WET-DRY STATUS OF TEXAS COUNTIES AS OF AUGUST 31, Indicates sale of mixed beverages is legal in all or part of county (70)

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "WET-DRY STATUS OF TEXAS COUNTIES AS OF AUGUST 31, Indicates sale of mixed beverages is legal in all or part of county (70)"

Dayna Sullivan
5 years ago
Views:

1 WET-DRY STATUS OF TEXAS COUNTIES AS OF AUGUST 31, Indicates sale of mixed beverages is legal in all or part of county (70) *Indicates counties totally wet for distilled spirits (34); All others dry in part ('73) COUNTIES IN WIDCH DISTILLED SPIRITS ARE LEGAL: 152 Anderson +*Aransas Archer Atascosa +*Austin +Bandera *Bastrop +*Bee +Bell +*Bexar +Blanco +*Brazos *Brewster Brown Burleson Burnet +Calhoun +*Cameron Carson Cass Castro Chambers Coleman +*Colorado +*Comal Comanche Cooke Crane *Culberson Dallam +Dallas +Denton +De Witt Dickens +Dimmit +Donley +*Duval Eastland +Ector Edwards +*EI Paso Falls Fannin +Fayette +*Fort Bend +Galveston Garza +Gillespie +Goliad Gonzales Gray Grayson Gregg +Grimes +Guadalupe Hardin +Harris Harrison Haskell +Hays Henderson +*Hidalgo Hill Howard +*Hudspeth Hunt Hutchinson Jackson Jasper Jeff Davis +Jefferson +*Jim Hogg +Jim Wells Karnes Kaufman +*Kendall Kenedy +Kerr King +*Kinney Lamar +La Salle +Lavaca Lee Liberty Live Oak +Llano +*Loving +Lubbock Marion +Matagorda +Maverick +McCulloch +McLennan McMullen +Medina Menard +Midland Milam Mills +Montgomery +*Moore Nacogdoches +Navarro Newton +Nueces Orange Palo Pinto Pecos +Polk +Potter +*Presidio Rains +Randall *Reagan Reeves Refugio Runnels San Augustine San Jacinto +San Patricio San Saba *Schleicher Shelby +*Starr Stonewall +*Sutton +Tarrant Taylor *Terrell +Titus Tom Green +Travis *Trinity Upshur *Upton Uvalde +Val Verde +Victoria +Walker Waller Ward +*Washington +*Webb +Wharton Wichita Willacy Williamson +*Wilson *Winkler +*Zapata Zavala -48

UNTIES IN WilleR ONLY 4% BEER IS LEGAL: 13 *Indicates entire county wet for 4% beer, others only in part Brazoria Ellis *Kimble Robertson oaks Frio *Kleberg Sabine caldwell Irion Mason Stephens

2 UNTIES IN WilleR ONLY 4% BEER IS LEGAL: 13 *Indicates entire county wet for 4% beer, others only in part Brazoria Ellis *Kimble Robertson oaks Frio *Kleberg Sabine caldwell Irion Mason Stephens Concho COUNTIES IN WHICR 14% BEVERAGES ARE LEGAL: 2 Limestone Somervell COUNTIES WHOLLY DRY: 87 Andrews Dawson Jack Real Angelina Deaf Smith Johnson Red River Armstrong Delta Jones Roberts Bailey Erath Kent Rockwall Baylor Fisher Knox Rusk Borden Floyd Lamb Scurry Bosque Foard Lampasas Shackelford Bowie Briscoe Franklin Freestone Leon Lipscomb Sherman Smith Callahan Gaines Lynn Sterling Camp Glasscock Madison Swisher Cherokee Hale Martin Terry Childress Hall Mitchell Throckmorton Clay Hamilton Montague Tyler Cochran Hansford Morris Van Zandt Coke Hardeman Motley Wheeler Collin Hartley Nolan Wilbarger Collingsworth Hemphill Ochiltree Wise Coryell Hockley Oldham Wood Cottle Hood Panola Yoakum Crockett Hopkins Parker Young Crosby Houston Parmer -49

LOCAL OPTION ELECTIONS There were twenty-nine local option elections during the fiscal year ending August 31, 1975.

