False-Positive Elevations of Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Patients With a History of Resected Colorectal Cancer
|
|
- Francine Casey
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Original Article 907 False-Positive Elevations of Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Patients With a History of Resected Colorectal Cancer Anya Litvak, MD a ; Andrea Cercek, MD a ; Neil Segal, MD, PhD a ; Diane Reidy-Lagunes, MD a ; Zsofia K. Stadler, MD a ; Rona D. Yaeger, MD a ; Nancy E. Kemeny, MD a ; Martin R. Weiser, MD b ; Melissa S. Pessin, MD, PhD c ; and Leonard Saltz, MD a Abstract Routine monitoring of carcinoembryonic antigen (A) levels is standard in patients with resected colorectal cancer (CRC). The incidence of false-positives and the upper limits of false-positive elevations have not been previously well characterized. A search of medical records at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center identified 728 patients who underwent an R0 resection of locoregional CRC between January 2003 and December 2012 and who had an increase in A level above the normal range after a normal perioperative A level. Of these, 358 had a false-positive elevation of A level, 335 had a truepositive elevation indicative of recurrent CRC, and 35 had a truepositive elevation indicative of the development of a new, non-crc malignancy. Of those with false elevations, 111 had a single isolated A level elevation (median highest A level of 5.5 ng/ml) with no further abnormal measurements, whereas 247 had elevations on 2 or more readings, with a median highest level of 6.7 ng/ml. Of these 247 patients with confirmed false-positive A level elevations, only 5 (2%) had measurements greater than 15 ng/ml, and no confirmed elevation greater than 35 ng/ml was a false-positive. False-positive A test results in the range of 5 to 15 ng/ml are common. Confirmation of A elevation in this range before initiating imaging studies may be appropriate. False-positive results greater than 15 ng/ml are rare, and all confirmed A levels greater than 35 ng/ml were associated with cancer recurrence. (J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2014;12: ) NCCN: Continuing Education Accreditation Statement This activity has been designated to meet the educational needs of physicians and nurses involved in the management of patients with cancer. There is no fee for this article. No commercial support was received for this article. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians. NCCN designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s). Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. NCCN is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center`s Commission on Accreditation. This activity is accredited for 1.0 contact hour. Accreditation as a provider refers to recognition of educational activities only; accredited status does not imply endorsement by NCCN or ANCC of any commercial products discussed/displayed in conjunction with the educational activity. Kristina M. Gregory, RN, MSN, OCN, is our nurse planner for this educational activity. All clinicians completing this activity will be issued a certificate of participation. To participate in this journal activity: 1) review the learning objectives and author disclosures; 2) study the education content; 3) take the posttest with a 66% minimum passing score and complete the evaluation at node/46923; and 4) view/print certificate. Release date: June 16, 2014; Expiration date: June 16, 2015 From the a Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, b Department of Surgery, and c Department of Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Submitted October 21, 2013; accepted for publication January 6, The authors have disclosed that they have no financial interests, arrangements, affiliations, or commercial interests with the manufacturers of any products discussed in this article or their competitors. Correspondence: Leonard Saltz, MD, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East 66th Street, Room 1049, New York, NY saltzl@mskcc.org EDITOR Kerrin M. Green, MA, Assistant Managing Editor, JNCCN Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Ms. Green has disclosed that she has no relevant financial relationships. AUTHORS Deborah J. Moonan, RN, BSN, Director, Continuing Education & Grants Ms. Moonan has disclosed that she has no relevant financial relationships. Ann Gianola, MA, Manager, Continuing Education & Grants Ms. Gianola has disclosed that she has no relevant financial relationships. Kristina M. Gregory, RN, MSN, OCN, Vice President, Clinical Information Operations Ms. Gregory has disclosed that she has no relevant financial relationships.
2 908 Litvak et al Learning Objectives Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to: Recognize the high incidence of false-positive elevations of A in patients with a history of resected CRC Identify a level of A elevation that would indicate the need for imaging and diagnostic evaluations for possible recurrent disease Discuss some of the possible effects of false-positive A elevation in patients with resected CRC In 1965, Gold and Freedman 1,2 discovered an oncofetal antigen expressed in human fetal colonic tissues and in colonic carcinomas, which they named carcinoembryonic antigen (A). In 1969, Thomson et al 3 developed a radioimmunoassay technique that could detect A in the serum. Later, A was found to be a glycosylphosphatidylinositol cell surface anchored glycoprotein that serves as a functional colon carcinoma ligand of the cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) L-selectin and E-selectin. 4,5 Since shortly after its discovery, A level has been widely used as a surveillance tool in patients after curative-intent resection of a colorectal cancer (CRC) primary. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Colon Cancer recommend routine monitoring of A levels every 3 to 6 months (to view the most recent version of these guidelines, visit NCCN.org). 6 Abnormal elevations in A levels (>5 ng/ml in most assays) are regarded by physicians as concerning for possible recurrent disease, and are used as a basis for initiating more-intensive imaging and other diagnostic evaluations. It is well-known that false-positive A elevations occur, defined as elevations in A not associated with active cancer. The frequency and range of these false-positives have not been well characterized, however, and have not been examined extensively in the era of modern high-quality imaging. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and range of false-positive elevations of A in patients with a history of resected stage I, II, or III CRC and to identify a maximum level of falsepositive A elevation. Patients and Methods Electronic medical records at Memorial Sloan- Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) were searched using a proprietary search engine. Patients were identified who underwent resection of locoregional colon or rectal cancer from January 2003 through December 2012 who had a normal perioperative A level of 5 ng/ml or less and then subsequently developed a A elevation higher than normal range. Charts were then manually reviewed to confirm that patients had either stage I, II, or III CRC, an R0 resection, and no other active, clinically relevant malignancies at the time of resection. Data were collected to identify the A level at the time of diagnosis, surgery date, resection margin status, perioperative A nadir, time of first elevated postoperative A level, highest postoperative A measurement, and disease status at last follow-up. The maximum level of A attained and the identification, or lack thereof, of a recurrence of malignancy, or development of a new malignancy, was determined. Radiographic imaging reports were reviewed and a definitive diagnosis of recurrence was established based on the appearance of new lesions on CT scan and/or PET scan imaging thought