County-Level Estimates of Non-Elderly Uninsured

Transcription

1 County-Level Estimates of Non-Elderly Uninsured Prepared by the North Carolina Institute of Medicine & the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Data Snapshot Children (0-18) Adults (19-64) Non-elderly (0-64) Alamance 7, % High 20, % Mid-Low 27, % Mid-High Alexander 1, % Mid-Low 4, % Low 6, % Low Alleghany < % Low 2, % High 2, % Mid-High Anson 1, % Mid-Low 4, % High 5, % High Ashe 1, % Low 4, % Mid-High 5, % Mid-High Avery 1, % Mid-Low 3, % High 3, % High Beaufort 2, % Mid-Low 7, % Mid-High 8, % Mid-High Bertie 1, % Mid-High 3, % Mid-High 4, % Mid-High Bladen 1, % Mid-High 5, % Mid-High 6, % Mid-High Brunswick 2, % Low 14, % Mid-High 16, % Mid-Low Buncombe 7, % Mid-Low 29, % Low 36, % Low Burke 3, % Mid-High 12, % Low 15, % Low Cabarrus 7, % Mid-High 20, % Low 26, % Low Caldwell 3, % Mid-Low 10, % Low 13, % Low Camden < % Low 1, % Mid-Low 2, % Mid-Low Carteret 1, % Low 9, % Mid-Low 10, % Low Caswell 1, % Low 4, % Mid-High 4, % Mid-High Catawba 6, % Mid-High 20, % Low 26, % Low Chatham 2, % High 8, % Low 10, % Mid-Low Cherokee 1, % Low 4, % Mid-High 5, % Mid-High

2 Chowan 1, % Mid-Low 2, % Mid-High 3, % Mid-High Clay < % Low 1, % Mid-High 2, % Mid-Low Cleveland 3, % Mid-Low 13, % Mid-Low 17, % Mid-Low Columbus 2, % Mid-High 9, % High 11, % High Craven 4, % Mid-High 12, % Mid-Low 16, % Mid-Low Cumberland 15, % High 45, % Mid-High 60, % Mid-High Currituck 1, % Low 4, % Mid-Low 4, % Mid-Low Dare 1, % Low 5, % Mid-Low 6, % Mid-Low Davidson 6, % Mid-High 20, % Low 26, % Low Davie 1, % Mid-High 5, % Low 6, % Low Duplin 4, % High 10, % High 13, % High Durham 11, % High 34, % Low 45, % Mid-Low Edgecombe 2, % Mid-High 9, % High 11, % High Forsyth 14, % Mid-High 44, % Low 58, % Mid-Low Franklin 2, % High 9, % Mid-Low 11, % Mid-High Gaston 7, % Mid-High 26, % Low 33, % Low Gates < % Mid-Low 2, % Mid-High 2, % Mid-Low Graham < % Low 1, % High 2, % High Granville 2, % High 8, % Low 10, % Mid-Low Greene 1, % High 4, % High 5, % High Guilford 15, % Mid-Low 59, % Low 74, % Low Halifax 2, % Low 9, % High 11, % High Harnett 6, % High 17, % Mid-High 22, % High

3 Haywood 1, % Low 8, % Mid-Low 9, % Low Henderson 3, % Mid-High 13, % Mid-Low 16, % Mid-Low Hertford 1, % Mid-Low 4, % High 5, % High Hoke 3, % High 7, % High 10, % High Hyde < % Low 1, % High 1, % High Iredell 5, % Mid-Low 19, % Low 24, % Low Jackson 1, % Low 6, % Mid-High 7, % Mid-High Johnston 8, % High 23, % Mid-Low 30, % Mid-High Jones < % Mid-High 2, % High 2, % High Lee 3, % High 8, % Mid-Low 11, % Mid-High Lenoir 2, % Mid-High 9, % Mid-High 11, % Mid-High Lincoln 3, % High 10, % Mid-Low 13, % Mid-Low McDowell 2, % Mid-High 6, % Low 7, % Mid-Low Macon 1, % Low 5, % High 6, % Mid-High Madison 1, % Low 3, % Mid-Low 3, % Mid-Low Martin 1, % Mid-High 4, % High 5, % High Mecklenburg 31, % Mid-Low 110, % Low 142, % Low Mitchell < % Low 2, % Mid-High 3, % Mid-Low Montgomery 2, % High 4, % High 6, % High Moore 3, % Mid-Low 10, % Low 13, % Low Nash 4, % Mid-High 13, % Mid-Low 16, % Mid-Low New Hanover 5, % Low 26, % Mid-Low 30, % Low Northampton 1, % Low 3, % Mid-High 4, % Mid-Low

