Annual Report: Fiscal Year July, 2006 June, 2007

Transcription

1 Snat Bill 94 (SB 94) Evaluation Annual Rport: Fical Yar July, 2006 Jun, 2007 For Colorao Dpartmnt of Human Srvic Offic of Chilrn, Youth an Family Srvic Diviion of Youth Corrction By 4855 Rivrbn Roa, Suit 201 Boulr Colorao Octobr 29, 2007

2

3 Contnt Excutiv Summary, Concluion an Rcommnation...iii Introuction Trn in Dtntion & Commitmnt... 4 Trn in Statwi Dtntion an Commitmnt ADP Trn in Dtntion B U 2. Profil of Youth Scrn...17 Youth Scrn Profil of Youth JDSAG Youth Profil Youth Placmnt Profil Initial Placmnt Agrmnt 3. Progr in Achiving FY Goal an Objctiv...27 Planning Proc Progr in Achiving Goal an Objctiv 4. Program Rourc an Practic...33 Stat Funing Expnitur of FY Fun Local Rourc 5. Potntial Program Practic Iu...42 Srvic Availability Scrning an Placmnt of Youth Local Dtntion B Allocation Emrgncy Rla Polici Concluion an Rcommnation...50 Appnix A. Dtntion B U...57 Appnix B: Prformanc Goal Rourc an Practic Survy...81 Appnix C: Map of Dtntion B Allocation...87 TriWt Group i SB 94 Annual Rport FY

4 TriWt Group ii SB 94 Annual Rport FY

5 Excutiv Summary Each yar, th Colorao Long Bill rquir that an valuation of th ffctivn of th SB 94 Program b ubmitt to th Lgilativ Joint Bugt Committ. Thi rquirmnt i tail in Footnot 87 of Snat Bill with th following rquir componnt: 1. Comparion of trn in tntion an commitmnt incarcration rat; 2. Profil of youth rv; 3. Progr in achiving th prformanc goal tablih by ach juicial itrict; 4. Th lvl of local funing for altrnativ to tntion; an, 5. Intification an icuion of potntial policy iu. Th SB 94 Program ha xprinc two continuing major ytm chang in Fical Yar (FY) Th firt wa that FY wa th fourth fical yar of implmntation of th tatutory cap on th u of juvnil tntion b. Although Juicial Ditrict SB 94 Program again uccfully manag to thir cap, it i clar that th train of oing o ha rmain high for om itrict. Th con ara of major ytm chang i th opportunity provi by funing incra allocat by th Colorao Stat Gnral Ambly. In FY funing for th SB 94 Program wa incra 14.2% from th FY lvl, partially rtoring pat ruction. Th aitional incra projct for FY will bring th SB 94 Program bugt back to a point 2.6% highr than in FY (not ajut for any Cot of Living Incra mi uring tho yar), whn Stat program capacity cut bgan. 1. Trn in Dtntion an Commitmnt Th tatwi tntion avrag aily population (ADP) rat for FY wa 7.9; an avrag of 7.9 youth in tntion ach ay for vry 10,000 youth in th gnral population a hown in Figur 1, a light ruction from lat yar lvl of 8.2. Th ADP rat in th lat four yar (inc th implmntation of b cap) hav bn lowr than any maur inc th SB 94 Program wa implmnt tatwi in Figur 1. Commitmnt an Dtntion ADP Rat Trn ADP Rat Commitmnt Dtntion FY92-93 FY94-95 FY96-97 FY98-99 FY00-01 FY02-03 FY04-05 FY06-07 TriWt Group iii SB 94 Annual Rport FY

6 Th ovrall ADP lvl wa 414.9, a cra from th FY lvl of Dpit thi 3% ruction, cur tntion u rmain an ara of concrn for th ytm a th aily oprational lvl rmain high at 86.5% of cap. Lngth of tay (LOS) in tntion in FY wa baically th am, at an avrag of 14 ay, a in FY whn it wa 14.1 ay pr youth. Trn in Dtntion B U. Following th implmntation of tntion b cap, th FY Annual Evaluation Rport 1 point out that th n to manag to a tntion b cap rquir analyi of mor than jut avrag tntion u. Th cap i appli to u at any point in tim, o ay at or abov 90% capacity ha bn intifi a an inicator of capacity train on SB 94 Program in thir managmnt of tntion b, irctly an inirctly affcting thir ability to plac youth a n acro thir tntion continuum. Th trm capacity train i u in thi rport to rfr to th gr to which th tntion continuum i prciv a bing trtch to rpon to th numbr of youth rquiring placmnt at a givn tim. Capacity train vlop through th intraction of a numbr of factor rlat to ffort to mot ffctivly utiliz limit rourc acro th continuum of placmnt from cur an taff cur tntion rourc, to community ba upport. Th rourc, polici, prcption, an practic of all agnci who work with th youth influnc th ciion that ar ma about rfrral, crning an thn placmnt an rvic. Th pn in larg part on availabl rourc that inclu tntion continuum placmnt an community rvic rourc, taff or program rourc, an rourc from othr agnci. A numbr of conition having to o with th movmnt in an out of th tntion continuum intract to influnc th lvl of capacity train. Mitigating factor alo impact prciv train, incluing altrnativ rvic availability, crning, an variou local practic. Looking acro faciliti, it appar that th incra in capacity train in FY an FY may hav bgun to tabiliz. Th avrag u ha cra for mot of th 12 faciliti a inicat by th cra in avrag u (at 9 of 12 faciliti) an th prcnt of ay at or abov 90% capacity (at 10 of 12 faciliti). Th Cntral, Northat an South rgion all how cra whil th Wtrn rgion incra. Statwi avrag u cra from 89% in FY to 86.6% in FY an ay at or abov 90% of capacity cra from 65.5% in FY to 41.1% in FY Dpit tatwi improvmnt in ay at or abov 90% of capacity, it continu to b a concrn for om itrict. Whil on avrag th tatwi b cap of 479 wa nvr xc on any ay in FY , on all but thr ay on or mor faciliti xprinc high capacity train (fin a b occupancy of 90% or highr). On any givn ay th ytm avrag about fiv (42%) faciliti at or abov 90% capacity. 1 TriWt Group. (2004). Snat Bill 94 (SB 94) Evaluation Annual Rport: Fical Yar , July, 2003 Jun, Boulr, Colorao. TriWt Group iv SB 94 Annual Rport FY

7 Figur 4. Statwi Dtntion U Inicator: FY04 to FY 07 Cap 479 A D P FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 Fical Yar P r c n t U ADP: Av. Daily Pop. U: Prcnt of Cap Prcnt Day at 90% or Abov Trn in Statwi Commitmnt ADP. Th tatwi commitmnt ADP rat for FY wa 27.1; an avrag of about 27 youth in commitmnt ach ay for vry 10,000 youth in th gnral population. Thi i th con cra in commitmnt ADP ovr th pat two yar, which bring th commitmnt ADP rat own to within about 5% of th commitmnt ADP rat in FY an FY (a wa hown in Figur 1 at th bginning of thi ummary). Thi cra coinci with ignificant invtmnt in th commitmnt continuum, a wll a rcnt incra in funing for community rvic for SB 94. Th craing commitmnt ADP rat in FY m to primarily rlat to initiativ targting xpanion of th commitmnt continuum to inclu mor communityba rvic, a wll a acro th boar incra in human rvic availability a program ruction ovr prviou yar ar bing rtor. Th tatwi initiativ HB-1451 i anothr xampl of ffort that upport community rvic. 2. Profil of Youth Srv Bginning in FY , DYC rquir that all itrict crn vry youth prior to placmnt in cur tntion. A a rult, th numbr of youth crn in FY i incra from prviou yar. Sinc thn, th lvl of crning ha bn craing lightly, an in FY th numbr of crn youth wa 11,842, 2.5% blow that of FY whn it wa 12, Ovr th pat yar, th chang in itrict crning rat wa not ignificantly corrlat with th chang in itrict ADP rat (r=-.205, p>.05). Th tntion crning tool aign ach youth to on of fiv profil. Th profil rflct factor rlat to th youth n for placmnt in a cur tting, uch a failing to appar for court at or rciving nw charg, rathr than rik to r-offn or rik po to th 2 Thi numbr inclu all crn aminitr an may contain mor than on crn for om youth. TriWt Group v SB 94 Annual Rport FY

8 community. Th youth profil ar primarily u to gui ciion acro iffrnt lvl of initial placmnt. It houl b kpt in min that youth who ar crn ar a mall ubt of youth who hav bn arrt. Thr ar about 45,000 arrt of youth ag 10 through 17 on avrag ach yar in Colorao. Of tho, a hown in th figur blow, only about on in four ar rfrr for cur tntion an crn. Th cra in numbr of youth crn hav accompani cra in th numbr of juvnil arrt. Th cra in th numbr of youth crn icu in Sction Two, alo point to a concrn that youth may not alway b rfrr by law nforcmnt for crning, poibly a a rult of th prcption of cra rourc. Thi uggt that othr local practic may play a cntral rol in cur tntion u. Figur 5. Juvnil Jutic Filtring Proc to Dtntion: FY Juvnil Population Ag Yar 525, % Juvnil Arrt 44, % SB94 Dtntion Scrn 11, % DYC Scur/Staff Suprvi Dtntion Amiion 10, % Analyi of th tatwi itribution how that th mot frquntly u initial placmnt continu to b cur tntion, with 76% of all youth plac at that lvl. Th nxt hight placmnt lvl i rla to th cutoy of parnt at 13%. Similar to pat yar, of tho youth crn to cur tntion, 90.4% (7,834) wr plac thr. In mark contrat wr th rult of crning to hltr/hom an taff cur tntion. Of youth crn to hltr/hom, 70.5% wr plac in tho typ of placmnt initially, a cra from th 76.4% high in FY , but till highr than th 69.3% in FY Of mot concrn wa that mor youth crn to hltr/hom wnt to cur placmnt thi yar (28.6%), compar with 22.2% in FY Of th group crn to b plac at hom with rvic, only about 35% of th wr actually plac thr. Almot 31% wr plac in cur tntion whn tho placmnt wr availabl, whil about 33% wr imply rla u to th unavailability of n rvic. Thi trn uggt that th community-ba n of th tntion continuum may not yt b aquat to rv all youth crn a abl to go hom with rvic, vn with th incra rourc. 3. Progr in Achiving Local Goal an Objctiv Currnt DYC guilin for local program goal an objctiv focu on prajuicat youth an youth ntnc to tntion TriWt Group vi SB 94 Annual Rport FY

9 or probation. Th firt two objctiv (tabl blow) wr pcifi for ach goal in FY ; th thir objctiv wa a in FY In FY Ditrict wr alo rquir to pcify on or mor aitional goal, rlat objctiv an prformanc outcom for aitional apct of thir program. Each iniviual itrict t it own prformanc targt within ach goal ara. Progr in achiving th tanariz goal an objctiv i hown in th tabl blow. Ovrall lvl of prformanc wr vry poitiv, particularly th numbr of youth without nw charg an who appar in court whn chul. Rquir Goal an Objctiv Prformanc Lvl Srvic Ara Goal Maurabl Objctiv Prformanc 1. Prajuicat Youth FY07 Goal To uccfully uprvi prajuicat youth plac in community-ba tntion rvic. 2. Sntnc Youth FY07 Goal To uccfully uprvi ntnc youth plac in community-ba tntion rvic. 1. Prcnt of nroll prajuicat youth that complt SB 94 rvic without FTA (Failur To Appar for Court). 2. Prcnt of nroll prajuicat youth that complt SB 94 rvic without nw charg. 3. Prcnt of prajuicat youth rv through SB 94 that complt th prio of th intrvntion with a poitiv or nutral lav raon. 1. Prcnt of nroll ntnc youth that complt SB 94 rvic without FTA. 2. Prcnt of nroll ntnc youth that complt SB 94 rvic without nw charg. 3. Prcnt of ntnc youth rv through SB 94 that complt th prio of th intrvntion with a poitiv or nutral lav raon 96% of Youth ha no FTA 96% of Youth ha no nw charg 92% of Youth ha poitiv or nutral lav raon 98% of Youth ha no FTA 96% of Youth ha no nw charg 89% of Youth ha poitiv or nutral lav raon 4. Program Rourc an Practic For FY , SB94 rciv both a cot of living incra of 3.25% an an aitional $1 million allocation. Thi incra mov th SB 94 Program to within 13% of th FY allocation (not ajut for inflation), partially rvring th ruction ma inc thn. In allocating th aitional $1 million, th itrict wr ak to propo how th aitional rourc woul b u, an thy continu to plac a highr mphai on funing tratmnt an rtorativ rvic. TriWt Group vii SB 94 Annual Rport FY

10 W xamin th proportion of fun xpn by catgory acro yar. Spning on uprviion, an crning an amnt (incluing rik amnt, a wll a aitional n amnt, ca rviw an crn) continu to tak up mot of th availabl SB 94 Program bugt xpnitur, at about 45% an 25% rpctivly. Th funing incra in FY i nabl program to continu to improv thir ability to provi tratmnt rvic (11.7%), rtorativ rvic (7.4%) an youth an family training (2.5%). In aition to tat fun, many Juicial Ditrict SB 94 Program hav acc othr fun or program rvic for SB 94 youth. Through itrict-pcific approach an coorination with othr youth-rving agnci an rourc, SB 94 Program hav continu to lvrag aitional rourc to augmnt thir ability to mt th n of youth an accomplih th program goal of rucing rlianc on cur tntion placmnt whil maintaining public afty. Howvr, u to fluctuation in th availability of fun acro all human rvic program in th tat ovr th pat fw yar, th ovrall gr to which SB 94 Program rport bing uccful in th attmpt ha vari inc thn, a icu furthr in Sction Four of th rport. Th tatwi initiativ HB-1451 (Collaborativ Managmnt of Multi-agncy Srvic Provi to Chilrn an Famili) alo upport intragncy collaboration. Thi initiativ i an ffort to vlop a uniform ytm of collaboration to hlp agnci at th tat an local lvl to har rourc, a wll a manag an intgrat th tratmnt an rvic provi to chilrn an famili involv with multipl agnci. Eightn counti from thirtn juicial itrict ar now involv in thi proc, up from ix in FY Potntial Program Practic Iu SB 94 Juicial Ditrict Program fac vral iu in Fical Yar rlat to ongoing SB 94 program opration. Rcovry from pat SB 94 Program bugt ruction an tntion b capping wr clarly formot in th thinking of itrict. Howvr th factor highlight othr local iu. Four main iu wr intifi an a in th planning proc by ach itrict planning committ for FY : rvic availability, crning youth, placing youth along th tntion continuum, an local tntion b allocation. A part of th prparation for thi rport, ach Juicial Ditrict wa urvy in March of 2007 to ocumnt thir prcption of th program iu. Th urvy wa inclu a an anum to ach itrict plan, nabling planning committ mmbr to rviw planning an urvy ata togthr a a group an not paratly, a thy ha in pat urvy. Thi proc alo ma urvy ata availabl to th Statwi Aviory Boar for th DYC plan rviw an approval proc. 1. Srvic Availability. In lin with th partial rtoration of pat program cut not abov, itrict urvy rult rflct chang aociat with th quantifiabl funing trn. With xpnitur incraing in tratmnt rvic, rtorativ rvic, an 3 Counti involv in HB-1451 a of Sptmbr 18, Sourc: Norm Kirch, Colorao Dpartmnt of Human Srvic. TriWt Group viii SB 94 Annual Rport FY

11 training for clint an famili in FY , a majority (59.1%) of itrict rat rvic availability poitivly. In FY , 52.4% of itrict rat th impact a poitiv. Rating chang in th pat two yar compar favorably with only 19% of itrict rating th impact poitivly in FY an 9.1% in FY Scrning Youth Survy rult how that poitiv rating of th impact of crning youth incra to 90.1% in FY , up from 85.7% in FY an 52.4% in FY Continu itrict concrn wr rport in thi ara rlat to th limitation in th ability of th crning proc to tranlat into actual placmnt ciion, givn ruction in placmnt an rvic availability along th tntion continuum (uch a community rvic an taff cur an rintial placmnt). Th chang in impact rating follow th incra in funing in th pat two yar an ruc tntion ADP ovrall. 3. Placing Youth Ditrict wr alo ak to rat th proc of placing youth. Survy rult how that th poitiv rating of th impact of placing youth hav incra to 77.3% in FY , up from th improvmnt in poitiv rating hown firt in FY (68.1%) an much highr than th 19% poitiv rating in FY Thi rprnt ramatic improvmnt in th pat two yar. 4. Local Dtntion B Allocation. Rating of th impact of b allocation hav rmain on avrag ngativ, a fining that i not particularly urpriing givn that itrict ar rating a manat that many prciv to limit thir ability to plac youth a thy wih. Poitiv rating in FY wr own to 22.7% of itrict (5 of 22) from a high in FY of 31.8% of itrict (7 of 22) rat th impact of b allocation a poitiv. Prcnt Figur 10. Local B Allocation Impact Rating Ngativ Nutral Poitiv Figur 11. Local B Allocation Aquacy 100 FY FY FY FY Intrtingly, 57.1% of itrict (12 of 21) inicat in March 2007 whn thy ubmitt thir plan for FY that thir b allocation wa aquat. Prcnt FY FY FY FY No Y TriWt Group ix SB 94 Annual Rport FY

12 Concluion an Rcommnation Th SB 94 Program tatwi, a wll a th iniviual juicial itrict that compri th program, continu to xprinc th influnc of two ignificant ytm chang that at back to FY Th firt wa th ongoing implmntation of tntion b cap. Th con ha bn th multi-yar bugt fluctuation that bgan a ruction in FY , wr furthr ruc in FY , an wr partially rvr in FY an FY to hlp rtor th ytm ability to provi tratmnt rvic, rtorativ rvic, an youth an family training. Th incra in allocation for FY will bring Juicial Ditrict SB 94 funing back to about 2% abov FY lvl (not ajut for any Cot of Living Incra mi uring tho yar) an houl continu to hlp rbuil SB 94 Program ability to mot ffctivly rv youth. Th Diviion of Youth Corrction an th SB 94 Program hav continu to vlop an provi a continuum of tntion option within thi contxt. Although SB 94 Program hav not focu pcifically on committ youth, for th lat two yar commitmnt ADP ha cra. Thi poitiv vlopmnt corrlat with incra ffort an flxibility in vloping DYC continuum of car for commitmnt, an i tail in a parat valuation rport. Th mall ruction in tntion ADP xprinc thi yar continu thi ownwar trn in rtrictiv confinmnt. DYC ha continu to oprat uccfully within th tntion b cap. At th local lvl, howvr, on of th mot important challng not in lat yar valuation rport wa ignificant vinc of incra capacity train acro all tntion faciliti an juicial itrict in th tat. In FY thr wr om poitiv inication that train might b craing, pcially in om faciliti an itrict. Howvr, pit tatwi improvmnt in ay at or abov 90% of capacity, it continu to b a concrn for om itrict. Whil th tatwi b cap of 479 wa nvr xc on any ay in FY , on all but thr ay on or mor faciliti xprinc high capacity train (fin a b occupancy of 90% or highr). On any givn ay th ytm avrag about fiv (42%) faciliti at or abov 90% capacity. Whn utilization i at or abov 90% within faciliti, th train i gratr on all of th itrict uing thm, rgarl of which itrict contribut mot to th train. Fwr availabl tntion b rquir mor planning on th part of itrict for th poibility that youth may n to b rla arlir than thy woul hav bn ha pac bn availabl. It alo rquir mor aminitrativ taff tim to coorinat acro itrict to borrow b whn n an coorinat u ovrall. Acro th an othr multipl factor, whn facility u xc 90%, iproportionat lvl of itrict juvnil jutic ytm rourc ar train. Thrfor, ay at or abov 90% capacity rv a a bnchmark for capacity train acro faciliti. Statwi, ay at or abov 90% of capacity narly tripl from 21.9% in FY to 65.5% in FY In FY ay at or abov 90% rcovr omwhat, craing to 41.1%. Thi i a poitiv chang for tntion b u. Howvr, th mot ffctiv lvl of tntion b u till rmain to b intifi. TriWt Group x SB 94 Annual Rport FY

