FINAL COVER SYSTEM SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DESIGN
|
|
- Anissa Riley
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DRAFT ONONDAGA LAKE SEDIMENT CONSOLIDATION AREA CIVIL & GEOTECHNICAL FINAL DESIGN BBAPPENDIX K. FINAL COVER SYSTEM SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DESIGN p:\honeywell -syr\ - lake detail design\ reports\. sca draft final\appendices\appendix flysheets.doc Parsons
2
3 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: FINAL COVER SYSTEM SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DESIGN BACKGROUND & PURPOSE This package was prepared in support of the design of the Sediment Consolidation Area (SCA) for the Onondaga Lake Bottom Site, which will be constructed on Wastebed (WB-). Specifically, the package is intended to present the design and analysis of the surface water management system for the proposed final cover system of the SCA. The package addresses the surface water management system for the SCA final cover system. For purposes of the calculations conducted in this package, the SCA has a footprint corresponding to a capacity of up to. million cubic yards of dredge material within geotextile tubes (geo-tubes) surrounded by a perimeter dike (SCA perimeter dike). KEY CONSIDERATIONS AND LIMITATIONS This package addresses surface water management within the limits of the SCA perimeter dike. Surface water management outside the limits of the SCA perimeter dike will be addressed separately. The anticipated duration for placement of dredged material in geo-tubes is years, at which time it is expected that the final cover system will be constructed. Settlement is expected to occur during the four-year operational period, and continue to occur, after the final cover system is constructed. The calculations performed herein were based on a calculated fouryear post-settlement grade of the SCA (i.e., at the time when the final cover system will be constructed) based on calculations presented in the package titled Settlement Analyses for SCA (Appendix H of the SCA Final Design). It is recognized that settlement of the SCA will continue to occur after the construction of the final cover system; however, the magnitude of the differential settlement is expected to be relatively small, based on calculations. Therefore, the design of the surface water management system presented herein does not consider the calculated -year post-settlement grade. Periodic visual inspections, maintenance activities, and repair of the components of the surface water management system will be specified in the Post-Closure Care Plan (Appendix O of the SCA Final Design) for the final cover system to address any deficiencies that might be identified during the design life of the SCA final cover system. GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
4 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: The vegetation type for the final cover system had not been selected at the time this package was prepared. Since vegetation may consist of either grass or willows, the design parameters have been conservatively selected to work for either case. REGULATORY & DESIGN CRITERIA The surface water management system is designed to manage the calculated runoff from a -year, -hour design storm event as required by New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Regulations Section -.(b)()(ii). Specifically, the open-channel components of the surface water management system are designed to handle peak velocities of ft/s from the design storm and convey the calculated discharges from the design storm event with a minimum freeboard of inches. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM COMPONENTS The surface water management system of the SCA final cover system will include the components listed below and shown in Figure. Riprap Chutes Runoff from the top-deck will be collected by trapezoidal riprap chutes, which will be constructed along the side slopes. The riprap chutes will direct the runoff to the two culvert locations. Interception Benches (i.e., tack-on berms) Runoff from the upper portion of the side slopes will be intercepted by interception benches, which will be constructed along the side slopes. The interception benches will direct the runoff to the two culvert locations. Toe Drainage Channels Runoff from the lower portion of the side slopes will be collected by toe drainage channels, which will be excavated into the SCA perimeter dike. The toe drainage channels will direct the runoff to the two culvert locations. Perimeter Culverts Perimeter culverts will be located at the two low-points of the toe drainage channels. These two locations will be the main confluence areas for all runoff from the top deck and side slopes as the riprap chutes, toe drainage channels, and interception benches discharge. The culverts will convey all the runoff through the dike to a location outside the limits of the final cover system. GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
5 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY Hydraulic and hydrologic analyses are conducted using methods presented in TR- (SCS, ) and TR- (SCS, ). Analyses are conducted using the computer program HydroCAD TM (HydroCAD, ). Computer program analyses are supplemented with other design calculation methods wherever applicable. MAJOR ASSUMPTIONS Subcatchment Properties For purposes of the analyses conducted herein, the extent of the final cover system is divided into subcatchments four top-deck subcatchments (i.e., above the side slopes, SA through SA), four upper side-slope subcatchments (i.e., above the interception benches, SB through SB), and four lower side-slope subcatchments (i.e., below the interception benches, SC through SC). Tables,, and summarize the important topographic features of the topdeck, upper side-slope, and lower side-slope subcatchments, respectively, including: area, longest travel path, and elevation maxima and minima. Table Summary of Top-Deck Subcatchments SA SA SA SA Area (acres).... Longest Path (ft) Max. Elev. (ft).... Min. Elev. (ft).... GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
6 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: Table Summary of Upper Side-Slope Subcatchments SB SB SB SB Area (acres).... Longest Path (ft) Max Elev. (ft).... Min. Elev. (ft).... Table Summary of Lower Side-Slope Subcatchments SC SC SC SC Area (acres).... Longest Path (ft) Max Elev. (ft).... Min. Elev. (ft).... Manning Coefficients For purposes of the calculations conducted herein, Manning Coefficients were adopted from the built-in database in HydroCAD TM. The complete table is shown in Attachment (HydroCAD, ). Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) for Cover System For purposes of this calculation, it is assumed that the final cover system soils are of HSG Type D (i.e., clay loam, silty clay loam, sandy clay, silty clay, or clay). This assumption will result in the most conservative estimate of the final cover runoff volumes as soils of HSG Type D result in the highest runoff quantity. For an extended description of HSG see Attachment (TR-, SCS, ). Runoff Curve Number (CN) The final cover system is expected to be well vegetated. CN = is selected based on Open Space, Good Condition, HSG Type D from Attachment (TR-, SCS, ). Rainfall Distribution for Design Storm - As shown in Attachment (TR-, SCS, ), the site is located in a region designated under a SCS Type II Rainfall Distribution. GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
7 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: Rainfall Depth for Design Storm - Rainfall depths for -year and -year -hour design storm events were obtained from Attachment (TR-, SCS, ) and summarized below. Table Rainfall Depths for Design Storm Events Return Period (years) Rainfall Depth (inches).. HYDROLOGIC MODELING Nodal Network Diagram Attachment presents a nodal network diagram showing the connectivity of the subcatchments and the surface water management system components listed below. osa through SA Top-Deck Subcatchments osb through SB Upper Side-Slope Subcatchments osc through SC Lower Side-Slope Subcatchments ora through RC Riprap Chutes ob through B Interception Benches ot through T Toe Drainage Channels oc and C Perimeter Culverts Computer Modeling A hydrologic analysis was conducted using the above described assumptions and the HydroCAD TM (HydroCAD, ) computer program. The results of the modeling are presented in Attachment. DESIGN OF FINAL COVER SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM COMPONENTS Riprap Chutes The riprap chutes are shown as RA-RB and RA-RB-RC in the HydroCAD TM nodal diagram and as RX and RX in Figure. RX and RX are segmented in multiple reaches in the HydroCAD TM model because the slope of the riprap chutes changes at multiple locations. The riprap chutes are designed as trapezoidal channels that will convey discharges from the top deck to the perimeter GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
8 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: culverts. The design of the riprap chutes involved the selection of a riprap size that can withstand the calculated tractive stresses from the calculated peak inflow conditions from the western and eastern halves of the top-deck. Riprap was selected based on permissible tractive stress using an established method by Robinson et al. (). In using this method, the Manning s n value is a function of flow rate, channel width, slope, and riprap size, thus Manning s n is computed multiple times because both RX and RX have slope breaks. Attachment provides the calculation for required riprap size for the steepest slope and the resulting Manning s n value for each of the segmented sections of the riprap chutes. Based on this calculation, a riprap size with D = inches is selected for design. Design summary is as follows: GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water Peak Design Inflow Q = cfs (greater of RA and RA) Available Channel Depth =. foot Bottom Width of Chutes = feet Left Side Slope = H:V Right Side Slope = H:V Manning s n (Riprap size with D = inches) RX: RA, n =.; RB, n =. RX: RA, n =.; RB, n =.; RC, n =. Calculated Maximum Depth of Flow =. RA (available freeboard = inches based on an available depth of. foot) Interception Benches The interception benches are shown as B, B, B, and B in the HydroCAD TM nodal diagram and Figure. Interception benches are designed to collect and convey the runoff from Upper Side-Slope subcatchments SB, SB, SB, and SB to the culverts. The benches are designed with the following properties. Available Channel Depth = foot Bottom Width of Chutes = feet (V-Channel) Left Side Slope = H:V Right Side Slope = Varies based on grading of top-deck areas B and B =.H:V B and B =.H:V Manning s n =.; Channel Lining = Grass The proposed dimensions and hydraulic properties of the interception benches are modeled within HydroCAD TM (HydroCAD, ) (i.e., B through B), and the peak flow depth and the peak velocities for the -year, -hour design storm for each
