Appendix C Risk Calculations Western Margin of Northern Plumes
|
|
- Egbert Stanley
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Appendix C Calculations Western Margin of Northern Plumes Consolidated Human Health Assessment
2 General Parameters Air s During Irrigation (Reference: Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Petroleum contaminated Sites in New Zealand) All Calculations NOTES: Vs = Volume of Air within Irrigation zone (m3) Chemical Parameters (H and MW) for taken from RAIS in August 2010 Q = Volumetric Flow rate of Water (L/min) 30 H (atm.m3/mol) = H' (dimensionless) / 41 Time = Duration of Irrigation (min) 60 d = Droplet diameter (cm) 0.2 t = Droplet drop time (s) 10 R = Gas Constant (atm.m3/mol/k) 8.20E-05 T = Absolute Temperature (K) 293 Ts = Sprinkler Water Temperature (K) 288 m1 = Water viscosity at 20oC (g/m.s) m2 = Water viscosity at Sprinkler Water Temperature (g/m.s) Chemical Parameters Calculations Liquid Mass Transfer Coefficient (cm/hr) Gas Phase Mass Transfer Coefficient (cm/hr) Overall Mass Transfer Coefficient (cm/hr) Adjusted Overall Mass Transfer Coefficient (cm/hr) Fraction Volatilised (mg/mg) Mass Volatilised (mg) in Soil Water (mg/l) COPC in Water (mg/l) Henry's Law (atm.m 3 /mol) Molecular Weight in Air (mg/m 3 ) Cw HL MW Kl Kg KL KL' fv Ms Cair Cwater 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) E E E E E E E E-02 Vinyl chloride E E E E E E E E-02 Carbon tetrachloride E E E E E E E E-03 Trichloroethene (TCE) E E E E E E E E-03 Tetrachloroethene (PCE) E E E E E E E E-03
3 Equations Uptake of Organic Chemicals into Crops from Water (Reference: Briggs et al. (1982), Travis and Arms (1988), RISC User Manual (Version 4.0, 2001)) Uptake into Root Crops Potential for Translocation to Above-Ground Crops Uptake into Above-Ground Crops where there is Potential 2 Uptake = VG RCF (logkow -1.78) logkow TSCF = exp( - ) = log Kow RCF = Uptake (1 - MC ) f K where: where: VG orrection Factor where: log Kow= log octanol/water partition coeff. (L/kg) RCF = Root Factor (mg/kg produce per mg/l) TSCF = Transpiration Stream Factor (unitless) MC = moisture content of produce (g/g) log Kow= log octanol/water partition coeff. (L/kg) log Kow= log octanol/water partition coeff. (L/kg) Koc = organic carbon partition coeff. (ml/g) Translocation of importance if TSCF>0.1 foc = fraction of organic carbon (g/g) oc oc Calculation of Uptake Factors COPC Uptake into Root Crops RCF (mg/kg produce per Uptake Factor (mg/kg mg/l) produce per mg/l water) Uptake Factor (mg/kg produce per mg/l water) log Kow (L/kg) Koc (ml/g) foc VG (unitless) TSCF Potential for uptake? MC (g/g) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) E E E-01 yes E-01 Vinyl chloride E E E-01 yes E-01 Carbon tetrachloride E E E-01 yes E-02 Trichloroethene (TCE) E E E-01 yes E-01 Tetrachloroethene (PCE) E E E-01 yes E-02 s Above Ground Crops (mg/kg produce) Total Produce (19% root crops and 81% other crops) (mg/kg) COPC Soil Water (mg/l) Root Crops (mg/kg produce) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 3.1E E E E-03 Vinyl chloride 9.8E E E E-02 Carbon tetrachloride 6.2E E E E-04 Trichloroethene (TCE) 9.0E E E E-03 Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 8.9E E E E-04 Uptake into Above-Ground Crops
4 Calculation of Emissions into House with Crawl-Space Using Measured Flux Emissions Data Building Parameters Value Reference/Comments Indoor Air Model - Modified Box Model for Infinite Source LB length of building, m 12.7 Estimated size of house WB width of building, m 10 Estimated size of house HB height of building, m 2.7 Estimated typical height A area of floor of house, m Turczynowicz, 2002 Hcs height of crawl space, m 0.3 Estimated - Conservative Value Vcs volume of crawl space, m Calculated (Turczynowicz, 2002) Vd volume of dwelling space, m Calculated (Turczynowicz, 2002) Xcs air exchange rate in crawl space, (per day) Lower value from Australian Studies Xd air exchange rate in dwelling, (per day) Typical value as per Turczynowicz, 2002 Qcsd volumetric flow rate of air from crawl space to dwelling through wooden floor Typical value as per Turczynowicz, 2002 S indoor sinks (inhalation only), (m 3 /day) 35.1 Turczynowicz, 2002 Outdoor Air Model w Width of area outdoors (m) - upwind distance 25 Estimated A Area of area outdoors (m 2 ) 625 Calculated from width A Area outdoors (acres) 0.15 Conversion of area Q/C Dispersion Ratio (g/m 2 /s per kg/m 3 ) Calculated for typical climates in Aust. Calculation of Indoor Air (Turczynowicz, 2002) Chemical Volatile Degradation rate in Air Measured Emission Rate from Surface in Crawl Space within Building within Building Max Measured Emission Rate from Surface (per day) J (ug/day/m 2 ) C craw l space (ug/m 3 ) C building (ug/m 3 ) C building (mg/m 3 ) J (ug/min/m 2 ) 1,2-Dichloroethane 1.1E E E E E E-02 Dichloromethane 5.8E E E E E E+00 Carbon Tetrachloride 5.2E E E E E E-02 Trichloroethene 1.4E E E E E E-02 Tetrachloroethene 7.2E E E E E E-01 Calculation of Outdoor Air (Soil Screening Guidance 1996 and 2000) Chemical Measured Emission Rate from Surface Outside Outside ER (g/s/m 2 ) C outside (ug/m 3 ) C outside (mg/m 3 ) 1,2-Dichloroethane 7.50E E E-06 Dichloromethane 7.00E E E-04 Carbon Tetrachloride 2.83E E E-06 Trichloroethene 6.17E E E-06 Tetrachloroethene 1.30E E E-04
5 Inhalation of Volatiles (derived from Groundwater Source) Inhalation ExposureConc V a ET FI EF ED AT (mg/m 3 ) Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Adult Residents - Western Margin Exposure Time Indoors (ET, hr/day) 20 Time spend indoors every day (as per NEPM 1999 and enhealth 2002) Exposure Time Outdoors (ET, hr/day) 4 Time spend indoors every day (as per Nap 1999 and enhealth 2002) Fraction Inhaled from Contaminated Source (FI, unitless) 1 Assume all of home above impacted soils Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 337 Assume time at home each year Exposure Duration (ED, years) 54 Duration of exposure as per NEPM 1999 and USEPA 1989 Averaging Time - Non (Atc, hours) USEPA 2009 Averaging Time - (Atn, hours) USEPA 2009 Inhalation Unit Chronic TC Background air Intake (% Chronic TC) Chronic TC Allowable for Assessment (TC- Daily Exposure Calculated in Air (Ca) Inhalation Exposure Inhalation Exposure Non- Chronic Hazard - - Quotient Non (mg/m 3 ) -1 (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 2.8E E E E E-7 89% -- Dichloromethane 2.0E-01 20% 1.6E E E E % Carbon tetrachloride 6.1E-03 40% 3.7E E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 4.3E E E E E E E-8 11% % Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 2.0E-02 10% 1.8E E E E % TOTAL 4.2E Ca oncentration in air weighted indoor and outdoor concentration
6 Exposure to Chemicals via Incidental Ingestion of Water (Extracted Groundwater) Daily Chemical Intake IW W IR W FI B EF ED (L/kg/day) BW AT Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Adult Residents - Western Margin Ingestion Rate (Irw, L/day) 0.2 Assume 10% daily intake from backyard tap Fraction Ingested from Source 100% Assumed to be 100% Bioavailability (B) 100% Assume 100% bioavailability via ingestion of chemicals in water. Exposure Frequency (EF, days/year) 64 Assume contact with water 2 days per week in warmer 8 months Exposure Duration (ED, years) 54 Duration of exposure as per NEPM 1999 and USEPA 1989 Body Weight (BW, kg) 75 ABS 2008 Averaging Time - Non (Atc, days) USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Averaging Time - (Atn, days) USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Non- Slope Factor TDI Background Intake (% TDI) TDI Allowable for Assessment (TDI- in Water (Cw) Daily Intake Non Non- Calculated Chronic Hazard Quotient (mg/kg-day) -1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (mg/l) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 1.0E E E E-7 0% -- Vinyl chloride 2.3E E E E-4 100% -- Carbon tetrachloride 1.4E-03 40% 8.5E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 7.8E E E E E E-9 0% % Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 1.4E-02 10% 1.3E E E % TOTAL 2.0E
