Pediatric Imaging Original Research
|
|
- Dorthy Nicholson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Pediatric Imaging Original Research Podberesky et al. Dose Estimates of Pediatric Cardiac CT Angiography Using 320-MDCT Scanner Pediatric Imaging Original Research Daniel J. Podberesky 1 Erin Angel 2 Terry T. Yoshizumi 3 Greta Toncheva 3 Shelia R. Salisbury 4 Christopher Alsip 1 Alessandra Barelli 2 John C. Egelhoff 1,5 Colin Anderson-Evans 3,6 Giao B. Nguyen 3 David Dow 7 Donald P. Frush 3 Podberesky DJ, Angel E, Yoshizumi TT, et al. Keywords: cardiac CT angiography, pediatrics, radiation dosimetry DOI: /AJR Received December 24, 2011; accepted after revision April 18, The Department of Radiology at Cincinnati Children s Hospital receives research support from Toshiba America Medical Systems. D. J. Podberesky is a member of the Toshiba professional speaker s bureau. E. Angel and A. Barelli are employees of Toshiba America Medical Systems. This investigation was presented at the 2011 ARRS meeting. 1 Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, MLC 5031, Cincinnati, OH Address correspondence to D. J. Podberesky (daniel.podberesky@cchmc.org). 2 Toshiba America Medical Systems, Tustin, CA. 3 Radiation Safety Division, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. 4 Center for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Cincinnati Children s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH. 5 Present affiliation: Department of Radiology, Phoenix Children s Hospital, Phoenix, AZ. 6 Present affiliation: Quality Assurance Services, Chula Vista, CA. 7 Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH. AJR 2012; 199: X/12/ American Roentgen Ray Society Radiation Dose Estimation for Prospective and Retrospective ECG-Gated Cardiac CT Angiography in Infants and Small Children Using a 320-MDCT Volume Scanner OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to determine patient dose estimates for clinical pediatric cardiac-gated CT angiography (CTA) protocols on a 320-MDCT volume scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Organ doses were measured using 20 metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters. Radiation dose was estimated for volumetrically acquired clinical pediatric prospectively and retrospectively ECG-gated cardiac CTA protocols in 5-year-old and 1-year-old anthropomorphic phantoms on a 320- MDCT scanner. Simulated heart rates of 60 beats/min (5-year-old phantom) and 120 beats/ min (1- and 5-year-old phantoms) were used. Effective doses (EDs) were calculated using average measured organ doses and International Commission on Radiological Protection 103 tissue-weighting factors. Dose-length product (DLP) was recorded for each examination and was used to develop dose conversion factors for pediatric cardiac examinations acquired with volume scan mode. DLP was also used to estimate ED according to recently published dose conversion factors for pediatric helical chest examinations. Repeated measures and paired Student t test analyses were performed. RESULTS. For the 5-year-old phantom, at 60 beats/min, EDs ranged from 1.2 msv for a prospectively gated examination to 4.5 msv for a retrospectively gated examination. For the 5-year-old phantom, at 120 beats/min, EDs ranged from 3.0 msv for a prospectively gated examination to 4.9 msv for a retrospectively gated examination. For the 1-year-old phantom, at 120 beats/min, EDs ranged from 2.7 msv for a prospectively gated examination to 4.5 msv for a retrospectively gated examination. CONCLUSION. EDs for 320-MDCT volumetrically acquired ECG-gated pediatric cardiac CTA are lower than those published for conventional 16- and 64-MDCT scanners. R ecent advancements in CT technology have allowed more rapid imaging of children with congenital and acquired heart disease, with better spatial and temporal resolution and fewer motion artifacts. These advances have increased the number of, and indications for, cardiac CT angiography (CTA) examinations in children [1]. Radiation exposure, especially with this increasing use, is of paramount concern in children, because they are at increased risk for cancer development at similar radiation exposures compared with adults [2]. A 320-MDCT volume scanner allows axial volumetric scanning up to 16 cm in the z- axis in a single 0.35-second gantry rotation with no table movement [3]. This scanner is alluring to pediatric radiologists because it offers the potential advantages of decreased scan durations, reduced motion artifacts, reduced need for sedation, and reduced con- trast agent volume requirements. In addition, the lack of z-axis overranging, lack of overlapping helical rotations, and minimal penumbral overbeaming with volumetric scanning have the advantage of reducing patient radiation exposure [4]. Effective dose (ED) is a commonly used estimate of patient dose [5]. For CT, ED can be estimated using a dose-length product (DLP) based method. However, this method may be inaccurate [2, 6 8]. The purported inaccuracy of the DLP method may be particularly true with newer CT scanner technology and in pediatric patients [9]. Additionally, organ doses cannot be easily or accurately derived from the DLP. Another method of ED estimation uses metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFET) in organ locations in anthropomorphic phantoms and has been shown to be accurate and relatively efficient [7]. AJR:199, November
2 Podberesky et al. Fig. 1 5-year-old anthropomorphic phantom. A, Photograph of phantom with metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) detectors in place. B, CT scanogram image shows wires leading to in-place MOSFET detectors. C, Representative axial CT image shows three MOSFET detectors (arrows) in place. Several recent reports have found diagnostic-quality images with 320-MDCT volume cardiac CTA in both adults [10] and children, even at very high heart rates [11]. In addition, A recent reports have been published on the estimated ED associated with adult cardiac CTA imaging on a 320-MDCT volume scanner [12 15]. However, to our knowledge, TABLE 1: Locations of Organ Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor (MOSFET) Detectors in 1- and 5-Year-Old Phantoms Dosimeter No. Organ or Structure Slice No., Phantom B Location No., Phantom 1 Year Old 5 Year Old 1 Year Old 5 Year Old 1 Bone marrow, mandible Thyroid Thymus Bone marrow, ribs Bone marrow, spine Breast, left Lungs, middle Heart H4 H4 9 Esophagus Lungs, lower Liver Pancreas and stomach Spleen Kidney and adrenal gland, right Liver Intestine Bone marrow, pelvis Urinary bladder Gonads Skin surface Variable Variable NA NA Note NA = not applicable. there have been only two published reports on this topic in the pediatric population, but those investigators used the potentially inaccurate DLP method of ED estimation [11, 16]. What is lacking from the literature is more accurate dosimetry data, whether in phantoms or in patients, for clinical pediatric cardiac CTA protocols performed on a 320-MDCT scanner. Therefore, the purposes of this investigation are to determine organ doses and EDs for clinically used ECG-gated cardiac CTA protocols for a 1- and 5-year-old phantom on a 320-MDCT volume scanner with MOSFET technology, to compare the MOSFET ED to the DLP ED using a set of recently available helical pediatric chest examination dose conversion factors [9, 17], and to develop cardiacspecific pediatric dose conversion factors for volume scan modes. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval of this study was not required, because no patients or animals were scanned and no clinical images were reviewed. Phantom and Detector Placement Tissue-equivalent anthropomorphic phantoms of a 1- and 5-year-old child (models 704-D and 705-D, respectively, CIRS) were used (Fig. 1). Organ dose measurements were obtained using 20 MOSFET dosimeters (model TN-502RD-H, Best Medical Canada) placed in defined anatomic locations throughout the phantom (Table 1). Each detector was calibrated at 100 kvp. Detailed calibration methods and validation of MOSFET organ dose measurement methods have been described elsewhere [7]. C 1130 AJR:199, November 2012
