Appendix C Risk Calculations: Western Margin of Northern Plumes

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Appendix C Risk Calculations: Western Margin of Northern Plumes"

Transcription

1 Appendix C Calculations: Western Margin of Northern Plumes Consolidated Human Health Assessment

2 Table of Contents C1.0 Introduction... C-1 C2.0 Calculation of Exposure and : Young Children... C-2 C3.0 Calculation of Exposure and : Older Children and Adults... C-11 C4.0 Calculation of Exposure and : Intrusive Workers... C-25 Consolidated Human Health Assessment

3 C1.0 Introduction This appendix presents the calculations undertaken to characterise risks to human health for all relevant receptors and exposure pathways associated with contamination along the Western Margin of the Northern Plumes within the 2017 CHHRA. The methodology adopted for the characterisation of risk is presented in Appendix A, and details relevant to the risk issues that require evaluation and exposure concentrations are presented in the main report. Consolidated Human Health Assessment C-1 P age

4 C2.0 Calculation of Exposure and : Young Children Consolidated Human Health Assessment C-2 P age

5 Calculation of Emissions into House with Crawl-Space - Young Children Using Measured Flux Emissions Data Building Parameters Value Reference/Comments Indoor Air Model - Modified Box Model for Infinite Source LB length of building, m 12.7 Estimated size of house WB width of building, m 10 Estimated size of house HB height of building, m 2.7 Estimated typical height A area of floor of house, m Turczynowicz, 2002 Hcs height of crawl space, m 0.3 Estimated - Conservative Value Vcs volume of crawl space, m Calculated (Turczynowicz, 2002) Vd volume of dwelling space, m Calculated (Turczynowicz, 2002) Xcs air exchange rate in crawl space, (per day) Lower value from Australian Studies Xd air exchange rate in dwelling, (per day) Typical value as per Turczynowicz, 2002 Qcsd volumetric flow rate of air from crawl space to dwelling through wooden floorin Typical value as per Turczynowicz, 2002 S indoor sinks (inhalation only), (m 3 /day) 35.1 Turczynowicz, 2002 Outdoor Air Model w Width of area outdoors (m) - upwind distance 25 Estimated A Area of area outdoors (m 2 ) 625 Calculated from width A Area outdoors (acres) 0.15 Conversion of area Q/C Dispersion Ratio (g/m 2 /s per kg/m 3 ) Calculated for typical climates in Aust. Calculation of Indoor Air (Turczynowicz, 2002) Chemical Volatile Degradation rate in Air Measured Emission Rate from Surface in Crawl Space within Building within Building Max Measured Emission Rate from Surface (per day) J (ug/day/m 2 ) Ccrawl space (ug/m 3 ) Cbuilding (ug/m 3 ) Cbuilding (mg/m 3 ) J (ug/min/m 2 ) 1,2-Dichloroethane 1.1E E E E E E-02 Dichloromethane 5.8E E E E E E-01 Carbon Tetrachloride 5.2E E E E E+00 Trichloroethene 1.4E E E E E E-02 Tetrachloroethene 7.2E E E E E E-02 Calculation of Outdoor Air (Soil Screening Guidance 1996 and 2000) Chemical Measured Emission Rate from Surface Outside Outside ER (g/s/m 2 ) Coutside (ug/m 3 ) Coutside (mg/m 3 ) 1,2-Dichloroethane 1.67E E E-06 Dichloromethane 1.48E E E-04 Carbon Tetrachloride 0.00E E E+00 Trichloroethene 3.33E E E-06 Tetrachloroethene 3.33E E E-06 Consolidated Human Health Assessment C-3 P age

6 Air s During Irrigation - Young Children (Reference: Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Petroleum contaminated Sites in New Zealand) General Parameters All Calculations NOTES: Vs = Volume of Air within Irrigation zone (m3) Chemical Parameters (H and MW) for taken from RAIS in August 2010 Q = Volumetric Flow rate of Water (L/min) 30 H (atm.m3/mol) = H' (dimensionless) / 41 Time = Duration of Irrigation (min) 60 d = Droplet diameter (cm) 0.2 t = Droplet drop time (s) 10 R = Gas Constant (atm.m3/mol/k) 8.20E-05 T = Absolute Temperature (K) 293 Ts = Sprinkler Water Temperature (K) 288 m1 = Water viscosity at 20oC (g/m.s) m2 = Water viscosity at Sprinkler Water Temperature (g/m.s) Chemical Parameters Calculations COPC in Water (mg/l) Henry's Law (atm.m 3 /mol) Molecular Weight Liquid Mass Transfer Coefficient (cm/hr) Gas Phase Mass Transfer Coefficient (cm/hr) Overall Mass Transfer Coefficient (cm/hr) Adjusted Overall Mass Transfer Coefficient (cm/hr) Fraction Volatilised (mg/mg) Mass Volatilised (mg) in Air (mg/m 3 ) in Soil Water (mg/l) Cw HL MW Kl Kg KL KL' fv Ms Cair Cwater 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) E E E E E E E E-02 Consolidated Human Health Assessment 2017 C-4 P age

7 Equations Uptake of Organic Chemicals into Crops from Water - Young Children (Reference: Briggs et al. (1982), Travis and Arms (1988), RISC User Manual (Version 4.0, 2001)) Uptake into Root Crops Potential for Translocation to Above-Ground Crops Uptake into Above-Ground Crops where there is Potential Uptake VG RCF log Kow RCF TSCF exp( (log Kow ) 2 ) log Kow Uptake 10 (1 MC ) f oc K oc where: where: VG = Correction Factor where: log Kow= log octanol/water partition coeff. (L/kg) RCF = Root Factor (mg/kg produce per mg/l) TSCF = Transpiration Stream Factor (unitless) MC = moisture content of produce (g/g) log Kow= log octanol/water partition coeff. (L/kg) log Kow= log octanol/water partition coeff. (L/kg) Koc = organic carbon partition coeff. (ml/g) Translocation of importance if TSCF>0.1 foc = fraction of organic carbon (g/g) Calculation of Uptake Factors COPC log Kow (L/kg) Koc (ml/g) foc VG (unitless) Uptake into Root Crops Uptake into Above-Ground Crops RCF (mg/kg produce per mg/l) Uptake Factor (mg/kg produce per mg/l water) TSCF Potential for uptake? MC (g/g) Uptake Factor (mg/kg produce per mg/l water) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) E E E-01 yes E-01 s Soil Water (mg/l) Root Crops (mg/kg produce) Above Ground Crops (mg/kg produce) Total Produce (19% root crops and 81% other crops) (mg/kg) COPC 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 1.9E E E E-03 Consolidated Human Health Assessment 2017 C-5 P age

8 Inhalation of Volatiles (derived from Groundwater Source) Inhalation ExposureConc V C a ET FI EF ED (mg/m 3 ) AT Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Young Children Residents - Western Margin Exposure Time Indoors (ET, hr/day) 20 Time spend indoors every day (enhealth 2012b) Exposure Time Outdoors (ET, hr/day) 4 Time spend outdoors every day (enhealth 2012b) Fraction Inhaled from Contaminated Source (FI, unitless) 1 Assume all of home above impacted groundwater Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 365 Assumed time at home each year (enhealth 2012b) Exposure Duration (ED, years) 6 Duration of exposure Averaging Time - Non (Atc, hours) USEPA 2009 Averaging Time - (Atn, hours) USEPA 2009 Inhalation Unit Chronic TC air Background Intake (% Chronic TC) Chronic TC Allowable for Assessment (TC- Daily Exposure Calculated in Air (Ca) Inhalation Exposure - Non Inhalation Exposure - Non- Chronic Hazard (mg/m 3 ) -1 (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 2.8E E E E E-9 -- Dichloromethane 3.5E-01 20% 2.8E E E E % Carbon tetrachloride 6.1E-03 40% 3.7E Trichloroethene (TCE) 4.0E E-03 10% 1.8E E E E E Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 2.0E-01 10% 1.8E E E E TOTAL 3.8E Ca = in air weighted indoor and outdoor concentration Consolidated Human Health Assessment 2017 C-6 P age

9 Exposure to Chemicals via Incidental Ingestion of Water (Extracted Groundwater) Daily Chemical Intake IW C W IR W FI B EF ED (L/kg/day) BW AT Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Young Children Residents - Western Margin Ingestion Rate (Irw, L/day) 0.2 Assumed intake when using water in backyard Fraction Ingested from Source 100% Assumed to be 100% Bioavailability (B) 100% Assume 100% bioavailability via ingestion of chemicals in water. Exposure Frequency (EF, days/year) 64 Assume contact with water 2 days per week in warmer 8 months Exposure Duration (ED, years) 6 Duration of exposure Body Weight (BW, kg) 15 Average for children aged 1-5 years as per enhealth (2012b) Averaging Time - Non (Atc, days) USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Averaging Time - (Atn, days) 2190 USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Non- Slope Factor TDI Background Intake (% TDI) TDI Allowable for Assessment (TDI- in Water (Cw) Daily Intake Calculated Non Non- Chronic Hazard (mg/kg-day) -1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (mg/l) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 1.0E E E E-8 100% -- TOTAL 8.8E-8 Consolidated Human Health Assessment 2017 C-7 P age