9 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: interception bench is calculated within the model. The table below summarizes the performance of the interception benches. As shown below, each bench has at least inches of freeboard during peak flow and is below the ft/s allowable peak velocity. Table Summary of Interception Benches B B B B Peak Inflow (cfs).. Minimum Freeboard (in) Peak Velocity (ft/s).... Toe Drainage Channel The toe drainage channels are shown as T, T, T, and T in the HydroCAD TM nodal diagram and Figure. Toe drainage channels will collect and convey the runoff from the side slopes to the two culvert locations. The channels are designed with the following properties: Available Channel Depth = feet Bottom Width of Chutes = feet Left Side Slope = H:V Right Side Slope = H:V Manning s n =.; Channel Lining = Grass Toe drainage channels are modeled in HydroCAD TM (HydroCAD, ) as T, T, T, and T. The proposed dimensions and hydraulic properties of the toe drainage channels are modeled within HydroCAD (i.e., T through T), and the peak flow depth and the peak velocities for the -year, -hour design storm for each toe drainage channel is calculated within the model. The table below summarizes the performance of the toe drainage channels. As shown below, each channel has at least of freeboard during peak flow and is below the ft/s allowable peak velocity. GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
10 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: Table Summary of Toe Drainage Channels T T T T Peak Inflow (cfs).... Minimum Freeboard (in) Peak Velocity (ft/s).... Perimeter Culverts The perimeter culverts are shown as C and C in the HydroCAD TM nodal diagram and Figure. Perimeter culverts will be located at two locations across the SCA perimeter dike at the low-points of the toe drainage channel. It is assumed that the discharge conveyed by these culverts to outside the limits of the SCA dike will be managed as part of the Wastebeds through Closure. Therefore, at this time, nodes C and C are modeled as dummy nodes in HydroCAD TM (HydroCAD, ). However, for planning purposes, calculations were performed to identify the number and diameter of the pipes required to convey the peak discharge. The following assumptions were required for these calculations: odesign Q = cfs (greater of C and C) omanning s n =.; Concrete Pipe, straight & clean olongitudinal Slope =. ft/ft (Assumed Minimum Slope) Given these assumptions, six -inch diameter pipes are required. CONCLUSION The components of the proposed final cover surface water management system for the SCA were designed to convey the calculated discharges from a -year, -hour design storm. This package addresses surface water management within the limits of the SCA perimeter dike, and does not address how surface water management will be implemented outside the limits of the SCA perimeter dike, which will be addressed separately. GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
11 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: REFERENCES HydroCAD, HydroCAD TM Storm Water Modeling System, Version., HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC., Chocorua, New Hampshire,. NYSDEC (New York State Department of Environmental Conservation),. Solid Waste Management Facilities. Part of Title of the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules, and Regulations. Robinson, K. M., Rice, C. E., Kadavy, K. C., Design of Rock Chutes, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Volume, No.,, pp. -. SCS, Computer Program for Project Formulation-Hydrology, Technical Release (TR-), United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C.,. SCS, Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Technical Release (TR-), United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C.,. GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
12 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: Figures GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
13 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: Figure : Final Cover Surface Water Management System Design GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
14 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: Attachment Manning Coefficients (HydroCAD, ) GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
15 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.:
16 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.:
17 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: Attachment Hydrologic Soil Groups and Runoff Curve Numbers (TR-, SCS, ) GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
18 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
19 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
20 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: Attachment Rainfall Distributions (TR-, SCS, ) GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
21 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: Site Location GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
22 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: Attachment Rainfall Depths (TR-, SCS, ) GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
23 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: Site Location GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
24 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: Site Location. inches GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
25 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: Attachment Nodal Network Diagram GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
26 SC Lower Side T B SB Toe Bench Upper Side C RC RB RA Culvert Riprap C Riprap B Riprap A T B SB Toe Bench Upper Side SC Lower Side Subcat Reach Pond Link SC Lower Side SB B T SA SA Upper Side Bench Toe Top Deck Top Deck RA RB C SA SA Riprap A Riprap B Culvert Top Deck Top Deck SB B T Upper Side Bench Toe SC Lower Side Drainage Diagram for final_cover, Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
27 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: Attachment HydroCAD Analysis GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
28 HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Printed // Page Area (acres) CN Description (subcatchment-numbers) Area Listing (all nodes). (SA, SB, SC, SA, SB, SC, SA, SB, SC, SA, SB, SC). TOTAL AREA
29 HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Printed // Page Area (acres) Soil Group Subcatchment Numbers Soil Listing (all nodes). HSG A. HSG B. HSG C. HSG D. Other SA, SB, SC, SA, SB, SC, SA, SB, SC, SA, SB, SC. TOTAL AREA
30 HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Printed // Page Line# Node Number In-Invert (feet) Out-Invert (feet) Pipe Listing (all nodes) Length (feet) Slope (ft/ft) n Diam/Width (inches) Height (inches) Fill (inches) C C
31 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Time span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs, points Runoff by SCS TR- method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment SA: Top Deck Subcatchment SB: Upper Side Subcatchment SC: Lower Side Subcatchment SA: Top Deck Subcatchment SB: Upper Side Subcatchment SC: Lower Side Subcatchment SA: Top Deck Subcatchment SB: Upper Side Subcatchment SC: Lower Side Subcatchment SA: Top Deck Subcatchment SB: Upper Side Subcatchment SC: Lower Side Runoff Area=. ac.% Impervious Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=' Tc=. min CN= Runoff=. cfs. af Runoff Area=. ac.% Impervious Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=' Tc=. min CN= Runoff=. cfs. af Runoff Area=. ac.% Impervious Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=' Tc=. min CN= Runoff=. cfs. af Runoff Area=. ac.% Impervious Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=,' Tc=. min CN= Runoff=. cfs. af Runoff Area=. ac.% Impervious Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=' Tc=. min CN= Runoff=. cfs. af Runoff Area=. ac.% Impervious Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=' Tc=. min CN= Runoff=. cfs. af Runoff Area=. ac.% Impervious Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=,' Tc=. min CN= Runoff=. cfs. af Runoff Area=. ac.% Impervious Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=' Tc=. min CN= Runoff=. cfs. af Runoff Area=. ac.% Impervious Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=' Tc=. min CN= Runoff=. cfs. af Runoff Area=. ac.% Impervious Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=,' Tc=. min CN= Runoff=. cfs. af Runoff Area=. ac.% Impervious Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=' Tc=. min CN= Runoff=. cfs. af Runoff Area=. ac.% Impervious Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=' Tc=. min CN= Runoff=. cfs. af Reach B: Bench Reach B: Bench Reach B: Bench Reach B: Bench Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps Inflow=. cfs. af n=. L=,.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Outflow=. cfs. af Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps Inflow=. cfs. af n=. L=,.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Outflow=. cfs. af Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps Inflow=. cfs. af n=. L=,.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Outflow=. cfs. af Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps Inflow=. cfs. af n=. L=,.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Outflow=. cfs. af
32 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Reach C: Culvert Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps Inflow=. cfs. af." Round Pipe x. n=. L=.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Outflow=. cfs. af Reach C: Culvert Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps Inflow=. cfs. af." Round Pipe x. n=. L=.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Outflow=. cfs. af Reach RA: Riprap A Reach RB: Riprap B Reach RA: Riprap A Reach RB: Riprap B Reach RC: Riprap C Reach T: Toe Reach T: Toe Reach T: Toe Reach T: Toe Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps Inflow=. cfs. af n=. L=.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Outflow=. cfs. af Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps Inflow=. cfs. af n=. L=.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Outflow=. cfs. af Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps Inflow=. cfs. af n=. L=.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Outflow=. cfs. af Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps Inflow=. cfs. af n=. L=.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Outflow=. cfs. af Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps Inflow=. cfs. af n=. L=.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Outflow=. cfs. af Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps Inflow=. cfs. af n=. L=,.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Outflow=. cfs. af Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps Inflow=. cfs. af n=. L=,.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Outflow=. cfs. af Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps Inflow=. cfs. af n=. L=,.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Outflow=. cfs. af Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps Inflow=. cfs. af n=. L=,.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Outflow=. cfs. af Total Runoff Area =. ac Runoff Volume =. af Average Runoff Depth =.".% Pervious =. ac.% Impervious =. ac
33 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Subcatchment SA: Top Deck Runoff =. hrs, Volume=. af, Depth=." Runoff by SCS TR- method, UH=SCS, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Area (ac) CN Description *...% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)... Sheet Flow, Sheet Flow Grass: Short n=. P=."... Shallow Concentrated Flow, Shallow Concentrated Grassed Waterway Kv=. fps. Total Subcatchment SA: Top Deck Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Runoff Area=. ac Runoff Volume=. af Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=' Tc=. min CN= Runoff Time (hours)
34 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Subcatchment SB: Upper Side Runoff =. hrs, Volume=. af, Depth=." Runoff by SCS TR- method, UH=SCS, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Area (ac) CN Description *...% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)... Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n=. P=."... Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n=. P=.". Total Subcatchment SB: Upper Side Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Runoff Area=. ac Runoff Volume=. af Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=' Tc=. min CN= Runoff Time (hours)
