Ultrasound Demonstration of Mammographically Detected Microcalcifications in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast
|
|
- Dorcas Turner
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Breast Cancer Vol. 12 No. 3 July 2005 Original Article Ultrasound Demonstration of Mammographically Detected Microcalcifications in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast Takeshi Nagashima 1, Hideyuki Hashimoto 2, Keiko Oshida 1, Shigeharu Nakano 1, Naoto Tanabe 1, Takashi Nikaido 3, Keiji Koda 1, and Masaru Miyazaki 1 1 Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 2 Chiba Cancer Screening Center, 3 Division of Diagnostic Pathology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan. Background: Breast microcalcifications are difficult to depict by ultrasound (US). However, recent advances in US equipment and the refinement of breast imaging techniques have improved the detection and characterization of small breast lesions. The present study attempts to determine whether US examination is able to demonstrate nonpalpable breast lesions associated with mammographically detected microcalcifications without mass density or distortion, and to evaluate the clinical reliability of US-guided procedures, especially in cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. Methods: The subjects consisted of 73 patients with breast cancer diagnosed preoperatively as DCIS by stereotactic core needle biopsies, all of whom had microcalcifications without other abnormalities on mammography. The radiological appearance and size of the clustered microcalcifications were evaluated. US examinations were performed preoperatively, and the detection rates were assessed. Sonographically detected lesions underwent US-guided wire localization followed by surgical excision. Results: The lesions associated with microcalcifications were identified sonographically in 54 of 73 cases (74%), and the pathological examination revealed breast cancer in all of the corresponding specimens. Lesions with linear-branching shape, segmental-linear distribution and category-5 calcifications on mammography had a high level of visibility on US. The US visible cases had a larger size of calcified area on mammography when compared with US invisible cases. Pathologically, the lesions were more frequently seen on US in cases with minimally invasive cancer or with comedo type DCIS. Conclusions: US examination is an effective method for identifying and localizing breast microcalcifications, and can be used as an alternative to stereotactic localization in selected patients with early breast cancer. Breast Cancer 12: , Key words: Breast cancer, Calcification, Mammography, Ultrasound The recent reduction of the mortality rate of breast cancer in Europe and the United States was influenced increased by the detection of early stage breast cancer due to mammographic screening for breast cancer 1). Mammography is very sensitive in the detection of breast microcalcifications, which are associated with breast cancer. Reprint requests to Takeshi Nagashima, Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba , Japan. Abbreviations: DCIS, Ductal carcinoma in situ; US, Ultrasound; BI-RADS, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Received May 20, 2004; accepted March 15, 2005 Microcalcifications are probably the most reliable mammographic feature in early nonpalpable breast cancer 2). Mammographically detected, suspicious clustered microcalcifications are usually diagnosed by either percutaneous core needle biopsy with stereotactic guidance or by surgical excision after mammographically guided wire localization. However, stereotactic biopsy equipment is expensive and the procedure is time consuming. Ultrasound (US) has long been known as a reliable modality for the diagnosis of a cystic or solid breast lesion 3). In general, a US-guided procedure is preferred by patients over a mammographically guided procedure because patients are more comfortable supine, the breast is not compressed, and 216
2 Breast Cancer Vol. 12 No. 3 July 2005 the procedure is often quicker. Furthermore, no ionizing radiation is used, the needle insertion site is more flexible, and the needle can be observed in real time 4, 5). The advances in US equipment and the refinement of breast imaging techniques enable better detection and characterization of small lesions, but the low capability of US to depict microcalcifications remains a major limitation 6-11). Microcalcifications are hardly visible with US, especially when they are located inside echogenic and fibroglandular breast tissue, because of the difficulty in differentiating them from the echogenic interfaces among tissues. Only a few studies exist on the US detection rate of microcalcifications within carcinoma in situ. The present study attempts to determine whether US examination is able to demonstrate nonpalpable breast lesions associated with mammographically detected microcalcifications without mass density or distortion, and to evaluate the clinical reliability of a US-guided procedure, especially in cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. Patients and Methods The subjects consisted of 73 cases with breast cancer diagnosed preoperatively as DCIS by core needle biopsies, who had microcalcifications without other abnormalities on mammography. The patients were surgically treated at the Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan, from 2000 to All of the patients had undergone breast screening by mammography and suspicious microcalcifications had been noted on their mammograms. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy (Mammotome; Johnson & Johnson Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH) was performed at Chiba Cancer Screening Center, Chiba, Japan, and pathological examinations revealed DCIS associated with microcalcifications. The cases with palpable breast lesions and/or with mammographically identified masses or architectural distortions were excluded from this series. Mammography was performed using a conventional film-screen technique (Senographe DMR ; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI). Standard mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal images of the breasts, and additional spot compression magnification images of areas containing microcalcifications were also obtained in all patients. Categorization of microcalcifications was performed according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) developed by American College of Radiology 12) and the Japanese Mammography Guidelines 13). The calcifications were morphologically classified as small round, amorphous, pleomorphic or linear/branching. The distribution of calcifications was described as clustered or segmental/linear. The size of the clustered microcalcifications was measured and calculated by the greatest diameter and its perpendicular dimension of the calcified group on mediolateral oblique projections. The radiological appearances of the microcalcifications identified on mammograms were evaluated by two or more specialists who received the image-reading training course of the Central Committee in the Quality Control of Mammographic Screening and ranked as having ability for mammogram-reading 1). US examinations were performed with the patient in the supine position with the arms raised, using an Aloka model SSD 5500 (ALOKA Co., Tokyo, Japan) ultrasound system with a MHz broadband liner-array probe. The scans were performed with a knowledge of the mammographic findings for presence and areas of microcalcifications, focused on the suspicious area in the breast. Successful detection of the lesions on US was assessed based on whether a hypoechogenic area, local dilated ductlike structures and/or echogenic dots with or without acoustic shadowing were observed in the location of the mammographically visualized microcalcifications (Fig 1, 2). Sonographically detected lesions underwent US-guided wire localization using a 21-gauge hooked wire needle (Hakko Medical, Nagano, Japan), and lesions not seen on US underwent stereotactic procedure. Sequential surgical excision was performed and specimen radiography was obtained in all cases to ensure the complete excision of the microcalcifications. The excised lesions were fixed in 10% formalin, paraffin embedded as tissue blocks, cut into multiple serial sections, stained by hematoxylin and eosin (H-E) and evaluated by our experienced pathologist. Pathological intraductal components were classified into comedo type and non-comedo type, depending on the existence of a comedo element. Statistical differences were determined by the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and 217
