Hemodynamics and Early Clinical Performance of the St. Jude Medical Regent Mechanical Aortic Valve
|
|
- Franklin Berry
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Hemodynamics and Early Clinical Performance of the St. Jude Medical Regent Mechanical Aortic Valve David S. Bach, MD, Marc P. Sakwa, MD, Martin Goldbach, MD, Michael R. Petracek, MD, Robert W. Emery, MD, and Friedrich W. Mohr, MD Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan; Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada; Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Thomas Hospital, Nashville, Tennessee; and Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Herzzentrum Universitat Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany Background. The St. Jude Medical Regent valve is the next-generation bileaflet aortic prosthesis, modified from the currently marketed St. Jude Medical mechanical valve to achieve a larger geometric orifice without changing the existing design of the pivot mechanism or bloodcontact surface areas. The present study reports the hemodynamic and early clinical results of an ongoing multicenter trial investigating the performance of the Regent valve. Methods. Between July 1998 and July 2001, 361 patients at 17 centers in North America and Europe underwent implantation of a Regent mechanical aortic valve prosthesis. Clinical status was prospectively recorded, and echocardiography with Doppler was performed at discharge and at 2 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after operation. Results. Follow-up to date is 300 patient-years (average, years per patient; range, 0.0 to 2.7 years). There The St. Jude Medical Regent valve is the nextgeneration bileaflet mechanical prosthetic aortic valve, constructed of pyrolytic carbon and modified from the currently marketed St. Jude Medical mechanical valve. The currently marketed Standard and HP valve prostheses have excellent in vitro and in vivo hemodynamics [1], with an excellent record for safety and freedom from adverse events [2]. The Regent valve has a modified external profile that achieves a larger geometric orifice area without changing the existing design of the pivot mechanism or blood-contact surface areas. The prosthesis is presently in clinical use in Europe and Canada, and is undergoing evaluation for clinical use by the US Food and Drug Administration. The purpose of the present study is to report the hemodynamic and early clinical results of an ongoing prospective, observational, multicenter, international trial investigating the clinical Presented at the Thirty-eighth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Jan 28 30, Address reprint requests to Dr Bach, University of Michigan, L3119 Women s 0273, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; dbach@umich.edu. were low rates of clinical adverse events. Mean gradient at 6 months was mm Hg, mm Hg, mm Hg, mm Hg, and mm Hg, respectively, for 19-mm, 21-mm, 23-mm, 25-mm, and 27-mm valves; effective orifice area was cm 2, cm 2, cm 2, cm 2, and cm 2, respectively. Indexed effective orifice area was equal to or greater than 1.0 cm 2 /m 2 for all valve sizes. Left ventricular mass index decreased significantly between early postoperative ( g/m 2 ) and 6-month follow-up ( g/m 2 ; g/m 2 ; p < ). Conclusions. The St. Jude Medical Regent aortic valve has excellent hemodynamics and early clinical results, with rapid and significant left ventricular mass regression. Long-term clinical assessment is ongoing. (Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:2003 9) 2002 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons performance of the Regent mechanical aortic valve prosthesis. Patients and Methods Study Population Between July 1998 and July 2001, 361 patients at 17 centers in North America and Europe underwent implantation of a Regent mechanical aortic valve prosthesis (St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, MN). Participating centers and principal investigators are listed in the Appendix. Patients included 253 (70%) men and 108 (30%) women. Mean age at the time of operation was years (range, 28.8 to 84.9 years). The predominance of patients (235, 65.1%) were 50 to 69 years (147 patients, 40.7%, were 60 to 69 years), and 45 (12.5%) were at least 70 years at the time of operation. Preoperative left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction was 56.4% 13.7% (range, 18% to 83%). History of arrhythmia was present in 58 patients (16%), including 40 (11%) with atrial fibrillation. Carotid artery disease was present in 15 patients (4%). Preoperative valve dysfunction was aortic stenosis in 182 (50.4%) patients, aortic regurgitation in 68 (18.8%), 2002 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons /02/$22.00 Published by Elsevier Science Inc PII S (02)
2 2004 BACH ET AL Ann Thorac Surg REGENT AORTIC VALVE 2002;74: Clinical Follow-Up All patients underwent regular clinical follow-up at the investigational center at which the aortic valve operation was performed. Adverse clinical events were recorded prospectively, including evidence of embolization (any; and reversible ischemic neurological deficit, cerebrovascular accident, or peripheral), nonstructural valve dysfunction (paravalvular leak), structural deterioration, endocarditis, major bleeding event, clinically significant hemolytic anemia, thrombosis, reoperation, and death (all-cause, cardiac, and valve-related). Definitions for adverse events were based on published guidelines [3, 4]. Early events were defined as those occurring on or before 30 days after valve implantation. Patient-years at risk for late events were determined from 31 days after operation to either occurrence of the primary event or to the censoring event. Fig 1. Valve sizes implanted among patients undergoing Regent aortic valve replacement. and mixed stenosis and regurgitation in 111 (30.7%). The cause of disease (more than one cause could be included for each patient) was degenerative in 212 (58.7%) patients, congenital in 124 (34.3%), rheumatic in 48 (13.3%), infective in 8 (2.2%), and other causes in 41 (11.4%). Surgical inspection of valve disease (patients could be counted more than once) revealed leaflet calcification in 260 (72.0%), annular calcification in 207 (57.3%), leaflet thickening in 102 (28.3%), commissural fusion in 84 (23.3%), annular dilation in 27 (7.5%), leaflet perforation in 12 (3.3%), and other diseases in 34 (9.4%). Aortic valve repair or replacement had been previously performed in 12 (3.3%) patients; prior coronary artery bypass grafting had been performed in 16 (4.4%). The distribution of aortic valve sizes implanted is shown in Figure 1. Concomitant surgical procedures were performed in 138 (38.2%) of 361 patients, and included coronary artery bypass grafting in 109 (30.2%) patients, mitral valve repair in 6 (1.7%), and aortic root enlargement in 4 (1.1%). Postoperative anticoagulation schemes were determined by individual physicians and study sites. The preponderance of sites used a target international normalized ratio range of 2.0 to 3.0 or 3.5. Echocardiography By protocol, transthoracic echocardiography with Doppler was performed at specified times, including before hospital discharge and at 2 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively, and yearly thereafter. Imaging included two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography, pulsed-wave and continuous-wave spectral Doppler, and color flow Doppler imaging. The aortic valve prosthesis was interrogated for regurgitation using parasternal and apical windows. Echocardiographic images were recorded on standard or super VHS videotape for subsequent analysis. All echocardiograms were analyzed at a central, core echocardiography laboratory by observers highly trained in qualitative and quantitative echocardiography and Doppler. Observers had no knowledge of clinical information at the time of echocardiographic analysis. Echocardiographic analysis included two-dimensional echocardiographic measurement of LV dimensions and ejection fraction, measurement of mean and peak aortic gradients using the modified Bernoulli equation P 4(V 2 2 V 1 2 ) [5], and calculation of aortic valve effective orifice area using the continuity equation [5]. Left ventricular mass was calculated using the modified American Society of Echocardiography cube method [6]: Surgical Technique The Regent valve is shown in Figure 2. Surgical procedure was performed in accordance with clinical practice at each investigative site, using cardiopulmonary bypass typically with hypothermia and cold crystalloid cardioplegic cardiac arrest. Valve implantation was typically in a supraannular position, using a noneverting suture technique with 2-0 Ethibond (Ethicon Inc, Somerville, NJ). Fig 2. Regent aortic valve prosthesis.
