TG-128: Quality Assurance for Prostate Brachytherapy Ultrasound

Transcription

1 TG-128: Quality Assurance for Prostate Brachytherapy Ultrasound STEVEN SUTLIEF DOUG PFEIFFER (HEATHER PIERCE, WENGZHENG FENG, JIM KOFLER) AAPM ANNUAL MEETING 2010

2 Educational Objectives To describe the methods of TG-128: Quality assurance tests for prostate brachytherapy ultrasound systems. To highlight special techniques which may be used to accomplish the tests described in TG-128. To review the materials and time needed to complete the TG-128 tests.

3 Outline Ultrasound physics Equipment TG128 tests Tolerances Time estimates Materials

4 Report AAPM Task Group 128: Quality assurance tests for prostate brachytherapy ultrasound systems. Medical Physics, Vol. 35, No. 12, December 2008, pages The report is available on the Publications page of the AAPM web site.

5 Beam geometry Ultrasound physics

6 Ultrasound Physics Wavelength (axial resolution) λ = c f where f = ultrasound frequency c = speed of sound in the tissue Material Velocity ( m/s) Air 330 Water 1497 Bone 3500 Fat 1440 Blood 1570 Soft tissue 1540

7 Ultrasound Physics Sound Power Reflection Coefficient [ ] 2 [ Z 2 + Z 1 ] 2 α r = Z 2 Z 1 Z is the acoustic impedance Z 1 = 3500 (bone) Z 2 = 1540 (soft tissue) α r = 0.15 Stronger boundary signal Z 1 = 1450 (fat) Z 2 = 1540 (soft tissue) α r = Weaker boundary signal

8 Ultrasound physics The attenuation coefficient for a typical clinical tissue density and ultrasound frequency is 0.5 db/cm/mhz. P P o P P o = 0.5 db/cm/mhz 3 MHz 5 cm 2 = = = 0.5 db/cm/mhz 6 MHz 5 cm 2 = 15/10 15 db = (deeper resolution) 30/10 30 db = 10 = (less deep resolution)

9 Ultrasound Physics So why would you ever use 6 MHz? λ = c f You can t measure smaller than your wavelength m/s λ = = 0.5 mm 3 MHz (finer resolution) 1540 m/s λ = = 0.3 mm 6 MHz (coarser resolution)

10 US equipment Probe

11 System US equipment

12 Prostate Brachytherapy US QA Complete QA will include: Ultrasound unit Needle template Treatment planning system Fluoroscope CT for post implant Template Needle Prostate Ultrasound Probe Ultrasound System

13 Setup for Phantom Measurements Clinical perspective, but coupling gel can leak out

14 Setup for Phantom Measurements Coupling gel stays in place, but image can be confusing

15 QC Testing Limit inter-observer variability Ideally performed by a single individual If multiple people, train for consistency

16 The Phantom CIRS Model 45 phantom. Used here for illustrative purposes only; no endorsement is implied. Wires spaced at known intervals Volumetric objects. TG128 report recommends a phantom design, but no manufacturer has implemented it yet

17 Test 1: Grayscale visibility Monitor must be adjusted appropriately for optimal visibility Calibration and brightness can drift over time Phosphors can fade

18 Test 1: Grayscale visibility Locate the gray scale strip on the side of the ultrasound screen. Depending on the type of strip, count the number of gray levels or measure the length of the gradation.

19 Test 2: Depth of penetration Reduced depth of penetration can reduce visibility of anterior capsule border Any increase in system noise will reduce depth of penetration Dead transducer elements (reducing signal) will also reduce depth of penetration

20 Test 2: Depth of penetration Find a relatively homogeneous region in the phantom. Using the digital calipers, determine the maximum depth that the static ultrasound speckle pattern of the phantom can be clearly distinguished from the dynamic electronic noise.

