Enhancing Encoding of a Motor Memory in the Primary Motor Cortex By Cortical Stimulation
|
|
- Bennett Gilbert
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 J Neurophysiol 91: , First published January 7, 2004; /jn Enhancing Encoding of a Motor Memory in the Primary Motor Cortex By Cortical Stimulation Cathrin M. Bütefisch, 1 Vikram Khurana, 1 Leonid Kopylev, 2 and Leonardo G. Cohen 1 1 Human Cortical Physiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, ; and 2 Biometry and Field Studies Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland Submitted 27 October 2003; accepted in final form 27 December 2003 Bütefisch, Cathrin M., Vikram Khurana, Leonid Kopylev, and Leonardo G. Cohen. Enhancing encoding of a motor memory in the primary motor cortex by cortical stimulation. J Neurophysiol 91: , First published January 7, 2004; /jn Motor training results in encoding of motor memories, a form of use-dependent plasticity. Here we tested the hypothesis that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) synchronously applied to a motor cortex engaged in a motor training task could enhance this plastic process. Healthy volunteers were studied in four sessions: training consisting of performance of directionally specific voluntary thumb movements (Train alone), training with TMS delivered during the execution of the training movement in a strictly temporal relationship to the motor cortex contralateral (Train TMS synchronous contra ) and ipsilateral (Train TMS synchronous ipsi )tothe training hand, and training with TMS delivered asynchronous to the training movement to the motor cortex contralateral to the training hand (Train TMS asynchronous contra ). Train alone, Train TMS synchronous contra, and Train TMS asynchronous contra but not Train TMS synchronous ipsi elicited a clear motor memory. The longevity of the encoded memory was significantly enhanced by Train TMS synchronous contra when compared with Train alone and Train TMS asynchronous contra. Therefore use-dependent encoding of a motor memory can be enhanced by synchronous Hebbian stimulation of the motor cortex that drives the training task and reduced by stimulation of the homologous ipsilateral motor cortex, a result relevant for studies of cognitive and physical rehabilitation. INTRODUCTION Motor training leads to encoding of kinematic details of the practiced movements in the human motor cortex (Classen et al. 1998), a form of use-dependent plasticity (Bütefisch et al. 2000; Classen et al. 1998). The operating mechanisms include changes in the balance of excitation and inhibition within the hand motor representation (Bütefisch et al. 2000, 2002; Classen et al. 1998; Sawaki et al. 2001) that are influenced by N- methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA), muscarinic and alpha-adrenergic receptor function as well as GABAergic neurotransmission (Bütefisch et al. 2000, 2002; Sawaki et al. 2001). It has been proposed that the mechanisms underlying this form of plasticity share similarities with those involved in long-term potentiation (LTP) (Bliss and Lomo 1973; Bütefisch et al. 2000; Rioult-Pedotti et al. 1998). Use-dependent plasticity plays an important role in motor learning and recovery of motor function after brain lesions (Nudo et al. 1996), such as in patients with multiple sclerosis Present address and address for reprint requests and other correspondence: C. Bütefisch, Neurological Therapeutic Center, Institut at the Heinrich-Heine University, Hohensandweg 37, Düsseldorf, Germany ( cathrin.buetefisch@uni-duesseldorf.de or cohen@ninds.nih.gov). and stroke (Liepert et al. 1998, 2000; Reddy et al. 2000). Enhancing use-dependent plasticity may result in improvements in the ability of the CNS to compensate for the loss of function (Bütefisch et al. 2002; Feeney et al. 1982). Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a technique that allows noninvasive focal stimulation of the human brain (Hallett 2000) and that, in particular settings, can enhance cortical reorganization (Ziemann et al. 1998a) and information processing (Boroojerdi et al. 2001; Flitmann et al. 1998). Therefore one possible strategy to enhance use-dependent plasticity could be the synchronous application of TMS to the motor cortex engaged in performing the training motions, a paradigm reminiscent of in vitro experiments in which stimulation of cortical afferents was paired with depolarization of the synaptic target neuron in a specific temporal relationship (Baranyi and Szente 1987; Baranyi et al. 1991). In the current study, we hypothesized that TMS applied to a thumb motor representation at a time it is engaged in driving a training motion would facilitate encoding of a motor memory for the trained movements. METHODS Subjects Six of 11 healthy, right-handed volunteers (4 of them men; mean age: 34.2 yr; range: yr) fulfilled the inclusion criteria (see following text) and gave written informed consent and participated in the study under a protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Experimental protocol Subjects, unaware of the experimental purpose of the study, participated in different sessions testing the effects of four different interventions on the ability of training to form an elementary motor memory. Encoding of a motor memory Subjects were seated in a chair firmly connected to a frame that kept the head steady and the stimulating coil in a constant position with respect to the head. Head and coil stability were monitored with a three-dimensional laser system as previously described (Bütefisch et al. 2000). Each subject s right forearm was immobilized in a molded armrest with the four long fingers supported and the thumb freely The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact
2 ENHANCING MOTOR MEMORY IN MOTOR CORTEX 2111 movable. Thumb movements were recorded with a two-dimensional accelerometer mounted on the proximal phalanx of the thumb (Classen et al. 1998). The direction of the thumb movements was calculated from the first-peak acceleration vector. TMS was delivered from a custom-built magnetoelectric stimulator (Cadwell Laboratories, Kennewick, WA) through a figure-eight shaped magnetic coil (wing diameter: 7.0 cm). The coil was placed tangentially to the scalp and rotated 45 away from the midline. The current induced in the brain was, therefore directed approximately perpendicular to the central sulcus, which is the optimal condition for activating the corticospinal tract transsynaptically (Kaneko et al. 1996; Werhahn et al. 1994). Stimuli were delivered to the optimal scalp position for eliciting mild isolated thumb movements. In addition to TMS-evoked movement directions, we recorded motor potentials (MEP) evoked by TMS from extensor pollicis brevis (EPB), a hand muscle mediating thumb movements in extension, and from flexor pollicis brevis (FPB), a hand muscle mediating thumb movements in flexion. MEP recorded from the muscle that acted as agonist to the training motions (see following text) is described as MEP agonist, whereas that recorded from the muscle that acted as antagonist to the training movements is described as MEP antagonist. Motor threshold (MT) was defined as the minimum TMS intensity that evoked an MEP of 50 V in 5 of 10 trials in the target muscle (Rossini et al. 1994). MT was determined to the nearest 1% of maximum stimulator output in the resting EPB and FPB muscles. MEP amplitudes after the training were expressed relative to MEP amplitudes at baseline. Initially, we determined the direction of TMS-evoked thumb movements by stimulating the optimal scalp position overlying the contralateral motor cortex (total of 60 stimuli) at 0.1 Hz, a rate that does not affect cortical excitability (Chen et al. 1997). Subjects occasionally realized that the thumb had moved but could not determine its direction. In these trials, the baseline direction was defined as the mean angle of TMS-evoked movements that fell in the predominant direction (Fig. 1). After identifying the baseline TMS-evoked thumb-movement direction, subjects practiced voluntary brisk thumb movements in a direction opposite to baseline in six blocks of 5 min for a total of 30 min at 1 Hz. After every single training movement, the thumb returned to the original position by relaxation as confirmed by electromyography (EMG). Acceleration and EMG signals of 20 training movements recorded at random in each training block were sampled at 1 khz (120 training movements total). Quality of the motor training, as defined by the accuracy and consistency of training movements, was monitored on-line by one investigator. If necessary, the subject was encouraged to perform better. Additionally, quality and consistency of training movements was measured off-line by calculating the angular difference between the voluntary thumb-movement training direction and the TMS-evoked thumb-movement direction at baseline, the dispersion of thumb movement training directions, and the magnitude of the first-peak acceleration of these movements. The measure for dispersion of thumb-movement direction is derived from the length of the mean of the individual vectors in the unit circle. In a unit circle, a mean vector of 1 means that the direction of the individual vectors was identical, while a mean vector close to 0 means maximal dispersion (Batschelet 1981). At the end of the 30-min training period, TMS-evoked thumb-movement directions were recorded for 30 min (post 1 post 3, see following text) in all conditions. Because testing post 3 in Train TMS synchronous contra revealed FIG. 1. Experimental set-up. A: the direction of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked or voluntary movement was derived from the 1st-peak acceleration in the 2 major axes of the movement, measured by a 2-dimensional accelerometer. B: circular frequency histogram illustrating the main effect of training. Baseline TMS-induced movement directions are a combination of extension and abduction (open). Training movements were performed in a direction approximately opposite to baseline (arrow). The mean training direction is at the center of the training target zone (TTZ). The black bar scale shows the number of TMS-evoked movements (in this case, 20) that fall in each 10 bin (see METHODS). Posttraining TMS-induced movement directions fell largely in the TTZ (filled), close to a 180 change from the baseline direction. Circular frequency histograms in the following figures are constructed in the same way. C: schematic diagram of the experimental setup during training. TMS application was triggered by the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the muscle supporting the training movement of the thumb (training agonist). In the subject illustrated in this figure, the training direction was flexion; therefore the flexor pollicis brevis (FPB) operated as training agonist during training motions. EMG activity was recorded from the FPB. The potentiometer was adjusted in such a way that TMS was triggered when the EMG amplitude of the training agonist (FPB) was 10 20% of the maximal EMG amplitude during a ballistic movement. Accordingly, the TMS to the contralateral motor cortex occurred within the 1st half of the EMG burst that was generated by the training agonist. EPB, extensor pollicis brevis.
