Development of pig welfare assessment protocol integrating animal-, environment-, and management-based measures
|
|
- Terence Jordan
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Renggaman et al. Journal of Animal Science and Technology (2015) 57:1 DOI /s RESEARCH Open Access Development of pig welfare assessment protocol integrating animal-, environment-, and management-based measures Anriansyah Renggaman 1, Hong L Choi 1*, Sartika IA Sudiarto 1, Laura Alasaarela 2,3 and Ok S Nam 1 Abstract Background: Due to increased interest in animal welfare, there is now a need for a comprehensive assessment protocol to be used in intensive pig farming systems. There are two current welfare assessment protocols for pigs: Welfare Quality Assessment Protocols (applicable in the Europe Union), that mostly focuses on animal-based measures, and the Swine Welfare Assurance Program (applicable in the United States), that mostly focuses on management- and environment-based measures. In certain cases, however, animal-based measures might not be adequate for properly assessing pig welfare status. Similarly, welfare assessment that relies only on environment- and management-based measures might not represent the actual welfare status of pigs. Therefore, the objective of this paper was to develop a new welfare protocol by integrating animal-, environment-, and management-based measures. The background for selection of certain welfare criteria and modification of the scoring systems from existing welfare assessment protocols are described. Methods: The developed pig welfare assessment protocol consists of 17 criteria that are related to four main principles of welfare (good feeding, good housing, good health, and appropriate behavior). Good feeding, good housing, and good health were assessed using a 3-point scale: 0 (good welfare), 1 (moderate welfare), and 2 (poor welfare). In certain cases, only a 2-point scale was used: 0 (certain condition is present) or 2 (certain condition is absent). Appropriate behavior was assessed by scan sampling of positive and negative social behaviors based on qualitative behavior assessment and human-animal relationship tests. Results: Modification of the body condition score into a 3-point scale revealed pigs with a moderate body condition (score 1). Moreover, additional criteria such as feed quality confirmed that farms had moderate (score 1) or poor feed quality (score 2), especially those farms located in a high relative humidity region. Conclusions: The developed protocol can be utilized to assess welfare status in an intensive pig farming system. Although further improvements are still needed, this studyisafirststepindevelopingapigwelfareassessment protocol that combines animal-, environment-, and management-based measures. Keywords: Animal welfare, Environment-based measure, Pig farming, Intensive farming system, Welfare assessment protocol * Correspondence: ulsoo8@snu.ac.kr 1 Department of Agriculture Biotechnology and Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea Full list of author information is available at the end of the article 2014 Renggaman et al.; licensee BioMed Central. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
2 Renggaman et al. Journal of Animal Science and Technology (2015) 57:1 Page 2 of 11 Background Animal welfare reflects the wellbeing of an animal and comprises an animal s physical and mental health. Animal welfare is affected by environmental conditions and innate behavior [1]. In Europe, animal welfare has been used as livestock product quality certification parameter [2]. Importance of animal welfare varies among countries or regions. For example, the high awareness of European consumers regarding the welfare of livestock animals has led to livestock welfare regulations [3]. In contrast, Asian consumers show no or little interest in animal welfare, especially that of livestock animals. Nevertheless, the development of a welfare assessment protocol in Asian countries such as Republic of Korea is needed to advise farmers in improving the welfare of their livestock. Moreover, a welfare certification scheme to standardize livestock products would assist trade between countries in the same region [4]. There are two current welfare assessment protocols for pigs, Welfare Quality Assessment Protocols and Swine Welfare Assurance Program (SWAP). Welfare Quality Assessment Protocols are applicable in the European Union and mostly focuses on animal-based measures [5]. Swine Welfare Assurance Program (SWAP) is applicable in the United States and mostly focuses on environment- and management-based measures [6]. These current pig welfare assessment protocols are not necessary applicable in Asian countries. The main obstacle is the difference in how livestock welfare is viewed among the different regions. The objective of this paper was to develop a new protocol to assess welfare status of growing and fattening pigs in Asian countries such as Republic of Korea by integrating animal-, management-, and environmentbased measures. In certain cases, animal-based measures might not be adequate to properly assess pig welfare status. Similarly, welfare assessment that relies only on environment- and management-based measures might not represent the actual welfare status of the pig. In developing the new protocol, the background for selection of certain welfare criteria and modification of the scoring systems from existing welfare assessment protocols are described. Moreover, the new protocol was validated by assessing the welfare status of two growing pig farms. Methods Farm sample The developed welfare assessment protocol was tested at two experimental growing pig farms of Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Both farms were representative of early growing and fattening phases. Both farms were conventional indoor farms on concrete flooring with a partially-slatted floor. Pigs entered the farm with an average weight of 20 kg and were removed for slaughter at an average weight of 110 kg. The growing pigs observed in the present study were handled humanely and did not received any constraint throughout the observation. Welfare quality was assessed by two observers, each of which was responsible for assessing two main principles of animal welfare. Protocol for growing pigs Similar to Welfare Quality Assessment Protocols, the developed protocol consisted of four main principles of animal welfare: good feeding, good housing, good health, and appropriate behavior. The four main principles are subdivided into 17 independent criteria that are a combination of animal-, environment-, and managementbased measures (Table 1). On the other hand, Welfare Quality Assessment Protocols only subdivides the four main principles into 12 independent criteria and focus on animal-based measures. As the first step of the farm survey, general farm information was recorded by interviewing farmers using a previously prepared questionnaire. During the interview, observation methods were explained to get farmers consent. The questionnaire recorded information on mortality rate, total number of pigs in the farm and observation house, total number of pens in the observation house, pen area, ventilation system, average weight of observed pigs, and age of observed pigs. After collecting general farm information, behavioral observations were carried out, followed by evaluation of animal- and environment-based measures related to good feeding, good housing, and good health. Farmers had given their consent prior to the observation. Measurement of good feeding, good housing, and good health Measurement for these welfare principles was carried out at the pen or individual pig level using a 3-point scale: 0 for good welfare, 1 for compromised welfare, and 2 for unacceptable welfare. The number of pens or pigs that got a score of 0, 1, or 2 was recorded, and the proportion of total pens or pigs that got a score of 0, 1, or 2 were calculated. When welfare status could not be classified into one of the three different states as mentioned above, a binary scale of 0 when a certain case was absent or 2 when a certain case was present was used (Table 2). Pigs were individually analyzed for their body condition, bursitis, manure on body, lameness, wounds on body, tail biting, pumping, twisted snouts, rectal prolapse, skin condition, ruptures, and hernia. Huddling, shivering, panting, feed quality, facility condition, and scouring were analyzed at the pen level (Table 2). Huddling, shivering, panting, coughing, and sneezing were observed outside the pens. All other measures were assessed inside the pen in order to better observe the pig body. Manure on the body, skin condition, bursitis, and
