2016 Three Rivers Public Health Department Community Health Needs Assessment
|
|
- Vivien Henderson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2016 Public Health Department Community Health Needs Assessment Report prepared by Schmeeckle Research in conjunction with the Public Health Department
2 Table of Contents Overview of the Community Health Needs Assessment... 1 Community Health and the Local Public Health System... 2 Description of Data Sources... 3 Demographics... 4 Veterans... 7 Poverty... 9 Single Parent Families Minority Populations Health Disparities Access to Health Services Mental Health Bullying Youth Substance Abuse Adult Alcohol and Tobacco Use Alcohol-Impaired Driving Motor Vehicle Safety Unintentional Injury Crime Foster Care and Child Abuse/Neglect Education Physical Activity Nutrition Obesity Health Screening General Health Metrics Cancer Heart Disease Stroke High Blood Pressure and Cholesterol Diabetes Respiratory and Pulmonary Illnesses Child and Adolescent Mortality Maternal and Infant Health Teen Pregnancy Sexually Transmitted Disease Alzheimer s Disease Arthritis Oral Health Kidney Disease Flu and Pneumonia Vaccination Child Immunization Environmental Health Conclusion: Community Health Needs References... 87
3 Overview of the Community Health Needs Assessment Under the direction of the Public Health Department, the 2015 Community Health Needs Assessment has been created for the three counties in the Health District (Dodge, Saunders, and Washington Counties in ). This assessment will be the basis for the Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP). This assessment will also serve as a reference document for the non-profit hospitals in the district to assist in strategic planning. It is the purpose of this assessment to inform all interested parties about the health status of the population within the district and to provide community partners with a wide array of data that can be used to educate and mobilize the community and its resources to improve the health of the population. The Community Health Needs Assessment process is collaborative and is intended to serve as a single data report for multiple coalitions, organizations, and hospitals in the three county region unified by the Public Health Department. It is the goal of the Community Health Needs Assessment to describe the health status of the population and identify areas for health improvement, with the hope that the data from this report will be used to target strategic initiatives focused on the areas of highest public health need in the District. This assessment will be updated and revised every three years, thus providing communities with up to date data to evaluate progress made towards identified health priorities, and for the selection of new ones. This report contains a broad array of demographic and public health data (see a description of the main sources of data in the Description of Data Sources section (page 3). Additional reports have been created for each county in which the county-level data indicative of need are highlighted. Schmeeckle Research of Lincoln, NE assembled this assessment of public health and community well-being under the direction of the District Health Department. 1
4 Community Health and the Local Public Health System Community health includes a broad array of issues addressed by numerous agencies. Topics that fall under community health include such things as access to health care, child welfare, crime, alcohol and tobacco use, drug use, poverty, obesity, diabetes, teen pregnancy, teen sexual activity, healthy children, environmental factors affecting health, cancer, heart disease, and a broad array of other epidemiological topics. Addressing needs of community health goes far beyond the work of hospitals and the public health department. A broad network of agencies must work in collaboration to meet the diverse health needs of the community. An example of the local public health system network is shown in Figure 1 below, in which over 20 agencies collaborate in various ways in order to form a multi-connected network of public, private, faith based, non-profit, and for-profit agencies that effectively addresses the health needs of the community. Figure 1: The Local Public Health System (an example) (Source: Rural Health Association) 2
5 Description of Data Sources A broad array of sources provide data for this report. Following is a summary of the most frequently cited sources (Figure 2). Note that statistical significance is only indicated on Behavioral Rick Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data. None of the other data sources provided indication of statistical significance. Figure 2 Frequently Cited Data Sources Data Source Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Health Rankings Crime Commission Department of Education Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Risk and Protective Factor Student Survey (NRPFSS) U.S. Census/American Community Survey Description - A comprehensive, annual health survey of adults ages 18 and over on risk factors such as alcohol use, tobacco use, obesity, physical activity, health screening, economic stresses, access to health care, mental health, physical health, cancer, diabetes, and many other areas impacting public health. Note that all BRFSS data are age-adjusted, except for indicators keying on specific age groups. The data are also weighted by other demographic variables according to an algorithm defined by the CDC. - A wide array of data from multiple sources combined to give an overall picture of health in a county. Examples of data include premature deaths, access to locations for physical activity, ratio of population to health care professionals, violent crimes, and many other indicators. Health Rankings provides health outcomes and health factors rankings for 78 counties in. - Annual counts on arrests (adult and juvenile) by type submitted voluntarily by local and state-level police departments. - Data contained in 's annual State of the Schools Report, including graduation and dropout rates, student characteristics, and student achievement scores. - A wide array of data around births, mortality, child abuse and neglect, health professionals, and other areas. Note that all mortality data are age-adjusted. - A survey of youth in grades 8, 10, and 12 on risk factors such alcohol, tobacco, and drug use, and bullying. - U.S. Census Bureau estimates on demographic elements such as population, age, race/ethnicity, household income, poverty, health insurance, single parent families, and educational attainment. Annual estimates are available through the American Community Survey. 3
6 Demographics The total population of the District is 77,709 (Figure 3). Figure 3 Population (2013) Saunders Washington Dodge 36,675 20,800 20,234 77,709 Source: U.S. Census/American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2013) As a whole, the District is 91.7% White non-hispanic. There is a significantly sized minority population in Dodge (Figure 4). See also the Minority Populations section below (page 12). Figure 4 Race/Ethnicity (2013) White (non-hispanic) Dodge Saunders Washington Total 87.1% % 91.7% 81.7% Minority 12.9% % 8.3% 18.3% Source: U.S. Census/American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2013) Each of the three counties in the District has a median age of over 40, which is higher than the median age of 36.3 for the state (Figure 5). Figure 5 Median age (2013) Saunders Washington Dodge * *An average weighted by the population in each county. Source: U.S. Census/American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2013) 4
7 Among the three counties in the District, Dodge has the highest percentage of the population that is age 65 or older at 18.6%. As a whole, 16.9% of the Three Rivers District is 65 or older (compared to 13.7% for the state) (Figure 6). Figure 6 Number and percentage of the population age 65 and over (2013) Dodge 6,833 (18.6%) Saunders 3,327 (16.) Washington 2,944 (14.5%) 13,104 (16.9%) 252,585 (13.7%) Source: U.S. Census/American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2013) Just under one-fourth (24.3%) of the population is under the age of 18 (Figure 7). Figure 7 Number and percentage of the population under the age of 18 (2013) Dodge Saunders Washington 8,624 (23.5%) 5,349 (25.7%) 4,890 (24.2%) 18,863 (24.3%) 460,116 (25.) Source: U.S. Census/American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2013) From 2010 to 2013, the birth rate was lower for each of the three counties in the District than it was for the state. In 2013, there were 941 births in the district, which makes for a rate of 12.1 births per 1,000 population (compared to a rate of 14.0 per 1,000 for the state) (Figure 8). Figure 8. Number of births and birth rate per 1,000 population Dodge 491 (13.4) 422 (11.5) 500 (13.7) 476 (13.0) Saunders 270 (13.0) 261 (12.5) 235 (11.3) 226 (10.8) Washington 210 (10.4) 213 (10.5) 182 (9.0) 239 (11.8) 971 (12.5) 896 (11.5) 917 (11.8) 941 (12.1) 25,916 (14.2) 25,722 (14.0) 25,939 (14.0) 26,094 (14.0) 5
8 Dodge stands out as having a notably lower median household income and per capita income as compared to the state. Saunders and Washington Counties each have higher median household incomes and per capita incomes as compared to the state (Figure 9). Figure 9 Income (2013) Median household income Dodge Saunders Washington * $59,038 $75,270 $76,170 $67,844 $67,023 Per capita income $24,588 $30,039 $29,328 $27,281 $26,899 *An average weighted by the population in each county. Source: U.S. Census/American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2013) 6
