Attrition and Retention Consortium 2016 Benchmark Conference Call (2015 Retention Data)
|
|
- Annabella McGee
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Attrition and Retention Consortium 2016 Benchmark Conference Call (2015 Retention Data) Professor and Department Chair Rutgers University & Distinguished Research Environment Professor Warwick Business School University of Warwick
2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXEMPT TURNOVER OBSERVATIONS Voluntary turnover continues to go up But smaller increase compared to last year Who is more likely to quit? Shorter tenure Women Non-White Non-High Performers Younger Defined Contribution Retirement Plans 2
3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXEMPT TURNOVER OBSERVATIONS Absolute quit rates remain modest, but firm year-over-year increases approach 5 in some cases Hiring appears to be up a little On-boarding and socializing newcomers remains an issue Continued issues with retaining women and minorities Especially newcomer women and African-Americans The gap between high performer and non-high performer quit rates continues to narrow The shift from defined benefit to defined contribution retirement plans continues The defined contribution quit rate is now more than 2.5x the defined benefit quit rate The Non-US exempt quit rate is slightly down from last year 3
4 Firm Report Layout Defining Quit Rates Data Provided by Your Company Employment Status Employees Classified as B = Still Employed Q = Voluntary Quit R = Retirement V = Voluntary Layoff L = Involuntary Layoff T = Other Termination - Base Population = Sum (B + Q + R + V + L +T) QUIT RATE = SUM(Q) SUM(B + Q + R+ V + L +T) X 100 4
5 Calculation of Weighted Average Voluntary Quit Rate Weighted (Individual-Level) Average Quit Rate = Total Number of Quits for All Firms Total Base Population for All Firms x 100 Unweighted (Firm-Level) Average Quit Rate = (Quit Rates for Each Firm) Total Number of Firms x 100 5
6 ALL ARC DATA 11.2% of Customer Service Employees with Less than 1 Yr Quit 6.62% of Software Engineers with 2 Years of Service Quit ARC 2012 CONFERENCE 6
7 ARC 2015 FIRM PARTICIPANTS N=21 firms (2014 = 21 firms; 2013 = 21 firms; 2012 = 23 firms) Eli Lilly submitted after one year absence; Progressive did not submit 3M Allstate Insurance BAE Systems BNSF Railway Boeing Caterpillar Citizen s Financial Cummins Dow Chemical Eli Lilly Ford Motor Company General Motors John Deere Lockheed Martin Monsanto Nationwide Parker Hannifin Raytheon State Farm Union Pacific Weyerhauser 7
8 ARC 2015 FIRM PARTICIPANTS (all employees) N = 1,220, = 1,204, = 1,232, % 4. Quit Rate 3.5% 2015 Quit Rate = 4.4% 2014 Quit Rate = 4.1% 2013 Quit Rate = 3.2% 2012 Quite Rate = 3.1% * weighted/individual level % % % Quit Rate 8
9 ARC 2015 US EXEMPT WORKFORCE N = 544, = 563, 116 (21 firms) 2013 = 559, 341 (21 firms) 2012 = 621,554 (23 firms) 4.5% % 3. Quit Rate 2015 Quit Rate = 3.8% 2014 Quit Rate = 3.7% 2013 Quit Rate = 3.2% 2012 Quite Rate = 3.1% 2.5% % % * weighted/individual level Quit Rate 9
10 US Exempt Demographic Attributes Sex Women: 30.2% (2014: 31.3%; 2013: 32.; 2012: 30.3%) Men: 69.8% (2014: 68.7%; 2013: 68.; 2012: 64.6%) Unknown: <.1% Job Performance High Performers: 13.7% (2014: 14.8%; 2013: 13.1%; 2012: 15.9%) Not High Perform: 64.6% (2014: 68.8%; 2013: 73.5%; 2012: 68.5%) Unknown: 21.7% (2014: 16.5%; 2013: 13.4%) Ethnicity Caucasians: 74. (2014: 77.1%; 2013: 78.7%; 2012: 71.3%) African Americans: 7.2% (2014: 7.; 2013: 6.8%; 2012: 5.9%) Hispanic Americans: 5.4% (2014: 5.4%; 2013: 4.9%; 2012: 4.5%) Asian Americans: 8.4% (2014: 7.9%; 2013: 7.8%; 2012: 6.4%) Native Americans: 0.4% (2014: 0.5%; 2013: 0.5%; 2012: 0.4%) Hawaii - Pacific Island: 0.2% (2014: 0.2%; 2013: 0.1%; 2012: 0.1%) Multiracial: 4.1% (2014: 1.1%; 2013: 0.9%; 2012: 0.8%) Unknown: 0.3% (2014: 0.8%; 2013: 0.3%; 2012: 10.6%) 10
11 US Exempt Demographics Tenure Frequency (Years) (%) (%) (%) (%) < 1 37, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
12 US Exempt Demographics Age Frequency (Years) (%) (%) (%) (%) <=24 14, , , , , , , , , Unkno <
13 US Exempt Demographics US Region Frequency Midwest Northeast South West Unknown 202,103 57, , ,912 2,435 (%) (%) (%) (%)
14 US EXEMPT DEMOGRAPHICS Job Type Frequency (%) (%) (%) (%) 01 Customer Service 45, Manufacturing Ops/Engr 51, Manufacturing Ops/Supv 19, Engineering 142, Software Engineering 22, Information Technology 54, Research 26, Sales 21, Marketing 15, Supply Chain/Purchasing 28, Financial Customer Service 9, Finance 29, Human Resources 13, Corp Affairs/Communication 3, Legal 6, Other Exempt 53,
15 US EXEMPT DEMOGRAPHICS Job Level Frequency Executive Individual Contributors Individual Contributors (Union) Managers/Supervisors Unknown/NA (%) (%) (%) (%) 17, , , NA NA 110, Retirement Type Frequency (%) (%) (%) (%) Defined Benefits 259, Defined Contributions 166, Unknown/NA 117,
16 Total Turnover Rate 18% 16% 14% 12% 1 8% 6% 4% Firm Total Turnover Rate for US Exempt Workforce Voluntary Quits, Terms, Layoffs, Retirements 4.5% 4.8% 4.9% % 5.6% 7.9% 8.4% 8.7% 9.5% 9.6% 9.8% 9.8% 9.8% % 13.1% 13.8% % 15.8% 2% OO LL JJ NN RR EE UU TT CC DD ARC BB SS GG FF MM KK PP HH AA QQ II ARC FIRMS ARC = Unweighted Average of All Firm Quit Rates ARC 2015 Turnover Rate = 9.2% ARC 2014 Turnover Rate = 8.6% ARC 2013 Turnover Rate = 7.9% ARC 2012 Turnover Rate = 7.4% * weighted/individual level 16
17 Firm Non-Quit Termination Rates US Exempt Workforce 12% 11.4% 1 9.3% 9.6%10.1% Termination Rates 8% 6% 4% 2% % 7.2% 6.7% 6.4% 5.1% 5.3% 5.4% 3.9% 4.4% 3.3% 2.2% 2.4% 2.5% 2.7% 2.7% 2.7% 1.7% LL OO UU RR JJ EE NN CC TT AA DD GG ARC MM SS FF BB KK II QQ PP HH ARC = Unweighted Average of All Firm Quit Rates ARC FIRMS ARC 2015 Non-Quit Turnover Rate = 5.4% ARC 2014 Non-Quit Turnover Rate = 4.8% ARC 2013 Non-Quit Turnover Rate = 4.7% ARC 2012 Non-Quit Turnover Rate = 4.4% * weighted/individual level 17