3 Ann Thorac Surg BACH ET AL 2002;74: REGENT AORTIC VALVE 2005 LV Mass IVS LVIDD PW 3 LVIDD 3 0.6, where IVS interventricular septum, LVIDD LV internal diameter in diastole, and PW posterior wall. Left ventricular mass index was calculated as LV mass divided by body surface area. If present, aortic regurgitation was quantified as trivial, mild, moderate, or severe based on measurement of regurgitant jet diameter relative to the diameter of the LV outflow tract [7], assessment of aortic regurgitation deceleration slope on spectral continuous-wave Doppler, and assessment of diastolic flow reversal in the descending thoracic aorta. Aortic regurgitation when present was categorized by location as valvular, paravalvular, or indeterminate, based on jet location and characteristics in all available views. Statistical Analysis All data are presented as mean standard deviation. Kaplan-Meier analyses for bleeding event, embolism, endocarditis, paravalvular leak, valve reoperation, allcause mortality, and valve-related mortality were created using SAS system statistical software (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC). Results Clinical Follow-Up Follow-up for the study group to date is patientyears (average follow-up, years per patient; range, 0.0 to 2.7 years); 253 (70%) of patients have been followed at least 6 months. Of 361 patients who originally underwent aortic valve replacement, 17 (4.7%) died, 6 (1.7%) were lost to follow-up, and 3 (0.8%) underwent subsequent valve explantation, yielding a group of 335 patients available for continuing follow-up. At the time of writing, a total of 348 patients were available for clinical assessment at discharge, 320 at 2 months, 253 at 6 months, 176 at 1 year, and 67 at 2 years after operation. Anticoagulation with warfarin or a warfarin derivative was used in all patients at hospital discharge and at all subsequent postoperative intervals. New York Heart Association functional class before operation and at postoperative intervals is shown in Figure 3. Absolute rates for early adverse events and linearized rates for late adverse events are shown in Table 1. Kaplan-Meier freedom from adverse events is shown in Table 2. In all cases of adverse events, rates fell within objective performance criteria guidelines. Two patients experienced a valve-related death. One patient with cardiomyopathy had an embolic stroke 5 weeks after operation, with the apparent source a new LV thrombus. The other patient had a history of multiple myeloma and experienced an intracranial hemorrhage 8 months after operation, at a time when the international normalized ratio was above target. In neither case was there evidence of valve dysfunction. Reoperation occurred in 3 patients within 2 weeks of operation and in 1 patient 14 months after operation. All Fig 3. New York Heart Association functional class before and after Regent aortic valve replacement. ;; ;; ;;; ;;; class I; ;;; class II; o class III; class IV. (Preop preoperative; R number of patients at risk.) reoperations were to address paravalvular leak; 2 (1 early and 1 late) were sequelae of infective endocarditis. Valves were replaced in 3 patients (2 early and 1 late), and the leak was repaired without valve replacement in the other. Bleeding occurred in 32 patients (27 early and 5 late). Procedure-related bleeding occurred in 25 patients, and anticoagulation-related hemorrhage occurred in 10. (More than one bleeding event occurred in 8 patients, including both procedure-related and anticoagulation- Table 1. Early (Absolute) and Late (Linearized) Rates of Adverse Events Adverse Event Early Events (Absolute Rates) n % n Late Events (Linearized Rates) Pt-Yrs at Risk %/ Pt-Yr Embolism All RIND/CVA/ Peripheral Paravalvular leak Structural deterioration Endocarditis Major bleeding event Hemolysis Thrombosis Reoperation All Repair Explant Death All causes Valve-related Cardiac Other causes CVA cerebrovascular accident; Pt-Yr patient-years; RIND reversible ischemic neurological deficit.
4 2006 BACH ET AL Ann Thorac Surg REGENT AORTIC VALVE 2002;74: Table 2. Kaplan-Meier Freedom From Adverse Events Adverse Event n 1-year Freedom (%) 2-year Freedom (%) Embolism All RIND/CVA/Peripheral Paravalvular leak Structural deterioration Endocarditis Major bleeding event Hemolytic anemia Thrombosis Reoperation All Repair Explant Death All causes Valve-related Cardiac Other causes RIND reversible ischemic neuro- CVA cerebrovascular accident; logical deficit. related bleeding in 4.) Anticoagulation-related hemorrhage was gastrointestinal in 8, and intraocular, intracranial, and after ileostomy in 1 each. Anticoagulation was above target in four of eight cases of gastrointestinal bleeding, therapeutic in three, and unknown in one. Hemodynamics Echocardiograms were successfully performed in 318 (91.4%) of 348 eligible patients at discharge, 269 (84.2%) of 320 eligible patients at 2 months, 197 (77.9%) of 253 at 6 months, 120 (68.2%) of 176 at 1 year, and 39 (58.2%) of 67 at 2 years after operation. Values for mean pressure gradient, peak pressure gradient, and effective orifice area by valve size at 6 months are shown in Table 3. Graphic depiction of gradients and effective orifice area at hospital discharge and through 1 year of follow-up are shown in Figure 4. For the group as a whole, mean pressure gradient decreased significantly between discharge ( mm Hg) and 6 months of follow-up ( mm Hg; mm Hg; p 0.001). Similarly, a statistically significant decrease in peak pressure gradient was observed between discharge ( mm Hg) and 6 months ( mm Hg; mm Hg; p ). No further significant decrease in gradients was observed. Effective orifice area increased significantly between discharge ( cm 2 ) and 6 months of follow-up ( cm 2 ; cm 2 ; p 0.002). Cardiac output remained stable between early postoperative ( L/min), 6 months after operation ( L/min; p 0.51), and 1 year after operation ( L/min; p 0.34 versus early postoperative). Left Ventricular Mass Regression Left ventricular mass index was greater than normal on early postoperative echocardiograms, consistent with significant LV hypertrophy. Left ventricular mass index as a function of time is shown in Figure 5. There was a statistically significant decrease in LV mass index between early postoperative ( g/m 2 ) and 6 months ( g/m 2 ; ; p ), with a large proportion of the decrease observed in the first 2 months. Between discharge and 6 months, LV mass decreased significantly for valve sizes 19 mm ( to g/m 2 ; p 0.03), 21 mm ( to g/m 2 ; p 0.006), 23 mm ( to g/m 2 ; p ), and 25 mm ( to g/m 2 ; p 0.003); LV mass regression was of similar magnitude but failed to reach statistical significance among patients with a 27-mm valve ( to g/m 2 ; p 0.26). Left ventricular mass regression from discharge to 6 months was similar (p 0.7 among groups) for patients with preoperative aortic stenosis ( 28.8 g/m 2 ; p ), aortic regurgitation ( 26.7 g/m 2 ; p 0.005), and mixed stenosis and regurgitation ( 20.9 g/m 2 ; p 0.001). At 6 months, LV mass had returned to normal in 88 of 187 (47.1%) patients, including 46 of 94 (51.1%) with preoperative aortic stenosis, 20 of 44 (45.5%) with preoperative aortic regurgitation, and 22 of 49 (44.9%) with mixed disease. Aortic Regurgitation The presence and severity of aortic regurgitation on hospital discharge and subsequent follow-up intervals is shown in Figure 6. There was no to mild aortic regurgitation in 99.3%, 98.4%, 99.4%, 98.2%, and 96.9% of patients at discharge, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. At 1 year after operation, more than mild aortic regurgitation was found in 2 patients: 1 with severe paravalvular regurgitation resulting from endocarditis, and 1 with moderate regurgitation of indeterminate origin. At 2 years, more than mild regurgitation Table 3. Hemodynamic Variables by Valve Size at 6 Months Postoperatively Variable 19 mm (n 12) 21 mm (n 52) 23 mm (n 65) 25 mm (n 39) 27 mm (n 13) 29 mm (n 2) Mean gradient (mm Hg) Peak gradient (mm Hg) Effective orifice area (cm 2 ) EOA-I (cm 2 /m 2 ) EOA-I indexed effective orifice area.