to be indicative of recurrence, and/or histologic confirmation of recurrence through biopsy. For the purposes of this analysis, a false-positive was described as a A level higher than the upper range of normal (ie, 5.1 ng/ml) with no evidence of cancer on either imaging studies or other diagnostic procedures, with either follow-up of (1) at least 1 year since the first abnormal A or (2) abnormal A elevations followed by spontaneous normalization, with at least 2 consecutive subsequent normal A measurements in the absence of a therapeutic intervention. Because this was a retrospective review, practice patterns and the frequency of A sampling varied. The general practice for surveillance of patients with CRC who had definitive colorectal resection at MSKCC during the study period was to monitor serum A levels at 3- to 6-month intervals for approximately 5 years after resection. Diagnostic imaging, most frequently with CT scans, was typically performed at a minimum of every 12 months for a total of 5 years, or more frequently if symptoms developed or A levels were found to be elevated. Colonoscopy was typically performed at 1 year from the date of surgery (or 6 months from surgery if complete colonoscopy had not been performed preoperatively), and then repeated every 3 to 5 years unless advanced adenomas were detected. PET/CT scans
3 909 False-Positive A Elevations were not routinely used unless a questionable lesion on CT scan warranted further evaluation. All A levels were determined using a commercially available assay through the MSKCC laboratories. The A assay used was a Tosoh AIA-2000 automated analyzer (Tosoh Bioscience, Inc., South San Francisco, CA). The assay is a 2-site immunoenzymometric assay that uses a A-directed monoclonal antibody immobilized on a magnetic solid phase and a second enzyme-labeled A-directed monoclonal antibody. After the magnetic beads are washed to remove unbound enzyme-labeled antibody, a fluorogenic substrate is added and the resulting fluorescence is proportional to the amount of A in the sample. The reference range for this assay is 0 to 5.0 ng/ml. Results Patient Characteristics A total of 805 patients were identified who underwent R0 resection for stage I III CRC with a normal perioperative A level who subsequently had at least one abnormal A measurement. Of these patients, 77 were excluded: 11 had noncolorectal malignancies at the time of resection, which could potentially elevate the A level; 38 were lost to follow-up or died within 1 year of first elevated A level without identification of a source (peak A range, ng/ml); and 27 were excluded because less than 1 year had elapsed since the first elevated A level until time of data cutoff, with persistence of A elevation without identification of a source (peak A range, ng/ml). The remaining patient was excluded as indeterminate, because recurrent disease was strongly suspected but not verified; this patient had known cirrhosis and resected T3,N2 colon cancer with normal perioperative A level. He then had an increase in his A level up to 24 ng/ml at 8 months after resection and died in hospice 6 months later with tense ascites. Of the 728 evaluable patients, 358 patients (49%) were determined to have had a false-positive A elevation without evidence of recurrent cancer, 335 patients (46%) had a true-positive A elevation indicative of recurrent CRC, and 35 patients (5%) had a true-positive A elevation indicative of the development of a new noncolorectal malignancy. Of the 335 patients who developed documented CRC relapse and A elevation (true-positives), the median lowest normal perioperative A level recorded was 2.9 ng/ml (range, ng/ml). The 35 patients who developed a A elevation while under surveillance were found to have developed a noncolorectal A-producing malignancy, accounting for their elevated postoperative A level. Of these, 12 patients developed lung cancer, 6 developed prostate cancer, 5 developed breast cancer, 5 developed a noncolorectal gastrointestinal malignancy, 3 developed bladder cancer, 2 developed thyroid cancer, 1 developed thymic cancer, and 1 developed endometrial cancer. In these 35 patients, the median peak A level after colorectal resection was 9.5 ng/ml, the median interval from time of colorectal resection to time of first elevated A level was 1.6 years, and the median time to diagnosis of second malignancy was 2.5 years. Among the 358 patients with false-positive A elevations, the median follow-up time from definitive colorectal resection to last contact was 4.2 years (range, years), and the median follow-up time from first elevated postoperative A level to last contact was 2.9 years (range, years). The median lowest perioperative serum A level was 3.8 ng/ml (range, ng/ml) and the median peak A level during surveillance was 6.3 ng/ml (range, ng/ml). Also among the 358 patients with false-positive A elevations, 111 had only a single elevated A measurement, followed by spontaneous normalization with at least 2 consecutive subsequent A mearurements. The median peak A level in this group was 5.5 ng/ml (range, ng/ml). Of these 111 patients, the peak A level was between 5.1 and 10.0 ng/ml in 104 patients (93%), between 10.1 and 15.0 ng/ml in 3 patients (3%), between 5.1 and 20.1 ng/ml in 1 patient (1%), between 25.1 and 30.0 ng/ml in 1 patient (1%), and between 40.1 and 50.0 ng/ml in 2 patients (2%). A total of 247 patients had A elevations documented on 2 or more readings (Table 1). The median peak A level during surveillance for these patients with confirmed elevations was 6.7 ng/ml (range, ng/ml). Among these 247 patients, the peak A level was between 5.1 and 10.0 ng/ml in 224 patients (91%), between 10.1 and 15.0 ng/ml in 18 patients (7%), between 15.1 and 20.0 ng/ml in 2 patients (1%), between 20.1 and 30.0 ng/ml in 1 patient (0.4%), and between 30.1 and 35.0 ng/ml
4 910 Litvak et al Table 1 Range of Highest A Levels Recorded During Postoperative Surveillance Peak A (ng/ml) Patients Without Recurrence and 2 Elevated Postoperative A Levels (N=247) Patients Without Recurrence and One-Time Elevation in A Level (N=111) Patients With Recurrence (N=335) Patients With A-Producing Noncolorectal Malignancy (N=35) (90.7%) 104 (93.7%) 79 (24%) 19 (54%) (7.3%) 3 (2.7%) 35 (11%) 1 (3%) (0.8%) 1 (0.9%) 21 (6%) 2 (6%) (0.4%) 0 (0%) 23 (7%) 5 (14%) (0.4%) 1 (0.9%) 24 (7%) 1 (3%) (0.4%) 0 (0%) 153 (46%) 7 (21%) (0%) 2 (1.8%) 145 (43%) 7 (21%) 99 Patients With Malignancy (%) Abbreviation: A, carcinoembryonic antigen. in 1 patient (0.4%). No confirmed A elevation greater than 35.0 ng/ml was a false-positive. Table 2 shows the false-positive rates of at least 2 elevated postoperative A levels based on A cutoffs. Test Performance Analysis Because negative results (A level 5 ng/ml) were not obtained for this study, these were modeled using the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. A cutoff of 10 ng/ml was used because the data necessary for this calculation were available from both the assay package insert (Tosoh) and the current study (MSKCC). The calculation was as follows: Sensitivity (Tosoh) at 10 ng/ml: 0.40 Specificity (Tosoh) at 10 ng/ml: 0.98 True-positives (MSKCC) at 10 ng/ml: 272 False-positives (MSKCC) at 10 ng/ml: 23 False-negatives=true-positives*[1-sensitivity]/ sensitivity=272[ ]/0.40 = 408 True-negatives=specificity*false-positives/ [1-specificity] = 0.98*23/[ ] = 1127 Based on these results, the values at other cutoff points could be determined and a resulting receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve could be generated (Figure 1). Compared with the package insert, the assay did not perform as well in patients from MSKCC, because the area under the curve is 0.76 for the Tosoh data and 0.67 for the MSKCC data. However, the optimum cutoff would be at a similar point: 7.9 ng/ml for MSKCC (sensitivity, 0.44 and specificity, 0.95) and 8.0 ng/ml for Tosoh (sensitivity, 0.54 and specificity, 0.90). At the cutoff of 5.0 