Effects of Quality Assurance Regulatory Enforcement on Performance of Mammography Systems: Evidence From Large- Scale Surveys in Taiwan
|
|
- Arline Stone
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Quality Assurance in Mammography Medical Physics and Informatics Original Research Medical Physics and Informatics Original Research Yi-Shuan Hwang 1 Hui-Yu Tsai 2 Chien-Chuan Chen 1 Pei-Kwei Tsay 3 Huay-Ben Pan 4,5 Giu-Cheng Hsu 6 Jen-Hsuan Lin 7 Chen-Shou Chui 8 Yung-Liang Wan 1,2 Ho-Ling Liu 1,2 Hwang YS, Tsai HY, Chen CC, et al. Keywords: average glandular dose, image quality, mammography, quality assurance, standards DOI: /AJR Received July 17, 2012; accepted without revision September 18, This work was supported by grants from the National Science Council and the Atomic Energy Council of Taiwan (NSC NU, E NU, E NU, and AEC10103L) and grants from the Bureau of Health Promotion of Taiwan (SC961035, C, and 9927C). 1 Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, 5 Fushing St, Kweishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan. Address correspondence to H. L. Liu (hlaliu@mail.cgu.edu.tw) or Y. L. Wan (ylw0518@adm.cgmh.org.tw). 2 Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, College of Medicine, and Healthy Aging Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan. 3 Department of Public Health and Center of Biostatistics, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan. 4 Department of Radiology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 5 National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. 6 Department of Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan. 7 Department of Radiation Protection, Atomic Energy Council, Taipei, Taiwan. 8 Department of Medical Physics, Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan. WEB This is a web exclusive article. AJR 2013; 201:W307 W X/13/2012 W307 American Roentgen Ray Society Effects of Quality Assurance Regulatory Enforcement on Performance of Mammography Systems: Evidence From Large- Scale Surveys in Taiwan OBJECTIVE. The Standards for Medical Exposure Quality Assurance in mammography systems were enacted on July 1,, in Taiwan. This study aimed to evaluate the trends in performance of mammography units before and after the regulation started on the basis of annual on-site surveys from to MATERIALS AND METHODS. On-site measurements were conducted on 215, 205, and 209 mammography units in, 2009, and 2010, respectively, which accounted for more than % of all units in Taiwan. Phantom image quality, average glandular dose (AGD), and half-value layer were evaluated on all systems. Processor conditions, compression conditions, radiation output, and computed radiography exposure indicators were assessed on units participating in mammography screening in and on all units in the later years. Evaluations of maximum compression force and automatic exposure control reproducibility were added into the protocol from 2009 onward. RESULTS. Mean phantom scores were improved significantly from to 2009 (11.63 ± 1.30 vs ± 0.94, p < 5) and remained stable for 2010 (12.35 ± 0.87). Mean AGDs were 1.48 ± 0.47, 1.38 ± 0.41, and 1.37 ± 0.42 mgy over the 3 years, with a significant reduction from to 2009 (p < 5). For film-screen mammography systems, variations of sensitometric curves were greatly reduced in 2009 and 2010 when compared with. Passing rates were increased after the regulation took effect in almost all aspects. CONCLUSION. Results from large-scale on-site surveys showed an overall improvement in performance after quality assurance in mammography was enforced in Taiwan. M ammography is regarded as the most important tool in early detection of breast cancer. For accurate diagnosis, high-quality mammographic images are needed to detect small lesions or any abnormal structures. However, radiation dose in mammography also has been a critical concern. To produce high-quality mammographic images and keep patient dose reasonably low, a quality control (QC) program in mammography, especially in successful breast cancer screening programs, must be implemented. Because of the increased attention being paid, the Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) was enacted in the United States in 1992 and enforced in 1994 [1]. The mammography QC manual published by the American College of Radiology (ACR) in 1999 [2] and the vendor/model-specific QC manuals approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for digital mammography provide practical references for complying with the regulation in the United States. For breast cancer screening, the European Commission established European guidelines for quality assurance (QA) in screening mammography [3]. Similarly, extensive QC programs have been implemented in mammography screening centers across other countries [4]. In Taiwan, the Bureau of Health Promotion, Ministry of Health, started the mammography screening project in 2002 [5]. Although general image quality and radiation doses were monitored on the screening units, no comprehensive QA program was required. Since July 1,, mammography systems have been included in the scope of Standards for Medical Exposure Quality Assurance by the Atomic Energy Council of Taiwan. All clinical facilities are now required by law to perform mammography QC procedures, which are similar to those required by MQSA with some modifications for local practice. To evaluate the effectiveness of QC practices and the performance of mammography systems, national or regional surveys were previously conducted in several countries [4, 6 14]. AJR:201, August 2013 W307
2 Data from the Nationwide Evaluation of X-Ray Trends (NEXT) survey and the MQSA inspection have shown continuous improvements in performance of mammography systems in the United States since 1985 [6, 7]. In the United Kingdom, all mammographic systems used in the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) are subject to regular testing following the procedures defined by the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM) [15]. When compared with previous survey data, results collected from 1998 to 1999 showed improvements in image quality without a significant increase in radiation dose [9]. Generally, medical equipment in Taiwan is considered quite modern, but the concept of QA in diagnostic imaging started relatively late compared with developed Western countries. Most previously published studies about the impact of QA on mammography system performance are from 10 years ago and are focused on film-screen mammography systems. To initiate mammography QA regulation in Taiwan and evaluate its impact, large-scale surveys with on-site measurements were conducted annually from to This study aimed to evaluate the effects of QA enforcement on the basis of the survey results, which may constitute a unique reference, especially for countries or regions that have not started similar regulations. Materials and Methods A total of 215, 205, and 209 mammography units were evaluated in, 2009, and 2010, respectively, which accounted for more than % of the total units in Taiwan. The numbers of filmscreen and digital mammography systems (with the distribution of manufacturers and models) are listed in Table 1. On-site visits and measurements were conducted by physics assistants who were trained by certificated medical imaging physicists. Phantom image quality, average glandular dose (AGD), and half-value layer (HVL) were evaluated on all systems over the 3 years. Film processor conditions, compression conditions, automatic exposure control reproducibility, radiation output, and computed radiography exposure indicator confirmations were assessed on the screening units in and on all units in 2009 and Phantom Image Quality An ACR accreditation phantom (Victoreen model N , Fluke Biomedical) was