18 12% 1 Firm Voluntary Quit Rates US Exempt Workforce 10.7% Voluntary Quit Rates 8% 6% 4% 2% 2.2% 2.3% 2.3% 2.4% 2.6% 2.9% 2.9% 2.9% % 3.2% 4.4% 4.4% 4.5% 3.9% 3.9% 4.1% 5.3% 5.5% 6.2% 7.7% NN JJ OO HH BB EE RR PP FF SS LL MM KK ARC DD TT GG CC UU QQ II AA ARC = UNWEIGHTED AVERAGE OF ALL FIRM QUIT RATES ARC Firms ARC 2015 Quit Rate = 3.8% ARC 2014 Quit Rate = 3.7% ARC 2013 Quit Rate = 3.2% ARC 2012 Quit Rate = 3.1% * weighted/individual level 18
19 9% 8% Service-Adjusted Firm Voluntary Quit Rates for US Exempt Workforce 8.2% Service-Adjusted Voluntary Quit Rate 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % 2.8% 3.7% 3.2% 3.2% 3.3% 3.4% 3.5% 3.7% 3.8% 4.1% 3.5% 2.9% 4.9% 5.2% 4.8% 4.5% 6.1% 6.1% JJ OO NN PP HH KK FF SS BB LL RR TT MM EE ARC DD GG CC UU II QQ AA ARC = Unweighted Average of All Firm Quit Rates ARC Firms ARC 2015 Quit Rate = 3.8% ARC 2014 Quit Rate = 3.7% ARC 2013 Quit Rate = 3.2% ARC 2012 Quit Rate = 3.1% * weighted/individual level 19
20 Voluntary Quit Rate 1 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% Distribution of ARC Workforce and Voluntary Quits by Service US Exempt Workforce % 7.7% 6.8% 6.6% % 6.3% 5.8% % 3.1% 2.4% 13.2% 14% 12.5% 8.6% 12% % 1 6.1% 8% 6.6% 4.5% 4.5% 6% 3.6% 3.6% 3.5% 3.5% 3.6% 2.7% 4% 1.4% 2% 0.8% 0.4% 0.1% < Length of Service Population Percent Percent Population Voluntary Quit Rate 20
21 Longitudinal Trend - Weighted Average for All Firms US Exempt Workforce 12% 1 Voluntary Quit Rates 8% 6% 4% 2% Year 21
22 Retention Curves Over the Years 2006 Retention Rates 2007 Retention Rates 2008 Retention Rates Quit Rate = 2.21% 2009 Retention Rates 2010 Retention Rates 2011 RETENTION RATES Retention Rates Quit Rate = 5.32% If 100 new employees began work in 2006, then 38 would still be employed after 15 years. If 100 new employees began work in 2009, then 63 would still be employed after 15 years. Assumes Quit Rates for Various Service Categories are Stable for Next 15 Years. If 100 new employees began work in 2015, then 44 would still be employed after 15 years Quit Rate 0 <1 yr yrs 15+ yrs Length of Service 22
23 ANOVA Predicting Quits by JobCat US Exempts Occupations 2015 Quit Rate 2014 Quit Rate 2013 Quit Rate 11-Financial Customer Service 6.98% 2.44% Sales % Human Resources 5.22% 4.49% Corp Affairs/Communications 4.98% 4.29% Finance 4.96% 4.51% Other Exempt 4.95% 4.73% Info Tech 4.95% Legal 4.72% 3.95% Software Engineering 4.71% 4.25% Supply Chain/Purch 3.78% 3.29% Customer Service % Manufac Ops/Engr 3.33% 3.79% Marketing 3.33% 3.38% Engineering % Manufac Ops/Supv 2.91% 2.24% Research 2.32% 2.72%
24 Logistic Regression Predicting Quits N = 328,130 Nagelkerke R 2 =.14* US Exempts Less than.05 means statistically significant Less than 1.0 means LESS likely to Quit; Greater than 1.0 means MORE likely to Quit Longer tenure less likely to Quit B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Service_Yrs Sex Race HighPerf Age JobLevel DBDC Constant Women more likely to Quit Non-White more likely to Quit High Performers less likely to Quit Older less likely to Quit Defined Contribution more likely to Quit 24
25 Follow-Up to Logistic Regression Predicting Quits (US Exempts) Quit Rate Quit Rate 3.9%Men 4.3%Women 2.5%Defined Benefit 6.3%Defined Contribution Quit Rate 7.7%Men Service_Yrs 5 or Less Quit Rate 3.8%Not High 8.2%Women 3.6% High Performers Quit Rate 3.7%White 4.8%Non-White 5.5%African-Am Quit Rate Service_Yrs 5 or Less 3.6%WM 7.5% 5.4%AAW 10.2% 25
26 Group differences in Attrition Some Concepts: Absolute Ratio: The ratio of total attrition of one group compared to another group, for example women total attrition rate compared to men total attrition rate Service-Adjusted Ratio: An adjusted ratio that removes the influence of the differences in the length-of-service profile between groups. It answers the question: What would group A s (e.g. women) overall quit rate be if they had the same length-of-service distribution as group B (men) applied to their quit rates across the length of service bands? 26
27 1 9% 8% 7% Gender Differences by Length of Service Women Weighted Mean Quit Rate = 4.12% (2014 = 4.13%; 2013 = 3.86%; 2012 = 3.06) Men Weighted Mean Quit Rate = 3.68% (2014 = 3.57%; 2013 = 2.88%; 2012 = 2.88%) 16% 14% 12% Voluntary Quit Rate 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 1 8% 6% 4% 2% Population Percent < Length of Service PERCENT WOMEN PERCENT MEN WOMEN QUIT RATE MEN QUIT RATE 27
28 Ratio of Women to Men Voluntary Quit Rates ARC = ARC = ARC = ARC = Absolute Ratio of Women to Men Voluntary Quit Rates US Exempt Workforce AA JJ UU CC RR II FF KK ARC LL OO QQ DD GG TT EE BB MM PP HH NN SS ARC FIRMS ARC = UNWEIGHTED AVERAGE OF FIRMS' RATIOS 28
29 US Exempt Service-Adjusted Ratio of Women to Men Voluntary Quit Rates Assume Same Male Service Distribution Service-Adjusted Ratio of Women to Men Voluntary Quit Rates JJ AA UU CC LL II RR FF SS BB ARC QQ OO GG KK TT DD PP HH EE MM NN ARC = UNWEIGHTED AVERAGE OF FIRM RATIOS ARC Firms 29
30 White-NonWhite Differences in Voluntary Quits by Service 1 NONWHITE WEIGHTED AVERAGE QUIT RATE = 4.59% (2014 = 4.54%; 2013 = 4.07%; 2012 = 3.92%) WHITE WEIGHTED AVERAGE QUIT RATE = 3.53% (2014 = 3.36%; 2013 = 2.95%; 2012 = 2.68%) 16% 9% 8% 7% 14% 12% Voluntary Quit Rates 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 1 8% 6% 4% 2% Population Percent < Length of Service PERCENT NONWHITE PERCENT WHITE NONWHITE QUIT RATE WHITE QUIT RATE 30