3 Dose Estimates of Pediatric Cardiac CT Angiography Using 320-MDCT Scanner Fig. 2 Diagrammatic representation of ECG-gated scan acquisition modes tested. A, Prospective acquisition at heart rate of 60 beats/min with exposure phase window of 70 80% of R-R of one cardiac cycle. B, Two-segment prospective acquisition at heart rate of 120 beats/min with exposure phase window of 30 40% of R-R of two cardiac cycles. C, Retrospective acquisition at heart rate of 60 beats/min with ECG-gated dose modulation. With exception of 70 80% phase window, tube current is decreased throughout cardiac cycle. D, Retrospective acquisition at heart rate of 120 beats/min with continuous, uniform tube current throughout cardiac cycle. Scanning Parameters All CT examinations were performed on a single 320-MDCT volume scanner (Aquilion ONE, Toshiba Medical Systems), henceforth referred to as a 320-MDCT scanner. The phantoms were scanned supine according to the clinical ECG-gated cardiac CTA protocols at our institution (Fig. 2 and Table 2). All scans were performed at a tube voltage of 100 kvp and a 10-cm scan length (total collimated beam width of 10 cm). Our experience, which has been supported by other investigators using the 320-MDCT scanner, is that a tube voltage of 100 kvp (as opposed to 80 kvp) is an acceptable selection when performing pediatric ECG-gated cardiac CTA examinations, except for the smallest neonates and infants (< 10 kg) [18]. Although up to 16 cm of z-axis scan length can be covered in a single volume acquisition, only 10 cm were required to cover the heart on both the 1- and 5-year-old phantoms. For the 1-year-old phantom, a small FOV (240 mm) was used, and for the 5-year-old phantom, a medium FOV (320 mm) was used. Protocols were performed at simulated heart rates of 60 and 120 beats/min on the 5-year-old phantom and only 120 beats/min on the 1-year-old phantom using a commercially available heart rate simulator (BSM-2351A, Nihon Kohden). The normal heart rate range for a 1-yearold is beats/min, and that for a 5-year-old is beats/min [19]. We chose to use the upper and lower ends of the normal heart rate spectrum in the 5-year-old phantom to show the dose range that can be expected for children in this age range. The lower rate might also reflect the use of β-blockers at this age by some imagers. A C Two cardiac scan acquisition modes were tested: retrospectively and prospectively ECG-gated acquisition (Fig. 2). The retrospectively gated acquisition mode with ECG tube current modulation uses a variable tube current, with relatively higher tube current during diastole and reduced tube current during the other cardiac phases. In this investigation, because of the routine low tube current used for pediatrics, the variation in tube current was only 10%. In other words, the maximum tube current was only 10% higher than the minimum tube current. To accommodate the necessary temporal resolution for the higher heart rate of 120 beats/min, the retrospective mode automatically selects a continuous tube current with no modulation. The retrospective scan mode can be useful for functional analysis because images can be reconstructed at all phases of the R-R. For prospective acquisition, imaging is performed during the quiescent phase of the cardiac cycle only and the tube current is turned off during the remainder of the cycle. For patients with heart rates less than 70 beats/min, images of the entire heart are acquired from a single heartbeat. To accommodate the necessary temporal resolution for the higher heart rate of 120 beats/min, the prospective mode automatically selects a multisegmented two-beat acquisition in which segments of data from adjacent R-R s are combined. The scan modes used in this study are summarized in Table 2. Measurement Tabulation For each protocol on each phantom, organ dose was determined and ED was subsequently calculated. Volume CT dose index (CTDI vol ) and DLP were recorded for each protocol as well. To calculate ED using MOSFET technology, three replications for each protocol were performed to measure the mean (± SD) absorbed organ doses. To increase photon statistics for each MOSFET reading and to minimize source path geometry variations between scans, each replication included three consecutive acquisitions, each with a different tube start location (0, 120, and 240 ). The resulting MOSFET reading was divided by three. The organ doses and EDs were computed separately for each of the three replication sets of three scans. For organs with multiple MOSFET locations, the average absorbed dose was calculated. Each average organ dose was weighted using tissue-weighting factors according to International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 103 guidelines [20], and the ED was obtained by summing the dose equivalent for each organ. The CT scanogram was not included in ED determinations because it does not contribute substantially to the total ED of a CT scan [21]. In addition, on the basis of scanner-displayed CTDI vol, we estimate that the bolus tracking series comprises less than 10% of the total ED of a cardiac CTA, and, therefore, it was not included in ED determinations. The ED was also estimated by the DLP method using the displayed DLP from the console for each protocol using the following formula: ED(mSv)= k (msv mgy 1 cm 1 ) DLP(mGy cm) where k is a body part specific dose conversion factor [9, 17]. Because the scan length used in this investigation was only 10 cm, the CTDI vol (and thus DLP) was determined in accordance with Interna- B D AJR:199, November
4 Podberesky et al. TABLE 2: ECG-Gated Cardiac CT Angiography (CTA) Scan Protocols Phantom Years Scan Protocol tional Electrotechnical Commission standard Ed.3. We chose to use the recently published conversion factors by Deak et al. [9], which are derived as a function of ICRP 103 tissue-weighting factors, tube voltage (in this case 100 kvp), body region, and age. For the 1-year-old phantom, a chest conversion factor of msv mgy 1 cm 1 was used, and for the 5-year-old phantom, msv mgy 1 cm 1 was used [9]. The pediatric chest conversion factors by Deak et al. are reported for a body (32-cm) CTDI phantom. The 320- MDCT scanner displays DLP for a head (16-cm) phantom for small-fov scans, which were used for the 1-year-old phantom. To calculate ED from the DLP conversion factors, one must reference the same phantom size. Therefore, when estimating ED from DLP for the 1-year-old phantom, a division factor of 1.9 (determined on the CT scanner used for this investigation) was included in the calculation to normalize to a 32-cm phantom. Statistical Analysis Repeated measures analyses were performed to compare the ED among the protocols using the mixed procedure with the Kenward-Roger correction. For each protocol, a paired Student t test was used to compare the ED calculated from the MOS- FET organ dose measurements to the estimated ED calculated using DLP. All analyses were performed using SAS (version 9.2, SAS Institute) software using two-sided tests and were specified a priori; p values 0.05 or less were considered statistically significant. Reported p values are not adjusted for multiple testing. Results are reported as means (± SD). Results The measured absorbed organ doses are summarized in Table 3. The MOSFET- and DLP-estimated EDs for the various protocols on each phantom are provided in Table 4. Heart Rate (beats/min) Peak Tube Current (ma) Exposure Phase Window Organ doses varied depending on the specific acquisition type. The highest organ doses from all protocols (in descending maximum recorded dose order) were in the bone surface ( mgy), breast ( mgy), skin ( mgy), thymus ( mgy), esophagus ( mgy), heart ( mgy), and lungs ( mgy). The ED was lower for prospectively compared with retrospectively acquired cardiac CTA protocols. In the 1-yearold phantom, the ED for the prospectively acquired scan was approximately 40% lower than the ED for the retrospectively acquired scan (p < 0.001). In the 5-year-old phantom, at 60 beats/min, the ED for the prospectively acquired scan was approximately 73% lower than the ED for the retrospectively