FEASIBILITY REPORT UNITY AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS

Transcription

1 Public Works Dept Engineering Division Phone: FAX: FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR UNITY AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA January 14, 2011 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota Steven L. Lillehaug, P.E. Reg. No January 24, 2011 Feasibility Report 2011 Unity Avenue Neighborhood Improvements Page 1

2 I. BACKGROUND In 2011, the City of Brooklyn Center will be entering the 18 th year of its long-range infrastructure rehabilitation program often referred to as the Neighborhood Street and Utility Improvement Program. This program has consisted of a systematic rehabilitation and/or replacement of the City s aging streets, water main, sanitary sewer, storm sewers, sidewalks and street lights. The City s Capital Improvement Program identifies Unity Avenue for reconstruction in The proposed project includes roadway improvements along Unity Avenue from 69 th Avenue to 73 rd Avenue (see Figure 1). This report was prepared in response to City Council Resolution No dated August 9, 2010, directing staff to prepare a feasibility report and collect public input for the proposed project. Staff conducted a public informational meeting with residents and property owners located within the project area on January 12, A resident questionnaire was also distributed as part of the project evaluation process. A summary of resident comments is provided in Appendix A. The 2011 project area consists of just over one-half mile of streets. The project area consists of approximately 318 residential (R3) units. II. STREET IMPROVEMENTS A. EXISTING CONDITIONS Unity Avenue exists as a two-lane road that functions for both local access and a through traffic route from 69 th Avenue to 73 rd Avenue in Brooklyn Park. Unity Avenue was originally constructed in 1978, resulting in the existing street pavement being in service for more than 30 years. The roadway, as it currently exists, has concrete curb and gutter and is 30-feet wide. The curb and gutter is in fair to good condition with minimal locations where settlement/heaving and concrete cracking has occurred. The roadway s bituminous asphalt pavement has aged and is showing significant fatigue and distress. The typical service life for bituminous pavement is approximately 30 years. Generally, it is no longer cost-effective to routinely maintain these streets with seal coating or thin overlay procedures. Complete reconstruction is warranted. A geotechnical investigation was performed within the project area to obtain and analyze soil samples below the street pavement. Soil borings were taken to a depth of 4 feet and primarily indicate good soils containing sand and gravel below the pavement surface. Feasibility Report 2011 Unity Avenue Neighborhood Improvements Page 2

3 Feasibility Report 2011 Unity Avenue Neighborhood Improvements Page 3

4 B. PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS Street Improvements Based on the age and condition of the existing bituminous asphalt pavement surface, complete replacement of the street surface is warranted for the entire length of Unity Avenue. The existing concrete curb and gutter has not exceeded its life expectancy and can be suitably rehabilitated with spot repairs. Approximately 15 percent of the curb and gutter is estimated to be replaced due to heaving/settling issues, cracked concrete and impacts by other construction (e.g. storm sewer replacement). The roadway subgrade consists of good soils and is planned to be reclaimed (recycled) in place to be reused as the new aggregate base for the proposed street section. The existing roadway width will be maintained and is proposed to be constructed to 30 feet. Concrete curbing through driveways will be rehabilitated and replaced as necessary due to heaving/settling issues and impacts by other construction. The proposed street reconstruction does not include changes to the roadway width, alignment or elevation. Traffic Calming The proposed street design is sufficient to accommodate the current traffic levels. Significant changes in local traffic patterns are not anticipated as a result of the proposed reconstruction of the roadway. However, due to past concerns with higher volumes of traffic, speeding issues, and pedestrian safety issues, several speed humps were installed as a traffic calming management tool through this corridor. In an effort to preserve this element of traffic calming, 4-inch high speed tables are proposed to be reconstructed in the same areas that the existing speed humps are located (see Appendix B). III. STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM A. EXISTING CONDITIONS The neighborhood improvement program has historically included the replacement of free standing street lights located within the neighborhood. Free standing street lights are defined as lights mounted on poles that do not contain any other overhead utilities attached to them. There are currently 11 free standing street lights within the project area, three that might possibly be private lights and are currently incorrectly listed as public City lights. The lights consist of older style wood utility poles that have been in service for many years, most likely dating back to the original construction of the neighborhood. The existing free standing street lights have overhead power services with cobra-head type light fixtures. The City s Street Light Policy states that street lights may be provided at street intersections and at midblock locations where the distance between intersections exceeds 700 feet. Street lights are currently located at all intersections and in midblock locations as appropriate. B. PROPOSED STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS The recommended street light improvements include replacement of the eight public free standing street lights with fiberglass poles, cut-off type light fixtures and underground power services. Staff will be working with Xcel Energy to determine which lights are private/public and to have them properly designated as such. Regardless of the private/public classification, all will be requested to be replaced by Xcel Energy under Xcel Energy s street light replacement program. Feasibility Report 2011 Unity Avenue Neighborhood Improvements Page 4

