|
|
- Anthony Knight
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Biologically Guided Radiation Therapy (BGRT) Relative Biologically Effectiveness (RBE) and Oxygen Effects in Particle Therapy Rob Stewart, Ph.D. Associate Professor and Assistant Head, School of Health Sciences Director, Radiological Health Science Program School of Health Sciences Purdue University University of Washington Department of Radiation Oncology Friday April 23, 2010 School of Health Sciences
2 Slide 2/71 Physics Chemistry Biology Clinic Radiation Chemical 10-3 s 1 Gy ~ 1 in 10 Correct Repair 6 Repair Ionization Excitation 10-6 s 10 2 s 10 4 s Enzymatic Repair (BER, NER, NHEJ, ) to s DNA damage Angiogenesis and Early Effects Incorrect or 10 6 s Vasculogenesis 10 3 s (erythema, ) 10 5 s Incomplete Repair Loss of Function Inflamatory and Remodeling Responses Cell Death Late Effects (fibrosis, ) 10 8 s 10 4 s 10 5 s Cancer 10 8 s Clonal Expansion 10 7 s Slf Self renewal and Differentiation Heritable Effects Neoplastic Transformation 10 5 s Germline Somatic cells Small- and large-scale mutations (point mutations and chromosomal aberrations)
3 Slide 3/71 RBE Effects in the SOBP Delivered dose in the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) due to a mixture of low, intermediate and high energy protons Source: ICRU 78 (2007)
4 Slide 4/71 Effect of Radiation Quality (1 st level) 500 ev electron Simple DSB Opposed strand breaks within about 10 bp Complex DSB composed 2 strand breaks with collateral base damage in same or opposed strands Segment of a 4 MeV α particle ( 4 He He ) Complex SSB one or more strand breaks (same side) with collateral abasic sites and base damage in the opposed strand
5 Slide 5/71 Relative SSB and DSB induction electron 3.0 alpha lative SSB Yield Re alpha Rela ative DSB Yield electron Increasing LET Increasing LET Kinetic Energy (MeV) Kinetic Energy (MeV) Ratio of SSB per DSB decreases with increasing LET V.A. Semenenko and R.D. Stewart. Fast Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage formed by electrons and light ions. Phys. Med. Biol. 51(7), (2006)
6 Slide 6/71 DSB complexity N umber of Lesions per Cluster Double-strand breaks electron 1 Increasing LET proton alpha Particle Energy (MeV) V.A. Semenenko and R.D. Stewart. Fast Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage formed by electrons and light ions. Phys. Med. Biol. 51(7), (2006)
7 Slide 7/71 SSB and DSB yield ) SSB Yield (Gy -1 Gbp electron 200 total > 2 lesions > 4 lesions proton > 4 lesions > 2 lesions total 0 30 > 6 lesions DSB Yield (G Gy -1 Gbp -1 ) Total (2 or more) > 4 lesions > 6 lesions Total (2 or more) > 4 lesions Electron Energy (MeV) Proton Energy (MeV) V.A. Semenenko and R.D. Stewart. Fast Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage formed by electrons and light ions. Phys. Med. Biol. 51(7), (2006)
8 Slide 8/71 DNA and Chromatin Induction of individual and clustered DNA lesions by ionizing radiation related stochastic ti events and processes on Spatial scale < 10 nm (100 to 1000 nucleotides) Time scales < 10-3 s nm 30 nm 11 nm Nucleosome ( bp)
9 Slide 9/71 Radiation Quality and Fragment Size Distributions (2 nd level) ~ 1000 bp (fiber) ~ 85 bp (nucleosome) ~ 85 bp (nucleosome) ~ 1000 bp (fiber) Holley WR, Chatterjee A. Clusters of DNA induced by ionizing radiation: formation of short DNA fragments. I. Theoretical modeling. Radiat Res. 145(2): (1996). Rydberg B. Clusters of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation: formation of short DNA fragments. II. Experimental detection. Radiat Res. 145(2):200-9 (1996).
10 Slide 10/71 RMDS and DSB Proximity Significance? DSB in close spatial proximity are more likely to interact (less likely to be correctly repaired) ) than DSB separated by large distances High-LET radiation is more effective at producing spatially and temporally correlated DSB than low LET radiation On average, DSB formed by high-let radiation are more likely to cause harm than DSB from low-let radiation
11 Slide 11/71 Damage Distribution Among Cells (3 rd level) ency (DS SB -1 ) Frequ Gy absorbed dose 0.05 Low LET (1 kev/μm) DSB cell tracks DSB track z F = 2.04 mgy Number of DSB
12 Slide 12/71 DSB distribution (1 Gy, 2 MeV α particle) B -1 ) Freque ency (DS Not hit 1 Gy absorbed dose High LET (162.5 kev/μm) 1 hit 2 hit 3 hit DSB cell tracks 4 hit 46.3 DSB track Number of DSB z F = mgy Nucleus 5 μm in diameter
13 Slide 13/71 Effects of Radiation Quality on α and α/β z α θ 1 F Σ =Σ + θ / κ θ / κ α / β = 2 zf + Σ z F LET d Σ = number of DSB Gy - 1 cell - 1 (estimated using Monte Carlo simulations) θ and κ are dimensionless, cell-specific biological constants that are independent or a weak function of LET up to about kev/μm frequency-mean specific energy (Gy)
14 Slide 14/71 Proton RBE (experimental) In vitro In vivo 1.75 In vitro: (0.8, 1.5) roton RBE P 1.50 In vivo: (0.8, 1.3) ICRU 78 (2007) recommends an RBE = Fraction Size (Gy) P tti H Ni i k A A ki i M G k LE G it i M Paganetti H, Niemierko A, Ancukiewicz M, Gerweck LE, Goitein M, Loeffler JS, Suit HD. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 53(2), (2002)
15 Slide 15/71 RBE for Clonogenic Survival 10 0 ng Fraction Survivi Low LET 10-1 Higher LET (e -, γ-rays, y, )) protons 10-2 RBE Dγ 7.6 Gy 1.7 D 4.4 Gy = p Absorbed Dose (Gy)
16 Slide 16/71 Equivalent Dose of the Reference Radiation Outcome reference radiation = Outcome mixture of protons n = n = i= 1 SD ( ) SD ( ) SD ( ) SD ( ) SD ( ) SD ( ) γ 2 2 exp α D β G D = exp α D β GD γ γ γ γ γ i i i i i i Take logarithm, apply quadratic formula and rearrange terms i D γ ( α / β) γ 4Gγ GD i i = αidi 1+ 2 G γ α γ ( α / β ) γ i ( α / β ) i Formula has explicit corrections for total dose, fraction size, and dose rate effects Effect of radiation quality implicit in the biological parameters. α i /α γ, (α/β) i, (α/β) γ
17 Slide 17/71 RBE for a Mixture of Protons Define n D 1 f i αi / α γ, D, Gγ p i γ, n i= 1 γ and G i 1 n p RBE D γ nγ( α / β) γ 4 D i = fidi 1+ Dp 2 Dp nγ( α / β) γ i np( α / β) i physical parameters: n γ, n p, D p, D i biological parameters: f i, (α/β) γ, (α/β) i Similar RBE formula derived by Wilkens and Oelfke (2004) and references therein. Wilkens JJ, Oelfke U, A phenomenological model for the relative biological effectiveness in therapeutic proton beams. Phys Med Biol. 49(13), (2004).