5 Ann Thorac Surg BACH ET AL 2002;74: REGENT AORTIC VALVE 2007 Fig 5. Temporal change in left ventricular (LV) mass index after Regent aortic valve replacement. Data with a sample size fewer than 5 are excluded. (Data not displayed for 17-mm or 29-mm valves, and for 19-mm valve at 1 year, owing to small sample sizes.) 19 mm; 21 mm; 23 mm; 25 mm; 27 mm; all sizes. (R number of patients at risk.) Comment The Standard and HP Series St. Jude Medical bileaflet mechanical prostheses have very good associated hemodynamics [1] and excellent records for durability and for freedom from adverse events [2]. The St. Jude Medical Regent mechanical aortic valve prosthesis represents a design modification of the existing St. Jude Medical bileaflet valves, with a modified external profile that results in a larger geometric orifice area without changing the existing design of the pivot mechanism or bloodcontact surface areas. As such, it is anticipated that the valve should have even better hemodynamics than the Standard and HP St. Jude Medical valves, and an equivalent profile for freedom from adverse events. The present report is a description of the hemodynamic and early clinical performance characteristics of the Regent valve. It provides characterization of the gradients and effective orifice area that can be anticipated; and with Fig 4. Temporal change in hemodynamics after Regent aortic valve replacement. (A) Mean pressure gradient. (B) Peak pressure gradient. (C) Effective orifice area (EOA). (Data not displayed for 17-mm and 29-mm valves owing to small sample sizes.) 19 mm; 21 mm; 23 mm; 25 mm; 27 mm; all sizes. (R number of patients at risk.) occurred in a single patient, who had severe central valvular regurgitation. This patient remains in New York Heart Association functional class I, and no other tests have been performed to evaluate the valve. Fig 6. Presence and severity of aortic regurgitation after Regent aortic valve replacement. ;; ;; ;;; ;;; none/trivial; ;;; mild; o moderate; severe. (R number of patients at risk.)
6 2008 BACH ET AL Ann Thorac Surg REGENT AORTIC VALVE 2002;74: more than 300 patient-years of follow-up, provides assessment of the early clinical performance of the prosthesis. Clinical Outcomes Ultimately, assessment of clinical outcomes relies on long-term assessment for years and decades. However, within the available follow-up of just more than 300 patient-years, there were excellent clinical outcomes among patients after implantation with the Regent mechanical aortic valve. Functional status assessed by New York Heart Association classification was excellent, and there were very low rates of adverse events. Postoperative bleeding events predominantly comprised early procedure-related events that were not directly related to the prosthesis. In all cases of adverse events, rates fell within objective performance criteria guidelines. Hemodynamics in Context The present study reveals excellent hemodynamic variables associated with the Regent aortic valve prosthesis, with low mean and peak transvalvular gradients and large effective orifice area and indexed effective orifice area. Left ventricular mass regression was noted with smaller as well as with larger valve sizes, confirming that good transvalvular hemodynamics are associated with the entire range of available valve sizes. Although previously reported with stentless bioprostheses [8], this finding has not been described with mechanical prostheses. Transvalvular gradients decreased and effective orifice area increased in the first 6 months after operation, which has not been previously reported with a mechanical prosthesis. Stable cardiac output and an increase in orifice area suggest that the decrease in gradients was not areflection of altered flow across the valve. Incomplete valve opening early after operation is unlikely in light of normal cardiac output. The most likely explanation for improved hemodynamics in the months after valve replacement may be related to regression of LV outflow tract hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement, suggesting that early postoperative gradients were contributed to by subvalvular narrowing. Further research to test this hypothesis would be of interest. The problem of prosthesis-patient mismatch is well documented and clinically evident among a subset of patients after aortic valve replacement [9, 10]. Prosthesispatient mismatch results in less symptomatic improvement and suboptimal LV mass regression after aortic valve replacement [10]. Because prosthesis-patient mismatch of the aortic valve usually can be avoided if the indexed effective orifice area is more than 0.85 cm 2 /m 2 [10], excellent hemodynamics in general, and the finding in the present report of indexed effective orifice area of at least 1.0 cm 2 /m 2 for all Regent valve sizes, suggests that patient-prosthesis mismatch should be uncommon with the use of this prosthesis. In the present report, there was a low prevalence of hemodynamically significant aortic regurgitation. Although trivial or mild aortic regurgitation was not uncommon, this is an anticipated finding with all bileaflet mechanical valves. There was a very low prevalence of significant periprosthetic regurgitation. Study Limitations The present study reports clinical outcomes with follow-up of just more than 300 patient-years. The data are sufficient to conclude that there are excellent hemodynamics associated with the Regent valve. However, longterm follow-up is desirable to continue to assess clinical outcomes and objective performance criteria. No direct comparison is made between the Regent valve and other mechanical or biologic prostheses, although such comparisons may be the subject of future investigations. Conclusion The present report demonstrates excellent hemodynamic performance of the Regent bileaflet aortic valve prosthesis, with rapid and significant LV mass regression. Patient functional class and freedom from adverse events were very good. Long-term clinical assessment of the valve is ongoing. References 1. Otto CM. Echocardiographic evaluation of prosthetic valve dysfunction. In: Otto CM, ed. Textbook of clinical echocardiography. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 2000: Baudet EM, Puel V, McBride JT. Long-term results of valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Division of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, and Neurological Devices, October 14, Draft Replacement Heart Valve Guidance Document. 4. Edmunds LH Jr, Clarke RE, Cohn LH, Miller DC, Weisel RD. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiovascular operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112: Feigenbaum H. Hemodynamic information derived from echocardiography. In: Feigenbaum H, ed. Echocardiography. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger, 1994: Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1986;57: Perry GJ, Helmcke F, Nanda NC, Byard C, Soto B. Evaluation of aortic insufficiency by Doppler color flow mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;9: Bach DS, David T, Yacoub M, et al. Hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression following implantation of the Toronto SPV valve. Am J Cardiol 1998;82: Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation 1978;58: Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:
