Subunit arrangement of γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors

Transcription

1 JBC Papers in Press. Published on July 20, 2001 as Manuscript M Subunit arrangement of γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors Sabine W. Baumann, Roland Baur and Erwin Sigel Department of Pharmacology, University of Bern, Friedbühlstrasse 49, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland Corresponding author: Erwin Sigel Department of Pharmacology Friedbuehlstrasse 49, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland Tel: , Fax: erwin.sigel@pki.unibe.ch Running title: Subunit arrangement of GABA A receptors 1 Copyright 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

2 The GABA A receptors are ligand-gated chloride channels. The subunit stoichiometry of the receptors is controversial; four, five or six subunits per receptor molecule have been proposed for αβ receptors, whereas αβγ receptors are assumed to be pentamers. In this study, α β and β α tandem cdnas from the α1 and β2 subunits of the GABA A receptor were constructed. We determined the minimal length of the linker that is required between the two subunits for functional channel expression for each of the tandem constructs. 10 and 23 amino acid residues are required for α β and β α, respectively. The tandem constructs either alone or in combination with each other failed to express functional channels in Xenopus oocytes. Therefore, we can exclude tetrameric or hexameric αβ GABA A receptors. We can also exclude proteolysis of the tandem constructs. In addition, the tandem constructs were combined with single α, β or γ subunits to allow formation of pentameric arrangements. In contrast to the combination with α subunits, the combination with either β or γ subunits led to expression of functional channels. Therefore, a pentameric arrangement containing 2 α1 and 3 β2 subunits is proposed for the receptor composed of α and β subunits. Our findings also favor an arrangement βαγβα for the receptor composed of α, β and γ subunits. 2

3 (Introduction) GABA 1 A receptors mediate fast synaptic inhibition in the mammalian brain. They are believed to form heterooligomers composed of subunits from 6 classes with several isoforms (α1-6, β1-3, γ1-3, ε, δ, θ, π) (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). These subunits belong to the gene superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels, which includes nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, GABA A receptors, glycine receptors and the serotonin type 3 (5HT 3 ) receptor. The major GABA A receptor isoform is likely to be composed of α1, β2 and γ2 subunits (1, 2, 6, 7). Heterologous expression demonstrated that the combination of α and β subunits produces GABA gated currents, but coexpression of a γ subunit is required for benzodiazepine sensitivity of the expressed receptors (8). GABA A receptors composed of α and β subunits differ from receptors that additionally contain the γ subunit in regard to Zn 2+ and benzodiazepine sensitivity and to single channel conductance (9, 10, 11, 12, 13). Some populations of neuronal GABA A receptors show high Zn 2+ sensitivity coupled with low single-channel conductance as described for αβ receptors (14, 15). While receptors made from α, β and γ subunits are thought to be pentameric (16, 17, 18), the subunit stoichiometry of receptors composed of α and β is still controversial. Recombinantly expressed receptors have been reported as possibly tetrameric (19, 20) as well as pentameric (18, 21). Unitary dose-response curves for αβ receptors, single IC 50 -values for Zn 2+ inhibition and unitary single channel properties (1) provide evidence against the formation of two populations of receptors, e.g. 2α3β and 3α2β. A tetrameric rather than a pentameric structure has been proposed as one of several 3

4 explanations for the lower average single channel conductance for the αβ receptor as compared to the αβγ receptor (22, 23). A powerful way to gain insight into the arrangement of subunits in a multimeric channel is to predetermine the alignment of subunits by gene fusion and to analyze whether the linked subunits are able to form functional channels. This approach was first successfully applied to potassium channels (24, 25, 26). Later it was also used to study subunit stoichiometry of other ion channels, e. g., a cyclic nucleotide-gated channel (27), the mechanosensitive channel MscL of E. coli (28) and the cystic fibrosis conductance regulator (CTFR) channel (29). All these channels have their N- and C-terminals on the cytoplasmic side so that the linkage occurs intracellularly. Up to now it has only been used once with limited success in the field of ligand-gated ion channels, which have both C- and N-terminals on the extracellular side. Applying it to a GABA A receptor, Im et al. (1995) prepared a tandem construct, where the α6 subunit is linked to the β2 subunit via 10 glutamine residues and studied functional expression in HEK293 cells (30). The connection between the two subunits included the signal sequence of the β2 subunit of 24 amino acid residues in length. The consequences of such a signal sequence in the middle of a protein are difficult to predict. We constructed here tandem constructs of α1 and β2 subunits for the first time in both arrangements α1-β2 and β2-α1. We determined the minimal length of the linkers necessary for the formation of functional channels. The constructs were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes either alone or in combination with single subunits to establish 4

