Hami lton Carson Hardin Cass +Harris Castro Harrison Chambers Haskell Childress +Hays Coleman Henderson Co 11 in +*Hida1go *Colorado Hi 11 +*Comal

Transcription

1 -93. WET-DRY STATUS OF TEXAS COUNTIES AS OF AUGUST 31, Indicates sale of mixed beverages is legal in all or part of county (86) Indicates counties totally wet for distilled spirits (36); All others dry in part (71) NTIES IN WHICH DISTILLED SPIRITS ARE LEGAL: Anderson +Donley 'Aransas +*Duval Archer Eastland Atascosa +Ector IAusti n Edwards Bandera +*El Paso *Bastrop +Falls Bee Fannin Bell +Fayette Bexar +*Fort Bend +Bl anco +Frio Bosque +Gal veston +Brazoria Garza Brazos +Gillespie *Brewster +Goliad Brown Gonzales Burleson Gray +Burnet Grayson Ca1houn Gregg Callahan +Grimes Cameron +Guadalupe +Camp Hami lton Carson Hardin Cass +Harris Castro Harrison Chambers Haskell Childress +Hays Coleman Henderson Co 11 in +*Hida1go *Colorado Hi 11 +*Comal Hood Comanche Howard Cooke +*Hudspeth Crane Hunt *Cul berson Hutchinson Dall am +Jackson +Oa 11 as Jasper +Denton Jeff Davis +DeWitt +Jefferson Dickens +*Jim Hogg +Oimmi t +J im Well s *Karnes Kaufman +*Kendall Kenedy +Kerr Kimble King +*Kinney +Kleberg +Lamar +La Salle +Lavaca Lee Leon Liberty Live Oak +Ll ana +*loving +Lubbock Marion +Matagorda +Maveri ck +McCulloch +McLennan +Medina Menard +Mid1and Milam Mills +Montgomery +*Moore Nacogdoches +Navarro Newton Nolan +Nueces +Orange Palo Pi nto Pecos +Po1k +Potter +*Presidio 166 Rains +Randall *Reagan Red River +Reeves Refugio Robertson Runnels San Augustine San Jaci nto +San Patricio San Saba *Schleicher Shelby +*Starr Stonewa11 +*Sutton +Tarrant +Taylor *Terrell +Titus Tom Green +*Travis *Trinity Upshur *Upton Uvalde +Val Verde +Victoria +Walker +Wa 11 er Ward +*Washington +*Webb +Wharton Wi chita +Willacy +Wi 11 i amson +*Wi1son *Winkler +*Zapata +Zavala

2 COUNTIES IN WHICH ONLY 4% BEER IS LEGAL: 11 *Indicates entire county wet for 4% beer, others only in part Baylor Concho Mason Stephens *Brooks Hartley McMullen Wise Caldwell Irion Sabine COUNTIES IN WHICH 14% BEVERAGES ARE LEGAL: 3 Ell is Limestone Somervell COUNTIES WHOLLY DRY: 74 Andrews Erath Angelina Fisher Armstrong Floyd Bail ey Foard Borden Franklin Bowie Freestone Briscoe Gaines Cherokee Glasscock Clay Hale Cochran Hall Coke Hansford Co 11 i ngsworth Hardeman Corye 11 Hemphi 11 Cottle Hockl ey Crockett Hopkins Crosby Houston Dawson Jack Deaf Smith Johnson Delta Jones Kent Knox Lamb Lampasas Lipscomb Lynn Madison Mart in Mitchell Montague Morri s Motley Ochi ltree Oldham Panola Parker Parmer Real Roberts Rockwa 11 Rusk Scurry Shackelford Sherman Smith Sterl i ng Swisher Terry Throckmorton Tyl er Van Zandt Wheeler Wil barger \~ood Yoakum Young

3 -95 LOCAL OPTION ELECTIONS forty-six local option elections during the fiscal year gust 31, Nineteen elections were called to the sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise on onlyi seven became "wet" and twelve remained "dry." 10ns were called to legalize the sale of mixed. two became "wet" and two remained "dry." Seven were called to legalize the sale of alcoholic beverages mixed beverages. four became "wet" and three remai ned One election was called to legalize the sale of all c beverages except mi xed beverages; one became "wet." Ten 5 were called to 1ega1i ze the sale of beer and wi ne for se consumption only. four became "wet" and six remained Three elections were called to legalize the sale of beer premise consumption only; two remained "dry" and one wet." Two elections \'1ere called to legalize the sale of d wine. two remained "dry." year: of Nash, Bowie County, on April 11, 1981, voted 246 for "the sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only" and against "the legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise liiiption only." City of Nash was "dry" before the election was d and remai ned "dry." inct No.5, Chambers County, on June 6, 1981, voted 123 for e legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise 5umption only" and 201 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic verages for off-premise consumption only." Precinct No.5 was Idry" before the election was held and remained "dry." City of Melissa, Collin County, on February 10, 1981, voted 125 for consumption only" and 133 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only." City of Melissa was 'dry" before the election was held and remained "dry."

