Reverse Shoulder Glenoid Loosening
|
|
- Hilary Fitzgerald
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 S12 Reverse Shoulder Glenoid Loosening An Evaluation of the Initial Fixation Associated with Six Different Reverse Shoulder Designs Nick Stroud, M.S., Matthew J. DiPaola, M.D., Pierre-Henri Flurin, M.D., and Christopher P. Roche, M.S., M.B.A. Abstract Introduction: This study quantified glenoid fixation before and after cyclic loading of six reverse shoulder prosthesis designs when secured to low and high density bone substitute blocks. Methods: A displacement test quantified fixation of six reverse shoulder designs: 38 mm Equinoxe standard offset (EQ), 38 mm Equinoxe lateral offset (EQL), 36 mm Depuy Delta III (DRS), 36 mm Zimmer (ZRS), 32 mm DJO RSP (DJO), and a 36 mm Tornier BIO-RSA (BIO), secured to 0.24 and 0.48 g/cm 3 polyurethane blocks as a shear (357 N) and compressive (50 N) load were applied before and after cyclic loading. Displacement was measured with a dial indicator in the directions of the applied loads along the superior/inferior axis. A cyclic test rotated each glenosphere (N= 7) at 0.5 Hz for 10 k cycles as 750 N was constantly applied. A two-tailed Student s unpaired t-test compared mean displacements. Results: The average displacement of the EQ, EQL, ZRS, DJO, DRS, and BIO-RSA devices in the low density substrate was 182, 137, 431, 321, 190, and 256 microns, respectively. The average displacement of the EQ, EQL, ZRS, DRS, and BIO-RSA devices in the high density substrate was 102, 95, 244, 138, and 173 microns, respectively. Pre- and post-cyclic displacement was significantly less in the high density bone substitutes than in the low density bone substitutes for the majority of implant comparisons. During the cyclic test, six Nick Stroud, M.S., and Christopher P. Roche, M.S., M.B.A., are employed by Exactech, Gainesville, Florida. Matthew J. DiPaola, M.D., is in the Department of Orthopaedics, Wright State University, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio. Pierre-Henri Flurin, M.D., is at the Bordeaux-Merignac Clinique du Sport, Merignac, France. Correspondence: Christopher P. Roche, M.S., M.B.A., Exactech, Inc., 2320 NW 66th Court, Gainesville, Florida 32653; chris. roche@exac.com. of seven ZRS devices failed at an average of 2,603 cycles, one of seven 32 mm DJO failed at 7,342 cycles, and four of seven BIO devices failed at an average of 2,926 cycles. All seven of the EQ, EQL, and DRS devices remained well fixed throughout cyclic loading. Discussion and Conclusions: This study quantified glenoid fixation of six reverse shoulder designs; significant differences in fixation were observed between nearly every implant design tested. Aseptic glenoid loosening is one of the primary historical failure modes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rtsa). Over the past decade, numerous noncemented rtsa prostheses have been developed to maximize initial fixation and prevent aseptic glenoid loosening. Design variations include baseplate profile, baseplate size, backside geometry, center of rotation (COR), surface finish and coatings, fixation screw diameters, number of fixation screw options, and type of screw fixation. Investigators have previously outlined some factors that influence initial fixation in glenoid bone: bone quality, COR position, screw position, and screw diameter appear to play an important role However, little comparative biomechanical data exist to substantiate one design consideration over another. Comparative biomechanical studies of different rtsa glenoid designs in clinically-relevant loading scenarios could aid the shoulder surgeon in deciding between the multiple implant offerings available on the market, particularly when confronted with high-demand or compromised bone situations. This study quantifies the initial glenoid fixation of six different rtsa designs in a low and high density polyurethane bone-substitute model by measuring glenoid baseplate/glenosphere displacement before and after cyclic loading of simulated abduction. It is estimated that these six designs represent over 75% of the rtsa US market share. Stroud N, DiPaola MJ, Flurin PH, Roche CP. Reverse shoulder glenoid loosening: an evaluation of the initial fixation associated with six different reverse shoulder designs. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2013;71(Suppl 2):S12-7.
2 S13 Materials and Methods A displacement test was conducted according to a previously presented test method 9,11-12 and used to quantify glenoid fixation of six different rtsa designs: 38 mm Equinoxe standard offset (EQ), 38 mm Equinoxe lateral offset (EQL), 36 mm Depuy Delta III (DRS), 36 mm Zimmer, (ZRS), 32 mm neutral DJO RSP (DJO), and a 36 mm DePuy Delta III with 29 x 10 mm of bone-substitute graft behind the baseplate (BIO-RSA). A quantity of seven of each reverse shoulder prosthesis was secured to a low and high density polyurethane bone-substitute block as a shear (357 N), and a compressive (50 N) load was applied before and after cyclic loading. The two different densities (0.24 and 0.48 g/cm 3 ) of polyurethane bone-substitute blocks (76 mm x 57 mm x 48 mm; Pacific Research, Inc.; Vashon, WA), each conforming to ASTM F 1839, 13 are intended to mimic the modulus, density, and strength range typical of patients receiving reverse shoulder arthroplasty, where the low and high density blocks simulate poor and good quality glenoid cancellous bone, respectively As described in Table 1, each reverse shoulder glenoid prosthesis was secured with 30 mm except for the BIO-RSA components, which used 45 mm to secure the 29 x 10 mm bone graft cylinders; these bone graft cylinders were manufactured from two different densities (0.24 and 0.48 g/cm 3 ) to simulate the BIO-RSA surgical technique The reverse shoulder glenoid loosening method consisted of two tests: a displacement test and a cyclic test and was conducted in three phases: phase 1) pre-cyclic displacement test, phase 2) cyclic test, and phase 3) post-cyclic displacement test. In the displacement test, the axial test machine (Model 8872; Instron Corp; Norwood, MA.; axial resolution of mm and an accuracy of mm) and 3 digital indicators (Model ID-C112EXB; Mitutoyo, Japan; resolution of mm and an accuracy of mm) measured displacement as a 50 N compressive axial load was applied perpendicular to the glenoid and a 357 N shear load was applied parallel to the face of the glenoid baseplate along its superior/inferior (S/I) axis and then performed a second time turning the component 90 and loading it along its anterior/ posterior (A/P) axis (Fig. 1). Two dial indicators were used to subtract out any compliance of the test construct; displacement was measured in the direction of the applied shear and compression loads to the nearest micron and applied along the S/I and then the A/P axes of each prosthesis. In the cyclic test, a 750 N axial load was constantly applied through the center of the humeral liner as the glenosphere/glenoid baseplate/bone-substitute block were rotated about the humeral component with a stepper motor to create a sinusoidal angular displacement profile encompassing an arc of 55 at 0.5 Hz for 10,000 cycles (Fig. 2). This loading profile (over the 55 arc) would induce a maximum calculated shear load of 456 N (with a corresponding compressive load of 595 N) at the lower extreme of rotation and a maximum compressive load of 750 N (with no corresponding shear load) when applied perpendicular to the baseplate. 