3 Renggaman et al. Journal of Animal Science and Technology (2015) 57:1 Page 3 of 11 Table 1 Developed measures for welfare assessment of growing pigs on farms Welfare criteria Measures I. Good feeding 1 Absence of prolonged hunger 1 Body condition scores 2 Feed quality 2 Feed condition 4 3 Absence of prolonged thirst 1 Water supply 4 II. Good housing 4 Environmental condition 2 Temperature and relative humidity 5 5 Ventilation status (air quality) 2, 3 Particulate matter and ammonia concentration 5 6 Comfort around resting 1 Bursitis and manure on the body 7 Thermal comfort 1 Shivering, panting, and huddling 8 Ease of movement 1 Space allowance 9 Other facility condition 3 Conditions of floor, fencing, feeder, and other facilities inside the farm 4 III. Good health 10 Absence of injuries 1 Lameness, wounds, tail biting 11 Absence of disease 1 Coughing, sneezing, pumping, twisted snouts, rectal prolapse, scouring, skin condition, ruptures, and hernia 12 Health management 3 Veterinary-client-patient relationship, medical record, and hospital pen 4 13 Euthanasia 2 Number of euthanized animal and euthanasia methods IV. Appropriate behavior 14 Expression of social behavior 1 Negative and positive social behavior 15 Expression of other behavior 1 Exploratory behavior 16 Good human animal relationship 1 Fear of humans 17 Positive emotional state 1 Qualitative behavior assessment 1 Based on Welfare Quality Assessment Protocols [5]. 2 New criteria added by the authors. 3 Based on Swine Welfare Assurance Program [6]. 4 Management-based measure. 5 Environment-based measure. wounds on body were assessed only on one side of each pig, as a previous study by Courboulay and Foubert [7] showed that there was no statistical difference between the left and right side of the animal body for these observations. Environment-based measures such as ammonia concentration, temperature, and relative humidity were determined from six points inside the pig house. The sampling points were located inside the pen at the pig nose and body height for ammonia concentration and microclimate parameters (temperature and relative humidity), respectively [8]. Particulate matter concentration was determined from three points of the aisle, as it would be difficult to keep the instrument safe from the pig if the measurement was done inside the pen. Details on the sampling points are shown in Figure 1. Ammonia concentration was measured on site using a detector tube (No. 3 L, GASTEC, Kanagawa, Japan). Indoor air was sampled using a gas sampling pump kit (Model GV- 100S, GASTEC, Kanagawa, Japan). Microclimate parameters (temperature and relative humidity) were measured using a Climomaster device (Model A531, KANOMAX, Osaka, Japan). Particulate matter was measured using an aerosol mass monitor (Model GT-331, SIBATA, Soca-city, Japan). Particulate matters that were analyzed included PM 10 (average aerodynamic diameter 10 μm), PM 7 (average aerodynamic diameter 7 μm), PM 2.5 (average aerodynamic diameter 2.5 μm), PM 1 (average aerodynamic diameter 1 μm), and total suspended particles (TSP) [9]. Measurement of appropriate behavior Behavior measurement was assessed based on Welfare Quality Assessment Protocols for growing pigs [5]. Behavior observation included social behavior, exploratory behavior, human-animal relationship, and qualitative behavior assessment. Social behavior and exploratory behavior were measured five times using scan samplings with 2.5 minute intervals between each scan conducted at three observation points [5]. Each observation point consisted of pigs for a total of pigs. Exploratory behavior was measured when enrichment material was available in the house and showed that almost all pig houses in
4 Renggaman et al. Journal of Animal Science and Technology (2015) 57:1 Page 4 of 11 Table 2 Developed scoring scale for good feeding, housing, and health Measures Scores Description Body condition 0 Animal with a good body condition 1 Animal with moderate body condition 2 Animal with a poor body condition (lean animals) Feed quality 1 0 Less than 1/3 is clod and there is no smell 1 More than 1/3 but less than 1/2 is clod and doesn t smell or less than 1/3 is clod but smells sour 2 More than half is clod and smells sour Temperature 2 0 Temperature is appropriate for the pigs 2 Temperature is inappropriate for the pigs Ammonia concentration 2 0 Ammonia concentration below 50 ppm 2 Ammonia concentration exceeded 50 ppm Bursitis 0 No existence of bursa 1 One or several small bursa or one medium bursa in same leg 2 Several medium bursa or one big bursa in same leg Manure on the body 0 Less than 20% of body is covered with feces 1 20 to 50% of body is covered with feces 2 More than 50% of body is covered with feces Huddling 1 0 No pigs showing huddling behavior 1 Less than 20% of pigs show huddling behavior 2 More than 20% of pigs show huddling behavior Panting 1 0 No pigs are panting 1 Less than 20% of pigs are panting 2 More than 20% of pigs are panting Shivering 1 0 No pigs are shivering 1 Less than 20% of pigs are shivering 2 More than 20% of pigs are shivering Facility condition 1 0 No facility damage inside the pen 2 There is facility damage inside the pen Wounds on body 0 No wounds on pig body 2 Wound on any part of pig body Tail biting 0 No existence of tail biting 2 Visible fresh blood on the tail and/or evidence of swelling and infection and/or part of the tail missing Lameness 0 Normal 2 Severely lame or not able to walk Pumping 0 No evidence of labored breathing 2 Evidence of labored breathing Scouring 1 0 No liquid manure visible in the pen 2 Liquid manure visible in the pen Twisted snouts 0 No evidence of twisted snouts 2 Evidence of twisted snouts Hernia 0 No hernia 2 Hernia/ruptures observed in pig Rectal prolapse 0 No rectal prolapse 2 Rectal prolapse observed in pig
5 Renggaman et al. Journal of Animal Science and Technology (2015) 57:1 Page 5 of 11 Table 2 Developed scoring scale for good feeding, housing, and health (Continued) Skin condition 0 Normal skin condition 2 Pig has inflamed, discolored, or spotted skin Veterinary-client-relationship 3 0 (1) There is an associated veterinarian that visits the farm regularly to check animal health conditions. (2) The veterinarian is readily available to follow up when health problems occur on the farm. 1 Only one aspect of previous point is fulfilled 2 None of the previous points are fulfilled Medication record 3 0 Medication record exists 2 Medication record does not exist Euthanasia methods There is capable person with sufficient knowledge to euthanize pigs. 2. The method used is safe for human and animal. 1 Only one aspect of previous point is fulfilled 2 None of the previous point is fulfilled 1 Pen level. House level. Farm level. Republic of Korea do not use any bedding or enrichment material. Good human-animal relationship was measured by observing fear of humans. Fear of humans was assessed by entering the pens, walking around the group slowly until returning to the starting point, and then waiting for 30 s. Then surveyor walked around slowly again in the opposite direction. The response was scored as 0 or 2. Zero means that up to 60% of pigs panicked, whereas 2 means more than 60% of pigs showed panic responses [5]. Qualitative behavior assessment was observed at two points for each pig house. The duration of each observation was 10 minutes for a total of 20 minutes for each pig house. There are 20 descriptions of behavior (active, relaxed, fearful, agitated, calm, content, happy, tense, enjoying, frustrated, sociable, bored, playful, distressed, positively occupied, listless, lively, indifferent, irritable, and aimless) that were observed on a minimum to maximum scale. A maximum score means that the behavior was dominant, whereas a minimum score means that there was an absence of the behavior in the observed animals. The total length of the scale is 125 mm long. Results and discussion General farm information Farm A reared about 152 pigs that were divided into 15 different pens. For farm A, average pig age and weight were 9 weeks and 24 kg, respectively. Pigs in farm A were in early growing phase, which explains their lower body weight. The pen area was approximately 3.64 m 2 with a feeder area of approximately 0.24 m 2. This indicates that the available area for pigs was approximately 3.4 m 2 in each pen. Farm B reared about 138 pigs that were divided into 30 different pens. For farm B, average pig age and weight were 18 weeks and 80 kg, respectively. Pigs in farm B were in early fattening phase, which Figure 1 Sampling points for the environment-based assessment. (A) Sampling point for ammonia concentration and microclimate parameter; and (B) Sampling points for particulate matter concentration.