acquired scan (p < 0.001). In the 5-year-old phantom, at 120 beats/min, the ED for the prospectively acquired scan was approximately 39% lower than the ED for the retrospectively acquired scan (p < ). For the 1-year-old phantom, the MOS- FET ED was 69% higher than the DLP ED for the prospective scan and 196% higher for the retrospective scan (after accounting for the phantom size differences between that reported on the console [16 cm] vs the used conversion factors [32 cm]). For the 5-yearold phantom, the MOSFET ED was 235% and 250% higher than the DLP ED for the prospective scans at 60 and 120 beats/min, respectively, and 300% and 306% higher for the retrospective scans at 60 and 120 beats/ min, respectively. Adjusted cardiac-specific conversion factors based on the MOSFET ED and console-displayed DLP ED compared with published conversion factors for pediatric chest CT are provided in Table 4. No. of R-R Intervals Gantry Rotation Time (s) 1 Prospectively gated CTA % of R-R Small 1 Retrospectively gated CTA/cardiac functional Continuous Small assessment 5 Prospectively gated CTA % of R-R Medium 5 Retrospectively gated CTA/cardiac functional assessment % of R-R FOV Medium 5 Prospectively gated CTA % of R-R Medium 5 Retrospectively gated CTA/cardiac functional assessment Continuous Medium Note Scan parameters were automatically selected for pediatric patients on the basis of patient age and heart rate. All scans were performed at 100 kvp and with a 10-cm scan length. A small FOV is 240 mm, and a medium FOV is 320 mm. Discussion The 320-MDCT volume scanner has theoretic advantages of increased temporal resolution, decreased scan duration, and decreased motion artifacts compared with conventional 16-MDCT and non dual-source 64-MDCT scanners. Volume acquisitions can potentially decrease radiation exposure during cardiac imaging, compared with helical acquisitions, because of the lack of overranging, minimal overbeaming, and avoidance of low-pitch helical scanning with volume acquisition [4]. Diagnostic-quality imaging for cardiac CTA using this volume CT scanner has been shown recently in adults and children [10, 11]. As use of this volume scanner technology potentially becomes more widespread, it is important to have more accurate dosimetry information than that currently available in the medical literature. Our study showed a statistically significant reduction in radiation dose using a prospectively gated technique compared with the retrospective technique. Recently, Al-Mousily et al. [16] reported a mean estimated ED of 0.8 msv using the DLP method with an ICRP 60 pediatric chest conversion factor (0.039 msv mgy 1 cm 1 ) on eight prospectively ECG-gated cardiac CTA examinations performed on predominantly young children (age range, months) with heart rates above 80 beats/min on a 320-MDCT scanner with an 80-kVp tube voltage, and scan ranges varying between 8 and 16 cm. Al-Mousily et al. manually selected a single-heartbeat technique ( Target mode) for prospective acquisitions, as opposed to the automatically selected two-heartbeat prospective technique used for our measurements at 120 beats/min [16]. This distinction, along with 1132 AJR:199, November 2012
5 Dose Estimates of Pediatric Cardiac CT Angiography Using 320-MDCT Scanner TABLE 3: Organ Radiation Dose Measured by Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor Detectors During ECG-Gated Cardiac CT Angiography in 1- and 5-Year-Old Anthropomorphic Phantoms Organ Location Prospective 1-Year-Old Phantom Retrospective Prospective (60 beats/min) Retrospective (60 beats/min) their lower tube voltage setting, may partly account for the difference between their DLP ED of 0.8 msv and our DLP ED of 1.3 and 1.4 msv for 120 beats/min prospective scans in the 1-year-old and 5-year-old phantoms, respectively, when using the same conversion factor [16, 17]. For both the study by Al-Mousily et al. [16] and our investigation, cardiac CTA doses were comparatively lower than published doses on helical non dual-source MDCT. Ou et al. [22] reported a mean DLP ED of 4.5 msv on 126 prospectively ECG-gated cardiac CTA examinations performed on 5- to 6-year-old patients with heart rates below 80 beats/min on a 64-MDCT scanner at 80 kvp. Herzog et al. [23], using 64-MDCT clinical scan parameters and a commercially available dose-estimation software package, reported a mean estimated ED on nongated pediatric cardiac CTA examinations using automated exposure controls of 2.5 msv. Using the DLP method, an adult chest conversion factor of msv mgy 1 cm 1, and a 120-kVp technique on a 64-MDCT, Horiguchi et al. [24] reported an estimated ED of 3.0 msv for a prospectively ECG-gated cardiac CTA. If one were to apply the published 120-kVp conversion factors by Deak et al. [9] for a 1- and 5-year-old chest CT of and msv mgy 1 cm 1 on the scans used by Horiguchi et al. [24] (assuming the same imaging parameters), the resultant estimated EDs would be 8.1 and 5.3 msv, respectively. To our knowledge, there is only one published report of radiation dose associated with volumetrically acquired retrospectively gated cardiac CT in children. Using the DLP method with a range of ICRP 60 pediatric chest conversion factors based on patient age ( msv mgy 1 cm 1 ), Greenberg et al. [11], using 80 kvp and 250 ma (87.5 mas) and a mean volume length of 11 cm, reported an ED of 8.0 msv in primarily infants on the 320-MDCT volume scanner. This ED is nearly double our MOSFET ED for a retrospectively ECG-gated cardiac CTA in a 1-year-old of 4.5 msv. In addition to the inherent DLP ED estimation issues discussed already, we think that the higher tube current used by Greenberg et al. partly explains this disparity. Huang et al. [1], using a 5-year-old 5-Year-Old Phantom Prospective Retrospective Bone marrow 0.95 ± ± ± ± ± ± 0.06 Lung 6.19 ± ± ± ± ± ± 0.40 Liver 0.74 ± ± ± ± ± ± 0.08 Adrenal glands 0.64 ± ± ± ± ± ± 0.39 Stomach 1.57 ± ± ± ± ± ± 0.22 Bone surface ± ± ± ± ± ± 0.41 Skin 7.26 ± ± ± ± ± ± 0.33 Thyroid 0.64 ± ± ± ± ± ± 0.13 Left breast 7.00 ± ± ± ± ± ± 0.59 Esophagus 5.86 ± ± ± ± ± ± 0.50 Heart 7.13 ± ± ± ± ± ± 0.42 Thymus 7.03 ± ± ± ± ± ± 0.23 Spleen 1.15 ± ± ± ± ± ± 0.06 Right kidney 0.64 ± ± ± ± ± ± 0.39 Pancreas 1.57 ± ± ± ± ± ± 0.22 Intestine 0.32 ± ± a 0.08 ± ± a Ovaries 0.04 ± ± a 0.04 ± a 0 a Colon 0.32 ± ± a 0.08 ± ± a Bladder 0.39 ± ± a 0.04 ± a 0 a Note Data are mean ± SD organ radiation dose (mgy). a Zero denotes that no dose was detected for any replication. phantom and thermoluminescent dosimeters with ICRP 103 tissue-weighting factors on a 64-MDCT with retrospective ECG-gating at 100 kvp, reported EDs of 16.5, 12.2, 12.0, and 11.8 msv at simulated heart rates of 40, 60, 70, and 90 beats/min, respectively. Our ED measurements are approximately 60% lower than those of Huang et al., even at a heart rate of 120 beats/min. We think that this difference is mostly attributable to the lack of overranging, minimal overbeaming, and avoiding the need for low-pitch acquisition on a 320-MDCT volume scanner compared with a helical acquisition on a conventional 64-MDCT scanner without adaptive collimation. We are also currently assessing dosimetry data for ECG-gated pediatric cardiac CTA on our 64-MDCT scanner for comparison purposes. Several investigators have reported lower estimated ED on both prospectively and retrospectively ECG-gated cardiac CTA in children and adults compared with this investigation using dual-source CT scanners [25, 26]. Disadvantages of dual-source CT scanner technology compared with 320-MDCT AJR:199, November
