Cross-protection between Sunn-hemp Mosaic and Tobacco Mosaic Viruses
|
|
- Arlene Clarke
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 J. gen. Virol. (1986), 67, Printed in Great Britain 1679 Key words: TMV/SHMV/coat protein/cross-protection/uneoating Cross-protection between Sunn-hemp Mosaic and Tobacco Mosaic Viruses By THOMAS M. ZINNEN*i" AND ROBERT W. FULTON Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, U.S.A. (Accepted 25 April 1986) SUMMARY Cross-protection reactions of two tobamoviruses, sunn-hemp mosaic virus (SHMV) and common tobacco mosaic virus (TMV-C), were investigated and compared. A mutant of SHMV (SHMV-n), produced by nitrous acid treatment, induced necrotic lesions in bean. SHMV protected completely against this mutant and against SHMV-n RNA. SHMV in bean protected only weakly, however, against TMV-C. To determine whether the coat protein of these viruses affected the ability to superinfect, RNA of each virus was encapsidated in the coat protein of the other. TMV-C RNA encapsidated in SHMV coat protein was five- to 27-fold less infectious on SHMVinfected bean leaves than TMV-C RNA re-encapsidated in TMV-C coat protein. When homologous or heterologous coat protein was added to inocula, infectivity for healthy plants was diminished markedly more by homologous protein, suggesting that extraneous homologous protein diminished infectivity by inhibiting viral uncoating. SHMV-n RNA encapsidated in TMV-C coat protein did not superinfect SHMVinfected bean leaves. Thus, although coat protein was shown to be a factor in crossprotection in some situations, other factors must also be involved. INTRODUCTION Strains of most viruses cross-protect infected plants against superinfection by related strains. The strength of the protection varies, but it may be strong enough to provide a practical control of plant virus infection (Rast, 1972; Costa & Muller, 1980). The phenomenon is also of interest from a theoretical aspect. One theory of the mechanism of cross-protection (Kohler & Hauschild, 1947) postulates a sequestering of an essential metabolite by the protecting virus. The specificity of protection, however, necessitates postulating specific metabolites for each virus, for which there is no evidence. Ross (1974) suggested that the protecting virus sequestered the majority of the ribosomes in a cell due to the rapid increase in mrna. Thus, nucleic acid of a second virus would find few ribosomes left for binding and would be degraded prior to expression. This theory is compatible with observations (Wenzel, 1971) that the first virus often inhibits a second virus, even if the two viruses are not related. It does not, however, explain the specificity of cross-protection. Gibbs (1969) thought that the RNA of a challenge virus might become irreversibly but ineffectually bound to the replicase of the virus already in the cell. The RNA of unrelated viruses would not bind and thus there would be no protection. Palukaitis & Zaitlin (1984) proposed that RNA complementary to viral RNA, such as that produced during replication of the viral RNA, might bind to the challenge RNA and prevent its expression. DeZoeten & Fulton (1975) suggested that when RNA of a second virus enters a cell containing a related virus it may be encapsidated by free coat protein before it can become replicated. Zaitlin (1976), however, showed that a mutant of tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) whose coat protein did not encapsidate RNA nevertheless reduced susceptibility to superinfection by common TMV (TMV-C) by about 70~. Moreover, Sarkar & Smitamana (1981) showed that t Present address: Agrigenetics Advanced Research Division, 5649 East Buckeye Road, Madison, Wisconsin 53716, U.S.A SGM
2 1680 T. M. ZINNEN AND R. W. FULTON half-leaves of Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Samsun-EN previously inoculated with a coat proteinfree mutant of TMV were less susceptible to infection by a necrotizing strain of TMV than were the mock-inoculated opposite half-leaves. More recently, Sherwood & Fulton (1982) presented evidence suggesting that coat protein may be involved in cross-protection in another way. Necrotizing strains of TMV, if sufficiently concentrated, induce necrotic lesions in dark green areas in leaves of Nicotiana sylvestris Spegaz & Comes systemically infected with TMV-C, but not in light green leaf areas (Fulton, 1951). Sherwood & Fulton (1982) found that the light green tissue of 'mosaic leaves' of N. sylvestris was superinfected if inoculated with RNA of necrotizing strains or with this RNA encapsidated in coat protein of the unrelated brome mosaic virus. This RNA encapsidated in TMV-C coat protein, however, did not superinfect the light green areas. TMV-N RNA failed, however, to induce lesions on N. sylvestris leaves inoculated a few days previously with a high concentration of TMV-C. Sherwood & Fulton (1982) concluded that necrotizing TMV failed to infect the light green areas of mosaic leaves of N. sylvestris because it was unable to uncoat, presumably due to the coat protein already present at the infection site. On the other hand, in locally inoculated leaves where TMV-C was multiplying actively, other factors seemed to prevent superinfection. Wilson & Watkins (1986) showed that extraneous TMV-C coat protein inhibited the in vitro co-translational disassembly of TMV-C virions previously treated briefly at ph 8. They suggested that the added coat protein interfered with uncoating or induced re-encapsidation of partially uncoated viral RNA. They proposed, by analogy, that high levels of free coat protein on mosaic leaves of plants systemically infected with TMV may reverse or prevent the initial release of coat protein from the 5' end of challenge TMV. Dodds et al. (1985) found that RNA, but not virions, of a strain of cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) superinfected tomato leaves containing a mild strain of CMV. Superinfection occurred only in inoculated leaves, but symptoms of the challenge virus did not appear. Double-stranded RNA and virions of the challenge strain were identified and distinguished from those of the protecting strain by electrophoresis. There is other evidence that superinfection may occur and that the challenge virus may multiply without causing symptoms (Cassels & Herrick, 1977; Barker & Harrison, 1978). In spite of this we have taken as evidence of superinfection the development of symptoms (necrotic lesions in our system) following challenge inoculation. The presence of small amounts of challenge virus may be difficult to detect in the presence of large amounts of protecting virus in extracts of challenged leaves. If no symptoms occur following challenge, replication is presumably more restricted than in unprotected leaves, and such leaves may still be considered as protected. We have investigated cross-protection between two distinct tobamoviruses, sunn-hemp mosaic virus (SHMV) and TMV-C, and between SHMV and a necrotizing mutant (SHMV-n), to determine the effect of coat protein in such protection. SHMV and TMV-C are more distantly related than the strains of TMV investigated by Sherwood & Fulton (1982), and other factors in addition to coat protein might be expected to affect cross-protection. The host ranges of the viruses also differ and the host might be expected to affect cross-protection. METHODS Viruses. SHMV is a tobamovirus distinct from TMV-C (Zaitlin et al., 1977; Van De Walle & Siegel, 1982). The amino acid sequences of the coat proteins differ in 96 residues; moreover, SHMV coat protein has 162 amino acid residues (Meshi et al., 1982) while TMV-C has 158. SHMV is morphologically similar to TMV-C. It has been referred to as the bean strain or the cowpea strain of TMV. Kassanis & Verma (1975) have given it the status of a distinct virus and we follow this practice. Reactions of various plants to the viruses used are given in Table 1. Because we had no way to test SHMV for its ability to cross-protect against a closely related strain, a necrotizing mutant (SHMV-n) was produced by nitrous acid mutagenesis as described by Siegel (1965). The selected mutant induced necrotic primary lesions and systemic necrosis in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and induced systemic mosaic in cowpea [ Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. It reacted strongly with SHMV-specific antiserum. Inoculations were made on corundum-dusted leaves with virus suspended in 30 mm-phosphate buffer ph 8. SHMV was propagated in primary leaves of Pinto bean. TMV-C was propagated in N. sylvestris or in N. tabacum
