ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION. Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction
|
|
- Derrick Lawson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION Aortic Valve Replacement in With Aortic Stenosis and Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction David E. Powell, MD; Paul A. Tunick, MD; Barry P. Rosenzweig, MD; Robin S. Freedberg, MD; Edward S. Katz, MD; Robert M. Applebaum, MD; John L. Perez, MD; Itzhak Kronzon, MD Background: The outcome of aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis is worse in patients with impaired left ventricular function. Such dysfunction in aortic stenosis may be reversible if caused by afterload mismatch, but not if it is caused by superimposed myocardial infarction. Methods: From our echocardiography database, 55 patients with severe aortic stenosis (valve area 0.75 cm 2 ) and ejection fractions of 30% or lower who subsequently underwent aortic valve replacement were included. The operative mortality and clinical follow-up were detailed. Results: There were 10 perioperative deaths (operative mortality, 18%). Twenty (36%) of the 55 patients had a prior myocardial infarction. In the 35 patients without prior myocardial infarction, there was only 1 death (3%). In contrast, 9 of 20 patients with prior myocardial infarction died (mortality rate, 45%; P.001). The factors significantly associated with perioperative death on univariate analysis (functional class, mean aortic gradient, and prior myocardial infarction) were entered into a model for stepwise logistic regression. This multivariate analysis showed that only prior myocardial infarction was independently associated with perioperative death (odds ratio, 14.9; 95% confidence interval, ; P =.004). Conclusions: The risk of aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and severely reduced left ventricular systolic function is extremely high if the patients have had a prior myocardial infarction. This information should be factored into the risk-benefit analysis that is done preoperatively for these patients, and it may preclude operation for some. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160: From the Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY. THE OUTCOME of aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis is worse in patients with impaired left ventricular function. 1,2 The increasing prevalence of aortic stenosis 3 and improved surgical techniques mandate continued interest in the determinants of surgical outcome in this highrisk group. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with severe aortic stenosis may be caused by reversible afterload mismatch when increases in left ventricular pressure result in a decrease in stroke volume and ejection fraction. 4 Alternatively, systolic dysfunction may be caused by the decreased contractility 5 associated with myofiber loss and fibrosis due to hypertrophy or superimposed myocardial infarction. 1 Postoperative improvement of ventricular performance in patients with severely diminished ejection fractions would indicate that systolic function is recoverable in these patients due to the unloading conferred by valve replacement. Such recovery in function should be curtailed by prior myocardial infarction. Previously, only small numbers of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction who have undergone aortic valve replacement have been described, 6,7 without defining the prevalence of previous infarction. 8 The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in patients with profoundly impaired left ventricular systolic function, both with and without prior myocardial infarction. RESULTS PATIENT POPULATION Patient characteristics are presented in Table 1. The average age of the 55 patients (17 women) with severe aortic stenosis and severe left ventricular dysfunction who underwent aortic valve re- 1337
2 PATIENTS AND METHODS From our echocardiography database, we identified all patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction 30%) and severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area 0.75 cm 2 ). There were 74 such patients seen between April 1989 and December Of these, 55 patients had had subsequent aortic valve replacement, and all of their echocardiograms performed less than 10 days before surgery were reviewed by us. All echocardiograms were technically adequate for interpretation and none were incomplete. Ejection fraction determinations were made by the area length method. 9 The aortic valve area (AVA) was calculated by means of the continuity formula 10 using flow velocity integrals (FVI) of the aorta and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) as follows: AVA = (Area LVOT )(FVI LVOT )/FVI Aorta In the setting of atrial fibrillation, calculations from 3 to 5 cardiac cycles were averaged. Technically adequate 2-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic studies documenting the above criteria for severe aortic stenosis and profoundly reduced left ventricular systolic function were available for a study group of 55 patients. For each patient, the presence of significant regional wall motion abnormalities (defined as akinesis or dyskinesis) was recorded. The mean aortic pressure gradient was calculated by Doppler echocardiography 11 using the optimal window (apical, suprasternal, or right parasternal) for the aortic velocity envelope. The degree of mitral regurgitation was determined by Doppler color flow mapping. 12 All medical records of these patients were reviewed, including preoperative clinical information, cardiac catheterization hemodynamic data and coronary anatomy, and operative data. Preoperative coronary angiography had been performed in all patients. A history of prior myocardial infarction required confirmation by (1) electrocardiographic Q waves or (2) total or subtotal occlusion of a coronary artery with akinesis or dyskinesis of the corresponding myocardial segment. Q waves had to be more than 0.04 seconds in duration (patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and narrower Q waves were not considered to have prior infarction). In the case of left bundle branch block, the angiographic (and not the electrocardiographic) criteria would be used to define infarction. Coronary artery stenosis was defined as 70% or greater stenosis of a major epicardial coronary artery. Postoperative echocardiograms performed without concomitant intravenous inotropic support were analyzed, including quantification of ejection fractions. Postoperative follow-up included review of all subsequent hospital charts, questionnaires sent to referring physicians, and, when necessary, direct contact with the patients. The most recent assessment of each surviving patient s New York Heart Association functional class was ascertained. Otherwise, the time and cause of death were established. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS (PC-90) (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill) and Microsoft Excel (Macintosh v. 5.0a) (Microsoft, Redmond, Wash) software. Univariate analysis of categorical variables was done using the 2 test. Continuous variables were analyzed with a 2-tailed t test. For multivariate analysis, variables significantly associated with perioperative death on univariate analysis were entered into a model for logistic regression. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the multivariate analysis. The changes in postoperative ejection fractions in survivors and nonsurvivors were compared using a between-groups and a repeated-measures analysis of variance. P.05 was considered significant. Data are presented as mean ± SD. placement was 73.3 ± 9.4 years (range, years). Their ejection fractions were very low (mean, 22.2% ± 6.2%; range, 10%-30%), and they were markedly symptomatic: 46 patients (84%) were New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. Their aortic valve areas were severely reduced (mean, 0.48 ± 0.2 cm 2 ; range, cm 2 ), and the average of their mean aortic gradients was 41 ± 14 mm Hg (range, mm Hg). Notably, 14 patients (26%) had a mean aortic gradient of 30 mm Hg or less. Twenty (36%) of 55 patients had had a prior myocardial infarction. Coronary angiography revealed no significant coronary lesions in 14 patients (26%), single-vessel disease in 9 patients (16%), double-vessel disease in 12 patients (22%), and triple-vessel disease in 20 patients (36%). Significant mitral regurgitation was present in 26 patients (47%). Moderate regurgitation was present in 17, and severe regurgitation in 9. Mitral repair or replacement was subsequently performed in 6 of these latter 9 patients. Diabetes mellitus was present in 17 patients (31%), and history of hypertension in 37 patients (67%). However, neither was significantly correlated with perioperative death (2 [12%] of 17 diabetic patients died [P =.4] and 5 [14%] with a history of hypertension died [P =.2]). PERIOPERATIVE MORTALITY AND PRIOR MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION There were 10 perioperative deaths, for an overall operative mortality rate of 18%. However, in the 35 patients (64% of the entire group) who did not have a history of prior myocardial infarction, there was only 1 death (3%). In contrast, 9 of 20 patients with prior myocardial infarction died, for a perioperative mortality rate of 45% (P.001) (Table 2). The patients can also be subdivided into 3 groups (those without coronary artery disease or prior infarction, those with coronary disease but no prior myocardial infarction, and those with coronary disease and prior myocardial infarction). None of the 21 patients with coronary disease but no prior infarction died. There was only 1 death in the group without coronary disease and no prior infarction; all the remaining patients who died (9 patients) had prior infarction. Those who died are compared with the surviving patients in Table 3. On univariate analysis, those who died had a significantly higher (worse) New York Heart Association functional class (3.8 ± 0.4 vs 3.3 ± 0.9; P =.006). They also had a significantly lower mean aortic gradient (32 ± 13 vs 43 ± 13 mm Hg; P=.01), although their ejec- 1338
3 Table 1. Patient Characteristics (N = 55)* Age, y 73.3 ± 9.4 Aortic valve area, cm ± 0.2 Mean aortic gradient, mm Hg 41 ± 14 Ejection fraction, % 22.2 ± 6.2 NYHA class III or IV 46 (84) Prior MI 20 (36) Coronary angiography Normal 14 (26) SVD 9 (16) DVD 12 (22) TVD 20 (36) Moderate or severe MR 26 (47) *Data are given as mean ± SD or number (percentage) of patients. NYHA indicates New York Heart Association; MI, myocardial infarction; SVD, single-vessel disease; DVD, double-vessel disease; TVD, triple-vessel disease; and MR, mitral regurgitation. Table 2. Clinical Follow-up Data* With Prior MI (n = 20) With No MI (n = 35) P Preoperative data, mean ± SD Age, y 74 ± ± Ejection fraction, % 24 ± 6 21 ± 6.22 Aortic valve area, cm ± ± Mean aortic gradient, mm Hg 35 ± ± Perioperative deaths, No. (%) 9 (45) 1 (3).001 Follow-up, mo (range) 24 (3-70) 31 (2-96).44 Hospital survivors, No F/U cardiac death, No. (%) 3/11 (27) Total cardiac mortality, No. (%) 12 (60) 1 (3).001 F/U noncardiac death, No. (%) 2/11 (18) 7/34 (21).86 Total mortality, No. (%) 14 (70) 8 (23).001 *MI indicates myocardial infarction; F/U, follow-up. tion fractions and aortic valve areas were not significantly different from those of the survivors. Patient age and sex and the performance of concomitant coronary bypass and mitral valve surgery were not significantly associated with perioperative death. There was also no significant difference in the prevalence of mitral regurgitation in the group that did not survive surgery. Atherosclerotic coronary artery disease as defined by coronary angiography (single-, double-, or triplevessel disease) was not significantly associated with perioperative mortality. However, 9 (90%) of 10 patients who died had had a previous myocardial infarction, which was a significantly higher prevalence than that in those who did not die perioperatively (11 [24%] of 45 patients; P.001). The ejection fractions and valve areas were similar in those with and without prior infarction (mean valve area and ejection fraction in patients with infarction were 0.47 ± 0.2 cm 2 and 24% ± 6%, vs 0.49 ± 0.2 cm 2 and 21% ± 6% in those without infarction, respectively). The mean aortic gradient was lower in patients with prior infarction (35 ± 13 mm Hg vs 44 ± 13 mm Hg; P =.01). The factors significantly associated with perioperative death on univariate analysis (functional class, mean Table 3. Operative Mortality Data* Who Died (n = 10) aortic gradient, and prior myocardial infarction) were entered into a model for stepwise logistic regression. This multivariate analysis showed that only prior myocardial infarction was independently associated with perioperative death, with an odds ratio of 14.9 (95% confidence interval, ; P =.004). More infarctions involved the anterior wall in those who died (8 of 9; 89%) than in those who survived (5 of 10; 50%), although this trend did not reach statistical significance (P =.07). CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP Who Survived (n = 45) P Age, y 73.8 ± ± NYHA class 3.8 ± ± Ejection fraction, % 24 ± 7 22 ± 6.46 Aortic valve area, cm ± ± Mean aortic gradient, mm Hg 32 ± ± Severe MR 2 (20) 7 (16).73 Moderate or severe MR 3 (30) 23 (51).23 CABG 7 (70) 23 (51).28 MVR 2 (20) 4 (9).31 SVD, DVD, or TVD 9 (90) 32 (71).21 DVD or TVD 7 (70) 25 (56).40 TVD 5 (50) 15 (33).32 Prior MI 9 (90) 11 (24).001 *Data are given as mean ± SD or number (percentage) of patients. NYHA indicates New York Heart Association; MR, mitral regurgitation; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; MVR, mitral valve repair or replacement; SVD, single-vessel disease; DVD, double-vessel disease; TVD, triple-vessel disease; and MI, myocardial infarction. The 45 surviving patients were followed up for 2 to 96 months (mean, 29 months). Those with previous myocardial infarction were compared with those without infarction (Table 2). There was no significant difference in age, ejection fraction, or aortic valve area. The 11 patients with prior infarction who survived the operation were followed up for an average of 24 months, and 3 patients (27%) had cardiac death (at 3, 6, and 70 months). Despite a longer mean follow-up of 31 months, there were no cardiac deaths among the 34 survivors of surgery without prior infarction, and this difference was highly significant (P =.002). There was a similar incidence of noncardiac death in both groups (18% vs 21%; P =.86). The total (perioperative plus follow-up, cardiac and noncardiac) mortality rate was significantly higher for the group with prior infarction (70%) than for the patients without prior infarction (23%) (P.001) (Figure). ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC FOLLOW-UP Postoperative echocardiograms were available for 38 (84%) of 45 survivors of surgery, and for 5 (50%) of 10 patients who had perioperative death. The follow-up time for the survivors ranged from 1 to 47 months (mean, 5.6 months). For those who had perioperative death, the postoperative ejection fraction increased compared with the preoperative ejection fraction in only 1 patient (20%); it did not 1339