6 Podberesky et al. TABLE 4: Effective Dose (ED) Estimates by Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor (MOSFET) and Dose-Length Product (DLP) Methods for Pediatric ECG-Gated Cardiac CT Angiography in 1-Year-Old and 5-Year-Old Anthropomorphic Phantoms Phantom (Heart Rate), Scan MOSFET ED (msv) CTDI vol (mgy) DLP (mgy cm) a DLP ED (msv) b 1-year-old phantom volume cardiac CTA include stairstep artifacts on image reformations, slower image acquisition increasing the potential for acquisition during an arrhythmia and patient motion, and the inability to capture the entire heart volume in a state of iodinated contrast at a single point in time [27]. In the present study, MOSFET ED estimates were times greater than DLP ED estimates for the 5-year-old phantom in both the prospective and retrospective scans at both tested heart rates and were times greater for the 1-year-old phantom. Our calculated cardiac conversion factors, which reference the 16-cm CTDI phantom, for the 1-yearold phantom were 0.85 times less for the prospective scan, to nearly equivalent for the retrospective scan, compared with the chest conversion factors determined by Deak et al. [9], which reference the 32-cm CTDI phantom, and times greater than the published pediatric chest conversion factors based on ICRP 60, which similarly reflect the 16-cm CTDI phantom [17]. Our calculated cardiac conversion factors for the 5-year-old phantom were times higher than chest conversion factors determined by Deak et al. [9] for the 5-year-old phantom for both prospective and retrospective scans, and times greater than the published pediatric chest conversion factors based on ICRP 60 [17]. This disparity has also been reported by other investigators comparing both MOSFET- and Published Chest Conversion Factor (msv mgy 1 cm 1 ) [9] Calculated Conversion Factor (msv mgy 1 cm 1 ) Prospective gating 2.7 ± 0.04 c a,d Retrospective gating 4.5 ± a year-old phantom (60 beats/min) Prospective gating 1.2 ± 0.03 e d Retrospective gating 4.5 ± d year-old phantom Prospective gating 3.0 ± 0.11 f d Retrospective gating 4.9 ± d a The displayed volume CT dose index (CTDI vol ) and DLP for the 5-year-old phantom, based on a medium (320-mm) FOV, are reported for a body (32-cm) phantom. The displayed CTDI vol and DLP for the 1-year-old phantom, based on a small (240-mm) FOV, are reported for a head (16-cm) phantom. The pediatric chest conversion factors used are based on the 32-cm phantom. Therefore, ED by DLP estimates for the 1-year-old phantom are normalized by dividing by a factor of 1.9 (factor was derived on scanner for relevant protocol). b ED = k DLP, where k is a region-specific (in this case, chest) dose conversion factor. c p < 0.001, compared with 1-year-old phantom retrospective acquisition. d p < 0.01, compared with ED by MOSFET method. e p < 0.001, compared with 5-year-old phantom (60 beats/min) retrospective acquisition. f p < , compared with 5-year-old phantom retrospective acquisition. Monte Carlo simulation based dose estimates to DLP-based dose estimations in adult cardiac and body CT [2, 5, 16, 28]. The discrepancy between MOSFET ED and DLP ED can likely be explained by several factors. Notably, the Deak et al. pediatric chest conversion factors are based on one model of scanner and were developed for a helical chest scan as opposed to a volume cardiac examination. In addition, the Deak et al. pediatric chest conversion factors are based on a scanner that reports all doses normalized to a 32-cm phantom, as opposed to the 16-cm phantom used for the 1-year-old phantom in this study. We normalized this difference by dividing our 1-year-old DLP ED values by 1.9, a value that was determined on the CT scanner used for this investigation. This emphasizes the importance of ensuring that the CTDI phantom size reported on the scanner matches the phantom size used to develop the dose conversion factors. We think it is crucial that radiologists be familiar with the meaning of their CT scanner s dose display values, DLP conversion factors, and inherent limitations when using this information to estimate CT ED. There is often confusion when using the DLP method to estimate ED, because DLP reflects the total amount of radiation imparted on an acrylic phantom by the scanner, not the dose absorbed by the patient [5], and because of the variety of conversion factors that can be found in the literature [9, 17]. Our calculated conversion factors support that published conversion factors for pediatric chest examinations may be inaccurate for estimating dose for pediatric cardiac examinations, specifically resulting in low ED estimations in general, as in this investigation. Further dose assessment for cardiac CTA is necessary for more-accurate dose estimations in children. We hope that this investigation encourages this type of individualized protocolspecific dose analysis. Our study had several limitations. We only tested our protocols in 1- and 5-year-old phantoms. However, these two phantom sizes best approximate the majority of our clinical pediatric cardiac CTA examinations. The phantoms also do not account for body shape differences at those ages and the effect on ED of those potential differences. Additionally, we only tested our protocols on simulated heart rates of 60 and 120 beats/min. We think that these two heart rates appropriately cover the range of normal heart rates in this age range, with or without the use of β-blockers [19]. We chose to exclude the scanogram and bolus tracking from the ED determination of these protocols, which results in a very small underestimation of the total dose associated with a complete cardiac CTA examination. Although we did not assess image quality or diagnostic capability in this investigation, the parameters studied are those used for our clinical ECG-gated pediatric cardiac CTA examinations and were specifical AJR:199, November 2012
7 Dose Estimates of Pediatric Cardiac CT Angiography Using 320-MDCT Scanner ly designed to mimic the acceptable image quality obtained in helical scan mode on our 64-MDCT scanner for our clinical practice. These parameters are similar to those used by Greenberg et al. [11] in their recent investigation showing diagnostic-quality imaging in clinical pediatric cardiac CTA on the 320-MDCT volume scanner even at heart rates above 120 beats/min. We also recognize the limitations of using published pediatric chest conversion factors for DLP ED estimations for cardiac CTA [5]. Pediatric-specific cardiac conversion factors are not available in the literature. We recognize the inherent limitations and potential error in using ED determination in medical imaging for the purposes of risk-benefit estimates, though we think it is an acceptable and familiar quantitative measurement for medical imaging dose estimations [29 31]. In conclusion, as CT scanner technology and applications continue to evolve, it is important that radiologists understand radiation doses associated with commonly performed CT examinations in children. Knowing the ED associated with a CT scan allows the radiologist, clinicians, patient, and parents to make a better informed risk-benefit decision. For pediatric ECG-gated cardiac CTA examinations on a 320-MDCT scanner, using MOSFET dosimetry, we found that the ED range was msv depending on prospective versus retrospective gating, phantom size (1- vs 5-year-old), and heart rate (60 vs 120 beats/min). These doses are lower than those previously reported for pediatric cardiac CTA on 16-MDCT and conventional 64-MDCT scanners. Acknowledgments We thank Lane Donnelly, Brian Coley, Alan Brody, Marilyn Goske, David Larson, and Lisa Lemen for their support of this investigation. References 1. Huang B, Law MW, Mak HK, Kwok SP, Khong P. Pediatric 64-MDCT coronary angiography with ECG-modulated tube current: radiation dose and cancer risk. AJR 2009; 193: Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 2001; 176: Choi SI, George RT, Schuleri KH, et al. Recent developments in wide-detector cardiac computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 25: Kroft LJ, Roelofs JJ, Geleijns J. Scan time and patient dose for thoracic imaging in neonates and small children using axial volumetric 320-detector row CT compared to helical 64-, 32- and 16-detector row CT acquisitions. Pediatr Radiol 2010; 40: Huda W, Tipnis S, Sterzik A, Shoepf UJ. Computing effective dose in cardiac CT. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55: Hollingsworth CL, Yoshizumi TT, Frush DP, et al. Pediatric cardiac-gated CT angiography: assessment of radiation dose. AJR 2007; 189: Yoshizumi TT, Goodman PC, Frush DP, et al. Validation of metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for organ dose assessment during CT: comparison with thermoluminescent dosimetry. AJR 2007; 188: American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Report 204: size specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. College Park, MD: American Association of Physicists in Medicine, Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalendar WA. Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose length product. Radiology 2010; 257: Lee AB, Nandurkar D, Schneider-Kolsky ME, et al. Coronary imaging quality of 320-detector MDCT in patients with heart rates above 65 beats per minute: preliminary experience. AJR 2011; 196:1313; [web]w729 W Greenberg SB, Bhutta S, Braswell L, Chan F. Computed tomography angiography in children with cardiovascular disease: low dose techniques and image quality. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 28: Hoe J, Toh KH. First experience with 320-row multidetector CT coronary angiography scanning with prospective electrocardiogram gating to reduce radiation dose. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009; 3: Zimmermann E, Dewey M. Whole-heart 320-row computed tomography: reduction of radiation dose via prior coronary calcium scanning. Rofo 2011; 183: Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder MD, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320- row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation. Circulation 2009; 120: Einstein AJ, Elliston C, Arai AA, et al. Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector row volume scanner. Radiology 2010; 254: Al-Mousily F, Shifrin RY, Fricker FJ, Feranec N, Quinn NS, Chandran A. Use of 320-detector computed tomographic angiography for infants and young children with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 2011; 32: American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Report 96: the measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT report of AAPM Task Group 23 of the Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee. College Park, MD: American Association of Physicists in Medicine, Siripornpitak S, Pornkul R, Khowsathit P, Layangool T, Promphan W, Pongpanich B. Cardiac CT angiography in children with congenital heart disease. Eur J Radiol 2011 Dec 21; [Epub ahead of print] 19. Custer JW, Rau RE, eds. Johns Hopkins: the Harriett Lane handbook, 18th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Elsevier, [No authors listed]. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007; 37: O Daniel JC, Stevens DM, Cody DD. Reducing radiation exposure from survey CT scans. AJR 2005; 185: Ou P, Celermajer DS, Marini D, et al. Safety and accuracy of 64-slice computer coronary angiography in children after the arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008; 1: Herzog C, Muvhihill DM, Nguyen SA, et al. Pediatric cardiovascular CT angiography: radiation dose reduction using automatic tube current modulation. AJR 2008; 190: Horiguchi J, Kiguchi M, Fujioka C, et al. Radiation dose, image quality, stenosis measurement, and CT densitometry using ECG-triggered coronary 64-MDCT angiography: a phantom study. AJR 2008; 190: Ben Saad M, Rohnean A, Sigal-Cinqualbre A, Adler G, Paul JF. Evaluation of image quality and radiation dose of thoracic and coronary dualsource CT in 110 infants with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39: Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 msv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: Otero HJ, Steigner ML, Rybicki FJ. The post- 64 era of coronary CT angiography: understanding new technology from physical principles. Radiol Clin North Am 2009; 47: Hurwitz LM, Yoshizumi TT, Goodman PC, et al. Effective dose determination using an anthropomorphic phantom and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for clinical adult body multidetector array computed tomography protocols. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007; 31: Martin CJ. Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures? Br J Radiol 2007; 80: Brenner DJ. Effective dose: a flawed concept that could and should be replaced. Br J Radiol 2008; 81: McCollough CH, Christner JA, Kofler JM. How predictive is effective dose as a predictor of radiation risk? AJR 2010; 194: AJR:199, November
Assessment of effective dose in paediatric CT examinations
Assessment of effective dose in paediatric CT examinations E. Dougeni 1,2 CL. Chapple 1, J. Willis 1, G. Panayiotakis 2 1 Regional Medical Physics Department, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, Newcastle
More informationRadiation Dose Reduction Strategies in Coronary CT Angiography
Radiation Dose Reduction Strategies in Coronary CT Angiography Noor Diyana Osman, PhD noordiyana@usm.my Contents: Introduction Radiation dosimetry in CT Radiation risk associated with coronary CT angiography
More informationEstimated Radiation Dose Associated With Low-Dose Chest CT of Average-Size Participants in the National Lung Screening Trial
Medical Physics and Informatics Original Research Larke et al. Estimated Radiation Dose for Low-Dose Chest CT Medical Physics and Informatics Original Research Frederick J. Larke 1 Randell L. Kruger 2
More informationOrgan-Based Dose Current Modulation and Thyroid Shields: Techniques of Radiation Dose Reduction for Neck CT
Medical Physics and Informatics Original Research Hoang et al. Radiation Dose Reduction for Neck CT Medical Physics and Informatics Original Research Jenny K. Hoang 1,2 Terry T. Yoshizumi 1 Kingshuk Roy
More informationLow Dose Era in Cardiac CT
Low Dose Era in Cardiac CT DIANA E. LITMANOVICH, MD Department of Radiology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard Medical School Disclosures Neither I nor my immediate family members have a financial
More informationDoses from pediatric CT examinations in Norway Are pediatric scan protocols developed and in daily use?
Doses from pediatric CT examinations in Norway Are pediatric scan protocols developed and in daily use? Eva Godske Friberg * Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, P.O. Box, Østerås, Norway Abstract.
More informationMeasurement of organ dose in abdomen-pelvis CT exam as a function of ma, KV and scanner type by Monte Carlo method
Iran. J. Radiat. Res., 2004; 1(4): 187-194 Measurement of organ dose in abdomen-pelvis CT exam as a function of ma, KV and scanner type by Monte Carlo method M.R. Ay 1, M. Shahriari 2, S. Sarkar 3, P.
More informationAccounting for Imaging Dose
Accounting for Imaging Dose High Profile Over-exposures Lead to Growing Concern FDA issues warning in October 2009-209 patients exposed to 8 times typical dose for CT brain perfusion scan (3-4 Gy) - Some
More informationESTABLISHING DRLs in PEDIATRIC CT. Keith Strauss, MSc, FAAPM, FACR Cincinnati Children s Hospital University of Cincinnati College of Medicine
ESTABLISHING DRLs in PEDIATRIC CT Keith Strauss, MSc, FAAPM, FACR Cincinnati Children s Hospital University of Cincinnati College of Medicine CT Dose Indices CTDI INTRODUCTION CTDI 100, CTDI w, CTDI vol
More informationA more accurate method to estimate patient dose during body CT examinations with tube current modulation
A more accurate method to estimate patient dose during body CT examinations with tube current modulation Poster No.: C-0738 Congress: ECR 2014 Type: Scientific Exhibit Authors: A. Kawaguchi 1, Y. Matsunaga
More informationAbsorbed Radiation Dose in Radiosensitive Organs Using 64- and 320-Row Multidetector Computed Tomography: A Comparative Study
Absorbed Radiation Dose in Radiosensitive Organs Using 64- and 320-Row Multidetector Computed Tomography: A Comparative Study The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share
More informationEstimating Patient Radiation Dose from Computed Tomography
Estimating Patient Radiation Dose from Computed Tomography C. Cagnon, J. DeMarco, E. Angel, M. McNitt-Gray UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine 1 Patient Dose from CT Advances in Technology... Helical
More informationAcknowledgments. A Specific Diagnostic Task: Lung Nodule Detection. A Specific Diagnostic Task: Chest CT Protocols. Chest CT Protocols