9,11 The components were cooled with a continuous jet of air with no lubrication during the cyclic test. It should be noted that the appropriate diameter of humeral liner (e.g., 32, 36, 38 mm) was manufactured with a 145 neck angle to test each device; a 145 humeral liner was utilized to ensure each device was subjected to the same combination of shear Table 1 Comparison of Reverse Shoulder Designs Utilized in this Glenoid Loosening Study Reverse Shoulder EQ EQL ZRS DJO DRS BIO-RSA Surface Finish Grit-blasted Grit-blasted Porous Plasma Spray HA Coated HA Coated Center of Rotation 2.5 mm lateral to bone 6.5 mm lateral to bone 2.5 mm lateral to bone 10 mm lateral to the bone 0 mm lateral to the bone 10 mm lateral to the bone substitute graft Glenosphere Diameter 38 mm 38 mm 36 mm 32 mm 36 mm 36mm Baseplate Profile Backside Geometry Central Fixation Method Screws (Number, Diameter/ Length, and Screw Type) Oval: 34 mm long, 25 mm wide Oval: 34 mm long, 25 mm wide Circle: 28 mm diameter Circle: 26 mm in diameter Circle: 29 mm in diameter Circle: 29 mm in diameter Curved back Curved back Flat-back Curved back Flat-back Flat-back Press-fit tapered cage peg: 8x16 mm 4, 4.5x30 mm Press-fit tapered cage peg: 8x16 mm 4, 4.5x30 mm screws Press-fit porous peg: 8x15 mm 2, 4.5x30 mm 6.5 mm integral compression screw 4, 5.0x30 mm self-taping Press-fit peg: 8x16 mm 2, 4.5x30 mm & 2, 4.5x30 mm locking screws Press-fit peg: 8x16 mm 4, 4.5x45 mm
3 S14 Figure 1 Depiction of the displacement test in which shear and compressive loads were applied while the shear and compressive loads were applied before and after cyclic loading. and compression loads during the cyclic test and isolate the effect of glenoid design on initial fixation in this model. A two-tailed unpaired Student s t-test was used to compare S/I and A/P glenoid prosthesis displacements relative to each density block in the direction of the applied shear load before and after cyclic loading, where p < 0.05 denotes significance. Figure 2 Depiction of the cyclic test in which a 750 N load is applied through the humeral liner as the glenoid component is cycled about an arc of 55 at 0.5 Hz for 10,000 cycles; note that the 10 angular bias was performed but is not depicted in the image above. Results The average pre- and post-cyclic displacement associated with each reverse shoulder design in the low and high density polyurethane substrates are described in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. The average displacement of the EQ, EQL, ZRS, DJO, DRS, and BIO-RSA devices in the low density substrate was 182, 137, 431, 321, 190, and 256 microns, respectively. The average displacement of the EQ, EQL, ZRS, DRS, and BIO-RSA devices was 102, 95, 244, 138, and 173 microns, respectively. Pre- and post-cyclic displacement was significantly less in the high density bone substitutes than in the low density bone substitutes for the majority of implant comparisons. The EQ, EQL, and DRS devices were associated with significantly lower (p < 0.05) pre- and post-cyclic displacement than the ZRS, DJO, and BIO-RSA devices in each substrate, where the EQL device was associated with the least displacement in either substrate. All seven of the EQ, EQL, and DRS devices remained well fixed throughout cyclic loading in both the low and high density blocks. During the cyclic test, six of seven ZRS devices failed from catastrophic loosening in the low density polyurethane blocks at an average of 2,603 ± 981 cycles (range: 1,144 to 3,810) (Fig. 3). Four of seven BIO- RSA devices failed from catastrophic loosening in the low density polyurethane blocks at an average of 2,926 ± 978 cycles (range: 1,600 to 3,913) (Fig. 4). Finally one of the seven DJO failed in the low density blocks at 7,342 cycles due to fatigue fracture of the central screw (Fig. 5). As a result of this implant failure, the DJO device was unable to be tested in the high density blocks. For the DJO device, the mean A/P and S/I displacement prior to cyclic loading was significantly lower than mean A/P (p = 0.005) and S/I (p = 0.001) displacement after cyclic loading. Discussion The results of this study demonstrate significant differences in fixation (p < 0.05), both before and after cyclic loading, for six different reverse shoulder designs; these results suggest that glenoid baseplate/glenosphere design does impact initial fixation with reverse shoulder arthroplasty in this model. Of the six designs evaluated, the EQ, EQL, and DRS had no catastrophic failures when tested in either the low and high density substrates and were associated with significantly less displacement (p < 0.05) than the ZRS, DJO, and BIO-RSA devices. The ZRS, DJO, and BIO-RSA devices each had at least one catastrophic failure when tested in the low-density substrate. It is unclear which design parameters were most responsible for the observed differences in fixation. However, some general statements about the designs can be made. Catastrophic failures were witnessed in various implants with COR lateralization ranging from 2.5 mm to 10 mm from the glenoid surface. Certainly, the more lateral the COR from the fixation surface, the greater the torque on that fixation surface, biomechanically explaining the observed fatigue failure of the DJO device. When lateralization was created through the BIO-RSA technique, there did appear to be an adverse effect on fixation as the BIO-RSA results were significantly poorer in both the low and high density
4 S15 Table 2 Pre- and Post-Cyclic Glenoid Displacement in the Low Density Polyurethane Substrate Displacement (microns) EQ EQL ZRS DJO DRS BIO-RSA SI Shear Pre 181 ± ± ± ± ± ± 14 SI Shear Post 186 ± ± 11 NA 368 ± ± ± 15 AP Shear Pre 180 ± ± ± ± ± ± 19 AP Shear Post 181 ± ± 21 NA 414 ± ± ± 11 Table 3 Pre- and Post-Cyclic Glenoid Displacement in the High Density Polyurethane Substrate Displacement (microns) EQ EQL ZRS DJO DRS BIO-RSA SI Shear Pre 102 ± ± ± ± ± 10 SI Shear Post 112 ± ± ± ± ± 27 AP Shear Pre 98 ± ± ± ± ± 19 AP Shear Post 96 ± ± ± ± ± 32 models than the DRS design when used without graft, despite the use of four, 15 mm longer screws with the BIO-RSA device. However, a lateralized COR alone is insufficient to describe the observed differences in fixation described in this study, as there were implants (EQL) with as much as 6.5 mm of COR lateralization that exhibited no failure and excellent maintenance of fixation. In fact, the EQL design was associated with the lowest overall displacement before and after cyclic loading in both the low and high density substitute. Interestingly, the EQL design had superior fixation than the EQ design in both the low and high density bone substitutes (as the primary differences between these designs is that EQL has a COR 4 mm more lateral and 1 mm less inferior shifted than the EQ design). These results suggest that superior/inferior changes in COR may play a more significant role on fixation in this model than medial/lateral changes in COR. In this model, implants with less-rough surfaces (e.g., HA and grit blasted) performed significantly better than implants with rougher coatings (e.g., porous trabecular metal and Ti plasma spray). However, the significance of this finding is unclear. Given that rougher coatings should better potentiate bone in-growth,23 it is possible that (in this model) rougher coatings could inadvertently be less favorable to fixation due to these coatings creating more abrasion at the implant-substrate surface. As the low and high density bone substitute used in this study cannot possibly simulate bone in-growth, this testing methodology only evaluates initial Figure 3 Representative image of the ZRS device in the low density substitute after disassociation during the cyclic test. Figure 4 Representative image of the BIO-RSA device in the low density substitute after disassociation during the cyclic test.
