Functional organization of the genome: chromatin

Transcription

1 Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology Functional organization of the genome: chromatin Patricia Ridgway 1,3, Christèle Maison 2,3 and Geneviève Almouzni 2 1. Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The John Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. 2. UMR 218 du CNRS, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'ulm, Paris Cedex 05, France. 3. equal contribution. May 2002 Introduction In eukaryotic cells the genetic material is organized into a complex structure composed of DNA and proteins and localized in a specialized compartment, the nucleus. This structure, detected with basic dyes, was called chromatin (from the Greek "khroma" meaning coloured and "soma" meaning body) at the end of the 19 th centruy [Flemming, 1882 #24]. Close to two meters of DNA in each cell must be assembled into a small nucleus of some in diameter. Despite this enormous degree of compaction, DNA must be rapidly accessible to permit its interaction with protein machineries that regulate the functions of chromatin: replication, repair and recombination. The dynamic organization of chromatin structure thereby influences, potentially, all functions of the genome. The fundamental unit of chromatin, termed the nucleosome, is composed of DNA and histone proteins. This structure provides the first level of compaction of DNA into the nucleus. Nucleosomes are regularly spaced along the genome to form a nucleofilament which can adopt higher levels of compaction (Figures 1 and 3), ultimately resulting in the highly condensed metaphase chromosome. The combined approaches of cell biology and genetic studies have led to the discovery that within an interphase nucleus chromatin is organized into functional territories [Cockell, 1999 #2]. Historically, based on microscopic observations, chromatin has been divided into two distinct domains, heterochromatin and euchromatin. Heterochromatin was defined as a structure that does not alter in its condensation throughout the cell cycle whereas euchromatin is decondensed during interphase [Heitz, 1928 #1]. Typically in a cell, heterochromatin is localized principally on the periphery of the nucleus and euchromatin in the interior of the nucleoplasm. We can distinguish constitutive heterochromatin, containing few genes and formed principally of repetitive sequences located in large regions coincident with centromeres and telomeres, from facultative heterochromatin composed of transcriptionally active regions that can adopt the structural and functional characteristics of heterochromatin, such as the inactive X chromosome of mammals [Lyon, 1999 #25] [Avner, 2001 #26]. In this review we will define the components of chromatin and outline the different levels of its organization from the nucleosome to domains in the nucleus. We will discuss how variation in the basic constituents of chromatin can impact on its activity and how stimulatory factors play a critical role in imparting diversity to this dynamic Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2002;

2 structure. Finally we will summarize how chromatin influences the organization of the genome at the level of the nucleus. The nucleosome Historically, the periodic nature of chromatin was identified by biochemical and electron microscopic studies. The partial digestion of DNA assembled into chromatin, isolated from rat liver nuclei, generated fragments of base pairs in length which were resolved by electrophoretic migration [Williamson, 1970 #3] [Hewish, 1973 #4]. This regularity of chromatin structure was later confirmed by electron microscope analysis that revealed chromatin as regularly spaced particles or "beads on a string" [Olins, 1974 #5] [Oudet, 1975 #7]. In parallel, chemical cross-linking analysis permitted the precise determination of the stoichiometry of DNA and histones in the nucleosome to be 1/1 based on their mass [Kornberg, 1974 #9]. Together these observations led to the proposition that the nucleosome was the fundamental unit of chromatin. Pierre Chambon's laboratory was the first to use the term "nucleosome" [Germont, 1976 #77]. It is composed of a core particle and a linker region (or internucleosomal region) that joins adjacent core particles (Figure 1). The core particle is highly conserved between species and is composed of 146 base pairs of DNA wrapped 1.7 turns around a protein octamer of two each of the core histones H3, H4, H2A and H2B. The length of the linker region, however, varies between species and cell type. It is within this region that the variable linker histones are incorporated. Therefore, the total length of DNA in the nucleosome can vary with species from 160 to 241 base pairs [Compton, 1976 #10] [Morris, 1976 #11] [Noll, 1976 #12] [Spadafora, 1976 #13] [Thomas, 1977 #14]. Figure 1. Defining elements of nucleosomes and chromatosome The first crystal structure of the core particle was obtained at a resolution of 7A by diffraction of X rays [Finch, 1977 #15]. More recently the structure of the octamer was resolved at 3.1A [Arents, 1993 #16]. Finally, crystalization that enabled a resolution of 2.8A was obtained using a unique sequence of DNA and purified recombinant proteins [Luger, 1997 #17]. This analysis revealed, firstly, the distortion of the DNA wound around the histone octamer and, secondly, that the histone/dna and histone/histone interactions through their "histone fold domain" formed a configuration remniscent of a hand shake. This structural information has facilitated experimental approaches used to study the functions of specific regions of histones, with the exception of their N-terminal tails that are not visualized in the crystal. Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2002;