35 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Subcatchment SC: Lower Side Runoff =. hrs, Volume=. af, Depth=." Runoff by SCS TR- method, UH=SCS, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Area (ac) CN Description *...% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)... Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n=. P=."... Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n=. P=.". Total Subcatchment SC: Lower Side Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Runoff Area=. ac Runoff Volume=. af Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=' Tc=. min CN= Runoff Time (hours)
36 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Subcatchment SA: Top Deck Runoff =. hrs, Volume=. af, Depth=." Runoff by SCS TR- method, UH=SCS, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Area (ac) CN Description *...% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)... Sheet Flow, Sheet Flow Grass: Short n=. P=."... Shallow Concentrated Flow, Shallow Concentrated Grassed Waterway Kv=. fps., Total Subcatchment SA: Top Deck Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs Time (hours) Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Runoff Area=. ac Runoff Volume=. af Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=,' Tc=. min CN= Runoff
37 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Subcatchment SB: Upper Side Runoff =. hrs, Volume=. af, Depth=." Runoff by SCS TR- method, UH=SCS, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Area (ac) CN Description *...% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)... Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n=. P=."... Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n=. P=.". Total Subcatchment SB: Upper Side Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Runoff Area=. ac Runoff Volume=. af Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=' Tc=. min CN= Runoff Time (hours)
38 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Subcatchment SC: Lower Side Runoff =. hrs, Volume=. af, Depth=." Runoff by SCS TR- method, UH=SCS, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Area (ac) CN Description *...% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)... Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n=. P=."... Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n=. P=.". Total Subcatchment SC: Lower Side Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Runoff Area=. ac Runoff Volume=. af Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=' Tc=. min CN= Runoff Time (hours)
39 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Subcatchment SA: Top Deck Runoff =. hrs, Volume=. af, Depth=." Runoff by SCS TR- method, UH=SCS, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Area (ac) CN Description *...% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)... Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n=. P=.".,.. Shallow Concentrated Flow, Shallow Concentrated Grassed Waterway Kv=. fps., Total Subcatchment SA: Top Deck Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Runoff Area=. ac Runoff Volume=. af Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=,' Tc=. min CN= Runoff Time (hours)
40 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Subcatchment SB: Upper Side Runoff =. hrs, Volume=. af, Depth=." Runoff by SCS TR- method, UH=SCS, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Area (ac) CN Description *...% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)... Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n=. P=."... Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n=. P=."... Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n=. P=.". Total Subcatchment SB: Upper Side Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Runoff Area=. ac Runoff Volume=. af Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=' Tc=. min CN= Runoff Time (hours)
41 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Subcatchment SC: Lower Side Runoff =. hrs, Volume=. af, Depth=." Runoff by SCS TR- method, UH=SCS, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Area (ac) CN Description *...% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)... Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n=. P=."... Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n=. P=.". Total Subcatchment SC: Lower Side Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Runoff Area=. ac Runoff Volume=. af Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=' Tc=. min CN= Runoff Time (hours)
42 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Subcatchment SA: Top Deck Runoff =. hrs, Volume=. af, Depth=." Runoff by SCS TR- method, UH=SCS, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Area (ac) CN Description *...% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)... Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n=. P=."... Shallow Concentrated Flow, Shallow Concentrated Grassed Waterway Kv=. fps., Total Subcatchment SA: Top Deck Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs Time (hours) Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Runoff Area=. ac Runoff Volume=. af Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=,' Tc=. min CN= Runoff
43 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Subcatchment SB: Upper Side Runoff =. hrs, Volume=. af, Depth=." Runoff by SCS TR- method, UH=SCS, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Area (ac) CN Description *...% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)... Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n=. P=."... Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n=. P=."... Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n=. P=.". Total Subcatchment SB: Upper Side Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Runoff Area=. ac Runoff Volume=. af Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=' Tc=. min CN= Runoff Time (hours)
44 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Subcatchment SC: Lower Side Runoff =. hrs, Volume=. af, Depth=." Runoff by SCS TR- method, UH=SCS, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Area (ac) CN Description *...% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)... Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n=. P=."... Sheet Flow, Sheet Grass: Short n=. P=.". Total Subcatchment SC: Lower Side Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Runoff Area=. ac Runoff Volume=. af Runoff Depth=." Flow Length=' Tc=. min CN= Runoff Time (hours)
45 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Reach B: Bench Inflow Area =. ac,.% Impervious, Inflow Depth =." for -year event Inflow =. hrs, Volume=. af Outflow =. hrs, Volume=. af, Atten= %, Lag=. min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Max. Velocity=. fps, Min. Travel Time=. min Avg. Velocity =. fps, Avg. Travel Time=. min Peak Storage=, hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage=.' Bank-Full Depth=.', Capacity at Bank-Full=. cfs.' x.' deep channel, n=. Side Slope Z-value=.. '/' Top Width=.' Length=,.' Slope=. '/' Inlet Invert=.', Outlet Invert=.' Reach B: Bench Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs. cfs Inflow Area=. ac Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps n=. L=,.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Inflow Outflow Time (hours)
46 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Reach B: Bench Inflow Area =. ac,.% Impervious, Inflow Depth =." for -year event Inflow =. hrs, Volume=. af Outflow =. hrs, Volume=. af, Atten= %, Lag=. min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Max. Velocity=. fps, Min. Travel Time=. min Avg. Velocity =. fps, Avg. Travel Time=. min Peak Storage=, hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage=.' Bank-Full Depth=.', Capacity at Bank-Full=. cfs.' x.' deep channel, n=. Side Slope Z-value=.. '/' Top Width=.' Length=,.' Slope=. '/' Inlet Invert=.', Outlet Invert=.' Reach B: Bench Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs. cfs Inflow Area=. ac Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps n=. L=,.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Inflow Outflow Time (hours)
47 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Reach B: Bench Inflow Area =. ac,.% Impervious, Inflow Depth =." for -year event Inflow =. hrs, Volume=. af Outflow =. hrs, Volume=. af, Atten= %, Lag=. min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Max. Velocity=. fps, Min. Travel Time=. min Avg. Velocity =. fps, Avg. Travel Time=. min Peak Storage=, hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage=.' Bank-Full Depth=.', Capacity at Bank-Full=. cfs.' x.' deep channel, n=. Side Slope Z-value=.. '/' Top Width=.' Length=,.' Slope=. '/' Inlet Invert=.', Outlet Invert=.' Reach B: Bench Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs. cfs Inflow Area=. ac Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps n=. L=,.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Inflow Outflow Time (hours)
48 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Reach B: Bench Inflow Area =. ac,.% Impervious, Inflow Depth =." for -year event Inflow =. hrs, Volume=. af Outflow =. hrs, Volume=. af, Atten= %, Lag=. min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Max. Velocity=. fps, Min. Travel Time=. min Avg. Velocity =. fps, Avg. Travel Time=. min Peak Storage=, hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage=.' Bank-Full Depth=.', Capacity at Bank-Full=. cfs.' x.' deep channel, n=. Side Slope Z-value=.. '/' Top Width=.' Length=,.' Slope=. '/' Inlet Invert=.', Outlet Invert=.' Reach B: Bench Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs. cfs Inflow Area=. ac Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps n=. L=,.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Inflow Outflow Time (hours)
49 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Reach C: Culvert [] Hint: Inlet/Outlet conditions not evaluated [] Hint: Exceeded Reach T OUTLET depth hrs [] Hint: Exceeded Reach T outlet invert hrs Inflow Area =. ac,.% Impervious, Inflow Depth =." for -year event Inflow =. hrs, Volume=. af Outflow =. hrs, Volume=. af, Atten= %, Lag=. min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Max. Velocity=. fps, Min. Travel Time=. min Avg. Velocity =. fps, Avg. Travel Time=. min Peak Storage= hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage=.' Bank-Full Depth=.', Capacity at Bank-Full=. cfs A factor of. has been applied to the storage and discharge capacity." Round Pipe n=. Length=.' Slope=. '/' Inlet Invert=.', Outlet Invert=.'
50 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Reach C: Culvert Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs. cfs Time (hours) Inflow Area=. ac Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps." Round Pipe x. n=. L=.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Inflow Outflow
51 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Reach C: Culvert [] Hint: Inlet/Outlet conditions not evaluated [] Hint: Exceeded Reach T OUTLET depth hrs [] Hint: Exceeded Reach T OUTLET depth hrs Inflow Area =. ac,.% Impervious, Inflow Depth =." for -year event Inflow =. hrs, Volume=. af Outflow =. hrs, Volume=. af, Atten= %, Lag=. min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Max. Velocity=. fps, Min. Travel Time=. min Avg. Velocity =. fps, Avg. Travel Time=. min Peak Storage= hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage=.' Bank-Full Depth=.', Capacity at Bank-Full=. cfs A factor of. has been applied to the storage and discharge capacity." Round Pipe n=. Length=.' Slope=. '/' Inlet Invert=.', Outlet Invert=.'