7 Dermal Exposure to Chemicals via Contact with Water (Extracted Groundwater) Daily Chemical Intake DW W SAw ET DP CF EF ED BW AT (L/kg/day) Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Adult Residents - Western Margin Surface Area (Saw, cm 2 ) Whole adult body surface area, assuming that the adult gets completely we during irrigation or use of water from the backyard bore. A more realistic exposure would be to hands only (1068 cm2) (maximum assumed in Stage 2 Assessment) Exposure Time (ET, hr/day) 1 Assume contact with water for 1 hours each time GW is used Conversion Factor (CF, L/cm 3 ) 1.E-03 Conversion of units Dermal Permeability (cm/hr) Chemical-specific (as below) Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 64 Assume contact with water 2 days per week in warmer 8 months Exposure Duration (ED, years) 54 Duration of exposure as per NEPM 1999 and USEPA 1989 Body Weight (BW, kg) 75 ABS 2008 Averaging Time - Non (Atc, days) USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Averaging Time - (Atn, days) USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Non- Slope Factor TDI Background TDI Allowable for Intake (% TDI) Assessment (TDI- Dermal Permeability (DP) in Water (Cw) Daily Intake Non- Non- Calculated Chronic Hazard Quotient (mg/kg-day) -1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (cm/hr) (mg/l) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 1.0E E E E E-7 0% -- Vinyl chloride 2.3E E E E E-4 100% -- Carbon tetrachloride 1.4E-03 40% 8.5E E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 7.8E E E E E E E-9 0% % Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 1.4E-02 10% 1.3E E E E % 1.8E
8 Inhalation of Volatiles (derived from Irrigation of Groundwater) Inhalation Exposure Conc V a ET FI EF ED AT (mg/m 3 ) Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Adult Residents - Western Margin Exposure Time (ET, hr/day) 1 Assume groundwater used to irrigate for 1 hour each time Fraction Inhaled from Contaminated Source (FI, unitless) 1 All derived from impacted groundwater Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 104 Assume groundwater used to irrigate 2 days per week Exposure Duration (ED, years) 54 Duration of exposure as per NEPM 1999 and USEPA 1989 Averaging Time - Non (Atc, hours) USEPA 2009 Averaging Time - (Atn, hours) USEPA 2009 Inhalation Unit Chronic TC Background air Intake (% Chronic TC) Chronic TC Allowable for Assessment (TC- Daily Exposure Calculated in Air (Ca) Inhalation Exposure Inhalation Exposure Non- Chronic Hazard - - Quotient Non (mg/m 3 ) -1 (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 2.8E E E E E-8 8% -- Vinyl chloride 8.8E E E E E-7 91% -- Carbon tetrachloride 6.1E-03 40% 3.7E E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 4.3E E E E E E E-9 0% % Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 2.0E-02 10% 1.8E E E E % TOTAL 1.0E
9 Exposure to Chemicals via Ingestion of Home-grown Produce (Irrigated with Extracted Groundwater) Daily ChemicalIntake FV FV IR FV FH B EF ED BW AT (mg/kg/day) Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Adult Residents - Western Margin Ingestion Rate of Fruit and Veg (IR FV kg/day) enhealth 2003 draft intake based on yr age group intake (max) Fraction Ingested that is Home-grown 35% Assume 35% of produce consumed each year is home-grown Bioavailability (B) 100% Assume 100% bioavailability Exposure Frequency (EF, days/year) 337 Assume time at home each year Exposure Duration (ED, years) 54 Duration of exposure as per NEPM 1999 and USEPA 1989 Body Weight (BW, kg) 75 ABS 2008 Averaging Time - Non (Atc, days) USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Averaging Time - (Atn, days) USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Non- Slope Factor TDI Background Intake (% TDI) TDI Allowable for Assessment (TDI- in Produce (C FV ) Daily Intake Non Non- Calculated Chronic Hazard Quotient (mg/kg-day) -1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 1.0E E E E-7 0% -- Vinyl chloride 2.3E E E E-5 100% -- Carbon tetrachloride 1.4E-03 40% 8.5E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 7.8E E E E E E-9 0% % Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 1.4E-02 10% 1.3E E E % TOTAL 4.2E
10 Inhalation of Volatiles (derived from Groundwater Source) Inhalation ExposureConc V a ET FI EF ED AT (mg/m 3 ) Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Older Children Residents - Western Margin Exposure Time Indoors (ET, hr/day) 20 Time spend indoors every day (as per NEPM 1999 and enhealth 2002) Exposure Time Outdoors (ET, hr/day) 4 Time spend indoors every day (as per Nap 1999 and enhealth 2002) Fraction Inhaled from Contaminated Source (FI, unitless) 1 Assume all of home above impacted soils Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 337 Assume time at home each year Exposure Duration (ED, years) 10 Duration of exposure as per NEPM 1999 and USEPA 1989 Age Dependant Adjustment Factor (ADAF) - where relevant 3 Relevant for children aged 2 to <16 years as per USEPA 2005 Averaging Time - Non (Atc, hours) USEPA 2009 Averaging Time - (Atn, hours) USEPA 2009 Inhalation Unit Chronic TC Background air Intake (% Chronic TC) Chronic TC Allowable for Assessment (TC- Daily Exposure Calculated in Air (Ca) Inhalation Exposure Inhalation Exposure Non- Chronic Hazard - - Quotient Non (mg/m 3 ) -1 (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 2.8E E E E E-8 73% -- Dichloromethane 2.0E-01 20% 1.6E E E E % Carbon tetrachloride 6.1E-03 40% 3.7E E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 4.3E E E E E E E-8 27% % Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 2.0E-02 10% 1.8E E E E % TOTAL 9.4E Ca oncentration in air weighted indoor and outdoor concentration Includes consideration of early life susceptibility for non-threshold calculation
11 Exposure to Chemicals via Incidental Ingestion of Water (Extracted Groundwater) Daily Chemical Intake IW W IR W FI B EF ED (L/kg/day) BW AT Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Older Children Residents - Western Margin Ingestion Rate (Irw, L/day) 0.2 Assume 10% daily intake from backyard tap Fraction Ingested from Source 100% Assumed to be 100% Bioavailability (B) 100% Assume 100% bioavailability via ingestion of chemicals in water. Exposure Frequency (EF, days/year) 64 Assume contact with water 2 days per week in warmer 8 months Exposure Duration (ED, years) 10 Duration of exposure as per NEPM 1999 and USEPA 1989 Body Weight (BW, kg) 34.5 As per USEPA 1999 Age Dependant Adjustment Factor (ADAF) - where relev 3 Relevant for children aged 2 to <16 years as per USEPA 2005 Averaging Time - Non (Atc, days) USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Averaging Time - (Atn, days) 3650 USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Non- Slope Factor TDI Background Intake (% TDI) TDI Allowable for Assessment (TDI- in Water (Cw) Daily Intake Non Non- Calculated Chronic Hazard Quotient (mg/kg-day) -1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (mg/l) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 1.0E E E E-7 0% -- Vinyl chloride 2.3E E E E-5 100% -- Carbon tetrachloride 1.4E-03 40% 8.5E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 7.8E E E E E E-9 0% % Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 1.4E-02 10% 1.3E E E % TOTAL 8.0E Includes consideration of early life susceptibility for non-threshold calculation