3 Histone proteins Core histones The core histones, H3, H4, H2A and H2B, are small, basic proteins highly conserved in evolution (Figure 2). The most conserved region of these histones is their central domain structurally composed of the "histone fold -helicies separated by two loop regions [Arents,domain" consisting of three 1991 #18]. In contrast, the N-terminal tails of each core histone is more variable and unstructured. The tails are particularily rich in lysine and arginine residues making them extremely basic. This region is the site of numerous post-translational modifications that are proposed to modify its charge and thereby alter DNA accessibility and protein/protein interactions with the nucleosome [Strahl, 2000 #19]. It is significant to note that other proteins that interact with DNA also contain the "histone fold domain" [Baxevanis, 1995 #20] [Wolffe, 1996 #21]. There is a web site that lists proteins containing a "histone fold domain" ( [Baxevanis, 1998 #27] [Sullivan, 2002 #78]. Figure 2. Defining elements of nucleosomes and chromatosome The core histones. A. Structure of nucleosomal histones. B. Amino-terminal tails of core histones. The numbers indicate amino acid position. The post-translational modifications are indicated (red ac = acetylation sites ; blue p = phosphorylation sites ; green m = methylation sites ; purple rib = ADP ribosylation). Linker histones Linker histones associate with the linker region of DNA between two nucleosome cores and, unlike the core histones, they are not well conserved between species [Richmond, 2000 #22]. In higher eukaryotes, they are composed of three domains: a globular, non-polar central domain essential for interactions with DNA and two nonstructured N- and C- terminal tails that are highly basic and proposed to be the site of post translational modifications. The linker histones have a role in spacing nucleosomes and can modulate higher order compaction by providing an interaction Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2002;

4 region between adjacent nucleosomes. The precise role of the linker histones is still a controversial subject [Khochbin, 2001 #79] and a variety of models have been proposed [Pruss, 1996 #28] [Thomas, 1999 #29]. General steps in chromatin assembly The assembly of DNA into chromatin involves a range of events, beginning with the formation of the basic unit, the nucleosome, and ultimately giving rise to a complex organization of specific domains within the nucleus. This step-wise assembly is described schematically in Figure 3. The first step is the deposition onto the DNA of a tetramer of newly synthesized (H3-H4)2 to form a sub-nucleosomal particle, which is followed by the addition of two H2A-H2B dimers [Senshu, 1978 #32] [Cremisi, 1977 #31] [Worcel, 1978 #30]. This produces a nucleosomal core particle consisting of 146 base pairs of DNA wound around a histone octamer. This core particle and the linker DNA together form the nucleosome [Kornberg, 1974 #9]. Newly synthesized histones are specifically modified; the most conserved modification is the acetylation of histone H4 on lysine 5 and lysine 12 [Sobel, 1995 #34]. The next step is the maturation step that requires ATP to establish regular spacing of the nucleosome cores to form the nucleofilament. During this step the newly incorporated histones are de-acetylated. Next the incorporation of linker histones is accompanied by folding of the nucleofilament into the 30nm fibre, the structure of which remains to be elucidated. Two principal models exist : the solenoid model, an example of which is presented in Figure 3, and the zig zag [Woodcock, 2001 #23]. Finally, further successive folding events lead to a high level of organization and specific domains in the nucleus. At each of the steps described above, variation in the composition and activity of chromatin can be obtained by modifying its basic constituents and the activity of stimulatory factors implicated in the processes of its assembly and disassembly. Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2002;