exposed with the clinical technique for a 4.2-cm compressed breast of average density at each surveyed site [4]. Each phantom image was scored by two of four qualified medical physicists according to the ACR scoring protocols, and the average scores were taken under optimal viewing condition for each system. For film-screen mammography systems, background density and density difference were measured on the phantom imaging test films. Passing criteria were given for the visibility of four fibers, three specks, three masses, and a background density no less than 1.20 for film-screen mammography units. For digital systems, passing criteria were based on manufacturer recommendations (quality control manuals for Senographe 2000 D and Senographe Essential, GE Healthcare; Lorad Selenia, Hologic; Giotto Image 3D, IMS; Navation DR and Inspiration, Siemens Healthcare; FCRm, Fujifilm Medical Systems; and Regius Contact, Konica Minolta Medical Imaging). Phantom total scores were calculated as the summation of the scores of fibers, specks, and masses. Automatic Exposure Control Reproducibility and Average Glandular Dose Breast entrance exposures were measured using a 6-cm 3 ion chamber and an electrometer (models M-3 and 10, Radcal Corporation) calibrated at mammographic x-ray beam energies, with the setup according to the ACR QC manual [4]. Four exposures were made with the clinical technique for a 4.2-cm average breast at each site. The passing criterion for the automatic exposure control reproducibility was a coefficient of variation (CV) of the four measurements no greater than 5. The mean entrance exposure was used to estimate the AGD by applying the exposure to the AGD conversion factor from Wu et al. [16, 17] or Dance et al. [18, 19], depending on the mammographic system. The upper limit of the AGD was 3 mgy. Fig. 1 Chart shows mean phantom scores and average glandular dose (AGD) values obtained from to 2010 in Taiwan. Asterisk denotes significant differences (p < 5) compared with previous year. Error bars indicate standard error of mean. Phantom Score Phantom score AGD Film Processor Conditions Film processing tests were performed at 115, 73, and 51 sites using film-screen mammography in, 2009, and 2010, respectively. A film of the surveyed site was exposed by a calibrated sensitometer (Victoreen model , Fluke Biomedical) and developed in the local processor. A sensitometric curve was produced for each processor by measuring the optical densities using a calibrated densitometer (Victoreen model , Fluke Biomedical). Base plus fog, mid density, and density difference were obtained according to the ACR QC manual [4]. Other Measurements HVL, radiation output, and compression conditions were evaluated as described in the ACR QC manual [4], with the same ion chamber and electrometer used for the breast entrance exposure measurements. In addition, exposure indicator accuracy was investigated on computed radiography systems according to protocols recommended by the manufacturers. Type 1145 aluminum alloy plates (model 8220, Radcal Corporation) were used for HVL measurements and the passing criterion was no less than kvp / + 3 mm aluminum, with the compression paddle in place. For radiation output, the passing criteria were 7.0 mgy/s for film-screen mammography and according to manufacturers recommendations for digital systems. For computed radiography exposure indicator confirmation, the passing criterion was within 20% of the target values. For compression conditions, measurements included the compression thickness accuracy and reproducibility, maximum compression force, and alignment of the chest wall edge of the compression paddle. The ACR phantom was adopted for the compression thickness check, with passing criteria of ± cm for accuracy and ± 0.2 cm for reproducibility. Maximum compression force was measured with a mammography compression test device (model 163, RMI), and the result had to lie between 11.4 and 20.4 kg (25 and 45 pounds) in the initial power drive mode. Passing criteria for the compression paddle alignment required the chest wall edge of the paddle to be invisible in the image and not extend beyond the image receptor by more than 1% of the source-to-image distance. Statistical Analysis Quantitative data were analyzed using analysis of variance to test different systems and years. If the test was significant, we used the Bonferroni procedure Year AGD (mgy) W308 AJR:201, August 2013
3 Quality Assurance in Mammography for multiple comparisons. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, version 17.0, and a p value < 5 was considered statistically significant. Optical Density A Optical Density C Fig. 2 Scatterplot shows mean phantom score versus average glandular dose (AGD) for film-screen mammography ( ), computed radiography ( ), digital radiography ( ), and all systems combined ( ) obtained from to Phantom Score Results Phantom Image Quality and Average Glandular Dose From the on-site measurements in, 2009, and 2010, the mean phantom total scores were ± 1.30, ± 0.94, and ± 0.87, respectively, and the corresponding mean AGDs were 1.48 ± 0.47, 1.38 ± 0.41, and 1.37 ± 0.42 mgy. Figure 1 illustrates the trends of these two indexes, showing a significant increase in phantom scores and a significant decrease in AGDs of all systems over the first 2 years (p < 5). No significant changes in these two measurements were observed from 2009 to The results were further categorized into film-screen mammography, computed radiography, and digital radiography for comparison. All systems showed increasing phantom scores from to 2009, with significance seen especially in film-screen mammography (p < 5). Phantom scores for both computed radiography and digital radiography were significantly higher (p < 5) than filmscreen mammography units, and digital radiography systems had significantly higher scores than computed radiography for all 3 years. On other hand, all systems showed a slight decrease in AGD over the 3-year period, with film-screen mammography and digital radiography having significantly lower doses compared with computed radiography systems (p < 5) in all 3 years. Scatterplots of mean phantom scores versus mean AGD of the combined data and the Optical Density B Coefficient of Variation D AGD (mgy) 2009 three categories are illustrated in Figure 2. An ideal system would fall in the upper left quadrant, having both high image quality and low radiation dose. Thus, digital radiography systems were considered better overall. More specifically, a clear trend of improvement could be observed for all systems between and 2009, and this advancement continued for computed radiography but not for film-screen mammography and digital radiography toward the third year Fig. 3 Sensitometric curves analysis in ( ), 2009 ( ), and 2010 ( ). A D, Analyses of film sensitometric curves obtained from surveyed processors show all curves obtained in (A) and 2009 (B) and mean curves (C) and coefficient of variation (CV) (D) for all 3 years. AJR:201, August 2013 W309
