATH-103/ % 24.5% 27.1% 38.1% 25.6% 28.3% (n = 264) (n = 240) (n = 330) (n = 416) (n = 268) (n = 1,518) MATH-120 or above 23.3% 19.4% 21.4% 12.8% 22.7% 19.9% (n = 241) (n = 190) (n = 261) (n = 140) (n = 238) (n = 1,070) 1st Time Cohort (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)

41 40 P age Math-088 Assessments Table 63: MATH-088 Placements by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 14.3% 30.3% 30.6% 46.8% 28.0% 30.0% (n = 63) (n = 76) (n = 62) (n = 62) (n = 50) (n = 313) American Indian 33.3% 0.0% 20.0% 66.7% 0.0% 26.7% (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 15) Asian 13.6% 27.3% 4.3% 38.1% 22.2% 20.9% (n = 22) (n = 22) (n = 23) (n = 21) (n = 27) (n = 115) Filipino 18.8% 9.5% 13.6% 8.3% 11.8% 12.0% (n = 16) (n = 21) (n = 22) (n = 24) (n = 17) (n = 100) Hispanic/Latino 10.9% 16.9% 14.6% 27.1% 21.4% 18.1% (n = 387) (n = 403) (n = 499) (n = 414) (n = 379) (n = 2,082) Pacific Islander 0.0% 33.3% 16.7% 50.0% 0.0% 20.0% (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 20) White 26.8% 20.4% 20.8% 31.1% 28.3% 25.6% (n = 444) (n = 388) (n = 520) (n = 489) (n = 480) (n = 2,321) Two or more 18.4% 22.2% 18.9% 23.6% 30.1% 22.8% (n = 76) (n = 54) (n = 74) (n = 72) (n = 83) (n = 359) Total 18.7% 19.9% 18.2% 29.7% 25.4% 22.4% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) Table 64: MATH-088 Placements by Gender, - Female 22.8% 21.0% 19.4% 33.1% 28.5% 25.0% (n = 486) (n = 499) (n = 587) (n = 556) (n = 522) (n = 2,650) Male 15.2% 18.6% 17.1% 26.0% 22.0% 19.7% (n = 539) (n = 472) (n = 620) (n = 526) (n = 510) (n = 2,667) Total 18.7% 19.9% 18.2% 29.7% 25.4% 22.4% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)

42 41 P age Table 65: MATH-088 Placements by Age, - < 20 years 7.0% 10.7% 7.9% 20.1% 17.6% 12.5% (n = 791) (n = 787) (n = 961) (n = 835) (n = 731) (n = 4,105) years 37.3% 42.9% 39.0% 46.7% 34.9% 39.8% (n = 102) (n = 77) (n = 105) (n = 105) (n = 129) (n = 518) years 67.7% 61.7% 61.8% 69.8% 47.5% 61.2% (n = 93) (n = 81) (n = 102) (n = 106) (n = 120) (n = 502) 40+ years 77.6% 80.0% 85.7% 72.3% 52.2% 71.7% (n = 49) (n = 35) (n = 49) (n = 47) (n = 67) (n = 247) Total 18.7% 19.9% 18.2% 29.7% 25.4% 22.4% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) Table 66: MATH-088 Placements by Disability Status, - Yes 44.2% 29.7% 34.5% 56.4% 43.3% 41.0% (n = 77) (n = 91) (n = 87) (n = 78) (n = 67) (n = 400) No 16.7% 18.9% 17.0% 27.7% 24.2% 20.9% (n = 958) (n = 889) (n = 1,130) (n = 1,015) (n = 980) (n = 4,972) Total 18.7% 19.9% 18.2% 29.7% 25.4% 22.4% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)

43 42 P age Table 67: MATH-088 Placements by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 24.4% 23.3% 21.0% 33.2% 29.1% 26.3% (n = 692) (n = 660) (n = 828) (n = 792) (n = 776) (n = 3,748) No 7.3% 12.8% 12.3% 20.6% 14.8% 13.3% (n = 343) (n = 320) (n = 389) (n = 301) (n = 271) (n = 1,624) Total 18.7% 19.9% 18.2% 29.7% 25.4% 22.4% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) Table 68: MATH-088 Placements by Veteran Status, - Yes 29.7% 39.1% 40.0% 39.4% 25.0% 35.2% (n = 37) (n = 46) (n = 45) (n = 33) (n = 32) (n = 193) No 18.3% 19.0% 17.4% 29.4% 25.4% 21.9% (n = 998) (n = 934) (n = 1,172) (n = 1,060) (n = 1,015) (n = 5,179) Total 18.7% 19.9% 18.2% 29.7% 25.4% 22.4% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) Table 69: MATH-088 Placements by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 50.0% 20.0% 50.0% 20.0% 30.0% 30.8% (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 26) No 18.7% 19.9% 18.1% 29.8% 25.4% 22.3% (n = 1,033) (n = 975) (n = 1,213) (n = 1,088) (n = 1,037) (n = 5,346) Total 18.7% 19.9% 18.2% 29.7% 25.4% 22.4% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)

44 43 P age Table 70: MATH-088 Placement by 1st Generation, - Yes 25.7% 27.8% 22.4% 35.8% 29.9% 28.3% (n = 385) (n = 353) (n = 442) (n = 399) (n = 431) (n = 2,010) No 10.7% 10.8% 12.2% 23.0% 17.5% 15.1% (n = 458) (n = 520) (n = 638) (n = 608) (n = 519) (n = 2,743) Total 18.7% 19.9% 18.2% 29.7% 25.4% 22.4% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)

45 44 P age MATH-090 Placements Table 71: MATH-090 Placements by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 52.4% 35.5% 30.6% 25.8% 38.0% 36.4% (n = 63) (n = 76) (n = 62) (n = 62) (n = 50) (n = 313) American Indian 0.0% 100.0% 60.0% 33.3% 50.0% 46.7% (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 15) Asian 40.9% 22.7% 21.7% 14.3% 22.2% 24.3% (n = 22) (n = 22) (n = 23) (n = 21) (n = 27) (n = 115) Filipino 37.5% 33.3% 36.4% 12.5% 35.3% 30.0% (n = 16) (n = 21) (n = 22) (n = 24) (n = 17) (n = 100) Hispanic/Latino 36.2% 40.4% 37.7% 20.5% 29.3% 33.0% (n = 387) (n = 403) (n = 499) (n = 414) (n = 379) (n = 2,082) Pacific Islander 0.0% 16.7% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 25.0% (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 20) White 25.2% 33.2% 30.2% 18.0% 22.7% 25.6% (n = 444) (n = 388) (n = 520) (n = 489) (n = 480) (n = 2,321) Two or more 35.5% 35.2% 24.3% 19.4% 25.3% 27.6% (n = 76) (n = 54) (n = 74) (n = 72) (n = 83) (n = 359) Total 32.5% 36.2% 33.2% 19.4% 26.3% 29.4% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) Table 72: MATH-090 Placements by Gender, - Female 31.7% 35.3% 34.8% 19.2% 27.8% 29.7% (n = 486) (n = 499) (n = 587) (n = 556) (n = 522) (n = 2,650) Male 33.4% 36.9% 31.9% 20.0% 25.1% 29.4% (n = 539) (n = 472) (n = 620) (n = 526) (n = 510) (n = 2,667) Total 32.5% 36.2% 33.2% 19.4% 26.3% 29.4% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)

46 45 P age Table 73: MATH-090 Placements by Age, - < 20 years 33.5% 38.4% 34.9% 19.8% 24.2% 30.3% (n = 791) (n = 787) (n = 961) (n = 835) (n = 731) (n = 4,105) years 41.2% 33.8% 34.3% 25.7% 31.0% 33.0% (n = 102) (n = 77) (n = 105) (n = 105) (n = 129) (n = 518) years 22.6% 27.2% 26.5% 12.3% 32.5% 24.3% (n = 93) (n = 81) (n = 102) (n = 106) (n = 120) (n = 502) 40+ years 16.3% 14.3% 12.2% 14.9% 28.4% 18.2% (n = 49) (n = 35) (n = 49) (n = 47) (n = 67) (n = 247) Total 32.5% 36.2% 33.2% 19.4% 26.3% 29.4% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) Table 74: MATH-090 Placements by Disability Status, - Yes 33.8% 40.7% 46.0% 17.9% 29.9% 34.3% (n = 77) (n = 91) (n = 87) (n = 78) (n = 67) (n = 400) No 32.4% 35.8% 32.2% 19.5% 26.0% 29.1% (n = 958) (n = 889) (n = 1,130) (n = 1,015) (n = 980) (n = 4,972) Total 32.5% 36.2% 33.2% 19.4% 26.3% 29.4% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)

47 46 P age Table 75: MATH-090 Placements by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 33.1% 35.0% 33.9% 19.1% 24.7% 28.9% (n = 692) (n = 660) (n = 828) (n = 792) (n = 776) (n = 3,748) No 31.2% 38.8% 31.6% 20.3% 30.6% 30.7% (n = 343) (n = 320) (n = 389) (n = 301) (n = 271) (n = 1,624) Total 32.5% 36.2% 33.2% 19.4% 26.3% 29.4% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) Table 76: MATH-090 Placements by Veteran Status, - Yes 45.9% 39.1% 35.6% 27.3% 43.8% 38.3% (n = 37) (n = 46) (n = 45) (n = 33) (n = 32) (n = 193) No 32.0% 36.1% 33.1% 19.2% 25.7% 29.1% (n = 998) (n = 934) (n = 1,172) (n = 1,060) (n = 1,015) (n = 5,179) Total 32.5% 36.2% 33.2% 19.4% 26.3% 29.4% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) Table 77: MATH-090 Placements by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 0.0% 60.0% 25.0% 60.0% 70.0% 53.8% (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 26) No 32.5% 36.1% 33.2% 19.2% 25.8% 29.3% (n = 1,033) (n = 975) (n = 1,213) (n = 1,088) (n = 1,037) (n = 5,346) Total 32.5% 36.2% 33.2% 19.4% 26.3% 29.4% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)

48 47 P age Table 78: Placements by 1st Generation, - Yes 33.5% 36.3% 35.5% 20.6% 30.2% 31.1% (n = 385) (n = 353) (n = 442) (n = 399) (n = 431) (n = 2,010) No 31.7% 36.2% 32.8% 19.1% 24.3% 28.6% (n = 458) (n = 520) (n = 638) (n = 608) (n = 519) (n = 2,743) Total 32.5% 36.2% 33.2% 19.4% 26.3% 29.4% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372)

49 48 P age MATH-103/110 Placements Table 79: MATH-103/110 Placements by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 19.0% 23.7% 32.3% 21.0% 24.0% 24.0% YES 0.85 (n = 63) (n = 76) (n = 62) (n = 62) (n = 50) (n = 313) American Indian 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 20.0% YES* 0.71 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 15) Asian 13.6% 22.7% 39.1% 23.8% 29.6% 26.1% NO 0.92 (n = 22) (n = 22) (n = 23) (n = 21) (n = 27) (n = 115) Filipino 12.5% 19.0% 9.1% 66.7% 29.4% 29.0% NO* 1.03 (n = 16) (n = 21) (n = 22) (n = 24) (n = 17) (n = 100) Hispanic/Latino 29.7% 23.6% 29.5% 41.1% 28.2% 30.5% NO 1.08 (n = 387) (n = 403) (n = 499) (n = 414) (n = 379) (n = 2,082) Pacific Islander 75.0% 33.3% 16.7% 0.0% 100.0% 40.0% NO* 1.42 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 20) White 24.3% 25.3% 24.4% 36.6% 23.3% 26.9% NO 0.95 (n = 444) (n = 388) (n = 520) (n = 489) (n = 480) (n = 2,321) Two or more 21.1% 29.6% 31.1% 43.1% 25.3% 29.8% NO 1.05 (n = 76) (n = 54) (n = 74) (n = 72) (n = 83) (n = 359) Total 25.5% 24.5% 27.1% 38.1% 25.6% 28.3% 24.4% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Latino) Table 80: MATH-103/110 Placements by Gender, - Female 23.5% 25.1% 28.3% 36.2% 24.1% 27.6% NO 0.98 (n = 486) (n = 499) (n = 587) (n = 556) (n = 522) (n = 2,650) Male 27.1% 23.9% 26.0% 39.7% 27.3% 28.8% NO 1.02 (n = 539) (n = 472) (n = 620) (n = 526) (n = 510) (n = 2,667) Total 25.5% 24.5% 27.1% 38.1% 25.6% 28.3% 23.0% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Male)

50 49 P age Table 81: MATH-103/110 Placements by Age, - < 20 years 31.0% 27.3% 31.8% 45.1% 31.5% 33.4% NO 1.18 (n = 791) (n = 787) (n = 961) (n = 835) (n = 731) (n = 4,105) years 10.8% 22.1% 16.2% 21.9% 19.4% 18.0% YES 0.64 (n = 102) (n = 77) (n = 105) (n = 105) (n = 129) (n = 518) years 6.5% 8.6% 6.9% 12.3% 6.7% 8.2% YES 0.29 (n = 93) (n = 81) (n = 102) (n = 106) (n = 120) (n = 502) 40+ years 4.1% 2.9% 0.0% 6.4% 7.5% 4.5% YES 0.16 (n = 49) (n = 35) (n = 49) (n = 47) (n = 67) (n = 247) Total 25.5% 24.5% 27.1% 38.1% 25.6% 28.3% 26.8% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (< 20 years) Table 82: MATH-103/110 Placements by Disability Status, - Yes 13.0% 17.6% 11.5% 17.9% 16.4% 15.3% YES 0.54 (n = 77) (n = 91) (n = 87) (n = 78) (n = 67) (n = 400) No 26.5% 25.2% 28.3% 39.6% 26.2% 29.3% NO 1.04 (n = 958) (n = 889) (n = 1,130) (n = 1,015) (n = 980) (n = 4,972) Total 25.5% 24.5% 27.1% 38.1% 25.6% 28.3% 23.4% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Not DSPS) Table 83: MATH-103/110 Placements by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 22.0% 22.3% 26.6% 35.6% 26.4% 26.8% NO 0.95 (n = 692) (n = 660) (n = 828) (n = 792) (n = 776) (n = 3,748) No 32.7% 29.1% 28.3% 44.5% 23.2% 31.5% NO 1.12 (n = 343) (n = 320) (n = 389) (n = 301) (n = 271) (n = 1,624) Total 25.5% 24.5% 27.1% 38.1% 25.6% 28.3% 25.2% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Not Econ)

51 50 P age Table 84: MATH-103/110 Placements by Veteran Status, - Yes 16.2% 15.2% 15.6% 27.3% 21.9% 18.7% YES 0.66 (n = 37) (n = 46) (n = 45) (n = 33) (n = 32) (n = 193) No 25.9% 24.9% 27.6% 38.4% 25.7% 28.6% NO 1.01 (n = 998) (n = 934) (n = 1,172) (n = 1,060) (n = 1,015) (n = 5,179) Total 25.5% 24.5% 27.1% 38.1% 25.6% 28.3% 22.9% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Not Vet) Table 85: MATH-103/110 Placements by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 50.0% 0.0% 25.0% 20.0% 0.0% 11.5% YES* 0.41 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 26) No 25.5% 24.6% 27.1% 38.1% 25.8% 28.3% NO 1.00 (n = 1,033) (n = 975) (n = 1,213) (n = 1,088) (n = 1,037) (n = 5,346) Total 25.5% 24.5% 27.1% 38.1% 25.6% 28.3% 22.7% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Not FY) Table 86: MATH-103/110 Placements by 1st Generation, - Yes 23.1% 20.4% 26.5% 33.1% 24.8% 25.7% NO 0.91 (n = 385) (n = 353) (n = 442) (n = 399) (n = 431) (n = 2,010) No 28.6% 28.8% 28.7% 42.9% 27.9% 31.7% NO 1.12 (n = 458) (n = 520) (n = 638) (n = 608) (n = 519) (n = 2,743) Total 25.5% 24.5% 27.1% 38.1% 25.6% 28.3% 25.4% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Not FG)

52 51 P age MATH-120 or Above Placements Table 87: MATH-120 or Above Placements by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 14.3% 10.5% 6.5% 6.5% 10.0% 9.6% YES 0.48 (n = 63) (n = 76) (n = 62) (n = 62) (n = 50) (n = 313) American Indian 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.7% YES* 0.33 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 15) Asian 31.8% 27.3% 34.8% 23.8% 25.9% 28.7% NO 1.44 (n = 22) (n = 22) (n = 23) (n = 21) (n = 27) (n = 115) Filipino 31.3% 38.1% 40.9% 12.5% 23.5% 29.0% NO* 1.46 (n = 16) (n = 21) (n = 22) (n = 24) (n = 17) (n = 100) Hispanic/Latino 23.3% 19.1% 18.2% 11.4% 21.1% 18.5% YES 0.93 (n = 387) (n = 403) (n = 499) (n = 414) (n = 379) (n = 2,082) Pacific Islander 25.0% 16.7% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 15.0% YES* 0.75 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 20) White 23.6% 21.1% 24.6% 14.3% 25.6% 21.9% YES 1.10 (n = 444) (n = 388) (n = 520) (n = 489) (n = 480) (n = 2,321) Two or more 25.0% 13.0% 25.7% 13.9% 19.3% 19.8% YES 0.99 (n = 76) (n = 54) (n = 74) (n = 72) (n = 83) (n = 359) Total 23.3% 19.4% 21.4% 12.8% 22.7% 19.9% 23.0% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Asian) Table 88: MATH-120 or Above Placements by Gender, - Female 22.0% 18.6% 17.5% 11.5% 19.5% 17.7% NO 0.89 (n = 486) (n = 499) (n = 587) (n = 556) (n = 522) (n = 2,650) Male 24.3% 20.6% 25.0% 14.3% 25.7% 22.1% NO 1.11 (n = 539) (n = 472) (n = 620) (n = 526) (n = 510) (n = 2,667) Total 23.3% 19.4% 21.4% 12.8% 22.7% 19.9% 17.7% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Male)

53 52 P age Table 89: MATH-120 or Above Placements by Age, - < 20 years 28.6% 23.6% 25.4% 15.0% 26.7% 23.8% NO 1.19 (n = 791) (n = 787) (n = 961) (n = 835) (n = 731) (n = 4,105) years 10.8% 1.3% 10.5% 5.7% 14.7% 9.3% YES 0.47 (n = 102) (n = 77) (n = 105) (n = 105) (n = 129) (n = 518) years 3.2% 2.5% 4.9% 5.7% 13.3% 6.4% YES 0.32 (n = 93) (n = 81) (n = 102) (n = 106) (n = 120) (n = 502) 40+ years 2.0% 2.9% 2.0% 6.4% 11.9% 5.7% YES 0.28 (n = 49) (n = 35) (n = 49) (n = 47) (n = 67) (n = 247) Total 23.3% 19.4% 21.4% 12.8% 22.7% 19.9% 19.0% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (<20 years) Table 90: MATH-120 or Above Placements by Disability Status, - Yes 9.1% 12.1% 8.0% 7.7% 10.4% 9.5% YES 0.48 (n = 77) (n = 91) (n = 87) (n = 78) (n = 67) (n = 400) No 24.4% 20.1% 22.5% 13.2% 23.6% 20.8% NO 1.04 (n = 958) (n = 889) (n = 1,130) (n = 1,015) (n = 980) (n = 4,972) Total 23.3% 19.4% 21.4% 12.8% 22.7% 19.9% 16.6% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Not DSPS) Table 91: MATH-120 or Above Placements by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 20.5% 19.4% 18.5% 12.1% 19.7% 17.9% YES 0.90 (n = 692) (n = 660) (n = 828) (n = 792) (n = 776) (n = 3,748) No 28.9% 19.4% 27.8% 14.6% 31.4% 24.5% NO 1.23 (n = 343) (n = 320) (n = 389) (n = 301) (n = 271) (n = 1,624) Total 23.3% 19.4% 21.4% 12.8% 22.7% 19.9% 19.6% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Not Econ)

54 53 P age Table 92: MATH-120 or Above Placements by Veteran Status, - Yes 8.1% 6.5% 8.9% 6.1% 9.4% 7.8% YES 0.39 (n = 37) (n = 46) (n = 45) (n = 33) (n = 32) (n = 193) No 23.8% 20.0% 21.9% 13.0% 23.2% 20.4% NO 1.02 (n = 998) (n = 934) (n = 1,172) (n = 1,060) (n = 1,015) (n = 5,179) Total 23.3% 19.4% 21.4% 12.8% 22.7% 19.9% 16.3% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Not Vet) Table 93: MATH-120 or Above Placements by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.8% YES* 0.19 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 26) No 23.3% 19.4% 21.5% 12.9% 23.0% 20.0% NO 1.00 (n = 1,033) (n = 975) (n = 1,213) (n = 1,088) (n = 1,037) (n = 5,346) Total 23.3% 19.4% 21.4% 12.8% 22.7% 19.9% 16.0% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Not FY) Table 94: MATH-120 or Above Placements by 1st Generation, - Yes 17.7% 15.6% 15.6% 10.5% 15.1% 14.9% YES 0.75 (n = 385) (n = 353) (n = 442) (n = 399) (n = 431) (n = 2,010) No 29.0% 24.2% 26.3% 15.0% 30.3% 24.6% NO 1.24 (n = 458) (n = 520) (n = 638) (n = 608) (n = 519) (n = 2,743) Total 23.3% 19.4% 21.4% 12.8% 22.7% 19.9% 19.7% (n = 1,035) (n = 980) (n = 1,217) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,047) (n = 5,372) (Not FG)

55 54 P age Preparation Rates (Student Success Scorecard) The preparation rate data are derived from the completion cohorts in the Student Success Scorecard. The completion cohorts comprise of first time students in the system that earned at least six units (within six years of their first enrollments) and attempted any level of math or English within three years.. If a student s first attempted English class was below transfer level English (ENGL-120) or first attempted math course was below college level math (MATH-103/110), then the student was considered unprepared. Students must have attempted transfer level English and college level math or higher to be considered prepared (See Table 379). Figure 3: Preparation Rate Trends

56 55 P age Table 95: Preparation Rate Trends by Race/Ethnicity to to to to to African American 12.8% 10.6% 16.5% 11.3% 9.8% 12.1% YES 0.74 (n = 47) (n = 66) (n = 85) (n = 106) (n = 92) (n = 396) American Indian 0.0% 50.0% 30.8% 15.4% 0.0% 22.9% NO* 1.40 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 13) (n = 13) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 48) Asian 22.6% 14.7% 12.1% 16.3% 14.8% 15.7% NO 0.96 (n = 31) (n = 34) (n = 33) (n = 49) (n = 88) (n = 235) Filipino 23.3% 12.1% 0.0% 20.0% 13.6% 14.2% YES 0.86 (n = 30) (n = 33) (n = 22) (n = 20) (n = 22) (n = 127) Hispanic 11.5% 10.1% 10.7% 12.2% 12.4% 11.5% YES 0.70 (n = 209) (n = 248) (n = 289) (n = 343) (n = 364) (n = 1,453) Pacific Islander 30.8% 12.5% 26.3% 25.0% 18.8% 22.6% NO* 1.38 (n = 13) (n = 16) (n = 19) (n = 20) (n = 16) (n = 84) White 22.2% 21.5% 19.2% 21.1% 14.8% 19.4% NO 1.18 (n = 504) (n = 553) (n = 637) (n = 611) (n = 770) (n = 3,075) Two or more N/A N/A N/A N/A 16.0% 16.0% NO* 0.98 (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 106) (n = 106) Unknown 12.9% 17.4% 15.5% 17.0% 11.3% 15.6% NO 0.95 (n = 155) (n = 144) (n = 168) (n = 264) (n = 53) (n = 784) Total 18.0% 17.4% 16.3% 17.3% 13.9% 16.4% 15.5% (n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (White) Table 96: Preparation Rate Trends by Gender to to to to to Female 15.2% 18.6% 14.6% 17.4% 12.4% 15.5% NO 0.95 (n = 506) (n = 607) (n = 692) (n = 799) (n = 832) (n = 3,436) Male 21.8% 15.9% 18.4% 17.0% 15.5% 17.5% NO 1.07 (n = 454) (n = 492) (n = 570) (n = 610) (n = 658) (n = 2,784) Total 18.0% 17.4% 16.3% 17.3% 13.9% 16.4% 14.0% (n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Male)

57 56 P age Table 97: Preparation Rate Trends by Age to to to to to <20 years 19.2% 18.5% 17.5% 19.3% 17.7% 18.4% NO 1.12 (n = 796) (n = 935) (n = 1,052) (n = 1,117) (n = 1,019) (n = 4,919) years 21.7% 10.3% 10.1% 18.3% 8.9% 13.1% YES 0.80 (n = 60) (n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 109) (n = 146) (n = 482) years 12.7% 11.1% 9.9% 4.6% 7.2% 8.2% YES 0.50 (n = 71) (n = 45) (n = 71) (n = 109) (n = 180) (n = 476) 40+ years 5.1% 13.0% 11.1% 6.6% 2.4% 6.0% YES 0.37 (n = 39) (n = 46) (n = 54) (n = 91) (n = 169) (n = 399) Total 18.0% 17.4% 16.3% 17.3% 13.9% 16.4% 14.7% (n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (<20 years) Table 98: Preparation Rate Trends by Disability Status to to to to to Yes 3.6% 8.2% 4.1% 5.7% 5.8% 5.5% YES 0.34 (n = 55) (n = 61) (n = 73) (n = 88) (n = 86) (n = 363) No 18.9% 17.9% 17.0% 18.1% 14.4% 17.1% NO 1.04 (n = 943) (n = 1,043) (n = 1,193) (n = 1,338) (n = 1,428) (n = 5,945) Total 18.0% 17.4% 16.3% 17.3% 13.9% 16.4% 13.7% (n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Not DSPS) Table 99: Preparation Rate Trends by Economically Disadvantaged to to to to to Yes 12.2% 11.8% 10.9% 14.6% 10.4% 12.0% YES 0.73 (n = 557) (n = 634) (n = 753) (n = 1,030) (n = 1,195) (n = 4,169) No 25.4% 24.9% 24.2% 24.5% 27.0% 25.1% NO 1.53 (n = 441) (n = 470) (n = 513) (n = 396) (n = 319) (n = 2,139) Total 18.0% 17.4% 16.3% 17.3% 13.9% 16.4% 19.3% (n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (No Econ)

58 57 P age Table 100: Preparation Rate Trends by Veteran Status to to to to to Yes 11.1% 13.9% 13.0% 18.9% 10.0% 13.2% YES 0.80 (n = 36) (n = 36) (n = 46) (n = 37) (n = 50) (n = 205) No 18.3% 17.5% 16.4% 17.3% 14.0% 16.5% NO 1.01 (n = 962) (n = 1,068) (n = 1,220) (n = 1,389) (n = 1,464) (n = 6,103) Total 18.0% 17.4% 16.3% 17.3% 13.9% 16.4% 13.2% (n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Non Vet)

59 58 P age STUDENT SUCCESS MILESTONES First Year Enrollment Patterns First year enrollments in English, ESL, and math among first-time students consist of the cohort fall term, and the subsequent spring and summer terms, and can completed anywhere in the district. Table 101: First Year Enrollment of First Time Students, Enrolled in English/ESL Only 10.6% 9.8% 11.8% 11.6% 13.3% 11.4% (n = 248) (n = 164) (n = 191) (n = 219) (n = 235) (n = 1,057) Enrolled in Math Only 11.5% 13.5% 10.8% 9.9% 8.8% 10.9% (n = 270) (n = 227) (n = 174) (n = 188) (n = 155) (n = 1,014) Enrolled in Both English/ESL and Math Not enrolled in English/ESL or Math 36.5% 36.2% 35.5% 41.6% 40.0% 38.0% (n = 854) (n = 609) (n = 574) (n = 788) (n = 705) (n = 3,530) 41.4% 40.5% 42.0% 36.9% 37.9% 39.8% (n = 970) (n = 682) (n = 679) (n = 698) (n = 667) (n = 3,696) 1st Time Cohort (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297)