12 Dermal Exposure to Chemicals via Contact with Water (Extracted Groundwater) Daily Chemical Intake DW W SAw ET DP CF EF ED BW AT (L/kg/day) Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Older Children Residents - Western Margin Surface Area (Saw, cm 2 ) Whole body gets wet each time GW is used, value adopted for male child aged years (90th percentile) (USEPA 1997) Exposure Time (ET, hr/day) 1 Assume contact with water for 1 hours each time GW is used Conversion Factor (CF, L/cm 3 ) 1.E-03 Conversion of units Dermal Permeability (cm/hr) Chemical-specific (as below) Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 64 Assume contact with water 2 days per week in warmer 8 months Exposure Duration (ED, years) 10 Duration of exposure as per NEPM 1999 and USEPA 1989 Body Weight (BW, kg) 34.5 As per USEPA 1997 Age Dependant Adjustment Factor (ADAF) - wher 3 Relevant for children aged 2 to <16 years as per USEPA 2005 Averaging Time - Non (Atc, days) USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Averaging Time - (Atn, days) 3650 USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Non- Slope Factor TDI Background TDI Allowable for Intake (% TDI) Assessment (TDI- Dermal Permeability (DP) in Water (Cw) Daily Intake Non- Non- Calculated Chronic Hazard Quotient (mg/kg-day) -1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (cm/hr) (mg/l) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 1.0E E E E E-8 0% -- Vinyl chloride 2.3E E E E E-5 100% -- Carbon tetrachloride 1.4E-03 40% 8.5E E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 7.8E E E E E E E-9 0% % Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 1.4E-02 10% 1.3E E E E % 5.1E Includes consideration of early life susceptibility for non-threshold calculation
13 Inhalation of Volatiles (derived from Irrigation of Groundwater) Inhalation Exposure Conc V a ET FI EF ED AT (mg/m 3 ) Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Older Children Residents - Western Margin Exposure Time (ET, hr/day) 1 Assume groundwater used to irrigate for 1 hour each time Fraction Inhaled from Contaminated Source (FI, unitless) 1 All derived from impacted groundwater Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 104 Assume groundwater used to irrigate 2 days per week Exposure Duration (ED, years) 10 Duration of exposure as per NEPM 1999 and USEPA 1989 Age Dependant Adjustment Factor (ADAF) - where relevant 3 Relevant for children aged 2 to <16 years as per USEPA 2005 Averaging Time - Non (Atc, hours) USEPA 2009 Averaging Time - (Atn, hours) USEPA 2009 Inhalation Unit Chronic TC Background air Intake (% Chronic TC) Chronic TC Allowable for Assessment (TC- Daily Exposure Calculated in Air (Ca) Inhalation Exposure Inhalation Exposure Non- Chronic Hazard - - Quotient Non (mg/m 3 ) -1 (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 2.8E E E E E-8 8% -- Vinyl chloride 8.8E E E E E-7 90% -- Carbon tetrachloride 6.1E-03 40% 3.7E E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 4.3E E E E E E E-9 1% % Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 2.0E-02 10% 1.8E E E E % TOTAL 2.0E Includes consideration of early life susceptibility for non-threshold calculation
14 Exposure to Chemicals via Ingestion of Home-grown Produce (Irrigated with Extracted Groundwater) Daily ChemicalIntake FV FV IR FV FH B EF ED BW AT (mg/kg/day) Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Older Children Residents - Western Margin Ingestion Rate of Fruit and Veg (IR FV kg/day) enhealth 2003 draft intake based on average of 8-15 yr intake Fraction Ingested that is Home-grown 35% Assume 35% of produce consumed each year is home-grown Bioavailability (B) 100% Assume 100% bioavailability Exposure Frequency (EF, days/year) 337 Assume time at home each year Exposure Duration (ED, years) 10 Duration of exposure as per NEPM 1999 and USEPA 1989 Body Weight (BW, kg) 34.5 As per USEPA 1997 Age Dependant Adjustment Factor (ADAF) - wh 3 Relevant for children aged 2 to <16 years as per USEPA 2005 Averaging Time - Non (Atc, days) USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Averaging Time - (Atn, days) 3650 USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Non- Slope Factor TDI Background Intake (% TDI) TDI Allowable for Assessment (TDI- in Produce (C FV ) Daily Intake Non Non- Calculated Chronic Hazard Quotient (mg/kg-day) -1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 1.0E E E E-8 0% -- Vinyl chloride 2.3E E E E-5 100% -- Carbon tetrachloride 1.4E-03 40% 8.5E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 7.8E E E E E E-9 0% % Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 1.4E-02 10% 1.3E E E % TOTAL 1.1E Includes consideration of early life susceptibility for non-threshold calculation
15 Inhalation of Volatiles (derived from Groundwater Source) Inhalation ExposureConc V a ET FI EF ED AT (mg/m 3 ) Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Young Children Residents - Western Margin Exposure Time Indoors (ET, hr/day) 20 Time spend indoors every day (as per NEPM 1999 and enhealth 2002) Exposure Time Outdoors (ET, hr/day) 4 Time spend indoors every day (as per Nap 1999 and enhealth 2002) Fraction Inhaled from Contaminated Source (FI, unitless) 1 Assume all of home above impacted soils Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 337 Assume time at home each year Exposure Duration (ED, years) 6 Duration of exposure as per NEPM 1999 and USEPA 1989 Age Dependant Adjustment Factor (ADAF) - where relevant 10 Relevant for children aged <2 years as per USEPA Relevant for children aged <2 to <16 years as per USEPA 2005 Averaging Time - Non (Atc, hours) USEPA 2009 Averaging Time - (Atn, hours) USEPA 2009 Inhalation Unit Chronic TC Background air Intake (% Chronic TC) Chronic TC Allowable for Assessment (TC- Daily Exposure Calculated in Air (Ca) Inhalation Exposure Inhalation Exposure Non- Chronic Hazard - - Quotient Non (mg/m 3 ) -1 (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 2.8E E E E E-8 60% -- Dichloromethane 2.0E-01 20% 1.6E E E E % Carbon tetrachloride 6.1E-03 40% 3.7E E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 4.3E E E E E E E-8 40% % Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 2.0E-02 10% 1.8E E E E % TOTAL 6.8E Ca oncentration in air weighted indoor and outdoor concentration Includes consideration of early life susceptibility for non-threshold calculation
16 Exposure to Chemicals via Incidental Ingestion of Water (Extracted Groundwater) Daily Chemical Intake IW W IR W FI B EF ED (L/kg/day) BW AT Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Young Children Residents - Western Margin Ingestion Rate (Irw, L/day) 0.2 Assumed intake when using water in backyard Fraction Ingested from Source 100% Assumed to be 100% Bioavailability (B) 100% Assume 100% bioavailability via ingestion of chemicals in water. Exposure Frequency (EF, days/year) 64 Assume contact with water 2 days per week in warmer 8 months Exposure Duration (ED, years) 6 Duration of exposure as per NEPM 1999 and USEPA 1989 Body Weight (BW, kg) 13.2 NEPM 1999 and enhealth 2002 Age Dependant Adjustment Factor (ADAF) - wh 10 Relevant for children aged <2 years as per USEPA Relevant for children aged <2 to <16 years as per USEPA 2005 Averaging Time - Non (Atc, days) USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Averaging Time - (Atn, days) 2190 USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Non- Slope Factor TDI Background Intake (% TDI) TDI Allowable for Assessment (TDI- in Water (Cw) Daily Intake Non Non- Calculated Chronic Hazard Quotient (mg/kg-day) -1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (mg/l) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 1.0E E E E-7 0% -- Vinyl chloride 2.3E E E E-4 100% -- Carbon tetrachloride 1.4E-03 40% 8.5E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 7.8E E E E E E-8 0% % Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 1.4E-02 10% 1.3E E E % TOTAL 1.3E Includes consideration of early life suseptability for non-threshold calculation