31 Absolute Ratio of Minority to Majority Voluntary Quit Rates US Exempt Workforce 3 Ratio of Minority to Majority Voluntary Quit Rates ARC 2015 = 1.39 ARC 2014 = 1.39 ARC 2013 = FF SS AA DD II TT CC KK JJ BB ARC OO LL RR HH QQ EE GG NN UU MM PP ARC = UNWEIGHTED AVERAGE OF FIRM RATIOS ARC FIRMS 31
32 3.00 US Exempt Service-Adjusted Ratio Minority to Majority Voluntary Quit Rates Assume Same Majority Service Distribution Service-Adjusted Ratio of Minority to Majority Voluntary Quit Rates ARC 2015 = 1.12 ARC 2014 = 1.10 ARC 2013 = FF SS II BB AA JJ DD OO LL QQ RR ARC EE CC KK PP GG NN HH TT UU MM ARC Firm 32
33 13% 12% 11% 1 9% African American to Caucasian American Differences in Voluntary Quits by Service African American Weighted Mean Quit Rate = 5.12% (2014 = 4.65%; 2013 = 4.17%; 2012 = 3.91%) Caucasian American Weighted Mean Quit Rate = 3.53% (2014 = 3.36%; 2013 = 2.95%; 2012 = 2.68%) 26% 24% 22% 2 18% Voluntary Quit Rate 8% 7% 6% 5% 16% 14% 12% 1 Percent Population 4% 8% 3% 6% 2% 4% 1% 2% < Length of Service Percent Caucasian American Percent African American Caucasian American Quit Rate African American Quit Rate 33
34 Absolute Ratio of African-Caucasian American Voluntary Quit Rates Absolute Ratio of African American to Caucasian American Voluntary Quit Rates US Exempt Workforce ARC 2015 = 1.40 ARC 2014 = 1.33 ARC 2013 = SS OO AA CC LL UU QQ EE TT BB KK MM ARC II DD FF RR HH NN GG JJ PP 2.08 ARC = UNWEIGHTED AVERAGE OF FIRM RATIOS ARC Firm 34
35 Service-Adjusted Ratio of African-Caucasian American Voluntary Quit Rates US Exempt Service-Adjusted Ratio of African American to Caucasian American Voluntary Quit Rates Assume African Americans Have Same Service Distribution as Caucasian Americans ARC 2015 = 1.19 ARC 2014 = 1.07 ARC 2013 = SS CC BB EE QQ LL OO AA II UU DD ARC HH GG TT JJ KK RR NN MM PP FF ARC = UNWEIGHTED AVERAGE OF FIRM RATIOS ARC Firm 35
36 11% 1 Hispanic American to Caucasian American Differences in Voluntary Quits by Service Hispanic American Weighted Mean Quit Rate = 4.68% (2014 = 4.61%; 2013 = 3.6; 2012 = 3.55%) Caucasian American Weighted Mean Quit Rate = 3.53% (2014 = 3.36%; 2013 = 2.95%; 2012 = 2.68%) 22% 2 9% 18% 8% 16% Voluntary Quit Rates 7% 6% 5% 4% 14% 12% 1 8% Percent Population 3% 6% 2% 4% 1% 2% < Length of Service Percent Hispanic American Percent Caucasian American Hispanic American Quit Rate Caucasian American Quit Rate 36
37 3 Absolute Ratio of Hispanic American to Caucasian American Voluntary Quit Rates US Exempt Workforce 2.96 Ratio of Hispanic-Caucasian American Voluntary Quit Rates ARC 2015 = 1.31 ARC 2014 = 1.39 ARC 2013 = FF JJ HH SS TT II DD CC QQ AA KK ARC OO LL RR BB GG PP EE UU NN MM ARC = UNWEIGHTED AVERAGE OF FIRM RATIOS ARC Firms 37
38 3.00 US Exempt Service-Adjusted Ratio of Hispanic American to Caucasian American Voluntary Quit Rates Assume Hispanic Americans have Same Service Distribution as Caucasian Americans Service-Adjusted Ratio of Hispanic-Caucasian American Voluntary Quit Rates ARC 2015 = 1.09 ARC 2014 = 1.14 ARC 2013 = JJ II SS HH QQ DD OO CC RR GG AA KK ARC BB LL PP EE TT UU NN FF MM ARC Firms 38
39 11% 1 Asian American to Caucasian American Differences in Voluntary Quits by Service Asian American Weighted Mean Quit Rate = 4.38% (2014 = 4.29%; 2013 = 4.11%; 2012 = 4.12%) Caucasian American Weighted Mean Quit Rate = 3.53% (2014 = 3.36%; 2013 = 2.95%; 2012 = 2.68%) 22% 2 9% 18% 8% 16% Voluntary Quit Rate 7% 6% 5% 4% Percent Population 14% 12% 1 8% 3% 6% 2% 4% 1% 2% < Length of Service Percent Asian American Percent Caucasian American Asian American Quit Rate Caucasian American Quit Rate 39
40 Absolute Ratio of Asian American to Caucasian American Voluntary Quit Rates US Exempt Workforce Ratio of Asian-Caucasian American Voluntary Quit Rates ARC 2015 = 1.39 ARC 2014 = 1.49 ARC 2013 = MM AA DD II BB NN TT GG LL KK ARC EE FF RR PP QQ CC SS OO UU HH JJ ARC Firms 40
41 Service-Adjusted Ratio of Asian-Caucasian American Voluntary Quit Rates US Exempt Service-Adjusted Ratio of Asian American to Caucasian American Voluntary Quit Rates Assume Asian Americans Have Same Service Distribution as Caucasian Americans ARC 2015 = 1.06 ARC 2014 = 1.23 ARC 2013 = MM SS NN AA DD LL BB PP II ARC QQ KK TT GG EE JJ OO UU CC HH FF RR ARC Firms 41
42 High Performers as Percent of Exempt Workforce 35% 32.9%33. High Performer Percentage in Workforce 3 25% 2 15% 1 ARC 2015 = 16.4% ARC 2014 = 16.1% ARC 2013 = 15.1% 6.4% 6.5% 7.9% 10.9% 10.3% 13.7% % 19.8% 18.9% 22.2% 30.5% 31.1% 5% 2.7% % JJ KK LL OO QQ FF RR BB DD TT MM NN PP ARC SS GG EE CC UU HH II AA ARC = UNWEIGHTED AVERAGE OF FIRM PERCENTAGES ARC Firms 42
43 12% 11% NonHigh Vs. High Performer Voluntary Quit Rates by Service NonHigh Performer Weighted Mean Quit Rate = 3.56% (2014 = 3.52%; 2013 = 2.9; 2012 = 2.81%) High Performer Weighted Mean Quit Rate = 3.55% (2014 = 3.36%; 2013 = 2.26%; 2012 = 1.97%) 22% 2 1 9% 18% 16% Voluntary Quit Rate 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 14% 12% 1 8% 6% 4% Percent Population 1% 2% < Length of Service Percent High Performers Percent NonHigh Performers High Performer Quit Rate NonHigh Performer Quit Rate 43
44 Longitudinal Trends in Voluntary Quits Between High and NonHigh Performers 6% 5.59% 5% Voluntary Quit Rate 4% 3% 2% 3.53% 2.59% 3.94% 2.24% 3.43% 2.03% 2.78% 3.22% 2.27% 2.22% 2.81% 1.97% 3.52% 3.56% % 3.55% 2.26% 1% 1.32% Year NonHigh High 44
45 Absolute Ratio of High Performer to NonHigh Performer Voluntary Quit Rates Ratio of High-NonHigh Voluntary Quit Rates ARC 2015 = 0.77 ARC 2014 = 0.67 ARC 2013 = 0.67 ARC 2012 = SS EE CC RR MM PP FF AA UU HH ARC TT DD II GG QQ BB JJ KK LL NN OO ARC Firm 45
46 Voluntary Quits by Pension Plan and Service 12% 1 Voluntary Quit Rates 8% 6% 4% 2% DB Quit Rate = 2.36% (2014 = 2.62%; 2013 = 2.38%; 2012 = 2.21%) DC Quit Rate = 6.02% (2014 = 5.29%; 2013 = 5.36%; 2012 = 5.66%) <1 YR 1 YR 2 YR 3 YR 4 YR 5 YR 6 YR 7 YR 8 YR 9 YR 10 YR YRS YRS YRS YRS 30+ YRS Length of Service DEFINED BENEFIT RETIREMENT DEFINED CONTRIBUTION RETIREMENT 46