4 Film Processor Conditions Figure 3A shows large variations in film characteristic curves from. These variations were largely reduced after QA enforcement, as seen in data from 2009 (Fig. 3B). In Figure 3C, the curve had a slower speed and a lower contrast when compared with the two curves from the following years. The large variation of the processor conditions in is also clearly illustrated in Figure 3D, with greater excessive CVs in the darker regions. From, the average mid density values increased from 0 to 3 6 over 3 years, and the respective average density difference values were 1.65, 1.72, and 1.75, respectively. However, the differences of both mid density and density difference did not reach statistical significance. Passing Rates Passing rates of phantom image quality and AGD are shown in Figure 4A. Although all AGDs, except those from one unit in, were below 3 mgy, the passing rates of phantom image quality improved from to 2010 (83%, %, and 96%, respectively). The relatively low passing rate in all stemmed A 85 AGD from film-screen mammography systems, either due to insufficient background density (14 units) or lower phantom scores (9 units) or both. Figure 4B shows changes in passing rates of items related to compression conditions. Except for the compression thickness reproducibility, which was % for all years, trends of improvement were found with all other items. In, paddle edges were not visible for all systems because compression conditions were investigated only for the screening systems in that year. As for 2010, all compression-related evaluations reached passing rates greater than 98%. Passing rates of HVL, automatic exposure control reproducibility, and radiation output are summarized in Figure 4C. Each year, no more than two units failed these tests. Figure 4D shows the results from computed radiography exposure indicator confirmations. In, only 10 computed radiography systems accredited for screening were included. As for 2009, all the computed radiography systems were evaluated, which yielded a relatively low passing rate of 75% (24 of 32) compared with. In 2010, the passing rate improved to 93% (41 of 44). Phantom Image Quality B Paddle Edge Not Visible Discussion The performance evaluations of more than % of the mammographic units in Taiwan were conducted annually before and after the enforcement of mammography QA, and the results showed significantly improved phantom image quality, reduced AGD, and overall increased passing rates after the regulation took effect. The overall improvements found in this study were in agreement with previous analyses of the influences of MQSA in the United States [10, 11]. An important factor to consider when interpreting our data is the rapid switch from film-screen mammography to digital mammography systems during this period, which might be naturally occurring or partially attributed to the regulation. The proportion of digital systems increased from 41% (87 of 214) of the total units in to 60% (124 of 205) and 75% (156 of 209) in 2009 and 2010, respectively. The survey results included major digital manufacturers and models that are presently marketed in the world and could serve as a reference for performance comparisons. The improvements in phantom image quality from our survey agreed with the results of Compressed Thickness Accuracy Compressed Thickness Reproducibility Paddle Alignment Maximum Compression Force C HVL AEC Reproducibility Radiation Output D 70 Exposure Indicator Fig. 4 Passing rates of surveys from (blue bars), 2009 (red bars), and 2010 (green bars). A D, Graphs show passing rates of phantom image quality and average glandular dose (AGD) (A), compression and paddle related tests (B), half-value layer (HVL), automatic exposure control (AEC) reproducibility and radiation output (C), and computed radiography exposure indicator (D) obtained from to W310 AJR:201, August 2013
5 the FDA inspection between 19 and 2006 in which trends toward higher background density and phantom scores were observed [12, 13]. However, increased phantom scores according to the FDA corresponded with an increase in mean AGD from 0 to 1.76 mgy, whereas in our survey a reduction from 1.48 to 1.39 mgy for film-screen mammography was found. This may be explained by the fact that major improvements in phantom image quality of our film-screen mammography systems came from the film processor rather than exposure techniques. As for the comparison between film-screen mammography and digital systems, the FDA inspection data showed a significantly higher mean phantom score of 1 for digital systems when compared with a score of 12.3 for film-screen mammography systems [8]. The same trend was observed from our survey, with a mean score of 12.8 for digital radiography and 11.6 for film-screen mammography systems in In our AGD measurements, computed radiography resulted in significantly higher AGDs than film-screen mammography and digital radiography systems. AGDs were also further reduced with new systems using a tungsten target, which were introduced in Taiwan after These AGD trends for digital systems were similar to the NHSBSP equipment review report [20]. The sensitometric data obtained from surveyed processors showed significant variations in film processing conditions among facilities, especially before QA enforcement. After the regulation took effect, the variations decreased, both due to improvements of film processing and retirement of processors that were not working properly. Many filmscreen mammography systems were replaced with digital systems during this period, reflecting the rapid reduction in the number of processors from to 2010 (Table 1). In our surveyed data, passing rates for phantom image quality were slightly lower in than the following 2 years, which agreed with the trends found in the United Kingdom and the United States [7 13]. Most of the failures in our data appeared in the film-screen mammography systems, either due to inappropriately selected exposure techniques or defective processor conditions. In contrast, passing rates for digital systems were greater than 97% in all 3 years, even with stricter criteria for some manufacturers systems. Our results agreed with the results in the Digital Mammography Imaging Screening Trial QC survey in the United States [21, 22], which suggested that a phantom that was more discriminative Quality Assurance in Mammography TABLE 1: Film-Screen and Digital Systems and Distribution of Digital Manufacturers and Models in the Survey Between and 2010 in Taiwan Year Manufacturer and Model Film-screen system Digital system (total) GE Healthcare Senographe 2000 D Senographe DS Senographe Essential Hologic Lorad Selenia Siemens Healthcare Mammomat Novation DR Mammomat Inspiration IMS Giotto Image 3D Computed radiography Fujifilm Medical Systems Konica Minolta Medical Imaging Kodak Medical Imaging of image quality of digital systems should be used in the future. In this study, mammography QA regulation and inspection appeared to have a great impact on system performance that could be adjusted or calibrated by service engineers. One example was related to the compression conditions. Relatively poor paddle alignment and compression force results were initially noticed, of which 19% (23 of 124) failed, but these errors were easily corrected after the regulation took effect. In another case, the computed radiography exposure indicator accuracy served as an important medium for monitoring both image quality and patient dose. When one of the computed radiography models was first introduced to Taiwan for mammography use in 2009, all five installations failed this test in the same year. However, by 2010, only one of 10 installations failed, indicating that calibrations could be done properly and that regulation and inspection made a positive impact. Two fundamental differences between this current study and previous ones in Western developed countries were that very few mammography facilities implemented the QA program before the regulatory requirement and only a few certified diagnostic medical physicists were in Taiwan. The mammography task group of the Chinese Society of Medical Physics, Taipei, recommended the QA procedures [23] and started to train QA personnel just before regulation enforcement. Thus, on-site measurements at all mammography facilities were meaningful as initial confirmations of quality. In fact, examples of continued improvement in compression conditions and computed radiography exposure indicator accuracy from 2009 to 2010 (Fig. 4) showed the importance of on-site measurements during the inspection in Taiwan. Our unique experience may provide a valuable reference for regions in which mammography QA is not yet common practice and diagnostic medical physics professionals have not yet been established. In summary, this study analyzed data from large-scale on-site surveys of mammography systems in Taiwan from to During this period, mammography QA was enforced under the Standards for Medical Exposure Quality Assurance and use of digital mammography systems increased in Taiwan. Compared with data surveyed in, higher phantom image quality, reduced AGD, and overall increased passing rates were found in the 2 years after the regulation took effect. The positive outcomes were attributed to facilities compliance with the regulation. The results presented in this study could provide a unique reference for countries and regions where AJR:201, August 2013 W311