5 Figure 3. General steps in chromatin assembly Assembly begins with the incorporation of the H3/H4 tetramer (1), followed by the addition of two H2A-H2B dimers (2) to form a core particle. The newly synthesized histones utilized are specifically modified; typically, histone H4 is acetylated at Lys5 and Lys12 (H3-H4*). Maturation requires ATP to establish a regular spacing, and histones are de-acetylated (3). The incorporation of linker histones is accompanied by folding of the nucleofilament. Here the model presents a solenoid structure in which there are six nucleosomes per gyre (4). Further folding events lead ultimately to a defined domain organization within the nucleus (5) (for details see [Ridgway, 2001 #89]). Variation in basic constituents In the first steps of chromatin assembly, the elementary particle can assume variations at the level of DNA (for example by methylation) or at the histone level by Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2002;

6 differential post-translational modification and the incorporation of variant forms (for example CENP-A, a variant of H3). All of these variations are capable of introducing differences in the structure and activity of chromatin. The vast array of posttranslational modifications of the histone tails summarized in Figure 2 (such as acetylation, phosphorylation, methylation, ubiquitination, polyadp-ribosylation), and their association with specific biological processes has led to a proposed hypothesis of a language, refered to as the "histone code", that marks genomic regions [Strahl, 2000 #19]. It must be emphasized that this code is a working hypothesis used to design experimental approaches that investigate the activity of chromatin. The code is "read"by other proteins or protein complexes that are capable of understanding and interpreting the profiles of specific modifications [Strahl, 2000 #19] [Jenuwein, 2001 #35]. The incorporation of histone variants such as H2A-X [Rogakou, 1999 #36], CENP-A [Sullivan, 1994 #37], macro H2A [Pehrson, 1992 #80] and H2A.Z [Clarkson, 1999 #38] may be important at specific domains of the genome. In this context, CENP-A, a variant of histone H3 is associated with silent centromeric regions [Sullivan, 1994 #37] and macro H2A on the inactive X chromosome of female mammals [Mermoud, 1999 #39]. H2A-X is implicated in the formation of foci containing DNA repair factors in the regions of DNA double-strand breaks [Paull, 2000 #81]. Growing evidence exists that H2A.Z has a role in modifying chromatin structure to regulate transcription [Santisteban, 2000 #40]. During the maturation step, incorporation of linker histones, non-histone chromatin associated proteins, called HMG (High Mobility Group), and other specific DNAbinding factors help to space and fold the nucleofilament. Therefore the early steps in assembly can have a great impact on the final characteristics of chromatin in specific nuclear domains [Marshall, 1997 #41]. Stimulatory Assembly Factors (for review see [Kaufman, 2000 #42]) Histone interacting factors Biochemical fractionation of extracts derived from cells or embryos permitted the identification of acidic factors that can form complexes with histones and enhance the process of histone deposition. They act as histone chaperones by facilitating the formation of nucleosome cores without being part of the final reaction product. These histone-interacting factors, also called chromatin-assembly factors, can bind preferentially to a subset of histone proteins. In Xenopus laevis, the proteins N1-N2 and nucleoplasmin are respectively associated with histones H3-H4 and histones H2A-H2B [Laskey, 1978 #43]. The situation is more complex for NAP-1 (Nucleosome Assembly Protein 1), depending on the system studied [Ito, 1997 #44]. Chromatin Assembly Factor-1 (CAF-1) interacts with newly synthesized acetylated histones H3 and H4 to preferentialy assemble chromatin during DNA replication [Smith, 1989 #45] [Kaufman, 1995 #46]. CAF-1 is also capable of promoting the assembly of chromatin specifically coupled to the repair of DNA [Gaillard, 1996 #47]. The recent demonstration of the interaction of CAF-1 with the protein PCNA (Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen) established a molecular link between the assembly of chromatin and the processes of replication and repair of DNA (see for review [Ridgway, 2000 #48] [Mello, 2001 #82]). The assembly of specialized structures in centromeric regions, by deposition of variant histones such as CENP-A, or telomeres may be a result of the specificity and the diversity of as yet uncharacterised histone chaperones. Remodelling machines and histone-modifying enzymes Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2002;