10 Dermal Exposure to Chemicals via Contact with Water (Extracted Groundwater) Daily Chemical Intake DW C W SAw ET DP BW CF EF ED (L/kg/day) AT Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Young Children Residents - Western Margin Surface Area (Saw, cm 2 ) 6100 Whole body surface area for child aged 2-3 years (enhealth 2012b) Exposure Time (ET, hr/day) 2 Assume contact with water for 2 hours each time GW is used Conversion Factor (CF, L/cm 3 ) 1.E-03 Conversion of units Dermal Permeability (cm/hr) Chemical-specific (as below) Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 64 Assume contact with water 2 days per week in warmer 8 months Exposure Duration (ED, years) 6 Duration of exposure Body Weight (BW, kg) 15 Average for children aged 1-5 years as per enhealth (2012b) Averaging Time - Non (Atc, days) USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Averaging Time - (Atn, days) 2190 USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Non- Slope Factor TDI Background Intake (% TDI) TDI Allowable for Assessment (TDI- Dermal Permeability (DP) in Water (Cw) Non- Daily Intake Calculated Non- (mg/kg-day) -1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (cm/hr) (mg/l) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 1.0E E E E E-8 100% E-8 Chronic Hazard Consolidated Human Health Assessment 2017 C-8 P age

11 Inhalation of Volatiles (derived from Irrigation of Groundwater) Inhalation Exposure Conc V C a ET FI EF ED AT (mg/m 3 ) Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Young Children Residents - Western Margin Exposure Time (ET, hr/day) 1 Assume groundwater used to irrigate for 1 hour each time Fraction Inhaled from Contaminated Source (FI, unitless) 1 All derived from impacted groundwater Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 104 Assume groundwater used to irrigate 2 days per week Exposure Duration (ED, years) 6 Duration of exposure Averaging Time - Non (Atc, hours) USEPA 2009 Averaging Time - (Atn, hours) USEPA 2009 Inhalation Unit Chronic TC air Background Intake (% Chronic TC) Chronic TC Allowable for Assessment (TC- Daily Exposure Calculated in Air (Ca) Inhalation Exposure - Non Inhalation Exposure - Non- Chronic Hazard (mg/m 3 ) -1 (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 2.8E E E E E-9 100% -- TOTAL 6.0E-9 Consolidated Human Health Assessment 2017 C-9 P age

12 Exposure to Chemicals via Ingestion of Home-grown Produce (Irrigated with Extracted Groundwater) IR FV Daily Chemical Intake C FV FV FH BW B EF AT ED (mg/kg/day) Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Young Children Residents - Western Margin Ingestion Rate of Fruit and Veg (IRFV kg/day) Intake for 2-3 year olds as per enhealth (2012b) Fraction Ingested that is Home-grown 10% Assume 10% total fruit and vegetable intake is homegrown, NEPM (2013) Bioavailability (B) 100% Assume 100% bioavailability Exposure Frequency (EF, days/year) 365 Assumed time at home each year (enhealth 2012b) Exposure Duration (ED, years) 6 Duration of exposure Body Weight (BW, kg) 15 Average for children aged 1-5 years as per enhealth (2012b) Averaging Time - Non (Atc, days) USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Averaging Time - (Atn, days) 2190 USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Non- Slope Factor TDI Background Intake (% TDI) TDI Allowable for Assessment (TDI- in Produce (C FV ) Daily Intake Calculated Non Non- Chronic Hazard (mg/kg-day) -1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 1.0E E E E-9 100% -- TOTAL 7.9E-9 Consolidated Human Health Assessment 2017 C-10 P age

13 C3.0 Calculation of Exposure and : Older Children and Adults Consolidated Human Health Assessment C-11 P age

14 Calculation of Emissions into House with Crawl-Space - Older Children and Adults Using Measured Flux Emissions Data Building Parameters Value Reference/Comments Indoor Air Model - Modified Box Model for Infinite Source LB length of building, m 12.7 Estimated size of house WB width of building, m 10 Estimated size of house HB height of building, m 2.7 Estimated typical height A area of floor of house, m Turczynowicz, 2002 Hcs height of crawl space, m 0.3 Estimated - Conservative Value Vcs volume of crawl space, m Calculated (Turczynowicz, 2002) Vd volume of dwelling space, m Calculated (Turczynowicz, 2002) Xcs air exchange rate in crawl space, (per day) Lower value from Australian Studies Xd air exchange rate in dwelling, (per day) Typical value as per Turczynowicz, 2002 Qcsd volumetric flow rate of air from crawl space to dwelling through wooden floorin Typical value as per Turczynowicz, 2002 S indoor sinks (inhalation only), (m 3 /day) 35.1 Turczynowicz, 2002 Outdoor Air Model w Width of area outdoors (m) - upwind distance 25 Estimated A Area of area outdoors (m 2 ) 625 Calculated from width A Area outdoors (acres) 0.15 Conversion of area Q/C Dispersion Ratio (g/m 2 /s per kg/m 3 ) Calculated for typical climates in Aust. Calculation of Indoor Air (Turczynowicz, 2002) Chemical Volatile Degradation rate in Air Measured Emission Rate from Surface in Crawl Space within Building within Building Max Measured Emission Rate from Surface (per day) J (ug/day/m 2 ) Ccrawl space (ug/m 3 ) Cbuilding (ug/m 3 ) Cbuilding (mg/m 3 ) J (ug/min/m 2 ) 1,2-Dichloroethane 1.1E E E E E E-02 Dichloromethane 5.8E E E E E E+00 Carbon Tetrachloride 5.2E E E E E E-02 Trichloroethene 1.4E E E E E E-02 Tetrachloroethene 7.2E E E E E E-01 Calculation of Outdoor Air (Soil Screening Guidance 1996 and 2000) Chemical Measured Emission Rate from Surface Outside Outside ER (g/s/m 2 ) Coutside (ug/m 3 ) Coutside (mg/m 3 ) 1,2-Dichloroethane 5.50E E E-06 Dichloromethane 5.17E E E-04 Carbon Tetrachloride 3.00E E E-06 Trichloroethene 5.17E E E-06 Tetrachloroethene 8.83E E E-04 Consolidated Human Health Assessment C-12 P age

15 Air s During Irrigation - Older Children and Adults (Reference: Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Petroleum contaminated Sites in New Zealand) General Parameters All Calculations NOTES: Vs = Volume of Air within Irrigation zone (m3) Chemical Parameters (H and MW) for taken from RAIS in August 2010 Q = Volumetric Flow rate of Water (L/min) 30 H (atm.m3/mol) = H' (dimensionless) / 41 Time = Duration of Irrigation (min) 60 d = Droplet diameter (cm) 0.2 t = Droplet drop time (s) 10 R = Gas Constant (atm.m3/mol/k) 8.20E-05 T = Absolute Temperature (K) 293 Ts = Sprinkler Water Temperature (K) 288 m1 = Water viscosity at 20oC (g/m.s) m2 = Water viscosity at Sprinkler Water Temperature (g/m.s) Chemical Parameters Calculations COPC in Water (mg/l) Henry's Law (atm.m 3 /mol) Molecular Weight Liquid Mass Transfer Coefficient (cm/hr) Gas Phase Mass Transfer Coefficient (cm/hr) Overall Mass Transfer Coefficient (cm/hr) Adjusted Overall Mass Transfer Coefficient (cm/hr) Fraction Volatilised (mg/mg) Mass Volatilised (mg) in Air (mg/m 3 ) Cw HL MW Kl Kg KL KL' fv Ms Cair Cwater 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) E E E E E E E E-02 Vinyl chloride E E E E E E E E-01 Carbon tetrachloride E E E E E E E E-03 Trichloroethene (TCE) E E E E E E E E-03 in Soil Water (mg/l) Consolidated Human Health Assessment C-13 P age

