Supporting Information:

Transcription

1 Supporting Informtion: Unlne reution of nutrient los hs rete n offshore grient from phosphorus to nitrogen limittion in the orth Se Authors: Amn Burson, Myke Stomp, Lriss Akil, orin.d. Brussr, n Jef Huismn

2 hlorophyll (mg m km 7km 1km 18km 25km 3km 36km 45km 5 Jn Fe Mr Apr My Jun Jul Aug Sep Ot ov De hlorophyll (mg m Jn Fe Mr Apr My Jun Jul Aug Sep Ot ov De hlorophyll (mg m Jn Fe Mr Apr My Jun Jul Aug Sep Ot ov De Figure S1. Sesonl vrition in surfe hlorophyll onentrtions t the ifferent sttions in ( 211, ( 212, n ( 213. The surfe hlorophyll onentrtions re 8-y imge omposites erive from the Moerte Resolution Imging Spetroriometer (MODIS sensor on ASA's Aqu stellite. The t were ownloe from the tionl Oeni n Atmospheri Aministrtion (OAA ost Wth rogrm ( Gry rs inite the timing of our ruises.

3 Temperture ( Depth (m Slinity (psu Mrh April 8.April Depth (m e. Mrh 34 Depth (m 8. Mrh f. April My Depth (m 36 2 g. My August Distne from shore (km 4 h. August Distne from shore (km Figure S2. (- Temperture, n (e-h slinity long the offshore trnset, uring reserh ruises in Mrh 213, April 213, My 212 n August 211. Dots inite epths from whih smples were ollete. In (-, slinity of 34 psu is inite y the lk isoline. Grphs were generte using Oen Dt View softwre ( 3

4 Sttion 45km Sttion 25km Sttion 1km Sttion 7km Fluoresene (F o Fluoresene (F o Fluoresene (F o Fluoresene (F o Mrh. Mrh. Mrh. Mrh + Time (hr + + e. April f. April g. April h. April Time (hr i. My j. k. August l. August o Dt Time (hr Figure S3. Development of the phytoplnkton onentrtion (expresse s hlorophyll fluoresene; ± SD uring the iossy experiments. The experiments were performe t four sttions (7km, 1km, 25km n 45km long the offshore trnset, uring the (- Mrh 213 ruise, (e-h April 213 ruise, (i My 212 ruise, n (k, l August 211 ruise. Tretments inlue the ontrol ( n itions of nitrte (, phosphte (, silite ( n light (Tle 1. The iossy experiments were hrveste for further nlysis fter 9644 hours, epening on the ruise length.

5 Sttion 7 km Mrh 1 e. April 1 i. My Sttion 1 km Sttion 25 km Sttion 45 km Mrh f. April j Mrh g. April k. August Mrh h. April l. August o Dt Tretment Tretment Tretment Figure S4. Growth rtes (± SD of totl phytoplnkton in the nutrient iossy experiments, se on hnges in hlorophyll onentrtion. The experiments were performe t four sttions (7km, 1km, 25km n 45km long the offshore trnset, uring the (- Mrh 213 ruise, (e-h April 213 ruise, (i My 212 ruise, n (k, l August 211 ruise. Tretments inlue the ontrol ( n itions of nitrte (, phosphte (, silite ( n light (Tle 1. Within eh pnel, rs with ifferent letters were signifintly ifferent, s teste y one-wy nlysis of vrine followe y post ho omprison of the mens (Tukey s HSD test

6 1.. Mrh e. April i. My Sttion 7 km Mrh 1. f. April 1. j. Sttion 1 km o Dt 1.. Mrh 1. g. April 1. k. August Sttion 25 km Mrh 1. h. April 1. l. August Sttion 45 km Tretment Tretment Tretment + + Figure S5. Growth rtes (± SD of itoms in the nutrient iossy experiments, se on hnges in their -iomss. For further etils, see the legen of Fig. S4.

7 1.. Mrh 1. e. April 1. i. My Sttion 7 km Mrh 1. f. April 1. j. Sttion 1 km o Dt 1.. Mrh 1. g. April 1. k. August Sttion 25 km Sttion 45 km 1.. Mrh Tretment h. April 1. l. August Tretment Tretment + + Figure S6. Growth rtes (± SD of inoflgelltes in the nutrient iossy experiments, se on hnges in their -iomss. For further etils, see the legen of Fig. S4.