7 Ann Thorac Surg BACH ET AL 2002;74: REGENT AORTIC VALVE 2009 Appendix St. Jude Medical Regent Investigational Centers and Principal Investigators European Centers Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH; University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Prof. Doctor Friedrich Mohr Krankenhaus Wien-Lainz, Wien, Austria; Prof. Doctor Manfred Deutsch Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Prof. Doctor Peter Kildeberg Paulsen Canadian Centers London Health Sciences Center, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario; Martin Goldbach, MD St. Michael s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto; Lee Errett, MD Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Benoit de Varennes, MD Hopital Laval, Saint-Foy, Quebec; Richard Baillot, MD United States Centers William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI; Marc P. Sakwa, MD St. Thomas Hospital, Nashville, TN; Michael Petracek, MD Abbott Northwestern/United Hospitals, Minneapolis, MN; Kit Arom, MD Jewish Hospital, Louisville, KY; Laman Gray, Jr, MD University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Presbyterian, Pittsburgh, PA; Ronald V. Pellegrini, MD Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles, CA; Siavosh Khonsari, MD St. Luke s Hospital, University of Missouri Medical School, Kansas City, MO; Michael Borkon, MD Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; Michael Banbury, MD Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY; Craig Smith, MD Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Ammar Bafi, MD DISCUSSION DR DAVID FULLERTON (Chicago, IL): Do you see this valve as supplanting the other St. Jude devices? DR EMERY: I would suspect so. There are sites that only stock the St. Jude Medical HP valve and do not stock the standard prosthesis. The Regent modification allows placement of a clearly larger valve size. It is very interesting because at times you think it might not fit, yet sizing is reliable. DR JOACHIM LAAS (Bad Bevensen, Germany): I have two questions. We know from experimental and clinical studies that valve orientation, especially in small-size valves, is very important. I would like to know if you can give any advice on valve orientation? The other question: you gain size by using a smaller sewing ring. However, is it really an advantage to implant a large size 27-mm valve and lose the safety of a pliable sewing ring? Furthermore, we know that in large size valves such as 27 mm, regurgitation can be as much as 25% and more in aortic and mitral subsitutes. DR EMERY: First, I do not have the specifics of valve orientation from this study. Personally I orient the leaflets directed toward the left coronary ostium, with a leaflet guard at the left coronary, so they open in line with the artery. The Regent valve is rotatable as are the standard and HP St. Jude valves. As far as the sizing of the valve, the sewing ring has less bulk. For implanting the standard St. Jude valve, which I have been using for a long time, I generally put in 12 or 13 mattress stitches. As the Regent sewing ring is smaller and thinner, I generally put in 2 or 3 more stitches and make the mattress sutures a bit narrower. I agree with you that there is possible risk. This has not turned out to be the case, however, neither in our hands nor in this multicenter study, that there is an increased incidence of paravalvular leak related to the sewing ring. Regarding aortic regurgitation, the incidence is actually low. (Slide) Here are the core laboratory echocardiographic results indicating none, mild, moderate, and trivial area. You can see over time that no significant aortic insufficiency occurs. One patient had an explant for endocarditis because of a paravalvular leak that occurred late. This patient is the one who went from zero to mild to severe insufficiency with a central jet. She is in New York Heart Association class I. Neither the core laboratory nor the investigative site is perfectly clear what this really means. Originally the jet was called unknown on the echocardiogram. Then it was called a paravalvular leak. And at the last echocardiogram it was called central. The patient is fine, and we are just planning on following her along to find out how she does. We have not done anything. So the regurgitation has really not been an issue with this prosthesis, and one can implant in an appropriate size that gives you excellent hemodynamics rather than trying to fit in an ultralarge size because you are concerned about gradients.
Does Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch Affect Long-term Results after Mitral Valve Replacement?
Original Article Does Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch Affect Long-term Results after Mitral Valve Replacement? Hiroaki Sakamoto, MD, PhD, and Yasunori Watanabe, MD, PhD Background: Recently, some articles
More information16 YEAR RESULTS Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Mitral Pericardial Bioprosthesis, Model 6900
CLINICAL COMMUNIQUé 6 YEAR RESULTS Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Mitral Pericardial Bioprosthesis, Model 69 The Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Mitral Pericardial Valve, Model 69, was introduced into clinical
More informationOutcomes of Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Regurgitation Due to Degenerative Disease
Outcomes of Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Regurgitation Due to Degenerative Disease TIRONE E. DAVID, MD ; SEMIN THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG 19:116-120c 2007 ELSEVIER INC. PRESENTED BY INTERN 許士盟 Mitral valve
More informationEchocardiographic Evaluation of Aortic Valve Prosthesis
Echocardiographic Evaluation of Aortic Valve Prosthesis Amr E Abbas, MD, FACC, FASE, FSCAI, FSVM, RPVI Co-Director, Echocardiography, Director, Interventional Cardiology Research, Beaumont Health System
More informationMedtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: Assessment of 12-year performance
Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: Assessment of 12-year performance W. R. Eric Jamieson, MD, a Friedrich-Christian Riess, MD, b Peter J. Raudkivi, MD, c Jacques Metras, MD, d Edward F. G. Busse,
More informationManagement of Difficult Aortic Root, Old and New solutions
Management of Difficult Aortic Root, Old and New solutions Hani K. Najm MD, Msc, FRCSC,, FACC, FESC Chairman, Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery Cleveland Clinic Conflict of Interest None Difficult
More informationProsthetic valve dysfunction: stenosis or regurgitation
Prosthetic valve dysfunction: stenosis or regurgitation Jean G. Dumesnil MD, FRCP(C), FACC, FASE(Hon) Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Québec, Québec No disclosures Possible Causes of High Gradients in
More information2017 Cardiovascular Symposium CARDIAC SURGERY UPDATE: SMALLER INCISIONS AND LESS COUMADIN DAVID L. SAINT, MD
2017 Cardiovascular Symposium CARDIAC SURGERY UPDATE: SMALLER INCISIONS AND LESS COUMADIN DAVID L. SAINT, MD David L Saint M.D. Tallahassee Memorial Hospital Southern Medical Group Division of Cardiothoracic
More informationTSDA Boot Camp September 13-16, Introduction to Aortic Valve Surgery. George L. Hicks, Jr., MD
TSDA Boot Camp September 13-16, 2018 Introduction to Aortic Valve Surgery George L. Hicks, Jr., MD Aortic Valve Pathology and Treatment Valvular Aortic Stenosis in Adults Average Course (Post mortem data)
More informationPROSTHETIC VALVE BOARD REVIEW
PROSTHETIC VALVE BOARD REVIEW The correct answer D This two chamber view shows a porcine mitral prosthesis with the typical appearance of the struts although the leaflets are not well seen. The valve
More informationPPM: How to fit a big valve in a small heart
PPM: How to fit a big valve in a small heart Hani K. Najm MD, Msc, FRCSC, FRCS (Glasgow), FACC, FESC King Abdulaziz Cardiac Centre National Guard Health Affairs Riyadh, Saudi Arabia GHA meeting Muscat
More informationHow to Avoid Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch
How to Avoid Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Philippe Pibarot, DVM, PhD, FACC, FAHA, FASE, FESC Canada Research Chair in Valvular Heart Diseases INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE DE CARDIOLOGIE ET DE PNEUMOLOGIE DE QUÉBEC
More informationProf. Patrizio LANCELLOTTI, MD, PhD Heart Valve Clinic, University of Liège, CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, BELGIUM
The Patient with Aortic Stenosis and Mitral Regurgitation Prof. Patrizio LANCELLOTTI, MD, PhD Heart Valve Clinic, University of Liège, CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, BELGIUM Aortic Stenosis + Mitral Regurgitation?