5 subunit stoichiometry and arrangement of GABA A receptors. We provide novel information on the architecture of GABA A receptors. 5

6 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES Construction of the tandem cdnas-several α-β tandem cdnas, encoding a single polypeptide αβ with linkers of differing length were established in the pcmv vector. The tandem constructs consisted of the modified rat α1 subunit (31) including its signal sequence at the N-terminal and the mature rat β2 subunit at the C-terminal. The modified α1 subunit differs from the original rat subunit by insertion of one amino acid residue. Insertion of this residue confers reactivity to the monoclonal antibody bd24 (32, 31) that was essential for western blot analysis (see below). The α1 subunit was amplified by polymerase chain reaction using the pchai vector as template and the primers CATAGAAGACACCGGGACGA as a vector specific primer and XTTGATGTGGTGTGGGGGCTTT as a gene specific primer. The latter was complementary to the last codons before the stop codon and had the first part of the sequence coding for the respective linker attached (X). The β2 subunit was amplified using pcb2 as template and the primers ACTGACACACATTCCACAGCT as vector specific primer and YCAGAGTGTCAATGACCCTAGT as a gene specific primer. The latter was complementary to the first codons of the sequence of the mature protein and had the second part of the sequence coding for the respective linker attached (Y). The obtained fragments contained the open reading frame of the gene and some additional vector derived sequence preceding or succeeding. The fragments were cut in the vector derived sequence by EcoRI or XbaI, respectively, to be ligated in a three fragment ligation into the pcmv vector cut with EcoRI and XbaI. The sequence of the resulting plasmids was verified. In the α-0-β tandem, the last amino acid residue of the α1 subunit is directly attached to the first amino 6

7 acid residue of the mature β2 subunit. In the other tandems the following amino acid sequences are present between the N-terminal α1 subunit and the C-terminal β2 subunit: α- 7-β: Q 7 ; α-10-β: Q 10. The β-α tandem cdnas were prepared similarly. The β subunit was amplified using CATAGAAGACACCGGGACGA as vector specific and XGTTCACATAGTAAAGCCAATAGAC as gene specific primer. The mature α subunit was amplified using ACTGACACACATTCCACAGCT as vector specific and YCAGCCGTCATTACAAGATGAA as gene specific primer. The linkers introduced into the different β-α tandems are the following: β10α: Q 10 ; β15α: Q 5 A 3 PAQ 5 ; β20α: Q 5 (A 3 P) 2 A 2 Q 5 ; β23α: Q 3 (Q 2 A 3 PA) 2 AQ 5. A long sequence of consecutive glutamine residues might exhaust the respective trna pool during protein synthesis and therefore lead to an early termination of the synthesized protein. Therefore, other amino acid residues were introduced. Alanine and proline residues were chosen for their properties to form no distinct secondary structure elements. Expression of tandem constructs and wild type subunits in Xenopus oocytes-capped crnas were synthesized (Ambion, Austin, Texas) from the linearized pcmv vectors containing the different tandem constructs, the single α1, β2 and γ2 subunits and from the vector pva2580 (33) encoding a neuronal voltage-gated sodium channel (Na). A poly-a tail of about 400 residues was added to each transcript using yeast poly-a polymerase (USB, Cleveland, Ohio). The concentration of the crna was quantified on a formaldehyde gel using Radiant Red stain (Biorad) for visualisation of the RNA and known concentrations of RNA ladder (GIBCO BRL) as standard on the same gel. crna 7

8 combinations α1/β2/na, α β/na, β α/na, α β/β α/na, α β/α1/na, β α/α1/na, α β/β α/α1/na, α β/β2/na and β α/β2/na, α β/γ2/na and β α/γ2/na were precipitated in ethanol/isoamylalcohol 19:1 and stored at 20 C. For injection, the alcohol was removed and the crnas were dissolved in water. Isolation of oocytes from the frogs, culturing of the oocytes, injection of crna and defolliculation were done as described earlier (34). Oocytes were injected with 50 nl of the crna solution. For crna combinations of α1 and β2 subunits only, the crna solution contained each subunit or tandem construct at 75 nm. In the case of coexpression of α1, β2 and γ2 subunits, the crna solution contained α1 and β2 subunits or the respective tandem construct at 10 nm and the γ2 subunit at 50 nm. The voltage-gated sodium channel was always added to a concentration of 40 nm. The injected oocytes were incubated in modified Barth s solution (10 mm HEPES ph 7.5, 88 mm NaCl, 1 mm KCl, 2.4 mm NaHCO 3, 0.82 mm MgSO 4, 0.34 mm Ca(NO 3 ) 2, 0.41 mm CaCl 2, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin) at 18 C for two days before the measurements. Two-electrode voltage clamp-all measurements were done in medium containing 5 mm HEPES ph 7.4, 90 mm NaCl, 1 mm MgCl 2, 1 mm KCl and 1 mm CaCl 2 at a holding potential of 80 mv. For the determination of maximal current amplitudes 1 mm GABA (Fluka, Switzerland) was applied for 20 seconds. Sodium currents were determined by a potential jump from a holding potential of 100 mv to 15 mv (Fig. 1). The GABAevoked peak current amplitude was standardized to the co-expressed sodium current amplitude of the same oocyte. The mean standardized current amplitude of at least 3 oocytes per subunit combination was then compared to the mean standardized wild type 8