18 Slide 18/71 Possible proton RBE range (α/β) γ = 1.5 Gy In vitro In vivo RBE 1.5 Proton RBE Fraction Size (Gy) 0.35 Gy -1 > α p > α γ 100 Gy > (α/β) α γ = 0.1 Gy -1 p > (α/β) γ Sampled using MC methods Fraction Size (Gy) Paganetti H, Niemierko i A, Ancukiewicz i M, Gerweck LE, Goitein i M, Loeffler JS, Suit HD. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 53(2), (2002)
19 Slide 19/71 Potential explanation for RBE < Su urviving Fract tion 10-1 proton RBE 1.5 photon Fraction Size (Gy) α γ = 0.1 Gy -1 (α/β) γ = 1.5 Gy Fraction Size (Gy) α p = 0.25 Gy -1 (α/β) p = 100 Gy
20 Slide 20/71 Is proton RBE constant? Any RBE in range from 0.8 to 1.5 consistent with available experimental data RBE = 1.1 unlikely to be useful (accurate) for Comparing the efficacy of photon vs proton treatments Guiding the selection of appropriate prescription dose and tolerance doses for normal tissues Constant RBE inconsistent with widely accepted biophysical mechanisms underpinning clonogenic survival, tumor control,
21 Slide 21/71 -lns vs Aberrations (= processed DSB) One to one correlation between lethal exchanges (dicentrics and centric rings) ) implies this form of damage is a major reason cells are killed by radiation Source: Cornforth and Bedford, Rad. Res., 111, p (1987). AC 1522 normal human fibroblasts irradiated by x-rays
22 Slide 22/71 Breakage and Reunion Theory DSB Chromosome Incorrect Rejoining Chromosome (= DNA molecule) R.K. Sachs and D.J. Brenner, Chromosome Aberrations Produced by Ionizing Radiation: Quantitative Studies ShowTOC&rid=mono_002
23 Slide 23/71 RBE for DSB induction DSB induction is closely linked to (but not identical to) ) a major cell killing mechanism for ionizing radiation RBE for DSB induction: dose of a reference radiation needed to produce the same # of DSB as another radiation ( isoeffect calculation ) RBE {dose of photons} D Σ = γ = {dose of proton} D Σ p p γ Σ = number of DSB Gy - 1 cell -1
24 Slide 24/71 Monte Carlo Damage Simulation (MCDS) MCDS successfully reproduces induction of DNA damage predicted by track structure simulations Electrons (> 80 ev), protons (> 105 kev), α (> 2 MeV) up to about 1 GeV (Semenenko and Stewart 2006) Photons from about 80 ev up to 1 GeV (Hsaio and Stewart 2008) Reasonable agreement with measured data Number of SSB and DSB per Gy per cell Computationally efficient and freely available Damage configurations for 100,000 cells exposed to 1 Gy can be simulated on 2.8 Ghz Pentium in about 1.5 minutes Y Hsiao, R.D. Stewart, Monte Carlo Simulation of DNA Damage Induction by X-rays and Selected Radioisotopes. Phys. Med. Biol. 53, (2008). V.A. Semenenko and R.D. Stewart. Fast Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage formed by electrons and light ions. Phys. Med. Biol. 51(7), (2006)
25 Slide 25/71 DSB yields Track Structure and MCDS DSB Yiel ld (Gy -1 cell -1 ) Open symbols Nikjoo et al. (1994, 1997, 1999, 2001, 2002) Filled symbols Friedland et al. (2003, 2005) Solid Line Semenenko and Stewart (2004, 2006) Diamonds electrons Squares protons Triangles α particles Low LET (high h KE) High LET (low KE) Z eff 2 /β 2 Figure adapted from V.A. Semenenko and R.D. Stewart. Fast Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage formed by electrons and light ions. Phys. Med. Biol. 51(7), (2006)
26 Slide 26/71 Fragmentation Analysis vs Theory (per track) -1 DSB trac ck -1 Gbp Tsao et al. (2007) Lobrich et al. (1996) Newman et al. (1997, 2000) 10 1 Hoglund et al. (2000) Belli et al. (2002) Rdb Rydberg et al. (2002) Radulescu et al. (2004) Meijer et al. (2005) 10 0 Esposito et al. (2005) Dini et al. (2005) 10-1 protons Lines denote damage yields for electrons (black black), protons (blue blue), and α particles (red)) predicted by MCDS LET (kev/μm)
27 Slide 27/71 Proton RBE for DSB induction μm (0.5 MeV) 3.0 Monte Carlo simulation (Semenenko k and Stewart 2006) LET (kev/μm m) μm (2 MeV) 1.2 mm (10 MeV) RBE for DSB indu uction ICRU 78 (2007) 0.5 MeV electron Kinetic Energy (MeV) Kinetic Energy (MeV) RBE for DSB induction computed using the MCDS
28 Slide 28/71 Model for α and α/β (conceptual basis) DSB Chromosome z α θ 1 F Σ =Σ + θ / κ θ / κ α / β = 2 zf + Σ z F LET d Incorrect Rejoining Σ = number of DSB Gy - 1 cell - 1 (estimated using Monte Carlo simulations) θ and κ are dimensionless, cell-specific biological constants that are independent or a weak function of LET up to about kev/μm
29 Slide 29/71 Radiosensitivity Parameters for Protons z F Σ α R, (α/β) R Other Radiation (same θ and θ/κ) Analyze clinical or laboratory z data for a reference radiation 1 F Σ α =Σ θ + θ / κ ( 60 Co γ-rays, 6 MV x-rays, ) θ / κ α / β = 2 zf + Σ LET d R, ( β) R LET z Σ F 2 d α R 2z F θ = 1 θ κ = Σ Σ [( α β) R 2zF] 2 Other Radiation ( αβ) R (e -, p, α, γ) ) Reference Radiation
30 Slide 30/71 Human Kidney T1 cells (in vitro) zfσ κ α =Σ θ 1 + β = Σ 0.25 θ / κ ) α (Gy ) β (Gy LET (kev/μm) LET (kev/μm) Radiosensitivity parameters for human kidney cells irradiated in vitro by x-rays, 2 H 1+ and 4 He 2+ ions. Filled symbols: estimates of α and β reported by Carlson et al. (2008) for x-rays (filled green triangles), 2 H + (filled red circles) and 4 He 2+ (filled blue squares). Error bars denote the 95% CI. Solid lines: predicted LQ parameter for protons with kinetic energies between 0.1 MeV to 1 GeV (θ = and θ/κ = 249.5). Estimate of θ and θ/κ computed from LQ parameters for x-rays with Σ = 50 DSB Gy -1 cell -1, α = Gy -1, α/β = 10 Gy. Carlson DJ, Stewart RD, Semenenko VA, Sandison GA, Combined use of Monte Carlo DNA damage simulations and deterministic repair models to examine putative mechanisms of cell killing. Rad. Res. 169, (2008)