9 Veterans Across the District there are 6,651 veterans, accounting for 11.3% of the total population aged 18 and over (Figure 10). Figure 10 Veterans (2013) Number of veterans Veterans as percentage of total population aged 18 years and over Dodge Saunders Washington 2,959 1,883 1,809 6, , % 12.2% 11.8% 11.3% 10.3% Source: U.S. Census/American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2013) Compared to the state, there is a lower proportion of younger veterans in the District. Veterans aged 18 to 34 comprise just 5.9% of the total veteran population in the Three Rivers District (compared to 9.4% for the state) (Figure 11). Figure 11 Age of veterans (2013) Dodge Saunders Washington * 18 to 34 years 3.8% 7.5% 7.7% 5.9% 9.4% 35 to 54 years 22.3% 22.8% 26.1% 23.5% to 64 years 17.4% 23.9% 23.1% 20.8% 22.5% 65 to 75 years 23.7% 22.5% % 19.2% 75 years and over 32.7% 23.3% 22.2% 27.2% 23.9% *An average weighted by the population in each county. Source: U.S. Census/American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2013) 7
10 Across the state veterans have considerably lower rates of poverty compared to non-veterans. In the District an estimated 4.5% of veterans are in poverty, compared to a poverty rate of 8.5% for nonveterans (Figure 12). Figure 12 Poverty rates: veterans and non-veterans (2013) Veterans in poverty Non-veterans in poverty Dodge *An average weighted by the population in each county. Saunders Washington * 5.6% 3.2% % 5.8% 10.1% 7.2% 6.7% 8.5% 11.9% Source: U.S. Census/American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2013) Across the state veterans have considerably higher rates of disability compared to nonveterans. In the District an estimated 28.9% of veterans have a disability, compared to a disability rate of 12.7% for non-veterans. Figure 13 Disability status (2013) Veterans with a disability Non-veterans with a disability Dodge *An average weighted by the population in each county. Saunders Washington * 29.1% 27.6% 30.1% 28.9% 26.2% 14.7% 11.1% 10.7% 12.7% 12. Source: U.S. Census/American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2013) 8
11 Poverty Despite having a lower median household income and per capita income as compared to the state (see Figure 9 directly above), Dodge has lower rates of poverty as compared to the state. Saunders and Washington Counties have rates of poverty that are also lower than the state. According to the U.S. Census, 9.2% of the total population is in poverty (compared to 12.8% for the state), and 12.3% of the under 18 population in the District is in poverty (compared to 17.4% for the state) (Figure 14). Figure 14. Individuals in poverty (2013) 2 15% 1 5% Dodge Saunders Washington Total population in poverty 10.7% % 9.2% 12.8% Under 18 population in poverty % 11.7% 12.3% 17.4% Source: U.S. Census/American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2013) An estimated total of 6,966 individuals are in poverty in the Three Rivers District (Figure 15). Figure 15 Number of individuals in poverty (2013) Saunders Washington Dodge 3,801 1,648 1,517 6,966 Source: U.S. Census/American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2013) 9
12 Unemployment is relatively low in the District at around 3% for each county (Figure 16). Figure 16 Unemployment (July, 2015) Saunders Washington Dodge * 3.3% 2.9% 3.1% 3.1% 3. *An average weighted by the population in each county. Source: Department of Labor (2015) In there was a substantial increase in the percentage of children in the District as well as the State eligible for free and reduced school meals. The increase may be due to a change in the guidelines for determining eligibility. In , 4,863 children in the District were eligible for free and reduced school meals, and over half (51.7%) of the children in Dodge were eligible (Figure 17). Figure 17. Number and percentage of children eligible for free and reduced school meals Dodge 2,073 (39%) 3,036 (51.7%) Saunders 815 (26%) 1,064 (34.2%) Washington 709 (16%) 763 (20.7%) 3,597 (28%) 4,863 (38.4%) 93,575 (36%) 133,972 (44.2%) Dept. of Education, contained in Kids Count (2015) In 2013, 5,482 District children were enrolled in Medicaid or the Children s Health Insurance Plan (CHIP), of these 3,505 were from Dodge (Figure 18). Figure 18. Number and percentage of children enrolled in Medicaid or CHIP Dodge 3,051 (36.) 3,505 (40.2%) Saunders 941 (18.4%) 1,174 (22.1%) Washington 774 (15.4%) 803 (16.2%) 4,766 (25.6%) 5,482 (28.9%) 140,281 (31.5%) 161,729 (35.5%) DHHS, Financial & Program Services, contained in Kids Count (2015) 10
13 In 2013, 24.1% of adults reported housing insecurity, and 17.7% reported food insecurity (Figures 19 and 20). See the notes below each figure for definitions of housing and food insecurity. Figure 19. Housing insecurity* in the past year among those who own or rent their home % 24.1% 26.6% 28.8% *Percentage who report they were always, usually, or sometimes worried or stressed about having enough money to pay their rent or mortgage. Figure 20. Food insecurity* in the past year among adults 18 and over % 17.7% 17.6% 19. *Percentage who report that they were always, usually, or sometimes worried or stressed about having enough money to buy nutritious meals. 11
14 Single Parent Families More than one-in-five (22.6%) children in the District live in a single parent household, which is lower than the rate of 28.3% for the state as a whole. Dodge is more in line with rates for the state with 27.4% of children living in a single parent household. (Figure 21). 3 Figure 21. Percentage of children living in single parent households* (2013) 27.4% 28.3% % 22.6% % Dodge Saunders Washington *Children living in either female householder, no husband present, families or male householder, no wife present, families, as a percentage of all children living in family households. Source: U.S. Census/American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2013) In the District, just 5.2% of married couple families with children are in poverty, but poverty among single mother households ( female householder, no husband present ) with children is at 27.2% in the district (Figure 22). 12
15 Figure 22. Poverty among families with children under 18 (2013) Dodge Saunders Washington All families % 14.5% Married-couple families 6.3% 3.7% 5.2% 5.2% 6.3% Female householder, no husband present families 26.7% % 27.2% 37.9% Source: U.S. Census/American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2013) Approximately one-third of all children in the District and are born to unmarried mothers. In Dodge, 40.8% of all births were to unmarried mothers from , accounting for 976 births over this five-year period (Figure 23). Note that children born to unmarried mothers and living in a single mother household (also known as female householder, no husband present family ) are much more likely to be in poverty than children living in married couple families (see Figure 22 above). Figure 23. Number and percentage of births to unmarried mothers Dodge 968 (38.9%) 964 (40.) 990 (40.6%) 976 (40.8%) Saunders 274 (21.1%) 286 (21.7%) 288 (22.4%) 274 (21.6%) Washington 260 (24.1%) 263 (24.8%) 255 (25.) 269 (25.8%) 1,502 (30.9%) 1,513 (31.4%) 1,533 (32.3%) 1,519 (32.2%) 44,729 (33.5%) 44,658 (33.7%) 44,305 (33.7%) 43,854 (33.6%) 13
16 Minority Populations An estimated total of 6,424 minorities live in the District, the majority of which are of Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (Figure 24). Figure 24 Minorities (2013) Hispanic/ Latino Black/ African- American NH Asian NH American Indian/ Alaskan Native NH Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander NH Two or More Races NH Other NH Total Minorities Dodge 3, ,731 Saunders Washington , ,424 Note: NH=non-Hispanic. Source: U.S. Census/American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2013) Among the foreign born population in the District, 57.2% are not U.S. citizens according to the U.S. Census. This is lower than the rate of 65.2% for the state (Figure 25). Figure 25 Foreign-born population (2013) Total foreignborn population Naturalized U.S. citizen Not a U.S. citizen Dodge 1, (40.3%) 1,182 (59.7%) Saunders (50.9%) 134 (49.1%) Washington (55.2%) 95 (44.8%) 2,466 1,055 (42.8%) 1,411 (57.2%) 116,630 40,566 (34.8%) 76,064 (65.2%) Source: U.S. Census/American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2013) 14
17 One-in-ten (10.3%) individuals age five and over in Dodge speak a language other than English at home, which is comparable to the rate of 10.5% for the state. Saunders and Washington Counties have relatively small non-english speaking populations (Figure 26). 15% 1 5% Figure 26. Percentage of the population age 5 and over speaking a language other than English at home (2013) 10.3% Dodge 4.4% Saunders 1.9% Washington 6.5% 10.5% Source: U.S. Census/American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2013) 15