47 Voluntary Quit Rate by Pension Plan and Age 12% 1 Voluntary Quit Rate 8% 6% 4% 2% <= Age Range DEFINED BENEFIT RETIREMENT DEFINED CONTRIBUTION RETIREMENT 47
48 Non-US Exempt Attributes N = 103,096 (2014 = 97,029; 2013 = 116,643; 2012 = 121,406) 11 FIRMS (2014 = = 11; 2012 = 13) QUIT RATE = 5.41% (2014 = 5.71%; 2013 = 5.35%; 2012 = 5.62%) GENDER Frequency Percent F M U STATUS Frequency Percent ACTIVE INVOLUTARY LAYOFF U VOLUNTARY QUIT RETIREMENT PERF Frequency Percent HIGH NONHIGH OTHER TERM VOLUNTARY LAYOFF
49 Non-US Exempt Attributes AGE RANGE Frequency Percent <= Unkno Tenure Frequency Percent <
50 Non-US Exempt Attributes JOB TYPE Frequency Percent Customer Service Manufac Ops/Engr Manufac Ops/Supv Engineering Software Engineering Info Tech Research Sales Marketing Supply Chain/Purch Financial Customer Service Finance Human Resources Corp Affairs / Communications Legal Other Exempt Job Rank Frequency Percent Executive Individual Contributor Individual Contributor (Union) n/a Manager / Supervisor XX Retirement Frequency Percent DB DC XX
51 Non-US Exempt Attributes Relative International Workforce Size of ARC Firms Distribution of International Exempt Workforce by Firm 35% Percent of International Exempt Population 3 25% 2 15% 1 5% 0.03% 0.34% 0.38% 1.02% Firm Firm Firm Firm 4.63% 5.44% Firm Firm 8.37% Firm 12.81% 13.21% Firm Firm 24.41% Firm 29.36% Firm 51
52 Non-US Exempt Attributes DISTRIBUTION BY REGION Region Frequency Percent AFRICA ASIA EUROPE LATIN AMERICA MIDDLE EAST OTHER NORTH AM XXX
53 Non-US Exempt Attributes 113 Countries (2014 = 104 Countries) TOP 10 COUNTRIES REPRESENTED SAME TOP 10 CHN, GBR, IND REMAIN TOP 3 COUNTRY FREQUENCY PERCENT QUIT RATE CHN % 7.17% 7.58% IND % 10.43% 8.04% 7.65% GBR % 5.89% 4.84% 6.89% DEU % 2.87% 2.35% 2.98% BRA % 3.75% 5.73% 5.9 MEX % 5.65% 3.29% 3.95% CAN % 4.36% 4.23% 4.2 AUS % 7.49% 5.41% 5.56% JPN % 2.13% 3.19% 2.21% FRA % 6.73% 8.35% 53
54 13% 12% 11% 1 Gender Differences by Length of Service International Exempt Workforce Women Weighted Mean Quit Rate = 5.53% (2014 = 5.75%; 2013 = 5.96%; 2012 = 6.25%) Men Weighted Mean Quit Rate = 5.35% (2014 = 5.68%; 2013 = 5.03%; 2012 = 5.35%) 26% 24% 22% 2 Voluntary Quit Rate 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 18% 16% 14% 12% 1 8% 6% 4% 2% Population Percent < Length of Service Percent Women Percent Men Women Quit Rate Men Quit Rate 54
55 2 18% NonHigh Vs. High Performer Voluntary Quit Rates by Service International Exempt Workforce NonHigh Performer Weighted Mean Quit Rate = 4.78% (2014 = 4.32%; 2013 = 4.6; 2012 = 5.73%) High Performer Weighted Mean Quit Rate = 3.23% (2014 = 2.65%; 2013 = 2.33%; 2012 = 10.08%) 2 18% 16% 16% Voluntary Quit Rate 14% 12% 1 8% 6% 14% 12% 1 8% 6% Percent Population 4% 4% 2% 2% < Length of Service Percent High Performers Percent NonHigh Performers High Performer Quit Rate NonHigh Performer Quit Rate 55
56 International vs. US Comparisons of Quit Rates by Length of Service Exempt Workforce 2 18% US Weighted Mean Quit Rate = 3.81% (2014 = 3.74%; 2013 = 3.2; 2012 = 3.03%) International Weighted Mean Quit Rate = 5.41% (2014 = 5.71%; 2013 = 5.35%; 012 = 5.61%) 2 18% 16% 16% 14% 14% Voluntary Quit Rate 12% 1 8% 12% 1 8% Percent Population 6% 6% 4% 4% 2% 2% < Length of Service Percent NonUS Percent US NonUS Quit Rate US Quit Rate 56
57 MAKING ARC DATA EVEN MORE VALUABLE Potential Additional Variables? Job tenure # past promotions Education level Recruitment source Pay level/range Individual s manager/supervisor 57
Attrition and Retention Consortium 2017 Benchmark Conference Call (2016 Retention Data)
Attrition and Retention Consortium 2017 Benchmark Conference Call (2016 Retention Data) David Allen(david.allen@rutgers.edu) @DGA_TalentProf Professor and Department Chair Rutgers University & Distinguished
More informationWhen Mendel crossed 2 plants that were different in a single trait, he called that a monohybrid cross. The resulting offspring were called the F1
Genetics Gregor Mendel The father of Genetics Genetics- the study of heredity Heredity- the passing of characteristics or traits from parents to offspring Mendel chose pea plants to research. Pea plants
More informationNorovirus Surrogate Test Exposure to SixLog s ihp TM (ionized Hydrogen Peroxide) Decontamination Technology. Executive Summary:
Norovirus Surrogate Test Exposure to SixLog s ihp TM (ionized Hydrogen Peroxide) Decontamination Technology Executive Summary: The ihp TM decontamination technology was used to kill a human norovirus surrogate
More informationThe National DAFNE Audit
The National DAFNE Audit Data Quality and Centre Performance David Hopkins King s College Hospital, London DAFNE Collaborative 26 th June 2015 Why audit matters Audit has been at the centre of DAFNE since
More informationResearch Award Recipient Survey
Research Award Recipient Survey Page 1 of 5 Recipient Name: Dermatology Foundation Research Awards: 1. Current Institutional Affiliation (please specify): Academic Institution: Other: 2. Current Professional
More informationBRINGING OUTSIDERS IN. Foreign Workers and Women in Elite Jobs in Corporate Japan
BRINGING OUTSIDERS IN Foreign Workers and Women in Elite Jobs in Corporate Japan Hilary J. Holbrow, PhD June 18, 2018 OUTSIDERS IN CORPORATE JAPAN: PAST AND PRESENT c. 1985 Women were: 29% of Regular Employees
More informationDay 15: Genetics. Insert Do Now
Insert Do Now Guided Notes: Genetics and Punnet Squares 1. What is a purebred? (slide 1) 2. What are the two purebreds in this example? (slide 1) 3. What does dominant mean? (slide 1) 4. What is a phenotype?