17 Dermal Exposure to Chemicals via Contact with Water (Extracted Groundwater) Daily Chemical Intake DW W SAw ET DP CF EF ED BW AT (L/kg/day) Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Young Children Residents - Western Margin Surface Area (Saw, cm 2 ) 7290 Whole body surface area (male child 3-4 yrs, 90 percentile, USEPA 1997) Exposure Time (ET, hr/day) 2 Assume contact with water for 2 hours each time GW is used Conversion Factor (CF, L/cm 3 ) 1.E-03 Conversion of units Dermal Permeability (cm/hr) Chemical-specific (as below) Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 64 Assume contact with water 2 days per week in warmer 8 months Exposure Duration (ED, years) 6 Duration of exposure as per NEPM 1999 and USEPA 1989 Body Weight (BW, kg) 13.2 NEPM 1999 and enhealth 2002 Age Dependant Adjustment Factor (ADAF) - wher 10 Relevant for children aged <2 years as per USEPA Relevant for children aged <2 to <16 years as per USEPA 2005 Averaging Time - Non (Atc, days) USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Averaging Time - (Atn, days) 2190 USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Non- Slope Factor TDI Background TDI Allowable for Intake (% TDI) Assessment (TDI- Dermal Permeability (DP) in Water (Cw) Daily Intake Non- Non- Calculated Chronic Hazard Quotient (mg/kg-day) -1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (cm/hr) (mg/l) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 1.0E E E E E-8 0% -- Vinyl chloride 2.3E E E E E-5 100% -- Carbon tetrachloride 1.4E-03 40% 8.5E E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 7.8E E E E E E E-8 0% % Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 1.4E-02 10% 1.3E E E E % 7.7E Includes consideration of early life susceptibility for non-threshold calculation
18 Inhalation of Volatiles (derived from Irrigation of Groundwater) Inhalation Exposure Conc V a ET FI EF ED AT (mg/m 3 ) Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Young Children Residents - Western Margin Exposure Time (ET, hr/day) 1 Assume groundwater used to irrigate for 1 hour each time Fraction Inhaled from Contaminated Source (FI, unitless) 1 All derived from impacted groundwater Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 104 Assume groundwater used to irrigate 2 days per week Exposure Duration (ED, years) 6 Duration of exposure as per NEPM 1999 and USEPA 1989 Age Dependant Adjustment Factor (ADAF) - where relevant 10 Relevant for children aged <2 years as per USEPA Relevant for children aged <2 to <16 years as per USEPA 2005 Averaging Time - Non (Atc, hours) USEPA 2009 Averaging Time - (Atn, hours) USEPA 2009 Inhalation Unit Chronic TC Background air Intake (% Chronic TC) Chronic TC Allowable for Assessment (TC- Daily Exposure Calculated in Air (Ca) Inhalation Exposure Inhalation Exposure Non- Chronic Hazard - - Quotient Non (mg/m 3 ) -1 (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 2.8E E E E E-9 8% -- Vinyl chloride 8.8E E E E E-7 90% -- Carbon tetrachloride 6.1E-03 40% 3.7E E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 4.3E E E E E E E-9 2% % Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 2.0E-02 10% 1.8E E E E % TOTAL 1.2E Includes consideration of early life susceptibility for non-threshold calculation
19 Exposure to Chemicals via Ingestion of Home-grown Produce (Irrigated with Extracted Groundwater) Daily ChemicalIntake FV FV IR FV FH B EF ED BW AT (mg/kg/day) Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Young Children Residents - Western Margin Ingestion Rate of Fruit and Veg (IR FV kg/day) As per enhealth 2003 Fraction Ingested that is Home-grown 35% Assume 35% of produce consumed each year is home-grown Bioavailability (B) 100% Assume 100% bioavailability Exposure Frequency (EF, days/year) 337 Assume time at home each year Exposure Duration (ED, years) 6 Duration of exposure as per NEPM 1999 and USEPA 1989 Body Weight (BW, kg) 13.2 NEPM 1999 and enhealth 2002 Age Dependant Adjustment Factor (ADAF) - wh 10 Relevant for children aged <2 years as per USEPA Relevant for children aged <2 to <16 years as per USEPA 2005 Averaging Time - Non (Atc, days) USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Averaging Time - (Atn, days) 2190 USEPA 1989 and CSMS 1996 Non- Slope Factor TDI Background Intake (% TDI) TDI Allowable for Assessment (TDI- in Produce (C FV ) Daily Intake Non Non- Calculated Chronic Hazard Quotient (mg/kg-day) -1 (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg) (mg/kg/day) (mg/kg/day) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 1.0E E E E-8 0% -- Vinyl chloride 2.3E E E E-5 100% -- Carbon tetrachloride 1.4E-03 40% 8.5E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 7.8E E E E E E-9 0% % Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 1.4E-02 10% 1.3E E E % TOTAL 1.2E Includes consideration of early life susceptibility for non-threshold calculation
20 Inhalation of Volatiles (derived from Groundwater Source) Inhalation ExposureConc V a ET FI EF ED AT (mg/m 3 ) Parameters Relevant to Quantification of Exposure by Intrusive Worker in Excavation Exposure Time (ET, hr/day) 8 Assumed time spent in excavation Fraction Inhaled from Contaminated Source (FI, unitless) 1 Assume all of workplace above impacted soils Exposure Frequency (EF, days/yr) 10 Assume intrusive works on services occur over 10 days each year Exposure Duration (ED, years) 5 Assume works occur on the same site over 5 years Averaging Time - Non (Atc, hours) USEPA 2009 Averaging Time - (Atn, hours) USEPA 2009 Inhalation Unit Chronic TC Background air Intake (% Chronic TC) Chronic TC Allowable for Assessment (TC- Daily Exposure Calculated in Excavation Air (Ca) Inhalation Exposure - Non Inhalation Exposure - Non- Chronic Hazard Quotient (mg/m 3 ) -1 (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (mg/m 3 ) (unitless) (unitless) 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 2.8E E E E E-9 89% -- Dichloromethane 2.0E-01 20% 1.6E E E E % Carbon tetrachloride 6.1E-03 40% 3.7E E E E % Trichloroethene (TCE) 4.3E E E E E E E-10 11% Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 2.0E-02 10% 1.8E E E E % TOTAL 1.8E Ca = 100 times larger than estimated in outdoor air, conservative estimate for excavations where air flow is limited
21 Summary of for RME Exposure - Western Margin Pathway Non s s Hazard Index Intrusive Workers Inhalation of volatile CHCs in excavations 1.8E Total 2E Adult Residents Inhalation of CHCs indoors and outdoors (from GW source) 4.2E Incidental ingestion of CHCs during backyard use of extracted GW 2.0E Dermal contact with CHCs during backyard use of extracted GW 1.8E Inhalation of CHCs during irrigation of extracted GW 1.0E Ingestion of CHCs accumulated in produce irrigated with extracted GW 4.2E Total (including exposures associated with extraction and use of GW) 4E Total (no GW use) 4E Older Child Residents Inhalation of CHCs indoors and outdoors (from GW source) 9.4E Incidental ingestion of CHCs during backyard use of extracted GW 8.0E Dermal contact with CHCs during backyard use of extracted GW 5.1E Inhalation of CHCs during irrigation of extracted GW 2.0E Ingestion of CHCs accumulated in produce irrigated with extracted GW 1.1E Total (including exposures associated with extraction and use of GW) 1E Total (no GW use) 9E Young Child Residents Inhalation of CHCs indoors and outdoors (from GW source) 6.8E Incidental ingestion of CHCs during backyard use of extracted GW 1.3E Dermal contact with CHCs during backyard use of extracted GW 7.7E Inhalation of CHCs during irrigation of extracted GW 1.2E Ingestion of CHCs accumulated in produce irrigated with extracted GW 1.2E Total (including exposures associated with extraction and use of GW) 2E Total (no GW use) 7E Lifetime (including exposures associated with extraction and use of GW) 8E Lifetime (no GW use) 6E