9 current amplitude. Current stimulation by diazepam was determined at a GABA concentration evoking 5% of the maximal current amplitude in combination with 1 µm diazepam (Roche, Switzerland). Western blotting-oocytes were homogenized in lysis buffer (10 mm HEPES ph 8.0, 100 mm NaCl, 10 mm EDTA, 1% TritonX-100, Pepstatin, Leustatin, Antipain and PMSF, each at 5 µg/ml) using a teflon glass homogenizer. The homogenate was incubated on ice for 15 min and centrifuged at 15,000g for 15 min at 4 C. The supernatant was subjected to SDS-PAGE (35). Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (HybondECL, Amersham, UK) according to (36) and decorated with the monoclonal antibody bd24 (31, 32), which recognizes the N-terminal of the α1 subunit of the GABA A receptor. Bands were detected using the ECL-system (Amersham). 9

10 RESULTS Preparation and analysis of tandem constructs-tandem cdnas were constructed that consisted of the α1 and the β2 subunit of the GABA A receptor in both arrangements, α1-β2 and β2-α1 (Fig. 2A). The N-terminal α1 (β2) subunit was taken in its precursor form to ensure insertion into the membrane mediated by the signal sequence. The C- terminal β2 (α1) subunit was depleted of its signal sequence, because it is difficult to predict what consequences this stretch of 24 (27) mostly hydrophobic amino acid residues in the middle of the new fusion protein will have. To bridge the distance between the C- terminal of the α1 (β2) subunit and the N-terminal of the β2 (α1) subunit, we introduced synthetic linkers of different length to determine the shortest possible linker resulting in a functional fusion protein after expression in the Xenopus oocyte. Although the subunits of the GABA A receptor share the same topology and have a high sequence homology, they differ slightly in the number of amino acid residues following the fourth predicted transmembrane region at the C-terminal as well as at the beginning of the N-terminal portion of the subunit. Therefore, linkers of different length were tested for the α1 β2 and β2 α1 construct separately. The function of the different tandem constructs was assessed after expression in Xenopus oocytes, either alone (Fig. 2B, I and II), in combination with each other (Fig. 2B, III) or in combination with single α1 (Fig. 2B, IV and V) or β2 (Fig 1B, VI and VII) subunits. Expression of tandem constructs alone is predicted to yield receptors composed of an even number of subunits, whereas combination of tandem constructs with single subunits can additionally result in receptors with an uneven number of subunits. 10

11 The first criterion for normal channel function was a GABA-evoked maximal current amplitude comparable to that of receptors made from single α1 and β2 subunits, the wild type receptor. These current amplitudes amounted to 1.5 to 8 µa. Expression of either α1 or β2 subunits alone failed to produce detectable currents. To compensate for differences in the expression level between the individual oocytes, GABA-induced current amplitudes were standardized to the current amplitude of the co-expressed voltage-gated sodium channel in the same oocyte. Constructs were examined for standardized maximal current amplitudes (I max ) and the apparent affinity for GABA (K a ). Only receptors performing very similar to the wild type receptor regarding I max and K a were considered fully functional. The tandem constructs are not proteolyzed in the linker sequence-to evaluate whether the expressed tandem constructs were intact or subjected to proteolysis we analyzed the newly formed GABA A receptors by western blotting. The monoclonal antibody bd24 against the N-terminal of the α1 subunit (31, 32) was used. Fig. 3 shows that single α1 subunits of wild type receptors migrate at 50 kda (lane 1). This specific band is missing in the α-10-β/β combination (lane 2), thus indicating the absence of monomeric α1 subunit and therefore of significant proteolysis of the linker. A very faint unspecific signal at the 50 kda position is also seen for non-injected oocytes (lane 3). As indicated by a strong signal, the α-10-β tandem construct migrates at kda. The absence of any additional band with bd24 reactivity also excludes proteolysis elsewhere in the construct. A peptide containing bd24 reactivity which is larger than 29 kda would have been detected. The β-23-α tandem construct could not be detected, because the epitope for the antibody 11