13 Capacity train vlop through th intraction of a numbr of factor rlat to ffort to mot ffctivly utiliz limit rourc acro th continuum of placmnt from cur an taff cur tntion rourc to community ba. Capacity train pn in larg part on th availability of rourc that inclu tntion continuum placmnt an rvic rourc, community-ba taff or program rourc, an rourc from othr agnci. Anothr factor of capacity train inclu th polici, prcption an practic of all agnci who work with youth a thy influnc th ciion that ar ma about rfrral, crning, placmnt, an rvic. Th following two trn rflct th factor. Firt, th u of cur tntion ha continu to b th mot likly ciion for youth whn community-ba tntion continuum rourc ar lacking. Howvr, th con hight crning rcommnation i for youth to go hom with rvic (14.0% of youth). Only about a thir of th youth (36%) actually go hom with rvic a an initial placmnt, with about 31% plac in mor rtrictiv tting an anothr 31% imply rla u to th unavailability of n rvic. Thi placmnt pattrn uggt that th communityba n of th tntion continuum i not yt aquat to rv all youth crn a abl to go hom with rvic. In aition, youth who ar crn to taff cur placmnt ar plac in cur tntion ovr 78% of th tim u to a lack of th rourc. Th introuction of mor rfin rik amnt crning (th Colorao Juvnil Rik Amnt or CJRA, HB-1161) within th SB 94 Program may hlp DYC vlop th capacity to bttr intify tho youth abl to bnfit from rla to hom an bttr match thm with availabl rvic. Scon, thr hav alo bn poitiv vlopmnt ovr th lat coupl of yar. On of th mot important ha involv incra in intragncy collaboration. Th mot commonly u approach to haring rourc ha bn to u an intragncy group uch a a Community Evaluation Tam (CET) a a mchanim to rviw youth ca, to mak rvic rfrral ciion an rcommnation to th bnch, an to intify rourc for rvic. Aftr craing in FY , th prcnt of itrict with CET ha bn incraing for th pat two yar. In FY , 17 itrict (72.7%) rport having a CET. Thi i a continu improvmnt in an important approach to collaboration with othr agnci for mor ffctiv u of availabl rourc. Th tatwi initiativ HB-1451 (Collaborativ Managmnt of Multi-agncy Srvic Provi to Chilrn an Famili) alo upport intragncy collaboration. Eightn counti from thirtn itrict ar now involv in thi proc, up from ix in FY DYC an local SB 94 Program hav continu to rfin program practic, to improv th tntion continuum an manag b allocation, an to provi broar opportuniti for continu program improvmnt. With partial rtoration of pat ruction in SB 94 funing, ffort ar bing ma to ar rvic gap that will upport th continu ucc of th SB 94 Program ovr tim, a vinc by th incra in xpnitur for tratmnt option ovr th lat yar. To continu to upport vlopmnt an u of th TriWt Group xi SB 94 Annual Rport FY

14 tntion continuum, th rcommnation blow ar offr for th SB 94 Program in FY an byon. 1. Monitor inicator of train to trmin if incra tntion or community-ba capacity, or aitional ajutmnt, ar n. Th primary inicator of ytm train currntly track i ay at or ovr 90% capacity. Although, it m from thi inicator that ytm train i bginning to tabiliz, attntion to b u inicator rmain important. Som of thi improvmnt may tm from fwr ovrall tntion crning, rathr than imply improv u of th tntion continuum. Although funing i incraing, youthrving rourc ar till in th proc of rcovry within th juvnil jutic ytm an th broar ytm of car for youth in n (incluing chil wlfar, chool, an mntal halth rvic). DYC ha ma ajutmnt in facility an itrict cap, primarily in th Southrn Rgion which hav hlp tho itrict. High lvl of train on tntion b capacity in multipl itrict till mrit aitional attntion to trmin if aitional flxibility in rourc managmnt for th itrict may b n or if othr ffort to ruc train can b implmnt (uch a mor invtmnt in community-ba rvic to allow youth to b uccfully plac at hom with rvic). 2. Improv monitoring of rla from tntion that rult from b cap. Diffrnc in monitoring practic acro itrict obcur maurmnt of th tru rat at which youth ar bing rla from tntion u to b cap limitation, omtim bfor ytm takholr woul othrwi hav trmin that thy wr ray for rla. Whil th rat of thi typ of rla i rlativly mall (timat a occurring for l than 5% of all youth tain), w rcommn that DYC vlop tanar finition an rporting rquirmnt to monitor th numbr of b borrow an youth rla that tm from complianc with a itrict-lvl cap. 3. Furthr improv th rporting of itrict-pcific prformanc outcom ata. For th thir yar in a row inc th SB 94 Program incption, DYC wa abl thi yar to rport on itrict prformanc rgaring tanariz goal. Now that DYC ha tanariz goal ara for rporting, critria for atifactory prformanc in ach goal ara houl b conir. Ovr th pat coupl yar DYC ha work with Ditrict to t thir critria for uccful prformanc to ncourag both high lvl of prformanc an ucc whil taking into coniration itrict-pcific circumtanc. Thi ha rult in attainabl objctiv an high prformanc, although prformanc xpctation for poitiv or nutral icharg raon may till b unralitic for om itrict. It appar that thi proc i working an that Ditrict ar gnrally making goo ciion about whr to t thir objctiv. Th on objctiv that n improvmnt i th thir objctiv: poitiv or nutral lav raon. Multipl ngativ lav raon mak thi objctiv th mot ifficult to achiv a it currntly i fin. For xampl, th ngativ lav raon inclu both FTA an Nw Charg which ar covr by th firt two objctiv, o thi objctiv oubl count challng ocumnt in th firt two objctiv, an thrfor houl not b t a high. In TriWt Group xii SB 94 Annual Rport FY

15 aition, poibl ngativ lav raon ar myria, incluing commitmnt, noncomplianc on th part of th youth or family, an rfual of rvic or nonparticipation in rvic. Succ on thi objctiv i clarly mor ifficult to obtain. W rcommn DYC conir ithr a lowr prformanc objctiv or rvi th lav raon that ar inclu in th inicator. 4. Proviing aquat rvic for youth rla to hom. A in pat yar, only about on-thir (36%) of th 1,634 youth intifi through th JDSAG a abl to b plac at hom with rvic in fact rciv uch upport. Slightly l than on-thir (31%) ar rla to hom without rvic an th rmainr (31%) inta go to cur or taff cur tntion. Implmntation of th CJRA ovr th nxt yar houl allow for mor rfin amnt of youth n an protctiv factor an may b u to rfin timat of both th numbr of youth who truly ar bt rv through a rla to hom with rvic an to pcify mor clarly th typ of rvic that may b n to upport uch rla. Such information may hlp DYC prioritiz futur rourc allocation to improv th rponivn an capacity of th tntion continuum. TriWt Group xiii SB 94 Annual Rport FY

16 TriWt Group xiv SB 94 Annual Rport FY

17 Introuction Lgilativ rporting rquirmnt an SB 94 goal provi th backgroun an contnt rquirmnt for th SB 94 Annual Evaluation Rport. DYC, Juicial Ditrict SB 94 Program an Colorao TRAILS provi th ata. Th rquir contnt ara an valuation mtho mploy ar crib brifly in thi ction. SB 94 Program Goal. Colorao Snat Bill (SB 94) wa ign into law on Jun 5, 1991 a th Colorao Gnral Ambly rcogniz th incraing man for cur tntion an commitmnt capacity for linqunt youth. Thi bcam th imptu for th Diviion of Youth Corrction (DYC) SB 94 Program. Th Gnral Ambly trmin that vloping a broar array of l rtrictiv tntion rvic, incluing communityba rvic, woul b mor cot ffctiv than a narrow approach of builing an maintaining aitional tat-run faciliti. Aitionally, thr wa hop that rving mor youth in thir own communiti an thu clor to hom coul rult in bttr outcom for youth an communiti. Th SB 94 Program ha bn uccful in accomplihing th Gnral Ambly viion of rucing th u of cur tntion in DYC faciliti. During th currnt fical yar, DYC continu to avanc th Gnral Ambly irctiv by upporting Juicial Ditrict SB 94 Program in thir continu uccful implmntation of th tntion b cap that wr firt intitut in Fical Yar DYC alo continu to promot ongoing tntion rform through ffort to broan an promot mor appropriat u of th tntion continuum by focuing on two ky concpt. Th firt i that tntion i a tatu, an not a plac, an th con i that tntion conit of a continuum of option, only on of which i cur tntion. In carrying out th objctiv, th SB 94 Program alo upport th Stat of Colorao Chilrn Co 4 that k to balanc th n of young pron with concrn for th afty of all mmbr of ocity. SB 94 Evaluation Rquirmnt. Each yar, th Colorao Long Bill rquir that an valuation of th ffctivn of th SB 94 Initiativ b ubmitt to th Lgilativ Joint Bugt Committ. Thi rquirmnt i tail in Footnot 87 of Snat Bill blow: Footnot 87 of Snat Bill (Long Appropriation Bill). Dpartmnt of Human Srvic, Diviion of Youth Corrction, Community Program, S.B Program -- Th Dpartmnt i rqut to ubmit to th Joint Bugt Committ no latr than Novmbr 1 of ach yar a rport that inclu th following information by juicial itrict an for th tat a a whol: (1) Comparion of trn in tntion an commitmnt incarcration rat; (2) profil of youth rv by S.B ; (3) progr 4 Colorao Statut, Titl 19 Chilrn Co/Articl 1 Gnral Proviion/Part 1 Gnral Proviion/ Lgilativ Dclaration. TriWt Group 1 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

18 in achiving th prformanc goal tablih by ach juicial itrict; (4) th lvl of local funing for altrnativ to tntion; an (5) intification an icuion of potntial policy iu with th typ of youth incarcrat, lngth of tay, an availabl altrnativ to incarcration. In mting th rquirmnt of th footnot, valuation activiti alo k to upport DYC tat an rgional managmnt ffort an local program managmnt in ach of th 22 Juicial Ditrict. A applicabl, th fining of thi valuation ar intn to b u to improv th SB 94 Program at all lvl. SB 94 Funing Contxt. In FY , funing for th SB 94 Program from th Colorao Stat Lgilatur wa incra about 14% from th FY allocation. Thi continu to hlp to a ignificant gr to offt th multi-yar Stat program ruction tmming from cra funing for th SB 94 Program uring th thr fical yar of FY through FY That trn rult in an ovrall ruction of about 33% ovr that thr yar prio an plac incraing man on Juicial Ditrict SB 94 Program. SB 94 wa not th only program that fac ignificant ruction, a many othr youth an familyrving program that rly on Stat funing hav xprinc bugt ruction or vn outright limination. Th hav now bn partially rtor. To hlp control tntion u, in th 2003 Lgilativ Sion th Colorao Gnral Ambly alo pa Snat Bill Thi lgilation tablih a limit of 479 Statfun cur tntion b availabl for u by th 22 juicial itrict. It alo rquir th Excutiv Dirctor of th Colorao Dpartmnt of Human Srvic an th Stat Court Aminitrator, in conultation with th Diviion of Criminal Jutic, th Offic of Stat Planning an Bugting, th Colorao Ditrict Attorny Council, an law nforcmnt rprntativ, to form a Working Group to annually carry out th following uti 5 : a. Allocat cur tntion b to catchmnt ara an juicial itrict; b. Dvlop a mchanim for juicial itrict to loan cur tntion b to othr juicial itrict within thir catchmnt ara; c. Dvlop mrgncy rla guilin; an. Dvlop juvnil tntion placmnt guilin. Th numbr of b allocat tatwi ha rmain at 479. B allocat to Juicial Ditrict an Rgion chang omwhat in FY , primarily in th Southrn Rgion. Whil th pcific impact of th cur tntion cap i not ar paratly in thi rport, it i ar whr rlvant, pcially in Sction On an Fiv. 5 Colorao Statut, Titl 19 Chilrn Co/Articl 2 Th Colorao Juvnil Jutic Sytm/Part 12 Dtntion B Managmnt/ Working Group allocation of b. TriWt Group 2 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

19 Structur of th Rport. Th rport i tructur to rpon to th Long Bill Footnot rporting rquirmnt hown abov. Each ction inclu a conn ummary at th top, nxt to th titl. Sction contnt an ata ourc ar brifly crib blow. At th n of th rport, w offr concluion an rcommnation rgaring poibl cour of action to improv th ability of th SB 94 Program to achiv it goal. 1. Trn in Scur Dtntion an Commitmnt Thi ction analyz avrag aily population (ADP) information for both tntion an commitmnt b, incluing trn ovr tim. TRAILS ata wa ummariz by DYC Rarch an Evaluation Unit an provi to TriWt Group for furthr analyi an rporting. 2. Profil of Youth Scrn Th ata prnt hr wa xtract from TRAILS an provi by DYC Rarch an Evaluation Unit. In aition to th analyi in thi rport, DYC provi monthly an annual managmnt rport of tntion an commitmnt ata, a wll a crning, profil an placmnt ata that contribut to th prparation of thi rport. 3. Progr in Achiving Goal an Objctiv Thi ction analyz information about itrict an tatwi progr in achiving prformanc goal. It i ba on information obtain from TRAILS for tanariz goal an objctiv for prajuicat youth an for ntnc youth. Data for itrict-pcific goal wa collct by DYC an TriWt Group irctly from itrict in Augut Program Rourc an Practic Thi ction rviw th FY Juicial Ditrict SB 94 Program bugt allocation an chang ovr tim. It alo prnt an icu local program rourc a intifi from itrict plan an from th Prformanc Goal, Rourc an Practic Survy (Ditrict Survy) inclu a an anum to th Stat plan. Expnitur ata track an rport by DYC i alo prnt. 5. Potntial Program Iu Thi ction ummariz trn rport by itrict rlat to practic iu facing th program an implication for ongoing improvmnt. Rating an fback about th iu wr provi by Ditrict in thir annual plan through a Ditrict Survy anum. TriWt Group 3 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

20 1. Trn in Dtntion & Commitmnt Th ovrarching SB 94 Program goal i to ruc rlianc on cur tntion in DYC faciliti. In thi ction, trn in tatwi Avrag Daily Population (ADP) for both tntion an commitmnt ar rport for FY ba on ata collct through TRAILS. Statwi, th 7.9 tntion Avrag Daily Population (ADP) rat uring FY rprnt a cra from th 8.2 lvl in FY Thi rat kp th tntion ADP rat of th pat four yar at th lowt maur inc th Snat Bill 94 program bgan an maintain th tntion ADP within tatutory cap. Dtntion ADP wa 414.9, an oprational lvl of about 87% of th 479 b cap. Thi i own from th 89% in FY Alo, th numbr of ay with b u at high lvl in faciliti cra lightly in FY , uggting that capacity train may b bginning to tabiliz for many itrict an faciliti. Aitionally, th commitmnt ADP rat cra for th con concutiv yar to 27.1 in FY own from 27.9 in FY Th rintatmnt of rourc for th SB 94 program that ha occurr ovr th pat two yar (icu furthr in Sction 4) appar to hav bn a componnt in th chang. Trn in Statwi Dtntion ADP. Avrag aily population (ADP) rat ar calculat in trm of th numbr of youth in tntion for vry 10,000 youth ag in th gnral population. Data provi by DYC Rarch an Evaluation unit how that th tntion ADP rat for FY wa 7.9. Thi man that, on avrag, lightly fwr than ight youth wr in tntion ach ay for vry 10,000 youth in th gnral population. Thi wa a 3.6% cra from th 8.2 ADP rat rport lat fical yar, th firt cra in thr yar. Thi rat kp th tntion ADP rat of th pat four yar at th lowt maur inc th SB 94 Program wa implmnt Statwi in 1994 (Figur 1). 35 Figur 1. Commitmnt an Dtntion ADP Rat Trn ADP Rat Commitmnt Dtntion FY92-93 FY94-95 FY96-97 FY98-99 FY00-01 FY02-03 FY04-05 FY06-07 TriWt Group 4 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

21 Thi ADP rat rflct a cra of about 1.6 youth pr 10,000 inc FY , about a 17% cra from that yar 9.5 lvl. A hown in Tabl 1 blow, th unrlying ADP cra to for FY from in FY Dtntion ADP an lngth of tay (LOS) ar hown in Tabl 1 for itrict an rgion for th pat four fical yar (FY through FY ). Th irctionality (i.., incra or cra) an magnitu of chang in ADP an LOS ovr tho yar i alo not. Ditrict ADP appar to b tabilizing in th four yar following th implmntation of tntion b cap, a ADP chang on avrag btwn FY an FY wa not tatitically ignificant (t=.695, f=21, p=.495). Only two itrict ADP chang by mor than two b of u btwn FY an FY ; ight mor chang btwn 1.5 an 2.0 b, with fiv incraing an thr falling. Th two itrict with th largt chang (both chang in u of 6.6 b) wr th 18 th, who ADP chang for th firt two yar, thn wa tabl th pat two yar, an th 4 th who ADP ha cra two of th pat thr yar. Whn tranlating ADP chang to a prcntag, th avrag prcnt chang acro th four yar wa 4.9. Thr wa conirabl variability in prcnt chang acro itrict, particularly in itrict with lowr u whr whr mall ADP chang appar to b much largr prcnt chang. For xampl, th ADP in th 14 th Juicial Ditrict wnt from 2.2 in FY to 4.0 in FY , an 81.8% incra. Ditrict chang ovr tim may rai qution for om itrict, but houl b conir iniviually an within th contxt of rgional an tatwi trn. Ditrict avrag LOS cra in FY compar with FY , but th cra wa not tatitically ignificant (t=.74, f=21, p=.47). Th chang inc FY (th yar following th major rop aftr tntion b cap wr implmnt), i alo not a tatitically ignificant chang (t=1.4, f=21, p=.165). Whn tranlating LOS chang to a prcntag, th avrag prcnt chang acro all itrict wa 9.4. Thr wa conirabl variability in prcnt chang. Although mor variabl than ADP, itrict LOS chang from FY wa high in only thr mallr itrict, th 14 th, 15 th, an 22 n, which all incra by mor than 55%. Thr largr itrict aw LOS incra of ovr on fifth, incluing th 2 n (22.5%), 18 th (23.5%), an 19 th (28.7%), whil th 8 th fll by narly a fifth (-19.5%). A with ADP, itrict chang ovr tim may rai qution for om itrict, but houl b conir iniviually an within th contxt of rgional an tatwi trn. TriWt Group 5 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

22 TriWt Group 6 SB 94 Annual Rport FY Tabl 1. FY to FY Dtntion ADP an Lngth of Stay LOS in Day*. Total chang from FY to FY an prcnt chang acro all four yar ar alo hown. Rgion ADP LOS Ditrict FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 Total Total Prcnt FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 Chang Chang Prcnt Cntral Rgion % % 1 t Jffron % % 2 n Dnvr % % 5 th Summit % % 18 th Arapaho % % Northat Rgion % % 8 th Larimr % % 13 th Logan % % 17 th Aam % % 19 th Wl % % 20 th Boulr % % Southrn Rgion % % 3 r La Anima % % 4 th El Pao % % 10 th Publo % % 11 th Frmont % % 12 th Alamoa % % 15 th Prowr % % 16 th Otro % % Wtrn Rgion % % 6 th La Plata % % 7 th Montro % % 9 th Garfil % % 14 th Routt % % 21 t Ma % % 22 n Montzuma % % Statwi % % * Statwi an Rgional ADP ar not a um of itrict, primarily u to Trail rouning an rporting iu, a wll a aignmnt of youth tranfrring itrict whil bing tain.