More informationThe Personal Profile System 2800 Series Research Report
The Personal Profile System 2800 Series Research Report The Personal Profile System 2800 Series Research Report Item Number: O-255 1996 by Inscape Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Copyright secured
More informationGlobal Deaf/Hearing Aid Market: Trends and Opportunities ( )
Global Deaf/Hearing Aid Market: Trends and Opportunities (2016-2020) View Report Details Scope of the Report The report titled Global Hearing Aid Market: Size, trends and Forecasts (2016-2020), provides
More informationWhat will women s empowerment mean for men? Selected facts and figures to spark your thinking
What will women s empowerment mean for men? Selected facts and figures to spark your thinking Prepared for the Women s Forum for the Economy and Society by PwC October 211 What will women s empowerment
More informationPositive Responses Neutral Responses Negative Responses Do Not Know/No Basis to Judge
2006 Federal Human Capital Survey Department of Health and Human Services - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Trend Report Number of Surveys Returned: 3600 This is a summary-by-question of your
More informationBangladesh. Rohingya Emergency Response. Early Warning, Alert and Response System (EWARS) Epidemiological Bulletin W1 2018
Bangladesh Rohingya Emergency Response Early Warning, Alert and Response System (EWARS) Epidemiological Bulletin W 0 Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Bangladesh Printed: : Tuesday, 0 January 0 UTC
More informationHalton Region. Business Conditions
Halton Region Business Conditions 2014 Message from Regional Chair Gary Carr Time and again, innovative business owners in Halton tell me that Halton is a great place to live and work because we offer
More informationbirthplace and length of time in the US:
Cervical cancer screening among foreign-born versus US-born women by birthplace and length of time in the US: 2005-2015 Meheret Endeshaw, MPH CDC/ASPPH Fellow Division Cancer Prevention and Control Office
More informationKatarina R. Mansir, Psy.D. Licensed Psychologist PSY25417 (858) Name: Date: Presenting Concerns
Name: Date: Presenting Concerns Briefly describe what brings you to therapy. Approximately how long has this concern been bothering you? Day Week Month Several months Year Several years Most of my life
More informationSurvey of U.S. Adult Cigarette Smokers
Survey of U.S. Adult Cigarette Smokers Topline Report 13 October 2016 ADULT CIGARETTE SMOKERS (U.S. NATIONWIDE): n=1,000 online surveys S1. First, which of the following ranges includes your age? 0% Under
More informationFood Labeling Survey ~ January 2019
Food Labeling Survey ~ January 2019 1 Introduction Research Objective Understand consumer attitudes towards healthy labels and different food packaging aspects that drive purchase behavior. Sampling Research
More informationState Summary Table 1 Child Care Workers/ Educators. Teachers 3 Assistant Teachers 4 Directors FCCH Providers
Appendix D: State Summary Table N Studies = a. Demographic Mean Age (Years) 11 (VI) 10, (VII) 1 42 (CA) 30 (WI) - 43.1 (MN) 31.3-42.4 (MN) 39.5-48.3 (MN) 37 (WI) - 45.7 (CA) Median Age (Years) 2 (VI) 2
More informationA few other notes that may be of use.
A few other notes that may be of use. - Online Version means that the worksheet is done solely on the computer using Microsoft WORD programme. -Except for the listed words and sentences, the main point
More informationStudent Data Files in Electronic Format Data Set Record Layout
Student Data Files in Electronic Format Data Set Record Layout 2013-2014 The enclosed CD contains student background information that is provided on the ReadiStep answer document, as well as details of
More informationNORC AmeriSpeak Omnibus Survey: 41% of Americans Do Not Intend to Get a Flu Shot this Season
Omnibus Survey: 41% of Americans Do Intend to Get a Flu Shot this Season Interview Dates: November 14-19, 2018 Nationally representative sample of 1,202 English-speaking adults age 18 and over, conducted
More informationThe Genetics of Parenthood
The Genetics of Parenthood Introduction Why do people, even closely related people, look slightly different from each other? The reason for these differences in physical characteristics (called phenotype)
More informationCrystal Run Healthcare's Journey To NCQA ACO Accreditation
Crystal Run Healthcare's Journey To NCQA ACO Accreditation Scott Hines, MD Co-Chief Clinical Transformation Officer AMGA QI Council Meeting March 13, 2013 NCQA Accreditation What? Voluntary program Assesses
More informationSCHEDULED DRUGS REGULATION
Province of Alberta PHARMACY AND DRUG ACT SCHEDULED DRUGS REGULATION Alberta Regulation 66/2007 With amendments up to and including Alberta Regulation 11/2017 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta
More informationJoint&Informa,onal&Hearing,& Judiciary&and&Appropria,ons&Commi:ees& &! April!22,!2014!! Council!of!State!Governments!Jus;ce!Center!!!
Joint&Informa,onal&Hearing,& Judiciary&and&Appropria,ons&Commi:ees& & April22,2014 CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus;ceCenter MichaelThompson,Director CouncilofStateGovernmentsJus;ceCenter Na;onalnonBprofit,nonBpar;sanmembershipassocia;onof
More informationMAKING AN IMPACT ON GENDER EQUALITY LET S UNCOVER THE ISSUES. LET S CREATE SOLUTIONS.