60 59 P age Table 102: First Year Enrollment in Both English/ESL and Math by Race/Ethnicity, African American/Black 24.0% 25.9% 30.4% 22.9% 21.5% 24.9% YES 0.66 (n = 146) (n = 116) (n = 135) (n = 140) (n = 130) (n = 667) American Indian 41.7% 20.0% 0.0% 80.0% 14.3% 31.4% YES* 0.83 (n = 12) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 35) Asian 36.6% 31.3% 33.3% 48.0% 30.8% 36.4% NO 0.96 (n = 82) (n = 48) (n = 45) (n = 50) (n = 39) (n = 264) Filipino 25.0% 19.0% 38.0% 29.2% 40.0% 30.4% YES 0.80 (n = 52) (n = 42) (n = 50) (n = 48) (n = 45) (n = 237) Hispanic/Latino 41.2% 42.6% 41.4% 46.8% 44.5% 43.4% NO 1.14 (n = 721) (n = 596) (n = 638) (n = 737) (n = 659) (n = 3,351) Pacific Islander 66.7% 71.4% 28.6% 44.4% 14.3% 44.4% NO* 1.17 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 36) White 35.2% 32.5% 31.2% 42.4% 39.6% 36.3% NO 0.96 (n = 1,083) (n = 727) (n = 629) (n = 760) (n = 755) (n = 3,954) Two or more 33.9% 42.1% 32.6% 31.7% 44.0% 36.6% NO 0.96 (n = 174) (n = 114) (n = 89) (n = 126) (n = 109) (n = 612) Total 36.5% 36.2% 35.5% 41.6% 40.0% 38.0% 34.7% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Latino) Table 103: First Year Enrollment in Both English/ESL and Math by Gender, Female 37.9% 37.0% 37.7% 42.7% 42.3% 39.5% NO 1.04 (n = 1,173) (n = 787) (n = 782) (n = 889) (n = 856) (n = 4,487) Male 35.4% 35.5% 33.3% 40.8% 37.8% 36.6% NO 0.96 (n = 1,140) (n = 878) (n = 825) (n = 987) (n = 889) (n = 4,719) Total 36.5% 36.2% 35.5% 41.6% 40.0% 38.0% 31.6% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Female)

61 60 P age Table 104: First Year Enrollment in Both English/ESL and Math by Age, < 20 years 55.1% 53.9% 52.7% 59.3% 60.0% 56.3% NO 1.48 (n = 1,218) (n = 981) (n = 986) (n = 1,160) (n = 1,023) (n = 5,368) years 16.4% 14.9% 9.6% 16.5% 15.3% 14.7% YES 0.39 (n = 385) (n = 268) (n = 270) (n = 291) (n = 300) (n = 1,514) years 15.7% 11.1% 8.0% 12.1% 9.6% 11.8% YES 0.31 (n = 452) (n = 262) (n = 251) (n = 298) (n = 314) (n = 1,577) 40+ years 17.1% 6.4% 7.2% 11.1% 12.0% 11.8% YES 0.31 (n = 287) (n = 171) (n = 111) (n = 144) (n = 125) (n = 838) Total 36.5% 36.2% 35.5% 41.6% 40.0% 38.0% 45.0% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (< 20 years) Table 105: First Year Enrollment in Both English/ESL and Math by Disability Status, Yes 33.5% 29.8% 42.1% 32.2% 37.9% 35.0% NO 0.92 (n = 170) (n = 124) (n = 133) (n = 118) (n = 103) (n = 648) No 36.7% 36.7% 34.9% 42.3% 40.1% 38.2% NO 1.01 (n = 2,172) (n = 1,558) (n = 1,485) (n = 1,775) (n = 1,659) (n = 8,649) Total 36.5% 36.2% 35.5% 41.6% 40.0% 38.0% 30.6% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not DSPS) Table 106: First Year Enrollment in Both English/ESL and Math by Economically Disadvantaged, Yes 40.3% 38.2% 40.4% 44.8% 44.6% 41.8% NO 1.10 (n = 1,283) (n = 1,052) (n = 988) (n = 1,203) (n = 1,143) (n = 5,669) No 31.8% 32.9% 27.8% 36.1% 31.5% 32.1% NO 0.84 (n = 1,059) (n = 630) (n = 630) (n = 690) (n = 619) (n = 3,628) Total 36.5% 36.2% 35.5% 41.6% 40.0% 38.0% 25.6% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not Econ)

62 61 P age Table 107: First Year Enrollment in Both English/ESL and Math by Veteran Status, Yes 32.7% 34.6% 24.7% 38.5% 23.9% 31.3% NO 0.82 (n = 98) (n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 96) (n = 71) (n = 432) No 36.6% 36.3% 36.1% 41.8% 40.7% 38.3% NO 1.01 (n = 2,244) (n = 1,604) (n = 1,529) (n = 1,797) (n = 1,691) (n = 8,865) Total 36.5% 36.2% 35.5% 41.6% 40.0% 38.0% 30.6% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not Vet) Table 108: First Year Enrollment in Both English/ESL and Math by Foster Youth Status, Yes 38.5% 20.0% 42.9% 0.0% 60.0% 34.3% NO* 0.90 (n = 13) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 35) No 36.5% 36.3% 35.4% 41.7% 40.0% 38.0% NO 1.00 (n = 2,329) (n = 1,677) (n = 1,611) (n = 1,888) (n = 1,757) (n = 9,262) Total 36.5% 36.2% 35.5% 41.6% 40.0% 38.0% 30.4% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not FY) Table 109: First Year Enrollment in Both English/ESL and Math by 1st Generation, Yes 25.5% 39.7% 38.8% 42.6% 43.7% 38.9% NO 1.03 (n = 435) (n = 556) (n = 544) (n = 673) (n = 615) (n = 2,823) No 26.7% 36.9% 34.7% 40.0% 38.6% 35.9% NO 0.94 (n = 738) (n = 767) (n = 914) (n = 1,036) (n = 1,024) (n = 4,479) Total 36.5% 36.2% 35.5% 41.6% 40.0% 38.0% 28.7% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not FG)

63 62 P age Developmental Sequence Completion Patterns The following tables summarize the enrollment patterns among first-time students that were enrolled in developmental English (ENGL-090 or ENGL-098) or developmental math (MATH-080, MATH-088, or MATH-090) in their first-year at the college, and successfully completed a college level course (ENGL-109/110 or MATH- 103/110) or a transfer level course (ENGL-120/124 or MATH-120 or higher) at either college in the same discipline within two years. Developmental English Sequence, College Level Completion The following table displays the percentage of first-time students who enrolled in English during their first year (Summer,, Spring, Summer) and successfully completed ENGL-109 or ENGL-110 within two years. These college level English completion rates are broken out by the course level of the students first English enrollment. For example, among first-time students who began their English sequence at ENGL-090, about 48 percent successfully completed college level English within two years. Overall, nearly 70 percent of firsttime students successfully completed college level English within two years. Table 110: Developmental English Sequence Completion, ENGL % 29.5% 35.0% 31.0% 47.9% 36.4% (n = 90) (n = 88) (n = 60) (n = 84) (n = 96) (n = 418) ENGL % 52.1% 64.9% 64.1% 58.1% 59.3% (n = 358) (n = 386) (n = 373) (n = 309) (n = 315) (n = 1,741) ENGL-099 N/A N/A N/A 79.6% 75.0% 76.5% (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 49) (n = 100) (n = 149) ENGL-109/110/120/ % 80.3% 81.4% 87.3% 87.5% 82.2% (n = 247) (n = 284) (n = 167) (n = 158) (n = 287) (n = 1,143) Annual ENGL- 109/110 or Higher Success Rate 61.7% 60.0% 66.5% 66.8% 69.5% 64.9% (n = 695) (n = 758) (n = 600) (n = 600) (n = 798) (n = 3,451)

64 63 P age The following tables display the percentages of first-time students who enrolled in a developmental English course (ENGL-090, ENGL-098, ENGL-099) during their first year (Summer,, Spring, Summer) and successfully completed ENGL-109 or ENGL-110 within two years. Table 111: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Race/Ethnicity, African American/Black 41.9% 45.7% 48.4% 38.5% 50.0% 44.6% YES 0.79 (n = 43) (n = 35) (n = 31) (n = 39) (n = 36) (n = 184) American Indian N/A 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 37.5% YES* 0.67 (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) Asian 71.4% 60.0% 58.3% 85.7% 66.7% 69.2% NO 1.23 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 12) (n = 14) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 52) Filipino 42.9% 33.3% 62.5% 88.2% 83.3% 70.0% NO 1.24 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 17) (n = 12) (n = 50) Hispanic/Latino 50.3% 47.0% 57.5% 57.8% 57.1% 54.1% NO 0.96 (n = 169) (n = 230) (n = 207) (n = 204) (n = 275) (n = 1,085) Pacific Islander 60.0% 33.3% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 53.8% NO* 0.96 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 13) White 62.0% 48.3% 70.5% 65.9% 66.0% 62.2% NO 1.11 (n = 163) (n = 149) (n = 129) (n = 132) (n = 147) (n = 720) Two or more 51.2% 62.1% 56.3% 36.0% 46.4% 51.0% NO 0.91 (n = 41) (n = 29) (n = 32) (n = 25) (n = 28) (n = 155) Total 54.0% 47.9% 60.7% 59.5% 59.5% 56.3% 49.8% (n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (White) Table 112: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Gender, Female 65.6% 50.6% 60.7% 65.4% 65.6% 61.4% NO 1.09 (n = 224) (n = 259) (n = 214) (n = 228) (n = 250) (n = 1,175) Male 41.6% 44.5% 60.5% 53.3% 53.5% 50.8% NO 0.90 (n = 219) (n = 211) (n = 215) (n = 212) (n = 258) (n = 1,115) Total 54.0% 47.9% 60.7% 59.5% 59.5% 56.3% 49.1% (n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Female)

65 64 P age Table 113: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Age, < 20 years 56.0% 49.6% 60.6% 62.3% 60.8% 57.9% NO 1.03 (n = 373) (n = 403) (n = 386) (n = 395) (n = 451) (n = 2,008) years 52.3% 41.4% 53.6% 35.7% 45.2% 46.3% YES 0.82 (n = 44) (n = 29) (n = 28) (n = 28) (n = 31) (n = 160) years 32.0% 33.3% 69.2% 31.3% 75.0% 44.0% YES 0.78 (n = 25) (n = 30) (n = 13) (n = 16) (n = 16) (n = 100) 40+ years 33.3% 41.7% 83.3% 66.7% 30.8% 45.0% YES* 0.80 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 12) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 13) (n = 40) Total 54.0% 47.9% 60.7% 59.5% 59.5% 56.3% 46.3% (n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (< 20 years) Table 114: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Disability Status, Yes 31.0% 46.8% 38.9% 42.3% 39.1% 40.5% YES 0.72 (n = 29) (n = 47) (n = 36) (n = 52) (n = 46) (n = 210) No 55.6% 48.0% 62.7% 61.8% 61.5% 57.9% NO 1.03 (n = 419) (n = 427) (n = 397) (n = 390) (n = 465) (n = 2,098) Total 54.0% 47.9% 60.7% 59.5% 59.5% 56.3% 46.3% (n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Not DSPS) Table 115: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Economically Disadvantaged, Yes 54.3% 50.7% 59.3% 58.1% 57.9% 56.2% NO 1.00 (n = 247) (n = 296) (n = 297) (n = 313) (n = 378) (n = 1,531) No 53.7% 43.3% 64.0% 62.8% 63.9% 56.4% NO 1.00 (n = 201) (n = 178) (n = 136) (n = 129) (n = 133) (n = 777) Total 54.0% 47.9% 60.7% 59.5% 59.5% 56.3% 45.1% (n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Not Econ)

66 65 P age Table 116: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Veteran Status, Yes 52.0% 50.0% 66.7% 45.5% 85.7% 58.8% NO 1.04 (n = 25) (n = 18) (n = 12) (n = 11) (n = 14) (n = 80) No 54.1% 47.8% 60.6% 59.9% 58.8% 56.2% NO 1.00 (n = 423) (n = 456) (n = 421) (n = 431) (n = 497) (n = 2,228) Total 54.0% 47.9% 60.7% 59.5% 59.5% 56.3% 45.0% (n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Not Vet) Table 117: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Foster Youth Status, Yes 50.0% 40.0% 50.0% 16.7% 0.0% 33.3% YES* 0.59 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 18) No 54.1% 48.0% 60.8% 60.1% 59.6% 56.5% NO 1.00 (n = 444) (n = 469) (n = 431) (n = 436) (n = 510) (n = 2,290) Total 54.0% 47.9% 60.7% 59.5% 59.5% 56.3% 45.2% (n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Not FY) Table 118: Developmental English Sequence Completion by 1st Generation, Yes 45.2% 44.7% 59.8% 59.7% 57.6% 56.4% NO 1.00 (n = 42) (n = 85) (n = 174) (n = 186) (n = 217) (n = 704) No 58.1% 33.9% 61.4% 60.3% 63.1% 57.7% NO 1.02 (n = 86) (n = 109) (n = 189) (n = 219) (n = 233) (n = 836) Total 54.0% 47.9% 60.7% 59.5% 59.5% 56.3% 46.1% (n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Not FG)

67 66 P age Developmental English Sequence, Transfer Level Completion The following table displays the percentage of first-time students who enrolled in English during their first year (Summer,, Spring, Summer) and successfully completed ENGL-120 or ENGL-124 within two years. These transfer level English completion rates are broken out by the course level of the students first English enrollment. For example, among first-time students who began their English sequence at ENGL-090, 25 percent successfully completed transfer level English within two years. Overall, about 52 percent of first-time students successfully completed transfer level English within two years. Table 119: Developmental English Sequence Completion, ENGL % 15.9% 18.3% 17.9% 25.0% 19.6% (n = 90) (n = 88) (n = 60) (n = 84) (n = 96) (n = 418) ENGL % 27.2% 35.9% 40.5% 37.1% 35.3% (n = 358) (n = 386) (n = 373) (n = 309) (n = 315) (n = 1,741) ENGL-099 N/A N/A N/A 57.1% 60.0% 59.1% (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 49) (n = 100) (n = 149) ENGL-109/ % 55.7% 54.5% 63.9% 60.9% 56.3% (n = 168) (n = 185) (n = 110) (n = 72) (n = 138) (n = 673) ENGL-120/ % 83.8% 87.7% 89.5% 85.9% 84.9% (n = 79) (n = 99) (n = 57) (n = 86) (n = 149) (n = 470) Annual ENGL- 120/124 Success Rate 42.9% 40.2% 42.5% 48.5% 51.8% 45.3% (n = 695) (n = 758) (n = 600) (n = 600) (n = 798) (n = 3,451)

68 67 P age The following tables display the percentages of first-time students who enrolled in a developmental English course (ENGL-090, ENGL-098, ENGL-099) during their first year (Summer,, Spring, Summer) and successfully completed ENGL-120 or ENGL-124 within two years. Table 120: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Race/Ethnicity, African American/Black 25.6% 22.9% 25.8% 15.4% 36.1% 25.0% YES 0.74 (n = 43) (n = 35) (n = 31) (n = 39) (n = 36) (n = 184) American Indian N/A 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 100.0% 25.0% YES* 0.74 (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) Asian 0.0% 40.0% 41.7% 78.6% 44.4% 46.2% NO 1.36 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 12) (n = 14) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 52) Filipino 14.3% 0.0% 37.5% 64.7% 58.3% 44.0% NO 1.30 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 17) (n = 12) (n = 50) Hispanic/Latino 32.0% 22.6% 29.0% 35.3% 37.1% 31.3% NO 0.92 (n = 169) (n = 230) (n = 207) (n = 204) (n = 275) (n = 1,085) Pacific Islander 40.0% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 23.1% YES* 0.68 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 13) White 39.9% 26.2% 41.1% 43.9% 43.5% 38.8% NO 1.14 (n = 163) (n = 149) (n = 129) (n = 132) (n = 147) (n = 720) Two or more 31.7% 44.8% 34.4% 24.0% 32.1% 33.5% NO 0.99 (n = 41) (n = 29) (n = 32) (n = 25) (n = 28) (n = 155) Total 33.7% 25.1% 33.5% 38.0% 39.3% 34.0% 31.0% (n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (White) Table 121: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Gender, Female 43.8% 26.6% 36.0% 44.3% 42.4% 38.4% NO 1.13 (n = 224) (n = 259) (n = 214) (n = 228) (n = 250) (n = 1,175) Male 22.8% 23.2% 31.2% 31.1% 36.0% 29.1% YES 0.86 (n = 219) (n = 211) (n = 215) (n = 212) (n = 258) (n = 1,115) Total 33.7% 25.1% 33.5% 38.0% 39.3% 34.0% 30.7% (n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Female)

69 68 P age Table 122: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Age, < 20 years 35.4% 26.6% 34.5% 39.5% 40.8% 35.5% NO 1.04 (n = 373) (n = 403) (n = 386) (n = 395) (n = 451) (n = 2,008) years 25.0% 20.7% 21.4% 28.6% 25.8% 24.4% YES 0.72 (n = 44) (n = 29) (n = 28) (n = 28) (n = 31) (n = 160) years 24.0% 16.7% 23.1% 18.8% 37.5% 23.0% YES 0.68 (n = 25) (n = 30) (n = 13) (n = 16) (n = 16) (n = 100) 40+ years 33.3% 8.3% 50.0% 33.3% 23.1% 25.0% YES* 0.74 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 12) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 13) (n = 40) Total 33.7% 25.1% 33.5% 38.0% 39.3% 34.0% 28.4% (n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (< 20 years) Table 123: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Disability Status, Yes 24.1% 25.5% 25.0% 26.9% 19.6% 24.3% YES 0.71 (n = 29) (n = 47) (n = 36) (n = 52) (n = 46) (n = 210) No 34.4% 25.1% 34.3% 39.5% 41.3% 34.9% NO 1.03 (n = 419) (n = 427) (n = 397) (n = 390) (n = 465) (n = 2,098) Total 33.7% 25.1% 33.5% 38.0% 39.3% 34.0% 28.0% (n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Not DSPS) Table 124: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Economically Disadvantaged, Yes 35.6% 27.4% 31.0% 37.1% 39.7% 34.4% NO 1.01 (n = 247) (n = 296) (n = 297) (n = 313) (n = 378) (n = 1,531) No 31.3% 21.3% 39.0% 40.3% 38.3% 33.1% NO 0.97 (n = 201) (n = 178) (n = 136) (n = 129) (n = 133) (n = 777) Total 33.7% 25.1% 33.5% 38.0% 39.3% 34.0% 26.5% (n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Not Econ)

70 69 P age Table 125: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Veteran Status, Yes 32.0% 22.2% 25.0% 36.4% 64.3% 35.0% NO 1.03 (n = 25) (n = 18) (n = 12) (n = 11) (n = 14) (n = 80) No 33.8% 25.2% 33.7% 38.1% 38.6% 33.9% NO 1.00 (n = 423) (n = 456) (n = 421) (n = 431) (n = 497) (n = 2,228) Total 33.7% 25.1% 33.5% 38.0% 39.3% 34.0% 27.1% (n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Not Vet) Table 126: Developmental English Sequence Completion by Foster Youth Status, Yes 25.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% YES* 0.33 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 18) No 33.8% 25.4% 33.4% 38.5% 39.4% 34.1% NO 1.01 (n = 444) (n = 469) (n = 431) (n = 436) (n = 510) (n = 2,290) Total 33.7% 25.1% 33.5% 38.0% 39.3% 34.0% 27.3% (n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Not FY) Table 127: Developmental English Sequence Completion by 1st Generation, Yes 19.0% 18.8% 34.5% 35.5% 38.2% 33.1% NO 0.97 (n = 42) (n = 85) (n = 174) (n = 186) (n = 217) (n = 704) No 33.7% 22.9% 33.9% 40.6% 42.5% 36.6% NO 1.08 (n = 86) (n = 109) (n = 189) (n = 219) (n = 233) (n = 836) Total 33.7% 25.1% 33.5% 38.0% 39.3% 34.0% 29.3% (n = 448) (n = 474) (n = 433) (n = 442) (n = 511) (n = 2,308) (Not FG)

71 70 P age Developmental Math Sequence, College Level Completion Table 128: Developmental Math Sequence Completion, MATH-080/ % 18.0% 15.9% 14.8% 15.2% 17.8% (n = 115) (n = 128) (n = 63) (n = 54) (n = 79) (n = 439) MATH-090/96/ % 26.4% 38.9% 33.8% 37.0% 34.4% (n = 195) (n = 193) (n = 221) (n = 219) (n = 281) (n = 1,109) MATH-103/110 or higher 68.0% 65.5% 74.4% 79.3% 72.4% 71.0% (n = 506) (n = 588) (n = 399) (n = 343) (n = 463) (n = 2,299) Annual MATH-103/110 or Higher Success Rate 53.4% 50.5% 57.5% 57.5% 54.8% 54.4% (n = 816) (n = 909) (n = 683) (n = 616) (n = 823) (n = 3,847) Table 129: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Race/Ethnicity, African American/Black 10.3% 18.2% 34.8% 12.5% 25.0% 19.3% YES 0.65 (n = 29) (n = 22) (n = 23) (n = 24) (n = 16) (n = 114) American Indian N/A 0.0% 0.0% N/A 0.0% 0.0% YES* 0.00 (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) Asian 18.2% 14.3% 22.2% 60.0% 66.7% 28.9% NO 0.97 (n = 11) (n = 14) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 45) Filipino 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 100.0% 50.0% 52.9% NO* 1.78 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 17) Hispanic/Latino 27.3% 16.0% 31.5% 29.1% 27.7% 27.0% NO 0.91 (n = 77) (n = 81) (n = 108) (n = 127) (n = 173) (n = 566) Pacific Islander 50.0% 0.0% N/A 50.0% N/A 33.3% NO* 1.12 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) White 35.9% 27.9% 36.2% 33.0% 36.2% 33.5% NO 1.13 (n = 145) (n = 165) (n = 105) (n = 94) (n = 141) (n = 650) Two or more 20.7% 38.9% 35.5% 14.3% 33.3% 28.8% NO 0.97 (n = 29) (n = 18) (n = 31) (n = 14) (n = 12) (n = 104) Total 29.7% 23.1% 33.8% 30.0% 32.2% 29.7% 26.8% (n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (White)

72 71 P age Table 130: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Gender, Female 32.7% 22.9% 37.9% 34.2% 34.0% 32.1% NO 1.08 (n = 165) (n = 188) (n = 153) (n = 149) (n = 206) (n = 861) Male 24.1% 21.1% 27.6% 24.4% 30.1% 25.6% YES 0.86 (n = 141) (n = 128) (n = 127) (n = 123) (n = 153) (n = 672) Total 29.7% 23.1% 33.8% 30.0% 32.2% 29.7% 25.6% (n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Female) Table 131: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Age, < 20 years 29.1% 13.2% 33.8% 30.6% 32.1% 28.7% YES 0.97 (n = 148) (n = 152) (n = 195) (n = 219) (n = 274) (n = 988) years 25.0% 27.8% 32.3% 18.2% 26.3% 26.3% YES 0.88 (n = 48) (n = 36) (n = 31) (n = 22) (n = 38) (n = 175) years 36.1% 31.6% 38.5% 34.8% 48.4% 36.5% NO 1.23 (n = 61) (n = 76) (n = 39) (n = 23) (n = 31) (n = 230) 40+ years 28.3% 35.1% 26.3% 33.3% 17.6% 29.7% NO 1.00 (n = 53) (n = 57) (n = 19) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 17) (n = 155) Total 29.7% 23.1% 33.8% 30.0% 32.2% 29.7% 29.2% (n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (25-39 years) Table 132: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Disability Status, Yes 25.0% 25.7% 20.6% 20.7% 16.1% 21.7% YES 0.73 (n = 32) (n = 35) (n = 34) (n = 29) (n = 31) (n = 161) No 30.2% 22.7% 35.6% 31.1% 33.7% 30.6% NO 1.03 (n = 278) (n = 286) (n = 250) (n = 244) (n = 329) (n = 1,387) Total 29.7% 23.1% 33.8% 30.0% 32.2% 29.7% 24.5% (n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Not DSPS)

73 72 P age Table 133: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Economically Disadvantaged, Yes 31.0% 24.1% 31.5% 30.7% 32.7% 29.9% NO 1.01 (n = 203) (n = 253) (n = 216) (n = 192) (n = 272) (n = 1,136) No 27.1% 19.1% 41.2% 28.4% 30.7% 29.1% NO 0.98 (n = 107) (n = 68) (n = 68) (n = 81) (n = 88) (n = 412) Total 29.7% 23.1% 33.8% 30.0% 32.2% 29.7% 23.3% (n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Not Econ) Table 134: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Veteran Status, Yes 40.7% 41.7% 50.0% 35.3% 65.2% 47.4% NO 1.59 (n = 27) (n = 12) (n = 16) (n = 17) (n = 23) (n = 95) No 28.6% 22.3% 32.8% 29.7% 30.0% 28.6% NO 0.96 (n = 283) (n = 309) (n = 268) (n = 256) (n = 337) (n = 1,453) Total 29.7% 23.1% 33.8% 30.0% 32.2% 29.7% 22.8% (n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Not Vet) Table 135: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Foster Youth Status, Yes 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A 0.0% YES* 0.00 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) No 29.8% 23.4% 33.9% 30.3% 32.2% 29.9% NO 1.01 (n = 309) (n = 316) (n = 283) (n = 271) (n = 360) (n = 1,539) Total 29.7% 23.1% 33.8% 30.0% 32.2% 29.7% 23.9% (n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Not FY)

74 73 P age Table 136: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by 1 st Generation, Yes 25.0% 18.2% 35.6% 34.2% 28.7% 30.3% NO 1.02 (n = 32) (n = 55) (n = 118) (n = 117) (n = 150) (n = 472) No 18.8% 16.4% 34.3% 27.0% 36.1% 29.5% NO 0.99 (n = 48) (n = 55) (n = 108) (n = 126) (n = 155) (n = 492) Total 29.7% 23.1% 33.8% 30.0% 32.2% 29.7% 23.6% (n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Not FG)

75 74 P age Developmental Math Sequence, Transfer Level Completion Table 137: Developmental Math Sequence Completion, MATH-080/88 2.6% 0.8% 4.8% 7.4% 3.8% 3.2% (n = 115) (n = 128) (n = 63) (n = 54) (n = 79) (n = 439) MATH-090/96/97 4.6% 7.8% 16.3% 13.2% 18.1% 12.6% (n = 195) (n = 193) (n = 221) (n = 219) (n = 281) (n = 1,109) MATH-103/ % 20.9% 38.4% 38.3% 36.1% 28.5% (n = 249) (n = 268) (n = 172) (n = 141) (n = 216) (n = 1,046) MATH-120 or higher 65.0% 67.2% 75.8% 80.2% 78.5% 72.6% (n = 257) (n = 320) (n = 227) (n = 202) (n = 247) (n = 1,253) Annual MATH-120+ Success Rate 27.3% 31.6% 40.6% 40.4% 39.6% 35.4% (n = 816) (n = 909) (n = 683) (n = 616) (n = 823) (n = 3,847) Table 138: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Race/Ethnicity, African American/Black 0.0% 9.1% 8.7% 12.5% 6.3% 7.0% YES 0.71 (n = 29) (n = 22) (n = 23) (n = 24) (n = 16) (n = 114) American Indian N/A 0.0% 0.0% N/A 0.0% 0.0% YES* 0.00 (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) Asian 0.0% 7.1% 11.1% 60.0% 33.3% 15.6% NO 1.56 (n = 11) (n = 14) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 45) Filipino 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 5.9% YES* 0.59 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 17) Hispanic/Latino 2.6% 3.7% 13.0% 13.4% 15.0% 11.0% NO 1.10 (n = 77) (n = 81) (n = 108) (n = 127) (n = 173) (n = 566) Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.0% N/A 0.0% N/A 0.0% YES* 0.00 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) White 6.2% 4.8% 16.2% 8.5% 16.3% 10.0% NO 1.01 (n = 145) (n = 165) (n = 105) (n = 94) (n = 141) (n = 650) Two or more 3.4% 11.1% 16.1% 14.3% 0.0% 9.6% NO 0.97 (n = 29) (n = 18) (n = 31) (n = 14) (n = 12) (n = 104) Total 3.9% 5.0% 13.7% 12.1% 15.0% 9.9% 8.8% (n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Latino)