More informationValve prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) was first defined
Impact of Valve Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Short-Term Mortality After Aortic Valve Replacement Claudia Blais, BSc; Jean G. Dumesnil, MD; Richard Baillot, MD; Serge Simard, MS; Daniel Doyle, MD; Philippe
More informationAssessment of the St. Jude Medical Regent Prosthetic Valve by Continuous-Wave Doppler. and dobutamine stress echocardiography
Assessment of the St. Jude Medical Regent Prosthetic Valve by Continuous-Wave Doppler and Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Akira Sezai, MD, PhD, Yuji Kasamaki, MD, PhD, Keisuke Abe, RMS, Mitsumasa Hata,
More informationEffect of Valve Suture Technique on Incidence of Paraprosthetic Regurgitation and 10-Year Survival
Effect of Valve Suture Technique on Incidence of Paraprosthetic Regurgitation and 10-Year Survival Sukumaran K. Nair, FRCS (C Th), Gauraang Bhatnagar, MBBS, Oswaldo Valencia, MD, and Venkatachalam Chandrasekaran,
More informationCLINICAL COMMUNIQUE 16 YEAR RESULTS
CLINICAL COMMUNIQUE 6 YEAR RESULTS Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Mitral Pericardial Bioprosthesis, Model 6900 Introduction The Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Mitral Pericardial Valve, Model 6900, was introduced
More informationProsthesis-Patient Mismatch or Prosthetic Valve Stenosis?
EuroValves 2015, Nice Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch or Prosthetic Valve Stenosis? Philippe Pibarot, DVM, PhD, FACC, FAHA, FASE FESC Canada Research Chair in Valvular Heart Diseases Université LAVAL Disclosure
More information15-Year Comparison of Supra-Annular Porcine and PERIMOUNT Aortic Bioprostheses
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION 15-Year Comparison of Supra-Annular Porcine and PERIMOUNT Aortic Bioprostheses WR Eric Jamieson, MD, Eva Germann, MSc, Michel R Aupart, MD 1, Paul H Neville, MD 1, Michel A Marchand,
More informationClinical material and methods. Copyright by ICR Publishers 2003
Fourteen Years Experience with the CarboMedics Valve in Young Adults with Aortic Valve Disease Jan Aagaard 1, Jens Tingleff 2, Per V. Andersen 1, Christel N. Hansen 2 1 Department of Cardio-Thoracic and
More informationA Case of Aortic Valve Replacement with St. Jude Medical Regent Valve (First Implant in Japan)
Case Report A Case of Aortic Valve Replacement with St. Jude Medical Regent Valve (First Implant in Japan) Akira Sezai, MD, 1 Motomi Shiono, MD, 1 Kenji Akiyama, MD, 1 Yukihiko Orime, MD, 1 Mitsumasa Hata,
More informationLong-term results (22 years) of the Ross Operation a single institutional experience
Long-term results (22 years) of the Ross Operation a single institutional experience Authors: Costa FDA, Schnorr GM, Veloso M,Calixto A, Colatusso D, Balbi EM, Torres R, Ferreira ADA, Colatusso C Department
More informationNineteen-Millimeter Aortic St. Jude Medical Heart Valve Prosthesis: Up to Sixteen Years Follow-up
Nineteen-Millimeter Aortic St. Jude Medical Heart Valve Prosthesis: Up to Sixteen Years Follow-up Dilip Sawant, FRCS, Arun K. Singh, MD, William C. Feng, MD, Arthur A. Bert, MD, and Fred Rotenberg, MD
More informationEchocardiographic Evaluation of Aortic Valve Prosthesis
Echocardiographic Evaluation of Aortic Valve Prosthesis Amr E Abbas, MD, FACC, FASE, FSCAI, FSVM, RPVI Co Director, Echocardiography, Director, Interventional Cardiology Research, Beaumont Health System
More informationHOW IMPORTANT ARE THESE ECHO MEASUREMENTS ANYWAY?