18 Health Disparities Figure 27 presents health disparity data for minorities in the District. There were statistically significant differences between minorities and White non-hispanics, with minorities faring worse, for the following health indicators: No health care coverage, year olds No personal doctor or healthcare provider Needed to see a doctor, but could not due to cost in the past year There was one indicator in which minorities in the District had a statistically significant difference that was better than White non-hispanics: binge drank in the past 30 days. Figure 27. Health indicator comparisons by race/ethnicity among adults 18 and over ( ) White (non-hispanic) Minority Physical health was not good on 14 or more of the past 30 days 9.6% 9.1% Mental health was not good on 14 or more of the past 30 days 9.3% 5.7% No health care coverage, year olds 15.2% 42.5%* No personal doctor or healthcare provider 15.3% 37.1%* Needed to see a doctor but could not due to cost in the past year 11.9% 26.9%* Ever told they have diabetes (excluding pregnancy) 7.1% 13.4% Obese (BMI of 30 or higher) 29.7% 26.4% Overweight or obese (BMI of 25 or higher) 65.9% 70.2% Met aerobic physical activity recommendation 51.1% 49.6% Binge drank in the past 30 days 22.3% 10.4%* Currently smoke cigarettes 21.7% 14.4% *Statistically significant difference (p<.05) between minority and white non-hispanic categories. Figure 28 presents health disparity data by income in the District. There were statistically significant differences between those of low income (less than $25,000) and other income groups, with the low income group faring worse, for the following health indicators: Physical health was not good on 14 or more of the past 30 days Mental health was not good on 14 or more of the past 30 days No health care coverage, year olds Needed to see a doctor but could not due to cost in the past year Ever told they have diabetes (excluding pregnancy) Currently smoke cigarettes 16
19 As with the comparison between minorities and White non-hispanics, there was one indicator in which the low income group in the District had a statistically significant difference that was better than those of higher income: binge drank in the past 30 days. Figure 28. Health indicator comparisons by income among adults 18 and over ( ) Less than $25,000 $25,000- $49,999 $50,000 or higher Physical health was not good on 14 or more of the past 30 days 19.9%* 10.7% 5.1% Mental health was not good on 14 or more of the past 30 days 16.3%* 9.1% 5.4% No health care coverage, year olds 42.4%* 23.5% 6.3% No personal doctor or healthcare provider 22.4% 21.2% 14.4% Needed to see a doctor but could not due to cost in the past year 29.4%* 16.8% 5.1% Ever told they have diabetes (excluding pregnancy) 13.3%* 7.6% 4.8% Obese (BMI of 30 or higher) 35.3% 28.8% 27.1% Overweight or obese (BMI of 25 or higher) 68.5% 62.3% 67.2% Met aerobic physical activity recommendation 50.4% 43.2% 57.5% Binge drank in the past 30 days 15.1%* 21.4% 27.3% Currently smoke cigarettes 34.9%* 23.4% 14.8% *Statistically significant difference (p<.05) between the less than $25,000 income category and one or both of the other two income categories. 17
20 Access to Health Services Approximately 4.9% of the under 18 population in the District is without health insurance coverage (Figure 29). Percentage of the population under 18 without health insurance Figure 29 coverage (2013) Saunders Washington Dodge 6.5% 3.4% 3.6% 4.9% 5.9% Source: U.S. Census/American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2013) Among the total population under the age of 65 in the District, there were an estimated 7,158 individuals without health insurance in 2012, accounting for 11.4% of the total population under the age of 65 (Figure 30). Figure 30. Number and percentage of the population under age 65 without health insurance Dodge 4,006 (13.7%) 4,252 (14.5%) 4,020 (13.8%) Saunders 1,788 (10.3%) 1,800 (10.4%) 1,742 (10.2%) Washington 1,545 (9.1%) 1,512 (8.9%) 1,396 (8.3%) 7,339 (11.5%) 7,564 (11.9%) 7,158 (11.4%) 206,100 (13.4%) 205,574 (13.3%) 200,265 (12.9%) Sauce: Small Area Health Insurance Estimates, contained in Health Rankings (2015) Among adults age in the District, 14.7% reported not having health care coverage in This represented a notable decline from 21.4% in 2012 (Figure 31). Figure 31. No health care coverage among adults % 2 15% 1 5% % 21.4% % 19.1% % 15.3% 18
21 In 2014, 17.4% of the population reported not having a personal doctor or health care provider, which represented an increase from 13.8% in 2012, but was still lower than the 2014 rate of 20.2% for the state (Figure 32). Figure 32. No doctor or personal health care provider among adults 18 and over 25% 2 15% 1 5% % 13.8% 14.9% 17.4% 18.4% 17.2% 20.9% 20.2% In 2014, 68.4% of adults reported having a routine checkup in the past year (compared to 63.3% for the state) (Figure 33). Figure 33. Had a routine checkup in the past year among adults 18 and over * * 2014* % 68.8% 68.4% 57.7% 60.4% 61.6% 63.3% *Statistically significant difference between and the state. 19
22 In 2014 among adults in the District, 10.7% reported needing to see a doctor but could not due to cost in the past year (compared to 11.9% for the state) (Figure 34). Figure 34. Needed to see a doctor but cold not due to cost in the past year among adults 18 and over 15% 12% 9% 6% 3% % 12.9% 11.2% 10.7% 12.5% 12.8% % Compared to the state, all three counties in the District have a higher ratio of population to primary care physicians, dentists, and mental health providers (Figure 35). Figure 35. Ratio of population to health care professionals Ratio of population to primary care physicians (2012) Ratio of population to dentists (2013) Ratio of population to mental health providers (2014) Dodge 1,656:1 1,739:1 664:1 Saunders 3,471:1 3,488:1 3,488:1 Washington 3,375:1 3,371:1 5,056:1 2,280:1 2,352:1 1,194:1 1,405:1 1,450:1 435:1 Source: Area Health Resource File/American Medical Association; CMS, National Provider Identification file, contained in Health Rankings (2015) 20
23 Figure 36 displays the number of primary care physicians, dentists, and mental health providers for each of the three counties in the District and Figure 37 displays a larger range of medical professionals. Figure 36 Number of health care professionals Number of primary care physicians (2012) Number of population to dentists (2013) Number of population to mental health providers (2014) Dodge Saunders Washington Source: Area Health Resource File/American Medical Association; CMS, National Provider Identification file, contained in Health Rankings (2015) Figure 37 Number of health professionals in area (2012) Dodge Saunders Washington Physicians FM/GP Internal Medicine Pediatrics OB/GYN Psychiatrists Dentists Pharmacists Physical Therapists (2010) Physician Assistants Nurse Practitioners RN's (2010) LPN's (2010) Source: Health Professions Tracking Center, University of Medical Center (2012) 21
24 Mental Health In 2014, 8.3% of adults in the District reported that their mental health was not good on 14 or more of the past 30 days (i.e., frequent mental distress) (Figure 38). Figure 38. Mental health was not good on 14 or more of the past 30 days among adults 18 and over 1 8% 6% 4% 2% % 9.3% 7.3% 8.3% 9.2% % 8.2% In 2014, 17.7% of adults in the District reported that they have ever been told by a mental health or medical professional that they have depression (Figure 39). Figure 39. Ever told they have depression among adults 18 and over % 14.2% 17.3% 17.7% 16.8% 16.7% 18.2% 17.7% 22
25 In 2012, 10.9% of adults in the District reported that they are currently taking medication or receiving treatment for a mental health condition, and 3.9% responded to a series of questions that indicated symptoms of a serious mental health illness in the past 30 days (Figure 40). Figure 40. Mental health indicators among adults 18 and over (2012) Currently taking medication or receiving treatment for a mental health condition Symptoms of serious mental health illness in past 30 days* 10.9% % 3.2% *Percentage reporting answers to six questions measuring risk for serious psychological distress during the past 30 days based on the Kessler 6 (KS) instrument that generate a score of 13 or higher, suggesting serious mental illness. Saunders is conspicuous for having a high rate of suicide from There were 19 suicides in Saunders during this five-year period and 47 in the District as a whole (Figures 41 and 42). 20 Figure 41. Death rate due to suicide per 100,000 (age-adjusted) Dodge Saunders Washington Figure 42 Number of deaths due to suicide ( ) Saunders Washington Dodge
26 Bullying Figure 39 presents four indicators of bullying among 8 th, 10 th, and 12 th graders. In 2014, 41.8% of 8 th graders, 40.2% of 10 th graders, and 30.9% of 12 th graders in the District reported some form of being bullied in the past year (either on school property, away from school property, or electronically) (Figure 43). Figure 43 Bullying among 8 th, 10 th, and 12 th graders in the past year (2014) Any bullying Bullied on school property Bullied away from school property Electronically bullied ( , text, chat, etc.) 8 th 10 th 12 th 41.8% 40.2% 30.9% 41.4% 34.3% 27.2% 32.3% 32.6% % 27.4% 20.4% 27.5% % 25.8% 21.7% 18.3% 22.3% 24.2% 20.8% % 17.1% Source: Risk and Protective Factors Student Survey (2014) 24