16 Equations Uptake of Organic Chemicals into Crops from Water - Older Children and Adults (Reference: Briggs et al. (1982), Travis and Arms (1988), RISC User Manual (Version 4.0, 2001)) Uptake into Root Crops Potential for Translocation to Above-Ground Crops Uptake into Above-Ground Crops where there is Potential Uptake VG RCF log Kow RCF TSCF exp( (log Kow ) 2 ) log Kow Uptake 10 (1 MC ) f oc K oc where: where: VG = Correction Factor where: log Kow= log octanol/water partition coeff. (L/kg) RCF = Root Factor (mg/kg produce per mg/l) TSCF = Transpiration Stream Factor (unitless) MC = moisture content of produce (g/g) log Kow= log octanol/water partition coeff. (L/kg) log Kow= log octanol/water partition coeff. (L/kg) Koc = organic carbon partition coeff. (ml/g) Translocation of importance if TSCF>0.1 foc = fraction of organic carbon (g/g) Calculation of Uptake Factors COPC log Kow (L/kg) Koc (ml/g) foc VG (unitless) Uptake into Root Crops Uptake into Above-Ground Crops RCF (mg/kg produce per mg/l) Uptake Factor (mg/kg produce per mg/l water) TSCF Potential for uptake? MC (g/g) Uptake Factor (mg/kg produce per mg/l water) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) E E E-01 yes E-01 Vinyl chloride E E E-01 yes E-01 Carbon tetrachloride E E E-01 yes E-02 Trichloroethene (TCE) E E E-01 yes E-01 s COPC Soil Water (mg/l) Root Crops (mg/kg produce) Above Ground Crops (mg/kg produce) Total Produce (19% root crops and 81% other crops) (mg/kg) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 2.7E E E E-03 Vinyl chloride 1.3E E E E-02 Carbon tetrachloride 4.1E E E E-04 Trichloroethene (TCE) 6.0E E E E-04 Consolidated Human Health Assessment C-14 P age

17 Inhalation of Volatiles (derived from Groundwater Source) Inhalation ExposureConc V C a ET FI EF ED (mg/m 3 ) AT Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Older Children Residents - Western Margin Exposure Time Indoors (ET, hr/day) 20 Time spend indoors every day (enhealth 2012b) Exposure Time Outdoors (ET, hr/day) 4 Time spend outdoors every day (enhealth 2012b) Fraction Inhaled from Contaminated Source (FI, unitless) 1 Assume all of home above impacted groundwater Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 365 Assumed time at home each year (enhealth 2012b) Exposure Duration (ED, years) 10 Duration of exposure Averaging Time - Non (Atc, hours) USEPA 2009 Averaging Time - (Atn, hours) USEPA 2009 Inhalation Unit Chronic TC air Background Intake (% Chronic TC) Chronic TC Allowable for Assessment (TC- Daily Exposure Calculated in Air (Ca) Inhalation Exposure - Non Inhalation Exposure - Non- Chronic Hazard (mg/m 3 ) -1 (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 2.8E E E E E-8 43% -- Dichloromethane 3.5E-01 20% 2.8E E E E % Carbon tetrachloride 6.1E-03 40% 3.7E E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 4.0E E-03 10% 1.8E E E E E-8 57% % Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 2.0E-01 10% 1.8E E E E % TOTAL 1.3E Ca = in air weighted indoor and outdoor concentration Consolidated Human Health Assessment C-15 P age

18 Exposure to Chemicals via Incidental Ingestion of Water (Extracted Groundwater) Daily Chemical Intake IW C W IR W FI B EF ED (L/kg/day) BW AT Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Older Children Residents - Western Margin Ingestion Rate (Irw, L/day) 0.2 Assume 10% daily intake from backyard tap Fraction Ingested from Source 100% Assumed to be 100% Bioavailability (B) 100% Assume 100% bioavailability via ingestion of chemicals in water. Exposure Frequency (EF, days/year) 64 Assume contact with water 2 days per week in warmer 8 months Exposure Duration (ED, years) 10 Duration of exposure Body Weight (BW, kg) 37 Average for children aged 6-15 years as per enhealth 2012b Averaging Time - Non (Atc, days) USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Averaging Time - (Atn, days) 3650 USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Non- Slope Factor TDI Background Intake (% TDI) TDI Allowable for Assessment (TDI- in Water (Cw) Daily Intake Calculated Non Non- Chronic Hazard (mg/kg-day) -1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (mg/l) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 1.0E E E E-8 0% -- Vinyl chloride 1.2E E E E-5 100% -- Carbon tetrachloride 1.4E-03 40% 8.5E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 4.6E E-04 10% 4.5E E E E-8 0% % TOTAL 4.8E Consolidated Human Health Assessment C-16 P age

19 Dermal Exposure to Chemicals via Contact with Water (Extracted Groundwater) Daily Chemical Intake DW C W SAw ET DP BW CF EF ED (L/kg/day) AT Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Older Children Residents - Western Margin Surface Area (Saw, cm 2 ) Whole body gets wet each time GW is used, value adopted is average for children aged 6-16 years (enhealth 2012b) Exposure Time (ET, hr/day) 1 Assume contact with water for 1 hours each time GW is used Conversion Factor (CF, L/cm 3 ) 1.E-03 Conversion of units Dermal Permeability (cm/hr) Chemical-specific (as below) Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 64 Assume contact with water 2 days per week in warmer 8 months Exposure Duration (ED, years) 10 Duration of exposure Body Weight (BW, kg) 37 Average for children aged 6-15 years as per enhealth 2012b Averaging Time - Non (Atc, days) USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Averaging Time - (Atn, days) 3650 USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Non- Slope Factor TDI Background Intake (% TDI) TDI Allowable for Assessment (TDI- Dermal Permeability (DP) in Water (Cw) Daily Intake Calculated Non- Non- (mg/kg-day) -1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (cm/hr) (mg/l) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 1.0E E E E E-8 0% -- Vinyl chloride 1.2E E E E E-5 100% -- Carbon tetrachloride 1.4E-03 40% 8.5E E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 4.6E E-04 10% 4.5E E E E E-8 0% % 2.7E Chronic Hazard Consolidated Human Health Assessment C-17 P age

20 Inhalation of Volatiles (derived from Irrigation of Groundwater) Inhalation Exposure Conc V C a ET FI EF ED AT (mg/m 3 ) Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Older Children Residents - Western Margin Exposure Time (ET, hr/day) 1 Assume groundwater used to irrigate for 1 hour each time Fraction Inhaled from Contaminated Source (FI, unitless) 1 All derived from impacted groundwater Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 104 Assume groundwater used to irrigate 2 days per week Exposure Duration (ED, years) 10 Duration of exposure Averaging Time - Non (Atc, hours) USEPA 2009 Averaging Time - (Atn, hours) USEPA 2009 Inhalation Unit Chronic TC air Background Intake (% Chronic TC) Chronic TC Allowable for Assessment (TC- Daily Exposure Calculated in Air (Ca) Inhalation Exposure - Non Inhalation Exposure - Non- Chronic Hazard (mg/m 3 ) -1 (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 2.8E E E E E-8 6% -- Vinyl chloride 8.8E E E E E-7 92% -- Carbon tetrachloride 6.1E-03 40% 3.7E E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 4.0E E-03 10% 1.8E E E E E-9 2% % TOTAL 2.5E Consolidated Human Health Assessment C-18 P age

21 Exposure to Chemicals via Ingestion of Home-grown Produce (Irrigated with Extracted Groundwater) IR FV Daily Chemical Intake C FV FV FH BW B EF AT ED (mg/kg/day) Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Older Children Residents - Western Margin Ingestion Rate of Fruit and Veg (IR FV kg/day) Intake for 9-13 year old children as per enhealth (2012b) Fraction Ingested that is Home-grown 10% Assume 10% total fruit and vegetable intake is homegrown, NEPM (2013) Bioavailability (B) 100% Assume 100% bioavailability Exposure Frequency (EF, days/year) 365 Assumed time at home each year (enhealth 2012b) Exposure Duration (ED, years) 10 Duration of exposure Body Weight (BW, kg) 37 Average for children aged 6-15 years as per enhealth 2012b Averaging Time - Non (Atc, days) USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Averaging Time - (Atn, days) 3650 USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Non- Slope Factor TDI Background Intake (% TDI) TDI Allowable for Assessment (TDI- in Produce (CFV) Daily Intake Calculated Non Non- Chronic Hazard (mg/kg-day) -1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 1.0E E E E-9 0% -- Vinyl chloride 1.2E E E E-6 99% -- Carbon tetrachloride 1.4E-03 40% 8.5E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 4.6E E-04 10% 4.5E E E E-9 0% % TOTAL 2.2E Consolidated Human Health Assessment C-19 P age

22 Inhalation of Volatiles (derived from Groundwater Source) Inhalation ExposureConc V C a ET FI EF ED (mg/m 3 ) AT Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Adult Residents - Western Margin Exposure Time Indoors (ET, hr/day) 20 Time spend indoors every day (enhealth 2012b) Exposure Time Outdoors (ET, hr/day) 4 Time spend outdoors every day (enhealth 2012b) Fraction Inhaled from Contaminated Source (FI, unitless) 1 Assume all of home above impacted groundwater Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 365 Assumed time at home each year (enhealth 2012b) Exposure Duration (ED, years) 19 Duration of exposure as adult (based on 35 years in total at one home) Averaging Time - Non (Atc, hours) USEPA 2009 Averaging Time - (Atn, hours) USEPA 2009 Inhalation Unit Chronic TC air Background Intake (% Chronic TC) Chronic TC Allowable for Assessment (TC- Daily Exposure Calculated in Air (Ca) Inhalation Exposure - Non Inhalation Exposure - Non- Chronic Hazard (mg/m 3 ) -1 (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 2.8E E E E E-7 43% -- Dichloromethane 3.5E-01 20% 2.8E E E E % Carbon tetrachloride 6.1E-03 40% 3.7E E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 4.0E E-03 10% 1.8E E E E E-7 57% % Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 2.0E-01 10% 1.8E E E E % TOTAL 2.4E Ca = in air weighted indoor and outdoor concentration Consolidated Human Health Assessment C-20 P age