ng/ml used at MSKCC, the sensitivity is 0.54 and the specificity is To better illustrate the difficulty in choosing an appropriate cutoff and why many false-positive results occur at a decision point of 5.0 ng/ml, the number of results at each A level was graphed for the patients with and without cancer (Figure 2). The data presented at levels greater than 5.0 ng/ml are the actual results, whereas the data appearing for levels less than 5.0 ng/ml are modeled. This analysis shows that actually more false-positives than true-positives occur at A levels up to approximately 10 ng/ml. Discussion The role of A in monitoring in the care of patients with resected CRC continues to evolve. Earlier efforts in the 1970s and 1980s were focused on attempts to use A to identify recurrent disease before it was evident on diagnostic imaging studies. During this period, serious consideration of A-directed second-look operations was advocated, with the hope that these surgeries might lead to R0 resections of recurrent disease in an early, oligometastatic pattern, and therefore might increase the salvage cure rate. Because the accuracy of diagnostic imaging studies improved and the utility of A-directed surgery failed to show benefit and is therefore no longer advocated, the role of A monitoring has become more of a means to reduce the frequency and number of CT scans performed, thereby saving
5 911 False-Positive A Elevations Table 2 False-Positive Rates of Sustained Elevated Postoperative As Based on A Cutoffs Peak A Level Nonrecurrence With 2 Elevated Postoperative A Levels Recurrence Noncolorectal Malignancy False-Positive Rates 5.1 ng/ml % 10.1 ng/ml % 15.1 ng/ml % 20.1 ng/ml % 25.1 ng/ml % 30.1 ng/ml % 35.1 ng/ml % Abbreviation: A, carcinoembryonic antigen. the patient from radiation exposure, anxiety, and expense. Therefore, current NCCN Guidelines for Colon Cancer 6 advocate A monitoring 2 to 4 times per year, while recommending CT scanning once annually. However, according to these guidelines, an elevation in A level leads to a recommendation for additional CT scanning to be performed, and repeated more frequently, until the cause of the A elevation is identified (to view the most recent version of these guidelines, visit NCCN.org). Thus, a false-positive A level, aside from its obvious anxiogenic potential, results in unnecessary increases in radiation exposure, diagnostic workup, and expense, with no benefit to the patient. Although false-positive A elevations are wellknown to occur, their frequency and range have not been previously well characterized. One report by Moertel et al 7 showed a 16% false-positive rate of A elevation when a cutoff of 5 ng/ml was used, and a false-positive rate of 4% when 10 ng/ml was used. That study, reported in 1993 and based on data accrued in the 1980s, used scanning that was far less sensitive and accurate than what is currently available. The present study provides the first large, modern data set for determining the frequency and range of false-positive A measurements during the surveillance period. The study focused on patients with stages I III CRC who underwent R0 resection. The patients in this trial all experienced a complete clinical and serologic response (A level 5 ng/ml) and then developed an increase in their serum A level greater than 5 ng/ml during the postoperative surveillance period. Therefore, the incidence of A elevation during the surveillance period was not defined, but rather the patients with new A elevations were used as the denominator and the true-positive and false-positive rates assessed within this group. Furthermore, the authors required that patients be followed for at least 1 year after the first sustained elevated A level or have a spontaneous normalization with at least 2 consecutive subsequent A measurements. Although older literature suggests that A elevations may precede clinical evidence of recurrence by as much as 6 to 10 months, these reports are from an era with far less sensitive and accurate scanning techniques, and likely greatly overstate the lead time that A monitoring might offer. For this reason, the authors believe that the likelihood a false-positive with 1 year of negative follow-up could still represent a true-positive with insufficient follow-up would be extremely low. The current findings identified 2 distinct groups of patients with false-positive A elevations: those with a single, isolated elevated reading, and those with confirmed A elevations. Isolated, one-time elevations in A level with spontaneous normalization were considered either transient false-positives from some acute process, or the result of simple laboratory or specimen labeling errors. The frequency of these one-time false-positives 111 of the 358 patients (31%) with false-positive A elevations and 111 of the 728 patients (15%) with any A elevations and the finding that 93% of these onetime elevations were low-level elevations of between 5.1 and 10.0 ng/ml support a recommendation to repeat and confirm any abnormal A test results with
6 912 Litvak et al True Positive, % (sensitivity) Tosoh T-L T-U MSKCC fitted M-L fit M-U fit TOSOH AUC = 0.76 MSKCC AUC = False Positive, % (1-Specificity) Figure 1 Receiver operating curves (ROC) comparing manufacturer s expected performance with performance at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC). Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; A, carcinoembryonic antigen; M-L, MSKCC lower (limit of the confidence interval); M-U, MSKCC upper; T-L, Tosoh lower; T-U, Tosoh upper. measurements less than 10 ng/ml before embarking on further workup. In patients with a repeated and confirmed A elevation, results showed that the confirmed falsepositive rate of an elevated sustained A level was 40% when the standard A cutoff of 5 ng/ml was used, which is far greater than would have been expected based on the limited earlier literature. Hypothetically, if a cutoff of 10 ng/ml were used, the false-positive rate would be reduced to 8%. However, the authors found that 27% of patients with truepositive A elevations had a A level between 5 and 10 ng/ml when recurrent disease was first seen on a scan, and therefore such a change in the upper limit of normal would likely result in an unacceptable loss in sensitivity. The authors also found that the most falsepositive A elevations were in the trace-elevated range of 5 to 10 ng/ml. False-positive A levels greater than 15 ng/ml were rare. Furthermore, only 1 of the 247 patients with a confirmed falsepositive A elevation had a A level greater than 30 ng/ml. All sustained A elevations greater than 35 ng/ml were associated with actual cancer recurrence. Hence, A levels greater than 35 ng/ml seem to be virtually diagnostic of the presence of cancer. This information is potentially useful for patients and doctors in terms of putting the meaning of the A elevation into context; the authors do not advocate initiation of chemotherapy or other therapeutic maneuvers based on an abnormal A level alone. Recurrent disease should be identified based on diagnostic imaging studies and/or biopsy results before consideration is given to a therapeutic intervention. This study is not designed to comment on the usefulness of A monitoring in terms of the overall management of CRC, and no conclusions on that topic should be drawn. The authors also have no basis for directly evaluating false-negatives, because they did not collect data on how often cancer was found to have recurred in the absence of a A elevation. This study does not address the cause or causes of false-positive elevations in A, nor was it designed to do so. False-positive A elevations have been reported to occur in smokers and in pa- Number of Results No cancer Cancer >50 A Level (ng/ml) Figure 2 Comparison of results at each carcinoembryonic antigen (A) level for patients with and without actual cancer. Levels > 5 ng/ml represent actual data; values < 5 ng/ml are calculated.