31 Slide 31/71 Maximum (low dose) ) RBE When D << α/β, S(D) exp(-αd) and RBE reduces to nγ( α / β) γ 4 Di = fidi 1 2 D nγ( α / β) + γ i n ( α / β) RBE p p i 1 D = fidi where P i f i zf( LETi) Σi Σ i 1 α + θ / κ Σ z ( LET) Σ Σ = 1 α z + / 1 γ γ θ κ Σ Σ Σ Σ γ + θ / κ i i F i i i γ γ γ Σ i (protons) and Σ γ (reference radiation) determined using the MCDS (Semenenko k and Stewart t 2006, Hsaio and Stewart t 2008) Y Hsiao and R.D. Stewart, Monte Carlo Simulation of DNA Damage Induction by X-rays and Selected Radioisotopes. Phys. Med. Biol. 53, (2008). V.A. Semenenko and R.D. Stewart. Fast Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage formed by electrons and light ions. Phys. Med. Biol. 51(7), (2006)
32 Slide 32/71 Maximum Proton RBE Max ximum RBE α/β =1.5 Gy α/β =3.1 Gy α/β =5 Gy α/β =10 Gy RBE for DSB induction Maximum RBE increases as α/β decreases RBE for cell survival is always greater than or equal to RBE for DSB induction to 3.00 (1 MeV) 1.13 to 1.18 (10 MeV) 1.05 to 1.10 (25 MeV) 2 1 ICRU 78 (2007) < 1.01 (> 100 MeV) Kinetic Energy (MeV) For comparison, ICRU 78 recommends an RBE = 1.1
33 Slide 33/71 Effective RBE in the SOBP Proton Dose Distribution EUD p Equivalent Photon Dose Distribution Niemierko, Med. Phys. 24(1), (1997) EUD γ RBE EUD γ EUD p MeV MeV protons incident on water phantom Pencil beam CSDA algorithm (NIST stopping power) Absorbed D ose (Gy) Entrance (5 mm skin ) Proximal (1 cm) Distal (1 cm) ) Depth into Water (cm)
34 Slide 34/71 RBE in the SOBP (4 cm target, 2 Gy fraction) Absor rbed Dose (Gy) Entrance (5 mm skin ) Proximal (1 cm) Distal (1 cm) Depth into Water (cm) α = Gy -1, α/β = 10 Gy Region EUD p EUD γ RBE Skin Proximal Middle Distal Target Avg α = Gy -1, α/β = 1.49 Gy Region EUD p EUD γ RBE Skin Proximal Middle Distal Target Avg RBE increases as photon α/β decreases
35 Slide 35/71 Effect of Target and Fraction Size 1.5 Photon: α = Gy -1, α/β = 1.49 Gy ctive RBE Effe Gy 2 Gy 0.01 Gy RBE increases as target size decreases RBE decreases as fraction size increases 1.1 ICRU 78 (2007) Width of SOBP (cm)
36 Slide 36/71 Summary and Conclusions Entrance RBE (e.g., skin) close to 1.0 RBE in distal edge of SOBP higher than proximal edge ( ) 1.8) Potential for biological hot and cold spots Average RBE in target (1.1 1 to 1.5) Increases as α/β decreases (tissue and tumor specific) Increases as target size decreases Increases as fraction size decreases For large fractions, RBE < 1 Range comparable to experimental observations (0.8 (08to 1.5) 15)
37 Monte Carlo Simulation of the Effects of Oxygen on Clustered DNA Lesions Formed by Ionizing Radiation Rob Stewart, Ph.D. Associate Professor and Assistant Head of Health Sciences Director, Radiological Health Science Program School of Health Sciences Purdue University Presented at 2008 RRS Annual Meeting (Sept 21-25, 2008) Boston, MA Stochastic Track Models Monday September 22, :30 to 4:30 pm School of Health Sciences
38 Slide 38/71 Effects of oxygen on DNA damage induction Long known that oxygen is a powerful modulator of DNA damage induction and closely related endpoints, such as clonogenic death and mutation Cells irradiated under reduced oxygen sustain less damage and are much more likely to survive (factor ~ 2-4) Models to predict the effects of oxygen on cluster induction could be used to help test hypotheses such as Reduced oxygen levels at the time of irradiation decreases cluster complexity (number of DNA lesions per cluster) and reduces the overall cluster yield per cell and per unit dose. The rate and fidelity (efficiency) of cluster repair increases as cluster complexity y( ff y) p p y decreases. Enhanced repair of clusters increases cell survival.
39 Slide 39/71 Chemical Basis of the Oxygen Effect Competition between oxygen fixation and chemical repair is the prevailing hypothesis (von Sonntag 2006) (1) DNA + ionizing radiation DNA lesion (biochemical repair required) (2) DNA + ionizing radiation DNA (various) (3) DNA + O 2 DNA-O 2 ( oxygen fixation biochemical repair required) (4) DNA + RSH DNA ( chemical repair restoration of the DNA * ) (5) DNA DNA lesion (biochemical repair required) * Von Sonntag notes that donation of a proton to a DNA radical may or may not restore the original chemical structure of the DNA. But, the chemical repair process evidently converts the DNA radical (or cluster of radicals?) ) into a form that is more amenable to biochemical repair Clemens von Sonntag, Free-Radical-Induced DNA Damage and its Repair A chemical perspective. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY (2006)
40 Slide 40/71 MCDS Modification Step 1 Use the original MCDS to simulate the location of DNA radicals At this stage of the simulation All lesions formed in the original MCDS treated as a radical that may undergo fixation or chemical repair No distinction made between radicals formed through direct and indirect mechanisms Preserves the ability of the MCDS to simulate lesion (radical) clustering y ( ) g effects without introducing any additional parameters into the modeling process.
41 Slide 41/71 MCDS Modification Step 2 (conceptual basis) Oxygen is uniformly distributed near the DNA and able to interact with all DNA radicals with equal probability O 2 O 2 O 2 O 2 O 2 O 2 O 2 O 2 O 2 If oxygen fixation occurs (DNA + O 2 DNA-O 2 ), radical converted to a strand break or damaged base as in the original MCDS cluster yields for normoxic conditions same as original MCDS. Fixation implicitly includes other processes that convert DNA radicals to a form requiring biochemical repair. DNA DNA lesion (biochemical repair) If chemical repair occurs (DNA + RSH DNA), DNA is restored to its original (undamaged) state lesion not created
42 Slide 42/71 Chemical repair or fixation? Define f as the fraction of the DNA radicals that undergo chemical repair Fraction (1-f f ) of the DNA radicals are fixed by oxygen O 2 O 2 O 2 O 2 O 2 O 2 O 2 O 2 O 2 f ([ O ]) = 2 1 [ O ] [ 2 O ] K + M K [O 2 ] = oxygen concentration at time of irradiation Formula is derived from (related to) ) oxygen-effect effect formula of Alper and Howard-Flanders (1956) Introduces two adjustable parameters (M and K) ) into the modeling process. Alper T, Howard-Flanders P. Role of oxygen in modifying the radiosensitivity of E. coli B, Nature (London) 178, (1956).