23 Exposure to Chemicals via Incidental Ingestion of Water (Extracted Groundwater) Daily Chemical Intake IW C W IR W FI B EF ED (L/kg/day) BW AT Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Adult Residents - Western Margin Ingestion Rate (Irw, L/day) 0.2 Assume 10% daily intake from backyard tap Fraction Ingested from Source 100% Assumed to be 100% Bioavailability (B) 100% Assume 100% bioavailability via ingestion of chemicals in water. Exposure Frequency (EF, days/year) 64 Assume contact with water 2 days per week in warmer 8 months Exposure Duration (ED, years) 19 Duration of exposure as adult (based on 35 years in total at one home) Body Weight (BW, kg) 78 Adult body weight as per enhealth 2012b Averaging Time - Non (Atc, days) USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Averaging Time - (Atn, days) 6935 USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Non- Slope Factor TDI Background Intake (% TDI) TDI Allowable for Assessment (TDI- in Water (Cw) Daily Intake Calculated Non Non- Chronic Hazard (mg/kg-day) -1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (mg/l) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 1.0E E E E-8 0% -- Vinyl chloride 1.2E E E E-5 100% -- Carbon tetrachloride 1.4E-03 40% 8.5E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 4.6E E-04 10% 4.5E E E E-8 0% % TOTAL 4.4E Consolidated Human Health Assessment C-21 P age

24 Dermal Exposure to Chemicals via Contact with Water (Extracted Groundwater) Daily Chemical Intake DW C W SAw ET DP BW CF EF ED (L/kg/day) AT Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Adult Residents - Western Margin Surface Area (Saw, cm 2 ) Whole adult body surface area, assuming that the adult gets completely we during irrigation or use of water from the backyard bore. A more realistic exposure would be to hands only (1068 cm2) (maximum assumed in Stage 2 Assessment) Exposure Time (ET, hr/day) 1 Assume contact with water for 1 hours each time GW is used Conversion Factor (CF, L/cm 3 ) 1.E-03 Conversion of units Dermal Permeability (cm/hr) Chemical-specific (as below) Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 64 Assume contact with water 2 days per week in warmer 8 months Exposure Duration (ED, years) 19 Duration of exposure as adult (based on 35 years in total at one home) Body Weight (BW, kg) 78 Adult body weight as per enhealth 2012b Averaging Time - Non (Atc, days) USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Averaging Time - (Atn, days) 6935 USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Non- Slope Factor TDI Background Intake (% TDI) TDI Allowable for Assessment (TDI- Dermal Permeability (DP) in Water (Cw) Daily Intake Calculated Non- Non- (mg/kg-day) -1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (cm/hr) (mg/l) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 1.0E E E E E-8 0% -- Vinyl chloride 1.2E E E E E-5 100% -- Carbon tetrachloride 1.4E-03 40% 8.5E E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 4.6E E-04 10% 4.5E E E E E-8 0% % 3.7E Chronic Hazard Consolidated Human Health Assessment C-22 P age

25 Inhalation of Volatiles (derived from Irrigation of Groundwater) Inhalation Exposure Conc V C a ET FI EF ED AT (mg/m 3 ) Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Adult Residents - Western Margin Exposure Time (ET, hr/day) 1 Assume groundwater used to irrigate for 1 hour each time Fraction Inhaled from Contaminated Source (FI, unitless) 1 All derived from impacted groundwater Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 104 Assume groundwater used to irrigate 2 days per week Exposure Duration (ED, years) 19 Duration of exposure as adult (based on 35 years in total at one home) Averaging Time - Non (Atc, hours) USEPA 2009 Averaging Time - (Atn, hours) USEPA 2009 Inhalation Unit Chronic TC air Background Intake (% Chronic TC) Chronic TC Allowable for Assessment (TC- Daily Exposure Calculated in Air (Ca) Inhalation Exposure - Non Inhalation Exposure - Non- Chronic Hazard (mg/m 3 ) -1 (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 2.8E E E E E-8 6% -- Vinyl chloride 8.8E E E E E-7 92% -- Carbon tetrachloride 6.1E-03 40% 3.7E E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 4.0E E-03 10% 1.8E E E E E-9 2% % TOTAL 4.7E Consolidated Human Health Assessment C-23 P age

26 Exposure to Chemicals via Ingestion of Home-grown Produce (Irrigated with Extracted Groundwater) IR FV Daily Chemical Intake C FV FV FH BW B EF AT ED (mg/kg/day) Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Adult Residents - Western Margin Ingestion Rate of Fruit and Veg (IR FV kg/day) Intake for adults aged 19 years and older as per enhealth 2012b Fraction Ingested that is Home-grown 10% Assume 10% total fruit and vegetable intake is homegrown, NEPM (2013) Bioavailability (B) 100% Assume 100% bioavailability Exposure Frequency (EF, days/year) 365 Assumed time at home each year (enhealth 2012b) Exposure Duration (ED, years) 19 Duration of exposure as adult (based on 35 years in total at one home) Body Weight (BW, kg) 78 Adult body weight as per enhealth 2012b Averaging Time - Non (Atc, days) USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Averaging Time - (Atn, days) 6935 USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Non- Slope Factor TDI Background Intake (% TDI) TDI Allowable for Assessment (TDI- in Produce (CFV) Daily Intake Calculated Non Non- Chronic Hazard (mg/kg-day) -1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 1.0E E E E-9 0% -- Vinyl chloride 1.2E E E E-6 99% -- Carbon tetrachloride 1.4E-03 40% 8.5E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 4.6E E-04 10% 4.5E E E E-9 0% % TOTAL 2.4E Consolidated Human Health Assessment C-24 P age

27 C4.0 Calculation of Exposure and : Intrusive Workers Consolidated Human Health Assessment C-25 P age

28 Inhalation of Volatiles (derived from Groundwater Source) Inhalation ExposureConc V C a ET FI EF ED (mg/m 3 ) AT Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Intrusive Worker in Excavation Exposure Time (ET, hr/day) 8 Assumed time spent in excavation Fraction Inhaled from Contaminated Source (FI, unitless) 1 Assume all of workplace above impacted soils Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 10 Assume intrusive works on services occur over 10 days each year Exposure Duration (ED, years) 5 Assume works occur on the same site over 5 years Averaging Time - Non (Atc, hours) USEPA 2009 Averaging Time - (Atn, hours) USEPA 2009 Inhalation Unit Chronic TC air Background Intake (% Chronic TC) Chronic TC Allowable for Assessment (TC- Daily Exposure Calculated in Excavation Air (Ca) Inhalation Exposure - Non Inhalation Exposure - Non- Chronic Hazard (mg/m 3 ) -1 (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 2.8E E E E E-8 98% -- Dichloromethane 3.5E-01 20% 2.8E E E E % Carbon tetrachloride 6.1E-03 40% 3.7E E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 4.0E E-03 10% 1.8E E E E E-9 2% % Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 2.0E-01 10% 1.8E E E E % TOTAL 8.2E Ca = 100 times larger than estimated in outdoor air, conservative estimate for excavations where air flow is limited Consolidated Human Health Assessment C-26 P age

Appendix C Risk Calculations Western Margin of Northern Plumes

Appendix C Risk Calculations Western Margin of Northern Plumes Appendix C Calculations Western Margin of Northern Plumes Consolidated Human Health Assessment - 2010 General Parameters Air s During Irrigation (Reference: Guidelines for the Assessment and Management

More information

Appendix H Risk Calculations Off-Site

Appendix H Risk Calculations Off-Site Appendix H Calculations Off-Site Exposure to Chemicals via Incidental Ingestion of Water (Extracted Groundwater) IR (L/kg/day) W FIBEFED Daily ChemicalIntakeIW CW BWAT Parameters Relevant to Quantification

More information

Risk Assessment Report for AGSS-ICS

Risk Assessment Report for AGSS-ICS 1. INTRODUCTION This Risk Assessment evaluated the human health risks from exposure during and after application of AGSS-ICS. This information will determine whether AGSS-ICS used to treat soil will present

More information

ANNEX A. Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS * * * * *

ANNEX A. Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS * * * * * ANNEX A TITLE 25. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PART I. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SUBPART D. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ARTICLE VI. GENERAL HEALTH AND SAFETY CHAPTER 250. ADMINISTRATION OF

More information

Table H3-1 Values Used for Daily Intake/Absorbed Dose Inhalation of Particulates

Table H3-1 Values Used for Daily Intake/Absorbed Dose Inhalation of Particulates Table H3-1 Values Used for Daily Intake/Absorbed Dose of Particulates Exposure Point Receptor Age: Particulates See Below Adult Exposure Parameter Parameter Definition Units RME RME Equation/ Route Code

