Secure Egg Supply Plan & Permitted Movement Database

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Secure Egg Supply Plan & Permitted Movement Database"

Laurel Grant
5 years ago
Views:

1 Secure Egg Supply Plan & Permitted Movement Database James A. Roth, DVM, PhD Center for Food Security and Public Health College of Veterinary Medicine Iowa State University

2 Secure Egg Supply Plan PUBLIC-PRIVATE-ACADEMIC-PARTNERSHIP (Started in 2008) The Egg Sector Working Group a multidisciplinary team prepared the SES plan. This team includes the following: University of Minnesota, Center for Animal Health and Food Safety Iowa State University, Center for Food Security and Public Health United Egg Producers Egg sector veterinarians and officials State officials United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services (USDA APHIS VS)

How the SES Plan Works http://www.cfsph.

3 How the SES Plan Works

4 SES Voluntary Preparedness Components

5 SES Preparedness - Iowa Implemented voluntary preparedness components Over 100 egg production facilities Training to complete response components Audited biosecurity standards SES Data Portal Iowa SAHO had MOUs with SAHOs in NE, CO, MN, WI

risk assessment only Movement controls in place until FAD

6 USDA-APHIS FAD PReP Movement Guidelines Establish Control Area Infected and Buffer Zone Federal quarantine Movement by permit, risk assessment only Movement controls in place until FAD eradicated Secure Food Supply Plans working on ensuring domestic movement 6

7 Highly Pathogenic H5N2 Avian Influenza in Iowa Total Poultry Affected (6/8/2015) 31,502,052 April 13 to June 16, 2015 Layers 24,725,086 Pullets 5,624,336 Turkeys 1,128, infected sites 6 Backyard sites 71 Commercial sites Hatchery 18,791 Backyard Flocks 5,110

8 SES & Data Portal Available to Other States H5 HPAI appeared in Pacific Flyway Egg industry and SAHOs interested in enhanced preparedness CFSPH is providing support for voluntary preparedness components Guidance to SAHOs Data Portal (state-specific) Guidance to the egg industry

9 State Steps for Participation SAHO consults with ADD (APHIS Assistant District Director) Offers participation to industry Identifies State SES Coordinator Designate NAHLN laboratory CFSPH supports state with training materials

10 Web Site for State Participation

12 State Steps for Participation State Coordinator signs up producers Registers facility on Data Portal Provides training materials to producer Ensures production site employees practice sample collection and delivery

14 State Steps for Participation SAHO/ADD Authorizes auditor(s) to confirm producer s compliance Reviews producer s information on Data Portal Plans to issue movement permits if facility located in Control Area

15 Industry Steps for Participation Review the SES Plan and the voluntary preparedness components Request permission from SAHO to participate Receive instructions and training materials from SAHO/ADD Register on SES Data Port Implement biosecurity standards Stock supplies for oropharyngeal sampling

16 SES Producer Signup Information

17 Industry Steps for Participation Train employees Biosecurity Collect oropharyngeal swabs How-to video Confirm lab sample results reported to SAHO/ADD Enter production data on state s portal Request an audit Maintain compliance

18 Oropharyngeal Sampling Video

19 SES Data Portal Overview Allow data sharing / viewing to support the Movement Permitting process Production Parameters: Producer Epidemiology (Questionnaire): Producer Biosecurity (Audit Status): SAHO Center for Food Security and Public Health Iowa State University 2015

20 What the Portal Does Not Have / Do Permitting: Requesting / Issuing Diagnostic lab test results Data integration with EMRS USA Herds Core One Center for Food Security and Public Health Iowa State University 2015

21 Future Improved Data Portal Working with Commercial company Multiple digital products (e.g. health certificates) Established relationships with all 50 states A producer funded model is likely. Center for Food Security and Public Health Iowa State University 2015

22 States With Data Portals (22) DiyMaps.net Center for Food Security and Public Health Iowa State University 2015

23 How is the Data Portal Used? Center for Food Security and Public Health Iowa State University 2015

24 Pre event Producers create own account Get supplies / training for swab collection Biosecurity Audit: Date, P/F recorded Center for Food Security and Public Health Iowa State University 2015

25 Biosecurity Auditing No USDA required standard, SAHO determines Documents available on web Validus available to conduct audits Center for Food Security and Public Health Iowa State University 2015

house # eggs # dead Health observations Center for

26 Producer in Control Area: Data Entry Epidemiology questionnaire Previous 7 days Daily reporting by house # eggs # dead Health observations Center for Food Security and Public Health Iowa State University 2015

27 Incident Command: View Data Center for Food Security and Public Health Iowa State University 2015

28 IC Data View Epidemiology Questionnaire Biosecurity Audit status Production Data Center for Food Security and Public Health Iowa State University 2015