5 S16 Figure 5 Representative image of the DJO device after fatigue fracture of the central screw during the cyclic test. fixation and makes no attempt to simulate biologic fixation. Therefore, we are unable to make any conclusions regarding the contribution of surface roughness. Four of the tested devices utilized four screws (EQ, EQL, DRS, and BIO-RSA), and in the other two, five screws (DJO) and two screws (ZRS) were used. Most devices utilized screws that were 4.5 mm in diameter; the DJO implant utilized the largest screws (one 6.5 mm central compression screw and four 5 mm compression screws). Some implants used locking screws, some used compression screws, some used compression screws with locking caps, and some used a combination of types. The ZRS implant with the greatest number of catastrophic failures in the low density bone substitute only utilized two screws, the least number of the implants tested; it may be that two screws is too few to provide sufficient initial fixation in certain clinical scenarios. With the exception of the DJO device, each implant had a unique, though similar method of press-fit central fixation. All but the DJO device utilized a press-fit peg to supplement peripheral screw fixation be it a porous peg, cage peg, or monolithic peg. The DJO device utilized a 6.5 mm central compression screw. Interestingly, one fatigue failure was observed with this 6.5 mm central screw at the minor diameter of the first (most lateral) thread (e.g., at the minimum cross sectional area) (Fig. 5). It should be noted that the fixation surface utilized by the DJO device had the smallest cross-sectional area of all the other devices tested. Given that there are several published reports of 6.5 mm central screw fracture with the DJO device, it may be that the cross sectional area of this central screw is insufficient to withstand long-term expected loading in all clinical scenarios. Regarding glenoid baseplate shape, there was also a combination of curved-back (EQ, EQL, DJO) and flatbacked (ZRS, DRS, BIO-RSA) glenoid baseplate designs, without any distinct pattern noted in their performance. Additionally, it is difficult to say whether the size of the baseplate played any role in the performance. However, it is worth noting that the devices with the biggest glenoid baseplates/largest surface area (EQ and EQL) were associated with the least displacement before and after cyclic loading in both the low and high density polyurethane bone-substitute substrates. This study has some limitations. It is purely biomechanical and may not represent the actual clinical condition perfectly. However, we believe that the method utilized in this study does simulate the primary function of reverse shoulders (e.g., abduction) better than that of other studies for reasons presented previously. 9 This study was performed in polyurethane blocks and not cadaveric scapulae. While foam blocks are ideal for their consistency, they differ in character and shape from actual scapula bone. It is unclear how deformity or anatomical morphological variations impact fixation and if it may be seen clinically. Conclusions This comparative biomechanical study quantified the glenoid fixation of six different rtsa designs before and after cyclic loading of simulated abduction when loaded at 750 N for 10,000 cycles in both a low and high density polyurethane bone-substitute model. Significant differences (p < 0.05) in glenoid fixation were observed in nearly every testing configuration, with the EQ, EQL, and DRS devices performing best (having significantly lower pre- and postcyclic displacement than the ZRS, DJO, and BIO-RSA devices). While some general trends were identified, future work using this cyclic-abduction test method should seek to isolate implant design differences in order to gain a greater understanding of which design parameters contribute most to achieve initial glenoid fixation with rtsa. Disclosure Statement Funding for this study was provided by Exactech, Inc., Gainesville, Florida. Nick Stroud and Christopher P. Roche are employed by Exactech, Inc. Pierre-Henri Flurin, M.D., is a consultant for Exactech, Inc., and receives royalties on products related to this article. Matthew J. DiPaola, M.D., has no financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this article, including but not limited to, employment, consultancy, stock ownership, honoraria, and paid expert testimony. References 1. Chebli C, Huber P, Watling J, et al. Factors affecting fixation of the glenoid component of a reverse total shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg Mar-Apr;17(2): doi: /j.jse Codsi MJ, Iannotti JP. The effect of screw position on the initial fixation of a reverse total shoulder prosthesis in a glenoid with a cavitary bone defect. J Shoulder Elbow Surg.