4 Survival Rate, % %, 6 mo 40%, 6 mo 80%, 24 mo Postoperative Months change in 1 patient (20%), and it fell in 3 patients (60%). The average change in ejection fraction was 1 ejection fraction unit, a relative change of 4% compared with the preoperative ejection fraction. For the survivors, the ejection fraction at follow-up increased in 36 patients (95%) by an average of 22 ejection fraction units (a relative increase in ejection fraction of 102%). The ejection fraction decreased in only 2 survivors (5%). Analysis of variance showed that the difference between the 2 groups (survivors and nonsurvivors) was highly significant (P =.002). There was no significant difference in the extent of coronary disease (number of diseased vessels) between those whose ejection fraction did not improve postoperatively and those whose did (P =.29). In addition, those whose ejection fractions did not improve postoperatively did not have incomplete revascularization (9 of 10 severely diseased coronary arteries were bypassed in these patients) or a predominance of anterior infarction (only 2 of 5). COMMENT 35%, 42 mo No MI Prior MI 77%, 49 mo 30%, 70 mo Survival rates for patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) and patients without prior MI. The natural history of nonsurgically treated severe aortic stenosis may be characterized by a long asymptomatic period. However, in one series the 5-year mortality rate in medically treated patients was 36%, 13 and in another it was 60%. 14 The average survival of patients once angina or syncope occurs is only 2 to 3 years, and if congestive heart failure supervenes, the survival time averages only 1.5 years. 15 Therefore, the current standard of care is to replace the aortic valve once symptoms occur. At our institution, a tertiary referral center, the operative mortality for aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis was 5.2% of 363 patients who had surgery from 1993 to The general operative mortality for aortic valve replacement is reported to range from 2% to 8%. 13 If overt left ventricular failure or a reduced ejection fraction is present, the mortality rate increases to 10% to 25%, 16 and depends on the severity of cardiac dysfunction and the experience of the surgical team. Despite this high operative mortality, the average survival of patients who undergo aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis associated with significant left ventricular dysfunction is longer than that of such patients who are medically treated. 17 The present study describes a severely symptomatic group of patients with severe aortic stenosis and profoundly abnormal left ventricular systolic function who have undergone aortic valve replacement. The mortality rate of 18% for the whole group is similar to that previously reported. 16 However, there is a striking dichotomy between those whose left ventricular dysfunction was associated with a previous myocardial infarction and those with no previous infarction. Although their ejection fractions were similar, their operative mortality was significantly different: 45% in the 20 patients with prior infarction and only 3% in the 35 patients with no prior infarction. In fact, the 3% mortality rate for aortic valve replacement in this group with an average ejection fraction of only 21% is half that of the entire group of 4377 patients who underwent cardiac surgery at our institution (both coronary bypass and valve surgery) from 1993 to 1996, which was 6%. In a previous study, the presence of coronary artery disease was significantly associated with a reduced survival rate following aortic valve replacement. 18 However, in the present study, coronary obstructive disease per se is not significantly related to operative risk. Prior myocardial infarction confers the markedly worse prognosis with operation. Perhaps the reason for this seeming discrepancy is that patients with and without prior infarction were grouped together in the previous study. In the present study, the patients with prior infarction had approximately the same valve areas and ejection fractions as those without infarction; however, the mean gradients were lower on average in those with prior infarction. This indicates a lower stroke volume in those with prior infarction, and lower cardiac output is known to decrease overall survival. 18 Although patients with anterior myocardial infarction are known to have a worse prognosis than those with inferior infarction, in our group there was no significant difference in the location of the myocardial infarction between those who survived (70% of infarctions were anterior) and those who did not (62% of infarctions were anterior). Even in the absence of coronary artery disease, it is well known that left ventricular hypertrophy may result in subendocardial (non Q wave) infarction; however, we have analyzed the impact of transmural (Q wave) infarction on survival. In the patients without Q wave infarction, who may well have had subendocardial damage, all but 1 survived surgery. They also had a significant recovery of left ventricular function. This was manifested by a doubling of the mean preoperative ejection fraction. In the group with prior transmural infarction, nearly half of whom did not survive the operation, the ejection fraction improved in only 1 of 5 in whom it was measurable. This was predictable, as the systolic dysfunction in these patients was at least in part due to permanent scarring rather than just reversible afterload mismatch. In the follow-up period, the only cardiac deaths occurred in those with prior infarction. The cardiac mortality in this group was 27% vs 0% in those without prior infarction. This significantly higher cardiac mortality rate 1340
5 occurred despite the fact that those with infarction were followed up for a shorter period. However, the sample size is small, and the follow-up period was not prolonged. These results confirm that it is possible to replace the aortic valve with an acceptably low mortality rate, and with recovery of left ventricular function, in some patients with severe aortic stenosis and severe left ventricular dysfunction. However, the results also identify a group of patients, those with prior myocardial infarction, whose operative risk is in the same order of magnitude as the mortality rate of patients who do not undergo surgery, whose long-term prognosis is poor. Screening for atherosclerotic heart disease appears to be appropriate in patients with aortic stenosis. It is striking that of the 20 patients with severe aortic stenosis, severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and a prior infarction who underwent aortic valve replacement, only 6 (30%) were alive 2 years after surgery. LIMITATIONS This was a retrospective study, and as such was subject to the effects of selection bias. However, patients who have aortic valve replacement at our institution routinely undergo echocardiography before and after surgery. Furthermore, all echocardiograms were analyzed by us specifically for this study, with calculations of valve area, gradients, and ejection fractions performed in a masked fashion. In this study, concomitant coronary bypass, preoperative mitral regurgitation, and mitral valve surgery were not significantly associated with perioperative death. However, the groups may not have been large enough to judge the impact of these factors. The comparison of outcomes for the present patient group with those in patients treated medically is based solely on historical results (this was not a prospective trial of surgery vs medical management). Although the 2-year mortality of 70% in those with prior infarction is similar to or worse than the unoperated mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis and heart failure, it is possible that the present study included patients with worse left ventricular dysfunction on average than did other reported groups. However, the strikingly low operative mortality (3%) in the group without prior infarction but with a mean ejection fraction of only 21% would seem to indicate that this particular selection bias (worse systolic function than was reported in previous studies) did not apply. The severity of aortic stenosis was derived from the Doppler measurements and continuity equation. It is known that this may underestimate the valve area (overestimate the severity of stenosis) in patients with a low ejection fraction and low cardiac output, as such patients may not have fully opened valves due to a low stroke volume. The administration of dobutamine may increase the valve area in patients with this set of circumstances 19 although in patients with truly fixed small valve areas, the valve area will not increase significantly with dobutamine (rather the gradient will increase). However, the valve areas of the patients in our study were very small (mean, 0.48 cm 2 ; range, cm 2 ). No dobutamine was administered to our patients, although an increase in valve area on the order of magnitude reported with dobutamine in the literature (0.2 cm 2 ) 19 would still leave a severely reduced valve area in our cohort of patients. It is therefore likely that these patients had truly severe stenosis. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The risk of aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and severely reduced left ventricular systolic function is extremely high if the patients have had a prior myocardial infarction. This information should be factored into the risk-benefit analysis that is done preoperatively for these patients, and it may preclude operation for some. Accepted for publication June 13, Presented in part at the 70th Scientific Sessions of the AmericanHeartAssociation, Orlando, Fla, November11, Reprints: Paul A. Tunick, MD, Noninvasive Cardiology Laboratory, NYU School of Medicine, 560 First Ave, New York, NY ( Paul.Tunick@med.nyu.edu). REFERENCES 1. Hwang MH, Hammermeister KE, Oprian C, et al. Preoperative identification of patients likely to have left ventricular dysfunction after aortic valve replacement. Participants in the Veterans Administration Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease. Circulation. 1989;80(3, pt 1):I65-I Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Goormastic M, Loop FD. Aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass grafting for patients with aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease: early and late results. Eur Heart J. 1988;9(suppl E): Aranki SF, Rizzo RJ, Couper GS, et al. Aortic valve replacement in the elderly: effect of gender and coronary artery disease on operative mortality. Circulation. 1993;88(5, pt 2):II17-II Ross J Jr. Afterload mismatch in aortic and mitral valve disease: implications for surgical therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985;5: Wisenbaugh T, Booth D, DeMaria A, Nissen S, Waters J. Relationship of contractile state to ejection performance in patients with chronic aortic valve disease. Circulation. 1986;73: Carabello BA, Green LH, Grossman W, Cohn LH, Koster JK, Collins JJ Jr. Hemodynamic determinants of prognosis of aortic valve replacement in critical aortic stenosis and advanced congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1980;62: Smucker ML, Manning SB, Stuckey TD, Tyson DL, Nygaard TW, Kron IL. Preoperative left ventricular wall stress, ejection fraction, and aortic valve gradient as prognostic indicators in aortic valve stenosis. CathetCardiovasc Diagn.1989;17: Brogan WC III, Grayburn PA, Lange RA, Hillis LD. Prognosis after valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and a low transvalvular pressure gradient. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21: FeigenbaumH.Echocardiography.5thed.Philadelphia,Pa:Lea&Febiger; 1994: Harrison MR, Gurley JC, Smith MD, Grayburn PA, DeMaria AN. A practical application of Doppler echocardiography for the assessment of severity of aortic stenosis. Am Heart J. 1988;115: Otto CM, Pearlman AS, Comess KA, Reamer RP, Janko CL, Huntsman LL. Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;7: Helmcke F, Nanda NC, Hsiung MC, et al. Color Doppler assessment of mitral regurgitation with orthogonal planes. Circulation. 1987;75: Braunwald E. Valvular heart disease. In: Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. Vol 4. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1992: Rapaport E. Natural history of aortic and mitral valve disease. Am J Cardiol. 1975; 35: Hakki A-H, Kimbiris D, Iskandrian AS, Segal BL, Mintz GS, Bemis CE. Angina pectoris and coronary artery disease in patients with severe aortic valvular disease. Am Heart J. 1980;100: O Toole JD, Geiser EA, Reddy S, Curtiss EI, Landfair RM. Effect of preoperative ejection fraction on survival and hemodynamic improvement following aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 1978;58: Lund O. Preoperative risk evaluation and stratification of long-term survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis: reasons for earlier operative intervention. Circulation. 1990;82: Connolly HM, Oh JK, Orszulak TA, et al. Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction: prognostic indicators. Circulation. 1997;95: Lin SS, Roger VL, Pascoe R, Seward JB, Pellikka PA. Dobutamine stress Doppler hemodynamics in patients with aortic stenosis: feasibility, safety, and surgical correlations. Am Heart J. 1998;136:
Aortic Valve Replacement or Heart Transplantation in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Aortic Valve Replacement or Heart Transplantation in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction L.S.C. Czer, S. Goland, H.J. Soukiasian, S. Gallagher, M.A. De Robertis, J. Mirocha,
More informationJournal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 44, No. 9, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /04/$30.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 44, 9, 2004 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN 0735-1097/04/$30.00 Published by Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.062 Relation
More informationAortic Stenosis and Perioperative Risk With Non-cardiac Surgery
Aortic Stenosis and Perioperative Risk With Non-cardiac Surgery Aortic stenosis (AS) is characterized as a high-risk index for cardiac complications during non-cardiac surgery. A critical analysis of old
More informationPatients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), left ventricular
Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Operative Risk Stratification and Predictors for Long-Term Outcome: A Multicenter Study Using Dobutamine Stress Hemodynamics Jean-Luc Monin, MD; Jean-Paul Quéré, MD; Mehran
More informationAortic Stenosis: UPDATE Anjan Sinha, MD Krannert Institute of Cardiology
Aortic Stenosis: UPDATE 2010 Anjan Sinha, MD Krannert Institute of Cardiology None Disclosures 67-Year-Old Male Dyspnea and angina Class III heart failure No PND or orthopnea 3/6 late peak SEM Diminished
More informationAortic stenosis (AS) is common with the aging population.
New Insights Into the Progression of Aortic Stenosis Implications for Secondary Prevention Sanjeev Palta, MD; Anita M. Pai, MD; Kanwaljit S. Gill, MD; Ramdas G. Pai, MD Background The risk factors affecting
More informationTo operate or not on elderly patients with aortic stenosis: the decision and its consequences
Heart 1999;82:143 148 143 To operate or not on elderly with aortic stenosis: the decision and its consequences B J Bouma, R B A van den Brink, J H P van der Meulen, H A Verheul, E C Cheriex, H P M Hamer,
More informationHemodynamic Assessment. Assessment of Systolic Function Doppler Hemodynamics
Hemodynamic Assessment Matt M. Umland, RDCS, FASE Aurora Medical Group Milwaukee, WI Assessment of Systolic Function Doppler Hemodynamics Stroke Volume Cardiac Output Cardiac Index Tei Index/Index of myocardial
More informationAortic stenosis aetiology: morphology of calcific AS,
How to improve patient selection in aortic stenosis? Fausto J. Pinto, FESC Aortic stenosis aetiology: morphology of calcific AS, bicuspid valve, and rheumatic AS (Adapted from C. Otto, Principles of
More informationDoes Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch Affect Long-term Results after Mitral Valve Replacement?