3 Nagashima T, et al Ultrasound Demonstration of Breast Calcifications Table 1 Characteristics of Microcalcifications and Ultrasound Detection Rates for All Patients Shape Small round Amorphous Pleomorphic Linear/Branching Distribution Clustered Segmental/Linear Category /17 (70.6%) 10/16 (62.5%) 23/30 (76.7%) 9/10 (90.0%) 24/36 (66.7%) 30/37 (81.1%) 19/29 (65.5%) 11/14 (78.6%) 24/30 (80.0%) Fig 1 A 42-year-old woman with minimally invasive ductal carcinoma. Ultrasonogram showing echogenic dots corresponded to mammographically visualized microcalcifications. Table 2 Characteristics of Microcalcifications and Ultrasound Detection Rates in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma in situ Shape Small round Amorphous Pleomorphic Linear/Branching Distribution Clustered Segmental/Linear Category /15 (66.7%) 7/12 (58.3%) 8/14 (57.1%) 4/5 (80.0%) 13/24 (54.2%) 16/22 (72.7%) 14/24 (58.3%) 7/8 (87.5%) 8/14 (57.1%) Fig 2 A 61-year-old woman with ductal carcinoma in situ. Ultrasonogram showing indefinite hypoechogenic area within the parenchyma. chi-square test for categorical variables. P values of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistically significant differences. Results All the patients were female and the ages ranged from 29 to 74 years with a median of 54 years. The small round shaped microcalcifications were seen in 17 patients, amorphous in 16, pleomorphic in 30 and linear/branching in 10 cases. Microcalcifications of 36 cases showed a clustered distribution and 37 cases presented a segmental/ linear distribution. The final assessment of mammographic findings was probably benign lesions (category 3) in 29 cases, suspicious lesions (category 4) in 14 cases, and highly suspicious lesions (category 5) in 30 cases. Mastectomies were performed in 31 cases (42.5%), and the other 42 cases (57.5%) received breast-conserving surgeries. The pathological examination revealed breast cancer in the resected specimens in all cases, including DCIS in 46 cases and minimally invasive ductal carcinomas in 27 cases 14). Among the DCIS cases, 15 (32.6%) had comedo components. Among 73 cases examined, the lesions of microcalcifications were identified sonographically in 54 cases (74%). The linear/branching shape (detection rate 90.0%) and segmental/linear distribution (81.1%) on mammography had a higher level of visibility on US examination, compared with other types (Table 1). Category 5 lesions were also more likely to be seen on US (80.0%), followed by category 4 and 3. In patients with DCIS, a similar tendency was demonstrated between the US visibility and characteristics of 218
4 Breast Cancer Vol. 12 No. 3 July 2005 Table 3 Sonographic Visibility and Distributed Area of Microcalcifications Visible Invisible cm cm 2 P Table 4 Pathological Subtypes and Ultrasound Detection Rates Minimally invasive Ductal carcinoma in situ Comedo Non-comedo 25/27 (92.6%) 29/46 (63.0%) 11/15 (73.3%) 18/31 (58.1%) microcalcifications (Table 2). However, there was no statistically significant difference among the groups of microcalcifications concerning US detection rates. The US visible cases had a larger size of calcification containing area on mammography than the invisible cases (P 0.019, Table 3). Table 4 shows the correlation between pathological subtypes and US detection rates. The breast lesions were more frequently observed on US in cases with minimally invasive cancers (92.6%) than DCIS (63.0%, P 0.006). The lesions were more frequently indicated on US in the comedo type (73.3%) than in the non-comedo type (58.1%) of DCIS. Discussion P Mammography is the gold standard for the detection and characterization of microcalcifications. In contrast, US examination has been reported to be less sensitive for the demonstration of microcalcifications than mammography 15-17). This low capability to visualize microcalcifications remains a major limitation for using US as a screening tool for early breast cancer. However, the marked improvement of current transducer technology has improved spatial resolution and contrast, allowing better and more frequent visualization of breast microcalcifications 5, 18-20). The main benefit of identifying the lesions corresponding to mammographically detected microcalcifications is to allow the use US procedures, such as needle biopsy and needle localization. US allows echogenic breast lesions to be directly targeted in real time, and the biopsy needle can be seen penetrating the target, thus ensuring accurate sampling. In addition, US-guided procedures are less expensive and faster than stereotactically guided procedures. At the institutions that do not have stereotactic equipment, the use of US in selected patients would extend the role of biopsy of early breast cancer 18, 21). Calcifications that occur within masses are easily seen on US 6, 22, 23). This is partly because most malignant solid tumors provide a very hypoechoic background, which enhances the US demonstration of the bright punctate calcification echoes. Previous studies have shown that sonography can reveal lesions containing microcalcifications. In 1982, Kasumi et al. succeeded in detecting microcalcifications within breast carcinomas by US 24). Hastrich et al. 25) sonographically evaluated isolated microcalcifications in 76 patients and identified 45% of microcalcifications with a 7.5 MHz probe. In reported series, high-resolution US is capable of visualizing microcalcifications within breast cancers with a sensitivity of 95% 22, 26, 27). Of course, US detectability of breast lesions is strongly dependent on the examiners experience and technique, the size of the lesions, and the histopathologic characteristic of the lesions. With no knowledge of mammographic findings, some microcalcifications or small lesions may be missed by US examination. Identifying isolated microcalcifications within normal breast tissue, which is comprised of much hyperechoic and heterogeneous fibrous tissue, is thought to be more difficult with US. This is mainly due to the lack of contrast between normal parenchyma with hyperechoic heterogeneous fibrous structures and the microcalcifications 28). Thus, the microcalcifications associated with DCIS are not easily visualized sonographically unless a mass effect develops 29). Consequently, little is known about the detailed US features of DCIS. In our study, 74% of microcalcific lesions without other mammographic findings were identified on US, and US guidance could be used successfully to help wire localization techniques. The breast lesions with a linear/branching shape or segmental/linear distributed microcalcifications were more frequently demonstrated on US. The detection rate was higher when the size of the microcalcification containing area became larger. Pathologically, minimally invasive cancers were more frequently detected on US than DCIS, and the comedo type of DCIS had a higher detection rate compared with the non-comedo type. These results coincided with the pathological reports that the 219