7 913 False-Positive A Elevations tients with nonmalignant conditions, including gastrointestinal disease (eg, inflammatory bowel disease, pancreatitis, liver disease, diverticulitis, hepatitis, peptic ulcers, biliary obstruction, cirrhosis), lung disease (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung infection, pleural effusions), and hypothyroidism. This review of published cases suggests that most of these elevations are modest, with most less than 10 ng/ml. Furthermore, because all patients had a normal perioperative A level, chronic conditions such as smoking are unlikely to account for the increase detected in these patients. These data confirm that the likelihood of one of these benign conditions causing A elevations greater than 10 ng/ml is exceedingly small, 8,9 and the likelihood of one causing a A elevation greater than 35 ng/ml seems too rare to be reportable. This study suggests that a low-level elevation of A between 5 and 10 ng/ml has a substantial likelihood of representing a false-positive elevation. Although some clinicians perform initial repeat A testing, this study suggests that confirmation of an ongoing increase in A level should be universal practice before an extensive workup is initiated. However, a repeated and confirmed serum A level greater than 15 ng/ml is strongly predictive of disease recurrence, and a confirmed serum A level greater than 35 ng/ml seems to be virtually diagnostic of the presence of cancer. These data can be used for prognostic purposes, to help set realistic expectations, and to guide individualization of the diagnostic workup for patients with CRC with a new abnormal A measurement. References 1. Gold P, Freedman SO. Demonstration of tumor-specific antigens in human colonic carcinomata by immunological tolerance and absorption techniques. J Exp Med 1965;121: Gold P, Freedman SO. Specific carcinoembryonic antigens of the human digestive system. J Exp Med 1965;122: Thomson DM, Krupey J, Freedman SO, et al. The radioimmunoassay of circulating carcinoembryonic antigen of the human digestive system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1969;64: Garcia M, Seigner C, Bastid C, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen has a different molecular weight in normal colon and in cancer cells due to N-glycosylation differences. Cancer Res 1991;51: Thomas SN, Zhu F, Schnaar RL, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen and CD44 variant isoforms cooperate to mediate colon carcinoma cell adhesion to E- and L-selectin in shear flow. J Biol Chem 2008;283: Benson AB III, Venook AP, Bekaii-Saab T, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Colon Cancer. Version 3, Available at: NCCN.org. Accessed April 21, Moertel CG, Fleming TR, Macdonald JS, et al. An elevation of the carcinoembryonic antigen test for monitoring patients with resected colon cancer. JAMA 1993;270: Stockley RA, Shaw J, Whitfield AG, et al. Effects of cigarette smoking, pulmonary inflammation, and lung disease on concentrations of carcinoembryonic antigen in serum and secretions. Thorax 1986;41: Loewenstein MS, Zamcheck N. Carcinoembryonic antigen levels in benign gastrointestinal disease states. Cancer 1978;42: Instructions for Completion To participate in this journal activity: 1) review the learning objectives and author disclosures; 2) study the education content; 3) take the posttest with a 66% minimum passing score and complete the evaluation at node/46923; and 4) view/print certificate. After reading the article, you should be able to answer the following multiple- choice questions. Credit cannot be obtained for tests completed on paper. You must be a registered user on NCCN.org. If you are not registered on NCCN.org, click on New Member? Sign up here link on the left hand side of the Web site to register. Only one answer is correct for each question. Once you successfully answer all posttest questions you will be able to view and/or print your certificate. Software requirements: Internet PostTest Questions 1. NCCN Guidelines for Colon Cancer recommend routine monitoring of A levels how often after curative intent resection of CRC in stage II and III patients for the first 2 years? a. Not at all b. Every 3 6 months c. Every 6 12 months d. Every 12 months 2. Repeated and confirmed A levels >15 ng/ml is strongly predictive of cancer recurrence. Recurrent disease should be confirmed based on diagnostic imaging studies and/or biopsy results before consideration is given to a therapeutic intervention. a True b. False 3. Possible effects for patients with falsepositive A elevation after CRC resection include which of the following: a. Anxiety b. Unnecessary radiation exposure c. Increased expenses d. All of the above
A Clinical Context Report
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Practice An Expert Commentary With Karen Reckamp, MD A Clinical Context Report Clinical Context: NSCLC in Practice Expert Commentary Jointly Sponsored by: and Clinical Context:
More informationMultidisciplinary Approach to Optimize Care for Breast Cancer
Multidisciplinary Approach to Optimize Care for Breast Cancer Friday October 27, 2017 7:30am 1:00pm Wallace Auditorium Chappaqua Crossing 480 Bedford Road Chappaqua, NY 10514 Multidisciplinary Approach
More informationPELVIC MRI COURSE. November 12-14, 2016
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center is pleased to announce: PELVIC MRI COURSE November 12-14, 2016 Conference Location: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Rockefeller Research Laboratories 430 East
More informationSafety and Efficacy of FOLFOX Followed by Cetuximab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Severe Liver Dysfunction
155 Safety and Efficacy of FOLFOX Followed by Cetuximab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Severe Liver Dysfunction Raymond Elsoueidi, MD a ; Jessica Craig, PharmD b ; Hesham Mourad, PharmD a ; and
More informationFRIDAY. Breast Cancer Symposium. The Eleventh Annual. Controversies and Advances in the Management of Breast Cancer. 8:00am 1:00pm.
