Survey shows participants positive to Gdansk conference

Transcription

1 Survy shows participants positiv to Gdansk cfrnc Th 13 th Baltic Dvlopmnt Forum Summit and th Europan Commissi s 2 nd Annual Forum th EU Stratgy for th Baltic Sa Rgi was hld in Gdansk, Poland, Octobr undr th titl Nw Ambitis for th Baltic Sa Rgi. This yar s cfrnc gathrd ca. 750 participants, during which 126 qustinairs wr cductd with our participants rprsnting approximatly 1 of all participants. Th organisrs would lik to thank vry who participatd in th qustinairs, and all th rspss and commnts will b takn into csidrati whn planning futur vnts in Th ovrall rspss rgarding th cfrnc wr vry positiv an ovrwhlming amount of rspdnts viwd th cfrnc as a succss. Th cfrnc covrd th currnt political and comic situati and th main ara of intrst for rspdnts was th EU Stratgy for th Baltic Sa Rgi. Th most popular sssis this yar wr Stting Targts for th EU Stratgy for th Baltic Sa Rgi and Rgial Idntity and Rgi Branding. Th main ras for participati was to ntwork and th Handbook was csidrd to b vry usful. A vast amount of rspdnts viwd th srvic of th organisrs of th cfrnc vry positivly and found th choic of vnu to b xcllnt. Also th mor informal parts of th cfrnc th BDF Gala Dinnr and Gdansk Shipyard Dinnr wr ratd highly. ar som furthr findings of th survy including additial rgarding th cfrnc wbsit Local govrn mnt 1 Int. Org. NGO Govrnmnt 39% Acadmia Businss 1 Rgistrd Participants by Sctor Sourc: Cfrnc Managr Systm Cfrnc participants rprsntd th various sctors as follows: 39% by Govrnmntal institutis; 1 by Businss; by Acadmia; by Intrnatial Organisatis; 1 by Local Govrnmnts; by NGOs. Accrditd Mdia is not includd in this chart but aftr calculatis mad up of th ovrall participants. Rgistrd Participants by Country Sourc: Cfrnc Managr Systm Poland (), Swdn (), Finland (), Dnmark (1), Grmany (8%) wr most rprsntd amgst participants, adding up to an ovrwhlming 78%. THE NETHERLA NDS RUSSIA NORWAY Othr SWEDEN POLAND BELGIUM/ EU FINLAND DENMARK 1 ESTONIA GERMANY 8% LATVIA LUXEMBO LITHUANIA URG

2 59% 2 Informat i What is your opini of th Summit/Forum as a whol? Th gnral fdback from th participants was vry positiv, and givn by 8. This is a slight incras from 2010 figurs that compild 8, rturning back to th lvls of 2009 (8). What is th main ras for your participati? Th main ras for participati at th cfrnc for 55% of th rspdnts was Ntworking, whil 19% attndd for Spcific Sssi(s), and 1 for Company Prsntatis. Th rmaining of rspdnts attndd th Summit for othr rass (1). Othr Company prsntati 1 Spcific Sssi(s) Ntworking 55% Missin g inform ati Ys 9 In your opini, did th thms of th Summit/Forum covr th currnt political and comic situati? An ovrwhlming 9 of th rspss indicat that th thms of th cfrnc covrd th currnt political and comical situati (88% in 2010). Did th Summit/Forum mt your xpctatis? Th xpctatis of 8 of th rspdnts wr mt by th cfrnc, compard to 9% of rspdnts that wr not. 9% Ys 8 Missin g inform ati

3 Informa ti 5% EU Stratg y/eu Agnda 5 Political Platfor m Busins s/privat Platfor m 1 EU/Russ ia What was your main ara of intrst? For th majority (5), th main ara of intrst was th EU Stratgy for th Baltic Sa Rgi and th EU Agnda. For of th rspdnts, th Political Platform was of intrst, whil th Businss/Privat Platform was indicatd by 1 of rspdnts. EU/Russia was of intrst for. During th vnt, did you gt a chanc to voic your viw th EU Stratgy for th BSR? 6 of rspdnts flt that thy had a chanc to voic thir viw th EU Stratgy for th Baltic Sa Rgi, whil 2 did not. 19% 2 Ys 6 19% 59% In your opini, how did th sssis covr th ovrall thm of th Summit/Forum? Th gnral fdback from th participants was vry positiv, and givn by 7 (2010 7). Only 19% csidrd th sssis (2010 2). Sssis that wr highlightd Amgst th rspdnts, th most popular sssis this yar wr Stting Targts for th EU Stratgy for th Baltic Sa Rgi and Rgial Idntity and Rgi Branding.

4 How would you valuat th lvl of spakrs at this yar s Summit/Forum? 1 1 As in prvious yars, th lvl of spakrs was highly apprciatd 7 of th rspdnts gav a positiv valuati. Howvr, th positiv rsps is lowr than in 2010 (8). 6 Avrag Excll nt informa ti How did you find th Ntworking Villag activitis? Avrag 3 Whn rating th Ntworking Villag activitis, th rspss and mad-up 6 (6 in 2010), and 3 (3 in 2010). 48% Do you find th Handbook usful? A vast amount of participants (9) found th Handbook usful, whil ly did not. Mis sing info r Ys 92 % 9% 8% How do you find th intractiv discussis btwn spakrs and participants? 25% 5 Most rspdnts found th intractiv discussis btwn spakrs and participants (5). 8% csidrd th discussis to b, whil 25% csidrd thm to b, and.

5 In gnral, how did you find th ovrall srvic of th organisrs of th Summit/Forum? informat i 5% Ovrall, 89% of rspdnts ratd th srvic of th organisrs of th cfrnc as positiv, 5 and 38%. Th rating of combind with Informati (5%) comprisd 1, which is a grat dcras from 2010 s 3. 38% 5 Avrag Avrag Excll nt 3 informa ti How would you valuat th Summit/Forum wbsit and th it providd? 49% Ctinuing th positiv trnd, a combind 8 of rspdnt valuatd th Baltic Sa Rgi 2011 wbsit as (3) and (49%), whil ly thought it was. Th graph blow shows that th wbsit attractd visits by absolut uniqu visitors. Th visitors countris of origin wr Poland (3 020 visitors, 48%), Swdn (2 287 visitors, 3), Finland (1 267 visitors, 2), Grmany (1 167 visitors, 19%), Dnmark (1,089 visitors, 1), Blgium (836 visitors, ), Russia (515 visitors, 8%), Lithuania (508 visitors, 8%), Estia (443 visitors, ), and Latvia (395 visitors, ). Sourc: Googl Analytics; last accssd 23 v 2011