Appendix C Risk Calculations: Western Margin of Northern Plumes
Appendix C Calculations: Western Margin of Northern Plumes Consolidated Human Health Assessment - 2017 Table of Contents C1.0 Introduction... C-1 C2.0 Calculation of Exposure and : Young Children... C-2
More informationAppendix H Risk Calculations Off-Site
Appendix H Calculations Off-Site Exposure to Chemicals via Incidental Ingestion of Water (Extracted Groundwater) IR (L/kg/day) W FIBEFED Daily ChemicalIntakeIW CW BWAT Parameters Relevant to Quantification
More informationRisk Assessment Report for AGSS-ICS
1. INTRODUCTION This Risk Assessment evaluated the human health risks from exposure during and after application of AGSS-ICS. This information will determine whether AGSS-ICS used to treat soil will present
More informationANNEX A. Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS * * * * *
ANNEX A TITLE 25. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PART I. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SUBPART D. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ARTICLE VI. GENERAL HEALTH AND SAFETY CHAPTER 250. ADMINISTRATION OF
More informationTable H3-1 Values Used for Daily Intake/Absorbed Dose Inhalation of Particulates
Table H3-1 Values Used for Daily Intake/Absorbed Dose of Particulates Exposure Point Receptor Age: Particulates See Below Adult Exposure Parameter Parameter Definition Units RME RME Equation/ Route Code
More informationB Supporting Information for Human Health Risk Assessment
B Supporting Information for Human Health Risk Assessment 001688.OY06.06_PT083 Appendix B Table of Contents 1. Calculation of Infant Body Weight 2. Calculation of Consumption Rate of Meat for Native American
More informationAPPENDIX IV.I.1. Delivery Truck HRA
APPENDIX IV.I.1 Delivery Truck HRA Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) Health Risk Assessment (HRA) of Delivery Trucks from the Project at Pico and Sepulveda, Los Angeles, California Introduction This health
More informationDevelopment of Interim CCME PCB Soil Quality Guidelines for Missing Pathways of Exposure for the Protection of Human Health and Ecological Receptors
Development of Interim CCME PCB Soil Quality Guidelines for Missing Pathways of Exposure for the Protection of Human Health and Ecological Receptors By: Karl Bresee, B.Sc., PBD, P.Biol. Intrinsik Environmental
More informationHuman Health Risk Assessment Guidance
Human Health Risk Assessment Guidance Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Cleanup Program 811 SW Sixth Avenue Portland, OR 97204 DRAFT May 12, 2010 I. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The primary
More information1, 2, 3-Trichloropropane (TCP): Assessment of Risks from Drinking Water
1, 2, 3-Trichloropropane (TCP): Assessment of Risks from Drinking Water 1, 2, 3-Trichloropropane (TCP): Assessment of Risks from Drinking Water Prepared for Alaimo Group (Engineers and Architects) 200
More informationEvaluation of Mixture Exposures in Human Health Risk Assessments. Ruth Custance, MPH
Evaluation of Mixture Exposures in Human Health Risk Assessments Ruth Custance, MPH March 2016 Objectives Objectives Describe each of the major steps of a HHRA Data Evaluation What chemicals and at what
More informationAECOM Environment Figures January 2010
AECOM Environment Figures January 2010 Figure 1 General Monitoring Approach Readville 5-Yard Site Dedham and Readville, MA Real-ime Monitoring Constituent-Specific Monitoring Conduct Field Screening for
More informationUpdates to HSRA Risk Reduction Standards
Updates to HSRA Risk Reduction Standards Georgia AWMA Regulatory Update Conference May 11, 2017 Chris Saranko, Ph.D, DABT Atlanta, GA Presentation Outline 2017 Hazardous Site Response Rulemaking Phased
More informationAPPENDIX G: TECHNICAL BASIS FOR PRELIMINARY REMEDIATION GOALS FOR FISH TISSUE IN ONONDAGA LAKE HONEYWELL
: TECHNICAL BASIS FOR PRELIMINARY REMEDIATION GOALS FOR FISH TISSUE IN ONONDAGA LAKE Prepared For: HONEYWELL 101 Columbia Road P.O. Box 2105 Morristown, NJ 07962 Prepared By: Exponent 4 Computer Drive
More informationPoly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), also called perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs)
Poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), also called perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) Perfluorooctane sulphonic acid (PFOS), and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) belong to a group of man-made compounds called
More informationPlant uptake and human health risks from dietary exposure
Plant uptake and human health risks from dietary exposure Organic non-ionised chemicals Ondřej Mikeš 1. Pathways between soil/plant/air 2. Building model 3. Different crops 4. Chemicals 5. Dietary exposure
More informationChapter 6 Quantifying Exposure
What s Covered in Chapter 6: Chapter 6 Quantifying Exposure 6.1 Inhalation Exposure Pathways 6.2 Ingestion Exposure Pathways 6.3 Dermal Exposure Pathways 6.4 Exposure Frequency 6.5 Exposure Duration 6.6
More informationPrelude to Risk Characterization Exposure Calculations from Risk and Decision Making
ENV U6220 THURSDAY, 8/04/05 RISK CHARACTERIZATION / MANAGEMENT PAGE 1 Prelude to Risk Characterization Exposure Calculations from Risk and Decision Making ENV U6220 THURSDAY, 8/04/05 RISK CHARACTERIZATION
More informationScreening Level Health Risk Assessment of PCCD/PCDF Contamination Da Nang Airbase Case Study
Regional Capacity Building Program for Health Risk Management of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) in South East Asia Program 7/15/2009 SLIDE 1 Screening Level Health Risk Assessment of PCCD/PCDF Contamination
More informationDevelopment of NJ Human Health-based Criteria and Standards
Development of NJ Human Health-based Criteria and Standards Gloria Post NJDEP Office of Science Presented to: Public Health Standing Committee October 18, 2010 Human Health-based Criteria and Standards
More informationAPPENDIX D HAZARDS SCREENING LEVEL HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT MEMORANDUM
APPENDIX D HAZARDS SCREENING LEVEL HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT MEMORANDUM AECOM 515 South Flower Street Eighth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 www.aecom.com 213.593.7700 tel 213.593.7715 fax Memorandum Date: July
More informationAssessing Risks for Inhalation and Ingestion of Pollutants
Assessing Risks for and Ingestion of Pollutants This investigation focuses on the basics of human and ecological risk assessment. The activity uses hypothetical scenarios to investigate inhalation of an
More informationProbabilistic Risk-Cost-Benefit Analysis of Additional Benzene Emissions Controls
Probabilistic Risk-Cost-Benefit Analysis of Additional Benzene Emissions Controls Arthur F. Eidson, Ph.D. Senior Risk Assessor The Shaw Group 1401 Enclave Parkway, Suite 250 Houston, Texas 77077 June 16,
More informationAppendix B Toxicity Summaries
Appendix B Toxicity Summaries Table of Contents B1 Introduction... B-1 B2 Carbon Tetrachloride... B-2 B3 Chloroform... B-8 B4 Dichloromethane... B-14 B5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane... B-20 B6 1,1,2-Trichloroethane...