6 comprehensive mammography QA programs are not yet implemented in the digital era. monds GR, Houn F. Mammography in the 19s: the United States and Canada. Radiology 1999; Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 2000; 23: Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine Acknowledgments We thank all the staff members of the mammography facilities who participated in the surveys for their help and cooperation. References 1. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration web site. Mammography Quality Standards Act Regulations. 21 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter B, cfm?cfrpart=0. Updated April 1, Accessed April 11, American College of Radiology. American College of Radiology (ACR) mammography quality control manual. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, European Commission. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 4th ed. Luxembourg: European Commission, Hendrick RE, Klabunde C, Grivegnee A, Pou G, Ballard-Barbash R. Technical quality control practices in mammography screening programs in 22 countries. Int J Qual Health Care 2002; 14: Pan HB, Hsu GC, Liang HL, et al. Assessing an emerging nationwide population-based mammography screening program in Taiwan. J Radiol Sci 2011; 36: Conway BJ, Suleiman OH, Rueter FG, Antonsen RG, Slayton RJ. National survey of mammographic facilities in 1985, 1988, and Radiology 1994; 191: Suleiman OH, Spelic DC, McCrohan JL, Sy- 210: Spelic DC, Kaczmarek RV, Hilohi M, Belella S. United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities. Biomed Imaging Interv J 2007; 3:e35 9. Young KC, Ramsdale ML, Rust A. Performance of mammographic equipment in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 1998/99. NHSBSP Publication No 45. Sheffield, UK: NHS Cancer Screening Programme, Hendrick RE, Chrvala CA, Plott CM, Cutter GR, Jessop NW, Wilcox-Buchalla P. Improvement in mammography quality control: Radiology 1998; 207: Pisano ED, Schell M, Rollings J, et al. Has the Mammography Quality Standards Act affected the mammography quality in North Carolina? AJR 2000; 174: Spelic DC. Dose and image quality in mammography: trends during the first decade of MQSA. US Food and Drug Administration web site. MammographyQualityStandardsActandProgram/FacilityScorecard/ucm htm. Published September 5, Updated May 5, Accessed November 11, Spelic DC. Updated trends in mammography dose and image quality. US Food and Drug Administration web site. Products/MammographyQualityStandardsActand- Program/FacilityScorecard/ucm htm. Published June 16, Updated November 17, Accessed November 11, Ng KH, DeWerd LA, Schmidt RC. Mammographic image quality and exposure in South East Asia. (IPEM). Commissioning and routine testing of mammographic X-ray systems. IPEM Report No 89. York, UK: IPEM, Wu X, Barnes GT, Tucker DM. Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography. Radiology 1991; 179: Wu X, Gingold EL, Barnes GT, Tucker DM. Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography. Radiology 1994; 193: Dance DR, Skinner CL, Young KC, et al. Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. Phys Med Biol 2000; 45: Dance DR, Young KC, van Engen RE. Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols. Phys Med Biol 2009; 54: Oduko JM, Young KC, Burch A, et al. Review of measurements on full field digital mammography systems. NHSBSP equipment report 01. Sheffield, UK: NHS Cancer Screening Programme, Bloomquist AK, Yaffe MJ, Pisano ED, et al. Quality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: Part I. Med Phys 2006; 33: Yaffe MJ, Bloomquist AK, Mawdsley GE, et al. Quality control for digital mammography. Part II. Recommendations from ACRIN DMIST trial. Med Phys 2006; 33: Hwang YS, Wang HC, Chen CC, Liu HL, Tsai HY. Review and recommendations for physics testing of conventional and digital mammography: CSMPT Mammography Task Group Report Chin J Radiol ; 33: [in Chinese] W312 AJR:201, August 2013
Radiographic techniques in screen-film mammography
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 3, NUMBER 3, SUMMER 2002 Radiographic techniques in screen-film mammography Thomas R. LaVoy* 4314 Kelsey Drive, Syracuse, New York 13215 Walter Huda
More informationBICOE Breast Imaging Center of Excellence. What is it? - Requirements. National Mammography Database. What do you get? ACR Accreditation in:
BICOE Breast Imaging Center of Excellence What is it? - Requirements William Geiser, MS DABR Senior Medical Physicist MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas wgeiser@mdanderson.org ACR Accreditation in:
More informationBICOE Stereotactic Breast Biopsy and Breast Ultrasound Accreditation. Introduction. Educational Objectives
BICOE Stereotactic Breast Biopsy and Breast Ultrasound Accreditation William Geiser, MS DABR Senior Medical Physicist MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas wgeiser@mdanderson.org 1 Introduction Objectives
More informationBICOE Stereotactic Breast Biopsy and Breast Ultrasound Accreditation. Introduction. Educational Objectives
BICOE Stereotactic Breast Biopsy and Breast Ultrasound Accreditation William Geiser, MS DABR Senior Medical Physicist MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas wgeiser@mdanderson.org 1 Introduction Objectives
More informationRADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY. L19: Optimization of Protection in Mammography
IAEA Training Material on Radiation Protection in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology RADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY L19: Optimization of Protection in Mammography
More informationPATIENT DOSES FROM SCREEN-FILM AND FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY IN A POPULATION BASED SCREENING PROGRAMME
Number of mammography X-ray sets Radiation Protection Dosimetry (year), Vol. 0, No. 0, pp. 0 0 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nc0000 SECTION TITLE HERE PATIENT DOSES FROM SCREEN-FILM AND FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY
More informationExamination of dose evaluation method for mammography: comparison of ACR, Euref and IAEA
Examination of dose evaluation method for mammography: comparison of ACR, Euref and IAEA Poster No.: C-0618 Congress: ECR 2011 Type: Authors: Scientific Paper T. Otsuka 1, S. Suzuki 1, M. Ogura 1, T. Igarashi
More informationKish chakrabarti, Ph.D. Senior Physicist CDRH/FDA
Facility Certification Extension Requirements, Quality Assurance and Medical Physicists role for Hologic Selenia Dimensions Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) System Kish chakrabarti, Ph.D. Senior Physicist
More informationMammography. Background and Perspective. Mammography Evolution. Background and Perspective. T.R. Nelson, Ph.D. x41433
- 2015 Background and Perspective 2005 (in US) Women Men Mammography Invasive Breast Cancer Diagnosed 211,240 1,690 Noninvasive Breast Cancer Diagnosed 58,940 Deaths from Breast Cancer 40,410 460 T.R.