8 1.. Mrh 1. e. April 1. i. My Sttion 7 km Mrh 1. f. April 1. j Sttion 1 km e e.5.25 o Dt Mrh 1. g. April 1. k. August Sttion 25 km Mrh 1. h. April 1. l. August Sttion 45 km Tretment Tretment Tretment + + Figure S7. Growth rtes (± SD of nnoflgelltes in the nutrient iossy experiments, se on hnges in their -iomss. For further etils, see the legen of Fig. S4.

9 Mrh e. April i. My Sttion 7 km f e Mrh f. April j. Sttion 1 km e e e o Dt Mrh 1. g. April 1. k. August Sttion 25 km Sttion 45 km Mrh 1. h. April 1.25 l. August Tretment e e e Tretment Tretment Figure S8. Growth rtes (± SD of heoystis spp. in the nutrient iossy experiments, se on hnges in their -iomss. For further etils, see the legen of Fig. S4.

10 1.. Mrh 1. e. April 1. i. My Sttion 7 km Mrh 1. f. April 1. j Sttion 1 km o Dt Mrh g. April k. August Sttion 25 km e e Mrh 1. h. April 1. l. August Sttion 45 km Tretment + + Tretment Tretment + + Figure S9. Growth rtes (± SD of pioeukryotes in the nutrient iossy experiments, se on hnges in their -iomss. For further etils, see the legen of Fig. S4.

11 Mrh e. April 1. i. My Sttion 7 km Mrh 1. f. April 1. j Sttion 1 km o Dt Mrh 1. g. April 1. k. August Sttion 25 km Mrh h. April 1. l. August Sttion 45 km Tretment Tretment Tretment + + Figure S1. Growth rtes (± SD of pioynoteri in the nutrient iossy experiments, se on hnges in their -iomss. For further etils, see the legen of Fig. S4.

12 utrient limittion of the ifferent phytoplnkton groups Below we summrize, for the totl phytoplnkton ommunity n for eh iniviul phytoplnkton group, the nutrient limittion ptterns eue from the iossy experiments. One-wy nlysis of vrine with post-ho omprison of the mens (Tukey s HSD test ws use to ssess signifint ifferenes in growth rtes mong the tretments, using signifine level α =.5. utrients (or light were onsiere limiting if their ition signifintly enhne phytoplnkton growth rte in omprison to the ontrol. We istinguishe etween three ifferent types of o-limittion (Hrpole et l Inepenent o-limittion ws efine s the signifint stimultion of phytoplnkton growth y two or more single nutrient tretments (e.g., + only n + only s well s y the omine nutrient tretment (++. multneous o-limittion ws efine s the signifint stimultion of phytoplnkton growth y the omine nutrient tretment, ut not y the single nutrient tretments. Finlly, seril olimittion ws efine s the signifint stimultion of growth y only one of the single nutrient tretments (e.g., + only, ut not + only n signifintly stronger stimultion y the omine nutrient tretment (++. In se of inepenent or seril o-limittion, the nutrient tht gve the strongest growth response is mentione first. Totl phytoplnkton ommunity (se on phytoplnkton iomss Mrh 7km, 1km, 25km n 45km (Fig. 6-: one of the tretments gve signifintly higher growth rtes thn the ontrol. onlusion: n.s. April 7km (Fig. 6e: Growth rtes of the +, +, ++ n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the +, +, ++ n +++ tretments i not iffer signifintly from eh other. onlusion: inepenent + o-limittion. April 1km (Fig. 6f: Growth rtes of the + n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the growth rte of the +++ tretment ws signifintly higher thn the + tretment. onlusion: seril + o-limittion (first, then. April 25 km (Fig. 6g: Growth rtes of the ++ n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the ++ n +++ tretments i not iffer signifintly from eh other, n + n + lone i not stimulte signifintly higher growth rtes thn the ontrol. onlusion: simultneous + o-limittion. April 45km (Fig. 6h: Growth rtes of the +, ++, n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the +, ++ n +++ tretments i not iffer signifintly from eh other. onlusion: limittion. My 7km (Fig. 6i: Growth rtes of the +, +, ++, n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the +++ tretment ws signifintly higher thn the + n + tretments, ut the ++ ws not signifintly higher thn the + tretment. onlusion: inepenent + o-limittion. August 25km (Fig. 6k: Growth rtes of the +, ++, n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the ++ n +++ tretments were signifintly greter thn the + ut i not iffer signifintly from eh other. onlusion: seril + o-limittion (first, then.