12 seems to include the free N-terminal of the α1 subunit, which is blocked by the linker in this construct. The small quantity of channel expressed prevented detection with another antibody due to insufficient sensitivity. As described below, we also have functional evidence for the fact that proteolysis of both tandem constructs can be excluded. The length of the linker is critical for functional expression of linked subunits-if the α1 β2 tandem construct was co-expressed with single β2 subunits, functional channels were formed provided the linker was long enough (Fig. 4). With no additional linker, but only the 13 amino acid residues following the fourth transmembrane region of the α1 subunit (α 0 β) connected to the N-terminal of the β2 subunit, no current was detectable in injected oocytes. With a linker of 7 residues in length (α-7-β) we found standardized maximal current amplitudes that remained below those expressed from wild type receptors, whereas the tandem construct with a linker of 10 residues (α-10-β) resulted in similar standardized maximal current amplitudes. The dose-response curves of the α-7-β and the α-10-β tandem constructs were close to that of the wild type receptors (Fig. 5A). The two constructs resulted in channels with similar K a values of 9±3 µm and 11±2 µm, respectively, comparable to the combination of single α and β subunits with a K a of 9±2 µm, pointing to an unchanged apparent affinity for GABA despite the covalent linkage. On the right panel of Fig. 4 the results of the analogue examination for the β2 α1 constructs are shown. There was almost no detectable current when we combined the constructs with linkers of 10 and 15 amino acid residues with single β2 subunits. A tandem construct with a linker of 20 residues produced receptors with standardized maximal 12

13 current amplitudes similar to those of wild type receptors. However, the dose-response curve (Fig. 5B) was shifted to the right, i. e., the apparent affinity for GABA was reduced. With 64±33 µm the K a was about 7-fold higher than that of the wild type receptors. A tandem construct containing a linker of 23 residues also reached standardized maximal current amplitudes similar to wild type receptors. The GABA dose-response curve for these channels (Fig. 5B) is characterized by a K a of 20±2 µm, which is close to the wild type receptor with a K a of 9±2 µm. GABA A receptors made from α1 and β2 subunits are pentamers containing 2 α and 3 β subunits-the two functional tandem constructs α-10-β and β-23-α were analyzed further. When either the α-10-β or the β-23-α constructs were expressed alone, we hardly detected GABA evoked currents (Fig. 6A). The co-expressed voltage-gated sodium channel showed the same expression levels in oocytes expressing tandem constructs or wild type receptors. Thus, the absence of RNase activity and the capability of protein expression in the individual oocyte was confirmed. Moreover we exclude proteolysis for either construct, because proteolysis of the linker would in each case liberate α1 and β2 subunits, which in turn should result in functional channels. When α 10 β and β 23 α constructs were expressed in the same oocyte, the standardized maximal current amplitudes remained below 10% of the wild type current (Fig. 6C). These results led to the conclusion that tetrameric receptors of the arrangement αβαβ, which is equal to the arrangement βαβα (see Fig. 2B, I and II), or of the arrangement αββα ( see Fig. 2B, III), do not correspond to a functional receptor made from single α and β subunits. 13

14 The tandem constructs α 10 β and β 23 α were also coexpressed with single α1 subunits and analyzed for maximal current amplitudes. Almost no current was detected upon application of GABA (Fig. 6B), whereas sodium currents were expressed in the same oocytes. Addition of a single α1 subunit to the combination of both tandem constructs α 10 β and β 23 α resulted in slightly elevated maximal current amplitudes as compared to the combination of α 10 β with β 23 α (Fig. 6C), but they were still far below those of the wild type receptors. This indicates an inefficient formation of functional channels in this case. Figure 5D shows that both, the α-10-β and the β-23-α tandem constructs could be complemented with single β2 subunits to form functional channels. This result matches the theoretical consideration that both tandem constructs yield the same arrangement when complemented with a single β2 subunit (compare Fig. 2B, VI and VII). Coexpression of the tandem constructs with a single γ2 subunit-when the α 10 β tandem construct is complemented with a single γ2 subunit, the standardized maximal current amplitude amounts to about 26% compared to the wild type receptor (Fig. 6E). Submaximal current amplitudes can be stimulated by diazepam by 134±8% (mean±sd, n=3) (not shown). The β 23 α tandem construct complemented with a single γ subunit results in functional channels with standardized maximal current amplitudes similar to wild type receptors (Fig. 6E). Submaximal current amplitudes of these receptors are also stimulated by diazepam by 360±10% (mean±sd, n=3) (not shown). 14