MAKING AN IMPACT ON GENDER EQUALITY LET S UNCOVER THE ISSUES. LET S CREATE SOLUTIONS. BIG PICTURE A global focus COMMITMENT FOR CHANGE Coming together for good PINPOINT ON FOODSERVICE What s meaningful
More informationA. CD 132 Creative Experiences for Children Across the Curriculum This item was tabled for changes.
CRAFTON HILLS COLLEGE CURRICULUM COMMITTEE MINUTES February 10, 2014 VOTING MEMBERS: Note: If Present Troy Dial Gwen Di Ponio Jodi Hanley Catherine Hendrickson Mariana Moreno Patricia Menchaca Mark McConnell
More information1. Coverage. This chapter provides a practical Index, by subject, to the OPM GPPA and the NSPS GPPA Supplement.
NATIONAL SECURITY PERSONNEL SYSTEM Chapter 34 NSPS Topic Index 1. Coverage. This chapter provides a practical Index, by subject, to the OPM GPPA and the NSPS GPPA Supplement. 2. Summary of Changes. The
More informationWebinar 1 Transcript
Webinar 1 Transcript Slide 1: This is the first of a series of webinars that will provide insights, techniques, tools and resources that will help us assist our homeless veteran clients address the many
More informationCervical Cancer Screening and Prevention in Latinas. Sandra Torrente, MD, MSc Kenneth Grullon, MD
ç Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention in Latinas Sandra Torrente, MD, MSc Kenneth Grullon, MD Objectives Cervical cancer epidemiology Cervical cancer screening rates locally Health Disparities of
More informationThe increasing involvement of corporate entities
Practice Location Characteristics of Non-Traditional Dental Practices Eric S. Solomon, DDS, MA; Daniel L. Jones, DDS, PhD Abstract: Current and future dental school graduates are increasingly likely to
More informationIssues in Women & Minority Health
Issues in Women & Minority Health Dr. Dawn Upchurch Professor Department of Community Health Sciences PH 150 Dr. Upchurch 1 Overview of Session HP 2010 Model: Determinants of Health Review of HP 2010 Goals
More informationSurvey for Concerned Family and Friends
Survey for Concerned Family and Friends We need your help. Your ideas and experiences with persons with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias will help inform the creation of a Florida state plan to
More informationGlobal Invisible Braces Market: Trends, Opportunities and Forecasts ( )
Global Invisible Braces Market: Trends, Opportunities and Forecasts (2016-2021) By Types Clear Aligners, Ceramic, Lingual By Region Americas, Europe, Middle East, Africa, Asia-Pacific By Country- USA,
More information2018 HIV/AIDS Epidemiology Update 2017 Data. James Dowling Health Program Coordinator Division of Public Health
2018 HIV/AIDS Epidemiology Update 2017 Data James Dowling Health Program Coordinator Division of Public Health Primary Sources Evaluation HIV/AIDS Reporting System (EHARS) Collects infection data from
More informationTHE EMERGE SURVEY ON TAKING PART IN BIOBANK RESEARCH: VERSION A
THE EMERGE SURVEY ON TAKING PART IN BIOBANK RESEARCH: VERSION A What is this survey about? This survey is about your views on taking part in medical research. We want to understand what you think about
More information2.2 p. 58. Unit 2.1 p. 53 Minidialogue Do Norman (purple) and Priscilla (pink) attend the same college?
Unit 2.1 p. 53 Minidialogue 1 _ 1. Do Norman (purple) and Priscilla (pink) attend the same college? 2. What languages are they learning? Who are their teachers? Minidialogue 2 1. Who are Stefanie and Iva
More informationDental Assisting Program Fall 2014 Entrance Demographic Survey
Dental Assisting Program Fall 2014 Entrance Demographic Survey Prepared by Elisa Lewis Date: 09.10.14 Introduction The Chaffey College Dental Assisting (DA) Program Entrance Demographic Survey was completed
More informationTHE STATE OF BLACKS IN NEW MEXICO: BLACK HEALTH DISPARITIES AND ITS EFFECTS ON HEALTH OUTCOMES IN NEW MEXICO AS REFLECTED BY THE DATA HUB
Research Brief THE STATE OF BLACKS IN NEW MEXICO: BLACK HEALTH DISPARITIES AND ITS EFFECTS ON HEALTH OUTCOMES IN NEW MEXICO AS REFLECTED BY THE DATA HUB By Brooke Abrams, Dr. Gabriel Sanchez, PhD, and
More informationConsumer Sodium Research
Consumer Sodium Research Concern, Perceptions and Action April 2009 125 CambridgePark Drive Cambridge, MA 02140 www.cogentresearch.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 OBJECTIVES & METHODOLOGY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RESEARCH
More informationBuilding the BCBSM Physician Group Incentive Program and Patient-Centered Medical Home
Building the BCBSM Physician Group Incentive Program and Patient-Centered Medical Home May 2011 Margaret H. Mason, MHSA Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan mmason@bcbsm.com What Can We Do Together? 2004
More informationState of Iowa Outcomes Monitoring System
State of Iowa Outcomes Monitoring System THE IOWA CONSORTIUM FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE RESEARCH AND EVALUATION Year 16 Annual Outcome Evaluation Trend Report November 2014 With Funds Provided By: Iowa Department
More informationLegendary Service: The Key Is to Care
Legendary Service: The Key Is to Care Kathy Riley Cuff Senior Consulting Partner The Ken Blanchard Companies Legal Notice: These slides are being provided to support your participation in the online seminar
More informationAllied Health Professions Act 7 of 2004 section 55
MADE IN TERMS OF section 55 Government Notice 211 of 2015 (GG 5831) came into force on date of publication: 16 September 2015 The Government Notice which publishes these regulations notes that they were
More informationName: Date of Birth: Address: City: State: Zip Code: Phone Number: Cell Phone: Work Number: Race: Primary Language: Secondary Language:
Address: Phone Number: Cell Phone: Work Number: Email: Last 4 of SS #: Patient Demographic Information: Gender: Male Female Marital Status Single Married Widowed Divorced Other: Ethnicity Hispanic or Latino
More informationDENTAL BENEFITS: A BRIDGE TO ORAL HEALTH & WELLNESS
R GUARDIAN WORKPLACE BENEFITS STUDY SM 5TH ANNUAL DENTAL BENEFITS: A BRIDGE TO ORAL HEALTH & WELLNESS Dental benefits utilization, especially for preventive services, contributes to better oral health
More informationAttitudes Toward Smoking Restrictions in Work Sites, Restaurants, and Bars Among North Carolinians. Abstract
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Attitudes Toward Smoking Restrictions in Work Sites, Restaurants, and Bars Among North Carolinians Rachel Loflin Maguire, Jason Brinkley, Christopher Mansfield Abstract Background Public
More informationTable of contents. Part I. Gender equality: The economic case, social norms, and public policies
Table of contents Executive summary... 13 Part I Gender equality: The economic case, social norms, and public policies Chapter 1. The economic case for gender equality... 23 Chapter 2. Why social institutions
More informationU.S. News Best Lawyers