3 LOCAL OPTION ELECTIONS There were twenty-nine local option elections during the fiscal year ending August 31, Eleven elections were called to legalize the sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only; eight remained "Dry" and three became "Wet". Two elections were calledto legalize the sale of beer for off-premise consumption only; one remained "Dry" and one became "Wet ll Two elections were called to legalize the sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only; one remained "Dryll andone became IIWet". One election was called to legalize the sale of allalcoholic beverages except mixed beverages' this area became "Wet". Two elections were called to legalize the sale of mixed beverages; one remained "Dry" and one became "Wet'. One electionwas called to legalize the sale of beer; this area became "Wet ll Six elections were called to legalize the sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages; three remained IIDry" and three became "Wet 'l One electionwas called to legalize the sale of beer and wine; this area became "Wet ll One election was called to prohibit the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages except mixed beverages; this area remained IIWet". One election was called to prohibit the legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption only; this area remained "WetII. One electionwas calledto prohibit the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages; this area remained "Wet". The voting for the fiscal year: BURNET COUNTY Justice Precinct No.1, Burnet County on June 26, 1975 voted 403 "For prohibiting the legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption only" and 826 "Against prohibiting the legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption only." Justice Precinct No. 1 was "Wet" for the legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption only before the election was held and remained "Wet". COLEMAN COUNTY Justice Precinct No.1, Coleman County on May 5, 1975 voted 389 II For prohibiting the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages except mixed beverages II and 615 l'against prohibiting the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages except mixedbeverages. II Justice PrecinctNo.1 was IIWet ll for the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages except mixed beverages before the election was held and remained "Wet ll. -50

4 lawson COUNTY J'ustice Precinct No.3, Dawson County on March 7, 1975 voted 53 For the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only" and 11 7 "Against the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only. 11 Justice Precinct No. 3 was "Dry" before the election was held and remained 'IDry". GAINES COUNTY Justice Precinct No.4, Gaines County on August 13, 1975 voted 37 IIFor the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only" and 78 II Against the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only." Justice Precinct No. 4 was IIDry II before the election was held and remained IIDry". HAYS COUNTY Justice PrecinctNo. 4, Hays Countyon May 24, 1975 voted 257 "For the legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only" and 342 IIAgainst the legal sale of beer andwine for off-premise consumption only." Justice Precinct No. 4 was lidryll before the election was held and remained II Dryll. HEMPHILL COUNTY Justice Precinct No.1, Hemphill County on April 5, 1975 voted 75 "For the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption onlyll and 121 IIAgainst the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only." Justice Precinct No.1 was IIDry11 before the election was held and remained "Dry". HENDERSON COUNTY Incorporated City of Berryville, Henderson County on September 7, 1974 voted 64 "For the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for offpremise consumptiononly" and 59 "Against the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only. 11 Berryville was "Wet" for the sale of beer for off-premise consumption only before the election was held and became "Wet ll for the sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only. - 51

5 LLANO COUNTY Justice Precinct No.6, Llano County on February 8, 1975 voted 105 II For the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages 11 and 8 II Against the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages. II Justice PrecinctNo. 6 was "Dry'l before the election was held and became I1Wet l1 for the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages. MARTIN COUNTY Justice PrecinctNo. 2, Martin County on November 5, 1974 voted 105 II For the legal sale of mixed beverages II and 202 II Against the legal sale of mixed beverages. II Justice Precinct No. 2 was I1Dry" before the election was held and remained IlDryll. MITCHELL COUNTY Justice Precinct No.2, Mitchell County on July 8, 1975 voted 142 "For the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages ll and 292 I1Against the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages. II Justice Precinct No. 2 was I1Dry l1 before the election was held and remained 11 Dry l1 MONTGOMERY COUNTY Justice Precinct No.2, Montgomery Countyon February 8, 1975 voted 621 II For the legal sale of all alcoholicbeverages including mixed beveraqes l1 and 760 l'against the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages. II Justice Precinct No. 2 was "Dry" before the election was held and remained "Dry". NAVARRO COUNTY Town of Angus, Navarro County on August 9, 1975 voted 44 I1For the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumptiononly" and 42 II Against the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only. II The Townof Angus was IlDry ll before the election was held and became II WetII for the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only. City of Mustang, Navarro County on March 25, 1975 voted 20 "For the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages I and 0 11 Against the legal sale of all alcoholicbeverages including mixed beverages. II City of Mustang was IIWet" for beer for off-premise consumption only before the election was held and became "Wet" for the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages. - 52

l'-njeces COUNTY Justice Precinct No.6, Nueces County on August 12, 1975 voted 940 IIFor prohibiting the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including ml"'(ed beverages!