15 DISCUSSION In this study we have demonstrated the feasibility of covalent subunit linkage α1-β2 and β2-α1 for the GABA A receptor channel. We have also established the minimal linker lengths required for functional expression. Our results strongly suggest a pentameric structure of the GABA A receptor composed of α1 and β2 subunits and exclude a tetramer. The technique described here may also be applied to the study of other ligand-gated ion channels. Tandem linkage of subunits is a powerful strategy to extract information about stoichiometry and arrangement of multimeric proteins. This approach has first been applied to the study of potassium channels (24). Later, Im et al. (1995) made a tandem construct consisting of the GABA A receptor subunit precursors α6 and β2. They found that their α6- β2 tandem construct alone failed to produce functional GABA channels, but combination with either single α6 or γ2 subunits, but not β2 subunits, restored receptor function after expression in HEK293 cells. Functional expression was however very low in all these cases and did not exceed 0.2 na even for the wild type subunit combination α6 and β2 (30). In the present tandem constructs we omitted the signal sequence stretch of the second subunit, which might have unpredictable effects on e.g., protein folding, insertion of the protein into the membrane, subunit assembly or proteolysis of the connection between the subunits. We linked the α1 and the β2 subunits of the GABA A receptor in both arrangements and expressed the resulting tandem constructs α β and β α in Xenopus oocytes. They were both shown to result in functional channels when complemented with β2 subunits. When the tandem constructs were expressed either alone or in combination 15

16 with each other, no functional receptors were formed. Therefore, our most important conclusion here is that the GABA A receptor made from α1 and β2 subunits is not composed of an even number of subunits. We can exclude tetrameric receptors of the subunit arrangements αβαβ from the expression of each of the tandem constructs alone and the arrangement αββα from their co-expression. Only arrangements of a 1:1 stoichiometry of α and β subunits have been tested here because stoichiometries for αβ receptors of 3:1 or 1:3 have been shown to be unlikely (19, 20). These findings confirm the conclusion drawn from western blot analysis that proteolytic cleavage in the sequence of the linker (Fig. 7A) does not occur to a significant extent. The participation of only one subunit of the tandem construct in the functional receptor (Fig. 7B) can also be excluded. If either one or both of these events had occurred, the formation of functional pentameric receptors from the tandem constructs alone would have been observed. The observation that both tandem constructs form functional channels in combination with single β2 subunits but fail to do so in combination with single α1 subunits supports the view that a receptor made from α and β subunits is a pentamer composed of 2 α and 3 β subunits. This had also been proposed based on immunoprecipitation experiments in HEK293 cells expressing α1β3 receptors (18). A receptor stoichiometry of 3 α6 and 2 β2 subunits has also been suggested (30). This might indicate that the subunit stoichiometry of an αβ receptor depends on the specific subunit isoforms expressed together and/or on differences in the expression systems used. A further aim of this study was the design of optimal linkers between the subunits. The linkage of two subunits should position both next to each other in the receptor. When 16

17 no functional channels can be detected, the forced neighbourhood of the two subunits either prohibits proper channel formation or the linker is too short. When, in contrast, functional channels can be expressed from linked subunits, their neighbourhood may be assumed unless the linker is very long. In this case the two linked subunits do not necessarily locate next to each other in the receptor multimer. It is then possible for another subunit to position itself between the two linked subunits. We therefore determined the minimal linker length for both, the α β and the β α tandem constructs, necessary for the formation of functional channels. We found this length to be 10 and 23 amino acid residues, respectively. Shorter linkers altered the apparent affinity for GABA or the maximal current amplitude of the channel, probably by distorting the conformation of the resulting receptor. It should be noted that the α 7 β and β 20 α tandem constructs, which have linkers that are 3 amino acid residues or about 11 Å shorter, performed nearly as well as wild type receptors. Therefore, the optimal linker length may be somewhat shorter than 10 or 23 amino acid residues, respectively. In our calculation of the actual linker length we included the synthetic linker as well as the C- and N-terminal elongations of the respective subunits (Table 1). We assumed an extended conformation of both with 3.6 Å per amino acid residue. In this case the total length of the subunit connection may be estimated to be maximally 83 Å and 97 Å in the α β and the β α tandem construct, respectively, which might be diminished by the existence of secondary structure elements. For the reasons mentioned above, we assume that the actual linker length is substantially shorter. It is of interest to estimate whether these respective linker lengths allow interspersing of an additional subunit. We can consider the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor an appropriate 17