Original Article Does Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch Affect Long-term Results after Mitral Valve Replacement? Hiroaki Sakamoto, MD, PhD, and Yasunori Watanabe, MD, PhD Background: Recently, some articles
More informationOutcome of elderly patients with severe but asymptomatic aortic stenosis
Outcome of elderly patients with severe but asymptomatic aortic stenosis Robert Zilberszac, Harald Gabriel, Gerald Maurer, Raphael Rosenhek Department of Cardiology Medical University of Vienna ESC Congress
More informationIn , three studies described patients
Heart 2001;85:337 341 VALVE DISEASE Should patients with asymptomatic mild or moderate aortic stenosis undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery also have valve replacement for their aortic stenosis? Shahbudin
More informationAssessing Cardiac Risk in Noncardiac Surgery. Murali Sivarajan, M.D. Professor University of Washington Seattle, Washington
Assessing Cardiac Risk in Noncardiac Surgery Murali Sivarajan, M.D. Professor University of Washington Seattle, Washington Disclosure None. I have no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise. CME
More informationCLINICAL PRACTICE. Clinical Practice AORTIC-VALVE AREA. N Engl J Med, Vol. 346, No. 9 February 28,
CLINICAL PRACTICE Clinical Practice This Journal feature begins with a case vignette highlighting a common clinical problem. Evidence supporting various strategies is then presented, followed by a review
More informationLoad and Function - Valvular Heart Disease. Tom Marwick, Cardiovascular Imaging Cleveland Clinic
Load and Function - Valvular Heart Disease Tom Marwick, Cardiovascular Imaging Cleveland Clinic Indications for surgery in common valve lesions Risks Operative mortality Failed repair - to MVR Operative
More informationIndications of Coronary Angiography Dr. Shaheer K. George, M.D Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University 2014
Indications of Coronary Angiography Dr. Shaheer K. George, M.D Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University 2014 Indications for cardiac catheterization Before a decision to perform an invasive procedure such
More informationCURRENT STATUS OF STRESS TESTING JOHN HAMATY D.O.
CURRENT STATUS OF STRESS TESTING JOHN HAMATY D.O. INTRODUCTION Form of imprisonment in 1818 Edward Smith s observations TECHNIQUE Heart rate Blood pressure ECG parameters Physical appearance INDICATIONS
More informationAortic Stenosis: Spectrum of Disease, Low Flow/Low Gradient and Variants
Aortic Stenosis: Spectrum of Disease, Low Flow/Low Gradient and Variants Martin G. Keane, MD, FASE Professor of Medicine Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University Basic root structure Parasternal
More informationSurvival After Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis With Low Transvalvular Gradients and Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 39, No. 8, 2002 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN 0735-1097/02/$22.00 Published by Elsevier Science Inc. PII S0735-1097(02)01759-X
More informationValve Disease in Patients With Heart Failure TAVI or Surgery? Miguel Sousa Uva Hospital Cruz Vermelha Lisbon, Portugal
Valve Disease in Patients With Heart Failure TAVI or Surgery? Miguel Sousa Uva Hospital Cruz Vermelha Lisbon, Portugal I have nothing to disclose. Wide Spectrum Stable vs Decompensated NYHA II IV? Ejection
More informationPART II ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY LABORATORY OPERATIONS ADULT TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY TESTING
PART II ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY LABORATORY OPERATIONS ADULT TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY TESTING STANDARD - Primary Instrumentation 1.1 Cardiac Ultrasound Systems SECTION 1 Instrumentation Ultrasound instruments
More informationLV geometric and functional changes in VHD: How to assess? Mi-Seung Shin M.D., Ph.D. Gachon University Gil Hospital
LV geometric and functional changes in VHD: How to assess? Mi-Seung Shin M.D., Ph.D. Gachon University Gil Hospital LV inflow across MV LV LV outflow across AV LV LV geometric changes Pressure overload
More informationAS with reduced LV ejection fraction: Contractile reserve should be systematically assessed: PRO
AS with reduced LV ejection fraction: Contractile reserve should be systematically assessed: PRO Jean-Luc MONIN, MD, PhD Henri Mondor University Hospital Créteil, FRANCE Potential conflicts of interest
More informationTrend and Outcomes of Direct Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement from a Single-Center Experience
Cardiol Ther (2018) 7:191 196 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40119-018-0115-0 BRIEF REPORT Trend and Outcomes of Direct Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement from a Single-Center Experience Anthony A. Bavry.
More informationValvular Guidelines: The Past, the Present, the Future
Valvular Guidelines: The Past, the Present, the Future Robert O. Bonow, MD, MS Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute Northwestern Memorial Hospital Editor-in-Chief,
More informationT he average life expectancy of patients with severe aortic
1324 INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY AND SURGERY Valve replacement in patients with critical aortic stenosis and depressed left ventricular function: predictors of operative risk, left ventricular function recovery,
More informationNatural History and Echo Evaluation of Aortic Stenosis
Natural History and Echo Evaluation of Aortic Stenosis Prof. Patrizio LANCELLOTTI, MD, PhD Heart Valve Clinic, University of Liège, CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, BELGIUM AORTIC STENOSIS First valvular disease
More informationCorrelation Between Regional Wall Motion Abnormalities via 2-Dimensional Echocardiography, and Coronary Angiographic Findings
THE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, IRAQI POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL AND CORONARY JOURNAL ANGIOGRAPHIC FINDINGS VOL.11, SUPPLEMENT,2012 Correlation Between Regional Wall Motion Abnormalities via 2-Dimensional Echocardiography,
More informationProf. Patrizio LANCELLOTTI, MD, PhD Heart Valve Clinic, University of Liège, CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, BELGIUM
The Patient with Aortic Stenosis and Mitral Regurgitation Prof. Patrizio LANCELLOTTI, MD, PhD Heart Valve Clinic, University of Liège, CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, BELGIUM Aortic Stenosis + Mitral Regurgitation?