The Eleventh Annual A CME Conference designated for 4 AMA PRA Category I Credits TM FRIDAY October 30, 2015 8:00am 1:00pm Chappaqua Crossing Auditorium 480 Bedford Road A member of the North Shore LIJ
More informationAdvances in Colorectal Cancer From Screening to Innovative Care
virginia mason continuing medical education Advances in Colorectal Cancer From Screening to Innovative Care Presented by The Cancer Institute and Digestive Disease Institute at Virginia Mason Friday, March
More informationCOLON CANCER FOLLOW UP GUIDELINES
COLON CANCER FOLLOW UP GUIDELINES CAGPO Dr. Raziya Mia October 1, 2016 1 DISCLOSURES NONE 2 MITIGATING POTENTIAL BIAS Recommendations are consistent with published guidelines American Society of Clinical
More informationHIV/AIDS in Practice. An Expert Commentary with Myron Cohen, MD. A Clinical Context Report
HIV/AIDS in Practice An Expert Commentary with Myron Cohen, MD A Clinical Context Report Clinical Context: HIV/AIDS in Practice Expert Commentary Jointly Sponsored by: and Clinical Context: HIV/AIDS in
More informationBest of Radiation Oncology
Best of Radiation Oncology A CME conference designated for 6.25 AMA PRA category I credits Friday, December 1, 2017 7:30 am 3:45 pm Time Warner Center 60 Columbus Circle 10th Floor, North Tower New York,
More informationBy: Tania Cortas, MD Arizona Oncology 03/10/2015
By: Tania Cortas, MD Arizona Oncology 03/10/2015 Epidemiology In the United States, CRC incidence rates have declined about 2 to 3 percent per year over the last 15 years Death rates from CRC have declined
More informationHIV/AIDS in Practice. An Expert Commentary with Nelson Michael, MD, PhD. A Clinical Context Report
HIV/AIDS in Practice An Expert Commentary with Nelson Michael, MD, PhD A Clinical Context Report Clinical Context: HIV/AIDS in Practice Expert Commentary Jointly Sponsored by: and Clinical Context: HIV/AIDS
More information2007 ANNUAL SITE STUDY HODGKIN S LYMPHOMA
2007 ANNUAL SITE STUDY HODGKIN S LYMPHOMA SUSQUEHANNA HEALTH David B. Nagel, M.D. April 11, 2008 Hodgkin s lymphoma was first described by Thomas Hodgkin in 1832. It remained an incurable malignancy until
More informationPELVIC MRI COURSE. November 12-14, 2016
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center is pleased to announce: PELVIC MRI COURSE November 12-14, 2016 Conference Location: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Rockefeller Research Laboratories 430 East
More informationThe Evolving Role of MRI in Prostate Cancer Management: Detection, Staging, Surveillance,
Office of Continuing Medical Education, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA presents The Evolving Role of MRI in Prostate Cancer Management: Detection, Staging, Surveillance, Follow Up, and Reporting
More informationThe solitary pulmonary nodule: Assessing the success of predicting malignancy
The solitary pulmonary nodule: Assessing the success of predicting malignancy Poster No.: C-0829 Congress: ECR 2010 Type: Scientific Exhibit Topic: Chest Authors: R. W. K. Lindsay, J. Foster, K. McManus;
More informationperformed to help sway the clinician in what the appropriate diagnosis is, which can substantially alter the treatment of management.
Hello, I am Maura Polansky at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. I am a Physician Assistant in the Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and the Program Director for Physician
More informationTUMOR M ARKERS MARKERS
TUMOR MARKERS M.Shekarabi IUMS Definition Many cancers are associated with the abnormal production of some molecules l which h can be measured in plasma. These molecules are known as tumor markers. A good
More informationWhen Is a Tumor Marker a Laboratory Test?
ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY SCIENCE, Vol. 7, No. 1 Copyright 1977, Institute for Clinical Science When Is a Tumor Marker a Laboratory Test? ROBERT S. GALEN, M.D., M.P.H. Department of Pathology,
More informationTumor Markers Yesterday, Today & Tomorrow. Steven E. Zimmerman M.D. Vice President & Chief Medical Director
Tumor Markers Yesterday, Today & Tomorrow Steven E. Zimmerman M.D. Vice President & Chief Medical Director Tumor Marker - Definition Substances produced by cancer cells or other cells in response to cancer
More informationTHE RELEVANCE OF SOME TUMORAL MARKERS IN PATIENTS WITH PANCREATIC CANCER
THE RELEVANCE OF SOME TUMORAL MARKERS IN PATIENTS WITH PANCREATIC CANCER DANIEL TIMOFTE 1, RADU DANILA 1*, ALIN CIOBICA 2, CORNELIU DIACONU 1, ROXANA LIVADARIU 3, LIDIA IONESCU 1 Keywords: pancreatic cancer,
More informationDiffuse high-attenuation within mediastinal lymph nodes on non-enhanced CT scan: Usefulness in the prediction of benignancy
Diffuse high-attenuation within mediastinal lymph nodes on non-enhanced CT scan: Usefulness in the prediction of benignancy Poster No.: C-1785 Congress: ECR 2012 Type: Authors: Keywords: DOI: Scientific
More informationSurgical Management of Pulmonary Metastases. Dr AG Jacobs Principal Specialist Dept Cardiothoracic Surgery Steve Biko Academic Hospital
Surgical Management of Pulmonary Metastases Dr AG Jacobs Principal Specialist Dept Cardiothoracic Surgery Steve Biko Academic Hospital Introduction Lungs 2 nd most common site of metastatic deposition
More informationLung Cancer in Women: A Different Disease? James J. Stark, MD, FACP
Lung Cancer in Women: A Different Disease? James J. Stark, MD, FACP Medical Director, Cancer Program and Director of Palliative Care Maryview Medical Center Professor of Medicine Eastern Virginia Medical
More informationSBRT IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PROSTATE CANCER SATELLITE SYMPOSIUM AT THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY (ASTRO) 2018 ANNUAL MEETING ADVANCES IN
DEPARTMENT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY ADVANCES IN SBRT IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PROSTATE CANCER SATELLITE SYMPOSIUM AT THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY (ASTRO) 2018 ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 21, 2018 MARRIOTT
More informationDr. Shari Srinivasan, Consultant Chemical Pathologist, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland
Draft Laboratory Testing for Tumour Markers V1.0 Authors Dr. Shari Srinivasan, Consultant Chemical Pathologist, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland Dr. Gerard Boran, Consultant Chemical Pathologist,
More informationConsensus and Controversies in Cancer of Prostate BASIS FOR FURHTER STUDIES. Luis A. Linares MD FACRO Medical Director
BASIS FOR FURHTER STUDIES Main controversies In prostate Cancer: 1-Screening 2-Management Observation Surgery Standard Laparoscopic Robotic Radiation: (no discussion on Cryosurgery-RF etc.) Standard SBRT
More informationEstimation of carcinoembryonic antigen in ulcerative colitis with special reference to malignant
Gut, 1975, 16, 255-26 Estimation of carcinoembryonic antigen in ulcerative colitis with special reference to malignant change J. B. DILAWARIF, J. E. LENNARD-JONES, A. M. MACKAY, JEAN K. RITCHIE, AND H.
