adin Aadin Arts/Rg Disadvantaged ARn English Language 04 All Students % 67,7% 72.7% 0% 72.7% 18.2% Arts I Reading

Transcription

1 English Language 03 Male <10 59% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts/Reading English Language 03 Economically < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts/Reading Disadvantaged EnglishLanguage 03 Studentswith < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 English Language 04 All Students % 67,7% 72.7% 0% 72.7% 18.2% Arts I Reading English Language 04 TwoorMore < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Races English Language 04 White % 70.5% 70% 0% 70% 20% 10% Arts / Reading English Language 04 White % 74.4% 70% 0% 70% 20% 10% EnglishLanguage 04 Female < % <10 <10 <10 <10 < Annual Education Report Student Assessment Data - Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Student Group School Year % Students Jstate % Students District % % Advanced % Proficient % Partially % Not Proficient Tested I Proficient Students (Level 1) (Level 2) Proficient (Level (Level 4) Proficient 3) English Language 03 All Students % 63.2% 75% 16.7% 58.3% 16.7% 8.3% eadin_ English Language 03 All Students % 62.4% 100% 273% 72.7% 0% 0% Arts/Reading EnglishLanguage 03 TwoorMore Arts/Reading Races < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 English Language Arts I Reading 03 White % 70.3% 72.7% 18.2% 54.5% 18.2% English Language Arts / Reading 03 White % 69.8% 100% 27.3% 72.7% 0% English Language 03 Female < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ARn English Language 03 Female < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 adin English Language 03 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Aadin I English Language 03 Economically % 50.3% 80% 20% 60% 10% 10% Arts/Rg Disadvantaged Art]feadit Disabilities English Language 03 Studentswith < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts/Reading )isabilities English Language 04 All Students % 63.5% 70% 0% 70% 20% 10% AR English Language 04 Female < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts I Reading Page 1 ci 29

2 Annual Education Report 08/27/2012 Michigan English Language 05 All Students % 65.3% 50% 0% 50% 33.3% 16.7% eadin English Language 05 All Students % 68.8% 76.5% 5.9% 70.6% 17.6% 5.9% Arts Re English Language 05 American Indian < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts/Reading or Alaska Native English Language 05 White % 71.4% 45.5% 0% 45.5% 36.4% 18.2% Arts / Reading English Language 05 White % 74.8% 76.5% 5.9% 70.6% 17.6% 5.9% adin English Language 05 Female < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts/Reading English Language 05 Female % 71.7% 70% 0% 70% 20% 10% AR English Language 05 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Disabilities Student Assessment Data - Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Student Group Schoo Year % Students State % Students District % % Advanced % Proficient % Partially % Not Proficient Tested Proficient Students (Level 1) (Level 2) Proficient (Level (Level 4) Proficient 3) English Language 04 Male % 59.7% 63.6% 0% 63.6% 27.3% 9,1% Arts / Reading English Language 04 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 adin English Language 04 Economically % 50% 57.1% 0% 57.1% 28.6% 14.3% Arts/R,L_ Disadvantaged English Language 04 Economically % 55% 70% 0% 70% 20% 10% Arts/Reading Disadvantaged English Language 04 Studentswith < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts/Reading Disabilities - English Language 04 Studentswith <10 35% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts/Rg Disabilities English Language 05 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts/Reading English Language 05 Economically % 51.9% 40% 0% 40% 40% 20% Disadvantaged English Language 05 Economically % 56.1% 63.6% 0% 63.6% 27.3% 9.1% 2,,,,,,,, Disadvantaged Arts/R English Language 05 Studentswith <10 28% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 English Language 05 Students with < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Artsjadir Disabilities English Language 06 All Students % 63.2% 69.2% 0% 69.2% 23.1% 7.7% Arts / Reading Page 2 of 29