More informationAdult Echocardiography Examination Content Outline
Adult Echocardiography Examination Content Outline (Outline Summary) # Domain Subdomain Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Anatomy and Physiology Pathology Clinical Care and Safety Measurement Techniques, Maneuvers,
More informationValve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis With Low Transvalvular Gradient and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Exceeding 0.50
Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis With Low Transvalvular Gradient and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Exceeding 0.50 Giuseppe Tarantini, MD, PhD, Elisa Covolo, MD, Renato Razzolini, MD, Claudio
More informationCorrective Surgery in Severe Heart Failure. Jon Enlow, D.O., FACS Cardiothoracic Surgeon Riverside Methodist Hospital, Ohiohealth Columbus, Ohio
Corrective Surgery in Severe Heart Failure Jon Enlow, D.O., FACS Cardiothoracic Surgeon Riverside Methodist Hospital, Ohiohealth Columbus, Ohio Session Objectives 1.) Identify which patients with severe
More informationValue of echocardiography in chronic dyspnea
Value of echocardiography in chronic dyspnea Jahrestagung Schweizerische Gesellschaft für /Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Pneumologie B. Kaufmann 16.06.2016 Chronic dyspnea Shortness of breath lasting
More informationRadiologic Assessment of Myocardial Viability
November 2001 Radiologic Assessment of Myocardial Viability Joshua Moss, Harvard Medical School Year III Patient EF 66yo female with a 3-year history of intermittent chest pain previously relieved by sublingual
More informationMy Patient Needs a Stress Test
My Patient Needs a Stress Test Amy S. Burhanna,, MD, FACC Coastal Cardiology Cape May Court House, New Jersey Absolute and relative contraindications to exercise testing Absolute Acute myocardial infarction
More informationPatient referral for elective coronary angiography: challenging the current strategy
Patient referral for elective coronary angiography: challenging the current strategy M. Santos, A. Ferreira, A. P. Sousa, J. Brito, R. Calé, L. Raposo, P. Gonçalves, R. Teles, M. Almeida, M. Mendes Cardiology
More informationThe Ross Procedure: Outcomes at 20 Years
The Ross Procedure: Outcomes at 20 Years Tirone David Carolyn David Anna Woo Cedric Manlhiot University of Toronto Conflict of Interest None The Ross Procedure 1990 to 2004 212 patients: 66% 34% Mean age:
More informationIndex of subjects. effect on ventricular tachycardia 30 treatment with 101, 116 boosterpump 80 Brockenbrough phenomenon 55, 125
145 Index of subjects A accessory pathways 3 amiodarone 4, 5, 6, 23, 30, 97, 102 angina pectoris 4, 24, 1l0, 137, 139, 140 angulation, of cavity 73, 74 aorta aortic flow velocity 2 aortic insufficiency
More informationClinical Outcome in Patients with Aortic Stenosis
Clinical Outcome in Patients with Aortic Stenosis Is the Prognosis Worse in Patients with Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis? Yoel Angel BSc, Shemy Carasso MD, Diab Mutlak MD, Jonathan Lessick MD Dsc,
More informationSpotlight on Valvular Heart Disease Guidelines
Spotlight on Valvular Heart Disease Guidelines Aortic Valve Disease Raphael Rosenhek Department of Cardiology Medical University of Vienna Palermo, April 26 th 2018 1998 2002 2006 2007 2008 2012 2014 2017
More informationNitroprusside in Critically Ill Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Aortic Stenosis
The new england journal of medicine original article Nitroprusside in Critically Ill Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Aortic Stenosis Umesh N. Khot, M.D., Gian M. Novaro, M.D., Zoran B. Popović,
More informationSUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL Table S1: Number and percentage of patients by age category Distribution of age Age
More informationPREDICTORS OF OUTCOME IN SEVERE, ASYMPTOMATIC AORTIC STENOSIS PREDICTORS OF OUTCOME IN SEVERE, ASYMPTOMATIC AORTIC STENOSIS.
PREDICTORS OF OUTCOME IN SEVERE, ASYMPTOMATIC AORTIC STENOSIS RAPHAEL ROSENHEK, M.D., THOMAS BINDER, M.D., GEROLD PORENTA, M.D., IRENE LANG, M.D., GÜNTHER CHRIST, M.D., MICHAEL SCHEMPER, PH.D., GERALD
More informationInvited Experts' Case Presentation and 5-Slides Focus Review
Invited Experts' Case Presentation and 5-Slides Focus Review FFR and IVUS in Myocardial Bridging Haegeun, Song. M.D. Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea Myocardial Bridging Common congenital
More informationPerioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac. Dr Mahmoud Ebrahimi Interventional cardiologist 91/9/30
Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery Dr Mahmoud Ebrahimi Interventional cardiologist 91/9/30 Active Cardiac Conditions for Which the Patient Should Undergo Evaluation
More informationParis, August 28 th Gian Paolo Ussia on behalf of the CoreValve Italian Registry Investigators
Paris, August 28 th 2011 Is TAVI the definitive treatment in high risk patients? Impact Of Coronary Artery Disease In Elderly Patients Undergoing TAVI: Insight The Italian CoreValve Registry Gian Paolo
More informationTSDA Boot Camp September 13-16, Introduction to Aortic Valve Surgery. George L. Hicks, Jr., MD
TSDA Boot Camp September 13-16, 2018 Introduction to Aortic Valve Surgery George L. Hicks, Jr., MD Aortic Valve Pathology and Treatment Valvular Aortic Stenosis in Adults Average Course (Post mortem data)
More informationStress Testing in Valvular Disease
2017 ASE Florida Orlando, FL October 10, 2017 2:40 2:50 PM 10 min Grand Harbor Ballroom South Stress Testing in Valvular Disease Muhamed Sarić MD, PhD, MPA Director of Noninvasive Cardiology Echo Lab Associate
More informationNon-cardiac Surgery in Valvular Heart Disease
Jafar Golshahi, MD; Shahnaz Aram, MD Abstract Background- Valvular heart disease is one of the common complications of acute rheumatic fever, which manifests its clinical complications one or two decades
More informationTricuspid and Pulmonic Valve Disease
Chapter 31 Tricuspid and Pulmonic Valve Disease David A. Tate Acquired disease of the right-sided cardiac valves is much less common than disease of the leftsided counterparts, possibly because of the
More informationOutline. EuroScore II. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score. EuroScore II
SURGICAL RISK IN VALVULAR HEART DISEASE: WHAT 2D AND 3D ECHO CAN TELL YOU AND WHAT THEY CAN'T Ernesto E Salcedo, MD Professor of Medicine University of Colorado School of Medicine Director of Echocardiography
More informationCoronary atherosclerotic heart disease remains the number
Twenty-Year Survival After Coronary Artery Surgery An Institutional Perspective From Emory University William S. Weintraub, MD; Stephen D. Clements, Jr, MD; L. Van-Thomas Crisco, MD; Robert A. Guyton,
More informationShould early elective surgery be performed in patients with severe but asymptomatic aortic stenosis?