More informationSacramento Rendering Company Health Risk Assessment
Sacramento Rendering Company Health Risk Assessment The SMAQMD regulates emissions of toxic substances under Rule 402 and SMAQMD s guidance document, Health Risk Management Programs for Existing, Modified
More informationHuman Health Risk Assessment. Marian Olsen U.S. EPA ERRD October 13, 2011
Human Health Risk Assessment Marian Olsen U.S. EPA ERRD October 13, 2011 Presentation Overview Conceptual Site Model Defining Risk Assessment Conceptual Site Model Superfund Risk Assessment Process Data
More informationScreening-Level Risk Assessment for Styrene- Acrylonitrile (San) Trimer Detected in Soil and Groundwater
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Papers U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2012 Screening-Level Risk Assessment for
More informationEVALUATION OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN CLAY TARGET FRAGMENTS AND SURFACE SOIL AT SHOT GUN RANGE SITES Presenter: Glenn Hoeger and Brian
EVALUATION OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN CLAY TARGET FRAGMENTS AND SURFACE SOIL AT SHOT GUN RANGE SITES Presenter: Glenn Hoeger and Brian Magee ARCADIS/Malcolm Pirnie May 11, 2011 Objectives 1.
More informationCURRENT ISSUES: Risk-Based Corrective Action 14 TH ANNUAL FLORIDA BROWNFIELDS CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION
14 TH ANNUAL FLORIDA BROWNFIELDS CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION November 14, 2011 Orlando, Florida CURRENT ISSUES: Risk-Based Corrective Action Paula Cobb, Esq Hopping Green & Sams Tallahassee, FL Koren Taylor,
More informationEvaluation of Swimming Pool Treatment Chemicals Health Effects under NSF/ANSI Standard 50
Evaluation of Swimming Pool Treatment Chemicals Health Effects under NSF/ANSI Standard 50 Presentation Outline About NSF International NSF/ANSI 50 Overview Development Process of Annex R Annex R Requirements
More informationRisk Characterization
Risk Characterization 1 Learning Objectives By the end of this module, participants should have an understanding of: The purpose of risk characterization Integrating the results of hazard identification,
More informationArkansas Department of Health
Mr. Jim Wise Ecologist Coordinator, Office of Water Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality 5301 Northshore Drive North Little Rock, AR 72118-5317 Dear Mr. Wise: Arkansas Department of Health 4815
More informationMethodology for Developing Chemical Exposure Guidelines for Deployed Military Personnel
2013 REVISION Methodology for Developing Chemical Exposure Guidelines for Deployed Military Personnel Reference Document 230 2013 Addendum This is the support document for Technical Guide 230 U.S. Army
More informationENV 455 Hazardous Waste Management
Risk Assessment Basic Information ENV 455 Hazardous Waste Management Environmental Risk Assessment Özgür ZEYDAN (Phd.) http://cevre.beun.edu.tr/zeydan/ Hazard: a potential source of harm to a worker. Risk:
More informationRISK ASSESSMENT OF EXPOSURE TO BENZENE, TOLUENE AND FORMALDEHYDE IN RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT IN CHINA
RISK ASSESSMENT OF EXPOSURE TO BENZENE, TOLUENE AND FORMALDEHYDE IN RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT IN CHINA C Zheng 1, GQ Zhang 1,*, J.H Hao 2, J.P Lin 2, YH Liu 2 1 College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University,
More informationOutline: risk assessment. What kind of environmental risks do we commonly consider? 11/19/2013. Why do we need chemical risk assessment?
Outline: Human health h and ecological l risk assessment Purpose of risk assessment Methodology for quantifying risk Case study: Children s exposure to As from CCA wood staircases Issues practical and
More informationRisk assessment for redevelopment of contaminated land at an old industrial site
5th WSEAS nt. Conf. on ENVRONMENT, ECOSYSTEMS and DEVELOPMENT, Tenerife, Spain, December 14-16, 2007 358 Risk assessment for redevelopment of contaminated land at an old industrial site D.F. VENDAS (a,1),
More informationAppendix I DOCUMENTS RECEIVED OR USED IN PREPARATION OF THE HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT FOR THE STRECKER FOREST DEVELOPMENT SITE, WILDWOOD MO
Appendix I DOCUMENTS RECEIVED OR USED IN PREPARATION OF THE HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT FOR THE STRECKER FOREST DEVELOPMENT SITE, WILDWOOD MO ATSDR. 1998. TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR CHLORINATED DIBENZO-p-
More informationT6 SVE/AS Pilot Study Results
APPENDIX E SVE/Air Sparge Pilot Study Results Training Area T-6, Parcel 183(6) and Cane Creek Training Area, Parcel 51(7), McClellan, Anniston, Alabama T6 SVE/AS Pilot Study Results Introduction On April
More informationApplication of Injected ZVI PRB to Control Off-Site Migration of a VOC Plume at a Drycleaner Site in Quebec. Andrzej Przepiora and Simone Smith
Application of Injected ZVI PRB to Control Off-Site Migration of a VOC Plume at a Drycleaner Site in Quebec Andrzej Przepiora and Simone Smith RemTech 2016 Oct. 12-14, 2016 Presentation Overview Project
More informationRISK ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE FOR INHALATION RISK ASSESSMENT SUPERFUND, PART F: Midwestern States Risk Assessment
RISK ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE FOR SUPERFUND, PART F: SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE FOR INHALATION RISK ASSESSMENT Michael Sivak EPA Region 2 Superfund Program Midwestern States Risk Assessment Symposium - November
More informationTable 1 Fuel Oil UST Closure Soil Analytical Results St. Ann Center for Intergenerational Care Sigma Project No
Table 1 Fuel Oil UST Closure Analytical s St. Ann Center for Intergenerational Care Sigma Project No. 14643 DRAFT Sample Location: S-1 (north base) S-2 (south base) S-3 (east wall) S-4 (south wall) Sample
More informationUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES WASHINGTON, D.C
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 September 7, 2005 MEMORANDUM Subject: From: Through: Occupational and Residential
More informationHUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT THROUG TitleCHAIN IN SOME AREAS WITH HIGH ARSEN CONCENTRATION Author(s) Nguyen, Thi phuong Thao Annual Report of FY 2004, The Core Citation between Japan Society for the Promo
More informationHazard, exposure, and risk Thinking about risk Risk assessment processes Risk management A.001 Environmental Engineering 2
1 Hazard, exposure, and risk Thinking about risk Risk assessment processes Risk management 457.210A.001 Environmental Engineering 2 2015 2 Hazard: the inherent properties of a substance, object, or activity
More information5.0 HAZARD ASSESSMENT AND RISK CHARACTERIZATION
5.0 HAZARD ASSESSMENT AND RISK CHARACTERIZATION 5.1 SELECTING A TOXICITY REFERENCE VALUE (TRV) Appropriate Toxicity Reference Values (TRVs) are required to characterize the potency of the contaminants
More informationCHAPTER 8 RISK CHARACTERIZATION
