STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN WISCONSIN S NEEDS ASSESSMENT PROCESS

Transcription

1 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN WISCONSIN S NEEDS ASSESSMENT PROCESS Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs Needs Assessment Training January 7, 2015

2 2 Wisconsin s Needs Assessment Stakeholder Groups Maternal and child health (MCH) professionals and parents/advocates MCH Advisory Committee Bureau of Community Health Promotion Family Health Section (FHS) Community groups Minority Health Program

3 3 Key Needs Assessment Activities Engaging Stakeholder Groups Stakeholder Survey (April 2014) MCH Advisory Committee Meetings (June and October 2014) Community Input on National Performance Measure (NPM) Selection (October 2014) Bureau of Community Health Promotion (BCHP) Section Chief Interviews (October 2014) Family Health Section Input (Ongoing) Minority Health Program Listening Sessions (2014) Stakeholder Webinar (January 2015)

4 4 Stakeholder Survey April 2014 Web-based survey distributed to MCH professionals, parents, and advocates 434 respondents started survey (74% professionals; 26% parents or advocates); 287 completed survey (66%) Provided introduction to and background on MCH needs assessment process Collected information on: Unmet and emerging health needs Current activities Capacity Future of MCH Shared survey link on the MCH Program website

5 5 MCH Advisory Committee Meetings June and October 2014 Approximately 60 participants Facilitated group work, including: Sharing background on needs assessment process and results from stakeholder survey Additional brainstorming of unmet and emerging needs, as well as current and future strategies to address Review of data profiles for each NPM, including Wisconsin trend data, national comparison data, and subpopulation analyses Completion of a NPM prioritization matrix, assessing trend, magnitude, severity, preventability, capacity, and community support

6 Community Input on NPM Selection October The Lifecourse Initiative for Healthy Families (LIHF) funds collaboratives in four high-risk Wisconsin cities through an innovative community-academic collaboration is designed to reduce infant mortality Members of each collaborative ranked NPMs Information was integrated into final data synthesis

7 7 Bureau of Community Health Promotion Section Chief Interviews October 2014 Section Chiefs were interviewed to assess opportunities for collaboration under new NPMS Chronic Disease and Cancer Prevention Section Nutrition and Physical Activity Section (including The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children WIC) Tobacco Prevention Section Relevant NPMs included: Tobacco Oral health Nutrition and physical activity Breastfeeding

8 8 Family Health Section Input Ongoing Regular needs assessment updates given at monthly Section meetings Activities included: MCH Priority Area Work Groups Completion of NPM prioritization matrix Input on new state priorities and selected NPMs Section-wide participation in development of logic models and work plans, monitoring progress, coordinating strategies, etc. for MCH new priority areas is anticipated

9 9 Minority Health Program Listening Sessions 2014 Concurrent process to inform Minority Health Program Priorities for Staff collected information about statewide community health to inform Minority Health Program Planning, including: Top concerns within community Ways to improve life within community, including strategies to make healthier choices Focus groups included diversity in: Race/ethnicity Socioeconomic status Geography Sexual orientation Disability

10 10 Stakeholder Webinar January 2015 Audience: MCH professionals and parents/advocates (same population that was contacted to take stakeholder survey) Purpose: Provide update on needs assessment process Share new MCH Priority Areas and NPMs Solicit feedback

11 Synthesizing Stakeholder Information for the Needs Assessment Leadership Team 11 Summary document (matrix) prepared for Needs Assessment Leadership Team to inform selection of NPMs Document included information on the presence of key factors relevant to NPM selection: Bad trend Large magnitude Existence of disparities across subpopulations High severity High preventability High capacity High community support High priority for LIHF High priority for MCH and FHS Large number of current activities and strategies Possible BCHP Partner Healthiest Wisconsin 2020 Priority Area Large number of local health departments working on topic Much of the data in this synthesis document relied on stakeholder input!

12 12 Contact Information Andrea Gromoske, MSW, PhD Epidemiologist and Evaluator Bureau of Community Health Promotion, Family Health Section Jessica Seay, MPH State Systems Development Initiative Bureau of Community Health Promotion, Family Health Section