Personalization of Pediatric Imaging in Terms of Needed Indication-Based Quality Per Dose Acknowledgments Duke University Medical Center Ehsan Samei, PhD Donald Frush, MD Xiang Li PhD DABR Cleveland Clinic
More informationCT Dose Estimation. John M. Boone, Ph.D., FAAPM, FSBI, FACR Professor and Vice Chair of Radiology. University of California Davis Medical Center
CT Dose Estimation John M. Boone, Ph.D., FAAPM, FSBI, FACR Professor and Vice Chair of Radiology 1 University of California Davis Medical Center CT Dose Estimation Introduction The CTDI Family of Metrics
More informationDiagnostic value of 320-slice coronary CT angiography in coronary artery disease: A
Diagnostic value of 320-slice coronary CT angiography in coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis Zhonghua Sun PhD 1, Chenghsun Lin PhD 2 1. Discipline of Medical Imaging, Department
More informationMedical Physics and Informatics Original Research
Medical Physics and Informatics Original Research Christner et al. Estimating Effective Dose for CT Medical Physics and Informatics Original Research FOCUS ON: Jodie A. Christner 1 James M. Kofler Cynthia
More informationRadiation Dose Estimations to the Thorax Using Organ-Based Dose Modulation
Cardiopulmonary Imaging Original Research Lungren et al. Organ-Based Dose Modulation Cardiopulmonary Imaging Original Research Matthew P. Lungren 1 Terry T. Yoshizumi 1 Samuel M. Brady 1 Greta Toncheva
More informationThoracic examinations with 16, 64, 128 and 256 slices CT: comparison of exposure doses measured with an anthropomorphic phantom and TLD dosimeters
Thoracic examinations with 16, 64, 128 and 256 slices CT: comparison of exposure doses measured with an anthropomorphic phantom and TLD dosimeters Poster No.: C-2584 Congress: ECR 2015 Type: Scientific
More informationCURRENT CT DOSE METRICS: MAKING CTDI SIZE-SPECIFIC
CURRENT CT DOSE METRICS: MAKING CTDI SIZE-SPECIFIC Keith Strauss, MSc, FAAPM, FACR Cincinnati Children s Hospital University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Acknowledgments John Boone, PhD Michael McNitt-Grey,
More informationCT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction
CT Radiation Risks and Dose Reduction Walter L. Robinson, M.S. D.A.B.S.N.M., D.A.B.M.P., D.A.B.R. Consultant Certified Medical Radiation Health & Diagnostic Imaging Physicist Medical Radiation and Children
More informationCoronary CT angiography with prospective ECG-triggering: an effective alternative to invasive coronary angiography
Review Article Coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG-triggering: an effective alternative to invasive coronary angiography Zhonghua Sun Discipline of Medical Imaging, Department of Imaging and Applied
More informationToshiba Aquillion 64 CT Scanner. Phantom Center Periphery Center Periphery Center Periphery
Comparison of radiation dose and imaging performance for the standard Varian x-ray tube and the Richardson Healthcare ALTA750 replacement tube for the Toshiba Aquillion CT scanners. by Robert L. Dixon,
More informationIntroduction. Original Article
Original Article Superior CT coronary angiography image quality at lower radiation exposure with second generation 320-detector row CT in patients with elevated heart rate: a comparison with first generation
More informationFundamentals, Techniques, Pitfalls, and Limitations of MDCT Interpretation and Measurement
Fundamentals, Techniques, Pitfalls, and Limitations of MDCT Interpretation and Measurement 3 rd Annual Imaging & Physiology Summit November 20-21, 21, 2009 Seoul, Korea Wm. Guy Weigold, MD, FACC Cardiovascular
More informationCardiac CT Techniques in Neonates (and infants)
Cardiac CT Techniques in Neonates (and infants) Siddharth P. Jadhav, MD Director, Body CT and MRI Edward B. Singleton Department of Pediatric Radiology Texas Children s Hospital Disclosures None Objectives
More informationAsk EuroSafe Imaging. Tips & Tricks. CT Working Group. Optimization of scan length to reduce CT radiation dose
Ask EuroSafe Imaging Tips & Tricks CT Working Group Optimization of scan length to reduce CT radiation dose Alban Gervaise (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nancy, FR) Mika Kortesniemi (HUS Medical Imaging
More informationCT Dose Optimization for Whole- Body PET/CT Examinations
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Original Research Tonkopi et al. CT Dose Optimization for PET/CT Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Original Research FOCUS ON: Elena Tonkopi 1,2 Andrew A. Ross
More informationTriple Rule-out using 320-row-detector volume MDCT: A comparison of the wide volume and helical modes
Triple Rule-out using 320-row-detector volume MDCT: A comparison of the wide volume and helical modes Poster No.: C-0488 Congress: ECR 2012 Type: Authors: Keywords: DOI: Scientific Exhibit E.-J. Kang,
More informationTo Shield or Not to Shield? Lincoln L. Berland, M.D.
To Shield or Not to Shield? Lincoln L. Berland, M.D. Disclosures Consultant to: Nuance, Inc. Page 2 Breast Radiation on CT Use of chest CT has increased in women vulnerable to cancer induction by radiation.
More informationManaging Radiation Risk in Pediatric CT Imaging
Managing Radiation Risk in Pediatric CT Imaging Mahadevappa Mahesh, MS, PhD, FAAPM, FACR, FACMP, FSCCT. Professor of Radiology and Cardiology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Chief Physicist
More informationAsk EuroSafe Imaging Tips & Tricks. CT Working Group
Ask EuroSafe Imaging Tips & Tricks CT Working Group Organ Based Tube Current Modulation to Reduce Radiation Dose to Superficial Radiosensitive Organs Eileen Kelly (Galway University Hospitals, IE) Matthias
More informationReduced exposure using asymmetric cone beam processing for wide area detector cardiac CT
Reduced exposure using asymmetric cone beam processing for wide area detector cardiac CT The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story
More informationX-Ray & CT Physics / Clinical CT
Computed Tomography-Basic Principles and Good Practice X-Ray & CT Physics / Clinical CT INSTRUCTORS: Dane Franklin, MBA, RT (R) (CT) Office hours will be Tuesdays from 5pm to 6pm CLASSROOM: TIME: REQUIRED
More informationCardiac CT - Coronary Calcium Basics Workshop II (Basic)
Cardiac CT - Coronary Calcium Basics Workshop II (Basic) J. Jeffrey Carr, MD, MSCE Dept. of Radiology & Public Health Sciences Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston-Salem, NC USA No significant
More information2 Cardiovascular Computed Tomography: Current and Future Scanning System Design
2 Cardiovascular Computed Tomography: Current and Future Scanning System Design Wm. Guy Weigold Introduction The heart can be visualized in gross form on any standard chest computed tomography (CT), but
More informationCT Dosimetry in the Clinical Environment: Methods and Analysis
CT Dosimetry in the Clinical Environment: Methods and Analysis Manuel Arreola, Ph.D. DABR Associate Chair of Radiology Director, Medical Physics Graduate Program Department of Radiology University of Florida
More informationRadiation doses, noise properties, and in-plane spatial resolutions for CT coronary angiography using different CT scanners: Phantom study
ORIGINAL ARTICLES Radiation doses, noise properties, and in-plane spatial resolutions for CT coronary angiography using different CT scanners: Phantom study Kosuke Matsubara 1, Tadanori Takata 2, Hiroshige
More informationHow to Develop CT Protocols for Children
How to Develop CT Protocols for Children Introduction Prior to 2001 the vast majority of CT imaging of children was conducted using the same or similar techniques used for adult imaging. In 2001, several
More informationDebra Pennington, MD Director of Imaging Dell Children s Medical Center
Debra Pennington, MD Director of Imaging Dell Children s Medical Center 1 Gray (Gy) is 1 J of radiation energy/ 1 kg matter (physical quantity absorbed dose) Diagnostic imaging doses in mgy (.001 Gy)
More informationComputed tomography Acceptance testing and dose measurements
Computed tomography Acceptance testing and dose measurements Jonas Andersson Medical Physicist, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Sciences University Hospital of Norrland, Umeå Sweden Contents The Computed
