Stink Bug Management Update. Thomas Turini UCCE Fresno Vegetable Crops Advisor Fresno County

Similar documents
Pest and Disease Overview for 2015: Stink bug and Beet curly top virus

Update on management of stink bugs. Thomas Turini University of California Cooperative Extension Vegetable Crops Advisor Fresno County

Chemical control evaluations for stink bug: Leafhopper surveys for Beet curly top virus

Chemical Control Evaluations for Stink Bug and for Powdery Mildew. Thomas Turini UCCE Fresno Vegetable Crops Advisor Fresno County

Pheromone-Based Tools for Management of the Invasive Brown Marmorated Stink Bug in Specialty Crops

Thrips Control Programs & Population Dynamics in Central SJV. Tom Turini UC Farm Advisor, Fresno

Thrips Control Programs & Population Dynamics in Central SJV

Comparison of insecticide efficacies against BMSB adults Regional BMSB insecticide bioassays project 2017 summary

Pest Management in Tomatoes. Thomas Turini University of California Cooperative Extension Vegetable Crops Advisor Fresno County

Developing Behaviorally Based Monitoring and Management Tools for the Invasive Brown Marmorated Stink Bug, Halyomorpha halys (Stål)

Brown Marmorated Stink Bug as a Pest of Tree Fruits in the Southern Appalachians

Lewis Mite, Thrips and Lygus Research Update

Knockdown and Residual Control of Bagrada Bug With Foliar Insecticides in Broccoli: 2013 Efficacy Report

2018 Peach Insect Management Update. Jim Walgenbach Dept Entomology & Plant Pathology MHCREC, Mills River, NC

Rate/a of commercial product. Days to

Olive Fruit Fly Management

Management of the plant resistance breaking strain of Tomato spotted wilt virus

Kusagikamemushi in Japan

2011 Lygus Bug Management Trial in Blackeyes Kearney Research and Extension Center, Parlier, CA C.A. Frate 1, S.C. Mueller and P.B.

2010 REPORT OF INSECTICIDE EVALUATION

2010 REPORT OF INSECTICIDE EVALUATION

Management Tips for Insects in Desert Vegetables. John C. Palumbo Yuma Ag Center

Potato XXII Potato Psyllid

MANAGEMENT OPTIONS FOR BLUE ALFALFA APHIDS IN CALIFORNIA ALFALFA. Larry Godfrey, Steve Orloff, Eric Natwick, and Rachael Long 1

EVALUATION OF NEW AND EXISTING INSECTICIDES FOR THE CONTROL OF WALNUT HUSK FLY 2012

Psyllid Management: Update on protection of young trees. M. E. Rogers Citrus Institute 2015

2017 Soybean Insect Control Recommendations

Insecticide Degradation vs SWD Population Dynamics in Northwest Washington Blueberry

COLORADO POTATO BEETLE

2012 Evaluation of Insecticides for Lygus Bug Control in Blackeye Cowpeas

Current insecticide efficacy research in Virginia. Tom Kuhar, John Aigner and Adam Morehead Dept. of Entomology Virginia Tech

2009 REPORT OF INSECTICIDE EVALUATION

Crops - Commercial. Cotton

Brenna Aegerter Michelle Le Strange Gene Miyao Scott Stoddard Tom Turini. University of California Cooperative Extension

LYGUS BUG MANAGEMENT IN SEED ALFALFA. Eric T. Natwick and M. Lopez 1 ABSTRACT

Management of Insect and Mite Pests in Soybean. Tom A. Royer Extension Entomologist

Navel Orangeworm Control: Looking Back, Looking Forward. David Doll UCCE Merced County

Crops - Commercial. Cotton

Management of Insect and Mite Pests in Soybean. Tom A. Royer Extension Entomologist

COLORADO POTATO BEETLE

OBLR Resistance Management in Tree Fruits. John Wise, Abdulwahab Hafez, and David Mota-Sanchez Michigan State University

Insecticides Labeled for Control of Bean Leaf Beetle, Mexican Bean Beetle, and Green Cloverworm. Amount product per acre

Advanced IPM for UT Tree Fruit

Spotted Wing Drosophila Update

Integrated Pest Management Successes

Processing Tomato Pest Management Research in Fresno County

Insect Management for Sweet Potatoes 1

2013Evaluation of Insecticides for Lygus Bug Control in Blackeye Cowpeas

Eastern(NY(Entomology(Update(on(Invasive(Species((Management!(

Arthropod Pest Management Research on Vegetables in Virginia 2011

San Jose Scale Management in North Carolina Peaches. Jim Walgenbach Dept. Entomology NC State University Mt Hort Crop Res & Ext Ctr Mills River, NC

Delivering the Proven Performance of Three Industry-leading Technologies

Integrated Pest Management Successes

Insecticide Efficacy for Pecan Aphids. Larry Blackwell 1 Brad Lewis 1,2 Tiffany Johnson 1 1 New Mexico State University 2 New Mexico Dept.