23 Trn in Dtntion B U. Th continuing low rat of cur tntion ADP obrv by DYC ovr th pat four yar maintain th ruction following implmntation of lgilativly-manat tntion b cap in FY Bginning July 1, 2003, ach Juicial Ditrict rciv an allocation of a portion of th 479 cur an taff cur tntion b. Starting Octobr 1, 2003, ach itrict wa rquir to manag to thir local b cap. Dtntion faciliti an catchmnt ara wr prohibit from xcing thir cap. Thi rquirmnt wa intn to prvnt th tatwi ytm from placing mor than 479 youth in cur or taff cur tntion at any tim. In thi pat yar (FY ), th avrag aily population wa 414.9, rprnting avrag u of about 87% of th b cap. Thi wa a cra from FY , whn an avrag of youth pr ay wr in tntion, rprnting about 89% of th cap. Dtntion ADP rmain highr than th avrag of youth pr ay (82% of cap) that wr in tntion ovr th cour of th firt yar of th cap (FY ). Capacity Strain. Th FY 2004 Annual Evaluation Rport 6 point out that th n by itrict to manag to a har tntion b cap rquir analyi of mor than jut avrag tntion u. Th cap i appli to u at any point in tim an rquir activ managmnt to rmain blow th cap at all tim, not jut to avrag blow th cap acro tim. Sinc th implmntation of tntion b cap, an in th prviou two yar particularly (FY an FY ), train on th ytm capacity ha bn mrging a an important concpt whn icuing an valuating tntion b u. Quantitativ inicator of capacity train, particularly ay at or abov 90% of b capacity, ar utiliz in thi rport to ai that icuion. Factor aociat with thi concpt hav bcom clarr a th ytm xprinc with b cap ha progr. Th trm capacity train i u in thi rport to rfr to th gr to which th tntion continuum i prciv a bing trtch to rpon to th numbr of youth rquiring placmnt at a givn tim o that availabl rvic ar fully utiliz without aitional capacity to mt any nw youth n. Th prcption of capacity train vlop through th intraction of a numbr of factor rlat to ffort to mot ffctivly utiliz limit rourc acro th continuum of placmnt from cur an taff cur tntion rourc, to community-ba rvic. Th two main factor m to b: Rourc - Ditrict SB 94 Program rourc vary from itrict to itrict, but inclu tntion continuum placmnt an rvic rourc, taff an program rourc, an rourc from othr agnci, ithr in th form of har funing / rvic or through th participation of agncy taff in planning an ca rviw activiti. Local Proc an Prcption - Youth ntr th juvnil jutic ytm through law nforcmnt activiti an ar crn an rviw for appropriat placmnt an rvic. Th polici, prcption an practic of all agnci who work with th youth influnc th ciion that ar ma about rfrral, crning an placmnt for tntion rvic. 6 TriWt Group. (2004). Snat Bill 94 (SB 94) Evaluation Annual Rport: Fical Yar , July, 2003 Jun, Boulr, Colorao. TriWt Group 7 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

24 Capacity train m to calat whn th following conition occur. Th numbr of youth in th ytm i high an nw youth ntr th ytm; Th mix of availabl tntion continuum placmnt an community rvic rourc o not match th prciv n of youth at a givn point in tim; Local policy an practic, balanc with th prciv rik an n of th youth, rult in ciion to plac aitional youth in cur tntion; an Youth n to mov out of cur tntion with th intntion of placmnt in l rtrictiv community option at tim whn th placmnt option ar not availabl or othrwi unabl to rpon to th n. In tranlating th concpt to analyi of tntion u, w hav intifi thr inicator. Apparnt inicator of capacity train at th itrict lvl inclu th firt two of th thr blow. Th thir factor (poitiv impact rating) i an inicator of train mitigation by itrict, balancing th firt two: Inicator On High facility an itrict cur tntion u, a maur by th prcnt of ay that faciliti an itrict u at or abov 90% of thir cap; Inicator Two Th frquncy whn placmnt option rcommn by a youth crning o not match th actual placmnt of th youth; an Inicator Thr Poitiv impact rating by local juvnil jutic ytm lar rgaring rvic availability, crning outcom, placmnt availability ovrall, an b allocation ( Sction 5 for analyi of th rating). Th valuation to at uggt that train in a givn itrict may b mitigat (that i, rvic ar abl to b match conitntly with youth n) whn th following conition ar mt: ufficint SB 94 tntion rourc acro th continuum that nabl program to mor ffctivly match youth n an minimiz prciv rik to th youth an community; mor ffctiv movmnt of youth through th continuum a youth ar abl to lav mor cur placmnt an rciv rvic in l rtrictiv option; continu ffort to rrv u of mor rtrictiv option for youth who cannot b afly maintain in l rtrictiv option; an ignificant intragncy involvmnt in planning, rviw an placmnt/rvic ciion. Th abov concptual mol for capacity train ha bn vlop a a rult of th ongoing valuation of th SB 94 Program. Thi concptualization appar to hav th potntial to hlp DYC an Ditrict program to monitor capacity train acro faciliti an ovr tim an to mak ajutmnt to kp capacity train within managabl lvl. W rcommn that DYC continu to rviw an vlop thi mol to hlp ar train an to ar th qution of th mot appropriat lvl an mix of SB 94 tntion continuum rourc. Th figur blow illutrat om of th point about ADP that bgan to call attntion to capacity train, th main two of which ar high lvl of avrag u an high prcntag of TriWt Group 8 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

25 ay at or abov 90% of cap. Th ar important a ongoing inicator of capacity train. Figur 2a blow an 2b on th nxt pag how aily b u at th Platt Vally Youth Srvic Cntr (PVYSC) in th DYC Northat Rgion for FY (Figur 2a) an for FY (Figur 2b). Thy ar follow by a ummary of chang in ay abov 90% u acro th four yar. 75 Figur 2a. Platt Vally YSC B U Pr Day Oct Jun 2004 B U B Cap 69 ADP % 40 Day Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun 75 Figur 2b. Platt Vally YSC - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 69 ADP % 40 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun TriWt Group 9 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

26 Th prcing figur illutrat th chang in capacity train inc th introuction of cap in FY Th Platt Vally trn ar typical of th largr group of faciliti, though capacity train inicator ar mor vr hr than in othr faciliti ( Tabl 2 blow for a ummary of capacity train inicator acro all faciliti). Figur 2a how what aily u wa lik in FY whn Platt Vally oprat at or abov 90% of thir cap about 26% of th tim. Figur 2b how th triking chang that accompani high u. By FY , th facility wa at or abov 90% of th cap th vat majority of th tim (86% of ay), an th u pattrn wa much mor conn an up againt th cap. Platt Vally wa at 100% capacity 38% of th tim in FY Evn though th fiv itrict that u thi facility in th Northat Rgion work with Platt Vally to coorinat b u, that fluctuation ha narrow puhing up againt th cap a th facility wa compltly full 7 (69 youth) 38% of th tim (about 2.7 ay pr wk on avrag) an at or abov 90% capacity 86% of th tim (about 6.0 ay pr wk). Figur 2c blow prnt inicator of capacity u ovr tim for Platt Vally. Looking at u acro all four yar, from FY to FY avrag aily u incra from 58 (about 84% of th total cap) to ovr 61 pr ay (about 89% of th total cap). In FY u incra again to 64 youth pr ay (about 93% of th cap). In FY u cra lightly for th firt tim inc cap wr implmnt to an avrag of about 63 or about 92% of th cap. Figur 2c. Platt Vally Dtntion U Inicator: FY04 to FY 07 Cap 69 A D P FY04 FY05 FY06 FY P r c n t U ADP: Av. Daily Pop. U: Prcnt of Cap Prcnt Day at 90% or Abov Prcnt Day at Cap Fical Yar 7 Du to intak to faciliti bing proc prior to icharg, DYC aily u ata omtim how mor youth than th facility capacity. Howvr, faciliti ar not allow to xc capacity. Facility aily u graph how tho intanc a ay at capacity. TriWt Group 10 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

27 In FY , Platt Vally ha 63 (90% of availabl capacity) or mor youth in thir 69 cur tntion b about 26% of th tim. Stat anothr way, th facility wa at or abov 90% capacity an avrag of 1.8 ay vry wk. U inicator continu to incra in FY an in FY , an ay with uch high u ha incra to th point whr 63 (90%) or mor youth wr in b about 90% of th tim, an avrag of 6.3 ay pr wk. In FY , ay with uch high u cra lightly from th prviou yar, but 63 (90%) or mor youth wr till in b about 86% of th tim, an avrag of about 6.0 ay pr wk. Functioning at uch high lvl of u rv to maximiz th u of tntion faciliti an furthr th goal of th SB 94 Program to utiliz cur tntion th mot ffctivly. Howvr, whn a facility i frquntly at or abov 90% capacity (which wa th ca for ovr ix ay pr wk on avrag for Platt Vally in FY ) or actually at capacity (2.7 ay pr wk on avrag), factor aociat with capacity train com to th for. Ca rviw an amnt by rprntativ of all involv ytm of currnt youth in th facility an thir n bcom critical givn th unknown man for tho b at any givn point in tim. A youth may b nt to Platt Vally whn it i at capacity an th facility an SB 94 program mut b prpar to mak a placmnt ciion to mov a Platt Vally youth to anothr point in th continuum to mak a b availabl, whthr or not th youth i ray or th tp-own placmnt availabl. If th timing i uch that matching continuum rourc ar not availabl, thn, pning on th prciv rik of th youth bing mov, a ciion about th nxt bt placmnt mut b ma an rourc icat to monitor th afty of th youth an th community. All thi occur a th facility mak ray to tain a nw youth. A train incra, activiti of managing th cap bcom mor intniv, an pning on polici, practic an rourc, ciion bcom imultanouly mor prur an critical a agncy taff wigh th n an afty of youth an thir communiti. Looking acro faciliti, w that on th vat majority of ay on or mor faciliti xprinc high capacity train. In FY , on avrag 5.1 faciliti (42.5%) wr at or abov 90% capacity on any givn ay. Thi i l than FY , whn on avrag 5.9 faciliti (49.2%) wr at or abov 90% capacity on any givn ay. Howvr, it i till highr than th 4.5 faciliti in FY (37.5% of faciliti) that wr at or abov 90% capacity on any givn ay. Look at anothr way, in FY thr wr only 3 ay with no faciliti at 90% or highr capacity. Ovrall, through artiv managmnt by itrict program, th tatwi b cap of 479 wa nvr xc on any ay in FY , a i hown in Figur 3 blow. Howvr, avrag u in FY rmain high, with faciliti oprating at an avrag of 86.6% of capacity. TriWt Group 11 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

28 B U Figur 3. Statwi Dtntion - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B Cap 479 ADP % Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun Appnix A provi imilar FY aily uag graph for all juicial itrict, faciliti, an rgion. A rviw of th itrict-lvl an facility graph of b u pr ay in Appnix A rval ignificant variation within itrict an within th tntion faciliti thy u. Ditrict variability i a uful gaug of th xprinc of th itrict with th cap, but, givn th mall iz of many itrict an thir b allocation, a high gr of variability can b xpct. Bcau mot itrict har tntion faciliti (with th xcption of th 2 n Ditrict u of Gilliam an th 17 th Ditrict u of Aam), th oprational implication of aily variability in b u ar xprinc primarily at th facility lvl. Whn pac i tight at faciliti, th train i gratr on all of th itrict uing thm, rgarl of which itrict contribut mot to th train. To ummariz thi ata, Tabl 2 blow prnt th capacity, avrag u, an ay at or abov 90% capacity for ach tat-run tntion facility. Day at or abov 90% capacity i u a a bnchmark for capacity train ovr tim an btwn faciliti. Only ix cur faciliti xprinc capacity train mor than 50% of th tim in FY , a oppo to nin in FY Capacity train in Wtrn Rgion taff cur faciliti jump to ovr 50% of ay for th firt tim (incraing to 55.6% of ay in FY from 20.5% in FY ). Looking acro faciliti in Tabl 2, it appar that avrag u cra lightly for mot faciliti (9 of 12) from FY to FY Th chang in avrag facility b u wa not tatitically ignificant (t=.92, f=11, p>.05) an lvl of u rmain ignificantly highr than in FY (t=3.3, f=11, p<.01). Capacity train, a maur by th prcnt of ay at or abov 90% capacity, ha alo cra lightly for 10 of th 12 faciliti (non-ignificantly, t=1.53, f=11, p>.05). A wa th ca for avrag u, ay at or abov 90% capacity rmain ignificantly highr (t=4.0, f=11, p<.01) than in FY Howvr, th light cra in avrag aily u for nin of th faciliti an ay at or abov 90% for tn of th faciliti uggt that capacity train may b bginning to tabiliz. TriWt Group 12 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

29 TriWt Group 13 SB 94 Annual Rport FY Tabl 2. Dtntion Facility B U, Octobr 2003 Through Jun 2004 an FY , an (Avrag u i th numbr of b u on avrag pr ay ivi by th b capacity) B & U Facility An Rgion Ditrict Srv B Cap Avrag U: ADP % of Cap Prcnt Day At / Abov 90% of Cap FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 Cntral Rgion 1, 2, 5, % 84.5% 91.0% 89.0% 7.7% 31.5% 73.7% 58.1% Gilliam YSC % 89.7% 93.7% 90.6% 37.6% 58.1% 68.8% 60.3% Marvin Foot YSC 2, 5, % 84.1% 90.8% 90.2% 20.4% 42.2% 77.5% 74.0% Mount Viw YSC 1, % 78.8% 87.8% 85.2% 16.4% 29.6% 57.5% 44.7% Northat Rgion 8, 13, 17, 19, % 86.7% 90.4% 89.7% 11.7% 50.7% 77.8% 66.0% Aam YSC % 85.4% 88.5% 89.3% 25.2% 63.0% 71.5% 62.5% Platt Vally YSC 8, 13, 17, 19, % 89.0% 93.3% 91.9% 26.3% 58.1% 89.6% 86.0% Rmington Hou 8, 13, 17, 19, % 73.2% 75.3% 75.6% 16.4% 37.5% 41.4% 42.5% Southrn Rgion 3, 4, 10, 11, 12, 15, % 80.9% 86.0% 79.3% 7.7% 21.1% 40.5% 17.3% Publo YSC 3, 10, 12, 15, % 80.8% 85.0% 77.1% 17.2% 28.5% 47.1% 18.9% Spring Crk YSC 4, % 81.0% 87.3% 82.1% 23.0% 38.9% 57.8% 37.0% Staff Scur 12, % 81.0% 77.5% 68.3% 54.7% 81.4% 78.1% 45.5% Wtrn Rgion 6, 7, 9, 14, 21, % 81.7% 82.0% 83.8% 21.5% 23.3% 28.8% 40.8% Gran Ma YSC 7, 9, 14, % 85.5% 87.5% 86.7% 39.8% 49.6% 57.8% 52.3% Robrt Dnir YSC 6, % 79.9% 84.8% 81.1% 27.4% 53.2% 61.4% 58.9% Staff Scur 7, 9, 14, % 72.6% 62.6% 77.1% 50.0% 40.5% 20.5% 55.6% * Th 90% thrhol for ach rgion an itrict wa chon o that it woul b at lat 1 b blow th cap an o that it woul b a clo to 90% a poibl. B u at or abov th 90% thrhol i rport a th prcnt ay at or abov 90% of cap. For xampl, Southrn Rgion Staff Scur faciliti combin total ix b, o th ay with on or no b opn (at or abov 83%) ar rport.

30 Statwi, aily u of itrict, facility an rgional b u appar to b tabilizing. Thi trn i hown in Figur 4 blow. Statwi ADP ha cra lightly in FY an th prcnt of ay at or abov 90% capacity ha corrponingly cra. Although th inication ar poitiv tatwi, thr ar till high lvl of u in om faciliti an itrict. Nvrthl, th rintatmnt of rourc for th SB 94 program that ha occurr ovr th pat two yar (icu furthr in Sction 4) appar to hav bn a componnt in th chang. Figur 4. Statwi Dtntion U Inicator: FY04 to FY 07 Cap 479 A D P FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 Fical Yar P r c n t U ADP: Av. Daily Pop. U: Prcnt of Cap Prcnt Day at 90% or Abov Trn in Statwi Commitmnt ADP. Th tatwi commitmnt ADP rat for FY wa 27.1; an avrag of about 27 youth in commitmnt ach ay for vry 10,000 youth in th gnral population. Thi i th con cra in commitmnt ADP ovr th pat two yar, which bring th commitmnt ADP rat own, a wa hown in Figur 1 at th bginning of thi ction, to within about 5% of th commitmnt ADP rat in FY an FY Th cra coinci with ignificant incra in funing for community rvic for SB 94. Th craing commitmnt ADP rat in FY alo corrpon with initiativ targting xpanion of th commitmnt continuum to inclu mor community-ba rvic, a wll a acro th boar incra in human rvic availability a program ruction ovr prviou yar ar bing rtor. Commitmnt ADP an lngth of tay (LOS) ar hown in Tabl 3 for itrict an rgion for th pat four fical yar (FY through FY ). Th irctionality (i.., incra or cra) an magnitu of chang in ADP an LOS ovr tho yar i alo not. Aftr two yar, th itrict ADP appar to b craing. Howvr, on avrag btwn FY an FY , th chang wa not tatitically ignificant (t=1.0, f=21, p=.33). TriWt Group 14 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

31 Iniviual itrict ADP ar mor variabl an how both incra an cra pning on th itrict. For xampl, commitmnt ADP cra in th 2 n Juicial Ditrict by 58.2 youth pr ay btwn FY to FY , raching lvl blow th FY lvl. Chang of thi ort hlp offt chang in th othr irction, a ADP continu to incra in th 8 th (39.3 youth), 10 th (20.6 youth), 17 th (17.7 youth), an 18 th (48.9 youth) Juicial Ditrict. Whn tranlating ADP chang to a prcntag, th avrag prcnt chang btwn FY to FY wa a 2% cra (28.5 youth ovrall). That chang brought th FY ADP to within 3.4% of FY Again, thr wa conirabl variability in prcnt chang acro itrict, particularly in itrict with lowr u whr mall ADP chang appar to b much largr prcnt chang. Ditrict chang ovr tim may rai qution for om itrict, but houl b conir iniviually an within th contxt of rgional an tatwi trn. Ditrict avrag LOS incra ignificantly to 19.0 month in FY compar with 18.2 month in FY (t=2.4, f=21, p<.05). Howvr, FY LOS wa not tatitically iffrnt whn compar to lat yar (FY ) avrag of 18.9 month (t=.2, f=21, p>.05). TriWt Group 15 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

32 TriWt Group 16 SB 94 Annual Rport FY Tabl 3. FY to FY Commitmnt ADP an Lngth of Stay LOS in Month. Chang from FY to FY an prcnt chang ar alo hown. Rgion & ADP LOS Ditrict FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 Chang Prcnt FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 Chang Prcnt Cntral Rgion % % 1 t Jffron % % 2 n Dnvr % % 5 th Summit % % 18 th Arapaho % % Northat Rgion % % 8 th Larimr % % 13 th Logan % % 17 th Aam % % 19 th Wl % % 20 th Boulr % % Southrn Rgion % % 3 r La Anima % 14.4 N/A % 4 th El Pao % % 10 th Publo % % 11 th Frmont % % 12 th Alamoa % % 15 th Prowr % % 16 th Otro % % Wtrn Rgion % % 6 th La Plata % % 7 th Montro % % 9 th Garfil % % 14 th Routt % % 21 t Ma % % 22 n Montzuma % % Statwi % %

33 2. Profil of Youth Scrn FY wa th fourth yar that DYC ha rquir all itrict to crn vry rfrr youth prior to placmnt in cur tntion, following th Only about on in four youth arrt ar rfrr for cur tntion crning. Still, a total of 11,842 crn wr complt tatwi in FY Th numbr of youth crn in FY cra lightly from FY lvl. Thr continu to b a high lvl of agrmnt (83%) btwn th placmnt uggt by th crning amnt an actual initial placmnt. Scur placmnt continu by far to b tho mot frquntly rcommn an u for rfrr youth. Only about 35% of youth crn a ning rintial/hltr or to go hom with rvic rciv that lvl of car. implmntation of SB in FY Givn th n to manag tntion b cap an othr local rourc availabl to itrict, crning information hlp itrict utiliz cur tntion placmnt for th youth mot in n of tho placmnt. Thi ction provi information about th numbr of youth crn, th profil of tho youth, an thir placmnt. Information i alo prnt to a th gr to which profil of youth hav chang a SB 94 Program hav aapt to major ytm chang uch a tntion cap an th lo an rintatmnt of youth-rving rourc ovr th pat fiv yar. Youth Scrn. Youth intifi for poibl placmnt in tat-fun tntion cntr ar crn an a by local SB 94 Program uing a tatwi tanariz tool th Juvnil Dtntion Scrning an Amnt Gui (JDSAG). Th JDSAG ocumnt factor aociat with th rik to fail to appar for court at or rciv nw charg, ky coniration in th u of cur tntion vru othr tntion continuum option. Colorao u of a tanariz crning an amnt intrumnt rprnt an xmplary practic, a uch crning hlp to nur that youth rcommn for placmnt at a givn lvl of rtrictivn along th tntion continuum ar at th appropriat lvl to warrant that placmnt. Furthrmor, in an nvironmnt that mphaiz a continuum of cur an community-ba tntion rvic, amnt tool can hlp avoi inavrtnt wining of th nt for youth uing tntion by making ur that any youth plac at any lvl of th tntion continuum, particularly cur tntion placmnt, ar rawn only from th pool of youth who rik lvl mrit th u of tntion. Making th mot ffctiv u of community rourc, a icu throughout thi rport, furthr unrcor th importanc of th crning an placmnt proc, an, at th am tim, rai awarn that th mot appropriat placmnt an rvic may not alway b availabl. Th an rlat iu ar prnt an icu throughout thi ction. Th numbr of youth crn ar hown in Tabl 4 for ach itrict an tatwi. A total of 11,842 crn wr complt tatwi 8 in FY , 4.9% fwr than in FY Thi numbr inclu all crn aminitr an may contain mor than on crn for om youth. TriWt Group 17 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