76 75 P age Table 139: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Gender, Female 3.6% 5.3% 18.3% 16.1% 14.6% 11.4% NO 1.14 (n = 165) (n = 188) (n = 153) (n = 149) (n = 206) (n = 861) Male 3.5% 4.7% 7.9% 7.3% 15.7% 8.0% YES 0.81 (n = 141) (n = 128) (n = 127) (n = 123) (n = 153) (n = 672) Total 3.9% 5.0% 13.7% 12.1% 15.0% 9.9% 9.1% (n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Female) Table 140: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Age, < 20 years 0.7% 3.9% 14.9% 11.9% 15.0% 10.4% NO 1.05 (n = 148) (n = 152) (n = 195) (n = 219) (n = 274) (n = 988) years 4.2% 11.1% 16.1% 13.6% 13.2% 10.9% NO 1.09 (n = 48) (n = 36) (n = 31) (n = 22) (n = 38) (n = 175) years 11.5% 2.6% 10.3% 13.0% 22.6% 10.0% NO 1.01 (n = 61) (n = 76) (n = 39) (n = 23) (n = 31) (n = 230) 40+ years 3.8% 7.0% 5.3% 11.1% 5.9% 5.8% YES 0.58 (n = 53) (n = 57) (n = 19) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 17) (n = 155) Total 3.9% 5.0% 13.7% 12.1% 15.0% 9.9% 8.3% (n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (< 20 years) Table 141: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Disability Status, Yes 0.0% 5.7% 5.9% 6.9% 12.9% 6.2% YES 0.62 (n = 32) (n = 35) (n = 34) (n = 29) (n = 31) (n = 161) No 4.3% 4.9% 14.8% 12.7% 15.2% 10.4% NO 1.04 (n = 278) (n = 286) (n = 250) (n = 244) (n = 329) (n = 1,387) Total 3.9% 5.0% 13.7% 12.1% 15.0% 9.9% 8.3% (n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Not DSPS)

77 76 P age Table 142: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Economically Disadvantaged, Yes 4.9% 3.6% 12.0% 13.5% 14.3% 9.7% NO 0.97 (n = 203) (n = 253) (n = 216) (n = 192) (n = 272) (n = 1,136) No 1.9% 10.3% 19.1% 8.6% 17.0% 10.7% NO 1.07 (n = 107) (n = 68) (n = 68) (n = 81) (n = 88) (n = 412) Total 3.9% 5.0% 13.7% 12.1% 15.0% 9.9% 8.5% (n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Not Econ) Table 143: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Veteran Status, Yes 7.4% 25.0% 18.8% 11.8% 43.5% 21.1% NO 2.12 (n = 27) (n = 12) (n = 16) (n = 17) (n = 23) (n = 95) No 3.5% 4.2% 13.4% 12.1% 13.1% 9.2% NO 0.93 (n = 283) (n = 309) (n = 268) (n = 256) (n = 337) (n = 1,453) Total 3.9% 5.0% 13.7% 12.1% 15.0% 9.9% 7.4% (n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Not Vet) Table 144: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by Foster Youth Status, Yes 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A 0.0% YES* 0.00 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) No 3.9% 5.1% 13.8% 12.2% 15.0% 10.0% NO 1.01 (n = 309) (n = 316) (n = 283) (n = 271) (n = 360) (n = 1,539) Total 3.9% 5.0% 13.7% 12.1% 15.0% 9.9% 8.0% (n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Not FY)

78 77 P age Table 145: Developmental Math Sequence Completion by 1 st Generation, Yes 2.1% 9.1% 13.9% 10.3% 17.4% 12.4% NO 1.25 (n = 48) (n = 55) (n = 108) (n = 126) (n = 155) (n = 492) No 3.1% 3.6% 16.1% 14.5% 12.0% 12.1% NO 1.21 (n = 32) (n = 55) (n = 118) (n = 117) (n = 150) (n = 472) Total 3.9% 5.0% 13.7% 12.1% 15.0% 9.9% 9.7% (n = 310) (n = 321) (n = 284) (n = 273) (n = 360) (n = 1,548) (Not FG)

79 78 P age Remedial Progress Rates (Student Success Scorecard) Remedial English Progress Rates The initial cohort of students is comprised of those first-time students whose first attempt in an English course was below transfer level (ENGL-120). The cohort year is based on the academic year of the first attempt. Students with successful outcomes are those students who successfully completed transfer level English (ENGL-120) within six years of their first attempt. Figure 4: Remedial English Progress Rate Trends

80 79 P age Table 146: Remedial English Progress Rate Trends by Race/Ethnicity to to to to to African American 24.6% 23.5% 28.3% 30.1% 38.9% 29.3% YES 0.67 (n = 69) (n = 98) (n = 99) (n = 103) (n = 95) (n = 464) American Indian 40.0% 33.3% 30.0% 22.2% 66.7% 34.8% YES* 0.80 (n = 15) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 46) Asian 50.0% 35.7% 40.6% 72.0% 47.1% 48.3% NO 1.11 (n = 24) (n = 28) (n = 32) (n = 25) (n = 34) (n = 143) Filipino 36.0% 46.2% 40.7% 44.4% 46.4% 42.9% NO 0.99 (n = 25) (n = 26) (n = 27) (n = 27) (n = 28) (n = 133) Hispanic 36.1% 44.5% 34.8% 40.1% 45.8% 40.6% NO 0.93 (n = 244) (n = 254) (n = 270) (n = 324) (n = 343) (n = 1,435) Pacific Islander 28.6% 53.8% 37.5% 33.3% 71.4% 46.0% NO* 1.06 (n = 14) (n = 13) (n = 16) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 14) (n = 63) White 43.9% 45.1% 46.6% 46.3% 50.3% 46.5% NO 1.07 (n = 474) (n = 443) (n = 498) (n = 508) (n = 485) (n = 2,408) Two or more N/A N/A N/A N/A 48.5% 48.5% NO* 1.12 (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 68) (n = 68) Unknown 46.8% 49.1% 50.4% 45.2% 47.6% 47.6% NO 1.10 (n = 139) (n = 110) (n = 131) (n = 155) (n = 82) (n = 617) Total 40.7% 43.0% 41.8% 43.2% 47.8% 43.4% 37.2% (n = 1,004) (n = 981) (n = 1,083) (n = 1,157) (n = 1,152) (n = 5,377) (White) Table 147: Remedial English Progress Rate Trends by Gender to to to to to Female 44.0% 47.2% 46.2% 47.4% 53.6% 47.8% NO 1.10 (n = 489) (n = 538) (n = 569) (n = 610) (n = 603) (n = 2,809) Male 36.9% 38.0% 36.9% 38.4% 41.2% 38.3% NO 0.88 (n = 488) (n = 439) (n = 512) (n = 541) (n = 539) (n = 2,519) Total 40.7% 43.0% 41.8% 43.2% 47.8% 43.4% 38.3% (n = 1,004) (n = 981) (n = 1,083) (n = 1,157) (n = 1,152) (n = 5,377) (Female)

81 80 P age Table 148: Remedial English Progress Rate Trends by Age to to to to to <20 years 46.4% 48.4% 47.6% 47.9% 53.6% 48.9% NO 1.13 (n = 666) (n = 655) (n = 685) (n = 793) (n = 746) (n = 3,545) years 34.0% 36.5% 33.9% 35.5% 40.1% 36.1% YES 0.83 (n = 156) (n = 148) (n = 221) (n = 197) (n = 212) (n = 934) years 23.3% 30.5% 32.7% 34.9% 34.4% 31.2% YES 0.72 (n = 116) (n = 105) (n = 110) (n = 109) (n = 131) (n = 571) 40+ years 20.5% 26.0% 23.9% 20.7% 33.3% 25.2% YES 0.58 (n = 44) (n = 73) (n = 67) (n = 58) (n = 63) (n = 305) Total 40.7% 43.0% 41.8% 43.2% 47.8% 43.4% 39.1% (n = 1,004) (n = 981) (n = 1,083) (n = 1,157) (n = 1,152) (n = 5,377) (<20 years) Table 149: Remedial English Progress Rate Trends by Disability Status to to to to to Yes 36.7% 39.7% 28.0% 27.5% 44.8% 35.1% YES 0.81 (n = 79) (n = 73) (n = 75) (n = 102) (n = 87) (n = 416) No 41.1% 43.3% 42.9% 44.7% 48.1% 44.1% NO 1.02 (n = 925) (n = 908) (n = 1,008) (n = 1,055) (n = 1,065) (n = 4,961) Total 40.7% 43.0% 41.8% 43.2% 47.8% 43.4% 35.3% (n = 1,004) (n = 981) (n = 1,083) (n = 1,157) (n = 1,152) (n = 5,377) (Not DSPS) Table 150: Remedial English Progress Rate Trends by Economically Disadvantaged to to to to to Yes 40.0% 38.9% 39.7% 43.4% 47.1% 42.4% NO 0.98 (n = 482) (n = 507) (n = 534) (n = 652) (n = 784) (n = 2,959) No 41.4% 47.5% 43.9% 43.0% 49.5% 44.7% NO 1.03 (n = 522) (n = 474) (n = 549) (n = 505) (n = 368) (n = 2,418) Total 40.7% 43.0% 41.8% 43.2% 47.8% 43.4% 35.8% (n = 1,004) (n = 981) (n = 1,083) (n = 1,157) (n = 1,152) (n = 5,377) (No Econ)

82 81 P age Table 151: Remedial English Progress Rate Trends by Veteran Status to to to to to Yes 30.2% 40.4% 48.9% 38.1% 37.5% 38.8% NO 0.89 (n = 53) (n = 52) (n = 47) (n = 42) (n = 56) (n = 250) No 41.3% 43.2% 41.5% 43.4% 48.4% 43.7% NO 1.01 (n = 951) (n = 929) (n = 1,036) (n = 1,115) (n = 1,096) (n = 5,127) Total 40.7% 43.0% 41.8% 43.2% 47.8% 43.4% 34.9% (n = 1,004) (n = 981) (n = 1,083) (n = 1,157) (n = 1,152) (n = 5,377) (Non Vet)

83 82 P age Remedial Math Progress Rates The initial cohort of students is comprised of those first-time students whose first attempt in a math course was below college level (MATH-103/110). The cohort year is based on the academic year of the first attempt. Students with successful outcomes are those students who successfully completed college level math (MATH-103/110) within six years of their first attempt. Figure 5: Remedial Math Progress Rate Trends

84 83 P age Table 152: Remedial Math Progress Rate Trends by Race/Ethnicity to to to to to African American 12.5% 29.5% 22.6% 17.5% 26.1% 22.1% YES 0.57 (n = 40) (n = 61) (n = 62) (n = 63) (n = 46) (n = 272) American Indian 20.0% 42.9% 20.0% 25.0% 0.0% 25.8% YES* 0.66 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 31) Asian 50.0% 60.0% 38.9% 53.8% 52.9% 51.4% NO 1.32 (n = 10) (n = 15) (n = 18) (n = 13) (n = 51) (n = 107) Filipino 8.3% 33.3% 25.0% 40.0% 33.3% 26.8% YES* 0.69 (n = 12) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 41) Hispanic 31.8% 30.0% 26.8% 29.7% 35.2% 30.7% YES 0.79 (n = 151) (n = 150) (n = 142) (n = 185) (n = 159) (n = 787) Pacific Islander 37.5% 16.7% 40.0% 28.6% 40.0% 32.3% YES* 0.83 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 31) White 41.9% 39.2% 43.4% 41.9% 53.4% 44.7% NO 1.15 (n = 265) (n = 265) (n = 249) (n = 260) (n = 371) (n = 1,410) Two or more N/A N/A N/A N/A 50.0% 50.0% NO* 1.28 (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 32) (n = 32) Unknown 41.4% 39.7% 42.4% 48.5% 53.5% 45.2% NO 1.16 (n = 87) (n = 58) (n = 85) (n = 97) (n = 71) (n = 398) Total 36.3% 36.1% 36.2% 36.9% 47.3% 39.0% 35.7% (n = 578) (n = 571) (n = 575) (n = 643) (n = 742) (n = 3,109) (White) Table 153: Remedial Math Progress Rate Trends by Gender to to to to to Female 36.7% 40.4% 37.6% 43.6% 50.7% 42.3% NO 1.09 (n = 338) (n = 332) (n = 338) (n = 374) (n = 448) (n = 1,830) Male 35.9% 29.6% 34.3% 27.4% 41.5% 33.9% NO 0.87 (n = 220) (n = 233) (n = 236) (n = 263) (n = 284) (n = 1,236) Total 36.3% 36.1% 36.2% 36.9% 47.3% 39.0% 33.9% (n = 578) (n = 571) (n = 575) (n = 643) (n = 742) (n = 3,109) (Female)

85 84 P age Table 154: Remedial Math Progress Rate Trends by Age to to to to to <20 years 35.6% 34.4% 32.4% 31.1% 41.1% 34.7% YES 0.89 (n = 261) (n = 253) (n = 247) (n = 267) (n = 219) (n = 1,247) years 32.8% 27.7% 35.6% 33.1% 43.2% 34.9% YES 0.90 (n = 122) (n = 112) (n = 135) (n = 166) (n = 155) (n = 690) years 33.0% 41.9% 39.5% 48.8% 51.5% 44.2% NO 1.13 (n = 109) (n = 117) (n = 114) (n = 123) (n = 202) (n = 665) 40+ years 51.4% 43.8% 44.3% 44.8% 54.2% 48.7% NO 1.25 (n = 70) (n = 89) (n = 79) (n = 87) (n = 166) (n = 491) Total 36.3% 36.1% 36.2% 36.9% 47.3% 39.0% 38.9% (n = 578) (n = 571) (n = 575) (n = 643) (n = 742) (n = 3,109) (40+ years) Table 155: Remedial Math Progress Rate Trends by Disability Status to to to to to Yes 47.1% 49.1% 35.3% 35.3% 43.4% 41.8% NO 1.07 (n = 68) (n = 55) (n = 68) (n = 68) (n = 76) (n = 335) No 34.9% 34.7% 36.3% 37.0% 47.7% 38.6% NO 0.99 (n = 510) (n = 516) (n = 507) (n = 575) (n = 666) (n = 2,774) Total 36.3% 36.1% 36.2% 36.9% 47.3% 39.0% 30.9% (n = 578) (n = 571) (n = 575) (n = 643) (n = 742) (n = 3,109) (Not DSPS) Table 156: Remedial Math Progress Rate Trends by Economically Disadvantaged to to to to to Yes 36.4% 37.4% 38.2% 39.3% 48.6% 41.2% NO 1.06 (n = 319) (n = 334) (n = 322) (n = 427) (n = 613) (n = 2,015) No 36.3% 34.2% 33.6% 31.9% 41.1% 34.9% NO 0.90 (n = 259) (n = 237) (n = 253) (n = 216) (n = 129) (n = 1,094) Total 36.3% 36.1% 36.2% 36.9% 47.3% 39.0% 27.9% (n = 578) (n = 571) (n = 575) (n = 643) (n = 742) (n = 3,109) (No Econ)

86 85 P age Table 157: Remedial Math Progress Rate Trends by Veteran Status to to to to to Yes 35.9% 39.1% 52.6% 37.5% 50.0% 43.2% NO 1.11 (n = 39) (n = 46) (n = 38) (n = 32) (n = 44) (n = 199) No 36.4% 35.8% 35.0% 36.8% 47.1% 38.7% NO 0.99 (n = 539) (n = 525) (n = 537) (n = 611) (n = 698) (n = 2,910) Total 36.3% 36.1% 36.2% 36.9% 47.3% 39.0% 31.0% (n = 578) (n = 571) (n = 575) (n = 643) (n = 742) (n = 3,109) (Non Vet)

87 86 P age ESL Progress Rates The initial cohort of students is comprised of those first-time students whose first attempt in an ESL course was below transfer level. The cohort year is based on the academic year of the first attempt. Students with successful outcomes are those students who successfully completed transfer level English (ENGL-120) within six years of their first attempt of an ESL course. Figure 6: ESL Progress Rate Trends

88 87 P age Table 158: ESL Progress Rate Trends by Race/Ethnicity to to to to to African American 100.0% 50.0% 33.3% 100.0% 100.0% 70.0% NO* 2.26 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) American Indian N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) Asian 28.6% 26.3% 36.8% 27.6% 40.0% 33.1% NO 1.07 (n = 14) (n = 19) (n = 19) (n = 29) (n = 40) (n = 121) Filipino 16.7% 0.0% 33.3% N/A N/A 18.2% YES* 0.59 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 11) Hispanic 20.3% 16.4% 16.0% 28.9% 36.0% 22.2% YES 0.72 (n = 59) (n = 55) (n = 75) (n = 83) (n = 25) (n = 297) Pacific Islander N/A 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 16.7% N/A N/A (n = 0) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) White 38.9% 34.6% 24.4% 38.1% 35.8% 34.5% NO 1.11 (n = 36) (n = 52) (n = 78) (n = 105) (n = 201) (n = 472) Two or more N/A N/A N/A N/A 46.2% 46.2% NO* 1.49 (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 13) (n = 13) Unknown 24.0% 19.6% 37.8% 40.5% 36.8% 32.4% NO 1.04 (n = 50) (n = 46) (n = 45) (n = 84) (n = 19) (n = 244) Total 26.5% 23.7% 25.4% 36.1% 36.8% 31.0% 27.6% (n = 166) (n = 177) (n = 224) (n = 305) (n = 302) (n = 1,174) (White) Table 159: ESL Progress Rate Trends by Gender to to to to to Female 27.0% 25.0% 30.8% 38.6% 41.5% 33.9% NO 1.09 (n = 111) (n = 124) (n = 143) (n = 202) (n = 183) (n = 763) Male 28.6% 20.8% 16.0% 29.3% 30.9% 25.7% YES 0.83 (n = 42) (n = 53) (n = 81) (n = 99) (n = 110) (n = 385) Total 26.5% 23.7% 25.4% 36.1% 36.8% 31.0% 27.2% (n = 166) (n = 177) (n = 224) (n = 305) (n = 302) (n = 1,174) (Female)

89 88 P age Table 160: ESL Progress Rate Trends by Age to to to to to <20 years 36.4% 42.3% 50.0% 42.4% 61.3% 45.8% NO 1.48 (n = 33) (n = 26) (n = 30) (n = 59) (n = 31) (n = 179) years 10.0% 20.5% 17.6% 49.2% 42.9% 33.0% YES 1.06 (n = 20) (n = 39) (n = 34) (n = 61) (n = 49) (n = 203) years 30.8% 21.9% 23.9% 35.6% 30.3% 29.0% YES 0.93 (n = 52) (n = 64) (n = 88) (n = 101) (n = 109) (n = 414) 40+ years 24.5% 18.8% 20.8% 22.6% 33.6% 25.4% YES 0.82 (n = 49) (n = 48) (n = 72) (n = 84) (n = 113) (n = 366) Total 26.5% 23.7% 25.4% 36.1% 36.8% 31.0% 36.6% (n = 166) (n = 177) (n = 224) (n = 305) (n = 302) (n = 1,174) (<20 years) Table 161: ESL Progress Rate Trends by Disability Status to to to to to Yes 42.9% 16.7% 31.3% 57.1% 26.3% 35.5% NO 1.14 (n = 7) (n = 6) (n = 16) (n = 14) (n = 19) (n = 62) No 25.8% 24.0% 25.0% 35.1% 37.5% 30.8% NO 0.99 (n = 159) (n = 171) (n = 208) (n = 291) (n = 283) (n = 1,112) Total 26.5% 23.7% 25.4% 36.1% 36.8% 31.0% 24.6% (n = 166) (n = 177) (n = 224) (n = 305) (n = 302) (n = 1,174) (Not DSPS) Table 162: ESL Progress Rate Trends by Economically Disadvantaged to to to to to Yes 31.1% 26.3% 30.2% 38.1% 36.6% 33.8% NO 1.09 (n = 132) (n = 133) (n = 169) (n = 257) (n = 295) (n = 986) No 8.8% 15.9% 10.9% 25.0% 42.9% 16.5% NO 0.53 (n = 34) (n = 44) (n = 55) (n = 48) (n = 7) (n = 188) Total 26.5% 23.7% 25.4% 36.1% 36.8% 31.0% 13.2% (n = 166) (n = 177) (n = 224) (n = 305) (n = 302) (n = 1,174) (No Econ)

90 89 P age Table 163: ESL Progress Rate Trends by Veteran Status to to to to to Yes 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 20.0% YES* 0.65 (n = 2) (n = 1) (n = 4) (n = 2) (n = 1) (n = 10) No 26.8% 23.3% 25.9% 36.3% 36.5% 31.1% NO 1.00 (n = 164) (n = 176) (n = 220) (n = 303) (n = 301) (n = 1,164) Total 26.5% 23.7% 25.4% 36.1% 36.8% 31.0% 24.9% (n = 166) (n = 177) (n = 224) (n = 305) (n = 302) (n = 1,174) (Non Vet)

91 90 P age Course Completion Course completion rates are based on duplicated enrollments. Successful Course Completion Rate = (Grades A, B, C, and P) / (Grades A, B, C, D, F, P, NP, I, W). Course Success Rates: All Courses The following charts and tables report the success rates of all credit courses offered in the fall terms at the college. Figure 7: All Course Success Rates, -

92 91 P age Table 164: All Course Success Rates by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 54.4% 56.9% 56.4% 59.8% 60.7% 57.5% YES 0.80 (n = 1,183) (n = 1,197) (n = 1,344) (n = 1,195) (n = 1,051) (n = 5,970) American Indian 68.0% 66.7% 66.0% 67.4% 67.6% 67.1% NO* 0.94 (n = 75) (n = 57) (n = 94) (n = 86) (n = 68) (n = 380) Asian 71.7% 78.2% 72.9% 81.8% 78.3% 76.4% NO 1.07 (n = 704) (n = 628) (n = 642) (n = 593) (n = 635) (n = 3,202) Filipino 72.2% 74.8% 72.2% 73.9% 69.8% 72.6% NO 1.01 (n = 417) (n = 457) (n = 468) (n = 476) (n = 484) (n = 2,302) Hispanic/Latino 66.3% 67.0% 66.1% 66.4% 66.9% 66.5% NO 0.93 (n = 5,751) (n = 6,080) (n = 6,930) (n = 6,949) (n = 6,688) (n = 32,398) Pacific Islander 79.2% 70.6% 60.2% 65.9% 54.2% 67.5% NO* 0.94 (n = 125) (n = 102) (n = 118) (n = 88) (n = 59) (n = 492) White 73.7% 75.7% 76.7% 78.3% 80.0% 76.9% NO 1.07 (n = 9,278) (n = 8,844) (n = 9,134) (n = 8,969) (n = 9,690) (n = 45,915) Two or more 66.1% 71.8% 68.1% 69.7% 70.0% 69.1% NO 0.97 (n = 1,527) (n = 1,522) (n = 1,533) (n = 1,496) (n = 1,532) (n = 7,610) Total 69.7% 71.6% 70.8% 72.3% 73.6% 71.6% 61.5% (n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (White) Table 165: All Course Success Rates by Gender, - Female 71.1% 73.3% 72.1% 74.0% 76.0% 73.3% NO 1.02 (n = 10,603) (n = 10,304) (n = 10,722) (n = 10,597) (n = 10,940) (n = 53,166) Male 67.9% 69.6% 69.5% 70.4% 70.6% 69.6% NO 0.97 (n = 9,154) (n = 9,042) (n = 9,871) (n = 9,408) (n = 9,342) (n = 46,817) Total 69.7% 71.6% 70.8% 72.3% 73.6% 71.6% 58.7% (n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Female)

93 92 P age Table 166: All Course Success Rates by Age, - < 20 years 70.9% 71.8% 71.3% 71.9% 73.6% 71.9% NO 1.00 (n = 6,393) (n = 5,860) (n = 6,525) (n = 6,264) (n = 6,089) (n = 31,131) years 65.7% 68.4% 67.2% 68.0% 68.7% 67.6% NO 0.94 (n = 6,095) (n = 6,483) (n = 6,893) (n = 6,623) (n = 6,744) (n = 32,838) years 70.0% 72.4% 71.5% 72.7% 75.0% 72.4% NO 1.01 (n = 4,428) (n = 4,455) (n = 4,527) (n = 4,604) (n = 4,861) (n = 22,875) 40+ years 74.6% 77.2% 77.7% 83.3% 83.1% 79.1% NO 1.10 (n = 3,014) (n = 2,711) (n = 2,777) (n = 2,650) (n = 2,744) (n = 13,896) Total 69.7% 71.6% 70.8% 72.3% 73.6% 71.6% 63.3% (n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (40+ years) Table 167: All Course Success Rates by Disability Status, - Yes 70.5% 68.4% 69.0% 70.2% 71.9% 70.0% NO 0.98 (n = 1,786) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,926) (n = 1,816) (n = 1,734) (n = 9,155) No 69.6% 71.9% 71.0% 72.5% 73.7% 71.8% NO 1.00 (n = 18,144) (n = 17,616) (n = 18,796) (n = 18,325) (n = 18,704) (n = 91,585) Total 69.7% 71.6% 70.8% 72.3% 73.6% 71.6% 57.4% (n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Not DSPS) Table 168: All Course Success Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 67.7% 70.3% 69.4% 71.6% 74.1% 70.7% NO 0.99 (n = 13,079) (n = 13,092) (n = 14,271) (n = 14,231) (n = 14,722) (n = 69,395) No 73.3% 74.1% 74.0% 73.9% 72.3% 73.5% NO 1.03 (n = 6,851) (n = 6,417) (n = 6,451) (n = 5,910) (n = 5,716) (n = 31,345) Total 69.7% 71.6% 70.8% 72.3% 73.6% 71.6% 58.8% (n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Not Econ)

94 93 P age Table 169: All Course Success Rates by Veteran Status, - Yes 74.6% 74.0% 73.0% 73.8% 69.4% 73.1% NO 1.02 (n = 1,203) (n = 1,310) (n = 1,250) (n = 1,151) (n = 1,016) (n = 5,930) No 69.3% 71.4% 70.7% 72.2% 73.8% 71.5% NO 1.00 (n = 18,727) (n = 18,199) (n = 19,472) (n = 18,990) (n = 19,422) (n = 94,810) Total 69.7% 71.6% 70.8% 72.3% 73.6% 71.6% 57.2% (n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Not Vet) Table 170: All Course Success Rates by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 59.8% 60.0% 38.7% 33.9% 50.0% 49.6% YES* 0.69 (n = 82) (n = 85) (n = 75) (n = 59) (n = 80) (n = 381) No 69.7% 71.6% 71.0% 72.4% 73.7% 71.7% NO 1.00 (n = 19,848) (n = 19,424) (n = 20,647) (n = 20,082) (n = 20,358) (n = 100,359) Total 69.7% 71.6% 70.8% 72.3% 73.6% 71.6% 57.3% (n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Not FY) Table 171: All Course Success Rates by 1 st Generation, - Yes 64.1% 68.5% 69.9% 71.1% 74.0% 70.2% NO 0.98 (n = 3,732) (n = 4,443) (n = 5,879) (n = 6,457) (n = 7,085) (n = 27,596) No 68.8% 70.4% 70.3% 71.9% 71.8% 70.8% NO 0.99 (n = 5,755) (n = 7,145) (n = 8,968) (n = 9,369) (n = 9,766) (n = 41,003) Total 69.7% 71.6% 70.8% 72.3% 73.6% 71.6% 56.7% (n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Not FG)