5 Nagashima T, et al Ultrasound Demonstration of Breast Calcifications comedo type showed invasive nests significantly more often and the rate of invasion increased with the extent of the calcifications 1, 30). Our results do not lead to a definitive consensus concerning the management of DCIS with microcalcifications by US techniques, because of the small number of cases. Further investigations of a large number of cases are needed to delineate the proper selection of clinically suitable cases with microcalcifications to undergo US guided procedures. However, US examination is an effective non-invasive method of identifying and localizing breast microcalcifications, and can be used as an alternative to stereotactic localization in the majority of cases with early breast cancer. References 1) Morimoto T, Okazaki M, Endo T: Current status and goals of mammographic screening for breast cancer in Japan. Breast Cancer 11:73-81, ) Bassett LW: Mammographic analysis of calcifications. Radiol Clin North Am 30:93-105, ) Hilton SV, Leopold GR, Olson LK, Willson SA: Realtime breast sonography: application in 300 consecutive patients. Am J Roentgenol 147: , ) Parker SH, Burbank F: A practical approach to minimally invasive breast biopsy. Radiology 200:11-20, ) Soo MS, Baker JA, Rosen EL, Vo TT: Sonographically guided biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications of the breast: a pilot study. Am J Roentgenol 178: , ) Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA: Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 196: , ) Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL: Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound; a retrospective review. Cancer 76: , ) Zonderland HM, Coerkamp EG, Hermans J, van de Vijver MJ, van Voorthuisen AE: Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography. Radiology 213: , ) Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH: Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 207: , ) Schwartz GF, Goldberg BB, Rifkin MD, D Orazio SE: Ultrasonographic localization of non-palpable breast masses. Ultrasound Med Biol 14:23-25, ) Cilotti A, Bagnolesi P, Moretti M, Gibilisco G, Bulleri A, Macaluso AM, Bartolozzi C: Comparison of the diagnostic performance of high-frequency ultrasound as a first- or second-line diagnostic tool in non-palpable lesions of the breast. Eur Radiol 7: , ) American College of Radiology: Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 3rd ed, Reston, Virginia, ) Committee of Mammography guideline: Mammography guideline. Igakushoin, Tokyo, 2001 (in Japan- ese). 14) The World Health Organization: Histological typing of breast tumors. Neoplasma 30: , ) Sickles EA: Mammographic detectability of breast microcalcifications. Am J Roentgenol 139: , ) Lambie RW, Hodgden D, Herman EM, Kopperman M: Sonomammographic manifestations of mammographically detectable breast microcalcifications. J Ultrasound Med 2: , ) Potterton AJ, Peakman DJ, Young JR: Ultrasound demonstration of small breast cancers detected by mammographic screening. Clin Radiol 49: , ) Moon WK, Im JG, Koh YH, Noh DY, Park IA: US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications. Radiology 217: , ) Anderson ME, Soo MSC, Bentley RC, Trahey GE: The detection of breast microcalcifications with medical ultrasound. J Acoust Soc Am 101:29-39, ) Yang WT, Suen M, Ahuja A, Metreweli C: In vivo demonstration of microcalcification in breast cancer using high resolution ultrasound. Br J Radiol 70: , ) Liberman L, Feng TL, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF: US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness. Radiology 208: , ) Kasumi F: Can microcalcifications located within breast carcinomas be detected by ultrasound imaging? Ultrasound Med Biol 14: , ) Mendelson EB: Breast sonography. In: Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW eds, Diagnostic Ultrasound, Mosby Year Book Inc, Missouri, pp , ) Kasumi F, Tanaka H: Detection of microcalcifications in breast carcinoma by ultrasound. In: Jellins J, Kobayashi T eds, Ultrasound examination of the breast, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp89-97, ) Hastrich DJ, Dunn JM, Armstrong JS, Davies JD, Davies ZD, Webb AJ, Farndon JR: Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of fine-wire localization biopsy for impalpable breast cancer. Br J Surg 79: , ) Gilles R, Meunier M, Lucidarme O, Zafrani B, Guinebretiere JM, Tardivon AA, Le Gal M, Vanel D, Neuenschwander S, Arriagada R: Clustered breast microcalcifications: evaluation by dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20:9-14, ) Harris JR, Lippman ME, Veronesi U, Willett W: Breast cancer (3). N Engl J Med 327: , ) Gufler H, Buitrago-Tellez CH, Madjar H, Allmann KH, Uhl M, Rohr-Reyes A: Ultrasound demonstration of mammographically detected microcalcifications. Acta Radiol 41: , ) Cheung YC, Wan YL, Chen SC, Lui KW, Ng SH, Yeow KM, Lee KF, Hsueh S: Sonographic evaluation of mammographically detected microcalcifications without a mass prior to stereotactic core needle biopsy. J Clin Ultrasound 30: , ) Nishimura S, Takahashi K, Gomi N, Tada K, Makita M, Tada T, Iwase T, Yoshimoto M, Akiyama F, Sakamoto G, Kasumi F: What is the predictor for invasion in non-palpable breast cancer with microcalcifications? Breast Cancer 11:49-54,
Diagnostic benefits of ultrasound-guided. CNB) versus mammograph-guided biopsy for suspicious microcalcifications. without definite breast mass
Volume 118 No. 19 2018, 531-543 ISSN: 1311-8080 (printed version); ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version) url: http://www.ijpam.eu ijpam.eu Diagnostic benefits of ultrasound-guided biopsy versus mammography-guided
More informationSonographic Detection and Sonographically Guided Biopsy of Breast Microcalcifications
Sonographic Detection and Sonographically Guided Biopsy of Breast Microcalcifications Mary Scott Soo 1 Jay A. Baker Eric L. Rosen OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of sonography
More informationHigh Detection Rate of Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Calcifications on Mammographically Directed High-Resolution Sonography
Article High Detection Rate of Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Calcifications on Mammographically Directed High-Resolution Sonography Beverly E. Hashimoto, MD, Dawna J. Kramer, MD, Vincent J. Picozzi,
More informationMammography and Subsequent Whole-Breast Sonography of Nonpalpable Breast Cancers: The Importance of Radiologic Breast Density
Isabelle Leconte 1 Chantal Feger 1 Christine Galant 2 Martine Berlière 3 Bruno Vande Berg 1 William D Hoore 4 Baudouin Maldague 1 Received July 11, 2002; accepted after revision October 28, 2002. 1 Department
More informationTable 1. Classification of US Features Based on BI-RADS for US in Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions US Features Benign n(%) Malignant n(%) Odds
215 Table 1. Classification of US Features Based on BI-RADS for US in Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions US Features Benign n(%) Malignant n(%) Odds ratio 719 (100) 305(100) Shape Oval 445 (61.9) 019
More informationAtypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at ultrasound guided biopsy of breast mass
Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at ultrasound guided biopsy of breast mass Poster No.: C-1483 Congress: ECR 2014 Type: Authors: Keywords: DOI: Scientific Exhibit J. Cho, J. Chung, E. S. Cha, J. E.