More information

B Supporting Information for Human Health Risk Assessment

B Supporting Information for Human Health Risk Assessment B Supporting Information for Human Health Risk Assessment 001688.OY06.06_PT083 Appendix B Table of Contents 1. Calculation of Infant Body Weight 2. Calculation of Consumption Rate of Meat for Native American

More information

APPENDIX IV.I.1. Delivery Truck HRA

APPENDIX IV.I.1. Delivery Truck HRA APPENDIX IV.I.1 Delivery Truck HRA Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) Health Risk Assessment (HRA) of Delivery Trucks from the Project at Pico and Sepulveda, Los Angeles, California Introduction This health

More information

Development of Interim CCME PCB Soil Quality Guidelines for Missing Pathways of Exposure for the Protection of Human Health and Ecological Receptors

Development of Interim CCME PCB Soil Quality Guidelines for Missing Pathways of Exposure for the Protection of Human Health and Ecological Receptors Development of Interim CCME PCB Soil Quality Guidelines for Missing Pathways of Exposure for the Protection of Human Health and Ecological Receptors By: Karl Bresee, B.Sc., PBD, P.Biol. Intrinsik Environmental

More information

Evaluation of Mixture Exposures in Human Health Risk Assessments. Ruth Custance, MPH

Evaluation of Mixture Exposures in Human Health Risk Assessments. Ruth Custance, MPH Evaluation of Mixture Exposures in Human Health Risk Assessments Ruth Custance, MPH March 2016 Objectives Objectives Describe each of the major steps of a HHRA Data Evaluation What chemicals and at what

More information

Human Health Risk Assessment Guidance

Human Health Risk Assessment Guidance Human Health Risk Assessment Guidance Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Cleanup Program 811 SW Sixth Avenue Portland, OR 97204 DRAFT May 12, 2010 I. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The primary

More information

AECOM Environment Figures January 2010

AECOM Environment Figures January 2010 AECOM Environment Figures January 2010 Figure 1 General Monitoring Approach Readville 5-Yard Site Dedham and Readville, MA Real-ime Monitoring Constituent-Specific Monitoring Conduct Field Screening for

More information

Appendix B Toxicity Summaries

Appendix B Toxicity Summaries Appendix B Toxicity Summaries Table of Contents B1 Introduction... B-1 B2 Carbon Tetrachloride... B-2 B3 Chloroform... B-8 B4 Dichloromethane... B-14 B5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane... B-20 B6 1,1,2-Trichloroethane...

More information

Plant uptake and human health risks from dietary exposure

Plant uptake and human health risks from dietary exposure Plant uptake and human health risks from dietary exposure Organic non-ionised chemicals Ondřej Mikeš 1. Pathways between soil/plant/air 2. Building model 3. Different crops 4. Chemicals 5. Dietary exposure

More information

Chapter 6 Quantifying Exposure

Chapter 6 Quantifying Exposure What s Covered in Chapter 6: Chapter 6 Quantifying Exposure 6.1 Inhalation Exposure Pathways 6.2 Ingestion Exposure Pathways 6.3 Dermal Exposure Pathways 6.4 Exposure Frequency 6.5 Exposure Duration 6.6

More information

APPENDIX D HAZARDS SCREENING LEVEL HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX D HAZARDS SCREENING LEVEL HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT MEMORANDUM APPENDIX D HAZARDS SCREENING LEVEL HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT MEMORANDUM AECOM 515 South Flower Street Eighth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 www.aecom.com 213.593.7700 tel 213.593.7715 fax Memorandum Date: July

More information

Sacramento Rendering Company Health Risk Assessment

Sacramento Rendering Company Health Risk Assessment Sacramento Rendering Company Health Risk Assessment The SMAQMD regulates emissions of toxic substances under Rule 402 and SMAQMD s guidance document, Health Risk Management Programs for Existing, Modified

More information

Poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), also called perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs)

Poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), also called perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) Poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), also called perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) Perfluorooctane sulphonic acid (PFOS), and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) belong to a group of man-made compounds called

More information

EVALUATION OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN CLAY TARGET FRAGMENTS AND SURFACE SOIL AT SHOT GUN RANGE SITES Presenter: Glenn Hoeger and Brian

EVALUATION OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN CLAY TARGET FRAGMENTS AND SURFACE SOIL AT SHOT GUN RANGE SITES Presenter: Glenn Hoeger and Brian EVALUATION OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN CLAY TARGET FRAGMENTS AND SURFACE SOIL AT SHOT GUN RANGE SITES Presenter: Glenn Hoeger and Brian Magee ARCADIS/Malcolm Pirnie May 11, 2011 Objectives 1.

More information

Prelude to Risk Characterization Exposure Calculations from Risk and Decision Making

Prelude to Risk Characterization Exposure Calculations from Risk and Decision Making ENV U6220 THURSDAY, 8/04/05 RISK CHARACTERIZATION / MANAGEMENT PAGE 1 Prelude to Risk Characterization Exposure Calculations from Risk and Decision Making ENV U6220 THURSDAY, 8/04/05 RISK CHARACTERIZATION

More information

Updates to HSRA Risk Reduction Standards

Updates to HSRA Risk Reduction Standards Updates to HSRA Risk Reduction Standards Georgia AWMA Regulatory Update Conference May 11, 2017 Chris Saranko, Ph.D, DABT Atlanta, GA Presentation Outline 2017 Hazardous Site Response Rulemaking Phased

More information

Screening Level Health Risk Assessment of PCCD/PCDF Contamination Da Nang Airbase Case Study

Screening Level Health Risk Assessment of PCCD/PCDF Contamination Da Nang Airbase Case Study Regional Capacity Building Program for Health Risk Management of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) in South East Asia Program 7/15/2009 SLIDE 1 Screening Level Health Risk Assessment of PCCD/PCDF Contamination

More information

Methodology for Developing Chemical Exposure Guidelines for Deployed Military Personnel

Methodology for Developing Chemical Exposure Guidelines for Deployed Military Personnel 2013 REVISION Methodology for Developing Chemical Exposure Guidelines for Deployed Military Personnel Reference Document 230 2013 Addendum This is the support document for Technical Guide 230 U.S. Army

More information

Per- and poly- fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): information for clinicians

Per- and poly- fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): information for clinicians Per- and poly- fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): information for clinicians Introduction The purpose of this information is to provide guidance to aid clinicians with patient consultations on perfluoroalkyl

More information

Assessing Risks for Inhalation and Ingestion of Pollutants

Assessing Risks for Inhalation and Ingestion of Pollutants Assessing Risks for and Ingestion of Pollutants This investigation focuses on the basics of human and ecological risk assessment. The activity uses hypothetical scenarios to investigate inhalation of an

More information

Risk assessment for redevelopment of contaminated land at an old industrial site

Risk assessment for redevelopment of contaminated land at an old industrial site 5th WSEAS nt. Conf. on ENVRONMENT, ECOSYSTEMS and DEVELOPMENT, Tenerife, Spain, December 14-16, 2007 358 Risk assessment for redevelopment of contaminated land at an old industrial site D.F. VENDAS (a,1),

More information

Screening-Level Risk Assessment for Styrene- Acrylonitrile (San) Trimer Detected in Soil and Groundwater

Screening-Level Risk Assessment for Styrene- Acrylonitrile (San) Trimer Detected in Soil and Groundwater University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Papers U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2012 Screening-Level Risk Assessment for

More information

ENV 455 Hazardous Waste Management

ENV 455 Hazardous Waste Management Risk Assessment Basic Information ENV 455 Hazardous Waste Management Environmental Risk Assessment Özgür ZEYDAN (Phd.) http://cevre.beun.edu.tr/zeydan/ Hazard: a potential source of harm to a worker. Risk:

More information

APPENDIX G: TECHNICAL BASIS FOR PRELIMINARY REMEDIATION GOALS FOR FISH TISSUE IN ONONDAGA LAKE HONEYWELL

APPENDIX G: TECHNICAL BASIS FOR PRELIMINARY REMEDIATION GOALS FOR FISH TISSUE IN ONONDAGA LAKE HONEYWELL : TECHNICAL BASIS FOR PRELIMINARY REMEDIATION GOALS FOR FISH TISSUE IN ONONDAGA LAKE Prepared For: HONEYWELL 101 Columbia Road P.O. Box 2105 Morristown, NJ 07962 Prepared By: Exponent 4 Computer Drive

More information

1, 2, 3-Trichloropropane (TCP): Assessment of Risks from Drinking Water

1, 2, 3-Trichloropropane (TCP): Assessment of Risks from Drinking Water 1, 2, 3-Trichloropropane (TCP): Assessment of Risks from Drinking Water 1, 2, 3-Trichloropropane (TCP): Assessment of Risks from Drinking Water Prepared for Alaimo Group (Engineers and Architects) 200