52 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Reach C: Culvert Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs. cfs Inflow Area=. ac Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps." Round Pipe x. n=. L=.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Inflow Outflow Time (hours)
53 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Reach RA: Riprap A Inflow Area =. ac,.% Impervious, Inflow Depth =." for -year event Inflow =. hrs, Volume=. af Outflow =. hrs, Volume=. af, Atten= %, Lag=. min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Max. Velocity=. fps, Min. Travel Time=. min Avg. Velocity =. fps, Avg. Travel Time=. min Peak Storage= hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage=.' Bank-Full Depth=.', Capacity at Bank-Full=. cfs.' x.' deep channel, n=. Side Slope Z-value=. '/' Top Width=.' Length=.' Slope=. '/' Inlet Invert=.', Outlet Invert=.' Reach RA: Riprap A Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs. cfs Inflow Area=. ac Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps n=. L=.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Inflow Outflow Time (hours)
54 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Reach RB: Riprap B [] Hint: Exceeded Reach RA outlet invert hrs Inflow Area =. ac,.% Impervious, Inflow Depth =." for -year event Inflow =. hrs, Volume=. af Outflow =. hrs, Volume=. af, Atten= %, Lag=. min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Max. Velocity=. fps, Min. Travel Time=. min Avg. Velocity =. fps, Avg. Travel Time=. min Peak Storage= hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage=.' Bank-Full Depth=.', Capacity at Bank-Full=. cfs.' x.' deep channel, n=. Side Slope Z-value=. '/' Top Width=.' Length=.' Slope=. '/' Inlet Invert=.', Outlet Invert=.' Reach RB: Riprap B Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs. cfs Inflow Area=. ac Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps n=. L=.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Inflow Outflow Time (hours)
55 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Reach RA: Riprap A Inflow Area =. ac,.% Impervious, Inflow Depth =." for -year event Inflow =. hrs, Volume=. af Outflow =. hrs, Volume=. af, Atten= %, Lag=. min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Max. Velocity=. fps, Min. Travel Time=. min Avg. Velocity =. fps, Avg. Travel Time=. min Peak Storage= hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage=.' Bank-Full Depth=.', Capacity at Bank-Full=. cfs.' x.' deep channel, n=. Side Slope Z-value=. '/' Top Width=.' Length=.' Slope=. '/' Inlet Invert=.', Outlet Invert=.' Reach RA: Riprap A Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs. cfs Time (hours) Inflow Area=. ac Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps n=. L=.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Inflow Outflow
56 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Reach RB: Riprap B [] Hint: Exceeded Reach RA outlet invert hrs Inflow Area =. ac,.% Impervious, Inflow Depth =." for -year event Inflow =. hrs, Volume=. af Outflow =. hrs, Volume=. af, Atten= %, Lag=. min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Max. Velocity=. fps, Min. Travel Time=. min Avg. Velocity =. fps, Avg. Travel Time=. min Peak Storage= hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage=.' Bank-Full Depth=.', Capacity at Bank-Full=. cfs.' x.' deep channel, n=. Side Slope Z-value=. '/' Top Width=.' Length=.' Slope=. '/' Inlet Invert=.', Outlet Invert=.' Reach RB: Riprap B Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs. cfs Time (hours) Inflow Area=. ac Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps n=. L=.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Inflow Outflow
57 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Reach RC: Riprap C [] Hint: Exceeded Reach RB OUTLET depth hrs Inflow Area =. ac,.% Impervious, Inflow Depth =." for -year event Inflow =. hrs, Volume=. af Outflow =. hrs, Volume=. af, Atten= %, Lag=. min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Max. Velocity=. fps, Min. Travel Time=. min Avg. Velocity =. fps, Avg. Travel Time=. min Peak Storage= hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage=.' Bank-Full Depth=.', Capacity at Bank-Full=. cfs.' x.' deep channel, n=. Side Slope Z-value=. '/' Top Width=.' Length=.' Slope=. '/' Inlet Invert=.', Outlet Invert=.' Reach RC: Riprap C Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs. cfs Time (hours) Inflow Area=. ac Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps n=. L=.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Inflow Outflow
58 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Reach T: Toe Inflow Area =. ac,.% Impervious, Inflow Depth =." for -year event Inflow =. hrs, Volume=. af Outflow =. hrs, Volume=. af, Atten= %, Lag=. min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Max. Velocity=. fps, Min. Travel Time=. min Avg. Velocity =. fps, Avg. Travel Time=. min Peak Storage=, hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage=.' Bank-Full Depth=.', Capacity at Bank-Full=. cfs.' x.' deep channel, n=. Side Slope Z-value=. '/' Top Width=.' Length=,.' Slope=. '/' Inlet Invert=.', Outlet Invert=.' Reach T: Toe Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs. cfs Inflow Area=. ac Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps n=. L=,.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Inflow Outflow Time (hours)
59 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Reach T: Toe Inflow Area =. ac,.% Impervious, Inflow Depth =." for -year event Inflow =. hrs, Volume=. af Outflow =. hrs, Volume=. af, Atten= %, Lag=. min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Max. Velocity=. fps, Min. Travel Time=. min Avg. Velocity =. fps, Avg. Travel Time=. min Peak Storage=, hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage=.' Bank-Full Depth=.', Capacity at Bank-Full=. cfs.' x.' deep channel, n=. Side Slope Z-value=. '/' Top Width=.' Length=,.' Slope=. '/' Inlet Invert=.', Outlet Invert=.' Reach T: Toe Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs. cfs Inflow Area=. ac Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps n=. L=,.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Inflow Outflow Time (hours)
60 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Reach T: Toe Inflow Area =. ac,.% Impervious, Inflow Depth =." for -year event Inflow =. hrs, Volume=. af Outflow =. hrs, Volume=. af, Atten= %, Lag=. min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Max. Velocity=. fps, Min. Travel Time=. min Avg. Velocity =. fps, Avg. Travel Time=. min Peak Storage=, hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage=.' Bank-Full Depth=.', Capacity at Bank-Full=. cfs.' x.' deep channel, n=. Side Slope Z-value=. '/' Top Width=.' Length=,.' Slope=. '/' Inlet Invert=.', Outlet Invert=.' Reach T: Toe Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs. cfs Inflow Area=. ac Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps n=. L=,.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Inflow Outflow Time (hours)
61 Type II -hr -year Rainfall=." Printed // HydroCAD. s/n HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page Summary for Reach T: Toe Inflow Area =. ac,.% Impervious, Inflow Depth =." for -year event Inflow =. hrs, Volume=. af Outflow =. hrs, Volume=. af, Atten= %, Lag=. min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span=.-. hrs, dt=. hrs Max. Velocity=. fps, Min. Travel Time=. min Avg. Velocity =. fps, Avg. Travel Time=. min Peak Storage=, hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage=.' Bank-Full Depth=.', Capacity at Bank-Full=. cfs.' x.' deep channel, n=. Side Slope Z-value=. '/' Top Width=.' Length=,.' Slope=. '/' Inlet Invert=.', Outlet Invert=.' Reach T: Toe Hydrograph Flow (cfs). cfs. cfs Inflow Area=. ac Avg. Flow Depth=.' Max Vel=. fps n=. L=,.' S=. '/' Capacity=. cfs Inflow Outflow Time (hours)
62 Written by: Jesus Sanchez Date: // Reviewed by: Client: Honeywell Project: Onondaga Lake SCA Final Design Page of Joseph Sura / Ganesh Krishnan Date: // Project No.: GJ Task No.: Attachment Riprap Chute Analysis GA/SCA Final Cover Surface Water
63 Design - Trapezoidal Riprap Chute Methodology: Robinson et.al Project: Onandaga Lake SCA Chute ID: RA INPUT PARAMETERS Peak Discharge, Q max =. cfs Bottom Width, B =. ft Left Side Slope, Z =. horizontal : vertical Right Side Slope, Z =. horizontal : vertical Longitudinal Channel Slope, S o =. ft/ft ROCK SIZING Equivalent Unit Discharge, q t =. cfs/ft Median Rock Diameter, D =. inches MANNING'S ROUGHNESS Calculated Channel Roughness, n =. NORMAL DEPTH CALCULATIONS - Using Manning's Equation Depth Area Wetted Hydraulic Average Discharge Avg. Tractive Comments of Flow of Flow Perimeter Radius Velocity (Flow Rate) Stress Y A P R=A/P V Q=AV ft ft ft ft ft/s ft /s lb/ft DESIGN Q GG, //, : PM GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS GeoHydraulics.xlsx, Rock Chute Design % ()