More informationMajor Response to Cyclophosphamide and Prednisone in Recurrent Castration- Resistant Prostate Cancer
911 Major Response to Cyclophosphamide and Prednisone in Recurrent Castration- Resistant Prostate Cancer Nicolas Batty, MD; Naveen Yarlagadda, MD; and Roberto Pili, MD Abstract Prostate cancer is the most
More informationA Clinical Context Report
Metastatic Breast Cancer in Practice An Expert Commentary with Carey Anders, MD A Clinical Context Report Clinical Context: Metastatic Breast Cancer in Practice Expert Commentary Jointly Sponsored by:
More informationIndex. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 16 (2007) Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.
Surg Oncol Clin N Am 16 (2007) 465 469 Index Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type. A Adjuvant therapy, preoperative for gastric cancer, staging and, 339 B Breast cancer, metabolic
More informationLearning Objectives. 1. Identify which patients meet criteria for annual lung cancer screening
Disclosure I, Taylor Rowlett, DO NOT have a financial interest /arrangement or affiliation with one or more organizations that could be perceived as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the context
More informationTreatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Current Concepts
Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Current Concepts James J. Stark, MD, FACP Medical Director, Cancer Program and Palliative Care Maryview Medical Center Professor of Medicine, EVMS Case Presentation
More informationCarcinoembryonic antigen levels of tumor-draining venous blood as a prognostic marker in colon cancer
Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology 217;13:68-74 https://doi.org/1.14216/kjco.171 pissn 1738-882 eissn 2288-484 Original rticle Carcinoembryonic antigen levels of tumor-draining venous blood as a prognostic
More informationMBP AP 3 Core Curriculum
MBP AP 3 Core Curriculum The MBP AP3 core curriculum focuses on providing pathologists with the knowledge and skills needed to be a vital member of the patient care team. Further, the curriculum fulfills
More informationColorectal. The Latest Advances to Improve Adenoma Detection Rates. Sunday, October 15, 2017
Presorted First Class Mail US Postage PAID Permit # 906 Bellmawr NJ Cancer Prevention Distinguished Indiana University Indianapolis, IN University of Kansas School of Medicine Kansas City, MO Editor in
More informationColorectal Disorders in Women
Women s Cancer Conference Colorectal Disorders in Women Saturday, April 23, 2016 8 a.m. - 12:05 p.m. Hilton Garden Inn Allen 705 Central Expressway South Allen, TX 75013 Presented by TexasHealth.org/CME
More informationScreening. for the Practicing Clinician. Tuesday, October 11, 2016 x 8:00 am - 4:00 PM
Continuing Medical Education Clinical Campus of Stony Brook University School of Medicine Cancer Screening for the Practicing Clinician Tuesday, October 11, 2016 x 8:00 am - 4:00 PM Winthrop Research &
More informationMeasure Description. Denominator Statement
CMS ID/CMS QCDR ID: CAP 18 Title: Mismatch Repair (MMR) or Microsatellite Instability (MSI) Biomarker Testing to Inform Clinical Management and Treatment Decisions in Patients with Primary or Metastatic
More informationRectal cancer with synchroneous liver mets: A challenging clinical case
ESMO Preceptorship Programme Rectal cancer Singapur November 2017 Rectal cancer with synchroneous liver mets: A challenging clinical case Andrés Cervantes Disclosures Consulting and advisory services,
More informationComparison of a new tumour marker, CA 199TM, with a-fetoprotein and carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with upper gastrointestinal diseases
J Clin Pathol 1984;37:218-222 Comparison of a new tumour marker, CA 199TM, with a-fetoprotein and carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with upper gastrointestinal diseases HANNU JALANKO,* PENTTI KUUSELA,*
More informationIn multiple published papers digital breast
2016 Case-Based Review & Advanced Breast Imaging Course: DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS NEW FOR 2016! Dedicated case review time on individual DBT workstations* September 17-18, 2016 San Diego, CA Register
More informationCurrent Topics in Breast Cancer Symposium
Current Topics in Breast Cancer Symposium Friday, October 6, 2017 Sheraton Station Square Hotel Pittsburgh, PA Sponsored by Allegheny General Hospital In collaboration with Cancer Institute Conference
More informationCorporate Medical Policy
Corporate Medical Policy Multigene Expression Assay for Predicting Recurrence in Colon File Name: Origination: Last CAP Review: Next CAP Review: Last Review: multigene_expression_assay_for_predicting_recurrence_in_colon_cancer
More informationIn multiple published papers digital breast
2015 September 26-27, 2015 San Diego, CA In multiple published papers digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has demonstrated the ability to improve the detection of breast cancer while, at the same time,
More informationSurveillance of Pancreatic Cancer Patients Following Surgical Resection
Surveillance of Pancreatic Cancer Patients Following Surgical Resection Jaime Benarroch-Gampel, M.D., M.S. CERCIT Scholar CERCIT Workshops March 16, 2012 INTRODUCTION Pancreatic cancer is the 4 th leading
More informationCancer Screenings and Early Diagnostics
Cancer Screenings and Early Diagnostics Ankur R. Parikh, D.O. Medical Director, Center for Advanced Individual Medicine Hematologist/Medical Oncologist Atlantic Regional Osteopathic Convention April 6
More informationName of Policy: Serum Tumor Markers for Breast and Gastrointestinal Malignancies
Name of Policy: Serum Tumor Markers for Breast and Gastrointestinal Malignancies Policy #: 195 Latest Review Date: October 2013 Category: Medical Policy Grade: A Background/Definitions: As a general rule,
More informationSurgical Management of Advanced Stage Colon Cancer. Nathan Huber, MD 6/11/14
Surgical Management of Advanced Stage Colon Cancer Nathan Huber, MD 6/11/14 Colon Cancer Overview Approximately 50,000 attributable deaths per year Colorectal cancer is the 3 rd most common cause of cancer-related
More informationRECTAL MRI WORKSHOP. One Workstation Per Participant - Space is limited! Includes Complimentary Registration to the Colorectal Centennial Symposium
RECTAL MRI WORKSHOP THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 2017 Zuckerman Research Center, New York City One Workstation Per Participant - Space is limited! Includes Complimentary Registration to the Colorectal Centennial
More informationNATIONAL CORPORATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES: CANCER TREATMENT UPDATE 2016
33rd Annual Meeting NATIONAL CORPORATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES: CANCER TREATMENT UPDATE 2016 Thursday-Friday, June 16-17, 2016 Conference Location: MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER Rockefeller Research
More informationMonitoring Patients Undergoing Cancer Therapy. By Timothy K. Egan
F E A T U R E By Timothy K. Egan Before placement in a computed tomography scanner, a patient is fitted with an immobilization device. Immobilization ensures that the same area of the patient is scanned
More informationHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Malignancies
Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Malignancies Gareth Eeson MD MSc FRCSC Surgical Oncologist and General Surgeon Kelowna General Hospital Interior Health Consultant, Surgical Oncology BC Cancer Agency Centre
