Regulation of Amyloid Precursor Protein Cleavage

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Regulation of Amyloid Precursor Protein Cleavage"

Transcription

1 Journal of Neurochemistry Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 1999 International Society for Neurochemistry Short Review Regulation of Amyloid Precursor Protein Cleavage Julia Mills and Peter B. Reiner Kinsmen Laboratory of Neurological Research, Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Abstract: Multiple lines of evidence suggest that increased production and/or deposition of the -amyloid peptide, derived from the amyloid precursor protein, contributes to Alzheimer s disease. A growing list of neurotransmitters, growth factors, cytokines, and hormones have been shown to regulate amyloid precursor protein processing. Although traditionally thought to be mediated by activation of protein kinase C, recent data have implicated other signaling mechanisms in the regulation of this process. Moreover, novel mechanisms of regulation involving cholesterol-, apolipoprotein E-, and stress-activated pathways have been identified. As the phenotypic changes associated with Alzheimer s disease encompass many of these signaling systems, it is relevant to determine how altered cell signaling may be contributing to increasing brain amyloid burden. We review the myriad ways in which first messengers regulate amyloid precursor protein catabolism as well as the signal transduction cascades that give rise to these effects. Key Words: Amyloid precursor protein -Amyloid Alzheimer s disease Second messengers. J. Neurochem. 72, (1999). Extracellular accumulation of fibrillar -amyloid (A ) in the cerebral and limbic cortices and in the walls of the cerebral microvasculature is a hallmark of Alzheimer s disease (AD) pathology (Selkoe, 1991). Evidence that A deposition plays a pivotal role in the cause of AD comes from several lines of inquiry. Perhaps the most convincing is genetic analysis indicating that three genetic alterations underlying familial AD increase the production and/or the deposition of A in the brain (Roses, 1996; Selkoe, 1997). These include mutations in the genes encoding the amyloid precursor protein (APP, the precursor to A ) (Goate et al., 1991; Mullan et al., 1992) and presenilin-1 and -2, (Rogaev et al., 1995; Sherrington et al., 1995). Further support for the amyloid hypothesis is the fact that individuals with trisomy 21 develop AD in their fourth or fifth decade of life (Tanzi et al., 1987). As the APP gene is located on chromosome 21, it has been suggested that this may be due to a gene dosage effect. Finally, allelic variation of apolipoprotein E is a significant risk factor for sporadic AD (Corder et al., 1993; Rebeck et al., 1993; Brousseau et al., 1994); as apolipoprotein E binds to A (Strittmatter et al., 1993a,b), it may be involved in the formation of senile plaques (Ma et al., 1994). Animal and cell culture studies characterizing the effects of familial AD mutations also support the amyloid hypothesis. Expression of these mutants in cell lines results in increased production of A or relative increases in production of the longer, more amyloidogenic form, A 1 42 (Citron et al., 1992, 1997; Cai et al., 1993; Barelli et al., 1997). Most important, transgenic mice expressing APP genes bearing the familial AD mutations exhibit some characteristics of the classic AD phenotype including neuritic plaques, age-dependent memory deficits, and hyperphosphorylated tau (Games et al., 1995; Hsiao et al., 1996; Masliah et al., 1996; Nalbantoglu et al., 1997; Sturchler-Pierrat et al., 1997). SECRETORY PROCESSING PATHWAYS APP is so named because it contains the A peptide (39 43 amino acids in length) within its sequence. APP comprises a family of type 1 membrane-spanning glycoproteins (Kang et al., 1987; Tanzi et al., 1987); alternative splicing generates APP mrnas giving rise to isoforms ranging from amino acid residues (Kosik, Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. P. B. Reiner at Kinsmen Laboratory of Neurological Research, University of British Columbia, 2255 Westbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z3. Abbreviations used: A, -amyloid; AD, Alzheimer s disease; APLP, amyloid precursor-like protein; APP, amyloid precursor protein; sapp, soluble ectodomain of APP; sapp, sapp derived from the -secretase cleavage; sapp, sapp derived from the -secretase cleavage; sapp, sapp derived following -secretase cleavage; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase; HEK, human embryonic kidney; 5-HT, serotonin; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase; p3, truncated -amyloid fragment; PKA, cyclic AMPdependent protein kinase; PKC, protein kinase C; PLA 2, phospholipase A 2 ; PLC, phospholipase C; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; SREBPs, sterol-regulating element binding proteins. 443

2 444 J. MILLS AND P. B. REINER 1993). The three major APP isoforms expressed in the brain are APP 695, APP 751, and APP 770. Of these, APP 695 is the only isoform lacking a 57-residue domain homologous to the family of kunitz serine protease inhibitors and is the isoform most highly expressed in neurons (Goedert, 1987; LeBlanc et al., 1991). APP matures while being transported through the secretory pathway, becoming N- and O-glycosylated and tyrosyl-sulfated while moving through the trans-golgi network (Weidemann et al., 1989). Immature APP (being N-glycosylated only) may be cleaved in the endoplasmic reticulum or the cis-golgi but the mature APP is degraded rapidly as it is transported to or from the cell surface via either a biosynthetic or an endocytic pathway (Haass et al., 1992; Sambamurti et al., 1992; Shoji et al., 1992; De Strooper et al., 1993; Kuentzel, 1993; Cook et al., 1997; Hartmann et al., 1997; Marambaud et al., 1997b). Cleavage of APP is complex and can occur via several different routes (Nitsch et al., 1994; Checler, 1995; Selkoe et al., 1996). Traditionally, these pathways have been categorized as either amyloidogenic (generating A, the main constituent of fibrils found in end-stage senile plaques) or nonamyloidogenic (generating sapp, an N-terminal APP fragment and p3, a truncated A fragment). However, this classification scheme appears to be an oversimplification, as N-terminal truncated A peptides such as p3 have been isolated from early-stage diffuse plaques and form amyloid fibrils even more readily than full-length A (Gowing et al., 1994; Pike et al., 1995). For convenience and clarity, in this review we categorize these pathways as being either A generating (the -secretase pathway) or not (the -secretase pathway) (Fig. 1). Cleavage of APP in both pathways generates soluble APP N-terminal fragments that together have been designated sapp (sapp derived from the -secretase pathway and sapp derived from the -secretase pathway). The generation of N-terminal truncated A peptides and novel cleavage fragments will be discussed; however, these will not be the focus of the present review, as neither their physiological function nor their regulation has been fully characterized. Production of sapp and p3 Processing of APP by -secretase was the first pathway to be characterized in detail. This processing route involves cleavage of APP at Lys 16 within the A sequence by an unidentified enzyme designated -secretase (Fig. 1) (Esch et al., 1990; Anderson et al., 1991; Wang et al., 1991), which may reside in a late Golgi compartment (Sambamurti et al., 1992; De Strooper et al., 1993; Kuentzel et al., 1993) or at the plasma membrane in microdomains known as caveolae (Ikezu et al., 1998). The principal determinants of cleavage by -secretase appear to be an -helical conformation around the cleavage site and the distance of the hydrolyzed peptide bond from the membrane (which occurs most efficiently at a distance of 12 amino acid residues from the plasma membrane on the extracellular side) but is apparently independent of sequence (Sisodia, 1992). FIG. 1. A: Secretase cleavage sites of APP. APP is cleaved inside the A sequence by -secretase at Lys 16 (numbering after A ). - and -secretase cleave APP on either side of the A sequence at Met 1 or in the region of Val 39 Thr 43, respectively. -Secretase cleaves APP 12 residues from the N-terminus of the A domain (Thr 12 ). B: APP is processed via two alternative pathways, resulting in cleavage by - or -secretase yielding sapp or sapp, respectively. The remaining C-terminal membrane-associated fragments are subsequently processed by -secretase to generate either p3 (when following -secretase cleavage) or A (when following -secretase cleavage). Cleavage by -secretase most commonly generates either soluble p3 and A species (ending at residue 40) or their more insoluble and amyloidogenic counterparts (ending at residue 42). Boldfaced outlines indicate A or A fragments. Stippled boxes indicate fragments that are potentially amyloidogenic. Novel cleavage fragments such as those occurring within the A sequence or the -secretase cleavage have not been included, as these fragments have not yet been categorized in detail. As would be expected of an extracellular cleavage event, the presence of the cytoplasmic domain of the holoprotein is not an absolute requirement (Sisodia, 1992; Haass et al., 1993; Efthimiopoulos et al., 1994). Cleavage by -secretase results in the release of a soluble N-terminal APP fragment designated sapp and the retention of its 10-kDa C-terminus at the cell membrane (Weidemann et al., 1989). This 10-kDa C-terminal fragment (also called p10) may undergo additional cleavage by an enzyme known as -secretase, which cleaves APP at the C- terminus of A (Haass et al., 1993). The resulting 3-kDa C-terminal fragment of A known as p3 appears to be stoichiometrically coupled to production of sapp (Busciglio et al., 1993) and, like sapp, is thought to be a product of the -secretase pathway (Haass et al., 1992, 1993). Both sapp and p3 are secreted by a variety of cultured cells and are found in human brain and CSF (Selkoe et al., 1988; Palmert et al., 1989; Schubert et al., 1989a,b; Weidemann et al., 1989; Oltersdorf et al., 1990). Cleavage of the APP holoprotein by -secretase results in a soluble N-terminal APP fragment lengthened