3 2112 C. M. BÜTEFISCH, V. KHURANA, L. KOPYLEV, AND L. G. COHEN TABLE 1. Measurements of motor excitability prior to the interventions MovT Intervention MT baseline MT training Percent Stimulation Output Percentage MT baseline MEP antagonist,mv MEP agonist,mv Train alone Train TMS synchronous contra Train TMS asynchronous contra Train TMS synchronous ipsi Motor threshold (MT) is given as a percentage of maximal stimulator output. Minimal stimulus intensity to elicit an isolated movement of the thumb (MovT). MovT is given as a percentage of maximal stimulator output (Stim. output) and percent of MT of baseline muscle. Values are means SE. MEP agonist, motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in hand muscles supporting thumb voluntary training motions; MEP antagonist, motor potentials evoked by TMS in hand muscles antagonist to the thumb voluntary training motions. persistent training effects, a fourth determination was made at min after the end of training (Fig. 3B, post 4). End-point measure To describe the effects of the different interventions, we defined a training target zone (TTZ) as a window of 20 centered on the training direction. The TTZ is shown in Fig. 1B. We measured the increase in the proportion of TMS-evoked movements in the TTZ at the end of training (Fig. 1B). By design, training was in the direction opposite to the baseline direction; hence, the proportion of TMSevoked movements in the TTZ before training was small. Therefore the end-point measure of this study was the training-induced increase in the proportion of TMS-evoked movements falling in the TTZ as a function of the different interventions. This measure describes the ability of the motor cortex to encode the kinematic details of the practiced movements, an elementary motor memory (Classen et al. 1998). Data analysis was implemented by personnel blind to the type of intervention. Experimental interventions Subjects participated in four different sessions separated by 1 day in a randomized, counterbalanced order: training alone (Train alone) (Bütefisch et al. 2002); training with TMS at 0.1 Hz applied synchronous with the training movements in a strict temporal relationship to the motor cortex contralateral (Train TMS synchronous contra ) and ipsilateral (Train TMS synchronous ipsi ) to the training hand; and training combined with TMS at 0.1 Hz applied to the contralateral motor cortex asynchronous to the training movements (Train TMS asynchronous contra ). TMS was applied at 80% resting motor threshold (MT) because this intensity is effective in modulating cortical plasticity (Ziemann et al. 1998a). TMS at subthreshold intensities used in this study activates corticocortical connections targeting pyramidal tract neurons (Day et al. 1987). TRAIN ALONE. In this session, subjects performed voluntary thumb movements at 1 Hz in the absence of TMS as previously described (Bütefisch et al. 2000). TRAIN TMS SYNCHRONOUS CONTRA. Subjects performed voluntary thumb movements at 1 Hz as in Train alone. A single TMS pulse was applied at 0.1 Hz to the contralateral motor cortex at 80% resting MT, synchronous with 1 of every 10 voluntary thumb movements, (triggered by the EMG burst in the muscle, acting as training agonist, when it reached a predetermined threshold amplitude level, 10 20% of the maximal amplitude of the EMG burst). In non-human primates, M1 activity associated with performance of a ballistic movement lasts for 250 ms after EMG onset (Crammond and Kalaska 2000). Therefore the TMS pulses in our study were applied to M1 soon after the EMG onset to arrive synchronously with cortical activity in M1 generating the training movements. TRAIN TMS SYNCHRONOUS IPSI. Subjects performed voluntary thumb movements at 1 Hz as in Train alone. A single TMS pulse was applied at 0.1 Hz to the ipsilateral motor cortex at 80% MT, synchronous with 1 of every 10 voluntary thumb movements, using a second figure-eight coil connected to a second stimulator (triggered by the EMG burst in the muscle, acting as training agonist, when it reached a predetermined threshold amplitude level, 10 20% of the maximal amplitude of the EMG burst). TRAIN TMS ASYNCHRONOUS CONTRA. This intervention was identical to Train TMS synchronous contra except that TMS pulses were applied asynchronous in relation to the training movements. Specifically TMS pulses were delivered regularly at 0.1 Hz at random in reference to the movements that occurred at 1 Hz. Inclusion criteria Participating subjects fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: ability of TMS to elicit isolated thumb movements in the absence of movements of any other digits, wrist, or arm; consistent (reproducible) direction of TMS-evoked thumb movements in the baseline condition; and posttraining TMS-evoked thumb-movement directions matching the training direction. Statistical analysis The proportion of TMS-evoked movements in TTZ before (baseline) and after (post 1) training were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A distribution-free Friedman rank test compared changes in the proportion of TMS-evoked movements falling in the TTZ after the different interventions calculated for the entire 30-min posttraining period (post 1 post 3). Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the magnitude of these changes for the entire 30-min posttraining period of each intervention relative to Train alone and to compare the training kinematics of each intervention relative to Train alone. RESULTS Motor threshold, movement threshold, and the amplitudes of MEP, MEP training antagonist, and MEP training agonist prior to the training did not differ across conditions (Train alone, Train TMS synchronous contra, Train TMS asynchronous con - tra, ortrain TMS synchronous ipsi ; Table 1). Similarly, training kinematics, including magnitude of the first-peak acceleration of training movements, dispersion of training movement directions, and angular difference between mean baseline and training angle, did not differ significantly across conditions (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: NS, Table 2). Formation of a motor memory Training alone or combined with TMS applied to the contralateral M1 either synchronous or asynchronous to the EMG