More informationPilot study of patient and phantom breast dose measurements in Bulgaria
Pol J Med Phys Eng. 2008;14(1):21-32. PL ISSN 1425-4689 doi: 10.2478/v10013-008-0003-3 website: http://www.pjmpe.waw.pl Simona Avramova-Cholakova, Jenia Vassileva Pilot study of patient and phantom breast
More informationUpdate on MQSA and Mammography Accreditation
MQSA - Who s Who Update on MQSA and Mammography Accreditation The Law: Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) The Regulator: US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Priscilla F. Butler, M.S. Senior Director,
More informationThe relationship of the mean glandular dose with compressed breast thickness in mammography
Review Article Page 1 of 8 The relationship of the mean glandular dose with compressed breast thickness in mammography Xiang Du, Ningle Yu, Yimei Zhang, Jin Wang Department of Radiation Protection, Jiangsu
More informationProven clinical effectiveness at low radiation dose
MicroDose Mammography Solutions Proven clinical effectiveness at low radiation dose Several studies provide evidence that Philips MicroDose Mammography* can provide outstanding image quality at 18% to
More informationUsing Monte Carlo Method for Evaluation of kvp & mas variation effect on Absorbed Dose in Mammography
Using Monte Carlo Method for Evaluation of kvp & mas variation effect on Absorbed Dose in Mammography Poster No.: C-2078 Congress: ECR 2011 Type: Authors: Keywords: DOI: Scientific Exhibit F. Salmani Rezaei,
More informationMammography Quality Control: A Refresher
Mammography Quality Control: A Refresher MATT WAIT, MS, DABR Objectives Attendees will re-familiarize themselves with the purpose of quality assurance and quality control Attendees will re-familiarize
More informationMQSA Physicist Qualifications. Jon J. Erickson, Ph.D., DABR
2027 North 36 th Street Saint Joseph, Mo 64506 (86) 390-90 (800) 306-4477 MQSA Physicist Qualifications Jon J. Erickson, Ph.D., DABR Contents Missouri Mammography Physicist Initial Qualifications Certificate
More informationQuality Control in Mammography: Results from a study in Recife, Brazil. H. J. Khoury, V. S. de Barros, M. Sampaio
Quality Control in Mammography: Results from a study in Recife, Brazil H. J. Khoury, V. S. de Barros, M. Sampaio Grupo de Dosimetria e Instrumentação, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Rua Prof. Luiz
More informationBREAST DOSE SURVEYS IN THE NHSBSP: SOFTWARE AND INSTRUCTION MANUAL Version 2.0
BREAST DOSE SURVEYS IN THE NHSBSP: SOFTWARE AND INSTRUCTION MANUAL Version 2.0 Report 04/ July 2004 K C Young National Co-ordinating Centre for the Physics of Mammography Guildford CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...2
More informationDosimetry in digital mammography
Dosimetry in digital mammography Professor David Dance NCCPM, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, United kingdom Outline Why do dosimetry? History Essentials of European breast dosimetry protocol
More informationDirect half value layer measurements in mammography - is near enough good enough?
Direct half value layer measurements in mammography - is near enough good enough? Poster No.: R-0127 Congress: Type: Authors: 2014 CSM Scientific Exhibit J. Diffey 1, L. Cartwright 2, J. Crocker 1, J.
More informationOverview. ACR Accreditation Update in Mammography. New ACR Activities. Requirements Today. What s New For Tomorrow. ACR: Recognized by FDA and CMS
ACR Accreditation Update in Mammography Eric Berns, PhD University of Colorado Hospital Denver Health Medical Center Denver, CO *No financial disclosures to report Overview New ACR Activities Requirements
More informationImplementation of a New Tomosynthesis Program: A Physicists Perspective
Implementation of a New Tomosynthesis Program: A Physicists Perspective Bill Geiser, MS DABR Senior Medical Physicist wgeiser@mdanderson.org 1 Conflict of Interest None of the authors nor their immediate
More informationClinical evaluation of breast dose and the factors affecting breast dose in screen-film mammography
Diagn Interv Radiol 2007; 13:134 139 Turkish Society of Radiology 2007 BREAST IMAGING ORIGINAL ARTICLE Clinical evaluation of breast dose and the factors affecting breast dose in screen-film mammography
More informationSurvey of Mammography Practice: Initial Results from Serbia
Survey of Mammography Practice: Initial Results from Serbia Olivera Ciraj Bjelac *, Dusko Kosutic, Danijela Arandjic, Milojko Kovacevic Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Radiation and Environmental
More informationMean glandular dose diagnostic reference levels are proposed for Irish symptomatic breast services
Mean glandular dose diagnostic reference levels are proposed for Irish symptomatic breast services Poster No.: C-0477 Congress: ECR 2011 Type: Scientific Paper Authors: D. O'Leary, L. Rainford; Dublin/IE
More informationUpdate on the ACR FFDM QC Manual
Update on the ACR FFDM QC Manual Eric Berns, PhD University of Colorado Hospital Denver Health Medical Center Denver, CO AAPM 2011 Vancouver, Canada 9000 8500 8000 7500 7000 6500 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000
More informationMammograms Obtained with Rhodium vs Molybdenum Anodes: Contrast and Dose Differences
1313 C. Kimme-Smith1 J. Wang2 N. DeBruhl1 M. Basic2 L. W. Bassett1 Received October 27, 1 993; accepted after revision January 25, 1994. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Roentgen Ray Society,
More informationThe American College of Radiology Digital Mammography QC Manual: Frequently Asked Questions (Revised 12/12/2018; new and updated items in red)
The American College of Radiology Digital Mammography QC Manual: Frequently Asked Questions (Revised 12/12/2018; new and updated items in red) Table of Contents General... 1 Applicability... 3 Transitioning
More informationHong Kong College of Radiologists Mammography Statement
Hong Kong College of Radiologists Mammography Statement The Hong Kong College of Radiologists would like to give the following comments concerning mammography. Mammography screening: Breast cancer is the
More informationImpact of digitalization of mammographic units on average glandular doses in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Program
Impact of digitalization of mammographic units on average glandular doses in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Program An De Hauwere, Hubert Thierens Ghent University, Department of Medical Physics,
More informationInvivo Dosimetry for Mammography with and without Lead Apron Using the Glass Dosimeters
Original Article PROGRESS in MEDICAL PHYSICS Vol. 26, No. 2, June, 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.14316/pmp.2015.26.2.93 Invivo Dosimetry for Mammography with and without Lead Apron Using the Glass Dosimeters
More informationImpact of quality control on radiation doses received by patients undergoing abdomen X-ray examination in ten hospitals
B.Aghahadi 1,2*,Z.Zhang 1,S.Zareh 3, S. Sarkar 3, P.S.Tayebi 4 1 Department of Physics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150080. P.R. China 2 Department of National Radiation Protection, Atomic Energy
More informationQ. Where can I find out if my state currently requires stereotactic breast biopsy accreditation?
The American College of Radiology Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Accreditation Program: Frequently Asked Questions (Revised: September 7, 2017; updated questions in red) Table of Contents Application - General...