More informationBreast US in Patients with Breast Cancer Presenting as Microcalcifications Only on Mammography: Can US Differentiate DCIS from Invasive Cancer?
Breast US in Patients with Breast Cancer Presenting as Microcalcifications Only on Mammography: Can US Differentiate DCIS from Invasive Cancer? Poster No.: C-1842 Congress: ECR 2012 Type: Scientific Exhibit
More informationAtypical Ductal Hyperplasia of the Breast:
Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia of the Breast: Radiologic and Histopathologic Correlation 1 Ji Young Lee, M.D., Bo Kyoung Seo, M.D. 2, Jung Hyck Kim, M.D., Yu Whan Oh, M.D., Kyu Ran Cho, M.D., Eun Jeong Choi,
More informationBI-RADS Categorization As a Predictor of Malignancy 1
Susan G. Orel, MD Nicole Kay, BA Carol Reynolds, MD Daniel C. Sullivan, MD BI-RADS Categorization As a Predictor of Malignancy 1 Index terms: Breast, biopsy, 00.1261 Breast neoplasms, localization, 00.125,
More informationSonographically-Guided 14-Gauge Core Needle Biopsy for Papillary Lesions of the Breast
Sonographically-Guided 14-Gauge Core Needle Biopsy for Papillary Lesions of the Breast Eun Sook Ko, MD Nariya Cho, MD Joo Hee Cha, MD Jeong Seon Park, MD Sun Mi Kim, MD Woo Kyung Moon, MD Index terms:
More informationIndex words: Breast US Breast neoplasm Breast cancer
Index words: Breast US Breast neoplasm Breast cancer 125 47.. 53. (),, taller than wide. 50.. 126 Table 1. + 34 24-106 145,, + 139 167-1 2 + 65 37-75 132 47. duct extension. 127 taller than wide + 62 95-78
More informationA-005 US DIAGNOSIS OF NONPALPABLE BREAST LESIONS
A-005 US DIAGNOSIS OF NONPALPABLE BREAST LESIONS Hideaki Shirai M.D., M. Sakurai M.D., K. Yoshida M.D., N. Usuda M.D., H. Masuoka M.D., I. Shimokawara M.D, K. Asaishi M.D. Sapporo Kotoni Breast Clinic,
More informationISSN X (Print) Research Article. *Corresponding author Dr. Amlendu Nagar
Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences (SJAMS) Sch. J. App. Med. Sci., 2015; 3(3A):1069-1073 Scholars Academic and Scientific Publisher (An International Publisher for Academic and Scientific Resources)
More informationSonographic Findings of High-Grade and Non High-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
Article Sonographic Findings of High-Grade and Non High-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast Ji-Sung Park, MD, Young-Mi Park, MD, Eun-Kyung Kim, MD, Suk-Jung Kim, MD, Sang-Suk Han, MD, Sun-Joo
More informationConsensus Guideline on Image-Guided Percutaneous Biopsy of Palpable and Nonpalpable Breast Lesions
Consensus Guideline on Image-Guided Percutaneous Biopsy of Palpable and Nonpalpable Breast Lesions Purpose: To outline the use of minimally invasive biopsy techniques (MIBT) for palpable and nonpalpable
More informationMammographic features and correlation with biopsy findings using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVABB)
Original article Annals of Oncology 14: 450 454, 2003 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdh088 Mammographic features and correlation with biopsy findings using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVABB)
More informationOriginal Contribution
doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.05.018 Ultrasound in Med. & Biol., Vol. 32, No. 9, pp. 1299 1306, 2006 Copyright 2006 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology Printed in the USA. All rights
More informationMammographic imaging of nonpalpable breast lesions. Malai Muttarak, MD Department of Radiology Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai, Thailand
Mammographic imaging of nonpalpable breast lesions Malai Muttarak, MD Department of Radiology Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai, Thailand Introduction Contents Mammographic signs of nonpalpable breast cancer
More informationNew Palpable Breast Lump With Recent Negative Mammogram: Is Repeat Mammography Necessary?