More information

Human Health Risk Assessment. Marian Olsen U.S. EPA ERRD October 13, 2011

Human Health Risk Assessment. Marian Olsen U.S. EPA ERRD October 13, 2011 Human Health Risk Assessment Marian Olsen U.S. EPA ERRD October 13, 2011 Presentation Overview Conceptual Site Model Defining Risk Assessment Conceptual Site Model Superfund Risk Assessment Process Data

More information

Evaluation of Swimming Pool Treatment Chemicals Health Effects under NSF/ANSI Standard 50

Evaluation of Swimming Pool Treatment Chemicals Health Effects under NSF/ANSI Standard 50 Evaluation of Swimming Pool Treatment Chemicals Health Effects under NSF/ANSI Standard 50 Presentation Outline About NSF International NSF/ANSI 50 Overview Development Process of Annex R Annex R Requirements

More information

Application of Injected ZVI PRB to Control Off-Site Migration of a VOC Plume at a Drycleaner Site in Quebec. Andrzej Przepiora and Simone Smith

Application of Injected ZVI PRB to Control Off-Site Migration of a VOC Plume at a Drycleaner Site in Quebec. Andrzej Przepiora and Simone Smith Application of Injected ZVI PRB to Control Off-Site Migration of a VOC Plume at a Drycleaner Site in Quebec Andrzej Przepiora and Simone Smith RemTech 2016 Oct. 12-14, 2016 Presentation Overview Project

More information

RISK ASSESSMENT OF EXPOSURE TO BENZENE, TOLUENE AND FORMALDEHYDE IN RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT IN CHINA

RISK ASSESSMENT OF EXPOSURE TO BENZENE, TOLUENE AND FORMALDEHYDE IN RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT IN CHINA RISK ASSESSMENT OF EXPOSURE TO BENZENE, TOLUENE AND FORMALDEHYDE IN RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT IN CHINA C Zheng 1, GQ Zhang 1,*, J.H Hao 2, J.P Lin 2, YH Liu 2 1 College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University,

More information

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES WASHINGTON, D.C

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES WASHINGTON, D.C UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 September 7, 2005 MEMORANDUM Subject: From: Through: Occupational and Residential

More information

Table 1 Fuel Oil UST Closure Soil Analytical Results St. Ann Center for Intergenerational Care Sigma Project No

Table 1 Fuel Oil UST Closure Soil Analytical Results St. Ann Center for Intergenerational Care Sigma Project No Table 1 Fuel Oil UST Closure Analytical s St. Ann Center for Intergenerational Care Sigma Project No. 14643 DRAFT Sample Location: S-1 (north base) S-2 (south base) S-3 (east wall) S-4 (south wall) Sample

More information

Development of NJ Human Health-based Criteria and Standards

Development of NJ Human Health-based Criteria and Standards Development of NJ Human Health-based Criteria and Standards Gloria Post NJDEP Office of Science Presented to: Public Health Standing Committee October 18, 2010 Human Health-based Criteria and Standards

More information

Subject: Summary Report on Surface Soil Sampling Activities, Former Lockheed Martin Facility, Utica, New York

Subject: Summary Report on Surface Soil Sampling Activities, Former Lockheed Martin Facility, Utica, New York Ruth Curley, P.E. Environmental Engineer New York State epartment of Environmental Conservation ivision of Environmental Remediation 625 Broadway Albany, New York 12233-7016 ARCAIS US, Inc. 10 Friends

More information

Appendix I DOCUMENTS RECEIVED OR USED IN PREPARATION OF THE HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT FOR THE STRECKER FOREST DEVELOPMENT SITE, WILDWOOD MO

Appendix I DOCUMENTS RECEIVED OR USED IN PREPARATION OF THE HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT FOR THE STRECKER FOREST DEVELOPMENT SITE, WILDWOOD MO Appendix I DOCUMENTS RECEIVED OR USED IN PREPARATION OF THE HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT FOR THE STRECKER FOREST DEVELOPMENT SITE, WILDWOOD MO ATSDR. 1998. TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR CHLORINATED DIBENZO-p-

More information

Risk Assessment Report on Tris (nonylphenyl)phosphite (TNPP)

Risk Assessment Report on Tris (nonylphenyl)phosphite (TNPP) EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate C - Public Health and Risk Assessment C7 - Risk assessment SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS SCHER

More information

Outline: risk assessment. What kind of environmental risks do we commonly consider? 11/19/2013. Why do we need chemical risk assessment?

Outline: risk assessment. What kind of environmental risks do we commonly consider? 11/19/2013. Why do we need chemical risk assessment? Outline: Human health h and ecological l risk assessment Purpose of risk assessment Methodology for quantifying risk Case study: Children s exposure to As from CCA wood staircases Issues practical and

More information

Hazard, exposure, and risk Thinking about risk Risk assessment processes Risk management A.001 Environmental Engineering 2

Hazard, exposure, and risk Thinking about risk Risk assessment processes Risk management A.001 Environmental Engineering 2 1 Hazard, exposure, and risk Thinking about risk Risk assessment processes Risk management 457.210A.001 Environmental Engineering 2 2015 2 Hazard: the inherent properties of a substance, object, or activity

More information

Use of Soil and Tissue Testing for Sustainable Crop Nutrient Programs

Use of Soil and Tissue Testing for Sustainable Crop Nutrient Programs Use of Soil and Tissue Testing for Sustainable Crop Nutrient Programs Kelly T. Morgan Soil and Water Science Department Southwest Florida Research and Education Center Immokalee 239 658 3400 conserv@ufl.edu

More information

Arkansas Department of Health

Arkansas Department of Health Mr. Jim Wise Ecologist Coordinator, Office of Water Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality 5301 Northshore Drive North Little Rock, AR 72118-5317 Dear Mr. Wise: Arkansas Department of Health 4815

More information

Dermal Occupational Exposure Limits. Their use in risk assessment

Dermal Occupational Exposure Limits. Their use in risk assessment Dermal Occupational Exposure Limits Their use in risk assessment Contents 1. Risk assessment for dermal exposure 2. Dermal Occupational Exposure Limit (DOEL) 3. REACH 4. SCOEL 5. ECETOC 6. Summary Risk

More information

July 9, Freeman Avenue Telephone: (562) Signal Hill, California Facsimile: (562)

July 9, Freeman Avenue Telephone: (562) Signal Hill, California Facsimile: (562) July 9, 2015 Paul Cho, P.G. Water Resources Control Engineer California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Site Cleanup Unit IV Los Angeles Region 320 West 4 th Street, Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90013

More information

HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT THROUG TitleCHAIN IN SOME AREAS WITH HIGH ARSEN CONCENTRATION Author(s) Nguyen, Thi phuong Thao Annual Report of FY 2004, The Core Citation between Japan Society for the Promo

More information

Pizza Pan Case Study

Pizza Pan Case Study Session 4 Case Study of Risk Assessment and Management Pizza Pan Case Study Fernanda Takata The Dow Chemical Company, Product Stewardship and Regulatory Specialist 16 March, May, 2013 2011 Taipei Chile

More information

and Benchmark Toxicology Services HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS EXPANSION OF WAGERUP REFINERY TO 4.7 MTPA

and Benchmark Toxicology Services HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS EXPANSION OF WAGERUP REFINERY TO 4.7 MTPA and Benchmark Toxicology Services HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS EXPANSION OF WAGERUP REFINERY TO 4.7 MTPA for Alcoa World Alumina Australia ENVIRON Australia Pty Ltd Level 2, Adelaide

More information

T6 SVE/AS Pilot Study Results

T6 SVE/AS Pilot Study Results APPENDIX E SVE/Air Sparge Pilot Study Results Training Area T-6, Parcel 183(6) and Cane Creek Training Area, Parcel 51(7), McClellan, Anniston, Alabama T6 SVE/AS Pilot Study Results Introduction On April

More information

Appendix B Toxicity of Mercury

Appendix B Toxicity of Mercury Appendix B Toxicity of Mercury - 2013 B1 General Mercury is a heavy metal which exists in three oxidation states: 0 (elemental), +1 (mercurous) and +2 (mercuric). As well as the common mercurous and mercuric

More information

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) TECHNICAL REPORT APPROVED: 03/05/2017 doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2017.en-1223 Outcome of the consultation with Member States, the applicant and EFSA on the pesticide risk assessment for L-ascorbic acid in light

More information

CURRENT ISSUES: Risk-Based Corrective Action 14 TH ANNUAL FLORIDA BROWNFIELDS CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION

CURRENT ISSUES: Risk-Based Corrective Action 14 TH ANNUAL FLORIDA BROWNFIELDS CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION 14 TH ANNUAL FLORIDA BROWNFIELDS CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION November 14, 2011 Orlando, Florida CURRENT ISSUES: Risk-Based Corrective Action Paula Cobb, Esq Hopping Green & Sams Tallahassee, FL Koren Taylor,