3 REGUL ATION OF APP CLEAVAGE 445 at its C-terminus by the A sequence (sapp ). Although sapp appears to occur in cell lines and in the CSF of aged rats (Anderson et al., 1992; Wallace et al., 1995), it has not been detected in the human brain (Pasternack et al., 1992). Although total sapp does not appear to change in AD (Hock et al., 1998; Moir et al., 1998), alterations in -secretase cleavage of various APP isoforms have been observed (Moir et al., 1998). Production of A An alternative physiological processing pathway for APP results in production of intact A (Fig. 1; Busciglio et al., 1993; Haass et al., 1993). The A segment begins on the extracellular side of APP, 28 amino acids from the membrane, and extends residues into the transmembrane domain. A production from the mature APP holoprotein occurs via the sequential action of two enzymes termed - and -secretase. Early studies suggested that these cleavage events occur in an endosomal compartment (Haass et al., 1992; Shoji et al., 1992; Peraus et al., 1997); however, recent evidence suggests that they may also occur in secretory compartments such as the endoplasmic reticulum or Golgi complex (Cook et al., 1997; Hartmann et al., 1997; Tomita et al., 1998). At least in some cases, the -secretase cleavage appears to occur first (Citron et al., 1995; Paganetti et al., 1996) generating a truncated APP fragment (sapp ; 16 residues shorter than the -secretase product) that ends at the N-terminus of the A domain (Seubert et al., 1993). The remaining 11.5-kDa membrane-associated fragment (Gabuzda et al., 1994) yields intact A following a second cleavage event occurring at the C-terminus of the A domain by -secretase (Anderson et al., 1992). This sequence of events does not appear to occur in all cases, as there is evidence for -secretase cleavage in the absence of -secretase cleavage (Anderson et al., 1992; Wallace et al., 1995). The A peptide is heterogeneous at both the amino and the carboxy termini. However, most -secretase cleavage occurs at the Met Asp bond preceding the A N-terminus; substitutions at either Met or Asp substantially increase A production (Citron et al., 1995). Soluble A and sapp are secreted by a variety of cells and have been found in human CSF (Sisodia et al., 1990; Haass et al., 1992; Seubert et al., 1992, 1993; Shoji et al., 1992; Busciglio et al., 1993). In the AD brain, soluble A is markedly higher than in the brains of controls (Kuo et al., 1996), whereas CSF levels of soluble A have been to shown decrease with increasing severity of dementia (Hock et al., 1998). Production of A and N-terminal truncated peptides (N-40 and N-42) A and N-terminal truncated peptides have heterogeneous C-termini (Cordell, 1994; Selkoe, 1994). Most full-length A peptides fall into one of two populations known as A 1 40, terminating at amino acid 40 and comprising 90% of secreted A, ora 1 42, terminating at amino acid 42 and comprising only 10% of secreted A (Haass et al., 1992; Seubert et al., 1992). C-terminal heterogeneity of A is especially significant to AD pathology, as increased length of the hydrophobic C-terminus has been shown to promote early deposition of fibrillar A in familial AD where there is a relative increase in the production of A 1 42 (Borchelt et al., 1996; Lemere et al., 1996; Citron et al., 1997). Moreover, A 1 42 exists in the form of water-soluble dimers that may form the building blocks of insoluble A filaments (Kuo et al., 1996). Another potentially amyloidogenic fragment contains the sequence of residues (p3), corresponding to the C-terminal sequence of A These fragments are one of the main constituents of nonfibrillar or diffuse plaques (Gowing et al., 1994). Although the mechanisms underlying C-terminal heterogeneity of A have not been determined, several hypotheses have been advanced. One is that C-terminal cleavage by -secretase occurs in several intracellular compartments. This has been most convincingly demonstrated in neuronal cells where an unusually high percentage of intracellular A is produced from immature APP (De Strooper et al., 1995; Hartmann et al., 1997; Wild-Bode et al., 1997). In neurons, the longer isoform, A 1 42, has been shown to be generated predominantly in the endoplasmic reticulum and nuclear envelope (Cook et al., 1997; Hartmann et al., 1997), whereas the shorter A 1 40 is produced in the trans-golgi membrane (Hartmann et al., 1997). Loose sequence specificity for -secretase action may be permitted in the endoplasmic reticulum, as this membrane is cholesterol poor, more permeable, and readily deformable relative to that of the trans-golgi membrane (Tischer and Cordell, 1996). A related hypothesis suggests that multiple forms of -secretase exist having different preferred cleavage sites (Hartmann et al., 1997). Indeed, differential sensitivity to cleavage at positions 40 and 42 by various protease inhibitors has been observed, suggesting that different -secretases are affected (Higaki et al., 1995; Citron et al., 1996; Klafki et al., 1996). A combination of both hypotheses is also possible, such that different ratios of distinct -secretases exist in different compartments, thereby resulting in differing A 1 40 /A 1 42 ratios. Novel processing of APP in neurons Secretory processing of APP may be somewhat more complex in neuronal cells yielding novel fragments. For example, radiosequencing studies of C-terminus APP fragments in rat hippocampal neurons overexpressing human APP 695 yielded an APP fragment starting at Asn 585 (12 residues from the N-terminus of the A domain). This cleavage fragment was found in amounts comparable with those of the - and -cleaved fragments and was named -cleavage (Simons et al., 1996). This cleavage fragment is also thought to exist in vivo (Estus et al., 1992); whether this intermediate serves as a precursor for A production is currently unknown. Radiosequencing of the kDa C-terminus fragments traditionally associated with -secretase cleavage has also displayed N-terminal heterogeneity yielding

4 446 J. MILLS AND P. B. REINER three major products in transfected neurons (Simons et al., 1996). One fragment is cleaved at the classic Lys 16 Leu 17 -secretase site (Esch et al., 1990), whereas the other two fragments are slightly longer. Most noteworthy is the fragment starting at Glu 11 of the A sequence. A is a major component of AD plaques (Masters et al., 1985; Naslund et al., 1994) and is thought to be produced via activation of the -secretase pathway (Xu et al., 1998), although direct evidence for this is still forthcoming. PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF sapp IN NEURONS Evidence for the physiological importance of sapp was examined in vivo by creating mutant mice having complete deficiency of APP. These mice were seen to have reactive gliosis in the hippocampus and cortex (Zheng et al., 1995) as well as behavioral abnormalities (Müller et al., 1994; Zheng et al., 1995). Likewise, mutant mice that were partially defective in -secretase processing exhibited reactive gliosis, were prone to seizures, and died prematurely (Moechars et al., 1996). Despite these effects, the ability of these mice to maintain normal litter sizes indicated that murine APP is either dispensable for development or that other APP family members (such as the amyloid precursor-like protein, APLP) and their various cleavage products compensated for the loss of APP. In support of the latter hypothesis, 80% of APLP2/APP double-knockout mice were shown to die within the first week after birth. Because soluble N-terminal fragments can be produced from both APP and APLP but A is derived only from APP, these data suggest that sapp is important in development but A is not (Vonkoch et al., 1997). In adult animals, APP has been shown to be important in neuronal survival, as sapp or a peptide fragment protected hippocampal CA1 neurons from ischemic injury or enhanced recovery from ischemic spinal cord injury, respectively (Bowes et al., 1994; Smith-Swintosky et al., 1994). Effects of sapp on plasticity in the adult brain have also been suggested, as administration of amino acids of APP enhances memory retention (Roch et al., 1994), whereas administration of APP antibodies impaired performance on memory tasks (Huber et al., 1993). In vitro, physiological functions for sapp in the developing and adult nervous system are well supported. Biological activities of sapp have been shown to include promotion of neuronal cell survival, adhesive interactions, neurite outgrowth, synaptogenesis, and synaptic plasticity (for review, see Mattson, 1997; Mattson et al., 1997). sapp has been shown to have effects on ion fluxes and various signaling pathways that may underly its purported physiological roles (Fraser et al., 1997; Mattson, 1997; Mattson et al., 1997). sapp is a regulator of intraneuronal Ca 2 (Mattson et al., 1993; Mattson, 1994; Barger et al., 1995; Furukawa et al., 1996a,b; Furukawa and Mattson, 1998; Koizumi et al., 1998) and activates high-conductance, charybdotoxin-sensitive K channels (Furukawa et al., 1996a). sapp has been shown to induce activation of NF- B (Barger and Mattson, 1996) and to alter various second messengers and effectors including cyclic GMP and protein kinase G (Barger et al., 1995; Furukawa et al., 1996a; Furukawa and Mattson, 1998), phospholipase C/protein kinase C (PLC/PKC) (Ishiguro et al., 1998), extracellular signalregulated protein kinase (ERK) (Greenberg et al., 1994, 1995), and inositol trisphosphate (Ishiguro et al., 1998; Koizumi et al., 1998). ACTIONS OF A IN NEURONAL CELLS Studies of A effects in neuronal cells have traditionally emphasized its toxicity, which occurs when A is present at high concentrations and in aggregated form (Mattson, 1997), although recent data indicate that nanomolar concentrations of A oligomers are also neurotoxic (Roher et al., 1996; Lambert et al., 1998). However, soluble A also has biological actions at more physiological concentrations (picomolar to nanomolar). One of the earliest studies to demonstrate such an effect showed that rat hippocampal cultures exposed to picomolar concentrations of A exhibited a trophic response, and that this effect was mediated by a portion of A (amino acids 25 35), which acted as a tachykinin antagonist (Yankner et al., 1990). Subsequent studies have shown that A has effects on neuronal cell signaling. For example, physiological concentrations of A increased tyrosine phosphorylation (Zhang et al., 1994; Luo et al., 1996) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity in cultured cortical neurons (Luo et al., 1996). A 1 42 activated hydrolysis of an acidic phospholipid by phospholipase A 2 (PLA 2 ) (Lehtonen et al., 1996) and A 1 40 maximally activated NF- B in primary neurons (Kaltschmidt et al., 1997). Finally, physiological levels of A can induce rapid changes in intracellular Ca 2 levels and ecto-pkc (Hogan et al., 1995; Luo et al., 1995; Wolozin et al., 1995). Soluble A has also been shown to compromise cholinergic neuronal function at concentrations that appear to be physiological. In vitro, long-term exposure to A 1 42 and A 1 28 reduced acetylcholine content in a mouse cell line derived from basal forebrain cholinergic neurons and this reduction was accompanied by a proportional decrease in choline acetyltransferase activity (Pedersen et al., 1996). Freshly solubilized oligomeric A 1 42 suppressed acetylcholine synthesis in cholinergic neurons without affecting neuronal survival (Hoshi et al., 1997). Also, exposure of rodent fetal cortical neurons to nanomolar concentrations of A impaired carbachol stimulation of GTPase activity but had no effect on cell survival (Kelly et al., 1996). Finally, inhibition of K - evoked acetylcholine release by A exposure occurred in a region-specific manner, being manifest in the hippocampal formation and frontal cortex, whereas striatal cholinergic neurons were unaffected (Kar et al., 1996).