3 Cross-protection between tobamoviruses 1681 Table 1. Viruses and the reaction of selected host plants* P. vulgaris CV r ~ ~ N. tabacum Virus Pinto Black Turtle Bountiful N. sylvestris cv. Xanthi-nc SHMV M M M LL LL SHMV-n~" LL + SL LL + SL LL + SL LL LL TMV-C LL LL - M LL SBMV LL M M * M, Mosaic; LL, local necrotic lesions; SL, systemic necrotic lesions and mosaic; -, no reaction. t Mutant generated from SHMV. L. cv. Havana 38. Both viruses were purified as described by Sherwood & Fulton (1982). Southern bean mosaic virus (SBMV) was purified from inoculated primary leaves of Bountiful bean as described by Hull (1977). Isolation of viral RNA and coat protein. RNA was prepared by the water-saturated phenol method of Ralph & Berquist (1967) as modified by Sherwood & Fulton (1982). Coat protein was prepared by the glacial acetic acid method of Fraenkel-Conrat (1957), except that pelleted coat protein was resuspended in 0.2 M-borate buffer ph 8. Encapsidation of viral RNA in coat protein. Viral RNA was encapsidated in either SHMV or TMV-C coat protein by the method of Richards & Williams (1972). Coat protein was dialysed against 50 m~t-acetate ph 4.7, until the preparation became cloudy. It was then dialysed at room temperature for 24 to 48 h against three changes of 41 ram-sodium phosphate ph 7.1 (equivalent to 0.1 ionic strength). Sufficient RNA to make a protein : RNA ratio of 40 : 1 was added to the protein. The mixture was incubated overnight at room temperature. Virus was collected by a cycle of low- and high-speed centrifugation. Pellets were resuspended in 3 mm-edta ph 7.0. Tests for superinfection, cross-protection and inoeulum interference. Cross-protection tests were done in two ways. In the first, one half of a leaf was inoculated with the protecting virus, and the opposite half was mock-inoculated. Four to 6 days later, the entire leaf was inoculated with the challenge virus. The extent of superinfection was expressed as an average of the ratios calculated by dividing the number of lesions in a protected half-leaf by the number in the opposite, mock-inoculated half-leaf. Because the protecting and challenge viruses were applied to the same leaf, this protection was called 'local protection'. In the second, seedlings were inoculated with the protecting virus; mock-inoculated seedlings served as controls. Challenge inoculations were made on systemically infected leaves and on comparable leaves of mock-inoculated plants, and therefore are referred to as tests for 'systemic protection'. Usually the first trifoliolate leaf of beans was used; second trifoliolate leaves were used when tests required distinct light and dark green areas, which were most distinct on these leaves. Both types of leaves are referred to as 'mosaic leaves'. When comparing two treatments, one was applied to the left leaflet and the other to the right leaflet. Healthy plants of the same age served as controls. In tests involving the effect of added coat protein on virus infectivity, which we termed inoculum interference, mixed inoculum was applied to one half of a leaf while inoculum containing only the same concentration of necrotizing virus was applied to the opposite half. The infectivity of the mixed inoculum was expressed as a percentage of lesions formed by the necrotizing virus alone. Values in tables are averages followed by standard errors. RESULTS Cross-protection of SHM V against TM V-C, SBM V and SHM V-n By selecting appropriate host plants, SHMV, TMV-C and SBMV could be evaluated as both protecting and challenge viruses in tests of local protection. SBMV is an icosahedral virus with single-stranded, messenger-sense RNA ; it is unrelated to the tobamoviruses and was included as an assay for any general decrease in susceptibility to superinfection due to infection by an unrelated virus (Wenzel, 1971). In tests for local protection, SHMV did not induce lesions in half-leaves of N. sylvestris inoculated 5 days before with 100 tig/ml TMV-C. In the reciprocal test, TMV-C induced 79/o as many lesions on half-leaves of Pinto bean inoculated 5 days before with 1 mg/ml SHMV, as compared to control half-leaves. SBMV, however, induced 76% as many lesions on SHMV-infected half-leaves of Pinto bean as on control half-leaves. Yet when SBMV (1 mg/ml) was tested as the protecting virus on P. vulgaris cv. Black Turtle bean, TMV-C induced only 6% as many lesions on half-leaves inoculated 6 days before with SBMV, as compared to control half-leaves.
4 1682 Table 2. T. M. ZINNEN AND R, W. FULTON Cross-protection by SHMV in Pinto bean against TMV-C particles and against equivalent amounts of TMV-C RNA Lesions per leaflet* Amount t J" Inoculum (!ag/ml) Healthy (H) Mosaic (Mi Ratio M/H RNA _ Virions _ _ RNA _ Virions _ * Values are averages, from six replicates per trial, of TMV-C lesions/leaflet on first trifoliolate leaves of healthy and of mosaic Pinto beans. To test the ability of SHMV to protect beans systemically against the necrotizing mutant, SHMV-n was applied at 12 ~tg/ml to first trifoliolate mosaic leaves of Pinto bean and to healthy plants. In two trials with five replicates per trial, previously healthy leaves developed averages of 6.4 and 6.9 lesions per cm 2, Mosaic leaves developed no lesions at all. An 80-fold increase of SHMV-n in the inoculum (to 1 mg/ml) also failed to induce lesions in protected leaves. Sherwood & Fulton (1982) found that the RNA of a necrotizing strain (TMV-N) was more efficient than intact TMV-N in superinfecting mosaic N. sylvestris leaves. To see whether SHMV behaved similarly, its RNA (50 ~tg/ml) and SHMV-n (10 gtg/ml) were applied to opposite leaflets of the first trifoliolate leaves of mosaic and healthy Pinto bean. In two trials with four replicates per trial, lesions averaging 67 and 178 per leaflet appeared in previously healthy leaflets inoculated with SHMV-n RNA and SHMV, respectively. No lesions were produced on mosaic leaves by either inoculum. Thus, unlike TMV-C, SHMV protected completely against an RNA inoculum of a necrotic mutant. It was of interest to determine whether this degree of protection would extend to the distantly related TMV-C. SBMV was also tested as a challenge virus to detect any general decrease in susceptibility to superinfection. In two trials in which Pinto beans systemically infected with SHMV were challenged with TMV-C and SBMV, SBMV induced as many lesions in previously healthy leaves as in SHMV-infected leaves (superinfection ratios of 1.02 and 1.13). TMV-C, however, induced fewer lesions in SHMV-infected leaves than in previously healthy leaves (superinfection ratios of 0.31 and 0.33). It should be noted that TMV-C induced lesions in both dark green and light green areas of mosaic leaves, in contrast to the inability of TMV-N to superinfect light green areas of mosaic leaves of N. sylvestris (Fulton, 1951). Moreover, the RNA of TMV-C was no more efficient than intact TMV-C in superinfecting bean leaves containing SHMV (Table 2). The protecting capacity of SHMV in bean was complete against a closely related mutant, but weak in both light green and dark green areas against the distantly related TMV-C. To test whether another protecting virus unrelated to TMV-C would provide incomplete protection, SBMV was tested as a systemic protectant against TMV-C. In two trials with SBMV as a protecting virus in Black Turtle bean and TMV-C (1, 5 and 25 ~tg/ml) as challenge virus, the superinfection ratios averaged 0.64, with a median of 0-59 and a range of 0.46 to The suppression of superinfection provided by SBMV was about one-half of that provided by SHMV. Systemic cross-protection by TMV-C against SHMV in N. sylvestris Previous results on cross-protection between strains of TMV had been obtained mainly with N. sylvestris as the host. This host also could be used to test cross-protection by TMV-C against SHMV, which causes primary necrotic lesions in N. sylvestris. SHMV (30 I.tg/ml) was applied to leaves of N. sylvestris systemically infected with TMV-C and to healthy plants. Mosaic leaves developed on average 9.5 lesions per leaf, while previously healthy leaves averaged 83 lesions per leaf. SHMV superinfected mosaic leaves, but lesions developed only in dark green areas, behaving in this respect in the same way as TMV-N (Sherwood & Fulton, 1982).