13 August 45km (Fig. 6l: Growth rtes of the +, ++, n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the +, ++ n +++ tretments i not iffer signifintly from eh other. onlusion: limittion. Totl phytoplnkton ommunity (se on hlorophyll onentrtion Mrh 7km, 1km, 25km n 45km (Fig. S4-: one of the tretments gve signifintly higher growth rtes thn the ontrol. onlusion: n.s. April 7km (Fig. S4e: Growth rtes of the +, +, ++ n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the ++ n +++ tretments i not iffer signifintly from eh other. onlusion: inepenent + o-limittion. April 1km (Fig. S4f: Growth rtes of the + n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the growth rte of the +++ tretment ws signifintly higher thn the + tretment. onlusion: seril ++ o-limittion (first, then or. April 25 km (Fig. S4g: Growth rtes of the +, +, ++ n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the ++ n +++ tretments i not iffer signifintly from eh other. onlusion: inepenent + o-limittion. April 45km (Fig. S4h: Growth rtes of the +, ++, n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the +, ++ n +++ tretments i not iffer signifintly from eh other. onlusion: limittion. My 7km (Fig. S4i: Growth rtes of the +, ++, n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the growth rte of the +++ tretment ws signifintly higher thn the + n ++ tretments whih i not iffer signifintly. onlusion: seril + o-limittion (first, then. August 25km (Fig. S4k: Growth rtes of the +, ++, n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the +, ++ n +++ tretments i not iffer signifintly from eh other. onlusion: limittion. August 45km (Fig. S4l: Growth rtes of the +, ++, n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the ++ n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the + ut i not iffer signifintly from eh other. onlusion: seril + o-limittion (first, then. Ditoms Mrh 7km, 1km, 25km n 45km (Fig. S5-: one of the tretments gve signifintly higher growth rtes thn the ontrol. onlusion: n.s. April 7km (Fig. S5e: Growth rtes of the + n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the + n +++ tretments i not iffer signifintly from eh other. onlusion: limittion. April 1km (Fig. S5f: Growth rtes of the +, +, n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the growth rte of the +++ tretment ws signifintly higher thn the + n + tretments. onlusion: inepenent + o-limittion. April 25 km (Fig. S5g: Growth rtes of the ++ n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the ++ n +++ tretments i not iffer signifintly

14 from eh other, n + n + lone i not stimulte signifintly higher growth rtes thn the ontrol. onlusion: simultneous + o-limittion. April 45km (Fig. S5h: Growth rtes of the + tretment were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the +, ++ n +++ tretments i not iffer signifintly. onlusion: limittion. My 7km (Fig. S5i: Growth rtes of the +, +, ++, n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the + n ++ tretments i not iffer signifintly from eh other. onlusion: inepenent + o-limittion. August 25km (Fig. S5k: Growth rtes of the +, ++, n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the ++ n +++ tretments i not iffer signifintly from eh other. ++ ws signifintly higher thn +. onlusion: seril + o-limittion (first, then. August 45km (Fig. S5l: one of the tretments gve signifintly higher growth rtes thn the ontrol. onlusion: n.s. Dinoflgelltes Mrh 7km, 1km, 25km n 45 km (Fig. S6-: one of the tretments gve signifintly higher growth rtes thn the ontrol. onlusion: n.s. April 7km (Fig. S6e: Growth rtes of the ++ tretment were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; + n + lone i not signifintly stimulte higher growth thn the ontrol. onlusion: simultneous + o-limittion. April 1km, 25km, n 45km (Fig. S6f-h: one of the tretments gve signifintly higher growth rtes thn the ontrol. onlusion: n.s. My 7km (Fig. S6i: Growth rtes of the ++ n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the ++ n +++ tretments i not iffer signifintly from eh other; + n + lone i not signifintly stimulte higher growth thn the ontrol. onlusion: simultneous + o-limittion. August 25km (Fig. S6k: Growth rtes of the ++ tretment were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the single + n + tretments i not signifintly stimulte higher growth thn the ontrol. onlusion: simultneous + o-limittion. August 45km (Fig. S6l: Growth rtes of the +, ++, n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the +, ++ n +++ tretments not iffer signifintly from eh other. onlusion: limittion. noflgelltes Mrh 7km, 1km, 25km n 45km (Fig. S7-: one of the tretments gve signifintly higher growth rtes thn the ontrol. onlusion: n.s. April 7km (Fig. S7e: one of the tretments gve signifintly higher growth rtes thn the ontrol. onlusion: n.s. April 1km (Fig. S7f: Growth rtes of the +, ++, +++ n +light tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the growth rte of the ++ tretment ws signifintly higher thn the + tretment n i not iffer signifintly from the