6 S May-Jun;17(3): doi: /j.jse Harman M, Frankle M, Vasey M, Banks S. Initial glenoid component fixation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical evaluation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg Jan- Feb;14(1 Suppl S):162S-7S. doi: /j.jse Hoenig MP, Loeffler B, Brown S, et al. Reverse glenoid component fixation: is a posterior screw necessary? J Shoulder Elbow Surg Jun;19(4): doi: /j. jse Hopkins AR, Hansen UN, Bull AMJ, et al. Fixation of the reversed shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg Nov-Dec;17(6): doi: /j.jse James J, Huffman KR, Werner FW, et al. Does glenoid baseplate geometry affect its fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? J Shoulder Elbow Surg Jul;21(7): doi: /j.jse Roche C, Flurin P-H, Wright T, et al. Effect of varying screw configuration and bone density on reverse shoulder glenoid fixation following cyclic loading. In: Transactions of the annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. San Francisco, CA: Orthopaedic Research Society, p Roche C, Steffens J, Flurin P-H, et al. Reverse shoulder glenoid loosening test method: an analysis of fixation between two different offset glenospheres. In: Transactions of the annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. Long Beach, CA: Orthopaedic Research Society, 2011, p Roche C, Stroud N, Martin, B, et al. The Impact of Scapular Notching on Reverse Shoulder Glenoid Fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg Jul;22(7): doi: /j. jse Sutton LG, Werner FW, Jones AK, et al. Optimization of glenoid fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty using 3-dimensional modeling. J Shoulder Elbow Surg Jul;19(5): doi: /j.jse Stroud N, DiPaola M, Martin B, et al. Initial Glenoid Fixation using Two Different Reverse Shoulder Designs with an Equivalent Center of Rotation in a Low and High Density Bone Substitute. J Shoulder Elbow Surg Apr 9. pii: S (13) doi: /j.jse Roche C, Stroud N, Martin B, et al. Achieving fixation in glenoids with superior wear using reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg May 7. pii: S (13) doi: /j.jse ASTM F (2012) Standard Specification for Rigid Polyurethane Foam for Use as a Standard Material for Testing Orthopaedic Devices and Instruments. Available at: www. astm.org/standards/f1839.htm. Accessed August 1, Anglin C, Tolhurst P, Wyss UP, Pichora DR. Glenoid cancellous bone strength and modulus. J Biomech Oct;32(10): Kalouche I, Crépin J, Abdelmoumen S, et al. Mechanical properties of glenoid cancellous bone. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) May;25(4): doi: /j.clinbiomech Lehtinen JT, Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, Warner JJP. Total, trabecular, and cortical bone mineral density in different regions of the glenoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg May- Jun;13(3): doi: /s Mimar R, Limb D, Hall RM. Evaluation of the mechanical and architectural properties of glenoid bone. J Shoulder Elbow Surg Mar-Apr;17(2): doi: /j. jse Norris TR, Kelly JDI, Humphrey CS. Management of Glenoid Bone Defects in Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty: a new application of the reverse total shoulder prosthesis. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;8(1): Neyton L, Boileau P, Nové-Josserand L, et al. Glenoid bone grafting with a reverse design prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg May-Jun;16(3 Suppl):S71-8. doi: /j. jse Bateman E, Donald SM. Reconstruction of massive uncontained glenoid defects using a combined autograft-allograft construct with reverse shoulder arthroplasty: preliminary results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg Jul;21(7): doi: /j.jse Melis B, Bonnevialle N, Neyton L, et al. Glenoid loosening and failure in anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty: is revision with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty a reliable option? J Shoulder Elbow Surg Mar;21(3): doi: /j. jse Boileau P, Moineau G, Roussanne Y, O Shea K. Bony increased-offset reversed shoulder arthroplasty: minimizing scapular impingement while maximizing glenoid fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res Sep;469(9): doi: /s Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C. Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res Jul;(208): Frankle M, Siegal S, Pupello D, et al. The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am Aug;87(8): Frankle M, Levy JC, Pupello D, et al. The reverse shoulder prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am Sep;88 Suppl 1 Pt 2: Frankle MA, Siegal S, Pupello DR, et al. Coronal plane tilt angle affects risk of catastrophic failure in patients treated with a reverse shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:e46. doi: /j.jse Holcomb JO, Cuff D, Petersen SA, et al. Revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty for glenoid baseplate failure after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg Sep-Oct;18(5): doi: /j.jse McFarland EG, Sanguanjit P, Tasaki A, et al. The reverse shoulder prosthesis: A review of imaging features and complications. Skeletal Radiol Jul;35(7): Epub 2006 Mar 29.
Optimizing Deltoid Efficiency with Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Using a Novel Inset Center of Rotation Glenosphere Design
S37 Optimizing Deltoid Efficiency with Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Using a Novel Inset Center of Rotation Glenosphere Design Christopher P. Roche, M.S., M.B.A., Matthew A. Hamilton, Ph.D., Phong Diep,
More informationBiomechanical Impact of Posterior Glenoid Wear on Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
S5 Biomechanical Impact of Posterior Glenoid Wear on Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Christopher P. Roche, M.S., M.B.A., Phong Diep, B.S., Sean G. Grey, M.D., and Pierre-Henri Flurin, M.D. Abstract
More informationBoth anatomic (atsa) and reverse (rtsa) total
S101 Comparison of Outcomes Using Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Pierre-Henri Flurin, M.D., Yann Marczuk, M.D., Martin Janout, M.D., Thomas W. Wright, M.D., Joseph Zuckerman, M.D., and
More informationBulletin of the Hospital for Joint Diseases 2013;71(4):284-93
284 Impact of Inferior Glenoid Tilt, Humeral Retroversion, Bone Grafting, and Design Parameters on Muscle Length and Wrapping in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Christopher P. Roche, M.S., M.B.A., Phong
More informationEffect of Prosthesis Design on Muscle Length and Moment Arms in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
S31 Effect of Prosthesis Design on Muscle Length and Moment Arms in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Matthew A. Hamilton, Ph.D., Christopher P. Roche, M.S., M.B.A., Phong Diep, B.S., Pierre- Henri Flurin,
More informationReverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A New Frontier (of Complications)
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A New Frontier (of Complications) Emilie Cheung, MD Associate Professor Chief Shoulder Elbow Svc Stanford University Department of Orthopedic Surgery Procedure volumes
More informationOptimal Baseplate Rotational Alignment in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Three-Dimensional Computer-Aided Design Study.
Optimal Baseplate Rotational Alignment in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Three-Dimensional Computer-Aided Design Study. Byron F. Stephens, MD 1, Casey T. Hebert 2, Thomas W. Throckmorton, MD 1,
More informationImpact of Modeling Assumptions on Stability Predictions in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
Impact of Modeling Assumptions on Stability Predictions in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Mehul A Dharia*, Jeff Bischoff* *Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN May 17, 2017 Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Shoulder Joint
More informationMatthew D. Saltzman, MD a, Deana M. Mercer, MD c, Winston J. Warme, MD b, Alexander L. Bertelsen, PA-C b, Frederick A. Matsen III, MD b, *
J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2010) 19, 1028-1033 www.elsevier.com/locate/ymse A method for documenting the change in center of rotation with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and its application to a consecutive
More informationBalgrist Shoulder Course 2017
How do we define a glenoid component at risk for clinical failure? Joseph P. Iannotti MD, PhD Maynard Madden Professor and Chairman Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute Cleveland Clinic Conflict of
More informationS h o u l d e r Solutions by Tornier C o n v e r T i b l e S h o u l d e r S y S T e m
S h o u l d e r Solutions by Tornier C o n v e r t i b l e s h o u l d e r s y s t e m C o n v e r t i b l e s h o u l d e r s y s t e m A n a t o m i c Aequalis Ascend Flex - UDZF131 One System. Two Solutions.