7 Stimulatory factors also act during the chromatin maturation stage to organize and maintain a defined chromatin state. Their effects on chromatin can induce changes in conformation at the level of the nucleosome or more globally over large chromatin domains. These factors are of two types; one requiring energy in the form of ATP, generally refered to as chromatin remodelling machines, and the other that act as enzymes to post-translationally modify histones. Chromatin remodelling machines are multi-protein complexes which have now been characterized from yeast, humans and Xenopus laevis and are summarized in Table 1. Complexes sharing the same ATPase subunit are classified in the same family. The ATPase subunit, mating-type switching/sucrose non-fermenting (swi2/snf2) defines the first family, the ATPase ISWI the second family, also termed ISWI, and the last family is called Mi2/NuRD (nucleosome remodeling histone deacetylase) complex after the name of the ATPase subunit Mi2. The activity of the ATPase permits the complex to modify nucleosomal structure, driven by the liberation of energy during the hydrolysis of ATP [Travers, 1999 #53]. The study of factors that stimulate the regular arrangement of nucleosomes during the assembly of chromatin led to the identification of several multi-protein complexes such as ATP-utilizing chromatin assembly and remodelling factor (ACF) [Ito, 1997 #44] [Ito, 1999 #50], chromatin accessibility complex (CHRAC) [Varga-Weisz, 1997 #83] and remodeling and spacing factor (RSF) [LeRoy, 1998 #51]. These complexes are capable of "sliding" nucleosomes along DNA in vitro [Langst, 1999 #52] [Ito, 1999 #50]. The common feature of these chromatin remodelling factors is their large size and multiple protein subunits including the ATPase, however, they display differences in abundance and activity. Remodels the Structure of Chromatin (RSC), for example, is ten times more abundant than SWI/SNF and contains 15 subunits in contrast to the 11 in SWI/SNF but it has six subunits in common with SWI/SNF including a homologous ATPase (reviewed in Bjorklund et al., 1999). In contrast to the SWI/SNF complex, all the subunits of RSC are essential for viability of yeast [Cao, 1997 #84]. Table 1: Chromatin remodeling complexes divided into families based on the similarity of their ATPase subunit (see for review [Kingston, 1999 #85] [Fry, 2001 #55]). The "histone code" hypothesis has been proposed to explain the diversity of chromatin activity in the nucleus. The unstructured N-terminal histone tails extend outside the nucleosome core and are the sites of action for enzymes that catalyze with high specificity their post-translational modification. The most well characterized of these modifications is the acetylation of lysine residues. Acetylation is the result of an equilibrium between two opposing activities: histone acetyl transferase (HAT) and histone deacetylation (HDAC) (for review see [Taddei, 1997 #56]). An in gel electrophoretic protein separation method allowed the identification of the first protein with a histone acetyltransferase activity, HAT A, also called p55 in Tetrahymena [Brownell, 1995 #86]. The characterisation of specific inhibitors such as trapoxine resulted in the purification of the first histone deacetylase, human HDAC1 [Taunton, 1996 #57]. Numerous proteins that play a role in the regulation of transcription have intrinsic histone acetyltransferase activity such as GCN5, PCAF and TAFII250 [Brownell, 1996 #58] [Mizzen, 1996 #59]. Similarly, histone deacetylases have been Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2002;