64 Design - Trapezoidal Riprap Chute Methodology: Robinson et.al Project: Onandaga Lake SCA Chute ID: RB INPUT PARAMETERS Peak Discharge, Q max =. cfs Bottom Width, B =. ft Left Side Slope, Z =. horizontal : vertical Right Side Slope, Z =. horizontal : vertical Longitudinal Channel Slope, S o =. ft/ft ROCK SIZING Equivalent Unit Discharge, q t =. cfs/ft Median Rock Diameter, D =. inches MANNING'S ROUGHNESS Calculated Channel Roughness, n =. NORMAL DEPTH CALCULATIONS - Using Manning's Equation Depth Area Wetted Hydraulic Average Discharge Avg. Tractive Comments of Flow of Flow Perimeter Radius Velocity (Flow Rate) Stress Y A P R=A/P V Q=AV ft ft ft ft ft/s ft /s lb/ft DESIGN Q GG, //, : PM GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS GeoHydraulics.xlsx, Rock Chute Design.%
65 Design - Trapezoidal Riprap Chute Methodology: Robinson et.al Project: Onandaga Lake SCA Chute ID: RA INPUT PARAMETERS Peak Discharge, Q max =. cfs Bottom Width, B =. ft Left Side Slope, Z =. horizontal : vertical Right Side Slope, Z =. horizontal : vertical Longitudinal Channel Slope, S o =. ft/ft ROCK SIZING Equivalent Unit Discharge, q t =. cfs/ft Median Rock Diameter, D =. inches MANNING'S ROUGHNESS Calculated Channel Roughness, n =. NORMAL DEPTH CALCULATIONS - Using Manning's Equation Depth Area Wetted Hydraulic Average Discharge Avg. Tractive Comments of Flow of Flow Perimeter Radius Velocity (Flow Rate) Stress Y A P R=A/P V Q=AV ft ft ft ft ft/s ft /s lb/ft DESIGN Q GG, //, : PM GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS GeoHydraulics.xlsx, Rock Chute Design %
66 Design - Trapezoidal Riprap Chute Methodology: Robinson et.al Project: Onandaga Lake SCA Chute ID: RB INPUT PARAMETERS Peak Discharge, Q max =. cfs Bottom Width, B =. ft Left Side Slope, Z =. horizontal : vertical Right Side Slope, Z =. horizontal : vertical Longitudinal Channel Slope, S o =. ft/ft ROCK SIZING Equivalent Unit Discharge, q t =. cfs/ft Median Rock Diameter, D =. inches MANNING'S ROUGHNESS Calculated Channel Roughness, n =. NORMAL DEPTH CALCULATIONS - Using Manning's Equation Depth Area Wetted Hydraulic Average Discharge Avg. Tractive Comments of Flow of Flow Perimeter Radius Velocity (Flow Rate) Stress Y A P R=A/P V Q=AV ft ft ft ft ft/s ft /s lb/ft DESIGN Q GG, //, : PM GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS GeoHydraulics.xlsx, Rock Chute Design.%
67 Design - Trapezoidal Riprap Chute Methodology: Robinson et.al Project: Onandaga Lake SCA Chute ID: RC INPUT PARAMETERS Peak Discharge, Q max =. cfs Bottom Width, B =. ft Left Side Slope, Z =. horizontal : vertical Right Side Slope, Z =. horizontal : vertical Longitudinal Channel Slope, S o =. ft/ft ROCK SIZING Equivalent Unit Discharge, q t =. cfs/ft Median Rock Diameter, D =. inches MANNING'S ROUGHNESS Calculated Channel Roughness, n =. NORMAL DEPTH CALCULATIONS - Using Manning's Equation Depth Area Wetted Hydraulic Average Discharge Avg. Tractive Comments of Flow of Flow Perimeter Radius Velocity (Flow Rate) Stress Y A P R=A/P V Q=AV ft ft ft ft ft/s ft /s lb/ft DESIGN Q GG, //, : PM GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS GeoHydraulics.xlsx, Rock Chute Design %
Drainage and Detention Report. for. Charity Auto Sales. located at: East 116 th Street North Collinsville, OK Revised August 22, 2016
Drainage and Detention Report for Charity Auto Sales located at: 9 East 6 th Street North Collinsville, OK 742 Revised August 22, 26 Olsson Associates, Inc. 9 N. Birch Street, Suite 2 Owasso, OK 74 (98)
More informationDecember 12, Mr. Ronald Gilbert, P.E. City Engineer City of Bessemer 1930 Second Avenue North Suite 150 Bessemer, AL 35020
December 12, 2014 Mr. Ronald Gilbert, P.E. City Engineer City of Bessemer 130 Second Avenue North Suite Bessemer, AL 3020 Re: The proposed new development of Pediatrics West McAdory Bell Hill Road Bessemer,
More informationDRAINAGE ANALYSIS REPORT
DRAINAGE ANALYSIS REPORT FOR The Village at Barnstable (Phase ) Active Adult Apartments Located at: Communication Way Hyannis, Massachusetts Prepared for: Greystar Group II, LLC, LLC Greensboro Drive Suite
More informationRevised Stormwater Management Report. Self-Storage Development. Wheeler Road Burlington, Massachusetts
An Employee-Owned Company Revised Stormwater Management Report For the Proposed: Self-Storage Development Located at: Wheeler Road Burlington, Massachusetts Prepared for Submission to: Town of Burlington,
More informationSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT HOG HILL BROOK Island Pond Road and West Side Drive Atkinson, New Hampshire December 21, 2009 KNA Project No. 09-0722-1 Prepared For: Prepared By: Ted Stewart, Road Agent Town
More informationAPPENDIX A Existing Conditions Map
APPENDIX A Existing Conditions Map APPENDIX B Conceptual Improvements Plans Sheets B-B- APPENDIX C Soil Mapping Hydrologic Soil Group Albany County, New York (McKownville Stormwater Project Soils)
More informationCITY OF AUBURN, NEW YORK
CITY OF AUBURN, NEW YORK History s Hometown Auburn Planning Board The Regular Monthly Meeting of the Planning Board will be held at 6:30 PM on January 2, 2018 at Council Chambers, Memorial City Hall, 24
More informationAdam D. James, P.E., CFM Eric Y. Chow, P.E., CFM. NRCS DAM RISK ASSESSMENTS Sites 6 and 8 Eddy and Chaves Counties, New Mexico
Adam D. James, P.E., CFM Eric Y. Chow, P.E., CFM NRCS DAM RISK ASSESSMENTS Sites 6 and 8 Eddy and Chaves Counties, New Mexico Cottonwood Walnut Creek watershed, drains east to the Pecos River Purpose to
More informationHard Hat Services ph: hardhatinc.com 932 N. Wright St., Suite 160 Naperville, IL 60563
Interstate Power and Light Company Burlington Generation Station CCR Surface Impoundment Annual Inspection Report 154.018.012.001 Report issued: December 21, 2016 Hard Hat Services ph: 877-630-7428 hardhatinc.com
More informationSTRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT
STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT CFR 257.73(d) Fly Ash Pond Big Sandy Plant Louisa, Kentucky October, 2016 Prepared for: Kentucky Power Big Sandy Plant Louisa, Kentucky Prepared by: American Electric Power
More informationDodge County Drainage Board
Dodge County Drainage Board Drainage District 1 ATCP 48.20 Specifications November 24, 2016 Prepared By: DesignTech Engineering, LLC P.O. Box 293 Beaver Dam, Wisconsin 53916-0293 Phone: (920) 887-3128
More informationATTACHMENT B8 Incident History
Appendix B GIS/Imagery Outputs ATTACHMENT B8 Incident History Appendix B - GIS/Imagery Outputs Appendix B: Attachment B8 Incident History TABLE OF CONTENTS B.B8-1 INTRODUCTION... 1 B.B8-2 FACT SHEETS...
More informationPlano esquemático. Estudio de flora y fauna. Estudio geotécnico. Determinación jurisdiccional de humedales. Prospección arqueológica fase 1a-1b
Plano esquemático 1 Estudio de flora y fauna 2 Estudio geotécnico 3 Determinación jurisdiccional de humedales 4 Prospección arqueológica fase 1a-1b 5 Cartas de las agencias 6 Estudio hidrológico e hidráulico
More informationBank Erosion and Bridge Scour
JULY 2017 NCHRP PRACTICE-READY SOLUTIONS FOR Bank Erosion and Bridge Scour NCHRP NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM RESEARCH TOPIC HIGHLIGHTS INTRODUCTION Bank Erosion and Bridge Scour: NCHRP
More informationPEAK FLOW REDUCTION OPPORTUNITIES IN THE CASCADE CREEK TRIBUTARIES. Final Report. Olmsted County, MN November 2008 Project Number:
PEAK FLOW REDUCTION OPPORTUNITIES IN THE CASCADE CREEK TRIBUTARIES Final Report Olmsted County, MN November 28 Project Number: 362-614 COUNTY OF OLMSTED PEAK FLOW REDUCTION OPPORTUNITIES IN THE CASCADE
More informationUNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CRANE LAKE ROAD OVER HAWKINSON CREEK ST. LOUIS COUNTY
UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 7883 CRANE LAKE ROAD OVER HAWKINSON CREEK ST. LOUIS COUNTY JUNE 21, 2012 PREPARED FOR THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY COLLINS ENGINEERS,
More informationPrepared for Friends of the Corte Madera Creek Watershed. By Ross Taylor and Associates
CATALOG OF STREAM CROSSINGS WITH CULVERTS AND OTHER MANMADE IMPEDIMENTS TO FISH PASSAGE LOCATED ON ANADROMOUS STREAM REACHES WITHIN FAIRFAX CREEK, CORTE MADERA CREEK WATERSHED, MARIN COUNTY, CA. Prepared
More informationUrban Drainage and Flood Control District. Goldsmith Iliff Pond E-19 Survey
Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Goldsmith Gulch @ Iliff Pond E-19 Survey GOLDSMITH GULCH @ ILIFF ALERT ID: 653/654 LID: ILFC2 Prepared by: HDR Engineering, Inc. 303 E 17 th Ave. Suite 700 Denver
More informationMONTANA FLUME. User s Manual. Montana (Short Parshall) Flume User s Manual
MONTANA FLUME User s Manual i Montana (Short Parshall) Flume User s Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction to the Montana Flume... 1 Function... 1 Design... 1 Standards... 2 Accuracy... 3 Dimensions...