More informationGlenoid baseplate fixation using hybrid configurations of locked and unlocked peripheral screws
J Orthop Traumatol (2017) 18:221 228 DOI 10.1007/s10195-016-0438-3 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Glenoid baseplate fixation using hybrid configurations of locked and unlocked peripheral screws Nathan T. Formaini 1
More informationBiomechanical concepts of total shoulder replacement. «Shoulder Course» Day 1. Richard W. Nyffeler Orthopädie Sonnenhof Bern. 11. Sept.
Biomechanical concepts of total shoulder replacement Richard W. Nyffeler Orthopädie Sonnenhof Bern First total shoulder prosthesis Jules Emile Péan, 1830-1898 Monobloc prostheses Charles Neer, 1917-2011
More informationwhat you is back within LOVE arm s reach find out why the exactech shoulder may be right for you
TOTAL shoulder REPLACEMENT what you is back within LOVE arm s reach find out why the exactech shoulder may be right for you how does your shoulder work? The shoulder is the most mobile joint in the body.
More informationManaging Glenoid Bone Deficiency The Augment Experience in Anatomic and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
Managing Glenoid Bone Deficiency The Augment Experience in Anatomic and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Publish date: March 5, 2018 Authors: Rowan J. Michael, MD Bradley S. Schoch, MD Joseph J. King, MD
More informationRevision of the Loose Glenoid Component in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
S68 Revision of the Loose Glenoid Component in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Pierre-Henri Flurin, M.D., Martin Janout, M.D., Christopher P. Roche, M.S., M.B.A., Thomas W. Wright, M.D., and Joseph
More informationComprehensive Reverse Shoulder System Augmented Baseplate
Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder System Augmented Baseplate Surgical Technique Addendum FPO 1 Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder System Augmented Baseplate Surgical Technique Addendum Adaptive Building on the
More informationAssessment of Approximate Glenoid Size in Thai People
Assessment of Approximate Glenoid Size in Thai People J Med Assoc Thai 2014; 97 (Suppl. 2): S14-S18 Full text. e-journal: http://www.jmatonline.com Pason Phonphok MD*, Nattha Kulkamthorn MD* * Division
More informationUse of a Caged, Bone Ingrowth, Glenoid Implant in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
S41 Use of a Caged, Bone Ingrowth, Glenoid Implant in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Technique and Early Results Sean G. Grey, M.D. Abstract Shoulder arthroplasty represents one of the fastest growing
More information"Stability and Instability of RTSA"
Orthopedics Update «Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty» Stability and Instability of RTSA A. LÄDERMANN Orthopaedics and Traumatology, La Tour Hospital, Meyrin, Switzerland Orthopaedics and Traumatology,
More informationFixed and Variable Geometry Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Fixed and Variable Geometry Total Shoulder Arthroplasty RECOVERY FUNCTION SURVIVORSHIP DePuy believes in an approach to total shoulder replacement that places equal importance on recovery, function and
More informationConflicts of Interest Consulting (C), Royalty (R)
Principles of Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Joseph P. Iannotti MD, PhD Maynard Madden Professor and Chairman Orthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute Cleveland Clinic Conflicts of Interest Consulting
More informationZimmer Patient Specific Instruments (PSI) for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
Zimmer Patient Specific Instruments (PSI) for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Ryan Krupp, M.D. Norton Orthopaedic Specialists Louisville, KY Anand Murthi, M.D. MedStar Union Memorial Hospital Baltimore,
More informationINITIAL FIXATION OF THE TRABECULAR METAL REVERSE SHOULDER GLENOID BASE PLATE IMPLANT
Copyright 2008 by Zimmer, Inc. INITIAL FIXATION OF THE TRABECULAR METAL REVERSE SHOULDER GLENOID BASE PLATE IMPLANT Matthew L. Mroczkowski M.S. Roy Wiley Background Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
More informationANATOMIC TOTAL SHOULDER REPLACEMENT:
The Shoulder Replacement A total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a surgery to replace the damaged parts of the ball and socket shoulder joint with an artificial prosthesis. The damage to the shoulder can
More informationAdvantages to medialize less
Advantages to medialize less less RSP? Clinical and radiological results Ph Valenti, D Katz, Ph Sauzieres J Kany, K Elkolti, P Gleyze Paris, Lorient, Toulouse, Lyon, Colmar Delta RSP CTA pseudoparalytic
More informationAnatomical. Redefined.
natomical. Redefined. On two days each year, daylight equals night. Perfect balance is achieved. Such is the power of the quinoxe. Other shoulder systems have claimed anatomical. xactech is raising the
More informationDisclosures A prospective comparison between reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
Disclosures A prospective comparison between reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty Tuyen Kiet Micah Naimark, MD Brian T. Feeley, MD Teddy T. Chung Tatiana Gajiu Sarah L. Hall, MA C. Benjamin
More informationScapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasties: The influence of glenometaphyseal angle
Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (2011) 97S, S131 S137 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasties: The influence of glenometaphyseal angle V. Falaise a, C. Levigne
More informationInfluence of Glenosphere Design on Outcomes and Complications of Reverse Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
Original Article Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2016;8:288-297 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2016.8.3.288 Influence of Glenosphere Design on Outcomes and Complications of Reverse Arthroplasty: A Systematic
More informationPosterior Glenoid Wear in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty:
Posterior Glenoid Wear in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Eccentric Anterior Reaming is Superior to Posterior Augment Tim Wang MD, Geoffrey Abrams MD, Anthony Behn MS, Emilie Cheung MD Department of Orthopaedic
More informationSSSR. 1. Nov Shoulder Prosthesis. Postoperative Imaging. Florian M. Buck, MD
Shoulder Prosthesis Postoperative Imaging Florian M. Buck, MD Shoulder Prosthesis Surgical Approach Findings Imaging Modalities Postoperative Problems Shoulder Prosthesis What are we talking about Anatomical
More informationWhy are these shoulder replacements called a reverse prosthesis?