4 ENHANCING MOTOR MEMORY IN MOTOR CORTEX 2113 TABLE 2. Training kinematics Intervention Peak Acceleration activity of the agonist muscle (Train TMS synchronous contra and Train TMS asynchronous contra ) resulted in a significant increase in the proportion of TMS-evoked thumb movements in the TTZ 0 10 min after completion of the training (post1) in reference to baseline (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: Train alone, P 0.05; Train TMS synchronous contra, P 0.03; Train TMS asynchronous contra, P 0.05; Fig. 2). TMS applied to the ipsilateral M1 (Train TMS synchronous ipsi ) blocked this effect (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: NS; Fig. 2). At baseline, the amplitude of MEP training antagonist exceeded that of MEP training agonist (Table 1). Consistent with the kinematic data, Train alone and Train TMS synchronous contra resulted in a differential modulation of MEP amplitudes, whereby the MEP training agonist increased and MEP training antagonist remained either unchanged or decreased (Fig. 3, A and B). Also consistent with the kinematic data, Train TMS synchronous ipsi did not result in such differential modulation (Fig. 3D). In Train TMS asynchronous contra, both MEP training antagonist and agonist increased although MEP training agonist still exceeds MEP training antagonist (Fig. 3C). Longevity of the encoded motor memory Angular Dispersion Angular Difference Train alone Train TMS synchronous contra Train TMS asynchronous contra Train TMS synchronous ipsi Peak acceleration is expressed in g. Angular dispersion is expressed as length of unit vector. Angular difference gives the difference between the mean training angle and the mean baseline angle and is expressed in degrees. The means SE are given for all data. There was no statistically difference of training parameters between conditions (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: NS). The longevity of changes in TMS-evoked movement directions differed according to the intervention [Friedman rank test (post 1 post 3 pooled): P 0.001; Fig. 3]. The changes lasted longer in Train TMS synchronous contra (Fig. 3B) than in Train alone [Fig. 3A; Wilcoxon signed-rank test (post 1 post 3 pooled data): P 0.001], which was similar to Train TMS asynchronous contra [Fig. 3C; Wilcoxon signed-rank test (post 1 post 3: NS)]. Changes in TMS-evoked movement directions lasted for 20 min in Train alone (Fig. 3A) and Train TMS asynchronous contra (Fig. 3C). Train TMS synchronous contra led to a substantial enhancement of the effect to 60 min (Fig. 3B). Consistent with the kinematic data, the differential regulation of MEP training agonist and MEP training antagonist amplitudes in Train alone and Train TMS synchronous contra was present for 30 min (Fig. 3, A and B). Data from a representative subject are shown in Fig. 4. when applied synchronously to the motor cortex engaged in generating the practice movements. Motor training leads to encoding motor memories in the CNS (Shadmehr and Brashers-Krug 1997). Under our experimental conditions, training leaves a memory trace in the primary motor cortex that reflects the kinematic details of the practiced movements (Classen et al. 1998). Here, we investigated if it is possible to enhance this plastic process by synchronous stimulation to the motor cortex engaged in the training motions, a proposal consistent with the Hebbian principle that potentiation of synaptic efficacy (LTP) occurs when its pre- and postsynaptic elements are simultaneously active (Hebb 1949). When inputs converge onto a target neural structure in temporal synchrony, they can enhance cortical plasticity (Baranyi and Feher 1981; Baranyi and Szente 1987; Iriki et al. 1989). With these considerations in mind, we hypothesized that application of TMS, a technique that stimulates preferentially intracortical connections targeting pyramidal tract neurons (Rothwell 1997) at a time when the motor cortex is engaged in generating a training motion, should lead to an enhancement in this form of plasticity. Previous work demonstrated that TMS can increase the excitability of the primary motor cortex (Pascual-Leone et al. 1994b), enhance deafferentation-induced plasticity in humans (Ziemann et al. 1998), and induce LTPand LTD-like changes in slice preparations of cortical tissue (Wang et al. 1996). Subjects participated in four different sessions testing the effects of motor training alone and motor training accompanied by TMS applied in synchrony and out of synchrony with the training motions. Preceding training, measures of corticomotoneuronal excitability, including motor thresholds (Mavroudakis et al. 1994), movement thresholds, and MEP amplitudes (Amassian et al. 1987; Ridding and Rothwell 1997) in two muscle groups controlling thumb movements, were similar across conditions. Additionally, monitoring of motor training kinematics revealed that the magnitude of the first-peak acceleration of training movements, the dispersion of training movement directions, and the angular difference between mean baseline and training angles did not differ significantly across conditions. The mean peak acceleration of training motions in DISCUSSION The main finding of this study was that TMS enhanced training-dependent encoding of an elementary motor memory FIG. 2. Proportion of TMS-evoked movements in the TTZ before (baseline) and after (post 1) training. Note that all interventions except Train TMS synchronous ipsi led to an increase in the proportion of TMS-evoked movements in the TTZ (mean SE; *P 0.05, **P 0.03; Wilcoxon signed-rank test).
5 2114 C. M. BÜTEFISCH, V. KHURANA, L. KOPYLEV, AND L. G. COHEN FIG. 3. Longevity of changes in the proportion of TMS-evoked movement in the TTZ (right y axis) and MEP training agonist (Œ) and antagonist ( ) muscles (left y axis) after Train alone (A), Train TMS synchronous contra (B), Train TMS asynchronous contra (C), and Train TMS synchronous ipsi (D). Note that changes in the proportion of TMSevoked movement in the TTZ lasted for 20 min with Train alone (A) and Train TMS asynchronous contra (C) but for 1 h with Train TMS synchronous contra (B). Train TMS synchronous contra was slightly larger than in Train alone, similar to Train TMS asynchronous contra (Table 2). It is possible that subthreshold TMS application in combination with training led to larger movement amplitudes. If present, this effect was very small because TMS was applied in only 1 of 10 trials, and in those trials, it did not evoke muscle twitches. More importantly, prolongation of learning occurred in the Train TMS synchronous contra but not in Train TMS asynchronous contra despite comparable acceleration levels. Overall, these results document comparable baseline motor cortical excitability levels preceding training and comparable motor training kinematics across the four interventions. FIG. 4. TMS-evoked movement directions displayed as circular histograms in a representative subject at baseline, post 1 and post 2. (see Fig. 1B for details). Mean training angle (arrow) and TTZ for all conditions are shown in A. In the Train alone (A) and Train TMS asynchronous contra (C) conditions, TMS-evoked movements at baseline were mainly in the extension/abduction (ext./abd.) direction (inset). At post 1, there was a substantial increase in the proportion of TMS-evoked movements in the TTZ (flex./add.). After min (post 2), most TMS-evoked movements returned to the baseline direction. Note that Train TMS synchronouscontra (B) elicited a more prominent and longer lasting change and that Train TMS synchronous ipsi (D) blocked the training effects.