5 Cross-protection between tobamoviruses 1683 Sherwood & Fulton (1982) showed that TMV-N RNA, or TMV-N treated with bentonite, induced lesions in both dark and light green areas of mosaic leaves of N. sylvestris. To determine if SHMV behaved similarly, half-leaves of TMV-C-infected N. sylvestris and of healthy plants were inoculated with 1.5 Ixg/ml SHMV RNA. Opposite half-leaves were inoculated with 30 Ixg/ml SHMV. SHMV induced an average of 522 lesions per half-leaf in previously healthy leaves and 20 lesions per half-leaf in mosaic leaves. Lesions induced by SHMV RNA induced an average of 131 lesions in control leaves and 5-5 lesions in mosaic leaves. Neither SHMV nor SHMV RNA induced lesions in light green areas of mosaic leaves, and neither did SHMV treated with 1 mg/ml bentonite. Thus, SHMV and TMV-N behaved differently in superinfection of N. sylvestris. These experiments provided no evidence that coat protein was involved in cross-protection reactions between TMV-C and SHMV. Heterologous eneapsidation and superinfection To determine whether SHMV-n RNA could superinfect SHMV-infected bean if encapsidated in coat protein of T MV-C (which readily superinfects), SHMV-n RN A was encapsidated in coat protein of either TMV-C or SHMV. When healthy leaflets of Bountiful bean were inoculated with SHMV-n RNA in TMV-C coat protein (50 ~tg/ml) an average of 449 lesions were formed per leaflet. When healthy leaflets were inoculated with SHMV-n RNA in SHMV coat protein (10 ~tg/ml) an average of 243 lesions were formed per leaflet. Mosaic leaves developed no lesions at all. Repeated attempts to detect SHMV-n in these leaves by subinoculations to healthy Pinto beans were unsuccessful. The complete protection of beans infected with SHMV against superinfection by SHMV-n raised a question regarding the specificity of superinfection. To test this, SHMV-n (10 ~tg/ml) and TMV-C (10 ~tg/ml) were applied to opposite leaflets of SBMV-infected Black Turtle beans and to healthy plants. Lesions induced by SHMV-n and TMV-C averaged 31 and 45 per leaflet, respectively, in infected bean, and 59 and 71 on previously healthy leaves. Superinfection ratios were 0.52 for SHMV-n and 0.56 for TMV-C. Prevention of superinfection by SHMV-n in bean infected by SHMV appeared to be a specific reaction. It seemed possible that TMV-C readily superinfected SHMV-infected bean leaves because the SHMV coat protein in the bean leaves was sufficiently different from the coat protein of the TMV-C for it not to inhibit uncoating. If this were so, then SHMV might inhibit the uncoating of and infection by a virus composed of TMV-C RNA encapsidated in SHMV coat protein. Such heterologously encapsidated virus (Het-TMV-C), and TMV-C RNA reconstituted in TMV-C coat protein (Recon-TMV-C) were prepared. To confirm that heterologously encapsidated particles containing TMV-C RNA were formed, preparations were examined in the electron microscope. Particles typical of TMV were seen. To test for full-length infectious particles, RNase at 10 ng/ml was added to the heterologously encapsidated preparations, to native TMV-C and to TMV-C RNA. After 30 min the infectivities of these preparations were compared on Pinto bean. Treatment with RNase eliminated all infectivity of TMV-C RNA, but reduced infectivity of the other preparations by only about 50~. The superinfecting capacity of the heterologously encapsidated TMV-C RNA and the reconstituted TMV-C were compared on opposite leaflets of SHMV-infected Pinto bean and on healthy beans. Protection against the heterologously encapsidated TMV-C RNA was five- to 27- fold stronger than against the reconstituted TMV-C (Table 3, Fig. 1). When heterologously encapsidated TMV-C RNA was inoculated to SHMV-infected bean with light and dark green areas, lesions developed in both areas, as with TMV-C. Interference by added coat protein on virus infectivity Previous results from this work and from others (Atabekov et al., 1970; Wilson & Watkins, 1986) suggested that an early stage in the infection process was affected by coat protein. It was thought that if coat protein present in protected leaves decreased superinfection, such a decrease might be mimicked by adding purified coat protein to the inoculum of challenge virus. To test for such interference, SHMV and TMV-C coat proteins (1 mg/ml prepared as for encapsidating RNA) were added separately to TMV-C and SHMV inocula (0.25 ~tg/ml, in 41 ram-phosphate,
6 1684 T. M. ZINNEN AND R. W. FULTON Fig. 1. Lesions induced by TMV-C RNA encapsidated in (a, c) SHMV coat protein or in (b, d) TMV-C coat protein on (a, b) healthy Pinto bean leaf or on (c, d) SHMV-infected Pinto bean leaf. T a b l e 3. Comparison of cross-protection by S H M V in Pinto bean against TMV-C RNA encapsidated in S H M V coat protein (Het-TMV-C) with cross-protection against TMV-C RNA encapsidated in TMV-C coat protein (Recon-TMV-C) Trial Virus (100 lag/ml) Recon-TMV-C Het-TMV-C Recon-TMV-C Het-TMV-C Recon-TMV-C Het-TMV-C Lesions per leaflet* r '~ Healthy (H) Mosaic (M) _ Ratio M/H * Values are averages, from five to seven replicates per trial, of lesions per leaflet on first trifoliolate leaves of healthy and of mosaic Pinto beans. p H 7.1). Infectivities o f m i x e d and control inocula were c o m p a r e d in N. tabacum cv. X a n t h i - n c. T M V - C i n o c u l u m s u p p l e m e n t e d w i t h T M V - C protein or w i t h S H M V protein i n d u c e d 11 ~ a n d 790/oo as m a n y lesions as the control respectively. T h e opposite effect was o b t a i n e d w i t h S H M V : w h e n m i x e d w i t h T M V - C protein or w i t h S H M V protein, S H M V particles i n d u c e d 6 9 ~ a n d 1 6 ~ as m a n y lesions as the control respectively. Thus, infectivity was d e c r e a s e d m o r e w h e n whole virus i n o c u l u m was m i x e d w i t h h o m o l o g o u s c o a t p r o t e i n t h a n w i t h heterologous c o a t protein.