PATIENT GUIDE TO REVERSE PROSTHESIS Edward G. McFarland MD The Division of Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery The Department of Orthopaedic Surgery The Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD Why are these
More informationcomprehensive Design Rationale shoulder system Knees Hips Extremities Cement and Accessories PMI TEchnology
comprehensive shoulder system Design Rationale Knees Hips Extremities Cement and Accessories PMI TEchnology . INTRODUCTION The Comprehensive Shoulder System is an evolutionary design based on the successful
More informationAccuracy of CT-based measurements of glenoid version for total shoulder arthroplasty
J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2009) -, 1-6 www.elsevier.com/locate/ymse Accuracy of CT-based measurements of glenoid version for total shoulder arthroplasty Heinz R. Hoenecke Jr., MD*, Juan C. Hermida, MD, Cesar
More informationEffect of baseplate size on primary glenoid stability and impingement-free range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Chae et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2014, 15:417 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Effect of baseplate size on primary glenoid stability and impingement-free range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
More informationConversion of Anatomic TSA to RSA
Conversion of Anatomic TSA to RSA Joseph A. Abboud, M.D. Professor of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Senior Vice-President at the Rothman Institute Philadelphia, PA Disclosures Joseph A. Abboud, MD Depuy Synthes
More informationEvaluating Scapular Notching after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow Vol. 18, No. 4, December, 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2015.18.4.248 CiSE Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow Evaluating Scapular Notching after Reverse
More informationChallenges of Shoulder Arthroplasty
Challenges, Complications and Value Jonathan Levy, MD Shoulder & Elbow Surgeon Chief, Orthopaedic Surgery Holy Cross Hospital Medical Director, Holy Cross Orthopaedic Research Institute Director, ASES
More informationCement Polished Tapered Stems of 12/14 Taper. 96 mm 98 mm 104 mm 110 mm 116 mm 122 mm 128 mm. Ceramic Femoral Head. Outer Diameter
Design Philosophy Cementless Stems of 12/14 Taper Stem Length Neck shaft Angle STEM-N3 STEM-N4 STEM-N5 STEM-N6 STEM-N7 STEM-N8 STEM-N9 123 mm 125 mm 130 mm 135 mm 140 mm 145 mm 150 mm 132 Cement Polished
More informationReverse Shoulder System. Abstracts
TM Reverse Shoulder System s 2 Contents Introduction 2 Reverse shoulder arthroplasty components and surgical techniques that restore glenohumeralmotion 3 Isometric strength, range of motion, and impairment
More informationRECOVERY. P r o t r u s i o
RECOVERY P r o t r u s i o TM C a g e RECOVERY P r o t r u s i o TM C a g e Design Features Revision acetabular surgery is a major challenge facing today s total joint revision surgeon. Failed endo/bi-polars,
More informationCurrent Controversies in Shoulder Surgery:
Current Controversies in Shoulder Surgery: Shoulder Instability Rotator Cuff Injury and Repair Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Brian Feeley, MD UC San Francisco Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery Disclosures
More informationCurriculum Vitae. Derek J. Cuff
Curriculum Vitae Derek J. Cuff Suncoast Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine 836 Sunset Lake Blvd, Building A Suite 205 Venice, FL 34292 Office:941-485-1505, Email: dcuff001@hotmail.com, web:www.suncoastshoulder-elbow.com
More informationGLENOID SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
UP. EXTREMITY Dual-Platform Shoulder Prosthesis GLENOID SURGICAL TECHNIQUE ANATOMICAL REVERSE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE REFERENCE NUMBERS HUMERAL STEM REFERENCE DIAMETER HEIGHT 267 360 Ø 06 100 265 102 Ø 08 120
More informationTORNIER BIO-RSA. Bony Increased Offset - Reversed Shoulder Arthroplasty SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
TORNIER BIO-RSA Bony Increased Offset - Reversed Shoulder Arthroplasty SURGICAL TECHNIQUE 2 Table of Contents: Concept...4 Bony Increased Offset Reversed Shoulder Arthroplasty (BIO-RSA ) Concept...4 Surgical
More informationDr. John Masonis Charlotte, NC OrthoCarolina. Dr. James Waddell Toronto, Ontario University of Toronto, St. Michael s Hospital
Design Rationale Design surgeon list Smith & Nephew thanks the following surgeons for their participation as part of the REDAPT Revision Acetabular System design team: Dr. Robert Bourne London, Ontario
More informationClinical Outcomes and Complications during the Learning Curve for Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: An Analysis of the First 40 Cases
Original Article Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2017;9:213-217 https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2017.9.2.213 Clinical Outcomes and Complications during the Learning Curve for Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty:
More informationHUMELOCK II. Cemented + Graft ANATOMICAL and REVERSIBLE if REVISION SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
TM HUMELOCK II Cemented + Graft ANATOMICAL and REVERSIBLE if REVISION SURGICAL TECHNIQUE CONTENTS - Device descriptionpage 02 - Intended use / indicationspage 03 - Warnings and precautions page 03 - Using
More informationCorrelation of Femoral Component Micromotion to a Physical Test Using an FEA Model.
Correlation of Femoral Component Micromotion to a Physical Test Using an FEA Model. Robert Davignon, Ananthkrishnan Gopalakrishnan. Stryker Corporation, Parsippany, NJ, USA. Disclosures: R. Davignon: 3A;
More informationThe glenoid in shoulder arthroplasty
J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2009) 18, 819-833 www.elsevier.com/locate/ymse The glenoid in shoulder arthroplasty Eric J. Strauss, MD a, Chris Roche, MS b, Pierre-Henri Flurin, MD c, Thomas Wright, MD d, Joseph
More informationStability of two versus three peripheral pegs of the glenoid component in modern total shoulder arthroplasty
International Orthopaedics (SICOT) (2017) 41:2345 2351 DOI 10.1007/s00264-017-3599-7 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Stability of two versus three peripheral pegs of the glenoid component in modern total shoulder arthroplasty
More informationP. Trouilloud M. Gonzalvez P. Martz H. Charles F. Handelberg R. W. Nyffeler E. Baulot DuocentricÒ Group
DOI 10.1007/s00590-013-1213-2 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Duocentric Ò reversed shoulder prosthesis and Personal Fit Ò templates: innovative strategies to optimize prosthesis positioning and prevent scapular notching
More informationM-SERIES. Modular Femoral Stem AN ACCURATE MATCH EVERY TIME
M-SERIES Modular Femoral Stem AN ACCURATE MATCH EVERY TIME 54 Extension 114 Flexion High How do you ensure optimal post-operative joint stability? MECHANICAL RANGE OF MOTION Cup Position: 45 degrees abduction,
More informationAssessment of Scapular Morphology and Surgical Technique as Predictors of Notching in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
An Original Study Assessment of Scapular Morphology and Surgical Technique as Predictors of Notching in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Vani Sabesan, MD, Mark Callanan, MD, Vinay Sharma, BA, and J. Michael
More informationCase Report Acute Failure of a Glenoid Component in Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty
Case Reports in Orthopedics Volume 2016, Article ID 6208294, 5 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6208294 Case Report Acute Failure of a Glenoid Component in Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty William E.