3 English Language 06 Female < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 eadin - English Language 06 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 English Language 06 Students with < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Disabilities English Language 07 All Students % 55.6% 50% 10% 40% 0% 50% Arts / Reading English Language 07 All Students % 59.7% 50% 0% 50% 28.6% 21.4% Arts / Reading English Language 07 TwoorMore < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts I Reading Races English Language 07 White % 62.8% 50% 10% 40% 0% 50% Arts/Reading English Language 07 White % 66.9% 46.2% 0% 46.2% 30.8% 23.1% 08/ Annual Education Report Student Assessment Data - Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Student Group School Year % Students State % Students District % % Advanced % Proficient % Partially % Not Proficient Tested Proficient I Students (Level 1) (Level 2) Proficient (Level (Level 4) Proficient 3j English Language Arts/Reading 06 All Students % 67% 60% 10% 50% 30% 10% EnglishLanguage 06 Americanlndian < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts/Rg_ or Alaska Native EnglishLanguage 06 Arts/Reading TwoorMore Races < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 English Language Arts/Reading 06 White % 70.7% 66.7% 0% 66.7% 25% 83% English Language 06 Arts / Reading White < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 English Language 06 Female % 66.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts/Reag Arts/Reag - English Language 06 Arts / Reading Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 [English Language 06 Economically Arts / Reading Disadvantaged % 48.9% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 English Language 06 Economically Arts/ Reading Disadvantaged < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 EnglishLanguage 06 Studentswith < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts/R_ Disabilities English Language 07 Female < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts / Reading English Language 07 Female < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts / Reading Page 3 of 29

4 Annual Education Report 08127/2012 Subject Grade Student Group School Year %Students State % Students District % % Advanced %Proficient % Partially % Not Proficient Tested Proficient Students (Level 1) (Level 2) Proficient (Level (Level 4) Proficient 3) English Language 07 Arts I Reading Male <10 511% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 English Language 07 Arts / Reading Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 English Language 07 Economically < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts I Reading Disadvantaged English Language 07 Economically % 44.5% 40% 0% 40% 30% 30% Arts/Reading Disadvantaged EnglishLanguage 07 Studentswith < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts IReading Disabilities renglish Language 07 Studentswith <10 19% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts/Reading Disabilities English Language Arts/Reading_ 08 All Students % 56% 62.5% 6.3% 56.3% 37.5% 0% English Language 08 [All Students % 60.5% 66.7% 0% 66.7% 8.3% 25% % District-Level Combined Reports Data for Traverse Bay Area ISO, Alba Public Schools Student Assessment Data - Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) English Language Arts / Reading 08 White % 61.9% 62.5% 6.3% 56.3% 37.5% 0% English Language 08 Arts / Reading White % 66.5% 66.7% 0% 66.7% 8.3% 25% English Language 08 Female % 60.9% 50% 10% 40% 50% 0% Arts I Reading English Language 08 Female < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts/Reading English Language 08 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts/Reading English Language 08 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts / Reading English Language 08 Economically % 41.4% 60% 0% 60% 40% 0% Arts/Reading Disadvantaged English Language 08 Economically < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts/Reading Disadvantaged English Language 08 Studentswith <10 l6.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 ArtjReir Disabilities English Language 08 Studentswith < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts/Reading Disabilities Mathematics 03 All Students % 34.8% 58.3% 25% 33.3% 33.3% 8.3% Mathematics 03 All Students % 36.3% 90.9% 72.7% 0% 9.1% Mathematics 03 TwoorMore < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Races Page4of 29