European Heart Journal (2002) 23, 1417 1421 doi:10.1053/euhj.2002.3163, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Clinical Perspective Should early elective surgery be performed in patients with
More informationCoronary Atherosclerosis in Valvular Heart Disease
Coronary Atherosclerosis in Valvular Heart Disease Jerome Lacy, M.D., Robert Goodin, M.D., Daniel McMartin, M.D., Ronald Masden, M.D., and Nancy Flowers, M.D. ABSTRACT To evaluate the usefulness of routine
More informationCoronary Artery Bypass Graft: Monitoring Patients and Detecting Complications
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Monitoring Patients and Detecting Complications Madhav Swaminathan, MD, FASE Professor of Anesthesiology Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia & Critical Care Duke University
More informationThe prevalence of calcific aortic valve disease approaches. Compendium. Current Management of Calcific Aortic Stenosis
Compendium Circulation Research Compendium on Aortic Valve Disease: Introduction to the Compendium Introduction to Aortic Stenosis Hemodynamic and Cellular Response Feedback in Calcific Aortic Valve Disease
More information: mm 86 mm EF mm
37 Vol. 35, pp. 37 42, 2007 2 3 : 9 6 22 68 40 2003 4 Ejection fraction: EF44 IV 70 mm 86 mm EF46 6 24 mm 4 mm EF 80 60 mm 70 mm Aortic Regurgitation: AR 2 3 AR Aortic Valve Replacement: AVR AR 38 : 68
More informationDecreasing Mortality for Aortic and Mitral Valve Surgery In Northern New England
ORIGINAL ARTICLES: CARDIOVASCULAR Decreasing Mortality for Aortic and Mitral Valve Surgery In Northern New England Nancy J. O. Birkmeyer, PhD, Charles A. S. Marrin, MBBS, Jeremy R. Morton, MD, Bruce J.
More informationManagement of Difficult Aortic Root, Old and New solutions
Management of Difficult Aortic Root, Old and New solutions Hani K. Najm MD, Msc, FRCSC,, FACC, FESC Chairman, Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery Cleveland Clinic Conflict of Interest None Difficult
More informationThe operative mortality rate after redo valvular operations
Clinical Outcomes of Redo Valvular Operations: A 20-Year Experience Naoto Fukunaga, MD, Yukikatsu Okada, MD, Yasunobu Konishi, MD, Takashi Murashita, MD, Mitsuru Yuzaki, MD, Yu Shomura, MD, Hiroshi Fujiwara,
More informationJournal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 37, No. 4, by the American College of Cardiology ISSN /01/$20.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 37, No. 4, 2001 2001 by the American College of Cardiology ISSN 0735-1097/01/$20.00 Published by Elsevier Science Inc. PII S0735-1097(00)01214-6 Prognostic
More informationCIPG Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement- When Is Less, More?
CIPG 2013 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement- When Is Less, More? James D. Rossen, M.D. Professor of Medicine and Neurosurgery Director, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory and Interventional Cardiology
More informationSevere aortic stenosis should be operated before symptom onset CONTRA. Helmut Baumgartner
Severe aortic stenosis should be operated before symptom onset CONTRA Helmut Baumgartner Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster Adult Congenital and Valvular Heart Disease Center Dept. of Cardiology
More informationAortic Valve Practice Guidelines: What Has Changed and What You Need to Know
Aortic Valve Practice Guidelines: What Has Changed and What You Need to Know James F. Burke, MD Program Director Cardiovascular Disease Fellowship Lankenau Medical Center Disclosure Dr. Burke has no conflicts
More informationLow Gradient, Low Ejection Fraction Aortic Stenosis John Chambers, MD
Low Gradient, Low Ejection Fraction Aortic Stenosis John Chambers, MD Address Cardiothoracic Centre, St. Thomas Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK. E-mail: johnchambers@dial.pipex.com Current
More informationJournal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 42, No. 3, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /03/$30.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 42, No. 3, 2003 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN 0735-1097/03/$30.00 Published by Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00649-1
More informationPediatric Echocardiography Examination Content Outline
Pediatric Echocardiography Examination Content Outline (Outline Summary) # Domain Subdomain Percentage 1 Anatomy and Physiology Normal Anatomy and Physiology 10% 2 Abnormal Pathology and Pathophysiology
More informationDetailed Order Request Checklists for Cardiology
Next Generation Solutions Detailed Order Request Checklists for Cardiology 8600 West Bryn Mawr Avenue South Tower Suite 800 Chicago, IL 60631 www.aimspecialtyhealth.com Appropriate.Safe.Affordable 2018
More informationEchocardiographic Cardiovascular Risk Stratification: Beyond Ejection Fraction
Echocardiographic Cardiovascular Risk Stratification: Beyond Ejection Fraction October 4, 2014 James S. Lee, M.D., F.A.C.C. Associates in Cardiology, P.A. Silver Spring, M.D. Disclosures Financial none
More informationLeft ventricle pseudoaneurysm as late postoperative complication of a large apical aneurysm
CASE REPORT Left ventricle pseudoaneurysm as late postoperative complication of a large apical aneurysm Mariana M. Floria 1, 4, Carmen Elena Pleșoianu 2, 4, Michel Buche 3, Baudouin Marchandise 4, Erwin
More informationTitle:Relation Between E/e' ratio and NT-proBNP Levels in Elderly Patients with Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis
Author's response to reviews Title:Relation Between E/e' ratio and NT-proBNP Levels in Elderly Patients with Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis Authors: Mihai Strachinaru (m.strachinaru@erasmusmc.nl) Bas
More informationEchocardiographic changes after aortic valve replacement: Does the failure rate of mitral valve change? Original Article
Echocardiographic changes after aortic valve replacement: Does the failure rate of mitral valve change? Abstract Arezoo Khosravi (1), Hadi Sheykhloo (2), Reza Karbasi-Afshar (1), Amin Saburi (3) Original
More information2019 Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) Performance Measures
2019 Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) Performance Measures Description: This document contains the 18 performance measures approved by CMS for inclusion in the 2019 Qualified Clinical Data Registry
More informationAsymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis with Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Watchful Waiting or Valve Replacement?
CM&R Rapid Release. Published online ahead of print April 12, 2013 as Perspective Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis with Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Watchful Waiting or Valve Replacement? Larry E.
More informationMedical Policy and and and and
ARBenefits Approval: 10/12/2011 Effective Date: 01/01/2012 Revision Date: Code(s): 93799, Unlisted cardiovascular service or procedure Medical Policy Title: Percutaneous Transluminal Septal Myocardial
More informationECHO HAWAII. Role of Stress Echo in Valvular Heart Disease. Not only ischemia! Cardiomyopathy. Prosthetic Valve. Diastolic Dysfunction
Role of Stress Echo in Valvular Heart Disease ECHO HAWAII January 15 19, 2018 Kenya Kusunose, MD, PhD, FASE Tokushima University Hospital Japan Not only ischemia! Cardiomyopathy Prosthetic Valve Diastolic
More informationThe diagnostic role of stress echocardiography in women with coronary artery disease: evidence based review John R. McKeogh
The diagnostic role of stress echocardiography in women with coronary artery disease: evidence based review John R. McKeogh Key points 1) Coronary artery disease in women differs from men in several ways,
More informationA Surgeon s Perspective Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease Adapted from the 2006 ACC/AHA Guideline Revision
A Surgeon s Perspective Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease Adapted from the 2006 ACC/AHA Guideline Revision Prof. Pino Fundarò, MD Niguarda Hospital Milan, Italy Introduction
More informationand Coronary Artery Surgery George M. Callard, M.D., John B. Flege, Jr., M.D., and Joseph C. Todd, M.D.