6 l'-njeces COUNTY Justice Precinct No.6, Nueces County on August 12, 1975 voted 940 IIFor prohibiting the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including ml"'(ed beverages!i and 1, 220 If Against prohibiting the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages. 11 Justice Precinct No.6 was "Wet" for the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages before the election was held and remained IIWet li ORANGE COUNTY Incorporated City of Rose City, Orange County on November 9, 1974 voted 98 II For the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only ll and Against the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only. II Rose Citywas "Dryl! before the election was held and remained IT Dryll. FOLK COUNTY Justice Precinct No.1, Polk County on April 5, 1975 voted 429 IIFor the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption onlyll and 658 "Against the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only. II Justice Precinct No. 1 was "Dry" before the election was held and remained :1 Dry". Justice Precinct No.2, Polk County on February 8, 1975 voted 502 lifor the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption onlyl1 and 637 If Against the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only. II Justice Precinct No. 2 was "Dryll before the election was held and remained II Dryll. Incorporated Town of Seven Oaks, Polk County on March 8, 1975 voted 47 IIFor the legal sale of mixed beverages lr and 9 :'Against the legal sale of mixed beverages. It Incorporated Town of Seven Oaks was "Dry" before the election was held and became li'ialet ll for the legal sale of mixed beverages. RUNNELS COUNTY Justice Precinct No.6, Runnels County on November 11, 1974 voted 218 II For the legal sale of beer II and 81 II Against the legal s ale of beer. 11 Justice Precinct No. 6 was IlDryll before the election was held and became IlWet ll for the legal sale of beer. - 53

7 SAN JACINTO COUNTY Justice Precinct No.7, San Jacinto Countyon October 5, 1974 voted 54 IIFor the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption onlyll and 162 "Against the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only. 11 Justice Precinct No. 7 was I!Dryl! before the election was held and remained I! Dryl!. SAN PATRICIO OJ UNTY Justice Precinct No.8, San Patricio County on March 1, 1975 voted 376 II For the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption onlyll and 243 II Against the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only. II Justice Precinct No. 8 was IIDry!l before the electionwas held andbecame!iwet l1 for the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only. City of Odem, San Patricio County on January 4, 1975voted 170 II For the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only!i and 272 II Against the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only.!i City of Odem was!idry!l before the election was held and remained!idry'l. TITUS COUNTY Incorporated City of Monticello, Titus County on May 6, 1975 voted 14 II For the legal sale of all alcoholicbeverages including mixed beverages!l and 0!IAgainst the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages.!i Monticello was I!Wet" for the legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption and became!iwet" for the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages after the election was held. TRAVIS COUNTY Justice PrecinctNo. 1, Travis County on June 7, 1975 voted 366 "For the legal sale of beer and wine 11 and 191 IIAgainstthe legal sale of beer andwine.!i Justice PrecinctNo. 1 was IIDrylt before the election was held and became "Wet" for the legal sale of beer and wine. - 54

'ALOE COUNTY Incorporated City of Sabinal, Uvalde County on September 7, 1974 1Dted 149 "For the legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption llil!

8 'ALOE COUNTY Incorporated City of Sabinal, Uvalde County on September 7, Dted 149 "For the legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption llil!y" and 131 "'Against the legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption only." sabinal was "Dry" before the election was held and became "wet" for the legal sale of beerfor off-premise consumption only. Town of Riverside, Walker County onnovember 9, 1974 voted 25 "For the legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption only" and 59 "Against the legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption only. 11 Riverside was IlDryl1 before the election was held and remained lidry". WILLACY OOUNTY City of Lyford, Willacy County on November 5, 1974 voted 135 "For the legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only" and 103 "Against the legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumptiononly. II Lyford was HDryll before the electionwas held and became "Wetll for the sale of beer for off-premise consumption only. Justice Precinct No.6, Willacy County on November 5, 1974 voted 67 "For the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages" and 136 "Against the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages." Justice Precinct No. 6 was "Dryt' before the election was held and remained "Dryll. SON COUNTY City of cedar Park, Williamson County on November 9, 1974 voted 111 "For the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages except mixed beverages" and 64 "Against the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages except mixed beverages. II Cedar Park was "Wel ll for beer only before the election was held and became "Wet" for all alcoholic beverages except mixed beverages. -55

UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company PPBP (is the PPO)

UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company PPBP (is the PPO) Texas County Acute Inpatient Hospital Pharmacies Health Care Providers (includes all other provider types) Anderson Met Met Met Andrews Met Met Not