4 -96 City of Melissa, Collin County, on May 9, 1981, voted 149 for "th legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only" an 142 against lithe legal sale of beer and wine for off-prem1s consumption only. II City of Mel i ssa was "dry" before the elect1o ' was held and became "wet" for the legal sale of beer and wine fo off-premise consumption only. Precinct No.5, Collin County, on June 6, 1981, voted 7,629 for "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages" and 8,736 against lithe legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages." Precinct No. 5 was "dry before the election was held and remained "dry." DENTON COUNTY City of The Co 1any, Denton County, on November 8, 1980, voted 1,082 for "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages" and 813 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages." City of The Colony was "dry" before the election was held and became "wet" for the 1ega1 sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages. DEWITI COUNTY Precinct No.6, DeWitt County, on November 12, 1980, voted 149 for "the legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption only" and 56 against lithe legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption only." Precinct No.6 was "dry" before the election was held and became "wet" for the legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption only. DONLEY COUNTY City of Howardwick, Donley County, on July 13, 1981, voted 78 for lithe legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages ll and 43 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages i ncl udi ng mi xed beverages. II Ci ty of Howardwi ck was "dry" before the election was held and became "wet ll for the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages. EASTLAND COUNTY Precinct No.1, Eastland County, on June 6, 1981, voted 456 for lithe legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only" and 910 against lithe legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption on1y.1i Precinct No.1 was IIdry" before the election was held and remained IIdry."

5 -97 COUNTY of Crowell, Foard County, on October 4, 1980, voted 322 for legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise &JDption only" and 665 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic ages for off-premise consumption only." City of Crowell was before the election was held and remained lidry." Y of Pottsboro, Grayson County, on March 7, 1981, voted 210 for ~e legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption only" and 227 lainst "the legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption only." 1ty of Pottsboro was "dry" before the election was held and ined "dry." tyof Pottsboro, Grayson County, on May 16, 1981, voted 175 for the legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption onlyll nd 267 against "the legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise onsumption only." City of Pottsboro was "dry" before the lection was held and remained "dry." City of Navasota, Grimes County, on November 8, 1980, voted 579 for "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages" and 310 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages." City of Navasota was "dry" before the election was held and became "wet" for the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages. HALL COUNTY City of Turkey, Hall County, on December 5, 1980, voted 136 for consumption only" and 211 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only.1i City of Turkey was "dry" before the election was held and remained IIdry." HENDERSON COUNTY City of Caney, Henderson County, on December 6, 1980, voted 19 for lithe legal sale of mixed beverages II and 46 against lithe legal sale of mixed beverages." City of Caney was IIdry" before the election was held and remained "dry.1i

6 -98 City of Seven Points, Henderson County, on August 8, 1981, voted 200 for "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages except mixed beverages" and 44 against ~the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages except mi xed beverages. II Ci ty of Seven Poi nts was "dry" before the election was held and became "wet" for the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages except mixed beverages. City of Tool, Henderson County, on August 8, 1981, voted 337 for lithe legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only and 270 against lithe legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only.1i City of Tool was "dryll before the election was held and became "wet" for the legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only. HILL COUNTY City of Itasca, Hill County, on October 4, 1980, voted 301 for "the legal sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only" and 304 against "the legal sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only.1i City of Itasca was "dry" before the election was held and remained "dry.1i HUNT COUNTY City of Lone Oak, Hunt County, on November 6, 1980, voted 62 for "the legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only" and 143 against lithe legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only. II City of Lone Oak was IId ry ll before the election was held and remained "dry." HUTCHINSON COUNTY Precinct No.9, Hutchinson County, on March 31, 1981, voted 6 for consumption on1y ll and 20 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only." Precinct No.9 was IIdry" before the election was held and remained "dry." JACKSON COUNTY Precinct No.2, Jackson County, on October 6, 1980, voted 290 for "the legal sale of mixed beverages II and 149 against "the legal sale of mixed beverages." Precinct No.2 was "dry" before the electi on was held and became "wet" for the 1ega1 sale of mi xed beverages.