5 REGUL ATION OF APP CLEAVAGE 447 TABLE 1. Regulation of - and -secretase pathways: lack of mutual exclusivity Treatment Action In vitro or in vivo system Effect on APP fragments References Phorbol esters Activators of PKC Human neuroblastoma 1sAPP 7A Dyrks et al. (1994) Fuller et al. (1995) Interleukin-1 Proinflammatory cytokine Human glioma Vasilakos et al. (1994) Buxbaum et al. (1994) Phorbol esters Activators of PKC Human glioma Human astrocytes 7sAPP 2A Gabuzda et al. (1993) Phorbol esters Activators of PKC Human neurons Transgenic mice 1sAPP 1A LeBlanc et al. (1998) Savage et al. (1998) Serum withdrawal Apoptosis Human neurons LeBlanc (1995) LeBlanc et al. (1998) Caffeine A [Ca 2 ] i Ca 2 ionophore HEK 293 Querfurth and Selkoe (1994) Querfurth et al. (1997) MUTUAL EXCLUSIVITY OF sapp AND A PRODUCTION Cleavage of APP is constitutive in most cells. However, the relative amounts of sapp and A that are produced are subject to regulation by many agents. Traditionally, it has been thought that regulation of sapp and A production occurs in a mutually exclusive manner (Nitsch and Growdon, 1994; Checler, 1995). Although this model appears to be correct under many circumstances, it is now clear that reciprocal regulation of these two pathways does not always occur (Table 1). sapp production increased but A production was unchanged when SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells were exposed to phorbol esters (Dyrks et al., 1994; Fuller et al., 1995) or when human neuroglioma cells were exposed to interleukin-1 (Buxbaum et al., 1994; Vasilakos et al., 1994). In contrast, A levels decreased but sapp was unchanged when human glioma cells or primary human astrocytes were treated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (Gabuzda et al., 1993). A similar result emerged after application of PMA to transgenic mice harboring the Swedish familial AD mutation and humanized A (Savage et al., 1998). Finally, both - and -secretase pathways were stimulated on activation of PKC or serum deprivation in primary human neuronal cultures (LeBlanc, 1995; LeBlanc et al., 1998) and after elevations of intracellular Ca 2 in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells (Querfurth and Selkoe, 1994; Querfurth et al., 1997). What accounts for these discrepant results? One contributing factor is that APP fragments have often been ill-defined. For example, antibodies directed against the N-terminal of APP are problematic in that they do not discriminate between sapp and sapp (an increase in -secretase activity with a corresponding decrease in -secretase cleavage would result in no net change). Such antibodies may also detect the production of sapp (Anderson et al., 1992; Wallace et al., 1995) a cleavage fragment that may be part of either the - or -secretase pathway. Also, a novel cleavage has recently been identified that occurs within A and may be associated with the -secretase pathway (Xu et al., 1998). A second confound is that detection methods for APP fragments may yield different results. Pulse-chase studies detect cleavage fragments of APP that have been newly synthesized, whereas other methods such as western blot analysis of secreted proteins do not discriminate new from old. Even given these caveats, under most circumstances when sapp increases, A decreases. However, the numerous exceptions to the rule of mutual exclusivity and the widespread availability of antibodies that can detect both sapp and A make it imperative that future studies measure both products when examining regulation of APP cleavage. NEUROTRANSMITTER REGULATION OF APP PROCESSING Regulation of sapp secretion by neurotransmitter receptors in cell lines The first study indicating that APP processing could be regulated by neurotransmitters involved HEK 293 cells overexpressing the human muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (Nitsch et al., 1992). Later studies extended these initial findings in a variety of cell lines overexpressing the muscarinic receptor; cholinergic agonists coincidently increased sapp release and decreased A production (Hung et al., 1993; Buxbaum et al., 1994; Slack et al., 1995). In a similar manner, cholinergic regulation of sapp secretion has been shown to occur in cell lines expressing their normal complement of muscarinic receptors (Buxbaum et al., 1992; Wolf et al., 1995). Regulation of sapp release has been subsequently shown to occur for other neurotransmitters acting at G protein-coupled receptors including the metabotropic glutamate receptor (Lee et al., 1995; Lee and Wurtman, 1997; Nitsch et al., 1997; Jolly-Tornetta et al., 1998) and serotonin (5-HT) receptors (Nitsch et al., 1996). G protein-coupled receptor stimulation of sapp release appears to be selective for receptor subtypes that are coupled to phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis. For ex-

6 448 J. MILLS AND P. B. REINER ample, stimulation of HEK 293 cells overexpressing the M 1 and M 3 receptor subtypes with the muscarinic agonist carbachol significantly increased sapp release but stimulation of the M 2 and M 4 receptor subtypes did not. Therefore, it was implied that stimulation of receptors coupled to the PLC pathway increased sapp release, whereas receptors linked to adenylyl cyclase did not. In a similar manner, application of 5-HT to 3T3 cells stably overexpressing the receptors 5-HT 2a or 5-HT 2c stimulated phosphatidylinositol turnover and sapp release in a dose-dependent manner (Nitsch et al., 1996). Finally, glutamate increased both sapp release and phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis in HEK 293 cells and human N tera 2 neurons expressing metabotropic glutamate receptors (Lee et al., 1995; Jolly-Tornetta et al., 1998), an effect that was antagonized by the metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonist -methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine (Nitsch et al., 1997). Unlike G protein-coupled receptors, few studies have examined regulation of sapp release by activation of ligand-gated channels. Treatment of PC12 cells with nicotine increased the release of sapp, an effect that was attenuated by cotreatment with a nicotinic receptor antagonist or EGTA, a calcium chelator (Kim et al., 1997). Likewise, we have observed NMDA receptor stimulation of sapp release in HEK 293 cells transiently transfected with the NMDA receptor subtypes (J. Mills and P. B. Reiner, unpublished data). Regulation of sapp secretion by neurotransmitter receptors in central neurons Neurotransmitter regulation of APP processing in central neurons has focused predominantly on cholinergic and glutamatergic innervation. Electrical depolarization of hippocampal slices induced a rapid increase in the release of both acetylcholine and sapp, effects that were inhibited by blocking voltage-sensitive sodium channels with tetrodotoxin (Nitsch et al., 1993). In a similar manner, the muscarinic receptor agonist bethanechol and cholinesterase inhibitors enhanced sapp release from cortical slices of the rat (Mori et al., 1995). Also, exposure of hippocampal slices to the mixed cholinergic agonist carbachol stimulated sapp release in the presence of the M 2 antagonist gallamine (Farber et al., 1995). Moreover, a selective M 1 agonist, talsaclidine (WAL 2014) (Ensinger et al., 1993), enhanced sapp release from cortical or striatal slices (Müller et al., 1997). Finally, reduced cortical cholinergic innervation in rats has been shown to decrease sapp and increase sapp release (Wallace et al., 1995; Rossner et al., 1997). In contrast to the above, stimulation of rat cortical cultures or hippocampal slices with the cholinergic agonist carbachol did not increase release of sapp (Farber et al., 1995; Mills and Reiner, 1996). This appears to be related to the pharmacological complexity of G proteincoupled receptor regulation of sapp release. Specifically, it has been suggested that M 2 receptor activation may be negatively coupled to sapp release, thereby explaining both the biphasic nature of the talsaclidine (WAL 2014) response (Müller et al., 1997) and the necessity of gallamine, to observe cholinergic stimulation of sapp release in hippocampal slices (Farber et al., 1995), although this is not consistent with the observation that bethanechol, a full agonist at muscarinic M 2 receptors, enhanced sapp release from cortical rat slices (Mori et al., 1995). Nevertheless, these observations have significant implications for the pharmacotherapy of AD. They predict that treatments that aim to alter A production via activation of neurotransmitter receptors must take into account the specificity of receptor subtypes coupling to regulation of APP cleavage. This view is reinforced by studies of glutamatergic regulation of sapp release, which has also been shown to be receptor subtype specific, involving metabotropic glutamate receptors coupled to phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis and Ca 2 mobilization (Lee et al., 1995; Kirazov et al., 1997; Ulus and Wurtman, 1997). In hippocampal rat neurons, L-glutamate, quisqualic acid, and 1-amino-1,3- cyclopentanedicarboxylic acid (ACPD) stimulated sapp release, an effect that was antagonized by both the PKC inhibitor GF X and the metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonist L-2-amino-3-phosphonopropionic acid (L-AP3) (Lee et al., 1995). Likewise, in rat brain cortical or hippocampal slices, L-glutamate or a selective metabotropic agonist increased sapp release (Kirazov et al., 1997; Ulus and Wurtman, 1997) and this effect was blocked by the metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonist -methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine and the PKC inhibitor GF X (Ulus and Wurtman, 1997). Ionotropic glutamate agonists had either modest or no effect on sapp release in all of these preparations. Taken together, these studies suggest that selective activation of subsets of neurotransmitter receptors represents a plausible avenue of regulation of A production. REGULATION OF APP CLEAVAGE BY INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PATHWAYS Regulation of APP processing by PKC-dependent signaling pathways A strong case has been made for the role of PKC activation in the regulation of APP processing both in vitro (for review, see Nitsch and Growdon, 1994) and in vivo (Caputi et al., 1997; Savage et al., 1998). PKC comprises a large family of serine/threonine kinases, classified as conventional, new, and atypical (Newton, 1995). All are activated, at least partially, by phospholipids, but conventional and new PKC isoenzymes are activated by diacylglycerol or its analogue phorbol ester. Conventional PKCs are the only ones that require Ca 2 as a cofactor. Stimulation of G protein-coupled receptors by neurotransmitters and neuropeptides has been shown to regulate APP processing by PKC-dependent signaling pathways. For example, the PKC inhibitor staurosporine antagonized cholinergic receptor stimulation of sapp release in HEK 293 cells overexpressing the M 1 or M 3 muscarinic receptors (Nitsch et al., 1992; Slack et al.,