More informationState of the art and future development for standardized estimation of organ doses in CT
State of the art and future development for standardized estimation of organ doses in CT March 2015 William J. O Connel, Dr. Ph, Senior Medical Physicist Imagination at work. Agenda Introduction Duke Florida
More informationA comparison of radiation doses from modern multi-slice Computed Tomography angiography and conventional diagnostic Angiography:
A comparison of radiation doses from modern multi-slice Computed Tomography angiography and conventional diagnostic Angiography: Rob Loader Oliver Gosling Introduction Approached by Dr Oliver Gosling (Research
More informationEXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE 9: , 2015
2384 Dose study of electrocardiogram automatic tube current modulation technology in prospective coronary computed tomography angiography scans of overweight patients GUIRU HE, XIAOPEI LIU, YAN LIU, WEI
More informationDose to Radiosensitive Organs During Routine Chest CT: Effects of Tube Current Modulation
Medical Physics and Informatics Original Research Angel et al. Radiation Dose During Chest CT Medical Physics and Informatics Original Research Erin Angel 1,2 Nazanin Yaghmai 1 Cecilia Matilda Jude 1 John
More informationDosimetric Consideration in Diagnostic Radiology
Dosimetric Consideration in Diagnostic Radiology Prof. Ng Kwan-Hoong Department of Biomedical Imaging University of Malaya ngkh@um.edu.my Radiation Dosimetry Workshop, 28-29 March 2014 2 Why do we measure
More informationImprovement of Image Quality with ß-Blocker Premedication on ECG-Gated 16-MDCT Coronary Angiography
16-MDCT Coronary Angiography Shim et al. 16-MDCT Coronary Angiography Sung Shine Shim 1 Yookyung Kim Soo Mee Lim Received December 1, 2003; accepted after revision June 1, 2004. 1 All authors: Department
More information8/18/2011. Acknowledgements. Managing Pediatric CT Patient Doses INTRODUCTION
Managing Pediatric CT Patient Doses Keith J. Strauss, MSc, FAAPM, FACR President X-Ray Computations, Inc. Boston, Massachusetts Acknowledgements Marilyn Goske, MD John Boone, PhD Cynthia McCollough, PhD
More informationAutomatic Patient Centering for MDCT: Effect on Radiation Dose
Patient Centering for MDCT CT Imaging Original Research Jianhai Li 1 Unni K. Udayasankar 1 Thomas L. Toth 2 John Seamans 2 William C. Small 1 Mannudeep K. Kalra 1,3 Li J, Udayasankar UK, Toth TL, Seamans
More informationKerma Area Product Method for Effective Dose Estimation During Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection Procedures: Phantom Study
Vascular and Interventional Radiology Original Research Kim et al. Dose for Lumbar Steroid Injection Vascular and Interventional Radiology Original Research Sangroh Kim 1 Greta Toncheva 2,3 Colin Anderson-Evans
More informationRadiation Dosimetry for CT Protocols
Radiation Dosimetry for CT Protocols This document contains radiation dosimetry information from CT scans and can be used by investigators to estimate the dosimetry information required by the JRSC or
More informationSkyscan 1076 in vivo scanning: X-ray dosimetry
Skyscan 1076 in vivo scanning: X-ray dosimetry DOSIMETRY OF HIGH RESOLUTION IN VIVO RODENT MICRO-CT IMAGING WITH THE SKYSCAN 1076 An important distinction is drawn between local tissue absorbed dose in
More informationEffect of dose reduction on image quality and diagnostic performance in coronary computed tomography angiography
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2013) 29:453 461 DOI 10.1007/s10554-012-0096-3 ORIGINAL PAPER Effect of dose reduction on image quality and diagnostic performance in coronary computed tomography angiography
More informationEstimation of Organ and Effective Doses for Neonate and Infant Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterizations
Medical Physics and Informatics Original Research Kawasaki et al. Dose Estimates for Neonate and Infant Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization Medical Physics and Informatics Original Research Toshio Kawasaki
More informationAustin Radiological Association Nuclear Medicine Procedure PET SODIUM FLUORIDE BONE SCAN (F-18 NaF)
Austin Radiological Association Nuclear Medicine Procedure PET SODIUM FLUORIDE BONE SCAN (F-18 NaF) Overview Indication Sodium Fluoride F18 injection is a radioactive diagnostic agent for positron emission
More informationPediatric CT: Strategies to Lower Radiation Dose
Pediatric Imaging Review Zacharias et al. Strategies to Lower Pediatric CT Radiation Dose Pediatric Imaging Review FOCUS ON: Claudia Zacharias 1 Adam M. Alessio 2 Randolph K. Otto 3 Ramesh S. Iyer 3 Grace
More informationA Snapshot on Nuclear Cardiac Imaging
Editorial A Snapshot on Nuclear Cardiac Imaging Khalil, M. Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Helwan University. There is no doubt that nuclear medicine scanning devices are essential tool in the
More informationComparison of organ doses estimations in radiology with PCXMC application based on MIRD phantoms and CALDose-X application based on voxel phantoms
Comparison of organ doses estimations in radiology with PCXMC application based on MIRD phantoms and CALDose-X application based on voxel phantoms G. Gialousis 1, Z. Pappouli 2, A. Dimitriadis 2, E. Karavassilis
More informationAn Assessment of Organ and Effective Dose of Patients who Undertake CT Examinations in two Teaching Hospitals of Mashhad&Isfahan
An Assessment of Organ and Effective Dose of Patients who Undertake CT Examinations in two Teaching Hospitals of Mashhad&Isfahan *M.T.Bahreyni Toossi, **S.Mohandes Dastgherdi Medical Physics Dep., Faculty
More informationTechnology Assessment Institute: Summit on CT Dose Cardiac CT - Optimal Use of Evolving Scanner Technologies
Cardiac CT - Optimal Use of Evolving Scanner Technologies P. Rogalla, M.D. Dept. of Medical Imaging University of Toronto Special thanks to Dr. Lembcke, Dr. Hein Charité, Berlin Disclosures No salaries
More informationPatient / Organ Dose in CT
Patient / Organ Dose in CT Patient specific and organ dose estimation H.D. Nagel Dr. HD Nagel, Science & Technology for Radiology Buchholz / Germany www.sascrad.com 1 Topics CTDI & patient dose SSDE Organ
More informationImpact of ICRP-89 Based Models on Dose Estimates for Radiopharmaceuticals and CT Exams. Stabin MG, Kost SD, Clark JH, Pickens DR, Price RR, Carver DE
Impact of ICRP-89 Based Models on Dose Estimates for Radiopharmaceuticals and CT Exams Stabin MG, Kost SD, Clark JH, Pickens DR, Price RR, Carver DE Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA Abstract New
More informationCancerogenesis Risks between 64 and 320 Row Detector CT for Coronary CTA Screening
Cancerogenesis Risks between 64 and 320 Row Detector CT for Coronary CTA Screening Atif N. Khan, Harvard Medical School Faisal Khosa, Harvard Medical School Boris Nikolic, Emory University Waqas Shuaib,
More informationCurrent status of diagnostic imaging in dental university hospitals in Japan
Oral Radiol (2004) 20:15 21 Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Springer-Verlag Tokyo 2004 DOI 10.1007/s11282-004-0010-3 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Takehito Sasaki Minoru Fujita Tsuguhisa Katoh
More informationAdopting DAP as a dose metric in CT
Adopting DAP as a dose metric in CT Nick Weir Department of Medical Physics Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh NHS Lothian Dose Area Product (DAP) in CT Hypothesis: There are advantages to using DAP: (i) In
More informationElectron Beam CT versus 16-slice Spiral CT: How Accurately Can We Measure. Coronary Artery Calcium Volume?
Electron Beam CT versus 16-slice Spiral CT: How Accurately Can We Measure Coronary Artery Calcium Volume? 1 Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate how accurately we can measure CAC volume
More informationTranslating Protocols Across Patient Size: Babies to Bariatric
Translating Protocols Across Patient Size: Babies to Bariatric Cynthia H. McCollough, PhD, FACR, FAAPM Professor of Radiologic Physics Director, CT Clinical Innovation Center Department of Radiology Mayo
More informationScientific Exhibit. Authors: D. Takenaka, Y. Ohno, Y. Onishi, K. Matsumoto, T.