7 160 "~ ' ~. 80 6o I I I Cross-protection between tobamoviruses I ~ l l,6o t ~ 40.o 20 O O I I 10 l's vs 103 Protein added (~tg/ml) 011 l l I II ' Protein added (pg/ml) Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 2. Effect of TMV-C protein (O) and SHMV protein (ZS) on the infectivity of TMV-C RNA encapsidated in TMV-C coat protein on primary leaves of healthy Pinto bean. Fig. 3. Effect of TMV-C protein (O) and SHMV protein (Z~x) on the infectivity of TMV-C RNA encapsidated in SHMV coat protein on primary leaves of healthy Pinto bean. Similarly, TMV-C coat protein interfered more than SHMV coat protein with infection by reconstituted TMV-C in Pinto bean (Fig. 2). SHMV coat protein interfered more than TMV-C coat protein with the infectivity of TMV-C RNA encapsidated in SHMV protein (Fig. 3). Interference was consistently stronger when the added coat protein was the same as the protein in the virus particle. A time course trial showed that interference did not increase with time after mixing the inoculum with coat protein (data not shown). The decrease in TMV-C infectivity resulting from the addition of coat protein appeared to be specific because the addition of TMV-C coat protein to SBMV inoculum slightly increased its infectivity on Pinto bean. DISCUSSION SHMV and SBMV incompletely protected Black Turtle bean against TMV-C in tests of both local and systemic protection. SHMV incompletely protected Pinto bean against TMV-C but not against SBMV in tests of both local and systemic protection. Since SBMV conferred some protection against TMV-C, at least some of the protection by SHMV against TMV-C might have been due to a non-specific effect. The weak protection of SHMV against TMV-C in contrast to the lack of protection of SHMV against SBMV, however, suggests that the interaction between the two tobamoviruses is specific. Including SBMV as an assay for general effects leads apparently to contradictory conclusions, and shows the difficulty in describing protection as specific. Cross-protection by SHMV against its necrotizing mutant appeared to be complete, in contrast to the protection resulting from infection of N. sylvestris by TMV-C against the closely related TMV-N (Sherwood & Fulton, 1982) and against the distantly related SHMV. Furthermore, while SHMV induced lesions only in dark green areas of mosaic N. sylvestris leaves, TMV-C induced lesions in both light green and dark green areas of mosaic bean leaves. The host is evidently a factor in determining the completeness of the cross-protection reaction. The failure of SHMV-n RNA to cause lesions in SHMV-infected bean leaves, and of SHMV RNA to cause lesions in light green areas of mosaic leaves of N. sylvestris, indicates that
8 1686 T. M. ZINNEN AND R. W. FULTON unknown factors other than coat protein must prevent the development of the symptoms of and possibly the replication of the challenge virus. But because these unknown factors completely block superinfection, any inhibitory effect of coat protein would be masked. We could test, however, whether coat protein promotes superinfection. SHMV-n RNA encapsidated in TMV- C coat protein, however, failed to superinfect mosaic bean leaves; thus, there is no evidence that coat protein of a successful challenge virus promotes superinfection by a challenge RNA which alone did not superinfect. To detect inhibition of superinfection by coat protein, a challenge virus, or at least its RNA, must induce lesions in the protected leaves. The effect of coat protein on superinfectivity can then be measured by encapsidating the successful challenge RNA in various coat proteins, and assaying the infectivity of the virions in healthy leaves and in protected leaves. The decreased superinfectivity on SHMV-infected bean leaves of TMV-C RNA encapsidated in SHMV coat protein rather than in TMV-C coat protein indicated that SHMV coat protein somehow inhibited superinfection. In this case, the coat protein encapsidating the challenge RNA was the same as that of the protecting virus. This result led us to test directly the effect of added coat protein on the infectivity of virus in healthy plants. The addition of homologous coat protein to the inoculum decreased the infectivity of both native and re-encapsidated virus on healthy plants more than the addition of heterologous coat protein. Our results confirm those of Atabekov et al. (1970) with TMV-C and cucumber virus 4, although we disagree with their suggestion that the inhibition of infection by homologous coat protein indicates the presence of a specific binding site in plant cells for plant viruses. The inhibiting effect of added homologous protein on infectivity and superinfectivity is the result that would be expected if uncoating of a virus is affected by extraneous identical protein. Brakke & Van Pelt (1969) proposed that uncoating of TMV in vitro is a reversible reaction in which the virus particle is the reagent, and coat protein and partially stripped particles (and eventually naked RNA) are products. Pelcher et al. (1980) showed that added TMV-C coat protein slowed the rate of uncoating in vitro of TMV-C and a tomato isolate of TMV. They concluded that coat protein in solution may play a major role in the production and stabilization of partially uncoated virus particles. They noted, however, that extensive reversal of disassembly did not occur under their conditions. Wilson & Watkins (1986) showed that TMV coat protein preferentially inhibited the co-translational disassembly of TMV virions in vitro, and suggested the inhibition of uncoating proposed by Sherwood & Fulton (1982) results from the prevention of the initial release of a few coat protein subunits from the 5' end of the challenge virus RNA. Our results of tests with plants are consistent with the predictions of hypotheses derived from tests in vitro. We thank G. A. dezoeten for suggestions and S. A. Vicen for art work and photography. This research was supported by the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin. REFERENCES ATABEKOV, J. G., NOVIKOV, V. K., VISHNICHENKO, V. K. & JAVAKHIA, V. K. (1970). A study of the mechanisms controlling the host range of plant viruses. II. The host range of hybrid viruses reconstituted in vitro and of free viral RNA. Virology 41, BARKER, H. & HARRISON, B. D. (1978). Double infection, interference and superinfection in protoplasts exposed to two strains of raspberry ringspot virus. Journal of General Virology 40, BRAKKE, M. K. & VAN PELT, N. (1969). Influence of bentonite, magnesium, and polyamines on degradation and aggregation of tobacco mosaic virus. Virology 39, CASSELS, A. C. & I-I]/RRICK, C. C. (1977). Cross protection between mild and severe strains of tobacco mosaic virus in doubly inoculated tomato plants. Virology 78, COSTA, A. S. & MULLER, G. W. (1980). Tristeza control by cross protection: a U.S.-Braziiian cooperative success. Plant Disease 64, DEZOETEN, G. A. & FULTON, R. w. (1975). Understanding generates possibilities. Phytopathology 65, DODDS, J. A., LEE, S. Q. & TIFFANY, M. (1985). Cross protection between strains of cucumber mosaic virus: effect of host and type of inoculum on accumulation of virions and double-stranded RNA of the challenge strain. Virology 144, FRAENKEL-CONRAT, H. (1957). Degradation of tobacco mosaic virus with acetic acid. Virology 4, 1-4. FULTON, R. W. (1951). Superinfection by strains of tobacco mosaic virus. Phytopathology 41,
9 Cross-protection between tobamoviruses 1687 GIBBS, A. J. (1969). Plant virus classification. Advances in Virus Research 14, HULL, a. (1977). The banding behaviour of the viruses of southern bean mosaic virus group in gradients of caesium sulphate. Virology 79, KASSANIS, a. & VARMA, A. (1975). Sunn-hemp mosaic virus. Commonwealth Mycological Institute/Association of Applied Biologists Descriptions of Plant Viruses, No KOHLER, E. & nauscmld, I. (1947). Betrachtungen und versuche zum Problem der "erwarbenen Immunit~t" gegen Virusinfektionen bei Pflanzen. Zfichter 17/18, MESHI, x., OnNO, T. ~ OKADA, V. (1982). Nucleotide sequence of the 30 K protein cistron of cowpea strain of tobacco mosaic virus. Nucleic Acids Research 10, PALUKAITIS, P. & ZAITLIN, M. (1984). A model to explain the 'cross-protection' phenomenon shown by plant viruses and viroids. In Plant-Microbe Interactions: Molecular and Genetic Perspectives, pp Edited by T. Kosuge & E. W. Nester. London & New York: Macmillan. PELCHER, L. E., WALMSLEY, S. L. & MACKENZIE, S. L. (1980). The effects of heterologous and homologous coat protein on alkaline disassembly of tobacco and tomato isolates of tobacco mosaic virus. Virology 105, RALPH, R. K. & BErtQUIST, B. L. (1967). Separation of viruses into components. Methods in Virology 2, RAST, A. "r. B. (1972). M II-16, an artificial symptomless mutant of tobacco mosaic virus for seedling inoculation of tomato crops. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 78, RICttARDS, K. E. & WILLIAMS, R. C. (1972). Assembly of tobacco mosaic virus in vitro: effect of state of polymerization of the protein component. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 69, Ross, A. F. (1974). Interaction of viruses in the host. Acta horticulturae 36, d. sarkar, S. & SMITAMANA, P. (1981). A proteinless mutant of tobacco mosaic virus: evidence against the role of a viral coat protein for interference. Molecular and General Genetics 184, Snl~l~wooD, J. L. & fulton, R. W. (1982). The specific involvement of coat protein in tobacco mosaic virus cross protection. Virology 119, SIEGEL, h. (1965). Artificial production of mutants of tobacco mosaic virus. Advances in Virus Research 11, VAN DE WALLE, M. J. SIEGEL, A. (1982). Relationships between strains of tobacco mosaic virus and other selected plant viruses. Phytopathology 72, WENZEL, t3. (1971). Vergleichende Untersuchungen des Interferenzverhaltens phytopathogener Viren auf Tabak. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 71, WILSON, T. M. A. & WATKINS, P. A. C. (1986). Influence of exogenous viral coat protein on the cotranslational disassembly of tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) particles in vitro. Virology 149, ZAITLIN, M. (1976). Viral cross protection: more understanding is needed. Phytopathology 66, ZAITLIN, M., BEACHY, R. N. & BRUENING, G. (1977). Lack of molecular hybridization between RNAs of two strains of TMV: reconsideration of the criteria for strain relationships. Virology 82, (Received 9 January 1986)
cycles of ultracentrifugation and analysis with the spectrophotometer (E2-0
Physiology and Biochemistry Replication and Properties of Cowpea Chlorotic Mottle Virus in Resistant Cowpeas S. D. Wyatt and C. W. Kuhn Department of Plant Pathology and Plant Genetics, University of Georgia,
More informationAttenuated Isolates of Cucumber Mosaic Virus Produced by Satellite RNA and Cross Protection between Attenuated Isolates and Virulent Ones
Attenuated Isolates of Cucumber Mosaic Virus Produced by Satellite RNA and Cross Protection between Attenuated Isolates and Virulent Ones Kouji YOSHIDA*, Tadanori GOTO* and Norio IIZUKA* Key Words: attenuated
More informationTOBAMOVIRUS STRAIN P101 ISOLATED FROM PEPPER IN BULGARIA
TOBAMOVIRUS STRAIN P101 ISOLATED FROM PEPPER IN BULGARIA E. Stoimenova 1, A. Yordanova 2 Institute of Genetics, Sofia, Bulgaria 1 National Bank for Industrial Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Sofia, Bulgaria
More informationGenomic RNA of an insect virus directs synthesis of infectious virions in plants
Proc. Nail. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 87, pp. 434-438, January 1990 Biochemistry Genomic RNA of an insect virus directs synthesis of infectious virions in plants (viral host range/nodavirus/drosophila) BERNARD
More informationPersistent Infection of MDCK Cells by Influenza C Virus: Initiation and Characterization
J. gen. Virol. (199), 70, 341-345. Printed in Great Britain 341 Key words: influenza C virus/interferon/persistent infection Persistent Infection of MDCK Cells by Influenza C Virus: Initiation and Characterization
More informationApparent Symbiotic Interaction Between Particles of Tobacco Rattle Virus
J. gen. ViroL (1967), 1, 57-70 With 1 plate Printed in Great Britain 57 Apparent Symbiotic Interaction Between Particles of Tobacco Rattle Virus By R. R. FROST,* B. D. HARRISONt AND R. D. WOODS Rothamsted
More informationChanges Induced by Magnesium Ions in the Morphology of Some Plant Viruses with Filamentous Particles
J. gen. Virol. (I97I), I3, 127-132 Printed in Great Britain 127 Changes Induced by Magnesium Ions in the Morphology of Some Plant Viruses with Filamentous Particles By D. A. GOVIER AND R. D. WOODS Rothamsted
More informationMultiplication of RNA Plant Viruses. C.L. Mandahar
Multiplication of RNA Plant Viruses C.L. Mandahar MULTIPLICATION OF RNA PLANT VIRUSES Multiplication of RNA Plant Viruses by C. L. MANDAHAR Botany Department, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India A C.I.P.