34 whn 12,453 youth wr crn ( Tabl 6 latr in thi ction) an 2.5% lowr than in FY whn 12,147 youth wr crn. Thi m to rflct a cra in th numbr of youth intifi a poibly in n of tntion. Four itrict ach account for 10% or mor of all youth crn (1 t, 2 n, 4 th, an 18 th ); takn togthr thy account for 60% of all youth crn. Ditrict 18 (Arapaho) crn th mot youth at 2,501 or 21.1% of all youth crn tatwi. Not urpriingly, th numbr of crn i almot fully corrlat with population (r=.95, p<.01), an th four itrict mntion abov ar four of th fiv largt itrict in youth population. Howvr, population i not th only factor that trmin th numbr of crn a montrat by th iffrnc btwn th 2 n an th 17 th, two itrict with approximatly th am iz youth population. Thrfor, to tanariz th numbr acro population, thy wr convrt to rat pr 10,000 youth uing th population ata for youth ag 10 to 17 yar in ach itrict. Statwi, about 225 youth wr crn pr 10,000. Tabl 4. Numbr of Youth Scrn & Rat Pr 10,000 Population Ditrict Youth Scrn Rat Pr 10K Population Numbr Prcnt Population Rat 1 t Jffron 1, % 59, n Dnvr 1, % 52, r Hurfano % 2, th El Pao 1, % 68, th Summit % 9, th La Plata % 6, th Montro % 10, th Larimr % 28, th Garfil % 7, th Publo % 17, th Frmont % 8, th Alamoa % 5, th Logan % 9, th Routt % 5, th Prowr % 2, th Otro % 3, th Aam % 55, th Arapaho 2, % 97, th Wl % 26, th Boulr % 28, t Ma % 14, n Montzuma % 3, Statwi 11, % 525, In Tabl 5 blow, crning rat ar orr from high to low with th mian point hown (th point at which half th itrict fall abov an half fall blow). Th tabl alo how TriWt Group 18 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

35 linquncy ptition rat to hlp put th lvl of crning in contxt. For xampl, Ditrict 3 (Hurfano) ha th mallt youth population, but thir crning rat i th hight. In aition, Hurfano alo ha th hight rat of linquncy filing. That th crning an ptition rat tn to go togthr i born out by th ignificant corrlation btwn th two rat (r=.68, p<.01). Th fact that crning rat i rlat to filing rat, uggt that common factor uch a tat an local polici (incluing tho byon th influnc of SB 94 Program) influnc crning pattrn. Tabl 5. Rank Scrning an Ptition Rat Pr 10,000 Population Ditrict Youth Youth Youth Scrn Ptition* Population Rat Pr 10,000 & Rank Numbr Numbr Numbr Scrning Rank Ptition * Rank 3 r Hurfano , th Frmont , th Publo , t Ma , n Dnvr 1, , th Otro , th Wl , th Arapaho 2, , th El Pao 1, , t Jffron 1, , th La Plata , Mian Rat Highr Scrning Rat Lowr Scrning Rat 12 th Alamoa , th Prowr , th Boulr , th Garfil , th Larimr , th Logan , th Aam , n Montzuma , th Montro , th Routt , th Summit , Statwi 11,842 15, , n/a n/a * Data from th juvnil linquncy ptition factor of th FY bugt allocation proc wa u, which avrag ptition ovr th thr yar prio of 2003 thru On major factor i how law nforcmnt agnci rfr youth for crning. Th gr to which law nforcmnt practic in thi rgar vary from itrict to itrict can influnc th numbr of youth crn an th profil of tho youth. Thi may particularly b th ca if law nforcmnt officr ar lctiv in rfrring youth, chooing to o o only for youth thy think ar likly to n mor rtrictiv tntion continuum placmnt (uch a cur tntion). Dpit uch variability, within th SB 94 Program, tanarization of crning TriWt Group 19 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

36 xpctation to ncompa at lat all youth rfrr for cur tntion ha rmov on lvl of variability acro itrict rporting. Th mot rcnt tat policy chang with rgar to crning rult from th implmntation of SB in FY With th implmntation of SB , DYC rquir that all itrict crn vry rfrr youth bfor placmnt in cur tntion. Prior to that, it wa optional for itrict to crn youth who wr rman to cutoy irctly by th court or youth who wr ntnc to tntion. Although thr wa prviouly an mphai on crning youth to ai in making placmnt ciion, th implmntation of tntion cap, chang in othr youth-rving rourc aociat with Stat rvnu fluctuation, an th implmntation of SB hightn that mphai, rulting in chang acro many itrict. Tabl 6 blow how that th tatwi numbr of youth crn incra in FY , but ha inc cra annually to th point whr youth crn in FY total 2.5% l than in FY Thi trn appar to b on factor in th ruction in cur tntion u. Tabl 6. Chang in Numbr of Youth Scrn Ditrict Youth Scrn Chang FY03 FY04 FY05 5 FY06 FY07 0 FY03 to FY07 1 t Jffron 1,242 1,494 1,471 1,518 1, % 2 n Dnvr 2,063 1,889 1,722 1,726 1, % 3 r Hurfano % 4 th El Pao 1,777 1,805 1,689 1,789 1, % 5 th Summit % 6 th La Plata % 7 th Montro % 8 th Larimr % 9 th Garfil % 10 th Publo % 11 th Frmont % 12 th Alamoa % 13 th Logan % 14 th Routt % 15 th Prowr % 16 th Otro % 17 th Aam % 18 th Arapaho 2,596 2,427 2,514 2,455 2, % 19 th Wl % 20 th Boulr % 21 t Ma % 22 n Montzuma % Statwi 12,147 12,692 12,607 12,453 11, % TriWt Group 20 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

37 Profil of Youth. Givn th incraing mphai of DYC in th pat fiv yar on managing a continuum of rourc for youth in n, th priority ha bn to utiliz availabl tntion placmnt for th mot appropriat youth. Th JDSAG tntion crning tool rv a an inicator of lvl of placmnt n for ach youth. Th fiv tntion continuum placmnt profil rflct factor rlat to th youth n for placmnt in a cur tting, uch a failing to appar for court at or rciving nw charg, rathr than rik to r-offn or rik po to th community. It houl b kpt in min that youth who ar crn ar alray a mall ubt of youth who hav bn arrt (approximatly a quartr: 11,842 of 44,985), an an vn mallr ubt of all Colorao youth (2.3%, or 11,842 of 525,713), a hown in Figur 5. Figur 5. Juvnil Jutic Filtring Proc to Dtntion: FY Juvnil Population Ag Yar 525, % Juvnil Arrt 44, % SB94 Dtntion Scrn 11, % DYC Scur/Staff Suprvi Dtntion Amiion 10, % Youth Placmnt Profil. Compltion of th JDSAG crning tr provi fback to gui ciion about appropriat lvl of placmnt along th tntion continuum. On of fiv poibl tntion placmnt lvl i intifi from th pattrn of itm rpon whn th JDSAG i complt. Th fiv lvl ar: Lvl 1, Scur Dtntion Thi rfr to a phyically cur an lock facility. Lvl 2, Staff Scur Dtntion Thi rfr to a rintial facility whr ach youth i unr continuou taff uprviion an whr all rvic, uch a ucation an tratmnt, ar provi at that location. Lvl 3, Rintial or Shltr Placmnt Thi rfr to a placmnt in th community in a non-cur living ituation outi th hom. Lvl 4, Hom an Community Dtntion/Srvic Thi rfr to th rla of a youth to th cutoy of hi or hr parnt or guarian with n uprviion an rvic, a an altrnativ to placmnt outi th hom. Lvl 5, Rla Thi rfr to th rla of a youth to th cutoy of parnt or guarian with littl or no xtrnal uprviion or rvic upport. TriWt Group 21 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

38 Tabl 7 blow how th prcnt of youth initially plac in ach of th tntion continuum placmnt lvl. Sinc thi rprnt only th youth initial placmnt, it uggt a highr lvl of cur tntion u than i actually th ca on avrag, givn that youth oftn quickly tp own to lowr lvl of rtrictivn. Howvr, th ata provi a uful inicator of trn in initial placmnt, which i a critical ciion point a youth mov through th juvnil jutic ytm. 9 Tabl 7. Dtntion Continuum Youth Placmnt by Prcnt Ditrict Scur Staff Scur Rintial /Shltr Shltr / Hom / Srvic Rla Prcnt Prcnt Prcnt Prcnt Prcnt 1 t Jffron n Dnvr r Hurfano th El Pao th Summit th La Plata th Montro th Larimr th Garfil th Publo th Frmont th Alamoa th Logan th Routt th Prowr th Otro th Aam th Arapaho th Wl th Boulr t Ma n Montzuma Statwi From th tatwi itribution, it i clar that th mot frquntly u initial placmnt i cur tntion, with 76.1% of all youth plac at that lvl. Th nxt hight u placmnt lvl i rla to th cutoy of parnt without ignificant uprviion or upport at 13.1%. Statwi, th chang in cur tntion u ovr tim ha bn vry light, incraing from 73.5% in FY to 75.3% in FY , rmaining at 75.9% in both FY an FY an incraing to 76.1% in FY Rlat chang ovr 9 TriWt Group. (2003). Colorao in Contxt: Stat Dtntion Sytm an Bt Practic in Juvnil Dtntion Altrnativ. Boulr, Colorao. TriWt Group 22 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

39 th pat yar wr alo light, with an initial incra in youth rla from FY (11.5%) to 14.1% in FY an thn a ruction in th youth rla ovr two yar to 13.6% in FY an 13.0% in FY , tabilizing at 13.1% in FY Rflcting th rintatmnt of SB 94 rourc ovr th pat two yar, youth nt hom with rvic ha incra from 6.2% in FY to 8.5% in FY an cra lightly in FY to 7.9%. A crib abov, tatwi placmnt u ha montrat om light hift in placmnt initially u along th tntion continuum. Howvr, charactrizing any givn itrict by th tatwi chang i not accurat. To illutrat iffrnc within th largr tatwi trn, four xampl ar hown blow in Tabl 8. Statwi ata i alo hown towar th bottom of th tabl. Th four xampl inclu: Th 9 th Juicial Ditrict (Garfil) wnt from 30.4% cur tntion placmnt in FY , to 77.9% in FY , a vry noticabl incra. Such u thn wnt own for two yar to 57.1% in FY an 47.7% in FY Tho chang wr contingnt on othr rourc an th u of taff cur placmnt an rvic in th community. In FY th 9 th incra it u of cur tntion, likly th rult of a cra of on b from 7 to 6. Until FY , th 1 t cra it u of cur tntion in favor of placing youth at hom with rvic. In FY thr wa a light incra in th u of cur tntion. Th 17 th initially how a imilar hift a th 1 t, xcpt thy tn to rla youth without upport rathr than plac thm at hom with rvic. Thn in FY , that placmnt u pattrn hift to a highr u of cur tntion an l frqunt rla. Th 19 th cra btwn FY an FY in th u of cur tntion. Sinc thn cur tntion u ha rmain about th am whil hom with rvic ha taily incra. TriWt Group 23 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

40 Tabl 8. Youth Placmnt Pattrn for th 9 th, 1 t an 17 th Juicial Ditrict an Statwi: FY through FY an Dirction of Chang in Placmnt. Th oli arrow inicat rlativly mor chang an th ah arrow inicat rlativly l chang. 9 th Garfil 1 t Jffron 17 th Aam 19 th Wl Ditrict & Fical Yar Statwi Scur Staff Scur Rintial/ Shltr Hom/ Srvic Rla Total Prcnt Prcnt Prcnt Prcnt Prcnt Prcnt FY Chang FY Chang FY FY Chang FY FY Chang FY FY FY Chang FY FY Chang FY FY Chang FY FY Chang FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY Initial Placmnt Agrmnt. Thi ubction analyz how youth placmnt uggt by th rult of th JDSAG crn compar with actual initial placmnt. Tabl 9 blow how th agrmnt btwn th crning tr an th actual placmnt for tho 11,636 youth for TriWt Group 24 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

41 whom both crning an actual placmnt information wa availabl. Th combination of th numbr of youth in th thr ha agrmnt cll on th iagonal rflct an ovrall agrmnt of 83.0%. Thi continu a conitnt trn of high agrmnt rat ovr tim btwn th placmnt uggt by th crn an th actual placmnt (82.3% in FY , 83.2% in FY , 83.7% in FY an 84.0% in FY ). Of th 8,669 youth crn to cur tntion, 90.4% (7,834) wr plac in cur tntion. Thi prcnt i only ngligibly lowr than lat yar (91.1%) an rflct only a 0.6% chang ovr th pat four yar (FY wa 89.9%). Of th 412 youth crn to taff cur, only 23 (5.6%) wr actually plac thr initially. Thi rult i u to th low lvl of taff cur capacity inc FY whn 43.8% of youth crn to taff cur wr plac in taff cur. Sinc thn, many mor youth who wr crn to taff cur wnt to cur placmnt (78.2%), own from FY (80.7%). Th prcnt of youth who wr crn to taff cur an plac in hltr or hom placmnt incra to 16.3%. Of youth crn to hltr/hom, 70.5% wr plac in tho typ of placmnt initially, a cra from th 76.4% in FY , an about th am a th 69.3% in FY Th othr i of thi chang wa that mor youth crn to hltr/hom wnt to cur placmnt thi yar (28.6%) compar with 22.2% in FY an 25.7% in FY Tabl 9. Scrning Tr Suggt Placmnt an Actual Initial Placmnt Actual Initial Placmnt Scrning Shltr Tr Scur Staff Scur /Hom Total Numbr Prcnt Numbr Prcnt Numbr Prcnt Numbr Prcnt Scur 7, , Staff Scur Shltr/Hom , , Total 8, , , * Shltr/Hom i a catgory that contain Rintial/Shltr, Hom Dtntion with Srvic, an Rla. Givn that th vat majority of youth ar crn a ning cur tntion an rciv it, it i intructiv to look at th ovrall prcnt of youth who ar plac at a lvl iffrnt from th lvl crn, combining multipl cll hown in Tabl 9 abov. Th youth who actual placmnt i mor cur than that uggt by th crning tr ( = 1,075) account for 9.2% of all youth. Mot of th ar youth crn a abl to rturn hom with rvic (or to rintial or rla) who ar inta plac in cur tntion. Th group crn to Shltr/Hom inclu rintial/hltr, hom with rvic, an rla. Raiing concrn furthr, only about 36% of th group crn to hom with rvic ar actually plac thr. Almot 31% ar plac in cur tntion whn tho TriWt Group 25 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

42 placmnt ar availabl, whil about 31% ar imply rla u to th unavailability of n rvic. Thi pattrn uggt that placmnt in th community-ba n of th tntion continuum ar not yt aquat to rv all youth crn to go hom with rvic, with narly a thir of th youth inta plac in mor rtrictiv tntion option an anothr thir rla without any rvic. Th youth who actual placmnt i l cur than that uggt by th crning tr ( = 902) account for 7.8% of all youth. Th numbr rflct light ruction in th youth going to mor cur placmnt (9.5% in FY an 9.2% in FY ) an a lightly lowr prcntag going to l cur placmnt (8.2% in FY an 7.8% in FY ). Tabl 10 blow how agrmnt lvl for all itrict. Thr continu to b conirabl variation acro itrict on th gr to which th actual placmnt i iffrnt from th crning uggt placmnt. Tabl 10. Ditrict U of Mor an L Scur Placmnt. Ditrict Actual Placmnt Ovrri Agrmnt Mor Scur L Scur Total 1 t Jffron 87.7% 4.8% 7.5% 12.3% 2 n Dnvr 88.7% 11.0% 0.3% 11.3% 3 r Hurfano 81.0% 7.9% 11.1% 19.0% 4 th El Pao 90.9% 7.8% 1.4% 9.1% 5 th Summit 91.1% 8.9% 0.0% 8.9% 6 th La Plata 82.1% 11.2% 6.7% 17.9% 7 th Montro 71.0% 17.8% 11.2% 29.0% 8 th Larimr 72.4% 15.5% 12.0% 27.6% 9 th Garfil 63.1% 15.5% 21.4% 36.9% 10 th Publo 71.8% 27.6% 0.6% 28.2% 11 th Frmont 83.3% 6.3% 10.3% 16.7% 12 th Alamoa 28.6% 5.4% 66.1% 71.4% 13 th Logan 70.7% 10.6% 18.7% 29.3% 14 th Routt 83.3% 4.8% 11.9% 16.7% 15 th Prowr 50.0% 5.0% 45.0% 50.0% 16 th Otro 77.8% 7.1% 15.2% 22.2% 17 th Aam 89.2% 8.9% 1.9% 10.8% 18 th Arapaho 80.2% 6.0% 13.8% 19.8% 19 th Wl 87.8% 10.3% 1.9% 12.2% 20 th Boulr 76.5% 7.9% 15.6% 23.5% 21 t Ma 80.0% 7.7% 12.3% 20.0% 22 n Montzuma 66.7% 13.9% 19.4% 33.3% Avrag 83.0% 9.2% 7.8% 17.0% TriWt Group 26 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

43 3. Progr in Achiving Local Goal an Objctiv Planning Proc. All Juicial Ditrict SB 94 Program mut ubmit an annual program plan for approval ach yar (th SB 94 Altrnativ to Incarcration Juvnil Srvic Plan). Each itrict plan for Fical In FY DYC work with Juicial Ditrict SB 94 Program to track progr on a tanar t of thr objctiv ach for prajuicat an for ntnc youth. Th objctiv ar focu on (1) attaining low rat of youth who fail to appar for court haring, (2) attaining low rat of youth with nw charg, an (3) achiving a high rat of poitiv or nutral raon for youth laving SB 94 Program. All thr objctiv in both goal ara wr achiv. Ovr 96% of prajuicat an ntnc youth wr uccful in apparing for court haring an in not committing nw charg. Ovr 89% of youth ha poitiv or nutral lav raon. In aition, ach itrict pcifi a uniqu goal an objctiv() pcific thir own SB 94 Program. Yar wa complt in March Local Juicial Ditrict Juvnil Srvic Planning Committ ar rponibl for vloping th annual SB 94 plan. Th committ broar manat i to coorinat ach local program, th rvic provi by th program, an rourc u to accomplih SB 94 goal an objctiv. To facilitat coorination an collaboration, ach Juvnil Srvic Planning Committ inclu a comprhniv group of tatutorily pcifi agnci, 10 a wll a aitional community involvmnt uggt by DYC. An xampl of a typical planning committ i hown in Figur 6 blow. Figur 6. Typical Local SB 94 Juvnil Srvic Planning Committ SB94 Juvnil Srvic Planning Committ Municipal Govrnmnt Ditrict Attorny Offic Offic of Public Dfnr Probation Dpartmnt County Govrnmnt Tratmnt Provir Statutorily Spcifi Agnci on Committ Law Enforcmnt Diviion of Youth Corrction Aitional Community Involvmnt on Committ Social Srvic School Ditrict Mntal Halth Privat Citizn Ditrict Court Employmnt Srvic 10 Colorao Statut/Titl 19 Chilrn Co/Articl 2 Th Colorao Juvnil Jutic Sytm/Part 2 Aminitrativ Entiti Agnt/ Local Juvnil Srvic Planning Committ Cration Duti. TriWt Group 27 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