PEANUT INSECT MANAGEMENT Dan Anco, Extension Peanut Specialist

Tree Fruit Pest & Insecticide Update. Celeste Welty January 2009

Research Abstract for the CALIFORNIA LEAFY GREENS RESEARCH PROGRAM April 1, 2012 March 31, 2013

Monitoring, Modeling and Managing the Lepidopteran Complex in Apple: How Complex Is It?

Aphid Management on Head Lettuce Using Imidacloprid and Foliar Insecticides

UNDERSTANDING INSECTICIDES AND HOW THEY WORK IN THE AGE OF SWD. Greg Loeb, Department of Entomology, NYSAES, Geneva, NY!

INSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POPCORN ENT -62 Prepared by Ric Bessin and Douglas W. Johnson, Extension Entomologists.

Title: Development of Crop Protection Chemicals for control of Potato Psyllid in Washington Potatoes

INSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TOBACCO BEDS AND FIELDS Prepared by Lee Townsend, Extension Entomologist

2012 WI-1 Columbia ±0.39) 0.05 ( ) WI-40 Marinette ±0.43) 0.55 ( ) (

BMSB impact on vegetable and field crops in the Mid- Atlantic and research plans for 2011

Ecology and management of stink bugs & Lygus on cotton in the SE and Mid-south

USING AEROSOL PHEROMONE PUFFERS FOR AREA-WIDE SUPPRESSION OF CODLING MOTH IN WALNUTS: YEAR FOUR

Chemical Control of Spotted Wing Drosophila in Berry Crops

Impact of Lygus lineolaris Management on Biodiversity in Cotton IPM

2.2.3 Attract-and-Kill, Repellents, Cultural Techniques for IPM, RNAi

Developing a First Detector Network for Utah. Cooperative A g Pest Sur vey Coordinator

Halyomorpha halys (=H. mista)

Development of an IPM program for citrus thrips in blueberries. David R. Haviland, UCCE Kern Co and Joseph G. Morse, UCR

Chapter 8. Eggplant Production

Results and Discussion

Soybean aphid management: New challenges posed by insecticide resistance. Robert Koch Department of Entomology

Pesticide Safety Insecticides Update 2006

Alfalfa Weed Control Research Update

Chapter 9. Leafy Vegetable Production

2012 REPORT OF INSECTICIDE EVALUATION

Brenna Aegerter UCCE San Joaquin County

Tree Fruit IPM Advisory: June 20 th, 2006

CHEMICAL SAFETY IN THE GREENHOUSE

Efficacy of Selected Acaricides on Spider Mites in Corn 2011

Disease control in bean green, lima, navy, red kidney (cont.)

Insect Management in Mississippi Pecans

Seasonality of influenza activity in Hong Kong and its association with meteorological variations

Investigating the role of invasive tree-wooded borders on brown marmorated stink bug infestations in soybeans and residual efficacy of insecticides

INSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TOBACCO BEDS AND FIELDS Prepared by Lee Townsend, Extension Entomologist

2015 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut, Jay, FL

Planting. Pickling cucumbers. Slicing cucumbers. Annual nitrogen, phosphate, and potash recommendations for cucumber

Efficacy of Additional Insecticides for Insect Pests in a MGVII Soybean Beaumont, TX 2005

Managing Spider Mites in Almonds. David Haviland Entomology Farm Advisor UC Cooperative Extension, Kern Co.

Biology and Management of Potato Psyllid in Pacific Northwest Potatoes.