More information

LIC-WILLIAMS STREET 3 (PID 94085) MAY 2014 SUB SLAB AND INDOOR AIR TESTING RESULTS: 99 S. JAMES STREET 100 S. JAMES STREET

LIC-WILLIAMS STREET 3 (PID 94085) MAY 2014 SUB SLAB AND INDOOR AIR TESTING RESULTS: 99 S. JAMES STREET 100 S. JAMES STREET LIC-WILLIAMS STREET 3 (PID 94085) MAY 2014 SUB SLAB AND INDOOR AIR TESTING RESULTS: 99 S. JAMES STREET 100 S. JAMES STREET LIC-WILLIAM STREET 3 (PID 94085) SUB-SLAB & INDOOR AIR TESTING RESULTS PROPERTY

More information

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED Abbreviation Meaning Abbreviation Meaning % Per cent Mn Manganèse & and mm milimetre * Asterisk IW Irrigation water Ca Calcium K Potassium cm centimetre kg kilogram CPE Cumulative

More information

HEALTH CONSIDERATIONS RELATED TO ARSENIC IN SOIL UNDER PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT CONSTRUCTED OF CCA-TREATED WOOD

HEALTH CONSIDERATIONS RELATED TO ARSENIC IN SOIL UNDER PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT CONSTRUCTED OF CCA-TREATED WOOD HEALTH CONSIDERATIONS RELATED TO ARSENIC IN SOIL UNDER PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT CONSTRUCTED OF CCA-TREATED WOOD Prepared for: Hopping Green Sams & Smith Tallahassee, FL and American Wood Preservers Institute

More information

Probabilistic Risk-Cost-Benefit Analysis of Additional Benzene Emissions Controls

Probabilistic Risk-Cost-Benefit Analysis of Additional Benzene Emissions Controls Probabilistic Risk-Cost-Benefit Analysis of Additional Benzene Emissions Controls Arthur F. Eidson, Ph.D. Senior Risk Assessor The Shaw Group 1401 Enclave Parkway, Suite 250 Houston, Texas 77077 June 16,

More information

Material Safety data sheet

Material Safety data sheet 1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBSTANCE / PREPARATION AND THE COMPANY / UNDERTAKING Product Name: UTURN - PLANT GROWTH REGULATOR CAS No. 76738-62-0 SUPPLIER: SEVROC PTY.LTD ABN: 09947875 STREET ADDRESS: 51

More information

Risk Characterization

Risk Characterization Risk Characterization 1 Learning Objectives By the end of this module, participants should have an understanding of: The purpose of risk characterization Integrating the results of hazard identification,

More information

RISK ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE FOR INHALATION RISK ASSESSMENT SUPERFUND, PART F: Midwestern States Risk Assessment

RISK ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE FOR INHALATION RISK ASSESSMENT SUPERFUND, PART F: Midwestern States Risk Assessment RISK ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE FOR SUPERFUND, PART F: SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE FOR INHALATION RISK ASSESSMENT Michael Sivak EPA Region 2 Superfund Program Midwestern States Risk Assessment Symposium - November

More information

Hazard Classification: Not classified as hazardous according to OSHA Hazard Communication Standard, 29 CFR

Hazard Classification: Not classified as hazardous according to OSHA Hazard Communication Standard, 29 CFR Safety Data Sheet: Stance SnF2 Rinse Concentrate 0.63% SECTION 1: IDENTIFICATION Product Name: Stance - Stannous Fluoride Rinse Concentrate 0.63% Catalog Numbers: Mint & Tropical Fruit - 745246310, 745246313

More information

ATTACHMENT E. Selection of Soil Ingestion Rates

ATTACHMENT E. Selection of Soil Ingestion Rates ATTACHMENT E Selection of Soil Ingestion Rates In assessing exposures and risks from the ingestion of floodplain soil, the HHRA evaluates eleven exposure scenarios (including residential, recreational,

More information

SAFE AT DIFFERENT APPLICATIONS AND USE PATTERNS. Polycarbonate beverage containers. Typical migration level less than 0,005mg/kg (5ppb)

SAFE AT DIFFERENT APPLICATIONS AND USE PATTERNS. Polycarbonate beverage containers. Typical migration level less than 0,005mg/kg (5ppb) SAFE AT DIFFERENT APPLICATIONS AND USE PATTERNS There are many different polycarbonate and epoxy products, with different use patterns and exposure situations. This is reflected in different migration

More information

Pharmaceuticals, DDT and human health. BettinaGenthe

Pharmaceuticals, DDT and human health. BettinaGenthe Pharmaceuticals, DDT and human health BettinaGenthe Extent of the problem 3.6 Million people in South Africa have no access to safe water and 16 million have no access to hygienic sanitation Babies, young

More information

Material Safety Data Sheet of dangerous substance METHYLENE CHLORIDE (DICHLOROMETHANE) 1. CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

Material Safety Data Sheet of dangerous substance METHYLENE CHLORIDE (DICHLOROMETHANE) 1. CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Page 1 of 7 1. CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Product name: Application: Distributor: METHYLENE CHLORIDE Solvent Wojciech Pawłowski 37-450 Stalowa Wola ul. Kwiatkowskiego 1 Tel. 015 / 842

More information

Annex V of Technical Volume 4 UNSCEAR ASSESSMENT OF THE DOSE TO THE PUBLIC

Annex V of Technical Volume 4 UNSCEAR ASSESSMENT OF THE DOSE TO THE PUBLIC Annex V of Technical Volume 4 UNSCEAR ASSESSMENT OF THE DOSE TO THE PUBLIC V 1. UNSCEAR ASSESSMENT OF EXTERNAL EXPOSURE V 1.1. External exposure during passage of the plume There were not enough environmental

More information

Acute Risks Health Risks from Short-term Exposure to Soil Contamination

Acute Risks Health Risks from Short-term Exposure to Soil Contamination Acute Risks Health Risks from Short-term Exposure to Soil Contamination UPDATE Barry Mitcheson, Wood plc SoBRA December Conference Objectives: Acute GAC sub-group Develop methodology to derive generic

More information

Step by Step Approach for GPS Risk Assessment

Step by Step Approach for GPS Risk Assessment Step by Step Approach for GPS Risk Assessment 1) Tier Categorization and Prioritization 2) Hazard Characterization By Mr. Krittanon Yuen-ying (Product Regulatory) Dow Chemical Thailand Limited Email: krittanon.yuen-ying@dow.com

More information

Risk Assessment Pt2. K.E. Kelly University of Utah

Risk Assessment Pt2. K.E. Kelly University of Utah Risk Assessment Pt2 K.E. Kelly University of Utah Reminders/Updates I will post the solu.on to HW#1 on Tuesday evening. - Presenta.on topics and schedules are up. Please review the schedule. I have done

More information

Arsenic in the Environment

Arsenic in the Environment Arsenic in the Environment Teresa S. Bowers Gradient Corporation Presented at Middleport, New York October 28, 2008 2 Arsenic Occurs Naturally All arsenic in the environment is of natural origin (natural

More information

Case Study Summary: Appendix: Evaluation of Hazard Range for Three Additional Chemicals: Tetrachloroethylene, Chromium (VI) and Arsenic.

Case Study Summary: Appendix: Evaluation of Hazard Range for Three Additional Chemicals: Tetrachloroethylene, Chromium (VI) and Arsenic. Case Study Summary: Practical Guidance on the Development of a Non-cancer Hazard Range for Effective Risk Assessment and Risk Management of Contaminated Sites: A Case Study with Trichloroethylene and Other

More information

SAFETY DATA SHEET (SDS)

SAFETY DATA SHEET (SDS) 1. PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION SAFETY DATA SHEET (SDS) Product Name: Product Number: Formula: Product Use: Restrictions on Use: NaturaLyte (45X) (0000 through 4000 Series) None Solution: Acetic

More information

SAFETY DATA SHEET. Natural Guard Neem RTU. Effective Date: 23-Mar PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

SAFETY DATA SHEET. Natural Guard Neem RTU. Effective Date: 23-Mar PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION 1. PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION PRODUCT NAME: Neem RTU EPA Reg. No.: 70051-13-7401 COMPANY IDENTIFICATION: Bonham, TX. 75418 2. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION 2.1. Classification of the substance or mixture

More information

Benzo[a]Pyrene Update - A Game Changer for Environmental Remediation and Property Revitalization? April 28, Presented by Kristen Rivera

Benzo[a]Pyrene Update - A Game Changer for Environmental Remediation and Property Revitalization? April 28, Presented by Kristen Rivera Benzo[a]Pyrene Update - A Game Changer for Environmental Remediation and Property Revitalization? April 28, 2017 Presented by Kristen Rivera What is Benzo[a]Pyrene (BaP)? Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon

More information

Safety Data Sheet. KHA300 INTERTUF 262 OFF WHITE PART A Version Number 2 Revision Date 05/14/18