More informationREGULATION: QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMS FOR MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY INSTALLATIONS N.J.A.C. 7:28-22
REGULATION: QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMS FOR MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY INSTALLATIONS N.J.A.C. 7:28-22 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of X-ray Compliance PO Box 420, Mail Code 25-01
More informationEstablishing a quality assurance baseline for radiological protection of patients undergoing diagnostic radiology
Establishing a quality assurance baseline for radiological protection of patients undergoing diagnostic radiology G K Korir, BSc, MSc (Nuclear Science), PhD (Radiological Science) Department of Physics
More informationHISTORY OF MQSA AND ACR
HISTORY OF MQSA AND ACR DEBORAH THAMES R.T. (R)(M)(QM) WHY MQSA? In the United States, there was a lack of standards in mammography imaging. Reporting Imaging Type of imaging screening/diagnostic Equipment
More informationDental Extraoral X-ray Systems
Dental Extraoral X-ray Systems PROPOSED REVISIONS TO 4732.XXXX, 1.0 4732.#### DENTAL EXTRAORAL X-RAY SYSTEMS; STATIONARY AND MOBILE. Subpart 1. Applicability. A registrant s x-ray system used for dental
More informationDental Intraoral X-ray Systems
Dental Intraoral X-ray Systems PROPOSED REVISIONS TO 4732.XXXX, 2.0 4732.#### DENTAL INTRAORAL X-RAY SYSTEMS; STATIONARY AND MOBILE. Commented [JC(1]: Based on part 4732.0880. Subpart 1. Applicability.
More informationIAEA TECDOC 1517 Quality Control in Mammography Software
IAEA TECDOC 1517 Quality Control in Mammography Software Fredy Somarriba a, Patricia Mora b*, Margarita Chevalier c and Raul Ramirez d a Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Nicaragua, Managua, Nicaragua.
More informationA tissue-equivalent phantom series for mammography dosimetry
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOL. 5, NO. 4, FALL 2004 A tissue-equivalent phantom series for mammography dosimetry William P. Argo, 1 Kathleen Hintenlang, 2 and David E. Hintenlang 3 U.S.
More informationComparison Between Film-Screen and Digital Mammography for Woman Breast Cancer Screening: Mean Glandular Dose
Academic Journal of Cancer Research 7 (2): 162-167, 2014 ISSN 1995-8943 IDOSI Publications, 2014 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.ajcr.2014.7.2.83313 Comparison Between Film-Screen and Digital Mammography for Woman
More informationMean glandular dose values used for the mammography screening program in Poland according to the type of image registration system
Original article NOWOTWORY Journal of Oncology 2017, volume 67, number 2, 115 120 DOI: 10.5603/NJO.2017.0018 Polskie Towarzystwo Onkologiczne ISSN 0029 540X www.nowotwory.edu.pl Mean glandular dose values
More informationPhD Title: Improving QA/QC in mammography screening and breast in Montenegro
3rd Doctoral Coordinated Research Project (CRP) on Advances in medical imaging techniques (E2.40.19) MNE BEL PhD Title: Improving QA/QC in mammography screening and breast in Montenegro MNE BEL PhD Candidate:
More informationPatient Dosimetry in Mammography and Tomosynthesis:
2013 ICTP/IAEA Training Course on Radiation Protection of Patients Trieste Patient Dosimetry in Mammography and Tomosynthesis: What to measure, why and how John M. Boone, Ph.D., FAAPM, FSBI, FACR Professor
More informationEvaluation of Doses and Image Quality in Mammography with Screen-Film, CR, and DR Detectors Application of the ACR Phantom
Signature: Pol J Radiol, 1; 1: -91 DOI: 1.159/PJR.97 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Received: 15.1. Accepted: 1.1.1 Published: 1..1 Authors Contribution: A Study Design B Data Collection C Statistical Analysis D Data
More informationDose reduction in Hologic Selenia FFDM units through AEC optimization, without compromising diagnostic image quality.
Dose reduction in Hologic Selenia FFDM units through AEC optimization, without compromising diagnostic image quality. Poster No.: C-1636 Congress: ECR 2015 Type: Authors: Keywords: DOI: Scientific Exhibit
More informationRadiation Dosimetry in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. March, 2015 William J. O Connel, Dr. Ph, Senior Medical Physicist
Radiation Dosimetry in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis March, 2015 William J. O Connel, Dr. Ph, Senior Medical Physicist Imagination at work. Syllabus 1. Introduction 2. Dosimetry in Mammography 3. Dosimetry
More informationBreast Imaging Essentials
Breast Imaging Essentials Module 1 Transcript 2016 ASRT. All rights reserved. Breast Imaging Essentials Module 1 - Fundamentals of Breast Imaging 1. ASRT Animation 2. Welcome Welcome to Module 1 of Breast
More informationOverview. ACR Update on FFDM Accreditation. New ACR Activities. QC Today. QC Tomorrow. ACR Breast Imaging Centers of Excellence BICOE
ACR Update on FFDM Accreditation Overview New ACR Activities Eric Berns, PhD University of Colorado Hospital Denver Health Medical Center Denver, CO QC Today QC Tomorrow *No financial disclosures to report
More informationCT Quality Control Manual FAQs
CT Quality Control Manual FAQs General Question: How often will the QC Manual be updated and how will those updates be communicated? Answer: The ACR CT Physics Subcommittee will review any comments, issues
More informationMethod for determination of the mean fraction of glandular tissue in individual female breasts using mammography
INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING Phys. Med. Biol. 50 (2005) 5953 5967 PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY doi:10.1088/0031-9155/50/24/013 Method for determination of the mean fraction of glandular tissue in
More informationBreast dosimetry system in screen/film mammography
Bull Fae Health Sei, Okayama Univ Med Seh, 10: 99-106, 2000 (Original article) Breast dosimetry system in screen/film mammography Sachiko GOTO, Yoshiharu AZUMA, Toshinori MARUYAMA, Yoshitada NAKAGIRI,
More informationCorporate Medical Policy
Corporate Medical Policy File Name: Origination: Last CAP Review: Next CAP Review: Last Review: digital_breast_tomosynthesis 3/2011 6/2016 6/2017 11/2016 Description of Procedure or Service Conventional
More informationTesting of the Implementation of the Code of Practice on Dosimetry in X-ray Diagnostic Radiology Hungarian Contribution
Testing of the Implementation of the Code of Practice on Dosimetry in X-ray Diagnostic Radiology Hungarian Contribution Ferenc Giczi a*, Sándor Pellet b, Ian Donald McLean c and Ahmed Meghzifene c a Széchenyi
More informationJournal of Breast Cancer
Journal of Breast Cancer ORIGINAL ARTICLE J Breast Cancer 13 March; 1(1): 9-9 Dose Reduction in Automatic Optimization Parameter of Full Field Digital Mammography: Breast Phantom Study Myung-Su Ko, Hak
More informationAnalysis of the results from the implementation of quality control program in mammography in Bulgaria
Analysis of the results from the implementation of quality control program in mammography in Bulgaria *, J. Vassileva, A. Dimov National Centre of Radiobiology and Radiation Protection, Sofia, Bulgaria
More informationQuality Assurance and Optimization of Radiation Protection of Patients in X-Ray Radiographic Examinations Using the Rejects Film Analysis
60 Journal of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, 2013, 1, 60-64 Quality Assurance and Optimization of Radiation Protection of Patients in X-Ray Radiographic Examinations Using the Rejects Film Analysis
More informationEstablishment of local diagnostic reference levels for quality control in intraoral radiography
Oral Radiol (27) 33:38 44 DOI.7/s282-6-24-9 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for quality control in intraoral radiography Maki Izawa Yasuo Harata Noriyoshi Shiba Nobuhide
More informationApplication of international standards to diagnostic radiology dosimetry
Application of international standards to diagnostic radiology dosimetry Poster No.: C-780 Congress: ECR 2009 Type: Scientific Exhibit Topic: Physics in Radiology Authors: I. D. McLean, A. Meghzifene,
More informationJoint ICTP/IAEA Advanced School on Dosimetry in Diagnostic Radiology and its Clinical Implementation May 2009
2033-4 Joint ICTP/ Advanced School on Dosimetry in Diagnostic Radiology and its Clinical Implementation 11-15 May 2009 Dosimetry for General Radiology and Clinical Uncertainty Peter Homolka EFOMP Training
More information1. Introduction. 2. Technical procedures
MAMMOGRAPHY QUALITY ASSURANCE IN MOROCCO i inn mill IT -7 v T i * ^ T i XA0101632 F. Zaoui, K. Talsmat, K. Lalaoui Departement des Applications Medicales et Biologiques, Centre National del'energie des
More informationMammography calibration qualities establishment in a Mo- Mo clinical system
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Mammography calibration qualities establishment in a Mo- Mo clinical system To cite this article: E L Corrêa et al 2016 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 733
More informationImpact of objective volumetric breast density estimates on mean glandular dose calculations in digital mammography
Impact of objective volumetric breast density estimates on mean glandular dose calculations in digital mammography Poster No.: C-1576 Congress: ECR 2015 Type: Scientific Exhibit Authors: G. Gennaro, I.