5 IV. STORM DRAINAGE AND TREATMENT SYSTEM A. EXISTING CONDITIONS The project area is located within Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission area and is a direct watershed tributary to Shingle Creek. The existing storm drainage systems within the project area consist of a network of storm sewer pipes, ponding areas and waterways installed during the 1970 s. This network eventually discharges to the Shingle Creek. The storm sewer system is well developed with all the storm sewer water flowing into five privately owned storm ponds (43-002, , , and 44-02) that are interconnected and flow into Shingle Creek. The existing underground pipe network in this area was found to be in good condition with some minor issues identified in inlet structures that warrant repair. A visual inspection of the sheet pile weir of the storm sewer crossing in the area just south of 70 th Circle showed signs of excessive corrosion. A televising inspection of the existing mainline storm sewer was conducted during the summer of The existing underground pipe network was found to be in fair to good condition. Some debris and sediment has accumulated within the larger diameter trunk storm sewers. Cleaning of these pipe segments will be conducted separately from the proposed project. Throughout the project area, no significant isolated or major flooding issues have been identified. B. PROPOSED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Minor storm sewer improvements will be made to the existing system that includes replacing/repairing catch basins and laterals where necessary. Repairs will be made as necessary to the existing sheet pile weir. With the existing storm water detention and treatment ponds in the area designed for the project area when the road was constructed, no storm water treatment improvements are proposed. V. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM A. EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing sanitary sewer collection system within the project area consists primarily of 8-inch diameter PVC sewer mains. A majority of the sanitary sewer system was installed in During the project planning phase, all public sanitary sewer pipes were inspected with remote televising equipment. These inspections confirmed that the sanitary sewer has minimal issues with sags and no root intrusion along pipe joints and services (see Figure 2). Surveys received from residents also indicate no occurrences of sewer service line blockage issues. The sanitary sewer is in good condition due to the relatively young age and good materials used in the original construction of the sanitary sewer, and there have been no maintenance issues of the sanitary sewer system in this area. Feasibility Report 2011 Unity Avenue Neighborhood Improvements Page 5

6 Figure 2. Sanitary Sewer Line, Unity Avenue PVC pipe B. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Only minor miscellaneous sanitary sewer repairs are proposed including the replacement of manhole castings and adjustment rings with external seals as part of the City s sanitary sewer infiltration and inflow program to minimize clean rainwater from entering the sanitary sewer. VI. WATER SYSTEM A. EXISTING CONDITIONS The watermain system within the project area consists primarily of 10-inch and 8-inch diameter ductile iron pipe installed in 1977 and Water records indicate that three breaks have occurred within the project area (see Figure 3). Minor water quality problems have been reported by residents that are typically caused by hard water issues and are mitigated by the periodic flushing of hydrants. Generally, the ductile iron water main is considered to be in good condition with an estimated 40 to 50 years of remaining service life. B. PROPOSED WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS Only minor miscellaneous repairs are planned for hydrants and valves that will be determined in the final design of the project. No watermain pipe replacement is recommended for this project. Feasibility Report 2011 Unity Avenue Neighborhood Improvements Page 6

7 Feasibility Report 2011 Unity Avenue Neighborhood Improvements Page 7

8 VII. RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS Generally, all public infrastructure owned, maintained and operated by the City throughout the project area is located within City easements and/or right-of-way. It is not anticipated that the City will need to obtain any additional easements for this project. VIII. ESTIMATED COSTS AND FUNDING CONSIDERATIONS The total estimated cost of the proposed project is $422,000. The preliminary estimate includes the cost for project administration, engineering and legal fees (15 percent) and construction contingency (15 percent). Table 1 provides a summary of the estimated project costs and recommended funding amounts from the various sources as indicated. Funding for the project is further described below. A. FUNDING FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS The estimated project cost of roadway improvements for Unity Avenue is $ 359,000. This preliminary estimate includes the costs for project administration, legal, engineering and construction contingency. Special assessments for street improvements are proposed in accordance with City policy and have been computed based on a partial reconstruction of the roadway with full-depth pavement rehabilitation. The rate is based on the average cost of similar resurfacing projects, multiplied by the Council s designated proportion to be assessed. Based on past projects and typical assessments (e.g Dupont Avenue project assessment amount of $2,576 per R1 zoned residential property), increased by the annual construction price index of 3.6 percent, which was the rate increase used for the full reconstruction assessment rate increase for 2011, the proposed assessment amount for a partial reconstruction for a R1 property would be $2,669. The properties on Unity Avenue between 69 th Avenue and 73 rd Avenue are zoned R3 within the project area (see Figure 4). In accordance with the City s assessment policy, the rate is based on the R1 unit assessment divided by 75 feet to determine the front footage rate. Based on the total development front footage and 318 units within the project area, which includes all properties and units on Unity Avenue, 70 th Circle, 71 st Circle, 72 nd Circle and Ponds Drive, the R3 assessment rate is computed and proposed to be $ per unit. A summary of the proposed special assessments for street improvements is provided in Appendix C. The total assessed amount to all properties would be $204, B. FUNDING FOR UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS The estimated cost of sanitary sewer improvements is $19,000; the estimated cost for water main improvements is $6,000; the estimated cost for storm sewer improvements is $24,000; and the estimated cost for street light replacement is $13,000. As previously noted, these total cost estimates include the costs for project administration, engineering and construction contingency. All costs for water, sanitary sewer and street light improvements will be funded by their respective utility funds in accordance with established policy for such improvements. Feasibility Report 2011 Unity Avenue Neighborhood Improvements Page 8