6 ENHANCING MOTOR MEMORY IN MOTOR CORTEX 2115 First, we evaluated the effects of the different interventions on the formation of a motor memory. TMS applied to the motor cortex involved in the training task enhanced this form of plasticity, whereas TMS applied to the motor cortex ipsilateral to the training hand reduced it. This latter finding is consistent with interhemispheric competition models of cortical sensory processing (Mesulam 1999). Each hand motor representation exerts inhibitory influences on the homonymous representation in the opposite hemisphere (Di Lazzaro et al. 1999; Ferbert et al. 1992; Gerloff et al. 1998; Murase et al. 2004; Werhahn et al. 2002). It has been proposed that balanced interhemispheric interactions are required for the generation of proper voluntary movements (Ferbert et al.1992). It is then possible that stimulation of the motor cortex ipsilateral to the training hand resulted in enhanced inhibitory drive exerted over the hand motor representation engaged in the training task, leading to the observed attenuation of the training effects (see Fig. 3D), a finding reminiscent of the reported reduction in deafferentation-induced plasticity in one hemisphere by application of TMS to the other hemisphere (Ziemann et al. 1998a). This proposal is consistent with the reported modulation of corticomotor excitability (Schambra et al. 2003) and intracortical inhibitory circuits in one hemisphere by stimulation of homologous motor areas of the opposite hemisphere (Daskalakis et al. 2002; Schnitzler et al. 1996). Additionally, Train TMS synchronous ipsi resulted in cancellation of training effects on encoding of this memory trace, consistent with a similar decrease in MEP amplitudes in agonist and antagonist muscles. It is of note that this form of plasticity relies on differential changes in excitability in agonist and antagonist muscles (Bütefisch et al. 2000) that were cancelled by application of ipsilateral TMS. On the other hand, we found that stimulation of the motor cortex engaged in the training task enhanced the training effects if applied in synchrony with the training motions. Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) alone results in cortical reorganization in the somatosensory and motor cortices in the rat (Nudo et al. 1990; Recanzone et al. 1992; Spengler and Dinse 1994). In humans, TMS increases motor cortical excitability (Pascual-Leone et al. 1994b) and can also facilitate functions mediated by the stimulated cortical areas (Boroojerdi et al. 2001; Flitmann et al. 1998). Interestingly, the facilitatory influence of TMS on training effects was observed in our study when stimulation was applied in synchrony with the training motions. The mechanisms underlying this effect remain to be determined. However, it is conceivable that LTP-like processes, known to operate in the motor cortex in vivo (Rioult- Pedotti et al. 1998) and thought to influence this particular form of plasticity (Bütefisch et al. 2000), could be enhanced by such Hebbian paradigm as also proposed when synchronized tactile-stimulation strategies were applied in the somatosensory system (Dinse et al. 2003). The duration of this elementary motor memory ( 60 min when training was combined with synchronous stimulation but only 20 min when TMS application was asynchronous to the training motions) is consistent with this hypothesis. Therefore we demonstrate for the first time that it is possible to enhance the effects of motor training and the duration of this memory trace by noninvasive cortical stimulation. This form of memory encoding may underlie the beneficial effect of preperformance practice (for example, in athletics or musical performance), and it may be a requirement for purposeful skill acquisition in intact humans and in the rehabilitation of persons with brain damage (Bütefisch et al. 1995). The results raise the exciting possibility that cortical stimulation combined with rehabilitative treatment could lead to more prominent behavioral gains than rehabilitative treatment alone in patients with cortical lesions like stroke. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank our subjects for their participation in the study and N. Dang for technical support. REFERENCES Amassian VE, Quirk GL, and Stewart M. Magnetic coil versus electrical stimulation of monkey motor cortex (Abstract). J Physiol 394: 119P, Baranyi A and Feher O. Synaptic facilitation requires paired activation of convergent pathways in the neocortex. Nature 290: , Baranyi A and Szente MB. Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission requires postsynaptic modifications in the neocortex. Brain Res 423: , Baranyi A, Szente MB, and Woody CD. Properties of associative longlasting potentiation induced by cellular conditioning in the motor cortex of conscious cats. Neuroscience 42: , Batschelet E. Cicular Statistics in Biology. London, UK: Academic, Bliss TV and Lomo T. Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J Physiol 232: , Boroojerdi B, Phipps M, Kopylev L, Wharton CM, Cohen LG, and Grafman J. Enhancing analogic reasoning with rtms over the left prefrontal cortex. Neurology 54: , Bütefisch CM, Davis BC, Sawaki L, Waldvogel D, Classen J, Kopylev L, and Cohen LG. Modulation of use-dependent plasticity by d-amphetamine. Ann Neurol 51: 59 68, Bütefisch CM, Davis BC, Wise SP, Sawaki L, Kopylev L, Classen J, and Cohen LG. Mechanisms of use-dependent plasticity in the human motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: , Bütefisch CM, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, and Mauritz KH. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 130: 59 68, Chen R, Classen J, Gerloff C, Celnik P, Wassermann EM, Hallett M, and Cohen LG. Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 48: , Classen J, Liepert J, Wise SP, Hallett M, and Cohen LG. Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. J Neurophysiol 79: , Crammond DJ and Kalaska JF. Prior information in motor and premotor cortex: activity during the delay period and effect on pre-movement activity. J Neurophysiol 84: , Daskalakis ZJ, Christensen BK, Fitzgerald PB, Roshan L, and Chen R. The mechanisms of interhemispheric inhibition in the human motor cortes. J Physiol 543: , Day BL, Thompson PD, Dick JP, Nakashima K, and Marsden CD. Different sites of action of electrical and magnetic stimulation of the human brain. Neurosci Lett 75: , Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Profice P, Insola A, Mazzone P, and Rothwell JC. Direct demonstration of interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex produced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res 124: , Dinse HR, Ragert P, Pleger B, Schwenkreis P, and Tegenthoff M. Pharmacological modulation of perceptual learning and associated cortical reorganization. Science 301: 91 94, Feeney DM, Gonzalez A, and Law WA. Amphetamine, haloperidol, and experience interact to affect rate of recovery after motor cortex injury. Science 217: , Ferbert A, Priori A, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Colebatch JG, and Marsden CD. Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex. J Physiol 453: , Flitmann SS, Grafmann J, Wassermann EM, Cooper V, O Grady J, Pascual-Leone A, and Hallett M. Linguistic processing during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 50: , 1998.