Combined Valvular and Coronary Artery Surgery George M. Callard, M.D., John B. Flege, Jr., M.D., and Joseph C. Todd, M.D. ABSTRACT Between July, 97, and March, 975,45 patients underwent combined valvular
More informationComprehensive Echo Assessment of Aortic Stenosis
Comprehensive Echo Assessment of Aortic Stenosis Smonporn Boonyaratavej, MD, MSc King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital Bangkok, Thailand Management of Valvular AS Medical and interventional approaches to
More informationDoppler-echocardiographic findings in a patient with persisting right ventricular sinusoids
Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 1990 Doppler-echocardiographic findings in a patient with persisting right
More informationEffect of intravenous atropine on treadmill stress test results in patients with poor exercise capacity or chronotropic incompetence ABSTRACT
Effect of intravenous atropine on treadmill stress test results in patients with poor exercise capacity or chronotropic incompetence Samad Ghaffari, MD, Bahram Sohrabi, MD. ABSTRACT Objective: Exercise
More informationLeft Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure in Evaluating Left Ventricular Function
Clin. Cardiol. 4,28-33 (1981) 0 G. Witzstrock Publishing House, nc. Practitioner s Corner Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure in Evaluating Left Ventricular Function A. s. SKANDRAN, M.D., B. L. SEGAL,
More informationMichigan Society of Echocardiography 30 th Year Jubilee
Michigan Society of Echocardiography 30 th Year Jubilee Stress Echocardiography in Valvular Heart Disease Moving Beyond CAD Karthik Ananthasubramaniam, MD FRCP (Glas) FACC FASE FASNC Associate Professor
More informationLeft Ventricular Wall Resection for Aneurysm and Akinesia due to Coronary Artery Disease: Fifty Consecutive Patients
Left Ventricular Wall Resection for Aneurysm and Akinesia due to Coronary Artery Disease: Fifty Consecutive Patients Armand A. Lefemine, M.D., Rajagopalan Govindarajan, M.D., K. Ramaswamy, M.D., Harrison
More informationSevere left ventricular dysfunction and valvular heart disease: should we operate?
Severe left ventricular dysfunction and valvular heart disease: should we operate? Laurie SOULAT DUFOUR Hôpital Saint Antoine Service de cardiologie Pr A. COHEN JESFC 16 janvier 2016 Disclosure : No conflict
More informationIn a previous study of 113 patients with asymptomatic
Outcome of 622 Adults With Asymptomatic, Hemodynamically Significant Aortic Stenosis During Prolonged Follow-Up Patricia A. Pellikka, MD; Maurice E. Sarano, MD; Rick A. Nishimura, MD; Joseph F. Malouf,
More informationin Patients Having Aortic Valve Replacement John T. Santinga, M.D., Marvin M. Kirsh, M.D., Jairus D. Flora, Jr., Ph.D., and James F. Brymer, M.D.
Factors Relating to Late Sudden Death in Patients Having Aortic Valve Replacement John T. Santinga, M.D., Marvin M. Kirsh, M.D., Jairus D. Flora, Jr., Ph.D., and James F. Brymer, M.D. ABSTRACT The preoperative
More informationSevere Aortic Stenosis With Low Transvalvular Gradient and Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Severe Aortic Stenosis With Low Transvalvular Gradient and Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction Result of Aortic Valve Replacement in 52 Patients Heidi M. Connolly, MD; Jae K. Oh, MD; Hartzell V. Schaff,
More informationValvular Heart Disease
Valvular Heart Disease Roman M. Sniecinski, MD, FASE Associate Professor of Anesthesiology Emory University School of Medicine Learning Objectives Review the major pathophysiology of the most common heart
More informationWhat the Cardiologist needs to know from Medical Images
What the Cardiologist needs to know from Medical Images Gerald Maurer Department of Cardiology Medical University of Vienna What kinds of Cardiologists Plumbers Electricians Photographers And then there
More informationMitral Gradients and Frequency of Recurrence of Mitral Regurgitation After Ring Annuloplasty for Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation
Mitral Gradients and Frequency of Recurrence of Mitral Regurgitation After Ring Annuloplasty for Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Matthew L. Williams, MD, Mani A. Daneshmand, MD, James G. Jollis, MD, John
More informationCase Study 50 YEAR OLD MALE WITH UNSTABLE ANGINA
Case Study 50 YEAR OLD MALE WITH UNSTABLE ANGINA Case History A 50-year-old man with type 1 diabetes mellitus and hypertension presents after experiencing 1 hour of midsternal chest pain that began after
More informationPreoperative Parameters Predicting the Postoperative Course of Endoventricular Circular Patch Plasty
Original Article Preoperative Parameters Predicting the Postoperative Course of Endoventricular Circular Patch Plasty Keiichiro Kondo, MD, Yoshihide Sawada, MD, and Shinjiro Sasaki, MD, PhD It is necessary
More informationNomograms for severity of aortic valve stenosis using peak aortic valve pressure gradient and left ventricular ejection fraction
European Journal of Echocardiography (2009) 10, 532 536 doi:10.1093/ejechocard/jen333 Nomograms for severity of aortic valve stenosis using peak aortic valve pressure gradient and left ventricular ejection
More informationleft heart catheterization
DIAGNOSTIC METHODS VALVUIAR HEART DISEASE A new method to calculate aortic valve area without left heart catheterization DAVID C WARTH, MD, WILLIAM J STEWART, MD, PETER C BLOCK, MD, AND ARTHUR E WEYMAN,
More informationEffect of Heart Rate on Tissue Doppler Measures of E/E
Cardiology Department of Bangkok Metropolitan Administration Medical College and Vajira Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand Abstract Background: Our aim was to study the independent effect of heart rate (HR) on
More informationNon-invasive estimation of the mean pressure
Br Heart J 1986;56:45-4 Non-invasive estimation of the mean pressure difference in aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound DAG TEIEN, KJELL KARP, PETER ERIKSSON From the Departments of Clinical Physiology
More informationWhich Type of Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation Accompanying Mitral Valve Disease Should Be Surgically Treated?
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 19: 428 434 Online January 31, 2013 doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.12.01929 Original Article Which Type of Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation Accompanying Mitral Valve Disease Should
More informationAortic Stenosis in the Elderly: Difficulties for the Clinician. Are Symptoms Due to Aortic Stenosis?
Aortic Stenosis in the Elderly: Difficulties for the Clinician Are Symptoms Due to Aortic Stenosis? Raphael Rosenhek Department of Cardiology Medical University of Vienna No disclosure European Society
More information