95 94 P age Course Success Rates: Transfer Level Courses The following charts and tables report the success rates of all credit courses that transfer to either CSU or UC offered in the fall terms at the college (NOTE: for math courses, we only included courses at or above MATH-120; for English courses, we included courses at or above ENGL-120). Figure 8: Transfer Level Course Success Rates, - 100% 69.5% 71.0% 68.9% 71.2% 71.8% 70.5% 60% 40% 20% 0% (n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323)

96 95 P age Table 172: Transfer Level Course Success Rates by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 56.8% 58.6% 55.4% 60.6% 57.3% 57.7% YES 0.82 (n = 708) (n = 693) (n = 828) (n = 786) (n = 694) (n = 3,709) American Indian 69.0% 66.7% 59.3% 64.7% 62.0% 63.9% NO* 0.91 (n = 42) (n = 36) (n = 59) (n = 51) (n = 50) (n = 238) Asian 72.5% 77.3% 71.3% 81.7% 77.0% 75.9% NO 1.08 (n = 418) (n = 365) (n = 404) (n = 388) (n = 453) (n = 2,028) Filipino 76.0% 74.2% 69.2% 71.3% 68.0% 71.4% NO 1.01 (n = 258) (n = 314) (n = 334) (n = 328) (n = 362) (n = 1,596) Hispanic/Latino 67.1% 66.7% 65.2% 66.0% 65.7% 66.1% NO 0.94 (n = 3,611) (n = 3,921) (n = 4,553) (n = 4,674) (n = 4,619) (n = 21,378) Pacific Islander 76.6% 67.9% 58.4% 57.4% 45.2% 62.6% NO* 0.89 (n = 77) (n = 56) (n = 77) (n = 61) (n = 42) (n = 313) White 72.5% 74.8% 74.3% 77.3% 78.6% 75.6% NO 1.07 (n = 5,530) (n = 5,181) (n = 5,457) (n = 5,471) (n = 6,192) (n = 27,831) Two or more 66.1% 72.5% 66.5% 67.8% 67.1% 67.9% NO 0.96 (n = 961) (n = 907) (n = 936) (n = 980) (n = 1,009) (n = 4,793) Total 69.5% 71.0% 68.9% 71.2% 71.8% 70.5% 60.7% (n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Asian) Table 173: Transfer Level Course Success Rates by Gender, - Female 71.2% 72.3% 69.7% 72.6% 73.8% 71.9% NO 1.02 (n = 6,582) (n = 6,319) (n = 6,811) (n = 6,946) (n = 7,286) (n = 33,944) Male 67.4% 69.4% 68.1% 69.6% 69.2% 68.8% NO 0.98 (n = 5,436) (n = 5,411) (n = 6,041) (n = 5,869) (n = 6,169) (n = 28,926) Total 69.5% 71.0% 68.9% 71.2% 71.8% 70.5% 57.6% (n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Female)

97 96 P age Table 174: Transfer Level Course Success Rates by Age, - < 20 years 72.9% 73.4% 71.6% 73.2% 74.0% 73.0% NO 1.04 (n = 4,484) (n = 4,047) (n = 4,545) (n = 4,500) (n = 4,437) (n = 22,013) years 66.2% 68.5% 66.4% 68.1% 67.6% 67.4% NO 0.96 (n = 4,272) (n = 4,500) (n = 5,031) (n = 4,900) (n = 5,093) (n = 23,796) years 68.5% 70.4% 66.9% 68.9% 71.8% 69.4% NO 0.98 (n = 2,194) (n = 2,243) (n = 2,303) (n = 2,427) (n = 2,762) (n = 11,929) 40+ years 69.9% 73.6% 73.7% 82.5% 80.8% 76.2% NO 1.08 (n = 1,167) (n = 1,029) (n = 1,049) (n = 1,078) (n = 1,262) (n = 5,585) Total 69.5% 71.0% 68.9% 71.2% 71.8% 70.5% 60.9% (n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (40+ years) Table 175: Transfer Level Course Success Rates by Disability Status, - Yes 69.5% 66.5% 67.3% 69.2% 71.3% 68.7% NO 0.98 (n = 947) (n = 993) (n = 1,073) (n = 998) (n = 1,018) (n = 5,029) No 69.5% 71.4% 69.1% 71.4% 71.8% 70.6% NO 1.00 (n = 11,170) (n = 10,826) (n = 11,855) (n = 11,907) (n = 12,536) (n = 58,294) Total 69.5% 71.0% 68.9% 71.2% 71.8% 70.5% 56.5% (n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Not DSPS) Table 176: Transfer Level Course Success Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 67.1% 69.4% 67.2% 70.5% 72.1% 69.4% NO 0.98 (n = 7,775) (n = 7,809) (n = 8,746) (n = 9,038) (n = 9,572) (n = 42,940) No 73.7% 74.0% 72.5% 72.9% 70.9% 72.8% NO 1.03 (n = 4,342) (n = 4,010) (n = 4,182) (n = 3,867) (n = 3,982) (n = 20,383) Total 69.5% 71.0% 68.9% 71.2% 71.8% 70.5% 58.2% (n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Not Econ)

98 97 P age Table 177: Transfer Level Course Success Rates by Veteran Status, - Yes 71.2% 72.7% 71.3% 71.6% 67.8% 71.0% NO 1.01 (n = 673) (n = 762) (n = 654) (n = 680) (n = 653) (n = 3,422) No 69.4% 70.9% 68.8% 71.2% 72.0% 70.5% NO 1.00 (n = 11,444) (n = 11,057) (n = 12,274) (n = 12,225) (n = 12,901) (n = 59,901) Total 69.5% 71.0% 68.9% 71.2% 71.8% 70.5% 56.4% (n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Not Vet) Table 178: Transfer Level Course Success Rates by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 58.3% 64.5% 44.8% 28.2% 54.0% 51.7% YES* 0.73 (n = 60) (n = 62) (n = 58) (n = 39) (n = 50) (n = 269) No 69.5% 71.0% 69.0% 71.3% 71.8% 70.6% NO 1.00 (n = 12,057) (n = 11,757) (n = 12,870) (n = 12,866) (n = 13,504) (n = 63,054) Total 69.5% 71.0% 68.9% 71.2% 71.8% 70.5% 56.4% (n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Not FY) Table 179: Transfer Level Course Success Rates by 1 st Generation, - Yes 63.9% 67.5% 66.9% 68.7% 72.4% 68.6% NO 0.97 (n = 2,020) (n = 2,469) (n = 3,345) (n = 3,838) (n = 4,397) (n = 16,069) No 70.0% 71.1% 69.9% 72.0% 70.8% 70.8% NO 1.00 (n = 3,620) (n = 4,539) (n = 6,048) (n = 6,487) (n = 7,052) (n = 27,746) Total 69.5% 71.0% 68.9% 71.2% 71.8% 70.5% 56.7% (n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Not FG)

99 98 P age Course Success Rates: Developmental Courses The following charts and tables report the course success rates of basic skills courses in math, English, and ESL courses (i.e., courses coded at least two levels below transfer). They do not include the outcomes for skills courses (e.g., ENGL-064 or ENGL-090R). Figure 9: Developmental Course Success Rates, -

100 99 P age Table 180: Developmental Course Success Rates by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 57.5% 54.6% 62.1% 52.9% 62.3% 57.8% YES 0.78 (n = 87) (n = 97) (n = 116) (n = 102) (n = 77) (n = 479) American Indian 100.0% 57.1% 50.0% 33.3% 50.0% 54.5% YES* 0.73 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 22) Asian 70.6% 78.5% 74.2% 84.6% 74.4% 75.5% NO 1.02 (n = 85) (n = 65) (n = 62) (n = 39) (n = 39) (n = 290) Filipino 66.7% 86.4% 82.8% 84.0% 56.3% 77.3% NO* 1.04 (n = 18) (n = 22) (n = 29) (n = 25) (n = 16) (n = 110) Hispanic/Latino 67.6% 67.3% 70.5% 61.0% 67.0% 66.9% NO 0.90 (n = 509) (n = 554) (n = 699) (n = 557) (n = 518) (n = 2,837) Pacific Islander 100.0% 80.0% 75.0% 0.0% 100.0% 80.8% NO* 1.09 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 26) White 80.9% 76.6% 82.2% 80.9% 83.6% 81.0% NO 1.09 (n = 771) (n = 788) (n = 967) (n = 933) (n = 989) (n = 4,448) Two or more 67.9% 64.6% 81.5% 67.5% 77.1% 71.7% NO 0.96 (n = 140) (n = 144) (n = 146) (n = 117) (n = 118) (n = 665) Total 74.2% 71.5% 76.8% 72.2% 76.8% 74.4% 64.8% (n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (White) Table 181: Developmental Course Success Rates by Gender, - Female 75.4% 75.0% 79.7% 74.5% 82.2% 77.5% NO 1.04 (n = 944) (n = 968) (n = 1,116) (n = 1,013) (n = 1,041) (n = 5,082) Male 72.9% 66.8% 73.2% 69.1% 68.9% 70.3% NO 0.95 (n = 722) (n = 745) (n = 923) (n = 773) (n = 731) (n = 3,894) Total 74.2% 71.5% 76.8% 72.2% 76.8% 74.4% 62.0% (n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Female)

101 100 P age Table 182: Developmental Course Success Rates by Age, - < 20 years 70.5% 68.2% 72.9% 65.4% 71.3% 69.9% NO 0.94 (n = 735) (n = 764) (n = 920) (n = 662) (n = 656) (n = 3,737) years 63.1% 65.2% 71.1% 62.5% 64.0% 65.3% YES 0.88 (n = 236) (n = 339) (n = 343) (n = 357) (n = 303) (n = 1,578) years 81.1% 77.2% 84.8% 78.3% 84.0% 81.3% NO 1.09 (n = 365) (n = 329) (n = 409) (n = 387) (n = 445) (n = 1,935) 40+ years 82.5% 80.9% 82.6% 86.6% 87.7% 84.2% NO 1.13 (n = 348) (n = 303) (n = 379) (n = 388) (n = 383) (n = 1,801) Total 74.2% 71.5% 76.8% 72.2% 76.8% 74.4% 67.4% (n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (40+ years) Table 183: Developmental Course Success Rates by Disability Status, - Yes 72.9% 63.4% 67.0% 62.9% 69.2% 66.8% NO 0.90 (n = 218) (n = 284) (n = 264) (n = 251) (n = 211) (n = 1,228) No 74.4% 73.1% 78.2% 73.7% 77.8% 75.6% NO 1.02 (n = 1,466) (n = 1,451) (n = 1,787) (n = 1,543) (n = 1,576) (n = 7,823) Total 74.2% 71.5% 76.8% 72.2% 76.8% 74.4% 60.5% (n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Not DSPS) Table 184: Developmental Course Success Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 75.5% 71.6% 77.4% 73.1% 79.1% 75.5% NO 1.01 (n = 1,372) (n = 1,385) (n = 1,706) (n = 1,556) (n = 1,553) (n = 7,572) No 68.6% 71.1% 73.6% 66.4% 61.5% 68.9% NO 0.93 (n = 312) (n = 350) (n = 345) (n = 238) (n = 234) (n = 1,479) Total 74.2% 71.5% 76.8% 72.2% 76.8% 74.4% 55.1% (n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Not Econ)

102 101 P age Table 185: Developmental Course Success Rates by Veteran Status, - Yes 71.6% 64.3% 76.5% 59.3% 47.1% 66.5% NO 0.89 (n = 67) (n = 70) (n = 85) (n = 54) (n = 34) (n = 310) No 74.3% 71.8% 76.8% 72.6% 77.4% 74.7% NO 1.00 (n = 1,617) (n = 1,665) (n = 1,966) (n = 1,740) (n = 1,753) (n = 8,741) Total 74.2% 71.5% 76.8% 72.2% 76.8% 74.4% 59.7% (n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Not Vet) Table 186: Developmental Course Success Rates by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 83.3% 63.6% 33.3% 42.9% 46.2% 55.0% YES* 0.74 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 11) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 13) (n = 40) No 74.2% 71.6% 76.9% 72.3% 77.0% 74.5% NO 1.00 (n = 1,678) (n = 1,724) (n = 2,048) (n = 1,787) (n = 1,774) (n = 9,011) Total 74.2% 71.5% 76.8% 72.2% 76.8% 74.4% 59.6% (n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Not FY) Table 187: Developmental Course Success Rates by 1 st Generation, - Yes 71.5% 72.5% 77.2% 73.4% 77.9% 75.0% NO 1.01 (n = 466) (n = 582) (n = 854) (n = 823) (n = 849) (n = 3,574) No 71.7% 68.2% 74.2% 65.3% 69.9% 69.9% NO 0.94 (n = 385) (n = 560) (n = 639) (n = 547) (n = 518) (n = 2,649) Total 74.2% 71.5% 76.8% 72.2% 76.8% 74.4% 55.9% (n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Not FG)

103 102 P age Course Success Rates: Career Technical Education (CTE) Courses The following charts and tables report the course success rates for CTE courses (SAM Codes = Apprenticeship, Advanced Occupational, Clearly Occupational, or Possibly Occupational). Figure 10: CTE Course Success Rates, - 100% 67.5% 70.9% 71.2% 72.5% 74.8% 71.2% 60% 40% 20% 0% (n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333)

104 103 P age Table 188: CTE Course Success Rates by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 46.9% 52.3% 57.1% 53.8% 63.6% 54.2% YES 0.76 (n = 309) (n = 298) (n = 322) (n = 260) (n = 206) (n = 1,395) American Indian 58.3% 64.3% 73.9% 76.9% 72.7% 68.2% NO* 0.96 (n = 24) (n = 14) (n = 23) (n = 13) (n = 11) (n = 85) Asian 65.5% 77.6% 73.4% 84.1% 80.4% 76.1% NO 1.07 (n = 145) (n = 165) (n = 158) (n = 138) (n = 143) (n = 749) Filipino 67.6% 68.9% 81.2% 78.3% 82.7% 75.1% NO 1.06 (n = 136) (n = 106) (n = 101) (n = 106) (n = 98) (n = 547) Hispanic/Latino 63.2% 66.0% 66.6% 69.0% 68.9% 66.7% NO 0.94 (n = 1,206) (n = 1,186) (n = 1,259) (n = 1,226) (n = 1,219) (n = 6,096) Pacific Islander 82.4% 69.6% 75.0% 85.7% 69.2% 77.4% NO* 1.09 (n = 34) (n = 23) (n = 24) (n = 21) (n = 13) (n = 115) White 72.8% 75.1% 76.4% 76.5% 79.9% 75.9% NO 1.07 (n = 2,329) (n = 2,129) (n = 2,056) (n = 1,829) (n = 1,714) (n = 10,057) Two or more 60.1% 70.4% 63.7% 68.3% 70.3% 66.5% NO 0.93 (n = 323) (n = 368) (n = 355) (n = 284) (n = 303) (n = 1,633) Total 67.5% 70.9% 71.2% 72.5% 74.8% 71.2% 60.7% (n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (White) Table 189: CTE Course Success Rates by Gender, - Female 67.0% 73.0% 72.1% 74.7% 76.9% 72.5% NO 1.02 (n = 2,153) (n = 2,002) (n = 1,972) (n = 1,738) (n = 1,779) (n = 9,644) Male 67.9% 69.0% 70.5% 70.7% 73.1% 70.1% NO 0.98 (n = 2,535) (n = 2,411) (n = 2,433) (n = 2,193) (n = 1,967) (n = 11,539) Total 67.5% 70.9% 71.2% 72.5% 74.8% 71.2% 58.0% (n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Female)

105 104 P age Table 190: CTE Course Success Rates by Age, - < 20 years 58.3% 61.4% 66.7% 66.2% 71.8% 64.0% NO 0.90 (n = 720) (n = 546) (n = 460) (n = 464) (n = 412) (n = 2,602) years 63.3% 66.0% 66.5% 67.7% 72.3% 67.0% NO 0.94 (n = 1,384) (n = 1,356) (n = 1,351) (n = 1,198) (n = 1,225) (n = 6,514) years 68.9% 73.1% 71.4% 73.8% 74.6% 72.3% NO 1.02 (n = 1,526) (n = 1,537) (n = 1,589) (n = 1,483) (n = 1,424) (n = 7,559) 40+ years 76.7% 79.3% 79.0% 80.8% 81.4% 79.2% NO 1.11 (n = 1,095) (n = 1,010) (n = 1,033) (n = 811) (n = 709) (n = 4,658) Total 67.5% 70.9% 71.2% 72.5% 74.8% 71.2% 63.4% (n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (40+ years) Table 191: CTE Course Success Rates by Disability Status, - Yes 68.8% 72.9% 74.0% 70.5% 69.0% 71.1% NO 1.00 (n = 385) (n = 377) (n = 384) (n = 336) (n = 316) (n = 1,798) No 67.4% 70.7% 70.9% 72.7% 75.4% 71.2% NO 1.00 (n = 4,340) (n = 4,072) (n = 4,049) (n = 3,620) (n = 3,454) (n = 19,535) Total 67.5% 70.9% 71.2% 72.5% 74.8% 71.2% 57.0% (n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Not DSPS) Table 192: CTE Course Success Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 64.0% 69.4% 67.3% 69.9% 73.7% 68.7% NO 0.96 (n = 2,799) (n = 2,700) (n = 2,721) (n = 2,343) (n = 2,377) (n = 12,940) No 72.6% 73.2% 77.3% 76.3% 76.8% 75.1% NO 1.05 (n = 1,926) (n = 1,749) (n = 1,712) (n = 1,613) (n = 1,393) (n = 8,393) Total 67.5% 70.9% 71.2% 72.5% 74.8% 71.2% 60.1% (n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Not Econ)

106 105 P age Table 193: CTE Course Success Rates by Veteran Status, - Yes 81.9% 77.7% 76.2% 76.6% 72.7% 77.2% NO 1.08 (n = 426) (n = 435) (n = 512) (n = 406) (n = 337) (n = 2,116) No 66.0% 70.2% 70.5% 72.0% 75.0% 70.5% NO 0.99 (n = 4,299) (n = 4,014) (n = 3,921) (n = 3,550) (n = 3,433) (n = 19,217) Total 67.5% 70.9% 71.2% 72.5% 74.8% 71.2% 56.4% (n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Not Vet) Table 194: CTE Course Success Rates by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 58.3% 11.1% 28.6% 50.0% 27.3% 35.6% YES* 0.50 (n = 12) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 11) (n = 45) No 67.5% 71.0% 71.2% 72.5% 75.0% 71.3% NO 1.00 (n = 4,713) (n = 4,440) (n = 4,426) (n = 3,950) (n = 3,759) (n = 21,288) Total 67.5% 70.9% 71.2% 72.5% 74.8% 71.2% 57.0% (n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Not FY) Table 195: CTE Course Success Rates by 1 st Generation, - Yes 61.0% 66.5% 71.1% 70.9% 73.6% 69.1% NO 0.97 (n = 919) (n = 992) (n = 1,172) (n = 1,128) (n = 1,266) (n = 5,477) No 64.9% 67.6% 69.3% 71.1% 73.7% 69.6% NO 0.98 (n = 1,460) (n = 1,617) (n = 1,895) (n = 1,878) (n = 1,813) (n = 8,663) Total 67.5% 70.9% 71.2% 72.5% 74.8% 71.2% 55.7% (n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Not FG)

107 106 P age Course Success Rates: Distance Education (DE) Courses The following charts and tables include the course success rates of all courses that were taught 51% or more online. Figure 11: DE Course Success Rates, -

108 107 P age Table 196: DE Course Success Rates by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 37.2% 45.9% 46.6% 43.5% 51.3% 44.9% YES 0.72 (n = 226) (n = 229) (n = 236) (n = 248) (n = 228) (n = 1,167) American Indian 80.0% 60.0% 33.3% 46.2% 60.0% 51.1% YES* 0.82 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 12) (n = 13) (n = 10) (n = 45) Asian 52.1% 76.0% 60.7% 76.7% 68.5% 66.7% NO 1.07 (n = 96) (n = 104) (n = 117) (n = 90) (n = 149) (n = 556) Filipino 57.7% 55.4% 64.0% 67.1% 64.5% 62.2% NO 1.00 (n = 71) (n = 74) (n = 89) (n = 85) (n = 107) (n = 426) Hispanic/Latino 53.9% 54.6% 52.1% 53.7% 56.5% 54.2% YES 0.87 (n = 707) (n = 756) (n = 931) (n = 936) (n = 1,054) (n = 4,384) Pacific Islander 45.5% 56.3% 77.3% 43.8% 46.2% 55.1% YES* 0.89 (n = 22) (n = 16) (n = 22) (n = 16) (n = 13) (n = 89) White 66.0% 70.1% 65.7% 69.6% 74.2% 69.4% NO 1.12 (n = 1,387) (n = 1,430) (n = 1,441) (n = 1,498) (n = 1,874) (n = 7,630) Two or more 56.8% 66.2% 52.9% 63.5% 61.1% 59.9% NO 0.96 (n = 241) (n = 234) (n = 295) (n = 249) (n = 321) (n = 1,340) Total 58.6% 63.6% 59.0% 62.3% 66.2% 62.2% 55.6% (n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (White) Table 197: DE Course Success Rates by Gender, - Female 58.4% 64.7% 58.6% 64.6% 68.7% 63.2% NO 1.02 (n = 1,776) (n = 1,792) (n = 1,940) (n = 1,891) (n = 2,279) (n = 9,678) Male 59.1% 61.9% 59.2% 59.2% 62.5% 60.5% NO 0.97 (n = 1,086) (n = 1,136) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,262) (n = 1,501) (n = 6,251) Total 58.6% 63.6% 59.0% 62.3% 66.2% 62.2% 50.6% (n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Female)

109 108 P age Table 198: DE Course Success Rates by Age, - < 20 years 56.4% 66.1% 61.1% 66.2% 69.5% 64.4% NO 1.04 (n = 447) (n = 454) (n = 509) (n = 580) (n = 685) (n = 2,675) years 56.2% 59.4% 54.4% 59.2% 63.5% 58.8% NO 0.95 (n = 1,063) (n = 1,074) (n = 1,275) (n = 1,192) (n = 1,465) (n = 6,069) years 59.9% 64.6% 61.2% 60.6% 65.3% 62.4% NO 1.00 (n = 961) (n = 1,006) (n = 1,077) (n = 1,023) (n = 1,235) (n = 5,302) 40+ years 64.2% 69.5% 65.1% 70.8% 73.1% 68.6% NO 1.10 (n = 419) (n = 423) (n = 370) (n = 384) (n = 420) (n = 2,016) Total 58.6% 63.6% 59.0% 62.3% 66.2% 62.2% 54.9% (n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (40+ years) Table 199: DE Course Success Rates by Disability Status, - Yes 61.4% 62.4% 60.0% 59.3% 62.4% 61.1% NO 0.98 (n = 166) (n = 205) (n = 205) (n = 209) (n = 218) (n = 1,003) No 58.4% 63.7% 58.9% 62.6% 66.5% 62.2% NO 1.00 (n = 2,724) (n = 2,752) (n = 3,026) (n = 2,970) (n = 3,587) (n = 15,059) Total 58.6% 63.6% 59.0% 62.3% 66.2% 62.2% 49.8% (n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Not DSPS) Table 200: DE Course Success Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 55.2% 61.9% 56.3% 61.3% 66.4% 60.6% NO 0.98 (n = 1,841) (n = 1,996) (n = 2,224) (n = 2,195) (n = 2,648) (n = 10,904) No 64.5% 67.2% 64.9% 64.6% 65.8% 65.4% NO 1.05 (n = 1,049) (n = 961) (n = 1,007) (n = 984) (n = 1,157) (n = 5,158) Total 58.6% 63.6% 59.0% 62.3% 66.2% 62.2% 52.3% (n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Not Econ)

110 109 P age Table 201: DE Course Success Rates by Veteran Status, - Yes 69.7% 64.6% 59.0% 63.1% 56.9% 62.6% NO 1.01 (n = 185) (n = 240) (n = 195) (n = 198) (n = 209) (n = 1,027) No 57.9% 63.6% 59.0% 62.3% 66.8% 62.1% NO 1.00 (n = 2,705) (n = 2,717) (n = 3,036) (n = 2,981) (n = 3,596) (n = 15,035) Total 58.6% 63.6% 59.0% 62.3% 66.2% 62.2% 49.7% (n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Not Vet) Table 202: DE Course Success Rates by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 64.7% 42.1% 42.9% 25.0% 60.0% 49.3% YES* 0.79 (n = 17) (n = 19) (n = 14) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 15) (n = 73) No 58.6% 63.8% 59.0% 62.4% 66.3% 62.2% NO 1.00 (n = 2,873) (n = 2,938) (n = 3,217) (n = 3,171) (n = 3,790) (n = 15,989) Total 58.6% 63.6% 59.0% 62.3% 66.2% 62.2% 49.8% (n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Not FY) Table 203: DE Course Success Rates by 1 st Generation, - Yes 56.9% 57.7% 57.1% 61.0% 67.8% 61.5% NO 0.99 (n = 441) (n = 527) (n = 784) (n = 916) (n = 1,224) (n = 3,892) No 55.6% 62.0% 58.0% 62.9% 64.8% 61.4% NO 0.99 (n = 840) (n = 1,018) (n = 1,404) (n = 1,504) (n = 1,934) (n = 6,700) Total 58.6% 63.6% 59.0% 62.3% 66.2% 62.2% 49.1% (n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Not FG)

111 110 P age Retention Rates Course retention rates are based on duplicated enrollments. Retention Rate = (Grades A, B, C, D, F, P, NP, I) / (Grades A, B, C, D, F, P, NP, I, W). Basically, the retention rate is the percentage of course enrollments resulting in a grade notation EXCEPT for Withdrawal. Course Retention Rates: All Courses The following charts and tables report the retention rates of all credit courses offered in the fall terms at the college. Figure 12: All Course Retention Rates, -

112 111 P age Table 204: All Course Retention Rates by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 76.2% 79.7% 80.0% 81.0% 81.1% 79.6% NO 0.93 (n = 1,183) (n = 1,197) (n = 1,344) (n = 1,195) (n = 1,051) (n = 5,970) American Indian 92.0% 82.5% 79.8% 84.9% 82.4% 84.2% NO* 0.98 (n = 75) (n = 57) (n = 94) (n = 86) (n = 68) (n = 380) Asian 83.2% 87.6% 86.4% 88.2% 87.4% 86.5% NO 1.01 (n = 704) (n = 628) (n = 642) (n = 593) (n = 635) (n = 3,202) Filipino 85.1% 85.6% 82.7% 87.4% 84.3% 85.0% NO 0.99 (n = 417) (n = 457) (n = 468) (n = 476) (n = 484) (n = 2,302) Hispanic/Latino 84.2% 84.9% 85.3% 84.0% 84.1% 84.5% NO 0.99 (n = 5,751) (n = 6,080) (n = 6,930) (n = 6,949) (n = 6,688) (n = 32,398) Pacific Islander 90.4% 81.4% 83.1% 84.1% 67.8% 82.9% NO* 0.97 (n = 125) (n = 102) (n = 118) (n = 88) (n = 59) (n = 492) White 84.5% 87.4% 88.0% 88.5% 89.8% 87.7% NO 1.02 (n = 9,278) (n = 8,844) (n = 9,134) (n = 8,969) (n = 9,690) (n = 45,915) Two or more 81.4% 86.6% 84.2% 85.0% 85.2% 84.5% NO 0.99 (n = 1,527) (n = 1,522) (n = 1,533) (n = 1,496) (n = 1,532) (n = 7,610) Total 83.7% 86.0% 86.0% 86.1% 86.8% 85.7% 70.1% (n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (White) Table 205: All Course Retention Rates by Gender, - Female 83.9% 85.7% 85.9% 86.2% 87.8% 85.9% NO 1.00 (n = 10,603) (n = 10,304) (n = 10,722) (n = 10,597) (n = 10,940) (n = 53,166) Male 83.4% 86.2% 86.1% 86.0% 85.7% 85.5% NO 1.00 (n = 9,154) (n = 9,042) (n = 9,871) (n = 9,408) (n = 9,342) (n = 46,817) Total 83.7% 86.0% 86.0% 86.1% 86.8% 85.7% 68.7% (n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Female)