More informationLab Tuesday: Virus Diseases
Lab Tuesday: Virus Diseases Quiz for Bacterial Pathogens lab (pp 67-73) and Biocontrol of Crown Gall (p. 113-117), Observation of Viral Movement in Plants (p. 119), and Intro section for Viruses (pp. 75-77).
More informationLab Tuesday: Virus Diseases
Lab Tuesday: Virus Diseases Quiz for Bacterial Pathogens lab (pp 69-75) and Biocontrol of Crown Gall (p. 115-119), Observation of Viral Movement in Plants (p. 121), and Intro section for Viruses (pp. 77-79).
More informationUltrastructure of Mycoplasmatales Virus laidlawii x
J. gen. Virol. (1972), I6, 215-22I Printed in Great Britain 2I 5 Ultrastructure of Mycoplasmatales Virus laidlawii x By JUDY BRUCE, R. N. GOURLAY, AND D. J. GARWES R. HULL* Agricultural Research Council,
More informationBY F. BROWN, B. CARTWRIGHT AND DOREEN L. STEWART Research Institute (Animal Virus Diseases), Pirbright, Surrey. (Received 22 August 1962) SUMMARY
J. gen. Microbial. (1963), 31, 179186 Prinied in Great Britain 179 The Effect of Various Inactivating Agents on the Viral and Ribonucleic Acid Infectivities of FootandMouth Disease Virus and on its Attachment
More informationVirus-host interactions
Virus-host interactions - Strategies viruses use to replicate their genomes in susceptible host cells replication - Strategies viruses use to move their genomes throughout susceptible host plants cell-to-cell
More informationUnequal Variation in the Two Genome Parts of Tobraviruses and Evidence for the Existence of Three Separate Viruses
J. gen. Virol. (1985), 66, 171-176. Printed in Great Britain 171 Key words: tobravirus/tr V serotypes/peb V/RNA sequence homology Unequal Variation in the Two Genome Parts of Tobraviruses and Evidence
More informationGenetic Analysis of Cucumber Mosaic, Peanut Stunt and Chrysanthemum Mild Mottle Viruses
Ann. Phytopath. Soc. Japan 46: 159-168 (1980) Genetic Analysis of Cucumber Mosaic, Peanut Stunt and Chrysanthemum Mild Mottle Viruses Kaoru HANADA* and Hiroshi TOCHIHARA* Abstract Four strains of cucumber
More informationvirus is inactivated by such dilutions (Afanasiev and Morris, 1952; Kim and Hagendorn, 1959; Patino and Zaumeyer, 1959; Smith, 1957;
STABILITY OF TOBACCO-MOSAIC VIRUS, MARMOR TABACI H, IN SOLUTIONS DILUTED BEYOND THE END POINT OF INFECTIVITY H. H. THORNBERRY AND B. B. NAGAICH' Department of Plant Pathology, University of Illinois, Urbana,
More informationNew Insights in Freesia Leaf Necrosis Disease
New Insights in Freesia Leaf Necrosis Disease E.T.M. Meekes 1 and M. Verbeek 2 1 Naktuinbouw, P.O. Box 40, 2370 AA Roelofarendsveen, The Netherlands 2 Plant Research International, P.O. Box 69, 6700 AB
More informationProject Title: Development of a method for conducting tests for resistance to tombusviruses and lettuce dieback in the greenhouse.
I. Abstract. Project Title: Development of a method for conducting tests for resistance to tombusviruses and lettuce dieback in the greenhouse. Project Investigators: Drs. William M. Wintermantel and Ivan
More informationVirology. *Viruses can be only observed by electron microscope never by light microscope. The size of the virus: nm in diameter.
Virology We are going to start with general introduction about viruses, they are everywhere around us; in food; within the environment; in direct contact to etc.. They may cause viral infection by itself
More informationby Attenuated Virus Control of Tomato Mosaic Disease ByNOBUYUKIOSHIMA* Effects of attenuated virus inoculation History of attenuated virus in Japan
Control of Tomato Mosaic Disease by Attenuated Virus ByNOBUYUKIOSHIMA* First Research Division, Institute for Plant Virus Research The mosaic disease of tomato which is caused by tobacco mosaic virus(tmv)
More informationJournal of Agricultural Technology 2012 Vol. 8(4): Journal of Agricultural
Journal of Agricultural Technology 2012 Vol. 8(4): 1389-1395 Journal of Agricultural Available Technology online http://www.ijat-aatsea.com 2012, Vol. 8(4): 1389-1395 ISSN 1686-9141 The effect of the decreased
More informationOverview: Chapter 19 Viruses: A Borrowed Life
Overview: Chapter 19 Viruses: A Borrowed Life Viruses called bacteriophages can infect and set in motion a genetic takeover of bacteria, such as Escherichia coli Viruses lead a kind of borrowed life between
More informationDouble-stranded, Replicative Form RNA Molecules of Cowpea Mosaic Virus Are Not Infectious
J. gen. Virol. (1985), 66, 925-930. Printed in Great Britain 925 Key words : CPM V/replicatire Jbrm RNA Double-stranded, Replicative Form RNA Molecules of Cowpea Mosaic Virus Are Not Infectious By M. SHANKS,
More informationThe Inactivation of Virus in Cultured Shoot Tips of Nicotiana rustica L.
J. gen. ViroL (1969), 5, 237-24I With I plate Printed in Great Britain 237 The Inactivation of Virus in Cultured Shoot Tips of Nicotiana rustica L. By D. G. A. WALKEY, JANET FITZPATRICK JUDITH M. G. WOOLFITT
More informationPinwheels and Crystalline Structures Induced by Atropa Mild Mosaic Virus, a Plant Virus with Particles 925 nm. Long
J. gen. Virol. (I970, xo, 71-78 Printed in Great BritMn 7I Pinwheels and Crystalline Structures Induced by Atropa Mild Mosaic Virus, a Plant Virus with Particles 925 nm. Long By B. D. HARRISON AND I. M.