HOW IMPORTANT ARE THESE ECHO MEASUREMENTS ANYWAY? John D. Carroll, MD Professor, Director of Interventional Cardiology and Co-Medical Director of the Cardiac and Vascular Center, University of Colorado
More informationThe impact of prosthesis patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement varies according to age at operation
Editor s choice Scan to access more free content 1 Division of Cardiac Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA 2 Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Ottawa Heart Institute,
More informationReconstruction of the intervalvular fibrous body during aortic and
Aortic and mitral valve replacement with reconstruction of the intervalvular fibrous body: An analysis of clinical outcomes Nilto C. De Oliveira, MD Tirone E. David, MD Susan Armstrong, MSc Joan Ivanov,
More informationDoppler-Echocardiographic Assessment of Carbomedics Prosthetic Valves in the Mitral Position
Doppler-Echocardiographic Assessment of Carbomedics Prosthetic Valves in the Mitral Position Chee-Siong Soo, MRCP, Mestres Ca, MD, Monica Tay, Joon-Kuan Yeoh, MRCP, Eugene Sim, FRCS, and M. Choo, FRCP,
More informationMulticentre clinical study evaluating a novel resheatable self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve system
Multicentre clinical study evaluating a novel resheatable self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve system Preliminary Results: Acute and 1-year Outcomes Ganesh Manoharan, MBBCh, MD, FRCP Consultant Cardiologist
More informationTrifecta Valve. Clinical Compendium. Five Year Data
Trifecta Valve Clinical Compendium Five Year Data Trifecta Valve Compendium INTRODUCTION The Trifecta valve is a tri-leaflet stented pericardial valve designed for supra-annular placement in the aortic
More informationIncidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch in patients receiving mitral Biocor porcine prosthetic valves
INTERVENTION/VALVULAR HEART DISEASE ORIGINAL ARTICLE Cardiology Journal 2016, Vol. 23, No. 2, 178 183 DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2016.0011 Copyright 2016 Via Medica ISSN 1897 5593 Incidence of prosthesis-patient
More informationAdult Echocardiography Examination Content Outline
Adult Echocardiography Examination Content Outline (Outline Summary) # Domain Subdomain Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Anatomy and Physiology Pathology Clinical Care and Safety Measurement Techniques, Maneuvers,
More informationSURGICAL ABLATION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION DURING MITRAL VALVE SURGERY THE CARDIOTHORACIC SURGICAL TRIALS NETWORK
SURGICAL ABLATION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION DURING MITRAL VALVE SURGERY THE CARDIOTHORACIC SURGICAL TRIALS NETWORK Marc Gillinov, M.D. For the CTSN Investigators ACC Late Breaking Clinical Trials March 16,
More informationEchocardiographic Evaluation of Mitral Valve Prostheses
Echocardiographic Evaluation of Mitral Valve Prostheses Dennis A. Tighe, M.D., FACC, FACP, FASE Cardiovascular Medicine University of Massachusetts Medical School Worcester, MA www.asecho.org 1 Nishimura
More informationWe present the case of an asymptomatic, 75-year-old
Images in Cardiovascular Medicine Asymptomatic Rupture of the Left Ventricle Lech Paluszkiewicz, MD; Stefan Ożegowski, MD; Mohammad Amin Parsa, MD; Jan Gummert, PhD, MD We present the case of an asymptomatic,
More informationEchocardiographic variables associated with mitral regurgitation after aortic valve replacement for aortic valve stenosis
The Egyptian Heart Journal (2013) 65, 135 139 Egyptian Society of Cardiology The Egyptian Heart Journal www.elsevier.com/locate/ehj www.sciencedirect.com ORIGINAL ARTICLE Echocardiographic variables associated
More informationPatient/prosthesis mismatch: how to evaluate and when to act?
Patient/prosthesis mismatch: how to evaluate and when to act? Svend Aakhus, MD, PhD Oslo University Hospital, Norway Disclosures: No conflict of interest Types of aortic valve prostheses (AVR) Mechanical
More informationIschemic mitral valve reconstruction and replacement: Comparison of long-term survival and complications
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease Ischemic mitral valve reconstruction and replacement: Comparison of long-term survival and complications Eugene A. Grossi, MD Judith D. Goldberg, ScD Angelo
More informationIn Vitro Two-Dimensional Echocardiographic Imaging of a Stented Porcine Bioprosthetic Valve: The Bent Strut Artifact
C 2008, the Author Journal compilation C 2008, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2008.00753.x In Vitro Two-Dimensional Echocardiographic Imaging of a Stented Porcine Bioprosthetic Valve:
More information25 different brand names >44 different models Sizes mm
Types of Prosthetic Valves BIOLOGIC STENTED Porcine xenograft Pericardial xenograft STENTLESS Porcine xenograft Pericardial xenograft Homograft (allograft) Autograft PERCUTANEOUS MECHANICAL Bileaflet Single
More informationCarpentier-Edwards supra-annular aortic porcine bioprosthesis: Clinical performance over 20 years
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular aortic porcine bioprosthesis: Clinical performance over 20 years W. R. Eric Jamieson, MD, Lawrence H. Burr, MD, Robert T. Miyagishima,
More informationEarly Experience of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Results from the Intrepid Global Pilot Study
Early Experience of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Results from the Paul Sorajja, MD for the Investigators Presenter Disclosure Information Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner have
More informationHani K. Najm MD, Msc, FRCSC FACC, FESC President Saudi Society for Cardiac Surgeons Associate Professor of Cardiothoracic Surgery King Abdulaziz
Hani K. Najm MD, Msc, FRCSC FACC, FESC President Saudi Society for Cardiac Surgeons Associate Professor of Cardiothoracic Surgery King Abdulaziz Cardiac Centre Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Decision process for
More informationThe need for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction
Polytetrafluoroethylene Bicuspid Pulmonary Valve Implantation James A. Quintessenza, MD The need for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction and pulmonary valve replacement is increasing for many
More information30-Day Outcomes Following Implantation of a Repositionable Self-Expanding Aortic Bioprosthesis: First Report From the FORWARD Study
30-Day Outcomes Following Implantation of a Repositionable Self-Expanding Aortic Bioprosthesis: First Report From the Study Stephan Windecker Department of Cardiology Bern University Hospital - INSELSPITAL
More informationThe Edge-to-Edge Technique f For Barlow's Disease
The Edge-to-Edge Technique f For Barlow's Disease Ottavio Alfieri, Michele De Bonis, Elisabetta Lapenna, Francesco Maisano, Lucia Torracca, Giovanni La Canna. Department of Cardiac Surgery, San Raffaele
More informationEight-Year Results of Aortic Root Replacement With the Freestyle Stentless Porcine Aortic Root Bioprosthesis
Eight-Year Results of Aortic Root Replacement With the Freestyle Stentless Porcine Aortic Root Bioprosthesis Neal D. Kon, MD,* Robert D. Riley, MD, Sandy M. Adair, RN, Dalane W. Kitzman, MD, and A. Robert
More informationA 20-year experience of 1712 patients with the Biocor porcine bioprosthesis
Acquired Cardiovascular Disease Mykén and Bech-Hansen A 2-year experience of 1712 patients with the Biocor porcine bioprosthesis Pia S. U. Mykén, MD, PhD, a and Odd Bech-Hansen, MD, PhD b Objective: The
More informationBicuspid aortic root spared during ascending aorta surgery: an update of long-term results
Short Communication Bicuspid aortic root spared during ascending aorta surgery: an update of long-term results Marco Russo, Guglielmo Saitto, Paolo Nardi, Fabio Bertoldo, Carlo Bassano, Antonio Scafuri,
More informationTAVR 2018: TAVR has high clinical efficacy according to baseline patient risk! ii. Con
TAVR 2018: TAVR has high clinical efficacy according to baseline patient risk! ii. Con Dimitrios C. Angouras, MD, FETCS Associate Professor of Cardiac Surgery National and Kapodistrian University of Athens,
More informationValvular Heart Disease
Valvular Heart Disease B K Singh, MD, FACC Disclosures: None 1 CARDIAC CYCLE S2 S2=A2P2 S1=M1T1 S4 S1 S3 2 JVP Carotid S1 Slitting of S2 S3 S4 Ejection click Opening snap Dynamic Auscultation What is the
More informationIntroducing the COAPT Trial
physician INFORMATION Eligible patients Symptomatic functional mitral regurgitation 3+ Not suitable candidates for open mitral valve surgery NYHA functional class II, III, or ambulatory IV Introducing
More informationCarpentier-Edwards Pericardial Valve in the Aortic Position: 25-Years Experience
SURGERY: The Annals of Thoracic Surgery CME Program is located online at http://www.annalsthoracicsurgery.org/cme/ home. To take the CME activity related to this article, you must have either an STS member
More informationAortic valve replacement with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless prosthesis: 7 years experience in 130 patients
Aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless prosthesis: 7 years experience in 130 patients Augusto D Onofrio, MD, Stefano Auriemma, MD, Paolo Magagna, MD, Alessandro Favaro, MD,
More informationClinical event rates with the On-X bileaflet mechanical heart valve: A multicenter experience with follow-up to 12 years
Clinical event rates with the On-X bileaflet mechanical heart valve: A multicenter experience with follow-up to 12 years John B. Chambers, MD, FRCP, FACC, a Jose L. Pomar, MD, PhD, FETCS, b Carlos A. Mestres,
More informationExpanding Relevance of Aortic Valve Repair Is Earlier Operation Indicated?