27 Youth Substance Abuse Past 30-day alcohol use among youth has generally been on the decline in both the District and the state as a whole from 2003 to 2014 (Figure 44). 6 Figure 44. Past 30-day alcohol use among 8th, 10th, and 12th graders th grade 10th grade 12th grade 15.8% 10.3% 10.2% 7.5% 5.4% 4.5% 41.3% 33.3% 26.4% 20.7% 19.7% 17.4% 47.4% 50.4% 45.7% 31.7% 29.7% 31.1% 18.1% 13.9% 10.3% 7.9% 6.3% 4.4% 36.2% 31.6% 27.1% % 15.9% 48.9% 47.2% 41.8% 34.7% 31.4% 29.6% Source: Risk and Protective Factors Student Survey (2014) As with alcohol use, past 30-day cigarette use among youth has generally been on the decline in both the District and the state as a whole from 2003 to 2014 (Figure 45). 4 Figure 45. Past 30-day cigarette use among 8th, 10th, and 12th graders th grade 10th grade 12th grade 5.9% 5.3% 4.1% 5.9% 4.1% 3.6% % 12.5% 13.7% 8.1% 8.5% % 30.4% 20.9% 17.6% 16.8% 7.7% 6.9% 4.7% 4.8% 3.3% 2.9% 19.3% 15.3% 13.4% 11.7% 9.3% 7.6% % 24.1% 20.9% 18.8% 15.8% Source: Risk and Protective Factors Student Survey (2014) 25
28 In 2014, 8.8% of 10 th graders and 17.6% of 12 th graders in the District reported marijuana use in the past 30 days. Both of these rates are higher than the state. In past years, 12 th graders have consistently reported higher rates of past 30-day marijuana use compared to the state (Figure 46). 3 Figure 46. Past 30-day marijuana use among 8th, 10th, and 12th graders th grade 10th grade 12th grade 2.4% 2.4% 1.7% 2.4% 2.4% 2.7% % 9.1% 8.9% 9.5% 8.8% 21.3% 20.2% 22.2% 15.5% 13.3% 17.6% % 2.1% 2.4% 2.3% 2.3% 11.9% 9.4% 8.5% % 7.6% 15.6% 13.6% 13.2% 11.8% 11.7% 12.7% Source: Risk and Protective Factors Student Survey (2014) Past 30-day prescription drug use has been declining in both the District and the state as whole since However, past 30-day prescription drug use has been consistently higher among youth than in the state (Figure 47). Figure 47. Past 30-day prescription drug use among 8th, 10th, and 12th graders 12% 9% 6% 3% th grade 10th grade 12th grade 3.2% % % 7.1% 4.8% 3.7% 2.3% 2.6% 10.3% % 4.6% 5.2% 3.8% 1.8% 1.1% 0.7% 0.6% 6.2% 4.3% 2.8% 2.4% 2.2% 7.4% 4.8% 4.2% 3.8% 3.3% Source: Risk and Protective Factors Student Survey (2014) 26
29 Adult Alcohol and Tobacco Use Rates of tobacco-related deaths in the District are basically on par with the rest of the state. However, Dodge has a higher rate of tobacco-related deaths compared to the state. There were 570 such deaths in the District from (Figures 48 and 49). 150 Figure 48. Tobacco-related deaths per 100,000 (age-adjusted) Dodge Saunders Washington Figure 49 Number of tobacco-related deaths ( ) Saunders Washington Dodge ,183 27
30 Both cigarette smoking and tobacco use appear to be on the decline since 2011 in the Three Rivers District. In 2014, 17.9% of adults reported currently smoking cigarettes and 4.5% reported current smokeless tobacco use (Figures 50 and 51). In addition, in the District in 2014, 63.6% of current smokers reported that they attempted to quit smoking in the past year (state comparison: 58.2%) (Source: Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System, 2014). Figure 50. Currently smoke cigarettes among adults 18 and over % 22.1% 16.5% 17.9% % 18.5% 17.4% Figure 51. Current smokeless tobacco use among adults 18 and over 1 8% 6% 4% 2% % 4.2% 5.1% 4.5% 5.6% 5.1% 5.3% 4.7% 28
31 Rates of alcohol-related deaths are basically on par with the rest of the state. There were 145 such deaths in the District from (Figures 52 and 53). 40 Figure 52. Alcohol-related deaths per 100,000 (age-adjusted) Dodge Saunders Washington Figure 53 Number of alcohol-related deaths ( ) Saunders Washington Dodge ,042 29
32 In 2014, 15.7% of adults in the District reported binge drinking in the past 30 days (compared to 20.3% for the state). This rate of binge drinking has been declining in the District every year since (Figure 54) Figure 54. Binge drank (5 or more drinks in one occassion for men, 4 for women) in the past 30 days among adults 18 and over * 21.3% 20.3% 18.5% 15.7% 22.7% 22.1% % *Statistically significant difference between and the state. Heavy drinking (see the note below the figure for the definition) was reported by 4.3% of Three Rivers adults in 2014 (compared to 6.4% for the state). This rate has also been declining since 2014 (Figure 55). Figure 55. Heavy drinking* in the past 30 days among adults 18 and over 1 8% 6% 4% 2% % 7.6% 5.2% 4.3% 7.5% 7.2% 6.8% 6.4% *Percentage of men who report drinking more than 60 alcoholic drinks during the past 30 days and percentage of women who report drinking more than 30 alcoholic drinks in the past 30 days. 30
33 Alcohol-Impaired Driving From , there were 10 alcohol-impaired driving deaths in the District, accounting for 21.3% of all driving deaths in the district (Figure 56). Figure 56. Alcohol-impaired driving deaths ( ) Number of alcohol-impaired driving deaths Number of driving deaths Alcoholimpaired driving deaths as a percentage of all driving deaths Dodge % Saunders % Washington % % 360 1, % Fatality Analysis Reporting System, contained in Health Rankings (2015) In 2014, 1.4% of 10 th graders and 11.8% of 12 th graders reported driving under the influence of alcohol in the past year. The rates of youth reporting driving under the influence have been declining considerably across the state (Figure 57). 5 Figure 57. Drove a vehilcle under the influence of alcohol in the past year among 8th, 10th, and 12th graders th grade 10th grade 12th grade 2.8% 2.8% 2.7% 1.9% 1.3% 1.1% 14.9% 11.8% 7.5% 4.5% 3.5% 1.4% 37.3% 43.6% 33.2% 13.4% 11.1% 11.8% 5.4% 5.1% 3.4% 1.3% % 15.9% % 5.1% % % 31.5% 20.1% 14.8% 13.5% Source: Risk and Protective Factors Student Survey (2014) 31
34 In 2014, 15.5% of 8 th graders, 14.8% of 10 th graders, and 13. of 12 th graders reported riding in a vehicle driven by someone who had been drinking alcohol in the past 30 days (Figure 58). Rode in a vehicle driven by someone who had been Figure 58 drinking alcohol in the past 30 days among 8 th, 10 th, and 12 th graders (2014) 8 th 10 th 12 th 15.5% 14.8% % 15.7% 15.9% Source: Risk and Protective Factors Student Survey (2014) In 2014, 0.9% of adults in the District reported alcohol impaired driving in the past 30 days (compared to 2.5% for the state) (Figure 59). Figure 59. Alcohol impaired driving in the past 30 days among adults 18 and over 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% * 3.3% 0.9% 3.4% 2.5% *Statistically significant difference between and the state. 32
35 Motor Vehicle Safety See also the previous section for data on alcohol-impaired driving. In 2014, less than three-fourths (72.8%) of adults from the Three Rivers District reported always wearing a seat belt when driving or riding in a car (Figure 60). Figure 60. Always wear a seatbelt when driving or riding in a car among adults 18 and over 10 75% 5 25% % 69.4% 74.3% 72.8% 71.3% 69.7% 74.1% 72.4% In 2012, 23.9% of adults from the District reported texting on a cell phone while driving in the past 30 days and 67.6% reported talking on a cell phone while driving (Figure 61). Figure 61. Indicators of distracted driving among adults 18 and over (2012) Texted on a cell phone while driving in the past 30 days Talked on a cell phone while driving in the past 30 days 23.9% 26.8% 67.6% 69.1% 33
36 As a whole, the District has a higher rate of motor vehicle deaths compared to the state. Furthermore, each county in the district has a higher rate of motor vehicle deaths compared to the state. From there were 69 motor vehicle deaths in the District, making for a rate of 18.1 per 100,000 (compared to 12.2 per 100,000 for the state) (Figures 62 and 63). 30 Figure 62. Motor vehicle deaths per 100,000 (age-adjusted) Dodge Saunders Washington Figure 63 Number of motor vehicle deaths ( ) Saunders Washington Dodge ,133 34
37 Unintentional Injury Unintentional injury includes a broad array of injuries including motor vehicle accidents, falls, drug poisoning, fires and burns, drowning, suffocation, work-related accidents, and other similar types of unintentional injuries. See also the previous two sections for data on alcoholimpaired driving and motor vehicle safety. From 2009 to 2013 the rate of unintentional injury deaths was 39.5 per 100,000 in the District (compared to 35.9 per 100,000 for the state). Over this five-year period, there were 180 unintentional injury deaths in the district. Dodge has the highest rates of unintentional injury in the district (Figures 64 and 65). 50 Figure 64. Unintentional injury deaths per 100,000 (age-adjusted) Dodge Saunders Washington Figure 65 Number of deaths due to unintentional injury ( ) Saunders Washington Dodge ,541 One-in-ten (10.1%) of adults age 45 and over reported being injured due to a fall in the past year in 2014 (Figure 66). Figure 66. Falls among adults 45 and over (2014) Had a fall in the past year 28.3% 26.1% Injured due to a fall in the past year 10.1% 8.8% 35
38 Crime In 2013, there were 2,304 total arrests in the District, accounting for a rate of 29.6 arrests per 1,000 population (compared to 39.5 per 1,000 for the state) (Figure 67). Note: statelevel arrest data provided by the Crime Commission are unreliable as law enforcement agencies are not required to submit arrest data, and some agencies choose not to. In 2011 and 2013, all law enforcement agencies in the District reported arrest data. Figure 67. Number and rate of total arrests per 1,000 population Dodge 1,525 (41.6) 1,466 (40.0) Saunders 450 (21.8) 471 (22.6) Washington 574 (28.4) 367 (18.1) 2,549 (32.9) 2,304 (29.6) * 82,442 (45.5) 72,804 (39.5) *State-level data are unreliable as law enforcement agencies are not required to submit arrest data, and some agencies choose not to. Source: Crime Commission (2013) There were 333 juvenile arrests in the District in 2013 (Figure 68). Figure 68. Number and rate of juvenile arrests per 1,000 population Dodge 256 (29.7) 220 (25.5) Saunders 53 (9.9) 78 (14.6) Washington 80 (16.4) 35 (7.2) 389 (20.6) 333 (17.7) * 13,134 (28.5) 10,534 (22.9) *State-level data are unreliable as law enforcement agencies are not required to submit arrest data, and some agencies choose not to. Source: Crime Commission (2013) 36