6 Renggaman et al. Journal of Animal Science and Technology (2015) 57:1 Page 6 of 11 explains their medium body weight. The pen area was approximately 4.29 m 2 with a feeder area of approximately of 0.37 m 2. This indicates that the available area for pigs was approximately 3.92 m 2 in each pen. Space allowances in farms A and B were approximately and m 2 per pig, respectively. Pigs in both farms were fed manually once a day. Moreover, cleaning in both farms was done once before pigs were housed. Measurement of good feeding, good housing, and good health In intensive farming systems, prevalence of poor body condition (score 2) is very low since pigs are usually fed ad libitum [10]. This often results in a low assessment sensitivity of body condition when using Welfare Quality Assessment Protocol. Welfare Quality Assessment Protocol uses a binary scoring system (0 or 2) for body condition, which means it can only differentiate between a very poor body condition and good body condition. Therefore, another scoring method is necessary. The current welfare assessment protocol has a score of 0, 1, or 2 to measure pig body condition, thus allowing easier distinction of good, moderate, or poor body condition, respectively. A new criterion (feed quality) was also introduced for the good feeding principle in the developed welfare assessment protocol. Feed quality analysis was proposed since the climate of Republic of Korea is humid, especially in the summer, which means feed can easily rot. Having a feed condition score provides information on whether or not feed is rotten, which would affect the pig digestive system and result in watery feces (diarrhea). In terms of body condition, assessment of the two experimental farms showed a moderate body condition (score 1) (Figure 2a). Proportions of pigs showing a moderate body condition in farms A and B were 6.0% and 10.87%, respectively. This result shows that scoring for moderate body condition (scoring 1) is a necessary criterion in the welfare assessment protocol. For feed quality, good feed quality (score 0) and moderate feed quality (score 1) were observed in farm B, whereas only good feed quality (score 0) was observed in farm A (Figure 2b). Proportions of pens showing good and moderate feed quality in farm B were 46.67% and 63.33%, respectively. The moderate feed quality observed in farm B might be due to high relative humidity, which ranged from 62.6 to 93.8% with an average of 79.30% (Table 3). The relative humidity in farm A ranged from 65.9 to 70.05% with an average of 67.69%. The lower relative humidity in farm A could explain the lack of moderate or poor feed quality. This result suggests that feed quality could be a problem in intensive farming systems, especially for farms located in humid areas. Therefore, feed quality is a necessary criterion in the welfare assessment protocol. Ammonia (NH 3 ) is a highly irritating, colorless gas that is produced by microbial degradation of pig urine and the nitrogenous compound fraction of feces, and it is representative of gaseous compounds in pig houses. Moreover, NH 3 accumulation inside pig houses is an indicator of ventilation failure. Ammonia was chosen as the determined factor since it can be analyzed on-site. The National Pork Board US [6] suggested that the NH 3 concentration should not exceed 50 ppm. In our results, both pig houses had NH 3 concentrations lower than 50 ppm. The average NH 3 concentration in pig houses A and B were 2.83 and 6.35 ppm, respectively (Table 3). This result indicates that the ventilation systems were adequate in both houses. Although the NH 3 concentration during validation of the developed welfare assessment protocol was quite low, NH 3 concentration is still a necessary criterion for welfare assessment since high NH 3 levels are known to reduce pig performance (average weight gain and feed efficiency), health, and welfare status [11-13]. Particulate matter (PM) is one of the primary air pollutants in livestock housing and almost completely Figure 2 Validation result of developed welfare assessment protocols in good feeding principles. (a) Body condition and (b) Feed quality.
7 Renggaman et al. Journal of Animal Science and Technology (2015) 57:1 Page 7 of 11 Table 3 Microclimate parameter and particulate matter concentration in farm A and farm B during validation of the developed welfare assessment protocol Parameters Farm A Farm B Temperature, C ± ± 0.86 Relative Humidity, % ± ± 10.2 NH 3, ppm 2.83 ± ± 3.23 PM 10, μg/m ± ± PM 7, μg/m ± ± PM 2.5, μg/m ± ± PM 1, μg/m ± ± 5.86 TSP, μg/m ± ± consists of organic and biological matters derived from feed, skin, livestock hair, bedding material, urine, feces, and microorganisms. PM has several adverse effects, such as affecting health of livestock and transporting infectious diseases (microorganisms and toxic compounds) in pig houses [14,15]. Although there is no threshold for PM concentration inside pig houses, addition of PM as a criterion of welfare assessment needs to be considered since PM concentration is related to respiratory diseases such as lung inflammation, irritation of the respiratory system, and rhinitis. It is known that a PM concentration higher than 3700 μg/m 3 increases mortality and pneumonia or pleuritis prevalence in fattening pigs [16,17]. Several PM sizes were analyzed since any PM larger than 10 μm is deposited in the nasal passage, PM between 5 to 10 μm is deposited in the upper respiratory tract, and PM smaller than 5 μm (respirable dust) is deposited in the lower respiratory tract and lungs [14,18]. Thus, each PM size might have different effects on the pig body, which means it is necessary to measure PM sizes in pig houses. The PM concentration at both farms was relatively low (Table 3), indicating no welfare problem related to PM concentration. Bursitis and manure on the body indicates comfort during rest and thus becomes an important factor for assessing pig welfare status [19,20]. In terms of bursitis, most pigs (more than 90%) showed no signs of bursitis (score 0), indicating good welfare quality in both farms. Nevertheless, medium bursitis (score 1) and severe bursitis (score 2) were more common in farm B than farm A (Figure 3a). One explanation is that pig body weight was higher in farm B compared to farm A. Higher body weight creates more tension on the leg and in turn results in bursitis. In terms of manure on the body (Figure 3b), farm A showed good welfare quality, as more than 86% of pigs had no or little manure on their bodies (score 0). However, the welfare criteria in terms of manure on the body must be improved since more than 10% of pigs had a medium amount of manure on their bodies Figure 3 Validation results of developed welfare assessment protocol criteria following good housing principles. (a) Bursitis; (b) Manure on the body; (c) Huddling; (d) Shivering; and (e) Panting.
8 Renggaman et al. Journal of Animal Science and Technology (2015) 57:1 Page 8 of 11 (score 1). On the other hand, farm B showed poor welfare quality, as more than 60% of pigs had a medium or large amount of manure on their bodies (scores 1 and 2). This maybeduetoahigherroomtemperatureinfarmb (27.4 C) than the recommended temperature of growing pigs in the weight range from 68 to 100 kg, which is around 10 to 24 C [21]. High temperature induces wallowing behavior in pigs, which reduces body temperature. In farm B, the welfare of pigs in terms of manure body condition can be improved by reducing the room temperature and increasing cleaning frequency. Huddling, shivering, and panting are animal-based indicators of thermal comfort [10]. In terms of huddling (Figure 3c) and shivering (Figure 3d), both farms showed good welfare quality based on the lack of huddling or shivering behavior in pigs (score 0). However, about 20% of pens in farm B indicated panting behavior (Figure 3e), which is one way for pigs to dissipate body heat. As explained previously, the room temperature in farm B (27.4 C) was higher than the recommended temperature for growing pigs in the weight range from 68 to 100 kg. Physical health refers to the state of an animal s brain and body in an attempt to cope with pathology. Therefore, health is an important aspect of animal welfare and must be appropriately considered [22,23]. In terms of absence of injury, the following scores were measured: lameness, wounds, and tail biting. There was no evidence of injuries in farm A, whereas around 2.2% of pigs had wounds in farm B (Table 4). The warning threshold for wounds in the protocol is 5%, which means that pigs in farm B can be considered as normal. However, lameness measurement could not be performed properly due to insufficient space, which made it almost impossible for the pig to walk. Additionally, low light intensity made it difficult to do the observation. Almost all of the pigs experienced tail docking, which made it difficult to differentiate whether or not tail biting Table 4 Validation results of developed welfare assessment protocol following good health principles Parameters Farm A Farm B Lameness, % Wounds on body, % Tail biting, % Pumping, % Twisted snouts, % Rectal prolapse, % Scouring, % Skin condition, % Ruptures and hernia, % Abscesses, % had occurred. Tail docking is considered as an effective method of reducing tail biting, although recent studies have shown it to have many disadvantages such as pain sensitization, risk of infection, and ethical considerations [5]. In addition, our category defined tail biting as visible fresh blood on the tail, evidence of swelling and infection, or part of the tail missing. In both farms, most pigs showed reduced tail lengths due to tail docking, so we did not count those cases as tail biting. In term of diseases, the following scores were measured: mortality rate, coughing, sneezing, pumping, twisted snouts, rectal prolapse, scouring, skin condition, ruptures, and hernias and abscesses. In farm A, only one pig (0.9%) showed evidence of pumping (Table 4), which does not exceed the warning threshold (1.8%). In addition, there was evidence of scouring in 60% of total pens (9/15) in farm A, and the alarm threshold for scouring in our protocol is 15%. Additionally, pens were classified as either with liquid feces or without liquid feces. This classification is not sufficient to differentiate the cause of scouring. To exactly determine the problem, detailed information about factors such as fecal consistency and color are needed. Nevertheless, the presence of scouring only in farm A might be due to the young age of the pigs (about 9-weeks-old), which is an age prone to scouring. Environmental changes in early growing pigs can cause a stress response that in turn affects the incidence and severity of enteric disease [24]. The mortality rates in both farms were low (0.05% in farm A and 0.2% in farm B) with a warning threshold of 2.6%. This result shows that the welfare status of the farms based on mortality rate was good. Several studies have concluded that lung inflammation can be estimated by calculating frequency of coughing [5]. In farm A, coughing frequency was 0.31 with a warning threshold of Therefore, the causes behind coughing should be determined. In farm A (0.04), sneezing was under the threshold value of In farm B, both coughing (0.01) and sneezing (0.08) were maintained under threshold values. Therefore, there was no indication of a health problem in farm B. In terms of health management, the following scores were measured: veterinarian-client-patient relationship and medication records. Both farms had medication records, but they did not confirm any veterinarian-clientpatient relationship. Our measurement included two possible situations: (1) The veterinarian has recently seen and is personally acquainted with the keeping and care of the animal(s) via medically appropriate and timely visits to the premises where the animal(s) are kept; (2) The practicing veterinarian is readily available for follow-up in case of adverse reactions or failure of the therapy regimen. Neither of these was fulfilled in either farm. Good health management practices, which include a good veterinarian