Expanding Relevance of Aortic Valve Repair Is Earlier Operation Indicated? RM Suri, V Sharma, JA Dearani, HM Burkhart, RC Daly, LD Joyce, HV Schaff Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester,
More informationHemodynamic Assessment. Assessment of Systolic Function Doppler Hemodynamics
Hemodynamic Assessment Matt M. Umland, RDCS, FASE Aurora Medical Group Milwaukee, WI Assessment of Systolic Function Doppler Hemodynamics Stroke Volume Cardiac Output Cardiac Index Tei Index/Index of myocardial
More informationIndication, Timing, Assessment and Update on TAVI
Indication, Timing, Assessment and Update on TAVI Swedish Heart and Vascular Institute Ming Zhang MD PhD Interventional Cardiology Structure Heart Disease Conflict of Interest None Starr- Edwards Mechanical
More informationThe St. Jude Medical Biocor Bioprosthesis
The St. Jude Medical Biocor Bioprosthesis Clinical Evidence of Long-term Durability Long-term Biocor Experience A Review and Comparative Assessment Long-term Biocor Stented Tissue Valve Studies Twenty-year
More informationExperience with 500 Stentless Aortic Valve Replacements
Experience with 500 Stentless Aortic Valve Replacements Dimitrios C. Iliopoulos, MD Cardiac Surgeon Ass. Professor of Surgery University of Athens, School of Medicine I declare no conflict of interest
More informationPresenter Disclosure. Patrick O. Myers, M.D. No Relationships to Disclose
Presenter Disclosure Patrick O. Myers, M.D. No Relationships to Disclose Aortic Valve Repair by Cusp Extension for Rheumatic Aortic Insufficiency in Children Long term Results and Impact of Extension Material
More informationEchocardiographic Evaluation of Aortic Valve Prosthesis
Echocardiographic Evaluation of Aortic Valve Prosthesis Amr E Abbas, MD, FACC, FASE, FSCAI, FSVM, RPVI Director, Interventional Cardiology Research, Beaumont Health System Associate Professor of Medicine,
More informationAlthough mitral valve replacement (MVR) is no longer the surgical
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease Ruel et al Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with mitral prosthetic valves Marc Ruel, MD, MPH a,b Fraser D.
More informationSurgical repair techniques for IMR: future percutaneous options?
Surgical repair techniques for IMR: can this teach us about future percutaneous options? Genk - Belgium Prof. Dr. R. Dion KULeu Disclosure slide Robert A. Dion I disclose the following financial relationships:
More information(Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:845 53)
I Made Adi Parmana The utility of intraoperative TEE has become increasingly more evident as anesthesiologists, cardiologists, and surgeons continue to appreciate its potential application as an invaluable
More information1-YEAR OUTCOMES FROM JOHN WEBB, MD
1-YEAR OUTCOMES FROM JOHN WEBB, MD ON BEHALF OF THE SAPIEN 3 INVESTIGATORS UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA VANCOUVER, CANADA Potential conflicts of interest Speaker's name: John Webb I have the following
More informationMitral Gradients and Frequency of Recurrence of Mitral Regurgitation After Ring Annuloplasty for Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation
Mitral Gradients and Frequency of Recurrence of Mitral Regurgitation After Ring Annuloplasty for Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Matthew L. Williams, MD, Mani A. Daneshmand, MD, James G. Jollis, MD, John
More informationPROVEN PLUS. Introducing the Avalus Aortic Valve by Medtronic.
PROVEN PLUS. Introducing the Avalus Aortic Valve by Medtronic. With more than 40 years of heart valve innovations, we took proven valve design concepts and adapted them for excellent implantability for
More informationQUANTIFICATION AND PREVENTION TECHNIQUES OF PROSTHESIS-PATIENT MISMATCH
QUANTIFICATION AND PREVENTION TECHNIQUES OF PROSTHESIS-PATIENT MISMATCH 1,2 Radu A. SASCĂU 3 Cristina OLARIU 1,2 Cristian STĂTESCU 1 Internal Medicine Department, Gr.T.Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy,
More informationAortic stenosis (AS) is common with the aging population.