21

22 Test 3: Spatial resolution Negatively impacted by Poor probe condition Problems with pulse formation circuit boards Problems with pulse send/receive circuit boards 1 mm 2 mm 3 mm 4 mm 5 mm

23 Test 3: Spatial resolution Find a region of the phantom having single filament targets at various depths. Measure the dimensions of the filament image in both the axial and lateral directions. These dimensions are effectively the axial and lateral resolution limits. Switch the probe to the orthogonal direction and repeat

24 Test 4: Distance measurement accuracy Distance determined by pixel size and pixel calibration Pixel depth determined by range equation Differences from 1540 m/s sound speed will lead to errors in distance measurement Lateral distance calibration determined by FOV and pixel calibration. Errors can stem from image processing board and other circuitry

25 Test 4: Distance measurement accuracy Axial measurement: Align a column of fiber targets near to the center of the image, if possible. Freeze the image. Using the electronic calipers, measure the distance between the most proximal and the most distal targets. Lateral measurement: Repeat using a row of targets, measuring most lateral targets.

26 Test 5: Area measurement accuracy Area measurement is central to the implant procedure Since area measurement and distance measurement are so closely related, they have similar fault causes

27 Test 5: Area measurement accuracy Scan an object of known dimension such that the ultrasound beam intercepts it normally Using the appropriate tool on the ultrasound system, carefully trace the boundary of the object and record the calculated area of the object Measured area = 3.1 Nominal area = 3.05

28 Test 6: Volume measurement accuracy Complementary to distance and area measurements Errors are compounded multiplicatively

29 Test 6: Volume measurement accuracy Measured volume: 20.8 cc Certified volume: 20.6 cc Locate the base and apex of the phantom target; zero the stepper at the base Using the typical clinical procedure, perform a volume study After contouring the entire target, record the calculated volume

30 Test 7: Needle template alignment Depends on Accuracy of electronic template Distance measurement accuracy Physical needle template location

31 Test 7: Needle template alignment Place the probe with the needle template attached vertically in the water bath. Place needles at each corner of the needle template and one at the center. On the US system, verify that needle flashes in the image correspond to locations of needles on electronic grid overlay.

32 Test 8: TPS volume accuracy Perform a volume study of 3D target in the US phantom Import ultrasound images into treatment planning computer Retrace contours in treatment planning software Compare TPS volume to volume calculated by US system Variseed volume: 21.4 cc (3.9%) US Measured volume: 20.8 cc Certified volume: 20.6 cc

33 Tolerances Test Test name Tolerances 1 Grayscale visibility Δ > 2 steps or 10% from baseline 2 Depth of penetration Δ > 1 cm from baseline 3 Axial and lateral resolution Δ > 1 cm from baseline 4 Axial and lateral distance accuracy Error > 2 mm or 2% 5 Area measurement accuracy Error > 3 mm or 3% 6 Volume measurement accuracy Error > 5% 7 Needle template alignment Error > 3 mm 8 Treatment planning computer volume accuracy Error > 5%

34 Frequency # Test name Frequency 1 Grayscale visibility Annual 2 Depth of penetration Annual* 3 Axial and lateral resolution Annual* 4 Axial and lateral distance measurement accuracy Annual 5 Area measurement accuracy Annual 6 Volume measurement accuracy Annual 7 Needle template alignment Annual** 8 Treatment planning computer volume accuracy At Acceptance *Or following transport to another facility. **Or when a new template is used.

35 Time Estimates Test # Test name Typical duration 0 Gather and filling in preliminary information 10 minutes 1 Grayscale visibility 2 minutes 2 Depth of penetration 2 minutes 3 Axial and lateral resolution 1-5 minutes 4 Axial and lateral distance measurement accuracy 5 minutes 5 Area measurement accuracy 5 minutes 6 Volume measurement accuracy 10 minutes 7 Needle template alignment 15 minutes 8 Treatment planning computer volume accuracy 15 minutes Total: 70 minutes

36 Materials # Test name Equipment 1 Grayscale visibility Phantom 2 Depth of penetration Phantom 3 Axial and lateral resolution Phantom 4 Axial and lateral distance measurement accuracy Phantom 5 Area measurement accuracy Phantom 6 Volume measurement accuracy Phantom 7 Needle template alignment Water bath 8 Treatment planning computer volume accuracy TPS, Phantom

37 Ring-down artifact The signal is reflected multiple times within the needle.

38 Moisture in probe connection Electronic artifact

39 Poor contact between probe and object Contact artifact

40 Concluding Remarks Each of the tests rely on establishing a set of baseline measurements against which future measurements can be compared. The overall time commitment is manageable: the full set of measurements should be performed annually and will take about 90 minutes.