18 model for the structure of the GABA A receptor as they both belong to the same superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels. The 3D structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor has been resolved to 4.6 Å (37). All the members of the superfamily share a high sequence homology, the same topology and it is assumed that they also have a very similar overall shape. From the dimensions of the receptor we can estimate the minimal length of a peptide passing along the perimeter of one subunit to be about at least 54 Å in case the N-terminal is located at the membrane surface. This minimal length of 54 Å is unrealistic for the following reasons. First, the receptor surface is certainly not smooth but irregular. Second, the N-terminal of the second subunit of the tandem construct is not necessarily located at the membrane surface as the beginning of the connection is predicted to be. Most importantly, location of either the N-terminal or the C-terminal away from the opposed edges of the linked subunits would both result in a corresponding increase of the required minimal length. Comparing the maximal length of the subunit connections and the minimal length such a connection must have to surround an additional subunit and the restrictions made to these values, we consider it unlikely that another subunit is interspersing, but we can not entirely exclude this possibility. In initial experiments we combined the two tandem constructs α-10-β and β-23-α each with single γ subunits. In the case of the β 23 α tandem construct the resulting channel exhibited the same maximal current amplitude as wild type receptors, whereas in the case of the α-10-β tandem construct maximal current amplitudes remained below that of wild type receptors. The fact that both tandem constructs α β and β α resulted in channels sensitive to diazepam was very surprising. The binding site for benzodiazepines is 18

19 thought to be located at the αγ subunit interface (38). This defined interface is lost in one of the two arrangements I and II shown in Fig. 7C. It is possible that the βγ subunit interface can take over benzodiazepine binding properties as it has been observed that receptors expressed from only β and γ subunits are sensitive to benzodiazepines (39). An alternative and more likely interpretation is based on a rearrangement of one of the tandem constructs. We suggest this rearrangement for the following reason. In the presence of γ subunits receptors containing α and β subunits alone are no more formed (23), but the γ subunit seems to induce a subunit assembly leading to αβγ receptors (40, 18). The assembly of the tandem constructs with the γ subunits might thus start with the formation of proper αγ or γβ subunit interfaces. Then the second subunit of the tandem would be integrated. In the case of the β 23 α tandem construct this happens very efficiently, resulting in channels with current amplitudes similar to wild type receptors. In contrast, the α-10-β tandem constructs have to reorient to adopt a β α arrangement (Fig. 7C, II). The linker might now be too short and disturb the proper conformation of the subunits. It is also conceivable that the rearrangement proceeds inefficiently. Therefore the maximal current amplitude is lower, nevertheless the proper binding sites for GABA and benzodiazepines both seem to be present. Thus we propose the subunit arrangement βαγβα for the α1β2γ2 receptor. A rearrangement as proposed for the tandem construct α-β in the presence of a γ2 subunit would not result in additional subunit arrangements in the case of a tetrameric receptor but would add another possible subunit sequence in pentameric receptors composed of only α and β subunits. If one of the tandem constructs in Fig. 2B, VI 19

20 reorients, an arrangement ααβββ which is not shown will be formed. This additional arrangement can not be excluded from our data. The preparation of triple constructs containing the γ subunit and its co-expression with the β-α tandem construct will allow to study the effect of single point mutations exclusively in one defined α or β subunit. For topological reasons it can be safely predicted that subunits linked in a triple construct are not able to rearrange. It will also be possible to study the positional effect of different subunit isoforms in the same receptor pentamer. In summary, we have demonstrated the feasibility of covalent subunit linkage for a ligand-gated ion channel. For the first time we have established the minimal linker lengths required for functional expression. Our results strongly suggest a pentameric structure of the α1β2 GABA A receptor and exclude a tetramer. This work provides a new perspective for the study of subunit arrangement also of other ligand-gated ion channels. 20