Melon: muskmelon (cantaloupe), watermelon

TOBACCO INSECT CONTROL Francis P. F. Reay Jones, Extension Entomologist

Spotted Wing Drosophila: A New Pest of Cherries and

ALFALFA: ALFALFA INSECT CONTROL

Pink Bollworm. Description

Empowering Weight Loss Charts & Logs Healthy Weight Chart Cholesterol Chart Blood Pressure Chart Exercise Calorie Burning Chart

Transcription:

Stink Bug Management Update Thomas Turini UCCE Fresno Vegetable Crops Advisor Fresno County

Why did Populations and Damage Increase? Changes in insecticides used? Possible Increase in permanent crops which may serve as overwintering sites? Possible Different species? Probably not Recent weather conditions? Possible

Why did Populations and Damage Increase? Changes in insecticides used? Increase in permanent crops which may serve as overwintering sites? Different species? Recent weather conditions?

Why did Populations and Damage Increase? Changes in insecticides used? Increase in permanent crops which may serve as overwintering sites? Different species? Recent weather conditions?

Consperse Stink Bug Schematic Life Cycle Dark Light Weeds Tomato June Summer Solstice Diapause Leaf Litter December Winter Solstice Weeds Tomato June Summer Solstice Diapause Leaf Litter Russian Thistle Cheeseweed (little mallow) Mustard Fall - Winter Immature Adult F1 F2 Fall - Winter Immature Adult F3 Slide adapted from Goodell 2014

Why did Populations and Damage Increase? Changes in insecticides used? Increase in permanent crops which may serve as overwintering sites? Different species? Recent weather conditions?

Consperse stink bug: Euschistus conspersus

Stink Bug Species Reported in CA Say's stink bug complex: Chlorochroa sayi and Chlorochroa uhleri Redshouldered stink bug: Thyanta pallidovirens Consperse stink bug: Euschistus conspersus Southern green stink bug: Nezara viridula

Stink Bugs Recently Reported in California Halyomorpha halys Brown marmorated Euschistus servus Brown stink bug Slide adapted from Goodell 2014

Brown marmorated stink bug (BMSB), Halyomorpha halys

Brown vs. Consperse Slide adapted from Goodel 2014

All Identified Stink Bugs Associated with Fresno Co. Tomatoes from 2013-2014 were Consperse Photos by E. Hannon 2014

Why did Populations and Damage Increase? Changes in insecticides used? Increase in permanent crops which may serve as overwintering sites? Different species? Recent weather conditions?

Monthly DD >54 Accumulation 30 yr 2014 2013 2012 2007 Jan 18.69 105.74 30.23 63.98 32.41 Feb 77.43 115.93 61.66 83.25 76.44 Mar 168.3 226.56 230.12 144.3 258.74 Apr 248.14 333.14 337.5 259.62 283.64 May 427.48 544.03 462.62 473.45 491.52 June 590 642.8 654.1 584.95 593.55 July 803.9 839.4 824.4 785.4 744.4 Aug 767.4 786.9 732.93 838.4 747.98 Sept 595.5 664.1 560.27 692.56 468.44 Oct 352.57 440.78 309.75 385.24 281.99 Nov 112.99 149.28 154.88 153.93 146.45 Dec 14.24 55.07 48.83 41.12 19.96

Why did Populations and Damage Increase? Changes in insecticides used? Possible Increase in permanent crops which may serve as overwintering sites? Possible Different species? Probably not Recent weather conditions? Possible

CTRI Funded Project Objectives: Overwintering site identification and evaluate seasonal population development Pheromone trap evaluation Insecticide comparisons and program evaluation

Firebaugh-Area x

Five Points-Area x

Huron-Area x

Stink Bug Detected in Leaf Litter Fall 14

Overwintering site identified Tomatoes harvested in mid-oct 2014 Fallow field 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 2 1 0 6 0 10 16 7 0 12 0 2 4 1 0 18 1 1 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 30 Oranges 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 Mandarins N

Sterling stink bug live trap

Trapping in High Risk Areas 9 8 7 6 5 4 Firebaugh Five Points Huron 3 2 1 0 2-Mar 12-Mar 22-Mar 1-Apr 11-Apr 21-Apr 1-May 11-May 21-May 31-May

Trap/Canopy Detection at UC WSREC 12 10 trap plant shake 8 6 4 2 0 10-Jun 20-Jun 30-Jun 10-Jul 20-Jul 30-Jul 9-Aug 19-Aug 29-Aug 8-Sep

stink bugs detected in canpoy Trap/Canopy Stink Bug Detection 25 20 15 y = 0.1286x + 3.4224 R² = 0.0035 10 5 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 stink bugs captured in pheromone traps

Insecticide Trials (Efficacy and Programs)