44 In th contxt of othr tat an what i known about ffctiv approach, Colorao local planning tam ar an xmplary practic. Local planning an control within Colorao SB 94 ytm incra th liklihoo that program acro th tntion continuum ar rponiv an rlvant to local n. Similarly, thi typ of local larhip ha bn hown to la to poitiv program outcom an utainability (for xampl, th Anni E. Cay Juvnil Dtntion Altrnativ Initiativ rfrnc in DYC 2003 bt practic rport 11 ). Th Chif Jug of ach Juicial Ditrict i rponibl for appointing th Juvnil Srvic Planning Committ an nuring participation. Th Juvnil Srvic Planning Committ an th SB 94 Coorinator ovr th aminitration of th plan an th program for thir itrict. SB 94 Coorinator work with thir planning committ to vlop goal an objctiv. Th proc an guilin for pcifying goal an objctiv ha volv ovr th pat fw yar to th point whr it i now rquir for itrict to rport on progr in achiving tanar goal an objctiv for two tntion population, fin a follow: 1. Prajuicat youth Youth rciving any SB 94 fun rvic u to bing at imminnt rik of bing plac in tntion aftr arrt or rmaining in tntion aftr a tntion haring, but who ar not ntnc to tntion, on probation, parol or committ. 2. Youth ntnc to tntion or on probation Youth rciving SB 94 rvic a an altrnativ to a ntnc to tntion an/or youth on probation who ar at imminnt rik of rvocation or in angr of roffning that woul rult in tntion without th u of intrvntion rvic. Thi catgory inclu youth ntnc to tntion for contmpt of court or a a conition of probation. Thi may alo inclu rvic targt to ruc th lngth of tay of ntnc youth in tntion. Th natur of th two youth population i iffrnt in that prajuicat youth ar mor likly to b firt tim offnr an nw to th juvnil jutic ytm. Th con group of youth ha alray bn ajuicat or ntnc to tntion or ar on probation. Thy ar alo mor likly to b at highr rik of roffning an may inclu youth for whom uprviion on probation ha not bn uccful. For FY thr tanariz objctiv wr pcifi by DYC for ach of th two goal, a hown in Tabl 11 on th following pag. Each Juicial Ditrict SB 94 program i thu rquir to track an rport on ix tanariz objctiv, but th lvl of prformanc targt for ach objctiv i lft to b trmin by th itrict SB 94 program through it local planning proc. Ditrict ar alo rquir to pcify on or mor aitional goal, rlat objctiv an prformanc outcom for aitional apct of thir program. 11 TriWt Group. (2003). Colorao in Contxt: Stat Dtntion Sytm an Bt Practic in Juvnil Dtntion Altrnativ. Boulr, Colorao TriWt Group 28 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

45 Tabl 11. Rquir Goal an Objctiv Srvic Ara Goal 1. Prajuicat Youth FY06 Goal To uccfully uprvi prajuicat youth plac in community-ba tntion rvic. 2. Sntnc Youth FY06 Goal To uccfully uprvi ntnc youth plac in community-ba tntion rvic. Maurabl Objctiv 1. Prcnt of nroll prajuicat youth that complt SB 94 rvic without FTA (Failing To Appar for Court) uring th prio of th intrvntion. 2. Prcnt of nroll prajuicat youth that complt SB 94 rvic without rciving nw charg uring th prio of th intrvntion. 3. Prcnt of prajuicat youth rv through SB 94 that complt th prio of th intrvntion with a poitiv or nutral lav raon. 1. Prcnt of nroll ntnc youth that complt SB 94 rvic without FTA uring th prio of th intrvntion. 2. Prcnt of nroll ntnc youth that complt SB 94 rvic without rciving nw charg uring th prio of th intrvntion. 3. Prcnt of ntnc youth rv through SB 94 that complt th prio of th intrvntion with a poitiv or nutral lav raon Progr in Achiving Goal an Objctiv. Th ability of th SB 94 Program an iniviual Juicial Ditrict to monitor an rport on prformanc in achiving goal an objctiv ha progr to th point whr FY i th thir yar that a tanar t of goal an objctiv hav bn rquir by DYC. Each iniviual itrict t thir own prformanc lvl within ach tanariz goal ara a thir critria of ucc in achiving thir objctiv. Each itrict goal an objctiv ar rviw a part of th annual planning an funing proc an ar approv prior to th bginning of th fical yar. Prajuicat youth Tabl 12 on th following pag how th rult for th thr rquir objctiv unr th prajuicat youth goal. Th objctiv for FTA, Nw Charg an Poitiv Lav Raon hav bn hown paratly. For ach itrict, th prformanc lvl t for th objctiv i hown follow by th maur prformanc for th yar (th rult). Th tabl how that SB 94 Program wr vry uccful an xc objctiv in all thr targt ara. Prformanc in mting thir objctiv to TriWt Group 29 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

46 nur prajuicat youth appar for court haring an to minimiz nw charg for youth whil proviing rvic wa particularly triking. Acro rporting itrict, 96% of all youth i not hav FTA an 96% of all youth i not hav nw charg. Th objctiv for youth to complt or lav rvic for a poitiv or nutral raon alo wa uccful. Ovrall, 92% of youth lft rvic for a poitiv or nutral raon. Tabl 12. Achivmnt of Plan Objctiv for Prajuicat Youth by Each Ditrict 12. Th rult ar for youth complting SB 94 Srvic. Youth Complting Youth Complting Without Failing to Ditrict* Without Nw Appar for Court Charg Haring Youth With Poitiv or Nutral Lav Raon Objctiv Rult Objctiv Rult Objctiv Rult 1 t Jffron 85% 97% 85% 98% 85% 92% 2 n Dnvr 95% 96% 95% 96% 90% 85% 3 r Hurfano 85% 97% 85% 97% 90% 100% 4 th El Pao 90% 96% 90% 98% 90% 93% 5 th Summit 88% 100% 88% 83% 90% 100% 6 th La Plata 95% 99% 90% 98% 90% 93% 7 th Montro 90% 95% 90% 81% 90% 84% 8 th Larimr 90% 100% 90% 99% 90% 88% 9 th Garfil 98% 98% 93% 100% 56% 91% 10 th Publo 90% 100% 90% 99% 90% 98% 11 th Frmont 90% 99% 90% 96% 90% 98% 12 th Alamoa 75% 100% 75% 92% 75% 96% 13 th Logan 90% 100% 90% 100% 90% 96% 14 th Routt 95% 100% 80% 91% 90% 94% 15 th Prowr 85% 94% 85% 88% 90% 100% 16 th Otro 90% 100% 90% 100% 90% 100% 17 th Aam 90% 98% 90% 98% 90% 88% 18 th Arapaho 90% 94% 90% 94% 90% 94% 19 th Wl 90% 98% 85% 97% 90% 93% 20 th Boulr 95% 100% 95% 96% 80% 80% 21 t Ma 94% 96% 94% 93% 92% 96% 22 n Montzuma 90% 97% 80% 97% 90% 87% Statwi Avrag 90% 96% 88% 96% 87% 92% Iniviually, 100% of itrict mt thir FTA objctiv, 19 itrict (86.4%) mt thir objctiv for nw charg an 17 (77.3%) mt thir objctiv for poitiv or nutral lav raon. It i intructiv to tak a clor look at th prformanc lvl chon by th itrict for th poitiv or nutral lav raon objctiv. Th fiv itrict that i not accomplih thir objctiv all t thir prformanc lvl at 90%. Thir avrag prformanc wa at th 86% lvl, lowr than th 17 itrict who accomplih thi objctiv but high nonthl. 12 Th information hown in Tabl 14 an 15 wa obtain from TRAILS rport. Th valuation tam work with DYC to obtain ata for ach Ditrict uniqu goal an objctiv(). TriWt Group 30 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

47 Combin, th ngativ lav raon mak thi objctiv th mot ifficult to achiv a it currntly i fin. For xampl, th ngativ lav raon inclu both FTA an Nw Charg. In aition, thy inclu commitmnt, noncomplianc on th part of th youth or family an rfual of rvic or nonparticipation in rvic. Improvmnt on thi objctiv clarly rquir icuion an clarification about th lav raon an which ar inclu. Sntnc youth Tabl 13 blow how th rult for th thr rquir objctiv for ntnc youth, montrating that SB 94 Program wr vry uccful in mting thir objctiv in all thr targt ara. A with prformanc lvl for prajuicat objctiv, th rport prformanc lvl for nuring that ntnc youth appar for court haring an for minimizing nw charg for youth whil proviing rvic ar impriv. Acro rporting itrict, 98% of all youth i not hav FTA an 96% of all youth i not hav nw charg. Iniviually, 95% of itrict (21 of 22) mt thir FTA objctiv, an 19 itrict (86.4%) mt thir objctiv for nw charg. Tabl 13. Achivmnt of Plan Objctiv for Sntnc Youth by Each Ditrict. Th rult ar for youth complting SB 94 Srvic. Ditrict* Youth Complting Youth Complting Youth With Poitiv Without Failing to Without Nw or Nutral Lav Appar for Court Charg Raon Haring Objctiv Rult Objctiv Rult Objctiv Rult 1 t Jffron 85% 98% 85% 96% 85% 90% 2 n Dnvr 95% 96% 95% 99% 90% 87% 3 r Hurfano 90% 100% 85% 67% 90% 100% 4 th El Pao 90% 100% 90% 95% 90% 87% 5 th Summit 80% 95% 80% 91% 85% 86% 6 th La Plata 90% 100% 90% 96% 90% 92% 7 th Montro 90% 94% 90% 83% 90% 81% 8 th Larimr 90% 99% 90% 98% 90% 89% 9 th Garfil 90% 100% 80% 100% 90% 90% 10 th Publo 90% 100% 90% 100% 90% 89% 11 th Frmont 90% 94% 90% 90% 90% 90% 12 th Alamoa 75% 96% 75% 100% 75% 96% 13 th Logan 90% 100% 90% 94% 90% 94% 14 th Routt 90% 100% 80% 100% 90% 82% 15 th Prowr 85% 95% 85% 95% 90% 86% 16 th Otro 90% 90% 90% 79% 90% 79% 17 th Aam 95% 98% 95% 98% 90% 82% 18 th Arapaho 90% 99% 90% 98% 90% 90% 19 th Wl 80% 99% 75% 98% 90% 97% 20 th Boulr 95% 100% 95% 98% 80% 87% 21 t Ma 94% 95% 94% 95% 92% 100% 22 n Montzuma 90% 80% 80% 80% 90% 60% Statwi Avrag 89% 98% 87% 96% 89% 89% TriWt Group 31 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

48 Ovrall, th prformanc for ntnc youth with poitiv or nutral lav raon wa alo uccful, avraging 89%. Howvr, rult for iniviual itrict wr mix, with only 12 itrict (54.5%) mting thir objctiv. Again, it i intructiv to tak a clor look at th prformanc lvl chon by th itrict for th poitiv or nutral lav raon objctiv. Th tn itrict that i not accomplih thir objctiv, all t thir prformanc critria at 90%. Thir avrag prformanc wa at th 88% lvl, lightly lowr than th 12 itrict who accomplih thi objctiv, but high nonthl. A not abov for prajuicat youth, thi objctiv i th mot ifficult to achiv a it currntly i fin. For xampl, th ngativ lav raon inclu both FTA an Nw Charg which ar covr by th firt two objctiv, o thi objctiv oubl count challng ocumnt in th firt two objctiv, an thrfor houl not b t a high. In aition, poibl ngativ lavr raon ar myria, incluing commitmnt, noncomplianc on th part of th youth or family, an rfual of rvic or nonparticipation in rvic. Succ on thi objctiv i clarly mor ifficult to obtain. W rcommn DYC conir ithr a lowr prformanc objctiv or rvi th lav raon that ar inclu in th inicator. Uniqu itrict goal an objctiv. For FY , DYC rquir ach itrict to intify an aitional goal uniqu to thir rpctiv itrict. Twnty of th twnty-two itrict i thi, intifying a total of 32 objctiv, 22 for rving prajuicat youth an 10 for rving ntnc youth. Nintn of th 22 (86.4%) objctiv for prajuicat youth wr accomplih, an fiv of th tn objctiv for rving ntnc youth wr accomplih. Th objctiv ar a rang of prformanc incluing prtrial rvic of variou typ, rvic to accomplih ucational objctiv, rvic for alcohol an rug problm, rvic for minority youth an rtorativ rvic to ait victim. Planning an rporting progr. In FY , only 17 itrict t goal an objctiv for youth ntnc to tntion or on probation. In FY , DYC rquir tanar goal for both prajuicat an ntnc population for all 22 itrict. In FY , DYC a on mor objctiv for ach goal. In FY goal an objctiv uniqu to ach itrict wr inclu in th annual planning an rporting ffort. A vinc by th prformanc lvl, thi ha ocumnt notabl ucc an ongoing improvmnt for th SB 94 Program. In aition, th ongoing improvmnt in th availability of TRAILS ata ha nabl bttr rporting. Th tanarization of goal an objctiv that bgan in FY ha facilitat improvmnt in th rporting proc an accountability to DYC an th Stat of Colorao. Thi, coupl with th availability of TRAILS ata, clarly ha nabl itrict an DYC to rport mor pcifically on progr in achiving goal an objctiv within iniviual itrict an tatwi. It i clar from thi monitoring that itrict ovrall hav bn vry uccful in working with th youth thy rv, a vinc by thir prformanc in achiving th goal an objctiv. TriWt Group 32 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

49 4. Program Rourc an Practic Stat Funing. Th SB 94 bugt allocation proc tak plac in January an Fbruary of ach yar an rult in Th funing incra in FY hlp to rtor th ytm ability to provi all typ of rvic an pcially tratmnt rvic. Suprviion rmain th primary man of youth ovright, although th rlativ mphai on uprviion ha cra a funing wa rtor in th pat two yar. Th incra in FY will rtor th total SB 94 appropriation to about 2% abov th FY lvl, not ajuting for any Cot of Living incra mi uring tho yar. Juicial Ditrict SB 94 Program allocation for th coming fical yar. Th SB94 Allocation Committ, a ubcommitt of th SB94 Aviory Boar, rcommn an allocation approach an a bugt allocation for ach Juicial Ditrict. Th plan i thn icu, approv by th Boar, an forwar to DYC larhip for final coniration. Th allocation approach for th FY bugt u a four-factor mol intn to maintain tability by limiting th prcnt of chang (incra or cra) for a Juicial Ditrict bugt from on fical yar to th nxt. Th factor utiliz in th FY bugt allocation wr: 1. Juvnil Population Projction by Juicial Ditrict for 2007 (ata provi by th Colorao Dpartmnt of Local Affair); 2. Avrag of Nw Unuplicat Juvnil Probation Intak for FY (ata provi by th Colorao Juicial Dpartmnt); 3. Avrag of Juvnil Dlinquncy Filing for FY (ata provi by th Colorao Juicial Dpartmnt); an 4. Population blow Povrty (Wight = 0.5) (ata provi by th Colorao Dpartmnt of Local Affair). Tabl 14 (on th following pag) prnt Juicial Ditrict bugt allocation from FY through FY To facilitat yar-to-yar analyi of itrict balin allocation, prformanc incntiv numbr hav bn rmov from th bugt of tho itrict rciving incntiv in FY (incntiv wr liminat mi-way through FY ). Incntiv ollar ar inclu in th ovrall program (tatwi) total in orr to pict chang in ovrall funing lvl. Not hown in th tabl i th rvi bugt following th ruction of 5.79% that bcam ffctiv uring th con half of FY That ruction wa a rult of mi-yar lgilativ ffort to ar th cra availability of fun for all tat fun program. Th tat bugt hortfall in FY rult in anothr 21% ruction in fun to SB 94 Program, for a total bugt ruction ovr that tim fram of narly 25%. TriWt Group 33 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

50 TriWt Group 34 SB 94 Annual Rport FY Tabl 14. FY to FY Juicial Ditrict SB 94 Bugt Allocation an Total Appropriation. Juicial Ditrict FY Bugt Allocation FY Bugt Allocation FY Bugt Allocation FY Bugt Allocation FY Bugt Allocation FY Bugt Allocation % Chang FY07 to FY08 % Chang FY03 to FY08 1 t Jffron $1,173,652 $893,779 $796,907 $950,499 $1,064,355 $1,265, % 7.8% 2 n Dnvr $1,713,018 $1,290,698 $1,150,806 $1,236,916 $1,338,409 $1,511, % -11.8% 3 r Hurfano $81,143 $60,606 $60,606 $61,823 $75,000 $85, % 5.6% 4 th El Pao $1,497,290 $1,110,322 $989,980 $1,022,715 $1,174,351 $1,413, % -5.6% 5 th Summit $144,198 $107,940 $96,241 $139,274 $160,773 $199, % 38.3% 6 th La Plata $144,837 $107,828 $96,141 $100,890 $109,765 $125, % -13.3% 7 th Montro $186,030 $143,169 $127,652 $171,154 $186,972 $210, % 13.4% 8 th Larimr $535,180 $396,831 $353,820 $445,613 $527,963 $636, % 19.0% 9 th Garfil $144,452 $110,493 $98,518 $113,091 $125,019 $156, % 8.5% 10 th Publo $603,310 $448,657 $400,029 $408,061 $421,323 $443, % -26.5% 11 th Frmont $204,190 $151,598 $135,167 $196,809 $243,917 $294, % 44.5% 12 th Alamoa $160,635 $119,372 $106,434 $124,283 $144,901 $175, % 9.4% 13 th Logan $190,646 $141,372 $126,049 $145,851 $166,696 $201, % 5.5% 14 th Routt $110,607 $82,239 $73,325 $86,577 $95,594 $113, % 3.0% 15 th Prowr $68,512 $55,000 $55,000 $56,100 $75,000 $80, % 16.8% 16 th Otro $129,668 $96,659 $86,183 $87,913 $92,522 $109, % -15.8% 17 th Aam $1,105,058 $852,975 $760,525 $848,699 $948,425 $1,117, % 1.1% 18 th Arapaho $1,660,466 $1,306,457 $1,164,857 $1,350,529 $1,544,479 $1,873, % 12.8% 19 th Wl $521,041 $409,865 $365,442 $534,549 $692,102 $855, % 64.3% 20 th Boulr $707,292 $526,019 $469,006 $519,610 $562,785 $672, % -5.0% 21 t Ma $338,030 $251,056 $223,845 $263,665 $321,164 $390, % 15.6% 22 n Montzuma $63,892 $55,000 $55,000 $61,029 $75,000 $80, % 25.2% Ditrict Total $11,704,539 $8,717,935 $7,791,533 $8,925,650 $10,146,514 $12,012, % 2.6% Total Appropriation $12,255,883 $8,966,324 $7,966,324 $9,125,650 $10,422,234 $12,463, % 1.7% 1 Juicial Ditrict bugt allocation figur provi by DYC an by th SB 94 Aviory Boar. 2 Approximatly $221,000 of FY an FY bugt wr allocat ba on Juicial Ditrict Prformanc. That amount i inclu in th Statwi total, but not in th itrict total. Prformanc incntiv wr liminat with th FY mi-yar bugt ruction.

