'.., -,,-- ".' The Relationship Between Basic Physical Fitness and Body Fat in +95kg Category University Judo Athletes

Transcription

1 ..- - c S;:;}tt:;. t $JUf 30-(1} : <1> -:-; : : :. : ; f 11 :1 :d ;[ H1 jg.--fu M 0 -= ::::..;. 3 u 1 :1 J. :. ;f The Relatonshp Between Basc Physcal Ftness and Body Fat n +95kg Category Unversty Judo Athletes Eo DA (Japanese Academy of Budo) Takesh NAKAJMA (Kokushkan Unversty) Yoshyuk MATSUURA J (Chukyo Womens Unversty) Masayuk TAKEUCH:) (Dato Bunka Unversty) DavdATSUMOTQ.;; (San Francsco State Unversty) HdeyuK TANAKA-M:(Unversty-of ShzuoKa) ==-_ Fujto()MOR. -. -c[so.kushkanunyersty :- -. {: C; :: -.;.j) :::; : 1. ntroducton..;:1 ;.J.; :/between those wth hgh and low body fat rato41. ;The sayng Shn-G- Ta: (Mental Techn- : : (3) We know that the rato of body fat. ncreases cal-physcal) s often used to descrbe the necev: remarkably from the -:::-78kg category on the sary ngredents of performance ablty n Judo:;n : above6. : : ::;:: :-= the past we have proceeded n our research wth. -Therefore n ths study we examned the the assumpton that body structure as well as basc assocaton among the 8 components comprsng physcal ftness are one mportant component to - basc.physcal ftness; and body fat whch s a performance ablty n Judo. Even fr<:>mthesngl structural component of weght among unversty perspectve of the performance abltes of Judo Judo athletes of the same weght class of +95kg. athletes the basc physcal ftness tems descrbed n 1)through 7) can be consdered to have a hgh 2. Methods :. 1.= degree of aldty as mnmum essentals from. (1) tems and Measurement Procedures ; prevous expermental results1)2j3)4)s)6)7). to:.- We have conducted repeated studes sng a Moreo\er () weght whch represents body 52 tem test of. Basc physcal ftness wth unversty bulk has a hgh correlaton wth statc muscular Judo athletes as subjects. These studes have strength and can be sad to be an mportant area spanned an 11 year perod from wth of basc physcal ftness But the other sde to ths 19 dfferent condtons nvolvng 702 subjects of s that t also serves as a lmted factor to Aglty dfferent ages natonaltes favorte technques muscular power and speed endurance. These are weght and weght categoryl)213)s)6)718). Regardless functonal areas that are consdered extremely of these dfferences n condtons the expermental mportant n recent compettve Judo whch s results have shown the followng; characterzn by contnuous attack and aggresson ) The factor loadngs are consstently hgh especally n nternatonal compettons) (2) wthn weght and categores. There are sgnfcant dfferences n speed endurance 2) The tems have sgnfcant factor loadngs wthn the weght categores especally and communaltes across the 19 studes. 3) The tems have low correlatons among other components. T24S Ko-mach Kamakura-sh Kanagawa-ken. japan 4) The valdty of the selected measurement Tel tems was tested4). -t. 8com tam. streng :est. 1 c:xam: ; <: here 1 }: objec ;. jh;. Also. : comp (Boe (2) S t: 1: <: ;.: :t. ; > 1. H; : 1t. f.l 1:1 1 f ;;s com: gory team Japa; rank: and: 42 ) subj. reser. ttne (3); nent un\ the Wtf 24.0 ::}. ; -22-.:::U