More informationPERSONALIZED PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center is pleased to present: PERSONALIZED PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY A CASE-BASED APPROACH Saturday, October 12, 2019 Rockefeller Research Laboratories 430 East 67th Street New York,
More informationAre extra-colonic findings on CT colonogram clinically significant? A review of 758 consecutive cases
Are extra-colonic findings on CT colonogram clinically significant? A review of 758 consecutive cases Lynn WR 1, Vadhwana B 1, Borgstein R 2, Demetriou G 1, Nair MS 1, Meleagros L 1, Bell DJ 2 1 Department
More informationBridging Treatment to Transplant and Current Advances
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in partnership with The Bone Marrow Foundation and the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP)/Be The Match present: Bridging Treatment to Transplant and Current Advances
More informationPRINCESS MARGARET CANCER CENTRE CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES
PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER CENTRE CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES GASTROINTESTINAL RECTAL CANCER GI Site Group Rectal Cancer Authors: Dr. Jennifer Knox, Dr. Mairead McNamara 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. SCREENING AND
More informationCOLON CANCER CARE GUIDELINES NON-METASTATIC DISEASE
COLON CANCER CARE GUIDELINES NON-METASTATIC DISEASE Guideline Authors: Todd S. Crocenzi, M.D.; Mark Whiteford, M.D.; Matthew Solhjem, M.D.; Carlo Bifulco, M.D.; Melissa Li, M.D.; Christopher Cai, M.D.;
More informationClinical guideline Published: 1 November 2011 nice.org.uk/guidance/cg131
Colorectal cancer: diagnosis and management Clinical guideline Published: 1 November 2011 nice.org.uk/guidance/cg131 NICE 2017. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and-conditions#notice-ofrights).
More informationSMOKING CESSATION FOR PREGNANCY AND BEYOND: A VIRTUAL CLINIC WB2590
SMOKING CESSATION FOR PREGNANCY AND BEYOND: A VIRTUAL CLINIC WB2590 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: The goal of this educational offering is to improve the clinical application of best practice interventions for
More informationBest Papers. F. Fusco
Best Papers UROLOGY F. Fusco Best papers - 2015 RP/RT Oncological outcomes RP/RT IN ct3 Utilization trends RP/RT Complications Evolving role of elnd /Salvage LND This cohort reflects the current clinical
More informationHepatobiliary Malignancies Retrospective Study at Truman Medical Center
Hepatobiliary Malignancies 206-207 Retrospective Study at Truman Medical Center Brandon Weckbaugh MD, Prarthana Patel & Sheshadri Madhusudhana MD Introduction: Hepatobiliary malignancies are cancers which
More informationTreatment outcomes and prognostic factors of gallbladder cancer patients after postoperative radiation therapy
Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2011;15:152-156 Original Article Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of gallbladder cancer patients after postoperative radiation therapy Suzy Kim 1,#, Kyubo
More information!"#$ Oncology Outcomes Report
!"#$ Oncology Outcomes Report The Cleveland Clinic Florida Cancer Institute is dedicated to the comprehensive care of patients with cancer. Oncologists collaborate with a variety of physicians across multiple
More informationLung Cancer Screening: To Screen or Not to Screen?
Lung Cancer Screening: To Screen or Not to Screen? Lorriana Leard, MD Co-Director of UCSF Lung Cancer Screening Program Vice Chief of Clinical Activities UCSF Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy & Sleep
More informationColon, or Colorectal, Cancer Information
Colon, or Colorectal, Cancer Information Definition Colon, or colorectal, cancer is cancer that starts in the large intestine (colon) or the rectum (end of the colon). Other types of cancer can affect
More informationMolecular Imaging and Cancer
Molecular Imaging and Cancer Cancer causes one in every four deaths in the United States, second only to heart disease. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, more than 512,000
More informationMultidisciplinary Breast Pathology
Multidisciplinary Breast Pathology Advanced Learning Series MANUAL This Multidisciplinary Breast Pathology manual is current as of October, 2018. Information is subject to change. CURRICULUM The MBP Advanced
More informationOutcomes Report: Accountability Measures and Quality Improvements
Outcomes Report: Accountability Measures and Quality Improvements The FH Memorial Medical Center s Cancer Committee ensures that patients with cancer are treated according to the nationally accepted measures.
More informationPET imaging of cancer metabolism is commonly performed with F18
PCRI Insights, August 2012, Vol. 15: No. 3 Carbon-11-Acetate PET/CT Imaging in Prostate Cancer Fabio Almeida, M.D. Medical Director, Arizona Molecular Imaging Center - Phoenix PET imaging of cancer metabolism
More informationDERMOSCOPY. October 23-24, 2015 INTERMEDIATE COURSE. 11th Annual. New York. is pleased to announce:
is pleased to announce: October 23-24, 2015 11th Annual INTERMEDIATE COURSE COURSE LOCATION Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center ZUCKERMAN RESEARCH CENTER 417 East 68th Street between First and York
More informationBIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE POST RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE POST RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AZHAN BIN YUSOFF AZHAN BIN YUSOFF 2013 SCENARIO A 66 year old man underwent Robotic Radical Prostatectomy for a T1c Gleason 4+4, PSA 15 ng/ml prostate
More informationModern Staging of Small Cell Lung Cancer
Focused Review 99 Modern Staging of Small Cell Lung Cancer Gregory P. Kalemkerian, MD, a and Shirish M. Gadgeel, MD b Abstract For many years, small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been staged using the Veterans
More information2016 Clinical Breast Imaging:
ENTIRE PROGRAM: 22.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) TM 11.75 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) TM 8.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) TM 5.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) TM 10.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) TM
More informationLung Cancer 2017: November 4, 2017 Renaissance Washington, DC Dupont Circle Hotel
Lung Cancer 2017: November 4, 2017 Renaissance Dupont Circle Hotel Progress and Future Directions Course Directors: Giuseppe Giaccone, MD, PhD MedStar Georgetown Cancer Network CME INFORMATION COURSE DESCRIPTION
More informationSurgical oncology in Africa (Nigeria)
Surgical oncology in Africa (Nigeria) T. Peter Kingham MD, FACS Hepatobiliary Surgery Director of Global Cancer Disparity Initiatives Assoc. Attending Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Isaac Alatise,
More informationColorectal Cancer: With a Focus on Colon Cancer
Table of Contents: PAGE 1 Community Cancer Center Program at French Hospital Medical Center PAGE 2 Colorectal Cancer Basic Facts Symptoms of Colorectal Cancer 2018 French Hospital Medical Center Cancer
More informationColorectal Cancer Treatment
Scan for mobile link. Colorectal Cancer Treatment Colorectal cancer overview Colorectal cancer, also called large bowel cancer, is the term used to describe malignant tumors found in the colon and rectum.