7 REGUL ATION OF APP CLEAVAGE 449 TABLE 2. APP processing by PKC-independent mechanisms Agent Spectrum of action Cell system Effect on APP cleavage References Thapsigargin or inositol trisphosphate 1[Ca 2 ] i HEK 293 CHO Human neuroglioma 3T3 1 or 7 sapp Variable on A Buxbaum et al. (1994) Querfurth and Selkoe (1994) Nitsch et al. (1996) A23187 Ca 2 ionophore HEK 293 Nitsch et al. (1992) Querfurth and Selkoe (1994) Melittin Activator of PLA 2 CHO-M 1 3T3 HEK 293 Indomethacin Inhibitor of Human glioblastoma cyclooxygenase 1sAPP Emmerling et al. (1993) Nitsch et al. (1996) Nitsch et al. (1997) Kinouchi et al. (1995a) Forskolin Activator of adenylate cyclase Rat glioma, PC12 HEK or 2 sapp Efthimiopoulos et al. (1996) Xu et al. (1996) Marambaud et al. (1996) Dibutyryl cyclic AMP Cyclic AMP analogue HEK A Querfurth and Selkoe (1994) 1995) and bradykinin-dependent increases in sapp in PC12 cells (Nitsch et al., 1998). In a similar manner, glutamatergic stimulation of the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 1 increased sapp release, an effect that was inhibited with the more specific PKC inhibitor chelerythrine chloride (Nitsch et al., 1997). Down-regulation of PKC by pretreatment with PMA also blocked metabotropic glutamate receptor stimulation of sapp release in HEK 293 cells (Nitsch et al., 1997). Likewise metabotropic glutamate receptor stimulation of sapp release from either rat cortical astrocytes or hippocampal cultures was suppressed by the PKC inhibitor GF X (Lee et al., 1995; Lee and Wurtman, 1997). Direct activation of PKC by phorbol esters has been shown to regulate APP cleavage in several continuous cell lines including PC12 (Buxbaum et al., 1990; Caporaso et al., 1992), Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) (Buxbaum et al., 1993), COS (Gabuzda et al., 1993), neuroblastoma (Dyrks et al., 1994), Swiss 3T3 (Slack et al., 1993), and HEK 293 cells (Nitsch et al., 1992; Jacobsen et al., 1994; Marambaud et al., 1997a,b) as well as primary neuronal cultures (Lee et al., 1995; Mills and Reiner, 1996; Nitsch et al., 1996, 1997; Mills et al., 1997). Short-term activation of PKC by phorbol esters has been shown to coincidently increase sapp and decrease A release (Buxbaum et al., 1993; Gabuzda et al., 1993; Hung et al., 1993; Jacobsen et al., 1994). PKCmediated stimulation of sapp has been shown to be specific insofar as down-regulation of PKC blocked both phorbol ester stimulation of sapp release (Buxbaum et al., 1994) and phorbol ester inhibition of A release (Hung et al., 1993; Buxbaum et al., 1994). Moreover, these effects were blocked by the PKC inhibitors 1-(5- isoquinolinylsulfonyl)-2-methylpiperazine (H-7) (Gabuzda et al., 1993; Slack et al., 1993), staurosporine (Hung et al., 1993), and GF X (Slack et al., 1995). Furthermore, regulation of APP processing was not seen with the inactive phorbol ester analogue 4 -phorbol 12,13-didecanoate (Caporaso et al., 1992; Gabuzda et al., 1993). Also, an analogue of diacylglycerol, the physiological activator of PKC, mimicked the effects of phorbol esters on APP processing (Gabuzda et al., 1993). Finally, further evidence supporting a role for the PLC/ PKC signaling pathway in regulating APP processing has come from studies using mastoparan and mastoparan X, activators of PLC that increased formation of sapp but decreased production of A (Buxbaum et al., 1993). The role of various PKC isoenzymes in regulating APP processing has not been addressed extensively. The conventional PKC isoenzyme PKC regulated sapp release in Swiss 3T3 fibroblast cells; although the total amount of sapp released was unchanged, the EC 50 for PMA regulation of sapp release was lower in cell lines overexpressing PKC (Slack et al., 1993). A complementary study demonstrated that a specific inhibitor of PKC (Gö-6976) reduced constitutive and phorbol ester regulation of sapp in human fibroblasts (Benussi et al., 1998). In a similar manner, in a rat fibroblast cell line, sapp was increased by PKC and PKC but not PKC after stable overexpression of these isoenzymes (Kinouchi et al., 1995b). Regulation of APP processing by PKC-independent signaling pathways Although PKC activation can regulate APP processing, neurotransmitter and neuropeptide regulation of APP catabolism has been shown to occur in cells lacking functional PKC (Buxbaum et al., 1994; Slack et al., 1995; Nitsch et al., 1996, 1997, 1998; Racchi et al., 1998). Several intracellular signaling pathways have been suggested to act as intermediaries in PKC-independent neurotransmitter receptor regulation of APP processing, including the second messenger Ca 2, PLA 2, cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), and an unidentified tyrosine kinase (Tables 2 and 3) (Buxbaum et al., 1994; Slack et al., 1995; Nitsch et al., 1996, 1997). Ca 2. The effects of Ca 2 on APP processing are complex and appear somewhat contradictory. For exam-

8 450 J. MILLS AND P. B. REINER TABLE 3. Inhibition of neurotransmitter receptor stimulation of sapp: PKC-independent pathways Neurotransmitter receptor Receptor subtype Drug action Cell system References Acetylcholine Serotonin M 1 5-HT 2a or 5-HT 2c PLA 2 inhibitors CHO-M 1 3T3 fibroblasts Emmerling et al. (1993) Nitsch et al. (1996) Glutamate mglur1 HEK 293 Nitsch et al. (1997) Glutamate Metabotropic Activator of adenylate cyclase Rat cortical astrocytes Lee and Wurtman (1997) cyclic AMP analogue Acetylcholine M 1 or M 3 Tyrosine kinase inhibitors HEK 293 Slack et al. (1995) mglur1, metabotropic glutamate receptor 1. ple, Buxbaum et al. (1994) reported that thapsigargin, a compound that raises intracellular Ca 2 (Thastrup et al., 1990), increased formation of sapp from CHO cells overexpressing APP 751 after down-regulation of PKC. Likewise, in HEK 293 cells overexpressing APP 751, Querfurth et al. (1997) reported that the calcium reuptake inhibitors thapsigargin and cyclopiazonic acid potentiated caffeine-stimulated p3 release, a fragment that is presumably stoichiometrically coupled to sapp and therefore is thought to be a product of the -secretase pathway. In contrast to these findings, Nitsch et al. (1996) reported that thapsigargin failed to change sapp release in 3T3 cells using the same concentrations of drug. Finally, in an earlier report using the Ca 2 ionophore A23187, Nitsch et al. (1992) demonstrated that Ca 2 did not increase sapp release from HEK 293 cells. The effects of Ca 2 on A release are equally complex. For example, Buxbaum et al. (1994) demonstrated a concentration-dependent effect of thapsigargin on A release, increasing relative A release at 10 nm but decreasing release at 20 nm. However, direct application of inositol trisphosphate, the second messenger presumed to be responsible for releasing cytoplasmic calcium from intracellular stores, had no effect on A release (Querfurth and Selkoe, 1994). Furthermore, a rise in intracellular Ca 2 generated by A23187 or caffeine was shown to increase A release from HEK 293 cells stably expressing APP 751 (Querfurth and Selkoe, 1994). Finally, thapsigargin and cyclopiazonic acid were both shown to potentiate caffeine-stimulated release of A, presumably by inhibiting reuptake of Ca 2 (Querfurth et al., 1997). Clearly, these contradictions cannot easily be explained by cell-specific differences. However, some of these discrepancies may be explained by effects of these drugs on Ca 2 within the acidic luminal environment of the secretory pathway (Querfurth et al., 1997). For example, NH 4 Cl decreases A and results in luminal Ca 2 depletion. Likewise, an increase in A secretion observed with calcium ionophores and caffeine may be a consequence of increased Ca 2 sequestration within the post-golgi vesicles. That NH 4 Cl attenuates caffeine- or A23187-induced stimulation of A secretion supports this hypothesis (Querfurth et al., 1997). PLA 2. Stimulation of heterotrimeric G protein-coupled receptors activates cytosolic PLA 2 (Farooqui et al., 1997a,b). Receptor-mediated activation of PLA 2 generates free fatty acids (i.e., arachidonic acid) and lysophosphatidylcholine from membrane phospholipids (Farooqui et al., 1997a,b). An initial study suggested that PLA 2 can partially mediate muscarinic receptor stimulation of sapp formation (Emmerling et al., 1993). Subsequent studies have extended these results to include both serotonergic and glutamatergic regulation of APP processing. The PLA 2 inhibitors manoalide, dimethyleicosadienoic acid, or oleyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine inhibited 5-HT stimulation of sapp secretion in a fibroblast cell line overexpressing either 5-HT 2a or 5-HT 2c receptors (Nitsch et al., 1996). In a similar manner, these same inhibitors antagonized glutamate receptor stimulation of sapp release in HEK 293 cells expressing the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 1 (Nitsch et al., 1997). Furthermore, melittin, a peptide that stimulates PLA 2, has been shown to augment sapp release in a variety of cell lines (Emmerling et al., 1993; Nitsch et al., 1996, 1997). Likewise, inhibition of cyclooxygenase, an enzyme that metabolizes arachidonic acid, increases sapp release in human glioma cells (Kinouchi et al., 1995a). PKA. Recent evidence suggests that like PKC, PKA exerts effects on both constitutive as well as regulated APP processing. PKA-mediated effects on constitutive secretory processing of APP vary between studies. Forskolin, an activator of adenylate cyclase, inhibited constitutive production of sapp in a glioma cell line, whereas 1,9-dideoxyforskolin, an inactive analogue, had no effect (Efthimiopoulos et al., 1996). Conversely, two independent studies found that either forskolin or 8-bromo cyclic AMP increased constitutive sapp release from PC12 and HEK 293 cells (Marambaud et al., 1996; Xu et al., 1996). Finally, Querfurth and Selkoe (1994) demonstrated that the cyclic AMP analogue dibutyryl cyclic AMP had no effect on constitutive A release. Resolution of these apparent discrepancies is still a matter of investigation. In contrast to the variability seen for the effects of PKA on constitutive sapp release, PKA has been shown to inhibit regulation of APP processing in all studies to date. For example, in a glioma cell line, a rise in intracellular cyclic AMP, levels induced by either stimulation of -adrenergic receptors, by the cyclic AMP agonist dibutyryl cyclic AMP or by the PKA agonist forskolin all