5 08127/2012 Annual Education Report District-Level Combined Reports Data for Traverse Bay Area ISO, Alba Public Schools Student Assessment Data - Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Student Group School Year % Students State % Students District % % Advanced % Proficient % Partially % Not Proficient Tested Proficient Students (Level 1) (Level 2) Proficient (Level (Level 4) Proficient 3) Mathematics 03 White % 40.5% 54.5% 18.2% 36.4% 36.4% 9.1% Mathematics 03 White % 42.3% 90.9% 18.2% 72.7% 0% 9.1% Mathematics 03 Female < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 03 Female < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 03 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 03 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 03 Economically Disadvantaged % 21.6% 60% 20% 40% 30% 10% Mathematics 03 Economically Disadvantaged <10 23% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 03 Studentswith Disabilities < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 03 Studentswith Disabilities < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 04 All Students % 39.6% 421% 0% 42.1% 26.3% 31.6% Mathematics 04 All Students % 39.9% 45.5% 0% 45.5% 27,3% 27.3% Mathematics 04 TwoorMore Races < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 04 White % 46% 42.1% 0% 42.1% 26.3% 31.6% Mathematics 04 White % 46.4% 40% 0% 40% 30% 30% Mathematics 04 Female < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 04 Female < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 04 Male % 41.4% 50% 0% 50% 20% 30% Mathematics 04 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 04 Economically Disadvantaged % 25.3% 46.2% 0% 46.2% 23.1% 30.8% Mathematics 04 Economically Disadvantaged % 25.3% 40% 0% 40% 30% 30% Mathematics 04 Studentswith Disabilities < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 04 Students with Disabilities < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 05 All Students % 38.5% 8.3% 0% 8.3% 50% 41.7% Mathematics 05 All Students % 39.6% 11.8% 0% 11.8% 29.4% 58.8% Mathematics 05 American Indian < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 or Alaska Native Mathematics 05 White % 44.2% 9.1% 0% 9.1% 45.5% 45.5% Page 5 Ct 2

6 Proficient Michigan 37.4% 08/27/2012 Annual Education Report Student Assessment Data - Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Fubject Grade Student Group School Year %Students State % Students District % % Advanced % Proficient % Partially % Not Proficient Tested Proficient Students (Level 1) (Level 2) Proficient (Level (Level 4) I 3) hematics 05 White % 45.7% 11.8% 0% 11.8% 29.4% 58.8% Mathematics 05 Female < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 05 Female % 37.5% 0% 0% 0% 20% 80% Mathematics 05 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 05 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 05 Economically Disadvantaged % 24.1% 0% 0% 0% 60% 40% Mathematics 05 Economically Disadvantaged % 24.9% 18.2% 0% 18.2% 27.3% 54.5% Mathematics 05 Students with Disabilities < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 05 Studentswith Disabilities <10 16% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 06 All Students % 36,2% 7.7% 0% 7.7% 30.8% 61.5% Mathematics 06 American Indian < % <10 <10 <10 <10 1<io or Alaska Native I Mathematics 06 All Students % 37.1% 30% 0% 30% 20% 50% Mathematics 06 TwoorMore Races < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 06 White % 41.9% 8,3% 0% 8.3% 25% 66.7% Mathematics 06 White <10 43% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 06 Female % 36.1% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 06 Female < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 06 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 06 Male <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 06 Economically Disadvantaged % 22% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 06 Economically Disadvantaged < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 06 Students with Disabilities <10 10% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 06 Studentswith Disabilities <10 11% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 07 All Students % 35.9% 0% 0% 0% 30% 70% Mathematics 07 All Students % 37.2% 21.4% 0% 21.4% 14.3% 64.3% Mathematics 07 TwoorMore Races < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Page 6 of 29

7 Annual Education Report 08/27/ % 0% Student Assessment Data - Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Student Group School Year % Students State % Students District % % Advanced % Proficient % Partially % Not Proficient Tested Proficient Students (Level 1) (Level 2) Proficient (Level (Level 4) Proficient 3) Mathematics White % 42% 0% 0% 0% 30% 70% Mathematics 07 White % 43.6% 15.4% 15.4% 15.4% 69.2% Mathematics 07 Female <10 36% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 07 Female <10 38% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 07 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 07 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 07 Economically < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Disadvantaged Mathematics 07 Economically % 21.6% 10% 0% 10% 20% 70% -...-_dvantaed Mathematics 07 Students with Disabilities <10 7.6% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 07 Studentswith Disabilities <10 8.6% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 08 All Students % 28.9% 12.5% 0% 12.5% 43.8% 43.8% Mathematics 08 All Students % 29.4% 8.3% 0% 8.3% 41.7% 50% Mathematics 08 White % 33.9% 12.5% 0% 12.5% 43.8% 43.8% Mathematics 08 White % 34.6% 8.3% 0% 8.3% 41.7% 50% Mathematics 08 Female 100% 27.4% 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% Mathematics 08 Female <10 28% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 08 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 08 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 08 Economically Disadvantaged % 14.6% 20% 0% 20% 40% 40% Mathematics 08 Economically Disadvantaged < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 08 Studentswith Disabilities <10 5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 08 Studentswith Disabilities <10 5.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Science All Students % 17.4% 8.3% 0% 8.3% 33.3% 58.3% Science 05 All Students % 15.3% 0% 0% 0% 29.4% 70.6% Science 05 American Indian or Alaska Native <10 9.6% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Sdence 05 White % 21.4% 0% 0% 0% 36.4% 63.6% Science 05 White % 0% 0% 0% 29.4% 70.6% 05 Female < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