51 In FY , th allocation proc flt th ffct of continuing rvnu hortfall in th Stat of Colorao, with an aitional 10.6% ruction from th FY bugt. That chang ruc th FY funing lvl to approximatly two-thir of th initial FY bugt. Th SB 94 Aviory Boar again rcommn a proportional ruction of 10.83% for all itrict, with th xcption that itrict bugt wr not to b l than $55,000. In FY , th Colorao Stat Lgilatur provi a $1 million (14.5%) incra in th appropriation for th SB 94 Program, compar to FY lvl. Thi incra i not compltly rvr th ruction inc FY , with th ruction btwn FY an FY till amounting to ovr 23%; howvr, it i rult in an incra in itrict program ability to provi aitional rvic uch a tratmnt an uprviion. In allocating th aitional $1 million, itrict wr ak to propo how th aitional rourc woul b u, an thy plac a highr mphai on funing tratmnt an rtorativ rvic compar with th pattrn of xpnitur ovr th pat coupl yar, a tail in th nxt ubction. For fical yar , SB94 rciv both a cot of living incra of 3.25% an an aitional $1 million to rtor mor of th prviou program ruction. A rvi allocation for ach itrict wa thn trmin ba on th SB94 funing formula an appli to th aitional $1 million. 13 In aition, th funing floor wa incra from $55,000 to $75,000. A wa th ca for th FY funing proc, ach itrict vlop a plan for thir allocation of th incra in rourc. Allocation of th incra funing for fical yar unrwnt a proc imilar to that mploy in th FY allocation. Thr wr om iffrnc uch a th cot of living incra bing l at 1.5% an an incra in th funing floor from $75,000 to $80,000. In aition, th Diviion rpon 14 to how th aitional funing woul b utiliz contain four lmnt 1) tatwi implmntation of th Colorao Juvnil Rik Amnt (CJRA) for Snat Bill 94, 2) a focu on vinc ba programming which i hown to ruc rciivim, 3) allowing itrict to xpan th cop of Snat Bill 94 rvic to inclu rvic intn to prvnt a commitmnt to DYC, an 4) furthr vlopmnt of th tntion continuum. Th focu on th tntion continuum wa ba on minimizing th capacity train intifi in th pat two Snat Bill 94 Evaluation Annual Rport. Th Snat Bill 94 valuation rult for thi yar ( Sction 1 abov) uggt that capacity train can b mitigat if ufficint rourc xit along a tntion continuum to match th n an rik of th youth who ntr th ytm. Whil th pcific program vlop to ar capacity train can iffr by juicial itrict, SB 94 program wr trongly ncourag to a ara in th tntion continuum whr capacity train i occurring an vlop program an practic which focu on th appropriat placmnt of youth within thir particular tntion continuum. Ditrict wr authoriz to u fun for 13 SB 94 COLA an Allocation Incra for FY May 18, Mmoranum to SB 94 Aviory Boar, Coorinator an Chairpron. 14 SB 94 Allocation Lttr. May 23, 2007 lttr to JSPC Chairpron an SB 94 Coorinator TriWt Group 35 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

52 rvic intn to prvnt commitmnt a long a tho fun wr not for JISP (Juvnil Intniv Srvic Probation) officr for rvic to prvnt commitmnt. Expnitur of FY Fun. Tabl 15 on th following pag how fun xpn by catgory. Thi provi contxt for th gr of chang in xpnitur catgori btwn FY an FY Throughout th yar of bugt cra an thn rcovry thr ha bn iffrntial chang acro th rvic catgori. For xampl, uprviion ha rmain th hight prcnt of xpnitur an rach 50% of xpnitur in FY whn funing wa at th lowt. With incraing funing in FY an FY th proportion of xpnitur for uprviion ha cra o that in FY uprviion wa 44.6%, lowr than in FY whn it wa 45.4%. Scrning an amnt (incluing rik amnt, a wll a aitional n amnt, ca rviw an crn) rmain th con hight proportion of all xpnitur an rlativly paking, ha rmain at about 25% of xpnitur for th pat thr yar. Tratmnt rvic wr thir hight in prcnt of xpnitur an hav hown th oppoit trn a uprviion. That i, with craing funing, th proportion of xpnitur for tratmnt wnt own. Sinc funing ha incra, th proportion of rourc xpn on tratmnt rvic ha incra to th point whr it i highr in FY (11.7%) than in FY (10.1%). Rtorativ rvic an training for clint an famili ar fourth an fifth in prcnt of xpnitur. Th how th am trn a tratmnt rvic xpnitur ovr tim. Rtorativ rvic ar till lowr than thir lvl in FY 02-03, but training ha incra to abov th FY lvl. Expnitur for irct upport compri th lowt rlativ ara of xpn, at 1.4% in FY , about 41% blow that of FY Expnitur for plan aminitration, a a prcnt of total pning cra in FY own to 7.1%, much lowr than th 9.0% lvl of FY or th 9.5% lvl of FY Following Tabl 15, Tabl 16 ummariz for ach juicial itrict th pattrn of xpnitur acro rvic typ. Th pattrn rflct om of th iffrnt approach u acro th itrict. For xampl, vn itrict xpn 59% or highr of thir rourc on uprviion. Tho itrict tn to xpn lowr than avrag rourc on crning, tratmnt an rtorativ rvic. Ovrall, itrict that xpn lowr lvl of thir bugt on uprviion tn to provi highr lvl of crning an amnt, tratmnt rvic, irct upport, or rtorativ rvic. TriWt Group 36 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

53 TriWt Group 37 SB 94 Annual Rport FY Tabl 15. Srvic Catgory Expnitur an Chang from FY 03 to FY 07. Srvic Catgori Suprviion FY Expnitur Prcnt of Total FY Expnitur Prcnt of Total FY Expnitur Prcnt of Total FY Expnitur Prcnt of Total FY Expnitur Prcnt of Total $5,015,765.5 $3,814,877.1 $3,920, $4,161, $4,293, % 46.8% 50.3% 48.3% 44.6% Scrning & $2,612,230.5 $2,120,499.7 $1,959,661.8 $2,161, $2,424, Amnt 23.6% 26.0% 25.2% 25.1% 25.2% Tratmnt $1,120,636.2 $621,743.8 $548, $752, $1,129, % 7.6% 7.0% 8.7% 11.7% Rtorativ $874,056.3 $555,560.6 $418, $554, $713, Srvic 7.9% 6.8% 5.4% 6.4% 7.4% Training Clint $204,803.0 $155,415.5 $102, $159, $238, & Famili 1.9% 1.9% 1.3% 1.8% 2.5% Plan $996,850.3 $773,665.4 $706, $728, $686, Aminitration 9.0% 9.5% 9.1% 8.5% 7.1% Dirct Support $224,424.8 $116,356.9 $132, $100, $131, % 1.4% 1.7% 1.2% 1.4% $11,704,539 $8,717,935 $7,791,533 $8,925,650 $10,146,514 Total % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100% Actual Expnitur Chang FY to FY % -7.20% 1 Th Statwi Total amount rflct th total SB 94 allocation a hown in Tabl 14. FY actual xpnitur total $10,146, % % 16.40% % % %

54 TriWt Group 38 SB 94 Annual Rport FY Tabl 16. FY Prcnt of Bugt Expn by Ditrict an Statwi by Srvic Catgory. Th tabl i rank high to low from top to bottom by uprviion pning proportion. Juicial Ditrict Suprviion Scrning/ Amnt Tratmnt Srvic Rtorativ Srvic Dirct Support Training: Clint & Famili Plan Aminitration 16 th Otro 87.4% 2.5% 2.8% 0.8% 1.3% 5.2% 0.0% 100% 5 th Summit 79.7% 3.7% 4.6% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 11.2% 100% 15 th Prowr 73.1% 3.0% 8.8% 2.9% 2.9% 0.0% 9.2% 100% 6 th La Plata 68.2% 16.3% 7.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.3% 100% 22 n Montzuma 65.3% 24.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.7% 0.0% 4.0% 100% 20 th Boulr 63.0% 12.2% 5.9% 3.7% 2.5% 5.6% 7.1% 100% 17 th Aam 60.4% 22.0% 7.2% 0.7% 0.6% 0.6% 8.5% 100% 10 th Publo 59.0% 16.1% 16.8% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 7.5% 100% 13 th Logan 53.4% 2.5% 34.7% 0.8% 0.2% 0.5% 8.0% 100% 14 th Routt 49.5% 40.5% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.4% 100% 19 th Wl 48.3% 24.0% 12.4% 8.1% 0.2% 0.0% 7.1% 100% 21 t Ma 45.6% 33.4% 5.0% 0.0% 1.5% 0.0% 14.5% 100% 7 th Montro 44.5% 29.0% 12.2% 4.9% 0.0% 0.0% 9.5% 100% 4 th El Pao 44.3% 16.4% 25.9% 0.7% 4.0% 0.9% 7.8% 100% 9 th Garfil 43.1% 42.3% 2.2% 4.0% 0.1% 0.0% 8.4% 100% 3 r Hurfano 42.6% 15.4% 5.9% 1.9% 4.3% 17.9% 12.0% 100% 11 th Frmont 42.1% 15.2% 15.2% 15.6% 4.5% 0.0% 7.5% 100% 2 n Dnvr 40.7% 43.0% 6.0% 0.0% 2.1% 0.7% 7.6% 100% 1 t Jffron 37.6% 26.4% 13.6% 11.4% 2.5% 0.0% 8.5% 100% 8 th Larimr 35.2% 25.9% 30.3% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 8.4% 100% 18 th Arapaho 29.9% 26.4% 3.0% 29.6% 0.0% 9.7% 1.4% 100% 12 th Alamoa 26.2% 40.0% 5.2% 1.8% 9.4% 5.9% 11.5% 100% Statwi Avrag 44.6% 25.2% 11.8% 7.4% 1.4% 2.5% 7.1% 100% Total

55 Local Rourc. In aition to tat fun, many SB 94 Program hav takn th initiativ to acc othr fun or program rvic for SB 94 youth. Th upport ar not fun through th SB 94 Program, but rprnt important local rourc that SB 94 Program can hlp coorinat for youth in th juvnil jutic ytm. Through itrict-pcific approach an coorination with othr youth-rving agnci, SB 94 Program hav continu to try to lvrag aitional rourc to augmnt thir ability to mt th n of youth an accomplih th program goal of rucing rlianc on cur tntion placmnt. Th ovrall gr to which SB 94 Program rport bing uccful in th attmpt vari. Th approach inclu to iffrnt gr acro itrict: Bln fun from on or mor othr community agnci to plac an trat SB 94 youth. Th mchanim for th u of bln fun i oftn an intragncy tam working collaborativly to rviw youth n an ait in mting tho n. Som counti provi local ivrion rourc, vn though Colorao Dpartmnt of Public Safty Divrion fun through th Diviion of Criminal Jutic (DCJ) wr unavailabl bginning in FY bcau of tat bugt cut. DCJ Wrap Aroun Program (WRAP) fun ar u by local, intragncy Community Evaluation Tam (CET) to taff youth ca an intify, rcommn an fun crativ tratgi to ivrt youth from cur tntion or othr out-of-hom placmnt. Thi catgory alo inclu othr imilar grant from othr ourc. Fral Offic of Juvnil Jutic an Dlinquncy Prvntion (OJJDP) Juvnil Accountability Incntiv Block Grant (JAIBG) fun ar alo provi through th DCJ with th avic of th Govrnor Juvnil Jutic an Dlinquncy Prvntion Council. Ditrict act locally to puru th fun that may b u in a varity of way to ncourag accountability-ba rform at th local lvl. All SB 94 Program alo vlop formal an informal collaboration with agnci in thir communiti to har rourc, a bt practic approach promot by th Anni E. Cay Juvnil Dtntion Altrnativ Initiativ (JDAI). 15 Such collaboration may inclu applying with othr agnci for grant uch a JAIBG or WRAP, or rving in an ovright capacity for th fun through othr agnci or program. On of th mot ffctiv mchanim for blning fun or utilizing grant fun i th implmntation of intragncy ca rviw tam, known by a varity of nam uch a Community Evaluation Tam (CET) an Intragncy Staffing Committ (ISC). W rfr to th a Community Evaluation Tam (CET) in th tabl blow. Th tatwi initiativ HB-1451 (Collaborativ Managmnt of Multi-agncy Srvic Provi to Chilrn an Famili) alo upport intragncy collaboration. Thi initiativ i an ffort to vlop a uniform ytm of collaboration which will allow agnci at th tat an local lvl to har rourc, or manag an intgrat th tratmnt an rvic provi to chilrn an famili who bnfit from multi-agncy rvic. Eightn counti from thirtn itrict ar now involv in thi proc, up from ix in FY Som of 15 TriWt Group 39 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

56 th agnci that ar involv in clor working through thi proc inclu: county partmnt of ocial rvic, local juicial itrict (incluing probation rvic), halth partmnt, local chool itrict, community mntal halth cntr, an DYC. Tabl 17 blow how which of th many rourc jut crib that Juicial Ditrict SB 94 Program u. Each itrict ha a y or no in th tabl for ach catgory an th prcnt of all itrict with aitional rourc in ach catgory i hown at th bottom of th tabl for th pat fiv fical yar. Tabl 17. FY SB 94 Local Rourc Ditrict* Community Evaluation Tam Juvnil Divrion WRAP or Similar Grant JAIBG Bln Fun Y/No Y/No Y/No Y/No Y/No 1 t Jffron Y No No No No 2 n Dnvr Y No No No Y 3 r Hurfano Y No No No No 4 th El Pao Y Y No Y Y 5 th Summit Y No No No No 6 th La Plata No No No No No 7 th Montro Y Y Y Y No 8 th Larimr Y Y Y No No 9 th Garfil No No No No No 10 th Publo No No No No No 11 th Frmont Y Y Y No No 12 th Alamoa No No No No No 13 th Logan No No No No No 14 th Routt Y Y No No Y 15 th Prowr Y No No No No 16 th Otro Y No No Y No 17 th Aam Y No No No Y 18 th Arapaho Y No Y Y Y 19 th Wl No No No Y Y 20 th Boulr Y Y Y Y Y 21 t Ma Y No Y No No 22 n Montzuma Y Y No Y No Statwi FY07 16 (72.7%) 7 (31.8%) 6 (27.3%) 7 (31.8%) 7 (31.8%) Statwi FY06 15 (68.2%) 8 (36.4%) 8 (36.4%) 11 (50.0%) 5 (22.7%) Statwi FY05 9 (40.9%) 9 (40.9%) 6 (27.3%) 8 (36.4%) 7 (31.8%) Statwi FY04 15 (68.2%) 4 (18.2%) 3 (13.6%) 11(50.0%) 3 (13.6%) Statwi FY03 19 (86.4%) 14 (63.6%) 10 (45.4%) 13 (59.1%) 9 (40.9%) * Th information in tabl wa provi by itrict in thir FY Ditrict Plan Anum: Fical Yar Prformanc Goal Rourc an Practic Survy. TriWt Group 40 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

57 Th mot commonly u approach to haring rourc ha bn to u an intragncy group, uch a a Community Evaluation Tam (CET) a a mchanim to rviw youth ca, mak rvic rfrral ciion an rcommnation to th bnch, an to intify rourc for rvic. Th numbr of itrict with CET (or an quivalnt group) ha bn taily craing to th point whr only nin itrict (40.9% of rporting itrict) rport having a CET two yar ago (FY ). Thi trn rvr in FY , with 15 itrict (68.2%) rporting a CET an continuing into th mot rcnt fical yar (FY ) with16 itrict (72.7%) rporting having a CET. Thi rprnt an improvmnt in an important approach to collaboration with othr agnci for mor ffctiv u of availabl rourc. Th important function carri out by CET, pcially whn thy inclu mmbr from othr rvic ytm (.g., mntal halth, chil wlfar or ucation), i aociat with bttr coorinat tranition from th juvnil jutic ytm back to th community, an tn to prict poitiv outcom for youth. 16 Juvnil Divrion, WRAP (or imilar grant), JAIBG, an bln fun wr ach availabl for about 30% of th itrict. 16 Fl, Barry C., Juvnil an Criminal Jutic Sytm Rpon to Youth Violnc, in Tonry, M. & Moor, M.H. (E.), Youth Violnc: Crim an Jutic, A Rviw of Rarch, Vol. 24 (Chicago, IL: Univrity of Chicago Pr, 1998), pp TriWt Group 41 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

58 5. Potntial Program Practic Iu Th SB 94 Program ha xprinc many chang ovr th pat fw yar. FY aw a con partial rtoration of funing following bugt cra in th two yar prior to that. FY wa alo th fourth yar with tntion b cap an cap managmnt. Th an rlat factor wr In aition to th ovrarching program iu rlat to managing tntion b cap (tail prviouly in Sction On), othr concrn rat by itrict rlat to rvic availability, th crning proc, youth placmnt, an tntion b allocation. Th apparnt connu acro itrict wa that impact of crning an amnt, a wll a youth placmnt, ar poitiv. Alo, inication ar that rvic availability i having an incraingly poitiv impact on youth an SB 94 Program. Ditrict ar uccfully managing to thir cap, but a majority till bliv that th impact of cap i ngativ. Fwr itrict rport that thir b allocation ar aquat, but thi i not appar to b a a rult of capacity train a wa th ca in FY N for mor tntion continuum rourc wa xpr by vral itrict. clarly th mot ignificant, but othr factor alo appar to hlp upport itrict ffort to continu to rv youth in thi contxt. Thi ction icu aitional iu rport by SB 94 Program uring th lat fical yar. Many of th iu ar rlat to broar tat human rvic program bugt fluctuation in pat yar an tntion cap. Du to th ignificanc of th two ovrarching factor on tntion an largr juvnil jutic ytm opration throughout th tat, it i ifficult to parat thir ffct from th othr factor impacting th itrict. Multipl nvironmntal raliti continu to affct SB 94 program an practic. Thi ction nvrthl attmpt to crib how four important iu hav affct SB 94 Program ovr tim. Th iu icu in thi ction inclu: 1. Srvic Availability 2. Scrning Youth 3. Placmnt of Youth 4. Local Dtntion B Allocation Th ata for thi ction com from two primary ourc. Th firt ourc i ach itrict SB 94 Community-Ba Dtntion Juvnil Srvic Plan ubmitt in March, In th plan, qution about all of th iu wr ar by ach itrict. Th con ourc wa a urvy of ach itrict program that wa inclu a an anum to th plan. In th thr yar prior to 2007, th Prformanc Goal Rourc an Practic Survy (Ditrict Survy) ( Appnix C for a copy) wa complt in Augut of th following fical yar. For th firt tim thi pat yar, with th FY Plan complt in March 2007, th urvy wa complt along with th plan. Thi accomplih two objctiv. Th firt wa to minimiz th burn an incra th TriWt Group 42 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

59 coorination of itrict ffort to collct ata an rviw it with thir planning committ. By complting th urvy in March rathr than Augut, planning committ mmbr coul rviw th planning an urvy ata a a whol an not paratly. Th con objctiv wa to hav th urvy ata availabl for th DYC plan rviw an approval proc. Th itrict urvy complmnt information from itrict plan by aking pcifically about program practic iu an thir prciv impact on ach itrict youth an program. Rlvant ata from itrict plan an urvy rpon ar ummariz blow for ach of th four iu. 1. How Srvic Availability Affct SB 94 Program Practic. A rport in Sction Four of thi rport, SB 94 Program funing incra in FY , an hlp to rtor th ytm ability to provi many typ of n rvic an pcially tratmnt rvic. Rflcting tho quantifiabl incra in rourc, th impact rating rport by itrict for rvic availability alo continu to improv. With xpnitur incraing for rvic for clint an famili, a majority (59.1%) of th itrict rat rvic availability poitivly in FY Thi i a tatitically ignificant improvmnt (t=3.4, f=20, p<.01) ovr th lat two yar, compar with only 19% of itrict rating th impact poitivly in FY ( Tabl 18, Figur 7). Tabl 18. Impact Rating of Srvic Availability: FY Through FY Ditrict Impact Rating FY04 Numbr an Prcnt of Ditrict FY05 Numbr an Prcnt of Ditrict FY06 Numbr an Prcnt of Ditrict FY07 Numbr an Prcnt of Ditrict N % N % N % N % (+2) Strong Poitiv 2 9.1% 2 9.5% % % (+1) Som Poitiv 0 0.0% 2 9.5% % % ( 0 ) Not Poitiv, Not Ngativ 2 9.1% % 2 9.5% % (-1) Som Ngativ % % % % (-2) Strong Ngativ % % 1 4.8% 0 0.0% Miing/Di Not Rat 0 NA 1 NA 1 NA 0 NA Total % % % % Avrag Scor Funing rtoration ovr th lat two yar appar to hav hlp in thi ara. Th aitional funing rtoration in FY houl alo improv itrict prcption of thir ability to acc rvic for th youth thy rv. Prcnt Figur 7. Chang in Srvic Availability Impact Rating FY FY FY FY Ngativ Nutral Poitiv TriWt Group 43 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