7 2116 C. M. BÜTEFISCH, V. KHURANA, L. KOPYLEV, AND L. G. COHEN Gerloff C, Cohen LG, Floeter MK, Chen R, Corwell B, and Hallett M. Inhibitory influence of the ipsilateral motor cortex on responses to stimulation of the human cortex and pyramidal tract. J Physiol 510: , Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain. Nature 406: , Hebb DO. The Organization of Behavior. A Neuropsychological Theory. New York: Wiley, Hess G, Aizenman C, and Donoghue JP. Conditions for the induction of long-term potentiation in layer II/III horizontal connections of the rat motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 75: , Hess G and Donoghue JP. Long-term potentiation of horizontal connections provides a mechanism to reorganize cortical motor maps. J Neurophysiol 71: , Iriki A, Pavlides C, Keller A, and Asanuma H. Long-term potentiation in the motor cortex. Science 245: , Kaneko T, Kawai S, Fuchigami Y, Morita H, and Ofuji A. The effect of current direction induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation on the corticospinal excitability in human brain. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 101: , Liepert J, Miltner WHR, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E, and Weiller C. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 250: 5 8, Liepert J, Bauder H, Miltner WHR, Taub E, and Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 31: , Mavroudakis N, Caroyer JM, Brunko E, and Beyl DZ. Effects of dephenylhydantoin on motor potentials evoked with magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 93: , Mesulam MM. Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events.[erratum appears in Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 354: 2083]. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 354: , Murase N, Duque J, Mazziocchio R, and Cohen LG. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic subcortical stroke. Ann Neurol In press. Nudo JR, Jenkins WR, and Merzenich M. Repetitive microstimulation alters the cortical representation of movements in adult rats. Somatosens Motor Res 7: , Nudo JR, Wise BM, SiFuentes FS, and Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 272: , Pascual-Leone A, Grafmann J, and Hallett M. Modulation of cortical motor output maps during development of implicit and explicit knowledge. Science 263: , 1994a. Pascual-Leone A, Valls-Sole J, Wassermann EM, and Hallett M. Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain 117: , 1994b. Recanzone GH, Merzenich M, Jenkins WM, Grajski KA, and Dinse HR. Topographic reorganization of the hand representation in cortical area 3b of owl monkeys trained in a frequency discrimination task. J Neurophysiol 67: , Reddy H, Narayanan S, Arnoutelis R, Jenkinson M, Antel J, Matthews PM, and Arnold DL. Evidence for adaptive functional changes in the cerebral cortex with axonal injury from multiple sclerosis. Brain 123: , Ridding MC and Rothwell JC. Stimulus/response curves as a method of measuring motor cortical excitability in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 105: , Rioult-Pedotti MS, Friedman D, Hess G, and Donoghue JP. Stengthening of horizontal cortical connections following skill learning. Nature Neurosci 1: , Rossini PM, Barker AT, Berardelli A, Caramia MD, Caruso G, Cracco RQ, Dimitrijevic MR, Hallett M, Katayama Y, and Lucking CH. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 91: 79 92, Rothwell JC. Techniques and mechanisms of action of transcranial stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Neurosci Methods 74: , Sawaki L, Boroojerdi B, Kaelin-Lang A, Burstein AH, Bütefisch CM, Kopylev L, Davis B, and Cohen LG. Cholinergic influences on usedependent plasticity. J Neurophysiol 87: , Schambra HM, Sawaki L, and Cohen LG. Modulation of excitability of human motor cortex (MI) by 1 Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralateral M1. Clin Neurophysiol 114: , Schnitzler A, Kessler KR, and Benecke R. Tanscallosally mediated inhibition of interneurons within human primary motor cortex. Exp Brain Res 112: , Shadmehr R and Brashers-Krug T. Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory. J Neurosci 17: , Spengler F and Dinse HR. Reversible relocation of representational boundaries of adult rats by intracortical microstimulation. Neuroreport 5: , Wang H, Wang X, and Scheich H. LTD and LTP induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation in auditory cortex. Neuroreport 7: , Werhahn KJ, Jong JKY, Meyer B, Priori A, Rothwell JC, Day BL, and Thompson PD. The effect of coil orientation on the latency of surface EMG and single motor unit responses in the first dorsal interosseous muscle. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 93: , Werhahn KJ, Mortensen J, Kaelin-Lang A, Boroojerdi B, and Cohen LG. Cortical excitability changes induced by deafferentation of the contralateral hemisphere. Brain 125: , Ziemann U, Corwell B, and Cohen LG. Modulation of plasticity in human motor cortex after forearm ischemic nerve block. J Neurosci 18: , 1998a. Ziemann U, Hallett M, and Cohen L. Mechanisms of deafferentation-induced plasticity in human motor cortex. J Neurosci 18: , 1998b.
Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability worldwide and a condition for which
NEUROLOGICAL REVIEW SECTION EDITOR: DAVID E. PLEASURE, MD Mechanisms Underlying Recovery of Motor Function After Stroke Nick S. Ward, MD; Leonardo G. Cohen, MD Stroke is the leading cause of long-term
More informationWater immersion modulates sensory and motor cortical excitability
Water immersion modulates sensory and motor cortical excitability Daisuke Sato, PhD Department of Health and Sports Niigata University of Health and Welfare Topics Neurophysiological changes during water
More informationIntroduction to TMS Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Introduction to TMS Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Lisa Koski, PhD, Clin Psy TMS Neurorehabilitation Lab Royal Victoria Hospital 2009-12-14 BIC Seminar, MNI Overview History, basic principles, instrumentation
More informationChanges in intracortical excitability induced by stimulation of wrist afferents in man
12359 Journal of Physiology (2001), 534.3, pp.891 902 891 Changes in intracortical excitability induced by stimulation of wrist afferents in man Jean-Marc Aimonetti and Jens Bo Nielsen * Laboratoire Développement
More informationMemory Formation in the Motor Cortex Ipsilateral to a Training Hand
Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published October 10, 2007 Cerebral Cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm173 Memory Formation in the Motor Cortex Ipsilateral to a Training Hand J. Duque 1,2, R. Mazzocchio 1,3,
More informationPhasic Voluntary Movements Reverse the Aftereffects of Subsequent Theta- Burst Stimulation in Humans
J Neurophysiol 100: 2070 2076, 2008. First published August 27, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.90521.2008. Phasic Voluntary Movements Reverse the Aftereffects of Subsequent Theta- Burst Stimulation in Humans Ennio
More informationInduction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation
Brain (2000), 123, 572 584 Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation Katja Stefan, 1 Erwin Kunesch, 1 Leonardo G. Cohen, 2 Reiner Benecke 1 and Joseph Classen
More informationTREATMENT-SPECIFIC ABNORMAL SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY IN EARLY PARKINSON S DISEASE
TREATMENT-SPECIFIC ABNORMAL SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY IN EARLY PARKINSON S DISEASE Angel Lago-Rodriguez 1, Binith Cheeran 2 and Miguel Fernández-Del-Olmo 3 1. Prism Lab, Behavioural Brain Sciences, School of
More informationNaoyuki Takeuchi, MD, PhD 1, Takeo Tada, MD, PhD 2, Masahiko Toshima, MD 3, Yuichiro Matsuo, MD 1 and Katsunori Ikoma, MD, PhD 1 ORIGINAL REPORT
J Rehabil Med 2009; 41: 1049 1054 ORIGINAL REPORT REPETITIVE TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION OVER BILATERAL HEMISPHERES ENHANCES MOTOR FUNCTION AND TRAINING EFFECT OF PARETIC HAND IN PATIENTS AFTER STROKE
More informationEffects of Sub-Motor-Threshold Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on. Event-Related Potentials and Motor-Evoked Potentials
東海大学基盤工学部紀要 5(2017 年 )1 頁 ~6 頁 Bull. School of Industrial and Welfare Engineering Tokai Univ., 5(2017), pp.1-6 Effects of Sub-Motor-Threshold Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Event-Related Potentials
More informationDifferential modulation of intracortical inhibition in human motor cortex during selective activation of an intrinsic hand muscle
J Physiol (2003), 550.3, pp. 933 946 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.042606 The Physiological Society 2003 www.jphysiol.org Differential modulation of intracortical inhibition in human motor cortex during selective
More informationStimulation-Induced Within-Representation and Across-Representation Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex
The Journal of Neuroscience, July 1, 2002, 22(13):5563 5571 Stimulation-Induced Within-Representation and Across-Representation Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex Ulf Ziemann, George F. Wittenberg, and Leonardo
More informationPaired-Pulse TMS to one Brain Region. Joyce Gomes-Osman Research Fellow Berenson-Allen Center for Non-Invasive Stimulation LEASE DO NOT COPY
Paired-Pulse TMS to one Brain Region Joyce Gomes-Osman Research Fellow Berenson-Allen Center for Non-Invasive Stimulation Paired-Pulse Paradigms Sequential pulses applied to the same cortical region Variable
More informationShort interval intracortical inhibition and facilitation during the silent period in human
J Physiol 583.3 (27) pp 971 982 971 Short interval intracortical inhibition and facilitation during the silent period in human Zhen Ni, Carolyn Gunraj and Robert Chen Division of Neurology, Krembil Neuroscience
More informationThis short review summarizes the technical principle and the
Transcranial Magnetic Brain Stimulation: a Tool to Investigate Central Motor Pathways Kai M. Rösler Department of Neurology, University of Berne, Inselspital, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland Transcranial magnetic
More informationLong lasting effects of rtms and associated peripheral sensory input on MEPs, SEPs and transcortical reflex excitability in humans
Journal of Physiology (2002), 540.1, pp. 367 376 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013504 The Physiological Society 2002 www.jphysiol.org Long lasting effects of rtms and associated peripheral sensory input on
More informationObjectives Neurophysiology of brain area related to movement and motor control
Objectives Neurophysiology of brain area related to movement and motor control 1. Ascending pathways (sensory input) 2. Sensory input treatment, and thalamo-cortical & cortico-thalamic filter 3. Sensory
More informationMechanisms of Cortical Reorganization in Lower-Limb Amputees
The Journal of Neuroscience, May 1, 1998, 18(9):3443 3450 Mechanisms of Cortical Reorganization in Lower-Limb Amputees Robert Chen, Brian Corwell, Zaneb Yaseen, Mark Hallett, and Leonardo G. Cohen Human
More informationSTUDIES OF HUMAN MOTOR PHYSIOLOGY WITH TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION
ABSTRACT: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a safe, noninvasive, and painless way to stimulate the human motor cortex in behaving human subjects. When it is applied as a single-pulse, measurements
More informationMaturation of corticospinal tracts assessed by electromagnetic stimulation of the motor cortex
Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1988, 63, 1347-1352 Maturation of corticospinal tracts assessed by electromagnetic stimulation of the motor cortex T H H G KOH AND J A EYRE Department of Child Health,
More informationModulation of single motor unit discharges using magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in incomplete spinal cord injury
1 SHORT REPORT Division of Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine, Charing Cross Hospital, London W 8RF, UK H C Smith NJDavey D W Maskill P H Ellaway National Spinal
More informationThe role of the human motor cortex in the control of complex and simple finger movement sequences
Brain (1998), 121, 1695 1709 The role of the human motor cortex in the control of complex and simple finger movement sequences Christian Gerloff, Brian Corwell, Robert Chen, Mark Hallett and Leonardo G.