21 REFERENCES 1. Macdonald, R. L. and Olsen, R. W. (1994) Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 17, Rabow, L. E., Russek, S. J. and Farb, D. H. (1995) Synapse 21, Davies, P. A., Hanna, M. C., Hales, T. G. and Kirkness, E. F. (1997) Nature 385, Whiting, P. J., McAllister, G., Vassilatis, D., Bonnert, T. P., Heavens, R. P., Smith, D. W., Hewson, L., O'Donnell, R., Rigby, M. R., Sirinathsinghji, D. J., Marshall, G., Thompson, S. A., Wafford, K. A. and Vasilatis, D. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, Hedblom, E. and Kirkness, E. F. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, Laurie, D. J., Seeburg, P. H. and Wisden, W. (1992) J. Neurosci. 12, Benke, D., Fritschy, J. M., Trzeciak, A., Bannwarth, W. and Möhler, H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, Pritchett, D. B., Sontheimer, H., Shivers, B. D., Ymer, S., Kettenmann, H., Schofield, P. R. and Seeburg, P. H. (1989) Nature 338, Draguhn, A., Verdoorn, T. A., Ewert, M., Seeburg, P. H. and Sakmann, B. (1990) Neuron 5, Verdoorn, T. A., Draguhn, A., Ymer, S., Seeburg, P. H. and Sakmann, B. (1990) Neuron 4, Moss, S. J., Ravindran, A., Mei, L., Wang, J. B., Kofuji, P., Huganir, R. L. and Burt, D. R. (1991) Neurosci Lett 123, Smart, T. G., Moss, S. J., Xie, X. and Huganir, R. L. (1991) Br. J. Pharmacol. 103, Angelotti, T. P., Uhler, M. D. and Macdonald, R. L. (1993) J. Neurosci. 13,

22 14. Smart, T. G. (1992) J. Physiol. 447, Kaneda, M., Farrant, M. and Cull-Candy, S. G. (1995) J. Physiol. 485, Backus, K. H., Arigoni, M., Drescher, U., Scheurer,L., Malherbe, P., Möhler, H. and Benson, J. A. (1993) Neuroreport 5, Chang, Y., Wang, R., Barot, S. and Weiss, D. S. (1996) J Neurosci 16, Tretter, V., Ehya, N., Fuchs, K. and Sieghart, W. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, Kellenberger, S., Eckenstein, S., Baur, R., Malherbe, P., Buhr, A. and Sigel, E. (1996) Neuropharmacology 35, Gorrie, G. H., Vallis, Y., Stephenson, A., Whitfield, J., Browning, B., Smart, T. G. and Moss, S. J. (1997) J Neurosci 17, Knight, A. R., Hartnett, C., Marks, C., Brown, M., Gallager, D., Tallman, J. and Ramabhadran, T. V. (1998) Receptors Channels 6, Angelotti, T. P. and Macdonald, R. L. (1993) J. Neurosci. 13, Hevers, W. and Lüddens, H. (1998) Mol. Neurobiol. 18, Isacoff, E. Y., Jan, Y. N. and Jan, L. Y. (1990) Nature 345, Liman, E. R., Tytgat, J. and Hess, P. (1992) Neuron 9, Hurst, R. S., Kavanaugh, M. P., Yakel, J., Adelman, J. P. and North, R. A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, Varnum, M. D. and Zagotta, W. N. (1996) Biophys. J. 70, Sukharev, S. I., Schroeder, M. J. and McCaslin, D. R. (1999) J. Membr. Biol. 171, Zerhusen, B., Zhao, J., Xie, J., Davis, P. B. and Ma, J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, Im, W. B., Pregenzer, J. F., Binder, J. A., Dillon, G. H. and Alberts, G. L. (1995) J. Biol. 22

23 Chem. 270, Ewert, M., Shivers, B. D., Lüddens, H., Möhler, H. and Seeburg, P. H. (1990) J. Cell. Biol. 110, Häring, P., Stähli, C., Schoch, P., Takacs, B., Staehelin, T. and Möhler, H. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, Kuhn, F. J. and Greeff, N. G. (1999) J. Gen. Physiol. 114, Sigel, E. (1987) J. Physiol. 386, Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, Towbin, H., Staehelin, T. and Gordon, J. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, Miyazawa, A., Fujiyoshi, Y., Stowell, M. and Unwin, N. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 288, Sigel, E. and Buhr, A. (1997) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 18, Sigel, E., Baur, R., Trube, G., Möhler, H. and Malherbe, P. (1990) Neuron 5, Connolly, C. N., Krishek, B. J., McDonald, B. J., Smart, T. G. and Moss, S. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271,

24 FOOTNOTES This study was supported by the grant /1 from the Swiss National Science Foundation. 1 The abbreviations used are: GABA: γ-aminobutyric acid; GABA A : GABA type A; HEK: human embryonic kidney; I max : maximal current amplitude; K a : apparent affinity Acknowledgments: We thank Dr. V. Niggli for carefully reading the manuscript. 24