43 Slide 43/71 Effect of O 2 on fixation and chemical repair 1.0 Pro obability 0.8 [ f max = 1 1/M 1-f (fixation) chemical repair normoxic K = M = f at 1/M f O ] ( ) = 2 1 [ O ] [ 2 O ] 2 + K + M K M determines maximum fraction of radicals fixed at 0% O 2 K = oxygen concentration at which f equals 1/M K Oxygen Concentration (%)
44 Slide 44/71 OER for Damage Induction (low LET) Georgakalis ( unpublished) Frankenberg-Schwager et al. (1991) Nygren and Ahnstrom (1996) Hirayama et al. (2005) Whitaker McMillan (1992) Prise et al. (1992) Botchway et al. (1997) V79 cells CHO cells Human kidney T-1 cells OER MCDS (1 MeV e - ) OER Oxygen Concentration (%) 1.0 DSB CllS Cell Survival Oxygen Concentration (%) Trends and estimates of OER for DSB induction and cell survival comparable to values predicted by MCDS (K = , M = ). Carlson DJ, Stewart RD, Semenenko VA, Effects of oxygen on intrinsic radiation sensitivity: A test of the relationship between aerobic and hypoxic linear-quadratic (LQ) model parameters. Med Phys. 33(9), (2006).
45 Slide 45/71 Interplay between oxygen and LET (1) DNA + ionizing radiation DNA lesion (biochemical repair required) (2) DNA + ionizing radiation DNA (various) (3) DNA + O 2 DNA-O 2 ( oxygen fixation biochemical repair required) (4) DNA +RSH DNA ( chemical repair restoration of the DNA * ) (5) DNA DNA lesion (biochemical repair required) If ionization does not substantially alter the local cellular environment (e.g., oxygen-in-track hypothesis ), might expect reactions (3)-(5) ( ) to be same for low and high LET radiation. f [ O ] ( ) 2 1 = [ O2 ] [ O ] 2 + K Assume M and K are independent of radiation quality. + M K radiation quality.
46 Slide 46/71 OER OER with f independent of LET e - Cell survival (Carlson et al. 2006) Frankenberg-Schwager et al. (1991) Prise et al. (1989) Prise et al. (1990) Hirayama et al. (2005) LET (kev/μm) α Number of Lesions 2 MeV α (162.5 kev/μm) f = 39.6% DSB Yield (%) Anoxic Normoxic Model cannot easily explain the decrease in the OER as LET > increases Avg per DSB
47 Slide 47/71 Possible explanation for LET effect? (1) DNA + ionizing radiation DNA lesion (biochemical repair required) (2) DNA + ionizing radiation DNA (various) (3) DNA + O 2 DNA-O 2 ( oxygen fixation biochemical repair required) (4) DNA +RSH DNA ( chemical repair restoration of the DNA * ) (5) DNA DNA lesion (biochemical repair required) Ionization does not substantially alter the local cellular environment (reactions 3-5 same for low and high LET radiation), but reaction 1 is enhanced relative to reaction 2 f [ O ] ( ) 2 1 = [ O2 ] [ ] 2 + K O + M() l K K isindependent of radiation quality and M becomes function of radiation quality (convenient way to implement effect into model)
48 Slide 48/71 OER with f a function of radiation quality f ([ O2 ]) M() l = 1 where l [ O ] [ ] K O + M() l K ( M 11 ) 0 = M0 + 1 q/ l 2 Z eff β 2/3 ( β ) Z Z eff = 1 exp 125 Z β = ( 1 + T / mc 2 0 ) OER α Cell survival (Carlson et al. 2006) Frankenberg-Schwager g et al. (1991) 1.0 Prise et al. (1989) Prise et al. (1990) Hirayama et al. (2005) e - LET (kev/μm) M 0 = , q = , K =
49 Slide 49/71 Effect of Oxygen on Cluster Complexity Number of Lesions DSB Yield (%) Anoxic Normoxic > Avg per DSB OER MeV α (162.5 kev/μm) Number of Lesions DSB Yield (%) Anoxic Normoxic > Avg per DSB OER MeV e - (0.186 kev/μm)
50 Slide 50/71 OER for SSB and DSB induction MeV electron DSB 2.5 DSB OER OER 1.5 SSB 1.5 SSB Measured doer ssb ~ 2-4 4(l (low LET) Oxygen Concentration (%) LET (kev/μm) OER dsb (OER ssb ) 2 M(l) 2
51 Slide 51/71 Summary Predicted trends in the OER for DSB induction consistent with estimates derived from measured data for DSB induction and cell survival (OER ~ 2 to 3) Three new parameters introduced into the modeling process to account for oxygen concentration (M and K) and to correct for the effects of radiation quality (q) As LET increases, the probability chemical repair occurs per initial DNA radical may decrease (oxygen fixation increases and/or lesions are directly created) Predicted OER for SSB induction approximately equal to the square root of the OER for DSB induction (OER ~ 1.4 to 1.7) Most of the measured data suggest a higher OER for SSB induction Average cluster complexity increases as the oxygen concentration increases 1 MeV e - (2.5 lesions/dsb 0% O 2 and28lesions/dsb21%o) % 2 2 MeV α (6.8 lesions/dsb 0% O 2 and 8.0 lesions/dsb 21% O 2 )
Assistant Professor Department of Therapeutic Radiology Yale University School of Medicine
A Mechanism-Based Approach to Predict Relative Biological i Effectiveness and the Effects of Tumor Hypoxia in Charged Particle Radiotherapy David J. Carlson, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Therapeutic
More informationThe Promise and Pitfalls of Mechanistic Modeling in Radiation Oncology
The Promise and Pitfalls of Mechanistic Modeling in Radiation Oncology Robert D. Stewart, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Radiation Oncology University of Washington School of Medicine Department of Radiation
More informationPresented at the. Associate Professor, Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics. University of Washington Department of Radiation Oncology
Multiscale Modeling of Radiation Response Effects of Radiation Quality and Hypoxia Robert D. Stewart, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics University of Washington Medical
More informationPresented at 2014 AAPM Meeting, Austin, TX Session: TU-A-BRE-3 (last number indicates order within session)
Models and Mechanisms Connecting Physics and dbi Biology at Multiple l Scales in the Biological i l Hierarchy Robert D. Stewart, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Radiation Oncology University of Washington
More informationModelling the induction of cell death and chromosome damage by therapeutic protons
Modelling the induction of cell death and chromosome damage by therapeutic protons M.P. Carante 1,2 and F. Ballarini 1,2, * 1 University of Pavia, Physics Department, Pavia, Italy 2 INFN, Sezione di Pavia,
More informationLET, RBE and Damage to DNA
LET, RBE and Damage to DNA Linear Energy Transfer (LET) When is stopping power not equal to LET? Stopping power (-de/dx) gives the energy lost by a charged particle in a medium. LET gives the energy absorbed
More informationRapid MCNP Simulation of DNA Double Strand Break (DSB) Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) for Photons, Neutrons, and Light Ions
Rapid MCNP Simulation of DNA Double Strand Break (DSB) Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) for Photons, Neutrons, and Light Ions Robert D. Stewart 1,, Seth W. Streitmatter 2, David C. Argento 1, Charles