7 -99 Precinct No.1, Jackson County, on October 6, 1980, voted 403 for "the legal sale of mixed beverages" and 436 against "the legal sale of mixed beverages." Precinct No. 1 was Udry" before the election was held and remained "dry." Precinct No.4, Jackson County, on August 22, 1981, voted 148 for "the legal sale of beer and wine" and 218 against "the legal sale of beer and wine." Precinct No.4 was "dry" before the election was held and remained "dry." JEFF DAVIS COUNTY Precinct No.3, Jeff Davis County, on June 5, 1981, voted 42 for "the legal sale of beer and wine" and 108 against "the legal sale of beer and wi nee " Preci nct No. 3 was "dry" before the election was held and remained "dry." JOHNSON COUNTY City of Venus, Johnson County, on March 7, 1981, voted 93 for "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only" and 134 against "the legal sale of all alcohol ic beverages for off-premise consumption only." City of Venus was "dry" before the election was held and remained "dry." City of Rio Vista, Johnson County, on March 28, 1981, voted 76 for "the legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only" and 113 agai nst "the 1egal sal e of beer and wi ne for off-premise consumption only.1i City of Rio Vista was "dry" before the election was held and remained IIdry." City of Rio Vista, Johnson County, on August 29, 1981, voted 59 for "the legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption only" and 114 against "the legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption only." City of Rio Vista was "dryll before the election was held and remained "dry." KL EBE RG COUNTY Precinct No. I, Kleberg County, on February 7, 1981, voted 225 for "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages ll and 246 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages." Precinct No.1 was "dry" before the election was held and remained IIdry."

8 100 LEON COUNTY City of Jewett. Leon County. on February voted 153 for consumption only" and 152 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premi se consumpt i on only." Ci ty of Jewett was "dry" before the election was held and became "wet" for the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only. LLANO COUNTY City of Sunrise Beach Village, Llano County, on September voted 96 for "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only" and 87 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only." City of Sunrise Beach Village was "dry" before the election was held and became "wet" for the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only. MARION COUNTY Precinct No.2. Marion County. on September , voted 204 for "the legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only" and 286 against "the legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only." Precinct No.2 was "dry" before the election was held and remained "dry." City of Jefferson, Marion County. on June voted 534 for consumption only" and 273 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premi se consumpt i on only." City of Jefferson was "dry" before the election was held and became "wet" for the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only. NAVARRO COUNTY Precinct No Navarro County, on February 7, voted 76 for "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages" and 111 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages." Precinct No. 107 was "dry" before the election was held and remained "dry." City of Ri ceo Navarro County. on August 8, voted 109 for consumption only" and 100 against "the legal sale of all alcohol ic beverages for off-premise consumption only." City of Rice was "dry" before the election was held and became "wet" for the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only.

9 -101 COUNTY of Driscoll, Nueces County, on June 30, 1981, voted 93 for egal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only" 6 against "the legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise ption only.1i City of Driscoll was IId ryll before the election eld and became II wet ll for the legal sale of beer and wine for emise consumption only. net No.1, Polk County, on May 9, 1981, voted 536 for lithe 1 sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption and 660 against lithe legal sale of all alcoholic beverages off-premise consumption only." Precinct No. 1 was "dry" e the election was held and remained "dry." 1nct No.3, Real County, on January 3, 1981, voted 86 for "the 1 sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption and 158 against "the 1egal sal e of all al cohol ic beverages off-premise consumption only." Precinct No. 3 was "dry" 'ore the election was held and remained "dry." ~ of Annona, Red River County, on December 6, 1980, voted 173 sumption only" and 69 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic erages for off- premi se consumption only." City of Annona was 1" before the election was held and became "wet" for the legal le of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only. eeinct No.3, Roberts County, on March 7, voted 36 for he legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise sumption only" and III against "the legal sale of all alcoholic verages for off-premise consumption only." Precinct No.3 was dry" before the election was held and remained "dry." County, on May , voted 215 for he legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise nsumption only" and 172 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic everages for off-premise consumption only." Precinct No.5 was dry" before the election was held and became II wet 11 for the legal ale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only.

10 -102 SAN PATRICIO COUNTY City of Portland, San Patricio County, on June 6, 1981, voted 742 for lithe legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption onlyll and 689 against lithe legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off- premi se consumpt i on only. II City of Portland was "d ry ll before the election was held and became II wet li for the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only. TARRANT COUNTY City of Bedford, Tarrant County, on December 30, 1980, voted 1,435 for lithe legal sale of mixed beverages II and 848 against tithe legal sale of mixed beverages. 1I City of Bedford was "dry" before the election was held and became "wet" for the legal sale of mixed beverages. City of Everman, Tarrant County, on June 6, 1981, voted 617 for "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages" and 398 against lithe legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages." City of Everman was "dryll b~fore the election was held and became "wet ll for the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages. TERRY COUNTY City of Brownfield, Terry County, on October , voted 953 for lithe legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only" and 1,770 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only.1i City of Brownfield was II dry II before the election was held and remained "dry. II WALKER COUNTY City of Huntsville. Walker County, on August 8, 1981, voted 326 for lithe legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only" and 264 against lithe legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only.1i City of Huntsville was "dryll before the election was held and became II wet li for the legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only. WILLACY COUNTY Precinct No.5, Willacy County, on November 8, 1980, voted 95 for "the legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only" and 121 aga i nst "the 1ega1 sa1e of beer and wi ne for off-premi se consumption only." Precinct No. 5 was "dry ll before the election was held and remained "dry."