113 112 P age Table 206: All Course Retention Rates by Age, - < 20 years 88.5% 89.1% 90.0% 88.8% 89.2% 89.1% NO 1.04 (n = 6,393) (n = 5,860) (n = 6,525) (n = 6,264) (n = 6,089) (n = 31,131) years 81.4% 84.1% 83.8% 83.6% 84.1% 83.4% NO 0.97 (n = 6,095) (n = 6,483) (n = 6,893) (n = 6,623) (n = 6,744) (n = 32,838) years 80.8% 84.3% 83.3% 84.2% 85.9% 83.8% NO 0.98 (n = 4,428) (n = 4,455) (n = 4,527) (n = 4,604) (n = 4,861) (n = 22,875) 40+ years 82.3% 86.6% 86.6% 89.3% 90.0% 86.9% NO 1.01 (n = 3,014) (n = 2,711) (n = 2,777) (n = 2,650) (n = 2,744) (n = 13,896) Total 83.7% 86.0% 86.0% 86.1% 86.8% 85.7% 69.5% (n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (40+ years) Table 207: All Course Retention Rates by Disability Status, - Yes 83.9% 86.6% 86.9% 85.1% 86.6% 85.8% NO 1.00 (n = 1,786) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,926) (n = 1,816) (n = 1,734) (n = 9,155) No 83.7% 85.9% 85.9% 86.2% 86.9% 85.7% NO 1.00 (n = 18,144) (n = 17,616) (n = 18,796) (n = 18,325) (n = 18,704) (n = 91,585) Total 83.7% 86.0% 86.0% 86.1% 86.8% 85.7% 68.6% (n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Not DSPS) Table 208: All Course Retention Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 82.1% 85.1% 85.2% 85.4% 86.9% 85.0% NO 0.99 (n = 13,079) (n = 13,092) (n = 14,271) (n = 14,231) (n = 14,722) (n = 69,395) No 86.7% 87.8% 87.8% 87.7% 86.6% 87.4% NO 1.02 (n = 6,851) (n = 6,417) (n = 6,451) (n = 5,910) (n = 5,716) (n = 31,345) Total 83.7% 86.0% 86.0% 86.1% 86.8% 85.7% 69.9% (n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Not Econ)

114 113 P age Table 209: All Course Retention Rates by Veteran Status, - Yes 87.7% 88.2% 86.7% 88.2% 84.5% 87.2% NO 1.02 (n = 1,203) (n = 1,310) (n = 1,250) (n = 1,151) (n = 1,016) (n = 5,930) No 83.4% 85.8% 86.0% 86.0% 87.0% 85.6% NO 1.00 (n = 18,727) (n = 18,199) (n = 19,472) (n = 18,990) (n = 19,422) (n = 94,810) Total 83.7% 86.0% 86.0% 86.1% 86.8% 85.7% 68.5% (n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Not Vet) Table 210: All Course Retention Rates by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 75.6% 76.5% 76.0% 72.9% 76.3% 75.6% NO* 0.88 (n = 82) (n = 85) (n = 75) (n = 59) (n = 80) (n = 381) No 83.7% 86.0% 86.0% 86.1% 86.9% 85.8% NO 1.00 (n = 19,848) (n = 19,424) (n = 20,647) (n = 20,082) (n = 20,358) (n = 100,359) Total 83.7% 86.0% 86.0% 86.1% 86.8% 85.7% 68.6% (n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Not FY) Table 211: All Course Retention Rates by 1 st Generation, - Yes 80.9% 84.7% 86.5% 86.0% 87.0% 85.5% NO 1.00 (n = 3,732) (n = 4,443) (n = 5,879) (n = 6,457) (n = 7,085) (n = 27,596) No 84.6% 86.3% 85.8% 86.3% 86.0% 85.9% NO 1.00 (n = 5,755) (n = 7,145) (n = 8,968) (n = 9,369) (n = 9,766) (n = 41,003) Total 83.7% 86.0% 86.0% 86.1% 86.8% 85.7% 68.7% (n = 19,930) (n = 19,509) (n = 20,722) (n = 20,141) (n = 20,438) (n = 100,740) (Not FG)

115 114 P age Course Retention Rates: Transfer Level Courses The following charts and tables report the retention rates of all credit courses that transfer to either CSU or UC offered in the fall terms at the college (NOTE: for math courses, we only included courses at or above MATH-120; for English courses, we included courses at or above ENGL-120). Figure 13: Transfer Level Course Retention Rates, -

116 115 P age Table 212: Transfer Level Course Retention Rates by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 76.8% 82.0% 80.7% 81.3% 79.8% 80.2% NO 0.94 (n = 708) (n = 693) (n = 828) (n = 786) (n = 694) (n = 3,709) American Indian 92.9% 83.3% 76.3% 80.4% 76.0% 81.1% NO* 0.95 (n = 42) (n = 36) (n = 59) (n = 51) (n = 50) (n = 238) Asian 83.3% 87.1% 86.4% 85.8% 86.8% 85.8% NO 1.01 (n = 418) (n = 365) (n = 404) (n = 388) (n = 453) (n = 2,028) Filipino 87.6% 84.7% 80.2% 86.9% 81.5% 84.0% NO 0.99 (n = 258) (n = 314) (n = 334) (n = 328) (n = 362) (n = 1,596) Hispanic/Latino 84.1% 84.7% 84.9% 82.8% 83.7% 84.0% NO 0.99 (n = 3,611) (n = 3,921) (n = 4,553) (n = 4,674) (n = 4,619) (n = 21,378) Pacific Islander 88.3% 80.4% 80.5% 78.7% 61.9% 79.6% NO* 0.93 (n = 77) (n = 56) (n = 77) (n = 61) (n = 42) (n = 313) White 84.1% 86.5% 86.9% 88.1% 88.8% 86.9% NO 1.02 (n = 5,530) (n = 5,181) (n = 5,457) (n = 5,471) (n = 6,192) (n = 27,831) Two or more 81.7% 87.2% 83.0% 84.1% 83.5% 83.9% NO 0.99 (n = 961) (n = 907) (n = 936) (n = 980) (n = 1,009) (n = 4,793) Total 83.5% 85.6% 85.2% 85.2% 85.8% 85.1% 69.5% (n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (White) Table 213: Transfer Level Course Retention Rates by Gender, - Female 84.1% 85.1% 84.7% 85.3% 86.6% 85.2% NO 1.00 (n = 6,582) (n = 6,319) (n = 6,811) (n = 6,946) (n = 7,286) (n = 33,944) Male 82.7% 86.1% 85.8% 85.1% 84.8% 84.9% NO 1.00 (n = 5,436) (n = 5,411) (n = 6,041) (n = 5,869) (n = 6,169) (n = 28,926) Total 83.5% 85.6% 85.2% 85.2% 85.8% 85.1% 68.2% (n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Female)

117 116 P age Table 214: Transfer Level Course Retention Rates by Age, - < 20 years 89.1% 88.8% 89.5% 88.6% 89.5% 89.1% NO 1.05 (n = 4,484) (n = 4,047) (n = 4,545) (n = 4,500) (n = 4,437) (n = 22,013) years 81.2% 84.4% 83.7% 83.1% 82.9% 83.1% NO 0.98 (n = 4,272) (n = 4,500) (n = 5,031) (n = 4,900) (n = 5,093) (n = 23,796) years 79.2% 82.4% 80.5% 81.8% 84.0% 81.7% NO 0.96 (n = 2,194) (n = 2,243) (n = 2,303) (n = 2,427) (n = 2,762) (n = 11,929) 40+ years 78.5% 85.2% 83.9% 88.2% 89.1% 85.0% NO 1.00 (n = 1,167) (n = 1,029) (n = 1,049) (n = 1,078) (n = 1,262) (n = 5,585) Total 83.5% 85.6% 85.2% 85.2% 85.8% 85.1% 71.3% (n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (< 20 years) Table 215: Transfer Level Course Retention Rates by Disability Status, - Yes 83.5% 85.7% 86.7% 84.1% 85.3% 85.1% NO 1.00 (n = 947) (n = 993) (n = 1,073) (n = 998) (n = 1,018) (n = 5,029) No 83.5% 85.6% 85.1% 85.3% 85.9% 85.1% NO 1.00 (n = 11,170) (n = 10,826) (n = 11,855) (n = 11,907) (n = 12,536) (n = 58,294) Total 83.5% 85.6% 85.2% 85.2% 85.8% 85.1% 68.1% (n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Not DSPS) Table 216: Transfer Level Course Retention Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 81.5% 84.7% 84.2% 84.3% 85.8% 84.2% NO 0.99 (n = 7,775) (n = 7,809) (n = 8,746) (n = 9,038) (n = 9,572) (n = 42,940) No 87.0% 87.4% 87.3% 87.3% 85.9% 87.0% NO 1.02 (n = 4,342) (n = 4,010) (n = 4,182) (n = 3,867) (n = 3,982) (n = 20,383) Total 83.5% 85.6% 85.2% 85.2% 85.8% 85.1% 69.6% (n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Not Econ)

118 117 P age Table 217: Transfer Level Course Retention Rates by Veteran Status, - Yes 85.1% 88.1% 86.7% 87.2% 83.3% 86.1% NO 1.01 (n = 673) (n = 762) (n = 654) (n = 680) (n = 653) (n = 3,422) No 83.4% 85.4% 85.1% 85.1% 86.0% 85.0% NO 1.00 (n = 11,444) (n = 11,057) (n = 12,274) (n = 12,225) (n = 12,901) (n = 59,901) Total 83.5% 85.6% 85.2% 85.2% 85.8% 85.1% 68.0% (n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Not Vet) Table 218: Transfer Level Course Retention Rates by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 73.3% 83.9% 81.0% 66.7% 76.0% 77.0% NO* 0.90 (n = 60) (n = 62) (n = 58) (n = 39) (n = 50) (n = 269) No 83.5% 85.6% 85.2% 85.3% 85.9% 85.1% NO 1.00 (n = 12,057) (n = 11,757) (n = 12,870) (n = 12,866) (n = 13,504) (n = 63,054) Total 83.5% 85.6% 85.2% 85.2% 85.8% 85.1% 68.1% (n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Not FY) Table 219: Transfer Level Course Retention Rates by 1 st Generation, - Yes 80.3% 84.4% 85.8% 84.6% 86.4% 84.8% NO 1.00 (n = 2,020) (n = 2,469) (n = 3,345) (n = 3,838) (n = 4,397) (n = 16,069) No 85.5% 86.2% 85.8% 85.8% 85.4% 85.7% NO 1.01 (n = 3,620) (n = 4,539) (n = 6,048) (n = 6,487) (n = 7,052) (n = 27,746) Total 83.5% 85.6% 85.2% 85.2% 85.8% 85.1% 68.6% (n = 12,117) (n = 11,819) (n = 12,928) (n = 12,905) (n = 13,554) (n = 63,323) (Not FG)

119 118 P age Course Retention Rates: Developmental Courses The following charts and tables report the course retention rates of basic skills courses in math, English, and ESL courses (i.e., courses coded at least two levels below transfer). They do not include the outcomes for skills courses (e.g., ENGL-049 or ENGL-090R). Figure 14: Developmental Course Retention Rates, -

120 119 P age Table 220: Developmental Course Retention Rates by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 83.9% 90.7% 87.9% 83.3% 84.4% 86.2% NO 0.95 (n = 87) (n = 97) (n = 116) (n = 102) (n = 77) (n = 479) American Indian 100.0% 71.4% 50.0% 83.3% 100.0% 81.8% NO* 0.90 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 22) Asian 91.8% 89.2% 93.5% 97.4% 87.2% 91.7% NO 1.01 (n = 85) (n = 65) (n = 62) (n = 39) (n = 39) (n = 290) Filipino 88.9% 95.5% 96.6% 96.0% 93.8% 94.5% NO* 1.04 (n = 18) (n = 22) (n = 29) (n = 25) (n = 16) (n = 110) Hispanic/Latino 91.0% 88.1% 93.1% 87.3% 85.5% 89.2% NO 0.98 (n = 509) (n = 554) (n = 699) (n = 557) (n = 518) (n = 2,837) Pacific Islander 100.0% 90.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.2% NO* 1.05 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 26) White 92.7% 91.9% 94.0% 92.4% 94.9% 93.3% NO 1.02 (n = 771) (n = 788) (n = 967) (n = 933) (n = 989) (n = 4,448) Two or more 82.9% 86.1% 93.8% 88.0% 93.2% 88.7% NO 0.97 (n = 140) (n = 144) (n = 146) (n = 117) (n = 118) (n = 665) Total 90.7% 89.9% 93.3% 90.2% 91.4% 91.2% 74.6% (n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (White) Table 221: Developmental Course Retention Rates by Gender, - Female 91.0% 91.4% 94.2% 90.8% 93.4% 92.2% NO 1.01 (n = 944) (n = 968) (n = 1,116) (n = 1,013) (n = 1,041) (n = 5,082) Male 90.6% 87.8% 92.5% 89.4% 88.6% 89.9% NO 0.99 (n = 722) (n = 745) (n = 923) (n = 773) (n = 731) (n = 3,894) Total 90.7% 89.9% 93.3% 90.2% 91.4% 91.2% 73.8% (n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Female)

121 120 P age Table 222: Developmental Course Retention Rates by Age, - < 20 years 91.2% 91.6% 94.9% 91.8% 90.5% 92.2% NO 1.01 (n = 735) (n = 764) (n = 920) (n = 662) (n = 656) (n = 3,737) years 85.2% 85.5% 88.9% 85.7% 88.1% 86.8% NO 0.95 (n = 236) (n = 339) (n = 343) (n = 357) (n = 303) (n = 1,578) years 90.1% 89.7% 95.1% 89.9% 92.1% 91.5% NO 1.00 (n = 365) (n = 329) (n = 409) (n = 387) (n = 445) (n = 1,935) 40+ years 94.3% 90.4% 91.6% 91.8% 94.5% 92.6% NO 1.02 (n = 348) (n = 303) (n = 379) (n = 388) (n = 383) (n = 1,801) Total 90.7% 89.9% 93.3% 90.2% 91.4% 91.2% 74.0% (n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (40+ years) Table 223: Developmental Course Retention Rates by Disability Status, - Yes 89.0% 88.4% 89.4% 84.5% 91.9% 88.5% NO 0.97 (n = 218) (n = 284) (n = 264) (n = 251) (n = 211) (n = 1,228) No 91.0% 90.1% 93.9% 91.1% 91.3% 91.6% NO 1.00 (n = 1,466) (n = 1,451) (n = 1,787) (n = 1,543) (n = 1,576) (n = 7,823) Total 90.7% 89.9% 93.3% 90.2% 91.4% 91.2% 73.3% (n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Not DSPS) Table 224: Developmental Course Retention Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 90.4% 89.0% 93.9% 90.4% 91.9% 91.2% NO 1.00 (n = 1,372) (n = 1,385) (n = 1,706) (n = 1,556) (n = 1,553) (n = 7,572) No 92.3% 93.4% 90.4% 88.7% 88.0% 90.9% NO 1.00 (n = 312) (n = 350) (n = 345) (n = 238) (n = 234) (n = 1,479) Total 90.7% 89.9% 93.3% 90.2% 91.4% 91.2% 72.7% (n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Not Econ)

122 121 P age Table 225: Developmental Course Retention Rates by Veteran Status, - Yes 92.5% 88.6% 92.9% 85.2% 91.2% 90.3% NO 0.99 (n = 67) (n = 70) (n = 85) (n = 54) (n = 34) (n = 310) No 90.7% 89.9% 93.3% 90.3% 91.4% 91.2% NO 1.00 (n = 1,617) (n = 1,665) (n = 1,966) (n = 1,740) (n = 1,753) (n = 8,741) Total 90.7% 89.9% 93.3% 90.2% 91.4% 91.2% 73.0% (n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Not Vet) Table 226: Developmental Course Retention Rates by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 83.3% 72.7% 66.7% 85.7% 76.9% 77.5% NO* 0.85 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 11) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 13) (n = 40) No 90.8% 90.0% 93.4% 90.2% 91.5% 91.2% NO 1.00 (n = 1,678) (n = 1,724) (n = 2,048) (n = 1,787) (n = 1,774) (n = 9,011) Total 90.7% 89.9% 93.3% 90.2% 91.4% 91.2% 73.0% (n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Not FY) Table 227: Developmental Course Retention Rates by 1 st Generation, - Yes 89.9% 88.8% 93.0% 89.9% 90.3% 90.6% NO 0.99 (n = 466) (n = 582) (n = 854) (n = 823) (n = 849) (n = 3,574) No 89.6% 92.9% 92.6% 89.0% 90.0% 91.0% NO 1.00 (n = 385) (n = 560) (n = 639) (n = 547) (n = 518) (n = 2,649) Total 90.7% 89.9% 93.3% 90.2% 91.4% 91.2% 72.8% (n = 1,684) (n = 1,735) (n = 2,051) (n = 1,794) (n = 1,787) (n = 9,051) (Not FG)

123 122 P age Course Retention Rates: Career Technical Education (CTE) Courses The following charts and tables report the course retention rates for CTE courses (SAM Codes = Apprenticeship, Advanced Occupational, Clearly Occupational, or Possibly Occupational). Figure 15: CTE Course Retention Rates, -

124 123 P age Table 228: CTE Course Retention Rates by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 72.5% 71.8% 76.4% 73.1% 78.6% 74.3% NO 0.89 (n = 309) (n = 298) (n = 322) (n = 260) (n = 206) (n = 1,395) American Indian 83.3% 85.7% 87.0% 92.3% 81.8% 85.9% NO* 1.03 (n = 24) (n = 14) (n = 23) (n = 13) (n = 11) (n = 85) Asian 78.6% 86.1% 85.4% 90.6% 88.1% 85.7% NO 1.02 (n = 145) (n = 165) (n = 158) (n = 138) (n = 143) (n = 749) Filipino 80.9% 79.2% 88.1% 86.8% 91.8% 85.0% NO 1.02 (n = 136) (n = 106) (n = 101) (n = 106) (n = 98) (n = 547) Hispanic/Latino 81.3% 82.1% 80.7% 83.5% 83.6% 82.3% NO 0.98 (n = 1,206) (n = 1,186) (n = 1,259) (n = 1,226) (n = 1,219) (n = 6,096) Pacific Islander 94.1% 73.9% 95.8% 95.2% 69.2% 87.8% NO* 1.05 (n = 34) (n = 23) (n = 24) (n = 21) (n = 13) (n = 115) White 82.9% 86.8% 85.3% 86.1% 88.5% 85.7% NO 1.02 (n = 2,329) (n = 2,129) (n = 2,056) (n = 1,829) (n = 1,714) (n = 10,057) Two or more 77.7% 84.0% 78.9% 83.1% 84.5% 81.6% NO 0.97 (n = 323) (n = 368) (n = 355) (n = 284) (n = 303) (n = 1,633) Total 81.5% 84.1% 82.9% 84.4% 86.1% 83.7% 68.6% (n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (White) Table 229: CTE Course Retention Rates by Gender, - Female 80.2% 83.5% 82.5% 84.2% 87.7% 83.5% NO 1.00 (n = 2,153) (n = 2,002) (n = 1,972) (n = 1,738) (n = 1,779) (n = 9,644) Male 82.7% 84.6% 83.3% 84.5% 84.6% 83.9% NO 1.00 (n = 2,535) (n = 2,411) (n = 2,433) (n = 2,193) (n = 1,967) (n = 11,539) Total 81.5% 84.1% 82.9% 84.4% 86.1% 83.7% 67.1% (n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Male)

125 124 P age Table 230: CTE Course Retention Rates by Age, - < 20 years 79.9% 81.9% 82.2% 82.3% 87.9% 82.4% NO 0.98 (n = 720) (n = 546) (n = 460) (n = 464) (n = 412) (n = 2,602) years 80.9% 82.4% 80.3% 82.4% 85.0% 82.1% NO 0.98 (n = 1,384) (n = 1,356) (n = 1,351) (n = 1,198) (n = 1,225) (n = 6,514) years 81.5% 84.8% 82.9% 84.8% 85.5% 83.8% NO 1.00 (n = 1,526) (n = 1,537) (n = 1,589) (n = 1,483) (n = 1,424) (n = 7,559) 40+ years 83.6% 86.6% 86.7% 87.8% 88.2% 86.4% NO 1.03 (n = 1,095) (n = 1,010) (n = 1,033) (n = 811) (n = 709) (n = 4,658) Total 81.5% 84.1% 82.9% 84.4% 86.1% 83.7% 69.1% (n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (40+ years) Table 231: CTE Course Retention Rates by Disability Status, - Yes 80.5% 87.0% 85.9% 85.4% 82.9% 84.4% NO 1.01 (n = 385) (n = 377) (n = 384) (n = 336) (n = 316) (n = 1798) No 81.6% 83.8% 82.6% 84.3% 86.4% 83.6% NO 1.00 (n = 4340) (n = 4072) (n = 4049) (n = 3620) (n = 3454) (n = 19535) Total 81.5% 84.1% 82.9% 84.4% 86.1% 83.7% 66.9% (n = 4725) (n = 4449) (n = 4433) (n = 3956) (n = 3770) (n = 21333) (Not DSPS) Table 232: CTE Course Retention Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 79.7% 82.8% 79.8% 82.6% 85.2% 81.9% NO 0.98 (n = 2,799) (n = 2,700) (n = 2,721) (n = 2,343) (n = 2,377) (n = 12,940) No 84.2% 86.2% 87.9% 87.0% 87.6% 86.5% NO 1.03 (n = 1,926) (n = 1,749) (n = 1,712) (n = 1,613) (n = 1,393) (n = 8,393) Total 81.5% 84.1% 82.9% 84.4% 86.1% 83.7% 69.2% (n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Not Econ)

126 125 P age Table 233: CTE Course Retention Rates by Veteran Status, - Yes 90.6% 89.4% 86.3% 88.4% 84.9% 88.0% NO 1.05 (n = 426) (n = 435) (n = 512) (n = 406) (n = 337) (n = 2,116) No 80.6% 83.5% 82.5% 83.9% 86.2% 83.2% NO 0.99 (n = 4,299) (n = 4,014) (n = 3,921) (n = 3,550) (n = 3,433) (n = 19,217) Total 81.5% 84.1% 82.9% 84.4% 86.1% 83.7% 66.6% (n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Not Vet) Table 234: CTE Course Retention Rates by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 75.0% 44.4% 28.6% 100.0% 72.7% 64.4% YES* 0.77 (n = 12) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 11) (n = 45) No 81.6% 84.2% 83.0% 84.4% 86.1% 83.7% NO 1.00 (n = 4,713) (n = 4,440) (n = 4,426) (n = 3,950) (n = 3,759) (n = 21,288) Total 81.5% 84.1% 82.9% 84.4% 86.1% 83.7% 67.0% (n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Not FY) Table 235: CTE Course Retention Rates by 1 st Generation, - Yes 78.9% 81.5% 83.6% 84.4% 85.5% 83.0% NO 0.99 (n = 919) (n = 992) (n = 1,172) (n = 1,128) (n = 1,266) (n = 5,477) No 80.3% 82.7% 81.5% 83.7% 85.3% 82.8% NO 0.99 (n = 1,460) (n = 1,617) (n = 1,895) (n = 1,878) (n = 1,813) (n = 8,663) Total 81.5% 84.1% 82.9% 84.4% 86.1% 83.7% 66.2% (n = 4,725) (n = 4,449) (n = 4,433) (n = 3,956) (n = 3,770) (n = 21,333) (Not FG)

127 126 P age Course Retention Rates: Distance Education (DE) Courses The following charts and tables include the course retention rates of all courses that were taught 51% or more online. Figure 16: DE Course Retention Rates, - 100% 75.4% 78.1% 75.6% 77.8% 81.0% 77.7% 60% 40% 20% 0% (n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062)

128 127 P age Table 236: DE Course Retention Rates by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 63.3% 66.4% 66.9% 69.8% 71.1% 67.5% NO 0.87 (n = 226) (n = 229) (n = 236) (n = 248) (n = 228) (n = 1,167) American Indian 100.0% 80.0% 58.3% 53.8% 80.0% 68.9% NO* 0.89 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 12) (n = 13) (n = 10) (n = 45) Asian 74.0% 85.6% 76.1% 84.4% 81.2% 80.2% NO 1.03 (n = 96) (n = 104) (n = 117) (n = 90) (n = 149) (n = 556) Filipino 71.8% 66.2% 78.7% 81.2% 78.5% 75.8% NO 0.98 (n = 71) (n = 74) (n = 89) (n = 85) (n = 107) (n = 426) Hispanic/Latino 73.6% 73.4% 71.6% 73.0% 76.3% 73.7% NO 0.95 (n = 707) (n = 756) (n = 931) (n = 936) (n = 1,054) (n = 4,384) Pacific Islander 72.7% 62.5% 81.8% 56.3% 61.5% 68.5% NO* 0.88 (n = 22) (n = 16) (n = 22) (n = 16) (n = 13) (n = 89) White 78.5% 82.3% 79.9% 81.8% 85.2% 81.8% NO 1.05 (n = 1,387) (n = 1,430) (n = 1,441) (n = 1,498) (n = 1,874) (n = 7,630) Two or more 76.8% 79.5% 72.9% 77.9% 78.8% 77.1% NO 0.99 (n = 241) (n = 234) (n = 295) (n = 249) (n = 321) (n = 1,340) Total 75.4% 78.1% 75.6% 77.8% 81.0% 77.7% 65.4% (n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (White) Table 237: DE Course Retention Rates by Gender, - Female 75.2% 78.3% 75.7% 78.4% 83.1% 78.4% NO 1.01 (n = 1,776) (n = 1,792) (n = 1,940) (n = 1,891) (n = 2,279) (n = 9,678) Male 75.7% 77.8% 75.4% 77.0% 77.7% 76.8% NO 0.99 (n = 1,086) (n = 1,136) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,262) (n = 1,501) (n = 6,251) Total 75.4% 78.1% 75.6% 77.8% 81.0% 77.7% 62.7% (n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Female)

129 128 P age Table 238: DE Course Retention Rates by Age, - < 20 years 78.3% 80.0% 80.7% 81.0% 84.1% 81.1% NO 1.04 (n = 447) (n = 454) (n = 509) (n = 580) (n = 685) (n = 2,675) years 74.9% 76.4% 74.0% 77.9% 79.5% 76.7% NO 0.99 (n = 1,063) (n = 1,074) (n = 1,275) (n = 1,192) (n = 1,465) (n = 6,069) years 74.3% 77.2% 74.9% 74.6% 80.5% 76.5% NO 0.98 (n = 961) (n = 1,006) (n = 1,077) (n = 1,023) (n = 1,235) (n = 5,302) 40+ years 76.1% 82.5% 75.9% 81.3% 82.4% 79.7% NO 1.03 (n = 419) (n = 423) (n = 370) (n = 384) (n = 420) (n = 2,016) Total 75.4% 78.1% 75.6% 77.8% 81.0% 77.7% 64.9% (n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (< 20 years) Table 239: DE Course Retention Rates by Disability Status, - Yes 75.9% 78.5% 77.1% 78.9% 74.8% 77.1% NO 0.99 (n = 166) (n = 205) (n = 205) (n = 209) (n = 218) (n = 1,003) No 75.4% 78.1% 75.5% 77.7% 81.3% 77.8% NO 1.00 (n = 2,724) (n = 2,752) (n = 3,026) (n = 2,970) (n = 3,587) (n = 15,059) Total 75.4% 78.1% 75.6% 77.8% 81.0% 77.7% 62.2% (n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Not DSPS) Table 240: DE Course Retention Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 73.6% 76.8% 73.5% 77.1% 81.2% 76.7% NO 0.99 (n = 1,841) (n = 1,996) (n = 2,224) (n = 2,195) (n = 2,648) (n = 10,904) No 78.6% 80.7% 80.2% 79.4% 80.6% 79.9% NO 1.03 (n = 1,049) (n = 961) (n = 1,007) (n = 984) (n = 1,157) (n = 5,158) Total 75.4% 78.1% 75.6% 77.8% 81.0% 77.7% 63.9% (n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Not Econ)