More informationChapter13 Characterizing and Classifying Viruses, Viroids, and Prions
Chapter13 Characterizing and Classifying Viruses, Viroids, and Prions 11/20/2017 MDufilho 1 Characteristics of Viruses Viruses Minuscule, acellular, infectious agent having either DNA or RNA Cause infections
More informationVIRUSES RECORDED IN PORTUGAL IN TOMATO PROTECTED CROPS. J. C. Sequeira Estaçâo Agronómica Nacional INIA 2780 OEIRAS Portugal
VIRUSES RECORDED IN PORTUGAL IN TOMATO PROTECTED CROPS M. Lourdes V. Borges Estaçâo Agronómica Nacional INIA 2780 OEIRAS Portugal J. C. Sequeira Estaçâo Agronómica Nacional INIA 2780 OEIRAS Portugal Abstract
More informationChapter 19: Viruses. 1. Viral Structure & Reproduction. What exactly is a Virus? 11/7/ Viral Structure & Reproduction. 2.
Chapter 19: Viruses 1. Viral Structure & Reproduction 2. Bacteriophages 3. Animal Viruses 4. Viroids & Prions 1. Viral Structure & Reproduction Chapter Reading pp. 393-396 What exactly is a Virus? Viruses
More informationSimilarities in the genomic sequence and coat protein structure of plant virsuses
Proc. Int. Sytnp. Biomol. Struct. Interactions, Suppl. J. Biosci., Vol. 8, Nos 3 & 4, August 1985, pp. 815 821. Printed in India. Similarities in the genomic sequence and coat protein structure of plant
More informationSupporting Information
Supporting Information Harries et al. 1.173/pnas.9923916 A Fig. S1. Disruption of microfilaments within epidermal cells after treatment with 5 M Lat. Images of N. benthamiana cells are from plants expressing
More informationChapter 19: Viruses. 1. Viral Structure & Reproduction. 2. Bacteriophages. 3. Animal Viruses. 4. Viroids & Prions
Chapter 19: Viruses 1. Viral Structure & Reproduction 2. Bacteriophages 3. Animal Viruses 4. Viroids & Prions 1. Viral Structure & Reproduction Chapter Reading pp. 393-396 What exactly is a Virus? Viruses
More informationThe Application of Electron Microscopy to the Study of Plant Viruses in Unpurified Plant Extracts
104 BAWDEN, F. C. & NIXON, H. L. (1951). J. gen. Microbiol. 5, 104~109. The Application of Electron Microscopy to the Study of Plant Viruses in Unpurified Plant Extracts BY F. C. BAWDEN AND H. L. NIXON
More informationVIROIDS, PRIONS. Infectious Stage When virus infects a cell, nucleic acid must be uncoated and gain access to metabolic machinery of cell.
VIROIDS, PRIONS A virus is a small infectious agent that can replicate only inside the living cells of organisms. Most viruses are too small to be seen directly with a light microscope. Viruses infect
More informationChapter 6- An Introduction to Viruses*
Chapter 6- An Introduction to Viruses* *Lecture notes are to be used as a study guide only and do not represent the comprehensive information you will need to know for the exams. 6.1 Overview of Viruses
More informationMatthews' Plant Virology
Matthews' Plant Virology Fourth Edition Roger Hull i Emeritus Research Fellow John lnnes Center Norwich Research Park Colney, Norwich Technische Universitat Darmstadt FACHBEREICH 10 BIOLOGIE Bibtiothek
More informationChapter 13 Viruses, Viroids, and Prions. Biology 1009 Microbiology Johnson-Summer 2003
Chapter 13 Viruses, Viroids, and Prions Biology 1009 Microbiology Johnson-Summer 2003 Viruses Virology-study of viruses Characteristics: acellular obligate intracellular parasites no ribosomes or means
More informationPOSSIBILITIES FOR INTER- AND INTRACELLULAR TRANSLOCATION OF SOME ICOSAHEDRAL PLANT VIRUSES
POSSIBILITIES FOR INTER- AND INTRACELLULAR TRANSLOCATION OF SOME ICOSAHEDRAL PLANT VIRUSES G. A. DE ZOETEN and G. GAARD From the Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
More informationBiological Properties of Pseudorecombinant and Recombinant Strains Created with Cucumber Mosaic Virus and Tomato Aspermy Virus
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, May 1997, p. 3597 3602 Vol. 71, No. 5 0022-538X/97/$04.00 0 Copyright 1997, American Society for Microbiology Biological Properties of Pseudorecombinant and Recombinant Strains Created
More informationThe Kinetics of DEAE-Dextran-induced Cell Sensitization to Transfection
J. gen. Virol. (1973), x8, 89 93 8 9 Printed in Great Britain The Kinetics of DEAE-Dextran-induced Cell Sensitization to Transfection (Accepted 19 October 972 ) DEAE-dextran has commonly been found to
More informationComplete Nucleotide Sequence of RNA1 of Cucumber Mosaic Virus Y Strain and Evolutionary Relationships among Genome RNAs of the Virus Strains
Complete Nucleotide Sequence of RNA1 of Cucumber Mosaic Virus Y Strain and Evolutionary Relationships among Genome RNAs of the Virus Strains Jiro KATAOKA*, Chikara MASUTA* and Yoichi TAKANAMI* Abstract
More informationSTRUCTURE, GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS AND REPRODUCTION OF VIRUSES
STRUCTURE, GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS AND REPRODUCTION OF VIRUSES Introduction Viruses are noncellular genetic elements that use a living cell for their replication and have an extracellular state. Viruses
More informationIndex. 2-(a-Hydroxybenzyl)-benzimidazole (HBB),143 Hypotonicity,
Index N-Acetyl-D-glucosamine,240 Actinomycin D, 39, 86, 116, 314 Adsorption of bacteriophage, 36-37 on F pili, 36 of picornavirus, 119 of reovirus, 281-282 Alfalfa mosaic virus, 66, 78, 90 top a, 73, 88
More informationGenetically Engineered Plant Virus Resistance. Rebecca Grumet Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
FEATURE Genetically Engineered Plant Virus Resistance Rebecca Grumet Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 Molecular genetic and plant transformation technologies
More informationPRODUCT: RNAzol BD for Blood May 2014 Catalog No: RB 192 Storage: Store at room temperature
PRODUCT: RNAzol BD for Blood May 2014 Catalog No: RB 192 Storage: Store at room temperature PRODUCT DESCRIPTION. RNAzol BD is a reagent for isolation of total RNA from whole blood, plasma or serum of human
More informationProperties of Sweet Potato Feathery Mottle Virus RNA and Capsid Protein
J. gen. I/irol. (1985), 66, 1185 1189. Printed in Great Britain 1185 Key words: potyvirus/lpomoea batatas/spfmv Properties of Sweet Potato Feathery Mottle Virus RNA and Capsid Protein By J. W. MOYER* AND
More informationSedimentation Coefficients of the Virions of Soil-Borne Wheat Mosaic Virus Myron K. Brakke
Etiology Sedimentation Coefficients of the Virions of Soil-Borne Wheat Mosaic Virus Myron K. Brakke Research Chemist, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture and also Professor, Department
More informationInduced biochemical changes in the CMV infected cucurbit plants
Available online at www.scholarsresearchlibrary.com Annals of Biological Research, 2012, 3 (2):863-870 (http://scholarsresearchlibrary.com/archive.html) ISSN 0976-1233 CODEN (USA): ABRNBW Induced biochemical
More information19 Viruses BIOLOGY. Outline. Structural Features and Characteristics. The Good the Bad and the Ugly. Structural Features and Characteristics
9 Viruses CAMPBELL BIOLOGY TENTH EDITION Reece Urry Cain Wasserman Minorsky Jackson Outline I. Viruses A. Structure of viruses B. Common Characteristics of Viruses C. Viral replication D. HIV Lecture Presentation
More informationVIRUS VIROID PRION. Ms.Tanyaratana Dumkua Biology Department, Mahidolwittayanusorn School
VIRUS VIROID PRION Ms.Tanyaratana Dumkua Biology Department, Mahidolwittayanusorn School What is virus? Living? Need food? Reproduction? Cell? Cytoplasm? Cell membrane? Metabolism? Size? Component? Adenovirus
More informationLeaves turn yellow: small RNAs from viruses silence plant genes such as those involved in photosynthesis. Vitantonio Pantaleo IPSP-CNR
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Di.S.Ba Conferenza del Dipartimento di Scienze Bio-agroalimentari del CNR Accademia dei Georgofili, Firenze 24-25 Ottobre 2016 Accademia dei Georgofili Leaves turn yellow:
More informationGeneral Virology I. Dr Esam Ibraheem Azhar (BSc, MSc, Ph.D Molecular Medical Virology) Asst. Prof. Medical Laboratory Technology Department
General Virology I Dr Esam Ibraheem Azhar (BSc, MSc, Ph.D Molecular Medical Virology) Asst. Prof. Medical Laboratory Technology Department ١ General Virology I Lecture Outline Introduction istory Definition
More informationViruses defined acellular organisms genomes nucleic acid replicate inside host cells host metabolic machinery ribosomes
The Viruses Viruses Viruses may be defined as acellular organisms whose genomes consist of nucleic acid, obligately replicate inside host cells using host metabolic machinery and ribosomes to form a pool
More informationOverview of virus life cycle
Overview of virus life cycle cell recognition and internalization release from cells progeny virus assembly membrane breaching nucleus capsid disassembly and genome release replication and translation
More informationVirology. Virology: virus replications, ssrna viruses, Plant viruses, Sanitation
Virology Virology: virus replications, ssrna viruses, Plant viruses, Sanitation VIRUSES-definition A virus is a non-cellular, obligate intracellular parasite which has two phases in its life cycle: 1.