More informationThe biological effectiveness of low-energy photons
Onkologisches Zentrum Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie Medizinische Strahlenphysik The biological effectiveness of low-energy photons Elisabetta Gargioni University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
More informationPeak temperature ratio of TLD glow curves to investigate the spatial variation of LET in a clinical proton beam
Peak temperature ratio of TLD glow curves to investigate the spatial variation of LET in a clinical proton beam University of Chicago CDH Proton Center LET study C. Reft 1, H. Ramirez 2 and M. Pankuch
More informationTFY4315 STRÅLINGSBIOFYSIKK
Norges teknisk-naturvitenskaplige universitet Institutt for fysikk EKSAMENSOPPGÅVER med løysingsforslag Examination papers with solution proposals TFY4315 STRÅLINGSBIOFYSIKK Biophysics of Ionizing Radiation
More informationFigure 1.1 PHITS geometry for PTB irradiations with: broad beam, upper panel; mono energetic beams, lower panel. Pictures of the setups and of the
Figure 1.1 PHITS geometry for PTB irradiations with: broad beam, upper panel; mono energetic beams, lower panel. Pictures of the setups and of the PMMA ring holder with 7 containers are also shown. Relative
More informationA Mechanism-Based Approach to Predict the Relative Biological Effectiveness of Protons and Carbon Ions in Radiation Therapy
International Journal of Radiation Oncology biology physics www.redjournal.org Physics Contribution A Mechanism-Based Approach to Predict the Relative Biological Effectiveness of Protons and Carbon Ions
More informationBiological Optimization of Hadrontherapy. Uwe Oelfke
4/2/2012 page 1 Biological Optimization of Hadrontherapy Uwe Oelfke DKFZ Heidelberg (E040) Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 69120 Heidelberg, Germany u.oelfke@dkfz.de 4/2/2012 page 2 Contents Introduction and General
More informationA comparison of mechanism-inspired models for particle relative biological effectiveness (RBE)
A comparison of mechanism-inspired models for particle relative biological effectiveness (RBE) Robert D. Stewart a) Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE
More informationWhat is radiation quality?
What is radiation quality? Dudley T Goodhead Medical Research Council, UK DoReMi Radiation Quality workshop Brussels. 9-10 July 2013 What is radiation quality? Let s start at the very beginning. A very
More informationEffects of Radiation Quality and Oxygen on Clustered DNA Lesions and Cell Death
RADIATION RESEARCH 176, 587 602 (2011) 0033-7587/11 $15.00 Ó2011 by Radiation Research Society. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. DOI: 10.1667/RR2663.1 Effects of Radiation Quality and Oxygen
More informationCOMPARISON OF RADIOBIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF CARBON IONS TO PROTONS ON A RESISTANT HUMAN MELANOMA CELL LINE
COMPARISON OF RADIOBIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF CARBON IONS TO PROTONS ON A RESISTANT HUMAN MELANOMA CELL LINE I. Petrovi a, A. Risti -Fira a, L. Kori anac a, J. Požega a, F. Di Rosa b, P. Cirrone b and G. Cuttone
More informationRadiation qualities in carbon-ion radiotherapy at NIRS/HIMAC
Radiation qualities in carbon-ion radiotherapy at NIRS/ Shunsuke YONAI Radiological Protection Section Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS) E-mail:
More informationNeutrons. ρ σ. where. Neutrons act like photons in the sense that they are attenuated as. Unlike photons, neutrons interact via the strong interaction
Neutrons Neutrons act like photons in the sense that they are attenuated as I = I 0 e μx where Unlike photons, neutrons interact via the strong interaction μ = The cross sections are much smaller than
More informationCHAPTER TWO MECHANISMS OF RADIATION EFFECTS
10-2 densely ionizing radiation CHAPTER TWO MECHANISMS OF RADIATION EFFECTS 2.0 INTRODUCTION Cell survival curves describe the relationship between the fractional survival, S, of a population of radiated
More informationComputer modeling of radiation effects
Computer modeling of radiation effects 20th International CODATA Conference 25 October 2006, Beijing Noriyuki B. Ouchi and Kimiaki Saito Radiation Effects Analysis Research Group, Nuclear Science and Engineering
More informationNature of Radiation and DNA damage
Nature of Radiation and DNA damage Index 1. What is radiation? 2. Ionizing Radiation 3. Interaction of Gamma-radiation with Matter 4. Radiobiology 5. Direct and Indirect action of radiation 6. Steps of
More informationChapter 7. What is Radiation Biology? Ionizing Radiation. Energy Transfer Determinants 09/21/2014
Chapter 7 Molecular & Cellular Radiation Biology What is Radiation Biology? A branch of biology concerned with how ionizing radiation effects living systems. Biological damage that occurs from different
More informationBiological Effects of Radiation
Radiation and Radioisotope Applications EPFL Doctoral Course PY-031 Biological Effects of Radiation Lecture 09 Rafael Macian 23.11.06 EPFL Doctoral Course PY-031: Radioisotope and Radiation Applications
More informationModelling of Biological Processes
Modelling of Biological Processes WHAT HAPPENS AFTER EARLY MOLECULAR DAMAGE? Stephen McMahon Queen s University, Belfast, Northern Ireland 3 rd August 2016 1 Do we need biology? The Linear-quadratic relationship
More information8/3/2016. Clinical Significance of RBE Variations in Proton Therapy. Why RBE (relative biological effectiveness)?
8//06 Clinical Significance of Variations in Proton Therapy H. Paganetti PhD Professor, Harvard Medical School Director of Physics Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Radiation Oncology Introduction
More informationInduction of DNA Damage by Light Ions Relative to 60 Co c-rays
Induction of DNA Damage by Light Ions Relative to 60 Co c-rays Robert D. Stewart Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA Abstract The specific types
More informationClinical considerations of RBE in proton therapy
Clinical considerations of RBE in proton therapy H. Paganetti PhD Professor, Harvard Medical School Director of Physics Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Radiation Oncology Why do we need the RBE
More informationA general mechanistic model enables predictions of the biological effectiveness of different qualities of radiation
A general mechanistic model enables predictions of the biological effectiveness of different qualities of radiation McMahon, S. J., McNamara, A. L., Schuemann, J., Paganetti, H., & Prise, K. M. (2017).