4 Onslow 9, % High 26, % High 34, % High Orange 4, % Mid-Low 15, % Low 19, % Low Pamlico < % Low 2, % Mid-Low 2, % Mid-Low Pasquotank 2, % Mid-High 7, % High 8, % High Pender 2, % Mid-Low 8, % Mid-High 10, % Mid-High Perquimans < % Low 2, % Mid-High 2, % Mid-High Person 1, % Mid-High 5, % Mid-Low 7, % Mid-Low Pitt 6, % High 22, % Mid-High 28, % Mid-High Polk 1, % Low 2, % Low 3, % Low Randolph 7, % High 19, % Mid-Low 25, % Mid-Low Richmond 2, % Mid-High 7, % Mid-High 9, % High Robeson 7, % High 24, % High 31, % High Rockingham 4, % Mid-High 13, % Mid-Low 17, % Mid-Low Rowan 5, % Mid-High 18, % Low 23, % Low Rutherford 2, % Mid-High 9, % Mid-High 11, % Mid-High Sampson 4, % High 11, % High 15, % High Scotland 1, % Mid-Low 6, % Mid-High 7, % Mid-High Stanly 2, % Mid-Low 8, % Mid-Low 10, % Low Stokes 1, % Mid-Low 6, % Low 7, % Low Surry 3, % High 10, % Mid-Low 13, % Mid-High Swain < % Mid-Low 2, % Mid-High 2, % Mid-Low Transylvania 1, % Low 4, % Mid-Low 4, % Low Tyrrell < % High 1, % High 1, % High

5 Union 8, % Mid-High 23, % Low 31, % Low Vance 2, % High 7, % High 9, % High Wake 26, % Mid-Low 97, % Low 123, % Low Warren 1, % Mid-Low 3, % High 4, % High Washington < % Low 2, % High 3, % High Watauga 1, % Mid-Low 7, % Mid-High 8, % Mid-High Wayne 5, % High 16, % Mid-Low 22, % Mid-High Wilkes 2, % Mid-Low 9, % Low 11, % Low Wilson 3, % High 12, % Mid-High 15, % High Yadkin 2, % High 5, % Mid-Low 7, % Mid-Low Yancey 1, % Mid-Low 3, % High 3, % Mid-High NORTH CAROLINA 345, % 1,232, % 1,578, % Source: Produced by the North Carolina Institute of Medicine and the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research ( and Estimates rounded to nearest Rank: "High" denotes 25 counties with the highest percent uninsured. "Mid-High" next 25 highest, "Mid-Low" next 25 highest, and "Low" denotes the 25 counties with lowest percent non-elderly uninsured. The North Carolina Institute of Medicine (NCIOM) serves as a non-political source of health policy analysis and advice in North Carolina. The NCIOM is an independent, quasi-state agency that was chartered by the North Carolina General Assembly in 1983 to provide balanced, nonpartisan information on issues relevant to the health of North Carolina's population. To meet its mission, the NCIOM convenes task forces of knowledgeable and interested individuals to study these issues and develop workable solutions. For more information, visit For more information on this publication or the NCIOM, contact Jennifer Hastings, Director of Communications, at , ext. 22 or jennifer_hastings@nciom.org