CHAPTER 8 RISK CHARACTERIZATION This chapter describes the final step of the baseline health risk assessment process, risk characterization. In this step, the toxicity and exposure assessments are summarized
More informationLIC-WILLIAMS STREET 3 (PID 94085) MAY 2014 SUB SLAB AND INDOOR AIR TESTING RESULTS: 99 S. JAMES STREET 100 S. JAMES STREET
LIC-WILLIAMS STREET 3 (PID 94085) MAY 2014 SUB SLAB AND INDOOR AIR TESTING RESULTS: 99 S. JAMES STREET 100 S. JAMES STREET LIC-WILLIAM STREET 3 (PID 94085) SUB-SLAB & INDOOR AIR TESTING RESULTS PROPERTY
More informationPer- and poly- fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): information for clinicians
Per- and poly- fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): information for clinicians Introduction The purpose of this information is to provide guidance to aid clinicians with patient consultations on perfluoroalkyl
More informationSubject: Summary Report on Surface Soil Sampling Activities, Former Lockheed Martin Facility, Utica, New York
Ruth Curley, P.E. Environmental Engineer New York State epartment of Environmental Conservation ivision of Environmental Remediation 625 Broadway Albany, New York 12233-7016 ARCAIS US, Inc. 10 Friends
More informationPizza Pan Case Study
Session 4 Case Study of Risk Assessment and Management Pizza Pan Case Study Fernanda Takata The Dow Chemical Company, Product Stewardship and Regulatory Specialist 16 March, May, 2013 2011 Taipei Chile
More informationand Benchmark Toxicology Services HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS EXPANSION OF WAGERUP REFINERY TO 4.7 MTPA
and Benchmark Toxicology Services HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS EXPANSION OF WAGERUP REFINERY TO 4.7 MTPA for Alcoa World Alumina Australia ENVIRON Australia Pty Ltd Level 2, Adelaide
More informationATTACHMENT E. Selection of Soil Ingestion Rates
ATTACHMENT E Selection of Soil Ingestion Rates In assessing exposures and risks from the ingestion of floodplain soil, the HHRA evaluates eleven exposure scenarios (including residential, recreational,
More informationUpdated Health Risk Assessment Guidelines
Updated Health Risk Assessment Guidelines California OEHHA s Air Toxics Hot Spots Program March 31 st, 2015 Insert then choose Picture select your picture. Right click your picture and Send to back. Copyright
More informationAppendix B Toxicity of Mercury
Appendix B Toxicity of Mercury - 2013 B1 General Mercury is a heavy metal which exists in three oxidation states: 0 (elemental), +1 (mercurous) and +2 (mercuric). As well as the common mercurous and mercuric
More informationThe user will find here a brief introduction to using the UPERCUT tool. In interpreting the results and their scope, he should consult the introductory document available at: https://www.webdepot.umontreal.ca/usagers/lavouej/mondepotpublic/upercut/docs/intro.htm.
More informationUNITED STATES AIR FORCE IERA
IERA-RS-BR-TR-2000-0005 UNITED STATES AIR FORCE IERA Human Health Risk Assessment, Pope Air Force Base, North Carolina (AMC) Victor Caravello, Captain, USAF, BSC G. Cornell Long July 2000 Air Force Institute
More informationHEALTH CONSIDERATIONS RELATED TO ARSENIC IN SOIL UNDER PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT CONSTRUCTED OF CCA-TREATED WOOD
HEALTH CONSIDERATIONS RELATED TO ARSENIC IN SOIL UNDER PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT CONSTRUCTED OF CCA-TREATED WOOD Prepared for: Hopping Green Sams & Smith Tallahassee, FL and American Wood Preservers Institute
More informationJuly 9, Freeman Avenue Telephone: (562) Signal Hill, California Facsimile: (562)
July 9, 2015 Paul Cho, P.G. Water Resources Control Engineer California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Site Cleanup Unit IV Los Angeles Region 320 West 4 th Street, Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90013
More informationHazard Classification: Not classified as hazardous according to OSHA Hazard Communication Standard, 29 CFR
Safety Data Sheet: Stance SnF2 Rinse Concentrate 0.63% SECTION 1: IDENTIFICATION Product Name: Stance - Stannous Fluoride Rinse Concentrate 0.63% Catalog Numbers: Mint & Tropical Fruit - 745246310, 745246313
More informationCHAPTER 14 RISK ASSESSMENT. C.P. Gerba. Structure of risk analysis.
CHAPTER 14 RISK ASSESSMENT C.P. Gerba Structure of risk analysis. 212 C. P. Gerba 213 14.1 THE CONCEPT OF RISK ASSESSMENT Risk, which is common to all life, is an inherent property of everyday human existence.
More information1- Select a chemical
The user will find here a brief introduction to using the UPERCUT tool. In interpreting the results and their scope, he should also consult the introductory document found on the Website. An exhaustive
More informationRisk Assessment Report on Tris (nonylphenyl)phosphite (TNPP)
EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate C - Public Health and Risk Assessment C7 - Risk assessment SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS SCHER
More information1,4-Dioxane: Overview & NJDEP Ground Water Quality Criterion
1,4-Dioxane: Overview & NJDEP Ground Water Quality Criterion Gloria B. Post, Ph.D., DABT New Jersey Drinking Water Quality Institute December 18, 2018 USGS Water Science Center Lawrenceville, NJ Information
More informationEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
TECHNICAL REPORT APPROVED: 03/05/2017 doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2017.en-1223 Outcome of the consultation with Member States, the applicant and EFSA on the pesticide risk assessment for L-ascorbic acid in light
More informationStep by Step Approach for GPS Risk Assessment
Step by Step Approach for GPS Risk Assessment 1) Tier Categorization and Prioritization 2) Hazard Characterization By Mr. Krittanon Yuen-ying (Product Regulatory) Dow Chemical Thailand Limited Email: krittanon.yuen-ying@dow.com
More informationCase Study Summary: Appendix: Evaluation of Hazard Range for Three Additional Chemicals: Tetrachloroethylene, Chromium (VI) and Arsenic.
Case Study Summary: Practical Guidance on the Development of a Non-cancer Hazard Range for Effective Risk Assessment and Risk Management of Contaminated Sites: A Case Study with Trichloroethylene and Other
More informationRisk Assessment Pt2. K.E. Kelly University of Utah
Risk Assessment Pt2 K.E. Kelly University of Utah Reminders/Updates I will post the solu.on to HW#1 on Tuesday evening. - Presenta.on topics and schedules are up. Please review the schedule. I have done
More informationLIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED Abbreviation Meaning Abbreviation Meaning % Per cent Mn Manganèse & and mm milimetre * Asterisk IW Irrigation water Ca Calcium K Potassium cm centimetre kg kilogram CPE Cumulative
More informationUse of Soil and Tissue Testing for Sustainable Crop Nutrient Programs
Use of Soil and Tissue Testing for Sustainable Crop Nutrient Programs Kelly T. Morgan Soil and Water Science Department Southwest Florida Research and Education Center Immokalee 239 658 3400 conserv@ufl.edu
More informationPresenting Uncertainty in the Context of Toxicological, Biological Monitoring and Exposure Information. William H.