More informationRadiobiological Models in Brachytherapy Planning and Evaluation
Therapy Educational Course (TH-C-108, 10:30-11:25 am): Radiobiological Models in Brachytherapy Planning and Evaluation Zhe (Jay) Chen, PhD & David J. Carlson, PhD Department of Therapeutic Radiology S
More informationProton and helium beams: the present and the future of light ion beam therapy
Proton and helium beams: the present and the future of light ion beam therapy Dr. Andrea Mairani Group Leader Biophysics in Particle Therapy Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center HIT Department of Radiation
More informationRadiation Oncology. Initial Certification Qualifying (Computer-based) Examination: Study Guide for Radiation and Cancer Biology
Radiation Oncology Initial Certification Qualifying (Computer-based) Examination: Study Guide for Radiation and Cancer Biology This exam tests your knowledge of the principles of cancer and radiation biology
More informationProton and heavy ion radiotherapy: Effect of LET
Proton and heavy ion radiotherapy: Effect of LET As a low LET particle traverses a DNA molecule, ionizations are far apart and double strand breaks are rare With high LET particles, ionizations are closer
More informationAre Track Structure Simulations Truly Needed for Radiobiology at the Cellular and Tissue Levels
Are Track Structure Simulations Truly Needed for Radiobiology at the ellular and Tissue Levels Robert D. Stewart, h.d. Associate rofessor of Radiation Oncology University of Washington School of Medicine
More informationInternational Open Laboratory at NIRS (Second Term)
Ryuichi Okayasu, Ph.D. Scientific Secretary E-mail: rokayasu@nirs.go.jp The second term NIRS International Open Laboratory (IOL) was started in April 2011 with four new units and its term was completed
More informationReview of the Radiobiological Principles of Radiation Protection
1 Review of the Radiobiological Principles of Radiation Protection Cari Borrás, D.Sc., FACR, FAAPM Radiological Physics and Health Services Consultant Adjunct Assistant Professor (Radiology) GWU School
More informationUNC-Duke Biology Course for Residents Fall
UNC-Duke Biology Course for Residents Fall 2018 1 UNC-Duke Biology Course for Residents Fall 2018 2 UNC-Duke Biology Course for Residents Fall 2018 3 UNC-Duke Biology Course for Residents Fall 2018 4 UNC-Duke
More informationIsoeffective Dose Specification of Normal Liver in Yttrium-90 Microsphere Radioembolization*
Isoeffective Dose Specification of Normal Liver in Yttrium-90 Microsphere Radioembolization* Barry W. Wessels, Ph.D 1 ; Amilia G. Di Dia, PhD 2 ;Yiran Zheng, PhD 1 Marta Cremonesi, PhD 2 1 University Hospitals
More informationNuclear Data for Radiation Therapy
Symposium on Nuclear Data 2004 Nov. 12, 2004 @ JAERI, Tokai Nuclear Data for Radiation Therapy ~from macroscopic to microscopic~ Naruhiro Matsufuji, Yuki Kase and Tatsuaki Kanai National Institute of Radiological
More informationMulti-Ion Analysis of RBE using the Microdosimetric Kinetic Model
Multi-Ion Analysis of RBE using the Microdosimetric Kinetic Model Council of Ionizing Radiation Measurements and Standards (CIRMS) March 28 th, 2017 Michael P. Butkus 1,2 Todd S. Palmer 2 1 Yale School
More informationVariable RBE in proton therapy: comparison of different model predictions and their influence on clinical-like scenarios
Giovannini et al. Radiation Oncology (2016) 11:68 DOI 10.1186/s13014-016-0642-6 RESEARCH Variable RBE in proton therapy: comparison of different model predictions and their influence on clinical-like scenarios
More informationBIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION Natural Sources of Radiation Natural background radiation comes from three sources: Cosmic Radiation Terrestrial Radiation Internal Radiation 2 Natural Sources of Radiation
More informationMicrodosimetric Relative Biological Effectiveness of Therapeutic Proton Beams. Chuan Jong Tung 1,2
Special Edition 399 Microdosimetric Relative Biological Effectiveness of Therapeutic Proton Beams Chuan Jong Tung 1,2 When compared to photon beams, particle beams have distinct spatial distributions on
More informationCalculated LET spectrum from antiproton beams stopping in water
Acta Oncologica, 2009; 48: 223226 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Calculated LET spectrum from antiproton beams stopping in water NIELS BASSLER 1,2 & MICHAEL HOLZSCHEITER 3 1 Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology,
More informationRadiobiological Characterization of Clinical Proton and Carbon-Ion Beams
Proceedings of the CAS-CERN Accelerator School: Accelerators for Medical Applications, Vösendorf, Austria, 26 May 5 June 2015, edited by R. Bailey, CERN Yellow Reports: School Proceedings, Vol. 1/2017,
More informationInterazioni iniziali Radiaz. indirett. ionizzanti (raggi X, raggi γ)
Radiobiologia delle particelle pesanti Angelica Facoetti Fondazione CNAO Corso teorico-pratico sull adroterapia: l alta tecnologia applicata alla clinica CNAO, Pavia, 17-1818 Maggio 2013 Radiobiologia
More informationChronic cell death may play a crucial role in mutagenesis and carcinogenesis due to radon exposure
Chronic cell death may play a crucial role in mutagenesis and carcinogenesis due to radon exposure Balázs G. Madas, Imre Balásházy MTA Centre for Energy Research,, Hungary balazs.madas@energia.mta.hu Low
More informationHealth Physics and the Linear No-Threshold Model
Health Physics and the Linear No-Threshold Model Understanding Radiation and Its Effects John Baunach Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN What is health physics? Outline What organizational bodies govern
More informationProtons Monte Carlo water-equivalence study of two PRESAGE formulations for proton beam dosimetry J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.
Protons Monte Carlo water-equivalence study of two PRESAGE formulations for proton beam dosimetry T Gorjiara, Z Kuncic, J Adamovics and C Baldock 2013 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 444 012090 PRESAGE is a radiochromic
More informationChapter 14 Basic Radiobiology
Chapter 14 Basic Radiobiology This set of 88 slides is based on Chapter 14 authored by N. Suntharalingam, E.B. Podgorsak, J.H. Hendry of the IAEA publication (ISBN 92-0-107304-6): Radiation Oncology Physics:
More informationThe Impact of Cobalt-60 Source Age on Biologically Effective Dose in Gamma Knife Thalamotomy
The Impact of Cobalt-60 Source Age on Biologically Effective Dose in Gamma Knife Thalamotomy BH Kann, JB Yu, J Bond, C Loiselle, VL Chiang, RS Bindra, JL Gerrard, DJ Carlson Leksell Gamma Knife Society
More informationnuclear science and technology
EUROPEAN COMMISSION nuclear science and technology The role of intercellular communication and DNA double-strand breaks in the induction of bystander effects (INTERSTANDER) Contract N o FIGH-CT2002-00218
More informationRadiobiological modelling applied to Unsealed Source (radio) Therapy
Radiobiological modelling applied to Unsealed Source (radio) Therapy Alan E. Nahum Physics Department Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust Bebington, Wirral CH63 4JY UK alan.nahum@clatterbridgecc.nhs.uk
More informationMaría José Mesa López
María José Mesa López q Radiobiology. q Ionizing Radiations. q Mutations. q Stochastic Effects Vs Deterministic Effects. q Cellular Radiosensitivity. q Bibliography. Science which combines the basic principles
More informationRadiation Effects in Life Sciences
Radiation Effects in Life Sciences oocyte eggs in uterus spermatheca gonad Quality of Radiation Biological Effects Applications of SSD in Life sciences Nanodosimetry Particle Microscope (pct) vulva Radiation
More informationHadrons on Malignant Cells: Recent Activities within Collaboration between LNS INFN and Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences
ENSAR2 Midterm Meeting of Networking Activity 5: MediNet March 12 th 14 th, 218 Vinča Institute of Nuclear sciences, University of Belgrade Hadrons on Malignant Cells: Recent Activities within Collaboration
More informationBiological Effects of Radiation KJ350.