Not all pesticides mentioned in this presentation are currently registered in tomatoes. Carefully read all current labels before writing a pesticide recommendation

Insecticides with Activity against Stink Bug > 80% control (adults and nymphs) Beta cyfluthrin Permethrin Lambda-cyhalothrin + thiamethoxam Bifenthrin Dimethoate Dimethoate Dinotefuron Venom > 60% control (adults and nymphs) Beta-cyfluthrin + Leverage imidacloprid Lambda-cyhalothrin Warrior II Thiamethoxam Clothianidin Methomyl Baythroid Ambush, Pounce and others Warrior II + Actara Brigade, Bifenture, Capture, and others Actara Belay Lannate < 50% control of adults and > 80% control of nymphs S-cypermethrin Hero, Mustang Max From Frank Zalom (UC Davis Entomology)

Insecticides Selected for 2014 Trials IRAC #* Trade name Common name 1A Lannate methomyl 1B Dibrom 8E naled 1B dimethoate dimethoate 2B Thionex endosulfan 3A Danitol fenpopathrin 3A Warrior II lambda-cyhalothrin 3A + 4A Endigo ZCX lambda-cyhalothrin + thiamethoxam 3A + 4A Leverage cyfluthrin + imidicloprid 4A Belay clothianidin 4A Venom dinotefuran 21A Torac tolfenpyrad * IRAC# mode of action as assigned by the Insecticide Resistance Action Committee

Efficacy Trial Details Belay 4 oz + Warrior II 1.92 oz Danitol 10.67 oz Dibrom 8E 1.0 pts Dibrom 8E 1.0 pts TRAP* Dimethoate 1 pt Endigo CX 4.5 fl oz Endigo ZCX 4.5 fl oz Lannate SP 1 lb Asana 9.6 fl oz Leverage 2.7 3.75 oz Leverage 2.7 3.75 oz TRAP Thionex 1 1/3 qts Torac 21.0 fl oz Venom 70 SG 4 oz Warrior II 1.92 oz Untreated H5608 planted 21 May; harvested 15-17 Sep - All plots received an application on 8 and 29 Aug * Treatments followed by TRAP were applied on 18 Jul after 1 st capture. ** Asana was applied on 15 Aug in addition to the Lannate applications on 8 and 29 Aug,

Stink bug efficacy, yield and quality Fruit quality (%) Treatment yield (t/a) reds greens sunburn rot stink bug Venom 70 SG 4 oz 39.24 60.83 12.44 10.01 9.99 6.72 Leverage 2.7 3.75 oz trap 40.82 73.46 5.31 4.25 9.52 7.47 Thionex 1 1/3 qts 45.80 74.35 6.54 4.34 5.33 9.41 Leverage 2.7 3.75 oz 40.84 55.88 10.09 9.83 13.86 10.34 Danitol 10.67 oz 37.40 66.04 9.84 4.92 8.49 10.71 Belay 4 oz + Warrior II 1.92 oz 41.80 69.46 5.76 5.36 7.36 12.05 Endigo CX 4.5 fl oz 37.22 59.62 15.77 4.45 7.29 12.87 Torac 21.0 fl oz 41.09 50.05 7.78 13.06 10.66 18.44 Warrior II 1.92 oz 37.00 60.67 8.72 5.73 6.41 18.48 Lannate SP 1 lb Asana 9.6 fl oz 47.52 58.43 14.55 2.46 6.00 18.56 Dibrom 8E 1.0 pts trap1 45.75 46.33 10.55 11.54 10.69 20.89 Endigo ZCX 4.5 fl oz 41.79 57.33 7.84 4.94 8.47 21.44 Dibrom 8E 1.0 pts 37.70 53.13 8.12 2.79 9.26 26.70 Dimethoate 1 pt 40.84 47.82 6.60 11.83 6.62 27.13 Untreated 38.91 52.84 7.02 7.46 7.30 25.38 LSD (P=0.05) s 8.440 15.935 7.305 8.425 6.346 12.357 CV (%) 14.33 18.89 56.04 85.95 52.37 52.64 Unless otherwise specified all applications were made on 8 and 29 Aug. Treatments followed by trap were applied on 18 Jul after 1 st capture. Asana was applied on 15 Aug in addition to the Lannate applications on 8 and 29 Aug, H5608 planted 21 May and harvested 15-17 Sep