The feasibility of biphasic contrast-media-injection-protocol for chest imaging on 320-slice volume MDCT: Direct comparison of biphasic and bolus contrast-media injection protocols on 320-slice volume
More informationDoses from Cervical Spine Computed Tomography (CT) examinations in the UK. John Holroyd and Sue Edyvean
Doses from Cervical Spine Computed Tomography (CT) examinations in the UK John Holroyd and Sue Edyvean Why a new dose survey? Number of enquires received concerning the current NDRL Concern that could
More informationDianna Cody, PhD, DABR, FAAPM Professor & Clinical Operations Director Imaging Physics U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX
Dianna Cody, PhD, DABR, FAAPM Professor & Clinical Operations Director Imaging Physics U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX Learning Objectives: Limitations for estimating patient dose for CT Methods
More informationLow-Dose Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography With Prospective Electrocardiogram Triggering
Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 57, No. 3, 2011 2011 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN 0735-1097/$36.00 Published by Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.08.634
More informationInfluence of Image Acquisition on Radiation Dose and Image Quality: Full versus Narrow Phase Window Acquisition Using 320 MDCT
Influence of Image Acquisition on adiation Dose and Image Quality: Full versus Narrow Phase Window Acquisition Using 320 MDCT The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share
More informationCT Optimisation for Paediatric SPECT/CT Examinations. Sarah Bell
CT Optimisation for Paediatric SPECT/CT Examinations Sarah Bell Sarah.bell14@nhs.net Outline 1. Introduction 2. Aims and Objectives 3. Methods 4. Results 5. Discussion 6. Conclusions 7. References Introduction
More informationIntroduction and Background
CT Lung Cancer Screening and the Medical Physicist: Background, Findings and Participant Dosimetry Summary of the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) Randell Kruger, PhD, DABR Medical Physics Section
More informationPatient Radiation Doses from Adult and Pediatric CT
Radiation Doses from CT CT Imaging Original Research Walter Huda 1 Awais Vance 1,2 Huda W, Vance A Keywords: MDCT, pediatric CT, physics of radiology, radiation dose DOI:.2214/AJR.06.01 Received January
More informationFeasibility of contrast agent volume reduction on 640-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with low heart rate
Feasibility of contrast agent volume reduction on 640-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with low heart rate Poster No.: B-0742 Congress: ECR 2013 Type: Authors: Keywords: DOI: Scientific Paper
More informationImpact of ICRP-89 Based Models on Dose Estimates for Radiopharmaceuticals and CT Exams
Impact of ICRP-89 Based Models on Dose Estimates for Radiopharmaceuticals and CT Exams Stabin MG, Kost SD, Clark JH, Pickens DR, Price RR, Carver DE Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN, USA 13th International
More informationTitle Radiation dose and cancer risk from on 64-slice CT: a phantom study Author(s) Feng, ST; Law, MWM; Huang, B; Ng, S Khong, PL Citation European Journal of Radiology, 201 Proof Issue Date 2010 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10722/123973
More informationDose Reduction Options in Cardiac CT
Dose Reduction Options in Cardiac CT Doyle P, Ball P*, Donnelly P # Radiological Sciences & Imaging, Forster Green Hospital *Department of Radiology, Ulster Hospital # Department of Cardiology, Ulster
More informationMultislice CT angiography in cardiac imaging. Part III: radiation risk and dose reduction
R e v i e w A r t i c l e Singapore Med J 2010; 51(5) : 374 Multislice CT angiography in cardiac imaging. Part III: radiation risk and dose reduction Sun Z, Ng K H Discipline of Medical Imaging, Department
More informationBanding and Step-Stair Artifacts on the Cardiac-CT Caused By Pseudo-Ectopic Beats
Banding and Step-Stair Artifacts on the Cardiac-CT Caused By Pseudo-Ectopic Beats Amolak Singh 1*, Yash Sethi 1, Sonya Watkins 1, Angela Youtsey 1, Angie Thomas 1 1. Department of Radiology, University
More informationModifi ed CT perfusion contrast injection protocols for improved CBF quantifi cation with lower temporal sampling
Investigations and research Modifi ed CT perfusion contrast injection protocols for improved CBF quantifi cation with lower temporal sampling J. Wang Z. Ying V. Yao L. Ciancibello S. Premraj S. Pohlman
More informationChief Radiographer TEI Clinical Associate 2016
MDCT Principles i and Applications Ε ΑGADAKOS MSc Ε. ΑGADAKOS MSc Chief Radiographer TEI Clinical Associate 2016 Aim To understand d recent technological advances in MSCT and how they can be effectively
More informationSurvey of patients CT radiation dose in Jiangsu Province
Original Article Page 1 of 6 Survey of patients CT radiation dose in Jiangsu Province Yuanyuan Zhou 1, Chunyong Yang 1, Xingjiang Cao 1, Xiang Du 1, Ningle Yu 1, Xianfeng Zhou 2, Baoli Zhu 1, Jin Wang
More informationSOMATOM Drive System Owner Manual Dosimetry and imaging performance report
www.siemens.com/healthcare SOMATOM Drive System Owner Manual Dosimetry and imaging performance report Table of contents 1 Dosimetry and imaging performance report 5 1.1 Dose information 5 1.1.1 General
More informationCardiac CT Lowering the Dose Dramatically
Cardiac CT Lowering the Dose Dramatically U. Joseph Schoepf, MD, FAHA, FSCBT MR, FSCCT Professor of Radiology, Medicine, and Pediatrics Director of Cardiovascular Imaging Disclosures Consultant for / research
More informationA new method for radiation dose reduction at cardiac CT with multi-phase data-averaging and non-rigid image registration: preliminary clinical trial
A new method for radiation dose reduction at cardiac CT with multi-phase data-averaging and non-rigid image registration: preliminary clinical trial Poster No.: C-0595 Congress: ECR 2013 Type: Authors:
More informationRadiation Dose Reduction and Coronary Assessability of Prospective Electrocardiogram-Gated Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography
Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 52, No. 18, 2008 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN 0735-1097/08/$34.00 Published by Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.048
More information128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography using highpitch scan protocols in 102 patients
128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography using highpitch scan protocols in 102 patients Poster No.: C-0634 Congress: ECR 2010 Type: Scientific Exhibit Topic: Cardiac Authors: Y. H. Choe, J. W. Lee,
More informationCombined Anatomical and Functional Imaging with Revolution * CT
GE Healthcare Case studies Combined Anatomical and Functional Imaging with Revolution * CT Jean-Louis Sablayrolles, M.D. Centre Cardiologique du Nord, Saint-Denis, France Case 1 Whole Brain Perfusion and
More informationManaging Patient Dose in Computed Tomography (CT) INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION
Managing Patient Dose in Computed Tomography (CT) International Commission on Radiological Protection Information abstracted from ICRP Publication 87 Available at www.icrp.org Task Group: M.M. Rehani,
More informationWhy is CT Dose of Interest?
Why is CT Dose of Interest? CT usage has increased rapidly in the past decade Compared to other medical imaging CT produces a larger radiation dose. There is direct epidemiological evidence for a an increase
More informationSPECIFIC PRINCIPLES FOR DOSE REDUCTION IN HEAD CT IMAGING. Rajiv Gupta, MD, PhD Neuroradiology, Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School
SPECIFIC PRINCIPLES FOR DOSE REDUCTION IN HEAD CT IMAGING Rajiv Gupta, MD, PhD Neuroradiology, Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School OUTLINE 1 st Presentation: Dose optimization strategies
More informationCardiopulmonary Imaging Original Research
Cardiopulmonary Imaging Original Research Bischoff et al. Versus Helical Mode for Coronary CTA Cardiopulmonary Imaging Original Research Bernhard Bischoff 1 Franziska Hein 1 Tanja Meyer 1 Markus Krebs
More informationFDG-18 PET/CT - radiation dose and dose-reduction strategy
FDG-18 PET/CT - radiation dose and dose-reduction strategy Poster No.: C-1856 Congress: ECR 2014 Type: Authors: Keywords: DOI: Scientific Exhibit P. Nicholson, S. McSweeney, K. O'Regan; Cork/IE Radiation
More informationMin Li 1, Bing-bing Yu 1, Jian-hua Wu 2, Lin Xu 3, Gang Sun 1 * Abstract. Introduction
Coronary CT Angiography Incorporating Doppler-Guided Prospective ECG Gating in Patients with High Heart Rate: Comparison with Results of Traditional Prospective ECG Gating Min Li 1, Bing-bing Yu 1, Jian-hua
More informationThe Post-64 Era of Coronary CT Angiography: Understanding New. Technology from Physical Principles
The Post-64 Era of Coronary CT Angiography: Understanding New Technology from Physical Principles The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
More informationNIH Public Access Author Manuscript Acad Radiol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 September 16.
NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Published in final edited form as: Acad Radiol. 2008 January ; 15(1): 40 48. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2007.07.023. Analysis of Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variation During Cardiac
More informationRadiation dose of cardiac CT what is the evidence?
Eur Radiol (2009) 19: 1311 1315 DOI 10.1007/s00330-009-1312-y CARDIAC Hatem Alkadhi Radiation dose of cardiac CT what is the evidence? Received: 10 December 2008 Revised: 2 January 2009 Accepted: 12 January
More information3 rd International Symposium on the System of Radiological Protection Seoul, October John Harrison
3 rd International Symposium on the System of Radiological Protection Seoul, October 2015 John Harrison UK Task Group 79 : Use of Effective Dose as a Risk-related Radiological Protection Quantity John
More informationCT Radiation Dosimetry Study Using Monte Carlo Simulation and. Computational Anthropomorphic Phantoms
CT Radiation Dosimetry Study Using Monte Carlo Simulation and Computational Anthropomorphic Phantoms by Yakun Zhang Graduate Program in Medical Physics Duke University Date: Approved: Ehsan Samei, Supervisor
More information