Biological Effects of Radiation KJ350 deborah.oughton@nmbu.no 2111 2005 Radiation Biology Interaction of radiation with biological material Doses (Gy, Sv) and effects Scientific Controversy Radiation Protection
More informationLa ricerca e la terapia in adroterapia-2. R.Orecchia / P. Fossati
La ricerca e la terapia in adroterapia-2 R.Orecchia / P. Fossati Dose (Gy) = energy (joule) / mass (kg) One degree of fever (from 37.5 to 38.5 ) > 4000 Gy RT small dose big damage Photons : Dose Resposne
More informationImpact of variable proton relative biological effectiveness on estimates of secondary cancer risk in paediatric cancer patients Vilde Grandemo
Impact of variable proton relative biological effectiveness on estimates of secondary cancer risk in paediatric cancer patients Vilde Grandemo Supervisors: Kristian Smeland Ytre-Hauge and Camilla Hanquist
More informationC-Beam Induces More Chromosomal Damage In Chemo-Radio-Resistant Cells Than. O-Beam
1 C-Beam Induces More Chromosomal Damage In Chemo-Radio-Resistant Cells Than 16 O-Beam Utpal Ghosh 1, Regina Lichti Binz, Ratan Sadhukhan, Asitikantha Sarma 3, Subrata Kumar Dey 4,Martin Hauer-Jensen,
More informationADVANCES IN RADIATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER
ADVANCES IN RADIATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER Bro. Dr. Collie Miller IARC/WHO Based on trends in the incidence of cancer, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and WHO
More informationRADIATION RISK ASSESSMENT
RADIATION RISK ASSESSMENT EXPOSURE and TOXITY ASSESSMENT Osipova Nina, associated professor, PhD in chemistry, Matveenko Irina, Associate professor, PhD in philology TOMSK -2013 The contents 1.What is
More informationMonte Carlo water-equivalence study of two PRESAGE formulations for proton beam dosimetry
Monte Carlo water-equivalence study of two PRESAGE formulations for proton beam dosimetry T Gorjiara 1, Z Kuncic 1, J Adamovics 2 and C Baldock 1,3 1 Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University
More informationRadiobiological principles of brachytherapy
Radiobiological principles of brachytherapy Low dose rate (LDR) Medium dose rate (MDR) High dose rate (HDR) The effect of dose rate As the dose rate is decreased, there is more time during irradiation
More informationLearning Objectives. Review of the Radiobiological Principles of Radiation Protection. Radiation Effects
1 Review of the Radiobiological Principles of Radiation Protection Cari Borrás, D.Sc., FAAPM, FACR Radiological Physics and Health Services Consultant Washington DC, USA Learning Objectives 1. To understand
More informationBiological Effects of Ionizing Radiation & Commonly Used Radiation Units
INAYA MEDICAL COLLEGE (IMC) RAD 232 - LECTURE 3, 4 & 5 Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation & Commonly Used Radiation Units DR. MOHAMMED MOSTAFA EMAM How does radiation injure people? - High energy
More informationPublished in: International Journal of Radiation: Oncology - Biology - Physics. Document Version: Peer reviewed version
Relative Biological Effectiveness Variation Along Monoenergetic and Modulated Bragg Peaks of a 62-MeV Therapeutic Proton Beam: A Preclinical Assessment Chaudhary, P., I Marshall, T., Perozziello, F. M.,
More informationProf. V. Grégoire Dr. P. Smeesters Mr M. Despiegeleer
1. Grandeurs et Unités - Mécanismes biologiques de l action des rayonnements ionisants 2. Effets aigus d une irradiation accidentelle 3. Cancers radio-induits 4. Effets héréditaires radio-induits 5. Effets
More informationOptimization of proton therapy plans with respect to biological and physical dose distributions Helge Henjum
Optimization of proton therapy plans with respect to biological and physical dose distributions Helge Henjum Supervisors: Kristian S. Ytre-Hauge, Tordis J. Dahle and Eivind Rørvik Master Thesis in Medical
More informationBiological Effects of Ionizing Radiation & Commonly Used Radiation Units
INAYA MEDICAL COLLEGE (IMC) RAD 232 - LECTURE 2 & 3 Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation & Commonly Used Radiation Units DR. MOHAMMED MOSTAFA EMAM How does radiation injure people? - High energy radiation
More informationTHE HIGH-CURRENT DEUTERON ACCELERATOR FOR THE NEUTRON THERAPY. S.V. Akulinichev, A. V. Andreev, V.M. Skorkin
THE HIGH-CURRENT DEUTERON ACCELERATOR FOR THE NEUTRON THERAPY S.V. Akulinichev, A. V. Andreev, V.M. Skorkin Institute for Nuclear Research of the RAS, Russia THE PROJECT OF NEUTRON SOURCES FOR THE NEUTRON
More informationRisk of secondary cancer induced by radiotherapy
Risk of secondary cancer induced by radiotherapy Iuliana Toma-Dasu Medical Radiation Physics Stockholm University and Karolinska Institutet Radiation - the two-edged sword Risk of secondary cancer induced
More informationRadiation Carcinogenesis
Radiation Carcinogenesis November 11, 2014 Dhyan Chandra, Ph.D. Pharmacology and Therapeutics Roswell Park Cancer Institute Email: dhyan.chandra@roswellpark.org Overview - History of radiation and radiation-induced
More informationScoring of linear energy transfer (LET) for calculation of biological dose in proton therapy
Scoring of linear energy transfer (LET) for calculation of biological dose in proton therapy And why biological calculation should be done within FLUKA Eivind Rørvik May 11, 216 Eivind Rørvik 4th Fluka
More informationMedical physics is beautiful
Translational research in particle therapy Marco Durante Medical physics is beautiful Pisa, 31.10.2014 Relative dose 1. 2 1. 0 Tumor Durante & Loeffler, Nature Rev Clin Oncol 2010 0. 8 Normal tissue 0.
More informationarxiv: v1 [physics.med-ph] 18 Sep 2018
arxiv:1809.06680v1 [physics.med-ph] 18 Sep 2018 Phenomenon-based prediction of relative biological effectiveness of ion beams by means of the MultiScale Approach A. Verkhovtsev 1,2, E. Surdutovich 3, A.V.