More informationHistory of MQSA ACR creates testing procedures Oct Mammography Quality Standards Act Dec 1993 Interim Regulations Oct All mammog
15 Years of MQSA, What works, what doesn t Jerry Soen, MS DABR History of MQSA 1990-9191 ACR creates testing procedures Oct. 1992 Mammography Quality Standards Act Dec 1993 Interim Regulations Oct. 1994
More informationDoses from pediatric CT examinations in Norway Are pediatric scan protocols developed and in daily use?
Doses from pediatric CT examinations in Norway Are pediatric scan protocols developed and in daily use? Eva Godske Friberg * Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, P.O. Box, Østerås, Norway Abstract.
More informationInvestigation of the clinical performance of a novel solid-state diagnostic dosimeter
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 16, NUMBER 4, 2015 Investigation of the clinical performance of a novel solid-state diagnostic dosimeter Jason Tse, a Donald McLean Medical Physics and
More informationCharacteristic curve measurement based on bootstrap method using a new calcium phosphate stepwedge in mammography
Characteristic curve measurement based on bootstrap method using a new calcium phosphate stepwedge in mammography Norimitsu SHINOHARA* a, Hiroshi FUJITA b, Takeshi HARA b, and Katsuhei HORITA c a Electronic
More informationIntroduction and Background
CT Lung Cancer Screening and the Medical Physicist: Background, Findings and Participant Dosimetry Summary of the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) Randell Kruger, PhD, DABR Medical Physics Section
More informationReceptor dose and Patient Dose in Radiographic exposures - a 15 year review
Receptor dose and Patient Dose in Radiographic exposures - a 15 year review D J Peet*, N Tyler, M Pryor, P Hollaway, C Strudley and L Leavesley Regional Radiation Protection Service, Royal Surrey County
More informationDisclosures. Outline. Learning Objectives. Introduction. Introduction. Stereotactic Breast Biopsy vs Mammography: Image Quality and Dose.
Disclosures Stereotactic Biopsy vs Mammography: and Dose None Vikas Patel, PhD, DABR Upstate Medical Physics 2014 Annual Meeting The American Association of Physicists in Medicine Austin, TX Learning Objectives
More informationAbout me 10/9/2018. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)
About me Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Deborah Thames, BSRS R.T.(R)(M)(QM) Advanced Health Education Center www.aheconline.com Work full time at a cancer hospital in Houston, Texas, born in South
More informationThe American College of Radiology Breast Ultrasound Accreditation Program: Frequently Asked Questions (Revised: July 31, 2017)
The American College of Radiology Breast Ultrasound Accreditation Program: Frequently Asked Questions (Revised: July 31, 2017) Table of Contents APPLICATION - GENERAL... 1 MOVED FACILITIES AND UNITS...
More informationABSTRACT I. INTRODUCTION
2017 IJSRSET Volume 3 Issue 6 Print ISSN: 2395-1990 Online ISSN : 2394-4099 Themed Section: Engineering and Technology Estimation of Entrance Surface Dose of Adult Patients undergoing Computed Radiography
More informationDo women with dense breasts have higher radiation dose during screening mammography?
Received: 8 June 6 Revised: 6 September 6 Accepted: 9 September 6 DOI:./tbj.8 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Do women with dense breasts have higher radiation dose during screening mammography? Jonathan V. Nguyen MD
More informationA STUDY ON SOME PHYSICAL PARAMETERS RELATED TO IMAGE QUALITY AND RADIATION SAFETY IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY
Journal of Bangladesh Academy of Sciences, Vol. 3, No. 1, 7-17, 211 A STUDY ON SOME PHYSICAL PARAMETERS RELATED TO IMAGE QUALITY AND RADIATION SAFETY IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY MAHFUZA BEGUM 1, A. S. MOLLAH
More informationDental ConeBeam Computed Tomography (CBCT) X-ray Systems
Dental ConeBeam Computed Tomography (CBCT) X-ray Systems PROPOSED REVISIONS TO 4732.XXXX, 1.0 4732.#### DENTAL CONEBEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CBCT) X-RAY SYSTEMS; STATIONARY AND MOBILE. Subpart 1. Applicability.
More informationMammographic Accreditation Phantom
Quality Control in Mammography RMI 156 Mammographic Accreditation Phantom RMI 156 A User s Guide GAMMEX RMI Table of Contents Product Overview...................... 1 Product Description....................
More informationIAEA-TECDOC-796. Radiation doses in diagnostic radiology
IAEA-TECDOC-796 Radiation doses in diagnostic radiology The IAEA does The originating Section FOREWORD It is well recognized that diagnostic radiology is the largest contributor to the collective dose
More informationEstablishment of the new IEC mammography qualities in a clinical system used for instruments calibration
Establishment of the new IEC 61267 mammography qualities in a clinical system used for instruments calibration 1 Corrêa, E.L.; 2 Vivolo, V.; 3 Potiens, M.P.A. Abstract Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas
More informationObjectives. Explanation of Radiation Dose Terminology 10/9/2018. What are these lines?