9 Renggaman et al. Journal of Animal Science and Technology (2015) 57:1 Page 9 of 11 relationship, is important for maintaining good herd health [6]. Therefore, this parameter can be added to assess the welfare status of pig farms. In terms of euthanasia, the following scores were measured: euthanized animals and euthanasia methods. Using the protocol, euthanized animals were calculated by comparing the amount of euthanized animals to total deaths. Euthanasia is used only when the animal is suffering a condition that either cannot be cured or is uneconomical to be cured. Further, there are situations in which immediate euthanasia is required as a response to inadequate animal conditions. Therefore, appropriate and timely euthanasia methods are critical for pig welfare [6]. However, in both farms, euthanasia practices were not used. Immediate action should be undertaken to improve animal welfare related to this area. Lastly, both farms had a hospital pen. Further information on the use of these hospital pens could be useful since this protocol only determined whether or not one was available. Measurement of appropriate behavior Appropriate behavior assessments focused on social behavior, human-animal relationships, and qualitative behavior. Exploratory behavior was not assessed since there was no enrichment material provided for the growing pigs in the visited farms. A lack of enrichment material such as straw can have many effects. From a behavioral point of view, this can reduce the incidence of behavioral expression in pigs [25]. This absence of any enrichment material is most likely due to a lack of knowledge on behalf of the farmer that an enrichment material increases mental health of pigs or too high production costs. Social behavior percentage was calculated based on total active behavior, whereas resting behavior was not considered. As shown in Table 5, there were differences in the percentage of social behavior between farms A and B, even though it was not significant. The percentage of negative social behavior was more pronounced in farm A, most likely due to a higher number of animals per pen. The space allowance in farms A and B were m 2 and m 2 per pig, respectively. It is known that the aggression potential is affected by crowding and that limited space causes competition for resources. Table 5 Animal behavior recorded during observation Behavior Farm A Farm B Active behavior, % Other, % Social behavior, % Negative social behavior, % Positive social behavior, % Pen with score 2 (show panic response), % Social behavior is also affected by environmental factors as well as management of the farm [1]. Limited access to resources such as food and water precipitates a competitive situation that leads to aggression, which is considered as negative social behavior. Intensive farming systems are characterized by elevated intensity and frequency of negative social behavior [20]. Based on our observations, space allowance has a strong effect on observed social behavior, so this information should always be recorded as a measurement of animal welfare. However, a high percentage of positive social behavior does not necessarily imply a good situation, as positive interactions sometimes result in negative ones. Temple et al. [20] showed that there is a high correlation between negative and positive social behaviors. The human-animal relationship (HAR) is important and influences both animal production and welfare [26]. Therefore, this criterion must be measured to assess animal welfare status. Fear of humans is measured to assess welfare since sudden and prolonged fear may severely harm animal welfare and have negative consequences on productivity and product quality [26]. In this study, the HAR in the form of a fear-of-human score was expressed as the percentage of pens with more than 60% Table 6 Qualitative behavior assessment observation scale expressed in millimeters Description Scale (mm) Mean SD Active Relaxed Fearful Agitated Calm Content Happy Tense Enjoying Frustrated Sociable Bored Playful Distressed Positively occupied Listless Lively Indifferent Irritable Aimless
10 Renggaman et al. Journal of Animal Science and Technology (2015) 57:1 Page 10 of 11 of pigs showing a panic response. As shown in Table 5, farms A and B showed scores of 46.67% and 30%, respectively. Fear of humans is a direct reflection of how the pigs are handled. There are also several factors that influence fear of humans, including age, genetic background, and space allowance [10]. The age of growing pigs was 9 weeks in farm A and 18 weeks in farm B. Moreover, space allowances in farms A and B were m 2 /pig and m 2 / pig, respectively. These differences in age and space allowance per pen between the two farms might explain many of the factors above. Results of the qualitative behavior assessment are expressed on a millimeter scale ranging from 0 to 125 mm. Zero is the minimum on the qualitative behavior scale while 125 is the maximum. The results of this assessment reveal high variability (Table 6), possibly due to subjectivity of measurement. Enriched environmental conditions can result in different behavioral expression in animals [27]. Therefore, measurement of behavioral expression plays an important part in measuring animal welfare. Even though it is difficult to interpret these results, this assessment provides information on animal-based welfare based on their emotional state. Our results also suggest that behavior measurement is needed to properly assess and improve animal welfare. Conclusions This study is a first step in developing a new pig welfare assessment protocol that combines animal-, environment-, and management-based measures. Environment- and management-based measures can help to assess welfare status whenever animal-based measures are difficult. This study also provides an explanation of each criterion in the developed pig welfare assessment protocol. Assessment showed that some farms have moderate (score 1) or poor feed quality (score 2), especially those farms located in a relatively high humidity region. Specifically, in farm B, 63.33% of pens showed moderate feed quality. Modification of body condition score into a 3-point scale showed that pigs could be divided into three classes: good body condition (score 0), moderate body condition (score 1), and poor body condition (score 2). The prevalence of pigs with moderate body condition in farms A and B were 6.0% and 10.87%, respectively. The validation results of the two farms show that the developed protocol could be utilized to assess welfare status in an intensive pig farming system. Further improvement of the developed protocol is needed, either by eliminating one or several measurement criteria or by changing the scoring system. Competing interest The authors declare that they have no competing interest. Authors contributions CHL, AR, SIAS, LA, and NSO participated in the design of the study and total organization. LA and NSO collected the data at the experimental site. AR and SIAS organized the data and performed statistical analysis. CHL, AR, and SIAS drafted and revised the manuscript. All the authors approved of the final manuscript. Acknowledgements This research was funded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) of the Republic of Korea through Project No and in part by the Ministry of Industry, Energy, and Trade through Project No Author details 1 Department of Agriculture Biotechnology and Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2 College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3 Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Received: 22 August 2014 Accepted: 20 November 2014 References 1. Temple D, Courboulay V, Manteca X, Velarde A, Dalmau A: The welfare of growing pigs in five different production systems: assessment of feeding and housing. Animal 2012, 6: Blokhuis HJ, Keeling LJ, Gavinelli A, Serratosa J: Animal welfare s impact on the food chain. Trends Food Sci Technol 2008, 19:S79 S Botreau R, Bonde M, Butterworth A, Perny P, Bracke M, Capdeville J, Veissier I: Aggregation of measures to produce an overall assessment of animal welfare. Part 1: a review of existing methods. Animal 2007, 1: Veissier I, Jensen KK, Botrea R, Sandøe P: Highlighting ethical decisions underlying the scoring of animal welfare in the Welfare Quality scheme. Anim Welf 2011, 20: Welfare Quality Assessment Protocol for Pigs (Sows and Piglets, Growing and Finishing Pigs) [ source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0cbsqfjaa&url=http%3a%2f% 2Fwww.welfarequalitynetwork.net%2Fdownloadattachment%2F45627% 2F21651%2FPig%2520Protocol.pdf&ei=XyXzU6LMEcG48gXyjYC4Dg& usg=afqjcng5g_tonriep5zldohmefnxoq8g5q] 6. National Pork Board: Pork Checkoff: Swine Welfare Assurance Program : a Program of America's Pork Producers. Des Moines: National Pork Board; Courboulay V, Foubert C: Testing different methods to evaluate pig welfare on farm. Anim Welf 2007, 16: Yao H, Choi H, Zhu K, Lee J: Key volatile organic compounds emitted from swine nursery house. Atmos Environ 2011, 45: Yao H, Choi H, Lee J, Suresh A, Zhu K: Effect of microclimate on particulate matter, airborne bacteria, and odorous compounds in swine nursery houses. J Anim Sci 2010, 88: Temple D, Dalmau A, Ruiz de la Torre JL, Manteca X, Velarde A: Application of the Welfare Quality protocol to assess growing pigs kept under intensive conditions in Spain. J Vet Behav Clin Appl Res 2011, 6: Banhazi T, Seedorf J, Rutley DL, Pitchford WS: Identification of risk factors for sub-optimal housing conditions in Australian piggeries: Part 1. Study justification and design. J Agric Saf Health 2008, 14: Lee C, Giles L, Bryden W, Downing J, Owens PC, Kirby A, Wynn P: Performance and endocrine responses of group housed weaner pigs exposed to the air quality of a commercial environment. Livest Prod Sci 2005, 93: Philippe F-X, Cabaraux J-F, Nicks B: Ammonia emissions from pig houses: influencing factors and mitigation techniques. Agr Ecosyst Environ 2011, 141: Carpenter G: Dust in livestock buildings review of some aspects. J Agr Eng Res 1986, 33: Takai H, Pedersen S, Johnsen JO, Metz J, Groot Koerkamp P, Uenk G, Phillips V, Holden M, Sneath R, Short J: Concentrations and emissions of airborne dust in livestock buildings in Northern Europe. J Agr Eng Res 1998, 70:59 77.