8 . Tested Female Science 05 Male <10 17% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 08 All Students % 16.5% 7.7% 0% 7.7% 30.8% 61.5% Science 08 White % 18,1% 12.5% 0% 12.5% 50% 37.5% Science 08 White % 20.1% 7.7% 0% 7.7% 30.8% 61.5% Science 08 Female % 12% 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% Science 08 Female < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 108 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 08 Male <10 19% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 08 Studentswith <10 3.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 08/27/2012 Annual Education Report Student Assessment Data Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Subject Grade Student Group School Year % Students State % Students District % % Advanced % Proficient % Partially % Not Proficient Science 05 Proficient Students (Level 1) (Level 2) Proficient (Level (Level 4) Proficient 3) % 13.6% 0% 0% 0% 20% 80% Science 05 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 05 Economically % 8.3% 10% 0% 10% 30% 60% Disadvantaged Science 05 Economically % 7% 0% 0% 0% 36.4% 63.6% Dad Science 05 Studentswith <10 5.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Disabilities Science 05 Studentswith <10 5.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Disabilities Science 08 All Students % 14.9% 12.5% 0% 12.5% 50% 37.5% Science 08 Economically Disadvantaged % 6.9% 20% 0% 20% 30% 50% Science 08 Economically Disadvantaged <10 7.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 08 Studentswith <10 3.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Disabilities Page 8 ot 29

9 Annual Education Report 08/27/2012 District-Level Combined Reports Data for Traverse Bay Area ISO, Alba Public Schools Student Assessment Data - Michigan Merit Examination (MME) Subject Grade Student Group School Year % Students State % Students District % % Advanced % Proficient % Partially % Not Proficient Tested Proficient Students (Level 1) (Level 2) Proficient (Level (Level 4) Proficient English Language Arts/Reactng 11 All Students % 52.7% 38.5% 0% 38.5% 38.5% 23.1% English Language Arts / Reading 11 All Students % 55,9% 46.7% 6.7% 40% 13.3% 40% English Language Arts/Reading 11 White % 59.5% 38.5% 0% 38.5% 38.5% 23.1% English Language 11 White % 62.4% 46.7% 6.7% 40% 13.3% 40% Ads/Readjpg -..- English Language 11 Female <10 551% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts I Reading English Language 11 Female < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts! Reading English Language 11 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts / Reading English Language 11 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts / Reading English Language 11 Economically < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Ads/Reading Pisadvantaged - - English Language 11 Economically % 39.9% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Ajadi,,_ Disadvantaged EnglishLanguage 11 Studentswith < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts/Reading Disabilities EnglishLanguage 11 Studentswith < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Arts I Reading Disabilities Mathematics 11 All Students % 27.3% 23.1% 0% 23.1% 30.8% 46.2% Mathematics 11 All Students % 29.1% 15.4% 0% 15.4% 138.5% 46.2% Mathematics 11 White % 319% 23.1% 0% 23.1% J30.8% 46.2% Mathematics 11 L.Thite % 33.6% 15.4% 0% 15.4% 138.5% 46.2% Mathematics 11 Female < % <10 <10 <10 1<10 <10 Mathematics 11 Female < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 11 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 11 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 11 Economically Disadvantaged < % <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 11 Economically % 13.4% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Disadvantaged Mathematics 11 Students with <10 3.6% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Disabilities Page 9 of 29