More informationEAH 422 ADVANCED WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING
EAH 422 ADVANCED WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING Bridge Hydraulics Prof. Aminuddin Ab. Ghani References The Art And Science Of River Engineering Bridge Failure Pier scour Pier scour Pier scour Bridge Failure
More informationFlood Hydrology. for. Michigan Watercourses
Flood Hydrology for Michigan Watercourses Michigan Hydrologic Methodologies FEMA Flood Insurance Study (FIS) Statistical Analysis of USGS Gage Data (Gage) Statistical Models for Estimating Flow Characteristics
More informationAppendix B. Shallow Foundations Report
12/10/2013 GEOTECHNICAL MANUAL Appendix B. Shallow Foundations Report PLEASE NOTE A sample foundations report is included here for reference. It is provided as an example of content, format, and organization
More informationTwo-Dimensional Computer Modeling of Pomme de Terre River at Highways 12 and 22 in Minnesota
Two-Dimensional Computer Modeling of Pomme de Terre River at Highways 12 and 22 in Minnesota Kamal Saffarinia 1, G. Kenneth Young 2, J. Sterling Jones 3, and Stuart Stein 4 This paper investigates two-dimensional
More informationRecalibration of New York City s Drainage System Models to Support Green Infrastructure Planning and Implementation
2011 Low Impact Development Symposium 9/28/2011 Recalibration of New York City s Drainage System Models to Support Green Infrastructure Planning and Implementation Sri Rangarajan, Chenchen Li, William
More informationThe New Jersey Nonstructural Strategies Point System (NSPS)
2011 Low Impact Development Symposium The New Jersey Nonstructural Strategies Point System (NSPS) NJDEP SWM Rules (NJAC 7:8) Issued Jointly with NJDEP Municipal Stormwater Regulation Program (NJAC 7:14)
More informationDynamic Routing Applied to an Urban Subsurface Drainage System
Dynamic Routing Applied to an Urban Subsurface Drainage System Michelle Iblings, PE, CFM (Freese and Nichols, Inc.) Jim Dulac,, PE (City of Richardson) TFMA Spring Conference May 1, 2008 Project Overview
More informationFlume Installation Instructions
Flume Installation Instructions To ensure a successful installation, it is important to keep the following points in mind: 1) There should be no bend, dips, elbows, or flow junction immediately upstream
More informationCHAPTER 11 APPENDIX D
OFFICE OF STRUCTURES STRUCTURE HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS DIVISION CHAPTER 11 APPENDIX D SCOUR COUNTERMEASURES FOR PIERS AND ABUTMENTS MAY 2015 Maryland SHA Office of Structures, Chapter 11, Appendix D May2015Page
More informationClay Sewer Pipe-Joint Infiltration Leak-Rate Testing
Clay Sewer Pipe-Joint Infiltration Leak-Rate Testing 1. ABSTRACT While numbers of small to large older cities are undertaking repairs and maintenance, several other newer cities are planning on installing
More informationUNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH 24 OVER HAWKINSON CREEK ST. LOUIS COUNTY
UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 7685 CSAH 24 OVER HAWKINSON CREEK ST. LOUIS COUNTY JUNE 21, 2012 PREPARED FOR THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY COLLINS ENGINEERS, INC. JOB
More informationCounty of Orange. Presented to the Flood Division August 13, 2001 by Nadeem Majaj
Using HECRAS TO Evaluate Scour At Bridges County of Orange Presented to the Flood Division August 3, 200 by Nadeem Majaj Approximately 575,000 bridges are built over waterways in the US. The most common
More informationABSCOUR 9 USERS MANUAL
OFFICE OF STRUCTURES BRIDGE SCOUR PROGRAM CHAPTER 11 APPENDIX A ABSCOUR 9 USERS MANUAL PART 1: DERIVATION OF METHODOLOGY APRIL 2011 Preface ABSCOUR 9, Build 2.3 is the current version of this program as
More informationUNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO th STREET OVER THE ZUMBRO RIVER CITY OF ROCHESTER
UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 89188 7 th STREET OVER THE ZUMBRO RIVER CITY OF ROCHESTER OCTOBER 2, 2012 PREPARED FOR THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY COLLINS ENGINEERS,
More informationWestcott site services
Westcott site services 6 prospect street Waltham ma 2453 781-647-62 westcottsite.com Hillside Center for Sustainable Living Newburyport, Massachusetts STORMWATER REPORT December 28, 215 WESTCOTT SITE SERVICES
More information2006 RALSTON AFTERBAY WATER TEMPERATURE INVESTIGATION STUDY REPORT
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC Project No. 2079) 2006 RALSTON AFTERBAY WATER TEMPERATURE INVESTIGATION STUDY REPORT Placer County Water Agency 144 Ferguson Road Auburn,
More informationLANDFILL STABILITY ISSUES
LANDFILL STABILITY ISSUES 1 2006 APWA International Congress & Exposition Kansas City, Missouri Timothy D. Stark, Ph.D., P.E. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign OUTLINE 2 Current Situation Liner
More informationIdentifying Number MPC-354. Project Title: Geotechnical Limit to Scour at Spill-through Abutments. University: The University of Wyoming
Identifying Number MPC-354 Project Title: Geotechnical Limit to Scour at Spill-through Abutments University: The University of Wyoming Principal Investigators: Robert Ettema PhD, PE College of Engineering
More informationSlope Stabilization in Itaipava Petropolis, RJ, Brazil Using Vetiver Solution A Total Success.
Slope Stabilization in Itaipava Petropolis, RJ, Brazil Using Vetiver Solution A Total Success. By Paulo R.Rogerio,PE,Geotechnical Consulting Engineer Pomerode SC Brazil email: prrog@terra.com.br and Joao
More informationFEASIBILITY REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT COASTAL STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECT
FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT COASTAL STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECT SURF CITY AND NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH NORTH CAROLINA Appendix E Sand Compatibility Analysis Appendix E: Sand Compatibility
More informationDon Pedro Project Project Operations/Water Balance Model Attachment B Model Description and User s Guide, Addendum 1 Base Case Description
Don Pedro Project Project Operations/Water Balance Model Attachment B Model Description and User s Guide, Addendum 1 Base Case Description 5-2-213 1. INTRODUCTION The Turlock Irrigation District ( TID
More informationCavitation. Cameron Fritz, John Glover, Maia Griswold
Cavitation Cameron Fritz, John Glover, Maia Griswold CIVE 401, Hydraulic Engineering Dr. P.Y. Julien November 19, 2014 Table of Contents Introduction Page 1 Theory Page 2 Failures Page 5 Prevention Page
More informationNORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY MICHIGAN CITY GENERATING STATION. Initial Annual RCRA CCR Unit Inspection Report
INITIAL ANNUAL INSPECTION REPORT NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY MICHIGAN CITY GENERATING STATION Initial Annual RCRA CCR Unit Inspection Report PRIMARY BASIN NUMBER 2 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT Submitted
More informationDoug Leeper, Senior Environmental Scientist Resource Conservation and Development Department Southwest Florida Water Management District
February 4, 2003 MEMORANDUM TO: File FROM: Doug Leeper, Senior Environmental Scientist Resource Conservation and Development Department Southwest Florida Water Management District SUBJECT: Proposed minimum
More informationMBW3-45 ELR: No coring surveys have been found for this structure. There are no records of any previous inspections of the structure.