Women s Imaging Original Research Leung et al. Repeat Mammogram for Breast Lump Found After Negative Mammogram Women s Imaging Original Research Stephanie E. Leung 1 Ilanit Ben-Nachum Anat Kornecki Leung
More informationUnderestimation of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia at Sonographically Guided Core Biopsy of the Breast
Women s Imaging Original Research Jang et al. Sonographic Breast Biopsy Women s Imaging Original Research WOMEN S IMAGING Underestimation of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia at Sonographically Guided Core Biopsy
More informationImaging-Guided Core Needle Biopsy of Papillary Lesions of the Breast
Eric L. Rosen 1 Rex C. Bentley 2 Jay A. Baker 1 Mary Scott Soo 1 Received January 30, 2002; accepted after revision April 12, 2002. 1 Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Division, Duke University Medical
More informationCurrent Imaging Diagnosis of the Breast Tumors
Breast Cancer Current Imaging Diagnosis of the Breast Tumors JMAJ 45(6): 258 264, 2002 Tokiko ENDO Director of the Department of Radiology, National Nagoya Hospital Abstract: Breast masses include the
More informationOriginal Report. Mucocele-Like Tumors of the Breast: Mammographic and Sonographic Appearances. Katrina Glazebrook 1 Carol Reynolds 2
Katrina Glazebrook 1 Carol Reynolds 2 Received January 2, 2002; accepted after revision August 28, 2002. 1 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. S.W., Rochester, MN 55905. Address correspondence
More informationDuctal carcinoma in situ, underestimation, ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy
Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed after an ultrasoundguided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: Can underestimation be predicted preoperatively? Poster No.: C-0442 Congress: ECR 2010 Type: Scientific
More informationStereotactic 11-Gauge Vacuum- Assisted Breast Biopsy: A Validation Study
Georg Pfarl 1 Thomas H. Helbich 1 Christopher C. Riedl 1 Teresa Wagner 2 Michael Gnant 3 Margaretha Rudas 4 Laura Liberman 5 Received March 11, 2002; accepted after revision May 17, 2002. 1 Department
More informationAna Sofia Preto 19/06/2013
Ana Sofia Preto 19/06/2013 Understanding the underlying pathophysiologic processes leading to the various types of calcifications Description and illustration of the several types of calcifications, according
More informationUltrasound Assessment of Invasive Breast Cancer:
Ultrasound Assessment of Invasive Breast Cancer: Correlation with Histologic Grade 1 Joo Hee Cha, M.D., Woo Kyung Moon, M.D. 2, Nariya Cho, M.D. 2, Sun Mi Kim, M.D. 2, Seung Ja Kim, M.D. 2, Seong Ho Park,
More informationMammographically non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: sonographic features with pathological correlation in 35 patients
Clinical Radiology (2009) 64, 628e636 ORIGINAL PAPER Mammographically non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: sonographic features with pathological correlation in 35 patients B. Mesurolle a, *, M. El-Khoury
More informationAtypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ as Revealed by Large-Core Needle Breast Biopsy: Results of Surgical Excision
Marla L. Rosenfield Darling 1 Darrell N. Smith 1 Susan C. Lester 2 Carolyn Kaelin 3 Donna-Lee G. Selland 1 Christine M. Denison 1 Pamela J. DiPiro 1 David I. Rose 1 Esther Rhei 3 Jack E. Meyer 1 Received
More informationDuctal carcinoma in situ: ultrasound, mammography and MRI features with pathologic correlation
Ductal carcinoma in situ: ultrasound, mammography and MRI features with pathologic correlation Poster No.: C-2252 Congress: ECR 2013 Type: Educational Exhibit Authors: L. Fernandes, H. A. M. R. Tinto,
More informationBilateral breast cancer: the role of mammography and ultrasonography in early detection
Original article Bilateral breast cancer: the role of mammography and ultrasonography in early detection Onthira Lekamnuaypon, M.D., 1 Pailin Kongmebhol, M.D., 1 Malai Muttarak, M.D. 1 Neelaya Sukhamwang,
More informationACRIN 6666 IM Additional Evaluation: Additional Views/Targeted US
Additional Evaluation: Additional Views/Targeted US For revised or corrected form check box and fax to 215-717-0936. Instructions: The form is completed based on recommendations (from ID form) for additional
More informationImaging in breast cancer. Mammography and Ultrasound Donya Farrokh.MD Radiologist Mashhad University of Medical Since
Imaging in breast cancer Mammography and Ultrasound Donya Farrokh.MD Radiologist Mashhad University of Medical Since A mammogram report is a key component of the breast cancer diagnostic process. A mammogram
More informationUW Radiology Review Course Breast Calcifications. BI-RADS 5 th Edition
UW Radiology Review Course Breast Calcifications Grace Kalish, MD Vantage Radiology BI-RADS 5 th Edition Benign Skin Vascular Large rod like Coarse popcorn Suspicious Amorphous Coarse heterogenous Fine
More informationBreast imaging in general practice
Breast series CLINICAL PRACTICE Breast imaging in general practice Nehmat Houssami, MBBS, FAFPHM, FASBP, PhD, is Associate Clinical Director, NSW Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead Hospital, Honorary Senior
More informationBI-RADS CATEGORIZATION AND BREAST BIOPSY categorization in the selection of appropriate breast biopsy technique is also discussed. Patients and method
Original Article Positive Predictive Value of BI-RADS Categorization in an Asian Population Yah-Yuen Tan, Siew-Bock Wee, Mona P.C. Tan and Bee-Kiang Chong, 1 Departments of General Surgery and 1Diagnostic
More informationThe Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) has standardized the description and management of findings identified on mammograms, thereby f
ORIGINAL RESEARCH BREAST IMAGING Elizabeth S. Burnside, MD, MPH, MS Jennifer E. Ochsner, MD Kathryn J. Fowler, MD Jason P. Fine, PhD Lonie R. Salkowski, MD Daniel L. Rubin, MD, MS Gale A. Sisney, MD Use
More informationDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
The British Journal of Radiology, 85 (2012), e349 e356 Comparison of the underestimation rate in cases with ductal carcinoma in situ at ultrasound-guided core biopsy: 14-gauge automated core-needle biopsy
More informationEvaluation of Breast Specimens Removed by Needle Localization Technique
Evaluation of Breast Specimens Removed by Needle Localization Technique Specimen Handling: The breast specimen when received should be measured and grossly inspected for any orientation designated by the
More informationCan magnetic resonance imaging obviate the need for biopsy for microcalcifications?