2 . :..; :. :. t;.1;tftt:::: <c..:;.::. -. d._. -- _.. 1:: r ld: The Relatonshp Between Basc Physcal Ftness and Body Fat n +9Skg Category Unversty Judo Athletes Accordngly we selected 10 tems comprsng : (n= 13) 29.2-:-32.0% (n= 13) and ]% 8 components we thought to be consstently mpor (n= 13) We calculated means and standard devatanto These were as follows: ; ) Body lnearty= Stature y fo each group ran NOV A wthn the 5 2) Body bulk=weght groups and examned the changes wthn the 3) Body compston =Body fat (%) groups - and relatonshp among the tems. 4) Statc muscular strength=back muscular strength 3. Results :--ShoUl.s:r::el1-=(RTnJ 5) Aglty=Sde step s- - test. tons ofrhe 10 basc physcal ftness tems separate- n- 6) Legmuscular power= Vertcal jump 7) Speed endurance=400m run 8) Extenson Dexblty=Trunk exrens?n 9) Dynamc bajance=bass dynamc balance -.:-n- J.beShows means and standard devatons --of the 10 basc physcal ftness tems of the each of fve groups classfed accordng to ther Percent Body Far (%) and the results of the ANOY As. -:- Fgures through 5 llustrate means and standard. dvatons on each tem for each the fve groups. -. Results of the body weght each groups were ( 0 These measurement tems were repeatedly - S?wS n Fg.. Sgnfcant overa dfferences examned wthn the studes and were measured - were not found anong the fve groups on stature here based on tbe consderatn that they nred. b<weght ncresd as Pecent body fat (%) nobjectvty and valdjty n our measurements. n creased and thatwas sgnfcantly dfferent across - Also there are varous ways to measure Body. the groups at level. Weght especally n-. composton and we used here the B._ -ceased sgnfcantly among 4th and 5th rc?ups (Boelectrcal mpedance) mthod (SF-891): n - _lch means Percent body fat was greater than 29. (2) Subjects ::_.n ::;_. :C: The subjects n ths study were 63members. :-:-;;Results of the back muscular strength n each contaned top juo athletes. -. he--+95kgte g6weresh; n Fg.2. No sfc:dffer gory. They were partcpated 4 unverstes whose ences n each groups were found on back muscular teams competedn and placed hghest n the All stength and shoulder arm strength (pullng) Japan Unversty Judo:Champonshps.Ther howver back muscular strength between 1st and ranks ranged from frst grade through thrd grade 3rd groups and shoulder arm strength between 1st and the average years n Judo career was 8.85 :: 2. - and:4th groups were sgnfcantly dfferent. These 42 years; These characterstcs nsured that the scores decreased as Percent body fat ncreased. subjectspartcpatng n ths study were fully rep- Based on prevous wor weght:represented by resentatve of the characterstcs of basc physcal Body bulk had hgh correlaton wth statc muscuftness n unversty Judo athletes. lar strength but that was also a lmtng factor to (3) Metbods of Analyss consecutve muscular power aglty and so on. Based on the measurement of the 8 compo- Ths study shows that statc muscular strength nents 10 tems descrbed above we dvded 63 remans same value above 24% of Percent body fat unversty Judo athletes n +95kg category nto (%) (B methods SF-891). the followng fve Percent Body Fat (%) groups As fgure shows weght ncreased as Percent wth relatvely equal numbers of people: Body Fat (%) ncreased. We need to examne 24.0% (n= 12) % (n= 12) % relatonshps between Percent Body Fat (%) and. J :1 ] 11 ; V r4 K H [j & c -23- ;-:c.::: > c. <t; ; t :-- 11 :t::::::: :: ::::::<;::=:

3 Jt J1f 30-{1) 1997 Table 1 MeaD and standard devaton between Fve Groups. j j J; j Group tem Percent body fat (%) Stature (em) Body weght (kg) SD Mf --. SO M ( %) N= ( %) N= SO ( %) N= r 5 ( %) N= )E ( %) N=J F )E f:.: Bkmuscular M strength (kg). -f -; _.f- - - SD J- -_ L- --/ : l l. j: : /. -.1 ;1 T tl r Shoulder M : : muscular (kg) strength pull SO Sde step t::: n_ - O (tmes) SD Vertcal jump (cm) 4OOmrun (see) Trunk extenson (em) M SO M SO -- M SO - Bass dynamc. balance Test - (pont) SO J-3E J8E : : - t -- 1:# -::C each of other tems the future. Results of the sde dfferences at the level. Those dfferences t f : <:.:::;} step were shown n Fg. 3. Sde-step was sgnfcantly dfferent wthn the fve groups at level. Sgnfcant dfference was found between 1st and other 4th groups but not among these four groups. Sgnfcant dfferences n all groups were not found on vertcal jump but only the 1st and 5th groups were sgnfcantly dfferent. Based on these results aglty and leg muscular power n + 95kg categores remaned same f Percent body fat (%) was greater than 24%. Therefore we assume levels of these factors are dfferent at 24% as a border. The 4OOmrun n each groups were shown n Fg. 4. The ANOV A results show sgnfcant were found between 1st and other groups between 2nd and 4th & 5th groups and between 3rd and 4th groups respectvely.aoom run scores became worse as Percent body fat (%) ncreased from 1st to 5th groups. The results show no sgnfcant dfferences among fve groups on trunk extenson. The results of dynamc baance test n each groups were shown n Fg. 5. The results of the ANOV A show sgnfcant group dfferences at O. 001 level. The dfferences were found between 1st and 4th & 5th group and between 2nd & 3rd groups and 5th group. As Percent body fat (%) ncreased the scores of dynamc balance decreased. 4. SUmm Base 10 tems ness TesT gory frorr was dvd ( ( :: :..;:21