11 Renggaman et al. Journal of Animal Science and Technology (2015) 57:1 Page 11 of Gustafsson G: Factors affecting the release and concentration of dust in pig houses. J Agr Eng Res 1999, 74: Pearson C, Sharples T: Airborne dust concentrations in livestock buildings and the effect of feed. J Agr Eng Res 1995, 60: Tan Z, Zhang Y: A review of effects and control methods of particulate matter in animal indoor environments. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2004, 54: Otten D, Annas E, Van den Weghe H: The application of animal welfare standards in intensive production systems using the assessment protocols of Welfare Quality: fattening pig husbandry in Northwest Germany. Int J Livest Prod 2013, 4: Temple D, Manteca X, Velarde A, Dalmau A: Assessment of animal welfare through behavioural parameters in Iberian pigs in intensive and extensive conditions. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2011, 131: Swine Care Handbook [ book.pdf] 22. Broom DM: Behaviour and welfare in relation to pathology. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006, 97: Temple D, Courboulay V, Velarde A, Dalmau A, Manteca X: The welfare of growing pigs in five different production systems in France and Spain: assessment of health. Anim Welf 2012, 21: Pearce G: Epidemiology of enteric disease in grower-finisher pigs: a postal survey of pig producers in England. Vet Rec 1999, 144: Tuyttens FAM: The importance of straw for pig and cattle welfare: a review. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2005, 92: Waiblinger S, Boivin X, Pedersen V, Tosi M-V, Janczak AM, Visser EK, Jones RB: Assessing the human animal relationship in farmed species: a critical review. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006, 101: Wemelsfelder F, Hunter E, Mendl MT, Lawrence AB: The spontaneous qualitative assessment of behavioural expressions in pigs: first explorations of a novel methodology for integrative animal welfare measurement. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2000, 67: Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of: Convenient online submission Thorough peer review No space constraints or color figure charges Immediate publication on acceptance Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar Research which is freely available for redistribution Submit your manuscript at
ANIMAL WELFARE ADD-ON MODULE FOR PIGS/FINISHERS
ANIMAL WELFARE ADD-ON MODULE FOR PIGS/FINISHERS CHECKLIST ENGLISH VERSION 1.0 VALID FROM: 15 FEBRUARY 2013 INSPECTION NOTES (for all external and internal inspections): 1. ALL CONTROL POINTS MUST BE INSPECTED,
More informationSELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL
Common Swine Industry Audit 1 SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL Premises Identification Number (PIN): Farm Name: Auditor Name: Phase of production at the site (check all that apply): Breeding Total number of Breeding
More informationPART 7 Sneezing and Nasal Discharges in Pigs
PART 7 Sneezing and Nasal Discharges in Pigs 139 7.1 Case Study The farmer operated a medium-sized established farm on a single site, with various buildings for breeders, nursery and finisher pigs. The
More informationAscribe disease risk for the management of airborne transmitted disease in horticultural cropping systems
Ascribe disease risk for the management of airborne transmitted disease in horticultural cropping systems Bio aerosols and disease transmission Cucumber gummy stem blight management Application for the
More informationThe welfare of growing pigs in five different production systems: assessment of feeding and housing
Animal (2012), 6:4, pp 656 667 & The Animal Consortium 2011 doi:10.1017/s1751731111001868 animal The welfare of growing pigs in five different production systems: assessment of feeding and housing D. Temple
More informationMessages from society? SWAP. CWP s. Pig Welfare What are the basics for grow-finish facilities? Pork producers can be proactive
Pig Welfare What are the basics for grow-finish facilities? Messages from society? Lee J. Johnston West Central Research and Outreach Center University of Minnesota, Morris Office: 320/589-1711 johnstlj@morris.umn.edu
More informationDesign base vs. outcome base animal welfare standards
Design base vs. outcome base animal welfare standards Dr. Antonio Velarde Calvo Animal Welfare Subprogram IRTA A Public Research Institute of the Catalan Government, belonging to the Ministry of Agriculture,
More informationunderstood as achieving highest possible efficiency (combined pigs produced per sow per
Bio-markers measuring health status and management tools to improve productive performance and animal health on swine commercial farms CARLOS PIÑEIRO NOGUERA Current swine production is led by competitiveness
More informationHSI Fact Sheet Human health impacts of odors from industrial farm animal production facilities
HSI Fact Sheet Human health impacts of odors from industrial farm animal production facilities Reports of adverse human health effects associated with odors from industrial farm animal production (IFAP)
More informationWhen is a pig fit for transport?
Gitte Øland Jensen, civil veterinarian, Fødevarestyrelsen Tina Birk Jensen, veterinarian, SEGES Svineproduktion When is a pig fit for transport? Tina Birk Jensen, Veterinarian, Danish Pig Research Center
More informationSection 2 Feed Management
Section 2 Approximately 70 percent of the nitrogen in the pig s diet is voided/excreted by the pig as feces and urine 8. This excess nitrogen can be released into the atmosphere as nitrous oxide or ammonia.