Scour Assessment Report Location Plan: Scale 1:5,000 MBW3-45 Score: 16.86 ELR: Contains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright and database right 2010 Category: HIGH Assessment Date: 19/11/2010 Contract:
More informationSEPTEMBER, 2006 ROAD DESIGN MANUAL 7-0(1) CHAPTER 7 PAVEMENT DESIGN
SEPTEMBER, 2006 ROAD DESIGN MANUAL 7-0(1) CHAPTER 7 PAVEMENT DESIGN 7-1.0 INTRODUCTION 7-2.0 RIGID PAVEMENT DESIGN 7-2.01 Cross Sections 7-2.02 Ramps and Loops with Storage Area 7-2.03 Major Forks, Branch
More informationIntegrating WEPP and a pathogen transport model to simulate fate and transport of Cryptosporidium parvum and Rotavirus in surface flow
Integrating WEPP and a pathogen transport model to simulate fate and transport of Cryptosporidium parvum and Rotavirus in surface flow Rabin Bhattarai, Prasanta Kalita and Paul Davidson Department of Agricultural
More informationThree Bridges at I-64/Mercury Boulevard Interchange in Hampton, VA
Three Bridges at I-64/Mercury Boulevard Interchange in Hampton, VA IRFAN A. ALVI, P.E., Alvi Associates, Inc., Baltimore, MD IBC-02-25 KEYWORDS: box girder, counterweight abutment, curved girder, high-performance
More informationBy James Owino, Universität für Bodenkultur, Wien Ralph Gretzmacher, Universität für Bodenkultur, Wien
PERFORMANCE OF NARROW STRIPS OF VETIVER GRASS (Vetiveria zizanioides) AND NAPIER GRASS (Pennisetum purpureum) AS BARRIERS AGAINST RUNOFF AND SOIL LOSS ON A CLAY LOAM SOIL IN KENYA. By James Owino, Universität
More informationEmergency Bridge Stabilization at Mile Watrous Subdivision
Emergency Bridge Stabilization at Mile 189.70 Watrous Subdivision Christophe Deniaud, Ph.D., P.Eng. Bridge Engineer, CN 10004-104 Avenue Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5J 0K2 Tel: (780) 421-6021 Fax: (780)
More informationTable 3-1 Summary of Storm Drain Outfalls
Table 3-1 Summary of Storm Drain Outfalls Outfall Number Description 005 The drainage area associated with Outfall 005 is to the west of the plant adjacent to and north of Warehouse 2/3, and includes a
More informationWhat Site Characteristics Explain Variability Of Peak Footing Drain Flows? Oskar Nordstrom, P.E. Mark TenBroek, P.E. CDM Michigan Inc.
What Site Characteristics Explain Variability Of Peak Footing Drain Flows? Oskar Nordstrom, P.E. Mark TenBroek, P.E. CDM Michigan Inc. Ann Arbor, MI MWEA Annual Conference June 22, 2009 City of Ann Arbor
More informationTALLAPOOSA RIVER FLOW ANALYSIS R L HARRIS DAM Downstream to WADLEY GAUGE GEO-TUBES EVALUATION
TALLAPOOSA RIVER FLOW ANALYSIS R L HARRIS DAM Downstream to WADLEY GAUGE GEO-TUBES EVALUATION November 3, 003 Page of INTRODUCTION This report addresses hydraulic analysis of a fourteen mile section of
More informationDraft. Not yet Approved. Natural Waterways 2012
Natural Waterways 2012 3.1 General 1 3 5 3.1.1 Scope (2012) 1 3 5 3.1.2 Importance (1992) R(2012) 1 3 5 3.2 Hydrologic Capacity of Waterway Openings1 1 3 5 3.2.1 General (2012) 1 3 5 3.2.2 Drainage Basin
More informationAlluvial Bar Morphology and Dynamics in the Middle Rio Grande: Application to Habitat Restoration for the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow
Alluvial Bar Morphology and Dynamics in the Middle Rio Grande: Application to Habitat Restoration for the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow Mike Harvey Mussetter Engineering, Inc. WORK CONDUCTED FOR: New Mexico
More informationVisual On-land Trash Assessment Protocol for Stormwater
Visual On-land Trash Assessment Protocol for Stormwater Version 1.3 Prepared by: EOA, Inc. 1410 Jackson St. Oakland, CA 94612 April 15, 2015 Visual On-land Trash Assessment Methodology INTRODUCTION This
More informationSEEPAGE ANALYSIS OF TWO CASE HISTORIES OF PIPING INDUCED BY EXCAVATIONS IN COHESIONLESS SOILS
ICCI2004, The First International Conference on Construction IT, Beijing, CHINA, August 12 th - 14 th SEEPAGE ANALYSIS OF TWO CASE HISTORIES OF PIPING INDUCED BY EXCAVATIONS IN COHESIONLESS SOILS Cai,
More informationService Life of Aluminized Type 2 Coated Steel Pipe: Predictions vs. Actual
Service Life of Aluminized Type 2 Coated Steel Pipe: Predictions vs. Actual Resource # 07-135 (04/16) 2 2016 American Concrete Pipe Association, all rights reserved. The last comprehensive inspection of
More informationFLOWABLE FILL Controlled Low-Strength Materials
FLOWABLE FILL FLOWABLE FILL Controlled Low-Strength Materials Unshrinkable Fill Controlled Density Fill Flowable Mortar Flowable Fly Ash Fly Ash Slurry Plastic Soil Cement Soil Cement Slurry What is Flowable
More informationMemorandum AECOM tel fax ABN
AECOM Australia Pty Ltd Level 10, Tower Two 727 Collins Street Melbourne VIC 3008 Australia www.aecom.com +61 3 9653 1234 tel +61 3 9654 7117 fax ABN 20 093 846 925 Memorandum To David Hitchcock Page 1
More informationHYDRAULIC MODELING ASSESSMENT OF THE TURNER FALLS IMPOUNDMENT TURNERS FALLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (NO. 1889) AND NORTHFIELD MOUNTAIN PUMPED STORAGE
HYDRAULIC MODELING ASSESSMENT OF THE TURNER FALLS IMPOUNDMENT TURNERS FALLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (NO. 1889) AND NORTHFIELD MOUNTAIN PUMPED STORAGE PROJECT (NO. 2485) FEBRUARY 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0
More informationTechnology. Reinforced Earth Wall Typical Section. Traffic Barrier. Roadway. Select Granular Material. Facing Panel Random Backfill.
Bridge Applications Technology The Reinforced Earth Company (RECo) offers a variety of bridge abutment and bridge crossing solutions, each are based on project specific requirements. Bridge abutments are
More informationNCHRP REPORT (2)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program NCHRP REPORT 4-5 () ABUTMENT SCOUR IN COHESIVE MATERIALS J.-L. Briaud, H.-C. Chen, K.-A Chang, S. J. Oh, X. Chen October 009 Transportation Research Board
More informationB. Stipulated Price (Lump Sum). If Contract is Stipulated Price Contract, payment for Work in this Section is included in total Stipulated Price.