4 . :.:::..... JDA: The Relatonshp Between Basc Physcal Ftness and Body Fat n +9Skg Category Unversty Judo Athletes (kg) _6.68 =--=--=t=-= / 126AL--=-C:;{;;:- ll T t ị (:J.. J rc-;;. ; l. :; ::-c: ;: -=. --- Fg Summary -. J :. : : :Go:; : ;-./ ::.:;-=l J. ;:JJG-: -.. : -: -: ;_- ; cq :<t ;«;« : rc > _.----Z;=::- f {). ;. 5-+ gro -- ;./... j --:J Means and- gfcance dfference n body weght between grous. tar. ;. :;f::::);\ Based on measurement of 8 components and 10 tems of the Physque and Basc Physcal Ft-. ness Test among 63 Judo athletes n +9Skg category from four unverstes Percent body fat (%) was dvded nto the followng groups; 1st group (J %) 2nd group ( %) 3rd group ( %) 4th group ( %) and 5th group ( %). We obtaredtbe followng. concluson based on the examnaton of the dfferences wthn the fve groups of Percent body fat (%) and relatonshp between basc physcal ftness and body fat. () Weght ncreased n +95kg category as Percent Body Fat (%) ncreased. (2) Speed endurance represented by 400 m run h :: f u;\. J 3 ;. 1.t:. rr. ); :; j :1...:./ )f::\:.. ::::=-:::::::::

5 ): 11f 30-{l) 1997 (kg) _ c : :-- -L ; : _ J /:- --.:.. 0 : :... 0 ::: E:;\>;::..:. :::F:;::::;: _u :;:4 5-: group Fg. 2 Means and sgnfcance dfference-na-ck muscular-streogth between groups.. (pont) > : ;; J_ r Fg Means and sgnfcant dfference n sdestep between groups :.>-> group U- -- n- h_h

6 -\;:b;-c;.:>;::-:--.-:.-:...:-::-;. /:::-.::- : :.:::.::- :::- -:.- :-:: DA: Thc Relatonshp Between Basc Physcal Ftness and Body Fat n +95kg Catcgory Unvcrsty Judo Athletes (sec) _. r /.=---:- - -=:_.-=_=11.1: ;. [: ;;.;. ::::-::c :::;;:: -:.. -:.:: g.2ff75; ;} ho >?t :1<.; c.;k:}1j; z.:><{;; -(; \:.:.:( : ;:::C: J ::.b::z::u c./. 1.:::;(; -1.1:1;;:.;;--:3 <:. -?:f.<; ;:v ;Z :c 1-: : ::_. ::J:- :-::::J ;::H:.{ H: ; (.;jj:: 1 - ;:2c:> -m:f::;1 ;rr;;:) :FC? <;?j-g :;:.-r:: : ;::-.1 :; cml;;j:v.j-/; hj;:t :{; w; 3.-r.: o mjj.n:>r.:::c=;.; ::.; -;::- -:;;T H :2;::; ho :: ;;rnuo r::;1::c:r 21-- L - ;;; (:> G-t;:-1r; ::; Fg. 4 -.:::;::..:. became less as Percent body fat (%) ncreased.. ; -_.---;.: :X :: J::;;- :u::;[;;:::;; or::: dc-;: <..}< :C;.wwj ;>:; rrl.:::;:;rlj 2d: ;:t::::j ;:.Z: 1q;r;. ::0.; D::u:; 0; ::x: :::ON ;-.. :::: )Sr :r.1jl :(fk: :;;:1:1-1 :0 :J21J::.1;:b [r ; ; 1..q :. :;;.:h.;; ;:::;jjj ::;:;;;t ; ::.6n : ;:o<;:p(}. (1.)(;6 ;;J:;:nk :::; 11>-: ;. \g :10 or. b:;. %-TJ :jj;: ;:.; c;;;-; ;: b::lq : \;::H:-r; h Cj:T:mJ::T ::r). r;;jj:oj :: l;:2 :LlH:Cn:U (:;; :1:; -.. C -.r: ;.r.: jut 3 4 < 5 group Means and sgnfcance dfference n 4O0m run betwe groups. (3) The ANOV A results showed the sgnfcant dfferences n aglty n each groups represented by sde step. Dfferences were found between 1st and other four groups but not among these four groups. Level of basc physcal ftness ncludng aglty and muscular power represented by vencal jump would be assumed to change at 24% of Percent body fat (%) as a border. (4) Dynamc balance represented by Bass dynamc balance test decreased as Percent body fat (%) ncreased. These fndngs offered mponance suggeston 10 the tranng methods of basc physcal ftness to mprove performance abltes among ;.::: K t: : - 1<> J t ; \;