15 +++ tretment. onlusion: seril + o-limittion (first, then, n light limittion. April 25 km (Fig. S7g: Growth rtes of the + tretment were signifintly higher thn the ontrol. onlusion: limittion. April 45km (Fig. S7h: one of the tretments gve signifintly higher growth rtes thn the ontrol. onlusion: n.s. My 7km (Fig. S7i: Growth rtes of the ++ tretment were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the single + n + tretments i not signifintly stimulte higher growth thn the ontrol. onlusion: simultneous + o-limittion. August 25km (Fig. S7k: Growth rtes of the ++, n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the ++ n +++ tretments i not iffer signifintly from eh other. The single + n + tretments i not signifintly stimulte higher growth thn the ontrol. onlusion: simultneous + o-limittion. August 45km (Fig. S7l: Growth rtes of the +, ++, n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the +, ++ n +++ tretments not iffer signifintly from eh other. onlusion: limittion. heoystis spp. Mrh 7km, 1km, n 25km (Fig. S8-: one of the tretments gve signifintly higher growth rtes thn the ontrol. onlusion: n.s. Mrh 45km (Fig. S8: Growth rtes of the +light tretment were signifintly higher thn the ontrol. onlusion: light limittion. April 7km (Fig. S8e: Growth rtes of the +, ++, +++ n +light tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; growth rtes of the ++ n +++ tretments were not signifintly higher thn the + tretment. onlusion: inepenent +light olimittion. April 1km (Fig. S8f: Growth rtes of the +, ++, n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the growth rtes of the +, ++ n +++ i not iffer signifintly. onlusion: limittion. April 25 km (Fig. S8g: Growth rtes of the +, +, ++, n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; growth rtes of the ++ tretment were signifintly higher thn the + n + tretments; the ++ n +++ tretments not iffer signifintly from eh other. onlusion: inepenent + o-limittion. April 45km (Fig. S8h: Growth rtes of the ++ n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the single + n + tretments i not signifintly stimulte higher growth thn the ontrol n the ++ n +++ tretments i not iffer signifintly. onlusion: simultneous + o-limittion. My 7km (Fig. S8i: Growth rtes of the +, ++ n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the +, ++ n +++ tretments i not signifintly iffer. onlusion: limittion. August 25km (Fig. S8k: Growth rtes of the + n + tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol. onlusion: inepenent + o-limittion.

16 August 45km (Fig. S8l: Growth rtes of the +, +, ++, +++ n light tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the +, +, ++ n +++ tretments not iffer signifintly from eh other. onlusion: inepenent ++light olimittion. ioeukryotes Mrh 7km, 1km, 25km n 45km (Fig. S9-: one of the tretments gve signifintly higher growth rtes thn the ontrol. onlusion: n.s. April 7km (Fig. S9e: Growth rtes of ll tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; however, it is more likely n error of the ontrol tretment thn rel growth response of pioeukryotes to ll other tretments. onlusion: n.s. April 1km (Fig. S9f: Growth rtes of the +, ++, n +++ tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the growth rtes of the +, ++ n +++ tretments i not iffer signifintly from eh other. onlusion: limittion. April 25 km (Fig. S9g: Growth rtes of the + tretment were signifintly higher thn the ontrol. onlusion: limittion. April 45km (Fig. S9h: one of the tretments gve signifintly higher growth rtes thn the ontrol. onlusion: n.s. My 7km (Fig. S9i: one of the tretments gve signifintly higher growth rtes thn the ontrol. onlusion: n.s. August 25km (Fig. S9k: Growth rtes of the ++, +++ n +light tretments were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the single + n + tretments i not signifintly stimulte higher growth thn the ontrol, n the ++ n +++ tretments i not iffer signifintly from eh other. onlusion: simultneous + o-limittion with inepenent light limittion. August 45km (Fig. S9l: one of the tretments gve signifintly higher growth rtes thn the ontrol. onlusion: n.s. ioynoteri Mrh 7km, 1km, 25km n 45km (Fig. S1-: one of the tretments gve signifintly higher growth rtes thn the ontrol. onlusion: n.s. April 7km (Fig. S1e: Growth rtes of the +++ tretment were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; growth rtes of the +++ tretment i not iffer signifintly from the + n ++ tretments, even though the ltter two tretments were not signifintly greter thn the ontrol; growth rtes of the + tretment were signifintly higher thn the +, the + n the +light tretments. onlusion: Most likely limittion rther thn simultneous ++ o-limittion. April 1km (Fig. S1f: one of the tretments gve signifintly higher growth rtes thn the ontrol. onlusion: n.s. April 25 km (Fig. S1g: Growth rtes of the ++ tretment were signifintly higher thn the ontrol; the single + n + tretments i not signifintly stimulte higher growth thn the ontrol. onlusion: simultneous + o-limittion.