8 described as components of multi-protein complexes associated with repressive chromatin. Also within these complexes are the Mi-2 family of remodeling factors [Knoepfler, 1999 #61] [Ng, 2000 #60] providing a link between remodelling of nucleosomes and histone deacetylation during chromatin-mediated repression. Very recently it has been proposed that another modification, methylation of histones, plays a functionally important role [Jenuwein, 2001 #35]. The first histonemethyltransferase, called SUV39H1 in human, was only recently discovered [Rea, 2000 #62]. It specifically methylates histone H3 on lysine residue 9 and this methylation modifies the interaction of H3 with heterochromatin associated proteins [Bannister, 2001 #63] [Lachner, 2001 #64]. The two possible modifications (acetylation and methylation) on the same residue (lysine 9) of the N-terminal tail of H3 is a perfect illustration of the "histone code" hypothesis in action. Indeed, acetylated lysine in H3 and H4 N-terminal tail selectively interact with chromodomain present in numerous proteins having intrinsic histone acetyltransferase activity. However, H3 methylated on lysine residue 9 interact specifically with the chromodomain of an heterochromatin associated protein HP1. Therefore, in addition to producing alterations in the overall charge of the histone tails, proposed to physically destabilize the nucleosome, modifications appear to impart specificity to protein:protein interactions with the histones. They are associated with different regions of the genome and are correlated with precise nuclear functions [Strahl, 2000 #19]. Organization of the genome in the nucleus The higher level of compaction of chromatin is not as well characterized. The nucleofilament is compacted to form the 30nm fibre that is organized into folds of 150 to 200 Kbp (250nm during interphase) to obtain a maximum level of compaction in the metaphase chromosome (850nm). At interphase the organization of the genome relies on the structure of chromosomes that have been characterized into different regions based on a specific banding pattern revealed by Giemsa staining [Comings, 1974 #65] [Belyaev, 1996 #66]. The principle bands are G and C bands that are late replicating in S phase and correspond to heterochromatin and the R bands that replicate earlier in S-phase and represent euchromatin. The R bands are enriched in acetylated histones and this modification is conserved through mitosis suggesting that histone acetylation may serve as a marker for the memory of domain organization through the cell cycle [Turner, 1998 #67] [Sadoni, 1999 #68]. The localization of chromosomes in the interphase nucleus by Fluorsecence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) reveals that each chromosome occupies a defined space [Lamond, 1998 #69]. This observation is in accordance with the notion of chromosomal territories proposed, in 1885 by Rabl, for the organization of chromosomes in plants. The Rabl configuration, in which the telomeres are attached to the nuclear envelope beside the nucleus with the centromeres on the other side, has been described in a number of cell types [Marshall, 1997 #70]. However, in mammals, this configuration does not exist and the organization of the chromosomes in the nucleus varies as a function of cell type [He, 1996 #87]. During interphase, regions that correspond to the bands of metaphase chromosomes are located in the nucleus based on the timing of their replication. On the nuclear periphery are the later replicating regions, corresponding to G and C bands and the transcriptionally silent telomeres, while gene rich regions are preferentially localized more internally. Therefore, although each chromosome occupies a different territory, distinct parts of chromosomes can unite to form functional domains [Cockell, 1999 #2] [Croft, 1999 #72]. The localization of coincident and non-coincident regions by FISH suggests that Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2002;

9 genes tend to be localized at the surface of chromosome territories. In the model proposed by Cremer, based on the localization of some genes, transcripts are released into interchromosomal channels, transferred to sites for processing, then exported to the cytoplasm after maturation [Cremer, 1993 #74] (and see for review [Cremer, 2001 #88]). Several studies have led to the proposal that the nucleus is organized into domains [van Holde, 1995 #76] [Lamond, 1998 #69] [Bridger, 1998 #75]. The localization of DNA in these domains is perhaps, in part, a consequence of the activities of chromatin. Targeting proteins might help to bring specialized proteins to specific domains in the nucleus [Sutherland, 2001 #91]. In a hypothetical model, the proteins associated with heterochromatin (for example HP1, Polycomb, Sir3p/Sir4p and ATRX), transcription factors (such as Ikaros) and assembly factors (such as CAF-1) may all be involved in the for establishment and maintenance of nuclear domains. Table 2: Revised nomenclatrue for the HMG chromosomal proteins From: M. Bustin Trends Biochem Sci Mar; 26(3): References 1. Arents G, Burlingame RW, Wang BC, Love WE, Moudrianakis EN. The nucleosomal core histone octamer at 3.1 A resolution: a tripartite protein assembly and a left-handed superhelix. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88: Arents G, Moudrianakis EN. Topography of the histone octamer surface: repeating structural motifs utilized in the docking of nucleosomal DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90: Avner P, Heard E. X-chromosome inactivation: counting, choice and initiation. Nat Rev Genet 2001; 2: Bannister AJ, Zegerman P, Partridge JF, et al. Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain. Nature 2001; 410: Baxevanis AD, Arents G, Moudrianakis EN, Landsman D. A variety of DNAbinding and multimeric proteins contain the histone fold motif. Nucleic Acids Research 1995; 23: Baxevanis AD, Landsman D. Histone Sequence Database: new histone fold family members. Nucleic Acids Res 1998; 26: Belyaev ND, Keohane AM, Turner BM. Histone H4 acetylation and replication timing in Chinese hamster chromosomes. Exp. Cell Res. 1996; 225: Bjorklund S, Almouzni G, Davidson I, Nightingale KP, Weiss K. Global transcription regulators of eukaryotes. Cell 1999; 96: Bridger JM, Bickmore WA. Putting the genome on the map. Trends Genet. 1998; 14: Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2002;