Original Article Can magnetic resonance imaging obviate the need for biopsy for microcalcifications? Shinya Yamamoto, Takashi Chishima Department of Breast Surgery, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Yokohama 222-0036,
More informationSonographically Guided Core Biopsy of the Breast: Comparison of 14-Gauge Automated Gun and 11-Gauge Directional Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy Methods
Sonographically Guided Core Biopsy of the Breast: Comparison of 14-Gauge Automated Gun and 11-Gauge Directional Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy Methods Nariya Cho, MD 1 Woo Kyung Moon, MD 1 Joo Hee Cha, MD 1 Sun
More informationPercutaneous Biopsy of the Breast
Percutaneous Biopsy of the Breast Expires Tuesday, March 31, 2020 Radiology Brooke A. Caldwell, M.D. Objectives 1. Describe the pros and cons of surgical biopsy and the reasoning behind the development
More informationRetrospective Analysis on Malignant Calcification Previously Misdiagnosed as Benign on Screening Mammography 스크리닝유방촬영술에서양성으로진단되었던악성석회화에대한후향적분석
Original Article pissn 1738-2637 / eissn 2288-2928 https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2017.76.4.251 Retrospective Analysis on Malignant Calcification Previously Misdiagnosed as Benign on Screening 스크리닝유방촬영술에서양성으로진단되었던악성석회화에대한후향적분석
More informationCDIS: what's beyond microcalcifications? - Pictorial essay
CDIS: what's beyond microcalcifications? - Pictorial essay Poster No.: C-1096 Congress: ECR 2014 Type: Educational Exhibit Authors: R. N. Lucas, C. A. S. Ruano, I. Oliveira, J. M. G. Lourenco, Z. 1 1 1
More informationUltrasonography. Methods. Brief Description. Indications. Device-related Prerequisites. Technical Requirements. Evaluation Criteria
1 Ultrasonography Brief Description Imaging modality using sound waves Tissue-specific wave reflection. Indications Evaluation of palpable breast nodules Evaluation of clinically occult mammographic findings
More informationManagement of Palpable Abnormalities in the Breast Katerina Dodelzon, MD July 31, 2018, 7:00pm ET
Management of Palpable Abnormalities in the Breast Katerina Dodelzon, MD July 31, 2018, 7:00pm ET SAM Questions 1. 21 year old female presenting with left breast palpable mass, what is the most appropriate
More informationAtypical papillary lesions after core needle biopsy and subsequent breast carcinoma
Asian Biomedicine Vol. 5 No. 2 April 2011; 243-248 DOI: 10.5372/1905-7415.0502.031 Original article Atypical papillary lesions after core needle biopsy and subsequent breast carcinoma Tuenchit Khamapirad
More informationIs Probably Benign Really Just Benign? Peter R Eby, MD, FSBI Virginia Mason Medical Center Seattle, WA
Is Probably Benign Really Just Benign? Peter R Eby, MD, FSBI Virginia Mason Medical Center Seattle, WA Disclosures: CONSULTANT FOR DEVICOR MEDICAL ARS Question 1 Is probably benign really just benign?
More informationSonographic Differentiation of Thyroid Nodules With Eggshell Calcifications
Article Sonographic Differentiation of Thyroid Nodules With Eggshell Calcifications Byung Moon Kim, MD, Min Jung Kim, MD, Eun-Kyung Kim, MD, Jin Young Kwak, MD, Soon Won Hong, MD, Eun Ju Son, MD, Ki Hwang
More informationBreast Health and Imaging Glossary
Contact: Lorna Vaughan HerSpace Breast Imaging & Biopsy Associates 300 State Route 35 South W. Long Branch, NJ 07764 732-571-9100, ext. 104 lorna@breast-imaging.com Breast Health and Imaging Glossary Women
More informationDoes Ultrasound-Guided Directional Vacuum-Assisted Removal Help Eliminate Abnormal Nipple Discharge in Patients with Benign Intraductal Single Mass?
Does Ultrasound-Guided Directional Vacuum-Assisted Removal Help Eliminate Abnormal Nipple Discharge in Patients with Benign Intraductal Single Mass? Jung Min Chang, MD 1 Nariya Cho, MD 1 Woo Kyung Moon,
More informationJournal of Breast Cancer
Journal of Breast Cancer ORIGINAL ARTICLE J Breast Cancer 2014 September; 17(3): 265-269 Absence of Residual Microcalcifications in Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Diagnosed via Stereotactic Vacuum-Assisted
More informationCase study 1. Rie Horii, M.D., Ph.D. Division of Pathology Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research
NCCN/JCCNB Seminar in Japan April 15, 2012 Case study 1 Rie Horii, M.D., Ph.D. Division of Pathology Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research Present illness: A 50y.o.premenopausal
More informationAtypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Papillomas: A Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Breast Biopsy and Stereotactic Guided Breast Biopsy
Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Papillomas: A Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Breast Biopsy and Stereotactic Guided Breast Biopsy Breast Cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women in the United
More informationClinical Significance of Microcalcifications Detection in Invasive Breast Carcinoma
Yonago Acta medica 2015;58:89 93 Original Article Clinical Significance of s Detection in Invasive Breast Carcinoma Yuki Hashimoto,* Aya Murata,* Naoki Miyamoto,* Toshihiro Takamori,* Yuta Hosoda,* Yukari
More informationExtent of Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer After Diagnosis by Stereotactic Core Versus Wire Localization Biopsy
Annals of Surgical Oncology, 6(4):330 335 Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 1999 The Society of Surgical Oncology, Inc. Extent of Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer After Diagnosis by Stereotactic Core
More informationIntroduction ORIGINAL ARTICLE. 170 Ultrasonography 33(3), July 2014 e-ultrasonography.org
Positive predictive value of additional synchronous breast lesions in wholebreast ultrasonography at the diagnosis of breast cancer: clinical and imaging factors Ah Hyun Kim 1 *, Min Jung Kim 1, Eun-Kyung
More informationPolicies, Standards, and Guidelines. Guidelines on Breast Ultrasound Examination and Reporting
Policies, Standards, and Guidelines Guidelines on Breast Ultrasound Examination and Reporting Approved by Council June 2018 Approved: June 2018 Guidelines on Breast Ultrasound Examination and Reporting
More informationLeonard M. Glassman MD
BI-RADS The New BI-RADS Leonard M. Glassman MD FACR Former Chief of Breast Imaging American Institute for Radiologic Pathology Washington Radiology Associates, PC Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System
More informationRadiologic Findings of Mucocele-like Tumors of the breast: Can we differentiate pure benign from associated with high risk lesions?