U.S. News Best Lawyers "Best Law Firms" Law Firm Survey 9th Edition Instructions We understand that not all of the questions included in this survey are applicable for every law rm. You will not be penalized
More informationReporting by Racial Subgroups Hawai i. Jill Miyamura, PhD Hawaii Health Information Corporation
Reporting by Racial Subgroups Hawai i Jill Miyamura, PhD Hawaii Health Information Corporation Issues Regarding Race Hawai i Disparities: Asians and Pacific Islanders Population estimates US Census 2
More information2 nd and 3 rd Order Impacts of Community Mitigation Strategies
2 nd and 3 rd Order Impacts of Community Mitigation Strategies Institute of Medicine October 26, 2006 Carter Mecher, MD Department of Veterans Affairs Pneumonia and Influenza Death Rates per 100,000 Infants,
More informationMinnesota s Alcohol and Drug Counselor Workforce,
OFFICE OF RURAL HEALTH AND PRIMARY CARE Minnesota s Alcohol and Drug Counselor Workforce, 2014-2016 HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE 2014 LADC WORKFORCE SURVEY i Overall According to the Board of Behavioral Health
More informationState of Iowa Outcomes Monitoring System
State of Iowa Outcomes Monitoring System THE IOWA CONSORTIUM FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE RESEARCH AND EVALUATION Year 17 Annual Outcome Evaluation Trend Report November 2015 With Funds Provided By: Iowa Department
More informationEvaluation of Grief Support Services Survey. Elective Modules and Questions
Evaluation of Grief Support Services Survey Elective Modules and Questions HOW TO USE THE EGSS SURVEY ELECTIVE MODULES AND QUESTIONS 1. Bereavement Component Modules The following modules represent various
More informationASL 1-2 Notes. Debbie Redelings. ASL 1-2 Notes 1
ASL 1-2 Notes Debbie Redelings ASL 1-2 Notes 1 PARAMETERS ASL 1-2 Notes 2 Signs Have Parts: Parameters Handshape ABCs / Modified ABCs (non-letters) Numbers / Modified Numbers Ex: FATHER Location: Where
More informationLewis & Clark National Estimation and Awareness Study
Lewis & Clark National Estimation and Awareness Study Prepared by for the Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research and Montana's Tourism Advisory Council Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research
More informationFederation of State Boards of Physical Therapy Minimum Data Set Questionnaire
Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy Minimum Data Set Questionnaire Purpose: Understanding the current United States Health Workforce enables Federal and State Governments and Health Professional
More informationBrand & Style Guide.
Brand & Style Guide. Contents 2 Introduction 6 Visual Identity 17 Applications Introduction A brand is more than just a logo. It's how we are perceived as an organisation, how we interact with our students,
More informationWorkplace Diversity. Women of Color in the Legal Profession. March 9, 2018
Workplace Diversity Women of Color in the Legal Profession March 9, 2018 Dual Burdens of Minority Status Women of color in the legal profession are the repository for every stereotype, negative bias, and
More information601 TAMALPAIS DRIVE CORTE MADERA, CA
6,477 SF Retail Available for Lease Conceptual Elevation Existing Stand-Alone Retail Opportunity John Cumbelich & Associates is pleased to present this rare, stand-alone retail opportunity in the heart
More informationA Profile of New Hospice and Palliative Medicine Physicians:
A Profile of New Hospice and Palliative Medicine Physicians: Results from the Survey of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Fellows Who Completed Training in 2015 George Washington University Health Workforce
More informationNATIONAL BENCHMARK SURVEY: IMPACT OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ON THE AMERICAN WORKPLACE
NATIONAL BENCHMARK SURVEY: IMPACT OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ON THE AMERICAN WORKPLACE Commissioned by: The Corporate Alliance to End Partner Violence Sponsored by: Verizon Wireless Blue Shield of California
More informationComprehensive Substance Abuse Prevention Program Evaluation
Comprehensive Substance Abuse Prevention Program Evaluation THE IOWA CONSORTIUM FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE RESEARCH AND EVALUATION Comprehensive Substance Abuse Prevention Program Evaluation Annual Report 7/1/2015
More informationDEMOGRAPHICS. DoB/Age = Date of birth / Age
DoB/Age = Date of birth / Age 1. CDE Variable DoB/age = date of birth / age 2. CDE Definition Age is defined as the time difference between the current date and the date of birth Date of birth: calendar
More informationMarket Access CTR Summary
Market Access CTR Summary Study No.: BEL114246 Title: Efficacy of Belimumab Treatment in a Subpopulation of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Patients: A Pooled Analysis of the HGS1006-C1056 (BLISS-52)
More informationDental Benchmarks: The Numbers That Matter: Benchmarking Your Dental Practice -The Key Measure for Success Aldrich
Dental Benchmarks: The Numbers That Matter: Benchmarking Your Dental Practice -The Key Measure for Success 2017 Aldrich HELPING OUR CLIENTS ACHIEVE THEIR GOALS Director of Dental Services at Aldrich Top
More informationPhase II Deaf Consumer Needs Assessment. Final Report
Phase II Deaf Consumer Needs Assessment Final Report SUBMITTED ON BEHALF OF THE NATIONAL CONSORTIUM OF INTERPRETER EDUCATION CENTERS (#H160A&B) BY DENNIS COKELY & ELIZABETH WINSTON, NIEC SEPTEMBER 2009
More informationDiagnostic Medical Sonography
Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program Report For Greater South Bay and Peninsula Region (Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties) September 2016 12345 El Monte Road Los Altos Hills, California 94022 650.949.7777
More informationRespond to the following questions for all household members each adult and child. A separate form should be included for each household member.
HMIS Data Collection Template for Project ENTRY CoC Program This form can be used by all CoC-funded project types: Prevention, Street Outreach, Safe Haven, Transitional Housing, Rapid Re-housing, Permanent
More informationSMOKE-FREE LAWS AND EMPLOYEE TURNOVER
SMOKE-FREE LAWS AND EMPLOYEE TURNOVER ERIC THOMPSON, ELLEN J. HAHN, GLENN BLOMQUIST, JOHN GAREN, DON MULLINEAUX, NOLA OGUNRO and MARY K. RAYENS* This study examines how smoke-free laws influence turnover
More informationThe Oral Health Workforce & Access to Dental Care
The Oral Health Workforce & Access to Dental Care Beth Mertz, PhD, MA National Health Policy Forum April 10, 2015 Objectives 1. Provide an overview of the current dental access and workforce landscape
More informationWho is TOD in Metro Denver? April Employee Survey Report. Appendix C: Responses to Survey Questions by Business Type
Who is TOD in Metro Denver? April 2010 Benchmarking the Evolution of TOD in Metro Denver Employee Survey Report Appendix C: Responses to Survey Questions by Business Type DRCOG Who is TOD in Metro Denver?