10 10. Brownell JE, Allis CD. An activity gel assay detects a single, catalytically active histone acetyltransferase subnit in Tetrahymena macronuclei. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92: Brownell JE, Zhou J, Ranalli T, et al. Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: a homolog to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation. Cell 1996; 84: Bustin M. Revised nomenclature for high mobility (HMG) chromosomal proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 2001; 26: Cao Y, Cairns BR, Kornberg RD, Laurent BC. Sfh1p, a component of a novel chromatin-remodelling complex, is required for cell cycle progression. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17: Clarkson MJ, Wells JR, Gibson F, Saint R, Tremethick DJ. Regions of variant histone His2AvD required for Drosophila development. Nature 1999; 399: Cockell M, Gasser SM. Nuclear compartments and gene regulation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1999; 9: Comings D. The structure of human chromosome. In: Busch H, ed. The cell nucleus. New York: Academic Press, Compton JL, Bellard M, Chambon P. Biochemical evidence of variability in the DNA repeat length in the chromatin of higher eukaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1976; 73: Cremer T, Kurz A, Zirbel R, et al. Functional organization of the nucleus. DNA and chromosomes. New-York: CSH Laboratory Press, Cremer T, Cremer C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat Rev Genet 2001; 2: Cremisi C, Chesteir A, Yaniv M. Preferential association of newly synthesized histones with replicating SV40 DNA. Cell 1977; 4: Croft JA, Bridger JM, Boyle S, Perry P, Teague P, Bickmore WA. Differences in the localization and morphology of chromosomes in the human nucleus. J Cell Biol 1999; 145: Finch JT, Lutter LC, Rhodes D, et al. Structure of nucleosome core particules of chromatin. Nature 1977; 269: Flemming W. Zell substanz, Kern und Zelltheilung. Leipzig: Vogel, Fry CJ, Peterson CL. Chromatin remodeling enzymes: who's on first? Curr Biol 2001; 11: R Gaillard PH, Martini EM, Kaufman PD, Stillman B, Moustacchi E, Almouzni G. Chromatin assembly coupled to DNA repair: a new role for chromatin assembly factor I. Cell 1996; 86: Germont JE, Bellard M, Oudet P, Chambon P. Stability of nucleosomes in native and reconstituted chromatins. Nucleic Acids Res 1976; 3: He D, Brinkley BR. Structure and dynamic organization of centromeres/prekinetochores in the nucleus of mammalian cells. J Cell Sci 1996; 109: Heitz E. Das heterochromatin der Moose. Jb. Wiss. Bot. 1928; 69: Hewish DR, Burgoyne LA. The calcium dependent endonuclease activity of isolated nuclear preparations. Relationships between its occurence and the occurence of other classes of enzymes found in nuclear preparations. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1973; 52: Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2002;