39 From there were 63 violent crimes in the District, which account for a rate of 80.5 per 100,000, notably lower than the rate of per 100,000 for the state (Figure 69). Figure 69. Number of violent crimes and rate per 100, Dodge 54 (152.7) 51 (140.7) 46 (126.5) Saunders 14 (68.7) 14 (67.9) 13 (60.6) Washington 7 (37.4) 5 (22.3) 4 (19.6) 75 (100.4) 70 (88.3) 63 (80.5) 5,239 (290.7) 4,939 (270.9) 4,857 (263.6) Source: Uniform Crime Reporting - FBI, contained in Health Rankings (2015) The percentage of 8 th, 10 th, and 12 th graders reporting that they have attacked someone with the idea of seriously hurting them has generally been declining in the District, as well as across the state. In 2014, 5.5% of 8 th graders, 7.4% of 10 th graders, and 6.9% of 12 th graders reported such behavior (Figure 70). Figure 70. Attacked someone with the idea of seriously hurting them in the past year among 8th, 10th, and 12th graders 12% 9% 6% 3% th grade 10th grade 12th grade 7.4% % 9.8% 7.8% 5.5% 11.5% 9.1% 8.8% 10.4% 8.2% 7.4% 7.4% 10.4% 9.7% 6.8% % 9.2% 9.4% 8.4% % 6.8% 10.6% 9.6% 8.8% 9.6% 7.8% 7.8% 8.3% 8.6% 7.6% 7.4% 6.3% 5.4% Source: Risk and Protective Factors Student Survey (2014) 37
40 During the five-year period of , there were 6 homicides in the District, which makes for a rate of 1.6 per 100,000 (compared to 3.5 for the state). Four of the six homicides in the district occurred in Saunders (Figures 71 and 72). Figure 71. Homicides per 100,000 (age-adjusted) Note: numbers too small to present rates by county. Figure 72 Number of homicides ( ) Saunders Washington Dodge
41 Foster Care and Child Abuse/Neglect From 2011 to 2014, the rate of substantiated cases of child abuse and neglect has been lower in the District, as compared to the state. However, in 2014 there was a slightly higher rate in Dodge compared to the state. There were a total of 89 cases of substantiated child abuse and neglect in the District in 2014 (Figure 73). Figure 73. Number of substantiated cases of child abuse and neglect and rate per 1, Dodge 36 (4.0) 44 (4.9) 48 (5.3) 55 (6.1) Saunders 29 (5.3) 20 (3.7) 11 (2.0) 27 (4.9) Washington 8 (1.6) 15 (2.9) 15 (2.9) 7 (1.4) 73 (3.7) 79 (4.0) 74 (3.8) 89 (4.5) 3,410 (6.9) 2,723 (5.5) 2,892 (5.9) 2,575 (5.2) Source: DHHS Child Abuse and Neglect Reports (2014) While the rate of youth in foster care in the District has been consistently lower than the state from 2012 to 2014, there was a notable increase in the number of youth in foster care in Dodge from 2013 (71 youth in foster care) to 2014 (101 youth in foster care). This increase caused the rate of youth in foster care in Dodge to surpass the rate for the state (Figure 74). Figure 74. Number in foster care and rate per 1, Dodge 73 (8.1) 71 (7.9) 101 (11.2) Saunders 26 (4.7) 21 (3.8) 22 (4.0) Washington 23 (4.5) 25 (4.9) 9 (1.7) 122 (6.2) 117 (6.0) 132 (6.7) 4,320 (8.8) 3,892 (7.9) 3,026 (6.2) Source: Foster Care Review Board (2014) 39
42 Education Nine-in-ten residents (90.3%) in the District have at least a high school diploma, which is also true for the state. Less than one fourth (22.9%) of the population in the Three Rivers District has a Bachelor s degree or higher, which is lower than the rate of 28.5% for the state. Dodge is conspicuous for having relatively low levels of educational attainment (Figure 75). Figure 75. Educational attainment of the population ages 25 and over (2013) % with at least a high school diplpoma or equivalent % with a Bachelor's degree or higher Dodge Saunders Washington % % 90.5% 18.7% 24.4% 28.9% 22.9% 28.5% Source: U.S. Census/American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2013) High school graduation rates are presented below in Figure 76. District-wide data were unavailable. Figure 76. High School Graduation Rate ( ) % 94.9% 95.3% 88.5% Dodge Saunders Washington Source: Department of Education, data provided by the Children and Families Foundation ( ) 40
43 The following six figures (Figures 77 through 82) present education statistics for each public school district in the District. Figure 77 Education Statistics for Public Schools Districts in Dodge ( ) Accountability Scores Student Characteristics Fremont Public Schools Logan View Public Schools North Bend Central Public Schools Scribner- Snyder Community Schools Public Schools % Proficient in reading 7 85% 87% 85% 77% % Proficient in mathematics 66% 76% 85% 82% 71% % Proficient in science 75% 84% 88% 87% 72% % Proficient in writing ( ) 58% 74% 85% 72% 68% Enrollment 4, ,398 % Receiving free/reduced lunch 56.6% 43.6% 35.3% 52.2% 44.9% % of ELL students * -* 6. % School mobility rate 16.7% 12.4% 8.5% 16.1% 12.1% % of Students in special education 19.8% 21.2% 13.8% % *Data has been masked to protect the identity of students if there are fewer than 10 students in a group. Source: Department of Education ( ) Figure 78 Four-Year Graduation Rates for Public Schools Districts in Dodge ( ) Fremont Public Schools 83.7% 81.3% 85.4% 85.9% Logan View Public Schools 86.4% 91.8% 95.7% 89.6% North Bend Central Public Schools % 97.1% 97.3% Scribner-Snyder Community Schools 91.7% 94.1% -* 10 Public Schools 86.1% 87.6% 88.5% 89.7% *Data has been masked to protect the identity of students. Source: Department of Education ( ) 41
44 Figure 79 Education Statistics for Public Schools Districts in Saunders ( ) Accountability Scores Student Characteristics Ashland- Greenwood Public Schools Cedar Bluffs Public Schools Mead Public Schools Wahoo Public Schools Yutan Public Schools Public Schools % Proficient in reading 88% 72% 81% 84% 82% 77% % Proficient in mathematics 85% 63% 73% 83% 86% 71% % Proficient in science 89% 74% 81% 82% 81% 72% % Proficient in writing ( ) 82% 61% 89% 64% 78% 68% Enrollment ,398 % Receiving free/reduced lunch 35.4% 42.6% 34.5% 32.7% 27.5% 44.9% % of ELL students -* -* -* -* -* 6. % School mobility rate 7.3% 13.2% 13.7% % 12.1% % of Students in special education 17.2% 10.3% 15.3% 22.7% % *Data has been masked to protect the identity of students if there are fewer than 10 students in a group. Source: Department of Education ( ) Figure 80 Four-Year Graduation Rates for Public Schools Districts in Saunders ( ) Ashland-Greenwood Public Schools 92.9% 93.5% % Cedar Bluffs Public Schools -* % 89.5% Mead Public Schools -* -* -* 10 Wahoo Public Schools 92.5% % 92.9% Yutan Public Schools 92.7% 96.8% -* 10 Public Schools 86.1% 87.6% 88.5% 89.7% *Data has been masked to protect the identity of students. Source: Department of Education ( ) 42
45 Figure 81 Accountability Scores Student Characteristics Education Statistics for Public Schools Districts in Washington ( ) Arlington Public Schools Blair Community Schools Fort Calhoun Community Schools Public Schools % Proficient in reading 9 83% 92% 77% % Proficient in mathematics 82% 79% 86% 71% % Proficient in science 86% 85% 89% 72% % Proficient in writing ( ) 79% 74% 69% 68% Enrollment 582 2, ,398 % Receiving free/reduced lunch 21.7% 25.8% 20.1% 44.9% % of ELL students -* -* -* 6. % School mobility rate 7.2% 4.7% 4.1% 12.1% % of Students in special education 11.7% % 15.7% *Data has been masked to protect the identity of students if there are fewer than 10 students in a group. Source: Department of Education ( ) Figure 82 Four-Year Graduation Rates for Public Schools Districts in Washington ( ) Arlington Public Schools 94.7% 94.8% % Blair Community Schools 89.7% 93.9% % Fort Calhoun Community Schools 89.4% 98.1% -* 10 Public Schools 86.1% 87.6% 88.5% 89.7% *Data has been masked to protect the identity of students. Source: Department of Education ( ) 43
46 Physical Activity Saunders and Dodge Counties appear to have relatively low rates of the population with access to locations for physical activity (Figure 83). More than onein-five (22.6%) of the adults reported having no leisure time devoted to physical activity in the past 30 days in 2014 (Figure 84). Just over half (52.9%) of Three Rivers adults reported meeting the physical activity recommendation in the past 30 days in 2013 (see the definition below the figure) (Figure 85). Figure 83. Percentage of the population with adequate access to locations for physical activity (2010 & 2013) Dodge 90.5% Saunders 52.8% Washington % Source: Business Analyst, Delorme map data, ESRI, and US Census Tigerline Files, contained in Health Rankings (2015) Figure 84. No leisure-time physical activity in the past 30 days among adults 18 and over % 21.9% 26.4% 22.6% 26.3% % 21.3% Figure 85. Met aerobic physical activity recommendation* among adults 18 and over in the past 30 days % 52.9% % *At least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity, or at least 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity physical activity, or an equivalent combination of moderate and vigorousintensity aerobic activity per week during the past month. 44