Section 02222 PART 1 G E N E R A L 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. Abandonment in place of existing sewers, junction structures, manholes, and force mains. 1.02 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT A. Unit Prices. 1. Payment
More informationa.the Vetiver Network International b.vietnam Vetiver Network
Presented at the Southern African Association of Geomorphology (SAAG) 2017 Conference, 25-28 July 2017, Swaziland APPLICATION OF VETIVER SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY FOR RIVERBANK AND COASTAL DIKE STABILISATION IN
More informationStormwater Mitigation Worksheet
Planning & Development Dept. Infrastructure Division P.O. Box 11706, or 155 Johnston Street Rock Hill, South Carolina 29731 1706 Phone: 803 329 5515 FAX: 803 329 7228 www.cityofrockhill.com Date Received:
More informationLessons learned in multi-objective urban detention basin projects
Lessons learned in multi-objective urban detention basin projects Raymond Wong, PhD, PE, LEED AP Patrick Sullivan, PE Bill Silva, PE Floodplain Management Association Conference September 6, 2017 Urban
More informationACCELERATED BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT: THE REPLACEMENT OF MD 362 OVER MONIE CREEK
ACCELERATED BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT: THE REPLACEMENT OF MD 362 OVER MONIE CREEK Joseph Navarra, P.E, Maryland State Highway Administration, 410-545-8315, jnavarra@sha.state.md.us ABSTRACT The MDSHA
More informationA Sensitivity Analysis of the Influence of Watershed and Development Characteristics on the Cumulative Impacts of Stormwater Detention Ponds
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2003 A Sensitivity Analysis of the Influence of Watershed and Development Characteristics
More informationNSW Coastal, Ocean and Port Engineering Panel
NSW Coastal, Ocean and Port Engineering Panel Design of Transition Zone for Cement Deep Mixing for a Port Reclamation Project Patrick Wong (23 April 2012) Presentation Outline Project description Site
More informationThe compliance monitors are responsible for reviewing NEXUS s construction and documenting compliance with the FERC Certificate.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE MONITORING PROGRAM WEEKLY SUMMARY REPORT NEXUS GAS TRANSMISSION PROJECT DOCKET NO.: CP16-22-000 FOR THE PERIOD: FEBRUARY 12 THROUGH FEBRUARY
More informationEnvironmental Impacts of Compost Application on Construction Sites
Environmental Impacts of Compost Application on Construction Sites Tom Glanville Agricultural & Biosystems Engineering Department by Dr. Tom Glanville, Agricultural & Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State
More informationGrade separated interchange at the intersection of U.S. Hwy 17 Bypass and Farrow Parkway
Grade separated interchange at the intersection of U.S. Hwy 17 Bypass and Farrow Parkway Jeff Sizemore, P.E. Geotechnical Design Support Engineer SCDOT Ed Tavera, P.E. Principal Geotechnical Engineer Geoengineers
More informationRTKC- East Abutment Extension Individual Permit Application November 15, Figure 1. East Abutment Extension General Vicinity Map
RTKC- East Abutment Extension November 15, 2016 2.1. Figure 1. East Abutment Extension General Vicinity Map WP NATURAL RESOURCE CONSULTING, INC. 4 RTKC- East Abutment Extension November 15, 2016 2.2. Figure
More informationRestoring a More Natural Flow Regime to the Clinton River Watershed. MWEA 87 th Annual Conference June 26, 2012
Restoring a More Natural Flow Regime to the Clinton River Watershed MWEA 87 th Annual Conference June 26, 2012 Donald D. Carpenter, Ph.D., PE, LEED AP Lawrence Technological University Agenda Study Goals
More informationHydrau-Tech, Inc. Engineering & Software
Hydrau-Tech, Inc. Engineering & Software HYDRAU-TECH, INC. H ydrau-tech, Inc. is an engineering consulting firm specializing since 1986 in openchannel hydraulics, watershed, river, and reservoir sedimentation,
More informationPENNDOT e-notification
PENNDOT e-notification Bureau of Design Engineering Computing Management Division BRADD No. 027 August 30, 2010 Release of Version 3.1.5.0 PennDOT's Bridge Automated Design and Drafting Software (BRADD)
More informationPerformance of Vetiver Grass in Protecting Embankments on the Bangladesh Coast against Cyclonic Tidal Surge
5 th National Conference on Coastal and Estuarine Habitat Restoration Preparing for Climate Change: Science, Practice, and Policy Performance of Vetiver Grass in Protecting Embankments on the Bangladesh
More informationUNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 4 OVER THE CLEARWATER RIVER (DAM) DISTRICT 2 - CLEARWATER COUNTY
UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4992 CSAH NO. 4 OVER THE CLEARWATER RIVER (DAM) DISTRICT 2 - CLEARWATER COUNTY PREPARED FOR THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY COLLINS ENGINEERS,
More informationStormwater Report. For ACORN STREET MILLIS, MA Proposed Senior Residential Community. July 12, 2018
Stormwater Report For ACORN PLACE ACORN STREET MILLIS, MA Proposed Senior Residential Community July, PREPARED BY: MERRIKIN ENGINEERING, LLP Consulting Engineers Main Street, Suite C Millis, MA PREPARED
More informationFiled: , EB , Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 1, Attachment 3, Page 1 of 8
Filed: 2018-07-04, EB-2018-0108, Exhibit B, Tab 1, Schedule 1, Attachment 3, Page 1 of 8 Stantec Consulting Ltd. 300-675 Cochrane Drive West Tower Markham ON L3R 0B8 Tel: (905) 944-7777 Fax: (905) 474-9889
More informationArizona Western College Prealgebra Final Exam Review. Name Class Time. Show your work for full credit.
Arizona Western College Prealgebra Final Exam Review Name Class Time Show your work for full credit. Write in expanded notation. 1) 2958 1) Provide an appropriate response. 2) The total population of a
More informationNumerical analysis of the embedded abutments of integral bridges
Numerical analysis of the embedded abutments of integral bridges Ming XU Researcher, Dept. of Civil & Env. Engrg., University of Southampton, UK Summary Alan G. BLOODWORTH Lecturer, Dept. of Civil & Env.
More informationNon-Destructive Testing of Drilled Shafts Current Practices and New Methods
Non-Destructive Testing of Drilled Shafts Current Practices and New Methods Brent Robinson, Pile Dynamics, Inc. 2012 Pile Dynamics, Inc. Foundation & Geotechnical Engineering Why Test Integrity? Survey
More informationPRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN
PNCC Manawatu River Pedestrian/ Cycle Bridge PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN 1 Introduction Opus has been commissioned by the Palmerston North City Council (PNCC) to prepare a Detailed Business Case (DBC)
More informationAPPENDIX H. Limit Equilibrium Analysis of Dike 1 Abutments Prior to Failure
APPENDIX H Limit Equilibrium Analysis of Dike 1 Abutments August 25, 2016 Appendix H Limit Equilibrium Analysis of Dike 1 Abutments TABLE OF CONTENTS H1 INTRODUCTION... 1 H2 ENGINEERING PROPERTIES OF THE
More informationOVERVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION of the TUNNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. TRB Tunnel Workshop. January 11, 2009 Washington, DC
OVERVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION of the TUNNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TRB Tunnel Workshop January 11, 2009 Washington, DC PRESENTATION TEAM Chester Allen, P.E. Martha Averso, P.E. Rick Patrick, P.E. DISCUSSION TOPICS
More informationBengt H. Fellenius. Wick Drains and Piling for Cai Mep Container Port, Vietnam, and the true cost of 5 cent per foot. Amsterdam.
Wick Drains and Piling for Cai Mep Container Port, Vietnam, and the true cost of 5 cent per foot Bengt H. Fellenius Amsterdam May 27, 216 Fellenius, B.H. and Nguyen, M.H., 213. Wick Drains and Piling for
More informationPEACHLAND CREEK WATERSHED (Second Year of Snowline Data)
Extent of Snow Cover During the 2002 Spring Freshet For the PEACHLAND CREEK WATERSHED (Second Year of Snowline Data) (Penticton Forest District) 1.0 INTRODUCTION The extent of snow cover over a watershed
More informationIf you have questions or need additional information, please contact us. Attachment: Prior Lake Outlet Annual Operations Report, Year 2008
January 16, 2009 Ms. Janell Miersch, Area Hydrologist Metro Region of Waters Department of Natural Resources 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55106 Prior Lake Outlet Annual Operations Report, Year
More informationTwo and One Half Year groundwater monitoring report at D.H. Griffin s Tower Ridge Landfill, GMS I.D. Number: NWD/17/
GLM & Associates Geoffrey L. Maddux Environmental Consultant 7497 Harvest Village Court Mailing Address P.O. Box 5339 Navarre, Florida 32566 (850) 939-8037 Fax (850) 936-5261 August 10, 2015 Ms. Dawn Templin,
More informationIntegral Abutment Bridge Design with Soil Structure Interaction
Integral Abutment Bridge Design with Soil Structure Interaction Thursday, May 11, 2017 3:00 PM 4:00 PM EST Speaker Engineer: Suthichai Saelim Project Location WESTBOROUGH Railroad HOPKINTON Project Location
More informationRisk Assessment Report for AGSS-ICS
1. INTRODUCTION This Risk Assessment evaluated the human health risks from exposure during and after application of AGSS-ICS. This information will determine whether AGSS-ICS used to treat soil will present
More informationQuestions and Answers on VDOT's Supplement to the AASHTO Manual for Bridge Element Inspection
Questions and Answers on VDOT's Supplement to the AASHTO Manual for Bridge Element Inspection No. 1 2/26/2016 830 MSE Wall V 26 Is ADE 830 MSE Wall to be used in conjunction with NBE 218 Other Abutment
More informationFour simply supported steel plate girders (appear to be an old railcar).
BRIDGE INSPECTION BRIDGE NO./NAME N4-005: Akolkolex Crawford FSR (19.0 km) Inspection Date: September 22 nd, 2012 Inspected By: M. Hanson, R. Veitch Year Built: 1982 Number of Spans: 1 Span Lengths: Superstructure
More informationFrancis E. Walter Reservoir Recreation Operations Plan for 2019
Revised: 24 October 2018 Francis E. Walter Reservoir Recreation Operations Plan for 2019 Note: This plan will remain the same for the next two years with the exception of dates, please reference Table
More information2011 BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
2011 BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT BYRD PARK PUMP STATION BRIDGE OVER KANAWHA CANAL April 2011 FINAL December 2011 Looking - from Abutment B to Abutment A Prepared by: WHITMAN, REQUARDT, & ASSOCIATES, LLP 9030
More informationA comparative study of the flow rate characteristics of flangeembedded averaging Pitot tube (APT) flow meters for various crosssection
A comparative study of the flow rate characteristics of flangeembedded averaging Pitot tube (AP) flow meters for various crosssection shapes Choong oon Lee Department of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering,
More informationTwo Dimensional Computer Modeling of
\N P? v&cu&ae yoomk Two Dimensional Computer Modeling of Green River at Dinosaur National Monument and Canyonlands National Park For: Water Rights Branch Water Resources Division National Park Service
More information