9 REGUL ATION OF APP CLEAVAGE 451 inhibited PKC stimulation of sapp release (Efthimiopoulos et al., 1996). In a similar manner, phorbol ester and metabotropic glutamate receptor stimulation of sapp release was inhibited by either forskolin or dibutyryl cyclic AMP in cortical astrocyte cultures (Lee and Wurtman, 1997). Tyrosine kinase. Stimulation of a wide range of receptors having intrinsic or associated tyrosine kinase activity has been shown to regulate APP processing. These include receptors for growth factors (Refolo et al., 1989; Schubert et al., 1989a; Fukuyama et al., 1993; Clarris et al., 1994; Ringheim et al., 1997), cytokines (Buxbaum et al., 1992, 1994; Vasilakos et al., 1994), thrombin (Davis- Salinas et al., 1994), and neurotransmitters (Slack et al., 1995). Studies on growth factor receptor stimulation of APP processing were among the first indicating that sapp release was a regulated event. For example, stimulation of various tyrosine kinase receptors with nerve growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, or epidermal growth factor have all been shown to increase sapp (Refolo et al., 1989; Schubert et al., 1989a; Fukuyama et al., 1993; Clarris et al., 1994; Ringheim et al., 1997). These studies focused on the effects of long-term exposure to growth factors, at which time alterations of APP expression levels have also been reported (Mobley et al., 1988; Gray and Patel, 1993; Lahiri and Nall, 1995; Ringheim et al., 1997). However, recent studies provide evidence that transient stimulation of growth factor receptors increase sapp release. For example, nerve growth factor stimulates sapp release from PC12 cells within 15 min of exposure (Mills et al., 1997; Desdouits-Magnen et al., 1998). In a similar manner, exposure of a human epidermoid carcinoma cell line to epidermal growth factor stimulates both sapp and phosphatidylinositol turnover within 30 min (Slack et al., 1997). Stimulation of tyrosine kinase receptors and receptors having associated tyrosine kinase activity has been shown to regulate APP cleavage in a PKC-independent manner. Epidermal growth factor receptor regulation of sapp was found to be predominantly PKC independent, as GF X decreased the effect of epidermal growth factor by 35% at a concentration that completely inhibited the release of sapp by PKC (Slack et al., 1997). In a similar manner, nerve growth factor receptor stimulation of sapp in PC12 cells was not blocked by either GF X or PKC down-regulation (Desdouits-Magnen et al., 1998). Also, carbachol and the Ca 2 ionophore ionomycin increased sapp release from HEK 293 cells that were overexpressing the muscarinic receptor M 3 ; both of these effects were mediated by a tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent mechanism (Slack et al., 1995; Petryniak et al., 1996). The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway: a point of convergence for multiple signals The data cited above predict the existence of an effector system that can be regulated in either a PKC-dependent or independent fashion and may involve activation of tyrosine kinases. The MAPK signaling pathway meets all of these criteria and has recently been implicated in both PKC and tyrosine kinase receptor regulation of APP catabolism (Mills et al., 1997; Desdouits-Magnen et al., 1998). The MAPK pathway refers to a three-level cascade involving the sequential activation of raf, MAPK kinase (MEK), and ERKs (Pelech and Charest, 1996). MAPK was antagonized by inhibiting MEK, its only known physiological activator. The MEK inhibitor PD antagonized nerve growth factor receptor stimulation of sapp release and ERK in PC12 cells. Moreover, exposure to PD or overexpression of a kinase-inactive MEK mutant reduced PKC-mediated effects on APP processing in a variety of cell lines (Mills et al., 1997; Desdouits-Magnen et al., 1998). Indeed, preliminary evidence from our laboratory suggests that the MAPK pathway is critically involved in NMDA receptor stimulation of sapp secretion (J. Mills and P. B. Reiner, unpublished data). This study suggests that the MAPK cascade may provide a useful target for altering secretory processing of APP. NOVEL MECHANISMS UNDERLYING REGULATION OF APP CLEAVAGE Estrogen regulation of APP cleavage Of potential therapeutic relevance, physiological concentrations of 17 -estradiol have been shown to alter APP cleavage in cell lines and primary cultures of rat, mouse, and human embryonic cerebrocortical neurons (Jaffe et al., 1994; Xu et al., 1998). In an early study, treatment of a breast carcinoma-derived cell line with 17 -estradiol increased sapp release (Jaffe et al., 1994). A later study extended these findings, demonstrating that 17 -estradiol decreased both A and a novel 3-kDa protein (A ) (Xu et al., 1998). It is noteworthy that maximal increases in sapp and decreases in A were observed after a 7 10-day treatment period. The biological mechanism for estrogen regulation of APP cleavage is presently unknown. The estrogen receptor is a ligand-regulated nuclear transcription factor that is widely expressed in the developing forebrain (Tsai and O Malley, 1994). Because of evidence suggesting that postmenopausal women taking estrogen have a reduced incidence of AD (Wickelgren, 1997), these findings are worthy of further investigation. Regulation of APP cleavage in response to stress Recent studies indicate that altered APP catabolism may arise as a result of stressful stimuli associated with oxidant stress, metabolic compromise, or programmed cell death. For example, in COS cells overexpressing APP 695, inhibition of oxidative energy metabolism by sodium azide or the mitochondrial uncoupler carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone increased the activity of -secretase, resulting in an 80-fold increase in the production of an 11.5-kDa C-terminal derivative (Gabuzda et al., 1994). Radiosequencing analysis con-

10 452 J. MILLS AND P. B. REINER firmed that this C-terminal fragment of APP resulted from -secretase cleavage and therefore was a potential processing intermediate in the generation of A (Gabuzda et al., 1994). In a similar manner, both glucose deprivation and sodium azide decreased release of sapp from COS cells within a 2-h exposure period but had no effect on APP expression levels (Gasparini et al., 1997). Treatment of COS cells with the antioxidant glutathione completely antagonized azide inhibition of sapp release (Gasparini et al., 1997). Altered APP catabolism resulting from stressful stimuli in neuronal cell lines or central neurons has also been observed. For example, oxidative stress in neuroblastoma cells increased secretion of A although APP expression levels were also increased (Yan et al., 1995). In a similar manner, serum-free media induced apoptosis in human primary neuronal cultures, resulting in a threefold increase in A release and a corresponding, although somewhat more modest, decrease in sapp production (LeBlanc, 1995). Also, PC12 cells maintained in serumfree media with or without additional injurious agents released a 60-kDa C-terminal fragment containing the intact A sequence (Baskin et al., 1991). Although extremely interesting, stress-induced regulation of APP catabolism by these various stimuli remains nothing more than phenomenology at present. Both the signaling cascades and the receptors involved in these regulatory pathways are presently unknown. However, a potential role for PKC has been suggested for altered APP catabolism induced by apoptosis (LeBlanc, 1995). Sterol-regulated APP processing A unique mechanism of regulation of APP cleavage was recently reported that correlates with cell membrane cholesterol content. Cellular cholesterol content is controlled either through intracellular synthesis or by uptake of cholesterol through the low-density lipoprotein receptor pathway (Brown and Goldstein, 1986). Dose-dependent inhibition of sapp release was observed when COS cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of cholesterol (Racchi et al., 1997). In a similar manner, cholesterol, solubilized by methyl- -cyclodextrin or ethanol, reduced sapp release but had no effect on cellular expression levels in HEK 293 cells (Bodovitz and Klein, 1996). This inhibition was specific, as cholesterol increased secretion of several other cellular proteins. Both synthesis and uptake of cholesterol are tightly regulated by sterol-regulating element binding proteins (SREBPs), membrane-bound transcription factors that are proteolytically cleaved and then translocate to the nucleus where they regulate transcription of genes involved in cholesterol biosynthesis and uptake (Brown and Goldstein, 1997). It is noteworthy that several parallels have been drawn between APP and SREBPs. Like APP, membrane-associated proteolytic cleavage of the SREBPs is also highly dependent on sterol membrane content, as cholesterol inhibits proteolytic processing of SREBP-1 and SREBP-2 in cultured cells (Brown and Goldstein, 1997). As SREBPs and APP are the only proteins known to be cleaved within a membrane-spanning segment, it has been suggested that proteases involved in SREBP processing may be similar to -secretase (Brown and Goldstein, 1997). That both processes are regulated by membrane cholesterol content suggests that these proteins exhibit multiple functional similarities. However, the recently cloned S2P gene (the gene encoding a putative protease-cleaving SREBP) was found to belong to a class of metalloproteases that appear to be different from APP -secretase (Rawson et al., 1997). In neurons, it has been suggested that apolipoprotein E may regulate phospholipid and cholesterol content (Igbavboa et al., 1997); apolipoprotein E lipoprotein complexes enter neurons by binding to the low-density lipoprotein receptor, thereby increasing cellular cholesterol content. Therefore, cholesterol effects on APP and SREBPs may be mediated by apolipoprotein E and its receptor. This idea is supported by experiments in transgenic mice where circulating cholesterol and apolipoprotein E levels were inversely related to amounts of secreted sapp and A in the brain (Howland et al., 1998). Likewise, cholesterol depletion in hippocampal neurons decreased the generation of A (Simons et al., 1998). Differential cholesterol and lipid uptake by apolipoproteins 3 and 4 (Poirier, 1994; Poirier et al., 1995) may also underlie effects of these proteins on sapp release. In PC12 cells, nanomolar levels of apolipoprotein 3 induced a rapid decrease in the secretion of sapp but apolipoprotein 4 increased secretion of sapp (Wolozin et al., 1996). If, as in transgenic mice, sapp and A levels are regulated in the same manner, apolipoprotein 4 would be expected to increase secretion of A as well. The actual mechanisms whereby cholesterol alters cleavage of membrane-bound proteins are not known. However, it has been suggested that increased cholesterol membrane content increases membrane rigidity (Yeagle, 1991), thereby decreasing the interaction of the various secretases with their substrate (Racchi et al., 1997). Altered activities of intrinsic membrane enzymes by changes in membrane lipid and cholesterol content set a precedent for this mechanism of control (Criado et al., 1982; Mitchell et al., 1990). MECHANISM OF REGULATION The mechanism by which various kinases regulate the secretory processing of APP is unknown. Although APP is phosphorylated by PKC (Suzuki et al., 1992), direct regulation by PKC through phosphorylation of the APP holoprotein is unlikely, as mutants lacking the phosphate acceptor residues are still cleaved and secreted after PKC activation (da Cruz e Silva et al., 1993; Efthimiopoulos et al., 1994; Hung and Selkoe, 1994). An alternative possibility is that protein kinases may also have a direct effect on the yet-to-be-identified secretases by altering their activity through phosphorylation. Indirect evidence for this has been suggested by studies using an APP construct resistant to proteolysis, which was no longer

G-Protein Signaling. Introduction to intracellular signaling. Dr. SARRAY Sameh, Ph.D

G-Protein Signaling. Introduction to intracellular signaling. Dr. SARRAY Sameh, Ph.D G-Protein Signaling Introduction to intracellular signaling Dr. SARRAY Sameh, Ph.D Cell signaling Cells communicate via extracellular signaling molecules (Hormones, growth factors and neurotransmitters

More information

Lipids and Membranes

Lipids and Membranes Lipids and Membranes Presented by Dr. Mohammad Saadeh The requirements for the Pharmaceutical Biochemistry I Philadelphia University Faculty of pharmacy Membrane transport D. Endocytosis and Exocytosis

More information

Receptors and Drug Action. Dr. Subasini Pharmacology Department Ishik University, Erbil

Receptors and Drug Action. Dr. Subasini Pharmacology Department Ishik University, Erbil Receptors and Drug Action Dr. Subasini Pharmacology Department Ishik University, Erbil Receptors and Drug Action Receptor Receptor is defined as a macromolecule or binding site located on the surface or

More information

Neurotransmitter Systems II Receptors. Reading: BCP Chapter 6

Neurotransmitter Systems II Receptors. Reading: BCP Chapter 6 Neurotransmitter Systems II Receptors Reading: BCP Chapter 6 Neurotransmitter Systems Normal function of the human brain requires an orderly set of chemical reactions. Some of the most important chemical

More information

Cell Signaling part 2

Cell Signaling part 2 15 Cell Signaling part 2 Functions of Cell Surface Receptors Other cell surface receptors are directly linked to intracellular enzymes. The largest family of these is the receptor protein tyrosine kinases,

More information

Regulation of cell function by intracellular signaling

Regulation of cell function by intracellular signaling Regulation of cell function by intracellular signaling Objectives: Regulation principle Allosteric and covalent mechanisms, Popular second messengers, Protein kinases, Kinase cascade and interaction. regulation

More information

Receptor mediated Signal Transduction

Receptor mediated Signal Transduction Receptor mediated Signal Transduction G-protein-linked receptors adenylyl cyclase camp PKA Organization of receptor protein-tyrosine kinases From G.M. Cooper, The Cell. A molecular approach, 2004, third