47 Three-in-ten (30.3%) Three Rivers adults reported meeting the muscle strengthening recommendation in the past 30 days in 2013 (see the definition below the figure) (Figure 86). Figure 86. Met muscle strentghening recommendation* among adults 18 and over in the past 30 days % 30.3% 28.1% 28.4% *Engaged in physical activities or exercises to strengthen their muscles two or more times per week during the past month. One-in-five (21.3%) Three Rivers adults reported meeting both the aerobic physical activity and muscle strengthening recommendations in the past 30 days in 2013 (see the definition below the figure) (Figure 87). Figure 87. Met both aerobic physical activity and muscle strentghening recommendations* among adults 18 and over in the past 30 days % 21.3% % *At least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity, or at least 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity physical activity, or an equivalent combination of moderate and vigorousintensity aerobic activity per week during the past month and engaged in physical activities or exercises to strengthen their muscles two or more times per week during the past month. 45
WASHINGTON STATE COMPARISONS TO: KITSAP COUNTY CORE PUBLIC HEALTH INDICATORS May 2015
WASHINGTON STATE COMPARISONS TO: KITSAP COUNTY CORE PUBLIC HEALTH INDICATORS This is a companion document to the Core Public Health Indicators that provides a comparison of to Washington State for the
More informationHealth Profile Chartbook 2016 Kalkaska County
Health Profile Chartbook 2016 Kalkaska County 2016 Chartbooks The 2016 Chartbooks provide a snapshot of the health status of the District Health Department #10 jurisdiction. Information is presented by
More informationHealth Profile Chartbook 2016 Mecosta County
Health Profile Chartbook 2016 Mecosta County 2016 Chartbooks The 2016 Chartbooks provide a snapshot of the health status of the District Health Department #10 jurisdiction. Information is presented by
More information2018 Community Health Assessment
2018 Community Health Assessment Community Health Status Assessment Linn County, IA Prepared by Amy Hockett, PhD, MPH, CHES Epidemiologist Linn County Public Health August 9, 2018 Community Health Status
More informationNutrition and Physical Activity
Nutrition and Physical Activity Lifestyle choices made early in life have a significant impact on the patterns of chronic disease developed in adulthood. In the U.S., poor diet and physical inactivity
More informationSarpy/Cass Department of Health and Wellness
This 2012 Community Health Report Card is the product of many community surveys and agency recordkeeping. The staff at the Sarpy/ Department of Health and Wellness finds value in all of this community
More informationColorado Health Disparities Profiles
Health Disparities Profiles includes: Larimer County Population Total Population Source: CDC/NCHS 2007-based, bridged-race population estimates, 2007. Social Determinants of Health 287,574 248,312 26,629
More informationPHACS County Profile Report for Searcy County. Presented by: Arkansas Center for Health Disparities and Arkansas Prevention Research Center
PHACS County Profile Report for Searcy County Presented by: Arkansas Center for Health Disparities and Arkansas Prevention Research Center Contents Introduction... Page 2 Demographics...Page 3 Social Environment
More informationColorado Health Disparities Profiles
Health Disparities Profiles County includes: Jackson, Moffat, Rio Blanco, and Counties Population Total Population 22,382 43,638 4,861,515 21,015 39,473 3,508,736 904 3,224 909,833 140 263 228,718 210
More informationCascade Pacific Action Alliance Regional Health Assessment
Cascade Pacific Action Alliance Regional Health Assessment Cowlitz, Grays Harbor, Lewis, Mason, Pacific, Thurston and Wahkiakum County December, 2014 V.4 Thematic Areas Demographics and Socioeconomic Status
More informationMARICOPA COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSESSMENT. Maricopa County Board of Health July 23, 2012 Eileen Eisen-Cohen, PhD
MARICOPA COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSESSMENT Maricopa County Board of Health July 23, 2012 Eileen Eisen-Cohen, PhD 1 What? Why? We Are Here 2 Local Public Health System Faith Instit. Military Dentists Labs
More informationCommunity Health Needs Assessment PREPARED BY
Community Health Needs Assessment PREPARED BY DEAR COMMUNITY PARTNERS We all know that good health is essential for a productive and thriving community. Furthermore, we understand that conditions in the
More informationCommunity Health Needs Assessment
Community Health Needs Assessment Scott County, Missouri This assessment will identify the health needs of the residents of Scott County, Missouri, and those needs will be prioritized and recommendations
More informationOakwood Healthcare Community Health Needs Assessment Indicators
POPULATION Sub-Category Education Socioeconomic Violence High School High School Dropouts Graduation Rate (Percent) Some College Births to Unmarried Women Children in Poverty Children in Singleparent Households
More informationHealtheCNY Indicator List by Data Source
American Community Survey 23 Adults with Health Insurance Children Living Below Poverty Level Children with Health Insurance Families Living Below Poverty Level Homeowner Vacancy Rate Homeownership Households
More informationFactual Information Contained in this Report: PURPOSE. Health Perceptions. Health Insurance Coverage. Health Care Access. Preventive Health Care
Factual Information Contained in this Report: Health Perceptions Health Insurance Coverage Health Care Access Preventive Health Care Maternal and Child Health Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug Use PURPOSE
More informationPierce County Health Indicators
Pierce County Health Indicators 3629 S. D. St., Tacoma WA 98418-6813 Phone: 253-798-7668 email: oapi@tpchd.org Demographics Characteristics Latest Year count Percent WA State count Percent Data Source
More informationTuscarawas County Health Department
Tuscarawas County Health Department Community Health Needs Assessment 214 TUSCARAWAS COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT Community Health Needs Assessment 214 Assessment Commissioned by: Dr. James Hubert D.O Health
More informationCommunity Health Status Assessment
Community Health Status Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Community Health Status Assessment (CHSA) is one of four assessments completed as part of the 2015-2016 Lane County Community Health Needs Assessment
More informationPierce County Health Indicators
Pierce County Health Indicators Updated 11/10/2016 Demographics Characteristics Latest Year count Percent WA State count Percent Total Population 2015 830,120 7,061,408 2015 Total Percent Total Percent
More informationThe Health of Jefferson County: Updates
The Health of Jefferson County: 2010-11 Updates Jefferson County Public Health Part I: Demographics Part II: Mental Health, Alcohol and Drug Use Part III: Health Care Access Part IV: Births, Quality of
More information2014 Butte County BUTTE COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSESSMENT
2014 Butte County BUTTE COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSESSMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2015 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TOGETHER WE CAN! HEALTHY LIVING IN BUTTE COUNTY Hundreds of local agencies and community members
More informationCommunity Health Needs Assessment
Community Health Needs Assessment Gratiot County Community Health Assessment Community Health Assessment Data Sources Primary Data (new data collected first-hand) Community Opinion Survey Provider Opinion
More informationLINCOLN COUNTY HEALTH PROFILE Maine Shared Community Health Needs Assessment
LINCOLN COUNTY HEALTH PROFILE 2018 Maine Shared Community Health Needs Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 How to Read this Document... 3 Demographics... 5 Past Maine Statewide Priorities...
More information2016 Collier County Florida Health Assessment Executive Summary
2016 Florida Health Assessment Executive Summary Prepared by: The Health Planning Council of Southwest Florida, Inc. www.hpcswf.com Executive Summary To access the report in its entirety, visit http://www.hpcswf.com/health-planning/health-planningprojects/.
More informationPrepared by Southern Illinois University School of Medicine s Center for Clinical Research And Office of Community Health and Service
Hospital Sisters Health System Community Health Needs Assessment (FY2015-FY2018) Quantitative and Secondary Data Analysis Report For St. Anthony s Hospital Effingham, Prepared by Southern University School
More informationWalworth County Health Data Report. A summary of secondary data sources
Walworth County Health Data Report A summary of secondary data sources 2016 This report was prepared by the Design, Analysis, and Evaluation team at the Center for Urban Population Health. Carrie Stehman,
More informationM.A.P. II. Monitoring and Assessment Project Executive Summary. Infectious Diseases. Chronic Diseases. Tarrant County Public Health
M.A.P. II Monitoring and Assessment Project 2002-2004 Environmental Health Social & Mental Health Injuries Chronic Diseases County Maternal & Child Health Infectious Diseases County Public Health Safeguarding
More informationCommunity Health Needs Assessment (CHNA)
Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA) Pierce ; St. Croix Contents Demographics... 3 Total Population... 4 Median Age... 6 Population Under Age 18... 8 Population Age 65+... 9 Population with Any Disability...