Oh no, it s not!!! with Breast Tomosynthesis It s not what you may be thinking, so I ll tell you! IT IS A VIETNAMESE PUMPKIN! Oh yes, it is! Objectives Explain radiation dose terminology Recognize 2D and
More informationPractitioner compression force variation in mammography : a 6 year study
Practitioner compression force variation in mammography : a 6 year study Mercer, CE, Hogg, P, Szczepura, K and Denton, E http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2013.06.001 Title Authors Type URL Practitioner
More informationThe New Jersey Radiographic Quality Assurance Program at 5 Years
The New Jersey Radiographic Quality Assurance Program at 5 Years Julie Timins, MD a, Paul Orlando, BS b, Jill Lipoti, PhD b Purpose: Five years ago, the New Jersey Bureau of Radiological Health decided
More information354 Korean J Radiol 9(4), August 2008
Review of Failed CT Phantom Image Evaluations in 2005 and 2006 by the CT Accreditation Program of the Korean Institute for Accreditation of Medical Image Hye Jung Park, MD 1 Seung Eun Jung, MD 1, 2 Young
More informationDigital Breast Tomosynthesis from a first idea to clinical routine
International Master Programm Biomedical Engineering Digital Breast Tomosynthesis from a first idea to clinical routine Historical background 2D imaging of 3D objects has important limitations Jörg Barkhausen
More informationNJ CBCT Regulation FAQ & Assistance
NJ CBCT Regulation FAQ & Assistance According to the State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, all dental CBCT facilities must implement the NJDA alternative QA program by June 30 th,
More informationMdiagnosing breast by using x-ray to both breasts. It
Asian Journal of Medical and Clinical Sciences Estimation radiation risk during mammography in Sudan 1 1 1, Hifaa.Mohamed Khair, Hiba.Osman, Abdelmoneim Sulieman* 1 Al Neelain University, Faculty of Science
More informationPrepublication Requirements
Issued Prepublication Requirements Standards Revisions for Organizations Providing Fluoroscopy Services The Joint Commission has approved the following revisions for prepublication. While revised requirements
More informationRoutine Quality Assurance Cookbook
This Cookbook is a companion guide to the AIUM Routine Quality Assurance (QA) for Diagnostic Ultrasound Equipment document, which outlines the basic QA requirements for AIUM-accredited practices. The Guide
More informationOPTIMISATION OF PATIENT PROTECTION AND IMAGE QUALITY IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY
March 2010 EAST AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL 127 East African Medical Journal Vol. 87 No. 3 March 2010 OPTIMIsATION OF PATIENT PROTECTION AND IMAGE QUALITY IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY G. K. Korir, BSc, MSc, PhD
More informationUpdates in Mammography. Dr. Yang Faridah A. Aziz Department of Biomedical Imaging University Malaya Medical Centre
Updates in Mammography Dr. Yang Faridah A. Aziz Department of Biomedical Imaging University Malaya Medical Centre Updates in Mammography Breast Imaging Dr. Yang Faridah A. Aziz Department of Biomedical
More informationMammography device use in Turkey, and quantity and quality analysis of mammography education
Diagn Interv Radiol 2007; 13:129 133 Turkish Society of Radiology 2007 BREAST IMAGING ORIGINAL ARTICLE Mammography device use in Turkey, and quantity and quality analysis of mammography education Nuray
More informationPOSITIONING ACR REQUIREMENTS IMAGE REVIEW CATEGORIES DEFICIENCIES IN POSITIONING ACR REQUIREMENTS 3/28/2016 NUMBER 1 REASON FOR ACR FAILURE
CERTIFYING AGENCIES MAMMOGRAPHY CLINICAL IMAGE EVALUATION Pam Fulmer, BA RT (R)(M)(QM) FDA approved certifying states States can only certify facilities within their state borders Illinois Iowa South Carolina
More informationImplementation of the 2012 ACR CT QC Manual in a Community Hospital Setting BRUCE E. HASSELQUIST, PH.D., DABR, DABSNM ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL
Implementation of the 2012 ACR CT QC Manual in a Community Hospital Setting BRUCE E. HASSELQUIST, PH.D., DABR, DABSNM ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL Conflict of Interest Disclaimer Employee of Aspirus Wausau
More informationGlandularity Estimation in Japanese Women by Using a Breast Model Made from Mammographic Findings of European Women
Jpn. J. Health Phys. 51 (4) 238 244 (2016) DOI: 10.5453/jhps.51.238 Original Paper Glandularity Estimation in Japanese Women by Using a Breast Model Made from Mammographic Findings of European Women Ai
More informationAAPM Annual Meeting. ACR Accreditation Update in CT
AAPM Annual Meeting ACR Accreditation Updates in CT, Ultrasound, Mammography and MRI: ACR Accreditation Update in CT Michael McNitt-Gray, PhD, DABR, FAAPM Professor, Department of Radiological Sciences
More informationPNRA-RG (Rev. 0) December, 2017 PROTECTION OF PATIENTS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY REGULATORY GUIDE PAKISTAN NUCLEAR REGULATORY AUTHORITY
PNRA-RG-904.05 (Rev. 0) December, 2017 PROTECTION OF PATIENTS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY REGULATORY GUIDE PAKISTAN NUCLEAR REGULATORY AUTHORITY For Further Details Directorate of Policies & Procedures PAKISTAN
More informationRadiation Physics Consultants, Inc. Medical Physicist. Mammography Qualifications, Continuing Experience and Continuing Education
Radiation Physics Consultants, Inc. Mammography Qualifications, Continuing Experience and Continuing Education For: Steven T. Nicholas, M.S. DABMP MAP ID s. Each medical physicist who provides medical
More informationSteven Tate Nicholas
Hereby awards this Certificate of Completion to Steven Tate Nicholas 3 hours of HOLOGIC's Online Tomosynthesis Training For Medical Physicists in accordance with MQSA guidance for Digital 3-D Mammography
More informationPatient dose in routine X-ray examinations in Yazd state
Iran. J. Radiat. Res., 2004; 1(4): 199-204 Patient dose in routine X-ray examinations in Yazd state F. Bouzarjomehri Health Physics Dept. Shahid Sadoghi Univ. of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran ABSTRACT Background:
More information25 TEXAS ADMINSTRATIVE CODE (TAC) (x) Certification of Mammography Systems and Mammography Machines Used for Interventional Breast Radiography
25 TEXAS ADMINSTRATIVE CODE (TAC) 289.230 Certification of Mammography Systems and Mammography Machines Used for Interventional Breast Radiography Texas Regulations for Control of Radiation (effective
More information