More information

2013 W. H. Freeman and Company. 12 Signal Transduction

2013 W. H. Freeman and Company. 12 Signal Transduction 2013 W. H. Freeman and Company 12 Signal Transduction CHAPTER 12 Signal Transduction Key topics: General features of signal transduction Structure and function of G protein coupled receptors Structure

More information

Sarah Jaar Marah Al-Darawsheh

Sarah Jaar Marah Al-Darawsheh 22 Sarah Jaar Marah Al-Darawsheh Faisal Mohammad Receptors can be membrane proteins (for water-soluble hormones/ligands) or intracellular (found in the cytosol or nucleus and bind to DNA, for lipid-soluble

More information

BIPN 140 Problem Set 6

BIPN 140 Problem Set 6 BIPN 140 Problem Set 6 1) Hippocampus is a cortical structure in the medial portion of the temporal lobe (medial temporal lobe in primates. a) What is the main function of the hippocampus? The hippocampus

More information

Propagation of the Signal

Propagation of the Signal OpenStax-CNX module: m44452 1 Propagation of the Signal OpenStax College This work is produced by OpenStax-CNX and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 By the end of this section,

More information

BIPN 140 Problem Set 6

BIPN 140 Problem Set 6 BIPN 140 Problem Set 6 1) The hippocampus is a cortical structure in the medial portion of the temporal lobe (medial temporal lobe in primates. a) What is the main function of the hippocampus? The hippocampus

More information

Receptors Families. Assistant Prof. Dr. Najlaa Saadi PhD Pharmacology Faculty of Pharmacy University of Philadelphia

Receptors Families. Assistant Prof. Dr. Najlaa Saadi PhD Pharmacology Faculty of Pharmacy University of Philadelphia Receptors Families Assistant Prof. Dr. Najlaa Saadi PhD Pharmacology Faculty of Pharmacy University of Philadelphia Receptor Families 1. Ligand-gated ion channels 2. G protein coupled receptors 3. Enzyme-linked

More information

General Principles of Endocrine Physiology

General Principles of Endocrine Physiology General Principles of Endocrine Physiology By Dr. Isabel S.S. Hwang Department of Physiology Faculty of Medicine University of Hong Kong The major human endocrine glands Endocrine glands and hormones

More information

Lecture 15. Signal Transduction Pathways - Introduction

Lecture 15. Signal Transduction Pathways - Introduction Lecture 15 Signal Transduction Pathways - Introduction So far.. Regulation of mrna synthesis Regulation of rrna synthesis Regulation of trna & 5S rrna synthesis Regulation of gene expression by signals

More information

Plasma membranes. Plasmodesmata between plant cells. Gap junctions between animal cells Cell junctions. Cell-cell recognition

Plasma membranes. Plasmodesmata between plant cells. Gap junctions between animal cells Cell junctions. Cell-cell recognition Cell Communication Cell Signaling Cell-to-cell communication is essential for multicellular organisms Communicate by chemical messengers Animal and plant cells have cell junctions that directly connect

More information

Chapter 9. Cellular Signaling

Chapter 9. Cellular Signaling Chapter 9 Cellular Signaling Cellular Messaging Page 215 Cells can signal to each other and interpret the signals they receive from other cells and the environment Signals are most often chemicals The

More information

Lecture 9: Cell Communication I

Lecture 9: Cell Communication I 02.05.10 Lecture 9: Cell Communication I Multicellular organisms need to coordinate cellular functions in different tissues Cell-to-cell communication is also used by single celled organisms to signal

More information

Signal-Transduction Cascades - 2. The Phosphoinositide Cascade

Signal-Transduction Cascades - 2. The Phosphoinositide Cascade Signal-Transduction Cascades - 2 The Phosphoinositide Cascade Calcium ion as a second messenger Tyrosine kinase and receptor dimerization scribd.com Faisal Khatib JU The Phosphoinositide Cascade Used by

More information

BCOR 011 Lecture 19 Oct 12, 2005 I. Cell Communication Signal Transduction Chapter 11

BCOR 011 Lecture 19 Oct 12, 2005 I. Cell Communication Signal Transduction Chapter 11 BCOR 011 Lecture 19 Oct 12, 2005 I. Cell Communication Signal Transduction Chapter 11 External signal is received and converted to another form to elicit a response 1 Lecture Outline 1. Types of intercellular

More information

Goals and Challenges of Communication. Communication and Signal Transduction. How Do Cells Communicate?

Goals and Challenges of Communication. Communication and Signal Transduction. How Do Cells Communicate? Goals and Challenges of Communication Reaching (only) the correct recipient(s) Imparting correct information Timeliness Causing the desired effect Effective termination Communication and Signal Transduction

More information

ALZHEIMER S DISEASE FACTOIDS & STATISTICS

ALZHEIMER S DISEASE FACTOIDS & STATISTICS ALZHEIMER S DISEASE FACTOIDS & STATISTICS ~ 4 million affected in US alone 6-8% if 65+ years old, 30-50% if 80+ By 2030, in US >65 million people >65+ (---> ~14 million with AD) AD is one of the top 10

More information

Biochemie 4. Cell communication - GPCR

Biochemie 4. Cell communication - GPCR Biochemie 4 Cell communication - GPCR 1 Lecture outline General principles - local and long-distance signaling - classes of receptors - molecular switches and second messengers Receptor tyrosine kinases

More information

By the name of Allah

By the name of Allah By the name of Allah Receptors function and signal transduction ( Hormones and receptors Types) We were talking about receptors of the neurotransmitters; we have 2 types of receptors: 1- Ionotropic receptors

More information

Chapter 11. Cell Communication

Chapter 11. Cell Communication Chapter 11 Cell Communication Overview: The Cellular Internet Cell-to-cell communication Is absolutely essential for multicellular organisms Concept 11.1: External signals are converted into responses

More information

Physiology Unit 1 CELL SIGNALING: CHEMICAL MESSENGERS AND SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION PATHWAYS

Physiology Unit 1 CELL SIGNALING: CHEMICAL MESSENGERS AND SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION PATHWAYS Physiology Unit 1 CELL SIGNALING: CHEMICAL MESSENGERS AND SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION PATHWAYS In Physiology Today Cell Communication Homeostatic mechanisms maintain a normal balance of the body s internal environment

More information

Signal Transduction: Information Metabolism. Chem 454: Regulatory Mechanisms in Biochemistry University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire

Signal Transduction: Information Metabolism. Chem 454: Regulatory Mechanisms in Biochemistry University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Signal Transduction: Information Metabolism Chem 454: Regulatory Mechanisms in Biochemistry University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Introduction Information Metabolism How cells receive, process and respond

More information

Cell Communication. Chapter 11. PowerPoint Lectures for Biology, Seventh Edition. Lectures by Chris Romero. Neil Campbell and Jane Reece

Cell Communication. Chapter 11. PowerPoint Lectures for Biology, Seventh Edition. Lectures by Chris Romero. Neil Campbell and Jane Reece Chapter 11 Cell Communication PowerPoint Lectures for Biology, Seventh Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece Lectures by Chris Romero Overview: The Cellular Internet Cell-to-cell communication Is absolutely

More information

Molecular Cell Biology - Problem Drill 19: Cell Signaling Pathways and Gene Expression

Molecular Cell Biology - Problem Drill 19: Cell Signaling Pathways and Gene Expression Molecular Cell Biology - Problem Drill 19: Cell Signaling Pathways and Gene Expression Question No. 1 of 10 1. Which statement about cell signaling is correct? Question #1 (A) Cell signaling involves receiving

More information

Lojayn Salah. Razan Aburumman. Faisal Muhammad

Lojayn Salah. Razan Aburumman. Faisal Muhammad 20 Lojayn Salah Razan Aburumman Faisal Muhammad Note: I tried to include everything that's important from the doctor's slides but you can refer back to them after studying this sheet.. After you read this

More information

Zool 3200: Cell Biology Exam 4 Part I 2/3/15

Zool 3200: Cell Biology Exam 4 Part I 2/3/15 Name: Key Trask Zool 3200: Cell Biology Exam 4 Part I 2/3/15 Answer each of the following questions in the space provided, explaining your answers when asked to do so; circle the correct answer or answers

More information

Lecture: CHAPTER 13 Signal Transduction Pathways

Lecture: CHAPTER 13 Signal Transduction Pathways Lecture: 10 17 2016 CHAPTER 13 Signal Transduction Pathways Chapter 13 Outline Signal transduction cascades have many components in common: 1. Release of a primary message as a response to a physiological

More information

Chapter 20. Cell - Cell Signaling: Hormones and Receptors. Three general types of extracellular signaling. endocrine signaling. paracrine signaling

Chapter 20. Cell - Cell Signaling: Hormones and Receptors. Three general types of extracellular signaling. endocrine signaling. paracrine signaling Chapter 20 Cell - Cell Signaling: Hormones and Receptors Three general types of extracellular signaling endocrine signaling paracrine signaling autocrine signaling Endocrine Signaling - signaling molecules

More information

Cell Communication. Chapter 11. Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for

Cell Communication. Chapter 11. Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for Chapter 11 Cell Communication PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece Lectures by Chris Romero, updated by Erin Barley with contributions from Joan Sharp

More information

Cell Biology (BIOL 4374 and BCHS 4313) Third Exam 4/24/01

Cell Biology (BIOL 4374 and BCHS 4313) Third Exam 4/24/01 Cell Biology (BIOL 4374 and BCHS 4313) Third Exam 4/24/01 Name SS# This exam is worth a total of 100 points. The number of points each question is worth is shown in parentheses. For multiple choice questions,

More information

Synaptic Communication. Steven McLoon Department of Neuroscience University of Minnesota

Synaptic Communication. Steven McLoon Department of Neuroscience University of Minnesota Synaptic Communication Steven McLoon Department of Neuroscience University of Minnesota 1 Course News The first exam is next week on Friday! Be sure to checkout the sample exam on the course website. 2

More information

Effects of Second Messengers

Effects of Second Messengers Effects of Second Messengers Inositol trisphosphate Diacylglycerol Opens Calcium Channels Binding to IP 3 -gated Channel Cooperative binding Activates Protein Kinase C is required Phosphorylation of many

More information

Enzyme-coupled Receptors. Cell-surface receptors 1. Ion-channel-coupled receptors 2. G-protein-coupled receptors 3. Enzyme-coupled receptors

Enzyme-coupled Receptors. Cell-surface receptors 1. Ion-channel-coupled receptors 2. G-protein-coupled receptors 3. Enzyme-coupled receptors Enzyme-coupled Receptors Cell-surface receptors 1. Ion-channel-coupled receptors 2. G-protein-coupled receptors 3. Enzyme-coupled receptors Cell-surface receptors allow a flow of ions across the plasma

More information

Receptors Functions and Signal Transduction- L4- L5

Receptors Functions and Signal Transduction- L4- L5 Receptors Functions and Signal Transduction- L4- L5 Faisal I. Mohammed, MD, PhD University of Jordan 1 PKC Phosphorylates many substrates, can activate kinase pathway, gene regulation PLC- signaling pathway

More information

Principles of Genetics and Molecular Biology

Principles of Genetics and Molecular Biology Cell signaling Dr. Diala Abu-Hassan, DDS, PhD School of Medicine Dr.abuhassand@gmail.com Principles of Genetics and Molecular Biology www.cs.montana.edu Modes of cell signaling Direct interaction of a

More information

Cell signaling. How do cells receive and respond to signals from their surroundings?