29 How to Get an SES Data Portal for Your State? State Animal Health Official must request Contact CFSPH Center for Food Security and Public Health Iowa State University 2015

30 The Secure Egg Supply Plan was the Vision of Dr. Darrell Trampel Dr. Darrell Trampel Center for Food Security and Public Health Iowa State University 2015

31 Comments and Questions: he Gentle Doctor by Christian Petersen, 1938

32 Secure Beef Supply Plan Federal, State, Industry, and Academic Partnership Funded by USDA APHIS Cattle Health Programs James A. Roth, DVM, PhD, DACVM Center for Food Security and Public Health College of Veterinary Medicine Iowa State University

33 Topics to Cover Background on Foot and Mouth Disease Need for FMD vaccine Background on Secure Milk and Pork Supply plans Approach to Secure Beef Supply Plan 33

34 FMD: The MOST Contagious Disease of Animals FMD is the major animal disease preventing world trade of animals and animal products Korea 10 Adults: Mortality is low but morbidity is high Young animals: High mortality associated with some strains UK 01 Japan 10 Not a public health or food safety concern 34 Egypt 12

35 Annual Value of U.S. Exports Total value of U.S. dairy exports (2013)* Total value of U.S. pork exports (2013)** Total value of U.S. beef exports (2013)** *US Dairy Export Council **US Meat Export Council Exports STOP Once FMD Diagnosed 35 $6.7 billion $6.0 billion $6.2 billion Total $18.9 billion

Global Prevalence of FMDv World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) has 178 member countries: 96 countries are endemic ( have it ) and have never been free of FMD 66 countries free of FMD 11

36 Global Prevalence of FMDv World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) has 178 member countries: 96 countries are endemic ( have it ) and have never been free of FMD 66 countries free of FMD 11 countries have free zones either with or without vaccination 5 countries were free and recently suffered from a re-emergence of FMD Leon, E. A. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 59 (Suppl. 1) pages 1-14, 2012

37 The United States has had Nine Outbreaks of FMD 1870, 1880 and 1884: Due to importation of infected animals. Since the development of a Federal system of inspection and quarantine of imported livestock, no outbreak has been attributed to admission of live animals. 1902, 1908, 1914, 1924 (two separate outbreaks) and 1929 All outbreaks were controlled by stop movement and stamping out

38 We must plan and be prepared to respond in new ways US livestock industries have changed dramatically since 1929

39 Factors Requiring a Change in the Planned Response to FMD Very large herd sizes Extensive movement of animals Public resistance to stamping out Environmental concerns with carcass disposal Changes in OIE policies related to FMD free with vaccination status

40 Phases and Types of FMD Response

FMD Detection in the United States: Types of an FMD Outbreak Six Types

and jurisdictions affected) Type 1: Focal Type 3: Large Regional Type 2:

S. Type 6: Catastrophic North American Response Shifts from Emphasis on

41 FMD Detection in the United States: Types of an FMD Outbreak Six Types of FMD Outbreaks Size of FMD Outbreak (in terms of animals, premises, and jurisdictions affected) Type 1: Focal Type 3: Large Regional Type 2: Moderate Regional Type 4: Widespread or National Type 5: Catastrophic U.S. Type 6: Catastrophic North American Response Shifts from Emphasis on Stamping-Out to Emphasis on Alternate Strategies (duration of FMD response)

42 USDA FMD Vaccination Policy in the U.S. September 2014

43 Foreign Animal Disease Preparedness & Response Plan FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Vaccination for Contagious Diseases APPENDIX A: Footand-Mouth Disease (May 2015, 135 pages) -prep-nahems-appendix-avaccination-for-foot-and-mouthdisease

44 FMD Vaccination Killed virus vaccine 7 distinct serotypes Not cross protective Approximately 65 Subtypes Cross-protection varies between strains within a serotype 23 strains are recommended for FMD vaccine banks It is essential to isolate virus and identify the serotype to select the correct vaccine

45 FMD Vaccine Surge Capacity for Emergency Use in the United States January 9, 2014 A White Paper (134 pages) Prepared by the Center for Food Security and Public Health at ISU for: National Pork Board (NPB) National Cattlemen s Beef Association (NCBA) National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF)

46 FMD Vaccine Surge Capacity for Emergency Use in the United States Letter to Chairman, Senate Committee on Ag, Nutrition, and Forestry, June 26, 2015, from 8 commodity groups Asking Senate to work with APHIS to address the need for FMD vaccine to manage an outbreak We are all well aware of the current devastation of the poultry industry due to HPAI. An FMD outbreak in the U.S would be magnitudes higher, especially with a shortage of vaccine to combat the disease.