New Insights Into the Progression of Aortic Stenosis Implications for Secondary Prevention Sanjeev Palta, MD; Anita M. Pai, MD; Kanwaljit S. Gill, MD; Ramdas G. Pai, MD Background The risk factors affecting
More informationIntensity of oral anticoagulation after implantation of St. Jude Medical mitral or multiple valve replacement: lessons learned from GELIA (GELIA 5)
European Heart Journal Supplements () 3 (Supplement Q), Q39 Q43 Intensity of oral anticoagulation after implantation of St. Jude Medical mitral or multiple valve replacement: lessons learned from GELIA
More informationFavorable Results in Patients with Small Size CarboMedics Heart Valves in the Aortic Position
Favorable Results in Patients with Small Size CarboMedics Heart Valves in the Aortic Position Kazuhito Imanaka, MD, Shinichi Takamoto, MD, and Akira Furuse, MD 2 Hemodynamic performance of the CarboMedics
More informationTricuspid and Pulmonic Valve Disease
Chapter 31 Tricuspid and Pulmonic Valve Disease David A. Tate Acquired disease of the right-sided cardiac valves is much less common than disease of the leftsided counterparts, possibly because of the
More informationThe ATS Medical Open Pivot heart valve (ATS Medical, 10-Year Experience With the ATS Mechanical Valve in the Mitral Position
10-Year Experience With the ATS Mechanical Valve in the Mitral Position Constantin Stefanidis, MD, Albert M. Nana, MD, Didier De Cannière, MD, PhD, Martine Antoine, MD, Jean-Luc Jansens, MD, Chi-Hoang
More informationAppropriate Use of TAVR - now and in the future. A Surgeon s Perspective. Neil Moat Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
Appropriate Use of TAVR - now and in the future A Surgeon s Perspective Neil Moat Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner
More informationInterventional procedures guidance Published: 26 September 2014 nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg504
Transcatheter valve-in-valve e implantation for aortic bioprosthetic valve dysfunction Interventional procedures guidance Published: 26 September 2014 nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg504 Your responsibility This
More informationHemodynamics Benefit of Supra-Annular Design in Failed Bio-Prosthetic Valves
Hemodynamics Benefit of Supra-Annular Design in Failed Bio-Prosthetic Valves Speaker's name: I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report: Proctorship for Medtronic Agenda Failure modes
More informationReoperation for Bioprosthetic Mitral Structural Failure: Risk Assessment
Reoperation for Bioprosthetic Mitral Structural Failure: Risk Assessment W.R.E. Jamieson, MD; L.H. Burr, MD; R.T. Miyagishima, MD; M.T. Janusz, MD; G.J. Fradet, MD; S.V. Lichtenstein, MD; H. Ling, MD Background
More informationProsthesis-Patient Mismatch in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis in a Randomized Trial of a Self-Expanding Prosthesis
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis in a Randomized Trial of a Self-Expanding Prosthesis George L. Zorn, III On Behalf of the CoreValve US Clinical Investigators
More informationCase. 15-year-old boy with bicuspid AV Severe AR with moderate AS. Ross vs. AVR (or AVP)
Case 15-year-old boy with bicuspid AV Severe AR with moderate AS Ross vs. AVR (or AVP) AMC case 14-year-old boy with bicuspid AV Severe AS with mild AR Body size Bwt: 55 kg, Ht: 154 cm, BSA: 1.53 m 2 Echocardiography
More informationThe CarboMedics bileaflet prosthetic heart was introduced
The CarboMedics Valve: Experience With 1,049 Implants José M. Bernal, MD, José M. Rabasa, MD, Francisco Gutierrez-Garcia, MD, Carlos Morales, MD, J. Francisco Nistal, MD, and José M. Revuelta, MD Department
More informationTAVR: Echo Measurements Pre, Post And Intra Procedure
2017 ASE Florida, Orlando, FL October 10, 2017 8:00 8:25 AM 25 min TAVR: Echo Measurements Pre, Post And Intra Procedure Muhamed Sarić MD, PhD, MPA Director of Noninvasive Cardiology Echo Lab Associate
More informationOutline. EuroScore II. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score. EuroScore II
SURGICAL RISK IN VALVULAR HEART DISEASE: WHAT 2D AND 3D ECHO CAN TELL YOU AND WHAT THEY CAN'T Ernesto E Salcedo, MD Professor of Medicine University of Colorado School of Medicine Director of Echocardiography
More informationRepair or Replacement
Surgical intervention post MitraClip Device: Repair or Replacement Saudi Heart Association, February 21-24 Rüdiger Lange, MD, PhD Nicolo Piazza, MD, FRCPC, FESC German Heart Center, Munich, Germany Division
More informationThe Ross Procedure: Outcomes at 20 Years
The Ross Procedure: Outcomes at 20 Years Tirone David Carolyn David Anna Woo Cedric Manlhiot University of Toronto Conflict of Interest None The Ross Procedure 1990 to 2004 212 patients: 66% 34% Mean age:
More informationICE: Echo Core Lab-CRF
APPENDIX 1 ICE: Echo Core Lab-CRF Study #: - Pt Initials: 1. Date of study: / / D D M M M Y Y Y Y 2. Type of Study: TTE TEE 3. Quality of Study: Poor Moderate Excellent Ejection Fraction 4. Ejection Fraction
More informationInterventional procedures guidance Published: 26 July 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg586
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis Interventional procedures guidance Published: 26 July 17 nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg586 Your responsibility This guidance represents the view of
More informationDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Lung Center, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
Long-Term Outcome of the Mitroflow Pericardial Bioprosthesis in the Elderly after Aortic Valve Replacement Johan Sjögren, Tomas Gudbjartsson, Lars I. Thulin Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart
More informationThe diameter of the aortic valve is in direct proportion
The CarboMedics Top-Hat Supraannular Prosthesis José M. Bernal, MD, Rafael Martin-Duran, MD, José M. Rabasa, MD, and José M. Revuelta, MD Departments of Cardiovascular Surgery and Echocardiography, Hospital
More informationOptions for my no option Patients Treating Heart Conditions Via a Tiny Catheter
Options for my no option Patients Treating Heart Conditions Via a Tiny Catheter Nirat Beohar, MD Associate Professor of Medicine Director Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Medical Director Structural
More informationT sors in the following aspects: the porcine aortic valve
Clinical and Hemodynamic Assessment of the Hancock I1 Bioprosthesis Tirone E. David, MD, Susan Armstrong, MSc, and Zhao Sun, MA Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Toronto Hospital and University of
More informationCARDIACSURGERY TODAY. Commentary and Analysis on Advances in the Surgical Treatment of Cardiac Disease
VOLUME 1 NUMBER 2 23 CARDIACSURGERY TODAY Commentary and Analysis on Advances in the Surgical Treatment of Cardiac Disease EDITORS-IN-CHIEF Robert W Emery, St Paul, MN, USA Francesco Musumeci, Rome, Italy
More informationPulmonary Valve Replacement
Pulmonary Valve Replacement with Fascia Lata J. C. R. Lincoln, F.R.C.S., M. Geens, M.D., M. Schottenfeld, M.D., and D. N. Ross, F.R.C.S. ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to describe a technique of
More informationCoreValve in a Degenerative Surgical Valve
CoreValve in a Degenerative Surgical Valve Ran Kornowski, MD, FESC, FACC Chairman Department of Cardiology Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest I, Ran Kornowski,
More informationCongenital. Unicuspid Bicuspid Quadricuspid
David Letterman s Top 10 Aortic Stenosis The victim can be anyone: Echo is the question and the answer!!!! Hilton Head Island Echocardiography Conference 2012 Timothy E. Paterick, MD, JD, MBA Christopher
More informationOn October 3, 1977, the first St. Jude Medical (SJM)
The St. Jude Medical Cardiac Valve Prosthesis: A 25-Year Experience With Single Valve Replacement Robert W. Emery, MD, Christopher C. Krogh, Kit V. Arom, MD, PhD, Ann M. Emery, RN, Kathy Benyo-Albrecht,
More informationA Surgeon s Perspective Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease Adapted from the 2006 ACC/AHA Guideline Revision
A Surgeon s Perspective Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease Adapted from the 2006 ACC/AHA Guideline Revision Prof. Pino Fundarò, MD Niguarda Hospital Milan, Italy Introduction
More informationBogdan A. Popescu. University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania. EAE Course, Bucharest, April 2010
Bogdan A. Popescu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania EAE Course, Bucharest, April 2010 This is how it started Mitral stenosis at a glance 2D echo narrow diastolic opening of MV leaflets
More informationMITRAL STENOSIS. Joanne Cusack
MITRAL STENOSIS Joanne Cusack BSE Breakdown Recognition of rheumatic mitral stenosis Qualitative description of valve and sub-valve calcification and fibrosis Measurement of orifice area by planimetry
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES PROGRAMME Interventional procedure overview of percutaneous mitral valve leaflet repair for mitral regurgitation Mitral regurgitation
More information