Presenting Uncertainty in the Context of Toxicological, Biological Monitoring and Exposure Information William H. Farland, PhD, ATS Presenting Risk Information and Uncertainty Concerns regarding how uncertainty
More informationDetailed Ecological Risk Assessment: N.E. British Columbia: Wildlife Protection and Extractable Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
Detailed Ecological Risk Assessment: N.E. British Columbia: Wildlife Protection and Extractable Aliphatic Hydrocarbons Craig Harris, M.Sc., P. Geo., R.P. Bio. October 18, 2012 Oil & Gas Commission BC MoE
More informationSAFE AT DIFFERENT APPLICATIONS AND USE PATTERNS. Polycarbonate beverage containers. Typical migration level less than 0,005mg/kg (5ppb)
SAFE AT DIFFERENT APPLICATIONS AND USE PATTERNS There are many different polycarbonate and epoxy products, with different use patterns and exposure situations. This is reflected in different migration
More informationBenzo[a]Pyrene Update - A Game Changer for Environmental Remediation and Property Revitalization? April 28, Presented by Kristen Rivera
Benzo[a]Pyrene Update - A Game Changer for Environmental Remediation and Property Revitalization? April 28, 2017 Presented by Kristen Rivera What is Benzo[a]Pyrene (BaP)? Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
More informationPart 2. Chemical and physical aspects
Part 2. Chemical and physical aspects 12. Chemical and physical aspects: introduction 12.1 Background information used The assessment of the toxicity of drinking-water contaminants has been made on the
More informationSAFETY DATA SHEET (SDS)
1. PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION SAFETY DATA SHEET (SDS) Product Name: Product Number: Formula: Product Use: Restrictions on Use: NaturaLyte (45X) (0000 through 4000 Series) None Solution: Acetic
More informationFederal Drinking Water Regulatory Update November 2012
Federal Drinking Water Regulatory Update November 2012 Bruce A. Macler USEPA Region 9 macler.bruce@epa.gov 415 972-3569 EPA DW Regulatory Status Out the door UCMR3 Proposed, closed and awaiting Final Total
More informationSAFETY DATA SHEET. Natural Guard Neem RTU. Effective Date: 23-Mar PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION
1. PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION PRODUCT NAME: Neem RTU EPA Reg. No.: 70051-13-7401 COMPANY IDENTIFICATION: Bonham, TX. 75418 2. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION 2.1. Classification of the substance or mixture
More informationDermal Occupational Exposure Limits. Their use in risk assessment
Dermal Occupational Exposure Limits Their use in risk assessment Contents 1. Risk assessment for dermal exposure 2. Dermal Occupational Exposure Limit (DOEL) 3. REACH 4. SCOEL 5. ECETOC 6. Summary Risk
More informationPerchlorate: an emerging contaminant
Perchlorate: an emerging contaminant WaterTech 2008 April 18, 2008 Presented by: Erik J. Martin, Ph.D. Outline of Presentation 1. Perchlorate Background 2. Health Effects 3. Exposure Assessment 4. Drinking
More informationPharmaceuticals, DDT and human health. BettinaGenthe
Pharmaceuticals, DDT and human health BettinaGenthe Extent of the problem 3.6 Million people in South Africa have no access to safe water and 16 million have no access to hygienic sanitation Babies, young
More informationEnvironmental Arsenic Exposure and Human Health in the Mekong River Basin of Cambodia
4 th International Forum on Sustainable Future in Asia 4 th NIES International Forum, 23-24 January 2019, Hanoi, Vietnam Environmental Arsenic Exposure and Human Health in the Mekong River Basin of Cambodia
More informationHepatitis B Immunoglobulin P Behring
1. Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking 1.1. Product identifier Product Identity Alternate Names Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin P Behring Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin P Behring
More informationSafety Data Sheet. KHA300 INTERTUF 262 OFF WHITE PART A Version Number 2 Revision Date 05/14/18
International Paint Singapore Pte Ltd Safety Data Sheet KHA300 INTERTUF 262 OFF WHITE PART A Version Number 2 Revision Date 05/14/18 1. Product and company identification 1.1. Product identifier INTERTUF
More informationMaterial Safety data sheet
1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBSTANCE / PREPARATION AND THE COMPANY / UNDERTAKING Product Name: UTURN - PLANT GROWTH REGULATOR CAS No. 76738-62-0 SUPPLIER: SEVROC PTY.LTD ABN: 09947875 STREET ADDRESS: 51
More informationMaterial Safety Data Sheet of dangerous substance METHYLENE CHLORIDE (DICHLOROMETHANE) 1. CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION
Page 1 of 7 1. CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Product name: Application: Distributor: METHYLENE CHLORIDE Solvent Wojciech Pawłowski 37-450 Stalowa Wola ul. Kwiatkowskiego 1 Tel. 015 / 842
More informationTetagam P SDS Revision Date: 06/03/2015
1. Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking 1.1. Product identifier Product Identity Alternate Names Tetagam P Human tetanus immunoglobulin 1.2. Relevant identified uses of
More informationArsenic in the Environment
Arsenic in the Environment Teresa S. Bowers Gradient Corporation Presented at Middleport, New York October 28, 2008 2 Arsenic Occurs Naturally All arsenic in the environment is of natural origin (natural
More informationEthylene Oxide
Ethylene Oxide 75-21-8 Hazard Summary The major use of ethylene oxide is as a chemical intermediate in the manufacture of ethylene glycol. Ethylene oxide is also used as a sterilizing agent for medical
More informationOPINION of the French Agency for Environmental and Occupational Health Safety
The Director General Maisons-Alfort, France, 15 June 2009 OPINION of the French Agency for Environmental and Occupational Health Safety Relating to establishing carcinogenic HTVs by inhalation for carbon
More informationCONCLUSION ON PESTICIDE PEER REVIEW. Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance diflubenzuron 1. Issued on 16 July 2009
Summary of the EFSA Scientific Report (2009) 332, 1-5 CONCLUSION ON PESTICIDE PEER REVIEW Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance diflubenzuron 1 (Question No EFSA-Q-2009-00240)
More informationExperiences with Exposure Models for Estimating the Bioavailability of Lead (Pb) in Children in the EU
18 September 2012 Experiences with Exposure Models for Estimating the Bioavailability of Lead (Pb) in Children in the EU Dr. Camilla Pease Senior Manager, Eurotox Registered Toxicologist. Human Health
More informationINVESTIGATION OF CHLORINATED METHANES TREATABILITY USING ACTIVATED SODIUM PERSULFATE
Preprint: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology (2005) INVESTIGATION OF CHLORINATED METHANES TREATABILITY USING ACTIVATED SODIUM PERSULFATE Duane K.
More informationAPPENDIX I. Soil Risk Calculation Supporting Details. Revised EE/CA. Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund Site: T-117 Early Action Area
APPENDIX I Soil Risk Calculation Supporting Details Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund Site: T-117 Early Action Area Revised EE/CA Appendix I. Soil Risk Calculation Supporting Details This appendix provides
More informationContribution of Drinking Water to Dietary Requirements of Essential Metals
Contribution of Drinking Water to Dietary Requirements of Essential Metals Michelle Deveau Water Quality Science Division Health Canada May 7, 2008 Workshop on Health Risk Assessment of Essential Metals
More informationDevelopment and Use of Wildlife Inhalation Toxicity Reference Values for Ecological Risk Assessment
Development and Use of Wildlife Inhalation Toxicity Reference Values for Ecological Risk Assessment Michael Anderson, California Environmental Protection Agency Ned Black, U.S. Environmental Protection
More informationCancer Risk Assessment from Trihalomethanes in Community Water Supply at Northeastern Thailand
Cancer Risk Assessment from Trihalomethanes in Community Water Supply at Northeastern Thailand Prapat Pentamwa, Benchamaporn Sukton, Tanisa Wongklom, and Sathaporn Pentamwa Abstract This study aims to
More informationPesticide Risk Assessment-- Dietary Exposure
Pesticide Risk Assessment-- Dietary Exposure Allan Felsot Department of Entomology, WSU-TC Food & Environmental Quality Lab afelsot@tricity.wsu.edu Lecture for 11/17/03 Mandates of the FQPA All tolerances
More informationCancer risk assessment from trihalomethanes in drinking water
Science of the Total Environment 387 (2007) 86 95 www.elsevier.com/locate/scitotenv Cancer risk assessment from trihalomethanes in drinking water Gen-Shuh Wang a,, Ya-Chen Deng a, Tsair-Fuh Lin b a Department
More information1.2 Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Use of the Substance/Mixture : Air care products
1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBSTANCE/MIXTURE AND OF THE COMPANY/UNDERTAKING 1.1 Product identifier : 1.2 Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Use of the Substance/Mixture
More information