25 (Figure legends) Figure 1. Current traces recorded from oocytes expressing GABA A receptors (upper panel) and voltage-gated sodium channels (lower panel). Oocytes were either expressing α and β subunits of GABA A receptors and voltage-gated sodium channels (α/β/na) or single α subunits (α/na) or β subunits (β/na) together with voltage-gated sodium channels. The duration of the application of GABA or of the potential jump from 100 to 15 mv are shown above the respective traces. Figure 2. (A) Schematic drawing of the α β tandem construct. The C-terminal of the α1 subunit is linked to the N-terminal of the β2 subunit by linkers of different length. (B) Theoretically possible subunit arrangements of α β and β α tandem constructs in a tetrameric (I-III) or a pentameric (IV-VII) receptor. Arrangements I and II are identical and can be formed by both tandem constructs α-β (I) or β-α (II). Arrangement III can be formed by one α-β and one β-α tandem construct. We assume the presence of at least two α and two β subunits in a pentameric receptor. Both tandem constructs α β and β α yield in this case the same arrangement when combined with a single α subunit (IV and V) or a single β subunit (VI and VII), respectively. Figure 3. Resistance to proteolysis of the fusion protein. Lane 1: The α1 subunit from the wild type α1β2 receptor migrates at 50 kda. Lane 2: The α-10-β tandem construct migrates at kda. No specific signal is detected at 50 kda, the size of a monomeric 25

26 α1 subunit, as could be expected upon proteolysis in the linker region. The absence of specific signals in other areas indicates that no N-terminal breakdown product of this tandem larger than 29 kda is formed. Lane 3: non-injected oocytes. Figure 4. A minimum length of the linker is required to obtain functional receptors from tandem constructs. The tandem constructs were each expressed in combination with single β2 subunits in Xenopus oocytes. Maximal current amplitudes were measured and standardized as indicated in the methods section. Each column shows the mean of experiments carried out in at least two different batches of oocytes with 5-6 oocytes each examined. Error bars represent SEM. WT: wild type receptors. Figure 5. Dose response curves of tandem constructs co-expressed with single β2 subunits. (A) The α β tandem constructs with linkers of 7 or 10 amino acid residues in length resulted in channels with an unchanged apparent affinity for GABA. (B) Channels from the β α tandem construct with a linker of 20 amino acid residues shows a slightly reduced apparent affinity for GABA, whereas for channels from the construct with a linker of 23 amino acid residues the apparent affinity is close to the one of the combination of single α and β subunits. Figure 6. Maximal relative current amplitudes of receptors resulting from different combinations of tandem constructs with single subunits. The α 10 β and β 23 α tandem constructs do not result in functional channels when (A) each is expressed alone or (B) each 26

27 is expressed in combination with single α1 subunits or when (C) both tandem constructs are expressed together or with additional single α1 subunits. When expressed with single β2 (D) or single γ2 (E) subunits, the tandem constructs are functionally complemented. Each column shows the mean of experiments in at least two different batches of oocytes with 5-6 oocytes each examined. Error bars represent SEM. Figure 7. Proteolysis of tandem constructs (A) or participation of only one subunit of the tandem construct (B) in a functional pentamer can be excluded from the results shown in Fig. 4 and 6A. (C) Proposed rearrangement of subunits in a tandem construct. The marked areas in the schematic subunits (stripes in γ, points in α) represent amino acid residues that can contribute to the benzodiazepine binding site. Note that a proper benzodiazepine binding site at a αγ subunit interface can only be formed in one of the two different subunit arrangements (II) and is lost in the other (I). 27

28 Table 1. Calculation of the actual linker length. properties of the linkers number of amino acid residues α β β α C-terminal part of the first subunit predicted to extrude from the membrane 13 1 length of the synthetic linker N-terminal elongation of the second subunit relative to the β2 subunit 0 3 total number of residues Table 1 (Discussion) 28

29 α/β/na β/na α/na 500 na 20 s 500 na 10 ms Figure 1 (Materials and Methods) 29

30 Figure 2 (Results) 30

31 Figure 3 (Results) 31

32 relative current amplitude 140 α β/β 140 β α/β WT WT length of linker in the tandem Figure 4 (Results) 32

33 relative current amplitude (%) A α/β α7β/β α10β/β B α/β β20α/β β23α/β GABA (M) GABA (M) Figure 5 (Results) 33

34 relative current amplitude A WT αβ βα B WT αβ/α βα/α C WT αβ/βα αβ/βα/α D WT αβ/β βα/β E WT αβ/γ βα/γ subunit combination Figure 6 (Results) 34

35 Figure 7 (Discussion) 35

36 J. Biol. Chem. Subunit arrangement of γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors Sabine W. Baumann, Roland Baur and Erwin Sigel published online July 20, 2001 Access the most updated version of this article at doi: /jbc.M Alerts: When this article is cited When a correction for this article is posted Click here to choose from all of JBC's alerts