60 2. How Iu of Scrning Youth Affct SB 94 Program Practic. In FY , th impact of crning an placing youth wr rat togthr inta of paratly. Sinc thn, itrict hav bn ak to a crning paratly from th proc of placing youth. Tabl 19 how only th impact of crning youth in th lat thr fical yar. Tabl 19 (an Figur 8) how that th poitiv rating of th impact of crning youth hav incra ignificantly (t=2.8, f=20, p<.05) to 90.9% in FY , at a lvl jut lightly highr than FY 06 an up from 52.4%% poitiv rating in FY Tabl 19. Impact Rating of Scrning Youth: FY Through FY Ditrict Impact Rating FY05 Numbr an Prcnt of Ditrict FY06 Numbr an Prcnt of Ditrict FY07 Numbr an Prcnt of Ditrict N % N % N % (+2) Strong Poitiv % % % (+1) Som Poitiv % % % ( 0 ) Not Poitiv, Not Ngativ % % 2 9.1% (-1) Som Ngativ % % 0 0.0% (-2) Strong Ngativ 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% Miing/Di Not Rat 1 NA 1 NA 0 NA Total % % % Avrag Scor Th itinction ma by th crning an placmnt rating iffrnc ovr Figur 8. Chang in Scrning Youth Impact Rating th pat thr yar upport th concluion that itrict concrn in thi ara primarily rlat to th limitation in th ability of th crning proc to tranlat into actual placmnt 50 ciion, givn rlativ availability of 40 placmnt an rvic along th tntion continuum. Th improvmnt in impact rating follow th cra 0 Ngativ Nutral Poitiv in ADP an th continu incra in funing ovr th pat two yar that ha rult in mor rvic availability a hown by th incra xpnitur for rvic. Prcnt FY FY FY How Iu of Placing Youth Affct SB 94 Program Practic. Along with th crning impact rating, for th pat thr yar itrict hav bn ak to rat th proc of placing youth inpnntly. Thrfor Tabl 20 how only th impact rating for placing youth from th lat thr fical yar, ocumnting that th poitiv rating of th impact of placing youth ha incra ignificantly (t=4.3, f=20, p<.01) to TriWt Group 44 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

61 77.3% in FY , up from 19% poitiv rating in FY an an improvmnt ovr FY (up from 68.1%). Thi i alo hown in Figur 9. Tabl 20. Impact Rating of Placing Youth: FY Through FY Ditrict Impact Rating FY04 Numbr an Prcnt of Ditrict FY05 Numbr an Prcnt of Ditrict FY06 Numbr an Prcnt of Ditrict N % N % N % (+2) Strong Poitiv 2 9.5% % % (+1) Som Poitiv 2 9.5% % % ( 0 ) Not Poitiv, Not Ngativ % % 1 4.5% (-1) Som Ngativ % % % (-2) Strong Ngativ % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Miing/Di Not Rat 1 NA 0 NA 0 NA Total % % % Avrag Scor Chang in crning an placmnt rating upport th concluion that itrict prcption in thi ara ar changing along with tho rlat to itrict ability to tranlat crning rcommnation into actual placmnt ciion. Th improvmnt in impact rating follow th incra in funing ovr th pat two yar that ha rult in mor rvic availability a hown by th incra xpnitur for rvic. Prcnt Figur 9. Chang in Placing Youth Impact Rating Ngativ Nutral Poitiv 77.3 FY FY FY How Local Dtntion B Allocation Affct SB 94 Program Practic. Rating of th impact of b allocation hav rmain on avrag omwhat ngativ a vinc by th avrag rating for FY of A hown in Tabl 21 an Figur 10 blow, it appar that th ovrall chang in FY rprnt a light hift towar mor xtrm rating in both irction. Howvr, in FY , vn though th majority of rating ar ngativ (59.1%), th rating ar l xtrm with ovr 80% of th rating in th om ngativ to om poitiv catgori. Givn that itrict ar rating a manat that many prciv limit thir ability to o a thy wih, a high numbr of poitiv rating by itrict may b an unralitic xpctation. TriWt Group 45 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

62 Tabl 21. Impact Rating of Local Dtntion B Allocation: FY Through FY Ditrict Impact Rating FY04 Numbr an Prcnt of Ditrict FY05 Numbr an Prcnt of Ditrict FY06 Numbr an Prcnt of Ditrict FY07 Numbr an Prcnt of Ditrict N % N % N % N % (+2) Strong Poitiv 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 1 4.5% (+1) Som Poitiv % % % % ( 0 ) Not Poitiv, Not Ngativ % % 1 4.5% % (-1) Som Ngativ % % % % (-2) Strong Ngativ % % % % Miing/Di Not Rat 1 NA 1 NA 0 NA 0 NA Total % % % % Avrag Scor Figur 11 how th numbr of itrict planning committ rating thir b allocation a aquat to hav cra in FY to 57.1%, about whr it wa in FY Chang ovr tim in aquacy rating hav not bn tatitically ignificant. Prcnt Figur 10. Local B Allocation Impact Rating 4.5 Th corrlation btwn rating 0 of allocation aquacy an Ngativ Nutral Poitiv allocation impact wa ignificant at r=.49 (f=21, p<05). Howvr, of th 12 itrict planning committ Figur 11. Local B Allocation Aquacy who rat b allocation a aquat, only fiv (42%) rat th impact a poitiv, with four (58%) rating it a 70 ngativ. Concrn xpr in th pat hav focu on prioritizing cur tntion to th trimnt of th 30 tntion continuum. In particular, om itrict cit th lack of availabl community placmnt an rvic, No Y pcially for youth rla on hort notic bfor aquat rvic can b arrang. Thi may chang with th aitional rourc in FY an th mphai on improving th tntion continuum, a icu in Sction Four. Prcnt FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY In FY , DYC urvy a wi rang of SB 94 takholr about managing b TriWt Group 46 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

63 u unr th tntion cap. 17 Whn ak to rpon to th tatmnt my Juicial Ditrict ha a ufficint numbr of cur tntion b, th avrag iniviual rpon wa iagr. Whil th iniviual takholr urvy by DYC appar to prciv thir cur tntion rourc to b inaquat, whn ak to conir th qution a an ntir planning committ uing th format crib abov for thi valuation, mot itrict (57%, a icu abov) rport thir rourc to b aquat. Th cau of thi icrpancy i not clar, though it appar that th group rviw proc of th planning committ la to mor favorabl group jugmnt. B allocation aquacy ha bn rlat with capacity train in th pat, maur a ay at or abov 90% of capacity. Tabl 22 how ay at or abov 90% capacity for FY through FY Th tabl how th avrag of th 22 itrict at th bottom. On avrag, itrict wr ignificantly highr in FY an FY than in th two prior yar in ay at or abov 90% capacity (t>3.2, f=21, p<.05). Th cra from FY 06 to FY 07 i not rach tatitical ignificanc (t=1.2, f=21, p>.05). Tabl 22. Ditrict Prcnt of Day at or Abov Ninty (90) Prcnt Capacity Ditrict Prcnt of Day At or Abov 90% Capacity FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 1 t Jffron 35.0% 31.0% 66.8% 57.5% 2 n Dnvr 32.5% 65.5% 72.6% 63.6% 3 r Hurfano 99.6% 65.2% 98.6% 80.0% 4 th El Pao 31.8% 31.0% 50.1% 23.6% 5 th Summit 16.4% 22.7% 52.9% 42.7% 6 th La Plata 45.1% 24.9% 58.4% 64.7% 7 th Montro 69.7% 39.7% 45.2% 73.2% 8 th Larimr 56.9% 71.0% 68.5% 72.1% 9 th Garfil 41.6% 18.9% 54.2% 32.6% 10 th Publo 24.8% 33.4% 49.9% 28.8% 11 th Frmont 40.5% 79.7% 82.2% 47.7% 12 th Alamoa 6.90% 48.5% 29.9% 40.0% 13 th Logan 32.1% 57.5% 66.3% 69.9% 14 th Routt 27.4% 24.9% 78.1% % 15 th Prowr 78.1% 54.8% 67.9% % 16 th Otro 27.4% 8.2% 67.2% 63.8% 17 th Aam 17.9% 54.0% 62.2% 56.4% 18 th Arapaho 23.4% 39.7% 80.8% 77.8% 19 th Wl 60.9% 86.3% 95.6% 89.0% 20 th Boulr.7% 14.0% 56.4% 46.0% 21 t Ma 59.5% 61.9% 52.3% 58.4% 22 n Montzuma 66.8% 72.6% 98.1% 85.2% Ditrict Avrag 40.7% 45.7% 66.1% 62.0% 1 Significantly highr (28.5) than th 62% itrict avrag. 17 SB91-94 Stakholr Survy: Managing th Dtntion Cap, Diviion of Youth Corrction. TriWt Group 47 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

64 Lat yar (FY ), a vry triking fining wa foun in th rlationhip btwn itrict rating thir b allocation a inaquat an ay at or abov 90% capacity. Thr wa an invr corrlation btwn aquacy of th allocation an ay at or abov 90% capacity wa (p<.01). Thi corrlation inicat that th mor likly a itrict wa to rat thir allocation a aquat, th l likly thy wr to hav a high prcnt of ay at or abov 90% of thir b allocation. In FY th corrlation btwn aquacy an ay at or abov 90% capacity wa not tatitically ignificant (-.41, p>.05). Thi inicat that, vn though fwr itrict rat thir allocation a aquat (57% compar to 71.4% in FY 06) it wa not ncarily bcau of capacity train, which cra omwhat ovrall in th lat yar. 5. Rla from tntion an borrowing an loaning b. On of th primary tratgi for managing tntion b u i th ongoing rviw of ca an th prparation to rla youth a oon a poibl from cur tntion. Ditrict rport that thi proc ha incra th taff tim rquir to manag b, omtim rportly tracting from thir ability to arrang for rvic for th youth. Howvr, it i alo clar from itrict that thi proc ha nabl thm to mor fficintly u th tntion b availabl. Although uch rla that occur prior to whn itrict might othrwi hav rla a youth in th abnc of a b cap ar omtim rfrr to a mrgncy rla, th mrgncy connotation i rally not accurat in that itrict rgularly a youth in tntion to trmin which youth coul b rla a thir tatu an th ovrall n for tntion vari ovr tim. Ditrict wr ak in th urvy how much planning tim thy typically ha to prpar to rla a youth. Ditrict rpon inicat that thr wr varying gr of typical planning tim for rla. Uually ach itrict rport having a conitnt amount of tim to prpar for rla. From th ata blow, it i apparnt that mor itrict ar rporting having l tim in th FY to prpar for rla than in FY Th rang of typical planning tim rport wa a follow: L than 24 hour notic FY : 10 itrict (45%); FY : 7 itrict (32%) 25 to 72 hour FY : 5 itrict (23%); FY : 6 itrict (27%) 73 hour to on wk FY : 2 itrict (9%), am a FY Mor than on wk FY : 2 itrict (9%), am a FY Varying gr of notic btwn 24 hour an on wk FY : 3 itrict (14%); FY : 5 itrict (23%) Howvr, uch rla ar not a common occurrnc u to th ilignc of SB 94 taff an rprntativ from involv ytm who participat in th ciion proc. For FY , th numbr of rla rport by itrict a mrgncy in th itrict urvy total about 414. Thi man that, of th 9,051youth that wr tain in cur TriWt Group 48 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

65 or taff cur tntion, only 4.6% (414 of 9,051) wr rla prior to thir othrwi chul rla. Howvr, th numbr of arly rla rport may not rprnt an accurat timat of th actual numbr bcau thr i no tanar rporting mchanim for rla othr than th pat two itrict urvy. It m that itrict hav a common unrtaning for what contitut an mrgncy rla. W rcommn that a tanariz finition for mrgncy rla b vlop an that th numbr of youth who ar rla through th mrgncy rla proc b mor formally track. In th itrict urvy rponnt wr ak: In th firt ix month (July Dcmbr 2006) of th fical yar, how many tim i your itrict rla youth arlir than woul hav othrwi bn th ca) in orr to comply with your b allocation? Thi rult in numbr for th firt ix month of FY To arriv at th 414 timat for th full fical yar, itrict numbr wr projct out by oubling thm. Evn though uch rla ar low occurrnc vnt, thy nvrthl po th potntial for riou ral an prciv ffct in a community. A a rult, it may alo b uful to xamin iniviual ca that ar rla mor cloly in orr to trmin th actual rik ntail in rlaing iniviual youth. In aition, bcau of th concrn for public afty xpr by many itrict, DYC houl conir collcting rciivim ata pcifically for rla youth ovr tim to trmin whthr or not itrict xpr concrn about public afty rik ar warrant. W alo rcommn that th numbr of b borrow b formally track. Mot itrict alray rport th numbr of youth mrgncy rla, but o not track th numbr of b borrow. Ditrict wr abl to rport in th urvy whthr thy wr abl to borrow b whn n mot of th tim, om of th tim or Infrquntly or Non of th Tim. Svntn (17) itrict (77%) rport thy coul borrow b whn n mot of th tim. Anothr four (4) or 18% inicat thy coul borrow om of th tim. Ditrict rating inicat that 68% (15) coul loan b mot of th tim whn n an anothr 18% (4) coul loan b om of th tim. Sinc tranportation m to b on of th mot cit barrir for rlaing a youth or borrowing b, itrict wr alo ak thi yar to rat th gr to which thi wa a barrir. Two itrict (9%) rat thi a a problm mot of th tim. Tn itrict (45%) inicat tranportation wa a problm om of th tim. Tranportation can bcom a problm whn factor xit uch a itanc to or btwn tntion faciliti, gography/wathr, tim man on law nforcmnt, an whn th loaning itrict n a b back, or whn thr ar juicial orr to not rla om youth. TriWt Group 49 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

66 Concluion an Rcommnation Th SB 94 Program tatwi, a wll a th iniviual juicial itrict that compri th program, continu to xprinc th influnc of two ignificant ytm chang that at back to FY Th firt wa th ongoing implmntation of tntion b cap. Th con ha bn th multi-yar bugt fluctuation that bgan a ruction in FY , wr furthr ruc in FY , an wr partially rvr in FY an FY to hlp rtor th ytm ability to provi tratmnt rvic, rtorativ rvic, an youth an family training. Th incra in allocation for FY will bring Juicial Ditrict SB 94 funing back to about 2% abov FY lvl (not ajut for any Cot of Living Incra mi uring tho yar) an houl continu to hlp rbuil SB 94 Program ability to mot ffctivly rv youth. Th Diviion of Youth Corrction an th SB 94 Program hav continu to vlop an provi a continuum of tntion option within thi contxt. Although SB 94 Program hav not focu pcifically on committ youth, for th lat two yar commitmnt ADP ha cra. Thi poitiv vlopmnt corrlat with incra ffort an flxibility in vloping DYC continuum of car for commitmnt, an i tail in a parat valuation rport. Th mall ruction in tntion ADP xprinc thi yar continu thi ownwar trn in rtrictiv confinmnt. DYC ha continu to oprat uccfully within th tntion b cap. At th local lvl, howvr, on of th mot important challng not in lat yar valuation rport wa ignificant vinc of incra capacity train acro all tntion faciliti an juicial itrict in th tat,. In FY thr wr om poitiv inication that train might b craing, pcially in om faciliti an itrict. Howvr, pit tatwi improvmnt in ay at or abov 90% of capacity, it continu to b a concrn for om itrict. Whil th tatwi b cap of 479 wa nvr xc on any ay in FY , on all but thr ay on or mor faciliti xprinc high capacity train (fin a b occupancy of 90% or highr). On any givn ay th ytm avrag about fiv (42%) faciliti at or abov 90% capacity. Whn utilization i at or abov 90% within faciliti, th train i gratr on all of th itrict uing thm, rgarl of which itrict contribut mot to th train. Fwr availabl tntion b rquir mor planning on th part of itrict for th poibility that youth may n to b rla arlir than thy woul hav bn ha pac bn availabl. It alo rquir mor aminitrativ taff tim to coorinat acro itrict to borrow b whn n an coorinat u ovrall. Acro th an othr multipl factor, whn facility u xc 90%, iproportionat lvl of itrict juvnil jutic ytm rourc ar train. Thrfor, ay at or abov 90% capacity rv a a bnchmark for capacity train acro faciliti. Statwi, ay at or abov 90% of capacity narly tripl from 21.9% in FY to 65.5% in FY In FY ay at or abov 90% rcovr omwhat, craing to 41.1%. Thi i a poitiv chang for tntion b u. Howvr, th mot ffctiv lvl of tntion b u till rmain to b intifi. TriWt Group 50 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

67 Capacity train vlop through th intraction of a numbr of factor rlat to ffort to mot ffctivly utiliz limit rourc acro th continuum of placmnt from cur an taff cur tntion rourc to community ba. Capacity train pn in larg part on th availability of rourc that inclu tntion continuum placmnt an rvic rourc, community-ba taff or program rourc, an rourc from othr agnci. Anothr factor of capacity train inclu th polici, prcption an practic of all agnci who work with youth a thy influnc th ciion that ar ma about rfrral, crning, placmnt, an rvic. Th following two trn rflct th factor. Firt, th u of cur tntion ha continu to b th mot likly ciion for youth whn community-ba tntion continuum rourc ar lacking. Howvr, th con hight crning rcommnation i for youth to go hom with rvic (14.0% of youth). Only about a thir of th youth (36%) actually go hom with rvic a an initial placmnt, with about 31% plac in mor rtrictiv tting an anothr 31% imply rla u to th unavailability of n rvic. Thi placmnt pattrn uggt that th communityba n of th tntion continuum i not yt aquat to rv all youth crn a abl to go hom with rvic. In aition, youth who ar crn to taff cur placmnt ar plac in cur tntion ovr 78% of th tim u to a lack of th rourc. Th introuction of mor rfin rik amnt crning (th Colorao Juvnil Rik Amnt or CJRA, HB-1161) within th SB 94 Program may hlp DYC vlop th capacity to bttr intify tho youth abl to bnfit from rla to hom an bttr match thm with availabl rvic. Scon, thr hav alo bn poitiv vlopmnt ovr th lat coupl of yar. On of th mot important ha involv incra in intragncy collaboration. Th mot commonly u approach to haring rourc ha bn to u an intragncy group uch a a Community Evaluation Tam (CET) a a mchanim to rviw youth ca, to mak rvic rfrral ciion an rcommnation to th bnch, an to intify rourc for rvic. Aftr craing in FY , th prcnt of itrict with CET ha bn incraing for th pat two yar. In FY , 17 itrict (72.7%) rport having a CET. Thi i a continu improvmnt in an important approach to collaboration with othr agnci for mor ffctiv u of availabl rourc. Th tatwi initiativ HB-1451 (Collaborativ Managmnt of Multi-agncy Srvic Provi to Chilrn an Famili) alo upport intragncy collaboration. Eightn counti from thirtn itrict ar now involv in thi proc, up from ix in FY DYC an local SB 94 Program hav continu to rfin program practic, to improv th tntion continuum an manag b allocation, an to provi broar opportuniti for continu program improvmnt. With partial rtoration of pat ruction in SB 94 funing, ffort ar bing ma to ar rvic gap that will upport th continu ucc of th SB 94 Program ovr tim, a vinc by th incra in xpnitur for tratmnt option ovr th lat yar. To continu to upport vlopmnt an u of th TriWt Group 51 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