10 Michigan Grade Stuclant Group School Year % Students State % Students District % % Advanced % Proficient % Partially 1% Not Proficient Tested Proficient Students (Level 1) (Level 2) Proficient(Level (Level 4) Proficient 3) Mathematics 11 Students with <10 3.9% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 08/27/2012 Annua Lducation Report Student Assessment Data - Merit Examination (MME)!DisabiIities Page 10sf 29

11 Annual Educabon Report 08/27/ Mathematics 06 All Students < % <10 <10 <10 <10 07 White % <10 <10 <10 Student Assessment Data - MI-Access : Functional Independence Subjoc Grade Student Group School Year % Students Tested State % Students District % % Surpassed Attained (Level % Emerging Proficient Students (Level 1) 2) (Level 3) Proficient Mathematics 04 All Students < % <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics < % <10 <10 <10 <10 I Mathematics 04 Male < % <10 1<10 <10 <10 Mathematics 05 All Students < % <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics - White < % <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 05 Male - < % <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 06 White < % <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics Emale < % <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 07 All Students < % <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics <10 - <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 07 Female < % t<lo <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 08 All Students <10 79% <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 08 White < %.j<io <10 <10 <10 Mathematics Female <10 76% - <10 <10 Mathematics 11 All Students < % <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 11 HispanicorLatino - < % <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 11 Female < % <10 <10 <10 Science 05 All Students < % <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 05 White < % <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 05 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 08 All Students < % <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 08 White < % <10 <10 <10 <10 Science 08 Female < % <10 1<10 <10 <10 Sdence 11 All Students < % <10 <10 I<io <10 Science 11 HispanicorLatino < % <10 1<10 10 <10 Science 11 Female < % <10 1<10 <10 <10 Pagellof 29

12 08)27/2012 Annual Education Report District-Level Combined Reports Data for Traverse Bay Area ISO, Alba Public Schools Student Assessment Data - MI-Access : Supported Independence Subject Grade 1% Surpassed % Attained (Level 1% Level Emerging Proficient 1) 2) (Level 3) L L Student Group School Year % Students Tested Statu % Students District % Proficient Students Page 12f 29

13 Annual Education Report 08/27/2012 District-Level Combined Reports Data for Traverse Bay Area ISO, Alba Public Schools Student Assessment Data - MI-Access Participation Subject I Grade Student Group School Year % Students Tested State % Students District % i% Surpassed % Attained (Level % Emerging Proficient Students (Level 1> 2) (Level 3) Proficient Pagel3of 29

14 Readir 08 White < % <10 <10 <10 <10 Reading 08 Male < % <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics J08 All Students <10 43% <10 <10 <10 <10 Mathematics 08 White < % <10 <10 <10 <10 [athematcs..jp < % <10 <10 1<10 <10 08/27/2012 Annual Education Report Student Assessment Data MEAP-Access Subject [ade Student Group School Year % Students Tested State % Students District % % Level 1 % Level 2 % Level 3 Proficient Students Proficient Readin 08 All Students < % <10 <10 <10 <10 Page l4of 29