Stink bug efficacy, yield and quality Fruit quality (%) Treatment yield (t/a) reds greens sunburn rot stink bug Venom 70 SG 4 oz 39.24 60.83 12.44 10.01 9.99 6.72 Leverage 2.7 3.75 oz trap 40.82 73.46 5.31 4.25 9.52 7.47 Thionex 1 1/3 qts 45.80 74.35 6.54 4.34 5.33 9.41 Leverage 2.7 3.75 oz 40.84 55.88 10.09 9.83 13.86 10.34 Danitol 10.67 oz 37.40 66.04 9.84 4.92 8.49 10.71 Belay 4 oz + Warrior II 1.92 oz 41.80 69.46 5.76 5.36 7.36 12.05 Endigo CX 4.5 fl oz 37.22 59.62 15.77 4.45 7.29 12.87 Torac 21.0 fl oz 41.09 50.05 7.78 13.06 10.66 18.44 Warrior II 1.92 oz 37.00 60.67 8.72 5.73 6.41 18.48 Lannate SP 1 lb Asana 9.6 fl oz 47.52 58.43 14.55 2.46 6.00 18.56 Dibrom 8E 1.0 pts trap1 45.75 46.33 10.55 11.54 10.69 20.89 Endigo ZCX 4.5 fl oz 41.79 57.33 7.84 4.94 8.47 21.44 Dibrom 8E 1.0 pts 37.70 53.13 8.12 2.79 9.26 26.70 Dimethoate 1 pt 40.84 47.82 6.60 11.83 6.62 27.13 Untreated 38.91 52.84 7.02 7.46 7.30 25.38 LSD (P=0.05) s 8.440 15.935 7.305 8.425 6.346 12.357 CV (%) 14.33 18.89 56.04 85.95 52.37 52.64 Unless otherwise specified all applications were made on 8 and 29 Aug. Treatments followed by trap were applied on 18 Jul after 1 st capture. Asana was applied on 15 Aug in addition to the Lannate applications on 8 and 29 Aug, H5608 planted 21 May and harvested 15-17 Sep.

Stink bug efficacy, yield and quality Fruit quality (%) Treatment yield (t/a) reds greens sunburn rot stink bug Venom 70 SG 4 oz 39.24 60.83 12.44 10.01 9.99 6.72 Leverage 2.7 3.75 oz trap 40.82 73.46 5.31 4.25 9.52 7.47 Thionex 1 1/3 qts 45.80 74.35 6.54 4.34 5.33 9.41 Leverage 2.7 3.75 oz 40.84 55.88 10.09 9.83 13.86 10.34 Danitol 10.67 oz 37.40 66.04 9.84 4.92 8.49 10.71 Belay 4 oz + Warrior II 1.92 oz 41.80 69.46 5.76 5.36 7.36 12.05 Endigo CX 4.5 fl oz 37.22 59.62 15.77 4.45 7.29 12.87 Torac 21.0 fl oz 41.09 50.05 7.78 13.06 10.66 18.44 Warrior II 1.92 oz 37.00 60.67 8.72 5.73 6.41 18.48 Lannate SP 1 lb Asana 9.6 fl oz 47.52 58.43 14.55 2.46 6.00 18.56 Dibrom 8E 1.0 pts trap1 45.75 46.33 10.55 11.54 10.69 20.89 Endigo ZCX 4.5 fl oz 41.79 57.33 7.84 4.94 8.47 21.44 Dibrom 8E 1.0 pts 37.70 53.13 8.12 2.79 9.26 26.70 Dimethoate 1 pt 40.84 47.82 6.60 11.83 6.62 27.13 Untreated 38.91 52.84 7.02 7.46 7.30 25.38 LSD (P=0.05) s 8.440 15.935 7.305 8.425 6.346 12.357 CV (%) 14.33 18.89 56.04 85.95 52.37 52.64 Unless otherwise specified all applications were made on 8 and 29 Aug. Treatments followed by trap were applied on 18 Jul after 1 st capture. Asana was applied on 15 Aug in addition to the Lannate applications on 8 and 29 Aug,H5608 planted 21 May and harvested 15-17 Sep