Secure Food Supply Plans Movement from Premises with No Evidence of Infection Secure Milk Supply Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) Movement of milk Secure

47 Secure Food Supply Plans Movement from Premises with No Evidence of Infection Secure Milk Supply Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) Movement of milk Secure Pork Supply FMD, Classical Swine Fever, African Swine Fever, and Swine Vesicular Disease Movement of animals Secure Beef Supply FMD Movement of animals 47

48 Common Components of Secure Food Supply Plans Voluntary pre-outbreak preparedness components Biosecurity, surveillance, epidemiology questionnaires, movement permits Risk assessments (completed and in process) Plans must be based on current capabilities and will evolve with science, risk assessments and new capabilities Guidelines only: Final decisions made by responsible officials during outbreak Outreach and training pre and post outbreak 48

Secure Beef Supply Partners SBS Steering Committee Representatives of all phases of the beef industry NCBA, AABP, AVC Federal and State officials

49 Secure Beef Supply Partners SBS Steering Committee Representatives of all phases of the beef industry NCBA, AABP, AVC Federal and State officials Academia Iowa State University Kansas State University University of California, Davis Funding began October 2014 from USDA APHIS Cattle Health Programs 49

50 Secure Beef Supply Initial Goals Develop biosecurity performance standards and surveillance plans (herd health monitoring) for feedlots, transporters and packer/processors To maintain finished cattle movement from feedlots with no evidence of infection in an FMD outbreak to and through packing and processing plants 50

51 SBS Plan Must Consider All Beef Cattle Operations 51

52 Secure Beef Supply Future Goals Expand the scope to the entire beef industry Cow-calf Dairy beef Backgrounders/stockers 52

53 Secure Beef Supply Planning Introductory webinar with steering committee December 18, 2014 Reviewed components of Milk, Pork that could apply to Beef In person meeting January 15, 2014 Identified gaps specific to beef industry Formed working groups Engaged, progressive thinkers encouraged to join the efforts 53

54 Working Groups Six Working Groups (WG): Biosecurity Surveillance Communications Data Management Managed Movement Continuity of Business for Infected Feedlots 54

55 Biosecurity WG Feedlot Line of Separation (LOS) 55

56 Surveillance NAHLN specimen testing RRT-PCR (virus) Herd inspection by Accredited Veterinarian (prior to load out) Trained Herd Health Monitor (daily and prior to load out)

57 Surveillance WG Cattle Health Monitors (CHM) These are feedlot personnel that have been trained in Active Observational Surveillance Ideally have a history of observing cattle on that feedlot Recognize clinical signs that could indicate FMD infection Record observations on proper forms Report to herd veterinarian and/or Incident Command 57

58 Communications WG Get all levels of the beef industry on the same page in regards to FMD response plan Help packers, retailers, and consumers understand that FMD is not a public health or food safety concern 58

59 Data Management WG Data collection, sharing is part of an FMD response to issue movement permits Learning from data collection system utilized for the Secure Egg Plan during the Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza outbreak Learning from Secure Pork Supply Plan Pilot 59

60 Data Management WG Learning about the Emergency Management Response System (EMRS 2.0) System used to track emergency response activities during the Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza outbreak 60

61 Controlled Movement of Cattle in an FMD Outbreak At the beginning of an outbreak Stop movement: No new movements initiated from the FMD control area Cattle already on the road need to go somewhere ~94,000 commercial cattle slaughter per day ~50,000 to 83,000 feedlot placements per day Restarting movement Depends on the type of outbreak Focus on moving finished cattle to processing

62 Controlled Cattle Movement To and Through a Packing Facility FMD is not a public health or food safety problem Animals which pass ante-mortem and post-mortem inspection by USDA FSIS are safe for human consumption, even if they may be in the pre-clinical stage or recovery phase of FMD infection

63 Continuity of Business for Infected Feedlots WG In a large FMD outbreak, infected feedlots may not be depopulated Management of an FMD infected feedlot will present unprecedented challenges No experience with FMD in highly susceptible cattle not stamped out 63

64 Continuity of Business for Infected Feedlots WG Challenges identified Biocontainment to prevent spread Secondary bacterial infections Euthanasia of severely affected animals No indemnity Marketing of recovered animals Management to return to FMD free status Economic viability for continued operation Re-stocking 64

65 Comments and Questions: he Gentle Doctor by Christian Petersen, 1938

Update to Iowa Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) and Livestock Emergency Management Plans

Update to Iowa Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) and Livestock Emergency Management Plans James A. Roth, DVM, PhD Center for Food Security and Public Health College of Veterinary Medicine Iowa State University