More informationColorectal Cancer at the MemorialCare Todd Cancer Institute at Long Beach Memorial
Colorectal Cancer at the MemorialCare Todd Cancer Institute at Long Beach Memorial ANNUAL REPOR T (562) 933-0900 MemorialCare.org/TCI 2810 Long Beach Blvd. Long Beach, CA 90806 #3 Colorectal cancer is
More informationRECENT ADVANCES IN ONCOLOGY FOR THE PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIAN PHILADELPHIA
Continuing Medical and Interprofessional Education THURSDAY, APRIL 19, 2018 5:30 PM- 8:30 PM The Rittenhouse 210 W Rittenhouse Square, Philadelphia, PA 19103 Penn Medicine s Abramson Cancer Center PRESENTS
More informationEarly Age Onset Colorectal Cancer. New York. Saturday, March EAO-CRC 2015 THE NATION S FIRST ANNUAL
Are Pleased to Jointly Sponsor THE NATION S FIRST ANNUAL Early Age Onset Colorectal Cancer S U M M I T Saturday, March 21 CONFERENCE LOCATION Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center ROCKEFELLER RESEARCH
More informationUpdates In Cancer Screening: Navigating a Changing Landscape
Updates In Cancer Screening: Navigating a Changing Landscape Niharika Dixit, MD I have no conflict of interest. 1 Why Should You Care Trends in Cancer Incidence by Site United States. Siegal Et al: CA
More informationQuestions and Answers About the Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Test
CANCER FACTS N a t i o n a l C a n c e r I n s t i t u t e N a t i o n a l I n s t i t u t e s o f H e a l t h D e p a r t m e n t o f H e a l t h a n d H u m a n S e r v i c e s Questions and Answers
More informationMedical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association
PET Scanning: Oncologic Applications Page 1 of 88 Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association Title: Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scanning: Oncologic Applications
More informationCARE OF THE OLDER ADULT ACROSS THE CANCER CONTINUUM
CARE OF THE OLDER ADULT ACROSS THE CANCER CONTINUUM SUPPORTIVE CARE CONSIDERATIONS Friday, May 6, 2016 Conference Location: MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER Zuckerman Research Center 417 East 68th
More informationBalancing Evidence and Clinical Practice in the Treatment of Localized Breast Cancer
2006 ONS Congress Webcast Evaluation Form Balancing Evidence and Clinical Practice in the Treatment of Localized Breast Cancer Session length: 1 hour, 49 minutes Contact hours: 1.6 Pharmacology hours offered:
More informationCurrent Status of Adjuvant Therapy for Colorectal Cancer
Review Article [1] May 01, 2004 By Michael J. O connell, MD [2] Adjuvant therapy with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy in addition to surgery improves outcome for patients with high-risk carcinomas
More informationGastrointestinal Multidisciplinary Cancer (GI MDC) Navigation May 3, 2012
Gastrointestinal Multidisciplinary Cancer (GI MDC) Navigation May 3, 2012 Coralyn Martinez MSN, RN, OCN GI Nurse Navigator The Lacks Cancer Center Saint Mary s Health Care Grand Rapids, MI History of
More informationPACIFIC MEDICAL TRAINING Arrhythmia Interpretation
PACIFIC MEDICAL TRAINING Arrhythmia Interpretation Introduction Activity Summary Target Audience Educational Objectives Nursing Educational Objective Faculty Physician Continuing Medical Education Nursing
More informationStaging Colorectal Cancer
Staging Colorectal Cancer CT is recommended as the initial staging scan for colorectal cancer to assess local extent of the disease and to look for metastases to the liver and/or lung Further imaging for
More informationCOLORECTAL CARCINOMA
QUICK REFERENCE FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS MANAGEMENT OF COLORECTAL CARCINOMA Ministry of Health Malaysia Malaysian Society of Colorectal Surgeons Malaysian Society of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Malaysian
More informationWanting to Get Pregnant
Continuing Medical Education COPD Case Presentation LEARNING OBJECTIVES Those completing this activity will receive information that should allow them to Assist a patient in developing a quit plan; Advise
More informationMultidisciplinary Genitourinary Oncology Course:
Taussig Cancer Institute and Glickman Urological Institute present Multidisciplinary Genitourinary Oncology Course: Focus on Kidney, Bladder, and Testicular Cancer Thursday, December 14, 2017 Cleveland,
More informationTumor Immunology. Tumor (latin) = swelling
Tumor Immunology Tumor (latin) = swelling benign tumor malignant tumor Tumor immunology : the study of the types of antigens that are expressed by tumors how the immune system recognizes and responds to
More informationComparison of three mathematical prediction models in patients with a solitary pulmonary nodule
Original Article Comparison of three mathematical prediction models in patients with a solitary pulmonary nodule Xuan Zhang*, Hong-Hong Yan, Jun-Tao Lin, Ze-Hua Wu, Jia Liu, Xu-Wei Cao, Xue-Ning Yang From
More informationOvarian Cancer Conference
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center is pleased to announce: State of the Art Ovarian Cancer Conference Thursday, October 6, 2016 www.mskcc.org/ovarianconference Course Overview Advances in women s health
More informationClinical Breakthroughs & Challenges In Hematologic Malignancies
Clinical Breakthroughs & Challenges In Hematologic Malignancies Saturday, January 19, 2013 Disney s Grand Floridian Resort Lake Buena Vista, Florida COURSE DIRECTOR CONFERENCE CONTACT Melissa.Pearson@Moffitt.org
More informationColorectal Cancer Care
Colorectal Cancer Care A Cancer Care Map for Patients Understanding the process of care that a patient goes through in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer in BC. ROUND2.3_CRCa_20pages_5.5x8.5_FINAL.indd
More informationDisclosures. Overview. Selection the most accurate statement: Updates in Lung Cancer Screening 5/26/17. No Financial Disclosures
Updates in Lung Cancer Screening Disclosures No Financial Disclosures Neil Trivedi, MD Associate Professor of Clinical Medicine SF VAMC Pulmonary and Critical Care Director, Bronchoscopy & Interventional
More informationPET IMAGING (POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPY) FACT SHEET
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) When calling Anthem (1-800-533-1120) or using the Point of Care authorization system for a Health Service Review, the following clinical information may be needed to
More information