130 129 P age Table 241: DE Course Retention Rates by Veteran Status, - Yes 81.1% 81.7% 74.4% 80.8% 76.6% 79.0% NO 1.02 (n = 185) (n = 240) (n = 195) (n = 198) (n = 209) (n = 1,027) No 75.0% 77.8% 75.7% 77.6% 81.2% 77.6% NO 1.00 (n = 2,705) (n = 2,717) (n = 3,036) (n = 2,981) (n = 3,596) (n = 15,035) Total 75.4% 78.1% 75.6% 77.8% 81.0% 77.7% 62.1% (n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Not Vet) Table 242: DE Course Retention Rates by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 76.5% 73.7% 64.3% 62.5% 73.3% 71.2% NO* 0.92 (n = 17) (n = 19) (n = 14) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 15) (n = 73) No 75.4% 78.1% 75.6% 77.8% 81.0% 77.8% NO 1.00 (n = 2,873) (n = 2,938) (n = 3,217) (n = 3,171) (n = 3,790) (n = 15,989) Total 75.4% 78.1% 75.6% 77.8% 81.0% 77.7% 62.2% (n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Not FY) Table 243: DE Course Retention Rates by 1 st Generation, - Yes 74.4% 73.2% 76.0% 77.3% 82.1% 77.7% NO 1.00 (n = 441) (n = 527) (n = 784) (n = 916) (n = 1,224) (n = 3,892) No 75.1% 76.1% 74.6% 78.9% 79.7% 77.3% NO 0.99 (n = 840) (n = 1,018) (n = 1,404) (n = 1,504) (n = 1,934) (n = 6,700) Total 75.4% 78.1% 75.6% 77.8% 81.0% 77.7% 61.9% (n = 2,890) (n = 2,957) (n = 3,231) (n = 3,179) (n = 3,805) (n = 16,062) (Not FG)

131 130 P age Persistence Rates ( to Spring) to spring persistence is tracked from fall at each college to spring enrollments districtwide. Persistence Rates ( to Spring): All Students The following charts and tables include all students who were enrolled in the fall term. Figure 17: to Spring Persistence Rates, 2010-

132 131 P age Table 244: All Students to Spring Persistence Rates by Race/Ethnicity, African American/Black 62.4% 64.4% 65.2% 62.6% 63.2% 63.5% NO 0.88 (n = 686) (n = 523) (n = 526) (n = 559) (n = 513) (n = 2,807) American Indian 55.4% 75.8% 66.7% 75.0% 52.6% 64.2% NO* 0.89 (n = 56) (n = 33) (n = 33) (n = 44) (n = 38) (n = 204) Asian 72.3% 73.6% 75.7% 77.1% 74.3% 74.5% NO 1.03 (n = 379) (n = 322) (n = 317) (n = 306) (n = 284) (n = 1,608) Filipino 66.1% 65.4% 74.5% 71.6% 77.4% 70.9% NO 0.98 (n = 257) (n = 211) (n = 216) (n = 222) (n = 221) (n = 1,127) Hispanic/Latino 65.6% 73.0% 72.1% 73.1% 72.5% 71.3% NO 0.99 (n = 2,598) (n = 2,359) (n = 2,540) (n = 2,814) (n = 2,881) (n = 13,192) Pacific Islander 77.6% 80.3% 83.0% 73.5% 68.3% 77.0% NO* 1.07 (n = 76) (n = 61) (n = 47) (n = 49) (n = 41) (n = 274) White 69.7% 75.5% 75.4% 75.0% 75.2% 74.0% NO 1.02 (n = 4,858) (n = 4,200) (n = 4,051) (n = 4,089) (n = 3,981) (n = 21,179) Two or more 68.0% 73.0% 73.5% 69.6% 70.0% 70.8% NO 0.98 (n = 744) (n = 666) (n = 665) (n = 705) (n = 673) (n = 3,453) Total 68.2% 73.7% 73.8% 73.1% 73.1% 72.3% 59.6% (n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Asian) Table 245: All Students to Spring Persistence Rates by Gender, Female 68.7% 74.6% 75.0% 74.3% 74.8% 73.3% NO 1.01 (n = 5,588) (n = 4,672) (n = 4,590) (n = 4,727) (n = 4,633) (n = 24,210) Male 67.6% 72.6% 72.3% 71.9% 71.2% 71.0% NO 0.98 (n = 4,564) (n = 4,002) (n = 4,005) (n = 4,215) (n = 4,078) (n = 20,864) Total 68.2% 73.7% 73.8% 73.1% 73.1% 72.3% 58.6% (n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Female)

133 132 P age Table 246: All Students to Spring Persistence Rates by Age, < 20 years 73.4% 82.6% 83.6% 83.5% 82.5% 80.7% NO 1.12 (n = 2,979) (n = 2,353) (n = 2,216) (n = 2,308) (n = 2,219) (n = 12,075) years 65.4% 71.7% 72.6% 71.8% 71.7% 70.6% NO 0.98 (n = 3,102) (n = 2,746) (n = 2,905) (n = 3,114) (n = 2,994) (n = 14,861) years 65.3% 67.5% 68.0% 65.6% 66.0% 66.5% NO 0.92 (n = 2,513) (n = 2,184) (n = 2,194) (n = 2,237) (n = 2,298) (n = 11,426) 40+ years 68.7% 72.5% 70.0% 70.8% 72.6% 70.9% NO 0.98 (n = 1,645) (n = 1,471) (n = 1,350) (n = 1,337) (n = 1,254) (n = 7,057) Total 68.2% 73.7% 73.8% 73.1% 73.1% 72.3% 64.5% (n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (< 20 years) Table 247: All Students to Spring Persistence Rates by Disability Status, Yes 76.7% 81.8% 77.6% 79.6% 76.4% 78.4% NO 1.08 (n = 774) (n = 729) (n = 820) (n = 818) (n = 779) (n = 3,920) No 67.5% 73.0% 73.5% 72.5% 72.8% 71.7% NO 0.99 (n = 9,465) (n = 8,025) (n = 7,845) (n = 8,178) (n = 7,986) (n = 41,499) Total 68.2% 73.7% 73.8% 73.1% 73.1% 72.3% 57.4% (n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Not DSPS) Table 248: All Students to Spring Persistence Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, Yes 75.7% 77.8% 78.1% 76.3% 77.1% 77.0% NO 1.07 (n = 5,321) (n = 5,341) (n = 5,476) (n = 5,843) (n = 5,792) (n = 27,773) No 60.1% 67.4% 66.5% 67.4% 65.3% 64.9% NO 0.90 (n = 4,918) (n = 3,413) (n = 3,189) (n = 3,153) (n = 2,973) (n = 17,646) Total 68.2% 73.7% 73.8% 73.1% 73.1% 72.3% 51.9% (n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Not Econ)

134 133 P age Table 249: All Students to Spring Persistence Rates by Veteran Status, Yes 73.4% 74.3% 70.0% 71.3% 69.7% 71.8% NO 0.99 (n = 546) (n = 499) (n = 546) (n = 509) (n = 459) (n = 2,559) No 67.9% 73.7% 74.1% 73.3% 73.3% 72.3% NO 1.00 (n = 9,693) (n = 8,255) (n = 8,119) (n = 8,487) (n = 8,306) (n = 42,860) Total 68.2% 73.7% 73.8% 73.1% 73.1% 72.3% 57.8% (n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Not Vet) Table 250: All Students to Spring Persistence Rates by Foster Youth Status, Yes 80.0% 71.0% 73.5% 58.1% 50.0% 67.1% NO* 0.93 (n = 35) (n = 31) (n = 34) (n = 31) (n = 30) (n = 161) No 68.2% 73.7% 73.9% 73.2% 73.2% 72.3% NO 1.00 (n = 10,204) (n = 8,723) (n = 8,631) (n = 8,965) (n = 8,735) (n = 45,258) Total 68.2% 73.7% 73.8% 73.1% 73.1% 72.3% 57.8% (n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Not FY) Table 251: All Students to Spring Persistence Rates by 1 st Generation, Yes 59.7% 70.7% 70.8% 72.7% 73.9% 70.6% NO 0.98 (n = 1,337) (n = 1,630) (n = 1,924) (n = 2,409) (n = 2,684) (n = 9,984) No 58.8% 70.5% 71.1% 71.7% 72.0% 69.5% NO 0.96 (n = 2,403) (n = 2,516) (n = 3,102) (n = 3,794) (n = 4,030) (n = 15,845) Total 68.2% 73.7% 73.8% 73.1% 73.1% 72.3% 55.6% (n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Not FG)

135 134 P age Persistence Rates ( to Spring): First-Time Students The following charts and tables include only first-time students to GCCCD who were enrolled in the fall term. Figure 18: First-Time Students to Spring Persistence Rates, 2010-

136 135 P age Table 252: First-Time Students to Spring Persistence Rates by Race/Ethnicity, African American/Black 62.3% 60.3% 65.9% 61.4% 59.2% 61.9% NO 0.84 (n = 146) (n = 116) (n = 135) (n = 140) (n = 130) (n = 667) American Indian 66.7% 80.0% 50.0% 80.0% 57.1% 65.7% NO* 0.89 (n = 12) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 35) Asian 65.9% 70.8% 73.3% 66.0% 69.2% 68.6% NO 0.93 (n = 82) (n = 48) (n = 45) (n = 50) (n = 39) (n = 264) Filipino 59.6% 61.9% 74.0% 64.6% 88.9% 69.6% NO 0.94 (n = 52) (n = 42) (n = 50) (n = 48) (n = 45) (n = 237) Hispanic/Latino 70.3% 78.7% 74.5% 78.2% 74.2% 75.1% NO 1.02 (n = 721) (n = 596) (n = 638) (n = 737) (n = 659) (n = 3,351) Pacific Islander 83.3% 85.7% 85.7% 66.7% 85.7% 80.6% NO* 1.09 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 36) White 74.0% 75.5% 73.3% 78.8% 76.3% 75.5% NO 1.02 (n = 1,083) (n = 727) (n = 629) (n = 760) (n = 755) (n = 3,954) Two or more 74.1% 73.7% 76.4% 69.0% 74.3% 73.4% NO 0.99 (n = 174) (n = 114) (n = 89) (n = 126) (n = 109) (n = 612) Total 71.4% 75.1% 73.4% 75.6% 74.2% 73.8% 60.4% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (White) Table 253: First-Time Students to Spring Persistence Rates by Gender, Female 72.2% 76.4% 76.9% 77.6% 76.5% 75.6% NO 1.02 (n = 1,173) (n = 787) (n = 782) (n = 889) (n = 856) (n = 4,487) Male 70.9% 74.0% 70.2% 74.2% 71.8% 72.2% NO 0.98 (n = 1,140) (n = 878) (n = 825) (n = 987) (n = 889) (n = 4,719) Total 71.4% 75.1% 73.4% 75.6% 74.2% 73.8% 60.5% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Female)

137 136 P age Table 254: First-Time Students to Spring Persistence Rates by Age, < 20 years 79.2% 84.5% 84.3% 86.6% 84.0% 83.6% NO 1.13 (n = 1,218) (n = 981) (n = 986) (n = 1,160) (n = 1,023) (n = 5,368) years 59.0% 64.6% 55.2% 60.1% 61.3% 60.0% YES 0.81 (n = 385) (n = 268) (n = 270) (n = 291) (n = 300) (n = 1,514) years 64.6% 59.5% 59.8% 56.7% 60.5% 60.7% YES 0.82 (n = 452) (n = 262) (n = 251) (n = 298) (n = 314) (n = 1,577) 40+ years 65.9% 62.0% 52.3% 57.6% 59.2% 60.9% YES 0.82 (n = 287) (n = 171) (n = 111) (n = 144) (n = 125) (n = 838) Total 71.4% 75.1% 73.4% 75.6% 74.2% 73.8% 66.9% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (< 20 years) Table 255: First-Time Students to Spring Persistence Rates by Disability Status, Yes 82.4% 81.5% 79.7% 82.2% 79.6% 81.2% NO 1.10 (n = 170) (n = 124) (n = 133) (n = 118) (n = 103) (n = 648) No 70.6% 74.6% 72.9% 75.2% 73.8% 73.3% NO 0.99 (n = 2,172) (n = 1,558) (n = 1,485) (n = 1,775) (n = 1,659) (n = 8,649) Total 71.4% 75.1% 73.4% 75.6% 74.2% 73.8% 58.6% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not DSPS) Table 256: First-Time Students to Spring Persistence Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, Yes 78.6% 78.6% 79.1% 78.6% 79.9% 79.0% NO 1.07 (n = 1,283) (n = 1,052) (n = 988) (n = 1,203) (n = 1,143) (n = 5,669) No 62.8% 69.4% 64.4% 70.4% 63.7% 65.8% NO 0.89 (n = 1,059) (n = 630) (n = 630) (n = 690) (n = 619) (n = 3,628) Total 71.4% 75.1% 73.4% 75.6% 74.2% 73.8% 52.7% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not Econ)

138 137 P age Table 257: First-Time Students to Spring Persistence Rates by Veteran Status, Yes 81.6% 74.4% 74.2% 77.1% 70.4% 75.9% NO 1.03 (n = 98) (n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 96) (n = 71) (n = 432) No 71.0% 75.2% 73.4% 75.6% 74.3% 73.7% NO 1.00 (n = 2,244) (n = 1,604) (n = 1,529) (n = 1,797) (n = 1,691) (n = 8,865) Total 71.4% 75.1% 73.4% 75.6% 74.2% 73.8% 59.0% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not Vet) Table 258: First-Time Students to Spring Persistence Rates by Foster Youth Status, Yes 76.9% 40.0% 71.4% 80.0% 80.0% 71.4% NO* 0.97 (n = 13) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 35) No 71.4% 75.3% 73.4% 75.6% 74.2% 73.8% NO 1.00 (n = 2,329) (n = 1,677) (n = 1,611) (n = 1,888) (n = 1,757) (n = 9,262) Total 71.4% 75.1% 73.4% 75.6% 74.2% 73.8% 59.1% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not FY) Table 259: First-Time Students to Spring Persistence Rates by 1 st Generation, Yes 63.4% 74.8% 72.1% 75.6% 73.5% 72.4% NO 0.98 (n = 435) (n = 556) (n = 544) (n = 673) (n = 615) (n = 2,823) No 63.3% 79.0% 75.1% 75.7% 74.3% 73.8% NO 1.00 (n = 738) (n = 767) (n = 914) (n = 1,036) (n = 1,024) (n = 4,479) Total 71.4% 75.1% 73.4% 75.6% 74.2% 73.8% 59.0% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not FG)

139 138 P age Persistence Rates ( to ) to fall persistence is tracked from fall at each college to fall enrollments the following year districtwide. Persistence Rates ( to ): All Students The following charts and tables include all students who were enrolled in the fall term. Figure 19: All Students to Persistence Rates, 2010-

140 139 P age Table 260: All Students to Persistence Rates by Race/Ethnicity, African American/Black 39.4% 48.4% 43.0% 44.7% 42.1% 43.3% YES 0.82 (n = 686) (n = 523) (n = 526) (n = 559) (n = 513) (n = 2,807) American Indian 42.9% 51.5% 39.4% 47.7% 44.7% 45.1% NO* 0.85 (n = 56) (n = 33) (n = 33) (n = 44) (n = 38) (n = 204) Asian 53.3% 52.8% 56.2% 54.9% 56.7% 54.7% NO 1.03 (n = 379) (n = 322) (n = 317) (n = 306) (n = 284) (n = 1,608) Filipino 44.4% 45.5% 53.7% 50.0% 53.8% 49.3% NO 0.93 (n = 257) (n = 211) (n = 216) (n = 222) (n = 221) (n = 1,127) Hispanic/Latino 48.8% 55.5% 57.5% 54.7% 53.0% 53.9% NO 1.02 (n = 2,598) (n = 2,359) (n = 2,540) (n = 2,814) (n = 2,881) (n = 13,192) Pacific Islander 55.3% 54.1% 61.7% 49.0% 41.5% 52.9% NO* 1.00 (n = 76) (n = 61) (n = 47) (n = 49) (n = 41) (n = 274) White 52.3% 55.9% 54.6% 54.5% 54.7% 54.3% NO 1.03 (n = 4,858) (n = 4,200) (n = 4,051) (n = 4,089) (n = 3,981) (n = 21,179) Two or more 46.6% 51.4% 51.9% 48.9% 50.2% 49.7% NO 0.94 (n = 744) (n = 666) (n = 665) (n = 705) (n = 673) (n = 3,453) Total 50.1% 54.6% 54.7% 53.1% 52.9% 53.0% 43.7% (n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (White) Table 261: All Students to Persistence Rates by Gender, Female 51.0% 56.4% 56.5% 53.6% 54.4% 54.2% NO 1.02 (n = 5,588) (n = 4,672) (n = 4,590) (n = 4,727) (n = 4,633) (n = 24,210) Male 48.9% 52.4% 52.6% 52.7% 51.2% 51.5% NO 0.97 (n = 4,564) (n = 4,002) (n = 4,005) (n = 4,215) (n = 4,078) (n = 20,864) Total 50.1% 54.6% 54.7% 53.1% 52.9% 53.0% 43.4% (n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Female)

141 140 P age Table 262: All Students to Persistence Rates by Age, < 20 years 58.5% 66.3% 69.0% 68.3% 65.8% 65.2% NO 1.23 (n = 2,979) (n = 2,353) (n = 2,216) (n = 2,308) (n = 2,219) (n = 12,075) years 44.6% 50.1% 51.2% 48.5% 49.4% 48.7% YES 0.92 (n = 3,102) (n = 2,746) (n = 2,905) (n = 3,114) (n = 2,994) (n = 14,861) years 45.8% 46.9% 45.9% 45.6% 44.9% 45.8% YES 0.86 (n = 2,513) (n = 2,184) (n = 2,194) (n = 2,237) (n = 2,298) (n = 11,426) 40+ years 51.7% 55.5% 52.7% 50.6% 53.2% 52.7% NO 1.00 (n = 1,645) (n = 1,471) (n = 1,350) (n = 1,337) (n = 1,254) (n = 7,057) Total 50.1% 54.6% 54.7% 53.1% 52.9% 53.0% 52.1% (n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (< 20 years) Table 263: All Students to Persistence Rates by Disability Status, Yes 60.2% 65.8% 62.4% 58.7% 57.6% 60.9% NO 1.15 (n = 774) (n = 729) (n = 820) (n = 818) (n = 779) (n = 3,920) No 49.3% 53.6% 53.9% 52.6% 52.4% 52.2% NO 0.99 (n = 9,465) (n = 8,025) (n = 7,845) (n = 8,178) (n = 7,986) (n = 41,499) Total 50.1% 54.6% 54.7% 53.1% 52.9% 53.0% 41.8% (n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Not DSPS) Table 264: All Students to Persistence Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, Yes 55.5% 58.7% 57.6% 54.6% 56.5% 56.6% NO 1.07 (n = 5,321) (n = 5,341) (n = 5,476) (n = 5,843) (n = 5,792) (n = 27,773) No 44.3% 48.1% 49.6% 50.4% 45.9% 47.3% NO 0.89 (n = 4,918) (n = 3,413) (n = 3,189) (n = 3,153) (n = 2,973) (n = 17,646) Total 50.1% 54.6% 54.7% 53.1% 52.9% 53.0% 37.9% (n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Not Econ)

142 141 P age Table 265: All Students to Persistence Rates by Veteran Status, Yes 49.3% 52.5% 45.2% 46.4% 44.4% 47.6% NO 0.90 (n = 546) (n = 499) (n = 546) (n = 509) (n = 459) (n = 2,559) No 50.1% 54.7% 55.3% 53.6% 53.4% 53.3% NO 1.01 (n = 9,693) (n = 8,255) (n = 8,119) (n = 8,487) (n = 8,306) (n = 42,860) Total 50.1% 54.6% 54.7% 53.1% 52.9% 53.0% 42.6% (n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Not Vet) Table 266: All Students to Persistence Rates by Foster Youth Status, Yes 42.9% 64.5% 47.1% 48.4% 33.3% 47.2% NO* 0.89 (n = 35) (n = 31) (n = 34) (n = 31) (n = 30) (n = 161) No 50.1% 54.5% 54.7% 53.2% 53.0% 53.0% NO 1.00 (n = 10,204) (n = 8,723) (n = 8,631) (n = 8,965) (n = 8,735) (n = 45,258) Total 50.1% 54.6% 54.7% 53.1% 52.9% 53.0% 42.4% (n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Not FY) Table 267: All Students to Persistence Rates by 1 st Generation, Yes 39.5% 52.9% 54.4% 53.9% 55.2% 52.3% NO 0.99 (n = 1,337) (n = 1,630) (n = 1,924) (n = 2,409) (n = 2,684) (n = 9,984) No 39.6% 51.4% 53.2% 52.8% 52.0% 50.4% NO 0.95 (n = 2,403) (n = 2,516) (n = 3,102) (n = 3,794) (n = 4,030) (n = 15,845) Total 50.1% 54.6% 54.7% 53.1% 52.9% 53.0% 40.4% (n = 10,239) (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 45,419) (Not FG)

143 142 P age Persistence Rates ( to ): First-Time Students The following charts and tables include only first-time students to GCCCD who were enrolled in the fall term. Figure 20: First-Time Students to Persistence Rates, 2010-

144 143 P age Table 268: First-Time Students to Persistence Rates by Race/Ethnicity, African American/Black 37.0% 46.6% 43.0% 41.4% 33.8% 40.2% YES 0.73 (n = 146) (n = 116) (n = 135) (n = 140) (n = 130) (n = 667) American Indian 25.0% 40.0% 33.3% 40.0% 28.6% 31.4% YES* 0.57 (n = 12) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 35) Asian 56.1% 45.8% 60.0% 58.0% 66.7% 56.8% NO 1.03 (n = 82) (n = 48) (n = 45) (n = 50) (n = 39) (n = 264) Filipino 38.5% 57.1% 60.0% 52.1% 64.4% 54.0% NO 0.98 (n = 52) (n = 42) (n = 50) (n = 48) (n = 45) (n = 237) Hispanic/Latino 49.1% 55.9% 57.2% 60.2% 54.8% 55.4% NO 1.00 (n = 721) (n = 596) (n = 638) (n = 737) (n = 659) (n = 3,351) Pacific Islander 66.7% 57.1% 71.4% 66.7% 28.6% 58.3% NO* 1.05 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 36) White 56.6% 58.3% 56.4% 62.6% 57.9% 58.3% NO 1.05 (n = 1,083) (n = 727) (n = 629) (n = 760) (n = 755) (n = 3,954) Two or more 51.7% 50.9% 50.6% 54.8% 55.0% 52.6% NO 0.95 (n = 174) (n = 114) (n = 89) (n = 126) (n = 109) (n = 612) Total 52.0% 55.9% 55.5% 59.0% 54.9% 55.3% 46.6% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (White) Table 269: First-Time Students to Persistence Rates by Gender, Female 54.9% 58.2% 58.7% 60.7% 56.3% 57.6% NO 1.04 (n = 1,173) (n = 787) (n = 782) (n = 889) (n = 856) (n = 4,487) Male 49.2% 53.6% 52.8% 57.6% 53.4% 53.2% NO 0.96 (n = 1,140) (n = 878) (n = 825) (n = 987) (n = 889) (n = 4,719) Total 52.0% 55.9% 55.5% 59.0% 54.9% 55.3% 46.1% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Female)

145 144 P age Table 270: First-Time Students to Persistence Rates by Age, < 20 years 60.7% 66.5% 69.7% 69.9% 68.0% 66.8% NO 1.21 (n = 1,218) (n = 981) (n = 986) (n = 1,160) (n = 1,023) (n = 5,368) years 34.0% 38.8% 30.0% 43.0% 38.7% 36.8% YES 0.67 (n = 385) (n = 268) (n = 270) (n = 291) (n = 300) (n = 1,514) years 45.1% 42.4% 34.7% 41.6% 34.1% 40.1% YES 0.73 (n = 452) (n = 262) (n = 251) (n = 298) (n = 314) (n = 1,577) 40+ years 50.2% 43.3% 38.7% 39.6% 39.2% 43.8% YES 0.79 (n = 287) (n = 171) (n = 111) (n = 144) (n = 125) (n = 838) Total 52.0% 55.9% 55.5% 59.0% 54.9% 55.3% 53.4% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (< 20 years) Table 271: First-Time Students to Persistence Rates by Disability Status Yes 64.7% 65.3% 66.2% 60.2% 63.1% 64.0% NO 1.16 (n = 170) (n = 124) (n = 133) (n = 118) (n = 103) (n = 648) No 51.0% 55.2% 54.5% 58.9% 54.4% 54.7% NO 0.99 (n = 2,172) (n = 1,558) (n = 1,485) (n = 1,775) (n = 1,659) (n = 8,649) Total 52.0% 55.9% 55.5% 59.0% 54.9% 55.3% 43.7% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not DSPS) Table 272: First-Time Students to Persistence Rates by Economically Disadvantaged, Yes 55.6% 58.6% 59.7% 59.3% 58.5% 58.2% NO 1.05 (n = 1,283) (n = 1,052) (n = 988) (n = 1,203) (n = 1,143) (n = 5,669) No 47.7% 51.6% 48.9% 58.6% 48.3% 50.7% NO 0.92 (n = 1,059) (n = 630) (n = 630) (n = 690) (n = 619) (n = 3,628) Total 52.0% 55.9% 55.5% 59.0% 54.9% 55.3% 40.6% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not Econ)

146 145 P age Table 273: First-Time Students to Persistence Rates by Veteran Status, Yes 59.2% 59.0% 39.3% 58.3% 45.1% 52.5% NO 0.95 (n = 98) (n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 96) (n = 71) (n = 432) No 51.7% 55.8% 56.4% 59.0% 55.4% 55.4% NO 1.00 (n = 2,244) (n = 1,604) (n = 1,529) (n = 1,797) (n = 1,691) (n = 8,865) Total 52.0% 55.9% 55.5% 59.0% 54.9% 55.3% 44.4% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not Vet) Table 274: First-Time Students to Persistence Rates by Foster Youth Status, Yes 23.1% 40.0% 28.6% 60.0% 40.0% 34.3% YES* 0.62 (n = 13) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 35) No 52.2% 56.0% 55.6% 59.0% 55.0% 55.4% NO 1.00 (n = 2,329) (n = 1,677) (n = 1,611) (n = 1,888) (n = 1,757) (n = 9,262) Total 52.0% 55.9% 55.5% 59.0% 54.9% 55.3% 44.3% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not FY) Table 275: First-Time Students to Persistence Rates by 1 st Generation, Yes 38.9% 57.4% 53.7% 57.4% 50.9% 52.4% NO 0.95 (n = 435) (n = 556) (n = 544) (n = 673) (n = 615) (n = 2,823) No 43.9% 59.3% 57.2% 59.7% 56.7% 55.9% NO 1.01 (n = 738) (n = 767) (n = 914) (n = 1,036) (n = 1,024) (n = 4,479) Total 52.0% 55.9% 55.5% 59.0% 54.9% 55.3% 44.7% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not FG)

147 146 P age Persistence Rates (Student Success Scorecard) The persistence rate data are derived from the completion cohorts in the Student Success Scorecard. The completion cohorts comprise of first time students in the system that earned at least six units (within six years of their first enrollments) and attempted any level of math or English within three years. Successful persistence includes students who attempted a credit course OR completed a degree or certificate or transferred to a fouryear institution within the first three consecutive major terms. Figure 21: Persistence Rate Trends