More informationStimulation over the human supplementary motor area interferes with the organization of future elements in complex motor sequences
Brain (1997), 120, 1587 1602 Stimulation over the human supplementary motor area interferes with the organization of future elements in complex motor sequences Christian Gerloff, Brian Corwell, Robert
More informationRiluzole does not have an acute effect on motor thresholds and the intracortical excitability in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
J Neurol (1999) 246 [Suppl 3]: III/22 III/26 Steinkopff Verlag 1999 Martin Sommer Frithjof Tergau Stephan Wischer Carl-D. Reimers Wolfgang Beuche Walter Paulus Riluzole does not have an acute effect on
More informationThis article was published in an Elsevier journal. The attached copy is furnished to the author for non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the author s institution, sharing
More informationCopyright 2002 American Academy of Neurology. Volume 58(8) 23 April 2002 pp
Copyright 2002 American Academy of Neurology Volume 58(8) 23 April 2002 pp 1288-1290 Improved executive functioning following repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [Brief Communications] Moser,
More informationNeurophysiology of systems
Neurophysiology of systems Motor cortex (voluntary movements) Dana Cohen, Room 410, tel: 7138 danacoh@gmail.com Voluntary movements vs. reflexes Same stimulus yields a different movement depending on context
More informationLong-term reorganization of human motor cortex driven by short-term sensory stimulation
Long-term reorganization of human motor cortex driven by short-term sensory Shaheen Hamdy 1,2, John C. Rothwell 2, Qasim Aziz 1, Krishna D. Singh 3, and David G. Thompson 1 1 University Department of Gastroenterology,
More informationMapping the cortical representation of the lumbar paravertebral muscles. NE O Connell MSc Centre for Research in Rehabilitation, Brunel University
Mapping the cortical representation of the lumbar paravertebral muscles NE O Connell MSc Centre for Research in Rehabilitation, Brunel University DW Maskill MPhil Centre for Research in Rehabilitation
More informationMovimento volontario dell'arto superiore analisi, perturbazione, ottimizzazione
Movimento volontario dell'arto superiore analisi, perturbazione, ottimizzazione Antonio Currà UOS Neurologia Universitaria, Osp. A. Fiorini, Terracina UOC Neuroriabilitazione ICOT, Latina, Dir. Prof. F.
More informationNon-therapeutic and investigational uses of non-invasive brain stimulation
Non-therapeutic and investigational uses of non-invasive brain stimulation Robert Chen, MA, MBBChir, MSc, FRCPC Catherine Manson Chair in Movement Disorders Professor of Medicine (Neurology), University
More informationPriming Stimulation Enhances the Depressant Effect of Low- Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
The Journal of Neuroscience, November 26, 2003 23(34):10867 10872 10867 Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive Priming Stimulation Enhances the Depressant Effect of Low- Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic
More informationMotor strategies and excitability changes of human hand motor area are dependent on different voluntary drives
European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 23, pp. 3399 3406, 2006 doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04852.x Motor strategies and excitability changes of human hand motor area are dependent on different voluntary
More informationThe vast majority of our physical interactions with the world
A cortico-cortical mechanism mediating object-driven grasp in humans L. Cattaneo*, M. Voss*, T. Brochier*, G. Prabhu*, D. M. Wolpert*, and R. N. Lemon* *Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement
More informationCorticomotor representation of the sternocleidomastoid muscle
braini0203 Corticomotor representation of the sternocleidomastoid muscle Brain (1997), 120, 245 255 M. L. Thompson, 1,2 G. W. Thickbroom 1,2 and F. L. Mastaglia 1,2,3 1 Australian Neuromuscular Research
More informationMotor Systems I Cortex. Reading: BCP Chapter 14
Motor Systems I Cortex Reading: BCP Chapter 14 Principles of Sensorimotor Function Hierarchical Organization association cortex at the highest level, muscles at the lowest signals flow between levels over
More informationNeurophysiological Basis of TMS Workshop
Neurophysiological Basis of TMS Workshop Programme 31st March - 3rd April 2017 Sobell Department Institute of Neurology University College London 33 Queen Square London WC1N 3BG Brought to you by 31 March
More informationMechanisms Underlying Functional Changes in the Primary Motor Cortex Ipsilateral to an Active Hand
The Journal of Neuroscience, May 28, 2008 28(22):5631 5640 5631 Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Functional Changes in the Primary Motor Cortex Ipsilateral to an Active Hand Monica A.
More informationPeripheral facial paralysis (right side). The patient is asked to close her eyes and to retract their mouth (From Heimer) Hemiplegia of the left side. Note the characteristic position of the arm with
More informationUsing Transcranial magnetic stimulation to improve our understanding of Transverse Myelitis
Using Transcranial magnetic stimulation to improve our understanding of Transverse Myelitis Kathy Zackowski, PhD, OTR Kennedy Krieger Institute Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine TMS (transcranial
More informationMOTOR EVOKED POTENTIALS AND TRANSCUTANEOUS MAGNETO-ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATION
MOTOR EVOKED POTENTIAS AND TRANSCUTANEOUS MAGNETO-EECTRICA NERVE STIMUATION Hongguang iu, in Zhou 1 and Dazong Jiang Xian Jiaotong University, Xian, People s Republic of China 1 Shanxi Normal University,
More informationPsychology 320: Topics in Physiological Psychology Lecture Exam 2: March 19th, 2003
Psychology 320: Topics in Physiological Psychology Lecture Exam 2: March 19th, 2003 Name: Student #: BEFORE YOU BEGIN!!! 1) Count the number of pages in your exam. The exam is 8 pages long; if you do not
More informationCortical Control of Movement
Strick Lecture 2 March 24, 2006 Page 1 Cortical Control of Movement Four parts of this lecture: I) Anatomical Framework, II) Physiological Framework, III) Primary Motor Cortex Function and IV) Premotor
More informationThe Physiology of the Senses Chapter 8 - Muscle Sense
The Physiology of the Senses Chapter 8 - Muscle Sense www.tutis.ca/senses/ Contents Objectives... 1 Introduction... 2 Muscle Spindles and Golgi Tendon Organs... 3 Gamma Drive... 5 Three Spinal Reflexes...