More informationAccelerated heavy ions as a tool for solving problems in fundamental and space radiobiology
Accelerated heavy ions as a tool for solving problems in fundamental and space radiobiology E. Krasavin Round Table 2 Italy-Russia@Dubna on SPACE PHISICS and BIOLOGY On Earth - accelerators of heavy charged
More informationΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΠΑΤΡΩΝ ΣΧΟΛΗ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΩΝ ΥΓΕΙΑΣ ΤΜΗΜΑ ΙΑΤΡΙΚΗΣ
ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΠΑΤΡΩΝ ΣΧΟΛΗ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΩΝ ΥΓΕΙΑΣ ΤΜΗΜΑ ΙΑΤΡΙΚΗΣ «Υπολογισµός πιθανότητας µετακτινικής επιπλοκής µε βελτιστοποίηση ακτινοβιολογικών παραµέτρων σε ασθενείς µε καρκίνο του πνεύµονος και συσχέτιση
More informationNeutron-Energy-Dependent Cell Survival and Oncogenic Transformation
J. RADIAT. RES., 40: SUPPL., 53 59 (1999) Neutron-Energy-Dependent Cell Survival and Oncogenic Transformation RICHARD C. MILLER 1 *, STEPHEN A. MARINO 1, STEWART G. MARTlN 2, KENSHI KOMATSU 3, CHARLES
More informationLYMHOCYTE CHROMOSOMAL ABERRATION ASSAY IN RADIATION BIODOSIMETRY
LYMHOCYTE CHROMOSOMAL ABERRATION ASSAY IN RADIATION BIODOSIMETRY Dr. Birutė Gricienė 1,2 1 Radiation Protection Centre 2 Vilnius University Introduction Ionising radiation is a well-known mutagenic and
More informationMechanisms for the Biological Effectiveness of High-LET Radiations
J. RADIAT. RES., 40: SUPPL., 1 13 (1999) Mechanisms for the Biological Effectiveness of High-LET Radiations DUDLEY T. GOODHEAD* Radiation and Genome Stability Unit, Medical Research Council, Harwell, Didcot,
More informationMolecular Radiobiology Module 4 Part #3
Molecular Radiobiology Module 4 Part #3 Bushong - Chapter 31 10-526-197 - Rhodes Interaction & damage is a matter of chance Energy deposited rapidly 10-17 seconds Interactions are non-selective in tissue
More informationRadiobiology of fractionated treatments: the classical approach and the 4 Rs. Vischioni Barbara MD, PhD Centro Nazionale Adroterapia Oncologica
Radiobiology of fractionated treatments: the classical approach and the 4 Rs Vischioni Barbara MD, PhD Centro Nazionale Adroterapia Oncologica Radiobiology It is fundamental in radiation oncology Radiobiology
More informationTopics covered 7/21/2014. Radiation Dosimetry for Proton Therapy
Radiation Dosimetry for Proton Therapy Narayan Sahoo Department of Radiation Physics University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Proton Therapy Center Houston, USA Topics covered Detectors used for to
More informationInhomogeneous Tissue Studies for Clinical Proton Therapy:
Inhomogeneous Tissue Studies for Clinical Proton Therapy: GNAMU/SLAC Universal Scaling and Interfacial Buildup Effects D. Fry 1,, Ph.D., W. Sewchand, Sc.D. and J. O Connell, MD 1 The Henry Jackson Foundation
More informationRanking radiotherapy treatment plans: physical or biological objectives?
Ranking radiotherapy treatment plans: physical or biological objectives? Martin Ebert Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Western Australia, Australia Background. The ranking
More informationGenome Instability is Breathtaking
Genome Instability is Breathtaking Effects of Alpha Radiation exposure on DNA at a molecular level and consequences to cell health Dr. Aaron Goodarzi A.Goodarzi@ucalgary.ca Radiation what do you think
More informationRADIOBIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES IN INTRAVASCULAR IRRADIATION
Cardiovascular Radiation Medicine 1:1 (1999) 42 47 BIOLOGY/PATHOLOGY ORIGINAL ARTICLE RADIOBIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES IN INTRAVASCULAR IRRADIATION Eric J. Hall, D.Sc.,* Richard C. Miller, Ph.D., and David J.
More informationOut-of-field Radiation Risks in Paediatric Proton Therapy
Out-of-field Radiation Risks in Paediatric Proton Therapy Charlot Vandevoorde NRF ithemba LABS Contact: cvandevoorde@tlabs.ac.za Seventh NCS Lustrum Proton Therapy Amsterdam Charlot Vandevoorde 27 October
More informationCharacterization and implementation of Pencil Beam Scanning proton therapy techniques: from spot scanning to continuous scanning
Characterization and implementation of Pencil Beam Scanning proton therapy techniques: from spot scanning to continuous scanning Supervisors Prof. V. Patera PhD R. Van Roermund Candidate Annalisa Patriarca
More informationOverview of Clinical and Research Activities at Georgetown University Hospital
Overview of Clinical and Research Activities at Georgetown University Hospital Dalong Pang, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Medicine Georgetown University Hospital Clinical Operation Two Varian linear accelerators
More informationarxiv: v1 [physics.med-ph] 31 Oct 2017
Estimation of linear energy transfer distribution for broad-beam carbon-ion radiotherapy at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Japan arxiv:7.4v [physics.med-ph] 3 Oct 27 Nobuyuki Kanematsu
More informationNew Treatment Research Facility Project at HIMAC
New Treatment Research Facility Project at Koji Noda Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy National Institute of Radiological Sciences IPAC10, Kyoto, JAPAN, 25th May, 2010 Contents 1. Introduction
More informationConsiderations when treating lung cancer with passive scatter or active scanning proton therapy
Mini-Review Considerations when treating lung cancer with passive scatter or active scanning proton therapy Sara St. James, Clemens Grassberger, Hsiao-Ming Lu Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts
More informationEnhanced radiobiological effects at the distal end of a clinical proton beam: in vitro study
Journal of Radiation Research Advance Access published May 13, 2014 Journal of Radiation Research, 2014, pp 1 7 doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrt230 Short Communication Enhanced radiobiological effects at the distal
More informationRadiation physics and radiation protection. University of Szeged Department of Nuclear Medicine
Radiation physics and radiation protection University of Szeged Department of Nuclear Medicine Radiation doses to the population 1 Radiation doses to the population 2 Sources of radiation 1 Radiation we
More informationThe impact of different radiation qualities on cancer cells
The impact of different radiation qualities on cancer cells Marjan Moreels, PhD Radiobiology Unit,, Belgium XXth Colloque GANIL Session 10, Amboise, France Oct 19, 2017 1 The Belgian Nuclear Research Center
More informationHampton University Proton Therapy Institute
Hampton University Proton Therapy Institute Brief introduction to proton therapy technology, its advances and Hampton University Proton Therapy Institute Vahagn Nazaryan, Ph.D. Executive Director, HUPTI
More informationRadiobiologcal Research at the JINR Accelerators
Radiobiologcal Research at the JINR Accelerators Е. А. Krasavin Laboratory of Radiation Biology Академик Н.М.Сисакян Академик В.В.Парин Академик О.Г.Газенко β What fundamental problems were solved by the
More informationDosimetric characterization with 62 MeV protons of a silicon segmented detector for 2D dose verifications in radiotherapy
Dosimetric characterization with 62 MeV protons of a silicon segmented detector for 2D dose verifications in radiotherapy C. Talamonti M. Bruzzi,M. Bucciolini, L. Marrazzo, D. Menichelli University of
More information