More informationTubular Inclusion Bodies in Plants Infected with Viruses of the NEPO Type
J. gen. Virol. (I97O), 7, I59-166 Printed in Great Britain I59 Tubular Inclusion Bodies in Plants Infected with Viruses of the NEPO Type By D. G. A. WALKEY AND M. J. W. WEBB National Vegetable Research
More informationSeries on Harmonization of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology No. 5
General Distribution OCDE/GD(96)162 Series on Harmonization of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology No. 5 CONSENSUS DOCUMENT ON GENERAL INFORMATION CONCERNING THE BIOSAFETY OF CROP PLANTS MADE VIRUS RESISTANT
More informationViral structure م.م رنا مشعل
Viral structure م.م رنا مشعل Viruses must reproduce (replicate) within cells, because they cannot generate energy or synthesize proteins. Because they can reproduce only within cells, viruses are obligate
More informationApplication of μmacs Streptavidin MicroBeads for the analysis of HIV-1 directly from patient plasma
Excerpt from MACS&more Vol 8 1/2004 Application of μmacs Streptavidin MicroBeads for the analysis of HIV-1 directly from patient plasma L. Davis Lupo and Salvatore T. Butera HIV and Retrovirology Branch,
More information19 2 Viruses Slide 1 of 34
1 of 34 What Is a Virus? What Is a Virus? Viruses are particles of nucleic acid, protein, and in some cases, lipids. Viruses can reproduce only by infecting living cells. 2 of 34 What Is a Virus? Viruses
More informationعلم األحياء الدقيقة Microbiology Introduction to Virology & Immunology
علم األحياء الدقيقة Microbiology Introduction to Virology & Immunology What is a virus? Viruses may be defined as acellular organisms whose genomes consist of nucleic acid (DNA or RNA), and which obligatory
More informationSuperinfection with Vaccinia Virus
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, Aug. 1975, p. 322-329 Copyright 1975 American Society for Microbiology Vol. 16, No. 2 Printed in U.S.A. Abortive Infection of a Rabbit Cornea Cell Line by Vesicular Stomatitis Virus:
More informationMicrobiology Chapter 7 Viruses
Microbiology Chapter 7 Viruses 7:1 Viral Structure and Classification VIRUS: a biological particle composed of genetic material (DNA or RNA) encased in a protein coat CAPSID: protein coat surrounding a
More informationMaterials and Methods , The two-hybrid principle.
The enzymatic activity of an unknown protein which cleaves the phosphodiester bond between the tyrosine residue of a viral protein and the 5 terminus of the picornavirus RNA Introduction Every day there
More informationReoviruses. Virion. Genome. Genes and proteins. Viruses and hosts. Diseases. Distinctive characteristics
Reoviruses Virion Genome Genes and proteins Viruses and hosts Diseases Distinctive characteristics Virion Naked icosahedral capsid (T=13), diameter 60-85 nm Capsid consists of two or three concentric protein
More informationhemagglutinin and the neuraminidase genes (RNA/recombinant viruses/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis/genetics)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 73, No. 6, pp. 242-246, June 976 Microbiology Mapping of the influenza virus genome: Identification of the hemagglutinin and the neuraminidase genes (RNA/recombinant viruses/polyacrylamide
More informationELECTRON MICROSCOPIC STUDIES ON EQUINE ENCEPHALOSIS VIRUS
Onderstepoort]. vet. Res. 40 (2), 53-58 (1973) ELECTRON MICROSCOPIC STUDIES ON EQUINE ENCEPHALOSIS VIRUS G. LECATSAS, B. J. ERASMUS and H. J. ELS, Veterinary Research Institute, Onderstepoort ABSTRACT
More informationLecture 2: Virology. I. Background
Lecture 2: Virology I. Background A. Properties 1. Simple biological systems a. Aggregates of nucleic acids and protein 2. Non-living a. Cannot reproduce or carry out metabolic activities outside of a
More informationGenetic Diversity in RNA Virus Quasispecies Is Controlled by Host-Virus Interactions
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, July 2001, p. 6566 6571 Vol. 75, No. 14 0022-538X/01/$04.00 0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.14.6566 6571.2001 Copyright 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Genetic
More information11/15/2011. Outline. Structural Features and Characteristics. The Good the Bad and the Ugly. Viral Genomes. Structural Features and Characteristics
Chapter 19 - Viruses Outline I. Viruses A. Structure of viruses B. Common Characteristics of Viruses C. Viral replication D. HIV II. Prions The Good the Bad and the Ugly Viruses fit into the bad category
More informationViruses. CLS 212: Medical Microbiology Miss Zeina Alkudmani
Viruses CLS 212: Medical Microbiology Miss Zeina Alkudmani History Through the 1800s, many scientists discovered that something smaller than bacteria could cause disease and they called it virion (Latin
More informationPolyomaviridae. Spring
Polyomaviridae Spring 2002 331 Antibody Prevalence for BK & JC Viruses Spring 2002 332 Polyoma Viruses General characteristics Papovaviridae: PA - papilloma; PO - polyoma; VA - vacuolating agent a. 45nm
More informationVirus Basics. General Characteristics of Viruses. Chapter 13 & 14. Non-living entities. Can infect organisms of every domain
Virus Basics Chapter 13 & 14 General Characteristics of Viruses Non-living entities Not considered organisms Can infect organisms of every domain All life-forms Commonly referred to by organism they infect
More informationPlasmid vector for cloning infectious cdnas from plant RNA viruses: high infectivity of cdna clones of tomato aspermy cucumovirus
Journal of General Virology (1997), 78, 1181 1185. Printed in Great Britain...... SHORT COMMUNICATION Plasmid vector for cloning infectious cdnas from plant RNA viruses: high infectivity of cdna clones
More informationNOMENCLATURE & CLASSIFICATION OF PLANT VIRUSES. P.N. Sharma Department of Plant Pathology, CSK HPKV, Palampur (H.P.)