More informationVoluntary Movements. Lu Chen, Ph.D. MCB, UC Berkeley. Outline. Organization of the motor cortex (somatotopic) Corticospinal projection
Voluntary Movements Lu Chen, Ph.D. MCB, UC Berkeley 1 Outline Organization of the motor cortex (somatotopic) Corticospinal projection Physiology of motor neurons Direction representation, population coding
More informationFunctional neuroplasticity after stroke: clinical implications and future directions
Functional neuroplasticity after stroke: clinical implications and future directions Dr. Michael R. Borich, PT, DPT, PhD Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Emory University
More informationSupplementary motor area provides an efferent signal for sensory suppression
Cognitive Brain Research 19 (2004) 52 58 Research report Supplementary motor area provides an efferent signal for sensory suppression Patrick Haggard*, Ben Whitford Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience
More informationNeuroscience Letters
Neuroscience Letters 529 (2012) 80 85 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Neuroscience Letters j ourna l ho me p ag e: www.elsevier.com/locate/neulet Loss of short-latency afferent inhibition
More informationMURDOCH RESEARCH REPOSITORY
MURDOCH RESEARCH REPOSITORY http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au This is the author's final version of the work, as accepted for publication following peer review but without the publisher's layout
More informationLong-term potentiation and. horizontal connections in rat motor cortex. Grzegorz ~ess' and John P. ~ ono~hue~
Long-term potentiation and horizontal connections in rat motor cortex Grzegorz ~ess' and John P. ~ ono~hue~ l~e~artment of Animal Physiology, Institute of Zoology, Jagiellonian University, 6 Ingarden St.,
More informationModulation of interhemispheric inhibition by volitional motor activity: an ipsilateral silent period study
J Physiol 587.22 (2009) pp 5393 5410 5393 Modulation of interhemispheric inhibition by volitional motor activity: an ipsilateral silent period study Fabio Giovannelli 1,2, Alessandra Borgheresi 1, Fabrizio
More informationPaired Associative Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex. Behzad Elahi
Paired Associative Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex by Behzad Elahi A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Institute of Medical
More informationEarly neural responses to strength training
J Appl Physiol 111: 367 375, 2011. First published May 5, 2011; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00064.2011. Early neural responses to strength training Victor S. Selvanayagam, 1,2 Stephan Riek, 1 and Timothy
More informationThe Journal of Physiology
J Physiol 590.4 (2012) pp 919 935 919 The early release of planned movement by acoustic startle can be delayed by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex Laila Alibiglou 1,2 and Colum D.
More informationTiming of cortical excitability changes during the reaction time of movements superimposed on tonic motor activity
J Appl Physiol 97: 2220 2227, 2004; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00542.2004. Timing of cortical excitability changes during the reaction time of movements superimposed on tonic motor activity Cyril Schneider,
More informationNeurosoft TMS. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulator DIAGNOSTICS REHABILITATION TREATMENT STIMULATION. of motor disorders after the stroke
Neurosoft TMS Transcranial Magnetic Stimulator DIAGNOSTICS REHABILITATION TREATMENT of corticospinal pathways pathology of motor disorders after the stroke of depression and Parkinson s disease STIMULATION
More informationVariety of muscle responses to tactile stimuli
Variety of muscle responses to tactile stimuli Julita Czarkowska-Bauch Department of Neurophysiology, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, 3 Pasteur St., 02-093 Warsaw, Poland Abstract. Influences
More informationLateral view of human brain! Cortical processing of touch!
Lateral view of human brain! Cortical processing of touch! How do we perceive objects held in the hand?! Touch receptors deconstruct objects to detect local features! Information is transmitted in parallel
More informationCortical Map Plasticity. Gerald Finnerty Dept Basic and Clinical Neuroscience
Cortical Map Plasticity Gerald Finnerty Dept Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Learning Objectives Be able to: 1. Describe the characteristics of a cortical map 2. Appreciate that the term plasticity is
More informationThe Three Pearls DOSE FUNCTION MOTIVATION
The Three Pearls DOSE FUNCTION MOTIVATION Barriers to Evidence-Based Neurorehabilitation No placebo pill for training therapy Blinded studies often impossible Outcome measures for movement, language, and
More informationChanges in Excitability of the Motor Cortex Associated with Internal Model Formation during Intrinsic Visuomotor Learning in the Upper Arm
Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, 2011, 1, 140-152 doi:10.4236/jbbs.2011.13019 Published Online August 2011 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/jbbs) Changes in Excitability of the Motor Cortex Associated
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. Supplementary Figure 1
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Supplementary Figure 1 The supralinear events evoked in CA3 pyramidal cells fulfill the criteria for NMDA spikes, exhibiting a threshold, sensitivity to NMDAR blockade, and all-or-none
More informationThe purpose of this systematic review is to collate evidence regarding the
Authors: Manuela Corti, PT Carolynn Patten, PhD, PT William Triggs, MD Affiliations: From the Neural Control of Movement Lab (MC, CP, WT), Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall VAMC, Gainesville,
More informationStatement on Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression. Position statement CERT03/17
Statement on Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression Position statement CERT03/17 Approved by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, Committee on ECT and Related Treatments: February 2017
More informationBasic and Clinical August 2013, Volume 4, Number 3
Basic and Clinical Corticospinal Facilitation of Erector Spinae and Rectus Abdominis Muscles During Graded Voluntary Contractions is Task Specific: A Pilot Study on Healthy Individuals Shapour Jaberzadeh
More informationThis too shall pass. Medieval Persian proverb
This too shall pass Medieval Persian proverb University of Alberta Changes in corticospinal excitability induced by neuromuscular electrical stimulation by Cameron Scott Mang A thesis submitted to the
More informationThe digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand).
http://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz ResearchSpace@Auckland Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you,
More informationNovel Approaches of Non-Invasive Stimulation Techniques to Motor Rehabilitation Following Stroke: A Review
Brain & NeuroRehabilitation Vol. 7, No. 2, September, 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.12786/bn.2014.7.2.71 Novel Approaches of Non-Invasive Stimulation Techniques to Motor Rehabilitation Following Stroke: A
More informationRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rtms), unlike
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Induced Corticomotor Excitability and Associated Motor Skill Acquisition in Chronic Stroke Yun-Hee Kim, MD, PhD; Sung H. You, PT, PhD; Myoung-Hwan Ko, MD, PhD;
More informationDaina S. E. Dickins, 1 Marc R. Kamke, 1 and Martin V. Sale 1,2. 1. Introduction
Hindawi Volume 217, Article ID 831949, 14 pages https://doi.org/1.1155/217/831949 Research Article Corticospinal Plasticity in Bilateral Primary Motor Cortices Induced by Paired Associative Stimulation
More informationThe following article was presented as an oral presentation at the Conference ICANN 98:
The following article was presented as an oral presentation at the Conference ICANN 98: Wiemer J, Spengler F, Joublin F, Stagge P, Wacquant S: A Model of Cortical Plasticity: Integration and Segregation
More informationSensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system
1 Sensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system Caroline Catmur 1, Vincent Walsh 1,2 & Cecilia Heyes 1 1 Department of Psychology, University College London, London WC1H 0AP, UK. 2 Institute
More informationTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Session 4 Virtual Lesion Approach I Alexandra Reichenbach MPI for Biological Cybernetics Tübingen, Germany Today s Schedule Virtual Lesion Approach : Study Design Rationale
More informationNEURO-MS TMS. Diagnostic Monophasic Magnetic Stimulator
NEURO-MS Diagnostic Monophasic Magnetic Stimulator Diagnostics of neurological disorders Powerful monophasic stimulus Ergonomic and lightweight coils of different shapes and sizes Configurations for single
More informationHow do individuals with congenital blindness form a conscious representation of a world they have never seen? brain. deprived of sight?
