Design and ERP data: Basic concepts. Caitlin M. Hudac Graduate student, Developmental Brain Laboratory

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Design and ERP data: Basic concepts. Caitlin M. Hudac Graduate student, Developmental Brain Laboratory"

Robyn French
5 years ago
Views:

1 Design and ERP data: Basic concepts Caitlin M. Hudac Graduate student, Developmental Brain Laboratory 1

2 Describe ERPs in terms of.. Peaks (positive or negative) Latency (post stimulus onset) Duration (e.g., slow wave) Scalp topography (maximal peak location) Source (location within the brain) Remember that: Current flow across the scalp Produces latency shias from one part of scalp to another Also produces amplitude shias across scalp Signals sum across the scalp large posifve wave on scalp meefng large negafve wave could sum to flat line! 2

3 What info do we collect? Time Space 2D: Scalp topographies 3D: Source esfmafon Person- speciﬁc characterisfcs Demographics: Age, gender, SES, etc. Constructs: Reading ability, temperament, emofon regulafon, social responsiveness, IQ, etc. 3

4 Time: Components P1 / P50 / P70 Peak amplitude and latency decrease with age (disappear, even) P50: Auditory inhibition à Sensory gating: 2 clicks presented quickly. 1 st amplitude < 2 nd amplitude. Reduced suppression in schizophrenia, neurodegenerative diseases. P1: Use pattern reversal (e.g. Plickering checkerboard) task. Largest over occipital regions. May relate to attention / arousal. 4

5 Time: Components N1 / N100 Selective attention to basic stimulus characteristics (necessary for later pattern recognition and discrimination processing). Auditory stimuli à larger N1 with shorter latency than visual stimuli (Hugdahl, 1995). Amplitude is larger in discrimination tasks, but smaller (if it exists at all) if short inter- stimulus intervals (ISIs). 5

6 Time: Components P2/ P200 Low inter- individual variability and high replicabilty. Often occurs together with the N1, yet peaks can be dissociated. Can be double- peaked. Amplitude increases with complexity of stimuli. 6

Time: Components Mismatch Negativity N2/ N200 Like Mismatch- negativity (e.g. Oddball paradigm), detection of deviation of subject s expectation but N2 only if subject is paying attention to stimuli.

7 Time: Components Mismatch Negativity N2/ N200 Like Mismatch- negativity (e.g. Oddball paradigm), detection of deviation of subject s expectation but N2 only if subject is paying attention to stimuli. MMN requires no attention! Interpretations: Orienting response, stimulus discrimination, target selection, response inhibition (e.g. Go- NoGo) N2 smaller in amplitude and shorter in latency for shorter ISIs. 7

8 Time: Components Jacques & Rossion, 2004 N170 Human face- processing (face vs. natural or human- made objects) Turns out, not specipic to faces but to expert object recognition! (Tanaka & Curran, 2001) 8

9 Time: Components P3a/ P300a Orienting replex Occurs when not required to actively respond to the targets Involuntary attention as well as inhibition (e.g. NoGo > Go) P3b/ P300b Controlled processing Subject must pay attention and respond to stimuli. Also fewer targets à larger peak. Variability: Amplitude (attention, stimulus relevance). Latency: stimulus complexity 9

10 Time: Components N4 / N400 Larger for unexpected, low probability (e.g. sentence endings): It was the Pirst day at work. He spread the warm bread with socks. Amplitude: Incongruent > Congruent Modality: Earlier in visual than auditory in temporal & frontal electrode sites. 10

11 Time: Components Late positive component Explicit and implicit recognition memory: (e.g. Old/new effect). 11

12 Time: Components Statistics? How do we decide what part of Fme to look at? A priori Principal Components Analysis Centroid Total Variance Factor 1 Factor 2 Factor 3 Factor 4 Factor 5 31% 15% 8.4% 6.6% 5.7% Factor 6 ms % 12

13 Time: Components Statistics? How do we decide what part of Fme to look at? A priori Principal Components Analysis Centroid Centroid Total Variance Factor 1 Factor 2 Factor 3 Factor 4 Factor 5 31% 15% 8.4% 6.6% 5.7% Factors Factor 6 ms % 13

14 Space (and Time) Electrode sites: Which sites reﬂect the variance in the ERP waveform? Example: PaVern- reversal task (800msà 4000ms) No Prisms With Prisms 14

15 2D Space Statistics? Step 1: IdenFfy what part of the waveform. Step 2: Run Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) on comparison of interest (e.g. Prism condifon). Centroid ANOVA results Factors 15 With Prism > No prisms No Prism > With prisms

16 3D Space Source Localization Step 1: IdenFfy what part of the waveform. Base upon temporal PCA factors and ANOVA results. 16

17 3D Space Source Localization Step 2: Using dipole models, esfmate what sources are most likely to generate the ERPs we see on the scalp. No prisms With prisms 17

18 3D Space Source Localization Step 3: Direct comparison of all dipoles across variable (e.g. prism condifon). No Prisms Somatosensory Primary somatosensory cortex Primary motor cortex Premotor cortex Frontal eye fields Polysensory associafon center Primary gustatory cortex Language Broca s area Wernicke s area ExecuFve and Memory Prefrontal cortex Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex Vision V1 V2 V3 SemanFc With Prisms Hippocampus Parahippocampus Cingulate cortex 18

19 Person- specipic characteristics How are people different? Across development infants vs children vs adults Cross- secfonal different individuals of the same age Longitudinal same individuals at different ages/fmes Gender SES Amount of sleep CogniFve abilifes IQ Reading ability Task performance 19

20 Increasing Positive Voltage Yellow Red Purple Increasing Negative Voltage Dark Blue 20

21 ERP to speech syllable ba Neonate Adult 21

22 QUESTIONS??? 22

ANALYZING EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS

Adavanced Lifespan Neurocognitive Development: EEG signal processing for lifespan research Dr. Manosusos Klados Liesa Ilg ANALYZING EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS Chair for Lifespan Developmental Neuroscience