Safety Data Sheet. KHA300 INTERTUF 262 OFF WHITE PART A Version Number 2 Revision Date 05/14/18 International Paint Singapore Pte Ltd Safety Data Sheet KHA300 INTERTUF 262 OFF WHITE PART A Version Number 2 Revision Date 05/14/18 1. Product and company identification 1.1. Product identifier INTERTUF

More information

Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin P Behring

Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin P Behring 1. Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking 1.1. Product identifier Product Identity Alternate Names Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin P Behring Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin P Behring

More information

SAFETY DATA SHEET Astonish Floor Cleaner Cotton Breeze

SAFETY DATA SHEET Astonish Floor Cleaner Cotton Breeze SAFETY DATA SHEET SECTION 1: Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking 1.1. Product identifier Product name Product number 262001 Internal identification F1V1 1.2. Relevant

More information

Updated Health Risk Assessment Guidelines

Updated Health Risk Assessment Guidelines Updated Health Risk Assessment Guidelines California OEHHA s Air Toxics Hot Spots Program March 31 st, 2015 Insert then choose Picture select your picture. Right click your picture and Send to back. Copyright

More information

Perchlorate: an emerging contaminant

Perchlorate: an emerging contaminant Perchlorate: an emerging contaminant WaterTech 2008 April 18, 2008 Presented by: Erik J. Martin, Ph.D. Outline of Presentation 1. Perchlorate Background 2. Health Effects 3. Exposure Assessment 4. Drinking

More information

Exposure to Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) During Construction

Exposure to Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) During Construction Health Risk Assessment - Construction Exposure to Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) During Construction Phase 1 Construction Receptors that would be exposed to DPM during construction of Phase 1 would include

More information

5.0 HAZARD ASSESSMENT AND RISK CHARACTERIZATION

5.0 HAZARD ASSESSMENT AND RISK CHARACTERIZATION 5.0 HAZARD ASSESSMENT AND RISK CHARACTERIZATION 5.1 SELECTING A TOXICITY REFERENCE VALUE (TRV) Appropriate Toxicity Reference Values (TRVs) are required to characterize the potency of the contaminants

More information

Tetagam P SDS Revision Date: 06/03/2015

Tetagam P SDS Revision Date: 06/03/2015 1. Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking 1.1. Product identifier Product Identity Alternate Names Tetagam P Human tetanus immunoglobulin 1.2. Relevant identified uses of

More information

Opinion. of the Scientific Committee on Food

Opinion. of the Scientific Committee on Food EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate C - Scientific Opinions C2 - Management of scientific committees; scientific co-operation and networks Scientific Committee

More information

1. Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking

1. Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking according to 1907/2006/EC, Article 31, amended by Regulation (EU) No. 453/2010 COSMETIC PREBIOTIC Date: 15/01/2018 1. Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking 1.1 Product

More information

CHAPTER 8 RISK CHARACTERIZATION

CHAPTER 8 RISK CHARACTERIZATION CHAPTER 8 RISK CHARACTERIZATION This chapter describes the final step of the baseline health risk assessment process, risk characterization. In this step, the toxicity and exposure assessments are summarized

More information

The PFAS Contamination Class Action against the Australian Military Who really Pays?

The PFAS Contamination Class Action against the Australian Military Who really Pays? The PFAS Contamination Class Action against the Australian Military Who really Pays? Peter Shannon, Special Counsel, Shine Lawyers QLD OPERATIONAL POLICY Dalby Oakey Brisbane Toowoomba 2014 PFAS EMPHASIS

More information

American Chemistry Council n-alkane VCCEP Consortium

American Chemistry Council n-alkane VCCEP Consortium American Chemistry Council n-alkane VCCEP Consortium Errata and Clarifications to n-alkane Category: Decane, Undecane, Dodecane (CAS Nos. 124-18-5, 1120-21-4, 112-40-3) Voluntary Children s Chemical Evaluation

More information

APPENDIX A STANDARD FORMULAS, EXPOSURE DATA, AND RISK CALCULATIONS FOR OCCUPATIONAL AND RESIDENTIAL EXPOSURES TO MEFLUIDIDE

APPENDIX A STANDARD FORMULAS, EXPOSURE DATA, AND RISK CALCULATIONS FOR OCCUPATIONAL AND RESIDENTIAL EXPOSURES TO MEFLUIDIDE APPENDIX A STANDARD FORMULAS, EXPOSURE DATA, AND RISK CALCULATIONS FOR OCCUPATIONAL AND RESIDENTIAL EXPOSURES TO MEFLUIDIDE 1 APPENDIX A -1 STANDARD FORMULAS USED FOR CALCULATING OCCUPATIONAL AND RESIDENTIAL

More information

Methodology for Dose Assessment due to Controlled Discharges in Belarus

Methodology for Dose Assessment due to Controlled Discharges in Belarus Methodology for Dose Assessment due to Controlled Discharges in Belarus Viktoryia Kliaus Republican Scientific-Practical Centre of Hygiene Laboratory of Radiation Safety Minsk, Belarus EMRAS II Working

More information

alternative short-chain fluorinated product technology

alternative short-chain fluorinated product technology The extensive toxicology data behind alternative short-chain fluorinated product technology SOT RASS-MISS Webinar 9 December 2015 Robert C. Buck, PhD Technical Fellow The Chemours Company Wilmington, Delaware,

More information

IRRIGATION AND NUTRITION MANAGEMENT FOR GOOD POSTHARVEST PERFORMANCE JOHN P BOWER

IRRIGATION AND NUTRITION MANAGEMENT FOR GOOD POSTHARVEST PERFORMANCE JOHN P BOWER IRRIGATION AND NUTRITION MANAGEMENT FOR GOOD POSTHARVEST PERFORMANCE JOHN P BOWER Agassiz, Canada Consultant: Horticultural Product Quality Objectives Fruit arrives in the market No external chilling damage

More information

1. CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION. Material for temporary filling and rebuilding root canals

1. CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION. Material for temporary filling and rebuilding root canals Page 1 of 7 1. CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Product name: BIO MTA + Application: Manufacturer s name: Material for temporary filling and rebuilding root canals Wojciech Pawłowski 37-450

More information

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE IERA

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE IERA IERA-RS-BR-TR-2000-0005 UNITED STATES AIR FORCE IERA Human Health Risk Assessment, Pope Air Force Base, North Carolina (AMC) Victor Caravello, Captain, USAF, BSC G. Cornell Long July 2000 Air Force Institute

More information

1.2 Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Use of the Substance/Mixture : Air care products

1.2 Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Use of the Substance/Mixture : Air care products 1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBSTANCE/MIXTURE AND OF THE COMPANY/UNDERTAKING 1.1 Product identifier : 1.2 Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Use of the Substance/Mixture

More information

Safety Data Sheet according to HPR, Schedule 1

Safety Data Sheet according to HPR, Schedule 1 Page 1/6 1 Identification Article number: 2087210001 Recommended use: Graffiti remover Restrictions on use: All other uses than those indicated on the product label and technical data sheet Manufacturer:

More information

PFAS at Parafield Airport. November 2018

PFAS at Parafield Airport. November 2018 PFAS at Parafield Airport November 2018 2 Summary PFAS has been detected at low levels in groundwater in isolated monitoring wells set up on the southern and western boundary of Parafield Airport. As a

More information

Environmental Arsenic Exposure and Human Health in the Mekong River Basin of Cambodia

Environmental Arsenic Exposure and Human Health in the Mekong River Basin of Cambodia 4 th International Forum on Sustainable Future in Asia 4 th NIES International Forum, 23-24 January 2019, Hanoi, Vietnam Environmental Arsenic Exposure and Human Health in the Mekong River Basin of Cambodia

More information

The user will find here a brief introduction to using the UPERCUT tool. In interpreting the results and their scope, he should consult the introductory document available at: https://www.webdepot.umontreal.ca/usagers/lavouej/mondepotpublic/upercut/docs/intro.htm.

More information

JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE

JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Health and Consumer Protection European Chemicals Bureau I-21020 Ispra (VA) Italy 2-(2-METHOXYETHOXY)ETHANOL CAS-No.: 111-77-3 EINECS-No.: 203-906-6

More information

Cancer Risk Assessment from Trihalomethanes in Community Water Supply at Northeastern Thailand

Cancer Risk Assessment from Trihalomethanes in Community Water Supply at Northeastern Thailand Cancer Risk Assessment from Trihalomethanes in Community Water Supply at Northeastern Thailand Prapat Pentamwa, Benchamaporn Sukton, Tanisa Wongklom, and Sathaporn Pentamwa Abstract This study aims to

More information

CHAPTER 14 RISK ASSESSMENT. C.P. Gerba. Structure of risk analysis.

CHAPTER 14 RISK ASSESSMENT. C.P. Gerba. Structure of risk analysis. CHAPTER 14 RISK ASSESSMENT C.P. Gerba Structure of risk analysis. 212 C. P. Gerba 213 14.1 THE CONCEPT OF RISK ASSESSMENT Risk, which is common to all life, is an inherent property of everyday human existence.

More information