17 April 45km (Fig. S1h: one of the tretments gve signifintly higher growth rtes thn the ontrol. onlusion: n.s. My 7km (Fig. S1i: one of the tretments gve signifintly higher growth rtes thn the ontrol. onlusion: n.s. August 25km n 45km (Fig. S1k,l: one of the tretments gve signifintly higher growth rtes thn the ontrol. onlusion: n.s.

18 Tle S1. Dinoflgellte gener in our smples n their feeing eology. Genus Feeing eology Referenes Alexnrium Mixotrophi Jeong et l. (25; Tillmnn et l. (27 ertium Autotrophi n mixotrophi speies Doge n Mrshll (1994; Jeong (1999 Dinophysis Mixotrophi Joson n Anerson (1994; Stoeker (1999 Gyroinium Mixotrophi Li et l. (2; Jeong et l. (21 Gymnoinium Mixotrophi Boksthler n ots (1993; Jeong et l. (21; Gómez (212 Heterops Mixotrophi Legrn et l. (1998; Stoeker (1999 Oxytoxum Autotrophi Yllop (21 roroentrum Mixotrophi Wieome et l. (22; Jeong et l. (25 Srippsiell Mixotrophi Jeong et l. (25 Mny inoflgelltes were ientifie to the speies level, some only to the genus level. The ssigne feeing eology is se on the speies ommonly enountere in our smples (e.g., Alexnrium tmrense, Heterops triquetr, Srippsiell trohoie oring to the informtion provie in the referenes. The genus Oxytoxum ws ominte y O. solopx Stein whih is generlly onsiere n utotrophi speies. Averge over ll sttions, mixotrophi gener ontriute 87% of the totl inoflgellte iomss. Tle S2. noflgellte gener in our smples n their feeing eology. Genus Feeing eology Referenes orymellus Autotrophi Gieskes n Kry (1986 ryptomons Mixotrophi ovrino (1991; ovrino et l. (1997; Toms (212 Dityoh Autotrophi Henriksen et l. (1993; ovrino et l. (1997 Miromons Mixotrophi ot et l. (24; Unrein et l. (214 rymnesium Unientifie green flgelltes Mixotrophi Autotrophi Green et l. (1982; ovrino et l. (1997; Tillmnn (23 Some nnoflgelltes were ientifie to the speies level, some only to the genus level. The ssigne feeing eology is se on the speies ommonly enountere in our smples (e.g., orymellus ureus, Dityoh speulum oring to the informtion provie in the referenes. Averge over ll sttions, mixotrophi gener ontriute 57% of the totl nnoflgellte iomss. A