Radiologic Findings of Mucocele-like Tumors of the breast: Can we differentiate pure benign from associated with high risk lesions? Poster No.: C-0332 Congress: ECR 2014 Type: Educational Exhibit Authors:
More informationEARLY DETECTION: MAMMOGRAPHY AND SONOGRAPHY
EARLY DETECTION: MAMMOGRAPHY AND SONOGRAPHY Elizabeth A. Rafferty, M.D. Avon Comprehensive Breast Center Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School Breast Cancer Screening Early detection of
More informationPictorial Review of the Ultrasound Appearances of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
Pictorial Review of the Ultrasound Appearances of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Poster No.: R-0079 Congress: 2016 ASM Type: Educational Exhibit Authors: W. G. D. U. M. Wijesinghe, D. Gunawardena, D. B. Taylor
More informationEvaluation of surgical margins by specimen in impalpable breast carcinoma: a radiopathological correlation
Evaluation of surgical margins by specimen in impalpable breast carcinoma: a radiopathological correlation Poster No.: C-1146 Congress: ECR 2014 Type: Scientific Exhibit Authors: D. Mandich, L. Koren,
More informationNon-Calcified Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Ultrasound and Mammographic Findings Correlated with Histological Findings
Yonsei Med J 49(1):103-110, 2008 DOI 10.3349/ymj.2008.49.1.103 Non-Calcified Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Ultrasound and Mammographic Findings Correlated with Histological Findings Kyu Ran Cho, 1 Bo Kyoung
More informationS. Murgo, MD. Chr St-Joseph, Mons Erasme Hospital, Brussels
S. Murgo, MD Chr St-Joseph, Mons Erasme Hospital, Brussels? Introduction Mammography reports are sometimes ambiguous and indecisive. ACR has developped the BIRADS. BIRADS consists of a lexicon in order
More informationMRI of the Breast for the Detection and Assessment of the Size of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
MRI of the Breast for the Detection and Assessment of the Size of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Do Youn Kim, MD 1 Woo Kyung Moon, MD 1 Nariya Cho, MD 1 Eun Sook Ko, MD 1 Sang Kyu Yang, MD 1 Jeong Seon Park,
More informationCystic Hypersecretory Carcinoma of the Breast:
J Korean Soc Radiol 2010;62:287-294 Cystic Hypersecretory Carcinoma of the Breast: Sonographic Features with a Histological Correlation 1 Sang Yu Nam, M.D., Boo-Kyung Han, M.D., Jung Hee Shin, M.D., Eun
More informationSonographic Morphology of Infiltrating Breast Carcinoma
rticle Sonographic Morphology of Infiltrating reast Carcinoma Relationship With the Shape of the Hyaluronan Extracellular Matrix Philippe Vignal, MD, Marie Reine Meslet, MD, Jean Michel Roméo, MD, Franck
More informationEARLY DETECTION: MAMMOGRAPHY AND SONOGRAPHY
EARLY DETECTION: MAMMOGRAPHY AND SONOGRAPHY Elizabeth A. Rafferty, M.D. Avon Comprehensive Breast Center Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School Breast Cancer Screening Early detection of
More informationAmammography report is a key component of the breast
Review Article Writing a Mammography Report Amammography report is a key component of the breast cancer diagnostic process. Although mammographic findings were not clearly differentiated between benign
More informationORIGINAL ARTICLE EVALUATION OF BREAST LESIONS USING X-RAY MAMMOGRAM WITH HISTOPATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION
Available online at www.journalijmrr.com INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN RESEARCH AND REVIEWS IJMRR ISSN: 2347-8314 Int. J. Modn. Res. Revs. Volume 3, Issue 10, pp 807-814, October, 2015 ORIGINAL ARTICLE
More informationPathologic outcomes of coarse heterogeneous calcifications detected on mammography
Pathologic outcomes of coarse heterogeneous calcifications detected on mammography Poster No.: C-1957 Congress: ECR 2011 Type: Scientific Paper Authors: H. J. Lim, K. R. Cho, K. W. Hwang, B. K. Seo, O.
More informationDCIS of the Breast--MRI findings with mammographic correlation.
DCIS of the Breast--MRI findings with mammographic correlation. Poster No.: C-1560 Congress: ECR 2013 Type: Educational Exhibit Authors: N. B. Ibrahim, P. Morris, S. ANANDAN; Burlington, MA/US Keywords:
More information«àπ π â Õ μ «å «π Áß μâ π π ßæ π ª
«æ å μ Ù-ı ªï Ë Ûapple Ë Ù μ.. -.. ÚııÙ Reg 4-5 Med J Vol. 30 No. 4 Oct - Dec 2011 π æπ åμâπ Original Article «μ»ÿ º æ.., Cheerawan Tansupaphon M.D., «.«. ß «π Thai Board of Diagnostic Radiology ÿà ß π
More informationThe Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) was
710 Evaluation of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 Mammograms and the Use of Stereotactic Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy in a Nonacademic Community Practice Angela Mendez, M.D. Fernando
More informationInvasive lobular carcinoma of the breast; spectrum of imaging findings.
Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast; spectrum of imaging findings. Poster No.: C-0847 Congress: ECR 2014 Type: Educational Exhibit Authors: D. Mandich, T. Diaz de Bustamante, L. Koren, M. Arroyo,
More informationReal Time Spatial Compound Imaging in breast ultrasound: technology and early clinical experience
R. Entrekin 1, P. Jackson 1, J.R. Jago 1 and B.A. Porter 2 Real Time Spatial Compound Imaging in breast ultrasound: technology and early clinical experience In current clinical practice, high-resolution
More informationDiagnostic Dilemmas of Breast Imaging
Diagnostic Dilemmas of Breast Imaging Common Causes of Error in Breast Cancer Detection By: Jason Cord, M.D. Mammography: Initial Imaging The standard for detection of breast cancer Screening mammography
More informationMedical Education. CME Article Clinics in diagnostic imaging (125) Padungchaichote W, Kongmebhol P, Muttarak M
1062 Medical Education CME Article Clinics in diagnostic imaging (125) Padungchaichote W, Kongmebhol P, Muttarak M la Ib Ic Fig. I (a) Bilateral mediolateral oblique mammograms; (b) spot right craniocaudal
More information160 A. Shiraishi et al. ms, TE: 9 ms, excitations: 1, FA: 30, FOV: 25 cm, matrix: 256~256, slice thickness: 3 4 mm, no gap) with fat saturation. The c
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences, Vol.2, No.4, p.159 163, 2003 MAJOR PAPER Extension of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Histopathological Association with MR Imaging and Mammography Akihiko SHIRAISHI 1
More informationPitfalls and Limitations of Breast MRI. Susan Orel Roth, MD Professor of Radiology University of Pennsylvania
Pitfalls and Limitations of Breast MRI Susan Orel Roth, MD Professor of Radiology University of Pennsylvania Objectives Review the etiologies of false negative breast MRI examinations Discuss the limitations
More informationNational Diagnostic Imaging Symposium 2013 SAM - Breast MRI 1
National Diagnostic Imaging Symposium 2013 December 8-12, 2013 Disney s Yacht Club Resort Lake Buena Vista, Florida Self Assessment Module Questions, Answers and References Day SAM Title - Each SAM title
More informationRadiologic-pathologic correlation of the mammographic findings retrospectively detected in inflammatory breast cancer: usefulness in clinical practice
Radiologic-pathologic correlation of the mammographic findings retrospectively detected in inflammatory breast cancer: usefulness in clinical practice Francesca Caumo, Erminia Manfrin, Franco Bonetti,
More informationBI-RADS classification in breast tomosynthesis. Our experience in breast cancer cases categorized as BI-RADS 0 in digital mammography
BI-RADS classification in breast tomosynthesis. Our experience in breast cancer cases categorized as BI-RADS 0 in digital mammography Poster No.: C-0562 Congress: ECR 2017 Type: Scientific Exhibit Authors:
More informationUsefulness of ultrasound elastography in reducing the number of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 lesions on ultrasonography
Usefulness of ultrasound elastography in reducing the number of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 lesions on ultrasonography Nariya Cho, Jihe Lim, Woo Kyung Moon Department of Radiology,
More informationOriginal Article Breast Imaging
Original Article Breast Imaging http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.6.697 pissn 1229-6929 eissn 2005-8330 Korean J Radiol 2014;15(6):697-703 Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Removal versus
More informationCurrent Status of Supplementary Screening With Breast Ultrasound
Current Status of Supplementary Screening With Breast Ultrasound Stephen A. Feig, M.D., FACR Fong and Jean Tsai Professor of Women s Imaging Department of Radiologic Sciences University of California,
More informationStereotactic Core-Needle Biopsy of Non-Mass Calcifications: Outcome and Accuracy at Long-Term Follow-Up
Stereotactic Core-Needle Biopsy of Non-Mass Calcifications: Outcome and Accuracy at Long-Term Follow-Up Boo-Kyung Han, MD 1 Yeon Hyeon Choe, MD 1 Young-Hyeh Ko, MD 2 Seok-Jin Nam, MD 3 Jung-Han Kim, MD
More informationIntracystic papillary carcinoma of the breast
Intracystic papillary carcinoma of the breast Poster No.: C-1932 Congress: ECR 2011 Type: Educational Exhibit Authors: V. Dimarelos, F. TZIKOS, N. Kotziamani, G. Rodokalakis, 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 T. MALKOTSI
More informationShort-Term Follow-Up of Palpable Breast Lesions With Benign Imaging Features: Evaluation of 375 Lesions in 320 Women
Women s Imaging Original Research Follow-Up Imaging of Palpable Breast Lesions Women s Imaging Original Research WOMEN S IMAGING Jennifer A. Harvey 1 Brandi T. Nicholson 1 Alexander P. LoRusso 1,2 Michael
More informationCURRENT METHODS IN IMAGE GUIDED BREAST BIOPSY
CURRENT METHODS IN IMAGE GUIDED BREAST BIOPSY Stuart Silver April 24, 2004 OBJECTIVES Review development of current techniques Discuss stereotactic breast biopsy Discuss US guided breast biopsy 1 OBJECTIVES
More informationObserver Agreement Using the ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-Ultrasound, First Edition (2003)
Observer Agreement Using the ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-Ultrasound, First Edition (2003) Chang Suk Park, MD 1 Jae Hee Lee, MD 2 Hyeon Woo Yim, MD 3 Bong Joo Kang, MD 4 Hyeon
More informationPoster No.: C-0466 Congress: ECR 2010 Scientific Exhibit
Up-right stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy (UP-VAB) of non palpable breast lesions: Results and correlations with radiological suspicion (BI-RADS classification) Poster No.: C-0466 Congress: ECR 2010
More informationStudy of validity of ultrasonographic diagnosis in relation to Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) diagnosis
Original article: Study of validity of ultrasonographic diagnosis in relation to Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) diagnosis *Dr Rajvi Matalia, ** Dr Y.P.Sachdev, ***Dr D.S.Kulkarni *Junior Resident,
More informationMalignant transformation of fibroadenomas
Malignant transformation of fibroadenomas Poster No.: C-2503 Congress: ECR 2013 Type: Educational Exhibit Authors: L. N. Elias, M. A. Rudner, L. M. Yano, P. C. Moraes, Y. 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 Chang, M. B.
More informationSTEREOTACTIC BREAST BIOPSY: CORRELATION WITH HISTOLOGY
3-rd Baltic Congress of Radiology, October 8-9, 2010 Riga Rūta Briedienė, Rūta Grigienė, Raimundas Meškauskas Institute of Oncology Vilnius University, National Centre of Pathology STEREOTACTIC BREAST
More informationMucocele-Like Tumors of the Breast as Cystic Lesions: Sonographic-Pathologic Correlation
Women s Imaging Original Research Kim et al. Breast Tumors as Cystic Lesions Women s Imaging Original Research WOMEN S IMGING Sun Mi Kim 1,2 Hak Hee Kim 1 Doo Kyung Kang 3 Hee Jung Shin 1 Nariya Cho 4
More informationCOMPARISON OF MAMMOGRAPHY AND ULTRASOUND COMBINED VERSUS ULTRASOUND ALONE IN EARLY EVALUATION OF SYMPTOMATIC BREAST CANCERS IN PAKISTAN
COMPARISON OF MAMMOGRAPHY AND ULTRASOUND COMBINED VERSUS ULTRASOUND ALONE IN EARLY EVALUATION OF SYMPTOMATIC BREAST CANCERS IN PAKISTAN Razia Bano 1, Huma M. Khan 2, Ayesha Ehsan 1, Awais A. Malik 2, Shahper
More informationClinical Utility of Bilateral Whole-Breast US in the Evaluation of Women with Dense Breast Tissue 1
Stuart S. Kaplan, MD Index terms: Breast, parenchymal pattern Breast, US, 00.129, 00.12989 Breast neoplasms, diagnosis, 00.32 Breast neoplasms, US, 00.129, 00.12989 Breast radiography, quality assurance,
More information