11 30. Ito T, Bulger M, Kobayashi R, Kadonaga JT. Drosophila NAP-1 is a core histone chaperone that functions in ATP-facilitated assembly of regularly spaced nucleosomal arrays. Mol Cell Biol 1996; 16: Ito T, Bulger M, Pazin MJ, Kobayashi R, Kadonaga JT. ACF, an ISWIcontaining and ATP-utilizing chromatin assembly and remodeling factor. Cell 1997; 90: Ito T, Levenstein ME, Fyodorov DV, Kutach AK, Kobayashi R, Kadonaga JT. ACF consists of two subunits, Acf1 and ISWI, that function cooperatively in the ATP-dependent catalysis of chromatin assembly. Genes Dev 1999; 13: Jenuwein T, Allis CD. Translating the histone code. Science 2001; 293: Kaufman PD, Kobayashi R, Kessler N, Stillman B. The p150 and p60 subunits of chromatin assembly factor I - a molecular link between newly synthesized histones and DNA replication. Cell 1995; 81: Kaufman PD, Almouzni G. DNA replication, Nucleotide Excision Repair end Nucleosome assembly. In: Elgin SCRW, J. L., ed. Chromatin Structure and Gene Expression. Oxford: IRL Press, 2000: Khochbin S. Histone H1 diversity: bridging regulatory signals to linker histone function. Gene 2001; 271: Kingston RE, Narlikar GJ. ATP-dependent remodeling and acetylation as regulators of chromatin fluidity. Genes Dev 1999; 3: Knoepfler PS, Eisenman RN. Sin meets NuRD and other tails of repression. Cell 1999; 99: Kornberg RD, Thomas JO. Chromatin structure : oligomers of the histones. Science 1974; 184: Lachner M, O'Carroll D, Rea S, Mechtler K, Jenuwein T. Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 creates a binding site for HP1 proteins. Nature 2001; 410: Lamond AI, Earnshaw WC. Structure and function in the nucleus. Science 1998; 280: Langst G, Bonte EJ, Corona DFV, Becker PB. Nucleosome movement by CHRAC and ISWI without disruption or trans-displacement of the histone octamer. Cell 1999; 97: Laskey RA, Honda BM, Mills AD, Finch JT. Nucleosomes are assembled by an acidic protein which binds histones and transfers them to DNA. Nature 1978; 275: LeRoy G, Orphanides G, Lane WS, Reinberg D. Requirement of RSF and FACT for transcription of chromatin templates in vitro. Science 1998; 282: Luger K, Mader AW, Richmond RK, Sargent DF, Richmond TJ. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution [see comments]. Nature 1997; 389: Lyon MF. X-chromosome inactivation. Curr Biol 1999; 9: R Marshall WF, Fung JC, Sedat JW. Deconstructing the nucleus: global architecture from local interactions. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1997; 7: Marshall WF, Straight A, Marko JF, et al. Interphase chromosomes undergo constrained diffusional motion in living cells. Curr. Biol. 1997; 7: Mello JA, Almouzni G. The ins and outs of nucleosome assembly. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2001; 11: Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2002;