More informationSmall Quantities of Straw Provided Daily Improve Behavior of Growing Gilts
Small Quantities of Straw Provided Daily Improve Behavior of Growing Gilts Guoan Yin a Xiang Li b Honggui Liu b Huang Dapeng a Jun Bao a * a College of Animal Science & Veterinary Medicine, Heilongjiang
More informationOhio Swine Health Symposium. March 18 th, 2015 Plain City, Ohio
Ohio Swine Health Symposium March 18 th, 2015 Plain City, Ohio Ohio Swine Health Symposium Traceability Changes on the Horizon Terri Specht, DVM Four Star Veterinary Service March 18, 2015 Topics Cull
More informationPCVAD A PRODUCER S GUIDE TO MANAGING. Porcine Circovirus Associated Diseases
A PRODUCER S GUIDE TO MANAGING PCVAD Porcine Circovirus Associated Diseases National Pork Board 1776 NW 114th St Des Moines, IA 50325 Tel: 515-223-2600; fax: 515-223-2646 E-mail: pork@pork.org www.pork.org
More informationWHAT PIGS TO EUTHANIZE AND WHEN
WHAT PIGS TO EUTHANIZE AND WHEN W. E. Morgan Morrow, Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University Robert E. Meyer, Department of Clinical Sciences, Mississippi State University Duncan
More informationBest practice guide for the control of bovine respiratory disease
Best practice guide for the control of bovine respiratory disease 1 1 Introduction This guide aims to offer helpful information about the disease, ways of preventing it and options for treatment if your
More informationHigher welfare labelling for pig meat
Higher welfare labelling for pig meat A summary of findings from the project Regulating Food Labels: The case of free range food products in Australia Christine Parker, Rachel Carey and Gyorgy Scrinis
More informationSafepork 2015 Posters
39. Associations between vaccination and antimicrobial consumption in Danish pig herds, 2013 Temtem, C. *(1), Alban, L. (2), Pedersen, K.S. (2), Nielsen, L.R. (3) Abstract Antimicrobial agents are being
More informationEvaluation of the potential connection between Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles and manure pit foaming in commercial pork production systems
= Evaluation of the potential connection between Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles and manure pit foaming in commercial pork production systems May 2015 By: Gerald Shurson, Department of Animal Science,
More informationEFFECTIVE TREATMENT AND HANDLING OF POOR DOING PIGS IN THE FINISHING BARN
EFFECTIVE TREATMENT AND HANDLING OF POOR DOING PIGS IN THE FINISHING BARN Tim Blackwell Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food Wellington Place, RR #1 Fergus, Ontario N1M 2W3 E-mail: tim.blackwell@omaf.gov.on.ca
More informationManagement support by drinking pattern modeling
Management support by drinking pattern modeling CPHpig 2018 Katarina Nielsen Dominiak Postdoc, IVH knd@sund.ku.dk This research was funded by the Danish Council for Strategic Research (The PigIT project,
More informationGilt Training for Electronic Sow Feeding Systems in Gestation
Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports Volume 2 Issue 8 Swine Day Article 6 January 2016 Gilt Training for Electronic Sow Feeding Systems in Gestation C. M. Vier Kansas State University,
More informationPorcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus
Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV) Miles Beaudin Current Status of Infection PEDV Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Is not Zoonotic Which means that it does not affect people or other animals Is not
More informationPneumonia in Beef Cattle
Technical Note TN571 ISSN 0142 7695 ISBN 1 85482 824 X September 2005 SUMMARY Calf pneumonia is a significant source of financial loss in beef production. It is a multifactorial disease and husbandry and
More informationHerd Health for Small-Scale Swine Farms Ines Rodriguez, M.S., V.M.D.
Herd Health for Small-Scale Swine Farms Ines Rodriguez, M.S., V.M.D. Currently in the United States, about 110 million hogs are raised and slaughtered on an annual basis. Of that number, roughly 5% are
More informationAnimal health and welfare in fattening pigs. in relation to housing and husbandry 1. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare
The EFSA Journal (2007) 564, 1-14 Animal health and welfare in fattening pigs in relation to housing and husbandry 1 Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (Question No EFSA-Q-2006-029)
More informationBIOSECURITY FACTSHEETS Dewey CE, Richardson KL
BIOSECURITY FACTS DISINFECTANTS DISEASES APP FLU ILEITIS MYCO PED BIOSECURITY FACTSHEETS Dewey CE, Richardson KL PRRS SALMONELLA STREP SWINE DYSENTERY TGE A project supported by the American Association
More informationGROW/FINISH VARIATION: COST AND CONTROL STRATEGIES
GROW/FINISH VARIATION: COST AND CONTROL STRATEGIES Cate Dewey, Angel de Grau, Bob Friendship Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College University of Guelph Variation in growth rate
More informationExperiences with Ingelvac MycoFLEX Vaccine and FLEXcombo in Australia
Experiences with Ingelvac MycoFLEX Vaccine and FLEXcombo in Australia Ingelvac MycoFLEX vaccine was launched into Australia late in 2015 to protect pigs from Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (M. hyo). The vaccine
More informationEC Insure Hog Health
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Historical Materials from University of Nebraska- Lincoln Extension Extension 1960 EC60-1904 Insure Hog Health Follow this
More informationSupplement table 1. A-Index categories, parameters and point scale for lactating sows, modified from Munsterhjelm et al.
Supplement table 1. A-Index categories, parameters and point scale for lactating sows, modified from Munsterhjelm et al. (2006) Category Best level Worst level Point scale Parameter Locomotion opportunities
More informationLivestock and Poultry Environmental Learning Center Webcast Series February 20, 2007
Retaining manure nitrogen in confinement housing Wendy Powers Departments of Animal Science and Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering Reasons to conserve nutrients Nutrients have value Lost nutrients
More informationArlene Garcia, Ph.D.
Arlene Garcia, Ph.D. moral principles that govern a person's behavior or the conducting of an activity There are 5 types of ethical theories: 1. Contractarianism- human centered 2. Utilitarianism- benefit
More informationHow to prevent transmission to/from domestic pigs
Workshop on African swine fever management in wild boar surveillance and prevention of transmission to/from domestic pigs How to prevent transmission to/from domestic pigs Marius Masiulis FAO international
More informationAdopted on 10 October 2007
The EFSA Journal (2007) 572, 1-13 Animal health and welfare aspects of different housing and husbandry systems for adult breeding boars, pregnant, farrowing sows and unweaned piglets 1 Scientific Opinion
More informationFARROWING SOW SCENARIO
Prepared by: J Siegford FARROWING SOW SCENARIO Animal Welfare Judging and Assessment Competition, 2011 Background Farrow to finish facility located in Missouri 200 Farrowing sows 20 Sows scheduled to farrow
More information100 Points NAME: KEY Lab section:
ANSC 324 Spring, 2007 EXAM 2 100 Points NAME: KEY Lab section: Instructions: Make sure that you take time to carefully read each question, and then answer the question appropriately. Answers to essay questions
More informationFarrowing crates. Benefits of enrichment prefarrowing:
Farrowing crates This can be a particularly difficult time to provide sows and piglets with appropriate enrichment, but when done well, there are many benefits. Benefits of enrichment prefarrowing: Enables
More informationAn Overview of the Common Swine Industry Audit
An Overview of the Common Swine Industry Audit Chris J. Rademacher, DVM Clinical Associate Professor and Iowa State University Swine Extension Veterinarian Agenda Background on Common Swine Industry Audit
More informationBarn Air Quality and Transmissible Disease Protection
Barn Air Quality and Transmissible Disease Protection Kara Lascola DVM, MS, DACVIM University of Illinois Horseman s clinic February 6 th 2016 Why do we care about the barn environment? Protection from
More informationPREVENTION PRACTICES FOR CLASSICAL SWINE FEVER (CSF)
CLASSICAL SWINE FEVER (CSF) Classical Swine Fever (CSF), also known as hog cholera, is a highly contagious viral disease of pigs. Eradicated from the United States in 1978, the disease is common in other
More informationIs Your Dairy Management Program Ready for the Summer Heat?
E-42 7-98 Is Your Dairy Management Program Ready for the Summer Heat? Sandy Stokes* Generally, the higher producing the cow, the higher the body temperature produced from her digestion and metabolism.