More informationProfile of DeKalb County
Profile of DeKalb County Figure 1: Population by Race, DeK alb County, 2012 Estimate Table 1: DeK alb County Population Profile Profile of DeKalb County POPULATION ESTIMATES According to the 2008 and 2012
More informationHAMILTON COUNTY DATA PROFILE ADULT CIGARETTE SMOKING. North Country Population Health Improvement Program
HAMILTON COUNTY DATA PROFILE ADULT CIGARETTE SMOKING North Country Population Health Improvement Program HAMILTON COUNTY DATA PROFILE: ADULT CIGARETTE SMOKING INTRODUCTION The Hamilton County Data Profile
More information2012 Assessment of St. Lucie County s Social, Health, and Public Safety Services
2012 Assessment of St. Lucie County s Social, Health, and Public Safety Services April 5, 2013 140 Intracoastal Pointe Drive, Suite 212 Jupiter, FL 33477-5064 561.744.5662 Fax: 561.575.7396 www.sra-researchgroup.com
More informationCommunity Youth Meetings 2007
Community Youth Meetings 2007 Health Status of Youth: Roxbury November 7, 2007 Presented by the Boston Public Health Commission Roxbury Charlestown Allston- Brighton Back Bay Fenway Roxbury South End East
More informationDemographics and Health Data
Demographics and Health Data Information for Local Planners City of Lakewood, WA Demographic Characteristics Environmental Health Division 3629 South D Street, Tacoma, WA 98418 (253) 798-6470 Table 1 presents
More informationDemographics and Health Data
Demographics and Health Data Information for Local Planners City of Puyallup, WA Demographic Characteristics Environmental Health Division 3629 South D Street, Tacoma, WA 98418 (253) 798-6470 Table 1 presents
More informationRacial/Ethnic Composition South Hayward, 2010
South Hayward Data Alameda County Public Health Department Community Assessment, Planning, Education, and Evaluation (CAPE) Epidemiology Team May 7, 2014 Racial/Ethnic Composition South Hayward, 2010
More informationKorean CHRNA (Community Health Resources and Needs Assessment)
Korean CHRNA (Community Health Resources and Needs Assessment) Between November 2013 and August 2014, the Center for the Study of Asian American Health (CSAAH) collected 161 surveys in the Korean community
More informationHealthy People 2010 Leading Health Indicators: California, 2000
January 4 DATA SUMMARY No. DS4- Healthy People Leading Health Indicators: California, By Jim Sutocky This report focuses on the Healthy People Leading Health Indicators (LHIs). H i g h l i g h t s As of
More informationCommunity Youth Meetings 2007
Community Youth Meetings 2007 Health Status of Youth: Fenway November 8, 2007 Presented by the Boston Public Health Commission Fenway Charlestown Allston Brighton Back Bay Fenway Roxbury South End East
More informationJackson Hospital Community Health Needs Assessment. Fiscal Year 2016
Jackson Hospital Community Health Needs Assessment Fiscal Year 2016 JACKSON HOSPITAL AT A GLANCE Jackson Hospital, located in Montgomery, Alabama, is a not-for-profit organization committed to improving
More informationRockford Health Council
2010 Healthy Community Study Rockford Area Early Learning Council Becky Cook Kendall April 12, 2011 Rockford Health Council Community-based healthy community collaborative Formed in 1982 as the Rockford
More informationJackson County Community Health Assessment
2016 Jackson County Community Health Assessment With Collaboration from Black River Memorial Hospital and Jackson County Public Health Wisconsin Population Health Institute Table of Contents Structure
More informationCOMMUNITY PARTNERS MEETING
PUBLIC HEALTH & SYSTEMS IN ACTION COMMUNITY PARTNERS MEETING Presenter: Amy Fagan, Assistant Director of Health Date: February 23, 2017 HEALTH DISTRICT VISION HEALTHY PEOPLE, HEALTHY COMMUNITY HEALTH COALITION
More informationExecutive Summary To access the report in its entirety, visit
Executive Summary To access the report in its entirety, visit http://www.hpcswf.com/health-planning/health-planningprojects/. Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics Population Demographics has a
More informationIndian CHRNA (Community Health Resources and Needs Assessment)
(Community Health Resources and Needs Assessment) Between 2014 and 2015, the Center for the Study of Asian American Health collected 113 surveys in the Indian community in NYC in partnership with community
More informationHealth System Members of the Milwaukee Health Care Partnership
Health System Members of the Milwaukee Health Care Partnership Aurora Health Care Children s Hospital of Wisconsin Columbia St. Mary s Health System Froedtert Health Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare In Collaboration
More informationManatee County Community Health Assessment 2015
Manatee County Community Health Assessment 2015 W E L L N E S S C O M M I T T E E M A N A T E E H E A L T H C A R E A L L I A N C E 7 / 3 0 / 1 5 Overview Background 4 Subcommittee Findings Community Health
More information5 Public Health Challenges
5 Public Health Challenges The most recent Mecklenburg County Community Health Assessment (CHA) prioritized the prevention of premature death and disability from chronic disease as the number one public
More information2016 PRC Community Health Needs Assessment
2016 PRC Community Health Needs Assessment Staunton City, Waynesboro City, and Augusta County, Virginia Prepared for: Augusta Health By Professional Research Consultants, Inc. The PRC Community Health
More informationCommunity Health Assessment. May 21, 2014
Community Health Assessment May 21, 2014 1 Presenters Stacey Adams, MS Co-Leader Domain 1 Carol Heier, LCSW Accreditation Coordinator Dale Quinney, MPH Co-Leader Domain 1 2 Recording available There is
More informationTHE HEALTH OF CHINESE AMERICANS: 1970 TO TODAY PRESENTED BY KATHY KO CHIN, PRESIDENT AND CEO ASIAN & PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN HEALTH FORUM
THE HEALTH OF CHINESE AMERICANS: 1970 TO TODAY PRESENTED BY KATHY KO CHIN, PRESIDENT AND CEO ASIAN & PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN HEALTH FORUM OUR MISSION The Asian & Pacific Islander American Health Forum
More informationHIP Year 2020 Health Objectives related to Perinatal Health:
PERINATAL HEALTH Perinatal health is the health and wellbeing of mothers and babies before, during, and after child birth. As described by Healthy People 2020, Pregnancy can provide an opportunity to identify
More informationCOMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND IMPLEMENATION PLAN JUNE 2016
COMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND IMPLEMENATION PLAN JUNE 2016 is, and has been an active member of the Healthy Blair County Coalition. Representatives of have been members of the Steering Committee,
More informationHealth of the City & Community Health Improvement Planning. Raynard Washington, PhD, MPH Chief Epidemiologist
Health of the City & Community Health Improvement Planning Raynard Washington, PhD, MPH Chief Epidemiologist What is the Community Health Assessment (CHA)? An annual assessment of population health in
More informationSTUDENT VERSION. Community Health Assessment: Pitt County, North Carolina. Cases in Population-Oriented Prevention (C-POP)-based teaching
STUDENT VERSION This project has the objective to develop preventive medicine teaching cases that will motivate medical students, residents and faculty to improve clinical preventive competencies complemented
More informationPrince George s County Health Department Health Report Findings
Prince George s County Health Department 2018 Health Report Findings Our Residents Socioeconomic Factors Compared to Maryland, Prince George s residents: have a higher median household income, are employed
More informationHealth is excellent, very good, or good
Health is excellent, very good, or good Source Description Item National Health Interview Survey Health is excellent, very good, or good Would you say [fill: your/alias s] health in general is excellent,
More informationHealth Status Disparities in New Mexico Identifying and Prioritizing Disparities
Health Status Disparities in New Mexico Identifying and Prioritizing Disparities Public Health Division March 23 Health Status Disparities in New Mexico Identifying and Prioritizing Disparities New Mexico
More informationJOINING HANDS: SHARING RESOURCES AND DATA ACROSS SECTORS TO IMPROVE POPULATION HEALTH
JOINING HANDS: SHARING RESOURCES AND DATA ACROSS SECTORS TO IMPROVE POPULATION HEALTH Virginia Population Health Summit Charlottesville, Virginia March 29, 2017 Steven H. Woolf, MD, MPH Director, Center
More informationSummary of Findings. Significant Health Needs of the Community. Areas of Opportunity Identified Through This Assessment. Healthy Lifestyles
Summary of Findings Significant Health Needs of the Community The following areas of opportunity represent the significant health needs of the community, based on the information gathered through this
More informationFLHealthCHARTS.com Update List
Released = New data, statistical brief, or analytic report not previously posted on FLHealthCHARTS. Added = New features or indicators not previously posted on FLHealthCHARTS. Updated = Change to data
More informationTri-County Health Assessment Collaborative 2013 Community Health Needs Assessment Research Review
Tri- Health Assessment Collaborative 2013 Community Health Needs Assessment Research Review The Tri- Collaborative Three counties Five health systems; 12 hospitals Three health departments Countless community
More informationAre You Ready to Sail. February 11, 2016
Are You Ready to Sail your SHIP?! February 11, 2016 Acknowledgement and Disclaimer This webinar was supported by funds made available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office for State,
More informationNew Mexico Department of Health. Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Report Card
New Mexico Department of Health Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Report Card August 30, 2006 Acknowledgments Many individuals contributed to the production of this report card and the Office of Policy
More informationWomen and Substance Abuse in Nevada. A Special Report
Women and Substance Abuse in Nevada A Special Report Women and Substance Abuse in Nevada A Special Report Table of Contents Introduction 1 Statewide Demographics & Archival Data 2 Nevada Statewide Telephone
More informationCounty Health Rankings Baldwin County 2016 Graphics of County Health Rankings Include All Counties In the North Central Health District
Health Rankings Baldwin 2016 Graphics of Health Rankings Include All Counties In the North Central Health District Public Health for Middle Georgia Serving Baldwin, Bibb, Crawford, Hancock, Houston, Jasper,
More informationHealth Disparities in Snohomish County
Health Disparities in Snohomish County Table of Contents BACKGROUND What Are Health Disparities?... 3 How Do We Address Health Disparities?... 3 Why Release a Health Disparities Report?... 3 SOCIODEMOGRAPHICS
More informationBaseline Health Data Report: Cambria and Somerset Counties, Pennsylvania
Baseline Health Data Report: Cambria and Somerset Counties, Pennsylvania 2017 2018 Page 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary.4 Demographic and Economic Characteristics 6 Race and Ethnicity (US Census,
More informationSUBSTANCE USE AND MENTAL HEALTH IN RHODE ISLAND (2017) A STATE EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PROFILE
SUBSTANCE USE AND MENTAL HEALTH IN RHODE ISLAND (2017) A STATE EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PROFILE PREPARED BY Samantha Rosenthal, PhD, MPH & Stephen L. Buka, ScD, MSc Brown University School of Public Health Center
More informationUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health The County Health Rankings Model of Population Health
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health The County Health Rankings Model of Population Health Institute of Medicine January 21, 2010 Washington DC Outline Background and rationale
More informationCounty Health Rankings Monroe County 2016
Health Rankings Monroe 2016 Graphics of Health Rankings Include All Counties In the North Central Health District Public Health for Middle Georgia Serving Baldwin, Bibb, Crawford, Hancock, Houston, Jasper,
More informationSTOKES COUNTY. State of the County Health Report 2011
STOKES COUNTY State of the County Health Report 2011 Demographics Overview of Stokes County Leading Causes of Death Identified Health Priorities Community Action Plan Current Activities 2011 Demographics
More informationConsolidated Project Information Project 4.a.ii Substance Abuse Prevention and Identification Initiative
Consolidated Project Information Project 4.a.ii Substance Abuse Prevention and Identification Initiative Contents 4.a.ii Prevent Substance Abuse and Other Mental Emotional Disorders (Focus Area 2)... 3
More informationall indicators compiled in assessment are listed separately when space allowed, or within categories when a large number were used.