Pre-Harvest Stink Bug Counts and Damage Evaluation

Stink bug efficacy, field evaluations Stink bug counts (per 4 ft) Stink bug damage (0-10) Treatment 21-Aug 28-Aug 5-Sep 21-Aug 28-Aug 5-Sep Venom 70 SG 4 oz 0.0 2.0 0.8 1.0 3.3 2.0 Leverage 2.7 3.75 oz trap 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 1.0 Thionex 1 1/3 qts 1.3 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.0 Leverage 2.7 3.75 oz 0.8 3.8 0.8 1.3 2.0 1.0 Danitol 10.67 oz 0.4 3.2 1.6 0.6 4.0 1.0 Belay 4 oz + Warrior II 1.92 oz v 1.5 0.5 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.0 Endigo CX 4.5 fl oz 0.5 3.0 3.3 1.0 2.0 2.0 Torac 21.0 fl oz 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 Warrior II 1.92 oz 0.8 1.3 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 Lannate SP 1 lb/asana 9.6 fl oz 0.5 1.0 2.3 1.3 1.0 2.0 Dibrom 8E 1.0 pts trap 0.3 2.3 2.5 1.5 4.0 2.3 Endigo ZCX 4.5 fl oz 1.3 1.3 0.3 2.8 1.8 0.7 Dibrom 8E 1.0 pts 0.0 0.5 4.3 1.5 1.8 1.7 Dimethoate 1 pt 1.0 3.3 3.0 2.8 3.5 3.7 Untreated 1.3 0.5 4.0 4.5 2.8 3.3 LSD (P=0.05) t NS s 3.05 3.23 1.93 2.24 1.39 CV (%) 149.46 133.74 120.69 80.74 71.74 55.45 Unless otherwise specified all applications were made on 8 and 29 Aug. Treatments followed by trap were applied on 18 Jul after 1 st capture. Asana was applied on 15 Aug in addition to the Lannate applications on 8 and 29 Aug, H5608 planted 21 May and harvested 15-17 Sep

Stink bug efficacy, field evaluations Stink bug counts (per 4 ft) Stink bug damage (0-10) Treatment 21-Aug 28-Aug 5-Sep 21-Aug 28-Aug 5-Sep Venom 70 SG 4 oz 0.0 2.0 0.8 1.0 3.3 2.0 Leverage 2.7 3.75 oz trap 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 1.0 Thionex 1 1/3 qts 1.3 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.0 Leverage 2.7 3.75 oz 0.8 3.8 0.8 1.3 2.0 1.0 Danitol 10.67 oz 0.4 3.2 1.6 0.6 4.0 1.0 Belay 4 oz + Warrior II 1.92 oz v 1.5 0.5 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.0 Endigo CX 4.5 fl oz 0.5 3.0 3.3 1.0 2.0 2.0 Torac 21.0 fl oz 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 Warrior II 1.92 oz 0.8 1.3 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 Lannate SP 1 lb/asana 9.6 fl oz 0.5 1.0 2.3 1.3 1.0 2.0 Dibrom 8E 1.0 pts trap 0.3 2.3 2.5 1.5 4.0 2.3 Endigo ZCX 4.5 fl oz 1.3 1.3 0.3 2.8 1.8 0.7 Dibrom 8E 1.0 pts 0.0 0.5 4.3 1.5 1.8 1.7 Dimethoate 1 pt 1.0 3.3 3.0 2.8 3.5 3.7 Untreated 1.3 0.5 4.0 4.5 2.8 3.3 LSD (P=0.05) t NS s 3.05 3.23 1.93 2.24 1.39 CV (%) 149.46 133.74 120.69 80.74 71.74 55.45 Unless otherwise specified all applications were made on 8 and 29 Aug. Treatments followed by trap were applied on 18 Jul after 1 st capture. Asana was applied on 15 Aug in addition to the Lannate applications on 8 and 29 Aug, H5608 planted 21 May and harvested 15-17 Sep

Stink Bug Project 2014 Overview Overwintering sites: Located in Fall 2014 singly or in groups up to 16 in leaf litter near late season tomatoes.

Stink Bug Project 2014 Overview Pheromone baited traps captured stink bugs before they were detected in the canopy, but quantities in traps did not correspond to canopy densities or damage observed.

Stink Bug Project 2014 Overview Thionex, Venom, Leverage, Belay + Warrior II and Endigo reduced damage. With the exception of Thionex, the only materials with apparent activity were pyrethroids, neonicotinoids or a combination of the two.

Acknowledgements CTRI Peter Goodell: UC IPM Kearney Ag Center Frank Zalom : UC Davis Entomology Les Ehler : Retired UC Davis Managers and PCAs of large scale ag operations in Fresno-area West Side Research and Extension Center

Questions? Tom Turini 559-375-3147 taturini@ucanr.edu)