More informationSelenium Toxicity in the Western United States Pork Industry
Selenium Toxicity in the Western United States Pork Industry 1 Selenium Toxicity in the Western United States Pork Industry Over the past year, selenium toxicity was identified in several swine and some
More informationA two-year follow-up study of the PCV2 status of a Danish pig herd that was initially assumed to be PCV2-free
Kristensen et al. Porcine Health Management 2015, 1:5 RESEARCH Open Access A two-year follow-up study of the PCV2 status of a Danish pig herd that was initially assumed to be PCV2-free Charlotte S Kristensen
More informationSTRESS AND DAIRY CALVES. Field Day, June 24, 1997 Carolyn L. Stull, Ph.D. Veterinary Medicine Extension University of California, Davis
STRESS AND DAIRY CALVES Field Day, June 24, 1997 Carolyn L. Stull, Ph.D. Veterinary Medicine Extension University of California, Davis What is Stress? Everyone knows what stress is, however, it is not
More informationActive Observational Surveillance (AOS) for FMD, CSF, and ASF: An Overview May 2017
Active Observational Surveillance (AOS) for FMD, CSF, and ASF: An Overview May 2017 Purpose This document describes Active Observational Surveillance (AOS), which is one potential surveillance option for
More informationThe use of a lesion score as an indicator for agonistic behaviour in pigs
Archiv Tierzucht 55 (2012) 2, 163-170, ISSN 0003-9438 Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Dummerstorf, Germany The use of a lesion score as an indicator for agonistic behaviour in pigs Andreas Stukenborg
More information4-H Market Swine Record Book
Northwestern Michigan Fair 4-H Market Swine Record Book For ages 12 and Older Name: Age: Address: Street Town Zip Code Name of 4-H Club: Years in the Swine project: Years in 4-H: Animal s Name: Buyer s
More informationEFFECTS OF MULTI-SUCKLING ON PIGLET
EFFECTS OF MULTI-SUCKLING ON PIGLET WELFARE AND PERFORMANCE PRE- AND POST- WEANING 1B-105 Report prepared for the Co-operative Research Centre for High Integrity Australian Pork David Lines, Julia-Sophia
More informationHOW TO SELECT THE RIGHT SHOW PIG
So, your interested in raising and showing a market hog. There are many things to consider when taking on such a big commitment. This book is designed to help guide you through the process. The first thing
More informationPractical strategies for improving farm animal welfare: an information resource
Practical strategies for improving farm animal welfare: an information resource Edited by Bryan Jones1 and Xavier Manteca2 1 Animal Behaviour & Welfare Consultant, Edinburgh, UK 2 Facultad de Veterinaria,
More informationPre-Slaughter Stunning: Why it is important
A Greener World Technical Advice Fact Sheet No. 18 Pre-Slaughter Stunning: Why it is important Certified Animal Welfare Approved by A Greener World (AGW) has the most rigorous standards for farm animal
More informationAssessing the Risk of Laboratory Acquired Allergies
Guideline Created By: Stephanie Thomson, Kelly Eaton, Sonam Uppal & Hollie Burrage Edited By: N/A Workplace Health Services Occupational & Preventive Health Unit Effective date: January 8, 2015 Review
More informationUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Hannover
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover Reliability of the Welfare Quality Animal Welfare Assessment Protocol for Growing Pigs Thesis Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree
More informationTOLSA NEWSLETTER FEED
SILICATES AS FEED ADDITIVES: A REVIEW OF EXAL PROPERTIES ON ANIMAL PERFORMANCE INTRODUCTION For many years, the use of silicates as binders of compound feeds has been prove in the animal nutrition sector.
More informationSongklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology SJST R2 Chullasuk
Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology SJST-0-00.R Chullasuk The association between respirable dust exposure and allergic symptoms in the libraries and general offices at Chulalongkorn University,
More informationEffects of Increasing Space Allowance by Removing a Pig or Gate Adjustment on Finishing Pig Growth Performance
Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports Volume 2 Issue 8 Swine Day Article 38 January 2016 Effects of Increasing Space Allowance by Removing a Pig or Gate Adjustment on Finishing Pig Growth
More informationCFIA Animal Health, Welfare and Biosecurity Division Biosecurity Recommendations for Travellers to Keep African Swine Fever Out of Canada
CFIA Animal Health, Welfare and Biosecurity Division Biosecurity Recommendations for Travellers to Keep African Swine Fever Out of Canada Re: Travellers to Canada - Visitors or returning Canadian residents
More informationSummary Report 3/2/05. Guowu Xu, Mark Whitney, and Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota
The Effects of Adding Distiller s Dried Grains with Solubles, with and without Phytase, to Swine Diets on Phosphorus Balance, and Phosphorus Levels and Chemical Forms of Phosphorus in Swine Manure. Introduction
More informationSystems of Filtration
Systems of Filtration EQS 110 Protecting & Filtering Our previous lecture focused on two different body systems that shared a common goal communicating with the body. In this lecture, we again will discuss
More informationBaseline report: Measuring welfare outcomes in pigs
Baseline report: 2013-2016 Measuring welfare outcomes in pigs Real Welfare Baseline report: 2013-2016 2 Real Welfare. Baseline report: 2013-2016 Contents Introduction 4 Overview 6 Vital statistics 8 Welfare
More informationHealth Interventions in Light of New Antibiotic Regulations Chris Rademacher, DVM
Health Interventions in Light of New Antibiotic Regulations Chris Rademacher, DVM Clinical Associate Professor ISU Swine Extension Veterinarian Iowa State University Agenda Effects of new regulations on
More informationRESPIRATORY DISEASES. Photo: Monique de Vrijer. Text: Monique de Vrijer Photos: Pauline van Schaik
Photo: Monique de Vrijer RESPIRATORY DISEASES Text: Monique de Vrijer Photos: Pauline van Schaik Our chickens can catch a cold same as we do, and also more often in the autumn then in summer. A sneeze,
More informationHealthy Animals. Figure One Healthy Animals
This publication contains suggested vaccinations and health practices for pork producers in Oregon regardless of whether it is a commercial herd, small part time operation or a youth project. The old saying
More informationSongklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 38 (4), , Jul. - Aug Original Article
Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 38 (4), 407-412, Jul. - Aug. 2016 http://www.sjst.psu.ac.th Original Article The association between respirable dust exposure and allergic symptoms in the libraries and
More informationResearch Sells DDGS. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota
Research Sells DDGS Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota History of U of M Swine DDGS Research Started with a meeting in 1997 Steve Markham (Commodity Specialists Company)
More informationHow to raise pigs. Tips and tools for pig owners
How to raise pigs Tips and tools for pig owners Welcome to being pig people Maybe raising pigs is a new project for your family. Maybe it s a long-standing tradition. No matter how or why you re raising
More informationInvestigating the use of aerosol disinfection during the weaner period on APP prevalence in fogged grower/finisher pigs
Investigating the use of aerosol disinfection during the weaner period on APP prevalence in fogged grower/finisher pigs 2C-117 Report prepared for the Co-operative Research Centre for High Integrity Australian
More informationTHE BENCHMARK IN CAR AIR PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY SHEPROS. Safety, Health & Environmental Product Solutions
THE BENCHMARK IN CAR AIR PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY SHEPROS Safety, Health & Environmental Product Solutions Indoor Air Quality Hazards of Cars Results of recent studies indicate that levels of airborne chemicals
More informationRespiratory Disease in Dairy and Beef Rearer Units
Respiratory Disease in Dairy and Beef Rearer Units Phil Scott DVM&S, DipECBHM, CertCHP, DSHP, FRCVS Respiratory disease is estimated to cost the UK cattle industry 80 million annually (between 30 for mild
More informationTHE TAIL-DOCKING OF PIGLETS A REPORT BY COMPASSION IN WORLD FARMING TRUST
July 1999 THE TAIL-DOCKING OF PIGLETS A REPORT BY COMPASSION IN WORLD FARMING TRUST Tail-docking involves amputating the lower part of the piglet s tail. Part of the tail is sliced off using either pliers
More informationThe Influence of Small Versus Large Pen Design on Health and Lesion Scores of the Grow-finisher Pig
Animal Industry Report AS 658 ASL R2727 2012 The Influence of Small Versus Large Pen Design on Health and Lesion Scores of the Grow-finisher Pig Leah Gesing Anna K. Johnson Kenneth J. Stalder Matthew Ritter
More informationORAL FLUID COLLECTION IN PIGS
ORAL FLUID COLLECTION IN PIGS INTRODUCTION Oral fluid sampling is an effective tool for swine health monitoring. It can be used to detect the presence of a disease agent or antibody response within a population
More informationCAUSES AND PREVENTION OF TAIL BITING IN GROWING PIGS: A REVIEW OF RECENT RESEARCH
CAUSES AND PREVENTION OF TAIL BITING IN GROWING PIGS: A REVIEW OF RECENT RESEARCH Tina Widowski Department of Animal and Poultry Science University of Guelph INTRODUCTION The problem of tail biting has
More informationTake part in profitability!