68 tntion continuum, th rcommnation blow ar offr for th SB 94 Program in FY an byon. 1. Monitor inicator of train to trmin if incra tntion or community-ba capacity, or aitional ajutmnt, ar n. Th primary inicator of ytm train currntly track i ay at or ovr 90% capacity. Although, it m from thi inicator that ytm train i bginning to tabiliz, attntion to b u inicator rmain important. Som of thi improvmnt may tm from fwr ovrall tntion crning, rathr than imply improv u of th tntion continuum. Although funing i incraing, youthrving rourc ar till in th proc of rcovry within th juvnil jutic ytm an th broar ytm of car for youth in n (incluing chil wlfar, chool, an mntal halth rvic). DYC ha ma ajutmnt in facility an itrict cap, primarily in th Southrn Rgion which hav hlp tho itrict. High lvl of train on tntion b capacity in multipl itrict till mrit aitional attntion to trmin if aitional flxibility in rourc managmnt or th itrict may b n or if othr ffort to ruc train can b implmnt (uch a mor invtmnt in community-ba rvic to allow youth to b uccfully plac at hom with rvic). 2. Improv monitoring of rla from tntion that rult from b cap. Diffrnc in monitoring practic acro itrict obcur maurmnt of th tru rat at which youth ar bing rla from tntion u to b cap limitation, omtim bfor ytm takholr woul othrwi hav trmin that thy wr ray for rla. Whil th rat of thi typ of rla i rlativly mall (timat a occurring for l than 5% of all youth tain), w rcommn that DYC vlop tanar finition an rporting rquirmnt to monitor th numbr of b borrow an youth rla that tm from complianc with a itrict-lvl cap. 3. Furthr improv th rporting of itrict-pcific prformanc outcom ata. For th thir yar in a row inc th SB 94 Program incption, DYC wa abl thi yar to rport on itrict prformanc rgaring tanariz goal. Now that DYC ha tanariz goal ara for rporting, critria for atifactory prformanc in ach goal ara houl b conir. Ovr th pat coupl yar DYC ha work with Ditrict to t thir critria for uccful prformanc to ncourag both high lvl of prformanc an ucc whil taking into coniration itrict-pcific circumtanc. Thi ha rult in attainabl objctiv an high prformanc, although prformanc xpctation for poitiv or nutral icharg raon may till b unralitic for om itrict. It appar that thi proc i working an that Ditrict ar gnrally making goo ciion about whr to t thir objctiv. Th on objctiv that n improvmnt i th thir objctiv: poitiv or nutral lav raon. Multipl ngativ lav raon mak thi objctiv th mot ifficult to achiv a it currntly i fin. For xampl, th ngativ lav raon inclu both FTA an Nw Charg which ar covr by th firt two objctiv, o thi objctiv oubl count challng ocumnt in th firt two objctiv, an thrfor houl not b t a high. In TriWt Group 52 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

69 aition, poibl ngativ lav raon ar myria, incluing commitmnt, noncomplianc on th part of th youth or family, an rfual of rvic or nonparticipation in rvic. Succ on thi objctiv i clarly mor ifficult to obtain. W rcommn DYC conir ithr a lowr prformanc objctiv or rvi th lav raon that ar inclu in th inicator. 4. Proviing aquat rvic for youth rla to hom. A in pat yar, only about on-thir (36%) of th 1,634 youth intifi through th JDSAG a abl to b plac at hom with rvic in fact rciv uch upport. Slightly l than on-thir (31%) ar rla to hom without rvic an th rmainr (31%) inta go to cur or taff cur tntion. Implmntation of th CJRA ovr th nxt yar houl allow for mor rfin amnt of youth n an protctiv factor an may b u to rfin timat of both th numbr of youth who truly ar bt rv through a rla to hom with rvic an to pcify mor clarly th typ of rvic that may b n to upport uch rla. Such information may hlp DYC prioritiz futur rourc allocation to improv th rponivn an capacity of th tntion continuum. TriWt Group 53 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

70 TriWt Group 54 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

71 Appnic Appnix A. Dtntion B U Appnix B Prformanc Goal Rourc an Practic Survy Appnix C. Map of Dtntion B Allocation by DYC Rgion TriWt Group 55 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

72 TriWt Group 56 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

73 Appnix A Scur an Staff Scur Dtntion B U Daily tntion maximum b u an avrag aily population ar hown in thi appnix. A graph i inclu for ach juicial itrict an tntion facility for fical yar Th graph ar organiz by DYC rgional catchmnt ara with a ummary tabl at th bginning of ach ction. Th tatwi b u graph an u inicator ar hown hr. Statwi B & U Inicator FY B U Inicator ADP A % Day At / Cap 90% ADP % of Cap Abov 90% % 41.1% B U Day Statwi Dtntion - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun B Cap 479 ADP % TriWt Group 57 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

74 Cntral Rgion Cntral Rgion B U for FY (July 2006 Through Jun 2007): Rgion, Ditrict an Faciliti. Inicator inclu avrag aily population (ADP), ADP a a prcnt of cap (avrag u), an prcnt of ay at or abov 90% of cap. Rgional ADP figur may iffr from th um of th itrict or faciliti u to rouning rror an/or ADP that wa not aignabl to a pcific itrict. Th 90% thrhol for ach rgion an itrict wa chon o that it woul b at lat 1 b blow th cap an o that it woul b a clo to 90% a poibl. B & U Inicator FY Cntral Rgion: B U Inicator Ditrict & Faciliti ADP A % Day At / Cap 90% ADP % of Cap Abov 90% 1 t Jffron % 57.5% 2 n Dnvr % 63.6% 5 th Summit % 42.7% 18 th Arapaho % 77.8% Cntral Rgion % 58.1% Gilliam YSC % 60.3% Marvin Foot YSC % 74.0% Mount Viw YSC % 44.7% 65 1t Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 56 ADP % 25 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun TriWt Group 58 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

75 B U Day 2n Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun B Cap 91 ADP % 9 8 5th Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 5 ADP % 0 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun TriWt Group 59 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

76 85 18th Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 74 ADP % 50 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun 80 Gilliam Youth Srvic Cntr - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 70 ADP % 40 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun TriWt Group 60 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

77 105 Marvin Foot Youth Srvic Cntr - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 96 ADP % 60 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun 70 Mount Viw Youth Srvic Cntr - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 60 ADP % 30 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun TriWt Group 61 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

78 245 Cntral Rgion - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 226 ADP % 145 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun TriWt Group 62 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

79 Northat Rgion Northat Rgion B U for FY (July 2006 Through Jun 2007): Rgion, Ditrict an Faciliti. Inicator inclu avrag aily population (ADP), ADP a a prcnt of cap (avrag u), an prcnt of ay at or abov 90% of cap. Rgional ADP figur may iffr from th um of th itrict or faciliti u to rouning rror an/or ADP that wa not aignabl to a pcific itrict. Th 90% thrhol for ach rgion an itrict wa chon o that it woul b at lat 1 b blow th cap an o that it woul b a clo to 90% a poibl. B & U Inicator FY Northat Rgion: B U Inicator Ditrict & Faciliti ADP A % Day At / Cap 90% ADP % of Cap Abov 90% 8 th Larimr % 72.1% 13 th Logan % 69.9% 17 th Aam % 56.4% 19 th Wl % 89.0% 20 th Boulr % 46.0% Northat Rgion % 66.0% Aam YSC % 62.5% Platt Vally YSC % 86.0% Rmington Hou % 42.5% 8th Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun B U B Cap 20 ADP % 6 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun TriWt Group 63 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

80 14 13th Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 8 ADP % 0 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun 17th Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun B U B Cap 33 ADP % 14 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun TriWt Group 64 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

81 40 19th Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U ADP % B Cap Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun 20th Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun B U B Cap 21 ADP % 4 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun TriWt Group 65 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

82 Aam Youth Srvic Cntr - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 29 ADP % 12 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun 80 Platt Vally YSC - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 69 ADP % 45 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun TriWt Group 66 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

83 12 Miway-Rmington - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 9 ADP % 0 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun 120 Northat Rgion - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 107 ADP % 70 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun TriWt Group 67 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

84 Wtrn Rgion Wtrn Rgion B U for FY (July 2006 Through Jun 2007): Rgion, Ditrict an Faciliti. Inicator inclu avrag aily population (ADP), ADP a a prcnt of cap (avrag u), an prcnt of ay at or abov 90% of cap. Rgional ADP figur may iffr from th um of th itrict or faciliti u to rouning rror an/or ADP that wa not aignabl to a pcific itrict. Th 90% thrhol for ach rgion an itrict wa chon o that it woul b at lat 1 b blow th cap an o that it woul b a clo to 90% a poibl. B & U Inicator FY Wtrn Rgion: B U Inicator Ditrict & Faciliti ADP A % Day At / Cap 90% ADP % of Cap Abov 90% 6 th La Plata % 64.7% 7 th Montro % 73.2% 9 th Garfil % 32.6% 14 th Routt % 91.2% 21 t Ma % 58.4% 22 n Montzuma % 85.2% Wtrn Rgion % 40.8% Gran Ma YSC % 52.3% Robrt Dnir YSC % 58.9% Othr Staff Scur % 55.6% 10 6th Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 6 ADP % 0 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun TriWt Group 68 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

85 7th Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 6 ADP % 0 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun 9th Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 6 ADP % 0 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun TriWt Group 69 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

86 9 14th Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 4 ADP % 0 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun B U Day 21t Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun B Cap 15 ADP % TriWt Group 70 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

87 8 22th Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 3 ADP % 0 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun 30 Gran Ma Youth Srvic Cntr - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 24 ADP % 10 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun TriWt Group 71 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

88 Robrt Dnir - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun B U B Cap 9 ADP % 0 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun 10 Robrt Brown, Emily Griffith & Hilltop - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 7 ADP % 0 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun TriWt Group 72 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

89 47 Wtrn Rgion - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 40 ADP % 17 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun TriWt Group 73 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

90 Southrn Rgion Southrn Rgion B U for FY (July 2006 Through Jun 2007): Rgion, Ditrict an Faciliti. Inicator inclu avrag aily population (ADP), ADP a a prcnt of cap (avrag u), an prcnt of ay at or abov 90% of cap. Rgional ADP figur may iffr from th um of th itrict or faciliti u to rouning rror an/or ADP that wa not aignabl to a pcific itrict. Th 90% thrhol for ach rgion an itrict wa chon o that it woul b at lat 1 b blow th cap an o that it woul b a clo to 90% a poibl. B & U Inicator FY Southrn Rgion: B U Inicator Ditrict & Faciliti ADP A % Day At / Cap 90% ADP % of Cap Abov 90% 3 r La Anima % 80.0% 4 th El Pao % 23.6% 10 th Publo % 28.8% 11 th Frmont % 47.7% 12 th Alamoa % 40.0% 15 th Prowr % 98.9% 16 th Otro % 63.8% Southrn Rgion % 17.3% Publo YSC % 18.9% Spring Crk YSC % 37.0% Staff Scur % 45.5% 9 3r Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun B U B Cap 3 ADP % 0 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun TriWt Group 74 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

91 70 4th Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 58 ADP % 20 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun 10th Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun B U B Cap 24 ADP % 10 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun TriWt Group 75 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

92 18 11th Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 9 ADP % 0 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun 10 12th Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 6 ADP % 0 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun TriWt Group 76 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

93 8 15th Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U ADP % B Cap Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun 8 16th Juicial Ditrict - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 4 ADP % 0 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun TriWt Group 77 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

94 50 Publo Youth Srvic Cntr - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 42 ADP % 15 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun 70 Spring Crk Youth Srvic Cntr - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun 2007 B U B Cap 58 ADP % 25 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun TriWt Group 78 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

95 Youthtrack & Prowr Youth Cntr - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun B U B Cap 6 ADP % 0 Day July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun B U Day Southrn Rgion - Maximum B U Pr Day July Jun July Aug Spt Oct Nov Dc Jan Fb Mar Apr May Jun B Cap 106 ADP % TriWt Group 79 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

96 TriWt Group 80 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

97 Appnix B Fical Yar Prformanc Goal Rourc an Practic Survy About th Survy Th Prformanc Goal Rourc an Practic Survy wa vlop by TriWt Group, in collaboration with DYC, a an anum to th SB94 Plan to collct ata in thr main ara for th firt ix month (July Dcmbr 2006) of th fical yar. Each of th ara i ummariz blow. Sinc th urvy wa an anum to ach itrict plan, urvy wr u with th plan in March in Rourc. Thi ction ak about othr ourc of rourc availabl an how thy hav impact th program, a wll a placmnt an rourc capacity. 2. SB 94 Program in th pat yar. Thi ction ak a ri of qution about th SB 94 program in th pat yar, how it ha chang an it ovrall impact. 3. Practic/policy iu. In thi ction you ar ak to rat an xplain th impact of practic/policy iu on your SB 94 program an th youth rv by your program. 1. Rourc Pla anwr th following rourc qution. A ction capturing rating of placmnt rourc capacity i on th following pag. Pla inicat which of th following wr u by your SB94 program in th firt ix month of FY Rourc or Collaboration from Non-SB 94 Sourc Bln Fun WRAP Divrion JAIBG Community Evaluation Tam (may b unr anothr nam) for intragncy ca rviw, planning an placmnt Othr Grant: Othr: Nam: U in FY ? Chck On Y or No Y or No Y or No Y or No Y or No Y or No Commnt How hav rourc from othr ourc bn u, an how i thir u affct your SB 94 program in FY ? TriWt Group 81 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

98 Rourc Continu. Placmnt Rourc Capacity. For ach ction blow, pla rat your ovrall program capacity (ability to plac youth in ach lvl) in FY an chang in capacity btwn FY an FY For ach rating, pla chck th numbr abov th capacity an chang cription. Scur Dtntion What wa it capacity for FY ovrall? How i capacity chang btwn FY06 an FY07? Commnt: Staff Scur Dtntion What wa it capacity for FY ovrall? How i capacity chang btwn FY06 an FY076? Commnt: Rintial/Shltr Srvic What wa it capacity for FY ovrall? How i capacity chang btwn FY06 an FY07? Commnt: Hom Dtntion / Srvic What wa it capacity for FY ovrall? How i capacity chang btwn FY06 an FY07? Commnt: Som, but Significant Aquat Exc Non much l than amount, but not Capacity Capacity n nough Dcra gratly Dcra omwhat Littl or no chang Incra omwhat Incra gratly Som, but Significant Aquat Exc Non much l than amount, but not Capacity Capacity n nough Dcra gratly Dcra omwhat Littl or no chang Incra omwhat Incra gratly Som, but Significant Aquat Exc Non much l than amount, but not Capacity Capacity n nough Dcra gratly Dcra omwhat Littl or no chang Incra omwhat Incra gratly Som, but Significant Aquat Exc Non much l than amount, but not Capacity Capacity n nough Dcra gratly Dcra omwhat Littl or no chang Incra omwhat Incra gratly TriWt Group 82 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

99 2. SB 94 Program Pla anwr th following program qution for FY In FY , ha thr bn any chang in intragncy collaboration? Y No If y, pla xplain. 2. How ha your SB 94 program ovrall impact bn for youth in th tntion continuum in th firt ix month (July Dcmbr 2006) of th fical yar? (chck on) Strong Poitiv Impact Som Poitiv Impact Nithr Poitiv or Ngativ Pla xplain your rating an not any inting JSPC viw. Som Ngativ Impact Strong Ngativ Impact 3. In th firt ix month (July Dcmbr 2006) of th fical yar, how many tim i your itrict rla youth arlir than woul hav othrwi bn th ca) in orr to comply with your b allocation? How much planning tim i your itrict hav to rla youth in orr to rmain in complianc with your cap? Planning tim houl inclu both proactiv planning tim bfor intification of th youth for arly/mrgncy rla an tim following intification. If you i not track uch rla with ufficint tail to pcify tim availabl to plan, pla mak timat of th prcntag of total rla that fall into ach of th four tim rang blow. Pla fill in th prcntag on th lin to th lft of ach planning tim prio. L than 24 hr hr 73 hr to 1 wk Mor than 1 wk Wr th abov numbr actual or timat? Actual Etimat Pla alo anwr th following four qution rlat to thi iu (chck th appropriat column if not applicabl, pla writ in N/A ): Hav you bn abl to borrow b whn n? Hav you bn abl to loan b whn rqut? Ha tranportation bn a barrir to obtaining n b? If thr wr othr barrir, what wr thy? Pla xplain. Mot or All of th Tim Som of th Tim Infrquntly or Non of th Tim TriWt Group 83 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

100 4. How ha your SB 94 program ovrall impact th u of commitmnt in th firt ix month (July Dcmbr 2006) of th fical yar, vn though SB 94 i not pcifically targt commitmnt ADP? (chck on) Strong Poitiv Impact Som Poitiv Impact Nithr Poitiv or Ngativ Pla xplain your rating an not any inting JSPC viw. Som Ngativ Impact Strong Ngativ Impact 3. Practic/Policy Iu - Th following practic/policy iu hav bn cntral to th proc of crning an placing youth, managing th tntion continuum, an proviing rvic. Pla rat th impact ach ha on your SB 94 program an th youth rv by your program. U th following cal to catgoriz th impact an brifly xplain an impact rating that rflct th ovrall prpctiv of your JSPC. Impact Rating Scal Strong Poitiv Impact Som Poitiv Impact Nithr Poitiv or Ngativ Som Ngativ Impact Strong Ngativ Impact If othr practic/policy iu not lit hr wr alo rlvant, pla (1) writ ach in a box at th n; (2) provi a brif xplanation of th iu an how it will affct your SB 94 program; an (3) rat it impact. Scrning Youth - Impact Rating. Pla rat th impact of crning youth on your SB 94 program an th youth rv by circling on of th numbr on th cal blow or putting an X in th box to th right of th numbr. Whn making thi rating, pla conir th apct of crning youth prnt in your FY05-06 plan, a wll a othr rlvant program information. Pla xplain your rating in th ara blow th rating cal Strong Poitiv Impact Som Poitiv Impact Nithr Poitiv nor Ngativ Som Ngativ Impact Strong Ngativ Impact Pla xplain your rating an not any inting JSPC viw. TriWt Group 84 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

101 Placing Youth - Impact Rating. Pla rat th impact of placing youth on your SB 94 program an th youth rv by circling on of th numbr on th cal blow or putting an X in th box to th right of th numbr. Whn making thi rating, pla conir th apct of placing youth prnt in your FY05-06 plan, a wll a othr rlvant program information uch a placmnt capacity a rat on pag 4. Pla xplain your rating in th ara blow th rating cal Strong Poitiv Impact Som Poitiv Impact Nithr Poitiv nor Ngativ Som Ngativ Impact Strong Ngativ Impact Pla xplain your rating an not any inting JSPC viw. Dtntion B Allocation - Impact Rating. Pla rat th impact of tntion b allocation on your SB 94 program an th youth rv by circling on of th numbr on th cal blow or putting an X in th box to th right of th numbr. Whn rating thi ara, pla conir th apct of tntion b allocation prnt in your FY05-06 plan, a wll a othr rlvant program information. Pla xplain your rating in th ara blow th rating cal Strong Poitiv Impact Som Poitiv Impact Nithr Poitiv nor Ngativ Som Ngativ Impact Strong Ngativ Impact Pla xplain your rating an not any inting JSPC viw. TriWt Group 85 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

102 Srvic & Availability - Impact Rating. Pla rat th impact on your SB 94 program, incluing on th youth, of rvic an rvic availability by circling on of th numbr on th cal blow or putting an X in th box to th right of th numbr. Whn rating thi ara, pla conir th apct of rving youth an rvic availability prnt in your FY05-06 plan, a wll a othr rlvant program information. Pla xplain your rating in th ara blow th rating cal Strong Poitiv Impact Som Poitiv Impact Nithr Poitiv nor Ngativ Som Ngativ Impact Strong Ngativ Impact Pla xplain your rating an not any inting JSPC viw. Othr Practic/Policy Iu() - Impact Rating(). Pla (1) intify any aitional practic/policy iu in th box blow; (2) provi a brif xplanation of th iu an how it will affct your SB 94 program; an (3) rat it impact by circling on of th numbr on th cal blow or putting an X in th box to th right of th numbr. Pla xplain th rating cor in th ara blow th rating cal. If thr ar multipl aitional iu, pla copy th blow rating cal an box a n Strong Poitiv Impact Som Poitiv Impact Nithr Poitiv nor Ngativ Som Ngativ Impact Strong Ngativ Impact Pla xplain your rating an not any inting JSPC viw: Othr Practic/Policy Iu:. Explanation. TriWt Group 86 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

103 Appnix C DYC Rgional Catchmnt Ara Dtntion B Allocation Map Th SB implmntation plan prnt th tntion b allocation for ach DYC rgional catchmnt ara. B allocation ar rviw annually an chang ma a ncary. Th tatwi b allocation map for FY i inclu hr. TriWt Group 87 SB 94 Annual Rport FY

104 Spring Crk YSC 58 B Publo YSC 42 B TriWt Group 88 SB 94 Annual Rport FY