15 Subject % Annual Education Report 08/27/2012 District-Level Combined Reports Data for Traverse Bay Area ISO, Alba Public Schools AYP Detail Data - [Student Group Location Tested (Goal 95%) % Proficient for AYP* All Students State English Language Arts / 98.8% 82.9% Reading All Students State Mathematics 98.5% 57.5% All Students District English Language Arts I 96.9% 79,1% Reading All Students District Mathematics 94.8% 44.7% American Indian or Alaska State English Language Arts! 97.7% 78.6% Native Reading American Indian or Alaska State Mathematics 97.5% 47.4% Native American Indian or Alaska District English Language Arts I <30 <30 Native Reading American Indian or Alaska District Mathematics <30 <30 Nattve Asian, Native Hawaiian, or State English Language Arts! 100.6% 89.8% Pacific Islander Reading Asian, Native Hawaiian, or State Mathematics 99.3% 80.1% Pacific Islander Black or African American State English Language Arts / 96.9% 67.4% Reading Black or African American State Mathematics 96.4% 32.2% Hispanic or Latino State English Language Arts I 99% 75.8% Reading State Mathematics 98.5% 44.6% Hispanic or Latino District English Language Arts / <30 <30 Hispanic or Latino District Mathematics <30 <30 Two or More Races State English Language Aria! 99.1% 83.6% Reading Two or More Races State Matheryatics 199% 54.9% Two or More Races District English Language Arts! <30 <30 Two or More Races District Mathematics <30 <30 White State English Language Arts! 99.2% 86.9% White State Mathematics 99% 63.9% White District English Language Arts / 96.8% 79.3% Reading White District Mathematics 94.6% 43.2% Economically State English Language Arts! 98.3% 74.4% Reading Economically State Mathematics 97.9% 43.3% Disadvantaged Economically District English Language Arts! 95.7% 73.8% Disadvantaged Reading dvantae Economically District Mathematics 92.8% 45% Disadvantaged Students with Disabilities State English Language Arts! 97.7% 51.5% addg Students with Disabilities State Mathematics 97.3% 32% Students with Disabilities District English Language Arts! <30 <30 Readng Students with Disabilities District Mathematics <30 <30 Note: 1037 Recently arrived LEP students took part in the State s ELPA instead of the MEAPIM ME/MI-Access. Pagel5of 29

16 Graduation Graduation Annual Education Report 08/27/2012 AYP Detail Data - Rate - Student Group Location Rate (High Schools only) (Goal 80%) All Students State 79.2% All Students District 82.61% American Indian or Alaska Native State 68.49% Asian State 90.49% Black or African American State 62.56% Hispanic or Latino State 68.31% - Migrant State 73.33% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander State 71.79% Two or More Races State 73.44% White State 84.81% White District 82.61% Female State 83.17% Female District <10 Male State 75,45% Male District 80% Economically Disadvantaged State 67.16% Economically Disadvantaged District <10 Students with Disabilities State 64.79% Students with Disabilities District <10 * All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year. Pagel6of 29

17 Attendance Annual Education Report 08/27/2012 AYP Detail Data - Attendance Rate Student Group Location - All Students State 94.8% All Students District 95.8% American Indian or Alaska Native State 94.1% American Indian or Alaska Native District 99.1% Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander State % Black or African American State -. 91% Hispanic or Latino State 94.3% Hispanic or Latino District 93.9% Two or More Races State 95% White State 95.8% White District 95.8% Economically Disadvantaged State 94.8% Economically Disadvantaged District 95.8% Students with Disabilities State 93.2% Students with Disabilities District 95.5% * All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year. Rate (Goal 90%) Pagel7of 29

18 School Year Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 1Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11 31% % 69% 68% 67% 66% 65% 71% ? 86% 85% 84% 83% 182% 82% 86% 1000/ 1000/ 1000/ 100/ 100/ 08127/2012 Annual Education Report Michigan Annual AYP Objectives for Reading/ELA :202 38% 131% 42% % % 31% 42% - 42% % 43% % 48% 46% 45% 43% 141% 52% 52% % 48% 46% 45% 143% 141% 52%?c:9z- % 590/ 57% 560/ 3% % 59% 57% 56% 54% 53% 61% r % 77% 76% 75% 74% 73% 79% Pagel8of 29

19 Annual Education Report 08/27/2012 School Year Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11 31% % 56% 53% 50% 46% 43% 44% % 56% 53% 50% 46% 43% 44% 67% [65% 62% 60% 57%54% 55% J5% % 82% 81% 80% 78% 77% 78% % 91% 90% 90% 89% 89% District-Level Combined Reports Data for Traverse Bay Area ISD, Mba Public Schools Michigan Annual AYP Objectives for Mathematics % 31% 33% % % 43% 44% 33% 33% % 65% 62% 60% 54% 55% % - 62% 60% 57% 54% 55% 75% _H% 71% 70% 67% 67% i3-14jj00% 100% 100% 1100% 100% 100% Pagelgof 29