How do individuals with congenital blindness form a conscious representation of a world they have never seen? What happens to visual-devoted brain structure in individuals who are born deprived of sight?
More informationCONTENTS. Foreword George H. Kraft. Henry L. Lew
EVOKED POTENTIALS Foreword George H. Kraft xi Preface Henry L. Lew xiii Overview of Artifact Reduction and Removal in Evoked Potential and Event-Related Potential Recordings 1 Martin R. Ford, Stephen Sands,
More informationCircuits & Behavior. Daniel Huber
Circuits & Behavior Daniel Huber How to study circuits? Anatomy (boundaries, tracers, viral tools) Inactivations (lesions, optogenetic, pharma, accidents) Activations (electrodes, magnets, optogenetic)
More informationResistant Against De-depression: LTD-Like Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex Induced by Spaced ctbs
Cerebral Cortex July 2015;25:1724 1734 doi:10.1093/cercor/bht353 Advance Access publication January 31, 2014 Resistant Against De-depression: LTD-Like Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex Induced by Spaced
More informationAFTER STROKE, RESIDUAL neurologic impairments
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Cortical Reorganization Induced by Body Weight Supported Treadmill Training in Patients With Hemiparesis of Different Stroke Durations Yea-Ru Yang, PhD, PT, I-Hsuan Chen, BS, PT, Kwong-Kum
More informationAugmenting Plasticity Induction in Human Motor Cortex by Disinhibition Stimulation
Cerebral Cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu176 Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published August 6, 2014 Augmenting Plasticity Induction in Human Motor Cortex by Disinhibition Stimulation Robin F.H. Cash 1,2,3,
More informationShort latency inhibition of human hand motor cortex by somatosensory input from the hand
Keywords: 9995 Journal of Physiology (2000), 523.2, pp. 503 513 503 Short latency inhibition of human hand motor cortex by somatosensory input from the hand H. Tokimura *, V. Di Lazzaro, Y. Tokimura *,
More informationTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Scientific evidence in major depression and schizophrenia C.W. Slotema Parnassia Bavo Group The Hague, the Netherlands Faraday s law (1831) Electrical current magnetic
More informationThe Journal of Physiology Neuroscience
J Physiol 591.19 (2013) pp 4903 4920 4903 The Journal of Physiology Neuroscience Microcircuit mechanisms involved in paired associative stimulation-induced depression of corticospinal excitability David
More informationPaired Associative Transspinal and Transcortical Stimulation Produces Bidirectional Plasticity of Human Cortical and Spinal Motor Pathways
City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Graduate Center 6-2016 Paired Associative Transspinal and Transcortical Stimulation Produces Bidirectional
More informationSurface recording of muscle activity
3 rd Congress of the European Academy of Neurology Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 24 27, 2017 Hands-on Course 5 Electromyography: Surface, needle conventional and single fiber - Level 1-2 Surface recording
More informationMaking Things Happen: Simple Motor Control
Making Things Happen: Simple Motor Control How Your Brain Works - Week 10 Prof. Jan Schnupp wschnupp@cityu.edu.hk HowYourBrainWorks.net The Story So Far In the first few lectures we introduced you to some
More informationFile name: Supplementary Information Description: Supplementary Figures, Supplementary Table and Supplementary References
File name: Supplementary Information Description: Supplementary Figures, Supplementary Table and Supplementary References File name: Supplementary Data 1 Description: Summary datasheets showing the spatial
More informationSupplementary figure: Kantak, Sullivan, Fisher, Knowlton and Winstein
Supplementary figure: Kantak, Sullivan, Fisher, Knowlton and Winstein Supplementary figure1 : Motor task and feedback display during practice (A) Participants practiced an arm movement task aimed to match
More informationHow Therapy Changes the Human Brain
Selected Neural Plasticity References How Therapy Changes the Human Brain Martha S. Burns, Ph.D.,ccc-slp Joint Appointment Professor Northwestern University Bryck & Fisher (2012) Training the Brain: Practical
More informationSynaptic plasticity and hippocampal memory
Synaptic plasticity and hippocampal memory Tobias Bast School of Psychology, University of Nottingham tobias.bast@nottingham.ac.uk Synaptic plasticity as the neurophysiological substrate of learning Hebb
More informationAbnormal associative plasticity of the human motor cortex in writer's cramp
awg273 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awg273 Brain (2003), 126, 1±11 Abnormal associative plasticity of the human motor cortex in writer's cramp Angelo Quartarone, 1 Sergio Bagnato, 1 Vincenzo Rizzo, 1 Hartwig R.
More informationBrain-Computer Interfaces to Replace or Repair the Injured Central Nervous System
Three approaches to restore movement Brain-Computer Interfaces to Replace or Repair the Injured Central Nervous System 1. Replace: Brain control of 2. Replace & Repair: Intra-Spinal Stimulation 3. Repair:
More informationProactive Interference as a Result of Persisting Neural Representations of Previously Learned Motor Skills in Primary Motor Cortex
Proactive Interference as a Result of Persisting Neural Representations of Previously Learned Motor Skills in Primary Motor Cortex Nicholas Cothros, Stefan Köhler, Erin W. Dickie*, Seyed M. Mirsattari,
More informationTrans-spinal direct current stimulation: a novel tool to promote plasticity in humans
Trans-spinal direct current stimulation: a novel tool to promote plasticity in humans Jean-Charles Lamy, PhD Brain and Spine Institute, Paris 1 Background Grecco et al., J Neuroresto, 2015 2 Background:
More information(Received 10 April 1956)
446 J. Physiol. (I956) I33, 446-455 A COMPARISON OF FLEXOR AND EXTENSOR REFLEXES OF MUSCULAR ORIGIN BY M. G. F. FUORTES AND D. H. HUBEL From the Department ofneurophysiology, Walter Reed Army Institute
More informationModulation of the cortical silent period elicited by single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation
Kojima et al. BMC Neuroscience 2013, 14:43 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Modulation of the cortical silent period elicited by single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation Sho Kojima 1,2*,
More informationDecoding a Perceptual Decision Process across Cortex
Article Decoding a Perceptual Decision Process across Cortex Adrián Hernández, 1 Verónica Nácher, 1 Rogelio Luna, 1 Antonio Zainos, 1 Luis Lemus, 1 Manuel Alvarez, 1 Yuriria Vázquez, 1 Liliana Camarillo,
More informationFurther insight into the task-dependent excitability of motor evoked potentials in first dorsal interosseous muscle in humans
Exp Brain Res (2001) 140:387 396 DOI 10.1007/s002210100842 RESEARCH ARTICLE Yoshiteru Hasegawa Tatsuya Kasai Toshio Tsuji Susumu Yahagi Further insight into the task-dependent excitability of motor evoked
More informationTMS Disruption of Time Encoding in Human Primary Visual Cortex Molly Bryan Beauchamp Lab
TMS Disruption of Time Encoding in Human Primary Visual Cortex Molly Bryan Beauchamp Lab This report details my summer research project for the REU Theoretical and Computational Neuroscience program as
More informationUbe3a is required for experience-dependent maturation of the neocortex
Ube3a is required for experience-dependent maturation of the neocortex Koji Yashiro, Thorfinn T. Riday, Kathryn H. Condon, Adam C. Roberts, Danilo R. Bernardo, Rohit Prakash, Richard J. Weinberg, Michael
More information