DRAFT February 26, 2018 CHSA Topic Areas Results from the 2018 Community Health Status Assessment have been summarized into a scorecard on page 2. A more detailed technical report for the entire CHSA process
More informationVietnamese CHRNA (Community Health Resources and Needs Assessment)
Vietnamese CHRNA (Community Health Resources and Needs Assessment) Between 2013 and 2015, the Center for the Study of Asian American Health (CSAAH) and Mekong NYC collected 103 surveys in the Vietnamese
More informationBernalillo County Community Profile
County Community Profile Introduction This profile describes the current health status of the county. With this information, the community can complete an assessment and begin to address specific issues
More informationCharlotte Mecklenburg Youth Risk Behavior Survey
2015 Charlotte Mecklenburg Youth Risk Behavior Survey HIGH SCHOOL TREND REPORT A collaborative report from Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools and Mecklenburg County Health Department 2015 Charlotte Mecklenburg
More information2010 Community Health Needs Assessment Final Report
2010 Community Health Needs Assessment Final Report April 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. BACKGROUND 3 B. DEMOGRAPHICS 4 C. GENERAL HEALTH STATUS 10 D. ACCESS TO CARE 11 E. DIABETES 12 F. HYPERTENSION AWARENESS
More informationAN OVERVIEW OF SELECTED HEALTH INDICATORS FOR MECKLENBURG COUNTY RESIDENTS
2011 State of the County Health Report AN OVERVIEW OF SELECTED HEALTH INDICATORS FOR MECKLENBURG COUNTY RESIDENTS MECKLENBURG COUNTY 2011 STATE OF THE COUNTY HEALTH REPORT E. Winters Mabry, MD, Health
More information2014 Edition RHODE ISLAND
214 RHODE ISLAND America's Health Rankings is the longest running comparative health index of states. It uses measures of behavior, community and environment, policy, clinical care, and health outcomes
More informationUnderage Drinking and Alcohol Abuse in Kent County, Delaware
Underage Drinking and Alcohol Abuse in Kent County, Delaware Delaware Drug and Alcohol Tracking Alliance (DDATA) Center for Drug and Alcohol Studies University of Delaware April 2013 42% of Delaware 5
More information2013 Arizona State Health Assessment Summary and Findings. Health and Wellness for all Arizonans
2013 Arizona State Health Assessment Summary and Findings Health and Wellness for all Arizonans Presentation Overview The State Health Assessment Process Health Indicators 15 Leading Health Issues: o County
More informationHEALTH FACTORS Health Behaviors. Adult Tobacco Use Adolescent Alcohol Use Healthy Eating School Food Environment Physical Activity
HEALTH FACTORS Health Behaviors Adult Tobacco Use Adolescent Alcohol Use Healthy Eating School Food Environment Physical Activity 1 Adult Tobacco Use Definition: For this assessment, adult tobacco use
More informationRock County Health Needs Assessment
Rock County Health Needs Assessment 2009 prepared by Starfish Consulting, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Letter from Health Officer...3-4 Executive Summary 5 The Path Ahead 6 Introduction...7 Purpose / Methodology
More informationWashoe County Community Health Needs Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2018 2020 Washoe County Community Health Needs Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2018-2020 Washoe County Community Health Needs Assessment was sponsored in full by the Washoe County Health District and
More informationCambodian CHRNA (Community Health Resources and Needs Assessment)
Cambodian CHRNA (Community Health Resources and Needs Assessment) Between 2013 and 2015, the Center for the Study of Asian American Health (CSAAH) and Mekong NYC collected 100 surveys in the Cambodian
More informationLincoln County. Community Health Assessment
Community Health Assessment Contents Acknowledgements 1 Introduction 2 Key Informant Health Survey 3 Community Health Data 7 Demographics 8 Substance Abuse 10 Mental Health and Trauma 11 Chronic Disease
More informationOverview of Health Disparities in Arkansas
Overview of Health Disparities in Arkansas Annual Critical Access Hospital Conference August 9, 2018 Joyce Biddle, MPH, MPA Chronic Disease Epidemiologist Office of Minority Health and Health Disparities
More informationTHE HEALTH OF LINN COUNTY, IOWA A COUNTYWIDE ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH STATUS AND HEALTH RISKS
THE HEALTH OF LINN COUNTY, IOWA A COUNTYWIDE ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH STATUS AND HEALTH RISKS Project Team Pramod Dwivedi, Health Director Amy Hockett, Epidemiologist Kaitlin Emrich, Assessment Health Promotion
More informationTHE HEALTH OF LINN COUNTY, IOWA A COUNTYWIDE ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH STATUS AND HEALTH RISKS
THE HEALTH OF LINN COUNTY, IOWA A COUNTYWIDE ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH STATUS AND HEALTH RISKS Project Team Pramod Dwivedi, Health Director Amy Hockett, Epidemiologist Kaitlin Emrich, Assessment Health Promotion
More informationALACHUA COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSESSMENT
ALACHUA COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSESSMENT JUNE 2016 This page intentionally left blank. ALACHUA COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSESSMENT (CHA) Contents Executive Summary 4 The Alachua Community Health Assessment
More informationRedington-Fairview General Hospital Community Health Needs Assessment Annual Report
Redington-Fairview General Hospital 2017 Community Health Needs Assessment Annual Report Original Community Needs Assessment: November 2007 Updated: January 2010; April 2012, September ; August 2015; July
More informationService Area: Herkimer, Fulton & Montgomery Counties. 140 Burwell St. 301 N. Washington St. Little Falls, NY Herkimer, NY 13350
2016 Community Service Plan & Community Health Improvement Plan & Herkimer County Public Health Service Area: Herkimer, Fulton & Montgomery Counties Bassett Healthcare Network s Little Falls Hospital Herkimer
More informationThese are more than words. They are the principles and philosophy that drive every decision that ProMedica makes as an organization.
Foreword Mission-driven. Community-based. Not-for-profit. These are more than words. They are the principles and philosophy that drive every decision that ProMedica makes as an organization. With people
More informationVanderbilt Institute for Medicine and Public Health Women s Health Research Tennessee Women s Health Report Card TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Vanderbilt Institute for Medicine and Public Health Women s Health Research 2009 Tennessee Women s Health Report Card TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 2009 Tennessee Women s Health Report Card Rationale
More informationResults of Lahey Health Community Health Needs Assessment Survey: Wenham October, 2012
Results of Lahey Health Community Health Needs Assessment Survey: October, 2012 Table 1: Number of respondents and response rates by town. Also, reporting average age, gender and household income based
More informationCommunity Health Needs Assessment Kalamazoo County. Bronson Methodist Hospital Published: December 2016
Community Health Needs Assessment Kalamazoo County Bronson Methodist Hospital Published: December 2016 Community Health Needs Assessment Table of Contents Summary... 3 1. Service Area Definition.. 5 2.
More informationResults of Lahey Health Community Health Needs Assessment Survey: Gloucester October, 2012
Results of Lahey Health Community Health Needs Assessment Survey: October, 2012 Table 1: Number of respondents and response rates by town. Also, reporting average age, gender, and household income based
More informationCounty Health Rankings and Roadmaps Suburban Cook County Equivalent Measures
County Health Rankings and Roadmaps Suburban Cook County Equivalent Measures - 2017 www.cookcountypublichealth.org Health Oak Forest Health Center 15900 S. Cicero Avenue Oak Forest, Il 60452 Terry Mason,
More information2014 Edition TENNESSEE
214 TENNESSEE America's Health Rankings is the longest running comparative health index of states. It uses measures of behavior, community and environment, policy, clinical care, and health outcomes to
More information