More informationProximal Humerus Fracture 3-D Modeling
Proximal Humerus Fracture 3-D Modeling Publish date: April 24, 2018 Authors: Krishn Khanna, MD Eugene W. Brabston, MD Usama Qayyum, MBBS Thomas R. Gardner, MCE William N. Levine, MD Charles M. Jobin, MD
More informationImmediate post surgical findings of soft tissue swelling, subcutaneous emphysema, and skin staples for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Immediate post surgical findings of soft tissue swelling, subcutaneous emphysema, and skin staples for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. REVERSE TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY WITH FRACTURED ACROMION Above:
More informationRegenerex Porous Titanium Construct. Knees Hips Extremities Cement and Accessories PMI Trauma Technology
Regenerex Porous Titanium Construct Knees Hips Extremities Cement and Accessories PMI Trauma Technology One Surgeon. One Patient. Over 1 million times per year, Biomet helps one surgeon provide personalized
More informationRadiology Case Reports. Scapular Spine Stress Fracture as a Complication of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
Radiology Case Reports Volume 2, Issue 2, 2007 Scapular Spine Stress Fracture as a Complication of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Kimberly J. Burkholz, Catherine C. Roberts, and Steven J. Hattrup We report
More informationReversed Indications the most extensive portfolio on the market
Reversed Indications the most extensive portfolio on the market next generation products for anatomic indications on the humeral side www.tornier.comromain Huon Intl Product Manager 1 Agenda Aequalis Reversed
More informationOptimum implant geometry
Design Rationale Optimum implant geometry Extending proven Tri-Lock heritage The original Tri-Lock was introduced in 1981. This implant was the first proximally coated tapered-wedge hip stem available
More informationIntegra. Titan Modular Shoulder System, 2.5
Titan Modular Shoulder System, 2.5 Limit uncertainty with a shoulder implant system that redefines modularity, addresses multiple indications, and allows for reproducible results. Titan Modular Shoulder
More informationScapular Notching. Recognition and Strategies to Minimize Clinical Impact. Gregory P. Nicholson MD, Eric J. Strauss MD, Seth L.
Clin Orthop Relat Res DOI 10.1007/s11999-010-1720-y SYMPOSIUM: REVERSE TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY Scapular Notching Recognition and Strategies to Minimize Clinical Impact Gregory P. Nicholson MD, Eric
More informationSURGICAL TECHNIQUE. Protrusio Cage A COMPREHENSIVE ACETABULAR REVISION SYSTEM
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE Protrusio Cage A COMPREHENSIVE ACETABULAR REVISION SYSTEM Important: This essential product information does not include all of the information necessary for selection and use of a device.
More informationSHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY (TOTAL, HEMI, REVERSE)/ARTHRODESIS
evicore healthcare. Clinical Decision Support Tool Diagnostic Strategies This tool addresses common symptoms and symptom complexes. Imaging requests for patients with atypical symptoms or clinical presentations
More informationApproach Patients with CONFIDENCE
Design Rationale Approach Patients with CONFIDENCE The ACTIS Total Hip System is the first DePuy Synthes stem specifically designed to be utilized with tissue sparing approaches, such as the anterior
More informationEncina Taper Stem. Stinson Orthopedics Inc. 303 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 600 Redwood City, CA
Stinson Orthopedics Inc. 303 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 600 Redwood City, CA 94065 info@stinsonortho.com www.stinsonortho.com Table of Contents Introduction 3 Features 4 Surgical Technique 5 Preoperative
More informationThe Role of Subscapularis Repair in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
S108 The Role of Subscapularis Repair in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Howard D. Routman, D.O., F.A.O.A.O. Abstract Background: Controversy surrounds the role of the subscapularis (SSC) in reverse
More informationACTIS. TOTAL HIP SYSTEM Approach Active Patients with Confidence DESIGN RATIONALE
ACTIS TOTAL HIP SYSTEM Approach Active Patients with Confidence DESIGN RATIONALE APPROACH ACTIVE PATIENTS WITH CONFIDENCE The ACTIS Total Hip System is the first DePuy Synthes Companies of Johnson & Johnson
More informationBalgrist Shoulder Course 2017
My approach to failed hemiprosthesis Ernst Wiedemann OCM Clinic Munich Consultant to Arthrex Royalties from Arthrex Consultant to Zimmer Disclosures Pathways Hemi-prosthesis Anatomical prosthesis (HSA
More informationThe Leader in Orthopaedic Innovation
The Leader in Orthopaedic Innovation Wright is a leading international manufacturer and distributor of superior, easy to use, and innovative orthopaedic implants and instrumentation. For over 50 years,
More informationAddressing Glenoid Erosion in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
S46 Addressing Glenoid Erosion in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Richard B. Jones, M.D. Abstract Glenoid wear is common in the setting of shoulder arthritis. Severe glenoid erosion presents a serious
More informationOptimum implant geometry
Design Rationale Optimum implant geometry Extending the proven Tri-Lock heritage The original Tri-Lock was introduced in 1981. This implant was the first proximally coated tapered-wedge hip stem available
More informationReaching new heights. Comprehensive. Efficient. Simple.