Alternative to surgical Castration Take part in profitability! Lower meat production cost safe vaccination equipment Robust reduction of testes size better FCR Boar Taint Males pigs are castrated in order
More informationThe Respiratory System
130 20 The Respiratory System 1. Define important words in this chapter 2. Explain the structure and function of the respiratory system 3. Discuss changes in the respiratory system due to aging 4. Discuss
More informationInfluence of Professional Affiliation on Expert s View on Welfare Measures
animals Article Influence of Professional Affiliation on Expert s View on Welfare Measures Nina Dam Otten 1, * ID, Tine Rousing 2 and Björn Forkman 1 1 Section for Animal Welfare and Disease Control, Department
More informationClinical audit for occupational therapy intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder: sampling steps and sample size calculation
DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1247-0 CORRESPONDENCE Open Access Clinical audit for occupational therapy intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder: sampling steps and sample size calculation Scott
More informationFood in the studs. by Domenico Bergero & Cynthia Préfontaine photos by TuttoArabi Archive. Desert Heritage Magazine
) artwork created by www.desertheritagemagazine.com ( by Domenico Bergero & Cynthia Préfontaine photos by TuttoArabi Archive Summer is a critical time for every horse, but for sports horses it is even
More informationPham Thi Thanh Hoa PhD candidate
Development of novel methodologies for the socio-economic evaluation of animal health surveillance system: application to swine disease surveillance in Vietnam Pham Thi Thanh Hoa PhD candidate 2013-2015
More informationExercise and Air Pollution
Exercise and Air Pollution Two Major Groups of Air Pollutants Primary From a single source of pollution CO, sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons, particulants Secondary Result from an interaction
More informationPenergetic-t Although new to North America, Penergetic-t feed supplement has been used in some European and Asian countries for over 10 years.
1 of 6 02/07/2009 10:31 AM Feed Additives Written by Innovations Penergetic-t Although new to North America, Penergetic-t feed supplement has been used in some European and Asian countries for over 10
More informationWeek 2: Concepts of measuring welfare: physiology, behavior, performance and health
Questions Page -- Measuring behavior & welfare Week 1. Terminology Who is Don Broom and what does he do for a living? What is the difference between welfare and well-being? What would one measure if they
More informationUniversity of Warwick institutional repository:
University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap This paper is made available online in accordance with publisher policies. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please
More informationSafe Pig Handling: Pig Behavior and You
Safe Pig Handling: Pig Behavior and You National Pork Board Pigs interact with Other pigs Their environment You Why do pigs act like pigs? Behavior is a result of thousands of years of adaptations Pig
More informationMANUAL ON AFRICAN SWINE FEVER FOR PIG PRODUCERS
MANUAL ON AFRICAN SWINE FEVER FOR PIG PRODUCERS MANUAL ON AFRICAN SWINE FEVER FOR PIG PRODUCERS FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2001 Manual on African swine fever for pig
More informationINFLUENCE OF REARING SPACE ON THE CARCASS AND MEAT QUALITY OF PIGS
INFLUENCE OF REARING SPACE ON THE CARCASS AND MEAT QUALITY OF PIGS Viktoras Liorancas, E-mail.: viktoras@lva.lt, Bronius Bakutis, E-mail.: zoohig@lva.lt, Gražina Januskevicienė, E-mail.: grazinaj@lva.lt
More informationChanging Pen Configuration From Small to Large Pens: How Does this Change Resource Use for the Growing Pig?
Animal Industry Report AS 657 ASL R2633 2011 Changing Pen Configuration From Small to Large Pens: How Does this Change Resource Use for the Growing Pig? Leah Gesing Anna K. Johnson Kenneth J. Stalder Matthew
More informationSHORT DESCRIPTION OF TECHNICAL PAPER CONTENT. About this technical paper
Avoiding the Need to Teeth Clip Piglets is one of a range Animal Welfare Approved technical papers designed to provide practical advice and support to farmers. For more information visit our website. SHORT
More informationOutline. Why consider temperament? Pigs with personality? Temperament traits in sows: Considerations for management and longevity
Temperament traits in sows: Considerations for management and longevity Dr. Jennifer Brown Prairie Swine Centre, Saskatchewan, Canada. Jennifer.brown@usask.ca Outline Introduction to temperament research
More informationANIMAL WELFARE - WHERE DOES SCIENCE END AND ETHICS BEGIN? Peter Sandøe, Björn Forkman & Karsten Klint Jensen. Department of Large Animal Sciences
ANIMAL WELFARE - WHERE DOES SCIENCE END AND ETHICS BEGIN? Peter Sandøe, Björn Forkman & Karsten Klint Jensen Department of Large Animal Sciences Institute of Food and Resource Economics University of Copenhagen
More informationManagement and Feeding of Group-Housed Gestating Sows
Management and Feeding of Group-Housed Gestating Sows Lee J. Johnston and Yuzhi Li West Central Research and Outreach Center University of Minnesota, Morris 56267 Phone: 320-589-1711 johnstlj@morris.umn.edu
More informationAdopting Technology in the Swine Industry: the impact of precision feeding
Adopting Technology in the Swine Industry: the impact of precision feeding C. Pomar Agriculture and Agri Food Canada, Sherbrooke Introduction Pigs are feed in groups with the same diet which composition
More informationCosts of Bedding, Trailer Washout, and Transport Losses in Market Weight Pigs
Animal Industry Report AS 660 ASL R2908 2014 Costs of Bedding, Trailer Washout, and Transport Losses in Market Weight Pigs Rebecca K. Kephart Iowa State University, rkdavis@iastate.edu Anna K. Johnson
More information! "# $% % &! % % ' ( #! )*!%( #!$! ' # %!% #&! #! %$ # # %%!! +! & # #$ % $ % ,-#%.#!$ #$ &#"/ #! %0 ' ! $!$ $" "!&#! 0 &!&,%. % !
! "# $% % &! % % ' ( #! )*!%( #!$! ' # %!% #&! #! %$ # # %%!! +! & # #$ % $ %,-#%.#!$ #$ &#"/ #! %0 '! $!$ $" "!&#! 0 &!&,%. %!% / "##-#% " % 1 & %!! 2 #! # $&!%$% % 34!2 %(# $ %!.&! %!/, #& &%%#%& #&
More informationRelationship between incident types and impact on patients in drug name errors: a correlational study
Tsuji et al. Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences (2015) 1:11 DOI 10.1186/s40780-015-0011-x RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Relationship between incident types and impact on patients in drug
More informationIowa State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) Policy
Effective Date: 6-16-2010 Approved Date: 5-17-2010 Revised Date: 4-5-2017 Last Reviewed: 4-5-2017 Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Policy ID Number: P207.02 Policy Title: Tumor Production in
More informationTakashi Yagisawa 1,2*, Makiko Mieno 1,3, Norio Yoshimura 1,4, Kenji Yuzawa 1,5 and Shiro Takahara 1,6
Yagisawa et al. Renal Replacement Therapy (2016) 2:68 DOI 10.1186/s41100-016-0080-9 POSITION STATEMENT Current status of kidney transplantation in Japan in 2015: the data of the Kidney Transplant Registry
More informationA Very Specific System
Evaluating the advantages of block-calving Establishing the targets required to maintain a block-calving pattern Examining specific management requirements. Objective: To establish the key factors to maintain
More information