19 SUORTIG IFORMATIO REFEREES: Boksthler, K. R., n D. W. ots Grzing of the mixotrophi inoflgellte Gymnoinium snguineum on ilite popultions of hespeke By. Mr. Biol. 116: , oi:1.17/bf3565 Doge, J. D., n H. G. Mrshll Biogeogrphi nlysis of the rmore plnktoni inoflgellte ertium in the orth Atlnti n jent ses. J. hyol. 3: , oi: /j x Gieskes, W. W., n G. W. Kry Anlysis of phytoplnkton pigments y HL efore, uring n fter mss ourrene of the miroflgellte orymellus ureus uring the spring loom in the open northern orth Se in Mr. Biol. 92: 45-52, oi:1.17/bf Gómez, F A quntittive review of the lifestyle, hitt n trophi iversity of inoflgelltes (Dinoflgellt, Alveolt. Syst. Bioivers. 1: , oi:1.18/ Green, J.., D. J. Hier, n R.. ienr The txonomy of rymnesium (rymnesiophyee inluing esription of new osmopolitn speies,. ptellifer sp. nov., n further oservtions on. prvum. rter. British hyol. J. 17: Henriksen,., F. Knipshilt, Ø. Moestrup, n H. A. Thomsen Auteology, life history n toxiology of the silioflgellte Dityoh speulum (lioflgellt, Dityohophyee. hyologi 32: 29-39, oi:1.2216/i Joson, D. M., n R. A. Anersen The isovery of mixotrophy in photosyntheti speies of Dinophysis (Dinophyee: light n eletron mirosopil oservtions of foo vuoles in Dinophysis umint, D. norvegi n two heterotrophi inophysoi inoflgelltes. hyologi 33: 971, oi:1.2216/i Jeong, H. J The eologil roles of heterotrophi inoflgelltes in mrine plnktoni ommunity. J. Eukryot. Miroiol. 46: , oi:1.1111/j t4618.x Jeong, H. J., Y. D. Yoo, J. S. Kim, K. A. Seong,. S. Kng, n T. H. Kim. 21. Growth, feeing n eologil roles of the mixotrophi n heterotrophi inoflgelltes in mrine plnktoni foo wes. Oen Si. 45: 65-91, oi:1.17/s Jeong, H. J., Y. D. Yoo, J. Y. rk, J. Y. Song, S. T. Kim, S. H. Lee, n W. H. Yih. 25. Feeing y phototrophi re-tie inoflgelltes: five speies newly revele n six speies previously known to e mixotrophi. Aqut. Miro. Eol. 4: 1335, oi:1.3354/me4133 Legrn,., E. Grnéli, n. rlsson Inue phgotrophy in the photosyntheti inoflgellte Heterops triquetr. Aqut. Miro. Eol. 15: 65-75, oi:1.3354/me1565

20 Li, A., D. K. Stoeker, n D. W. ots. 2. Mixotrophy in Gyroinium glthenum (Dinophyee: grzing responses to light intensity n inorgni nutrients. J. hyol. 36: 33-45, oi:1.146/j x ot, F., M. Lts, D. Mrie, T. riou, D. Vulot, n. mon. 24. A single speies, Miromons pusill (rsinophyee, omintes the eukryoti pioplnkton in the Western English hnnel. Appl. Environ. Miro. 7: , oi:1.1128/aem ovrino, G Oservtions on some new n interesting ryptophyee. or. J. Bot. 11: , oi:1.1111/j t1269.x ovrino, G., D. K, Mills, n F. Hnnh elgi flgellte popultions in the southern orth Se, I. Qulittive oservtions. J. lnkton Res. 19: 18119, oi:1.193/plnkt/ Stoeker, D. K Mixotrophy mong inoflgelltes. J. Eukryot. Miroiol. 46: , oi:1.1111/j t4619.x. Tillmnn, U. 23. Kill n et your pretor: winning strtegy of the plnktoni flgellte rymnesium prvum. Aqut. Miro. Eol. 31: 73-84, oi:1.3354/me3273 Tillmnn, U., U. John, n A. emell, 27. On the llelohemil poteny of the mrine inoflgellte Alexnrium ostenfelii ginst heterotrophi n utotrophi protists. J. lnkton Res. 29: , oi:1.193/plnkt/fm34 Toms,. R Mrine phytoplnkton: guie to nke flgelltes n oolithophoris. Aemi ress. Unrein, F., J. M. Gsol, F. ot, I. Forn, n R. Mssn Mixotrophi hptophytes re key teril grzers in oligotrophi ostl wters. ISME J. 8: 16476, oi:1.138/ismej Wiiome,. E., S. D. Arher,. H. Burkill, n S. Wiiome. 22. Diversity n struture of the miroplnkton ommunity uring oolithophore loom in the strtifie northern orth Se. Deep-Se Res. II. 49: , oi:1.116/s (262- Yllop, M. L. 21. Distriution ptterns n iomss estimtes of itoms n utotrophi inoflgelltes in the E Atlnti uring June n July Deep-Se Res. II. 48: , oi:1.116/s (99-