Reaching new heights Comprehensive. Efficient. Simple. Various acetabular cup choices Compatible with the different head and liner options including VERILAST Technology Reach for proven OR efficient Instrumentation
More informationProximal Humeral Fractures RSA v HHR. Proximal Humeral Fractures RSA v HHR. Introduction
Proximal Humeral Fractures RSA v HHR Xavier A. Duralde, MD Peachtree Orthopaedic Clinic Atlanta, GA Proximal Humeral Fractures RSA v HHR Consultant: Smith+Nephew Board of Directors: CORR Introduction Incidence
More informationS H O U L D E R Solutions by Tornier. BIO-RSA TM ANGled SURGICAL TECHNIQUE. BIO-RSA Angled. surgical technique
S H O U L D E R Solutions by Tornier BIO-RSA TM ANGled SURGICAL TECHNIQUE BIO-RSA Angled Bony increased offset - reversed shoulder arthroplasty surgical technique BIO-RSA TM ANGled SURGICAL TECHNIQUE BIO-RSA
More informationConvertibilité. Ph. Valenti. Paris Shoulder Unit Clinique Bizet (Paris, France)
Convertibilité Ph. Valenti Paris Shoulder Unit Clinique Bizet (Paris, France) Disclosures Arthroplasty Consultant : FH orthopaedics receive royalties Arthroscopy Consultant : Zimmer Biomet Arthrex In Last
More informationEffect of a Radial Neck Defect on Textured Ingrowth Stems for Radial Head Replacement
Effect of a Radial Neck Defect on Textured Ingrowth Stems for Radial Head Replacement Dave R. Shukla, MB, BCh, James S. Fitzsimmons, B.Sc., Kai N. An, Shawn W. O'Driscoll, PhD, MD. Mayo Clinic, Rochester,
More informationUse of a partial humeral head resurfacing system for management of an osseous mechanic... Page 1 of 12 Int J Shoulder Surg. 2011 Jan-Mar; 5(1): 17 20. doi: 10.4103/0973-6042.80465. PMCID: PMC3109768 Copyright
More informationAnatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Optimizing Outcomes and Avoiding Complications
Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Optimizing Outcomes and Avoiding Complications Dr. Ryan T. Bicknell, MD, MSc, FRCSC Associate Professor Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Departments of Surgery, Mechanical
More informationShoulder & Elbow Service, University of Washington Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine
Reverse Total Shoulder or Delta Shoulder for Shoulder Arthritis Combined with Massive Rotator Cuff Tear and for Failed Conventional Total Shoulder Replacement Follow: shoulderarthritis.blogspot.com For
More informationComprehensive Reverse Shoulder System
Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder System Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder System Simple. Versatile. The Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder System is the next generation reverse shoulder prosthesis, offering unmatched
More informationSpecializing in Mechanical Testing for Medical Devices. Office:
Specializing in Mechanical Testing for Medical Devices Office: 260.489.1444 Email: sales@jtlamerica.com www.jtlamerica.com Spine Spinal implant test standards can t keep up with the rapid pace of device
More informationPINNACLE REVISION CUP SYSTEM
PINNACLE REVISION CUP SYSTEM This publication is not intended for distribution in the USA. DESIGN RATIONALE FLEXIBILITY. PRECISION. CONFIDENCE. DePuy Synthes Joint Reconstruction is proud to offer the
More informationAugmented Glenoid Component for Bone Deficiency in Shoulder Arthroplasty
Clin Orthop Relat Res (2008) 466:579 583 DOI 10.1007/s11999-007-0104-4 SYMPOSIUM: NEW APPROACHES TO SHOULDER SURGERY Augmented Glenoid Component for Bone Deficiency in Shoulder Arthroplasty Robert S. Rice
More informationRECLAIM REVISION HIP SYSTEM
RECLAIM REVISION HIP SYSTEM Where Strength and Modularity Connect DESIGN RATIONALE System Overview RECLAIM Modular Revision Hip System WHERE STRENGTH & MODULARITY CONNECT 2 Offset Options Proximal Body
More informationR3think your options. For US distribution only.
R3think your options For US distribution only. R3think acetabular surgery It is widely accepted that total hip replacement surgery is one of the most successful procedures done today. Typically more thought
More informationRevision of reversed total shoulder arthroplasty. Indications and outcome
Farshad et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2012, 13:160 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Revision of reversed total shoulder arthroplasty. Indications and outcome Mazda Farshad *, Marion Grögli, Sabrina
More informationDoes Humeral Component Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Affect Rotator Cuff Torque? Evaluation in a Cadaver Model
Clin Orthop Relat Res (2017) 475:2564 2571 DOI 10.1007/s11999-017-5413-7 Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research A Publication of The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons CLINICAL RESEARCH Does Humeral
More informationAnalysis of a retrieved Delta III total shoulder prosthesis
Analysis of a retrieved Delta III total shoulder prosthesis R. W. Nyffeler, C. M. L. Werner, B. R. Simmen, C. Gerber From the University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland A reversed Delta III total shoulder
More informationEXACTECH SHOULDER. Design Rationale. Humeral Reconstruction Prosthesis. Surgeon focused. Patient driven. TM
EXACTECH SHOULDER Design Rationale Humeral Reconstruction Prosthesis Surgeon focused. Patient driven. TM Humeral Reconstruction Prosthesis TABLE OF CONTENTS DESIGN TEAM...1 INTRODUCTION...2 DESIGN HISTORY
More informationIntroduction: There is disagreement regarding whether, when possible, the rotator cuff should be
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ABSTRACT: Introduction: There is disagreement regarding whether, when possible, the rotator cuff should be repaired in conjunction with reverse
More informationGlenoid Baseplate Micromotion in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2016 Glenoid Baseplate Micromotion in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Jennifer Kristin Anderson Clemson University, jka2@clemson.edu Follow this and
More informationCigna Medical Coverage Policies Musculoskeletal Shoulder Arthroplasty (Total, Hemi, Reverse)/Arthrodesis
Cigna Medical Coverage Policies Musculoskeletal Shoulder Arthroplasty (Total, Hemi, Reverse)/Arthrodesis Effective January 1, 2016 Instructions for use The following coverage policy applies to health benefit
More informationHUMELOCK. REVERSED Cemented SURGICAL TECHNIQUE SUPERIOR GLENOID WEAR PRIMARY, REVISION & TRAUMA
HUMELOCK TM REVERSED Cemented SUPERIOR GLENOID WEAR PRIMARY, REVISION & TRAUMA SURGICAL TECHNIQUE CONTENTS - Device descriptionpage 0 - Intended use / Indicationspage 05 - Warnings and precautions page
More informationReversed Revised : What to do when it goes wrong?
Acta Orthop. Belg., 2014, 80, 314-321 ORIGINAL STUDY Reversed Revised : What to do when it goes wrong? Bart Middernacht, Alexander Van Tongel, Lieven De Wilde From Department of Orthopaedics, University
More informationBiomechanical Performance of Headless Compression Screws: Fixos Ø4.0, 5.0 & 7.0 mm compared to Synthes Ø4.5 & 6.5 mm HCS
Biomechanical Performance of Headless Compression Screws: ixos Ø4.0, 5.0 & 7.0 mm compared to Synthes Ø4.5 & 6.5 mm HCS M. Vallotton, A. Torcasio PhD Stryker Trauma AG, Selzach, Switzerland Abstract Introduction:
More informationReverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Protocol Shawn Hennigan, MD
General Information: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Protocol Shawn Hennigan, MD Reverse or Inverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (rtsa) is designed specifically for the treatment of glenohumeral (GH)
More informationHUMERISTM. Cementless ANATOMICAL and REVERSIBLE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
HUMERISTM Cementless ANATOMICAL and REVERSIBLE Hemi or Total Reversible SURGICAL TECHNIQUE CONTENTS - Device descriptionpage 0 - Intended use / indicationspage 04 - Warnings and precautions page 04 - Anatomical
More information