7 .; \ :E:)t Wf51:30-(1) (tmes) L- 40 : ). f. :?;;C. :;-l <;. : = ---0:_-= u ::;;. -.-/.-< -. :.< _ group.- Fg. 5 Means and sgnfcance dfference n Bass dynamc balance between groups _. heavy weght class athletes. n the future we Physcal Ftness for College Judosts 1986 Seoul Asan would. lke to collect larger samples and examne pmes Scentfc Congress Proceeng: characterstcs of basc physcal ftness that are 3) da E. Matsuura Y. Takeuch M. Ueguch T ;:>.--- :; (;... :- < <;;} -:< :.::):f\( l 1/ ṇ necessary for Judo athletes ncludng basc plys:: and Chnsung:Dong. -; Comparatve Study on Physcal ftness structure body composton relaton cal Ftness Between Korcanand Japanese College shp among each tes _a_n_s<:>n _. - us 1988 Seoul Olympc Scentfc Congress The summary of ths study was presented n Proceedng: the 1996 ntmatonal Scentfc Congress at the 4) da E. Matsuura Y. Takeuch M. Nakajma T July 199 j)allas Texas U.S.A and Tana H.: The StU?y on Measurement tems for.. - the Dagnoss on College Judosts Research Journal of ; REFERENCES.;;.; :).-.):: :.::. Budo 27 (2): (n Japanese) ) da E. Matsuura Y Aoyag O Takeuch M. - Tanaka H. Yoshoka T and Komata K.: Test Batteres of Fundamental Physcal Ftness for College :. Judosts Japan Journal of physcal Educaton 29 () : ; (n Japanese) ::-.. 2).-lda E. Matsuura Y. Takeuch; M. Tanaka H. -.Ueguch T. Takag C. Yoshoka T and Nshjma N.: Factoral Structure and Test Construc;ton of H. nagak A-and Ueguch T. :.ACompar ) Nakajma T. da E Matsuura Y. Takeuch M. Tanaka. son of the Factor Structure of Basc Physcal Ftness. -among Unversty Judosts of Dfferent Weght Catc-. gones ResearchJournal of Bullo 28 (): ) Nakajma T. Takeuch M. Matsuura Y. da E. Tanaka H. Komor F and Kashwazak K.: The Relatonshp between body Fat and Fundamental - -t ::::: :.: :::: ;.: ; -.: :c:.> --:;:T(::: ::7:;)?..:y;:;.:: -

8 n -- jf;j f :re30-(1) 1997 ffl&<7)1:jt. 11Wc ([)::?L \-c.--..; J (8) t 1m. ff (rpgt) j-cy 1fl (.;;/77/:A:Jffl) /j :tjf-(:::) Ms (:::).t: &-()c.{t$> r-f-r._c5f<:: ( ;z= n r- 7 =F ffwj.\.7- ). --_ ;. -:_- >: :L e B:2f;:$1::ff:<:tfjlt:7 -u 4:$. 95kg{$63 C l Lw:m.-f:1J-T A }-8 lo O)JJEJ: ) --t:lv::j:a: B (SF-891Ht: J: -0 Percent body fat (%) 1<:-:>\-e%ffO)A:b>l;: r;fl < t.t J: oj 1<: lp? % (N=12) % (N= 12) % (N=13) % (N=13) % (N=13) 0) 5:fO)tllttt;j;;:<::f.f l fdl1rao)-d) 11J t1djw$t O)fM<:-:>\)-elt.:d -O)J:.oj t.td J> s tlt.: 0 1) Percent body fat (%) o);jd1: 1: 1t:{$:1U{)1JUT.oo 2) 400m jelrt;;:h.o.jttl;j: Percent body fat (%) 0)1JDt t {) 1t:Jf:H;:TT.oo :-.: 3) Sde StepLrt;;tt o m-mlflfcn :1J;J: Percent body fat (%) 24%- jj[1t::: tl? 0){$:1J0)Y-Jv:b>7tJ)ntf1E tlt.:o.1 j f. :1 4) Bass dynamc balance test Lrtn.tJ.Jttl;J: Percent body fat (%) O)1JUtt:9;. o Pk1:O)dJ:: ) 1[:t0)1J t l -e 1:1J0) }-y-.:=.?;::m:5t--b;>m?:h c.t.:o 4-1J;:flU:tf-<4H\ftll;:-:>)-e -t-o){$:1jo)m 1 JJH3raO)ffk B<:jQ 1:1.oJm-=FO)11JO)tt;::-:>1) -efl L- -eft t.:1)t? -e t).o 0 u;t :.-.:.-:::.::::-- -::.-.::>::-:;.:::: : -:;::-. ;:-._:::.: u.--: - -.