NOMENCLATURE & CLASSIFICATION OF PLANT VIRUSES P.N. Sharma Department of Plant Pathology, CSK HPKV, Palampur (H.P.) What is the purpose of classification? To make structural arrangement comprehension for
More informationCoat protein blocks the in vitro transcription of the virion RNAs of alfalfa mosaic virus
Volume 209, number 2 FEBS 4215 December 1986 Coat protein blocks the in vitro transcription of the virion RNAs of alfalfa mosaic virus Corrie J. Houwing and E.M.J. Jaspars* Department of Biochemistry,
More informationViral reproductive cycle
Lecture 29: Viruses Lecture outline 11/11/05 Types of viruses Bacteriophage Lytic and lysogenic life cycles viruses viruses Influenza Prions Mad cow disease 0.5 µm Figure 18.4 Viral structure of capsid
More informationVirus Basics. General Characteristics of Viruses 5/9/2011. General Characteristics of Viruses. Chapter 13 & 14. Non-living entities
Virus Basics Chapter 13 & 14 General Characteristics of Viruses Non-living entities Not considered organisms Can infect organisms of every domain All life-formsf Commonly referred to by organism they infect
More informationDr. Gary Mumaugh. Viruses
Dr. Gary Mumaugh Viruses Viruses in History In 1898, Friedrich Loeffler and Paul Frosch found evidence that the cause of foot-and-mouth disease in livestock was an infectious particle smaller than any
More informationbrought to you by and REFERENCES
brought to you by www.thebacteriophages.org and www.phage.org REFERENCES 1. Butcher, S. J., T. Dokland, P. M. Ojala, D. H. Bamford, and S. D. Fuller. 1997. Intermediates in the assembly pathway of the
More informationInduction of Particle Polymorphism by Cucumber Necrosis Virus Coat Protein Mutants In Vivo
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, Feb. 2008, p. 1547 1557 Vol. 82, No. 3 0022-538X/08/$08.00 0 doi:10.1128/jvi.01976-07 Copyright 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Induction of Particle
More informationTHE MOVEMENT OF TOBACCO MOSAIC VIRUS IN THE TOMATO
[ 89 ] THE MOVEMENT OF TOBACCO MOSAIC VIRUS IN THE TOMATO BY JOHN CALDWELL Department of Botany, University College, Exeter {Received 9 March 1954) In a series of papers Caldwell (1930, 1931, 1934) pointed
More informationEmergence of a resistance breaking strain of Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) in California
Emergence of a resistance breaking strain of Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) in California Maria R. Rojas Department of Plant Pathology University of California Davis A diversity of viruses affect processing
More informationDeterminants of the Host Range of Feline Leukaemia Viruses
J. gen. Virol. (1973), 20, I69-t75 Printed in Great Britain 169 Determinants of the Host Range of Feline Leukaemia Viruses By O. JARRETT, HELEN M. LAIRD AND D. HAY University of Glasgow, Leukaemia Research
More informationActinidia Is a Natural Host to a Wide Range of Plant Viruses
Actinidia Is a Natural Host to a Wide Range of Plant Viruses M.N. Pearson 1, D. Cohen 2, R. Chavan 1 and A. Blouin 2 1 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92 019, Auckland,
More informationThe Zombies of the Scientific Community Viruses and Other Acellular Infectious Agents. Acellular Agents
viruses protein and nucleic acid viroids RNA virusoids RNA prions proteins The Zombies of the Scientific Community Viruses and Other Acellular Infectious Agents Acellular Agents Viruses major cause of
More informationSTUDIES ON ISOMETAMIDIUM: THE EFFECT OF ISOMETAMIDIUM, HOMIDIUM AND PYRITHIDIUM ON THE INFECTIVITY OF TRYPANOSOMES FOR MICE
Brit. J. Pharmacol. (1965), 25, 658-663. STUDIES ON ISOMETAMIDIUM: THE EFFECT OF ISOMETAMIDIUM, HOMIDIUM AND PYRITHIDIUM ON THE INFECTIVITY OF TRYPANOSOMES FOR MICE BY J. HILL From the Research Laboratories,
More informationDetermination of the temporal pattern and importance of BALF1 expression in Epstein-Barr viral infection
Determination of the temporal pattern and importance of BALF1 expression in Epstein-Barr viral infection Melissa Mihelidakis May 6, 2004 7.340 Research Proposal Introduction Apoptosis, or programmed cell
More informationChapter 13B: Animal Viruses
Chapter 13B: Animal Viruses 1. Overview of Animal Viruses 2. DNA Viruses 3. RNA Viruses 4. Prions 1. Overview of Animal Viruses Life Cycle of Animal Viruses The basic life cycle stages of animal viruses
More informationSymptom determinant of two Taiwan strains of cucumber mosaic virus is on RNA 3
Bot. Bull. Academia Sinica (1988) 29: 231-237 Symptom determinant of two Taiwan strains of cucumber mosaic virus is on RNA 3 Yau-Heiu Hsul, Chung-Chi Hui, Na-Sheng Lin 2 and Ren-Jong Chiul 1 Agricultural
More informationStudies on the Multiplication of a Tobacco Necrosis Virus in Inoculated Leaves of French-bean Plants
494 BAWDEN, F. C. & HARRISON, B. D. (19). J. gen. Microbiol. 13, 49608 Studies on the Multiplication of a Tobacco Necrosis Virus in Inoculated Leaves of French-bean Plants BY F. C. BAWDEN AND B. D. HARRISON*
More informationStructural biology of viruses
Structural biology of viruses Biophysical Chemistry 1, Fall 2010 Coat proteins DNA/RNA packaging Reading assignment: Chap. 15 Virus particles self-assemble from coat monomers Virus Structure and Function
More informationChapter 13. Viruses, Viroides and Prions
Chapter 13 Viruses, Viroides and Prions 1 A GLIMPSE OF HISTORY Tobacco mosaic disease (1890s) D. M. Iwanowsky, Martinus Beijerinck determined caused by filterable virus too small to be seen with light
More informationTHE QUANTITATIVE GLUCOSE AND MINERAL NUTRIENT REQUIREMENTS OF MOUSE LS (SUSPENSION) CELLS IN CHEMICALLY DEFINED MEDIUM
J. Cell Sci. 8, 693-700 (1971) Printed in Great Britain THE QUANTITATIVE GLUCOSE AND MINERAL NUTRIENT REQUIREMENTS OF MOUSE LS (SUSPENSION) CELLS IN CHEMICALLY DEFINED MEDIUM J. R. BIRCH* AND S. J. PIRT
More informationOne of the classifications was if the virus is enveloped or naked.
Last time we gave an introduction about viruses, we talked about; definition of viruses, characters of viruses, structures of viruses and classification of viruses. One of the classifications was if the
More informationIntroduction.-Cytopathogenic viruses may lose their cell-destroying capacity
AN INHIBITOR OF VIRAL ACTIVITY APPEARING IN INFECTED CELL CULTURES* BY MONTO Hot AND JOHN F. ENDERS RESEARCH DIVISION OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, THE CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER, AND THE DEPARTMENT OF BACTERIOLOGY
More informationTHE CYTOPATHOGENIC ACTION OF BLUETONGUE VIRUS ON TISSUE CULTURES AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE DETECTION OF ANTIBODIES IN THE SERUM OF SHEEP.
Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, Volume 27, Number 2, October, 1956. The Government Printer. THE CYTOPATHOGENIC ACTION OF BLUETONGUE VIRUS ON TISSUE CULTURES AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE DETECTION
More informationIdentification of new resistance sources for Cucumber mosaic virus new isolate-p1 (CMV-P1) in Capsicum spp.
Absorbance at 405nm Absorbance at 405nm Absorbance at 405nm College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Identification of new resistance sources for Cucumber mosaic virus new isolate-p1 (CMV-P1) in Capsicum
More information18.2. Viral Structure and Reproduction. Viruses differ in shape and in ways of entering
18.2 Viral Structure and Reproduction VOCABULARY bacteriophage lytic infection lysogenic infection prophage compare the structures of viruses to cells, describe viral reproduction, and describe the role
More informationUnit 13.2: Viruses. Vocabulary capsid latency vaccine virion
Unit 13.2: Viruses Lesson Objectives Describe the structure of viruses. Outline the discovery and origins of viruses. Explain how viruses replicate. Explain how viruses cause human disease. Describe how
More informationPart I. Content: History of Viruses. General properties of viruses. Viral structure. Viral classifications. Virus-like agents.
Viruses Part I Content: History of Viruses. General properties of viruses. Viral structure. Viral classifications. Virus-like agents. History Through the 1800s, many scientists discovered that something
More information