12 50. Mermoud JE, Costanzi C, Pehrson JR, Brockdorff N. Histone macroh2a1.2 relocates to the inactive X chromosome after initiation and propagation of X- inactivation. Journal of Cell Biology 1999; 147: Mizzen CA, Yang XJ, Kokubo T, et al. The TAF(II)250 subunit of TFIID has histone acetyltransferase activity. Cell 1996; 87: Morris NR. A comparison of the structure of chicken erythrocyte and chicken liver chromatin. Cell 1976; 9: Ng H, Bird A. Histone deacetylases: silencers for hire. TIBS 2000; 25: Noll M. Differences and similarities in chromatin structure of Neurospora crassa and higher eucaryotes. Cell 1976; 8: Olins AL, Olins DE. Spheroid chromatin units (v bodies). Sciences 1974; 183: Oudet P, Gross-Bellard M, Chambon P. Electron microscopic and biochemical evidence that chromatin structure is a repeating unit. Cell 1975; 4: Paull TT, Rogakou EP, Yamazaki V, Kirchgessner CU, Gellert M, Bonner WM. A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage. Curr Biol 2000; 10: Pehrson JR, Fried VA. MacroH2A, a core histone containing a large nonhistone region. Science 1992; 257: Pruss D, Bartholomew B, Persinger J, et al. An asymmetric model for the nucleosome: a binding site for linker histones inside the DNA gyres [see comments]. Science 1996; 274: Rea S, Eisenhaber F, O'Carroll D, et al. Regulation of chromatin structure by site-specific histone H3 methyltransferases. Nature 2000; 406: Richmond TJ, Widom J. Nucleosome and chromatin structure. In: Elgin SCRW, J. L., ed. Chromatin Structure and Gene Expression. Oxford: IRL Press, 2000: Ridgway P, Almouzni G. CAF-1 and the inheritance of chromatin states: at the crossroads of DNA replication and repair. J Cell Sci 2000; 113: Ridgway P, Almouzni G. Chromatin assembly and organization. J Cell Sci 2001; 114: Rogakou EP, Boon C, Redon C, Bonner WM. Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. J Cell Biol 1999; 146: Sadoni N, Langer S, Fauth C, et al. Nuclear organization of mammalian genomes: polar chromosome territories build up functionally distinct higher order compartments. J Cell Biol 1999; 146: Santisteban MS, Kalashnikova T, Smith MM. Histone H2A.Z regulats transcription and is partially redundant with nucleosome remodeling complexes. Cell 2000; 103: Senshu T, Fukuda M, Ohashi M. Preferential association of newly synthesized H3 and H4 histones with newly replicated DNA. J. Biochem. 1978; 84: 985= Smith S, Stillman B. Purification and characterization of CAF-I, a human cell factor required for chromatin assembly during DNA replication in vitro. Cell 1989; 58: Sobel RE, Cook RG, Perry CA, Annunziato AT, Allis CD. Conservation of deposition-related acetylation sites in newly synthesized histones H3 and H4. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92: Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2002;

13 70. Spadafora C, Bellard M, Compton JL, Chambon P. The DNA repeat lengths in chromatins from sea urchin sperm and gastrule cells are markedly different. FEBS Letters 1976; 69: Strahl BD, Allis DC. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 2000; 403: Sullivan KF, Hechenberger M, Masri K. Human CENP-A contains a histone H3 related histone fold domain that is required for targeting to the centromere. J Cell Biol 1994; 127: Sullivan S, Sink DW, Trout KL, et al. The histone database. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30: Sutherland HG, Mumford GK, Newton K, et al. Large-scale identification of mammalian proteins localized to nuclear sub-compartments. Hum Mol Genet. 2001; 10: Taddei A, Almouzni G. Histone acetyl-transferases and deacetylases, coregulators of transcription. Med Sci 1997; 13: Taunton J, Hassig CA, Schreiber SL. A mammalian histone deacetylase related to the yeast transcriptional regulator Rpd3p. Science 1996; 272: Thomas JO, Thompson RJ. Variation in chromatin structure in two cell types from the same tissue: a short DNA repeat length in cerebral cortex neurons. Cell 1977; 10: Thomas JO. Histone H1: location and role. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1999; 11: Travers A. An engine for nucleosome remodeling. Cell 1999; 96: Turner BM. Histone acetylation as an epigenetic determinant of long-term transcriptional competence. Cell Mol Life Sci 1998; 54: van Holde K, Zlatanova J. Chromatin higher order structure: chasing a mirage? J Biol Chem 1995; 270: Varga-Weisz PD, Wilm M, Bonte E, Dumas K, Mann M, Becker PB. Chromatin-remodelling factor CHRAC contains the ATPases ISWI and topoisomerase II. Nature 1997; 388: Williamson R. Properties of rapidly labelled deoxyribonucleic acid fragments isolated from the cytoplasm of primary cultures of embryonic mouse liver cells. J Mol Biol 1970; 51: Wolffe AP, Pruss D. Deviant nucleosomes: the functional specialization of chromatin. Trends Genet. 1996; 12: Woodcock CL, Dimitrov S. Higher-order structure of chromatin and chromosomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2001; 11: Worcel A, Han S, Wong ML. Assembly of newly replicated chromatin. Cell 1978; 15: Contributor(s) Written Citation Ridgway P., Maison C. and Almouzni G This paper should be referenced as such : Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2002;

14 Ridgway P., Maison C. and Almouzni G., Functional organization of the genome: chromatin. URL : Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2002;