9 Feasibility Report 2011 Unity Avenue Neighborhood Improvements Page 9

10 Figure 4. Unity Avenue Street Reconstruction Assessment Map Feasibility Report 2011 Unity Avenue Neighborhood Improvements Page 10

11 IX. RECOMMENDED PROJECT SCHEDULE Table 2 contains the preliminary schedule for the project. Table 2. Unity Avenue Project Schedule Action City Council Receives Feasibility Report, Declares Cost to be Assessed and Calls for Public Hearings Council Holds Public Hearing, Authorizes the Project and Orders Preparation of Plans and Specifications City Council Approves Plans and Specs, Authorizes Advertisement for Bids Target Date January 24, 2011 February 14, 2011 February 28, 2011 City Receives and Opens Project Bids April 25, 2011 City Council Considers Award of Contract May 10, 2011 Start Project Construction May 2011 Construction Substantially Complete August 2011 X. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The overall condition of the City's street and utility infrastructure systems is critical to the operation, safety, welfare and economic health of the entire community. As a result of the infrastructure needs described, and the proposed solutions and estimated costs provided in this report, the proposed project is considered to be necessary, cost effective and feasible. Feasibility Report 2011 Unity Avenue Neighborhood Improvements Page 11

12 Appendix A Resident Comments Feasibility Report 2011 Unity Avenue Neighborhood Improvements

13 QUESTIONNAIRE Unity Ave Street Project This questionnaire will help the City of Brooklyn Center engineering staff to better understand the infrastructure needs and issues in your neighborhood. Please return this survey by January 12, You may also contact us at to discuss these issues. Thank you for your cooperation. 1. Our televised sewer inspections typically identify sanitary sewer services with moderate to severe root infiltration. Have you experienced any problems with sanitary sewer service, such as the line plugging or having the service cleaned out to the street? How often? 2. Typically, improvements to the storm drainage system are needed. Do you have a problem with drainage or flooding in the street, your yard or your basement? 3. Do you experience problems relating to the water distribution system such as water pressure, taste, odor or color? (OVER)

14 4. Do you have a lawn irrigation (or sprinkler) system located within your property? Please circle one Yes No 5. Do you have a sump pump in your basement? Please circle one: A. Yes, my sump pump runs frequently (at least once every day) B. Yes, my sump pump runs less frequently C. No, I do not have a sump pump or do not use my sump pump 6. What other concerns, comments and/or issues do you have pertaining to the streets, sidewalks, utilities, etc., in your neighborhood? Should you have questions or need more information, please contact the engineering division at Your name: Address: Please return by January 12, 2011 to: Engineering Division City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN FAX publicworks@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us

15 Summary of Resident Survey UNITY AVENUE Street Sanitary Storm Water Sprinkler System Sump Pump Comments/ Concerns Unknown Address No No Water pressure normal. Taste appears normal. Odor and color a few times when City drain cleaning/extinguishers were flushed. Nothing unusual Yes No Power outages occur frequently due to above ground utility lines. Sidewalks are not applicable. They don't exist in front, nor around my property. NOTE: THIS SURVEY CAME BACK WITH NO ADDRESS ON IT. NO ENVELOPE WITH ADDRESS EITHER. Unity Ave No No No Yes No None. NOTE: THIS SURVEY CAME BACK WITH NO ADDRESS ON IT. ENVELOPE HAD NO ADDRESS ALSO. Mains are jetted annually. No Taste and color sometimes noticed. Taste is bad and color yellowish. No No Unity Avenue North isn't wide enough. No sidewalks. No, no problems. No, no basement. No No No What improvements are you planning? The only problems I know about (too narrow, no sidewalks, hard to see pedestrians in the dark, no place to put all the snow) - cars with loud music - are not likely to be solved by a street improvement project. No No No Yes No The streets could use some resurfacing. We don't have any sidewalks. No No Some problems with Yes No None odor. No never No No No No How much is it going to cost? No No No Yes No While I understand the need for period updates/repairs, my main concern at this time is what this will meant o me costwise. I look forward to a comprehensive explanation of specific improvements needed, alternate ways of attending to these needs, total costs and invidivdual assessment costs and how these costs will be met. Also, a summary of the January 12 meeting would be appreciated by those who could not attend. No No No No No No (sidewalks) No No No No No None 1 1/18/2011