20 Annual Education Report 08/27/2012 District AYP Status yelaireading Status AYP Mathematics Status AYP Overall Status Met - Met [ Page2Oof 29

21 Annual Education Report 08/27/2012 Schools in District AYP Status School! Building chool % of Schools making AYP: 100% % of Schools in School Improvement status: 0% % of Scrrools in Corrective Action status: 0% % of Schools in Restructuring status: 0% % of Title I Schools making AYP: 100% Title 1 Status % of Title I Schools in School Improvement status: 0% % of Title I Schools in Corrective Action status: 0% % of Title I Schools in Restructuring status: 0% AYP ELAlReading Status AYP Mathematics Status AYP Overall Status Met Met Education Yes Report Card School Status Indicator Grade Met I Page 21 of 29

22 Annual Education Report 08/27/2012 Teacher Quality Data Other Professional Qualifications of All Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the District Professional Qualifications are defined by the State and may include information such as the degrees of public school teachers (ag., percentage of teachers with Bachelors Degrees or Masters Degrees) or the percentage of fully certified teachers M.A. Ph.D Page22of 29

23 Annual Education Report 08/27/2012 District-Level Combined Reports Data for Traverse Bay Area ISD, Alba Public Schools Teacher Quality Data Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the 0% District with Emergency Certification Certification Percent Page 23 of 29

24 Annual Educabon Report 08/27/2012 Teacher Quality Data r District Aggregate -- High-Poverty Schools Low-Poverty Schools Percentage of Core Academic Subject Elementary and Secondary School Classes not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Page 24 of 29

25 Annual Education Report 08/27/2012 NAEP 2011 Grade 4 Mathematics Results Percent of Students Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Proficient Percent Advanced All Students Male Female National Lunch Program Eligility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available Race Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian Native :t: Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Two or More Races Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD Student is an English Language Learner ELL [Not ELL 1 Reporting Standards not met. Note: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment Program (NAEP) 2011 Mathematics Achievement. Page 25 of 29

26 Annual Education Report 08/27/2012 NAEP 2011 Grade 8 Mathematics Results Percent of Students PercentbeIowBasicJentBasi Percent Proficient Percent Advanced All Students Male Female National Lunch Program Eligility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available Race Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian 1 t Native Hawaiian/Pacific 2 1: Islander Two or More Races Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD Student is an English Language Leamer ELL IN0tELL Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. Some apparent differences between estimates may not be statistically significant. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment Program (NAEP) 2011 Mathematics Achievement. Page 26 of 29

27 Female Male All Students Z Percent of Students Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Proficient Percent Advanced NAEP 2011 Grade 4 Reading Results Page 27 of 29 Not ELL Language Learner Student classified as Student is an English SD N0tSD I Asian Hawaiian/Pacific having a disability Hispanic American Indian 0 Black Two or More Races Islander White Native rle Eligible Program Eligility National Lunch Annual Education Report 08/27/2012 Not Eligible 21 ELL # Rounds to zero Reporting not met. NOTE: Detail Standards may not sum to totals of rounding. Some differences between estimates may not be statistically SOURCE: because apparent significant. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National (NAEP), 2011 Reading Assessment of Educational Progress Assessment.

28 Annual Education Report 08/27/2012 NAEP 2011 Grade 8 Reading Results Percent of Students Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Proficient Percent Advanced All Students Male Female National Lunch Program Eligility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available Race Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian 1 Native Hawaiian/Pacific I 1: Islander Two or More Races Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. Some apparent differences between estimates may not be statistically significant. SOURCE: US. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2011 Reading Assessment. Page 28 of 29

29 Annual Education Report 08/27/2012 Grade Subject Participation Rate for Standard Error Participation Rate for Standard Error Students with Limited English Disabilities Proficient Students 4 Math Reading [8 Math Reading Page29of 29