Cell signaling. How do cells receive and respond to signals from their surroundings? Cell signaling How do cells receive and respond to signals from their surroundings? Prokaryotes and unicellular eukaryotes are largely independent and autonomous. In multicellular organisms there is a

More information

RAS Genes. The ras superfamily of genes encodes small GTP binding proteins that are responsible for the regulation of many cellular processes.

RAS Genes. The ras superfamily of genes encodes small GTP binding proteins that are responsible for the regulation of many cellular processes. ۱ RAS Genes The ras superfamily of genes encodes small GTP binding proteins that are responsible for the regulation of many cellular processes. Oncogenic ras genes in human cells include H ras, N ras,

More information

Chapter 11. Cell Communication. Signal Transduction Pathways

Chapter 11. Cell Communication. Signal Transduction Pathways Chapter 11 Cell Communication Signal Transduction Pathways Signal-Transduction Pathway Signal on a cell s surface is converted into a specific cellular response Local signaling (short distance) - Paracrine

More information

Lecture 36: Review of membrane function

Lecture 36: Review of membrane function Chem*3560 Lecture 36: Review of membrane function Membrane: Lipid bilayer with embedded or associated proteins. Bilayers: 40-70% neutral phospholipid 10-20% negative phospholipid 10-30% cholesterol 10-30%

More information

Bio 111 Study Guide Chapter 11 Cell Communication

Bio 111 Study Guide Chapter 11 Cell Communication Bio 111 Study Guide Chapter 11 Cell Communication BEFORE CLASS: Reading: Read the introduction on p. 210, and for Concept 11.1, read from the first full paragraph on p. 212. Read all of Concept 11.2. Pay

More information

Cellular Communication

Cellular Communication (a) Communicating cell junctions. by direct cell-cell contact lasma membranes 1. Direct cell contact. Vesicle-mediated 3. Chemical messengers (b) Cell-cell recognition. Gap junctions between animal cells

More information

Zool 3200: Cell Biology Exam 4 Part I 2/3/15

Zool 3200: Cell Biology Exam 4 Part I 2/3/15 Name: Trask Zool 3200: Cell Biology Exam 4 Part I 2/3/15 Answer each of the following questions in the space provided, explaining your answers when asked to do so; circle the correct answer or answers

More information

INTERACTION DRUG BODY

INTERACTION DRUG BODY INTERACTION DRUG BODY What the drug does to the body What the body does to the drug Receptors - intracellular receptors - membrane receptors - Channel receptors - G protein-coupled receptors - Tyrosine-kinase

More information

Cell Communication. Local and Long Distance Signaling

Cell Communication. Local and Long Distance Signaling Cell Communication Cell to cell communication is essential for multicellular organisms Some universal mechanisms of cellular regulation providing more evidence for the evolutionary relatedness of all life

More information

The Tissue Engineer s Toolkit

The Tissue Engineer s Toolkit The Tissue Engineer s Toolkit Stimuli Detection and Response Ken Webb, Ph. D. Assistant Professor Dept. of Bioengineering Clemson University Environmental Stimulus-Cellular Response Environmental Stimuli

More information

Psych 181: Dr. Anagnostaras

Psych 181: Dr. Anagnostaras Psych 181: Dr. Anagnostaras Lecture 5 Synaptic Transmission Introduction to synaptic transmission Synapses (Gk., to clasp or join) Site of action of most psychoactive drugs 6.5 1 Synapses Know basic terminology:

More information

Communication Between

Communication Between Communication Between Neurons Bởi: OpenStaxCollege The electrical changes taking place within a neuron, as described in the previous section, are similar to a light switch being turned on. A stimulus starts

More information

Signal Transduction Cascades

Signal Transduction Cascades Signal Transduction Cascades Contents of this page: Kinases & phosphatases Protein Kinase A (camp-dependent protein kinase) G-protein signal cascade Structure of G-proteins Small GTP-binding proteins,

More information

Cellular Messengers. Intracellular Communication

Cellular Messengers. Intracellular Communication Cellular Messengers Intracellular Communication Most common cellular communication is done through extracellular chemical messengers: Ligands Specific in function 1. Paracrines Local messengers (neighboring

More information

Synapses and Neurotransmitters

Synapses and Neurotransmitters Synapses and Neurotransmitters Communication Between Neurons Synapse: A specialized site of contact, and transmission of information between a neuron and an effector cell Anterior Motor Neuron Figure 45-5

More information

Membrane associated receptor transfers the information. Second messengers relay information

Membrane associated receptor transfers the information. Second messengers relay information Membrane associated receptor transfers the information Most signals are polar and large Few of the signals are nonpolar Receptors are intrinsic membrane proteins Extracellular and intracellular domains

More information

PHRM20001 NOTES PART 1 Lecture 1 History of Pharmacology- Key Principles

PHRM20001 NOTES PART 1 Lecture 1 History of Pharmacology- Key Principles PHRM20001 NOTES PART 1 Lecture 1 History of Pharmacology- Key Principles Hippocrates (5 th century BCE):... benefit my patients according to my greatest ability and judgment, and I will do no harm or injustice

More information

7.06 Cell Biology EXAM #3 April 24, 2003

7.06 Cell Biology EXAM #3 April 24, 2003 7.06 Spring 2003 Exam 3 Name 1 of 8 7.06 Cell Biology EXAM #3 April 24, 2003 This is an open book exam, and you are allowed access to books and notes. Please write your answers to the questions in the

More information

Signal Transduction I

Signal Transduction I Signal Transduction I Prof. Tianhua Zhou Department of Cell Biology Zhejiang University School of Medicine Office hours by appointment tzhou@zju.edu.cn Signal transduction: Key contents for signal transduction:

More information

11/8/16. Cell Signaling Mechanisms. Dr. Abercrombie 11/8/2016. Principal Parts of Neurons A Signal Processing Computer

11/8/16. Cell Signaling Mechanisms. Dr. Abercrombie 11/8/2016. Principal Parts of Neurons A Signal Processing Computer Cell Signaling Mechanisms Dr. Abercrombie 11/8/2016 Principal Parts of Neurons A Signal Processing Computer A Multitude of Synapses and Synaptic Actions Summation/Synaptic Integration 1 The Synapse Signal

More information

Protein kinases are enzymes that add a phosphate group to proteins according to the. ATP + protein OH > Protein OPO 3 + ADP

Protein kinases are enzymes that add a phosphate group to proteins according to the. ATP + protein OH > Protein OPO 3 + ADP Protein kinase Protein kinases are enzymes that add a phosphate group to proteins according to the following equation: 2 ATP + protein OH > Protein OPO 3 + ADP ATP represents adenosine trisphosphate, ADP

More information

Insulin Resistance. Biol 405 Molecular Medicine

Insulin Resistance. Biol 405 Molecular Medicine Insulin Resistance Biol 405 Molecular Medicine Insulin resistance: a subnormal biological response to insulin. Defects of either insulin secretion or insulin action can cause diabetes mellitus. Insulin-dependent

More information

Leen Osama, Lujain Hamdan, Osama Mohd, Razi Kittaneh... Faisal Mohammad

Leen Osama, Lujain Hamdan, Osama Mohd, Razi Kittaneh... Faisal Mohammad 23 Leen Osama, Lujain Hamdan, Osama Mohd, Razi Kittaneh... Faisal Mohammad Revision of previous lectures G-proteins coupled receptors mechanism: When a hormone binds to G-protein coupled receptor, GTP

More information

Cell Communication. Chapter 11. Key Concepts in Chapter 11. Cellular Messaging. Cell-to-cell communication is essential for multicellular organisms

Cell Communication. Chapter 11. Key Concepts in Chapter 11. Cellular Messaging. Cell-to-cell communication is essential for multicellular organisms Chapter 11 Cell Communication Dr. Wendy Sera Houston Community College Biology 1406 Key Concepts in Chapter 11 1. External signals are converted to responses within the cell. 2. Reception: A signaling

More information

MCB*4010 Midterm Exam / Winter 2008

MCB*4010 Midterm Exam / Winter 2008 MCB*4010 Midterm Exam / Winter 2008 Name: ID: Instructions: Answer all 4 questions. The number of marks for each question indicates how many points you need to provide. Write your answers in point form,

More information

Cell Biology Lecture 9 Notes Basic Principles of cell signaling and GPCR system

Cell Biology Lecture 9 Notes Basic Principles of cell signaling and GPCR system Cell Biology Lecture 9 Notes Basic Principles of cell signaling and GPCR system Basic Elements of cell signaling: Signal or signaling molecule (ligand, first messenger) o Small molecules (epinephrine,

More information

Basics of Pharmacology

Basics of Pharmacology Basics of Pharmacology Pekka Rauhala Transmed 2013 What is pharmacology? Pharmacology may be defined as the study of the effects of drugs on the function of living systems Pharmacodynamics The mechanism(s)

More information

Neurotransmitter Systems III Neurochemistry. Reading: BCP Chapter 6

Neurotransmitter Systems III Neurochemistry. Reading: BCP Chapter 6 Neurotransmitter Systems III Neurochemistry Reading: BCP Chapter 6 Neurotransmitter Systems Normal function of the human brain requires an orderly set of chemical reactions. Some of the most important

More information

BIOL212 Biochemistry of Disease. Metabolic Disorders - Obesity

BIOL212 Biochemistry of Disease. Metabolic Disorders - Obesity BIOL212 Biochemistry of Disease Metabolic Disorders - Obesity Obesity Approx. 23% of adults are obese in the U.K. The number of obese children has tripled in 20 years. 10% of six year olds are obese, rising

More information

Principles of cell signaling Lecture 4

Principles of cell signaling Lecture 4 Principles of cell signaling Lecture 4 Johan Lennartsson Molecular Cell Biology (1BG320), 2014 Johan.Lennartsson@licr.uu.se 1 Receptor tyrosine kinase-induced signal transduction Erk MAP kinase pathway

More information

Which DNA sequence is most likely to form a hairpin structure? x indicates any nucleotide.