148 147 P age Table 276: Persistence Rate Trends by Race/Ethnicity to to to to to African American 61.7% 71.2% 54.1% 68.9% 65.2% 64.4% NO 0.92 (n = 47) (n = 66) (n = 85) (n = 106) (n = 92) (n = 396) American Indian 88.9% 50.0% 61.5% 53.8% 100.0% 64.6% NO* 0.92 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 13) (n = 13) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 48) Asian 77.4% 79.4% 69.7% 85.7% 77.3% 78.3% NO 1.12 (n = 31) (n = 34) (n = 33) (n = 49) (n = 88) (n = 235) Filipino 80.0% 75.8% 59.1% 65.0% 77.3% 72.4% NO 1.03 (n = 30) (n = 33) (n = 22) (n = 20) (n = 22) (n = 127) Hispanic 76.6% 68.1% 61.6% 66.5% 65.4% 67.0% NO 0.95 (n = 209) (n = 248) (n = 289) (n = 343) (n = 364) (n = 1,453) Pacific Islander 69.2% 81.3% 57.9% 50.0% 81.3% 66.7% NO* 0.95 (n = 13) (n = 16) (n = 19) (n = 20) (n = 16) (n = 84) White 72.2% 73.1% 65.9% 70.2% 75.1% 71.4% NO 1.02 (n = 504) (n = 553) (n = 637) (n = 611) (n = 770) (n = 3,075) Two or more N/A N/A N/A N/A 69.8% 69.8% NO* 1.00 (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 106) (n = 106) Unknown 76.1% 72.2% 70.8% 70.8% 69.8% 72.1% NO 1.03 (n = 155) (n = 144) (n = 168) (n = 264) (n = 53) (n = 784) Total 73.7% 71.9% 64.6% 69.4% 71.9% 70.1% 57.1% (n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (White) Table 277: Persistence Rate Trends by Gender to to to to to Female 73.3% 72.2% 64.7% 69.6% 73.3% 70.5% NO 1.01 (n = 506) (n = 607) (n = 692) (n = 799) (n = 832) (n = 3,436) Male 74.0% 71.7% 64.6% 69.5% 70.1% 69.8% NO 0.99 (n = 454) (n = 492) (n = 570) (n = 610) (n = 658) (n = 2,784) Total 73.7% 71.9% 64.6% 69.4% 71.9% 70.1% 56.4% (n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Female)

149 148 P age Table 278: Persistence Rate Trends by Age to to to to to <20 years 75.5% 72.9% 62.3% 66.2% 65.3% 68.0% NO 0.97 (n = 796) (n = 935) (n = 1,052) (n = 1,117) (n = 1,019) (n = 4,919) years 60.0% 61.5% 65.2% 73.4% 78.1% 69.7% NO 0.99 (n = 60) (n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 109) (n = 146) (n = 482) years 57.7% 66.7% 81.7% 85.3% 87.8% 79.8% NO 1.14 (n = 71) (n = 45) (n = 71) (n = 109) (n = 180) (n = 476) 40+ years 82.1% 73.9% 87.0% 83.5% 89.3% 85.2% NO 1.21 (n = 39) (n = 46) (n = 54) (n = 91) (n = 169) (n = 399) Total 73.7% 71.9% 64.6% 69.4% 71.9% 70.1% 54.4% (n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (<20 years) Table 279: Persistence Rate Trends by Disability Status to to to to to Yes 76.4% 72.1% 72.6% 71.6% 79.1% 74.4% NO 1.06 (n = 55) (n = 61) (n = 73) (n = 88) (n = 86) (n = 363) No 73.6% 71.9% 64.1% 69.2% 71.4% 69.9% NO 1.00 (n = 943) (n = 1,043) (n = 1,193) (n = 1,338) (n = 1,428) (n = 5,945) Total 73.7% 71.9% 64.6% 69.4% 71.9% 70.1% 55.9% (n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Not DSPS) Table 280: Persistence Rate Trends by Economically Disadvantaged to to to to to Yes 75.2% 72.1% 65.9% 71.3% 75.9% 72.3% NO 1.03 (n = 557) (n = 634) (n = 753) (n = 1,030) (n = 1,195) (n = 4,169) No 71.9% 71.7% 62.8% 64.4% 56.7% 66.0% NO 0.94 (n = 441) (n = 470) (n = 513) (n = 396) (n = 319) (n = 2,139) Total 73.7% 71.9% 64.6% 69.4% 71.9% 70.1% 52.8% (n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (No Econ)

150 149 P age Table 281: Persistence Rate Trends by Veteran Status to to to to to Yes 75.0% 75.0% 67.4% 67.6% 78.0% 72.7% NO 1.04 (n = 36) (n = 36) (n = 46) (n = 37) (n = 50) (n = 205) No 73.7% 71.8% 64.5% 69.4% 71.7% 70.1% NO 1.00 (n = 962) (n = 1,068) (n = 1,220) (n = 1,389) (n = 1,464) (n = 6,103) Total 73.7% 71.9% 64.6% 69.4% 71.9% 70.1% 56.1% (n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Non Vet)

151 150 P age Units Attempted Categories of units attempted represent units attempted districtwide, and the average units attempted provide a breakdown of units attempted districtwide and at each college. Units attempted are counted for any course in which a grade notation was received (grades A, B, C, D, F, P, NP, I, W). Units Attempted: All Students The following tables include all students enrolled in the fall term. Table 282: All Students Units Attempted, Units 5.9% 4.8% 3.0% 2.8% 1.8% 3.6% (n = 520) (n = 412) (n = 270) (n = 244) (n = 168) (n = 1,614) Units 17.5% 18.4% 17.5% 18.2% 18.6% 18.0% (n = 1,534) (n = 1,596) (n = 1,570) (n = 1,597) (n = 1,702) (n = 7,999) Units 19.2% 19.3% 19.2% 19.3% 18.7% 19.1% (n = 1,680) (n = 1,676) (n = 1,726) (n = 1,695) (n = 1,710) (n = 8,487) Units 17.4% 17.5% 18.4% 18.1% 18.2% 17.9% (n = 1,527) (n = 1,515) (n = 1,655) (n = 1,586) (n = 1,663) (n = 7,946) Units 39.9% 40.0% 42.0% 41.6% 42.7% 41.2% (n = 3,493) (n = 3,466) (n = 3,775) (n = 3,643) (n = 3,902) (n = 18,279) All Students Cohort (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) Avg. Units GCCCD Avg. Units CC Avg. Units GC

152 151 P age Table 283: All Students Units Attempted by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 36.9% 34.0% 42.6% 37.4% 36.7% 37.6% NO 0.91 (n = 523) (n = 526) (n = 559) (n = 513) (n = 502) (n = 2,623) American Indian 30.3% 27.3% 29.5% 42.1% 20.5% 29.9% YES* 0.73 (n = 33) (n = 33) (n = 44) (n = 38) (n = 39) (n = 187) Asian 43.8% 39.1% 47.4% 44.0% 48.6% 44.5% NO 1.08 (n = 322) (n = 317) (n = 306) (n = 284) (n = 292) (n = 1,521) Filipino 28.4% 35.6% 43.7% 43.9% 44.3% 39.4% NO 0.95 (n = 211) (n = 216) (n = 222) (n = 221) (n = 230) (n = 1,100) Hispanic/Latino 42.6% 43.4% 43.7% 42.7% 40.3% 42.5% NO 1.03 (n = 2,359) (n = 2,540) (n = 2,814) (n = 2,881) (n = 2,928) (n = 13,522) Pacific Islander 32.8% 40.4% 38.8% 48.8% 28.1% 37.8% NO* 0.92 (n = 61) (n = 47) (n = 49) (n = 41) (n = 32) (n = 230) White 38.5% 38.3% 41.1% 41.5% 45.5% 41.0% NO 0.99 (n = 4,200) (n = 4,051) (n = 4,089) (n = 3,981) (n = 4,264) (n = 20,585) Two or more 44.0% 45.4% 38.7% 40.0% 39.8% 41.5% NO 1.01 (n = 666) (n = 665) (n = 705) (n = 673) (n = 741) (n = 3,450) Total 39.9% 40.0% 42.0% 41.6% 42.7% 41.2% 35.6% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Asian) Table 284: All Students Units Attempted by Gender, - Female 39.2% 39.1% 40.7% 41.8% 42.3% 40.6% NO 0.99 (n = 4,672) (n = 4,590) (n = 4,727) (n = 4,633) (n = 4,933) (n = 23,555) Male 40.7% 41.0% 43.3% 41.2% 43.2% 41.9% NO 1.02 (n = 4,002) (n = 4,005) (n = 4,215) (n = 4,078) (n = 4,130) (n = 20,430) Total 39.9% 40.0% 42.0% 41.6% 42.7% 41.2% 33.5% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Male)

153 152 P age Table 285: All Students Units Attempted by Age, - < 20 years 59.5% 57.7% 62.9% 62.1% 58.9% 60.2% NO 1.46 (n = 2,353) (n = 2,216) (n = 2,308) (n = 2,219) (n = 2,386) (n = 11,482) years 41.0% 42.5% 43.2% 41.4% 44.0% 42.5% YES 1.03 (n = 2,746) (n = 2,905) (n = 3,114) (n = 2,994) (n = 3,053) (n = 14,812) years 27.8% 27.8% 27.3% 29.5% 30.4% 28.6% YES 0.69 (n = 2,184) (n = 2,194) (n = 2,237) (n = 2,298) (n = 2,418) (n = 11,331) 40+ years 24.5% 25.3% 27.5% 27.8% 32.4% 27.4% YES 0.66 (n = 1,471) (n = 1,350) (n = 1,337) (n = 1,254) (n = 1,288) (n = 6,700) Total 39.9% 40.0% 42.0% 41.6% 42.7% 41.2% 48.2% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (< 20 years) Table 286: All Students Units Attempted by Disability Status, - Yes 37.2% 38.3% 37.4% 33.0% 36.4% 36.5% NO 0.88 (n = 729) (n = 820) (n = 818) (n = 779) (n = 748) (n = 3,894) No 40.1% 40.2% 42.4% 42.4% 43.2% 41.7% NO 1.01 (n = 8,025) (n = 7,845) (n = 8,178) (n = 7,986) (n = 8,397) (n = 40,431) Total 39.9% 40.0% 42.0% 41.6% 42.7% 41.2% 33.4% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Not DSPS) Table 287: All Students Units Attempted by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 45.4% 45.0% 47.4% 48.2% 50.0% 47.3% NO 1.15 (n = 5,341) (n = 5,476) (n = 5,843) (n = 5,792) (n = 6,032) (n = 28,484) No 31.2% 31.5% 31.9% 28.7% 28.5% 30.4% NO 0.74 (n = 3,413) (n = 3,189) (n = 3,153) (n = 2,973) (n = 3,113) (n = 15,841) Total 39.9% 40.0% 42.0% 41.6% 42.7% 41.2% 24.3% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Not Econ)

154 153 P age Table 288: All Students Units Attempted by Veteran Status, - Yes 52.7% 54.8% 50.9% 53.6% 51.8% 52.8% NO 1.28 (n = 499) (n = 546) (n = 509) (n = 459) (n = 434) (n = 2,447) No 39.1% 39.0% 41.4% 40.9% 42.2% 40.6% NO 0.98 (n = 8,255) (n = 8,119) (n = 8,487) (n = 8,306) (n = 8,711) (n = 41,878) Total 39.9% 40.0% 42.0% 41.6% 42.7% 41.2% 32.5% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Not Vet) Table 289: All Students Units Attempted by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 29.0% 44.1% 32.3% 30.0% 48.5% 37.1% NO* 0.90 (n = 31) (n = 34) (n = 31) (n = 30) (n = 33) (n = 159) No 39.9% 40.0% 42.0% 41.6% 42.6% 41.3% NO 1.00 (n = 8,723) (n = 8,631) (n = 8,965) (n = 8,735) (n = 9,112) (n = 44,166) Total 39.9% 40.0% 42.0% 41.6% 42.7% 41.2% 33.0% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Not FY) Table 290: All Students Units Attempted by 1 st Generation, - Yes 35.7% 40.4% 42.8% 43.7% 45.2% 42.2% NO 1.02 (n = 1,630) (n = 1,924) (n = 2,409) (n = 2,684) (n = 3,041) (n = 11,688) No 38.7% 40.0% 44.4% 43.6% 42.6% 42.2% NO 1.02 (n = 2,516) (n = 3,102) (n = 3,794) (n = 4,030) (n = 4,391) (n = 17,833) Total 39.9% 40.0% 42.0% 41.6% 42.7% 41.2% 33.8% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Not FG)

155 154 P age Units Attempted: First-Time Students The following tables include only first-time students to GCCCD who were enrolled in the fall term. Table 291: First-Time Students Units Attempted, Units 8.7% 5.9% 2.7% 3.3% 2.2% 4.5% (n = 146) (n = 95) (n = 52) (n = 59) (n = 40) (n = 392) Units 18.1% 21.9% 14.6% 18.3% 14.5% 17.3% (n = 304) (n = 354) (n = 276) (n = 322) (n = 269) (n = 1,525) Units 16.9% 16.3% 16.7% 14.2% 13.7% 15.5% (n = 285) (n = 264) (n = 316) (n = 251) (n = 253) (n = 1,369) Units 14.4% 15.0% 15.6% 16.0% 15.9% 15.4% (n = 243) (n = 242) (n = 296) (n = 282) (n = 295) (n = 1,358) Units 41.9% 41.0% 50.3% 48.1% 53.7% 47.3% (n = 704) (n = 663) (n = 953) (n = 848) (n = 993) (n = 4,161) 1st Time Cohort (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) Avg. Units GCCCD Avg. Units CC Avg. Units GC

156 155 P age Table 292: First-Time Students Units Attempted by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 40.5% 32.6% 47.9% 38.5% 42.7% 40.4% NO 0.85 (n = 116) (n = 135) (n = 140) (n = 130) (n = 103) (n = 624) American Indian 20.0% 16.7% 80.0% 57.1% 8.3% 31.4% YES* 0.67 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 12) (n = 35) Asian 35.4% 35.6% 50.0% 41.0% 58.5% 44.7% NO 0.95 (n = 48) (n = 45) (n = 50) (n = 39) (n = 53) (n = 235) Filipino 23.8% 36.0% 41.7% 57.8% 51.3% 42.0% NO 0.89 (n = 42) (n = 50) (n = 48) (n = 45) (n = 39) (n = 224) Hispanic/Latino 48.2% 44.8% 52.2% 51.6% 52.8% 50.0% NO 1.06 (n = 596) (n = 638) (n = 737) (n = 659) (n = 646) (n = 3,276) Pacific Islander 42.9% 57.1% 44.4% 14.3% 50.0% 41.7% NO* 0.88 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 36) White 38.2% 38.3% 49.9% 46.5% 57.5% 46.7% NO 0.99 (n = 727) (n = 629) (n = 760) (n = 755) (n = 843) (n = 3,714) Two or more 45.6% 49.4% 49.2% 51.4% 46.4% 48.3% NO 1.02 (n = 114) (n = 89) (n = 126) (n = 109) (n = 138) (n = 576) Total 41.9% 41.0% 50.3% 48.1% 53.7% 47.3% 40.0% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Latino) Table 293: First-Time Students Units Attempted by Gender, - Female 43.2% 43.0% 52.3% 51.3% 54.0% 49.1% NO 1.04 (n = 787) (n = 782) (n = 889) (n = 856) (n = 952) (n = 4,266) Male 40.8% 38.8% 48.7% 45.0% 53.7% 45.5% NO 0.96 (n = 878) (n = 825) (n = 987) (n = 889) (n = 867) (n = 4,446) Total 41.9% 41.0% 50.3% 48.1% 53.7% 47.3% 39.3% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Female)

157 156 P age Table 294: First-Time Students Units Attempted by Age, - < 20 years 57.3% 53.1% 66.5% 64.7% 67.5% 62.1% NO 1.31 (n = 981) (n = 986) (n = 1,160) (n = 1,023) (n = 1,052) (n = 5,202) years 26.1% 21.5% 27.8% 30.7% 36.2% 28.7% YES 0.61 (n = 268) (n = 270) (n = 291) (n = 300) (n = 312) (n = 1,441) years 20.6% 25.5% 24.8% 24.8% 35.8% 26.7% YES 0.57 (n = 262) (n = 251) (n = 298) (n = 314) (n = 338) (n = 1,463) 40+ years 10.5% 15.3% 18.8% 12.8% 33.1% 18.2% YES 0.38 (n = 171) (n = 111) (n = 144) (n = 125) (n = 148) (n = 699) Total 41.9% 41.0% 50.3% 48.1% 53.7% 47.3% 49.7% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (< 20 years) Table 295: First-Time Students Units Attempted by Disability Status, - Yes 29.0% 36.8% 39.0% 32.0% 38.7% 35.0% YES 0.74 (n = 124) (n = 133) (n = 118) (n = 103) (n = 93) (n = 571) No 42.9% 41.3% 51.1% 49.1% 54.5% 48.1% NO 1.02 (n = 1,558) (n = 1,485) (n = 1,775) (n = 1,659) (n = 1,757) (n = 8,234) Total 41.9% 41.0% 50.3% 48.1% 53.7% 47.3% 38.5% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Not DSPS) Table 296: First-Time Students Units Attempted by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 43.7% 45.7% 54.4% 55.2% 60.4% 52.4% NO 1.11 (n = 1,052) (n = 988) (n = 1,203) (n = 1,143) (n = 1,251) (n = 5,637) No 38.7% 33.5% 43.2% 35.1% 39.7% 38.1% NO 0.81 (n = 630) (n = 630) (n = 690) (n = 619) (n = 599) (n = 3,168) Total 41.9% 41.0% 50.3% 48.1% 53.7% 47.3% 30.5% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Not Econ)

158 157 P age Table 297: First-Time Students Units Attempted by Veteran Status, - Yes 60.3% 68.5% 64.6% 63.4% 62.7% 64.1% NO 1.36 (n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 96) (n = 71) (n = 75) (n = 409) No 41.0% 39.4% 49.6% 47.5% 53.3% 46.4% NO 0.98 (n = 1,604) (n = 1,529) (n = 1,797) (n = 1,691) (n = 1,775) (n = 8,396) Total 41.9% 41.0% 50.3% 48.1% 53.7% 47.3% 37.2% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Not Vet) Table 298: First-Time Students Units Attempted by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 20.0% 42.9% 40.0% 40.0% 80.0% 50.0% NO* 1.06 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 32) No 41.9% 41.0% 50.4% 48.2% 53.5% 47.2% NO 1.00 (n = 1,677) (n = 1,611) (n = 1,888) (n = 1,757) (n = 1,840) (n = 8,773) Total 41.9% 41.0% 50.3% 48.1% 53.7% 47.3% 37.8% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Not FY) Table 299: First-Time Students Units Attempted by 1 st Generation, - Yes 39.0% 41.9% 47.0% 48.5% 55.3% 46.9% NO 0.99 (n = 556) (n = 544) (n = 673) (n = 615) (n = 709) (n = 3,097) No 45.9% 41.7% 51.9% 48.3% 51.9% 48.2% NO 1.02 (n = 767) (n = 914) (n = 1,036) (n = 1,024) (n = 985) (n = 4,726) Total 41.9% 41.0% 50.3% 48.1% 53.7% 47.3% 38.5% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Not FG)

159 158 P age Units Completed Categories of units completed represent units completed districtwide, and the average units completed provide a breakdown of units completed districtwide and at each college. Units completed are counted for any course in which a grade notation was received (grades A, B, C, D, and P). Units Completed: All Students The following tables include all students enrolled in the fall term. Table 300: All Students Units Completed, - 0 Units 16.6% 15.8% 15.3% 15.4% 16.4% 15.9% (n = 1,453) (n = 1,365) (n = 1,374) (n = 1,351) (n = 1,501) (n = 7,044) Units 4.6% 4.2% 3.3% 3.0% 2.1% 3.4% (n = 404) (n = 367) (n = 295) (n = 263) (n = 193) (n = 1,522) Units 20.5% 19.8% 20.2% 20.6% 19.5% 20.1% (n = 1,797) (n = 1,718) (n = 1,814) (n = 1,803) (n = 1,781) (n = 8,913) Units 19.1% 19.1% 19.0% 19.2% 18.6% 19.0% (n = 1,671) (n = 1,652) (n = 1,710) (n = 1,681) (n = 1,703) (n = 8,417) Units 15.2% 15.9% 16.9% 15.3% 16.4% 16.0% (n = 1,331) (n = 1,380) (n = 1,520) (n = 1,343) (n = 1,497) (n = 7,071) Units 24.0% 25.2% 25.4% 26.5% 27.0% 25.6% (n = 2,098) (n = 2,183) (n = 2,283) (n = 2,324) (n = 2,470) (n = 11,358) 1st Time Cohort (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) Avg. Units GCCCD Avg. Units CC Avg. Units GC

160 159 P age Table 301: All Students Units Completed by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 16.4% 17.9% 18.8% 18.3% 15.1% 17.3% YES 0.68 (n = 523) (n = 526) (n = 559) (n = 513) (n = 502) (n = 2,623) American Indian 15.2% 9.1% 15.9% 21.1% 5.1% 13.4% YES* 0.52 (n = 33) (n = 33) (n = 44) (n = 38) (n = 39) (n = 187) Asian 28.9% 26.2% 30.7% 33.1% 35.3% 30.7% NO 1.20 (n = 322) (n = 317) (n = 306) (n = 284) (n = 292) (n = 1,521) Filipino 18.5% 20.8% 24.8% 26.7% 23.5% 22.9% YES 0.89 (n = 211) (n = 216) (n = 222) (n = 221) (n = 230) (n = 1,100) Hispanic/Latino 23.2% 24.8% 24.1% 24.3% 22.5% 23.8% YES 0.93 (n = 2,359) (n = 2,540) (n = 2,814) (n = 2,881) (n = 2,928) (n = 13,522) Pacific Islander 19.7% 12.8% 12.2% 22.0% 3.1% 14.8% YES* 0.58 (n = 61) (n = 47) (n = 49) (n = 41) (n = 32) (n = 230) White 25.1% 26.4% 27.4% 29.1% 32.1% 28.0% NO 1.09 (n = 4,200) (n = 4,051) (n = 4,089) (n = 3,981) (n = 4,264) (n = 20,585) Two or more 24.2% 28.0% 23.7% 26.0% 23.5% 25.0% NO 0.98 (n = 666) (n = 665) (n = 705) (n = 673) (n = 741) (n = 3,450) Total 24.0% 25.2% 25.4% 26.5% 27.0% 25.6% 24.6% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Asian) Table 302: All Students Units Completed by Gender, - Female 24.1% 25.5% 25.1% 27.9% 28.3% 26.2% NO 1.02 (n = 4,672) (n = 4,590) (n = 4,727) (n = 4,633) (n = 4,933) (n = 23,555) Male 23.8% 24.8% 25.6% 24.9% 25.4% 24.9% NO 0.97 (n = 4,002) (n = 4,005) (n = 4,215) (n = 4,078) (n = 4,130) (n = 20,430) Total 24.0% 25.2% 25.4% 26.5% 27.0% 25.6% 21.0% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Female)

161 160 P age Table 303: All Students Units Completed by Age, - < 20 years 36.3% 36.7% 38.5% 40.2% 37.3% 37.8% NO 1.47 (n = 2,353) (n = 2,216) (n = 2,308) (n = 2,219) (n = 2,386) (n = 11,482) years 23.4% 25.3% 25.0% 24.6% 25.3% 24.7% YES 0.97 (n = 2,746) (n = 2,905) (n = 3,114) (n = 2,994) (n = 3,053) (n = 14,812) years 17.4% 17.9% 17.5% 18.8% 20.2% 18.4% YES 0.72 (n = 2,184) (n = 2,194) (n = 2,237) (n = 2,298) (n = 2,418) (n = 11,331) 40+ years 15.1% 17.9% 17.0% 20.9% 24.8% 19.0% YES 0.74 (n = 1,471) (n = 1,350) (n = 1,337) (n = 1,254) (n = 1,288) (n = 6,700) Total 24.0% 25.2% 25.4% 26.5% 27.0% 25.6% 30.2% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (< 20 years) Table 304: All Students Units Completed by Disability Status, - Yes 21.4% 22.7% 21.5% 18.1% 23.1% 21.4% NO 0.83 (n = 729) (n = 820) (n = 818) (n = 779) (n = 748) (n = 3,894) No 24.2% 25.5% 25.8% 27.3% 27.4% 26.0% NO 1.02 (n = 8,025) (n = 7,845) (n = 8,178) (n = 7,986) (n = 8,397) (n = 40,431) Total 24.0% 25.2% 25.4% 26.5% 27.0% 25.6% 20.8% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Not DSPS)

162 161 P age Table 305: All Students Units Completed by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 26.4% 27.6% 28.3% 30.4% 32.1% 29.0% NO 1.13 (n = 5,341) (n = 5,476) (n = 5,843) (n = 5,792) (n = 6,032) (n = 28,484) No 20.2% 21.1% 19.9% 18.9% 17.2% 19.5% NO 0.76 (n = 3,413) (n = 3,189) (n = 3,153) (n = 2,973) (n = 3,113) (n = 15,841) Total 24.0% 25.2% 25.4% 26.5% 27.0% 25.6% 15.6% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Not Econ) Table 306: All Students Units Completed by Veteran Status, - Yes 34.9% 35.7% 30.5% 32.0% 26.0% 32.0% NO 1.25 (n = 499) (n = 546) (n = 509) (n = 459) (n = 434) (n = 2,447) No 23.3% 24.5% 25.1% 26.2% 27.1% 25.2% NO 0.99 (n = 8,255) (n = 8,119) (n = 8,487) (n = 8,306) (n = 8,711) (n = 41,878) Total 24.0% 25.2% 25.4% 26.5% 27.0% 25.6% 20.2% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Not Vet) Table 307: All Students Units Completed by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 16.1% 23.5% 3.2% 6.7% 15.2% 13.2% YES* 0.52 (n = 31) (n = 34) (n = 31) (n = 30) (n = 33) (n = 159) No 24.0% 25.2% 25.5% 26.6% 27.1% 25.7% NO 1.00 (n = 8,723) (n = 8,631) (n = 8,965) (n = 8,735) (n = 9,112) (n = 44,166) Total 24.0% 25.2% 25.4% 26.5% 27.0% 25.6% 20.5% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Not FY)

163 162 P age Table 308: All Students Units Completed by 1 st Generation, - Yes 20.3% 24.4% 26.2% 27.4% 28.6% 26.0% NO 1.01 (n = 1,630) (n = 1,924) (n = 2,409) (n = 2,684) (n = 3,041) (n = 11,688) No 22.5% 24.9% 26.9% 28.1% 26.1% 26.0% NO 1.01 (n = 2,516) (n = 3,102) (n = 3,794) (n = 4,030) (n = 4,391) (n = 17,833) Total 24.0% 25.2% 25.4% 26.5% 27.0% 25.6% 20.8% (n = 8,754) (n = 8,665) (n = 8,996) (n = 8,765) (n = 9,145) (n = 44,325) (Not FG)

164 163 P age Units Completed: First-Time Students The following tables include only first-time students to GCCCD who were enrolled in the fall term. Table 309: First-Time Students Units Completed, - 0 Units 19.1% 19.3% 16.6% 17.5% 13.9% 17.2% (n = 321) (n = 313) (n = 315) (n = 309) (n = 257) (n = 1,515) Units 5.8% 4.5% 3.3% 3.1% 2.3% 3.7% (n = 97) (n = 73) (n = 63) (n = 55) (n = 42) (n = 330) Units 20.4% 21.6% 18.1% 18.8% 18.2% 19.4% (n = 343) (n = 350) (n = 343) (n = 332) (n = 337) (n = 1,705) Units 16.7% 15.6% 17.2% 17.1% 15.6% 16.5% (n = 281) (n = 253) (n = 326) (n = 302) (n = 289) (n = 1,451) Units 13.4% 14.4% 15.1% 13.2% 16.3% 14.5% (n = 225) (n = 233) (n = 285) (n = 232) (n = 301) (n = 1,276) Units 24.7% 24.5% 29.6% 30.2% 33.7% 28.7% (n = 415) (n = 396) (n = 561) (n = 532) (n = 624) (n = 2,528) 1st Time Cohort (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) Avg. Units GCCCD Avg. Units CC Avg. Units GC