More informationTableau Public Viz Tool
Tableau Public Viz Tool The purpose of this document is to provide descriptions of the Split By variables for the 2016 VoiceGR Survey results displayed in the Tableau Public Viz Tool. Once you have entered
More informationRACE-ETHNICITY DIFFERENCES IN ADOLESCENT SUICIDE IN THE 2009 DANE COUNTY YOUTH ASSESSMENT
1 P age RACE-ETHNICITY DIFFERENCES IN ADOLESCENT SUICIDE IN THE 2009 DANE COUNTY YOUTH ASSESSMENT Andrew J. Supple, PhD Associate Professor Human Development & Family Studies The University of North Carolina
More informationNashville HMIS Intake Template Use COC Funded Projects: HMIS Intake at Entry Template
HMIS Data Collection Template for Project ENTRY CoC Program This form can be used by all CoC-funded project types: Prevention, Street Outreach, Safe Haven, Transitional Housing, Rapid Re-housing, Permanent
More informationArizona Youth Tobacco Survey 2005 Report
Arizona Department of Health Services Arizona Department of Health Services Arizona Youth Tobacco Survey 25 Report November 26 Office of Tobacco Education and Prevention Program Prepared by: Evaluation,
More informationPertussis: 2016 Year End Report
Pertussis: 216 Year End Report This report characterizes primary surveillance data collected by the Salt Lake County Health Department from questions on the Utah Pertussis Investigation Form and incorporates
More informationNational Breast Cancer Awareness Month. Media Handbook
National Breast Cancer Awareness Month Media Handbook At-a-Glance Facts About Komen and Our Mission: Research We ve funded more than $790 million in breast cancer research since 1982. We currently fund
More informationAlcohol & Drug Practice
Alcohol & Drug Practice Vice-President, Health & Safety June 1, 2011 Purpose Cenovus recognizes that the use of alcohol and drugs can adversely affect job performance, the work environment and the safety
More informationMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY DIVERSITY REPORT Degrees Awarded and Number of Completers Table 13. Degrees Awarded by CIP Family, Ethnicity and Fiscal Year
Table 13. Degrees Awarded by CIP Family, Ethnicity and 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 Number Percent Agriculture, Agriculture Operations and Related Sciences (CIP Family 01) Nonresident
More informationDeaths in Hawaii Due to Major Cardiovascular Disease
in Hawaii Due to Major Cardiovascular Disease Death Counts, Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates, and Years of Potential Life Lost for Coronary Heart Disease for the State of Hawaii (Residents Only), by State,
More informationPART 3 WHAT IS COVERED
PART 3 WHAT IS COVERED A. DEDUCTIBLE Deductible is the amount of charges you will pay before We begin to pay for certain Covered Services. 1. Your Yearly Deductible for Covered Services is $25.00. During
More information2017 HIV/AIDS Epidemiology Update 2016 Data. James Dowling Health Program Coordinator Division of Public Health
2017 HIV/AIDS Epidemiology Update 2016 Data James Dowling Health Program Coordinator Division of Public Health Primary Sources Evaluation HIV/AIDS Reporting System (EHARS) Collects infection data from
More informationMinnesota s Dental Assistant Workforce,
Minnesota s Dental Assistant Workforce, 2014-2015 HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE 2014-2015 DENTAL ASSISTANT WORKFORCE SURVEY i Overall According to the Minnesota Board of Dentistry, as of December 2015, there were
More informationDoes Variation in the Physical Characteristics of Generic Drugs Affect Patients Experiences?
Does Variation in the Physical Characteristics of Generic Drugs Affect Patients Experiences? Results from a National Survey of Pharmacists and Patients Ameet Sarpatwari, J.D., Ph.D. Instructor in Medicine,
More informationI t s i n o u r n a t u r e t o h e l p
I t s i n o u r n a t u r e t o h e l p COMPANY PROFILE Founded in 1977, Ceres Environmental Services, Inc. is a licensed general contractor and governmental contracting firm specializing in disaster recovery
More informationEpidemiological Highlights
W15 218 Highlights Epidemiological Highlights Week 15 W15 218 Highlights 156 health facilities are currently registered in EWARS. 116 reported were received for week 15. The cumulative completeness for
More informationEpidemiological Highlights
W24 218 Highlights Epidemiological Highlights Week 24 W24 218 Highlights 17 (63%) health facilities are currently registered as active EWARS reporting sites and no new facilities registered this week.
More informationEpidemiological Highlights
W12 218 Highlights Epidemiological Highlights Week 12 W12 218 Highlights Total population of 866 and 728 786 (84%) are under surveillance. 155 of health facilities enrolled. In week 12, a total of 77 alerts
More informationSupplemental Digital Content 3. Definitions of primary outcomes.
Supplemental Digital Content 1. Dates of Option B/B+ implementation at the 36 facilities in the SAIA trial. Kenya and Mozambique implemented Option B+; Côte d Ivoire implemented Option B. Study Arm Country
More informationDental Fee Schedule Updated
For Participating Dentists August 2004 Dental Fee Schedule Updated HMSA is pleased to announce that all fees for covered dental services will receive a 2.3 percent increase across the board effective October
More informationPublic Health 150 October 27, 2010 MIDTERM EXAMINATION
Public Health 150 October 27, 2010 MIDTERM EXAMINATION Select the best answer from the multiple choice questions. There are questions and pages on the examination. Notify the instructor if your examination
More informationWhere Is Autism Employment Heading In 2017?
1 of 5 3/19/2017 2:35 PM Michael Bernick Contributor I write about emerging employment structures, policy and law. Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own. BUSINESS 12/13/2016 @ 11:04AM
More informationWhat Do We Know about the Current and Future Psychologist Workforce?
What Do We Know about the Current and Future Psychologist Workforce? Karen Stamm, PhD Director, Center for Workforce Studies Virginia Behavioral Health Summit September 27, 2018 The opinions expressed
More informationCLASSIFICATION TREE ANALYSIS:
CLASSIFICATION TREE ANALYSIS: A USEFUL STATISTICAL TOOL FOR PROGRAM EVALUATORS Meredith L. Philyaw, MS Jennifer Lyons, MSW(c) Why This Session? Stand up if you... Consider yourself to be a data analyst,
More informationEpidemiological Highlights
W13 218 Highlights Epidemiological Highlights Week 13 W13 218 Highlights To date, 155 health facilities out of 158 (98%) have been registered as EWARS sites. 19 reported were received for week 13, with
More informationWe ll be covering three topics over the next 20 minutes.
This is the first of a series of webinars that will provide insights, techniques, tools and resources that will help us assist our homeless veteran clients address the many challenges they re likely to
More informationLongevity Offset and Oblique Liners. Surgical Technique
Longevity Offset and Oblique Liners Surgical Technique Longevity Offset & Oblique Liners Surgical Technique 1 Introduction Complete Acetabular System Joint instability is an important issue in both primary
More informationEpidemiological Highlights
W14 218 Highlights Epidemiological Highlights Week 14 W14 218 Highlights 155 health facilities are currently registered as EWARS sites. 111 reported were received for week 14. In 218, the cumulative completeness
More informationWORK PLACE HAPPINESS FOR EMPLOYEES IN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY IN TAMILNADU
WORK PLACE HAPPINESS FOR EMPLOYEES IN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY IN TAMILNADU Dr.L.Sumathy, Assistant Professor and Head, Department of Business Administration, Thiru.V.Ka.Govt.Arts College. Triruvarur,Tamil
More information