16 Summary of Resident Survey UNITY AVENUE Street Sanitary Storm Water Sprinkler System Sump Pump Comments/ Concerns No problems have been experienced. I have lived here for 8 years. Poor yard drainage on southeast No problems. Yes No Main concern is cost/assessment amount. corner of my home when there is a very heavy rain. Mainly due to land settling. No flooding experienced in basement. Not applicable. The drain right in front of our mailbox typically backs up and floods the street. Leaves may be part of the problem and the tree with most of the leaves is gone now. I think the drain across the street also backs up. Our tap water doesn't taste very good and it has a slight odor. Yes No NA No Toilet will plug up about once or twice a week. Plunger will unplug it. Lower leve - two to three times No Yes No NA in 24 years. No No Yes No Not applicable. No No No Yes No NA No problems at all. No problem at all. No problems at all. Yes. Maintained by Homeowners Association. No No concerns/comments/issues. No Heavy snow melt leaves large puddle in street outside of driveway Unity. No Yes No Mail boxes knocked down six times in fifteen years. I feel there's need for another hump/bump prior to autos reaching "stop sign" at 69th. 70th Cir No No No Not sure Not sure NA No No No Not sure Not sure NA NA NA NA Yes (townhome area) No 31 years in my home in BC. I live on a "private street" off Unity. I pay taxes but City doesn't provide certain services as paving, snow removal. 2 1/18/2011

17 Summary of Resident Survey UNITY AVENUE Street Sanitary Storm Water Sprinkler System Sump Pump Comments/ Concerns 71st Cir 72nd Cir Yes, once in 2009 first time in 18 No No Yes No NA years of occupancy. No problems. No No Yes No None - frequently have power outages. (townhome) No No No Yes No None No No No No No None None None No No No NA I have had no problems with sanitary sewer service. I have no complaints about the water system. I have no problem with drainage or flooding in the street or yard. I have no irrigation system on my property. I have no basement. I am happy with the way the City takes care of any street problems such as snowplowing, fixing potholes, patroling parking violations, etc. Due to sprained ankle I was not able to attend the 1/12/11 meeting. None None None No No I do not see a problem with the sewer at all. And cannot afford any assessments. NA NA NA No Not applicable. The sidewalk/pathways are non-existent along the Unity Ave roadway (70, 71 and 72nd Circles). High risk of injury for non-motorized "traffic" i.e. pedestrians. It would be convenient to have parking (metered?!) allowed in some areas and others posted as no parking anytime. GENERAL COMMENTS NA = No Answer 3 1/18/2011

18 Appendix B Project Drawings Feasibility Report 2011 Unity Avenue Neighborhood Improvements

19

20 Appendix C DRAFT Proposed Pending Assessment Roll Feasibility Report 2011 Unity Avenue Neighborhood Improvements

21 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROPOSED PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL January 24, 2011 UNITY AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROPERTY ID HOUSE NO. & STREET LEVY# STREET NOTES PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $

22 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROPOSED PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL January 24, 2011 UNITY AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROPERTY ID HOUSE NO. & STREET LEVY# STREET NOTES PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: ND CIR $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $

23 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROPOSED PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL January 24, 2011 UNITY AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROPERTY ID HOUSE NO. & STREET LEVY# STREET NOTES PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ 72, units x $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $

24 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROPOSED PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL January 24, 2011 UNITY AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROPERTY ID HOUSE NO. & STREET LEVY# STREET NOTES PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: TH CIR $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $

25 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROPOSED PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL January 24, 2011 UNITY AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROPERTY ID HOUSE NO. & STREET LEVY# STREET NOTES PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: UNITY AVE N $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $

26 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROPOSED PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL January 24, 2011 UNITY AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROPERTY ID HOUSE NO. & STREET LEVY# STREET NOTES PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ PID: ST CIR $ Total Assessments $204,814.26