165 164 P age Table 310: First-Time Students Units Completed by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black 16.4% 17.0% 17.1% 18.5% 14.6% 16.8% YES 0.59 (n = 116) (n = 135) (n = 140) (n = 130) (n = 103) (n = 624) American Indian 20.0% 0.0% 40.0% 28.6% 0.0% 14.3% YES* 0.50 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 12) (n = 35) Asian 22.9% 31.1% 34.0% 25.6% 41.5% 31.5% NO 1.10 (n = 48) (n = 45) (n = 50) (n = 39) (n = 53) (n = 235) Filipino 16.7% 20.0% 18.8% 40.0% 28.2% 24.6% YES 0.86 (n = 42) (n = 50) (n = 48) (n = 45) (n = 39) (n = 224) Hispanic/Latino 26.5% 25.5% 31.1% 30.8% 28.9% 28.7% NO 1.00 (n = 596) (n = 638) (n = 737) (n = 659) (n = 646) (n = 3,276) Pacific Islander 42.9% 14.3% 22.2% 14.3% 0.0% 19.4% YES* 0.68 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 36) White 25.6% 25.4% 31.6% 30.6% 41.6% 31.4% NO 1.10 (n = 727) (n = 629) (n = 760) (n = 755) (n = 843) (n = 3,714) Two or more 22.8% 23.6% 26.2% 36.7% 26.8% 27.3% NO 0.95 (n = 114) (n = 89) (n = 126) (n = 109) (n = 138) (n = 576) Total 24.7% 24.5% 29.6% 30.2% 33.7% 28.7% 25.2% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Asian) Table 311: First-Time Students Units Completed by Gender, - Female 26.8% 27.9% 31.7% 33.9% 37.1% 31.7% NO 1.11 (n = 787) (n = 782) (n = 889) (n = 856) (n = 952) (n = 4,266) Male 22.9% 21.2% 28.0% 26.8% 30.3% 25.9% NO 0.90 (n = 878) (n = 825) (n = 987) (n = 889) (n = 867) (n = 4,446) Total 24.7% 24.5% 29.6% 30.2% 33.7% 28.7% 25.4% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Female)

166 165 P age Table 312: First-Time Students Units Completed by Age, - < 20 years 33.2% 32.5% 40.3% 42.2% 42.2% 38.2% NO 1.33 (n = 981) (n = 986) (n = 1,160) (n = 1,023) (n = 1,052) (n = 5,202) years 15.7% 10.0% 13.7% 15.3% 18.9% 14.9% YES 0.52 (n = 268) (n = 270) (n = 291) (n = 300) (n = 312) (n = 1,441) years 13.0% 15.1% 15.4% 13.4% 25.7% 16.9% YES 0.59 (n = 262) (n = 251) (n = 298) (n = 314) (n = 338) (n = 1,463) 40+ years 7.6% 9.9% 5.6% 9.6% 23.0% 11.2% YES 0.39 (n = 171) (n = 111) (n = 144) (n = 125) (n = 148) (n = 699) Total 24.7% 24.5% 29.6% 30.2% 33.7% 28.7% 30.6% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (< 20 years) Table 313: First-Time Students Units Completed by Disability Status, - Yes 16.1% 19.5% 17.8% 17.5% 19.4% 18.0% YES 0.63 (n = 124) (n = 133) (n = 118) (n = 103) (n = 93) (n = 571) No 25.4% 24.9% 30.4% 31.0% 34.5% 29.5% NO 1.03 (n = 1,558) (n = 1,485) (n = 1,775) (n = 1,659) (n = 1,757) (n = 8,234) Total 24.7% 24.5% 29.6% 30.2% 33.7% 28.7% 23.6% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Not DSPS) Table 314: First-Time Students Units Completed by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes 24.3% 26.3% 30.7% 33.3% 37.4% 30.8% NO 1.07 (n = 1,052) (n = 988) (n = 1,203) (n = 1,143) (n = 1,251) (n = 5,637) No 25.2% 21.6% 27.8% 24.4% 26.0% 25.1% NO 0.87 (n = 630) (n = 630) (n = 690) (n = 619) (n = 599) (n = 3,168) Total 24.7% 24.5% 29.6% 30.2% 33.7% 28.7% 20.1% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Not Econ)

167 166 P age Table 315: First-Time Students Units Completed by Veteran Status, - Yes 41.0% 38.2% 50.0% 38.0% 30.7% 40.1% NO 1.40 (n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 96) (n = 71) (n = 75) (n = 409) No 23.9% 23.7% 28.5% 29.9% 33.9% 28.2% NO 0.98 (n = 1,604) (n = 1,529) (n = 1,797) (n = 1,691) (n = 1,775) (n = 8,396) Total 24.7% 24.5% 29.6% 30.2% 33.7% 28.7% 22.5% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Not Vet) Table 316: First-Time Students Units Completed by Foster Youth Status, - Yes 20.0% 14.3% 0.0% 20.0% 10.0% 12.5% YES* 0.44 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 32) No 24.7% 24.5% 29.7% 30.2% 33.9% 28.8% NO 1.00 (n = 1,677) (n = 1,611) (n = 1,888) (n = 1,757) (n = 1,840) (n = 8,773) Total 24.7% 24.5% 29.6% 30.2% 33.7% 28.7% 23.0% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Not FY) Table 317: First-Time Students Units Completed by 1 st Generation, - Yes 20.7% 23.3% 27.2% 28.8% 34.4% 27.3% NO 0.95 (n = 556) (n = 544) (n = 673) (n = 615) (n = 709) (n = 3,097) No 28.6% 26.1% 31.4% 31.3% 32.4% 30.1% NO 1.05 (n = 767) (n = 914) (n = 1,036) (n = 1,024) (n = 985) (n = 4,726) Total 24.7% 24.5% 29.6% 30.2% 33.7% 28.7% 24.1% (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 1,850) (n = 8,805) (Not FG)

168 167 P age 24+ Units Completion Rate in First Year These series of tables summarize the percentage of students that completed at least 24 units districtwide in their first year. Completed units are grade notations A, B, C, D, and P. Figure 22: 24+ Units Completion Rate in First Year, 2010-

169 168 P age Table 318: 24+ Units Completion Rate in First Year by Race/Ethnicity, African American/Black 6.8% 8.6% 10.4% 10.0% 6.9% 8.5% YES 0.46 (n = 146) (n = 116) (n = 135) (n = 140) (n = 130) (n = 667) American Indian 8.3% 20.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 11.4% YES* 0.61 (n = 12) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 35) Asian 19.5% 18.8% 20.0% 24.0% 25.6% 21.2% NO 1.14 (n = 82) (n = 48) (n = 45) (n = 50) (n = 39) (n = 264) Filipino 5.8% 16.7% 18.0% 18.8% 31.1% 17.7% NO 0.95 (n = 52) (n = 42) (n = 50) (n = 48) (n = 45) (n = 237) Hispanic/Latino 12.6% 19.6% 17.9% 22.8% 20.8% 18.7% NO 1.00 (n = 721) (n = 596) (n = 638) (n = 737) (n = 659) (n = 3,351) Pacific Islander 33.3% 28.6% 14.3% 11.1% 14.3% 19.4% NO* 1.04 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 36) White 16.3% 20.8% 17.5% 24.7% 24.1% 20.4% NO 1.10 (n = 1,083) (n = 727) (n = 629) (n = 760) (n = 755) (n = 3,954) Two or more 15.5% 15.8% 16.9% 16.7% 23.9% 17.5% NO 0.94 (n = 174) (n = 114) (n = 89) (n = 126) (n = 109) (n = 612) Total 14.4% 19.0% 17.0% 22.1% 21.6% 18.6% 17.0% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Asian) Table 319: 24+ Units Completion Rate in First Year by Gender, Female 15.1% 21.1% 19.6% 24.1% 25.2% 20.6% NO 1.11 (n = 1,173) (n = 787) (n = 782) (n = 889) (n = 856) (n = 4,487) Male 13.8% 17.4% 14.5% 20.5% 18.3% 16.8% NO 0.90 (n = 1,140) (n = 878) (n = 825) (n = 987) (n = 889) (n = 4,719) Total 14.4% 19.0% 17.0% 22.1% 21.6% 18.6% 16.5% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Female)

170 169 P age Table 320: 24+ Units Completion Rate in First Year by Age, < 20 years 20.4% 26.9% 23.3% 30.5% 32.2% 26.5% NO 1.42 (n = 1,218) (n = 981) (n = 986) (n = 1,160) (n = 1,023) (n = 5,368) years 10.6% 9.7% 6.3% 9.3% 7.3% 8.8% YES 0.47 (n = 385) (n = 268) (n = 270) (n = 291) (n = 300) (n = 1,514) years 6.9% 8.4% 7.6% 10.7% 8.0% 8.2% YES 0.44 (n = 452) (n = 262) (n = 251) (n = 298) (n = 314) (n = 1,577) 40+ years 5.9% 4.7% 8.1% 4.2% 4.0% 5.4% YES 0.29 (n = 287) (n = 171) (n = 111) (n = 144) (n = 125) (n = 838) Total 14.4% 19.0% 17.0% 22.1% 21.6% 18.6% 21.2% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (< 20 years) Table 321: 24+ Units Completion Rate in First Year by Disability Status, Yes 12.9% 8.9% 15.8% 14.4% 9.7% 12.5% YES 0.67 (n = 170) (n = 124) (n = 133) (n = 118) (n = 103) (n = 648) No 14.5% 19.8% 17.1% 22.6% 22.4% 19.1% NO 1.02 (n = 2,172) (n = 1,558) (n = 1,485) (n = 1,775) (n = 1,659) (n = 8,649) Total 14.4% 19.0% 17.0% 22.1% 21.6% 18.6% 15.3% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not DSPS) Table 322: 24+ Units Completion Rate in First Year by Economically Disadvantaged, Yes 13.0% 18.4% 17.8% 22.6% 23.8% 19.1% NO 1.02 (n = 1,283) (n = 1,052) (n = 988) (n = 1,203) (n = 1,143) (n = 5,669) No 16.1% 20.0% 15.7% 21.3% 17.6% 17.9% NO 0.96 (n = 1,059) (n = 630) (n = 630) (n = 690) (n = 619) (n = 3,628) Total 14.4% 19.0% 17.0% 22.1% 21.6% 18.6% 14.4% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not Econ)

171 170 P age Table 323: 24+ Units Completion Rate in First Year by Veteran Status, Yes 22.4% 28.2% 29.2% 38.5% 22.5% 28.5% NO 1.53 (n = 98) (n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 96) (n = 71) (n = 432) No 14.0% 18.6% 16.3% 21.3% 21.6% 18.2% NO 0.97 (n = 2,244) (n = 1,604) (n = 1,529) (n = 1,797) (n = 1,691) (n = 8,865) Total 14.4% 19.0% 17.0% 22.1% 21.6% 18.6% 14.5% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not Vet) Table 324: 24+ Units Completion Rate in First Year by Foster Youth Status, Yes 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% YES* 0.15 (n = 13) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 35) No 14.5% 19.0% 17.1% 22.2% 21.7% 18.7% NO 1.00 (n = 2,329) (n = 1,677) (n = 1,611) (n = 1,888) (n = 1,757) (n = 9,262) Total 14.4% 19.0% 17.0% 22.1% 21.6% 18.6% 15.0% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not FY) Table 325: 24+ Units Completion Rate in First Year by 1 st Generation, Yes 8.0% 18.3% 14.9% 19.9% 19.3% 16.7% NO 0.90 (n = 435) (n = 556) (n = 544) (n = 673) (n = 615) (n = 2,823) No 11.5% 21.5% 19.0% 23.8% 23.3% 20.3% NO 1.09 (n = 738) (n = 767) (n = 914) (n = 1,036) (n = 1,024) (n = 4,479) Total 14.4% 19.0% 17.0% 22.1% 21.6% 18.6% 16.3% (n = 2,342) (n = 1,682) (n = 1,618) (n = 1,893) (n = 1,762) (n = 9,297) (Not FG)

172 171 P age 30+ Units Completion Rate (Student Success Scorecard) Derived from the completion cohorts in the Student Success Scorecard, the 30+ Units Completion Rate tracks first time students in the system that earned at least six units (within six years of their first enrollments) and attempted any level of math or English within three years and identifies the percentage of students who completed 30 or more degree-applicable units anywhere in the system with six years of their first enrollment. Figure 23: 30+ Unit Completion Rate Trends

173 172 P age Table 326: 30+ Unit Completion Rate Trends by Race/Ethnicity to to to to to African American 51.1% 54.5% 54.1% 67.0% 56.5% 57.8% NO 0.85 (n = 47) (n = 66) (n = 85) (n = 106) (n = 92) (n = 396) American Indian 55.6% 70.0% 76.9% 61.5% 66.7% 66.7% NO* 0.98 (n = 1 to 9) (n = 10) (n = 13) (n = 13) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 48) Asian 80.6% 73.5% 66.7% 77.6% 80.7% 77.0% NO 1.13 (n = 31) (n = 34) (n = 33) (n = 49) (n = 88) (n = 235) Filipino 60.0% 51.5% 68.2% 45.0% 86.4% 61.4% NO 0.90 (n = 30) (n = 33) (n = 22) (n = 20) (n = 22) (n = 127) Hispanic 67.0% 62.1% 55.4% 62.1% 68.7% 63.1% NO 0.93 (n = 209) (n = 248) (n = 289) (n = 343) (n = 364) (n = 1,453) Pacific Islander 69.2% 87.5% 42.1% 70.0% 56.3% 64.3% NO* 0.94 (n = 13) (n = 16) (n = 19) (n = 20) (n = 16) (n = 84) White 66.3% 69.8% 65.6% 70.4% 77.8% 70.5% NO 1.03 (n = 504) (n = 553) (n = 637) (n = 611) (n = 770) (n = 3,075) Two or more N/A N/A N/A N/A 68.9% 68.9% NO* 1.01 (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 0) (n = 106) (n = 106) Unknown 67.7% 71.5% 73.8% 76.5% 69.8% 72.8% NO 1.07 (n = 155) (n = 144) (n = 168) (n = 264) (n = 53) (n = 784) Total 66.1% 67.2% 63.4% 69.1% 73.4% 68.2% 56.4% (n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (White) Table 327: 30+ Unit Completion Rate Trends by Gender to to to to to Female 69.8% 70.5% 64.9% 71.0% 74.9% 70.4% NO 1.03 (n = 506) (n = 607) (n = 692) (n = 799) (n = 832) (n = 3,436) Male 62.3% 63.4% 61.8% 66.7% 71.9% 65.6% NO 0.96 (n = 454) (n = 492) (n = 570) (n = 610) (n = 658) (n = 2,784) Total 66.1% 67.2% 63.4% 69.1% 73.4% 68.2% 56.3% (n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Female)

174 173 P age Table 328: 30+ Unit Completion Rate Trends by Age to to to to to <20 years 68.1% 67.5% 62.6% 67.3% 70.6% 67.1% NO 0.98 (n = 796) (n = 935) (n = 1,052) (n = 1,117) (n = 1,019) (n = 4,919) years 56.7% 52.6% 57.3% 67.9% 69.9% 62.7% NO 0.92 (n = 60) (n = 78) (n = 89) (n = 109) (n = 146) (n = 482) years 53.5% 84.4% 71.8% 79.8% 83.9% 76.7% NO 1.12 (n = 71) (n = 45) (n = 71) (n = 109) (n = 180) (n = 476) 40+ years 61.5% 69.6% 77.8% 79.1% 82.8% 77.7% NO 1.14 (n = 39) (n = 46) (n = 54) (n = 91) (n = 169) (n = 399) Total 66.1% 67.2% 63.4% 69.1% 73.4% 68.2% 53.7% (n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (<20 years) Table 329: 30+ Unit Completion Rate Trends by Disability Status to to to to to Yes 60.0% 78.7% 76.7% 63.6% 75.6% 71.1% NO 1.04 (n = 55) (n = 61) (n = 73) (n = 88) (n = 86) (n = 363) No 66.5% 66.5% 62.6% 69.4% 73.3% 68.0% NO 1.00 (n = 943) (n = 1,043) (n = 1,193) (n = 1,338) (n = 1,428) (n = 5,945) Total 66.1% 67.2% 63.4% 69.1% 73.4% 68.2% 54.4% (n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Not DSPS) Table 330: 30+ Unit Completion Rate Trends by Economically Disadvantaged to to to to to Yes 68.9% 70.3% 68.5% 72.7% 76.2% 72.1% NO 1.06 (n = 557) (n = 634) (n = 753) (n = 1,030) (n = 1,195) (n = 4,169) No 62.6% 63.0% 55.9% 59.6% 63.3% 60.6% NO 0.89 (n = 441) (n = 470) (n = 513) (n = 396) (n = 319) (n = 2,139) Total 66.1% 67.2% 63.4% 69.1% 73.4% 68.2% 48.5% (n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (No Econ)

175 174 P age Table 331: 30+ Unit Completion Rate Trends by Veteran Status to to to to to Yes 72.2% 66.7% 69.6% 75.7% 72.0% 71.2% NO 1.04 (n = 36) (n = 36) (n = 46) (n = 37) (n = 50) (n = 205) No 65.9% 67.2% 63.2% 68.9% 73.5% 68.1% NO 1.00 (n = 962) (n = 1,068) (n = 1,220) (n = 1,389) (n = 1,464) (n = 6,103) Total 66.1% 67.2% 63.4% 69.1% 73.4% 68.2% 54.5% (n = 998) (n = 1,104) (n = 1,266) (n = 1,426) (n = 1,514) (n = 6,308) (Non Vet)

176 175 P age GPA GPA: All Students Table 332: GPA of All Students, - < % 17.4% 18.6% 19.8% 20.5% 18.8% (n = 1,308) (n = 1,308) (n = 1,455) (n = 1,530) (n = 1,614) (n = 7,215) % 16.9% 15.9% 16.4% 14.8% 16.4% (n = 1,352) (n = 1,271) (n = 1,244) (n = 1,268) (n = 1,165) (n = 6,300) % 9.6% 9.4% 8.8% 9.1% 9.3% (n = 708) (n = 720) (n = 737) (n = 677) (n = 718) (n = 3,559) % 56.1% 56.1% 55.0% 55.7% 55.6% (n = 4,124) (n = 4,217) (n = 4,394) (n = 4,247) (n = 4,390) (n = 21,372) Total (n = 7,492) (n = 7,516) (n = 7,830) (n = 7,722) (n = 7,887) (n = 38,447) GPA GCCCD

177 176 P age Table 333: GPA of All Students by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black (n = 429) (n = 432) (n = 457) (n = 439) (n = 411) (n = 2,168) American Indian (n = 30) (n = 30) (n = 36) (n = 35) (n = 35) (n = 166) Asian (n = 271) (n = 276) (n = 278) (n = 251) (n = 262) (n = 1,338) Filipino (n = 183) (n = 197) (n = 199) (n = 201) (n = 208) (n = 988) Hispanic/Latino (n = 2,059) (n = 2,247) (n = 2,476) (n = 2,582) (n = 2,504) (n = 11,868) Pacific Islander (n = 53) (n = 40) (n = 43) (n = 39) (n = 25) (n = 200) White (n = 3,577) (n = 3,497) (n = 3,560) (n = 3,477) (n = 3,719) (n = 17,830) Two or more (n = 561) (n = 562) (n = 597) (n = 582) (n = 627) (n = 2,929) Total (n = 7,492) (n = 7,516) (n = 7,830) (n = 7,722) (n = 7,887) (n = 38,447) Table 334: GPA of All Students by Gender, - Female (n = 3,989) (n = 3,931) (n = 4,082) (n = 4,059) (n = 4,248) (n = 20,309) Male (n = 3,434) (n = 3,523) (n = 3,703) (n = 3,615) (n = 3,578) (n = 17,853) Total (n = 7,492) (n = 7,516) (n = 7,830) (n = 7,722) (n = 7,887) (n = 38,447)

178 177 P age Table 335: GPA of All Students by Age, - < 20 years (n = 2,165) (n = 2,030) (n = 2,150) (n = 2,075) (n = 2,070) (n = 10,490) years (n = 2,389) (n = 2,570) (n = 2,751) (n = 2,687) (n = 2,755) (n = 13,152) years (n = 1,778) (n = 1,823) (n = 1,837) (n = 1,942) (n = 2,027) (n = 9,407) 40+ years (n = 1,160) (n = 1,093) (n = 1,092) (n = 1,018) (n = 1,035) (n = 5,398) Total (n = 7,492) (n = 7,516) (n = 7,830) (n = 7,722) (n = 7,887) (n = 38,447) Table 336: GPA of All Students by Disability Status, - Yes (n = 586) (n = 675) (n = 699) (n = 660) (n = 643) (n = 3,263) No (n = 6,906) (n = 6,841) (n = 7,131) (n = 7,062) (n = 7,244) (n = 35,184) Total (n = 7,492) (n = 7,516) (n = 7,830) (n = 7,722) (n = 7,887) (n = 38,447)

179 178 P age Table 337: GPA of All Students by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes (n = 4,496) (n = 4,676) (n = 5,000) (n = 5,045) (n = 5,270) (n = 24,487) No (n = 2,996) (n = 2,840) (n = 2,830) (n = 2,677) (n = 2,617) (n = 13,960) Total (n = 7,492) (n = 7,516) (n = 7,830) (n = 7,722) (n = 7,887) (n = 38,447) Table 338: GPA of All Students by Veteran Status, - Yes (n = 458) (n = 493) (n = 453) (n = 416) (n = 384) (n = 2,204) No (n = 7,034) (n = 7,023) (n = 7,377) (n = 7,306) (n = 7,503) (n = 36,243) Total (n = 7,492) (n = 7,516) (n = 7,830) (n = 7,722) (n = 7,887) (n = 38,447) Table 339: GPA of All Students by Foster Youth Status, - Yes (n = 28) (n = 29) (n = 25) (n = 23) (n = 27) (n = 132) No (n = 7,464) (n = 7,487) (n = 7,805) (n = 7,699) (n = 7,860) (n = 38,315) Total (n = 7,492) (n = 7,516) (n = 7,830) (n = 7,722) (n = 7,887) (n = 38,447)

180 179 P age Table 340: GPA of All Students by 1 st Generation, - Yes (n = 1,303) (n = 1,587) (n = 2,031) (n = 2,320) (n = 2,572) (n = 9,813) No (n = 2,242) (n = 2,754) (n = 3,380) (n = 3,617) (n = 3,939) (n = 15,932) Total (n = 7,492) (n = 7,516) (n = 7,830) (n = 7,722) (n = 7,887) (n = 38,447)

181 180 P age GPA: First-Time Students Table 341: GPA of First-Time Students, - < % 22.4% 26.0% 24.8% 25.0% 24.1% (n = 309) (n = 311) (n = 435) (n = 381) (n = 406) (n = 1,842) % 17.8% 16.6% 18.9% 14.7% 17.0% (n = 243) (n = 247) (n = 278) (n = 290) (n = 239) (n = 1,297) % 9.0% 9.6% 8.3% 9.5% 9.3% (n = 141) (n = 125) (n = 160) (n = 127) (n = 154) (n = 707) % 50.8% 47.7% 48.1% 50.7% 49.6% (n = 728) (n = 704) (n = 797) (n = 740) (n = 823) (n = 3,792) Total (n = 1,421) (n = 1,387) (n = 1,670) (n = 1,538) (n = 1,622) (n = 7,638) GPA GCCCD

182 181 P age Table 342: GPA of First-Time Students by Race/Ethnicity, - African American/Black (n = 92) (n = 105) (n = 121) (n = 109) (n = 87) (n = 514) American Indian (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 11) (n = 32) Asian (n = 40) (n = 37) (n = 42) (n = 33) (n = 47) (n = 199) Filipino (n = 39) (n = 47) (n = 41) (n = 39) (n = 35) (n = 201) Hispanic/Latino (n = 524) (n = 562) (n = 659) (n = 591) (n = 585) (n = 2,921) Pacific Islander (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 33) White (n = 599) (n = 537) (n = 675) (n = 644) (n = 724) (n = 3,179) Two or more (n = 93) (n = 73) (n = 106) (n = 97) (n = 118) (n = 487) Total (n = 1,421) (n = 1,387) (n = 1,670) (n = 1,538) (n = 1,622) (n = 7,638) Table 343: GPA of First-Time Students by Gender, - Female (n = 672) (n = 668) (n = 783) (n = 737) (n = 835) (n = 3,695) Male (n = 735) (n = 710) (n = 875) (n = 786) (n = 758) (n = 3,864) Total (n = 1,421) (n = 1,387) (n = 1,670) (n = 1,538) (n = 1,622) (n = 7,638)

183 182 P age Table 344: GPA of First-Time Students by Age, - < 20 years (n = 899) (n = 894) (n = 1,089) (n = 945) (n = 997) (n = 4,824) years (n = 208) (n = 218) (n = 235) (n = 252) (n = 270) (n = 1,183) years (n = 190) (n = 194) (n = 234) (n = 248) (n = 263) (n = 1,129) 40+ years (n = 124) (n = 81) (n = 112) (n = 93) (n = 92) (n = 502) Total (n = 1,421) (n = 1,387) (n = 1,670) (n = 1,538) (n = 1,622) (n = 7,638) Table 345: GPA of First-Time Students by Disability Status, - Yes (n = 85) (n = 106) (n = 99) (n = 83) (n = 82) (n = 455) No (n = 1,336) (n = 1,281) (n = 1,571) (n = 1,455) (n = 1,540) (n = 7,183) Total (n = 1,421) (n = 1,387) (n = 1,670) (n = 1,538) (n = 1,622) (n = 7,638)

184 183 P age Table 346: GPA of First-Time Students by Economically Disadvantaged, - Yes (n = 866) (n = 825) (n = 1,038) (n = 974) (n = 1,072) (n = 4,775) No (n = 555) (n = 562) (n = 632) (n = 564) (n = 550) (n = 2,863) Total (n = 1,421) (n = 1,387) (n = 1,670) (n = 1,538) (n = 1,622) (n = 7,638) Table 347: GPA of First-Time Students by Veteran Status, - Yes (n = 74) (n = 83) (n = 88) (n = 64) (n = 66) (n = 375) No (n = 1,347) (n = 1,304) (n = 1,582) (n = 1,474) (n = 1,556) (n = 7,263) Total (n = 1,421) (n = 1,387) (n = 1,670) (n = 1,538) (n = 1,622) (n = 7,638) Table 348: GPA of First-Time Students by Foster Youth Status, - Yes (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 1 to 9) (n = 29) No (n = 1,416) (n = 1,381) (n = 1,665) (n = 1,534) (n = 1,613) (n = 7,609) Total (n = 1,421) (n = 1,387) (n = 1,670) (n = 1,538) (n = 1,622) (n = 7,638)

185 184 P age Table 349: GPA of First-Time Students by 1 st Generation, - Yes (n = 430) (n = 451) (n = 575) (n = 524) (n = 597) (n = 2,577) No (n = 697) (n = 818) (n = 944) (n = 917) (n = 920) (n = 4,296) Total (n = 1,421) (n = 1,387) (n = 1,670) (n = 1,538) (n = 1,622) (n = 7,638)

186 185 P age STUDENT SUCCESS OUTCOMES Completion Rates (Student Success Scorecard) The Completion Rate data are derived from the completion cohorts in the Student Success Scorecard. The completion cohorts comprise of first time students in the system that earned at least six units (within six years of their first enrollments) and attempted any level of math or English within three years. Successful completion includes students who earned a degree or certificate OR transferred to a 4-year institution OR were transferprepared within six years of their first enrollment. Students are transfer-prepared if they successfully completed 60+ UC/CSU transferrable units with a GPA greater than or equal to 2.0. Figure 24: Completion Rate Trends

187 186 P age Figure 25: Completion Rate Trends by Outcome Categories