Which DNA sequence is most likely to form a hairpin structure? x indicates any nucleotide. Which DNA sequence is most likely to form a hairpin structure? x indicates any nucleotide. A. xxxgtcagtxxxxtatgcgxxx B. xxxtcgtatxxxxgtccgaxxx C. xxxcactgtxxxxgtactgxxx D. xxxgtcagtxxxxcctagaxxx E. xxxgtcatcxxxxgatgacxxx

More information

Cell responses to environment-- Signals

Cell responses to environment-- Signals Cell responses to environment-- Signals Signal transduction can coordinate: Development Formation of tissues Timing of cell division Direction of cell enlargement Size and shape of organs Responses to

More information

- Biosignaling: Signal transduction. References: chapter 8 of Lippincots chapter 1 3 of Lehningers

- Biosignaling: Signal transduction. References: chapter 8 of Lippincots chapter 1 3 of Lehningers Basic concepts of Metabolism Metabolism and metabolic pathway Metabolic Map Catabolism Anabolism - Regulation of Metabolism Signals from within the cell (Intracellular) Communication between cells. - Biosignaling:

More information

Protein sorting (endoplasmic reticulum) Dr. Diala Abu-Hsasan School of Medicine

Protein sorting (endoplasmic reticulum) Dr. Diala Abu-Hsasan School of Medicine Protein sorting (endoplasmic reticulum) Dr. Diala Abu-Hsasan School of Medicine dr.abuhassand@gmail.com An overview of cellular components Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) It is a network of membrane-enclosed

More information

BIOLOGY. Cell Communication CAMPBELL. Reece Urry Cain Wasserman Minorsky Jackson. Lecture Presentation by Nicole Tunbridge and Kathleen Fitzpatrick

BIOLOGY. Cell Communication CAMPBELL. Reece Urry Cain Wasserman Minorsky Jackson. Lecture Presentation by Nicole Tunbridge and Kathleen Fitzpatrick CAMPBELL BIOLOGY TENTH EDITION Reece Urry Cain Wasserman Minorsky Jackson 11 Cell Communication Lecture Presentation by Nicole Tunbridge and Kathleen Fitzpatrick Cellular Messaging Cells can signal to

More information

Introduction! Introduction! Introduction! Chem Lecture 10 Signal Transduction & Sensory Systems Part 2

Introduction! Introduction! Introduction! Chem Lecture 10 Signal Transduction & Sensory Systems Part 2 Chem 452 - Lecture 10 Signal Transduction & Sensory Systems Part 2 Questions of the Day: How does the hormone insulin trigger the uptake of glucose in the cells that it targets. Introduction! Signal transduction

More information

Pharmacodynamics. OUTLINE Definition. Mechanisms of drug action. Receptors. Agonists. Types. Types Locations Effects. Definition

Pharmacodynamics. OUTLINE Definition. Mechanisms of drug action. Receptors. Agonists. Types. Types Locations Effects. Definition Pharmacodynamics OUTLINE Definition. Mechanisms of drug action. Receptors Types Locations Effects Agonists Definition Types Outlines of Pharmacodynamics Antagonists Definition Types Therapeutic Index Definition

More information

Cellular Signaling Pathways. Signaling Overview

Cellular Signaling Pathways. Signaling Overview Cellular Signaling Pathways Signaling Overview Signaling steps Synthesis and release of signaling molecules (ligands) by the signaling cell. Transport of the signal to the target cell Detection of the

More information

BL 424 Chapter 15: Cell Signaling; Signal Transduction

BL 424 Chapter 15: Cell Signaling; Signal Transduction BL 424 Chapter 15: Cell Signaling; Signal Transduction All cells receive and respond to signals from their environments. The behavior of each individual cell in multicellular plants and animals must be

More information

Cell Communication. Chapter 11. Biology. Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for

Cell Communication. Chapter 11. Biology. Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for Chapter 11 Cell Communication PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece Lectures by Chris Romero, updated by Erin Barley with contributions from Joan Sharp

More information

G-Protein Coupled Receptors GPCRs. GPCRs

G-Protein Coupled Receptors GPCRs. GPCRs 2 type of ligands 1 G-Protein Coupled Receptors GPCRs One of the largest protein families: > 1000 type of GPCRs in mammals >3% of the human genes Major drug targets: ~ 60 % of approved drugs interact with

More information

Introduction. up regulated include genes associated with stress response, DNA repair and

Introduction. up regulated include genes associated with stress response, DNA repair and Introduction Ageing is the biological process characterized by the progressive and irreversible loss of physiological function accompanied by increasing mortality with advancing age. It is a complex physiological

More information

Mechanisms of Hormone Action

Mechanisms of Hormone Action Mechanisms of Hormone Action General principles: 1. Signals act over different ranges. 2. Signals have different chemical natures. 3. The same signal can induce a different response in different cells.

More information

Autonomic Nervous System. Lanny Shulman, O.D., Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry

Autonomic Nervous System. Lanny Shulman, O.D., Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry Autonomic Nervous System Lanny Shulman, O.D., Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry Peripheral Nervous System A. Sensory Somatic Nervous System B. Autonomic Nervous System 1. Sympathetic Nervous

More information

Biosignals, Chapter 8, rearranged, Part I

Biosignals, Chapter 8, rearranged, Part I Biosignals, Chapter 8, rearranged, Part I Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor: A Ligand-Binding Ion Channel Classes of Receptor Proteins in Eukaryotes, Heterotrimeric G Proteins Signaling View the Heterotrimeric

More information

Chapter 5 Control of Cells by Chemical Messengers

Chapter 5 Control of Cells by Chemical Messengers Chapter 5 Control of Cells by Chemical Messengers = How hormones and other signals work Intercellular Communication = Intercellular Signal Transmission Chemical communication Electrical communication Intercellular

More information

Drug Receptor Interactions and Pharmacodynamics

Drug Receptor Interactions and Pharmacodynamics Drug Receptor Interactions and Pharmacodynamics Dr. Raz Mohammed MSc Pharmacology School of Pharmacy 22.10.2017 Lec 6 Pharmacodynamics definition Pharmacodynamics describes the actions of a drug on the

More information

Receptors. Dr. Sanaa Bardaweel

Receptors. Dr. Sanaa Bardaweel Receptors Types and Theories Dr. Sanaa Bardaweel Some terms in receptor-drug interactions Agonists: drugs that mimic the natural messengers and activate receptors. Antagonist: drugs that block receptors.

More information

Vets 111/Biov 111 Cell Signalling-2. Secondary messengers the cyclic AMP intracellular signalling system

Vets 111/Biov 111 Cell Signalling-2. Secondary messengers the cyclic AMP intracellular signalling system Vets 111/Biov 111 Cell Signalling-2 Secondary messengers the cyclic AMP intracellular signalling system The classical secondary messenger model of intracellular signalling A cell surface receptor binds

More information

Evaluation only. Created with Aspose.PowerPoint. Copyright 2004 Aspose Pty Ltd.

Evaluation only. Created with Aspose.PowerPoint. Copyright 2004 Aspose Pty Ltd. Da: Cell Signalling Biology - Michael J. Berridge - www.cellsignallingbiology.org - 2009 Evaluation only. Created with Aspose.PowerPoint. Copyright 2004 Aspose Pty Ltd. Nella comunicazione chimica il recettore

More information

Cell Signaling (part 1)

Cell Signaling (part 1) 15 Cell Signaling (part 1) Introduction Bacteria and unicellular eukaryotes respond to environmental signals and to signaling molecules secreted by other cells for mating and other communication. In multicellular

More information

Dania Ahmad. Tamer Barakat + Dania Ahmad. Faisal I. Mohammed

Dania Ahmad. Tamer Barakat + Dania Ahmad. Faisal I. Mohammed 16 Dania Ahmad Tamer Barakat + Dania Ahmad Faisal I. Mohammed Revision: What are the basic types of neurons? sensory (afferent), motor (efferent) and interneuron (equaled association neurons). We classified

More information

Close to site of release (at synapse); binds to receptors in

Close to site of release (at synapse); binds to receptors in Chapter 18: The Endocrine System Chemical Messengers 1. Neural 2. Endocrine 3. Neuroendocrine 4. Paracrine 5. Autocrine Endocrine System --Endocrine and nervous systems work together --Endocrine vs. Nervous

More information

Signal Transduction: G-Protein Coupled Receptors

Signal Transduction: G-Protein Coupled Receptors Signal Transduction: G-Protein Coupled Receptors Federle, M. (2017). Lectures 4-5: Signal Transduction parts 1&2: nuclear receptors and GPCRs. Lecture presented at PHAR 423 Lecture in UIC College of Pharmacy,

More information

Synaptic Transmission: Ionic and Metabotropic

Synaptic Transmission: Ionic and Metabotropic Synaptic Transmission: Ionic and Metabotropic D. Purves et al. Neuroscience (Sinauer Assoc.) Chapters 5, 6, 7. C. Koch. Biophysics of Computation (Oxford) Chapter 4. J.G. Nicholls et al. From Neuron to

More information

ANATOMY & PHYSIOLOGY - CLUTCH CH. 6 - CELL COMMUNICATION.

ANATOMY & PHYSIOLOGY - CLUTCH CH. 6 - CELL COMMUNICATION. !! www.clutchprep.com CONCEPT: CELL-TO-CELL CONNECTIONS AND SIGNALING Gap and Tight Junctions: Adjacent cells communicate and hold on to each other via junctions. Two important kinds: Gap Junctions are

More information

Section: Chapter 5: Multiple Choice. 1. The structure of synapses is best viewed with a(n):

Section: Chapter 5: Multiple Choice. 1. The structure of synapses is best viewed with a(n): Section: Chapter 5: Multiple Choice 1. The structure of synapses is best viewed with a(n): p.155 electron microscope. light microscope. confocal microscope. nissle-stained microscopic procedure. 2. Electron

More information

Mechanisms of Cell Injury: Loss of Calcium Homeostasis

Mechanisms of Cell Injury: Loss of Calcium Homeostasis Mechanisms of Cell Injury: Loss of Calcium Homeostasis SCPA610: Cellular Pathology Amornrat N. Jensen, Ph.D. amornrat.nar@mahidol.ac.th Leading questions Why is intracellular calcium important for the

More information

Signal Transduction Pathways. Part 2

Signal Transduction Pathways. Part 2 Signal Transduction Pathways Part 2 GPCRs G-protein coupled receptors > 700 GPCRs in humans Mediate responses to senses taste, smell, sight ~ 1000 GPCRs mediate sense of smell in mouse Half of all known

More information

Cell Communication. Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for

Cell Communication. Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece. PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for Chapter 11 Cell Communication PowerPoint Lecture Presentations for Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece Lectures by Chris Romero, updated by Erin Barley with contributions from Joan Sharp

More information